[LUTE] Re: De Visee

2014-03-02 Thread Greet Schamp
Dear all, 

I wonder if his name has something to do with the city of Visé, north east of 
Liège in Belgium?
The dutch name is WEZET but in the Walloon language it is called Vizé.
According to wikipedia in french, it has a long history 

It would add another lute/baroque guitar composer to our country ;>))

All the best
Greet


-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] Namens Monica 
Hall
Verzonden: zaterdag 1 maart 2014 12:39
Aan: Martyn Hodgson
CC: Lutelist
Onderwerp: [LUTE] De Visee

Thank you very much for that Martyn.

I don't know how many people have actually  read these liner notes.   Three 
whole pages are taken up with this "biography" - it is not until you turn to
p.4 that you discover - Oh by the way - none of this is true.  Some of the 
information is factually accurate.  Some of it is not - which I think is 
inexcusable - Satoh is apparently unaware that Louis XIV died in 1715 and that 
when De Visee was appointed guitar teacher to the King it was to the 9 year old 
Louis XV.  Some of it is obviously bollocks.

When I first read these I queried on this list whether there was any evidence 
that De Visee was born in Portugal - not after all impossible - but did not get 
a satisfactory answer.  I did my best to trace the source of this information - 
which had found its way into Wikipedia - perhaps that is where Satoh got the 
idea from.  It seems that somebody some time ago suggested that De Visee's name 
implied that his family (rather than he
himself) was Portuguese in origin. And so it goes. Endless pointless 
speculation masquerading as musicology,

I can understand why David and and others who know Satoh personally and admire 
his playing might want to try and defend him. But I think that it needs to be 
said that people in his position - after all he taught at one of the most 
prestigious music colleges in the world until recently  - shouldn't indulge in 
idle fantasy which may mislead the unwary.  At the end of the day he has said 
nothing about the music or the manuscript from which it is taken which would 
have been much more interesting.

As ever
Monica


- Original Message -
From: "Martyn Hodgson" 
To: "Lute Dmth" 
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2014 8:24 AM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Bartolotti's continuo treatise


>
>
> Perhaps you missed what Monica Hall wrote after quoting Satoh: “This is
> all my imagination and conjecture"? She added Satoh's more misleading
> comment "based on the few documents concerning De Visee's life"
>
>
> In short, Satoh misleads by suggesting that his spurious conjectures,
> especially on birth place, are somehow based on historical sources.
>
> MH
>
> 
>>>  From: howard posner 
>>> To: Lutelist 
>>> Sent: Friday, 28 February 2014, 23:32
>>> Subject: [LUTE] Re: Bartolotti's continuo treatise
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 28, 2014, at 2:17 PM, Monica Hall 
>> wrote:
>>>
  I think you are being disingenious. What Satoh actually says is
  "This is all my imagination and conjecture, based on the few
>> documents concerning De Visee's life".

  How is the reader supposed to know what is based on these few
 documents
>> and what is idle fantasy?
>>>
>>>
>>> I think “This is all my imagination and conjecture” pretty much gives it
>> away.
>>> --
>>>
>>> To get on or off this list see list information at
>>> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>






[LUTE] Re: De Visee

2014-03-02 Thread Shaun Ng
What I find interesting in all this (Satoh’s exercise) is why De Visée needs to 
be foreign. Is this to align him with Lully (the Italian)? In the light of the 
long tradition of lute playing in France, making De Visée foreign does not seem 
to elevate his status. In fact, historical writers in some circles belittled 
non-Parisian musicians. 

Or could this simply be the modern view of foreign is better?   

Shaun

On 2 Mar 2014, at 10:05 pm, Greet Schamp  wrote:

> Dear all, 
> 
> I wonder if his name has something to do with the city of Visé, north east of 
> Liège in Belgium?
> The dutch name is WEZET but in the Walloon language it is called Vizé.
> According to wikipedia in french, it has a long history 
> 
> It would add another lute/baroque guitar composer to our country ;>))
> 
> All the best
> Greet
> 
> 
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] Namens 
> Monica Hall
> Verzonden: zaterdag 1 maart 2014 12:39
> Aan: Martyn Hodgson
> CC: Lutelist
> Onderwerp: [LUTE] De Visee
> 
> Thank you very much for that Martyn.
> 
> I don't know how many people have actually  read these liner notes.   Three 
> whole pages are taken up with this "biography" - it is not until you turn to
> p.4 that you discover - Oh by the way - none of this is true.  Some of the 
> information is factually accurate.  Some of it is not - which I think is 
> inexcusable - Satoh is apparently unaware that Louis XIV died in 1715 and 
> that when De Visee was appointed guitar teacher to the King it was to the 9 
> year old Louis XV.  Some of it is obviously bollocks.
> 
> When I first read these I queried on this list whether there was any evidence 
> that De Visee was born in Portugal - not after all impossible - but did not 
> get a satisfactory answer.  I did my best to trace the source of this 
> information - which had found its way into Wikipedia - perhaps that is where 
> Satoh got the idea from.  It seems that somebody some time ago suggested that 
> De Visee's name implied that his family (rather than he
> himself) was Portuguese in origin. And so it goes. Endless pointless 
> speculation masquerading as musicology,
> 
> I can understand why David and and others who know Satoh personally and 
> admire his playing might want to try and defend him. But I think that it 
> needs to be said that people in his position - after all he taught at one of 
> the most prestigious music colleges in the world until recently  - shouldn't 
> indulge in idle fantasy which may mislead the unwary.  At the end of the day 
> he has said nothing about the music or the manuscript from which it is taken 
> which would have been much more interesting.
> 
> As ever
> Monica
> 
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Martyn Hodgson" 
> To: "Lute Dmth" 
> Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2014 8:24 AM
> Subject: [LUTE] Re: Bartolotti's continuo treatise
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Perhaps you missed what Monica Hall wrote after quoting Satoh: “This is
>> all my imagination and conjecture"? She added Satoh's more misleading
>> comment "based on the few documents concerning De Visee's life"
>> 
>> 
>> In short, Satoh misleads by suggesting that his spurious conjectures,
>> especially on birth place, are somehow based on historical sources.
>> 
>> MH
>> 
>> 
 From: howard posner 
 To: Lutelist 
 Sent: Friday, 28 February 2014, 23:32
 Subject: [LUTE] Re: Bartolotti's continuo treatise
 
 
 
 On Feb 28, 2014, at 2:17 PM, Monica Hall 
>>> wrote:
 
> I think you are being disingenious. What Satoh actually says is
> "This is all my imagination and conjecture, based on the few
>>> documents concerning De Visee's life".
> 
> How is the reader supposed to know what is based on these few
> documents
>>> and what is idle fantasy?
 
 
 I think “This is all my imagination and conjecture” pretty much gives it
>>> away.
 --
 
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
 
 
 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 





[LUTE] Re: De Visee

2014-03-02 Thread Monica Hall

Well that is possible I suppose. It may even account for the fact that
Castillion - who hied from Liege - copied the whole of De Visee's 1682 into
his earlier manuscript now in the Liege Conservatoire.   But that is just my 
imagination and conjecture and not based on any surviving documents


The truth is that at present we simply don't know where he came from and we 
ought accept that until some real evidence comes to light.   Perhaps you 
should start checking church records to see if he was baptised in Vize.

Cheers
Monica.


- Original Message - 
From: "Greet Schamp" 

To: "'Monica Hall'" ; "'Martyn Hodgson'"

Cc: "'Lutelist'" 
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 11:05 AM
Subject: RE: [LUTE] De Visee


Dear all,

I wonder if his name has something to do with the city of Visé, north east
of Liège in Belgium?
The dutch name is WEZET but in the Walloon language it is called Vizé.
According to wikipedia in french, it has a long history

It would add another lute/baroque guitar composer to our country ;>))

All the best
Greet


-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] Namens
Monica Hall
Verzonden: zaterdag 1 maart 2014 12:39
Aan: Martyn Hodgson
CC: Lutelist
Onderwerp: [LUTE] De Visee

Thank you very much for that Martyn.

I don't know how many people have actually  read these liner notes.   Three
whole pages are taken up with this "biography" - it is not until you turn to
p.4 that you discover - Oh by the way - none of this is true.  Some of the
information is factually accurate.  Some of it is not - which I think is
inexcusable - Satoh is apparently unaware that Louis XIV died in 1715 and
that when De Visee was appointed guitar teacher to the King it was to the 9
year old Louis XV.  Some of it is obviously bollocks.

When I first read these I queried on this list whether there was any
evidence that De Visee was born in Portugal - not after all impossible - but
did not get a satisfactory answer.  I did my best to trace the source of
this information - which had found its way into Wikipedia - perhaps that is
where Satoh got the idea from.  It seems that somebody some time ago
suggested that De Visee's name implied that his family (rather than he
himself) was Portuguese in origin. And so it goes. Endless pointless
speculation masquerading as musicology,

I can understand why David and and others who know Satoh personally and
admire his playing might want to try and defend him. But I think that it
needs to be said that people in his position - after all he taught at one of
the most prestigious music colleges in the world until recently  - shouldn't
indulge in idle fantasy which may mislead the unwary.  At the end of the day
he has said nothing about the music or the manuscript from which it is taken
which would have been much more interesting.

As ever
Monica


- Original Message -
From: "Martyn Hodgson" 
To: "Lute Dmth" 
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2014 8:24 AM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Bartolotti's continuo treatise





Perhaps you missed what Monica Hall wrote after quoting Satoh: “This is
all my imagination and conjecture"? She added Satoh's more misleading
comment "based on the few documents concerning De Visee's life"


In short, Satoh misleads by suggesting that his spurious conjectures,
especially on birth place, are somehow based on historical sources.

MH



 From: howard posner 
To: Lutelist 
Sent: Friday, 28 February 2014, 23:32
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Bartolotti's continuo treatise



On Feb 28, 2014, at 2:17 PM, Monica Hall 

wrote:



 I think you are being disingenious. What Satoh actually says is
 "This is all my imagination and conjecture, based on the few

documents concerning De Visee's life".


 How is the reader supposed to know what is based on these few
documents

and what is idle fantasy?



I think “This is all my imagination and conjecture” pretty much gives it

away.

--

To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html














[LUTE] Re: De Visee

2014-03-02 Thread Monica Hall
Well - Portugal is next door to Spain and shares its "exotic" reputation and 
supposed affinity to the guitar.


But De Visee was primarily a lutenist  and as you say there was long 
tradition of playing the lute in France.  It is much more likely that he 
was - well French - and learnt the lute from Gaultier, Pinel or whoever was 
in the ascendency in his youth.


Monica


- Original Message - 
From: "Shaun Ng" 

To: "Lutelist" 
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 11:54 AM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: De Visee


What I find interesting in all this (Satoh’s exercise) is why De Visée 
needs to be foreign. Is this to align him with Lully (the Italian)? In the 
light of the long tradition of lute playing in France, making De Visée 
foreign does not seem to elevate his status. In fact, historical writers 
in some circles belittled non-Parisian musicians.


Or could this simply be the modern view of foreign is better?

Shaun

On 2 Mar 2014, at 10:05 pm, Greet Schamp  wrote:


Dear all,

I wonder if his name has something to do with the city of Visé, north 
east of Liège in Belgium?

The dutch name is WEZET but in the Walloon language it is called Vizé.
According to wikipedia in french, it has a long history

It would add another lute/baroque guitar composer to our country ;>))

All the best
Greet


-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] Namens 
Monica Hall

Verzonden: zaterdag 1 maart 2014 12:39
Aan: Martyn Hodgson
CC: Lutelist
Onderwerp: [LUTE] De Visee

Thank you very much for that Martyn.

I don't know how many people have actually  read these liner notes. 
Three
whole pages are taken up with this "biography" - it is not until you turn 
to
p.4 that you discover - Oh by the way - none of this is true.  Some of 
the information is factually accurate.  Some of it is not - which I think 
is inexcusable - Satoh is apparently unaware that Louis XIV died in 1715 
and that when De Visee was appointed guitar teacher to the King it was to 
the 9 year old Louis XV.  Some of it is obviously bollocks.


When I first read these I queried on this list whether there was any 
evidence that De Visee was born in Portugal - not after all impossible - 
but did not get a satisfactory answer.  I did my best to trace the source 
of this information - which had found its way into Wikipedia - perhaps 
that is where Satoh got the idea from.  It seems that somebody some time 
ago suggested that De Visee's name implied that his family (rather than 
he
himself) was Portuguese in origin. And so it goes. Endless pointless 
speculation masquerading as musicology,


I can understand why David and and others who know Satoh personally and 
admire his playing might want to try and defend him. But I think that it 
needs to be said that people in his position - after all he taught at one 
of the most prestigious music colleges in the world until recently  - 
shouldn't indulge in idle fantasy which may mislead the unwary.  At the 
end of the day he has said nothing about the music or the manuscript from 
which it is taken which would have been much more interesting.


As ever
Monica


- Original Message -
From: "Martyn Hodgson" 
To: "Lute Dmth" 
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2014 8:24 AM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Bartolotti's continuo treatise





Perhaps you missed what Monica Hall wrote after quoting Satoh: “This is
all my imagination and conjecture"? She added Satoh's more misleading
comment "based on the few documents concerning De Visee's life"


In short, Satoh misleads by suggesting that his spurious conjectures,
especially on birth place, are somehow based on historical sources.

MH



From: howard posner 
To: Lutelist 
Sent: Friday, 28 February 2014, 23:32
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Bartolotti's continuo treatise



On Feb 28, 2014, at 2:17 PM, Monica Hall 

wrote:



I think you are being disingenious. What Satoh actually says is
"This is all my imagination and conjecture, based on the few

documents concerning De Visee's life".


How is the reader supposed to know what is based on these few
documents

and what is idle fantasy?



I think “This is all my imagination and conjecture” pretty much gives 
it

away.

--

To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html






















[LUTE] Re: Bartolotti's continuo treatise

2014-03-02 Thread David van Ooijen
   Hi Ed
   I do whatever is needed and possible.
   This weekend I had rehearsals with a viol and a cembalo. I brought a
   10-course in g and theorbo in a. Yesterday the cembalo was in Valotti,
   of which I am no fan and we ran into some problems (combined
   Renaissance & Baroque programme, flats as well as sharps in the
   continuo, and we each have to play two solo pieces for which we have to
   be happily in tune with ourselves as well). I asked for 1/6 comma
   meantone (aka Silbermann) and we agreed we'd give that a try today. It
   was a lot better. Pitch is never a problem, 415 it was this time, but
   if 440 (or 392, or 465, or whaetever in between), then I bring another
   lute (I have the luxury) but just crank up the theorbo (I don't have
   the luxury).
   As for tuning in between, of course, when needed. All those guts versus
   all those steel strings, whatever the temperature/humidiy changes in a
   concert situation, something has to give so someone will have to tune.
   I'm quicker in between pieces. The cembalo might retune in the break if
   it's too bad. It's all part of the game, but sometimes just playing
   guitar is easier. ;-)
   David
   > What do you do about temperaments? Do you play in equal for Baroque
   music? Do you discuss it ahead of time with the other continuo players?
   I've read that this is why lute and harpsichords didn't play together
   in the Renaissance. (I didn't say that, I read it) Do you decide on a
   base pitch? Presumably, the harpsichordist cannot change temperament
   without tuning. It might be possible to move some frets somewhat during
   an opera or long performance, but I guess retuning the long ones must
   wait until intermission. I'm curious as to what you do.
   >
   > On Feb 27, 2014, at 11:27 PM, David van Ooijen
   <[1]davidvanooi...@gmail.com> wrote:
   >
   >   When I play (arch)lute or theorbo with harpsichord I'd like to
   think we
   >   help eachother: the lute will make the sound of the harpsichord
   more
   >   mellow whilst the harpsichord will give volume to the sound of the
   >   lute. But one has to take care not to constantly double eachother.
   With
   >   organ, the lute gives attack while the organ gives sustain. That's
   an
   >   easier combination.
   >
   >
   > Ed Durbrow
   > Saitama, Japan
   > [2]http://www.youtube.com/user/edurbrow?feature=watch
   > [3]https://soundcloud.com/ed-durbrow
   > [4]http://www9.plala.or.jp/edurbrow/
   >
   >
   >

   --

References

   1. mailto:davidvanooi...@gmail.com
   2. http://www.youtube.com/user/edurbrow?feature=watch
   3. https://soundcloud.com/ed-durbrow
   4. http://www9.plala.or.jp/edurbrow/


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: De Visee

2014-03-02 Thread Jean-Marie Poirier
Maybe Visée first met Louis XIV who stayed in Vizé for a couple of days in the 
then famous "Maison Houbart" in 1672 and 1675, during the Franco-Dutch War... 
He was with the musketeer d'Artagnan who got killed in 1673 during the siege of 
Maastricht. 
Real facts but the rest is pure conjecture and my imagination, of course... ;-) 
!

Have a nice sunday,

Jean-Marie
--
 
>Dear all, 
>
>I wonder if his name has something to do with the city of Visé, north east of 
>Liège in Belgium?
>The dutch name is WEZET but in the Walloon language it is called Vizé.
>According to wikipedia in french, it has a long history 
>
>It would add another lute/baroque guitar composer to our country ;>))
>
>All the best
>Greet
>
>
>-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
>Van: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] Namens 
>Monica Hall
>Verzonden: zaterdag 1 maart 2014 12:39
>Aan: Martyn Hodgson
>CC: Lutelist
>Onderwerp: [LUTE] De Visee
>
>Thank you very much for that Martyn.
>
>I don't know how many people have actually  read these liner notes.   Three 
>whole pages are taken up with this "biography" - it is not until you turn to
>p.4 that you discover - Oh by the way - none of this is true.  Some of the 
>information is factually accurate.  Some of it is not - which I think is 
>inexcusable - Satoh is apparently unaware that Louis XIV died in 1715 and that 
>when De Visee was appointed guitar teacher to the King it was to the 9 year 
>old Louis XV.  Some of it is obviously bollocks.
>
>When I first read these I queried on this list whether there was any evidence 
>that De Visee was born in Portugal - not after all impossible - but did not 
>get a satisfactory answer.  I did my best to trace the source of this 
>information - which had found its way into Wikipedia - perhaps that is where 
>Satoh got the idea from.  It seems that somebody some time ago suggested that 
>De Visee's name implied that his family (rather than he
>himself) was Portuguese in origin. And so it goes. Endless pointless 
>speculation masquerading as musicology,
>
>I can understand why David and and others who know Satoh personally and admire 
>his playing might want to try and defend him. But I think that it needs to be 
>said that people in his position - after all he taught at one of the most 
>prestigious music colleges in the world until recently  - shouldn't indulge in 
>idle fantasy which may mislead the unwary.  At the end of the day he has said 
>nothing about the music or the manuscript from which it is taken which would 
>have been much more interesting.
>
>As ever
>Monica
>
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Martyn Hodgson" 
>To: "Lute Dmth" 
>Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2014 8:24 AM
>Subject: [LUTE] Re: Bartolotti's continuo treatise
>
>
>>
>>
>> Perhaps you missed what Monica Hall wrote after quoting Satoh: “This is
>> all my imagination and conjecture"? She added Satoh's more misleading
>> comment "based on the few documents concerning De Visee's life"
>>
>>
>> In short, Satoh misleads by suggesting that his spurious conjectures,
>> especially on birth place, are somehow based on historical sources.
>>
>> MH
>>
>> 
  From: howard posner 
 To: Lutelist 
 Sent: Friday, 28 February 2014, 23:32
 Subject: [LUTE] Re: Bartolotti's continuo treatise



 On Feb 28, 2014, at 2:17 PM, Monica Hall 
>>> wrote:

>  I think you are being disingenious. What Satoh actually says is
>  "This is all my imagination and conjecture, based on the few
>>> documents concerning De Visee's life".
>
>  How is the reader supposed to know what is based on these few
> documents
>>> and what is idle fantasy?


 I think “This is all my imagination and conjecture” pretty much gives it
>>> away.
 --

 To get on or off this list see list information at
 http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>




[LUTE] Re: De Visee

2014-03-02 Thread Monica Hall

The trail is getting hotter

Enjoy your day of rest

Monica

- Original Message - 
From: "Jean-Marie Poirier" 
To: "Greet Schamp" ; "Monica Hall" 
; "Martyn Hodgson" 

Cc: "'Lute List'" 
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: De Visee


Maybe Visée first met Louis XIV who stayed in Vizé for a couple of days in 
the then famous "Maison Houbart" in 1672 and 1675, during the Franco-Dutch 
War... He was with the musketeer d'Artagnan who got killed in 1673 during 
the siege of Maastricht.
Real facts but the rest is pure conjecture and my imagination, of 
course... ;-) !


Have a nice sunday,

Jean-Marie
--


Dear all,

I wonder if his name has something to do with the city of Visé, north east 
of Liège in Belgium?

The dutch name is WEZET but in the Walloon language it is called Vizé.
According to wikipedia in french, it has a long history

It would add another lute/baroque guitar composer to our country ;>))

All the best
Greet


-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] Namens 
Monica Hall

Verzonden: zaterdag 1 maart 2014 12:39
Aan: Martyn Hodgson
CC: Lutelist
Onderwerp: [LUTE] De Visee

Thank you very much for that Martyn.

I don't know how many people have actually  read these liner notes. 
Three
whole pages are taken up with this "biography" - it is not until you turn 
to
p.4 that you discover - Oh by the way - none of this is true.  Some of the 
information is factually accurate.  Some of it is not - which I think is 
inexcusable - Satoh is apparently unaware that Louis XIV died in 1715 and 
that when De Visee was appointed guitar teacher to the King it was to the 
9 year old Louis XV.  Some of it is obviously bollocks.


When I first read these I queried on this list whether there was any 
evidence that De Visee was born in Portugal - not after all impossible - 
but did not get a satisfactory answer.  I did my best to trace the source 
of this information - which had found its way into Wikipedia - perhaps 
that is where Satoh got the idea from.  It seems that somebody some time 
ago suggested that De Visee's name implied that his family (rather than he
himself) was Portuguese in origin. And so it goes. Endless pointless 
speculation masquerading as musicology,


I can understand why David and and others who know Satoh personally and 
admire his playing might want to try and defend him. But I think that it 
needs to be said that people in his position - after all he taught at one 
of the most prestigious music colleges in the world until recently  - 
shouldn't indulge in idle fantasy which may mislead the unwary.  At the 
end of the day he has said nothing about the music or the manuscript from 
which it is taken which would have been much more interesting.


As ever
Monica


- Original Message -
From: "Martyn Hodgson" 
To: "Lute Dmth" 
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2014 8:24 AM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Bartolotti's continuo treatise





Perhaps you missed what Monica Hall wrote after quoting Satoh: “This is
all my imagination and conjecture"? She added Satoh's more misleading
comment "based on the few documents concerning De Visee's life"


In short, Satoh misleads by suggesting that his spurious conjectures,
especially on birth place, are somehow based on historical sources.

MH



 From: howard posner 
To: Lutelist 
Sent: Friday, 28 February 2014, 23:32
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Bartolotti's continuo treatise



On Feb 28, 2014, at 2:17 PM, Monica Hall 

wrote:



 I think you are being disingenious. What Satoh actually says is
 "This is all my imagination and conjecture, based on the few

documents concerning De Visee's life".


 How is the reader supposed to know what is based on these few
documents

and what is idle fantasy?



I think “This is all my imagination and conjecture” pretty much gives 
it

away.

--

To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


















[LUTE] Re: De Visee

2014-03-02 Thread Peter Danner
Monica is quite right in pointing out that de Visee was never Louis XIV's 
official guitar teacher, which brings up another question. It has been years 
since I looked into the matter, but I find this in my notes. Perhaps someone 
can remind me of the Benoit citation. It identifies de la Salle as Spanish:

>From 1650 Bernard Jourdan de la Salle, a native of Saint-Luc, was the King's 
>teacher of the guitar. He was replaced by his son Louis Anne in 1695. 
"1681. Juillet. Naturalité pour Bernard Jourdan dit la Salle, natif de St. Luc 
en Espagne, faisant profession de la Religion catholique, apostolique et 
romanine." Benoit, p.79. 

Just who was this Bernard Jourdan de la Salle, and where was Saint-Luc? Why is 
there no surviving music by him? 

Peter Danner




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: De Visee

2014-03-02 Thread R. Mattes
On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 15:06:29 +0100, Jean-Marie Poirier wrote
> Maybe Visée first met Louis XIV who stayed in Vizé for a couple of
> days in the then famous "Maison Houbart" in 1672 and 1675, during
> the Franco-Dutch War... He was with the musketeer d'Artagnan who got
> killed in 1673 during the siege of Maastricht.

.. being killed just a few feet away from a certain Captian Churchill
(which later became the Duke of Malborough) - what a small world ;-)


> Real facts but

Yes, indeed. D'Artagnan's biography was first published between 1700 and
1701 as "The Memoirs of M. d'Artagnan, Captain-Lieutnant in the First
Company of the King's Musketeers", Cologne/Amsterdam, by Gatien de
Courtliz de Sandras [1].

> the
> rest is pure conjecture and my imagination, of course... ;-) !

As always ;-)

> Have a nice sunday,

Same to you

 RalfD


[1] Richard Cohen, "By the Sword, A History of Gladiators, Musketeers
..", Random House, 2002.



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: De Visee

2014-03-02 Thread Bernd Haegemann




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: De Visee

2014-03-02 Thread Monica Hall

I can only tell you what James Tyler has said in his book "The guitar and
its music" (2002) p. 108 as I don't have a copy of Benoit.

Jourdan de la Salle had been Louis XIVs' "Maitre de guittarre" at least 
since 1650 and
he died in 1695.  He was then succeeded by his son Louis who died in 1620. 
Louis Jourdan  was succeeded by De Visee.by which time of course Louis XIV 
had died and Louis XV had succeeded him.


Jourdan apparently was from  Sanlucar de Barrameda in the province of Cadiz. 
This is a small town on the coast.


The reference which Jim gives is Benoit "Dictionnairede la musique en France 
aux XVIIe et XVIIIe" 1992 p. 728


I am not sure about this and perhaps Jean-Marie can enlighten us - but I 
wonder if "Maitre de guitarre" doesn't necessarily mean that he actually 
taught Louis to play.   More that he was there to play to the King in his 
leisure hours.  He may not have been a composer but a lot of stuff in 
manuscript is anonymous and it may have been difficult to get guitar music 
printed in France before engraving rather than printing from musical type 
became common.


Best
Monica


- Original Message - 
From: "Peter Danner" 

To: "Monica Hall" 
Cc: "Lutelist" 
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 3:04 PM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: De Visee



Monica is quite right in pointing out that de Visee was never Louis XIV's
official guitar teacher, which brings up another question. It has been
years since I looked into the matter, but I find this in my notes. Perhaps
someone can remind me of the Benoit citation. It identifies de la Salle as
Spanish:

From 1650 Bernard Jourdan de la Salle, a native of Saint-Luc, was the
King's teacher of the guitar. He was replaced by his son Louis Anne in
1695.
"1681. Juillet. Naturalité pour Bernard Jourdan dit la Salle, natif de St.
Luc en Espagne, faisant profession de la Religion catholique, apostolique
et romanine." Benoit, p.79.

Just who was this Bernard Jourdan de la Salle, and where was Saint-Luc?
Why is there no surviving music by him?

Peter Danner




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html





[LUTE] Re: De Visee

2014-03-02 Thread Jean-Marie Poirier
Marcelle Benoit quotes a document of 1695 from the Archives Nationales where 
the surviving papers of the royal household are kept. It is from the 
"Secrétariat de la Maison du Roi" and on march 14th 1695, f° 38v in the series 
O.1 39 there is this allusion to Jourdan :
"Retenüe de joüeur de guitarre du Roy, pour le Sr de la Salle
Ayant egard aux services que feu Bernard Jourdan de la Salle nous a rendu 
depuis l'année 1650 que nous le choisismes pour nous enseigner a joüer de la 
guitarre, nous avons bien voulu, en cette consideration, conserver lad. charge 
a Louis Jourdan de la Salle, son fils, et luy contnuer les gages ordinaires de 
1200 livres tournois qui y sont attribuez..."

We learn that Louis XIV started to learn the guitar when he was 12 years old 
and that his teacher, who had come to France 10 years before the king's 
marriage with his Spanish cousin Marie-Thérèse d'Autriche, was dead by 1695 
("feu Bernard Jourdan de la Salle").

Marcelle Benoît in her "Dictionnaire de la musique en France aux XVIIe et 
XVIIIe siècles" writes that he was a native a Sanlucar de Barrameda in the 
province of Cadiz, as Monica justly quotes. Louis, his son who succeded him in 
his functions, was born in 1659 and Louis XIV was his godfather and Anne 
d'Autriche - the king's mother -  his godmother. Bernard married a certain 
Elizabeth Lesueur and had a daughter Elizabeth Laurente in 1660.
That's about the only facts we have about Bernard Jourdan de la Salle, who was 
naturalized in 1681, and the act where this is recorded says that he  was 
"natif de St Luc en Espagne (=Sanluccar) faisant profession de la Religion 
catholique, apostolique et romaine" (O.1 25, f° 203 & 242)
In 1684 he was paid 600 lt, like Champion, Ithier, Marais etc... and was 
qualified "La SAlle, maître à jouer de la guitarre".
Same thing in 1686. 
In 1688 he received 1200 lt, wheres the other musiciens of la Chambre had only 
600 lt.
In 1689, he had only 600 lt.
In 1691, he received 1200 lt. againn more than Michel Lambert, the singer and 
Lully father-in-law who only got 720 lt...
In 1693, he is called "Sieur de la Salle" and is listed for a sum of 600 lt 
with a comment "n'a pas été payé faute de de fonds dans l'estat de 
distribution" (  ;-) public money shortage not a new problem it seems...)
Eventually, in 1695 the money (1200 lt.) is delivered to "Louis Jourdand de la 
Salle, maistre à jouer de la guitarre du Roy, au lieu de feu Bernard Jourdan de 
la Salle son père".

Louis XIV must have been a rather gifted sutdent as, after his death, his 
brother's wife Elisabeth-Charlotte de Bavière wrote in a letter : "il ne 
connaissait aucune note de musique, mais il avait l'oreile juste et il jouait 
de la guitare mieux qu'un maître, arangeant sur cet instrument tout ce qu'il 
voulait"...
According to M. Benoit, Francisque Corbett (= Corbetta) seems to have been 
Bernard Jourdan's successor in spite of Louis Jourdan, legal heir of his 
father's functions.

End of story. No music so far has been unearthed that could be attributed to 
one of the two Jourdan de la Salle... 

We were more lucky with another Spaniard who had settled inFrance, Luys de 
Briceño, but that is another story ;-) !

All the best,

Jean-Marie

PS: all the information is to be found in Marcelle Benoit, "Versailles et les 
musiciens du roi" and "Musiques de cour, chapelle, chambre, écurie; recueil de 
documents", Paris : Picard, 1971 and her Dictionnaire, Paris : Fayard, 1992
--
 
>I can only tell you what James Tyler has said in his book "The guitar and
>its music" (2002) p. 108 as I don't have a copy of Benoit.
>
>Jourdan de la Salle had been Louis XIVs' "Maitre de guittarre" at least 
>since 1650 and
>he died in 1695.  He was then succeeded by his son Louis who died in 1620. 
>Louis Jourdan  was succeeded by De Visee.by which time of course Louis XIV 
>had died and Louis XV had succeeded him.
>
>Jourdan apparently was from  Sanlucar de Barrameda in the province of Cadiz. 
>This is a small town on the coast.
>
>The reference which Jim gives is Benoit "Dictionnairede la musique en France 
>aux XVIIe et XVIIIe" 1992 p. 728
>
>I am not sure about this and perhaps Jean-Marie can enlighten us - but I 
>wonder if "Maitre de guitarre" doesn't necessarily mean that he actually 
>taught Louis to play.   More that he was there to play to the King in his 
>leisure hours.  He may not have been a composer but a lot of stuff in 
>manuscript is anonymous and it may have been difficult to get guitar music 
>printed in France before engraving rather than printing from musical type 
>became common.
>
>Best
>Monica
>
>
>- Original Message - 
>From: "Peter Danner" 
>To: "Monica Hall" 
>Cc: "Lutelist" 
>Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 3:04 PM
>Subject: [LUTE] Re: De Visee
>
>
>> Monica is quite right in pointing out that de Visee was never Louis XIV's
>> official guitar teacher, which brings up another question. It has been
>> years since I looked into the matter, but I find th

[LUTE] Re: De Visee

2014-03-02 Thread Peter Danner
Thank you for this, Jean-Marie. Precisely the information I was looking for. I 
remember examining the Marcelle Beboit volumes in the Stanford library years 
ago. Louis XIV did indeed have some ability on the guitar from contemporary 
accounts, and Voltaire is later said to have stated that the only things Louis 
XIV learned to do well were to dance and play the guitar. 

On French-Spanish relationships, it might be worth pointing out that Louis' 
mother, Anne of Austria, in spite of her name, was a Spanish Habsburg, the 
daughter of King Philip III. Furthermore, Louis married the Infanta, Maria 
Teresa, daughter of Philip IV of Spain. In his biography of Louis XIV, Olivier 
Bernier mentions that she arrived in France not knowing a word of French and 
throughout her life always spoke it with a heavy Spanish accent (p. 68). She 
probably brought Spanish musicians in her retinue.

Peter Danner

On Mar 2, 2014, at 9:13 AM, "Jean-Marie Poirier"  wrote:

Marcelle Benoit quotes a document of 1695 from the Archives Nationales where 
the surviving papers of the royal household are kept. It is from the 
"Secrétariat de la Maison du Roi" and on march 14th 1695, f° 38v in the series 
O.1 39 there is this allusion to Jourdan :
"Retenüe de joüeur de guitarre du Roy, pour le Sr de la Salle
Ayant egard aux services que feu Bernard Jourdan de la Salle nous a rendu 
depuis l'année 1650 que nous le choisismes pour nous enseigner a joüer de la 
guitarre, nous avons bien voulu, en cette consideration, conserver lad. charge 
a Louis Jourdan de la Salle, son fils, et luy contnuer les gages ordinaires de 
1200 livres tournois qui y sont attribuez..."

We learn that Louis XIV started to learn the guitar when he was 12 years old 
and that his teacher, who had come to France 10 years before the king's 
marriage with his Spanish cousin Marie-Thérèse d'Autriche, was dead by 1695 
("feu Bernard Jourdan de la Salle").

Marcelle Benoît in her "Dictionnaire de la musique en France aux XVIIe et 
XVIIIe siècles" writes that he was a native a Sanlucar de Barrameda in the 
province of Cadiz, as Monica justly quotes. Louis, his son who succeded him in 
his functions, was born in 1659 and Louis XIV was his godfather and Anne 
d'Autriche - the king's mother -  his godmother. Bernard married a certain 
Elizabeth Lesueur and had a daughter Elizabeth Laurente in 1660.
That's about the only facts we have about Bernard Jourdan de la Salle, who was 
naturalized in 1681, and the act where this is recorded says that he  was 
"natif de St Luc en Espagne (=Sanluccar) faisant profession de la Religion 
catholique, apostolique et romaine" (O.1 25, f° 203 & 242)
In 1684 he was paid 600 lt, like Champion, Ithier, Marais etc... and was 
qualified "La SAlle, maître à jouer de la guitarre".
Same thing in 1686. 
In 1688 he received 1200 lt, wheres the other musiciens of la Chambre had only 
600 lt.
In 1689, he had only 600 lt.
In 1691, he received 1200 lt. againn more than Michel Lambert, the singer and 
Lully father-in-law who only got 720 lt...
In 1693, he is called "Sieur de la Salle" and is listed for a sum of 600 lt 
with a comment "n'a pas été payé faute de de fonds dans l'estat de 
distribution" (  ;-) public money shortage not a new problem it seems...)
Eventually, in 1695 the money (1200 lt.) is delivered to "Louis Jourdand de la 
Salle, maistre à jouer de la guitarre du Roy, au lieu de feu Bernard Jourdan de 
la Salle son père".

Louis XIV must have been a rather gifted sutdent as, after his death, his 
brother's wife Elisabeth-Charlotte de Bavière wrote in a letter : "il ne 
connaissait aucune note de musique, mais il avait l'oreile juste et il jouait 
de la guitare mieux qu'un maître, arangeant sur cet instrument tout ce qu'il 
voulait"...
According to M. Benoit, Francisque Corbett (= Corbetta) seems to have been 
Bernard Jourdan's successor in spite of Louis Jourdan, legal heir of his 
father's functions.

End of story. No music so far has been unearthed that could be attributed to 
one of the two Jourdan de la Salle... 

We were more lucky with another Spaniard who had settled inFrance, Luys de 
Briceño, but that is another story ;-) !




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: De Visee

2014-03-02 Thread Jean-Marie Poirier
>On French-Spanish relationships, it might be worth pointing out that Louis' 
>mother, Anne of Austria, in spite of her name, was a Spanish Habsburg, >the 
>daughter of King Philip III. Furthermore, Louis married the Infanta, Maria 
>Teresa, daughter of Philip IV of Spain. In his biography of Louis XIV, 
>>Olivier Bernier mentions that she arrived in France not knowing a word of 
>French and throughout her life always spoke it with a heavy Spanish >accent 
>(p. 68). She probably brought Spanish musicians in her retinue.
>
>Peter Danner

Precisely one of the possible reasons why Briceño chose to settle in Paris and 
had his book published by "Pedro Ballard" in 1626. Anne and her Spanish retinue 
had been in France for more than ten years by then... Another clear hint at the 
Spanish influence is the number of Airs de Cour in Spanish by Gabriel Bataille 
and by Moulinié (with guitar tablature). 
There is a short but very good chapter on this subject by Mrs Georgie Durosoir 
who is one of the best specialists of the 17th century in France in a book 
entitled "L'âge d'or de l'influence espagnole; la France et l'Espagne à 
l'époque d'Anne d'Autriche - 1615 - 1666" (pp. 385 - 392). Mont-de-Marsan : 
Editions Interuniversitaires, 1991

A fascinating period !

Best wishes,

Jean-Marie



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: De Visee

2014-03-02 Thread howard posner

On Mar 1, 2014, at 9:29 AM, Christopher Wilke  wrote:

> before you know it, it's a "known fact" that de Visee was from
>   Portugual.

My offhand remark that started this thread was based on a "known fact" that I 
gleaned from the liner notes of a Segovia LP (you may commence giggling), when 
I was not old enough to distrust such things: Visee was a Spaniard, born 
Roberto Viseo.  I never had occasion to inquire further, so until a few days I 
still believed it.  
--

To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: De Visee

2014-03-02 Thread Monica Hall
Many many thanks for all this fascinating  information.   Jourdan must have 
been quite an important person in Louis' household.  I have only one

comment - Corbetta died in 1681 so he can't have succeeded Jourdon in 1695
and in any case he spent most of his last 20 years in England although he
visited France again on a number of occasions.  Perhaps he gave Louis a few
master classes when he was in Paris.

Best
Monica



- Original Message - 
From: "Jean-Marie Poirier" 

To: "Monica Hall" ; "Peter Danner" 
Cc: "'Lute List'" 
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: De Visee



Marcelle Benoit quotes a document of 1695 from the Archives Nationales
where the surviving papers of the royal household are kept. It is from the
"Secrétariat de la Maison du Roi" and on march 14th 1695, f° 38v in the
series O.1 39 there is this allusion to Jourdan :
"Retenüe de joüeur de guitarre du Roy, pour le Sr de la Salle
Ayant egard aux services que feu Bernard Jourdan de la Salle nous a rendu
depuis l'année 1650 que nous le choisismes pour nous enseigner a joüer de
la guitarre, nous avons bien voulu, en cette consideration, conserver lad.
charge a Louis Jourdan de la Salle, son fils, et luy contnuer les gages
ordinaires de 1200 livres tournois qui y sont attribuez..."

We learn that Louis XIV started to learn the guitar when he was 12 years
old and that his teacher, who had come to France 10 years before the
king's marriage with his Spanish cousin Marie-Thérèse d'Autriche, was dead
by 1695 ("feu Bernard Jourdan de la Salle").

Marcelle Benoît in her "Dictionnaire de la musique en France aux XVIIe et
XVIIIe siècles" writes that he was a native a Sanlucar de Barrameda in the
province of Cadiz, as Monica justly quotes. Louis, his son who succeded
him in his functions, was born in 1659 and Louis XIV was his godfather and
Anne d'Autriche - the king's mother -  his godmother. Bernard married a
certain Elizabeth Lesueur and had a daughter Elizabeth Laurente in 1660.
That's about the only facts we have about Bernard Jourdan de la Salle, who
was naturalized in 1681, and the act where this is recorded says that he
was "natif de St Luc en Espagne (=Sanluccar) faisant profession de la
Religion catholique, apostolique et romaine" (O.1 25, f° 203 & 242)
In 1684 he was paid 600 lt, like Champion, Ithier, Marais etc... and was
qualified "La SAlle, maître à jouer de la guitarre".
Same thing in 1686.
In 1688 he received 1200 lt, wheres the other musiciens of la Chambre had
only 600 lt.
In 1689, he had only 600 lt.
In 1691, he received 1200 lt. againn more than Michel Lambert, the singer
and Lully father-in-law who only got 720 lt...
In 1693, he is called "Sieur de la Salle" and is listed for a sum of 600
lt with a comment "n'a pas été payé faute de de fonds dans l'estat de
distribution" (  ;-) public money shortage not a new problem it seems...)
Eventually, in 1695 the money (1200 lt.) is delivered to "Louis Jourdand
de la Salle, maistre à jouer de la guitarre du Roy, au lieu de feu Bernard
Jourdan de la Salle son père".

Louis XIV must have been a rather gifted sutdent as, after his death, his
brother's wife Elisabeth-Charlotte de Bavière wrote in a letter : "il ne
connaissait aucune note de musique, mais il avait l'oreile juste et il
jouait de la guitare mieux qu'un maître, arangeant sur cet instrument tout
ce qu'il voulait"...
According to M. Benoit, Francisque Corbett (= Corbetta) seems to have been
Bernard Jourdan's successor in spite of Louis Jourdan, legal heir of his
father's functions.

End of story. No music so far has been unearthed that could be attributed
to one of the two Jourdan de la Salle...

We were more lucky with another Spaniard who had settled inFrance, Luys de
Briceño, but that is another story ;-) !

All the best,

Jean-Marie

PS: all the information is to be found in Marcelle Benoit, "Versailles et
les musiciens du roi" and "Musiques de cour, chapelle, chambre, écurie;
recueil de documents", Paris : Picard, 1971 and her Dictionnaire, Paris :
Fayard, 1992
--


I can only tell you what James Tyler has said in his book "The guitar and
its music" (2002) p. 108 as I don't have a copy of Benoit.

Jourdan de la Salle had been Louis XIVs' "Maitre de guittarre" at least
since 1650 and
he died in 1695.  He was then succeeded by his son Louis who died in 1620.
Louis Jourdan  was succeeded by De Visee.by which time of course Louis XIV
had died and Louis XV had succeeded him.

Jourdan apparently was from  Sanlucar de Barrameda in the province of
Cadiz.
This is a small town on the coast.

The reference which Jim gives is Benoit "Dictionnairede la musique en
France
aux XVIIe et XVIIIe" 1992 p. 728

I am not sure about this and perhaps Jean-Marie can enlighten us - but I
wonder if "Maitre de guitarre" doesn't necessarily mean that he actually
taught Louis to play.   More that he was there to play to the King in his
leisure hours.  He may not have been a composer but a lot of stuff in
manuscript 

[LUTE] Re: De Visee

2014-03-02 Thread Peter Danner
After the remarks made about Satoh's liner notes, I hate to cite any others, 
but in Philippe Beaussant's rather poignant notes to Hopkison Smith's Pieces de 
Theorbe (Astree 7733), claim is made that Corbetta became known to Louis when 
Lully had the two play together in le Ballet de la Galanterie du temps. I 
believe this was1656. Corbetta must have been proud of this performance, since 
it is mentioned in both prefaces to his book of 1671.

I reason (conjecture again!) that guitar instructions from Corbetta to the King 
would have been earlier rather than later. Jourdan was succeeded by his son, 
Louis Anne, in 1695. So, why was it de Visee, not Jourdan, who was specifically 
called on to play the guitar to Louis while the latter was recovering from his 
almost-fatal illness of 1686? The guitar-loving king must have admired his 
playing. (Incidentally, it was while performing the Te Deum written to 
celebrate Louis' recovery from this illness that Lully suffered the wound that 
caused his death.)

Peter


On Mar 2, 2014, at 1:22 PM, Monica Hall  wrote:

Many many thanks for all this fascinating  information.   Jourdan must have 
been quite an important person in Louis' household.  I have only one
comment - Corbetta died in 1681 so he can't have succeeded Jourdon in 1695
and in any case he spent most of his last 20 years in England although he
visited France again on a number of occasions.  Perhaps he gave Louis a few
master classes when he was in Paris.

Best
Monica




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: De Visee

2014-03-02 Thread Geoff Gaherty

On 02/03/14 7:56 PM, Peter Danner wrote:

Incidentally, it was while performing the Te Deum written to
celebrate Louis' recovery from this illness that Lully suffered the
wound that caused his death.


Oh no...I fear we're next going to learn that the tale of Lully's death 
from gangrene brought about by an accident with his conducting staff is 
a fable also!  It must be true: Wikipedia says so.  Not to mention the 
liner notes on every record of Lully's music.  Incidentally, I learned 
from Wikipedia that the guitar was Lully's first instrument.


Geoff

--
Geoff Gaherty
Foxmead Observatory
Coldwater, Ontario, Canada
http://www.gaherty.ca
http://starrynightskyevents.blogspot.com/



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html