[leaf-user] DNS with Bering in a small LAN
Hey how is everybody doing? Let see if you can spot me here with my problem. I use to work with Bering 1.2 for VLAN issues but now I want to configure an old machine as a firewall using the software shorewall which is include in Berig 1.2. I have downloaded the quick start guide for a simple configuration, a local net conected to the firewall (eth1) by a hub (local PCs and the firewall by eth1 are conected to the same hub) and the firewall conected to a cisco router machine provided by my cable operator (eth0) of course eth1 has the subnet address of the local net and eh0 has the same subnet address of the router. Also I have configurated all the machines within the local net with their gateway set to the IP address of the local interafce of the firewall (eth1). I have the following policies: local net ACCEPT net all DROP all all REJCET Them in the rules I have PORT RULE Source DEST ProtoDEST ACCEPT fw net tcp 53 ACCEPT fw net udp 53 # For ssh conection ACCEPT locfwtcp 22 ACCEPT locfwicmp 8 ACCEPT netfwicmp 8 ACCEPT fw loc icmp 8 ACCEPT fw net icmp 8 ACCEPT locfwtcp 80 ACCEPT locfwudp 53 ACCEPT locfwtcp 4662 ACCEPT netfwtcp 4662 ACCEPT fw net tcp 4662 ACCEPT fw loc tcp 4662 ACCEPT netfwudp 4672 ACCEPT locfwudp 4672 ACCEPT fw net udp 4672 ACCEPT fw loc udp 4672 #SMTP mail ACCEPT locfwtcp 25 ACCEPT netfwtcp 25 ACCEPT fw net tcp 25 ACCEPT fw loc tcp 25 #POP mail ACCEPT locfwtcp 110 ACCEPT netfwtcp 110 ACCEPT fw net tcp 110 ACCEPT fw loc tcp 110 and in the Masq option of the Shorwall menu I have #Interface SubnetAddress eth0 eth1 192.168.10.106 Where 192.168.10.106 is teh ip address of eth0 the file host.allow has ALL:192.168.30.0/24 where 192.168.30.0 is the subnet address of the internal net conected to eth1 so that any PC from that net can access to the services of the firewall, and reach the internet, am I wrong?. I have, at this point two questions: 1º) I don´t have any DNS configured in my local net (neither at the firewall (LEAF Router), dnscache etc...). In the PCs of the local net I have the addresses of the DNS servers that my cable operator gave me. SO now I don´t know if I have to configure a DNS server in my firewall (Leaf Router) or what, and If so how???. As I have understood in the Quickstart guide for two interfaces, The resolv.conf will be written as soon as you conect to your ISP 2) so now here comes the problem. From any computer of the local net I can ping the internal IP address of the cisco router(which is conected to the fw) and from the firewall(LEAF router) I can ping either the internal address of the cisco router or any local PC. The question here is that I can´t ping the external IP address of the cisco router or do a traceroute and when I try to open my web broser in any of my local PCs it doesn´t work. It says that it can open the website, and the same for the mailing tool Outlook 3) with Bering 1.2 and its shorewall, do I have to start the firewall with any command? or does it get set up automaticly by it self after the sistem is booted? if so, how can I get it started? Did I do anything wrong in my configuration of the firewall or in the desing of the net? Thanks for yor time falks ___ Yahoo! Messenger - Nueva versión GRATIS Super Webcam, voz, caritas animadas, y más... http://messenger.yahoo.es --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] problems with Shorwall
Hey how is everybody doing? Let see if you can spot me here with my problem. I use to work with Bering 1.2 for VLAN issues but now I want to configure an old machine as a firewall using the software shorewall which is include in Berig 1.2. I have downloaded the quick start guide for a simple configuration, a local net conected to the firewall (eth1) by a hub (local PCs and the firewall by eth1 are conected to the same hub) and the firewall conected to the router (eth0) of course eth1 has the net IP address of the local net and eh0 has the same net IP address of the router. Also I have configurated all the machines within the local net with their gateway set with the IP address of the local interafce of the firewall (eth1) as it is said in the quickstart guide of shorewall for two interfaces. I have the following policies: local net ACCEPT net all DROP all all REJCET Them in the rules I have PORT RULE Source DEST ProtoDEST ACCEPT fw net tcp 53 ACCEPT fw net udp 53 # For ssh conection ACCEPT locfwtcp 22 ACCEPT locfwicmp 8 ACCEPT netfwicmp 8 ACCEPT fw loc icmp 8 ACCEPT fw net icmp 8 ACCEPT locfwtcp 80 ACCEPT locfwudp 53 ACCEPT locfwtcp 4662 ACCEPT netfwtcp 4662 ACCEPT fw net tcp 4662 ACCEPT fw loc tcp 4662 ACCEPT netfwudp 4672 ACCEPT locfwudp 4672 ACCEPT fw net udp 4672 ACCEPT fw loc udp 4672 #SMTP mail ACCEPT locfwtcp 25 ACCEPT netfwtcp 25 ACCEPT fw net tcp 25 ACCEPT fw loctcp 25 #POP mail ACCEPT locfwtcp 110 ACCEPT netfwtcp 110 ACCEPT fw net tcp 110 ACCEPT fw loctcp 110 and in the Masq option of the Shorwall menu I have #Interface SubnetAddress eth0 eth1 192.168.10.106 Where 192.168.10.106 is teh ip address of eth0 Because I am not giving any service I dont use the NAT protocol, so my question is that from any computer of the local net I can ping the private interface of the router (which is conected to the fw) and from the firewall I can ping either the router or any local PC. But when I try to open my web broser in any of my local PCs it doesn´t work. So here is my question, with Bering 1.2 and it´s shorewall, do I have to start the firewall with any command? or does it get set up automaticly by it self after the sistem is booted? if so, how can I get it started? Did I do anything wrong in my configuration of the firewall or in the desing of the net? Thanks for yor time falks ___ Yahoo! Messenger - Nueva versión GRATIS Super Webcam, voz, caritas animadas, y más... http://messenger.yahoo.es --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Problem starting Shorewall Firewall
Hey how is everybody doing? Let see if you can spot me here with my problem. I use to work with Bering 1.2 for VLAN issues but now I want to configure an old machine as a firewall using the software shorewall which is include in Berig 1.2. I have downloaded the quick start guide for a simple configuration, a local net conected to the firewall (eth1) by a hub (local PCs and the firewall by eth1 are conected to the same hub) and the firewall conected to the router (eth0) of course eth1 has thh net IP address of the local net and eh0 has the same net IP address of the router. Also I have configurated all the machines within the local net with their gateway set with the IP address of the local interfce of the firewall (eth1) as it is said in the quickstart guide of shorewall for two interfaces. I have the following policies: local net ACCEPT net all DROP all all REJCET The in the rules I have some rules like local fw tcp 53 local net tcp 4662 local net udp 4662 netlocal udp 4662 local fw tcp 80 fw net tcp 80 local net tcp 25 (SMTP) netlocal tcp 110 (POP) and two or three more, I don´t know if the rules are like that exactly now. The problem is that, from any computer of the local net I can ping the private interface of the router (which is conected to the fw) and from the firewall I can ping either the router or any local PC. But when I try to open my web broser in any of my local PCs it doesn´t work. So here is my question, with Bering 1.2 and it´s shorewall, do I have to start the firewall with any command? or does it get set up automaticly by it self after the sistem is booted? if so, how can I get it started? Did I do anything wrong in my configuration of the firewall or in the desing of the net? Thanks for yor time falks ___ Yahoo! Messenger - Nueva versión GRATIS Super Webcam, voz, caritas animadas, y más... http://messenger.yahoo.es --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Problems with my NIC
