CVS compilation error
Is this a Debian/unstable problem, is it me, or any one of you or,
speaking with the Monthy Pythons, something completely different?
I haven't been able compiling CVS since some time around release of
1.3.0 (which compiled fine).
[ after doing a CVS update: ]
-- snip ---
Script started on Tue Mar 11 11:30:47 2003
[root]/usr/src/CVS/LyX/lyx-devel export QTDIR=/usr/share/qt3 ./autogen.sh
./configure --prefix=/opt/qlyx --with-frontend=qt make install
Using Autoconf version 2.13
Locating GNU m4... /usr/bin/m4
Generate acinclude.m4... done.
Building macros...
.
lib/reLyX
done.
Building config header template...
.
done.
Building Makefile templates...
.
lib/reLyX
done.
Building configure...
.
autoconf: Undefined macros:
***BUG in Autoconf--please report*** AC_HELP_STRING
lib/reLyX
done.
Building lib/configure ... done.
run ./configure ; make
loading cache ./config.cache
configuring LyX version 1.4.0cvs
WARNING: This is a development version. Expect bugs.
checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking target system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking for install target ... ... lyx
checking for a BSD compatible install... (cached) /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for mawk... (cached) gawk
checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... (cached) yes
checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... (cached) yes
checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking for kpsewhich... (cached) kpsewhich
checking for gm4... (cached) m4
checking for gcc... (cached) gcc
checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... yes
checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) is a cross-compiler... no
checking whether we are using GNU C... (cached) yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... (cached) yes
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking dependency style of gcc... (cached) gcc3
checking for strerror in -lcposix... (cached) no
checking how to run the C preprocessor... (cached) gcc -E
checking for AIX... no
checking for Cygwin environment... (cached) no
checking for mingw32 environment... (cached) no
checking for executable suffix... (cached) no
checking what frontend should be used as main GUI... qt
checking for a good enough C++ compiler... g++
checking for c++... (cached) g++
checking whether the C++ compiler (g++ ) works... yes
checking whether the C++ compiler (g++ ) is a cross-compiler... no
checking whether we are using GNU C++... (cached) yes
checking whether g++ accepts -g... (cached) yes
checking dependency style of g++... (cached) gcc3
checking whether the C++ compiler understands explicit... (cached) yes
checking whether the included std::string should be used... checking ... (cached) no
checking whether the systems std::string is really good... (cached) yes
checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... (cached) g++ -E
checking for C headers wrappers... (cached) yes
checking whether C library functions are already in the global namespace... (cached) no
checking for conforming std::count... (cached) yes
checking for ostream... (cached) yes
checking for istream... (cached) yes
checking for sstream... (cached) yes
checking for locale... (cached) yes
checking for limits... (cached) yes
checking for modern STL streams... (cached) yes
checking for sin in -lm... (cached) yes
checking for fopen in -lc... (cached) yes
checking for extra library directory... (cached) NONE
checking for extra include directory... (cached) NONE
checking for extra lib+include directory... (cached) NONE
checking for main in -lAiksaurus... (cached) no
checking for ld used by GCC... (cached) /usr/bin/ld
checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... (cached) yes
checking for /usr/bin/ld option to reload object files... (cached) -r
checking for BSD-compatible nm... (cached) /usr/bin/nm -B
checking whether ln -s works... (cached) yes
checking how to recognise dependant libraries... (cached) pass_all
checking for object suffix... (cached) o
checking command to parse /usr/bin/nm -B output... (cached) ok
checking for dlfcn.h... (cached) yes
checking for ranlib... (cached) ranlib
checking for strip... (cached) strip
checking for objdir... .libs
checking for gcc option to produce PIC... (cached) -fPIC
checking if gcc PIC flag -fPIC works... (cached) yes
checking if gcc static flag -static works... (cached) yes
checking if gcc supports -c -o file.o... (cached) no
checking if we can lock with hard links... yes
checking if gcc supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions... yes
checking whether the linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes
checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate
checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes
checking dynamic linker characteristics... GNU/Linux ld.so
checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes
creating libtool
checking for pspell
Re: CVS compilation error
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | [ after doing a CVS update: ] Are you sure you are really up to date? I updated it right before producing the script session. But i've acted on both Angus' and José's comments, created a .cvsrc as proposed and updated again from CVS, and removed autoconf2.13, which was automatically preferred over autoconf-2.57 by LyX's ./configure from my Debian/unstable system. Now everything's currently compiling and i have to wait for the results. I'll see tonight when i'm coming home again whether everything went right. Thanks everybody! P. *8^)
CVS compilation error
Is this a Debian/unstable problem, is it me, or any one of you or,
speaking with the Monthy Pythons, something completely different?
I haven't been able compiling CVS since some time around release of
1.3.0 (which compiled fine).
[ after doing a CVS update: ]
-- snip ---
Script started on Tue Mar 11 11:30:47 2003
[root]/usr/src/CVS/LyX/lyx-devel > export QTDIR=/usr/share/qt3 && ./autogen.sh &
& ./configure --prefix=/opt/qlyx --with-frontend=qt && make install
Using Autoconf version 2.13
Locating GNU m4... /usr/bin/m4
Generate acinclude.m4... done.
Building macros...
.
lib/reLyX
done.
Building config header template...
.
done.
Building Makefile templates...
.
lib/reLyX
done.
Building configure...
.
autoconf: Undefined macros:
***BUG in Autoconf--please report*** AC_HELP_STRING
lib/reLyX
done.
Building lib/configure ... done.
run "./configure ; make"
loading cache ./config.cache
configuring LyX version 1.4.0cvs
WARNING: This is a development version. Expect bugs.
checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking target system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking for install target ... ... lyx
checking for a BSD compatible install... (cached) /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for mawk... (cached) gawk
checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... (cached) yes
checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... (cached) yes
checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking for kpsewhich... (cached) kpsewhich
checking for gm4... (cached) m4
checking for gcc... (cached) gcc
checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... yes
checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) is a cross-compiler... no
checking whether we are using GNU C... (cached) yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... (cached) yes
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking dependency style of gcc... (cached) gcc3
checking for strerror in -lcposix... (cached) no
checking how to run the C preprocessor... (cached) gcc -E
checking for AIX... no
checking for Cygwin environment... (cached) no
checking for mingw32 environment... (cached) no
checking for executable suffix... (cached) no
checking what frontend should be used as main GUI... qt
checking for a good enough C++ compiler... g++
checking for c++... (cached) g++
checking whether the C++ compiler (g++ ) works... yes
checking whether the C++ compiler (g++ ) is a cross-compiler... no
checking whether we are using GNU C++... (cached) yes
checking whether g++ accepts -g... (cached) yes
checking dependency style of g++... (cached) gcc3
checking whether the C++ compiler understands explicit... (cached) yes
checking whether the included std::string should be used... checking ... (cached) no
checking whether the systems std::string is really good... (cached) yes
checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... (cached) g++ -E
checking for C headers wrappers... (cached) yes
checking whether C library functions are already in the global namespace... (cached) no
checking for conforming std::count... (cached) yes
checking for ostream... (cached) yes
checking for istream... (cached) yes
checking for sstream... (cached) yes
checking for locale... (cached) yes
checking for limits... (cached) yes
checking for modern STL streams... (cached) yes
checking for sin in -lm... (cached) yes
checking for fopen in -lc... (cached) yes
checking for extra library directory... (cached) NONE
checking for extra include directory... (cached) NONE
checking for extra lib+include directory... (cached) NONE
checking for main in -lAiksaurus... (cached) no
checking for ld used by GCC... (cached) /usr/bin/ld
checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... (cached) yes
checking for /usr/bin/ld option to reload object files... (cached) -r
checking for BSD-compatible nm... (cached) /usr/bin/nm -B
checking whether ln -s works... (cached) yes
checking how to recognise dependant libraries... (cached) pass_all
checking for object suffix... (cached) o
checking command to parse /usr/bin/nm -B output... (cached) ok
checking for dlfcn.h... (cached) yes
checking for ranlib... (cached) ranlib
checking for strip... (cached) strip
checking for objdir... .libs
checking for gcc option to produce PIC... (cached) -fPIC
checking if gcc PIC flag -fPIC works... (cached) yes
checking if gcc static flag -static works... (cached) yes
checking if gcc supports -c -o file.o... (cached) no
checking if we can lock with hard links... yes
checking if gcc supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions... yes
checking whether the linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes
checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate
checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes
checking dynamic linker characteristics... GNU/Linux ld.so
checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes
creating libtool
checking for
Re: CVS compilation error
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: > Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > | [ after doing a CVS update: ] > > Are you sure you are really up to date? > I updated it right before producing the script session. But i've acted on both Angus' and José's comments, created a .cvsrc as proposed and updated again from CVS, and removed autoconf2.13, which was automatically preferred over autoconf-2.57 by LyX's ./configure from my Debian/unstable system. Now everything's currently compiling and i have to wait for the results. I'll see tonight when i'm coming home again whether everything went right. Thanks everybody! P. *8^)
Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.2.2 is released
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes: Paul Please note that this package is no official Debian package. Do you advise us to carry it on ftp.lyx.org? No. But i won't hinder you either... ;-)
Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.2.2 is released
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes: > Paul> Please note that this package is no official Debian package. > > Do you advise us to carry it on ftp.lyx.org? > No. But i won't hinder you either... ;-)
Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.2.2 is released
For all of Debian people here on the list, i've been building this release on Debian/unstable linked with the freed xforms-1.0 libraries and uploaded it to: --- /etc/apt/sources.list deb ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian unofficial/ deb-src ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian unofficial/ --- /etc/apt/sources.list Please note that this package is no official Debian package. Thanks, P. *8^)
Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.2.2 is released
For all of Debian people here on the list, i've been building this release on Debian/unstable linked with the freed xforms-1.0 libraries and uploaded it to: --- /etc/apt/sources.list deb ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian unofficial/ deb-src ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian unofficial/ --- /etc/apt/sources.list Please note that this package is no official Debian package. Thanks, P. *8^)
Re: Debian packages [was: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.2.1 is released]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes: Paul == Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Paul Updated *unofficial* Debian packages compiled with Paul libforms_1.0-RC4.1 are available here: Do you want them to go on ftp.lyx.org? I'd need the approval of Jules Bean, the official Debian maintainer for this package. But unfortunately he doesn't seem to be reachable. So better don't. Thanks, P. *8^)
Re: Debian packages [was: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.2.1 is released]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes: > >>>>> "Paul" == Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Paul> Updated *unofficial* Debian packages compiled with > Paul> libforms_1.0-RC4.1 are available here: > > Do you want them to go on ftp.lyx.org? > I'd need the approval of Jules Bean, the official Debian maintainer for this package. But unfortunately he doesn't seem to be reachable. So better don't. Thanks, P. *8^)
Re: LyX 1.2.1 is coming...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes: Can you doublecheck that fl_set_object_shortcut is not in forms.h? I really do not see how this can happen. Looks like it was actually my very own fault: Might it be a problem in debian packaging of xforms? As i've now found out i didn't have the latest release installed. I'm currently rebuilding LyX with an updated libforms1_1.0-0.RC4.1. What version of xforms is that? 1.0 is not out yet, AFAIK. No, this was just a 1.0 prerelease. The packages are available from http://people.debian.org/~psg/xforms/;. They'll be moved into Debian/main when the final release is out. If all compiles fine i'll put up the Debian packages of lyx_1.2.1 on /etc/apt/sources.list deb ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian unofficial/ deb-src ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian unofficial/ /etc/apt/sources.list But this will be done earliest in approximately eight hours because i've got to go now caring for other stuff. Thanks, P. *8^) -- Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany - http://ntama.uni-mainz.de --
Re: LyX 1.2.1 is coming...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes: > Can you doublecheck that fl_set_object_shortcut is not in forms.h? I > really do not see how this can happen. > Looks like it was actually my very own fault: > Might it be a problem in debian > packaging of xforms? > As i've now found out i didn't have the latest release installed. I'm currently rebuilding LyX with an updated "libforms1_1.0-0.RC4.1". > What version of xforms is that? 1.0 is not out > yet, AFAIK. > No, this was just a 1.0 prerelease. The packages are available from "http://people.debian.org/~psg/xforms/;. They'll be moved into Debian/main when the final release is out. If all compiles fine i'll put up the Debian packages of lyx_1.2.1 on /etc/apt/sources.list deb ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian unofficial/ deb-src ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian unofficial/ /etc/apt/sources.list But this will be done earliest in approximately eight hours because i've got to go now caring for other stuff. Thanks, P. *8^) -- Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany - http://ntama.uni-mainz.de --
Re: LyX 1.2.1 is coming...
Thanks, i'm currently building unofficial Debian packages which will be available under ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian/unofficial/; once completed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes: http://www.devel.lyx.org/~lasgouttes/www-user/announce/1_2_1.txt Just a minor glitch in this text: snip --- 1_2_1.txt 2002-08-20 23:12:14.0 +0200 +++ 1_2_1patch.txt 2002-08-20 23:11:51.0 +0200 @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ If you already have LyX 1.2.0 sources, you may want to apply the following patch instead - ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/patch-1.2.1.tar.gz + ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/patch-1.2.1.gz If you find what you think is a bug in LyX 1.2.1, you may either e-mail the LyX user's mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), or open snip Thanks, P. *8^)
Re: LyX 1.2.1 is coming...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes: Just a small note to say that I have prepared the 1.2.1 release and that the files are already on the ftp server. I just tried compiling this on Debian/Woody and get this: snip g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../src -I../../../images -I../../../src/ -I../../../src/frontends/ -I../../../src/frontends/controllers -I../../.. -I../../../boost -isystem /usr/X11R6/ include -O -fno-exceptions -c combox.C -Wp,-MD,.deps/combox.TPlo In file included from combox.C:39: combox.h: In method `void Combox::shortcut(const string , int)': combox.h:199: implicit declaration of function `int fl_set_object_shortcut(...)' make[6]: *** [combox.lo] Error 1 make[6]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.1/src/frontends/xforms' make[5]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[5]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.1/src/frontends/xforms' make[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.1/src/frontends' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.1/src' make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.1/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.1' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 snip gcc -v yields: Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.4/specs gcc version 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease) ii libforms-dev 1.0-1 Header files and static libraries for the XF
Re: LyX 1.2.1 is coming...
