Re: [LegacyUG] Windows 7
I've been running Legacy 7 on Windows 7 since the beta. Upgraded to release candidate when it came out, and have since upgraded to the retail version. No problems whatsoever. Jim On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 6:19 AM, Jackie bakerj...@gmail.com wrote: I'm running it on windows 7 but I'm a new user so I haven't asked it to do a whole lot. Gedcom import and looking at features. No problems though. Sent from my iPhone On Nov 5, 2009, at 1:18 PM, Christina Hruska bohemian1...@gmail.com wrote: I searched through the archives and the only answers were on the beta release of Windows 7. Now that is has officially been released has anyone try Legacy with Windows 7 yet? Any problem areas or should be a smooth transition. I will be installing it on a new system next week. tfyip, Christina Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Remarriage
Duh, why didn't I think of that grin Thanks, Ken, I was negligent in not searching the archives first. I can always claim the onset of senility, but I'll try not to let it happen again. The last answer there was just what I was looking for. Thanks all. Jim On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 1:48 AM, Ken genfol...@rogers.com wrote: Jim, Regarding the handling of couples remarrying each other following a divorce, you may want to follow this thread which appeared in the Legacy Archives back in 2007 http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/msg09867.html Ken in Ottawa - Original Message - From: Jim Walton jimwalt...@gmail.com To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 9:25 AM Subject: [LegacyUG] Remarriage I have a cousin that married, divorced, then remarried the same individual several years later. Should I treat this as two separate marriages or merely add divorce and remarriage events? I keep vacillating back and forth so would like to hear how some of our professionals handle this situation. Jim Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Tidying Up Addresses
The country name generally erroneously entered as United Kingdom or Great Britain is actually England. Great Britain is the island that includes England, Scotland, and Wales. The United Kingdom includes these three countries and adds Northern Ireland. I'm sure Ron will correct me if I'm wrong, at least I hope he will... You probably need to change your references to England as the country. Jim On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 7:47 PM, June Chan mai_l...@aapt.net.au wrote: I wait with baited breath to find out what I am doing wrong.. Thanks for the search and replace suggestion Jenny. Regards June What I would do is each time across a location with, say, UK that I wanted to be United Kingdom(*) is use Search and Replace, selecting Lists - Location for the Find where. Then repeat for Lists - Location Short and Lists - Location Sorted. (*) Except, of course, that I wouldn't have used UK or United Kingdom in a location name! Oh dear, I'm afraid you might have set Ron off again!!! -- Jenny M Benson Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Question about mass cleanup of location
The problems with doing this are presented in the 2nd CD tutorial. If you try to sort your localities by county or state, having the cemetery in the city location will cause the city to sort as a county. A better option is to use the + symbol by the burial and then enter the cemetery location and address in the burial address field. This way the location field can be used as designed, and the complete address information is available. Jim On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Jenny M Benson ge...@cedarbank.me.uk wrote: Randy Clark wrote OK, testing your method, I have a location: Warrington Reformed Lutheren Church, Dover Twp, York Co, Pennsylvania So I click on Sort (which has been set to right-to-left) and then can't find the location at all. This is why I thought that the use of parentheses was necessary. Am I wrong? Your list should still be alphabetical and if you slide down to the Ps you should find all the Pennsylvanias together and near the bottom of them Pennsylvania, York County and if you have several locations in York Country Dover Twp is probably one of the first and again, if you have several locations in Dover Twp I suspect Warrington Reformed Lutheran Church is one of the last. (It's simply a case of knowing your alphabet, you see!) -- Jenny M Benson Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
[LegacyUG] Remarriage
I have a cousin that married, divorced, then remarried the same individual several years later. Should I treat this as two separate marriages or merely add divorce and remarriage events? I keep vacillating back and forth so would like to hear how some of our professionals handle this situation. Jim Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Archives
Hi Lyn, HTML adds bold, color, and other fancy things to the text. The problem is that it also slows the system down and some users are on slower dial up connections so they have a problem getting the html messages. I started out with HTML too, not realizing the impact. So, no harm done and welcome to the list. Jim On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Lyn chedo...@mysoul.com.au wrote: G'day All In looking in the archives I noticed that someone was not impressed with HTML being used.I think I just did it with my last message. I do apologise as I don't know the difference between HTML and plain text. cheers Lyn Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Former generations users
You've probably already heard this, and you'll probably hear it again. The absolute best way to learn the program is with the tutorial CDs. The beginner CD is free and online, but you have to buy the others. Personally I would like to see them all as a part of the package when you buy it, but I don't regret for a minute that I went ahead and made the purchase. It will walk you through all the main features with video demonstrations as you go. I refer back to them now and again when I'm having an issue with something. Jim On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:38 AM, S. Fry azg...@rsib.net wrote: Hi Judy, I used Generations EasyTree for many years before switching to Legacy 7. One reason I chose Legacy was its similarites to Generations in how data is presented (the interface.) But Legacy has so many wonderful features that Generations never had! The biggest tip I have for you is to learn to use the clipboards, both the Source clipboard and the Event clipboard. These are also two of the features that were the hardest for me to learn how to use. I read and re-read the help files Clipboard, Source and Clipboard, Event many times, and read postings to this list before it finally clicked for me. But once learned, it makes adding the same event or source to many different people an absolute breeze. The second tip would be to decide early on how to organize and name your sources as this will determine how they appear in the Master Source List, and it will make it much easier for you to find the source again. In Legacy the Master Source List is displayed in numeric and alphabetic order whereas in Generations the Source List is in order by the number assigned to the source when you entered it. There has been a great deal of discussion on this list about how to organize sources -- to lump or split, to group by state or by event (birth, death, marriage, etc.) and on and on. You can check the archived messages at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ If there is something specific about using Legacy that you would like to ask about, please do. There are many people on this list who have used Legacy for many years, who are always willing to help, and who know much more about Legacy than I do. If you want to contact me off-list, that will be fine also. Sherry azg...@rsib.net From Bowlegs, Okla. - Original Message - From: Judy To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 6:32 PM Subject: [LegacyUG] Former generations users I would like to exchange info with ppl who have switched from Generations software to Legacy. I am having a hard time learning and wonder if someone there in my boat (or who has been in my boat) has any tips! Thanks, Judy Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Setting Birth Location for tagged individuals
Check out LTools from ZipperSoftware. It will allow you to view the tables, enter sql statements, and a lot of functionality is already built in. Check if out, it's a deal that is too good to pass up. (The help has a list of every table and what it contains - very helpful). Jim On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Roger Jarrett rhjarr...@xtra.co.nz wrote: Hi I was wondering if anybody can help with this problem. I have a large number of tagged individuals that I want to set their birth location to be the same. At the moment I cannot see any way to quickly do this other than editing each individual separately. I am able to use Microsoft Access and SQL if somebody could point me to the relevant tables and fields. Regards Roger Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Most have switched?
