Re: [leaf-user] Problem adding internal networks in Dachstein

2003-02-27 Thread Pär Johansson
Fixed
The quotes solved the problem.
Thanks for the fast and as always accurate response.
Regards

Pär J





PXr Johansson wrote:
Hi
I'm running Dachstein CD 1.0.1 on a 166 pentium with 32 MB RAM and
it's been working great.
I have some VPN tunnels using IpSec and TinyDNS running.
But now I want to add three more internal networks. I added the
cards and the modules, no problem, Eth3 reports transceiver problem
but I guess that is because it's not hooked up to any network.
Then I added this to network.conf:
eth2_IPADDR=192.168.20.254  
eth2_MASKLEN=24 
eth2_BROADCAST=+
eth2_ROUTES=
eth2_IP_SPOOF=YES   
eth2_IP_KRNL_LOGMARTIANS=YES
eth2_IP_SHARED_MEDIA=NO 
eth2_BRIDGE=NO  
eth2_PROXY_ARP=NO   
eth2_FAIRQ=NO

eth3_IPADDR=192.168.30.254  
eth3_MASKLEN=24 
eth3_BROADCAST=+
eth3_ROUTES=
eth3_IP_SPOOF=YES   
eth3_IP_KRNL_LOGMARTIANS=YES
eth3_IP_SHARED_MEDIA=NO 
eth3_BRIDGE=NO  
eth3_PROXY_ARP=NO   
eth3_FAIRQ=NO   

 
eth4_IPADDR=192.168.40.254  
eth4_MASKLEN=24 
eth4_BROADCAST=+
eth4_ROUTES=
eth4_IP_SPOOF=YES   
eth4_IP_KRNL_LOGMARTIANS=YES
eth4_IP_SHARED_MEDIA=NO
eth4_BRIDGE=NO
eth4_PROXY_ARP=NO
eth4_FAIRQ=NO   

And:

INTERN_IF=eth1# Internal
Interface
INTERN_NET=192.168.1.0/24 192.168.20.0/24 192.168.30.0/24
192.168.40.0/24
INTERN_IP=192.168.1.254 # IP number of Internal
Interface
ButAfter rebooting I cant't access the external net (Internet) from
my first local net on eth1 (192.168.1.0/24).
I can ping 213.199.64.62 wich is my external address but not the GW
213.199.64.1.
From the firewall I can ping both the GW and the internal net so
the problem must be that no traffic from the internal net get past
the firewall.
What have I done wrong? Please help.
snip

Your problem is no masquerade rules are being created for your
internal networks (including the first local network on eth1).
If the above is actually what you put in /etc/network.conf, the
first big problem is your lack of quoting for the INTERN_NET
assignment, which should be (all on one line):
INTERN_NET=192.168.1.0/24 192.168.20.0/24 192.168.30.0/24 192.168.40.0/24

I'm not sure why at least the first network isn't working, but try
with the quotes and see what happens.
NOTE:  You might also try using the current version of Dachstein,
which is 1.0.2.  The changelog doesn't indicate any bug fixes
related to multiple internal networks, but IIRC, I did have to fix
some sort of problem related to that around the time of Dachstein.
--
Charles Steinkuehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Med vänlig hälsning

Pär Johansson

_
 Tervento Industri AB   Tel. 0914-10500 Mobil 070-6060501
 Svarvargatan 6 Fax. 0914-10508 E-post [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 937 32 BURTRÄSKDir. 0914-10501
_
--


---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


RE: [leaf-user] Squid

2003-02-27 Thread Jan Johansson
Someone said me, that using a RAM as cache of a proxy reduces the life
of
the RAM to two years. Is it true?

Whoever said that has no idea what they are talking about.




---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] wisp-dist - has anyone used the vtun features?

2003-02-27 Thread Vladimir I.
I do use them. :-)

The default vtun configuration in the latest images shows how to 
bridging between br0 (usually containing eth0) and a tunnel interface.