Thanks, i'm currently building unofficial Debian packages which will be available under "ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian/unofficial/; once completed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes: > http://www.devel.lyx.org/~lasgouttes/www-user/announce/1_2_1.txt > Just a minor glitch in this text: snip --- 1_2_1.txt 2002-08-20 23:12:14.0 +0200 +++ 1_2_1patch.txt 2002-08-20 23:11:51.0 +0200 @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ If you already have LyX 1.2.0 sources, you may want to apply the following patch instead - ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/patch-1.2.1.tar.gz + ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/patch-1.2.1.gz If you find what you think is a bug in LyX 1.2.1, you may either e-mail the LyX user's mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), or open snip Thanks, P. *8^)
Re: LyX 1.2.1 is coming...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes: > Just a small note to say that I have prepared the 1.2.1 release and > that the files are already on the ftp server. > I just tried compiling this on Debian/Woody and get this: snip g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../src -I../../../images -I../../../src/ -I../../../src/frontends/ -I../../../src/frontends/controllers -I../../.. -I../../../boost -isystem /usr/X11R6/ include -O -fno-exceptions -c combox.C -Wp,-MD,.deps/combox.TPlo In file included from combox.C:39: combox.h: In method `void Combox::shortcut(const string &, int)': combox.h:199: implicit declaration of function `int fl_set_object_shortcut(...)' make[6]: *** [combox.lo] Error 1 make[6]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.1/src/frontends/xforms' make[5]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[5]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.1/src/frontends/xforms' make[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.1/src/frontends' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.1/src' make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.1/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.1' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 snip gcc -v yields: Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.4/specs gcc version 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease) ii libforms-dev 1.0-1 Header files and static libraries for the XF
Binary for Debian/unstable [was:Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.2.0 is there!]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes: After too long a wait, the LyX team are pleased to announce the new stable release, 1.2.0. Congratulations! It's a pleasure to see how LyX is getting even better than ever before! :-) Prebuild binaries (mainly rpms for linux distributions) are available at ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.2.0/ For the Debianites among us i've put up an unofficial Debian binary linked with xforms-0. on Debian/unstable. Here's the appropriate /etc/apt/sources.list entry: --- put in /etc/apt/sources.list # lyx-1.2.0: deb ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian unofficial/ deb-src ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian unofficial/ # xforms-0. stuff: deb http://people.debian.org/~psg/xforms ./ - The LyX packaging is based on the official Debian maintainers debianization routines and are guaranteed to work for me[TM] only. If it doesn't work for you then please wait for the officially maintained Debian package to appear. ;-) Thanks, P. *8^) -- Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany - http://ntama.uni-mainz.de --
Binary for Debian/unstable [was:Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.2.0 is there!]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes:
> After too long a wait, the LyX team are pleased to announce the new stable
> release, 1.2.0.
>
Congratulations! It's a pleasure to see how LyX is getting even
better than ever before! :-)
> Prebuild binaries (mainly rpms for linux distributions) are available
> at
> ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.2.0/
>
For the Debianites among us i've put up an unofficial Debian binary
linked with xforms-0. on Debian/unstable. Here's the appropriate
/etc/apt/sources.list entry:
--- put in /etc/apt/sources.list
# lyx-1.2.0:
deb ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian unofficial/
deb-src ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian unofficial/
# xforms-0. stuff:
deb http://people.debian.org/~psg/xforms ./
-
The LyX packaging is based on the official Debian maintainers
debianization routines and are guaranteed to work for me[TM] only. If
it doesn't work for you then please wait for the officially maintained
Debian package to appear. ;-)
Thanks, P. *8^)
--
---- Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de --
Re: pre5
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: Pre 5 seems to be pretty stable. Since pre5 was released it has been downloaded about ~850 times, and we have had very few failure/bug reports. I successfully compiled it under the latest Debian/unstable using xforms-0.whatever and noted the LyX has gained quite a lot of speed compared to 1.1.6fix4. :-) Other than that i just played around with it a few minutes. But i guess this hardly counts as a meaningful testing routine. ;-) Thanks, P. *8^) -- Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany - http://ntama.uni-mainz.de --
Re: pre5
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: > Pre 5 seems to be pretty stable. Since pre5 was released it has been > downloaded about ~850 times, and we have had very few failure/bug > reports. > I successfully compiled it under the latest Debian/unstable using xforms-0.whatever and noted the LyX has gained quite a lot of speed compared to 1.1.6fix4. :-) Other than that i just played around with it a few minutes. But i guess this hardly counts as a meaningful testing routine. ;-) Thanks, P. *8^) -- ---- Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany - http://ntama.uni-mainz.de --
Re: ftp lyx-1.2.0pre1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: On ftp.devel.lyx.org:/pub/lyx/lyx-1.2.0pre1.tar.gz Nice if people would take the time to test installation, building etc. On Debian/unstable installation of reLyX's auxiliary files(?) doesn't work. Here's some context from the build log: -- snip - Making install in lib make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.0pre1/lib' Making install in reLyX make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.0pre1/lib/reLyX' make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.0pre1/lib/reLyX' /bin/sh ./../../config/mkinstalldirs /usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.0pre1/debian/tmp/usr/bin /usr/bin/install -c reLyX /usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.0pre1/debian/tmp/usr/bin/reLyX /usr/bin/install -c noweb2lyx /usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.0pre1/debian/tmp/usr/bin/noweb2lyx for dir in reLyX reLyX/Text ; do \ /bin/sh ./../../config/mkinstalldirs /usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.0pre1/debian/tmp/usr/share/lyx/$dir ; \ done mkdir /usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.0pre1/debian/tmp/usr/share/lyx mkdir /usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.0pre1/debian/tmp/usr/share/lyx/reLyX mkdir /usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.0pre1/debian/tmp/usr/share/lyx/reLyX/Text files=`cd . ; echo *.pm *.pl README BUGS CHANGES reLyX.pod syntax.default Text/*.pm` ; \ for i in $(files) ; do \ /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 ./$i /usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.0pre1/debian/tmp/usr/share/lyx/reLyX/$i ; \ done /bin/sh: files: command not found -- snip - And after installation when trying to load any of the documentation from the Help menu: -- snip - [pseelig]~ lyx reLyX directory not found. LyX: unable to find documentation file `FAQ'. Bad installation? LyX: unable to find documentation file `Extended'. Bad installation? LyX: unable to find documentation file `Intro'. Bad installation? LyX: unable to find documentation file `Intro'. Bad installation? LyX: unable to find documentation file `Tutorial'. Bad installation? LyX: unable to find documentation file `UserGuide'. Bad installation? LyX: unable to find documentation file `Extended'. Bad installation? LyX: unable to find documentation file `Customization'. Bad installation? LyX: unable to find documentation file `FAQ'. Bad installation? LyX: unable to find documentation file `TOC'. Bad installation? -- snip - Does this make enough sense to be meaningful for further debugging? Other than that LyX builds, installs and works just fine (so far). Thanks, P. *8^) -- Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany - http://ntama.uni-mainz.de --