One thing you may not be aware of is that you can copy your training CDs directly to your hard drive and run them from there. What I did was to create a directory called Video Training and under that created a directory for each CD with the name, such as CD 1 - Legacy for Beginners. Then I just copied the entire CD to that directory. There are actually only two things you need to copy. The program file, in the example Legacy_for_Beginners.exe and the folder Media. The autorun.inf file is only used to start the program automatically when you insert a CD so there is no need to copy that to your hard drive. But, it won't hurt anything if you do. The entire first series of 5 CDs takes up less than 1 GB on the hard drive. In my estimation, it is a very worthwhile investment of hard drive space. You now have a lot of answers right at your fingertips. Jim Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Source details
Wow, I got confused and I use the source clipboard all the time. Here's step-by-step. 1. Open a new event and name it. I generally use Residence instead of Census, but that's just a personal choice. 2. To the left of the description you will see a blue triangle. Click on it. This will open the source clipboard. 3. On the source clipboard select step 1 to create a new source. If you already have the master source created, just select it on the master source list, or create a new one if necessary. 4. When finished you will be returned to the source clipboard where you can fill in all the details you need for the individual involved. 5. Make sure the Prompt for Detail box at the bottom of the page is checked so you can change information for each individual if you need to. 6. Click Save in the upper right corner. 7. You are now back on the event page, so click the little dash just below the triangle. That says to add information from the source clipboard. 8. That will open the detail page so you can change name, etc. if you need to. Click Save at upper right. 9. finish the event page and save it. You only have to do this once. To enter an event for another person, add the event, click the dash, make any changes, save and done. I recommend the training CDs. They cover this in a lot more detail plus a lot more. It was a hard decision for me to make because I'm retired and on a fixed limited income. But, I'm glad I did. It is well worth the investment. Jim On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Angela Gabbard gabba...@sbcglobal.net wrote: Hi, Need some basic help. I am using the source writer and have created my source and attached to an individual. I am now trying to attach the same source to a second person including the exact same details. The source writer prompts me to enter new source details but I don't want to have to retype everything a 2nd time. What am I missing? Thanks in Advance! Angela Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Locations in England
Thanks, Ron. You just saved me looking like an idiot on the B-G Forum. I was just getting ready to ask this same question. A nice addition to Legacy might be a change to the master list page. When you edit a location a template pops up. Enter the country and the proper fields then pop up to fill in. Kind of like the source templates. Maybe somebody should suggest it. (I've already made too many suggestions they don't like... grin) Jim On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Ron Ferguson rnldfe...@tiscali.co.uk wrote: Brian Beddor wrote: I have a copy of a 1901 England census from Ancestry.com and the location is: Administrative County: Lancaster Civil Parish of Chatburn Ecclesiastical Parish of Christ Church Chatburn. How would I list this in the Location field of Legacy in keeping with the recommendation for 4 fields (city; county; state or province; country)? Also, would the country be England or United Kingdom? I tried a couple of options but when I clicked on the Geo Location List button, it didn't seem to find it. Thanks, Brian Brian, As has been said many times on this list the *American* 4 field system is for America (and it doesn't always apply there so I am told). It may apply in your case, I'll look in a minute, but even if it happens to it will not for many, many locations in the UK. And on to my hobby horse :-) The UK is the United Kingdom of Great Broitain and Northerm Ireland, comprising the *countries* of England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales; it is a Kingdom not a country, and over here we do not have states. So the answer to this part of your question is that the country is England *not England GB and *not* England UK. The next tier is the county, in this case the Aministrative County of Lancaster, which for our current purposes is actually called Lancashire - yeh, I know, it's in our blood to complicate things :-). When looking at parishes it is normal for us to look at the civil parish rather than the ecclesiastical as the latter may just be the name of a church. In this case they are the same, but that is happenchance. So, The full location is: Chatburn, Lancashire, England. Like I said - forget 4 fields, it doesn't apply, and to make it so would be incorrect. Incidentally the 4 field system doesn't work for most of Europe either. Ron Ferguson _ New Tutorial: Embed Blogger RSS feed into your Website http://www.fergys.co.uk Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/ For The Fergusons of N.W. England http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Search and Replace in Source Detail, Name, Text/Comments
From the main menu select Search-Search and Replace, or just type Ctrl-H. Then clickk on the field that says Surname and scroll down the field to the Notes field you want. This will do a global replace. Jim On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 4:07 AM, Christopher Barttels chrisbartt...@msn.com wrote: In the Family View, I click on the icon for Show List of Assigned Sources, which brings up Assigned Sources For: I click on Name then click Edit Detail, which brings up the Edit Source Detail, and then click on the tab for Text/Comments. This is where I am trying to change hundred-plus occurances of coningum to coniugum. I hope this helps. Sorry for the confusion. Christopher Barttels Dayton, WA - Original Message - *From:* Ron Ferguson rnldfe...@tiscali.co.uk *To:* LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com *Sent:* Friday, October 16, 2009 11:43 AM *Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] Search and Replace in Source Detail, Name, Text/Comments I really do not understand what you mean. There are Given name, Surname, Dates-Birth, Dates-Baptism, Location fields for each and notes, for all of which one can use Search and Replace, so exactly where are you putting this word? Ron Ferguson _ New Tutorial: Embed Blogger RSS feed into your Website http://www.fergys.co.uk Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/ For The Fergusons of N.W. England http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Where to write notes
I'm assuming when you say source text and source comments you are referring to the detail text and comments. That's what I was saying, only not so clearly as you did. Thanks for the response. Jim On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Jenny M Benson ge...@cedarbank.me.ukwrote: Jim Walton wrote When I create an event, where is the best place to enter the notes. Right now, what I am doing is if I quote the source, I put the quote in the source details. If I just make a comment in reference to the source, I put the comment in the event notes. I've not done a lot with reports other than to print a few for proofing, so I'm not sure how best to do this. I would like to know what other people do, and if there is a best way to do this to get the information printed on the reports. It all depends on what is meant by Notes! If I want to make a comment or note about the Event itself, I will put it into Event Notes. If I want to include the actual text of the Source in the Citation I enter it in Source Text. If I want to make a comment or note about the Source, I will make it in Source Comments. And while we're on the subject, general notes about the individual go in General Notes and stuff that is relevant to my researches and really only of interest to me goes in Research Notes. I do not include the latter in Reports. -- Jenny M Benson Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Where to write notes
Thanks, Jenny. Hadn't thought about that for the web sites, but I like the idea. Every day I learn something more from this list. Jim On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Jenny M Benson ge...@cedarbank.me.ukwrote: Jim Walton wrote I'm assuming when you say source text and source comments you are referring to the detail text and comments. Again, it depends! It's rare that I have a Master Source which doesn't have various different Source Details so Comments might go with either Master or Detail (or different Comments in both) but Text is more likely to go with the Detail. When my Source is, for example, a Website I will include in the Master Source Text a description of the website, usually copied and pasted from the site itself. For example, The information included in the India Office Family History Search website is taken from a card index hitherto available only at the British Library. The card index was compiled by members of staff at the India Office Records from the mid-1970s onwards to meet the growing interest in genealogy. -- Jenny M Benson Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy Genelines