Note that you have to edit /etc/init.d/vtun in order to active the 
daemon itself.

wispdist wrote:
I was thinking about running all of our wireless network on private
addresses and using vtun to tunnel to a central machine.  This way all
traffic can be encrypted without using WEP.
Anyone tried this?

Pros -- Cons -- ??

If someone could give me an example of a working configuration it would help
me as I have not done this yet.
J.



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies!
Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships.
Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more.
www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


--
Best Regards,
Vladimir
Systems Engineer (RHCE)


---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] wisp-dist zebra ripd routing and multiple IP addressesper interface

2003-02-27 Thread Vladimir I.
Yep, I think you're correct.

wispdist wrote:
I found that the zebra ripd only sends out routing info referencing the
source as the primary address / subnet on the interface it is running on.
therefore, if you connect two routers running just the ripd and they are
connected to each other on a subnet that is a secondary subnet on both
interfaces, no routes will propagate .
In order for routes to propagate, both interfaces must have an IP address
that exists in the Primary subnet of the other interface.
Also, routes can propagate in only one direction if one interface is running
on the Primary address/subnet and the other on the Secondary.
Example:
Routers A and B are connected to each other via thier eth0 interfaces.
router A :  eth0: 10.0.0.1/24, 172.16.0.1/24
router B:  eth0:  192.168.1.1/24, 10.0.0.2/24

Note that router B's Secondary IP address of 10.0.0.2/24 exists on the
subnet of the Primary IP address of 10.0.0.1/24 on Router A
Now, routes from router A will propagate to router B
But, routes from router B WILL NOT propagate to router A.
Now this is OK as long as router A is the downstream router supplying router
B and router B's default gateway is router A.  But routes will become
unreachable by some on the network if it is the other way around.
If anyone has found out anything additional or find an error in my analysis,
please respond.
J.





---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies!
Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships.
Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more.
www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


--
Best Regards,
Vladimir
Systems Engineer (RHCE)


---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] wisp-dist - has anyone used the vtun features?

2003-02-27 Thread wispdist
Do I have to set up a bridge interface on each end of the link and then
create a tunnel between them?

Or can I just tunnel two interfaces together?

Hmm  how would this effect routing?

Sorry if the answer is obvious,  it just hasn't hit me yet  :-)

--Jeff

- Original Message -
From: Vladimir I. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wispdist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 2:27 AM
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] wisp-dist - has anyone used the vtun features?



 I do use them. :-)

 The default vtun configuration in the latest images shows how to
 bridging between br0 (usually containing eth0) and a tunnel interface.

 Note that you have to edit /etc/init.d/vtun in order to active the
 daemon itself.

 wispdist wrote:
  I was thinking about running all of our wireless network on private
  addresses and using vtun to tunnel to a central machine.  This way all
  traffic can be encrypted without using WEP.
 
  Anyone tried this?
 
  Pros -- Cons -- ??
 
  If someone could give me an example of a working configuration it would
help
  me as I have not done this yet.
 
  J.
 
 
 
 
  ---
  This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies!
  Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships.
  Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more.
  www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp
  
  leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
  SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
 


 --
 Best Regards,
 Vladimir
 Systems Engineer (RHCE)



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


RE: [leaf-user] sh-httpd Authentication

2003-02-27 Thread Bihari, Steve
Charles,

I did get thttpd to work with my existing Weblet implementation.  Wow is it
ever fast !!!  Authentication works if I manually create a .htpasswd file
in my /cgi-bin/ directory.  At this point, I only need to be concerned with
authenticated connections to this folder.

My question is:  Do we have any tools available that have been compiled for
Bering to generate the password file (htpasswd)?  Preferably one that will
do both the password change and encryption/hash.

TIA...Steve

-Original Message-
From: Charles Steinkuehler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 2:42 PM
To: Bihari, Steve; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] sh-httpd Authentication


Bihari, Steve wrote:
 Oh, the thttpd.lrp package posted on your site...is this compile with
the
 AUTH_FILE option? 