Hey how is everyone doing? Let´s see if you can help me out here. I used to work with LRP a few months ago, but now I wanna do it again to install a firewall. The problem is that now I have bought two NICs SureCom EP-320X-S to do the Two interface option of the manual, but the my boot disk doesn´t see any of the two NIC´s I have tried to install more modules, you know 3c509 but I don´t find the module I need for them. Did any of you work with these NICs before? If so I can I know what the exact module I need for them? Of course if you think that I am forgetting something obvious, please tell me what!!! I know this is a easy step but it is taking me too much time. Thanks ___ Yahoo! Messenger - Nueva versión GRATIS Super Webcam, voz, caritas animadas, y más... http://messenger.yahoo.es --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] problems with tulip.o
hey how are you doing guys? Here I send you another question about my NIC SureCom EP-320X-S. I think that I have to install the module tulip.o with dependences of pci-scan.o. So I install pci-scan.o with no problem but when I try to install the tulip.o I get a error message: $insmod tulip using /lib/modules/tulip.o insmod : init_module: tulip: Operation not supported by the system Any idea of what I am doing wrong? Thanks guys ___ Yahoo! Messenger - Nueva versión GRATIS Super Webcam, voz, caritas animadas, y más... http://messenger.yahoo.es --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Documentation about atmtools.lrp
Hi everyone, My name is Luis and I am studying C.S. at my University in Spain. I am getting interest for this proyect, but sometimes I feel that I don´t know enough to understand the process of some projects you talk here about. I did a job about Vlan using LEAF Bering rc 4 and it was pretty interesting for me, and it helped me a lot to know and understand more about networking. Now I used the package atmtools.lrp that Jacques Nilo told me that I could use to try my project and that I could find at http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/testing/atmtools.lrp I used it with LANE and CLIP and it seems to work pretty good, congratulations. But now I would like to do more than trying and I would like to help to this project creating my own packages and investigating by my own to provide you with my help (as far as I could do, of course I realize that people here knows a lot more than me). I have readed the Bering Devlopment Guide, but things are not pretty clear for me, so maybe any of you could have the time to explain me, carefully, how for instance, the package atmtools.lrp was created and compilated. I know that I need the Debian 2.1 OS and that I need to compilate everything and create a list file for the lrpkg command and tar it. But in practice it doesn´t work to tell you the truth. As I have readed at the Developer´s guide the steps I have to follow to create my package is adding the package and a group of files : pkgname.list List of files contained in the package, relative to / these paths must be relative to / (root). pkgname.version Version of the software package (in the format version-release). pkgname.help Help file for the software package. pkgname.exclude List of files to never include in the package or any other package these files might include spool files, temporary files, and files that get created every time the software starts. pkgname.conf A list of configuration files used by the package. Each entry can contain a comment after the filename but on the same line. This file is used by the configuration utilities found in LRP and LEAF systems. I know that I have to take the atm-tools for linux and get the lrp package... but can any of you explain me the process in steps, or if any of you has the documentation about how it was made,pass it to me?. I will be really pleased, well, me and my teacher too.. because he wants to know more about this project now that I have started to read about it. Thank you very much. The package provides: debian:/tmp/test# tar xzvf ../atmtools.lrp lib/libatm.so.1 lib/libatm.so.1.0.0 sbin/atmarp sbin/atmarpd usr/bin/aread usr/bin/atmdiag usr/bin/atmdump usr/bin/awrite usr/bin/awrite usr/bin/saaldump usr/bin/sonetdiag usr/bin/ttcp_atm usr/sbin/atmaddr usr/sbin/atmsigd usr/sbin/bus usr/sbin/esi usr/sbin/lecs usr/sbin/mpcd usr/sbin/zntune usr/sbin/atmloop usr/sbin/atmtcp usr/sbin/enitune usr/sbin/ilmid etc/atmsigd.conf etc/init.d/atm var/lib/lrpkg/atmtools.conf var/lib/lrpkg/atmtools.help var/lib/lrpkg/atmtools.list var/lib/lrpkg/atmtools.version usr/sbin/les usr/sbin/zeppelin ___ Yahoo! Messenger - Nueva versión GRATIS Super Webcam, voz, caritas animadas, y más... http://messenger.yahoo.es --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing more. Download eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] atmtools.lrp working
Hi, A few weeks ago, I asked you about how to do a package, atmtools.lrp, and you told me that you had it but you were not sure about if it worked or not. I tried it, doing LANE and it seems to work pretty good. If you want I cant tell you the configuration of my experiment, so later you can put it in latest/packages in your website. I am gonna try it now with CLIP, and I will tell you how it goes. Also I would like to know, if you don´t mind, how you created the package, so I can put it in my documentation and learn how to do it the next time by my own. Do you have to compile all the demonds, and the programs in Debian 2.1. I will be pleased if you can tell me how you did create the package. Thank you very much for your help Luis ___ Yahoo! Messenger - Nueva versión GRATIS Super Webcam, voz, caritas animadas, y más... http://messenger.yahoo.es --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0016ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Vlan Acces link (vlan.lrp + bridge.lrp
Hi everyone, I am trying to set a vlan but using vlan-unaware machines ( PC1, PC2,PC3 and PC4 as you can see in the picture). Here the bridge is the one to do the tagging of the frames and untag them to send them to the correct machine (Because the vlan-unaware machines dont tag their frames, as I have readed in some tutorials about vlans). I am using the packages vlan.lrp and bridge.lrp to configure the bridges as it follows: - - -PC1- -PC2- - - - - - eth0eth0- - 192.168.1.1192.168.1.2 - - - - - - - - eth1.10- - eth2.20 -- - br0- -- - eth0 - - - - - eth0 -- - br1- -- eth1.10 - - eth2.20 - - - - --- -- -- eth0 192.168.1.3 eth0 192.168.1.4 -- - - -PC3- -PC4- - - So following this picture, PC2 would see PC4 and PC1 would see PC3 and the bridges would be in charge of tagging and untagging the frames, the vlan-unaware machines would not have to know about the tagging, right, I think this is the Idea of the vlan access link. So to get this, I have configured the bridges this way: first I have created the vlans vconfig add eth1 10 vconfig add eth2 20 then I set them up ifconfig eth1.10 up ifconfig eth2.20 up so then I have configured the bridge brctl addbr br0 brctl addif br0 eth0 brctl addif br0 eth1.10 brctl addif br0 eth2.20 and set it up ifconfig br0 up As far as I know about vlans and bridging PC2 would have to be able to comunicate with PC4 and PC1 with PC3, but they don´t. Is it maybe because the kernel doesn´t support vlan access link, and PC1,PC2,PC3 and PC4 must be vlan-aware machines to tag the frames? (as it is possible in CISCO machines) If this bridge configuration to get a vlan access link is wrong, as I think it is because it doesn´t work, what do I have to change to get a vlan access link in my bridges so PC1, PC2, PC3 and PC4 could be vlan-unaware machines and don´t worry about tagging? Thank you for your help, I will be checking my mail to see if any of you can help me out with this. bye!! ___ Yahoo! Messenger - Nueva versión GRATIS Super Webcam, voz, caritas animadas, y más... http://messenger.yahoo.es --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0016ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Problems Vlan+bridge