Re: ftp lyx-1.2.0pre1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: > On ftp.devel.lyx.org:/pub/lyx/lyx-1.2.0pre1.tar.gz > > Nice if people would take the time to test installation, building etc. > On Debian/unstable installation of reLyX's auxiliary files(?) doesn't work. Here's some context from the build log: -- snip - Making install in lib make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.0pre1/lib' Making install in reLyX make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.0pre1/lib/reLyX' make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.0pre1/lib/reLyX' /bin/sh ./../../config/mkinstalldirs /usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.0pre1/debian/tmp/usr/bin /usr/bin/install -c reLyX /usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.0pre1/debian/tmp/usr/bin/reLyX /usr/bin/install -c noweb2lyx /usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.0pre1/debian/tmp/usr/bin/noweb2lyx for dir in reLyX reLyX/Text ; do \ /bin/sh ./../../config/mkinstalldirs /usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.0pre1/debian/tmp/usr/share/lyx/$dir ; \ done mkdir /usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.0pre1/debian/tmp/usr/share/lyx mkdir /usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.0pre1/debian/tmp/usr/share/lyx/reLyX mkdir /usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.0pre1/debian/tmp/usr/share/lyx/reLyX/Text files=`cd . ; echo *.pm *.pl README BUGS CHANGES reLyX.pod syntax.default Text/*.pm` ; \ for i in $(files) ; do \ /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 ./$i /usr/src/Debian/LyX/lyx-1.2.0pre1/debian/tmp/usr/share/lyx/reLyX/$i ; \ done /bin/sh: files: command not found -- snip - And after installation when trying to load any of the documentation from the "Help" menu: -- snip - [pseelig]~ > lyx reLyX directory not found. LyX: unable to find documentation file `FAQ'. Bad installation? LyX: unable to find documentation file `Extended'. Bad installation? LyX: unable to find documentation file `Intro'. Bad installation? LyX: unable to find documentation file `Intro'. Bad installation? LyX: unable to find documentation file `Tutorial'. Bad installation? LyX: unable to find documentation file `UserGuide'. Bad installation? LyX: unable to find documentation file `Extended'. Bad installation? LyX: unable to find documentation file `Customization'. Bad installation? LyX: unable to find documentation file `FAQ'. Bad installation? LyX: unable to find documentation file `TOC'. Bad installation? -- snip - Does this make enough sense to be meaningful for further debugging? Other than that LyX builds, installs and works just fine (so far). Thanks, P. *8^) -- Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany - http://ntama.uni-mainz.de --
Re: Getting rid of the splash dialog
Finally! What a relieve! :-)
Being just a humble user of LyX (who actually largely prefers XEmacs
with AUCTeX/RefTeX), i probably deserve no right at all to speak out
on such matters but i just can't let this go by uncommented.
Angus is addressing a topic which is most annoying in recent modern
X11 applications: *Splash screens are evil* if you can't *easily* turn
them off as normal user. Splash screens just get into the way when you
wnat to keep working within another application while the one annoying
with it's splash screen is starting. This is a bad bad *bad* thing to
happen in a fine multitasking environment because it is severely
hindering it's well appreciated capabilities from a users point of
view.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Angus Leeming) writes:
People have been complaining about the Splash dialog since the beginning of
time. It obsures other popups. It appears on all virtual desktops on KDE. It
does other nasty things with other window managers.
Finally a developer who agrees on this!
Shall I apply it?
Yes, please! What are you waiting for?
Thanks, P. *8^)
--
Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
--- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: Getting rid of the splash dialog
Finally! What a relieve! :-) Being just a humble user of LyX (who actually largely prefers XEmacs with AUCTeX/RefTeX), i probably deserve no right at all to speak out on such matters but i just can't let this go by uncommented. Angus is addressing a topic which is most annoying in recent modern X11 applications: *Splash screens are evil* if you can't *easily* turn them off as normal user. Splash screens just get into the way when you wnat to keep working within another application while the one annoying with it's splash screen is starting. This is a bad bad *bad* thing to happen in a fine multitasking environment because it is severely hindering it's well appreciated capabilities from a users point of view. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Angus Leeming) writes: > People have been complaining about the Splash dialog since the beginning of > time. It obsures other popups. It appears on all virtual desktops on KDE. It > does other nasty things with other window managers. > Finally a developer who agrees on this! > Shall I apply it? > Yes, please! What are you waiting for? Thanks, P. *8^) -- ---- Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany --- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
GUII Status page on www.devel.lyx.org broken
To whom it may concern:
For http://www.devel.lyx.org/guii.php3; i get the following with
konqueror:
Parse error: parse error, expecting `')'' in /home/httpd/html/lyx-devel/guii.php3 on
line 112
Netscape (with JavaScript turned off) just returns a blank page,
although the document source can be seen.
Have a nice weekend, P. *8^)
--
Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
--- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
GUII Status page on www.devel.lyx.org broken
To whom it may concern:
For "http://www.devel.lyx.org/guii.php3; i get the following with
konqueror:
Parse error: parse error, expecting `')'' in /home/httpd/html/lyx-devel/guii.php3 on
line 112
Netscape (with JavaScript turned off) just returns a blank page,
although the document source can be seen.
Have a nice weekend, P. *8^)
--
Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
--- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.1.6fix2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jules Bean) writes:
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 03:21:34PM +0200, Paul Seelig wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chanop Silpa-Anan) writes:
BTW, do you know whether the real maintainer will release lyx 1.1.6fix2
anytime soon? I emailed hime once and got no reply.
I don't know. If he could be maintaining the LyX Debian package more
frequently i wouldn't bother compiling it on my own. I guess he has a
good reason for not regularily updating the Debian package. Maybe he
cares mostly about stable releases (which is a very good reason IMHO)?
I don't have as much time for maintaining LyX as I'd like, but the
decision not to upload 1.1.6fix1 was deliberate, and, I think,
discussed on this list. 1.1.6fix2 hasn't been out for that long... I
have packaged it, and I will upload it shortly if there are no
problems with it.
Yes, i too wish the day had 48 hours instead of just 24 (in my case to
get more sleep ;).
Anyway, i'm actually really glad you are maintaining Debian's LyX
package at all! Maintaining a package for Debian usually is *quite* a
bit more than just hacking together an installation binary and then
forget about it...
Thank you, P. *8^)
--
Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
--- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: Pre-release 'offical' debs (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.1.6fix2)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jules Bean) writes:
At http://people.debian.org/~jules/ is the lyx 1.1.6fix2 deb which I
will upload to woody unless people find serious problems with it.
[ ... ]
Currently downloading and installing it...
Depends: libc6 (= 2.2.3-1), libforms0.89, libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2,
xlibs ( 4.0.3)
I thought libforms0.89 was deprecated for compilation by the LyX
developers?
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 05:21:34PM +1000, Chanop Silpa-Anan wrote:
[ about unofficial LyX .deb slowness ]
I don't see this problem locally at all. I'm using gcc 2.95.2-14 and
libstdc++ 2.95.3-6.
The Depends for my .deb differ only in regard to the libforms version.
I've used libforms0.88 whereas you've used libforms0.89. Maybe we can
find the culprit here? Yes, with your version i don't experience any
delays either. So this looks more like a libforms problem.
Cheers, P. *8^)
--
Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
--- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.1.6fix2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jules Bean) writes:
> On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 03:21:34PM +0200, Paul Seelig wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chanop Silpa-Anan) writes:
> >
> > > BTW, do you know whether the real maintainer will release lyx 1.1.6fix2
> > > anytime soon? I emailed hime once and got no reply.
> > >
> > I don't know. If he could be maintaining the LyX Debian package more
> > frequently i wouldn't bother compiling it on my own. I guess he has a
> > good reason for not regularily updating the Debian package. Maybe he
> > cares mostly about stable releases (which is a very good reason IMHO)?