Yes, although you may or may not find that it will work for you.  Thttpd 
protects files on a per-directory basis, based on the presence (and 
contents of) an AUTH_FILE.  Note that the protection is *NOT* 
heirerichal, ie: if you have:

foo/AUTH_FILE

then the files in foo/ AND ONLY IN foo/ are protected.  Files in other 
directories, such as:

foo/subdir1/secret.file

will *NOT* be require authentication.

This stems from thttpd being priamrily aimed at high-speed, low-overhead 
static file serving (recursive protection requires traversing the 
directory tree up to the document root when serving each file).

You may find one of the other small web-servers to be more appropriate, 
and you can always patch thttpd to check all requests against a central 
AUTH_FILE (IIRC, this has been done by someone already, a google search 
would probably find it).

-- 
Charles Steinkuehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] sh-httpd Authentication

2003-02-27 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
Bihari, Steve wrote:
Charles,

I did get thttpd to work with my existing Weblet implementation.  Wow is it
ever fast !!!  Authentication works if I manually create a .htpasswd file
in my /cgi-bin/ directory.  At this point, I only need to be concerned with
authenticated connections to this folder.
My question is:  Do we have any tools available that have been compiled for
Bering to generate the password file (htpasswd)?  Preferably one that will
do both the password change and encryption/hash.
I don't have one handy...I probably would, but my old debian development 
system's hard drive has gone to the bit bucket in the sky. :

Someone else on-list will probably have a copy, or a still-functional 
development environment to do a quick compile.

If you're in a big hurry, you can either compile it statically, or run 
it on another system and copy the hashed password over to your LEAF box.

--
Charles Steinkuehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] Boot from Ide disk

2003-02-27 Thread emilio
Hi list!

I´ve installed a bering rc4 bootin´ from a 3 1/2 disk. Now i want to boot
from a Ide disk of 20 MB but can´t do it.
I follow the step to boot from a Ide disk but when I boot send me this
errors:


Insmod: /lib/modules/2.4.18: No such file or directory
Insmod: /lib/modules: No such file or directory
Insmod: ide-mod.o: No module by that name found
Insmod: /lib/modules/2.4.18: No such file or directory
Insmod: /lib/modules: No such file or directory
Insmod: ide-disk.o: No module by that name found
Insmod: /lib/modules/2.4.18: No such file or directory
Insmod: /lib/modules: No such file or directory
Insmod: ide-pr~1.o: No module by that name found
.
Kernel panic

If i boot from a bering diskette I can install the modules of the disk but I
can´t mount it.

I put the modules in /boot/lib/modules and the name in /boot/etc/modules and
backup the initrd.lrp package. All the files except ldlinux are copied on
ide disk through win 98 boot disk.


Can somebody help me? What I´ve been made wrong?

THX in advance



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] htpasswd Generator

2003-02-27 Thread Bihari, Steve
Hello all,

Does anyone happen to have an htpasswd file generator compiled to work
with Bering?  I am wanting to provide basic authentication to Weblet using
thttpd.  Everything is working except the ability to (easily) change the
password.

TIA !

Steve Bihari 


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

___
leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] Receiving DHCP broadcasts

2003-02-27 Thread James Neave
Hello,

I'm trying to figure out why I have to reset my cable STB and Bering box
when my IP changes.
I read this on the help site for UK cable internet ISPs.

You should use the private IP address for the UBR, for instance, when
configuring firewalls to permit the UBR to send to your PC

The PC [My Bering box] transmits a broadcast calling for a DHCP server
to respond. This is picked up by the gateway-UBR, which is a DHCP Relay
Agent (see RFC 2131), and passed to the real DHCP server elsewhere in
the ISP's network. The reply from the DHCP server also has to be
broadcast back into the sub-net of the calling PC. The gateway-UBR
therefore has to broadcast DHCP responses into the CATV network in the
hope that the calling PC will recognise the reply intended for it. As a
side-effect, every customer PC on the CATV network will also receive
these DHCP broadcast replies, all of which will appear to emanate from
the UBR's private IP address 10.xxx.xxx.1 or 172.xx.xxx.254, directed to
the PC's DHCP client port.

