Re: TextMaker

2003-11-15 Thread Andrew L. Gould
On Saturday 15 November 2003 12:16 am, Kurt Wall wrote:
 Has anyone received their TextMaker $11.11 download instructions
 yet? I've not seen mine...

 Kurt

I received mine about 44 hours after I received the Thank You email.  The 
website said it usually takes a day; but at $11.11, I'm sure they're swamped.

I also bought the Handheld PC (WinCE) version.  I haven't installed it yet; 
but the website states that no conversion is necessary to use files on both 
the desktop and PDA, which means you don't have to sync before sending 
someone a file.

Andrew Gould

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: TextMaker

2003-11-15 Thread Terence McCarthy
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 01:16:23 -0500
Kurt Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Has anyone received their TextMaker $11.11 download instructions
 yet? I've not seen mine...

If you're keen to get started, download the 30 day trial- I think you can then unlock 
it when you get the instructions. If not save the files and delete before installing 
(installing the purchased version that is!).

I like the trial version, and am waiting for the cd, (I'm in the UK, if you hadn't 
already realised..)

Terence
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: TextMaker

2003-11-15 Thread Kurt Wall
Consuming 0.3K bytes, Kurt Wall blathered:
 Has anyone received their TextMaker $11.11 download instructions
 yet? I've not seen mine...

Works everytime - I send this message, and the license informaiton
arrives.

Kurt
-- 
Hacker's Law:
The belief that enhanced understanding will necessarily stir a
nation to action is one of mankind's oldest illusions.
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: StarOffice 7 reviewed in Wall Street Journal

2003-11-15 Thread Joel Hammer
Just in case people want to see the whole thing review:

StarOffice Improves Performance, but Still Can't Rival Microsoft

It has been years since Microsoft had any real competition for its Office
productivity suite -- the software package that includes Word, Excel,
PowerPoint and Outlook. Once-popular competitors like WordPerfect and Lotus
1-2-3 have been reduced to tiny niche players.

But there is a competing office suite that is the darling of those
companies, software developers and users who have made hating or battling
Microsoft into a sort of religion. It's called StarOffice, and is sold by
Sun Microsystems, a maker of high-end hardware and software that is one of
Microsoft's biggest critics.

Originally developed in Germany, and constantly improved by open-source
developers outside Sun, StarOffice runs on Windows, Linux and Sun's own
Solaris workstation systems. It includes a word processor, a spreadsheet, a
presentation program and database functionality. It lacks an e-mail,
calendar and contacts program like Microsoft's Outlook.

The program has its own file formats, but Sun boasts that StarOffice can
read and edit Microsoft Office files faithfully, and can save files in
Microsoft Office formats so that most of the world can open and edit them
using Microsoft Office. You can even set up StarOffice so it always saves
all files in Microsoft Office formats, rather than its own format.

Sun has just released a new version called StarOffice 7, and I've been
testing it. It's slightly easier to use and much better at importing
Microsoft documents than last year's version. But it's still not flawless at
interchanging documents with Microsoft Office, and for that reason I still
can't recommend it wholeheartedly for users who need to exchange more than
very basic documents.

The key virtue of StarOffice is that it's cheap. Sun sells it for $80,
compared with the hundreds of dollars Microsoft charges, especially for
versions of Office that include the Access database program.

In fact, StarOffice can be had free. Users can download a free open-source
version of the program, called OpenOffice 1.1, at www.openoffice.org1.
OpenOffice is essentially identical to StarOffice, except Sun provides a
better spell checker, more fonts and more database capabilities.

But these price advantages aren't as great as they once would have been,
because Microsoft has been stealthily cutting the price of Office for
consumers. A version of Microsoft Office called the Student and Teacher
edition costs only $149, and can legally be installed on up to three PCs in
a household. It is supposed to be sold only to students and teachers, but
Microsoft also says it can be purchased by anyone living in a household with
pretty much anyone who attends, or teaches at, any kind of educational
institution. And, in fact, most stores ask no questions at all when you buy
it.

I tested StarOffice 7 for two main things: ease of use, and the ability to
import and export documents in Microsoft formats -- a necessity in a world
where most people use Microsoft Office.