Amen to that. And who are the worst at keeping our own counsel? Those of us who work with computers every day and know better. One thing I will often do with a downloaded program like this is to write it to a CD. That way I've always got a backup of the original program. (This time I got smart and sprang for the bundle which gave me a CD copy...) Jim On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:25 PM, William H. Boswell whbosw...@gmail.comwrote: Make sure you back it up afterward. One thing I've learned many times is you can't trust hard drives. Bill Boswell -Original Message- From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com]on Behalf Of Diane Szabo Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2009 5:18 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy Genelines Good idea - I'll give that a try. Thank you! Diane - Original Message - From: Robert Carneal USA carnea...@adelphia.net To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2009 1:41 PM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy Genelines I would contact sales first. Seeing you paid for it, they would want to keep you happy. Unless, there is a newer version out and they can't get you the older version for some reason. Sales has always helped me; they are pretty helpful. Thanks. Robert At 2009-10-11 02:35 PM, you wrote: Hello. Due to a major malfunction on my PC, I lost my Legacy Genelines program. I have my registration key, but can someone explain what I need to do to download the program again without having to pay - again - for my subscription? Please and thanks, Diane Szabo Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Here is a good example
I download this in Firefox with no problems. In fact, I don't even download the program, I just select run from the download option page and it installs automatically. (use the .exe not the .zip) Remember, always back up your database before running LToos and then verify the changes before you accept it as final. I always keep the last 30 days of backup on my computer just in case. Jim On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:21 AM, Myrna mjorgens...@hot.rr.com wrote: In case anyone else is trying this and can't get it to download, try using Internet Explorer instead of your current browser. Myrna - Original Message - From: Ron Ferguson rnldfe...@tiscali.co.uk To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 3:07 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Here is a good example Michele Lewis wrote: I have a married couple that are both marked as living. Their son was born in 1847. I think that Legacy should be able to say that his parents are dead. michele Dennis has now written an LTool which will do this job for you see http://zippersoftware.com/ltools/download.html. Ron Ferguson Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
[LegacyUG] Where to write notes
When I create an event, where is the best place to enter the notes. Right now, what I am doing is if I quote the source, I put the quote in the source details. If I just make a comment in reference to the source, I put the comment in the event notes. I've not done a lot with reports other than to print a few for proofing, so I'm not sure how best to do this. I would like to know what other people do, and if there is a best way to do this to get the information printed on the reports. Thank you. Jim
Re: [LegacyUG] Death location
In keeping with standard locations I'm wondering if I could consider the ship as the city, leave the county and state fields blank, and use South Atlantic for the country. At least that way it would sort properly. Then in the notes I could give the details. Perhaps I'm being too critical. Jim On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:16 AM, Kramer kramer...@comcast.net wrote: We just had a cremation and possible private burial on farmland that I want to verify so I'm ready to do one of those too. This is how I would do it. In the Burial Notes or maybe burial location, I would mention buried at sea and which water area if that is what happened. In Death Notes I would mention that the death took place aboard a ship in the South Atlantic or whatever the situation is. With regard to cremation, I would note the cremation in the death notes if necessary, but I find burial more important. Since there are so many people scattering ashes to the wind, it will be very difficult for genealogists in the future. For the sake of locating the burial location, if given a choice, I would choose to note the burial location. The date of cremation is not an issue to me. Death and burial are the important things, just like the date of embalming is not noted. I would only use cremation date to note that we won't be able to find a burial spot due to a different disposal (gee, not very reverent) of the remains. Whether cremated or embalmed, if burial takes place, that takes precedence. If there is no burial, then I would note cremation to show that no burial took place. Ellen Kramer Researching and loving Dorman, Kramer, Mirarchi, Procopio, Renninger and Staudt-Stoudt-Stout families On Oct 9, 2009, at 10:34 PM, William H. Boswell wrote: I was wondering the same thing and am glad somebody asked it. I have a twist on one person: the person donated his body to a medical school, then was cremated. No idea where the cremains were buried. I noticed you can't select both cremated and burial. It's either one or the other. I think I have a separate event for cremations. Bill Boswell -Original Message- From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com]on Behalf Of Jim Walton Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 10:21 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Death location I have an uncle who died aboard ship during WW II. What do I put as his death location? I currently have Aboard ship in South Atlantic. On a similar topic, what to do about cremation. They are cremated and buried, but not necessarily on the same day. Do you just select cremated and then use the date and place of burial? I guess the cremation could be entered as an event, and then the burial record entered for burial. I really don't think it's a critical issue, but I'm curious how others are handling this. Jim Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Death location
Thanks, Ron, that's what I was looking for. Jim On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Ron Ferguson rnldfe...@tiscali.co.ukwrote: Jim, It is your database, so you can do as you wish. Nevertheless what you are suggesting would be incorrect. The usual way is to include at sea and, if one knows, it the name of the sea. I have a few of these and they sort fine at or near the start of the list: At sea, The English Channel, At Sea, The Atlantic Ocean etc. Ron Ferguson _ New Tutorial: Embed Blogger RSS feed into your Website http://www.fergys.co.uk Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/ For The Fergusons of N.W. England http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ - Original Message - *From:* Jim Walton jimwalt...@gmail.com *To:* LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com *Sent:* 12 October 2009 07:15 *Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] Death location In keeping with standard locations I'm wondering if I could consider the ship as the city, leave the county and state fields blank, and use South Atlantic for the country. At least that way it would sort properly. Then in the notes I could give the details. Perhaps I'm being too critical. Jim On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:16 AM, Kramer kramer...@comcast.net wrote: We just had a cremation and possible private burial on farmland that I want to verify so I'm ready to do one of those too. This is how I would do it. In the Burial Notes or maybe burial location, I would mention buried at sea and which water area if that is what happened. In Death Notes I would mention that the death took place aboard a ship in the South Atlantic or whatever the situation is. With regard to cremation, I would note the cremation in the death notes if necessary, but I find burial more important. Since there are so many people scattering ashes to the wind, it will be very difficult for genealogists in the future. For the sake of locating the burial location, if given a choice, I would choose to note the burial location. The date of cremation is not an issue to me. Death and burial are the important things, just like the date of embalming is not noted. I would only use cremation date to note that we won't be able to find a burial spot due to a different disposal (gee, not very reverent) of the remains. Whether cremated or embalmed, if burial takes place, that takes precedence. If there is no burial, then I would note cremation to show that no burial took place. Ellen Kramer Researching and loving Dorman, Kramer, Mirarchi, Procopio, Renninger and Staudt-Stoudt-Stout families On Oct 9, 2009, at 10:34 PM, William H. Boswell wrote: I was wondering the same thing and am glad somebody asked it. I have a twist on one person: the person donated his body to a medical school, then was cremated. No idea where the cremains were buried. I noticed you can't select both cremated and burial. It's either one or the other. I think I have a separate event for cremations. Bill Boswell -Original Message- From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com]on Behalf Of Jim Walton Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 10:21 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Death location I have an uncle who died aboard ship during WW II. What do I put as his death location? I currently have Aboard ship in South Atlantic. On a similar topic, what to do about cremation. They are cremated and buried, but not necessarily on the same day. Do you just select cremated and then use the date and place of burial? I guess the cremation could be entered as an event, and then the burial record entered for burial. I really don't think it's a critical issue, but I'm curious how others are handling this. Jim Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.421 / Virus Database: 270.14.9/2428 - Release Date: 10/11/09 06:39:00 Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
