Re: email attack

2003-09-20 Thread Gerry Doris
On 20 Sep 2003, burns wrote:

 On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 14:10, dep wrote:
 
  
  New Category 3 Worm/Virus: Swen.A (Yes, that's 'news' backwards)
  http://www.sarc.com/avcenter/venc/data/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Yup. Also:
 http://www.cert.org/current/current_activity.html#swena
 Looks like it could be a nasty precursor to other attacks... it attempts
 to disable all security products on the infected host.

I've had several dozen of these show up in the last couple of days on my 
home system.  They just keep pouring in!  This is in addition to the 
blantant sendmail attacks from some damn public school in China.

I bitched awhile ago to the syadmin for the school and that really got 
them going.  I guess the sysadmin is the one running the attacks!  They're 
not getting far as I've blocked most of the Far East at my firewall.

By the way, for those running sendmail here's a couple of rules that are 
working really well...these also stop the Verisign nonsense.  Put the 
following in your sendmail.mc file and then run the m4 macro and restart 
sendmail.

The gaps after the Left Hand Side entries MUST be tabs.  Make sure to put 
the rest of the verbage all on one line (the \'s just indicate the line 
wrapped).

LOCAL_RULESETS
SLocal_check_relay
R$* $: ${client_resolve}

RTEMP   $#error $@ 5.7.1 $: 550 Access Denied ; Incomplete DNS. Cannot \
resolve PTR record for  ${client_addr} Please have your system \
administrator correct the zone entries.

RFORGED $#error $@ 5.7.1 $: 550 Access Denied ; Incomplete DNS. IP \
name possibly forged  ${client_name} Please have your system \
administrator correct the zone entries.

RFAIL   $#error $@ 5.7.1 $: 550 Access Denied ; Incomplete DNS. \
Hostname lookup failed for  ${client_name} please have your system \
administrator correct the zone entries.


-- 
Gerry

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: OT: Here we go again ...

2003-09-20 Thread Gerry Doris
Shouldn't this thread be in linux-general?

-- 
Gerry

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


linux-users list passing on virii

2003-09-01 Thread Gerry Doris
For what it's worth I sent a virus passed to me through this mailing list
to Antony Stone on the MailScanner list.  He is running several virus
scanners.  He confirmed that ClamAV doesn't find this virus.  In fact,
here's the pertinent part of his reply message.

 It got picked up as Sobig.F by Bitdefender, F-Prot, Inoculan and McAfee,
 which on my system means that it got missed by ClamAV, Kaspersky and
 NOD32 (I run several antivirus engines on a single machine for exactly
 this sort of comparison!).

On my system I use MailScanner to run F-Prot, TrendMicro, and ClamAV.  
Only ClamAV is missing the virus.  If I remember correctly the list is 
just using ClamAV.

-- 
Gerry

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Is this really necessary - WARNING VIRUS FOUND!!!

2003-08-31 Thread Gerry Doris
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, mail daemon wrote:

 
 A message sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
   Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 7:07:31 +0800
 
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Cc: 
 
   Subject: Re: Details
 
 Did not reach it's recipient(s) because the following virus was found:
 
   Virus found in attachment  application.pif


Is it really necessary to send these out to the entire list?  It 
accomplishes absolutely nothing while taking up bandwidth.  

If people aren't bright enough to configure their virus scanners not to
spam the list perhaps these could be screened out at the linux-users
server?

-- 
Gerry

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


What the hell is going on - SOBIG.F

2003-08-31 Thread Gerry Doris
I have received several emails infected with Sobig.F supposedly from 
the list as well a pile of notices from various list members that they 
received infected messages.

1. isn't the list screening for virii?

2. can't you screen out all these damn virus received notification?  
They're worse than the Nigerian scams I get each day!

-- 
Gerry

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: What the hell is going on - SOBIG.F

2003-08-31 Thread Gerry Doris
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Bill Campbell wrote:

 On Sun, Aug 31, 2003, Gerry Doris wrote:
 I have received several emails infected with Sobig.F supposedly from 
 the list as well a pile of notices from various list members that they 
 received infected messages.
 
 Most of the e-mail worms that attack the Microsoft virus, Windows forge the
 headers so they appear to some somebody other than the real sender.
 
 I'm getting a fairly large number of virus notices from brain-dead virus
 scanners addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (not the capitilzation) saying
 that I sent them a virus.  The only place my e-mail address appears
 capitalized like that is in the signature block of my e-mails or perhaps in
 some rather ancient usenet news postings (at least 10 years old).  I don't
 do e-mail on any Windows machines, and never have.  The only times I've
 ever run OutLook has been to go through the menus to figure out how to
 specify server addresses, and once to see how Caldera's Volution Messaging
 System's one-click configuration worked.
 
 My guess is that the volume of mail messages from the so-called virus
 scanning software to the forged sender addresses probably is greater than
 the volume of actual worms.
 
 Bill

I believe that Doug is using ClamAV to scan the list messages.  I'm using 
ClamAV as well as F-Prot and TrendMicro.  Only F-Prot and Trend are 
picking up this variant of Sobig.F for me.  ClamAV seems to be missing 
them.

I even tried scanning my quarantine directory and ClamAV still misses the 
virus.  Yes. I'm using the latest ClamAV signatures.

I suspect these virii are coming through the list.  I could be wrong since 
Sobig forges the headers but I think they're slipping through.

-- 
Gerry

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: What the hell is going on - SOBIG.F

2003-08-31 Thread Gerry Doris
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Tim Wunder wrote:

 On Sunday 31 August 2003 1:32 pm, someone claiming to be Bill Campbell wrote:
  On Sun, Aug 31, 2003, Gerry Doris wrote:
  I have received several emails infected with Sobig.F supposedly from
  the list as well a pile of notices from various list members that they
  received infected messages.
 
  Most of the e-mail worms that attack the Microsoft virus, Windows forge the
  headers so they appear to some somebody other than the real sender.
 
 
 AFAICT, it's only forging the From: address. The Received From headers seem 
 to be unaffected, unless it's changed since it first came out...

snip...

Well, I guess if no one else has been seeing all these virii then the 
infected system(s) picked up my email address and is using the list as 
the source.

The messages claim to have originated at three separate sites

unmc.edu (University of Nebraska)
rackshack.net (?)
zusket.net (?)

I'm now dumping any messages from these three locations directly to
/dev/null and things have quieted down!

This is on my home system and I'm only using four boxes.  Three of these 
are running linux and the other is turned off.  The infection is not on my 
network.

-- 
Gerry

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: ADMIN: please don't copy the bounce address!

2003-08-27 Thread Gerry Doris
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Some people's MUAs apparently sometimes include the list list bounce
 address
 on a 'Reply-All' (the address would be listname[EMAIL PROTECTED]) .
 Please check that your MUA is not doing this. Anything sent to the bounce
 address is marked against YOU and eventually, you'll be unsubbed (mailman
 will think your email address is bouncing mail).
 Thanks.
 - --
 Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778

Which MUA's do this?

Gerry
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Ideas for Mail and Calendaring for 50,000 Users

2003-08-27 Thread Gerry Doris
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Tim Wunder wrote:
 [...]
 |
 | phpgroupware.
 | http://phpgroupware.com
 |
 |
 | Do you use it? I've looked at it for our small network here, but haven't
 | tried to implement it yet.
 |
 | Tim

 Yes. We have around 2000 users and it works quite well.
 phpgroupware/sendmail/MIMEDefang/clamav gives us shared calendars,
 global address books, check in/out functions, web, pop3  imap4 mail,
 spam filtering,  anti virus scanning all in one system that doesn't
 even yawn at 15,000 messages a day. (before sobig  blaster) Total cost?
 $0. Compared to 4 Exchange servers at $1,200 per, plus $50 per client
 license (x 2000) to connect = $104,800. To try to be a proponent of a
 solution like Microsoft offers would definitely be a valid argument of
 more money than brains
 We've made some worthwhile contributions to mail-abuse.org,
 phpgroupware, sendmail, spamcop.net and other open source providers
 though.

 - --
 Andrew Mathews

I'mn surprised you haven't plugged SpamAssassin into the mix.  Is there a
reason for that?

Gerry
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: OT To all New Zealand SxS members

2003-08-24 Thread Gerry Doris
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003, Bob Hemus wrote:

 Ted Ozolins wrote:
 
  Collins Richey wrote:
 
 
  The one thing we Americans and Canadians have in common, besides the
  language, is the best politicians money can buy.  They all suck.
 