It's from this address that DCHP replies are sent to my Bering box. This
is received by pump, yes?

Does pump already handle letting DHCP replies through shorewall? Or will
I have to configure this myself?

Cheers,

James


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] Receiving DHCP broadcasts

2003-02-27 Thread Tom Eastep


--On Thursday, February 27, 2003 05:09:39 PM + James Neave 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

hope that the calling PC will recognise the reply intended for it. As a
side-effect, every customer PC on the CATV network will also receive
these DHCP broadcast replies, all of which will appear to emanate from
the UBR's private IP address 10.xxx.xxx.1 or 172.xx.xxx.254, directed to
the PC's DHCP client port.
It's from this address that DCHP replies are sent to my Bering box. This
is received by pump, yes?
Does pump already handle letting DHCP replies through shorewall? Or will
I have to configure this myself?
There are two things to look at here:

a) Be sure that you have set the 'dhcp' option for your external interface 
in /etc/shorewall/interfaces.
b) Because your ISP is using RFC 1918 addresses within its infrastructure, 
you need to review Shorewall FAQ #14a 
(http://www.shorewall.net/FAQ.htm#faq14a).

-Tom
--
Tom Eastep   \ Shorewall - iptables made easy
Shoreline,\ http://www.shorewall.net
Washington USA \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] Shorewall proxyarp document problem?

2003-02-27 Thread Stephen Lee
I'm reading up on proxyarp/dmz using
Bering1.0Stable/Shorewall. I'm a bit confused by the last
sentence in the following exerpt from the Shorewall docs:

/etc/shorewall/proxyarp

If you want to use proxy ARP on an entire sub-network, I
suggest that you look at
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/mini/Proxy-ARP-Subnet/. If you
decide to use the technique described in that HOWTO, you
can set the proxy_arp flag for an interface
(/proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/interface/proxy_arp) by
including the proxyarp option in the interface's record in
/etc/shorewall/interfaces. When using Proxy ARP
sub-netting, you do NOT include any entries in
/etc/shorewall/proxyarp. 
  ^^^
Does Tom mean /etc/shorewall/interfaces? I have 5 public
IPs of which 1 resides on eth0 and 3 others withing the
DMZ on eth2. I would need to adjust
/etc/shorewall/proxyarp - correct?

Thanks,
Stephen





---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall proxyarp document problem?

2003-02-27 Thread Tom Eastep


--On Thursday, February 27, 2003 09:34:34 AM -0800 Stephen Lee 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

If you want to use proxy ARP on an entire sub-network, I
suggest that you look at
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/mini/Proxy-ARP-Subnet/. If you
decide to use the technique described in that HOWTO, you
can set the proxy_arp flag for an interface
(/proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/interface/proxy_arp) by
including the proxyarp option in the interface's record in
/etc/shorewall/interfaces. When using Proxy ARP
sub-netting, you do NOT include any entries in
/etc/shorewall/proxyarp. 
  ^^^
Does Tom mean /etc/shorewall/interfaces?
No, I mean /etc/shorewallproxyarp. If you are proxy arping an entire 
network the /etc/shorewall/proxyarp file is empty and you simply set the 
'proxyarp' option on the external interface and on the interface to the 
network in the /etc/shorewall/interfaces file.

I have 5 public
IPs of which 1 resides on eth0 and 3 others withing the
DMZ on eth2. I would need to adjust
/etc/shorewall/proxyarp - correct?
Yes -- see http://www.shorewall.net/shorewall_setup_guide.htm for more 
information.

-Tom
--
Tom Eastep   \ Shorewall - iptables made easy
Shoreline,\ http://www.shorewall.net
Washington USA \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] Boot from Ide disk

2003-02-27 Thread Erich Titl
Hi

emilio wrote the following at 17:17 27.02.2003:
Hi list!