Re: [LegacyUG] [Legacy] Emailing info
Probably the best option would be to create a PDF file as almost everyone has the capability to read that format. If they don't, the reader can be downloaded free. Jim On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 4:02 AM, Kramer kramer...@comcast.net wrote: This may seem elementary to the more techie people, but how do I email a report, not the entire family file, to someone? I wanted to send someone just her greatgrandparents on down so she could review for content and make additions and corrections. I could only figure out how to print and mail to her. That would make it more costly for me to do that for lots of people. Any detailed instructions would be most helpful. Most likely these would be in the Descendant Book format, but some might be in the Ancestor format. Thanks and God bless, Ellen Kramer Researching and loving Dorman, Kramer, Mirarchi, Procopio, Renninger and Staudt-Stoudt-Stout families Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
[LegacyUG] Death location
I have an uncle who died aboard ship during WW II. What do I put as his death location? I currently have Aboard ship in South Atlantic. On a similar topic, what to do about cremation. They are cremated and buried, but not necessarily on the same day. Do you just select cremated and then use the date and place of burial? I guess the cremation could be entered as an event, and then the burial record entered for burial. I really don't think it's a critical issue, but I'm curious how others are handling this. Jim
Re: [LegacyUG] Here is a good example
When you go to Options-Customize-Data Entry to set the age you want them to be presumed dead, you must then hit the Apply button. This will go through your database and mark everyone over the selected age as dead unless they have a date in the death field. So, if you decide to mark everyone over 100 as dead, and you have an ancester who lived to 102, Legacy will leave that one record alone, but mark everyone else dead at age 100. It is important that you hit the Apply button to change your database. Jim On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Michele Lewis cranberryf...@charter.netwrote: I have a married couple that are both marked as living. Their son was born in 1847. I think that Legacy should be able to say that his parents are dead. michele Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Census information
Got a reply from Legacy and their response was basically like it or lump it. Except I can't lump it so I guess it's like it or split it. Too bad because I really think it would make a census much easier to cite. Jin On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Ron Ferguson rnldfe...@tiscali.co.ukwrote: I had not considered that as a possible reason as to why I am a lumper, Jim, but you may well be right. It certainly is natural way of working for me rather than something which I actually gave consideration to when I first started out. Ron Ferguson _ New Tutorial: Embed Blogger RSS feed into your Website http://www.fergys.co.uk Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/ For The Fergusons of N.W. England http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ - Original Message - From: Jim Walton To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Sent: 07 October 2009 00:50 Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Census information I guess my problem stems from my history with computers. I grew up in the days that if you did something on a computer more than twice, you write a program to automate the task. (This was back in the 70s when most people still didn't believe such a thing as a personal computer was very useful.) When I look at a list of sources, I would much rather see three or four sources that are easy to locate and then add the state, county, and city information in the detail record. I see the census as a single source with a series of volumes, one for each state. Each volume would have a number of chapters, one for each county. Guess I'm a lumper, but that seems much more practical to me. Just one man's opinion... Jim On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 7:04 AM, Janis L Gilmore rajan...@earthlink.net wrote: In theory, it seems as if that would be true. But I haven't done much combining of sources, so I can't speak with any authority. g Janis On 10/5/09 4:21 PM, Bruce Jones juicebo...@gmail.com wrote: It seems to me that it is easier for a Splitter to move toward being a Lumper (by combining Master Sources) than it is for a Lumper to move towards being a Splitter. Do you agree? On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 4:25 AM, Janis L Gilmore rajan...@earthlink.net wrote: Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Census information
Evidence Explained says that a web site should not be used as a repository, so I don't. The only time I would have a repository is if it is a brick and mortar location like a genealogical library or personally owned copy. Web documents are digital images, and most templates have that capability. It's hard to find on some until you realize that a book image on the web is considered a reprint, so select book, reprint, online book, and then all the information goes in the right place. I had asked Legacy about it and never got a straight answer. I found it by accident while reading Ms. Mills and she mentioned the reprint issue. The more I use Legacy the easier it gets, but that's the normal way of things. Sure beats the old paper and pen method I was used to. Jim On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Jenny M Benson ge...@cedarbank.me.ukwrote: Mike Fry wrote Perhaps this is why I see so many Americans opting to 'split' and Europeans opting to 'lump'! If so, then aren't the lumpers confusing Source and Repository? I don't make a great deal of use of Repository I must admit. An example of one of my Census Sources (first time citation) reads 1851 census of England; digital images, The Generations Network, Ancestry ( www.ancestry.co.uk); citing PRO HO107; Original data: Census Returns of England and Wales, 1851. Kew, Surrey, England: The National Archives of the UK (TNA): Public Record Office (PRO), 1851. Data imaged from the National Archives, London, England. At the moment, all my Census information has come from Ancestry. In due course I will be obtaining some from FindMyPast, at which time I will add additional Master Sources for the Censuses from FMP. By the same token, I have several different Birth/Marriage/Death Index Master Sources because I access the GRO ones from both FreeBMD and Ancestry and Ancestry and have made various changes to their databases over the years and each Master Source relates to one database. So perhaps I'm not as much of a lumper as some database purists would like, but I definitely class myself as a lumper rather than a splitter! -- Jenny M Benson Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format, other bugs in reports
A pdf file is an image, similar to a jpg file. If it is created from a text file it has a text layer that can be indexed and modified, etc. It's quite easy to move a text or rtf file into pdf format, but a totally different matter to go the other way. I think the problem is that Legacy is a genealogical tool, not a reporting tool. The reporting section is very cumbersome and has no real formatting capabilities beyond the bare minimum. It might be better for them to partner with another company/program for the reporting functions. So far the main use I've seen in the report feature is to dump reports to the printer for proofreading and database corrections. I could never conceive of using it to create a document for publication. I did try to create one rtf report and got a single page that told me I could now import into my word processor and create an index because all the headings used heading tags. Very convenient, but the rest of the report was blank. (grin) Jim On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 1:21 AM, CE Wood wood...@msn.com wrote: The problem / BUG is that when the report is Previewed or in PDF, The Index/Indices is shown/printed. When it is Text or RTF (if allowed) the Index/Indices are NOT! If a report shows something in Preview, it needs to print it in ALL permissible formats! CE From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf Of Jim Walton Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 5:08 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format, other bugs in reports It seems to be designed that way. If you go through each of the reports you will see what printing options are available on the right, under the image of the printer. Family and descendant will do text, html, and pdf. Pedigree will only do pdf. Not sure why they aren't available in rtf because it is certainly capable of doing it. My plan is to do all my writing in Word, and importing a pdf of group sheets, etc. as images into the document. I'm just disappointed that I can't create an rtf of the source report so that I could then create a bibliography and reference that in my text. Jim On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 7:23 AM, CE Wood wood...@msn.com wrote: I am trying to produce Individual, Family, Ancestor, Descendant, and Lineage Reports. When I choose Text file or HTML (there is no option for RTF), the file is produced without any indices, even though both Name and Location indices have been selected and do appear in Preview and PDF. Also, when using Publishing Center, the HTML report includes only the first chapter of the book even though Preview and PDF include all the chapters. And, in the book, the Name Index for the book includes ONLY the names from the first chapter. CE Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.420 / Virus Database: 270.14.3/2409 - Release Date: 10/07/09 05:18:00 Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format, other bugs in reports