  I just learned that the reason that we (here in B. C.) are short of 
  manpower to address these fires is that a Workers Compaensation ruling 
  requires that anyone fighting a forest fire must possess cirtification 
  by the Forestry. snip
 
 Not so sure that is as bad as you think.  Back in my youth I used to 
 fall timber on fires.  Big trees like you have.  Back then they would 
 hire a guy that went out and buy a saw for the big bucks.  If he didn't 
 kill himself he could do it to a couple others,  also.  I'm not 
 defending all of their rules or procedures.  I have a kid (43 year old 
 kid) who's on one of the special overhead teams for the USFS/BLM/??, the 
 trouble with those teams as I see it is they move in on the locals that 
 know the lay of the land and take over.  In '87 they really botched 
 about a quarter million burn around Happy Camp.  Some jerk from Arizona 
 tried to light a big back-burn 10 muiles long at the bank of the Klamath 
 River 3 or 4 ridges away from the fire!  Fortunatley it was so smokey 
 and cold it wouldn't take.  Oh well I'd better quit. I get real radical.
 Bob

I was listening to an interview with a supervisor from the Ontario team
that's out in BC.  Apparently most of our Ontario fire fighters are out
there working under the guidance of the local folks (as are teams from 
Montana etc).

The supervisor was saying how important it was for this reporting
structure as his people weren't used to fighting fires in mountainous
terrain.  Northern Ontario is basically flat with lots of lakes.  In BC
they've been on mountain sides with temperatures often well over 30C.  The 
gear they have to carry is heavy and different.  Here they don't worry too 
much about drinking water but it's a major concern in BC.

It was an interesting interview.

-- 
Gerry

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: [GWAVA:b1cvwn12] Subject filter message notification

2003-08-18 Thread Gerry Doris
I thought I had seen a lot of stupid filters but...  Image mistaking an 
Adaptec SCSI driver for triple rated x porn!

Hmmm, my list of /dev/null senders is growing and growing!

-- 
Gerry

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: odd email. Maybe OT, but not sure.

2003-08-14 Thread Gerry Doris
On 9 Aug 2003, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:

 Has anyone been getting an email from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (where
 your.domain is your domain)?
 
 It has text like this:
 
 Hello there,
 
 I would like to inform you about important information regarding your
 email address. This email address will be expiring.
 Please read attachment for details.
 
 ---
 Best regards, Administrator
 maomnron
 
 It message also contains a zip attachment (message.zip) that contains an
 html doc (message.html) that is really a multipart doc with an encoded
 binary executable called foo.exe and some html code to run foo.exe
 
 Some new virus? Or other nonsense? I cannot exercise it as we don't do
 windows. (OK. I did clean the front windows this morning, but even there
 the point is that I do not want to see windows...)

The attachment contains a virus called mimail (if I rmemeber correctly).  
The company I worked for was hit very hard about a week ago.  The entire 
mail system slowed while the IT folks tried to find all the infected 
systems.

The virus scanners all flag this now.

-- 
Gerry

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Open Antivirus

2003-08-03 Thread Gerry Doris
On 3 Aug 2003, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:

 On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 15:34, Gerry Doris wrote:
 
  Actually, I use MailScanner and have installed both F-Prot and ClamAV. 
  F-Prot is free for non-commercial users.  MailScanner installs seamlessly
  requiring no changes to sendmail (also works with Postfix and Exim). 
  MailScanner calls the installed virus scanners (it supports about a dozen)
  to check the mail.  MailScanner also uses SpmaAssassin if that's installed
  to weed out spam.
 
 It seems that there are many solutions that install easily and will use
 many scanners. It is the scanners themselves that I don't have any idea
 about. They are always in some list and written as though, well, just
 everyone knows about them. 
 
 Any opinions on the scanners themselves, as opposed to the glue?

I already told you...F-Prot and ClamAV work very well.  I suspect that the
others do too or they wouldn't be in business but I haven't used them.  
If you have the $$$ buy them and then tell the rest of us how they work
since ClamAV is the only open source application that I'm aware of.

-- 
Gerry

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Open Antivirus

2003-08-01 Thread Gerry Doris
 While we are discussing email and spam, I was
 wondering if anyone had any experience with CLAM
 anti-virus, found at http://clamav.elektrapro.com/ ?

 I'm looking at anti-virus solutions for a Linux
 mailserver now that Microsoft has bought RAV and is in
 the process of shutting it down.

 Gary

I've been using it for months without problems...well, they've had a few
problems with their site when trying to get virus update files but those
were quickly resolved.

Actually, I use MailScanner and have installed both F-Prot and ClamAV. 
F-Prot is free for non-commercial users.  MailScanner installs seamlessly
requiring no changes to sendmail (also works with Postfix and Exim). 
MailScanner calls the installed virus scanners (it supports about a dozen)
to check the mail.  MailScanner also uses SpmaAssassin if that's installed
to weed out spam.

MailScanner also takes care of polling for virus updates for any installed
packages.  It's a great program!

All programs are easily installed and work well.


Gerry
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


samba error messages???

2003-07-26 Thread Gerry Doris
I'm seeing the following error message about every 30 min in 
/var/log/samba/log/smbd.  This is on a RH 9 system that was recently 
upgraded from 7.3.  I'm not sure if they were appearing before or not?

Any idea what this is trying to tell me???


[2003/07/26 09:31:27, 0] smbd/oplock_linux.c:linux_init_kernel_oplocks(287)

-- 
Gerry

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Slightly OTHappy Sys Admin Appreciation Day

2003-07-25 Thread Gerry Doris
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 June 25 (today) is the annual Sys Admin Appreciation Day. I'd just like to
 take a moment to tip my hat to my fellow admins on this list. I'll be
 throwing down a cold beverage in your honor later tonite!
 - --
 Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
 http://doug.hunley.homeip.net  http://www.linux-sxs.org

Hmmm, today is actually July 25th.  How old are you anyway g??

Gerry
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: gforce2 (MX400) with nvida drivers 1.0-4349

2003-04-06 Thread Gerry Doris
On Sun, 6 Apr 2003, Collins Richey wrote:

 I've just installed the nvidia drivers on my Slack 9.0 system, and the
 only way it will work is to disable AGP.  It craps out totally with
 either the kernel agp module or the nvidia agp module, but it works ok
 with agp disabled.
 
 I'm on a Aazza KT3-AV with KT133A chipset and an Athlon-XP 1800. 
 There are lots of writeups in the nvidia doc about via chipsets and/or
 Athlon processors, but none of them seem applicable to my situation. 
 I've even tried changing the AGP Driving setting in the BIOS to a range
 recommended by nvidia.
 
 I've also done a fair amount of googling to no avail.
 
 Syptoms are the screen turns to total black and white garbage as soon as
 the X server starts; only ctl-alt-del will cure the problem.  The
 standard X drivers worked ok with AGP enabled.
 
 Anyone have an opinion?

I tried using the new driver on a MX440 card and it worked.  This was on a 
Dell P2 400Mhz system.  

-- 
Gerry

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: OT We won't back down...

2003-03-29 Thread Gerry Doris
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, Keith Antoine wrote:

 At 11:54 AM 28/03/2003 +0930, you wrote:
 Hi,
 
 On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 11:27, Collins Richey wrote:
   Some of us support the troops.
 
 Knowing this is waay off-topic :) I think the troops deserve our 110%
 support. It is the leaders of the relevant Governments that may not
 deserve our support.
 
 James
 
 Well we have got our SAS troops over there with the coalition and also
 our 2 rowboat navy, plus some AC that we bought off you, grin. We are
 getting the peace at anyprice s**t thrown at us too, but the majority are
 behing the PM and the troops.
 
 Keith Antoine OZ Forever.

Well, here in Canada the pot is boiling.  The Canadian government has 
distinguished itself by abandoning her traditional allies of Britain and 
Australia and thumbing it's nose at the US.

One of our cabinet ministers standing on the Parliament steps in Ottawa 
criticized Bush to reporters calling him, among other things, a failed 
statesman.  That followed comments shouted in Parliament by a Liberal 
(ruling party) MP of screw the US.  Another Liberal called the US a 
bunch of bastards.  None of these members were censored publicly for 
these comments.