Hello everyone: I am trying to set up a easy configuration using a bridge with Vlan Support, but I am having a few problems with it and I don´t know why. Let´s see if you can help me out here. Here I show you the configuration --- - PC1 - --- - eth0 192.168.1.127 - - - - eth0 (No IP address) (eth0.10 for the vlan) --- - br0 - --- - eth1 (No IP address) (eth1.10 for the vlan) - - - eth0 192.168.1.129 --- - PC2 - --- What I am trying to get here is set a brige using vlans. I am using Bering rc4 with bridge support and vlan support. First I set the interfaces in the bridge Br0 with no IP address ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 up ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 up then I create the Vlans, eth0 and eth1 will belong to vlan10 vconfig add eth0 10 vconfig add eth1 10 So with this if I go to /proc/net/vlan I have the interfaces eth0.10 and eth1.10 with no IP address as we want for the bridge right? I set eth0.10 and eth1.10 up with ifconfig ifconfig eth0.10 up ifconfig eth1.10 up now I create the bridge brctl addbr br0 brctl stp br0 off so now I add the logical interfaces eth0.10 and eth1.10 to the bridge brctl addif br0 eth0.10 brctl addif br0 eth1.10 now I have what I think I need to et all the configuration to work, right? so I set the interface br0 up ifconfig br0 up As I think and as I readed in the tutorials and guides I found in the internet, this configuration should work. I should be able to ping from PC1 to PC2 because they are in the same vlan (PC1 and PC2 are using windows98 because my teacher says that the hosts that are not bridges dont have to support Vlan, so we can work with the normal interfaces) The problem is that, this doesn´t work, and I don´t now why I can not get a response for a ping to PC1 from PC2 or from PC2 to PC1. I tryed to do this not using vlans, with the normal physical interfaces in the bridge eth0 and eth1, instead eth0.10 and eth1.10, and of course it works. But what I am trying to set here is a bridge using vlans, them if I set eth0 in vlan 10 and eth1 in vlan 20 because the logical interfaces are not in the bridge it works when it shouldn´t. How can I get this configuration and this Idea to work? CAn any of you tell me why it doesn´t work? In the bridge, Do I have to use the the logical (eth0.10 and eth1.10) or the physical interfaces (eth0 and eth1)? Do I need PC1 and PC2 to support VLAN and get in PC1 eth0.10 with an IP addres and the same in the PC2? Can it be because with this I am working with trunck ports when I should work with acces ports? If so, how can I set the bridge to work with access ports. I will be really pleased if you can help me here, because I need it for my final degree project and time is running out. Thank you for your time, I apreciate it. Jose Luis Abuelo Sebio ___ Yahoo! Sorteos - http://loteria.yahoo.es Juega a la Lotería Primitiva sin salir de casa --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Problems VLAN + Bridge
Hello everyone: I am trying to set up a easy configuration using a bridge with Vlan Support, but I am having a few problems with it and I don´t know why. Let´s see if you can help me out here. Here I show you the configuration --- - PC1 - --- - eth0 192.168.1.127 - - - - eth0 (No IP address) (eth0.10 for the vlan) --- - br0 - --- - eth1 (No IP address) (eth1.10 for the vlan) - - - eth0 192.168.1.129 --- - PC2 - --- What I am trying to get here is set a brige using vlans. I am using Bering rc4 with bridge support and vlan support. First I set the interfaces in the bridge Br0 with no IP address ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 up ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 up then I create the Vlans, eth0 and eth1 will belong to vlan10 vconfig add eth0 10 vconfig add eth1 10 So with this if I go to /proc/net/vlan I have the interfaces eth0.10 and eth1.10 with no IP address as we want for the bridge right? I set eth0.10 and eth1.10 up with ifconfig ifconfig eth0.10 up ifconfig eth1.10 up now I create the bridge brctl addbr br0 brctl stp br0 off so now I add the logical interfaces eth0.10 and eth1.10 to the bridge brctl addif br0 eth0.10 brctl addif br0 eth1.10 now I have what I think I need to et all the configuration to work, right? so I set the interface br0 up ifconfig br0 up As I think and as I readed in the tutorials and guides I found in the internet, this configuration should work. I should be able to ping from PC1 to PC2 because they are in the same vlan (PC1 and PC2 are using windows98 because my teacher says that the hosts that are not bridges dont have to support Vlan, so we can work with the normal interfaces) The problem is that, this doesn´t work, and I don´t now why I can not get a response for a ping to PC1 from PC2 or from PC2 to PC1. I tryed to do this not using vlans, with the normal physical interfaces in the bridge eth0 and eth1, instead eth0.10 and eth1.10, and of course it works. But what I am trying to set here is a bridge using vlans, them if I set eth0 in vlan 10 and eth1 in vlan 20 because the logical interfaces are not in the bridge it works when it shouldn´t. How can I get this configuration and this Idea to work? CAn any of you tell me why it doesn´t work? In the bridge, Do I have to use the the logical (eth0.10 and eth1.10) or the physical interfaces (eth0 and eth1)? Do I need PC1 and PC2 to support VLAN and get in PC1 eth0.10 with an IP addres and the same in the PC2? Can it be because with this configuration I am working with truck ports in the bridge, when I shoud be working with access ports? If so how can I configure the bridge with access ports? I will be really pleased if you can help me here, because I need it for my final degree project and time is running out. Thank you for your time, I apreciate it. Jose Luis Abuelo Sebio ___ Yahoo! Sorteos - http://loteria.yahoo.es Juega a la Lotería Primitiva sin salir de casa --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Re: [VLAN] Problems Vlan+bridge