This program has a strong techie heritage, and is now controlled by a
company and an open-source community that couldn't tell a normal,
nontechnical computer user from a bag of Cheetos. But in version 7, the help
system has been vastly improved. Most of the icons and menus follow the
conventions set by Microsoft. Installation seemed simpler.

There are still techie vestiges in some of the options menus. The new
version retains my favorite inscrutable option choice: size optimization
for XML format (no pretty printing). And some tasks, such as inserting page
numbers and viewing word count, are still too hard. One annoying feature
tries to complete words you type.

But all in all, StarOffice is a bit easier to use. The biggest improvement
has been in the import and export of Microsoft Office documents. I tried
several of the same highly complex Word, Excel and PowerPoint documents I
tested last year, and version 7 handled them better. When they were opened
in StarOffice 7, some formatting was still messed up, but more of the files
looked about the same as they did in Microsoft Office. One complicated
PowerPoint file, with various transitions and sound effects, reproduced
perfectly.

I then composed a simpler test file in Microsoft Word, mainly consisting of
text in various colors, fonts and oddball styles, plus embedded graphics
files, tables and clip art. StarOffice 7 rendered this file very well, even
replicating unusual formatting, like engraved and embossed fonts. The
spacing between the graphics was a little off, but easily corrected.

But StarOffice choked on the exporting side of the equation. After editing
the same file in StarOffice, I then saved it and reopened it in Word. The
text, with the right fonts and formats -- even columns and tables -- came
through fine. But several embedded graphics were missing, which could be a
disaster in an important business document sent to a 

code for control+...?

2003-11-15 Thread Jorge Almeida
Sorry for the probably stupid question, but it's killing me...
I need to write a expect script where the pressing of the control key+
something needs to be detected. The man page has an example
set CTRLZ \032
where the code \032 corresponds to Control-Z. Now, how can I know the
codes corresponding to other combinations (e.g. Control-space)? 
TIA,

-- 
Jorge Almeida
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


newbie kmail filter ques.

2003-11-15 Thread Tony Alfrey
Hi;

Not being an expert with filters, I ask the assembled experts.
This is a kmail (which I use as a mail client) specific question.
I wish to set up a POP filter so that MS executables and scripts in 
attachments are not downloaded from my mail server (earthlink) .  So I 
just set up a POP filter in the handy dandy POP filter rules window box 
with a Filter Criteria of

message contains .exe  
message contains .scr

because message is what the kmail help page suggested for filtering 
the entire contents.  But no joy.  I'm not worried about them running, 
I just don't like them clogging up my mail.  Any helpful hints??  Am I 
interpreting the concept of mail server correctly (that is, the mail 
server is my earthlink isp that stores my email).
Thanks!

-- 
Tony Alfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd rather be sailing

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: TextMaker

2003-11-15 Thread Collins Richey
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 05:08:09 -0500 Kurt Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Consuming 0.3K bytes, Kurt Wall blathered:
  Has anyone received their TextMaker $11.11 download instructions
  yet? I've not seen mine...
 
 Works everytime - I send this message, and the license informaiton
 arrives.
 

Hey, I thought I had that method patented! g 

Mine came through in about a day and a half.  I had to try about 3 times to get
into the download site.  Unlike my prior attempt a few months ago, the
authorization code worked first time out of the chute.

You gotta love the installation - simplicity personified.

-- 
Collins Richey - Denver Area
if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the 
worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for.


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: newbie kmail filter ques.

2003-11-15 Thread Tim Wunder
On Saturday 15 November 2003 9:28 am, someone claiming to be Tony Alfrey 
wrote:
 Hi;

 Not being an expert with filters, I ask the assembled experts.
 This is a kmail (which I use as a mail client) specific question.
 I wish to set up a POP filter so that MS executables and scripts in
 attachments are not downloaded from my mail server (earthlink) .  So I
 just set up a POP filter in the handy dandy POP filter rules window box
 with a Filter Criteria of

 message contains .exe
 message contains .scr

 because message is what the kmail help page suggested for filtering
 the entire contents.  But no joy.  I'm not worried about them running,
 I just don't like them clogging up my mail.  Any helpful hints??  Am I
 interpreting the concept of mail server correctly (that is, the mail
 server is my earthlink isp that stores my email).
 Thanks!