I´ve installed a bering rc4 bootin´ from a 3 1/2 disk. Now i want 
to boot
from a Ide disk of 20 MB but can´t do it.
I follow the step to boot from a Ide disk but when I boot send me this
errors:

Insmod: /lib/modules/2.4.18: No such file or directory
Insmod: /lib/modules: No such file or directory
Insmod: ide-mod.o: No module by that name found
Insmod: /lib/modules/2.4.18: No such file or directory
Insmod: /lib/modules: No such file or directory
Insmod: ide-disk.o: No module by that name found
Insmod: /lib/modules/2.4.18: No such file or directory
Insmod: /lib/modules: No such file or directory
Insmod: ide-pr~1.o: No module by that name found
.
Kernel panic
You will have to copy the modules to /boot/lib/modules, edit 
/boot/etc/modules and make sure you save initrd to the hard disk or copy 
the saved initrd.lrp to the hard disk..
Please refer to http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bubooting.html

HTH
Erich
THINK
Püntenstrasse 39
8143 Stallikon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC 3954 3BC8 C024  8D8A B7D4 FF9D 05B8 0A16


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] Boot from Ide disk

2003-02-27 Thread Matt Schalit
Strange how it's getting hung during the insmod.
I think the key is that line that says
Insmod: ide-pr~1.o: No module by that name found

You should probably verify the package names
are not mangled and that you typed everything
correctly.  If you want, once you copy the files
to the IDE drive, I guess its /dev/hda1, you can
mount -t msdos /dev/hda1 /mnt
ls -l /mnt/boot/lib/modules
cat /mnt/boot/etc/modules
and paste the output in here so we can see the
filenames, dates, sizes, code
Matt







---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] Re: Wavelan2_cs orinoco_cs using LEAF Bering

2003-02-27 Thread Jacques Nilo
Le Jeudi 27 Février 2003 17:28, vous avez écrit :
The reason is the following they are several orinoco drivers available.
More info here:
http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Jean_Tourrilhes/Linux/Orinoco.html
Modules files corresponding to different cards are defined in 
/etc/pcmcia/config. 
This file comes from the pcmcia_cs package.

At the end of this file you have:

beg quote
# Include configuration files for add-on drivers

source ./*.conf

# Include local configuration settings

source ./config.opts
end quote

Therefore the config are overriden by present .conf files if any and 
ultimatly by /etc/pcmcia/config.opts

In the pcmcia_orinoco.lrp package you have two conf files:
/etc/pcmcia/hermes.conf (conf file from Wireless web site)
and
/etc/pcmcia/wavelan2_cs.conf   (original drivers from Orinoco)
The data from wavelan2_cs.conf will be utltimatly used (alpha order)
To force the usage of orinoco_cs just remove the wavelan2_cs.conf file. You 
can also remove most of the content of config and just keep the souce 
./*.conf statement. Then save pcmcia.lrp


The Lucent modules are defined several time in the following files:
debian:~/bering-2.4.20/pcmcia/etc/pcmcia# grep Lucent *
grep: cis: Is a directory
config:card Lucent Technologies WaveLAN/IEEE Adapter
config:  version Lucent Technologies, WaveLAN/IEEE
config:card Lucent Technologies WaveLAN Adapter
config:  version Lucent Technologies, WaveLAN/PCMCIA
hermes.conf:# First class of device : Lucent  OEM
hermes.conf:card Lucent Technologies Orinoco
hermes.conf:card Lucent Technologies Wavelan/IEEE
hermes.conf:  version Lucent Technologies, WaveLAN/IEEE
wavelan2_cs.conf:card Lucent Technologies WaveLAN/IEEE
wavelan2_cs.conf:  version Lucent Technologies, WaveLAN/IEEE
wireless.opts:# Lucent Wavelan IEEE (+ Orinoco, RoamAbout and ELSA)
wireless.opts:INFO=Wavelan IEEE example (Lucent default settings)
wireless.opts:# Old Lucent Wavelan
wireless.opts:INFO=Wavelan example (Lucent default settings)

Hope that will help

Jacques
 Hi,

 Sorry to bother you but I'd like to have
 your opinion about one problem I can't solve using
 LEAF Bering and my wireless card Lucent
 WaveLAN/IEEE.