I agree totally. I think the report tool should be used for personal reports for either archiving or editing purposes, and a totally separate program needs to be used for publishing. Naturally users of the program would like an all-in-one solution, but Microsoft can't even get their suite of office apps to play nice together. I think the Legacy programmers should stick to what they do best, creating the best genealogy program available. That's why I suggested a partnership with another group whose specialty is publishing. A good team would be unbeatable. All that needs to be done is to create hooks between the two so that there is a seamless interface between what Legacy produces and what the document writer needs. I think that for Millennia to get wrapped around the documentation axle would detract from what they need to be doing, keeping the best program as the best. Jim On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 5:18 AM, Ron Ferguson rnldfe...@tiscali.co.ukwrote: Jim, Whilst I broadly agree with you comments regarding the Legacy reporting (except for the blank page which I have never experienced) as I have said before, it is my belief that those asking for what would amount to a fully fledged word processor as part of the program are asking for far too much. The total size of the package would be far too big for many, and why should Legacy reinvent the wheel when it is there in Word, Open Office and a number of other programs. If it is ever done then let us add onto the list a fully fledged web page designer, after all, why should the web creation section of users be not have an equivalent tool for their chosen method of publication. Naturally, it should have the attributes of Dreamweaver or Front Page in order to meet all the demands which may be required. It shouldn't really be any bigger than a word processor and the total package should come in at not a lot more than 200MB. Pity that this is too big for Africa and the rural areas of many other countries (including the USA) where dial up is on the only access, but those of us with broadband should be fine. Or maybe we should have several different versions with escalating prices in order to meet all the available customisations. Please don't think that I am suggesting for one minute, Jim, that this is your view, I feel sure that it isn't. In one form or an other this argument has been going on for years, so please excuse the rant :-) Ron Ferguson _ New Tutorial: Embed Blogger RSS feed into your Website http://www.fergys.co.uk Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/ For The Fergusons of N.W. England http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ - Original Message - From: Jim Walton To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Sent: 07 October 2009 20:42 Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format, other bugs in reports A pdf file is an image, similar to a jpg file. If it is created from a text file it has a text layer that can be indexed and modified, etc. It's quite easy to move a text or rtf file into pdf format, but a totally different matter to go the other way. I think the problem is that Legacy is a genealogical tool, not a reporting tool. The reporting section is very cumbersome and has no real formatting capabilities beyond the bare minimum. It might be better for them to partner with another company/program for the reporting functions. So far the main use I've seen in the report feature is to dump reports to the printer for proofreading and database corrections. I could never conceive of using it to create a document for publication. I did try to create one rtf report and got a single page that told me I could now import into my word processor and create an index because all the headings used heading tags. Very convenient, but the rest of the report was blank. (grin) Jim On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 1:21 AM, CE Wood wood...@msn.com wrote: The problem / BUG is that when the report is Previewed or in PDF, The Index/Indices is shown/printed. When it is Text or RTF (if allowed) the Index/Indices are NOT! If a report shows something in Preview, it needs to print it in ALL permissible formats! CE From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf Of Jim Walton Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 5:08 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format, other bugs in reports It seems to be designed that way. If you go through each of the reports you will see what printing options are available on the right, under the image of the printer. Family and descendant will do text, html, and pdf. Pedigree will only do pdf. Not sure why they aren't available in rtf because it is certainly capable of doing it. My plan is to do all my writing in Word, and importing
Re: [LegacyUG] Census information
I guess my problem stems from my history with computers. I grew up in the days that if you did something on a computer more than twice, you write a program to automate the task. (This was back in the 70s when most people still didn't believe such a thing as a personal computer was very useful.) When I look at a list of sources, I would much rather see three or four sources that are easy to locate and then add the state, county, and city information in the detail record. I see the census as a single source with a series of volumes, one for each state. Each volume would have a number of chapters, one for each county. Guess I'm a lumper, but that seems much more practical to me. Just one man's opinion... Jim On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 7:04 AM, Janis L Gilmore rajan...@earthlink.netwrote: In theory, it seems as if that would be true. But I haven't done much combining of sources, so I can't speak with any authority. g Janis On 10/5/09 4:21 PM, Bruce Jones juicebo...@gmail.com wrote: It seems to me that it is easier for a Splitter to move toward being a Lumper (by combining Master Sources) than it is for a Lumper to move towards being a Splitter. Do you agree? On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 4:25 AM, Janis L Gilmore rajan...@earthlink.net wrote: Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format, other bugs in reports
It seems to be designed that way. If you go through each of the reports you will see what printing options are available on the right, under the image of the printer. Family and descendant will do text, html, and pdf. Pedigree will only do pdf. Not sure why they aren't available in rtf because it is certainly capable of doing it. My plan is to do all my writing in Word, and importing a pdf of group sheets, etc. as images into the document. I'm just disappointed that I can't create an rtf of the source report so that I could then create a bibliography and reference that in my text. Jim On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 7:23 AM, CE Wood wood...@msn.com wrote: I am trying to produce Individual, Family, Ancestor, Descendant, and Lineage Reports. When I choose Text file or HTML (there is no option for RTF), the file is produced without any indices, even though both Name and Location indices have been selected and do appear in Preview and PDF. Also, when using Publishing Center, the HTML report includes only the first chapter of the book even though Preview and PDF include all the chapters. And, in the book, the Name Index for the book includes ONLY the names from the first chapter. CE Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Census information
Agreed, and I'm having an issue right now with some state documents that contain many volumes, but every document has a separate title. Fortunately only a handfull of records are affected, but it looks like I'm going to have to split in this case and make every volume a separate source. So, I guess it works both ways. Jim On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Bruce Jones juicebo...@gmail.com wrote: I have gone the other way (splitting one master source into multiple), and it was a *lot* of work. On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Janis L Gilmore rajan...@earthlink.net wrote: In theory, it seems as if that would be true. But I haven't done much combining of sources, so I can't speak with any authority. g Janis On 10/5/09 4:21 PM, Bruce Jones juicebo...@gmail.com wrote: It seems to me that it is easier for a Splitter to move toward being a Lumper (by combining Master Sources) than it is for a Lumper to move towards being a Splitter. Do you agree? On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 4:25 AM, Janis L Gilmore rajan...@earthlink.net wrote: Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Census information