Remember that Canada is the US' largest trading partner.  Just imagine 
what the trade numbers look like from our side of the border!

The US Ambassador to Canada, John Celluci was highly critical of Canada's
government a couple of days ago.  He also suggested that Canada would pay.  
As Celluci pointed out, it's ironic since Canada has a handful of soldiers
with the US forces in Iraq along with a destroyer and two frigates
inspecting ship traffic in the Persian Gulf.  We also sent 1000 troops to
Afghanistan to backfill US troops freeing them up for Iraq.  All this and
the idiots in Ottawa are stating we don't support the war as long as the
UN doesn't support it.

Once again, our government is trying to have it both ways.  We stop far 
short of France and Germany but won't support our allies and partners.  
We've embarrassed and isolated ourselves.

Prime Minister Chretien has cancelled a trip to the US and Bush's visit 
here on May 5 is now uncertain.

I am absolutely certain that there is some kind of screening process for 
politicians to ensure they only have negative IQ's.

-- 
Gerry

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


News Flash! Rambus and SCO to merge!

2003-03-11 Thread Gerry Doris
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/03/10/212241


News Flash! Rambus and SCO to merge! (Score:5, Funny)
by Newer Guy (520108)  on Monday March 10, @06:03PM (#5481084)


In a surprise news announcement, the Chairman of rambus announces a historic
merger with SCO unix. The merged company - to be called RAMBO - will be
poised to respond to the challenges of the 21st century Chairman David Boies
said today. We are in the enviable position of controlling both hardware and
software Intellectual property Boies also announced Rambo's decision to sue
Microsoft for the use of the name windows. and it's use for networking. I
came up with the idea of windows networking 30 years ago Boies said. When I
was a kid I opened the window and yelled to my friends that it was time to
play baseball. This involved using a window to spread information to them. In
other words, Windows networking


Gerry



___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Why doesn't rdev work?

2003-02-13 Thread Gerry Doris
I've been playing with rdev on a Redhat 8.0 system.  If I create a
bootdisk using mkbootdisk it works just fine.

Running rdev correctly gives the result of

/dev/hda3  (ie. root is on /dev/hda3)

If I run

rdev /dev/fd0

on the newly created bootdisk.  I don't get /dev/hda3 like I was
expecting.  I get a hex value like /dev/0x3da5.  If I do a

rdev /dev/fd0 /dev/hda3

and then do a

rdev /dev/fd0

I get the expected answer back of /dev/hda3.  However, the bootdisk
won't work anymore.  What am I doing wrong.


Gerry



___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: How do I change from ext3 to ext2?

2003-02-11 Thread Gerry Doris
 This is a test system and there isn't anything critical on it.  This
 is more in the line of inquiring minds want to know.

 I'd still be hesitant to use it.  You could still technically go with
 dd, but you'd have to use some fancy partition extending tricks.  I
 guess it all comes down to whether you want to use an open source
 solution or a black box.


Well, I guess you've stated it well...do you want to use an open source
solution or a black box.

I'm already using a black box.  On this system Linux is sharing the disk
with a WinXP NTFS partition.  I'm not confident of any Linux tools that
can handle the NTFS stuff.  The Partition Magic DriveCopy package will
though and I can move the Linux stuff over manually if DriveCopy doesn't
work.

Gerry


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



How do I change from ext3 to ext2?

2003-02-10 Thread Gerry Doris
I want to do some disk rearranging and it would be really convenient if my 
partition were ext2 instead of ext3.

I thought all I had to do was use tune2fs to convert the partitions to 
ext2 and then modify fstab to indicate the partitions were ext2.  Well, 
that ended in a kernel panic with an error that the journal couldn't be 
found.

What's the right way?  Do I have to recompile the kernel? I'm using redhat 
8.

-- 
Gerry

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: How do I change from ext3 to ext2?

2003-02-10 Thread Gerry Doris
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Jerry McBride wrote:

 
  Gerry Doris wrote:
  I want to do some disk rearranging and it would be really convenient if my 
  partition were ext2 instead of ext3.
  
 
 From the EXT3.FAQ
 
 Q: How do I convert my ext3 partition back to ext2?
 
 Actually there is only little need to do so, because in most cases it is
 sufficient to mount the partition explicitely as ext2. But if you really need to
 convert your partion back to ext2 just do the following on an umounted
 partition:tune2fs -O ^has_journal /dev/hdaX
 
 To be on the safe side you should force a fsck run on this partition
 afterwards:fsck.ext2 -f /dev/hdaX
 
 After this procedure you can safely delete the .journal file if there was any. 
 

Hmmm, it doesn't work that way on my Redhat 8.0 system.  It looks like the 
Redhat stock kernel has the ext3 file system hardcoded.  Even after I've 
changed the partitions back to ext2 the kernel still tries to load them as 
ext3 and then panics.

I even changed the fstab entries to ext2 but it doesn't matter whether 
they're set to ext2 or ext3.  If the partitions are ext3 the kernel will 
mount them.  It panics otherwise.

This is on a dual boot system and I was going to use Partition Magic's
DriveCopy to copy the entire drive all at once to a new drive.  Problem is
that my copy of DriveCopy doesn't understand ext3.

Perhaps I can just change the partitions to ext2, let DriveCopy copy the
entire disk to the new one, and then change them back to ext3 so 
everything will work again?

-- 
Gerry

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: How do I change from ext3 to ext2?

2003-02-10 Thread Gerry Doris
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Net Llama! wrote:

 On 02/10/03 19:04, Gerry Doris wrote:
  This is on a dual boot system and I was going to use Partition Magic's
  DriveCopy to copy the entire drive all at once to a new drive.  Problem is
  that my copy of DriveCopy doesn't understand ext3.
 
 that's what dd is for.  its free, and works as advertised.

I'm going from a 40GB drive to an 80GB drive.  I thought that dd would end 
up making my 80GB drive look like a 40GB.  If I was moving to the same 
size drive dd would workright?

 
  Perhaps I can just change the partitions to ext2, let DriveCopy copy the
  entire disk to the new one, and then change them back to ext3 so 
  everything will work again?
 
 if you trust this DriveCopy thing.  quite frankly i'd be very concerned 
 about using a commerical product that can't even understand your filesystem.

This is a test system and there isn't anything critical on it.  This is 
more in the line of inquiring minds want to know. 

-- 
Gerry

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: RPM query error

2003-02-05 Thread Gerry Doris
 Yep, RH8.
 I was planning on searching google, usually do on these things, but
 chose to post on list first. Thanks for the links, though.

 Looks like it's the same old rpm problem I've experienced before
 (different symptom, though).

 Regards,
 Tim

 On 2/5/2003 9:02 AM, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote:
 You didn't say, but i'll bet money that this is on RH8.  See:
 https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/psyche-list/2002-November/005070.html
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73198
 https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/psyche-list/2002-November/005100.html

 Google is your friend.

 On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Tim Wunder wrote:


Hi,
When I execute rpm -qa |grep whatever, I was getting an error :
 error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 274 Header V3 DSA signature:
 BAD, key ID db42a60e

rpm --rebuilddb has fixed it, but I'm curious, anybody seen anything
 like that before? Any ideas on what might cause the error?

Thanks,
Tim

I posted several times on the redhat psyche list that I was getting these
exact same problems but never received a reply.  I would also fix it
temporarily by doing an rpm --rebuilddb.

I even ended up doing a complete fresh install and after a week the
problem starting showing up again.

However, I use an Nvidia 440 card and had loaded the latest Nvidia binary
drivers (I think they're 4191).  I had experienced problems on this same
system under Win98 after I started using that level of Nvidia driver.  I
changed back to Nvidia's 3123 level and haven't seen any trace of the bad
file descriptor problems since on either RH 8.0 or Win98.  It's been
running for about two weeks now straight without problems.

I have another RH 8.0 system dual booting with XP Pro.  It has a GEForce3
card in it and is using the 4191 drivers without problems

Gerry


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: RPM query error

2003-02-05 Thread Gerry Doris
snip...

 I posted several times on the redhat psyche list that I was getting
 these exact same problems but never received a reply.  I would also
 fix it temporarily by doing an rpm --rebuilddb.

 I even ended up doing a complete fresh install and after a week the
 problem starting showing up again.