hi, But imagine that the idea is using two machines PC1 and PC2 with linux and support for VLan, would be the configuration ok? How can I get the access port support instead the trunk port? Then If the configuration is ok, If I put PC2 eth0.20 and the bridge br0 with eth1.20 and eth0.10, It is suposed that I can not see PC1 from PC2 because they are in diferent vlan´s,but I can. Why? Thanks again --- Leonard Ye [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: in short, your teacher is wrong. Here is the longer answer. The vlan support in Linux is similar to trunk port concept in switch configuration. That is, an VLAN interface in Linux will only pick up and process packets that has already been VLAN-tagged. As in your case, windows machine will only generate normal ethernet packet, and it can only be picked up by non-vlan ethernet interface, thus, your bridging between eth0 and eth1 will work while bridging between eth0.10 and eth1.10 won't. I don't quite understand why you want to do bridging between VLANs while the source and destination machine can only generate/accept non-vlan traffic. Maybe you just want to try out this particular VLAN+bridge combination. Regards, Leonard Ye On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 20:31, Jose Luis Abuelo Sebio wrote: Hello everyone: I am trying to set up a easy configuration using a bridge with Vlan Support, but I am having a few problems with it and I don´t know why. Let´s see if you can help me out here. Here I show you the configuration --- - PC1 - --- - eth0 192.168.1.127 - - - - eth0 (No IP address) (eth0.10 for the vlan) --- - br0 - --- - eth1 (No IP address) (eth1.10 for the vlan) - - - eth0 192.168.1.129 --- - PC2 - --- What I am trying to get here is set a brige using vlans. I am using Bering rc4 with bridge support and vlan support. First I set the interfaces in the bridge Br0 with no IP address ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 up ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 up then I create the Vlans, eth0 and eth1 will belong to vlan10 vconfig add eth0 10 vconfig add eth1 10 So with this if I go to /proc/net/vlan I have the interfaces eth0.10 and eth1.10 with no IP address as we want for the bridge right? I set eth0.10 and eth1.10 up with ifconfig ifconfig eth0.10 up ifconfig eth1.10 up now I create the bridge brctl addbr br0 brctl stp br0 off so now I add the logical interfaces eth0.10 and eth1.10 to the bridge brctl addif br0 eth0.10 brctl addif br0 eth1.10 now I have what I think I need to et all the configuration to work, right? so I set the interface br0 up ifconfig br0 up As I think and as I readed in the tutorials and guides I found in the internet, this configuration should work. I should be able to ping from PC1 to PC2 because they are in the same vlan (PC1 and PC2 are using windows98 because my teacher says that the hosts that are not bridges dont have to support Vlan, so we can work with the normal interfaces) The problem is that, this doesn´t work, and I don´t now why I can not get a response for a ping to PC1 from PC2 or from PC2 to PC1. I tryed to do this not using vlans, with the normal physical interfaces in the bridge eth0 and eth1, instead eth0.10 and eth1.10, and of course it works. But what I am trying to set here is a bridge using vlans, them if I set eth0 in vlan 10 and eth1 in vlan 20 because the logical interfaces are not in the bridge it works when it shouldn´t. How can I get this configuration and this Idea to work? CAn any of you tell me why it doesn´t work? In the bridge, Do I have to use the the logical (eth0.10 and eth1.10) or the physical interfaces (eth0 and eth1)? Do I need PC1 and PC2 to support VLAN and get in PC1 eth0.10 with an IP addres and the same in the PC2? Can it be because with this I am working with trunck ports when I should work with acces ports? If so, how can I set the bridge to work with access ports. I will be really pleased if you can help me here, because I need it for my final degree project and time is running out. Thank you for your time, I apreciate it. Jose Luis Abuelo Sebio ___ Yahoo! Sorteos - http://loteria.yahoo.es Juega a la Lotería Primitiva sin salir de casa ___ VLAN mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.WANfear.com/mailman/listinfo/vlan VLAN Page: http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear/vlan.html -- Leonard Ye [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ant in Research Development Advanced Network Technology Laboratories Pte Ltd Tel: +65 68586789 Fax: +65 64874567 WWW: http://www.antlabs.com
[leaf-user] V port access and V port trunk
Hi everyone, I am trying to set a vlan configuration, and reading the guides or tutorials about Vlan I came up with some questions that maybe you can answer me. What I am trying to do with my configuration is creating two machines PC1 and PC3 in a VLAN ID 10 and PC2 and PC4 in VLANM ID 20. I use two machines as bridges and the graph is like this - - -PC1- -PC2- - - - - - eth0.10 eth0.20 - - 192.168.1.1192.168.1.2 - - - - - - - - eth1.10- - eth2.20 -- - br0- -- - eth0.10 - eth0.20 - - - eth0.10 - eth0.20 -- - br1- -- eth1.10 - - eth2.20 - - - - --- -- -- eth0.10 192.168.1.3 eth0.20 192.168.1.4 -- - - -PC3- -PC4- - - I know I know, this configuration is quite easy and useless, but this project is to better understanding the use and the way of working of vlans. Here is my question now. I can get this to work but to do this I PC1, PC2, PC3 and PC4 must have vlan support (they are linux machines) and of course the bridges too (they are leaf lrp machines). I think this ( the need of vlan support in PCx) is because I am using V trunk port, so I need all the machines in the configuration to support vlan. But with this everytime I need to change something I have to change it in the bridges and the workstations. I read somewhere that there is another use that we can use, the V access port where the PC´s 1,2,3 and 4 could be windows machines wich doesn´t need vlan support. Do you know if I can do this configuration keeping the configuration of the bridges but using machines as PC 1,2,3 and 4 with no vlan support. Here is the configuration of the bridges that I did, maybe I have to change something to get this. ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 up ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 up ifconfig eth2 0.0.0.0 up vconfig add eth0 10 vconfig add eth0 20 vconfig add eth1 10 vconfig add eth2 20 ifconfig eth0.10 up ifconfig eth0.20 up ifconfig eth1.10 up ifconfig eth2.20 up brctl addbr br0 brctl addif eth0 brctl addif eth1 brctl addif eth2 ifconfig br0 up and with this it works, but as I told you before, I am interesting in getting this to work with V access port instead V trunk port. Please, any ideas email me as soon as you can, I will apreciate it, c ya ___ Yahoo! Sorteos - http://loteria.yahoo.es Juega a la Lotería Primitiva sin salir de casa --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Problems using vlan.lrp and bridge.lrp
Hi, how everybody is doing?:
I am having some problems trying to set a vlan with
the Bering rc4 distribution. I going to explain what I
did it and how, to see if anyone can find the problem
or the mistake, because I think I am following the
documentation pretty good.
Here, this is a draw of what I am trying to set
---
- PC1 -
---
- eth0 IP 192.168.1.123
-
-
- eth1 IP 192.168.1.1
eth2 192.168.2.1 ---
- Bridge A - -- PC3 -
---
- eth0 IP 10.0.1.1 eth0 IP 192.168.2.3
-
-
- eth0 IP 10.0.1.2
eth2 192.168.2.2 ---
- Bridge B PC4 -
---
- eth1 IP 192.168.1.2eth0 IP 192.168.2.4
-
-
- eth0 IP 192.168.1.129
---
- PC2 -
---
BridgeA and BridgeB are running under Bering rc4 V1.2
with vlan.lrp bridge.lrp and 8021q.o and bridge.o
First I am gonna describe the situation of the
project. I have to computers, we will call them
BridgeA and BridgeB, which I wanna run as bridges.