Would that also include the details attached to that source? I've not tried the search function, so not sure how it will work. I'm real new to Legacy, so still feeling my way along as I go. When I bought the bundle I didn't see the second set of tutorial CDs so maybe I need to invest in them too. Jim On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Ron Ferguson rnldfe...@tiscali.co.uk wrote: You can't beat a good cringe! Don't forget that in V7 one can search the Source Citations for eg. contains Alabama (SeachFindDetailed Search). Ron Ferguson _ New Tutorial: Embed Blogger RSS feed into your Website http://www.fergys.co.uk Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/ For The Fergusons of N.W. England http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ Kirsten Bowman wrote: Jim: You're welcome. But just be forewarned: Someday you might want to know which families were all living in the same state at the same time . . . or the same county. Then you'll be on the road to splitting. I split at the county level and probably have well over 200 census sources but it bothers me not at all. (A certain Ron is cringing at this G.) Kirsten -Original Message- From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com]on Behalf Of Jim Walton Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2009 8:56 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Census information Thanks, Kirsten. It looks pretty good, so in the meantime I'll do it that way. You said it's extreme, but consider that a census is a document with 50 volumes, each volume has hundreds of chapters. Even the 1790 census would have at least 13 sources plus the counties. Even narrowing it down to states would produce over 50, considering territories such a Puerto Rico and Guam. But maybe I'm being too detailed. Anyway, your suggestion will work as a work-around. Thanks again. Jim On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Kirsten Bowman vik...@rvi.net wrote: Jim: That's pretty extreme lumping, but it should be easy to do. (And just today I wrote that I'm reforming from this!) Anyway, why can't you just create a Master Source called 1790 US Census and leave out the other location details. Then on the Source Detail screen on the Source Clipboard, you put the state, county, etc. in the ID of Person field. That seems to create a pretty decent looking citation. Kirsten -Original Message- From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com]on Behalf Of Jim Walton Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2009 4:41 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Census information I record census information as part of residency then I can do a chronology showing residence to compare people I think may be related. I then use the source writer for the census information and supplement it in the notes with my comments, such as children, etc. that clarify the numbers a little better. Problem is, the source writer asks for the state and county in the master source rather than in the detail. That means that I have multiple sources for the same area because different states and counties are involved. I want a single source for 1790, 1800, etc. rather than 1790-New Hampshire-Grafton,1790-New Hampshire-etc... Then the detail would include the local information. I have made a suggestion to Legacy to make the change as using the override to redo the citations is cumbersome, but I would like to get some feedback on my idea, methods, and other possibilities. Jim Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
[LegacyUG] sorting children
Is there a way to do a bulk sort on all children so they appear in date order? I have a couple of pages (problem report) of families that need the children sorted and don't relish doing it a family at a time. Lesson learned: Other family members don't do things like I do, or GEDCOMs are nice, but can be dangerous to your peace of mind... Jim Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] sorting children
Good point, Dawn. It's just that I've spent the better part of the last hour cleaning up other people's messes and was hoping for a quick fix (which may not have been a quick fix.) Guess I just need to take a break, then come back and do it... Thanks for the thought... Jim On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Dawn Crowley sc...@relatively-speaking.org wrote: I cannot think of a bulk way to do this. Besides, doing this en masse could also unintentionally change the order of children where the order is known, but dates are not. Dawn Jim Walton wrote: Is there a way to do a bulk sort on all children so they appear in date order? I have a couple of pages (problem report) of families that need the children sorted and don't relish doing it a family at a time. Lesson learned: Other family members don't do things like I do, or GEDCOMs are nice, but can be dangerous to your peace of mind... Jim Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] sorting children
Ha, you're one step ahead of the game, Dennis. Downloaded the update, ran the sort, and it works like a champ. Thanks. You just saved me a lot of time and headache. Jim On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Dennis M. Kowallek kowal...@iglou.com wrote: On Sun, 04 Oct 2009 14:34:35 -0700, Dawn Crowley sc...@relatively-speaking.org wrote: Besides, doing this en masse could also unintentionally change the order of children where the order is known, but dates are not. It all depends on how it is implemented. It could certainly be coded to only sort families where *all* the children have a date. -- Dennis Kowallek (LTools) http://zippersoftware.com/ltools http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ltools Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
[LegacyUG] Census information
I record census information as part of residency then I can do a chronology showing residence to compare people I think may be related. I then use the source writer for the census information and supplement it in the notes with my comments, such as children, etc. that clarify the numbers a little better. Problem is, the source writer asks for the state and county in the master source rather than in the detail. That means that I have multiple sources for the same area because different states and counties are involved. I want a single source for 1790, 1800, etc. rather than 1790-New Hampshire-Grafton,1790-New Hampshire-etc... Then the detail would include the local information. I have made a suggestion to Legacy to make the change as using the override to redo the citations is cumbersome, but I would like to get some feedback on my idea, methods, and other possibilities. Jim Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Changing surname
My grandfather's name was Irvin, but he is often referred to as Irving. He never used that name, yet if someone is searching for Irving they will not find him unless I add Irving as an AKA. So I would suggest that the AKA should be used, even if the person never used the name. I have a note on my grandfather's record that his name is Irvin and Irving is a disproven name so that perhaps someone will find my record and correct theirs accordingly. Jim On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Jan Roberts poo...@ozemail.com.au wrote: But I would only use the alternative name as an AKA if there is evidence that an individual actually used both variations, or was recorded in different documents with both variations. My late first husband’s grandmother was always Georgina DANIELS (until her marriage), but other branches of the family use the name DANIEL. As she never used DANIEL and I have never seen her documented as DANIEL I do not use DANIEL as an AKA for her. Cheers Jan From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf Of Jane Sarles Sent: Sunday, 4 October 2009 5:02 To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Changing surname Right now they are all in as Peter. Actually I would like all those after a certain date to be Peters. Must I go to the screen for each one and do and AKA? No way to do it as a group? Jane Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Census information
Thanks, Kirsten. It looks pretty good, so in the meantime I'll do it that way. You said it's extreme, but consider that a census is a document with 50 volumes, each volume has hundreds of chapters. Even the 1790 census would have at least 13 sources plus the counties. Even narrowing it down to states would produce over 50, considering territories such a Puerto Rico and Guam. But maybe I'm being too detailed. Anyway, your suggestion will work as a work-around. Thanks again. Jim On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Kirsten Bowman vik...@rvi.net wrote: Jim: That's pretty extreme lumping, but it should be easy to do. (And just today I wrote that I'm reforming from this!) Anyway, why can't you just create a Master Source called 1790 US Census and leave out the other location details. Then on the Source Detail screen on the Source Clipboard, you put the state, county, etc. in the ID of Person field. That seems to create a pretty decent looking citation. Kirsten -Original Message- From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com]on Behalf Of Jim Walton Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2009 4:41 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Census information I record census information as part of residency then I can do a chronology showing residence to compare people I think may be related. I then use the source writer for the census information and supplement it in the notes with my comments, such as children, etc. that clarify the numbers a little better. Problem is, the source writer asks for the state and county in the master source rather than in the detail. That means that I have multiple sources for the same area because different states and counties are involved. I want a single source for 1790, 1800, etc. rather than 1790-New Hampshire-Grafton,1790-New Hampshire-etc... Then the detail would include the local information. I have made a suggestion to Legacy to make the change as using the override to redo the citations is cumbersome, but I would like to get some feedback on my idea, methods, and other possibilities. Jim Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] marking people as not living