 However, I use an Nvidia 440 card and had loaded the latest Nvidia
 binary drivers (I think they're 4191).  I had experienced problems on
 this same system under Win98 after I started using that level of
 Nvidia driver.  I changed back to Nvidia's 3123 level and haven't seen
 any trace of the bad file descriptor problems since on either RH 8.0
 or Win98.  It's been running for about two weeks now straight without
 problems.

 I have another RH 8.0 system dual booting with XP Pro.  It has a
 GEForce3 card in it and is using the 4191 drivers without problems


 I have a Matrox G450, I highly doubt that the problem is related to
 anything Nvidia...

 Regards,
 Tim

I also don't see a connection either but haven't experienced the symptoms
since I changed drivers almost two weeks ago.  I've been trying to do
everything that's caused the bad file descriptor error messages.

In any case, I do believe I had a video problem as I was getting lockups
and errors about gnome failing to release video pages.  My lockups mainly
occurred just after 4:00am when I believe rebuilddb runs.  That's why I
was linking the two.

If you've got a Matrox then bad rpm database descriptors aren't related to
Nvidia binary drivers.

Gerry


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: shuttle disaster

2003-02-04 Thread Gerry Doris
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Keith Antoine wrote:

 On Tuesday 04 February 2003 22:52, dep wrote:
 
  what is surprising is the continued arrogance of nasa in having never
  pondered having to rescue people from a crippled shuttle.
 
 If memory serves me no space agency of any description has, or appeared to 
 have, any rescue agenda in place at anytime. What has happened in the past 
 was all cobbled together in situ with a lot of prayers. Wasn't it Arthur C 
 Clark who established, in about the late 40's early 50's, a rescue agenda 
 that was laughed at, at that time. Neither Russians nor NASA have seemed to 
 want to spend money on this, recalls to mind sub rescue operations in deep 
 water. 

I read the other day that Nasa used to train the crews to repair missing 
tiles in space.  They gave up on that a couple of years ago when they 
decided that the crews caused more damage than they were trying to fix.  
It was decided there simply wouldn't be enough damage to prevent reentry.

-- 
Gerry

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: No sound from audio cd's

2003-02-01 Thread Gerry Doris
On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 09:20, Matthew Carpenter wrote:
 Do you have the cable hooked up from the CD Drive to your sound card?
 
 
 On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 11:47:08 -0500 (EST)
 Gerry Doris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I've been knocking my head against the screen for the last couple of days.  
  I can't play audio cd's no matter what I do.
  
  I can burn audio cd's successfully.  I can play both wav and mp3 files 
  from disk.  However, when I try and play directly from cd everything looks 
  ok but there isn't any sound (also no error messages).
  
  I've tried the gnome default cdplayer, xmms, kscd.  They all perform 
  exactly the same.  They read the tracks and start playing but not a single 
  sound comes through.
  
  This is on a RH 8.0 system.
  
  -- 
  Gerry

This has been fixed.  The problem turned out to be the default gnome
mixer in RH 8.0.  As soon as that was activated it stopped all sound
from the cdrom.

I tried kmix and aumix.  Both of those indicated that audio from the
cdrom had been turned off.  Either would turn it back on.  However,
going to the gnome menu, selecting Sound  Video, then Volume Control
would immediately kill the audio.

Gerry


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



No sound from audio cd's

2003-01-29 Thread Gerry Doris
I've been knocking my head against the screen for the last couple of days.  
I can't play audio cd's no matter what I do.

I can burn audio cd's successfully.  I can play both wav and mp3 files 
from disk.  However, when I try and play directly from cd everything looks 
ok but there isn't any sound (also no error messages).

I've tried the gnome default cdplayer, xmms, kscd.  They all perform 
exactly the same.  They read the tracks and start playing but not a single 
sound comes through.

This is on a RH 8.0 system.

-- 
Gerry

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: No sound from audio cd's

2003-01-29 Thread Gerry Doris
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Tom Wilson wrote:

 Not trying to be facetious here but are you sure that there is a audio cable running 
from you cd-rom to your sound card?  That would be my first guess. 
 
 --Tom Wilson

Yes, there is an audio cable connected.  I even booted back to win98 (it's 
been a while) and I can play the same cd's without problem.  The hardware 
works!

-- 
Gerry

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: No sound from audio cd's - Fixed

2003-01-29 Thread Gerry Doris
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Tim Wunder wrote:

 On 1/29/2003 12:16 PM, someone claiming to be Gerry Doris wrote:
  On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Tom Wilson wrote:
  
  
  Not trying to be facetious here but are you sure that there is a
  audio cable running from you cd-rom to your sound card?  That would
  be my first guess.
  
  --Tom Wilson
  
  
  Yes, there is an audio cable connected.  I even booted back to win98
  (it's been a while) and I can play the same cd's without problem.
  The hardware works!
  
 
 Well, assuming you've actually *looked* at the hardware and have seen
 the cable and know it's connected and are not assuming that the cable is
 connected because Windows plays the CD's, run a mixer, kmix for KDE,
 and make sure the volume on the CD is not muted, and is turned up high 
 enough.
 
 HTH,
 Tim

Hmmm, this is weird.  I now have it working.  

If I use kmix I can get it to work.  However, if I use the gnome mixer
(the one on the sound menu called Volume Control) it kills the sound as
soon as it opens.  There is no way to turn the sound on again except to
start kmix and turn on the cd audio.

Thanks for pointing me to kmix!

-- 
Gerry

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: No sound from audio cd's - Fixed

2003-01-29 Thread Gerry Doris
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Net Llama! wrote:

 On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Gerry Doris wrote:
  Hmmm, this is weird.  I now have it working.
 
  If I use kmix I can get it to work.  However, if I use the gnome mixer
  (the one on the sound menu called Volume Control) it kills the sound as
  soon as it opens.  There is no way to turn the sound on again except to
  start kmix and turn on the cd audio.
 
 Try aumix.  Mixing without KDE's bloat.

aumix works too.  I just have to stay away from the gnome sound menu.  
Using the mixer on there kills the sound!

-- 
Gerry

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: No sound from audio cd's - Fixed

2003-01-29 Thread Gerry Doris
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Net Llama! wrote:

 On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Tim Wunder wrote:
  I really don't think RH put much effort into getting KDE working right
  under BlueCurve. If you're gonna run one of the RH stock desktops, use
 
 Redhat admitted it.  In one interview from LinuxWorld last week, (i think
 it was on slashdot, or newsforge) they stated that they have no KDE
 experts on staff any longer, and had to ship Bluecurve as-is, just to get
 8.0 out the door.

Yes, I remember a fuss when one of the Redhat 8.0 developers working on
KDE (forget his name right now) quit in frustration because of Redhat's
lack of interest in KDE and their willingness to ship a crippled  
desktop.

-- 
Gerry

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



mp3 volume question

2003-01-27 Thread Gerry Doris
All this talk of writing CD's reminded of an old problem that I've never
been able to resolve.

When I download mp3 songs from the internet they show up with different
volume settings.  After I burn them to CD (and yes, I am using linux to
burn them!!!) and play them I end up changing the volume level for each
song.

Is there some kind of program available that will automatically adjust the
volume before burning the files so that each song will have the same
volume setting???


Gerry


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: another small problem with networking

2003-01-05 Thread Gerry Doris
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Bill Day wrote:

 I know IPChains are old and IPTables latest. but PMFirewall is an awsome
 little firewall script that does everything you ask.  You may have to modify
 the scritps after its installed do play certain games through the network
 but other than that it works perfectly.
 
 http://www.pointman.org/
 
 Bill Day

Instead of going back to ipchains I suggest using Monmotha's iptables 
script.  It's easy to configure and works perfectly.  google for monmotha 
and you'll find his site.

-- 
Gerry

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: ATI AIW RADEON users

2002-12-31 Thread Gerry Doris
On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 10:33, Matthew Carpenter wrote:
 Hi all!
 
 I am preparing to purchase an ATI AIW RADEON card to solve both my gaming need 
(OpenGL) and Video Capture need.
 
 I would like someone's opinion about the following:
 ATI Supports the RADEON 8500, 9000, and 9700 with drivers available from them.
 The RADEON and RAGE128 apparently have built-in 3D drivers in XF86's DRI package
 
 For All-In-Wonder support, they point to the GATOS project at sourceforge., but 
mention that their TV Wonder and TV Wonder VE products should be supported out of the 
box.
 