 This card is recognized and works in a WLAN Managed
 mode but not in ad-hoc mode.

 After days of investigation and testing I found
 that it works correctly on my PC RedHat 8 that
 loads the modules hermes.o orinoco.o orinoco_cs.o
 but not with Bering that automatically loads
 wavelan2_cs.

 BTW, this wavelan2_cs.o is never mentionned in
 any config file ! And it looks impossible to
 force the card to use orinoco_cs even after forcing
 it through /etc/pcmcia/config.

 Do you have any idea of what I did wrong ?
 How these modules are selected ? I thought it was
 with /etc/pcmcia/config.

 Thanks in advance for your help.

 Pascal Maugeri


 ___
 Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français !
 Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-devel] RE: [leaf-user] htpasswd Generator

2003-02-27 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
Bihari, Steve wrote:
Okay, I believe what I want is a working version of cryptpw or at least
the source so I can compile on my RHAT 5.2 box.
What you want is the htpasswd program, which comes in the thttpd source 
tarball (in the extras/ directory):
http://www.acme.com/software/thttpd/thttpd-2.20c.tar.gz

--
Charles Steinkuehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] Testing dial-up modem

2003-02-27 Thread Richard Doyle
On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 19:18, Greg Playle wrote:
 On 19 Feb 2003 13:11:07 -0800, Richard Doyle wrote in reply:
 
 --- snip ---
 Post a log segment showing a complete sequence of chat and pppd entries.
 In general it is helpful to post unedited logs (but replace passwords
 with x's).
 
 The summary you provided doesn't provide any evidence that your system
 is communicating with your modem. The unsummarized log may give us a
 clue.
 
 My home network has two internal subnets and a dial-up connection to the
 Internet (currently via an internal modem, but in the past an external
 one), so your intended configuration is quite feasible. Your problem is
 probably not LEAF-specific--you might get more help by looking in the
 ppp howto (https://secure.linuxports.com/howto/ppp/), which is a bit
 old, and the linux-ppp mailing list
 (http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html).
 
 -Richard
 
 
 - end snip --
 
 Richard:
   I had no fear that what I wanted was achievable; I seem to have done 
 something incorrectly in setting it up.
 
   I've pulled various logs and configuration files and will post them below. 
  Advice and comment is quite welcome.
 
   The machine is an older P75, no hard drive, two 3C905B NICs, and an 
 external Zoltrix 56k modem.  What I am trying to set up is a dual-homed 
 firewall, dial-up service, and an internal store and forward server in 
 the DMZ, to capture, filter, and hold e-mail and such until I can join the 
 net and pull them.  Getting Bering working is the first step in this.
 
   On to the logs:  each is identified by a line before and after.  Some 
 lines may wrap
 
  snip  /var/log/messages  
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall syslogd 1.3-3#31.slink1: restart.
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: klogd 1.3-3#31.slink1, log source = 
 /proc/kmsg started.
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: Loaded 21 symbols from 8 modules.
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: 32MB LOWMEM available.
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: Initializing CPU#0
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: Memory: 30136k/32768k available (965k 
 kernel code, 2244k reserved, 252k data, 64k init, 0k highmem)
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: Dentry cache hash table entries: 4096 
 (order: 3, 32768 bytes)
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: Inode cache hash table entries: 2048 
 (order: 2, 16384 bytes)
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: Intel Pentium with F0 0F bug - workaround 
 enabled.
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK.
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 
 0xfcb71, last bus=0
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: PCI: Using configuration type 1
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: PCI: Probing PCI hardware
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: Limiting direct PCI/PCI transfers.
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: Based upon Swansea University Computer 
 Society NET3.039
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: Serial driver version 5.05c (2001-07-08) 
 with MANY_PORTS SHARE_IRQ DETECT_IRQ SERIAL_PCI enabled
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: ttyS00 at 0x03f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: ttyS01 at 0x02f8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: Real Time Clock Driver v1.10e
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: Software Watchdog Timer: 0.05, timer 
 margin: 60 sec
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: FDC 0 is a National Semiconductor PC87306
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: NET4: Linux TCP/IP 1.0 for NET4.0
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: IP Protocols: ICMP, UDP, TCP, IGMP
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: IP: routing cache hash table of 512 
 buckets, 4Kbytes
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: TCP: Hash tables configured (established 
 2048 bind 2048)
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for 
 Linux NET4.0.
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0 
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: Freeing initrd memory: 401k freed
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: Freeing unused kernel memory: 64k freed
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: 3c509.c:1.19 16Oct2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall chat[9516]: abort on (BUSY)
This is oddly wrong. Your system is attempting to run chat even before
the kernel loads the ppp modules, much less pppd. What does your
/etc/network/interfaces file contain? Have you followed
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bumodem.html step-by-step?