>
> I don't have as much time for maintaining LyX as I'd like, but the
> decision not to upload 1.1.6fix1 was deliberate, and, I think,
> discussed on this list. 1.1.6fix2 hasn't been out for that long... I
> have packaged it, and I will upload it shortly if there are no
> problems with it.
>
Yes, i too wish the day had 48 hours instead of just 24 (in my case to
get more sleep ;).
Anyway, i'm actually really glad you are maintaining Debian's LyX
package at all! Maintaining a package for Debian usually is *quite* a
bit more than just hacking together an installation binary and then
forget about it...
Thank you, P. *8^)
--
Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
--- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: Pre-release 'offical' debs (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.1.6fix2)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jules Bean) writes:
> At http://people.debian.org/~jules/ is the lyx 1.1.6fix2 deb which I
> will upload to woody unless people find serious problems with it.
[ ... ]
Currently downloading and installing it...
> Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.3-1), libforms0.89, libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2,
> xlibs (>> 4.0.3)
>
I thought libforms0.89 was deprecated for compilation by the LyX
developers?
> On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 05:21:34PM +1000, Chanop Silpa-Anan wrote:
[ about unofficial LyX .deb slowness ]
> I don't see this problem locally at all. I'm using gcc 2.95.2-14 and
> libstdc++ 2.95.3-6.
>
The Depends for my .deb differ only in regard to the libforms version.
I've used libforms0.88 whereas you've used libforms0.89. Maybe we can
find the culprit here? Yes, with your version i don't experience any
delays either. So this looks more like a libforms problem.
Cheers, P. *8^)
--
Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
--- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.1.6fix2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes:
It would be nice if debian people could tell what are the libstdc++
versions which are affected by the problem and make sure the bug has
been reported. As of today, I have only seen the problem reported by
debian (unstable?) and cygwin users.
Does this help?
-- snip
[pseelig]~ dpkg -s lyx | grep ^Depends
Depends: libc6 (= 2.2.3-1), libforms0.88, libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2, xlibs ( 4.0.3)
[pseelig]~ dpkg -l libc6 libforms0.88 libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 xlibs
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name VersionDescription
+++-==-==-
ii libc6 2.2.3-4GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii libforms0.88 0.88.1-5 The XForms graphical interface widget librar
ii libstdc++2.10- 2.95.4-0.01050 The GNU stdc++ library
ii xlibs 4.0.3-3X Window System client libraries
[pseelig]~
-- snip
Thanks, P. *8^)
--
Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
--- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.1.6fix2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes:
[ Debian's libstdc++ version ]
Is there a newer version of the library available? Has somebody filed
a bug against libstdc++ for this stuff? If we found a recent version
of libstdc++ which is _not_ broken, we would not have to work around
this particular bug...
The most recent version seems to be 2.95.4-0.010522. I'd have to
recompile to find out if this one is not broken. But this probably
will have to wait until weekend...
Thanks, P. *8^)
--
Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
--- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.1.6fix2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes:
Has somebody filed
a bug against libstdc++ for this stuff?
The Debian bug tracking system doesn't seem to list such a bug report:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=libstdc%2B%2B2.10-glibc2.2archive=no;
Cheers, P. *8^)
--
Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
--- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.1.6fix2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes:
> It would be nice if debian people could tell what are the libstdc++
> versions which are affected by the problem and make sure the bug has
> been reported. As of today, I have only seen the problem reported by
> debian (unstable?) and cygwin users.
>
Does this help?
-- snip
[pseelig]~ > dpkg -s lyx | grep ^Depends
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.3-1), libforms0.88, libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2, xlibs (>> 4.0.3)
[pseelig]~ > dpkg -l libc6 libforms0.88 libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 xlibs
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name VersionDescription
+++-==-==-
ii libc6 2.2.3-4GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii libforms0.88 0.88.1-5 The XForms graphical interface widget librar
ii libstdc++2.10- 2.95.4-0.01050 The GNU stdc++ library
ii xlibs 4.0.3-3X Window System client libraries
[pseelig]~ >
-- snip
Thanks, P. *8^)
--
Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
--- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.1.6fix2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes: [ Debian's libstdc++ version ] > Is there a newer version of the library available? Has somebody filed > a bug against libstdc++ for this stuff? If we found a recent version > of libstdc++ which is _not_ broken, we would not have to work around > this particular bug... > The most recent version seems to be 2.95.4-0.010522. I'd have to recompile to find out if this one is not broken. But this probably will have to wait until weekend... Thanks, P. *8^) -- -------- Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany --- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.1.6fix2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes: > Has somebody filed > a bug against libstdc++ for this stuff? > The Debian bug tracking system doesn't seem to list such a bug report: "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=libstdc%2B%2B2.10-glibc2.2=no; Cheers, P. *8^) -- -------- Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany --- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.1.6fix2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chanop Silpa-Anan) writes: It's good that you put together the deb. However, I still experienced the slowness when lyx calls latex from this deb. Do you have this problem on your box with this deb? Yes, unfortunately i do have it this way here as well. :-( The only way I can get lyx to run properly (both 1.1.6fix2 and 1.2.0cvs) is to use gcc-3.0. My locally compiled lyx-1.1.6fix2 (with gcc-3.0) works pretty well. You might consider recompile lyx with gcc-3.0 to work around the slownes instead of exporting to latex and compile by hand. I run debian/unstable which is updated almost on a daily basis and there is still no gcc-3.0 included in the Debian FTP archive. And i really don't want to mess with a gcc prerelease. But if you'd like to, you could just send me along the appropriately namend binary (lyx_1.1.6fix2-0.gcc3.0 or something) and i'd put it on the FTP server for public consumption? BTW, do you know whether the real maintainer will release lyx 1.1.6fix2 anytime soon? I emailed hime once and got no reply. I don't know. If he could be maintaining the LyX Debian package more frequently i wouldn't bother compiling it on my own. I guess he has a good reason for not regularily updating the Debian package. Maybe he cares mostly about stable releases (which is a very good reason IMHO)? No, i won't the official Debian package for LyX although i've got the Debian blessing being an official member of the project. Maintaining a package for Debian is lots more than just once in a while drop in a random .deb binary and unfortunately takes more time i could definitely provide. To tell the truth, i even don't really use LyX myself, maybe just a few times a year. I feel more comfortable with AUCTeX on any kind of (X)Emacs and actually only compile the unofficial .deb because i like LyX so much, that i want others to be able to just drop in a mostly up to date release. LyX is just too great to be ignored... ;-) Thanks for the feedback, P. *8^) Once upon a time, I heard Paul Seelig say An unofficial Debian package (beware: compiled on unstable) is available from http://ntama.uni-mainz.de/~pseelig/debian/;. Users relying on the joys of apt should enter the following into their respective /etc/apt/sources.list: deb ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian unofficial/ deb-src ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian unofficial/ This package is a simple recompilation using the very same debian/rules file as in former compilations from my part. Any bug complaints (plus fixes) go to me and *not* the official Debian maintainer of the LyX package, please.
Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.1.6fix2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marcello Nuccio) writes:
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 03:21:34PM +0200, Paul Seelig wrote:
I run debian/unstable which is updated almost on a daily basis and
there is still no gcc-3.0 included in the Debian FTP archive. And i
really don't want to mess with a gcc prerelease.
just do apt-get install gcc-3.0.