 First off, they don't mention the AIW RADEON 7500.  Does that mean I should avoid 
that card?
 Should I get the AIW RADEON like I want to or should I get some TV Wonder card and 
go for a standard RADEON graphis card (or some other at that point)?
 Has anyone used the GATOS drivers/programs and how well do they work?  I noticed 
there was even a remote control app (which I assume is for a TV-Remote type use?)
 
 Thanks a lot!
 Matt

Personally, I have never had good luck with ATI cards.  I know some
folks swear by them but I have tried them a couple of times and always
returned them for Nvidia cards.  I'd really like to use them as I live
just a few miles from their facilities just outside of Toronto (I'd
prefer to support the local company).

I found the ATI cards to work great in Windows but had difficulties with
their drivers in linux.  I returned a 9500 card just over a month ago
when I found out there were no linux drivers at all for it.  I
discovered there were only drivers available up to the 8500 series.  The
9x00 series had none. However, I believe ATI recently released some
linux drivers for the card but have no idea how good they are.

On the other hand my Nvidia cards have worked great in both Windows and
linux.  The downside is that their drivers are proprietary and need to
be compiled into the kernel.  It's easy to do but you won't get any
support from people like Redhat.  They blame any and all problems on the
Nvidia driver and require you to remove the driver before they will even
think about helping.  

I guess I'm skeptical that ATI's new linux drivers are as good as
Nvidia's.  Afterall, Nvidia's code has been around for many iterations
and new versions are released in sync with their Windows versions.  They
seem to know what they're doing in linux.

-- 
Gerry Doris [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: authenticating to sendmail?

2002-12-24 Thread Gerry Doris
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Douglas J Hunley wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 Gerry Doris spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
  1. sendmail no longer runs as root.  The result is that it can no longer
  access the /etc/sasldb file where the sasl username/passwords are stored
  (this is needed if you're going to enable either DIGEST-M5 or CRAM-M5).
  Lowering the permissions of /etc/sasldb will result in another error.
 
 why not just create /etc/mail/default-auth-info instead of /etc/sasldb like 
 Sendmail recommends?

If you want to use either CRAM-M5 or DIGEST-M5 you need to have Cyrus-SASL
installed and have used saslpasswd to create username/passwords.  Those
are created in /etc/sasldb.  You won't get CRAM-M5 or DIGEST-M5 working
without /etc/sasldb.  These mechanisms along with GASSAPI (kerberos) and
LOGIN are used to authenticate mail clients to the sendmail server.

The /etc/mail/default-auth-info file is used to authenticate one sendmail 
server to another.  

-- 
Gerry

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: authenticating to sendmail?

2002-12-23 Thread Gerry Doris
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, DOUGLAS HUNLEY wrote:

 anyone got any experience or docs or pointers to docs showing how to configure 
sendmail to require a valid id and password before you can SMTP through it? I'm *not* 
talking about POP before SMTP. I'm talking about 'my server requires authentication 
before I can send mail' ..
 thanks
 
 
 --
 Doug Hunley
 ODJFS DNS/Linux/Unix Admin

You might want to check www.linux-sxs.org.  It's a great site that has a 
number of docs including setting up authentication on sendmail g.  
There's some minor changes needed for the latest version of sendmail which 
I'll send to you a little later.

-- 
Gerry

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: authenticating to sendmail?

2002-12-23 Thread Gerry Doris
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, DOUGLAS HUNLEY wrote:

 anyone got any experience or docs or pointers to docs showing how to configure 
sendmail to require a valid id and password before you can SMTP through it? I'm *not* 
talking about POP before SMTP. I'm talking about 'my server requires authentication 
before I can send mail' ..
 thanks
 
 
 --
 Doug Hunley
 ODJFS DNS/Linux/Unix Admin

The latest version of sendmail requires some minor changes to the 
authentication SxS that's on the linux-sxs.org site.

1. sendmail no longer runs as root.  The result is that it can no longer 
access the /etc/sasldb file where the sasl username/passwords are stored 
(this is needed if you're going to enable either DIGEST-M5 or CRAM-M5).  
Lowering the permissions of /etc/sasldb will result in another error.

To get around this add the following to /etc/mail/sendmail.mc

define(`DontBlameSendmail', `GroupReadableSASLDBFile')dnl

Don't forget to run the M4 macro to generate /etc/mail/sendmail.cf AND
restart the sendmail service.

2. If you want one sendmail to authenticate with another sendmail server 
then add the following line to /etc/mail/sendmail.mc

define(`confAUTH_OPTIONS', `A')dnl

and add to /etc/mail/access

AuthInfo:server_name  U:user_name I:user_name P:password 
R:server_name M:DIGEST-M5 CRAM-M5 LOGIN GSSAPI

All of the above on one line and where server_name is the server you want 
your sendmail to authenticate to.  You only need one valid user_name and 
password for anyone on your server who has an account with the other 
sendmail.

The rest of the SxS should work as listed.  Let me know if you're having 
problems.

-- 
Gerry

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: this is pretty cool

2002-11-26 Thread Gerry Doris

 On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, David A. Bandel wrote:
 On Mon, 25 Nov 2002 20:05:45 -0800
 begin  Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:

  On 11/25/02 19:50, dep wrote:
   i was just reading some stuff rick moen wrote in connection with
 wordperfect for linux -- he and i were discussing describe on
 another list -- and i found that on
   http://linuxmafia.com/wpfaq/problems.html#WONTINSTALL he links to
 the sxs editors page. rick is not a lightweight by any means, so i
 think the link is a pretty good endorsement that the sxs authors
 have done good.
 
  I couldn't agree less.  I had the severe misfortune of having to sit
 in the cubicle next to Rick's for over a year.  His singular talent
 is to speak  write prolificly about topics of which he knows
 nothing.  He does a superb job of convinving others that he's an
 expert on many subjects, when in reality, all he does is ferret out
 other sources and present them as his own.  And don't get me started
 on his shortcomings in the non-technical arena.

 Amen.  Don't know him personally, but ...

 Consider yourself lucky.  He's an order of magnitude worse in person.

 Having conversed with him via e-mail on several occasions, he doesn't
 have a clue (and spreads misinformation).  Problem is, he does it so
 convincingly it's simple for neophites to believe him.  I only started
 one of his books, one that was recommended by someone who should know
 better, and I only got part way through before I threw is out.  Full
 of BS and misinformation.  Better if he wasn't still hanging around.

 He's a leech.  He loves to be the center of attention.  Oh, and did i
 mention that he was fired from VA Linux/Software for gross incompetance?
 The word 'loser' comes to mind.

 --
 ~~
 Lonni J Friedman  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMohttp://netllama.ipfox.com



Geesh, if you folks feel strongly about an issue you should really speak
out and not keep to yourself!  That said, how do you really feel about
this guy?

It's been a long time since I read comments so negative about one person
from so many!!!  He must really be a prize!

Gerry


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: OT sendmail guru help needed

2002-10-18 Thread Gerry Doris

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 This one has me stumped, hopefully one of you gurus can figure it out.
 Here at  work, we are trying to implement a sendmail test system to
 prove its  capabilities to mgmt. We are going to be allowed to have a
 small group of  specify email addresses be routed through the new
 sendmail box, while  everyone else's mail goes through the normal mail
 route. The problem is that  there is nothing in the email address itself
 to distinguish the allowed email  adrresses from the non-allowed. In
 other words, lets say we have 100  different users at somecompany.com.
 These 100 people currently receive mail  through a machine I'll call
 'maill. We're getting permission to  change 25 of  those 100 people to
 use our new email server, called sendmail. We are not  allowed to give
 these 25 people new email addresses for this test, nor are we  alowed to
 create a subdomain under somecompany.com. How would you gurus  configure
 sendmail to process the mail for these 25 people and simply forward  the
 mail for the other 75 people to the existing mail server?
 - --
 Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
 Admin: Linux StepByStep - http://www.linux-sxs.org
   and http://jobs.linux-sxs.org

Perhaps I'm missing something but I think you should be looking at
virtusertable.

I'm assuming that all mail is going to come through the linux sendmail
box.  I believe you can forward all the mail not being processed by
sendmail over to the other mail server using virtusertable.  The other
mail accounts would simply be processed by sendmail.

Gerry


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: OT sendmail guru help needed

2002-10-18 Thread Gerry Doris

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Gerry Doris spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
 Perhaps I'm missing something but I think you should be looking at
 virtusertable.