Each computer has 3 Ethernet NICs. To apply vlan
support to the bridgeA and bridgeB I install in each
one the package vlan.lrp (wich provides the command
vconfig) and the module 8021q.o. Them to support the
bridge funcionality I install the the bridge.lrp
package and the bridge.o module.
them in each of these computers I do this:
First I assign an IP address to each NIC
BridgeA
eth0 10.0.1.1
eth1 192.168.1.1
eth2 192.168.2.1
and I set them up with the command Ifconfig
Ifconfig eth0 up
Ifconfig eth1 up
Ifconfig eth2 up
(To do this I had to install netutils.lrp because ifup
didn´t seem to work)
so I did the same in bridgeB
eth0 10.0.1.2
eth1 192.168.1.2
eth2 192.168.2.2
and I set them up with ifconfig again.
So now in each of the briges I create the Vlans
vconfig add eth0 10
vconfig add eth0 20
vconfig add eth1 10
vconfig add eth2 20
so now I have the interfaces
eth0.10 eth0.20 eth1.10 and eth2.20
so I set them up again with ifconfig like
ifconfig eth1.10 up
So now I only have to create the bridge
brctl addbr Orense
brctl addif Orense eth0.10
brctl addif Orense eth0.20
brctl addif Orense eth1.10
brctl addif Orense eth2.20
and I set the bridge up
Ifconfig Orense up
(as you can see I use the interfaces eth0 of each
bridge to connect them in a backbone between the two
machines)
so then conected to the eth1 of the bridgeA I have a
computer with a NIC that has an IP address
192.168.1.123 and conected to the eth1 of the bridgeB
I
have another NIC with 192.168.1.129.
As I see it has to work, doesn´t it? but If I do a
ping from 192.168.1.123 to 192.168.1.129 I can´t see
the other side. I only can reach the machine I am
conected to (because the IP address) but not using the
bridge and VLAN technology.
It is the same for the PC´s in the VLAN ID 20 PC3 and
PC4.
Can anyone tell me why or what I did wrong?
It works if I do the bridge with the phisical
interfaces eth0,eth1,eth2
Bridge Orense
eth0, eht1 eth2
but the porpuse of this
project is using vlan and a bridge so this:
Bridge Orense
eth0.10, eth0.20, eth1.10, eth2.20
It doesn´t work
I don´t know what is wrong here.
Thank´s for your help, I will be checking my
mail to see if anyone has the answer to this.
Bye
___
Yahoo! Sorteos - http://loteria.yahoo.es
Juega a la Lotería Primitiva sin salir de casa
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner.
Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission!
INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] VLAN with vlan.lrp and bridge.lrp
Hi, good morning:
I am having some problems trying to set a vlan with
the Bering rc4 distribution. I going to explain what I
did it and how, to see if anyone can find the problem
or the mistake, because I think I am following the
documentation pretty good.
Here, this is a draw of what I am trying to set
---
- PC1 -
---
- eth0 IP 192.168.1.123
-
-
- eth1 IP 192.168.1.1
eth2 192.168.2.1 ---
- Bridge A - -- PC3 -
---
- eth0 IP 10.0.1.1 eth0 IP 192.168.2.3
-
-
- eth0 IP 10.0.1.2
eth2 192.168.2.2 ---
- Bridge B PC4 -
---
- eth1 IP 192.168.1.2eth0 IP 192.168.2.4
-
-
- eth0 IP 192.168.1.129
---
- PC2 -
---
BridgeA and BridgeB are running under Bering rc4 V1.2
with vlan.lrp bridge.lrp and 8021q.o and bridge.o
First I am gonna describe the situation of the
project. I have to computers, we will call them
BridgeA and BridgeB, which I wanna run as bridges.
Each computer has 3 Ethernet NICs. To apply vlan
support to the bridgeA and bridgeB I install in each
one the package vlan.lrp (wich provides the command
vconfig) and the module 8021q.o. Them to support the
bridge funcionality I install the the bridge.lrp
package and the bridge.o module.
them in each of these computers I do this:
First I assign an IP address to each NIC
BridgeA
eth0 10.0.1.1
eth1 192.168.1.1
eth2 192.168.2.1
and I set them up with the command Ifconfig
Ifconfig eth0 up
Ifconfig eth1 up
Ifconfig eth2 up
(To do this I had to install netutils.lrp because ifup
didn´t seem to work)
so I did the same in bridgeB
eth0 10.0.1.2
eth1 192.168.1.2
eth2 192.168.2.2
and I set them up with ifconfig again.
So now in each of the briges I create the Vlans
vconfig add eth0 10
vconfig add eth0 20
vconfig add eth1 10
vconfig add eth2 20
so now I have the interfaces
eth0.10 eth0.20 eth1.10 and eth2.20
so I set them up again with ifconfig like
ifconfig eth1.10 up
So now I only have to create the bridge
brctl addbr Orense
brctl addif Orense eth0.10
brctl addif Orense eth0.20
brctl addif Orense eth1.10
brctl addif Orense eth2.20
and I set the bridge up
Ifconfig Orense up
(as you can see I use the interfaces eth0 of each
bridge to connect them in a backbone between the two
machines)
so then conected to the eth1 of the bridgeA I have a
computer with a NIC that has an IP address
192.168.1.123 and conected to the eth1 of the bridgeB
I
have another NIC with 192.168.1.129.
As I see it has to work, doesn´t it? but If I do a
ping from 192.168.1.123 to 192.168.1.129 I can´t see
the other side. I only can reach the machine I am
conected to (because the IP address) but not using the
bridge and VLAN technology.
It is the same for the PC´s in the VLAN ID 20 PC3 and
PC4.
Can anyone tell me why or what I did wrong?
It works if I do the bridge with the phisical
interfaces eth0,eth1,eth2
Bridge Orense
eth0, eht1 eth2
but the porpuse of this
project is using vlan and a bridge so this:
Bridge Orense
eth0.10, eth0.20, eth1.10, eth2.20
It doesn´t work
I don´t know what is wrong here.
Thank´s for your help, I will be checking my
mail to see if anyone has the answer to this.
Bye
___
Yahoo! Sorteos - http://loteria.yahoo.es
Juega a la Lotería Primitiva sin salir de casa
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner.
Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission!
INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Problems setting a VLAN with vlan.lrp and bridge.lrp
Hi, good morning:
I am having some problems trying to set a vlan with
the Bering rc4 distribution. I going to explain what I
did it and how, to see if anyone can find the problem
or the mistake, because I think I am following the
documentation pretty good.