Don't think POP filters can filter on message, seems to be only available 
for regular filters. Looks to me like POP filters can only filter on the 
message header.

HTH, 
Tim

-- 
Fedora Core 1, Kernel 2.4.22-1.2115.nptl,  KDE 3.1.4, Xfree86 4.3.0
 09:35:00  up 5 days, 16:01,  2 users,  load average: 0.01, 0.44, 0.82
It's what you learn after you know it all that counts

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: spamassassin's sa-learn

2003-11-15 Thread M.W. Chang
did you train the filter by flagging all those slipped messages as junk?
iF you just delete them, the filter would not be improved!

 I've been using Moz Firebird as my only email for quite some time now. 
 And have been somewhat disappointed in the filters. It catches alot of 
 the junk right away, but it doesn't seem to be learning. I get the same 
 spam from the same scammers every day and no matter how many times I 
 flag it as junk it continues to show up. But it is a 0.7 Beta so I don't 
 want to be critical of it, just hope they flesh it out in the near future.

-- 
  .~.Might, Courage, Vision. In Linux We Trust.
 / v \   http://www.linux-sxs.org
/( _ )\  Linux 2.4.22-xfs
  ^ ^11:26pm up 5 days, 12:19, 1 user, load average: 0.99, 0.97, 0.96
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: spamassassin's sa-learn

2003-11-15 Thread Michael Hipp
M.W. Chang wrote:
did you train the filter by flagging all those slipped messages as junk?
iF you just delete them, the filter would not be improved!
Yes. I always hit the 'Junk' button which promptly gets them out of my 
sight and into the Junk folder. This seemed to work great on Mozilla but 
I suspect something is unfinished in Thunderbird. The same messages just 
keep getting thru. Likely it will be working in a later beta release.

Michael

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: code for control+...?

2003-11-15 Thread Chris Kassopulo
  Jorge Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:
  Sorry for the probably stupid question, but it's killing me...
  I need to write a expect script where the pressing of the control key+
  something needs to be detected. The man page has an example
   set CTRLZ \032
  where the code \032 corresponds to Control-Z. Now, how can I know the
  codes corresponding to other combinations (e.g. Control-space)? 
  TIA,
  
 
Greetings,
 
Get yourself an ascii table.  Here's a pretty one but you can google
for others if you like.

http://www.mindspring.com/~joeja/programs.html#PHP

The first column shows the control codes produced by the alpha keys
in the third column.  The keys in the second column don't produce
control codes.  The lowercase keys either don't produce control codes
or produce the same codes as the uppercase key.  I'm not sure which.

For example, the Z key (132 octal) produces the SUB control character
(032 octal).

Chris
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: newbie kmail filter ques.

2003-11-15 Thread Tony Alfrey
On Saturday 15 November 2003 06:50 am, Tim Wunder wrote:
snip

 Don't think POP filters can filter on message, seems to be only
 available for regular filters. Looks to me like POP filters can only
 filter on the message header.

 HTH,
 Tim

Yeah, I saw that, too, and typed in message.  It stuck but maybe it 
didn't work.  Bummer!

-- 
Tony Alfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd Rather Be Sailing

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


what does these mean?

2003-11-15 Thread M.W. Chang
   - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(reason: 554 cm61-10-50-59.hkcable.com.hk[61.10.50.59]: Client 
host rejected: Host rejected because of spam it sent.)

   - Transcript of session follows -
... while talking to kiezmar.lodz.tpsa.pl.:
 DATA

 554 cm61-10-50-59.hkcable.com.hk[61.10.50.59]: Client host 
rejected: Host rejected because of spam it sent.
554 5.0.0 Service unavailable
 554 Error: no valid recipients

BTW, I have set up my sendmail as a mail server and my ISP hkcable 
didn't block outgoing traffic from port 25. How could it intercept and 
reject this message sent from my sendmail directly?

--
  .~.Might, Courage, Vision. In Linux We Trust.
 / v \   http://www.linux-sxs.org
/( _ )\  Linux 2.4.22-xfs
  ^ ^1:00am up 5 days, 13:53, 0 users, load average: 0.99, 0.97, 0.98
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: spamassassin's sa-learn

2003-11-15 Thread M.W. Chang
I had that problem with spam-assassin' Bayesian filter. I actually tried
using the Junk folder of mozilla to train SA (sa-learn --mbox --spam
Junk). Until now, there are still some Chinese junk messages passing
through the sanity check of SA.