 I'm assuming that all mail is going to come through the linux sendmail
 box.  I believe you can forward all the mail not being processed by
 sendmail over to the other mail server using virtusertable.  The other
 mail accounts would simply be processed by sendmail.

 I had thought this too. But I couldn't find an example of how to
 accomplish  this. got one?

 - --
 Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
 Admin: Linux StepByStep - http://www.linux-sxs.org
   and http://jobs.linux-sxs.org

I've used virtusertable to forward from one mail server to another.  For
example the following entry:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

would send all mail coming into my mailserver addressed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to user gerry at an internal server called
tiger.dorfam.ca.  If I understand what you're trying to do then you would
need to add 75 addresses to the left hand side directing them to a
separate internal server.  Using virtusertable this will be done without
any processing.  The 25 names not listed will be processed.  You could
then use procmail to send those 25 users' mail onto the second server for
normal delivery after doing your filtering.



The following is from the sendmail docs


virtusertable   A domain-specific form of aliasing, allowing multiple
virtual domains to be hosted on one machine.  For example,
if the virtuser table contained:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]foo-info
[EMAIL PROTECTED]bar-info
[EMAIL PROTECTED] error:nouser 550 No such user here
[EMAIL PROTECTED] error:5.7.0:550 Address invalid
@baz.org[EMAIL PROTECTED]

then mail addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] will be sent to the
address foo-info, mail addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] will be
delivered to bar-info, and mail addressed to anyone at baz.org
will be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] will
be rejected with the specified error message, and mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] will also have a RFC 1893 compliant error code
5.7.0.

The username from the original address is passed
as %1 allowing:

@foo.org[EMAIL PROTECTED]

meaning [EMAIL PROTECTED] will be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Additionally, if the local part consists of user+detail
then detail is passed as %2 and +detail is passed as %3
when a match against user+* is attempted, so entries like

old+*@foo.org   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gen+*@foo.org   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+*@foo.org  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
@bar.org%1%3

and other forms are possible.  Note: to preserve +detail
for a default case (@domain) %1%3 must be used as RHS.
There are two wildcards after +: + matches only a non-empty
detail, * matches also empty details, e.g., [EMAIL PROTECTED]
matches +*@foo.org but not [EMAIL PROTECTED]  This can be used
to ensure that the parameters %2 and %3 are not empty.

All the host names on the left hand side (foo.com, bar.com,
and baz.org) must be in class {w} or class {VirtHost}.  The
latter can be defined by the macros VIRTUSER_DOMAIN or
VIRTUSER_DOMAIN_FILE (analogously to MASQUERADE_DOMAIN and
MASQUERADE_DOMAIN_FILE, see below).  If VIRTUSER_DOMAIN or
VIRTUSER_DOMAIN_FILE is used, then the entries of class
{VirtHost} are added to class {R}, i.e., relaying is allowed
to (and from) those domains.  The default map definition is:

hash /etc/mail/virtusertable

A new definition can be specified as the second argument of
the FEATURE macro, such as

FEATURE(`virtusertable', `dbm /etc/mail/virtusers')



Gerry


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: auth smtp and pam.d

2002-10-17 Thread Gerry Doris

 I will try recompile linux-pam myself and check if it got this
 pam_stack.so. maybe only the doc was outdated...

 Net Llama! wrote:
 Its part of Redhat's PAM.  I have no idea about any other distro.

BTW, if you're using a new version of sendmail then the authentication
instructions in the sxs won't work.  Sendmail now runs as non-root and has
changed a few things.

authinfo (I'm going from memory here) no longer works.  It been replaced
by a tag with similar data in the access database.  The access directive
has new parameters.  Also, sendmail can't access the /etc/sasldb file
since only root has permission to do that.  Changing the permission causes
complaints that the file has wrong permissions.  You can work around this
by including a DontBlameSendmail directive in sendmail.mc.

Gerry


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: RH 8.0 download [was: Re: glibc and RedHat 8.0]

2002-10-01 Thread Gerry Doris

On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Net Llama! wrote:

 Zoki News wrote:
  *** Freekin' hell! There are FIVE CD's for the new RH!! I am sure it is not
  going to install on a 150Mb partition like RH 5.0 did...
 
 RH-5 was a long long time ago.  And some of us would prefer to forget 
 that RH5 ever existed :)
 
 Anyhoo, i'm sure that at least of the CD's, if not two are SRPMs. 
 RH-7.3 was 3 RPM CDs, not sure about how many for SRPMs.

Discs 4  5 are SRPMs.  There is a separate documentation disc.  Only the 
first 3 discs are needed for an install.

-- 
Gerry

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Updated Step

2002-09-28 Thread Gerry Doris

On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, Nobody wrote:

 M.W. Chang via Gerry Gorris has just updated http://www.linux-sxs.org/smailauth.html 
to incorporate the following:
 Updated to clean up HTML formatting

Who's Gerry Gorris

-- 
Gerry

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: virus scanning for linux email downloader

2002-06-27 Thread Gerry Doris

On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:

 Anyone know if these work with exim?
 
 I have a feeling I would have to give up my favorite MTA to get this capability. 
Surely that would not be the case. I will have to investigate.
 
mailscanner works with exim.  

Gerry
-- 

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: virus scanning for linux email downloader

2002-06-27 Thread Gerry Doris


 Mr. Witowski,
 I'm not at all sure what is impaled in your ass, but kindly remove it,
 and then return to the playground.

 On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Brian Witowski wrote:
 Perhaps not.  You're just a dick and you repulse people.

   Never said anything about InstallShield...you did.  I also
   didn't say that I didn't know how to compile.
 
  And i never accused you of either.  Touched a raw nerve, did i?
 

Now that we've all had a good laugh perhaps we should go back on topic!

Gerry
-- 
The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne Chaucer


___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Mail server issues

2002-06-27 Thread Gerry Doris

On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, Brian Witowski wrote:

 I am getting the following error in my fetchmail log file upon trying to get
 mail from a POP3/IMAP account:
 
 
 fetchmail: SMTP connect to localhost failed
 fetchmail: can't raise the listener; falling back to /usr/bin/procmail -d
 %Tfetc
 hmail: IMAP )
 
 I only get it with one account.  I don't have a problem with it 'falling
 back' but it takes about 7 or 8 minutes to time out.  I don't know enough
 about email to figure out what it's trying to do.  Any suggestions as to
 what is causing the error and how to fix it?
 
 Thanks,
 Brian
 
I believe it is trying to say that it can't deliver to sendmail.  If 
you're sure that sendmail is running and this only happens with one 
account then check that you've got the user name correct in fetchmail.  

Is the user name at the remote server the same as the local where you're
trying to deliver the mail? If the names are different then you should be
using something like the following line in fetchmailrc

poll remote_server with proto POP3 user [EMAIL PROTECTED] there with 
passwd is harry here

Gerry
-- 

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



re: virus scanning for linux email downloader

2002-06-26 Thread Gerry Doris

 Michael:
   I use MIMEDefang to process email on the Linux StepByStep site as well
 as my
 other sites. You can get it from www.roaringpenguin.org/mimedefang . It
 then  calls SpamAssassin, which calls Vipuls Razor (v1 !!) and then
 calls  File::Scan to check for viruses. You could also throw Anomy::HTML
 in their to  check inbound HTML email as well. All are open source
 projects and I have had  NO issues with them. You will need the latest
 Sendmail and you need to have  it compiled with libmilter turned on (see
 the SxS). After that, it's fairly  easy to install the Perl modules. I
 would install Razor, then SpamAssassin,  then File::Scan and finally
 MIMEDefang (everything will autodetect each other  this way). Let me
 know if you have questions.
 - --
 Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
 Admin: Linux StepByStep - http://www.linux-sxs.org
   and http://jobs.linux-sxs.org

I originally tried to use MIMEdefang but never could get it to work.  I
was intrigued with the author's view that he doesn't supply binaries...if
you don't know how to compile code then you shouldn't be trying to use his
app.  I can see his point but it still seems to be rather stupid to me.

In any case, MIMEdefang just wouldn't compile on my system.  I continued
to get string errors no matter what I did.  MIMEdefang's author and I
exchanged printouts but he couldn't figger out what was happening either.