If you are using Legacy 7 there is an entry under CustomizeData Entry where you can set the age at which a person is Presumed Dead. It defaults to ask if over 90 and set as dead if over 120. You can change these years then hit the Apply button and it will update your database accordingly. It only changes records with no death date entered, so you might set it to set everyone at 80 years, at least temporarily. This may not get them all, but it should clean up the bulk of them. On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:16 AM, Rita Lynn McKale cagr...@comporium.netwrote: Would someone tell me how to do this search? Thanks. Rita in South Carolina -Original Message- From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf Of Michele Lewis Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 3:30 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] marking people as not living I don't think so Ron. I tagged over 1000 people in my file that fit the following criteria... no death date set as living Over 3/4 of those tagged are people that would have died before 1900 and couldn't possibly be alive. They had parents with birth dates of 1750 or children with birthdates of 1790 (you get the idea). I am manually going in and marking them as dead. I realize it is partly my problem for not estimating birth and death dates or manually marking them as dead when I enter them. michele - Original Message - From: ronald ferguson ronfe...@msn.com To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 11:48 AM Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] marking people as not living Michele, That is not so. It will look at ancestors and descendants and decide if they would have been over whatever date you have set for the life span. Ron Ferguson _ New Tutorial: Embed a Bogger RSS feed on your webpage http://www.fergys.co.uk/ View the Grimshaw Family Tree at: http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/ For The Fergusons of N.W. England See: http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ _ From: cranberryf...@charter.net To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] marking people as not living Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:48:37 -0400 I have the advanced set living thing set. It automatically marks those over 110 dead but that only works if you have birth and death dates! michele - Original Message - From: Gene Young To: Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 10:27 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] marking people as not living Michele Lewis wrote: I just figured something out the hard way. If you don't put a death date for someone it defaults to living even though their parents and children died in the 1700s! The significance to his is when you upload your file with all living persons blocked out a lot of your file is blocked out that shouldn't be. I am having to go through and find all these (I did it with a simple search, any body with no date of death that is marked living). michele From the help file; Advanced Set Living There are several Legacy reports, plus web pages, where the privacy of anyone whose Living status is set to Yes is protected by suppressing all personal details. When creating these reports, no information is included for ancestors born centuries ago if they are inadvertently left set as Living. Normally an individual's Living status is set at the time they are manually entered. The process is automatic if their death or burial information is entered or their birth or christening date is more than 120 years ago. If no birth, christening, death, or burial information is entered, their status remains at the default Yes, if not changed to No. It is an easy task to set the Living status of a few individuals manually, but the task can become formidable when adding hundreds or thousands of new people to your family file with a GEDCOM import. This is where the Advanced Set Living feature comes in handy. This option does an intelligent search through your entire family file looking for people that are older than the cutoff age, which is usually 120 years old. When someone of this age is found, it is assumed that all of their ancestors are older than that and that they are all dead. Legacy then sets their Living flag to NO as far back as the line goes from there, regardless of whether or not they have birth or christening dates. To use the Advanced Set Living feature: 1. Choose Advanced Set Living from the Tools menu. 2. Set the cutoff age at the desired level by either typing in the number or by using the up and down arrows of the spin control. 3. Click the Start button. Legacy goes through your entire family file
Re: [LegacyUG] Where to input census?
If you open the Family page for the individual, you can either click on the little note icon below the information filed, or click on the field to open the information page. Under Events/.Facts select Add, then enter Census in the event field. Enter the date and location of the census, then click on the books above the description and you can add the source information for the census. On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Mary Horner maryhor...@shaw.ca wrote: I am a newbie to Legacy. I have a hugs amount of data gleaned from 7 Canadian census reports 1851-1911. Where do I input this info? I started by pasting the household under Master Source notes with the ‘Head’ showing everyone in the household and then each individual gets a single line under detail in the source menu and then again entering each individual in events but this seems so repetitive and will take forever. I am also concerned that when it comes to printing reports the same census material is going to be repeated over and over. Does Legacy have instructions somewhere as to how to enter census info? All I can find is how to download a blank form. Thanks Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp image001.jpg
Re: [LegacyUG] Determining ages
Gee, Ron, I was hoping for someone who was alive then to give me a definitive answer... I guess in lieu of that we'll just have to go with what we have now... I hark for the 40's (in the last century, certainly not the 17th) and the legal age in the US was pretty much universal at 21, so no doubt that is the best choice. For now I will base my estimates on that value until someone comes up with something different. Thanks for the feedback. Jim On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Ron Ferguson rnldfe...@tiscali.co.ukwrote: Jim, I cannot help you with the American age, but if you are right, in that it was the same as for England, then it was almost certainly 21years. Although I am not as old as the date you are looking for it was 21years in England even when I was a kid :-). I have tried, without success, to get confirmation myself for the period to which you refer, and I am beginning to wonder if it was simply an age which was generally accepted, and later became enshrined in common law ie. without a specific Act of Parliament, or may be it came from church law. If anybody does have a definitive answer I would like to know myself. Ron Ferguson _ New Tutorial: Embed Blogger RSS feed into your Website http://www.fergys.co.uk Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/ For The Fergusons of N.W. England http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ - Original Message - From: Jim Walton To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com Sent: 27 September 2009 00:59 Subject: [LegacyUG] Determining ages I have several wills that use a phrase similar to arrive to age in the law. The time period is 17th and 18th century New Hampshire so I would assume that the English legal system would apply, but I have been unable to determine what that age should be. If I knew I could establish some better estimated dates of birth. Right now I'm using 18 years, but I recently read something that makes me think it may have been 21. Does anyone know for certain? Thank you. I'm picking up tidbits from this list almost on a daily basis. Jim Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
[LegacyUG] Source citations
*The Gazetteer of Washington County, Vt., 1783-1889*,* Part First*, according to the title page, was edited by William Adams and compiled and published by Hamilton Child. The options I have in the source writer don't allow for such a situation so how do I handle it? Since it is an online image I'm thinking of book, authored (reprint) with two authors, online image. The first author would be Child with a suffix of compiler and publisher and the second would be Adams with a suffix of editor. Does this sound like a reasonable solution, or is there a better way to handle this? Most online sources just list Child as the author. Jim