Michael Hipp wrote:
 Yes. I always hit the 'Junk' button which promptly gets them out of my 
 sight and into the Junk folder. This seemed to work great on Mozilla but 
 I suspect something is unfinished in Thunderbird. The same messages just 
 keep getting thru. Likely it will be working in a later beta release.

-- 
  .~.Might, Courage, Vision. In Linux We Trust.
 / v \   http://www.linux-sxs.org
/( _ )\  Linux 2.4.22-xfs
  ^ ^1:04am up 5 days, 13:57, 0 users, load average: 0.99, 0.97, 0.98
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: tar + bunzip2

2003-11-15 Thread Mike Reinehr
With COL 3.1 you can use the long option --use-compress-program=bzip2. Check 
out `info tar` for all the long  short options.

cmr

On Friday 14 November 2003 07:35 pm, M.W. Chang wrote:
 Even COL 3.1 doesn't have the -j and --bzip option. I will use the
 bzcat2 | tar - method. thanks.

 # tar -xjvf file.tar.bz2
 
  Yup. I'm running various SuSE distributions from 8.1-9.0 and they all
  have this option. My only remaining Caldera box (eD2.4), however, does
  not. It appears to have been added in newer versions of GNU tar.

-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: FW: [EmperorLinux-os-RedHat] do not use : GLIBC update packages ( from Red Hat Network)

2003-11-15 Thread Klaus-Peter Schrage
Net Llama! wrote:

Well, then i must just be lucky, because I didn't need to go through any
of that ordeal.  All I had to do was upgrade to the last glibc release
(late yesterday) and the problems created by the former (from early
yesterday) were solved.  Granted, I'm using my own 2.4.22-xfs kernel, and
not Redhat's, so perhaps that is why i'm not as plagued by this fiasco as
others.
I have my self rolled 2.4.22 kernel too with some mutimedia patches (low 
latency etc).
I guess, in my case it might have been an i368 vs. i686 issue: glibc rpm 
is one of the rare packages supplied in architecture specific versions, 
and I fear, apt-get (which otherwise I highly praise) didn't handle this 
correctly and upgraded ...i686 to ... i383. I can't reproduce this 
now, but I will keep an eye on apt-get in this respect.
Klaus

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: code for control+...?

2003-11-15 Thread Jorge Almeida
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Chris Kassopulo wrote:

   Jorge Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:
   Sorry for the probably stupid question, but it's killing me...
   I need to write a expect script where the pressing of the control key+
   something needs to be detected. The man page has an example
  set CTRLZ \032
   where the code \032 corresponds to Control-Z. Now, how can I know the
   codes corresponding to other combinations (e.g. Control-space)? 
   TIA,
   
  
 Greetings,
  
 Get yourself an ascii table.  Here's a pretty one but you can google
 for others if you like.
 
 http://www.mindspring.com/~joeja/programs.html#PHP
 
 The first column shows the control codes produced by the alpha keys
 in the third column.  The keys in the second column don't produce
 control codes.  The lowercase keys either don't produce control codes
 or produce the same codes as the uppercase key.  I'm not sure which.
 
 For example, the Z key (132 octal) produces the SUB control character
 (032 octal).

Thank you for the tip. I didn't know what kind of code I was looking
for. The link above doesn't tell me how to get Control-A (for example),
but I found it here:
http://www.hyperdictionary.com/computing/ascii+character+table

Regards,

Jorge Almeida
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: StarOffice 7 reviewed in Wall Street Journal

2003-11-15 Thread Roger Oberholtzer
On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 01:12, Joel Hammer wrote:

 He also noted that MS is stealthily reducing the price of its consumer
 software. You can buy an academic copy, which can be installed up to three
 times, at stores, and have only the weakest link to a full time student,
 or none. This runs about $150 dollars. So, the pricing differential is
 getting much less. This tends to support my contention that the biggest
 beneficiaries of the linux movement will be current MS users who don't
 switch to linux.