I then checked out mailscanner.  It doesn't require any config changes to
the stock sendmail install and comes as a rpm package (as well as tar).  I
installed it in minutes and it has worked ever since.

mailscanner uses spamassassin if you have it installed.  It also supports
several virus engines (ie. McAfee, Sophos, F-Prot, etc).  Julian Field who
wrote the code couldn't be more responsive to requests for features.  I
highly recommend mailscanner.

Gerry
-- 
The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne Chaucer


___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: virus scanning for linux email downloader

2002-06-26 Thread Gerry Doris

On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
 no changes to sendmail for mimedefang either. well, a tweak when you build 
 your sendmail.cf, but that is true of all milter-based apps
 - -- 
 Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
 Admin: Linux StepByStep - http://www.linux-sxs.org
   and http://jobs.linux-sxs.org

Hmmm, something has changed since I tried MIMEdefang about a year ago.  I 
had to compile sendmail from scratch.  That was a pain.

Gerry
-- 

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Virus Scanning for Linux Email Downloader

2002-06-24 Thread Gerry Doris


 Thanks for the pointers to mailscanner and amavis.org. I'll check them
 out.

 Are these free av products as prompt  thorough about updating virus
 definitions as, say, Norton  McAfee? Seems like it would be a nearly
 impossible job without significant full-time staff.

 Michael


Mailscanner is free but the virus engines aren't.  You will still need a
licensed version of McAfee, Sophos, F-Prot, or whatever virus package you
decide to use.  Unfotunately, most of these packages are targetted at
corporations and don't have an affordable price for small users.  I'm not
sure what your appication is?

F-Prot will allow their package to be used for free on linux systems for
personal/hobby use.  Business use requires a license.

Gerry
-- 
The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne Chaucer


___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Virus Scanning for Linux Email Downloader

2002-06-23 Thread Gerry Doris

On Sun, 23 Jun 2002, Michael Hipp wrote:

 I will be configuring a Linux box to download email from the ISP for a bunch 
 of Outhouse clients. Can anyone recommend a virus scanner that would catch 
 anyting coming into the Linux box before it can be downloaded to the 
 clients?
 
 Can I layer Spamassassin on top of that yet?
 
 Thanks,
 Michael

I suggest you use mailscanner.  It will work with serveral virus engines 
and also uses spamassassin if you have it installed.  It comes as an rpm 
package for redhat and works with sendmail or exim.

Gerry
-- 

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: error in /var/log/mail

2002-06-04 Thread Gerry Doris

On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, m.w.chang wrote:

 
 google.com didn't help me much... seems that it's a known problem of 
 sendmail...
 
 Jun  4 10:32:32 server sendmail[2437]: g542UVL02435: timeout waiting for 
 input from local during Draining Input
 Jun  4 10:32:34 server sendmail[2443]: g542UWL02441: timeout waiting for 
 input from local during Draining Input
 

The last time I checked these error messages I was told that sendmail was 
in the middle of receiving and the data flow stopped.  sendmail then timed 
out waiting for the remainder of the transfer to occur.  In other words, 
the transfer to your sendmail server was interrupted for some reason and 
sendmail finally gave up.  It isn't a sendmail problem.

Gerry
-- 

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: news

2002-05-10 Thread Gerry Doris

 On May 9 Net Llama! was heard saying:

 snip

 - *** On the other hand it is ridiculous the system works this way:
 - After all they ** made ** $15M!
 -
 -I think you missed the point.  They didn't 'make' anything.  The
 spent -more than they took in.  THey 'lost' money.


 *** Having followed the thread I can see I did miss the point.

 I must admit I never really cared to understand how it worked... until
 today. If somebody feels like giving me a short HOWTO on capitalism
 ;-)...

 What I read and understood was that their forcast was $18M while they
 have done $15M and their share value went down. Maybe I missed it,
 but where do I see that they spent more than they earned?

 Just a warning: I am a straight ** 0 ** in this matter! :-)

 Cheers,
 Zoran.
 --

If you really want to get into the ugly details you should download their
full results.  However, the essential part I think you missed was that they
had a LOSS of $0.23/share or $0.28/share..I forget which.

What it means is that they spent more than they made ie. had a negative
profit (a loss) and when the loss was divided by the number of shares that
have been issued it gave the above result.  In other words, Caldera and the
analysts seemed to believe that they would sell around $18M in revenue but
they missed and only got $15M.

By the way, losing $$$ although never good is acceptable as long as there
is a plan to get back to profitability and the company is tracking to the
plan.  The key is that the market place absolutely does NOT like
surprises.  Not meeting the targets that everyone expects will most
certainly bring down your stock price...and that will cause the company's
management to change, layoffs, and eventually the company will go broke if
it isn't corrected.

On the other hand Cisco announced on Tuesday night that they had a great
quarter beating their projected results (I think everyone expected +
$0.02/share and they came in at around + $0.08/share.  Their stock price
soared on Wed and the entire market took off.  The Dow average went up 350
points...the largest gain in one day since 1994.  This was based on
speculation that we may have turned the corner on the recession and people
are starting to place orders for telecommunications equipment again.

Gerry
-- 
The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne Chaucer


___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: news

2002-05-09 Thread Gerry Doris


 Greetings,

 On Thu, 9 May 2002, dep wrote:

 
http://computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/linux/story/0%2C10801%2C71003%2C00.html?nlid=AM
   Gee... $15 Million in revenue is a Bad Thing(tm)???  Not the $18
 Million they expected.  What sort of P/E does the $15 mil represent?  I
 would have to say that is GOOD news in light of the number of Linux
 distributions that tanked in the last 12 months.

   And I'm not at all suprised to hear they are cutting costs and
   letting
 go their Chief Technology officer.  They are long overdue to perform a
 bit of 'restructuring'...

  --- Jay

The key is that they lost $0.28/share and they lost more than they
predicted just 3 months ago.  To shareholders that indicates they don't
have control of their company.  Many companies have been punished severely
in the market by missing their projections by just $0.01!!!
I didn't read the full context but if they predicted they would make $18M
and they only made $15 then they were off their own projections by 16.7%
in 3 months...there's no way to make that good news.
The problem is that they need to demonstrate to shareholders that they are
taking measures to reduce the bleeding but laying off staff and closing
down development centres becomes a road straight to oblivion for a
technology company.
Gerry
-- 
The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne Chaucer


___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: news

2002-05-09 Thread Gerry Doris


 On May 9 Gerry Doris was heard saying:

 snip

 -I didn't read the full context but if they predicted they would make
 $18M -and they only made $15 then they were off their own projections
 by 16.7%



 *** On the other hand it is ridiculous the system works this way:
 After all they ** made ** $15M!

 Cheers,
 Zoran.
 --

Remember that although they made $15M in revenue they spent considerably
more.  They ended up losing $0.23 per share.  That isn't a success.
Gerry
-- 
The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne Chaucer


___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: news

2002-05-09 Thread Gerry Doris


 On Thursday 09 May 2002 19:13 pm, dep wrote:
 fyi, we did a little interview with ransom love an hour or so ago;
 it's up now:

 Sorry, but I don't buy the 'tough market' as being the sole reason for
 their  demise.   I still 'lurk' on the Caldera List and I cringe
 everytime I see  someone struggling mightily to compile something or
 upgrade something else  because Caldera 'forgot' or didn't include it
 in their stealth distro.

 I gave up on Caldera two years ago when the hand writing was on the
 wall that  they were no longer interested in the retail market and I
 have never looked  back.

 I think they've lost it.


Caldera was the first distro that I bought many years ago and I was
reasonably happy with it.  However, I also felt that they were moving away
from me and I gave up on them.
I hate to see Caldera in the fix they're in but it really is a tough
market.  SuSE has also struggled at least in North America.  Redhat,
inspite of all the criticism they get seem to have the correct vision and
seem to be just getting stronger while the rest are suffering.
Gerry
-- 
The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne Chaucer


___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Klez at it again

2002-05-02 Thread Gerry Doris

On Thu, 2 May 2002, David A. Bandel wrote:

 Folks,
 
 Please review the mail headers, someone on one of these lists has Klez. 
 This is not really bounce message: 1.  No Windoze here (much less
 Outhouse) 2.  I don't think I know this e-mail address
 
 The Return-Path has most certainly been altered.  But we can say that it
 originated on comcast.net:

snip
 
 Subject: Undeliverable mail--Troubleshooting
 

David, are you sure that it came from these lists?  I'm subscribed to them 
too and I don't remember seeing any messages with the subject 
Troubleshooting.  

I'm really curious since I may have deleted it without reading it as I get
so many messages that I usually scan the subjects and only read the
interesting topics.  If that's the case then mailscanner that is supposed 
to be checking for virii using F-Prot missed it.

On the other hand mailscanner definitely didn't find a message with Klez 
in it either???

S, either the message didn't come in on these lists or mailscanner 
running on my system didn't catch the virus?

Gerry
-- 

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: And now...., from our unlimited /hutzpah/ department

2002-05-01 Thread Gerry Doris

 Scribbling feverishly on May 01, M.W.Chang managed to emit:
 asounds like an evil cult if not marriage... till death we part.. :)

 But at least with marriage, you have the possibility of divorce
 or annulment.

 Kurt
 --
 Any father who thinks he's all important should remind himself that
 this country honors fathers only one day a year while pickles get a
 whole week.
 ___
 Linux-users mailing list -
 http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe
 info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.

Hmmm, I'm not sure if death isn't preferable to the divorce process???

Gerry
-- 
The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne Chaucer


___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Red Hat 7.2 on HP Netserver E800

2002-04-11 Thread Gerry Doris

On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Zoki wrote:

 html
 *** I will be installing RH 7.x on this machine without knowing what to think of the 
following: According to several colleagues HP seems to use the MBR for keeping 
hardware quot;specific dataquot; (?) in there which accordingly does not allow to 
write lilo to it.brbr
 What is true about this?br
 x-sigsepp/x-sigsep
 Cheers,br
 Zoran.br
 /html

Do you really feel it is necessary to post html to list servers???  You
see what it looks like in pine.  Also, if the list is sent out in digest
mode those subscribers are treated to the sample giberish.

-- 
Gerry

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne  Chaucer


___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: procmail, day 2

2002-04-06 Thread Gerry Doris

On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, [x-user-defined] toylet.linux[¤pª±·N] wrote:

 when I use /etc/procmailrc to start procmail, 
 what user does it assume? root or ... whatever?
 seems that it's not root...
 
 I know the case when it was started in /home/user

Well, I don't pretend to be a procmail guru by any means and I highly 
recommend you read the man files.  There are lots of examples available on 
the web too.

That said...When a user receives mail and procmail is enabled a procmail
process is kicked off for each message.  First, procmail searches for a
.procmailrc file in the user's home directory.  If that isn't found then
procmail looks for /etc/procmailrc.  

There are situations when this can result in running procmail as root if
it isn't set correctly so be careful.  Also, if several messages arrive at
the same time there may be contention in storing the messages.  That's
were the lock files come in.  They prevent various procmail processes from
stomping all over each other.

I only have a few users on my home network and have individual .procmailrc
files in each of their directories customized by user.  I use procmail to
screen out obvious spam for the most part although I do have some messages
automatically forwarded to different users.  I don't use the
/etc/procmailrc file at all.

One nice recipe is to eliminate duplicate messages (when those idiots go
on holidays and leave vacation messages pouring into list servers!!!).  I
see that you're using that recipe too.  If you want to use individual
.procmailrc files then change entries like /var/log/msgid.cache to the
user's home directory ie /home/gerry/msgid.cache to get around permission 
problems.

Here's some sample lines from my .procmailrc file:


SHELL=/bin/sh
ABYSS=/dev/null
LOGFILE=/var/log/procmail
VERBOSE=off
SENDMAIL=/usr/sbin/sendmail
MAILDIR=/var/spool/mail
DEFAULT=/var/spool/mail/gerry
HOME=/home/gerry

:0 Wh: $HOME/msgid.lock
| formail -D 8192 $HOME/msgid.cache

:0:
* ^From: .*(bellzinc\
|casino\
|musicmatch\
)
$ABYSS

:0 c
* ^(From: |To:|Cc:) .*aircanada 
! [EMAIL PROTECTED]

:0:
* ^Content-Type: .*(ks.*\
|ISO-2022-JP\
|ISO-8859-9\
)
$ABYSS

:0 D
* ^date:
$ABYSS

:0:
* ^X-Advertisement:.*
$ABYSS

:0:
* To: [ ]*$
$ABYSS

:0:
* To: .*(Undisclosed|undisclosed)
$ABYSS

:0:
* !To: .*
$ABYSS

:0fw:$HOME/spam.lock
| spamassassin -P
:0e
{
 EXITCODE=$?
  }
:0:  
* ^Subject:.*\*\*\*\*SPAM\*\*\*\*
$ABYSS

:0:
* ^(From: |To:|Cc:) .*(redhat\
|suse\
|linux\
|caldera\
|lvm\
|monmotha\
|pan\
|JISCMAIL\
|samba\
|gamespy\
|licq\
)
$DEFAULT


I have some other stuff after this but I don't want to totally bore you!!!  
I should clean the .procmailrc files up some day since stuff gets added in 
a rather ad hoc way.

Gerry


___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: procmail, day 2

2002-04-05 Thread Gerry Doris

I don't believe procmail cares where you put the log files as long as you
can write to the directory.  Change the path of the lock files to a
directory where the user running procmail can write.

 does sendmail guarantee that only one procmail will be active at any
 time when there is a /etc/procmailrc? This locking issue is definitely
 complicating my job... I have taken out all : in my /etc/procmailrc
 except the msgid.cache you created in the sample.

I believe the example assumes you are running as root.  That's why they
use /var/log.  A normal user can't write to /var/log for obvious reasons.
Each user may have his/her own .procmailrc file in their own directory.
When that user starts prormail it uses that user's .procmailrc file.  Just
make sure that whatever user is calling procmail it can write to the
specified directories.


Gerry

-- 
The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne Chaucer


___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: POP before SMTP

2002-03-18 Thread Gerry Doris

On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Douglas J Hunley wrote:

 Bill Day spewed electrons into the ether that assembled into:
  as in?   I still havent quite got SMTP with sendmail working, if I use my
 
 as in anyone who sucessfully pops first (id and password) can send through my 
 sendmail. right now, I can set you up an account on my machine, and you can 
 pop from it, but you won't be able to send through it cause relaying is 
 denied. If you logged into the machine, you could send. pop before smtp gets 
 around this..
 
I can help you set up sendmail with authorization.  It's quite simple.  
The idea is that your clients either check authentication required on 
their mail clients (ie. win Outlook) and point them at your mail server 
that's running sendmail as the MTA.  Linux boxes just point their mail 
clients at their own localhost sendmail which is told to use your mail 
server as their smart host.

sendmail on your mail server will then authenticate your clients using 
their user name and password.  They will also be able to relay through 
your mail server without problems.

I have to head out to work now but will send on the files this evening so 
you can see how it works.


Gerry

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Yahoo and Kmail

2002-03-10 Thread Gerry Doris

Follow the instructions in this url.  It assumes you're using sendmail as
your mta.


http://sdb.suse.de/en/sdb/html/sendmail_smtp_auth.html


Gerry

 Yahoo have changed their smtp so that it must be 'authenticated'. I am
 able to send via Netscape, but Kmail falls over with a reject response
 (from yahoo).

 The blurb on the Yahoo site gives an example for Outlook (Express)
 sigh and says to click the 'server requires authentication box'. This
 is not selectable under netscape mail composer (works anyway) but Kmail
 just will not send correctly?

 Anyone have a fix for this?




 _
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get your free yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

 ___
 Linux-users mailing list -
 http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe
 info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: procmail and sendmail

2002-02-23 Thread Gerry Doris

On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Douglas J Hunley wrote:

 Gerry Doris spewed electrons into the ether that assembled into:
  An even nicer solution is to add mailscanner.  It integrates with
  spamassassin and will also scan all mail from viruses using a variety of
  virus scanners.
 
 got a homepage for that?
 

www.sng.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailscanner

I've been using mailscanner to scan all mail coming/going on my server for 
viruses since Oct.  It supports several virus engines (one or all at the 
same time).  

When spam support is turned on mailscanner will make an internal call
directly to spamassassin.  If the spam count is above the threshold you
set mailscanner will modify the header adding {SPAM} that can be filtered
by procmail.

I've set spamassassin up to use razor.  That really cut the traffic down!

I've had many emails flagged for viruses.  The samba list was really bad 
until they started filtering themselves.  I rarely see a spam message 
anymore.  

-- 
Gerry

The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne Chaucer

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.