Here, this is a draw of what I am trying to set
---
- PC1 -
---
- eth0 IP 192.168.1.123
-
-
- eth1 IP 192.168.1.1
eth2 192.168.2.1 ---
- Bridge A - -- PC3 -
---
- eth0 IP 10.0.1.1 eth0 IP 192.168.2.3
-
-
- eth0 IP 10.0.1.2
eth2 192.168.2.2 ---
- Bridge B PC4 -
---
- eth1 IP 192.168.1.2eth0 IP 192.168.2.4
-
-
- eth0 IP 192.168.1.129
---
- PC2 -
---
BridgeA and BridgeB are running under Bering rc4 V1.2
with vlan.lrp bridge.lrp and 8021q.o and bridge.o
First I am gonna describe the situation of the
project. I have to computers, we will call them
BridgeA and BridgeB, which I wanna run as bridges.
Each computer has 3 Ethernet NICs. To apply vlan
support to the bridgeA and bridgeB I install in each
one the package vlan.lrp (wich provides the command
vconfig) and the module 8021q.o. Them to support the
bridge funcionality I install the the bridge.lrp
package and the bridge.o module.
them in each of these computers I do this:
First I assign an IP address to each NIC
BridgeA
eth0 10.0.1.1
eth1 192.168.1.1
eth2 192.168.2.1
and I set them up with the command Ifconfig
Ifconfig eth0 up
Ifconfig eth1 up
Ifconfig eth2 up
(To do this I had to install netutils.lrp because ifup
didn´t seem to work)
so I did the same in bridgeB
eth0 10.0.1.2
eth1 192.168.1.2
eth2 192.168.2.2
and I set them up with ifconfig again.
So now in each of the briges I create the Vlans
vconfig add eth0 10
vconfig add eth0 20
vconfig add eth1 10
vconfig add eth2 20
so now I have the interfaces
eth0.10 eth0.20 eth1.10 and eth2.20
so I set them up again with ifconfig like
ifconfig eth1.10 up
So now I only have to create the bridge
brctl addbr Orense
brctl addif Orense eth0.10
brctl addif Orense eth0.20
brctl addif Orense eth1.10
brctl addif Orense eth2.20
and I set the bridge up
Ifconfig Orense up
(as you can see I use the interfaces eth0 of each
bridge to connect them in a backbone between the two
machines)
so then conected to the eth1 of the bridgeA I have a
computer with a NIC that has an IP address
192.168.1.123 and conected to the eth1 of the bridgeB
I
have another NIC with 192.168.1.129.
As I see it has to work, doesn´t it? but If I do a
ping from 192.168.1.123 to 192.168.1.129 I can´t see
the other side. I only can reach the machine I am
conected to (because the IP address) but not using the
bridge and VLAN technology.
It is the same for the PC´s in the VLAN ID 20 PC3 and
PC4.
Can anyone tell me why or what I did wrong?
It works if I do the bridge with the phisical
interfaces eth0,eth1,eth2
Bridge Orense
eth0, eht1 eth2
but the porpuse of this
project is using vlan and a bridge so this:
Bridge Orense
eth0.10, eth0.20, eth1.10, eth2.20
It doesn´t work
I don´t know what is wrong here.
Thank´s for your help, I will be checking my
mail to see if anyone has the answer to this.
Bye
___
Yahoo! Sorteos - http://loteria.yahoo.es
Juega a la Lotería Primitiva sin salir de casa
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner.
Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission!
INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Problems setting a VLAN
Hi, good morning: I am having some problems trying to set a vlan with the Bering rc4 distribution. I going to explain what I did it and how, to see if anyone can find the problem or the mistake, because I think I am following the documentation pretty good. First I am gonna describe the situation of the project. I have to computers, we will call them BridgeA and BridgeB, which I wanna run as bridges. Each computer has 3 Ethernet NICs. To apply vlan support to the bridgeA and bridgeB I install in each one the package vlan.lrp (wich provides the command vconfig) and the module 8021q.o. Them to support the bridge funcionality I install the the bridge.lrp package and the bridge.o module. them in each of these computers I do this: First I assign an IP address to each NIC BridgeA eth0 10.0.1.1 eth1 192.168.1.1 eth2 192.168.2.1 and I set them up with the command Ifconfig Ifconfgi eth0 up Ifconfgi eth1 up Ifconfgi eth2 up (To do this I had to install netutils.lrp because ifup didn´t seem to work) so I did the same in bridgeB eth0 10.0.1.2 eth1 192.168.1.2 et2 192.168.2.2 and I set them up with ifconfig again. So now in each of the briges I create the Vlans vconfig add eth0 10 vconfig add etho 20 vconfig add eth1 10 vconfig add eth2 20 so now I have the interfaces eth0.10 eth0.20 eth1.10 and eth2.20 so I set them up again with ifconfig like ifconfig eth1.10 up So now I only have to create the bridge brctl addbr Orense brctl addif Orense eth0.10 brctl addif Orense eth0.20 brctl addif Orense eth1.10 brctl addif Orense eth2.20 and I set the bridge up Ifconfig Orense up (as you can see I use the interfaces eth0 of each bridge to connect them in a backbone between the two machines) so then conected to the eth1 of the bridgeA I have a computer with a NIC that has an IP address 192.168.1.12 and conected to the eth1 of the bridgeB I have another NIC with 192.168.1.14. As I see it has to work, doesn´t it? but If I do a ping from 192.168.1.12 to 192.168.1.14 I can see the other side. I only can reach the machine I am conected directly (because the IP address) but not using the bridge and VLAN technology. Can anyone tell me why or what I did wrong? It works if I do the bridge with the phisical interfaces eth0,eth1,eth2... but the porpuse of this project is using vlan and a bridge so... I don´t know what is wrong here. Thank´s for your help falks, I will be checking my mail to see if anyone has the answer to this. Bye ___ Yahoo! Sorteos - http://loteria.yahoo.es Juega a la Lotería Primitiva sin salir de casa --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Image file too long
Hey, what´s up? I am using a normal bering 1.2 boot disk, but now I need to add one module and another package (nicstar.o and atmtools.lrp) and when I try to back up any package or the floppy I don´t have space enough because those files are too big. Is there any way to make a boot disk in two floppies, or I need to install the module and the package everytime I restart the system. Thank´s ___ Yahoo! Sorteos - http://loteria.yahoo.es Juega a la Lotería Primitiva sin salir de casa --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here: http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Problem with bridge.o in Bering V1.1
Hi Guys: Let´s see if someone know what to do with this: I am trying to enable a atm nic to use a package called atmtools.lrp. To get this, I am using a nicstar.o module which depends of another module idt77105.o. I was trying to do this in different bering distributions V1.2, V1.1 and v1.0-stable. If I use the bering distributions v1.2 and v1.0-stable they give me erros like insmod idt77105.o using /lib/modules/idt77105.o insmod: unresolved symbol is gr_capable So I cant install the module nicstar.o Everything looked fine when using Bering V1.1 I could install these modules, but know if I install another module, which I need bridge.o I have this error (Remember in Bering v1.1) insmod bridge.o using /lib/modules/bridge.o insmod: unresolved symbol net_call_rx_atomic I have checked the modules.dep file and bridge.o has no dependences, so now I dont know why it is not working when the same module, bridge.o work fine in Bering rc3 and in Bering V1.2 and v1.0-stable Any ideas??? ___ Yahoo! Sorteos - http://loteria.yahoo.es Juega a la Lotería Primitiva sin salir de casa --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here: http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] problems with idt77105.o
Hi everyone! As I was told in this mailing list, I have downloaded the module idt77105.o to install with other module nicstar.o to get my atm nic ForeRunnerLE 25Mbps work under bering. I went to http://leaf.sf.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/modules/2.4.20/modules.dep to check the module dependences and I did not find a dependence with idt77105.o but when I try to install this module before I install nicstar.o I get this error: insmod idt77105.o Using idt77105.o insmod: unresolved symbol gr_is_capable so if later I do insmod nicstar.o it tells me that idt7105.o doesnt work, of course. Any ideas about what happens here? I will be more than glad if you can tell me something that can help me out. Thanks ___ Yahoo! Sorteos - http://loteria.yahoo.es Juega a la Lotería Primitiva sin salir de casa --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] problems with idt77105.o