 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall chat[9516]: abort on (NO CARRIER)
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall chat[9516]: abort on (VOICE)
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall chat[9516]: abort on (NO DIALTONE)
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall chat[9516]: abort on (NO ANSWER)
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall chat[9516]: send (ATZ^M)
 Feb 26 19:56:48 firewall kernel: 

RE: [leaf-user] Boot from Ide disk

2003-02-27 Thread S Mohan
Typical problem of DOS 8.3. Module is ide-probe-mod.o which gets
truncated. I've had this problem. After copying it to /lib/modules, I
rename it properly as declared in /etc/modules file. Guess this is the
key.

Mohan

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Schalit
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 11:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Boot from Ide disk



Strange how it's getting hung during the insmod.
I think the key is that line that says

 Insmod: ide-pr~1.o: No module by that name found

You should probably verify the package names
are not mangled and that you typed everything
correctly.  If you want, once you copy the files
to the IDE drive, I guess its /dev/hda1, you can

 mount -t msdos /dev/hda1 /mnt
 ls -l /mnt/boot/lib/modules
 cat /mnt/boot/etc/modules

and paste the output in here so we can see the
filenames, dates, sizes, code

Matt







---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] Maclist

2003-02-27 Thread Heriberto Höhlke
Hello

I need to limit the access to Internet by MAC address to 30 PCs. I plan to
implement with the Maclist file of Shorewall.
My question is:
30 MAC addresses in the Maclist file, doesn't slow down too much the
firewall?

Regards
Heriberto


¡Internet GRATIS es Yahoo! Conexión!
Usuario yahoo, contraseña yahoo. 
Desde Buenos Aires, 4004-1010.
Otras ciudades: http://conexion.yahoo.com.ar/avanzados.html


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] Bootable Bering CD

2003-02-27 Thread David Pitts
Good afternoon (for me anyway).

I have a very nice 2 floppy  Bering router setup but in the interests of
never being satisfied, I want to burn it all to CD.  I have followed the
steps in the Bering User Manual and all goes well but the CDs I burn
won't boot.  I should say that I have only tried to boot from one
machine but that machine will boot Windows based CDs.  I will try on
others.

However, can anyone point me to a troubleshooting page or give me some
ideas on what might be going wrong?  Or point me to an archived thread
that covers this?

Thanks yet again for your help.

David Pitts
IT Services Manager
Reid Library 
University of Western Australia
 
Telephone:   (08) 9380 3492 Fax:  (08) 9380 1012



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] CGI-BIN problems with thttpd

2003-02-27 Thread Raymond Koverzin
I'm trying to run thttpd on a Soekris 4521 with WISP-dist (Release
2003-01-22(2508)).  I've taken version 2.15 of thttpd (packaged as
thttpd.lrp) and installed it as part of WISP-dist.

From a browser on my laptop, I can see static pages served from thttpd
on the soekris box.  There is a server side include app (ssi) that is
distributed with thttpd.  When I execute that (i.e.,
http://wisp.address.com/ssi?), it displays an error message 500
Internal Error - Couldn't get PATH_INFO... so I know I'm hitting the
cgi-bin directory.

I can't, however, execute a cgi program.  All I get displayed is a blank
page; which (when I look at the page source) shows the header
titlestuff/title and a body with no stuff.