It does not replace gcc-2.95 and you must set CC=gcc-3.0 to use it.
Wow, i didn't know that gcc-3.0 was already packaged for Debian!
Thanks for the hint! :-)
I'll install it when i find some time for it and will try compile the
LyX package with it. But this probably won't be before next weekend.
Thanks, P. *8^)
--
Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
--- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.1.6fix2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chanop Silpa-Anan) writes: > It's good that you put together the deb. However, I still experienced the > slowness when lyx calls latex from this deb. Do you have this problem on > your box with this deb? > Yes, unfortunately i do have it this way here as well. :-( > The only way I can get lyx to run properly (both 1.1.6fix2 and > 1.2.0cvs) is to use gcc-3.0. My locally compiled lyx-1.1.6fix2 > (with gcc-3.0) works pretty well. You might consider recompile lyx with > gcc-3.0 to work around the slownes instead of exporting to latex and > compile by hand. > I run debian/unstable which is updated almost on a daily basis and there is still no gcc-3.0 included in the Debian FTP archive. And i really don't want to mess with a gcc prerelease. But if you'd like to, you could just send me along the appropriately namend binary (lyx_1.1.6fix2-0.gcc3.0 or something) and i'd put it on the FTP server for public consumption? > BTW, do you know whether the real maintainer will release lyx 1.1.6fix2 > anytime soon? I emailed hime once and got no reply. > I don't know. If he could be maintaining the LyX Debian package more frequently i wouldn't bother compiling it on my own. I guess he has a good reason for not regularily updating the Debian package. Maybe he cares mostly about stable releases (which is a very good reason IMHO)? No, i won't the official Debian package for LyX although i've got the Debian blessing being an official member of the project. Maintaining a package for Debian is lots more than just once in a while drop in a random .deb binary and unfortunately takes more time i could definitely provide. To tell the truth, i even don't really use LyX myself, maybe just a few times a year. I feel more comfortable with AUCTeX on any kind of (X)Emacs and actually only compile the unofficial .deb because i like LyX so much, that i want others to be able to just drop in a mostly up to date release. LyX is just too great to be ignored... ;-) Thanks for the feedback, P. *8^) > Once upon a time, I heard Paul Seelig say > > > An unofficial Debian package (beware: compiled on unstable) is > > available from "http://ntama.uni-mainz.de/~pseelig/debian/;. Users > > relying on the joys of apt should enter the following into their > > respective "/etc/apt/sources.list": > > > > deb ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian unofficial/ > > deb-src ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian unofficial/ > > > > This package is a simple recompilation using the very same > > debian/rules file as in former compilations from my part. Any bug > > complaints (plus fixes) go to me and *not* the official Debian > > maintainer of the LyX package, please.
Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.1.6fix2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marcello Nuccio) writes:
> On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 03:21:34PM +0200, Paul Seelig wrote:
> > >
> > I run debian/unstable which is updated almost on a daily basis and
> > there is still no gcc-3.0 included in the Debian FTP archive. And i
> > really don't want to mess with a gcc prerelease.
>
> just do "apt-get install gcc-3.0".
> It does not replace gcc-2.95 and you must set CC=gcc-3.0 to use it.
>
Wow, i didn't know that gcc-3.0 was already packaged for Debian!
Thanks for the hint! :-)
I'll install it when i find some time for it and will try compile the
LyX package with it. But this probably won't be before next weekend.
Thanks, P. *8^)
--
Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
--- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.1.6fix2
An unofficial Debian package (beware: compiled on unstable) is
available from http://ntama.uni-mainz.de/~pseelig/debian/;. Users
relying on the joys of apt should enter the following into their
respective /etc/apt/sources.list:
deb ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian unofficial/
deb-src ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian unofficial/
This package is a simple recompilation using the very same
debian/rules file as in former compilations from my part. Any bug
complaints (plus fixes) go to me and *not* the official Debian
maintainer of the LyX package, please.
Thanks for LyX, P. *8^)
--
Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
--- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.1.6fix2
An unofficial Debian package (beware: compiled on unstable) is available from "http://ntama.uni-mainz.de/~pseelig/debian/;. Users relying on the joys of apt should enter the following into their respective "/etc/apt/sources.list": deb ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian unofficial/ deb-src ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian unofficial/ This package is a simple recompilation using the very same debian/rules file as in former compilations from my part. Any bug complaints (plus fixes) go to me and *not* the official Debian maintainer of the LyX package, please. Thanks for LyX, P. *8^) -- -------- Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany --- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: New Arrival
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes:
And then we would be only able to distribute precompiled binaries for
windows, right? It will mostly be as free as motif is. I do not find
this very exciting.
Well, but users might be *very* excited about such a thing. Users
(and lazy sysadmins) don't want to be bothered with sources anyway. A
native win32 version based on QT would IMHO really smooth the way for
LyX becoming *the* documentation word processor standard in large
companies. People who need *their* work done are expected to not
waste the time they are paid for with compiling sources.
For example i work at HP Education in Germany translating american
course material authored within a custom specialized SGML framework
called HPCML. This framework was developed years ago for HP's course
material but has proven in real world as just too awkward to be
manageable by averagely knowledgeable employees (e.g. secretaries).
Even i rather prefer directly editing the SGML file in XEmacs (on
Linux) than in the specialized SGML authoring tool which was devised
for this task. Well, end of story is that HP Education is switching
over (actually already has largely switched) to MS-Word as standard
course material authoring tool. LyX would have been perfect for the
task but alas, it is no platform independent (in a corporate mindset:
runs *good* in MS-Win too) option for it. :-(
If LyX could be available even only as a binary on MS-Win as well,
people in the same position as myself could probably convince the
powers that are to switch over to a truly open standard. But since
not even a binary only version is available, i fear there is no real
possibility in any future to come.
Too bad i'm no developer so that i could invest my time in such a
beast. It could be a big popularity and publicity boost for LyX.
Cheers, P. *8^)
--
Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
--- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: New Arrival
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes: > And then we would be only able to distribute precompiled binaries for > windows, right? It will mostly be as free as motif is. I do not find > this very exciting. > Well, but users might be *very* excited about such a thing. Users (and lazy sysadmins) don't want to be bothered with sources anyway. A native win32 version based on QT would IMHO really smooth the way for LyX becoming *the* documentation word processor standard in large companies. People who need *their* work done are expected to not waste the time they are paid for with compiling sources. For example i work at HP Education in Germany translating american course material authored within a custom specialized SGML framework called HPCML. This framework was developed years ago for HP's course material but has proven in real world as just too awkward to be manageable by averagely knowledgeable employees (e.g. secretaries). Even i rather prefer directly editing the SGML file in XEmacs (on Linux) than in the specialized SGML authoring tool which was devised for this task. Well, end of story is that HP Education is switching over (actually already has largely switched) to MS-Word as standard course material authoring tool. LyX would have been perfect for the task but alas, it is no platform independent (in a corporate mindset: runs *good* in MS-Win too) option for it. :-( If LyX could be available even only as a binary on MS-Win as well, people in the same position as myself could probably convince the powers that are to switch over to a truly open standard. But since not even a binary only version is available, i fear there is no real possibility in any future to come. Too bad i'm no developer so that i could invest my time in such a beast. It could be a big popularity and publicity boost for LyX. Cheers, P. *8^) -- ---- Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany --- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: Unofficial LyX 1.1.6fix1 Debian packages [was: Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX 1.1.6fix1]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rainer Dorsch) writes:
$apt-get source lyx
[...]