I was thinking about this, and.. maybe the problem is because I am using bering rc3 (wihtout grsecurity ) and I would need to use rc4. If so, where can I find the image files of Bering rc4 patched with grsecurity Thanks --- Jacques Nilo [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Le Mercredi 11 Juin 2003 13:30, Jose Luis Abuelo Sebio a écrit : Hi everyone! As I was told in this mailing list, I have downloaded the module idt77105.o to install with other module nicstar.o to get my atm nic ForeRunnerLE 25Mbps work under bering. I went to http://leaf.sf.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/modules/2.4.20/modules.dep to check the module dependences and I did not find a dependence with idt77105.o but when I try to install this module before I install nicstar.o I get this error: insmod idt77105.o Using idt77105.o insmod: unresolved symbol gr_is_capable It looks like an incompatibility problem with the grsecurity patch. The only way to check would be to recompile the kernel with grsecurity disabled. Jacques --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here: http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html ___ Yahoo! Sorteos - http://loteria.yahoo.es Juega a la Lotería Primitiva sin salir de casa --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here: http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] problems proving atmtools.lrp
Hi, How are you doing? Let´s see if you can help me out here. I am trying to use a package called atmtools.lrp that you can find at this address http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/testing/atmtools.lrp I am using this package because I am trying to use an ATM NIC card (ForeRunner ATM Adapter), but I am having some problems that maybe you can help me with. 1) First I install the module to control the atm Nic called nicstar.o, which I have downloaded from the leaf modules website. But once I have this module installed, sometimes it gives me error, sometimes it doesn´t. But most of the time is does and it gives me this error: #insmod nicstar.o Using /lib/modules/nicstar.o insmod: unresolved symbol idt77105_stop insmod: unresolved symbol idt77105_init Another thing is that the command Ifconfig doesn´t work (It says ifconfig: not found). Another question that I have now, because ifconfig doesn´t work is how I can do in the /etc/interfaces to add the lines to configure the atm Nic automaticly.. you know we have something for eth0, eth1.. br0... but what do I have to do for the atm Nic? 2) I am using the packages vlan.lrp and bridge.lrp too. For these packages I had to install two modules 8021q.o for vlan.lrp and bridge.o, Do I have to install any extra module for atmtools.lrp? Thank you very much for all your help, I will be waiting and checking my mail every few minutes hehehe, see you and have a good day guys Jose Luis Abuelo Sebio ___ Yahoo! Sorteos - http://loteria.yahoo.es Juega a la Lotería Primitiva sin salir de casa --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Creating a atm-tools.lrp package
Hi everyone: Here I am trying to create a package for the LRP distribution Bering, which I am using. As I have readed at the Developer´s guide the steps I have to follow to create my package is adding the package and a group of files : pkgname.list List of files contained in the package, relative to / these paths must be relative to / (root). pkgname.version Version of the software package (in the format version-release). pkgname.help Help file for the software package. pkgname.exclude List of files to never include in the package or any other package these files might include spool files, temporary files, and files that get created every time the software starts. pkgname.conf A list of configuration files used by the package. Each entry can contain a comment after the filename but on the same line. This file is used by the configuration utilities found in LRP and LEAF systems. The situation is that I have got the atm-tools package for linux OS obtained from the leaf.sourceforge.net website. So, to create a atmtools.lrp package Do I have to add the files that I saw in the Developer´s guide?, or I have to install the package for the Linux OS and then get the binary and script files (you know which ones?), add the pkgname.list, .help... and create the .tar.gz file. I am sorry for this question but I am a begginer in this field. Thank you for your help. If somebody has created this package already I will be more than pleased if I can get it somewhere. (The package to use an adsl connection ppp with ATM is not useful for me because I am trying to use real ATM hardware ) ___ Yahoo! Sorteos - http://loteria.yahoo.es Juega a la Lotería Primitiva sin salir de casa --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] ATM Bering
Hi guys: I am trying to set up a project in the labs of my university working with a Bering distribution, and I would like to provide ATM to my project. This is the situation: I have to bridges running under Bering which are connecting a VLAN. The problem is that I have the bridges located in diferent places (cities) and I would like to provide a ATM net to connect them. I have worked with these netcards for ATM ForerunnerLE 155 and Forerunner LE 25 in linux (driver for linux is nicstar.o) I have readed the guide of Bering about ATM and it says that you can use xDSL, but what I want to do is just connect the bridges under a private net ( for example, it is going to be a cable but it sounds better to my professor if I say so) using ATM Do you know how can I do to mount this cards in a system running under Bering? and if there is any package to probide the conection of the bridges under ATM using these cards. If there is not any package, do you have any ideas of how to start working on this? Thank for your help guys. Have a good St Patrick's Day. ___ Yahoo! Messenger - Nueva versión GRATIS Super Webcam, voz, caritas animadas, y más... http://messenger.yahoo.es --- This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the chance of winning an Apple iPod: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Tunneling in bering
Hi guys: Here is the situation, I have two computers running with a bering distribution and working as bridges to set up a virtual lan. They are fisically connected by a cable and they work perfectly. The question is that I want to know how to set them up if the computers working as bridges, and which connect the workstations of the vlan, were located in different places like Europe and America. I was told in one of this lists that I should use a tunnel and that there is a tool called vtun that I could use. The problem is that I don't know how to set up the computers to work as bridges and to create a tunnel between them at the same time. They already work as bridges but could some of you tell me how to do to create a tunnel between them? Should I use the vtun tool for the bering distribution or you think that there is something better? Thank for your time, and I hope there is some of you that can help me with this. I will really apreciate it. If you do not know the answer to this but you have any documentation about it I will apreciate it if you can send it to me. Luis P.S. If this is not the correct mailing-list, sorry, but can you remail me to the correct one, thanks ___ Yahoo! Messenger - Nueva versión GRATIS Super Webcam, voz, caritas animadas, y más... http://messenger.yahoo.es --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] ATM bering
Hi, Let's see if somebody can help me with this. I've a computer running with a bering distribution and I would like to work with an ATM card too. Do you know if I can use ATM in bering? How? Do I need any package or module? How can I configure it? Do you know any guide for that? Thanks and I hope some of you can help me with this. See you ___ Yahoo! Messenger - Nueva versión GRATIS Super Webcam, voz, caritas animadas, y más... http://messenger.yahoo.es --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] tunneling with a bering distribution