I suspect the problem is related to the chroot in my thttpd.conf file
but I've tried both chroot and nochroot and still do not have it
working.  These are the things I've done:

1.  I've set user=root in the thttpd.conf file since the /var/www
directory are defined for root.

2.  All directories are defined as 755.

3.  All files (including executables) are defined as 755.

4.  I've tried to run a shell script but since sh (actually it's ash)
uses loadable modules and I supposedly have chroot to /var/www, it
should not run (and, of course, doesn't).

5.  I've created a simple .c program that just does a printf( I'm
here.\n), compiled it with flags -march=i486 and -static and put it in
the cgi-bin directory.  It has no loadable modules so it should not care
where chroot is pointing.  I still get the same problem.


Okay, I'm crying Uncle! right now.  What am I missing?  Why would the
'ssi' executable run but my statically linked app does not?

The following is my thttpd.conf file.

Ray...

--

#thttpd config file
#
# Specifies an alternate port number to listen on. (Default: 80)
port=80
#
# Specifies a directory to chdir() to at startup.
dir=/var/www
#
# Do a chroot() at initialization time (chroot/nochroot)
chroot
#
# Check symlinks to verify they are within origional document tree
# (symilnk/nosymlink)  Not used if chroot is turned on
#symlink
#
#Specifies what user to run as when invoked by root. (Default: nobody)
user=root
#
# Specifies a pattern for CGI  programs (None == no cgi support)
cgipat=/cgi-bin/*
#
# Specifies a file of throttle settings.
throttles=/etc/thttpd/thttpd.throttles
#
# Specifies a hostname to bind to, for multihoming. (Default: bind all)
#host=www.mydomain.com
#
# Leave blank to log via syslog or specify an alternate file here.
logfile=/var/log/thttpd.log
#
# Specifies a file to write the pid to.  If not specified, no pid is written
#pidfile=





---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] Bootable Bering CD

2003-02-27 Thread Victor McAllister
David Pitts wrote:

Good afternoon (for me anyway).

I have a very nice 2 floppy  Bering router setup but in the interests of
never being satisfied, I want to burn it all to CD.  I have followed the
steps in the Bering User Manual and all goes well but the CDs I burn
won't boot.  I should say that I have only tried to boot from one
machine but that machine will boot Windows based CDs.  I will try on
others.
However, can anyone point me to a troubleshooting page or give me some
ideas on what might be going wrong?  Or point me to an archived thread
that covers this?
Thanks yet again for your help.

David Pitts
IT Services Manager
Reid Library 
University of Western Australia
 

the uClibc version of Bering 1.1 has a bootable  iso image.  You might 
try it.

http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/leaf/bin/bering-uclibc/cd/Bering-uClibc-1.1.iso#rev1.1

With Mozilla you have to hold the shift key when clicking on the 
download link or it will read it as text.

You can try  your bering cd on a box with a newer bios.  It should 
ignore the hard drive and boot up to the root login.

Victor McAllister



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


RE: [leaf-user] htpasswd Generator

2003-02-27 Thread Lars Kneschke
Bihari, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: 
Okay, I believe what I want is a working version of cryptpw or at
least
the source so I can compile on my RHAT 5.2 box.
Have a look at (beta) packages. There is also a apache.lrp, which contains 
htpasswd.

http://distro.kneschke.de/download/packages/

Cu
--
Lars Kneschke
Vater Net-Com GmbH
CCNP, Cisco, Linux
written with FeLaMiMail





---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


RE: [leaf-user] htpasswd Generator

2003-02-27 Thread Bihari, Steve
Okay, I believe what I want is a working version of cryptpw or at least
the source so I can compile on my RHAT 5.2 box.

Thx

-Original Message-
From: Bihari, Steve 
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 11:38 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [leaf-user] htpasswd Generator


Hello all,

Does anyone happen to have an htpasswd file generator compiled to work
with Bering?  I am wanting to provide basic authentication to Weblet using
thttpd.  Everything is working except the ability to (easily) change the
password.

TIA !

Steve Bihari 


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

___
leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html