Office 2003 for home use is over $350 US in Sweden. And that is the
cheapest of their offerings I saw. The student thing surely exists as
well. So my $50 US for SO 7 is not too bad.

-- 
Roger Oberholtzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: code for control+...?

2003-11-15 Thread Alan Jackson
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 10:15:10 -0500
Chris Kassopulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   Jorge Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:
   Sorry for the probably stupid question, but it's killing me...
   I need to write a expect script where the pressing of the control key+
 Greetings,
  
 Get yourself an ascii table.  Here's a pretty one but you can google
 for others if you like.
 

man ascii

-- 
---
| Alan K. Jackson| To see a World in a Grain of Sand  |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]  | And a Heaven in a Wild Flower, |
| www.ajackson.org   | Hold Infinity in the palm of your hand |
| Houston, Texas | And Eternity in an hour. - Blake   |
---
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: newbie kmail filter ques.

2003-11-15 Thread Alan Jackson
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 09:50:23 -0500
Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Saturday 15 November 2003 9:28 am, someone claiming to be Tony Alfrey 
 wrote:
  Hi;
 
  Not being an expert with filters, I ask the assembled experts.
  This is a kmail (which I use as a mail client) specific question.
  I wish to set up a POP filter so that MS executables and scripts in

I think you need imap to do that sort of filtering...

-- 
---
| Alan K. Jackson| To see a World in a Grain of Sand  |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]  | And a Heaven in a Wild Flower, |
| www.ajackson.org   | Hold Infinity in the palm of your hand |
| Houston, Texas | And Eternity in an hour. - Blake   |
---
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: code for control+...?

2003-11-15 Thread Roger Oberholtzer
On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 14:05, Jorge Almeida wrote:
 Sorry for the probably stupid question, but it's killing me...
 I need to write a expect script where the pressing of the control key+
 something needs to be detected. The man page has an example
   set CTRLZ \032
 where the code \032 corresponds to Control-Z. Now, how can I know the
 codes corresponding to other combinations (e.g. Control-space)? 
 TIA,

Are you trying to use 'bind'? Anyway, look at that man page (for tcl,
not tcp). It discusses keystrokes. If you are after the 'raw' values,
and not the logical ones tcl nicely provides in a system independent
manner, then you are at the mercy of the system originating the key
press. It ceases to be a tcl question.

Here is one very stupid trick I use to decode keypresses. Start vi, then
press 'i', Then press Ctrl-v. Then press the key you want. Then press
the escape key. Save the file. It will contain the keystroke. Dump it
with od.

Although I use Tcl/Tk quite a bit, I have only used expect a bit. I
would imagine there were some hooks to help with this. Just good old
bind, if nothing else.

(



___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: newbie kmail filter ques.

2003-11-15 Thread Tony Alfrey
On Saturday 15 November 2003 11:09 am, Alan Jackson wrote:
 On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 09:50:23 -0500

 Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Saturday 15 November 2003 9:28 am, someone claiming to be Tony
  Alfrey
 
  wrote:
   Hi;
  
   Not being an expert with filters, I ask the assembled experts.
   This is a kmail (which I use as a mail client) specific question.
   I wish to set up a POP filter so that MS executables and scripts
   in

 I think you need imap to do that sort of filtering...

OK, thanks.  Found lots of stuff on Google about imap.  Reading comes 
next.  Appears to be a compact Linux Journal article about just this 
task.

-- 
Tony Alfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd rather be sailing

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: code for control+...?

2003-11-15 Thread Jorge Almeida
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
 Are you trying to use 'bind'? 
 
No.
 Here is one very stupid trick I use to decode keypresses. Start vi, then
 press 'i', Then press Ctrl-v. Then press the key you want. Then press
 the escape key. Save the file. It will contain the keystroke. Dump it
 with od.
Actually, I find it a clever trick, and it solves my problem! As you may
have guessed, I'm not really a programmer, just an amateur. I knew (after
posting) about Control-V in vim, but not about od.
 
 Although I use Tcl/Tk quite a bit, I have only used expect a bit. I
 would imagine there were some hooks to help with this.
 I have the Exploring Expect book, which doesn't seem to help in this
 specific matter.


 Thanks!

Jorge Almeida

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users