Hi guys: Here is the situation, I have two computers running with a bering distribution and working as bridges to set up a virtual lan. They are fisically connected by a cable and they work perfectly. The question is that I want to know how to set them up if the computers working as bridges, and which connect the workstations of the vlan, were located in different places like Europe and America. I was told in one of this lists that I should use a tunnel and that there is a tool called vtun that I could use. The problem is that I don't know how to set up the computers to work as bridges and to create a tunnel between them at the same time. They already work as bridges but could some of you tell me how to do to create a tunnel between them? Should I use the vtun tool for the bering distribution or you think that there is something better? Thank for your time, and I hope there is some of you that can help me with this. I will really apreciate it. If you do not know the answer to this but you have any documentation about it I will apreciate it if you can send it to me. Luis P.S. If this is not the correct mailing-list, sorry, but can you remail me to the correct one, thanks ___ Yahoo! Móviles Personaliza tu móvil con tu logo y melodía favorito en http://moviles.yahoo.es --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Question about bridge and vlan
Huy guys: I'm using a bering distribution to set up a vlan. I am using the bering distribution in two computers which has supposed to work as bridges. Both computers(bridges) have three interfaces wich are under the same bridge call Ourense, Bridge Ourense eth0 eth1 eth2 Both computers are directly connected by a cable using the eth0's interfaces, so I use the interfaces eth1 and eth2 in both bridges for the computers I want in the vlan. Everytthing works fine, but I have a question and I would like to know if any of you,guys, can help me. The question is that everything works fine becouse the computers which work as bridges are directly conected by a cable, but what happend if the bridges are located in different places like one in Europe and the other in America??? How do you say to the bridge that it has to conect to the other one? Can you use ip tables in the bridge?? Because what I think this bridge does is let the traffic pass throw all its interfaces and that's all. I have the interfaces eth0 eht1 and eth2 ( which are in the bridge) with IP address and I connect the bridges with the eth0's interfaces. Then I create two vlan one is eth1.10 and other eth2.20... but I do not use ip tables. How can I set the bridges if they are not connected directly by a cable?. Thank you for your time guys. Luis ___ Yahoo! Móviles Personaliza tu móvil con tu logo y melodía favorito en http://moviles.yahoo.es --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] question about vlan in linux
Hi guys: I'm trying to enable the vlan software in a linux machine. There is a module called 8021q.o which I already installed with the comand insmod 8021q but the problem is when I reboot the system all the configuration I did about vlan in the machine is gone because it does not load the module, so I have to do everything again. I used to work with the distribution Mandrake 8.1 and I know that you have to add the module you want to be loaded when the system is rebooted in a file /etc/modules/default... but now I am working with Red Hat 7.3 (kernel 2.4.18) and I don't find that file in anywhere. Do any of you know what I have to do to make that module permanent? I thought that uisng the command insmod or modprob was all what I had to do. If I do a dmesg after that I can see that the utility is working 8021q VLAN blablabla but I can get the module to be loaded every time I reboot the system ___ Yahoo! Móviles Personaliza tu móvil con tu logo y melodía favorito en http://moviles.yahoo.es --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies! Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships. Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more. www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] vlan workstation configuration in linux
Hy guys, let see if any of you can help me with this problem. I'm trying to add a workstation to a VLAN, so I have readed the guides and I 1) Did a patch to the kernel to be able to use 8021q 2) recompiled and installed the new kernel So now I should be able to add this workstation with linux to my vlan. But the problem is that I can not make a ping to my bridge/router. As it is sayd in the guide of cisco LINUX VLAN + Cisco Howto that you can find in www.candelatech.com/~greear/vlan/cisco_howto.html first you have to move everything to vlans, so you don't set ip address to the real interfaces, but set vlan interfaces. So to set eth0 with no ip I did : ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 up Then I wanted to add a vlan to this workstation so I went to my vlan directory and with the comand vconfig : vconfig add eth0 10 This should create a device called vlan0010 but it creates a device called eth0.10. So now Linux should think that eth0.10 is just another network device, so I can configure it like any other. What I did was ifconfig eth0.10 192.168.1.3 broadcast 192.168.1.255 netmask 255.255.255.0 So if you trust the guide the configuration is over and it should work. The problem is that, when I try to make a ping to the interface conected to this workstation in the bridge I don't receive anything. Do any of you know why? Thank's for your help guys ___ Yahoo! Móviles Personaliza tu móvil con tu logo y melodía favorito en http://moviles.yahoo.es --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] bridge.lrp
Hello everyone: I'm trying to install the package BRIDGE.LRP, I've copied it in the floppy disk and I've edited and modified the syslinux.cfg file. Then I've used the lrpkg -i comand to install the package but I want to work with it and I can't. Do any of you guys know why? Did I do anything wrong? Thank's for your help. ___ Yahoo! Móviles Personaliza tu móvil con tu logo y melodía favorito en http://moviles.yahoo.es --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Install the vlan.lrp
hey, an easy question: I'm new using the LRP, and I'm trying to install a package called vlan.lrp. I'm following all the instructions that I've read in the manual Leaf Bering instalation guide: I've copied the package in the floppy disk and then I've edited the syslinux.cfg and I've added the name of the package to the LRP= list. Then I've made a backup of the package and of the floppy disk and I've restarted the system. After the system was restarted I've used the comand lrpkg -i to install the package. I know that with all this the package has to be installed, becouse if I do lrpkg -l it shows a list of the packages already installed and the vlan.lrp is there. Then I made a backup of the floppy again and I've restarted the system. But the vlan.lrp provides a script called vconfig to configure vlan's and when I try to use this comand like this: vconfig add eth1 10 it shows me an error saying that it couldn't open the directory /proc/net/vlan/vconfing and so the package it's not installed becouse there is not any directory /proc/net/vlan Could any of you guys tell me if I've miss something in this procces to install this package? I've followed the instructions of the Leaf Bering instalation guide but it seems that it doesn't work. Thank's and I hope you'll can help me in this. bye ___ Yahoo! Postales Felicita las Navidades con las postales más divertidas desde http://postales.yahoo.es --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Bridging
hey, can any of you tell me how I can make a bridge between two interfaces in a computer with LRP?, I need the two interfaces with two IP address. I'll apreciate if any of you can give me the solution or if you know any document to read. thanks ___ Yahoo! Postales Felicita las Navidades con las postales más divertidas desde http://postales.yahoo.es --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