Failed to fetch ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian/unofficial/Sources
Unable to fetch file, server said '/pub/debian/unofficial/Sources.gz: No
such file or directory.
Ooops, sorry! This has been corrected and should work now as
previously announced.
Saludos fraternales, P. *8^)
--
Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
--- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: Unofficial LyX 1.1.6fix1 Debian packages [was: Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX 1.1.6fix1]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rainer Dorsch) writes: > $apt-get source lyx > [...] > Failed to fetch ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian/unofficial/Sources > Unable to fetch file, server said '/pub/debian/unofficial/Sources.gz: No > such file or directory. > Ooops, sorry! This has been corrected and should work now as previously announced. Saludos fraternales, P. *8^) -- ---- Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany --- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Unofficial LyX 1.1.6fix1 Debian packages [was: Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX 1.1.6fix1]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes: It is my pleasure to announce that LyX 1.1.6fix1 has been released today. This is a maintenance release which fixes some important bugs in 1.1.6, and updates a few things, in particular in the I've made some unofficial Debian packages of it based on the packaging directives of the official Debian LyX package maintainer. They are available from "ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian/unofficial/". The correct /etc/apt/sources.list entries for the latter are: deb ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian unofficial/ deb-src ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian unofficial/ May i remark that LyX is obviously becoming *the* killer app for true writers on *nix!? You guys are astonishing me every time a huge bit more than ever before. A *big* *THANKS* again for everyone involved. Thank you, P. *8^) -- ---- Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] - African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany --- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Unofficial LyX 1.1.6fix1 Debian packages [was: Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX 1.1.6fix1]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes: > It is my pleasure to announce that LyX 1.1.6fix1 has been released > today. This is a maintenance release which fixes some important bugs > in 1.1.6, and updates a few things, in particular in the > I've made some unofficial Debian packages of it based on the packaging directives of the official Debian LyX package maintainer. They are available from "ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian/unofficial/". The correct /etc/apt/sources.list entries for the latter are: deb ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian unofficial/ deb-src ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian unofficial/ May i remark that LyX is obviously becoming *the* killer app for true writers on *nix!? You guys are astonishing me every time a huge bit more than ever before. A *big* *THANKS* again for everyone involved. Thank you, P. *8^) -- ---- Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany --- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: Last prerelease of LyX 1.1.6
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 10:35:05AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Lior Silberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
| Try
| increasing the space on the /tmp filesystem (e.g. there may be files you
| don't need in there). If it is part of the swap device, add more swap
| space.
Or try to just set "export TMPDIR=dir"
to a dir with more avail. space.
Thanks, that's what i did and it build just fine. I'm just amazed
about the fact that this LyX unlike former versions (for me that's
1.1.5fix3) consumes up to almost 300MB of disk space for building.
I've build a proper Debian/unstable .deb file and plan to provide it
at "ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian/unofficial/" sometime tomorrow
or in the weekend, if anybody is interested.
I'm BTW *very* positively surprised by 1.1.6pre3! In spite of the
still annoying xforms toolkit the user interface enhancements are
really a big step forward. A big *THANK YOU* :-)
Cheers, P. *8^)
--
Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
--- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: Last prerelease of LyX 1.1.6
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 10:35:05AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Lior Silberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> | Try
> | increasing the space on the /tmp filesystem (e.g. there may be files you
> | don't need in there). If it is part of the swap device, add more swap
> | space.
>
> Or try to just set "export TMPDIR="
> to a dir with more avail. space.
>
Thanks, that's what i did and it build just fine. I'm just amazed
about the fact that this LyX unlike former versions (for me that's
1.1.5fix3) consumes up to almost 300MB of disk space for building.
I've build a proper Debian/unstable .deb file and plan to provide it
at "ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian/unofficial/" sometime tomorrow
or in the weekend, if anybody is interested.
I'm BTW *very* positively surprised by 1.1.6pre3! In spite of the
still annoying xforms toolkit the user interface enhancements are
really a big step forward. A big *THANK YOU* :-)
Cheers, P. *8^)
--
Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
--- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: Last prerelease of LyX 1.1.6
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjxnnes) writes: ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/lyx-1.1.6pre3.tar.gz Please try this out so that we can deliver a stable release that will be really stable. I just can't get it built at all while it was easy to build lyx-1.1.5fix3. Here's where compilation repeatedly (5x) fails: --- snip == ../nohup.lyx-xforms0.88 == g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../src -I../../../src/ -I../../../src/frontends/ -I../../.. -I../../.. -I../../../boost -isystem /usr/X11R6/include -g -O -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -W -Wall -c FormPreferences.C -o FormPreferences.o cc1plus: /tmp/cckmo0Pe.s: I/O error make[5]: *** [FormPreferences.lo] Error 1 make[5]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-1.1.6pre3/src/frontends/xforms' make[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-1.1.6pre3/src/frontends' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-1.1.6pre3/src' make[2]: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-1.1.6pre3/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-1.1.6pre3' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 Command exited with non-zero status 2 1174.44user 173.60system 25:46.71elapsed 87%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (1023856major+1087707minor)pagefaults 0swaps == ../nohup.lyx-xforms0.88 == g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../src -I../../../src/ -I../../../src/frontends/ -I../../.. -I../../.. -I../../../boost -isystem /usr/X11R6/include -g -O -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -W -Wall -c FormPreferences.C -o FormPreferences.o cc1plus: /tmp/cc6rzKnh.s: I/O error make[4]: *** [FormPreferences.lo] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-1.1.6pre3/src/frontends/xforms' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-1.1.6pre3/src/frontends' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-1.1.6pre3/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-1.1.6pre3/src' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 == ../nohup.lyx-xforms0.89 == g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../src -I../../../src/ -I../../../src/frontends/ -I../../.. -I../../.. -I../../../boost -isystem /usr/X11R6/include -g -O -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -W -Wall -c FormPreferences.C -o FormPreferences.o cc1plus: /tmp/ccBlQ6Zb.s: I/O error make[5]: *** [FormPreferences.lo] Error 1 make[5]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-1.1.6pre3/src/frontends/xforms' make[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-1.1.6pre3/src/frontends' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-1.1.6pre3/src' make[2]: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-1.1.6pre3/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-1.1.6pre3' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 Command exited with non-zero status 2 1173.61user 179.13system 31:57.97elapsed 70%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (1032542major+1103215minor)pagefaults 44swaps --- snip As you can see, i tried with both xforms-0.88 and xforms-0.89 and the error obviously occurs always in the same place. System is GNU/Debian Linux (release unstable aka woody) with kernel 2.2.17 on an i586-233MMX. Compiler is gcc/g++ version 2.95.2 2220, libc6 is 2.2. I've attached the output of "./configure". Thank you, P. *8^) Output of ./configure -- ---- Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] - African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany --- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: Last prerelease of LyX 1.1.6
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjxnnes) writes:
> ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/lyx-1.1.6pre3.tar.gz
>
> Please try this out so that we can deliver a stable release that will
> be really stable.