Re: [LegacyUG] Source citations
Actually an online image is considered a reprint, and when you choose book, reprint you can select online book and it is shown as a digital image with the website information. To further compound my confusion, the cover of the book features a picture of probably Hamilton Child and under the title it says Hamilton Child, William Adams. They certainly did things differently in the 1800s than they do today... I'll figure something out. Thanks for the input. Jim On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:49 AM, S. Fry azg...@rsib.net wrote: Jim, In SourceWriter I would choose Books Book, edited Editor known Basic format. William Adams would go in the Editor Last Name/Given Name fields. Hamilton Child, compiler would go in the Publisher field. If you have the date and place of publication, often found on the page after the title page, fill that in. With the information you supplied, the Footnote/Endnote Citation would read: William Adams, editor, The Gazetteer of Washington County, Vt., 1783-1889, Part First (N.p.: Hamilton Child, complier, n.d.). I would add a note that the book has been digitized along with the online source of the book either in the Text/Comments or Repository. Sherry from Bowlegs, Okla. - Original Message - From: Jim Walton To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 5:19 AM Subject: [LegacyUG] Source citations The Gazetteer of Washington County, Vt., 1783-1889, Part First, according to the title page, was edited by William Adams and compiled and published by Hamilton Child. The options I have in the source writer don't allow for such a situation so how do I handle it? Since it is an online image I'm thinking of book, authored (reprint) with two authors, online image. The first author would be Child with a suffix of compiler and publisher and the second would be Adams with a suffix of editor. Does this sound like a reasonable solution, or is there a better way to handle this? Most online sources just list Child as the author. Jim Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
[LegacyUG] Determining ages
I have several wills that use a phrase similar to arrive to age in the law. The time period is 17th and 18th century New Hampshire so I would assume that the English legal system would apply, but I have been unable to determine what that age should be. If I knew I could establish some better estimated dates of birth. Right now I'm using 18 years, but I recently read something that makes me think it may have been 21. Does anyone know for certain? Thank you. I'm picking up tidbits from this list almost on a daily basis. Jim
Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy use on Facebook
MyHeritage is a good idea with a poor implementation. You can upload a gedcom, but if you make changes you have to make them manually. An alternative is to delete the tree from MyHeritage and upload another gedcom using the same name. MyHeritage apparently uses non-standard entries in their gedcom, so there will be some errors. But it is a nice way to present photos, and allows picture identification that is miles ahead of facebook. You can size the face target which is nice, and you can also create an image to show on the family tree chart. I haven't turned my family loose on it yet as I'm still looking for a better alternative. The main thing I want is the chart view with pictures. Just forget the automatic matching in MyHeritage. It can really mess up a database. Jim On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 3:47 AM, Ward Walker wnkwal...@rogers.com wrote: Sue, There are other choices than Facebook if you want to mix genealogy with social networking. One that my brother-in-law uses is MyHeritage.com. I don't know how the interplay between it an Legacy would work, but it does support non-public family trees where relatives can become members, receive notifications, etc. Ward - Original Message - From: William H. Boswell To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 7:36 PM Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy use on Facebook Unless they fixed it, I don't think you can. I've been trying to do it for several months and the Facebook internal program just isn't there anymore. You used to be able to upload a GEDCOM only. Now you have to enter everything in all over again. Not worth it to me. I wish they would fix this. -Original Message- From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com]on Behalf Of Sue Bramley Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 7:27 PM To: Legacy mailing list Subject: [LegacyUG] Legacy use on Facebook Dear All, I would like to put some family tree details on Facebook, limiting it to a private group for my relatives on Facebook. Can I upload a gedcom or HTML file created using Legacy to Facebook? I was thinking of using the Notes area. Regards, Sue Bramley New Zealand Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] How to reduce size of Gedcom
Under the GEDCOM Export Record Selection select the second option -- Focus Group. There you can select the person to start with and select that person with all descendants. You can limit the number of generations so you can further limit the size of your file. You also have the choice of descendants or entire descendant line which includes everybody. Jim On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Jacob Psutka 4freeb...@gmail.com wrote: I would like to send a Gedcom that has all my entries except for the first few generations, which would not be of interest to the recipient. Since there are over 3000 records, adding a tag to each one I want is not practical. Can anyone think of another wat of accomplishing this? Regards, Jacob Psutka Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] uploading web pages
Just to give you an idea, I live in Korea so I ran two tests. The first to a local server in Seoul showed Down: 13.40 Up: 7.85 I then switched to a server in San Francisco, half-way around the world and got these results Down: 7.61 Up: 2.01 My worst case is twice your speeds. Korea, however, is known to have some of the fastest Internet connectivity in the world. So, down towards the bottom of the page where you did your test is a button (actually more of a text block) that says How do your results stack up? Click on that and it will show you how you compare to others in your area. Jim On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Michele Lewis cranberryf...@charter.netwrote: I did the speed test and these are the results... download 3.89 upload 1.00 so now tell me what that means. michele - Original Message - From: Brian L. Lightfoot br...@the-lightfoots.com To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 4:17 PM Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] uploading web pages This is getting slightly off topic but since it does directly affect Legacy users that are trying to upload web pages, here is one more shot at things to remember: 1. Your upload speed is not affected by choice of operating systems; Vista or XP have no effect on your upload speed. 2. Your upload speed is not significantly affected by your amount of RAM (unless you are so underspec but then you'd notice problems with just running any programs. For the average system, adding additional RAM will not increase your upload speed. 3. Your upload speed is not significantly affected by your brand of computer. 4. Your upload speed is not defined by merely saying cable modem, DSL, satellite, etc, all of which are loosely defined as broadband but bandwidth can and does vary widely. Some cable modem connections are only 768K while others are up to 18Mbps (that's over 23 times faster). 5. A dirty little secret of your Internet Service Provider is that your upload speed is almost always severely reduced over what your download speed is supposed to be. 6. Another dirty little secret of your Internet Service Provider is that your up/download speed is not guaranteed but rather sold to you as up to X Mbps. Your results may varyand they will. 7. The speed and efficiency of the server to which you are uploading will affect the time it takes you to transfer files. Normally, it isn't much of a factor unless you are using AOL, etc. If you don't know for sure, call and ask your ISP exactly what speed package you are paying for: you need two numbers as an answer. For example, a typical answer might be 3 Meg down and 256K up. Note that in this example it's the 256K upload speed which determines how long it takes for you to upload web pages. Finally (and really getting off topic now), if you are still having long delays uploading web pages, go here to test your ACTUAL speed as opposed to what you are paying for: http://www.speedtest.net/ Brian in CA -Original Message- From: Michele Lewis [mailto:cranberryf...@charter.net] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 8:52 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] uploading web pages I have a Dell laptop with 2GB RAM. I am running Vista. I am not uploading any pictures at all. I use a cable modem for my internet connection. michele Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.112/2387 - Release Date: 09/21/09 17:55:00 Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp