Re: This is just a test
Is it possible to do an ftp server with dialup where the IP address changes every time I log on and I don't have a domain registered anywhere so a DNS service would be useless? Sounds like you want a dynamic dns service. go to http://www.dyndns.org org and register once logged in click the services tab on the left hand side select the dynamic dns link it will expand to a list of sub options. click add host and make up a hostname and select which domain you want it to belong to and click add. Once you have done the above you need a DDNS Client, Click the Clients link under Dynamic DNS and select one for your OS. Download and configure it with your www.dyndns.org username and password and the hostname.x.xxx domain you selected and configure the update options per your tastes (the defaults are always a good start) Now when ever you dial up make sure that you have the DDNS Client active and updating your name to ip address mapping. -- James McDonald Singleton Australia 61+ (0)2 65712401 61+ 0428 320 219 Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. -- Albert Einstein Linux 2.6.0-test9 #1 Fri Nov 7 22:06:28 EST 2003 athlon i386 GNU/Linux 12:15:01 up 14:02, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.00 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: This is just a test
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 22:20:29 -0500 Robert E.Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] If you're wondering why a home user would want sendmail for himself, I just want it so I can send large files by email to people who don't have enough FTP upload accounts, as the Earthlink SMTP server has a 10 MB filesize limit. So why don't _you_ set up an FTP server they can d/l stuff from? 10MB+ e-mails? SMTP was never designed for that kind of nonsense. Called using the right tool for the job (ftp, rsync). Ciao, David A. Bandel -- Focus on the dream, not the competition. Nemesis Racing Team motto GPG key autoresponder: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: This is just a test
On Friday 31 October 2003 6:29, David A. Bandel wrote: On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 23:23:31 -0500 Robert E.Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snippage] V6 T1067573880 K1067574071 N1 P32378 MDeferred: Connection timed out with smtp.linux-sxs.org. Fbs Some ISPs block port 25. Can you telnet to the linux-sxs server on port 25? Ciao, David A. Bandel Nope, I can't. Any way I can get around the blockage? -- Linux EPoX.Linux.Raymond 2.6.0-test9 #2 Wed Oct 29 16:05:56 EST 2003 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2600+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux 06:51:21 up 1 day, 13:49, 7 users, load average: 0.54, 0.21, 0.12 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: This is just a test
On Friday 31 October 2003 6:31, David A. Bandel wrote: On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 22:20:29 -0500 Robert E.Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] If you're wondering why a home user would want sendmail for himself, I just want it so I can send large files by email to people who don't have enough FTP upload accounts, as the Earthlink SMTP server has a 10 MB filesize limit. So why don't _you_ set up an FTP server they can d/l stuff from? 10MB+ e-mails? SMTP was never designed for that kind of nonsense. Called using the right tool for the job (ftp, rsync). Is it possible to do an ftp server with dialup where the IP address changes every time I log on and I don't have a domain registered anywhere so a DNS service would be useless? I was thinking SMTP because then I could send the file at my leisure and the guy who needs the large files could receive it at his (we're on other sides of the pond.. so different sleep schedules.. plus dialup ain't as always on as I'd like it to be with other people in the house and an ISP that is very anti-internet-connection-sharing) Bob Raymond Ciao, David A. Bandel -- Linux EPoX.Linux.Raymond 2.6.0-test9 #2 Wed Oct 29 16:05:56 EST 2003 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2600+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux 06:52:43 up 1 day, 13:51, 7 users, load average: 0.88, 0.40, 0.19 The trouble with being punctual is that nobody's there to appreciate it. -- Franklin P. Jones ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: This is just a test
On Friday 31 October 2003 7:36, David A. Bandel wrote: On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 06:52:36 -0500 Robert E.Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 31 October 2003 6:29, David A. Bandel wrote: On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 23:23:31 -0500 Robert E.Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snippage] V6 T1067573880 K1067574071 N1 P32378 MDeferred: Connection timed out with smtp.linux-sxs.org. Fbs Some ISPs block port 25. Can you telnet to the linux-sxs server on port 25? Ciao, David A. Bandel Nope, I can't. Any way I can get around the blockage? Send them an angry letter and get another provider. Despite the hazards, taking away freedom by blocking ports is the wrong way to fight the spam problem. Ciao, David A. Bandel Arggh.. around here there is one other provider. I have no problems with it,except they only offer one email addy, which would go to my parents. Though I still get my inbox loaded with spam so their methods don't seem to be working. But still.. is there a reason why I can send and receive sendmail messages to myself? Oh well.. I'll see about the FTP option... Bob Raymond -- Linux EPoX.Linux.Raymond 2.6.0-test9 #2 Wed Oct 29 16:05:56 EST 2003 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2600+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux 07:41:19 up 1 day, 14:39, 7 users, load average: 0.28, 0.20, 0.13 It all happened during the magical summer of 1985. A maturing Joe Piscopo left `Saturday Night Live' to conquer Hollywood; People Express introduced a generation of hicks to plane travel; and I was in a barbershop quartet. -- Homer Simpson Homer's Barbershop Quartet ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: This is just a test
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 06:55, Robert E.Raymond wrote: On Friday 31 October 2003 6:31, David A. Bandel wrote: On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 22:20:29 -0500 Robert E.Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] If you're wondering why a home user would want sendmail for himself, I just want it so I can send large files by email to people who don't have enough FTP upload accounts, as the Earthlink SMTP server has a 10 MB filesize limit. So why don't _you_ set up an FTP server they can d/l stuff from? 10MB+ e-mails? SMTP was never designed for that kind of nonsense. Called using the right tool for the job (ftp, rsync). Is it possible to do an ftp server with dialup where the IP address changes every time I log on and I don't have a domain registered anywhere so a DNS service would be useless? Have you looked at dyndns.org or one of the similar services? That may be what you need. Tom Wilson McSwain Carpets 513.771.1400 x124 - System going down at 5 this afternoon to install scheduler bug. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: This is just a test
On Friday 31 October 2003 10:42, Tom Wilson wrote: On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 06:55, Robert E.Raymond wrote: On Friday 31 October 2003 6:31, David A. Bandel wrote: On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 22:20:29 -0500 Robert E.Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] If you're wondering why a home user would want sendmail for himself, I just want it so I can send large files by email to people who don't have enough FTP upload accounts, as the Earthlink SMTP server has a 10 MB filesize limit. So why don't _you_ set up an FTP server they can d/l stuff from? 10MB+ e-mails? SMTP was never designed for that kind of nonsense. Called using the right tool for the job (ftp, rsync). Is it possible to do an ftp server with dialup where the IP address changes every time I log on and I don't have a domain registered anywhere so a DNS service would be useless? Have you looked at dyndns.org or one of the similar services? That may be what you need. See, the thing about a place like that, I'd need to reg a domain, right? I'm trying to do this for free, which sendmail and ftp both are. I just need to send the guy files periodically (right now is one of those times ;)), and I suppose I could mail him a CD but it's certainly cheaper to just send him the files. -- Linux EPoX.Linux.Raymond 2.6.0-test9 #2 Wed Oct 29 16:05:56 EST 2003 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2600+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux 11:02:11 up 1 day, 18:00, 1 user, load average: 0.37, 0.19, 0.15 If it's working, the diagnostics say it's fine. If it's not working, the diagnostics say it's fine. - A proposed addition to rules for realtime programming ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: This is just a test
Hi Robert, See, the thing about a place like that, I'd need to reg a domain, right? I'm trying to do this for free, which sendmail and ftp both are. I just need to send the guy files periodically (right now is one of those times ;)), Would a commandline tool like sendEmail be enough? See http://caspian.dotconf.net/menu/Software/SendEmail/ HTH hjb ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: This is just a test
On 10/31/2003 11:04 AM, I believe that Robert E.Raymond wrote: On Friday 31 October 2003 10:42, Tom Wilson wrote: On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 06:55, Robert E.Raymond wrote: On Friday 31 October 2003 6:31, David A. Bandel wrote: On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 22:20:29 -0500 Robert E.Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] If you're wondering why a home user would want sendmail for himself, I just want it so I can send large files by email to people who don't have enough FTP upload accounts, as the Earthlink SMTP server has a 10 MB filesize limit. So why don't _you_ set up an FTP server they can d/l stuff from? 10MB+ e-mails? SMTP was never designed for that kind of nonsense. Called using the right tool for the job (ftp, rsync). Is it possible to do an ftp server with dialup where the IP address changes every time I log on and I don't have a domain registered anywhere so a DNS service would be useless? Have you looked at dyndns.org or one of the similar services? That may be what you need. See, the thing about a place like that, I'd need to reg a domain, right? I'm trying to do this for free, which sendmail and ftp both are. I just need to send the guy files periodically (right now is one of those times ;)), and I suppose I could mail him a CD but it's certainly cheaper to just send him the files. No. Check it out again. You can get name.dyndns.org for free, IIRC. Let's go here: http://www.dyndns.org/services/dyndns/ and see... OK, according to that page: The Dynamic DNS service allows you to alias a dynamic IP address to a static hostname in any of the many domains we offer, allowing your computer to be more easily accessed from various locations on the Internet. We provide this service, for up to five (5) hostnames, free to the Internet community. The Dynamic DNS service is ideal for a home website, file server, or just to keep a pointer back to your home PC so you can access those important documents while you're at work. Using one of the available third-party update clients you can keep your hostname always pointing to your IP address, no matter how often your ISP changes it. No more fumbling to find that piece of paper where you wrote down your IP address, or e-mailing all your friends every time it changes. Just tell them to visit yourname.dyndns.org instead! Sounds llike what you want to me. HTH, Tim ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: This is just a test
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 11:04, Robert E.Raymond wrote: See, the thing about a place like that, I'd need to reg a domain, right? I'm trying to do this for free, which sendmail and ftp both are. I just need to send the guy files periodically (right now is one of those times ;)), and I suppose I could mail him a CD but it's certainly cheaper to just send him the files. I'm not sure but it definately helps. :-) Does you ISP offer free web hosting? If they do and depending on the amount of space they offer for free, you could always make a website and post the files there for downloading. Tom Wilson McSwain Carpets 513.771.1400 x124 - Hofstadter's Law: It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take Hofstadter's Law into account. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: This is just a test
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 07:44:07 -0500 Robert E.Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] Arggh.. around here there is one other provider. I have no problems with it,except they only offer one email addy, which would go to my parents. Though I still get my inbox loaded with spam so their methods don't seem to be working. They block at their border routers. So you can send within their network (which is one trick spammers use, they also hijack Windoze boxes to send tons of crap). Port blocking only hurts legitimate users. Kinda like outlawing guns so only the outlaws the law is aimed at keeping guns away from will have guns. But still.. is there a reason why I can send and receive sendmail messages to myself? of course you can -- either through your own ISP or your own server (see my first para above, first sentence). Oh well.. I'll see about the FTP option... Ciao, David A. Bandel -- Focus on the dream, not the competition. Nemesis Racing Team motto GPG key autoresponder: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
This is just a test
Hi all, I'm testing sendmail. If you receive this you all know it works. If you don't, no one but me will know it doesn't work. I'll also know it works, but you're welcome to respond just to confirm that you received it anyway. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: This is just a test
On Thursday 30 October 2003 15:37, Robert E.Raymond wrote: Hi all, I'm testing sendmail. If you receive this you all know it works. If you don't, no one but me will know it doesn't work. I'll also know it works, but you're welcome to respond just to confirm that you received it anyway. Aggh.. sorry all I sent that with SMTP sendmail still ain't working except to send stuff to myself :( Bob Raymond -- Linux EPoX.Linux.Raymond 2.6.0-test9 #2 Wed Oct 29 16:05:56 EST 2003 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2600+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux 15:53:11 up 22:51, 5 users, load average: 0.93, 0.38, 0.30 Mind your own business, then you don't mind mine. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: This is just a test
Quoth Robert E.Raymond: Hi all, I'm testing sendmail. You have my sympathies. If you receive this you all know it works. I'm *so* relieved. If you don't, no one but me will know it doesn't work. Pity, that. I'll also know it works, but you're welcome to respond just to confirm that you received it anyway. Touché. Kurt -- Silverman's Law: If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: This is just a test
On Thursday 30 October 2003 20:08, Kurt Wall wrote: Quoth Robert E.Raymond: Hi all, I'm testing sendmail. You have my sympathies. If you receive this you all know it works. I'm *so* relieved. If you don't, no one but me will know it doesn't work. Pity, that. I'll also know it works, but you're welcome to respond just to confirm that you received it anyway. Touché. Kurt But it still doesn't work! Any ideas? I followed the SxS to the letter Do I need my own domain to do it properly? If you're wondering why a home user would want sendmail for himself, I just want it so I can send large files by email to people who don't have enough FTP upload accounts, as the Earthlink SMTP server has a 10 MB filesize limit. TIA Bob Raymond -- Linux EPoX.Linux.Raymond 2.6.0-test9 #2 Wed Oct 29 16:05:56 EST 2003 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2600+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux 20:20:59 up 1 day, 3:19, 5 users, load average: 0.09, 0.31, 0.62 Those of you who think you know everything are annoying those of us who do. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: This is just a test
Greetings Bob, On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Robert E.Raymond wrote: On Thursday 30 October 2003 20:08, Kurt Wall wrote: Quoth Robert E.Raymond: Hi all, I'm testing sendmail. ...stuff Bobbettized... But it still doesn't work! Any ideas? I followed the SxS to the letter Do I need my own domain to do it properly? If you're wondering why a home user would want sendmail for himself, I just want it so I can send large files by email to people who don't have enough FTP upload accounts, as the Earthlink SMTP server has a 10 MB filesize limit. Sendmail ships with its configuration set to ONLY listen to the loopback device. You can reconfigure it by simply changing one line (no need to run m4 and all that crap!). vi /etc/sendmail.cf Find for the line containing: DaemonPortOptions It will probably look like this: O DaemonPortOptions=Port=smtp,Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MTA Change it to look like this: O DaemonPortOptions=Name=MTA Stop and start sendmail... By not defining any ports in DaemonPortOptions you are telling sendmail to listen to ALL interfaces on your machine. So if you ever define alias interfaces on your ethernet, and add additional ethernet cards, your sendmail will work automagically with those new interfaces :-) Enjoy! --- Jay Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Ben Franklin (1759) ++ | Jay Nugent [EMAIL PROTECTED](734)484-5105(734)544-4326/Fax| | Nugent Telecommunications [www.nuge.com] (734)649-0850/Cell | | Internet Consulting/Linux SysAdmin/Engineering Design/ISP Reseller | | ISP Monitoring [www.ispmonitor.net] ISP Modem Performance Monitoring | | Web-Pegasus[www.webpegasus.com] Web Hosting/DNS Hosting/Shell Accts| | LinuxNIC, Inc. [www.linuxnic.net] Registrar of the .linux TLD| ++ 10:01pm up 43 days, 14:53, 4 users, load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.04 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: This is just a test
On Thursday 30 October 2003 11:04, Jay Nugent wrote: Greetings Bob, On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Robert E.Raymond wrote: On Thursday 30 October 2003 20:08, Kurt Wall wrote: Quoth Robert E.Raymond: Hi all, I'm testing sendmail. ...stuff Bobbettized... snipped, bobbettized is just plain too sick :P Sendmail ships with its configuration set to ONLY listen to the loopback device. You can reconfigure it by simply changing one line (no need to run m4 and all that crap!). vi /etc/sendmail.cf Find for the line containing: DaemonPortOptions It will probably look like this: O DaemonPortOptions=Port=smtp,Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MTA Change it to look like this: O DaemonPortOptions=Name=MTA Stop and start sendmail... By not defining any ports in DaemonPortOptions you are telling sendmail to listen to ALL interfaces on your machine. So if you ever define alias interfaces on your ethernet, and add additional ethernet cards, your sendmail will work automagically with those new interfaces :-) Enjoy! --- Jay It's already set to that... O DaemonPortOptions=Name=MTA O DaemonPortOptions=Port=587, Name=MSA, M=E I tried commenting out the 2nd line and sending with Sendmail, but I got my usual error message in mqueue- V6 T1067573880 K1067574071 N1 P32378 MDeferred: Connection timed out with smtp.linux-sxs.org. Fbs Bob Raymond -- Linux EPoX.Linux.Raymond 2.6.0-test9 #2 Wed Oct 29 16:05:56 EST 2003 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2600+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux 23:13:18 up 1 day, 6:11, 5 users, load average: 0.01, 0.14, 0.27 What good is a ticket to the good life, if you can't find the entrance? ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: This is just a test
Quoth Jay Nugent: [whack] Sendmail ships with its configuration set to ONLY listen to the loopback device. You can reconfigure it by simply changing one line (no need to run m4 and all that crap!). Well, Red Hat certainly ships Sendmail this way. The default Slackware Sendmail installation does not do this. Kurt -- U: There's a U -- a Unicorn! Run right up and rub its horn. Look at all those points you're losing! UMBER HULKS are so confusing. -- The Roguelet's ABC ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
RE: test message
Yes, he is. Always. -jhb- -Original Message- From: Collins Richey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 10:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: test message On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 23:08:14 -0400 dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: quoth Kurt Wall: | Quoth Keith Morse: | Please ignore. | | Pardon me? Did you say something? No? I didn't think so. hey. cut him a break. he's probably married. -- dep Writing takes no time. It's finding something to say that takes forever. If a tree falls in the forest with no woman present, is the man still at fault? -- Collins Richey - Denver Area if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: test message
Quoth Collins Richey: On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 23:08:14 -0400 dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: quoth Kurt Wall: | Quoth Keith Morse: | Please ignore. | | Pardon me? Did you say something? No? I didn't think so. hey. cut him a break. he's probably married. -- dep Writing takes no time. It's finding something to say that takes forever. If a tree falls in the forest with no woman present, is the man still at fault? Of course. K -- It's not that I'm afraid to die. I just don't want to be there when it happens. -- Woody Allen ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: test message
Quoth dep: quoth Kurt Wall: | Quoth Keith Morse: | Please ignore. | | Pardon me? Did you say something? No? I didn't think so. hey. cut him a break. he's probably married. That explains it! ;-) Kurt -- panic: kernel trap (ignored) ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
test message
Please ignore. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
OT test message
Sorry guys/gals. Should be the last one for whitelist testing. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: test message
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 17:35, Keith Morse wrote: Please ignore. Speak louder, I'm ignoring you. -- burns ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: test message
Quoth Keith Morse: Please ignore. Pardon me? Did you say something? No? I didn't think so. K -- Virtual means never knowing where your next byte is coming from. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: test message
quoth Kurt Wall: | Quoth Keith Morse: | Please ignore. | | Pardon me? Did you say something? No? I didn't think so. hey. cut him a break. he's probably married. -- dep Writing takes no time. It's finding something to say that takes forever. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: test message
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 23:08:14 -0400 dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: quoth Kurt Wall: | Quoth Keith Morse: | Please ignore. | | Pardon me? Did you say something? No? I didn't think so. hey. cut him a break. he's probably married. -- dep Writing takes no time. It's finding something to say that takes forever. If a tree falls in the forest with no woman present, is the man still at fault? -- Collins Richey - Denver Area if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
test
test 10/19 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: test
Quoth ronnie gauthier: test 10/19 Damn, and I forgot to study! Kurt -- Every absurdity has a champion who will defend it. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: test
0.526315789 On Sunday 19 October 2003 10:24 pm, someone claiming to be ronnie gauthier wrote: test 10/19 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users -- RedHat 8.0 Kernel 2.4.20-20.8, KDE 3.1.4, Xfree86 4.2.1 10:30pm up 15 days, 20 min, 1 user, load average: 0.44, 0.29, 0.22 It's what you learn after you know it all that counts ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Test
Bonjour, Pour voir si cela fonctionne. Désolé du dérangement. ;-) Patrick ___ Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: test
ronnie gauthier wrote: anyone home? ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Just got home but I was at work about 15 mins ago. But glad to be home now. But did notice about 24 hours ago the list would receive the mails but they werent being sent out. -- James McDonald Singleton Australia 61+ (0)2 65712401 61+ 0428 320 219 I joined scientology at a garage sale!! Linux 2.4.22 #1 Mon Sep 1 20:03:11 EST 2003 athlon i386 GNU/Linux 19:00:00 up 5 days, 17:01, 1 user, load average: 0.16, 0.06, 0.02 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
test
anyone home? ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: test
Home office... That count? On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 18:32:11 -0500 ronnie gauthier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: anyone home? ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users -- Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.eisgr.com/ Enterprise Information Systems * Network Server Appliances * Network Consulting, Integration Support * Web Integration and E-Business ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: test
Quoth ronnie gauthier: anyone home? No. I'm at work. Kurt -- It is the business of little minds to shrink. -- Carl Sandburg ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: TEST
burns wrote: OK, when? LOL sheesh... I think I'll write a bogus request for help next time something like. Guys, I'm tired of Linux and I realize that microsoft has been badly maligned and really should be given a second chance. How do I transfer my data away from Linux accross to my new Windows XP installation that is just so much more user friendly. Yours Sincerely [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: TEST
On 10/3/2003 9:22 AM, I believe that James McDonald wrote: burns wrote: OK, when? LOL sheesh... I think I'll write a bogus request for help next time something like. Guys, I'm tired of Linux and I realize that microsoft has been badly maligned and really should be given a second chance. How do I transfer my data away from Linux accross to my new Windows XP installation that is just so much more user friendly. Yours Sincerely [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wasn't there a time when this list required a story if you sent a test post? Am I really remembering that, or have I not had enough coffee, yet? Tim ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: TEST
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 23:22:33 +1000 James McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: burns wrote: OK, when? LOL sheesh... I think I'll write a bogus request for help next time something like. Guys, I'm tired of Linux and I realize that microsoft has been badly maligned and really should be given a second chance. How do I transfer my data away from Linux accross to my new Windows XP installation that is just so much more user friendly. Yours Sincerely [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can't resist! Currently you can't access your old data from XP. Merely wait until your XP is cracked, and then you won't be able to access anything. grin -- Collins Richey - Denver Area if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: TEST
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 09:30:59 -0400 Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/3/2003 9:22 AM, I believe that James McDonald wrote: burns wrote: OK, when? LOL sheesh... I think I'll write a bogus request for help next time something like. Guys, I'm tired of Linux and I realize that microsoft has been badly maligned and really should be given a second chance. How do I transfer my data away from Linux accross to my new Windows XP installation that is just so much more user friendly. Yours Sincerely [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wasn't there a time when this list required a story if you sent a test post? Am I really remembering that, or have I not had enough coffee, yet? Of course. A bare TEST message (with or without [please] ignore) simply means reply with wiseass remarks! -- Collins Richey - Denver Area if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: TEST
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 07:37:54 -0600 Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Of course. A bare TEST message (with or without [please] ignore) simply means reply with wiseass remarks! OK, so when do we get some? Terence ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
RE: TEST
Of course. A bare TEST message (with or without [please] ignore) simply means reply with wiseass remarks! OK, so when do we get some? Terence That is between you and your SO. In Harmony's Way and In A Chord, Tom ;-}) Registered Linux User #154358 Plain Text Emails Don't Spread Virii! ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: TEST
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 17:02:59 +0100 Terence McCarthy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 07:37:54 -0600 Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Of course. A bare TEST message (with or without [please] ignore) simply means reply with wiseass remarks! OK, so when do we get some? Check the archives. -- Collins Richey - Denver Area if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: TEST
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 11:13:40 -0600 Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Check the archives. Awwh- and I thought I might get something new.. Terence ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
TEST
___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
RE: TEST
-Original Message- From: James McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 5:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TEST ___ Grade: F -- No name on test. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: TEST
OK, when? -- burns ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: test
Quoth ronnie gauthier: test 1 echo $? 0 Kurt -- One difference between a man and a machine is that a machine is quiet when well oiled. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://mail.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
test
I have been trying to send messages to the list for two days. Trying another mail program? ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: test
On 09/07/03 09:00, Marianne Taylor wrote: I have been trying to send messages to the list for two days. Trying another mail program? Heard you loud clear. -- ~ L. Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo:http://netllama.ipfox.com 9:00am up 1 day, 19:54, 1 user, load average: 0.11, 0.05, 0.01 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: test
On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 09:00:19 -0700, Marianne Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have been trying to send messages to the list for two days. Trying another mail program? You're coming in loud and clear ;o) -- Myles Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] Slackware-9.1pre + IceWM-1.2.12 + Sylpheed-0.9.4 -- Alberta Mirror Linux-SxS.org http://linux-sxs.org/ ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: test
On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 12:00, Marianne Taylor wrote: I have been trying to send messages to the list for two days. Trying another mail program? A-OK -- burns ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: OT Test[ing again] - No need to reply
ah... ON my country it called baloto... and it is exactly as you described... Tom Wilson wrote: On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 03:22, Jean Sagi wrote: Lotto? What do you mean?... Baloto perhaps... Chucho! Here in America, many states have what they call a Lotto. What happens is you go to a local convenience store and purchase a Lotto ticket for a US $1 a ticket. They usually have 6 numbers on them from 1 to 40 or so. Then once a week they draw numbers out of a contraption that has a bunch of numbered ping pong balls in it and you hope that the six you picked (or had randomly generated) on your ticket are the same six that pop up out of the ball machine. Is so you win the jackpot of generally some tens to hundreds of millions of dollars. Most people don't win. Thus you have to pretty lucky if you do. --Tom Wilson ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users -- Atte, Jesús Antonio Santos Giraldo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: OT Test[ing again] - No need to reply
Kurt Wall wrote: Quoth Klaus-Peter Schrage: Tom Wilson wrote: Here in America, many states have what they call a Lotto. What happens is you go to a local convenience store and purchase a Lotto ticket for a US $1 a ticket. They usually have 6 numbers on them from 1 to 40 or so. Then once a week they draw numbers out of a contraption that has a bunch of numbered ping pong balls in it and you hope that the six you picked (or had randomly generated) on your ticket are the same six that pop up out of the ball machine. Is so you win the jackpot of generally some tens to hundreds of millions of dollars. Most people don't win. Thus you have to pretty lucky if you do. The chances of winning aren't that bad: 1:3838380 Mm, my statistics is a little rusty, but wouldn't the chances be rather worse? Order matters, so we want permutations, not combinations. So, 40_P_6 = 40!/(40 - 6)! = 40!/34! = 2,763,633,000 40_C_6 = 40!/(6! * (40 - 6)!) = 40!/(6! * 34!) = 3,838,380 I don't know about the details of the American lotto system, but according to Tom's description it seems to be similar to our's (apart from us having numbers from 1 to 49). Thus, order doesn't matter: a sequence of drawings of ping pong balls like 2, 4, 39, 5, 40, 9 yields the same result as 40, 2, 39, 5, 9, 4 or any other permution. So, it's combinations. Klaus ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: OT Test[ing again] - No need to reply
Quoth ronnie gauthier:
6 out of 40 if they must be picked in order drawn(if number drawn is removed)
40*39*38*36*35*34
else if not removed
40*40*40*40*40*40
any 6 out of 40(removed)
40*39*38*36*35*34
-
6*5*4*3*2*1
6 out of 40(removed) with 25 powerballs
40*39*38*36*35*34
- *25
6*5*4*3*2*1
so what you have in one form or another
n!
*Pb
n! (n-k)!
Right. So it is combinations, rather than permutations. That said,
the odds aren't bad at roughly 1:4 million, but still not great.
Kurt
--
Arbitrary systems, pl.n.:
Systems about which nothing general can be said, save nothing
general can be said.
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: OT Test[ing again] - No need to reply
Lotto? What do you mean?... Baloto perhaps... Chucho! Collins Richey wrote: On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 12:33:43 -0500 Jean Sagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am receiving email now from the list. Congratulations. Now you may want to try your luck with Lotto! -- Atte, Jesús Antonio Santos Giraldo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: OT Test[ing again] - No need to reply
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 03:22, Jean Sagi wrote: Lotto? What do you mean?... Baloto perhaps... Chucho! Here in America, many states have what they call a Lotto. What happens is you go to a local convenience store and purchase a Lotto ticket for a US $1 a ticket. They usually have 6 numbers on them from 1 to 40 or so. Then once a week they draw numbers out of a contraption that has a bunch of numbered ping pong balls in it and you hope that the six you picked (or had randomly generated) on your ticket are the same six that pop up out of the ball machine. Is so you win the jackpot of generally some tens to hundreds of millions of dollars. Most people don't win. Thus you have to pretty lucky if you do. --Tom Wilson ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: OT Test[ing again] - No need to reply
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Tom Wilson wrote: On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 03:22, Jean Sagi wrote: Lotto? What do you mean?... Baloto perhaps... Chucho! Here in America, many states have what they call a Lotto. What happens is you go to a local convenience store and purchase a Lotto ticket for a US $1 a ticket. They usually have 6 numbers on them from 1 to 40 or so. Then once a week they draw numbers out of a contraption that has a bunch of numbered ping pong balls in it and you hope that the six you picked (or had randomly generated) on your ticket are the same six that pop up out of the ball machine. Is so you win the jackpot of generally some tens to hundreds of millions of dollars. Most people don't win. Thus you have to pretty lucky if you do. As someone once said, the Lottery is a tax on the mathematically ignorant. -- ~~ Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: OT Test[ing again] - No need to reply
On 9/4/2003 9:29 AM, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote: On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Tom Wilson wrote: On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 03:22, Jean Sagi wrote: Lotto? What do you mean?... Baloto perhaps... snip Most people don't win. Thus you have to pretty lucky if you do. As someone once said, the Lottery is a tax on the mathematically ignorant. Ahh... but I *like* lotteries! Only the people who *want* to be taxed are taxed. I think *all* g'ment revenue should be generated via lotteries. That way, I'd never have to pay taxes... ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: OT Test[ing again] - No need to reply
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 07:39, Tim Wunder wrote: On 9/4/2003 9:29 AM, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote: On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Tom Wilson wrote: On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 03:22, Jean Sagi wrote: Lotto? What do you mean?... Baloto perhaps... snip Most people don't win. Thus you have to pretty lucky if you do. As someone once said, the Lottery is a tax on the mathematically ignorant. Ahh... but I *like* lotteries! Only the people who *want* to be taxed are taxed. I think *all* g'ment revenue should be generated via lotteries. That way, I'd never have to pay taxes... LOL I'll drin^H^H^H ... agree with you on that concept! Hey G-(wo)men!! You listening?? -- Myles Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
RE: OT Test[ing again] - No need to reply
Tom Wilson wrote: Here in America, many states have what they call a Lotto. What happens is you go to a local convenience store and purchase a Lotto ticket for a US $1 a ticket. They usually have 6 numbers on them from 1 to 40 or so. Then once a week they draw numbers out of a contraption that has a bunch of numbered ping pong balls in it and you hope that the six you picked (or had randomly generated) on your ticket are the same six that pop up out of the ball machine. Is so you win the jackpot of generally some tens to hundreds of millions of dollars. Most people don't win. Thus you have to pretty lucky if you do. In some places this is called the Optimist's Tax. Tom :-}) Thomas A. Condon Plain Text Emails Don't Pass Viruses! ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: OT Test[ing again] - No need to reply
Tom Wilson wrote: On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 03:22, Jean Sagi wrote: Lotto? What do you mean?... Baloto perhaps... Chucho! Here in America, many states have what they call a Lotto. What happens is you go to a local convenience store and purchase a Lotto ticket for a US $1 a ticket. They usually have 6 numbers on them from 1 to 40 or so. Then once a week they draw numbers out of a contraption that has a bunch of numbered ping pong balls in it and you hope that the six you picked (or had randomly generated) on your ticket are the same six that pop up out of the ball machine. Is so you win the jackpot of generally some tens to hundreds of millions of dollars. Most people don't win. Thus you have to pretty lucky if you do. The chances of winning aren't that bad: 1:3838380 Klaus ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: OT Test[ing again] - No need to reply
Quoth Net Llama!: On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Tom Wilson wrote: On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 03:22, Jean Sagi wrote: Lotto? What do you mean?... Baloto perhaps... Chucho! Here in America, many states have what they call a Lotto. What happens is you go to a local convenience store and purchase a Lotto ticket for a US $1 a ticket. They usually have 6 numbers on them from 1 to 40 or so. Then once a week they draw numbers out of a contraption that has a bunch of numbered ping pong balls in it and you hope that the six you picked (or had randomly generated) on your ticket are the same six that pop up out of the ball machine. Is so you win the jackpot of generally some tens to hundreds of millions of dollars. Most people don't win. Thus you have to pretty lucky if you do. As someone once said, the Lottery is a tax on the mathematically ignorant. Right. The Optimists' Tax. That said, if I actually won the Powerball Lottery (I don't play, so I won't win), you could call me mathematically ignorant all you want. But, as I said, I hardly every buy a lottery ticket, so I'm not likely to win. Kurt -- Right now I'm having amnesia and deja vu at the same time. -- Steven Wright ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: OT Test[ing again] - No need to reply
6 out of 40 if they must be picked in order drawn(if number drawn is removed) 40*39*38*36*35*34 else if not removed 40*40*40*40*40*40 any 6 out of 40(removed) 40*39*38*36*35*34 - 6*5*4*3*2*1 6 out of 40(removed) with 25 powerballs 40*39*38*36*35*34 - *25 6*5*4*3*2*1 so what you have in one form or another n! *Pb n! (n-k)! On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 19:54:41 -0400 - Kurt Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote the following Re: Re: OT Test[ing again] - No need to reply Quoth Klaus-Peter Schrage: Tom Wilson wrote: Here in America, many states have what they call a Lotto. What happens is you go to a local convenience store and purchase a Lotto ticket for a US $1 a ticket. They usually have 6 numbers on them from 1 to 40 or so. Then once a week they draw numbers out of a contraption that has a bunch of numbered ping pong balls in it and you hope that the six you picked (or had randomly generated) on your ticket are the same six that pop up out of the ball machine. Is so you win the jackpot of generally some tens to hundreds of millions of dollars. Most people don't win. Thus you have to pretty lucky if you do. The chances of winning aren't that bad: 1:3838380 Mm, my statistics is a little rusty, but wouldn't the chances be rather worse? Order matters, so we want permutations, not combinations. So, 40_P_6 = 40!/(40 - 6)! = 40!/34! = 2,763,633,000 40_C_6 = 40!/(6! * (40 - 6)!) = 40!/(6! * 34!) = 3,838,380 Kurt -- Experience is the worst teacher. It always gives the test first and the instruction afterward. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
OT Test[ing again] - No need to reply
Test -- Atte, Jesús Antonio Santos Giraldo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: OT Test[ing again] - No need to reply
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jean Sagi shocked and awed us all by speaking: Test did my hacking work? or did you not receive this email back? - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 http://doug.hunley.homeip.net http://www.linux-sxs.org I can see your point, but I still think you're full of crap. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/Vequ2MO5UukaubkRAtXvAKCplLRaktGVO3fQzHgQ7ZmsGmgNBwCfcf/G W6ge4DBi/Ekq63a0WTv3nu0= =mOWG -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Re: OT Test[ing again] - No need to reply
I am receiving email now from the list. Chucho! -Original Message- From: Douglas J Hunley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 09:20:46 -0400 Subject: Re: OT Test[ing again] - No need to reply -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jean Sagi shocked and awed us all by speaking: Test did my hacking work? or did you not receive this email back? - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 http://doug.hunley.homeip.net http://www.linux-sxs.org I can see your point, but I still think you're full of crap. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/Vequ2MO5UukaubkRAtXvAKCplLRaktGVO3fQzHgQ7ZmsGmgNBwCfcf/G W6ge4DBi/Ekq63a0WTv3nu0= =mOWG -END PGP SIGNATURE- Jean Sagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: OT Test[ing again] - No need to reply
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 12:33:43 -0500 Jean Sagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am receiving email now from the list. Congratulations. Now you may want to try your luck with Lotto! -- Collins Richey - Denver Area if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Test
On 31 Aug 2003 19:44:24 -0400 burns [EMAIL PROTECTED] professed: Test, over -- burns Your are 559 OM ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Test
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:44 am, burns wrote: Test, over Hell, I did not even know it had begun! Waht was I tested for? -- Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'SKIPPY' 18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061, Australia:: PH:61733002161 Practising Geriatric, Retired Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Test
On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 21:41, Keith Antoine wrote: On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:44 am, burns wrote: Test, over Hell, I did not even know it had begun! Waht was I tested for? sexually transmitted diseases. You failed and now will have to study much harder for the re-test. -- burns ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Test
Quoth burns: Test, over Ayup. -- All my life I wanted to be someone; I guess I should have been more specific. -- Jane Wagner ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Test
Quoth Keith Antoine: On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:44 am, burns wrote: Test, over Hell, I did not even know it had begun! Waht was I tested for? If we have to tell you, you failed. :-) Kurt -- Pity the meek, for they shall inherit the earth. -- Don Marquis ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Test
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 12:54 pm, burns wrote: On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 21:41, Keith Antoine wrote: On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:44 am, burns wrote: Test, over Hell, I did not even know it had begun! Waht was I tested for? sexually transmitted diseases. You failed and now will have to study much harder for the re-test. Thats no bloody good, I lost the instruction sheet. -- Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'SKIPPY' 18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061, Australia:: PH:61733002161 Practising Geriatric, Retired Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Test
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 18:31:00 +1000 Keith Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thats no bloody good, I lost the instruction sheet. so what about the hand book? Terence ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Test
Quoth Terence McCarthy: On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 18:31:00 +1000 Keith Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thats no bloody good, I lost the instruction sheet. so what about the hand book? Woot! Kurt -- Excellent day for putting Slinkies on an escalator. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Test
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003, Keith Antoine wrote: On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 12:54 pm, burns wrote: On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 21:41, Keith Antoine wrote: On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:44 am, burns wrote: Test, over Hell, I did not even know it had begun! Waht was I tested for? sexually transmitted diseases. You failed and now will have to study much harder for the re-test. Thats no bloody good, I lost the instruction sheet. Put tab A in slot B, Repeat. Bill -- INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX:(206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 URL: http://www.celestial.com/ ``The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed.'' -- Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers at 184-188 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Test
Test, over -- burns ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Test
On Tuesday 26 August 2003 21:17, burns carved in granite: radio check, over There are no checks in radio buttons, only in check boxes. In Harmony's Way and In A Chord, Tom ;-}) Tom. Condon Barbershop Bass Singer Registered Linux User #154358 A Jester Unemployed ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Test
On 27 Aug 2003 00:17:17 -0400 burns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: radio check, over OK, over ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Test
Quoth burns: radio check, over Under. In. Through. Beside. K -- You will lose your present job and have to become a door to door mayonnaise salesman. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Test
radio check, over -- burns QSL OM, I read you 5 by 5 Shawn ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Test
radio check, over -- burns ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Test
10-4 buddy. I gotcha loud-n-cleer! burns [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/27/2003 12:17 AM Please respond to general To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Test radio check, over -- burns ___ General mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/general ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
test kernel, RHL 8.0 and gcc-3.2
Decided to take a stab at installing the 2.6.0-test3 kernel on my RHL 8.0 system. I installed the latest modutils RPM, gotten from Rawhide, downloaded the kernel source, ran 'make gconfig' and 'make'. But I get the following error: CC [M] drivers/block/paride/pd.o drivers/block/paride/pd.c: In function `pd_init': drivers/block/paride/pd.c:896: warning: passing arg 1 of `blk_init_queue' from incompatible pointer type drivers/block/paride/pd.c:896: warning: passing arg 2 of `blk_init_queue' from incompatible pointer type drivers/block/paride/pd.c:896: too many arguments to function `blk_init_queue' make[2]: *** [drivers/block/paride/pd.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [drivers/block/paride] Error 2 make: *** [drivers] Error 2 Think this is a gcc problem, or am I doing something wrong? My kernel config file can be found here: http://www.thewunders.org/files/TestConfig1 Thanks, Tim -- RedHat 8.0 Kernel 2.4.20-19.8, KDE 3.1.CVS, Xfree86 4.2.1 10:05am up 4 days, 14:30, 3 users, load average: 0.40, 0.81, 0.64 It's what you learn after you know it all that counts ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: test kernel, RHL 8.0 and gcc-3.2
Turned off PARIDE and it got further. I'm now playing with other options trying to get a good build. Will post back if I come across one I can't get around. Thanks for listening... Tim On Thursday 21 August 2003 10:11 am, someone claiming to be Tim Wunder wrote: Decided to take a stab at installing the 2.6.0-test3 kernel on my RHL 8.0 system. I installed the latest modutils RPM, gotten from Rawhide, downloaded the kernel source, ran 'make gconfig' and 'make'. But I get the following error: snip -- RedHat 8.0 Kernel 2.4.20-19.8, KDE 3.1.CVS, Xfree86 4.2.1 10:35am up 4 days, 15:00, 4 users, load average: 0.23, 0.10, 0.20 It's what you learn after you know it all that counts ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: test kernel, RHL 8.0 and gcc-3.2
WooHoo! Success! (well, almost) I've booted to the new test kernel. Can't really notice a difference, yet, 'cept for sound not working :-(. It doesn't look like the sound module got loaded. Oh well, I'm getting there Took me only 9 iterations of make gconfig ;-) If anybody knows how to get the emu10k1 module loaded (I have a SoundBlaster Live!), I wouldn't mind pointers... I'm trying to use the ALSA soundsystem. My RHL 8.0 stock install uses OSS. Well, off for now... gotta go apply an icepack... Tim On Thursday 21 August 2003 10:41 am, someone claiming to be Tim Wunder wrote: Turned off PARIDE and it got further. I'm now playing with other options trying to get a good build. Will post back if I come across one I can't get around. Thanks for listening... Tim On Thursday 21 August 2003 10:11 am, someone claiming to be Tim Wunder wrote: Decided to take a stab at installing the 2.6.0-test3 kernel on my RHL 8.0 system. I installed the latest modutils RPM, gotten from Rawhide, downloaded the kernel source, ran 'make gconfig' and 'make'. But I get the following error: snip -- RedHat 8.0 Kernel 2.6.0-test3, KDE 3.1.CVS, Xfree86 4.2.1 4:16pm up 6 min, 2 users, load average: 0.19, 0.37, 0.19 It's what you learn after you know it all that counts ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
[OT] Geek Test
In case some of you haven't found it yet: http://www.innergeek.us/geek.html In Harmony's Way, and In A Chord, Tom :-}) Thomas A. Condon Barbershop Bass Singer Registered Linux User #154358 60.74951% - Extreme Geek Interfere not in the business of Dragons, For you are crunchy when flamed and taste good. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: [OT] Geek Test
Woh! How can any geeks ever finish that!? On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 09:10:38 -0700 Condon Thomas A KPWA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In case some of you haven't found it yet: http://www.innergeek.us/geek.html In Harmony's Way, and In A Chord, Tom :-}) Thomas A. Condon Barbershop Bass Singer Registered Linux User #154358 60.74951% - Extreme Geek Interfere not in the business of Dragons, For you are crunchy when flamed and taste good. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users -- Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.eisgr.com/ Enterprise Information Systems *Network Consulting, Integration Support *Web Development and E-Business ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Redhat releases unofficial 2.60-test kernel RPMs
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003 10:58:14 -0400 Bruce Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 19 July 2003 18:57 pm, Keith Antoine wrote: On Saturday 19 July 2003 01:03 am, Net Llama! wrote: On 07/19/03 11:22, Keith Antoine wrote: On Friday 18 July 2003 07:17 pm, Net Llama! wrote: These are for RH9 Rawhide: http://people.redhat.com/arjanv/2.5/RPMS.kernel/ I've not tested them, but plan to. Wonder whether they will work on mandrakeor have they forked too much. They'd prolly work in so much as you can boot with them, but whether they work well is another story. You've got little to loose by trying though, as long as you keep a known good kernel. But, Keith, you alreay knew that part, you taught it to me a few years ago :) I am trying to remember with rpm and kernels whether it overwrites the old or just installs the new one seperately. actually I am still tossing up about doing my own compile as I still do not trust rpm's. I compiled my own 2.6 kernel from kernel.org and had a lot of compile errors. Finally got the options right where it would compile. But when I booted... one new 'feechur' seems to be that the running messages of all the things it is doing during boot no longer is standard.. it just said it was booting and that was that. It finally hung somewhere in the process and I haven't taken the time to figure out how to get to the dmesg (or whatever) list of messages to see what it had a problem with. The most likely feechur is the £$%! decision in 2.6 to make VGA_CONSOLE, etc., off by default. Your boot will complete, but your have no way of knowing it. Auf gut Deutsch heisst das: beschissen! -- Collins Richey - Denver Area if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Redhat releases unofficial 2.60-test kernel RPMs
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 15:53:36 -0600 Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] The most likely feechur is the £$%! decision in 2.6 to make VGA_CONSOLE, etc., off by default. Your boot will complete, but your have no way of knowing it. Auf gut Deutsch heisst das: beschissen! Liked that gotcha, did ya? You must: compile into the kernel (not as a module): Input Device Support -- Input Devices (says nothing about VTs, but read that there) Character Devices -- Virtual Terminal (won't be present if the above isn't enabled) Ciao, David A. Bandel -- Focus on the dream, not the competition. Nemesis Racing Team motto GPG key autoresponder: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Redhat releases unofficial 2.60-test kernel RPMs
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 18:01:38 -0500 David A. Bandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 15:53:36 -0600 Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] The most likely feechur is the £$%! decision in 2.6 to make VGA_CONSOLE, etc., off by default. Your boot will complete, but your have no way of knowing it. Auf gut Deutsch heisst das: beschissen! Liked that gotcha, did ya? You must: compile into the kernel (not as a module): Input Device Support -- Input Devices (says nothing about VTs, but read that there) Character Devices -- Virtual Terminal (won't be present if the above isn't enabled) Yeah, another gotchas that I don't like: The developers have gone to great lengths to merge in alsa and officially deprecate the OSS functions, but the alsa module of the same name won't work with my sound card! I haven't tried yet with the deprecated OSS stuff, since I have no burning need to leave the 2.4.x kernels. Other than that, 2.5/2.6 seemed pretty ho hum on my system, which is pretty good for a development kernel. -- Collins Richey - Denver Area if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Redhat releases unofficial 2.60-test kernel RPMs
On Saturday 19 July 2003 01:03 am, Net Llama! wrote: On 07/19/03 11:22, Keith Antoine wrote: On Friday 18 July 2003 07:17 pm, Net Llama! wrote: These are for RH9 Rawhide: http://people.redhat.com/arjanv/2.5/RPMS.kernel/ I've not tested them, but plan to. Wonder whether they will work on mandrakeor have they forked too much. They'd prolly work in so much as you can boot with them, but whether they work well is another story. You've got little to loose by trying though, as long as you keep a known good kernel. But, Keith, you alreay knew that part, you taught it to me a few years ago :) I am trying to remember with rpm and kernels whether it overwrites the old or just installs the new one seperately. actually I am still tossing up about doing my own compile as I still do not trust rpm's. -- Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'SKIPPY' 18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061, Australia:: PH:61733002161 Practising Geriatric, Retired Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Redhat releases unofficial 2.60-test kernel RPMs
On 07/19/03 15:57, Keith Antoine wrote: On Saturday 19 July 2003 01:03 am, Net Llama! wrote: On 07/19/03 11:22, Keith Antoine wrote: On Friday 18 July 2003 07:17 pm, Net Llama! wrote: These are for RH9 Rawhide: http://people.redhat.com/arjanv/2.5/RPMS.kernel/ I've not tested them, but plan to. Wonder whether they will work on mandrakeor have they forked too much. They'd prolly work in so much as you can boot with them, but whether they work well is another story. You've got little to loose by trying though, as long as you keep a known good kernel. But, Keith, you alreay knew that part, you taught it to me a few years ago :) I am trying to remember with rpm and kernels whether it overwrites the old or just installs the new one seperately. actually I am still tossing up about doing my own compile as I still do not trust rpm's. If you 'rpm -ivh ...' then it won't overwrite anything. But i agree, i don't trust RPMs for kernels. -- ~ L. Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo:http://netllama.ipfox.com 7:00am up 4 days, 9:44, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Redhat releases unofficial 2.60-test kernel RPMs
On Saturday 19 July 2003 18:57 pm, Keith Antoine wrote: On Saturday 19 July 2003 01:03 am, Net Llama! wrote: On 07/19/03 11:22, Keith Antoine wrote: On Friday 18 July 2003 07:17 pm, Net Llama! wrote: These are for RH9 Rawhide: http://people.redhat.com/arjanv/2.5/RPMS.kernel/ I've not tested them, but plan to. Wonder whether they will work on mandrakeor have they forked too much. They'd prolly work in so much as you can boot with them, but whether they work well is another story. You've got little to loose by trying though, as long as you keep a known good kernel. But, Keith, you alreay knew that part, you taught it to me a few years ago :) I am trying to remember with rpm and kernels whether it overwrites the old or just installs the new one seperately. actually I am still tossing up about doing my own compile as I still do not trust rpm's. I compiled my own 2.6 kernel from kernel.org and had a lot of compile errors. Finally got the options right where it would compile. But when I booted... one new 'feechur' seems to be that the running messages of all the things it is doing during boot no longer is standard.. it just said it was booting and that was that. It finally hung somewhere in the process and I haven't taken the time to figure out how to get to the dmesg (or whatever) list of messages to see what it had a problem with. -- ++ + Bruce S. Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bellaire, MI 07/19/03 10:56 + ++ Friction is a drag. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Redhat releases unofficial 2.60-test kernel RPMs
These are for RH9 Rawhide: http://people.redhat.com/arjanv/2.5/RPMS.kernel/ I've not tested them, but plan to. -- ~ L. Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo:http://netllama.ipfox.com 4:15pm up 3 days, 18:59, 1 user, load average: 0.20, 0.17, 0.08 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Redhat releases unofficial 2.60-test kernel RPMs
On Friday 18 July 2003 07:17 pm, Net Llama! wrote: These are for RH9 Rawhide: http://people.redhat.com/arjanv/2.5/RPMS.kernel/ I've not tested them, but plan to. Wonder whether they will work on mandrakeor have they forked too much. -- Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'SKIPPY' 18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061, Australia:: PH:61733002161 Practising Geriatric, Retired Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Redhat releases unofficial 2.60-test kernel RPMs
On 07/19/03 11:22, Keith Antoine wrote: On Friday 18 July 2003 07:17 pm, Net Llama! wrote: These are for RH9 Rawhide: http://people.redhat.com/arjanv/2.5/RPMS.kernel/ I've not tested them, but plan to. Wonder whether they will work on mandrakeor have they forked too much. They'd prolly work in so much as you can boot with them, but whether they work well is another story. You've got little to loose by trying though, as long as you keep a known good kernel. But, Keith, you alreay knew that part, you taught it to me a few years ago :) -- ~ L. Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo:http://netllama.ipfox.com 10:00pm up 4 days, 44 min, 1 user, load average: 1.12, 0.75, 0.58 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Squirrel Mail Test
Please ignore and delete James McDonald Systems Engineer Singleton NSW Australia ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
test- ignore
test.- sorry wade ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: test- ignore
On Sat, 2003-01-18 at 19:10, Wade Barocsi wrote: test.- sorry wade Thats OK, at least I know the list my ISP are still up. Been way quiet today. Tom ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