>
I just can't get it built at all while it was easy to build
lyx-1.1.5fix3. Here's where compilation repeatedly (5x) fails:
--- snip
==> ../nohup.lyx-xforms0.88 <==
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../src -I../../../src/ -I../../../src/frontends/
-I../../.. -I../../.. -I../../../boost -isystem /usr/X11R6/include -g -O -fno-rtti
-fno-exceptions -W -Wall -c FormPreferences.C -o FormPreferences.o
cc1plus: /tmp/cckmo0Pe.s: I/O error
make[5]: *** [FormPreferences.lo] Error 1
make[5]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-1.1.6pre3/src/frontends/xforms'
make[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-1.1.6pre3/src/frontends'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-1.1.6pre3/src'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-1.1.6pre3/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-1.1.6pre3'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
Command exited with non-zero status 2
1174.44user 173.60system 25:46.71elapsed 87%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (1023856major+1087707minor)pagefaults 0swaps
==> ../nohup.lyx-xforms0.88 <==
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../src -I../../../src/ -I../../../src/frontends/
-I../../.. -I../../.. -I../../../boost -isystem /usr/X11R6/include -g -O -fno-rtti
-fno-exceptions -W -Wall -c FormPreferences.C -o FormPreferences.o
cc1plus: /tmp/cc6rzKnh.s: I/O error
make[4]: *** [FormPreferences.lo] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-1.1.6pre3/src/frontends/xforms'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-1.1.6pre3/src/frontends'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-1.1.6pre3/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-1.1.6pre3/src'
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
==> ../nohup.lyx-xforms0.89 <==
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../src -I../../../src/ -I../../../src/frontends/
-I../../.. -I../../.. -I../../../boost -isystem /usr/X11R6/include -g -O -fno-rtti
-fno-exceptions -W -Wall -c FormPreferences.C -o FormPreferences.o
cc1plus: /tmp/ccBlQ6Zb.s: I/O error
make[5]: *** [FormPreferences.lo] Error 1
make[5]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-1.1.6pre3/src/frontends/xforms'
make[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-1.1.6pre3/src/frontends'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-1.1.6pre3/src'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-1.1.6pre3/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-1.1.6pre3'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
Command exited with non-zero status 2
1173.61user 179.13system 31:57.97elapsed 70%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (1032542major+1103215minor)pagefaults 44swaps
--- snip
As you can see, i tried with both xforms-0.88 and xforms-0.89 and the
error obviously occurs always in the same place.
System is GNU/Debian Linux (release unstable aka woody) with kernel
2.2.17 on an i586-233MMX. Compiler is gcc/g++ version 2.95.2
2220, libc6 is 2.2. I've attached the output of "./configure".
Thank you, P. *8^)
Output of ./configure
--
Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
--- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: Lyx future
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think LyX will not spread among users as long as
one cannot:
[...]
You might want to take a closer look at abiword from
www.abisource.com. It does offer some of the features you are
interested in although it is not LaTeX oriented.
Cheers, P. *8^)
--
Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
--- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: Lyx future
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I think LyX will not spread among users as long as > one cannot: [...] You might want to take a closer look at abiword from www.abisource.com. It does offer some of the features you are interested in although it is not LaTeX oriented. Cheers, P. *8^) -- ---- Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany --- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: Compilation of LyX on Debian 2.2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Other question: Is a debian package available for LyX (even not the last version of LyX)? Check "http://packages.debian.org/lyx" and maybe ask the official maintainer to update the package he maintains to a more recent upstream release. Cheers, P. *8^) -- ---- Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] - African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany --- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: Compilation of LyX on Debian 2.2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Other question: Is a debian package available for LyX (even not the last version > of LyX)? > Check "http://packages.debian.org/lyx" and maybe ask the official maintainer to update the package he maintains to a more recent upstream release. Cheers, P. *8^) -- ---- Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany --- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: Making lyx with the kde frontend
Hi Angus!
It's great to hear about your success! :-)
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 02:20:09PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
checking for Qt... libraries /usr/users/aleem/OTHERS_CODE/qt-1.44/lib,
headers /usr/users/aleem/OTHERS_CODE/qt-1.44/include
[ snip ]
checking for KDE... libraries /usr/local/kde/lib, headers
/usr/users/aleem/OTHERS_CODE/kde-1.1.2/include
Isn't it a futile effort still using qt-1.4x and KDE-1.x for the KLyX
port? Wouldn't it make more sense basing this port right away on a
GPL'ed qt-2.x and the forthcoming KDE-2.x?
Thank you, P. *8^)
--
Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
--- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: Making lyx with the kde frontend
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 03:06:52PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, Paul Seelig wrote:
Isn't it a futile effort still using qt-1.4x and KDE-1.x for the KLyX
port? Wouldn't it make more sense basing this port right away on a
GPL'ed qt-2.x and the forthcoming KDE-2.x?
No, both me and Juergen agree on this. KDE2 is not even out yet, although
its stability is improving. Look at the two choices like this :
[ snip ]
Too bad, this unfortunately means no qt-1.4x-based official KLyX
package in Debian (my favourite distribution) until it has been ported
using KDE-2.x which is based on the recently GPL'ed qt-2.x. Oh well,
that's live. :-(
I just hope that the GTK/GNOME frontend becomes a worthwhile compile
ASAP. I'd really love to get rid of having to use LyX via the XForms
frontend once and for all... ;-)
Thanks, P. *8^)
--
Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
--- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: Making lyx with the kde frontend
Hi Angus! It's great to hear about your success! :-) On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 02:20:09PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > checking for Qt... libraries /usr/users/aleem/OTHERS_CODE/qt-1.44/lib, > headers /usr/users/aleem/OTHERS_CODE/qt-1.44/include [ snip ] > checking for KDE... libraries /usr/local/kde/lib, headers > /usr/users/aleem/OTHERS_CODE/kde-1.1.2/include > Isn't it a futile effort still using qt-1.4x and KDE-1.x for the KLyX port? Wouldn't it make more sense basing this port right away on a GPL'ed qt-2.x and the forthcoming KDE-2.x? Thank you, P. *8^) -- -------- Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany --- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: Making lyx with the kde frontend
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 03:06:52PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, Paul Seelig wrote:
>
> > Isn't it a futile effort still using qt-1.4x and KDE-1.x for the KLyX
> > port? Wouldn't it make more sense basing this port right away on a
> > GPL'ed qt-2.x and the forthcoming KDE-2.x?
>
> No, both me and Juergen agree on this. KDE2 is not even out yet, although
> its stability is improving. Look at the two choices like this :
[ snip ]
Too bad, this unfortunately means no qt-1.4x-based official KLyX
package in Debian (my favourite distribution) until it has been ported
using KDE-2.x which is based on the recently GPL'ed qt-2.x. Oh well,
that's live. :-(
I just hope that the GTK/GNOME frontend becomes a worthwhile compile
ASAP. I'd really love to get rid of having to use LyX via the XForms
frontend once and for all... ;-)
Thanks, P. *8^)
--
Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
--- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
[comp.sys.next.software] Lyx for NeXTstep 3.3 or OPENSTEP
Does anyone have a compiled version of LyX 1.1.5 for NeXTstep 3.3 or Openstep 4.2? Thanks, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] -= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-
[comp.sys.next.software] Lyx for NeXTstep 3.3 or OPENSTEP
Does anyone have a compiled version of LyX 1.1.5 for NeXTstep 3.3 or Openstep 4.2? Thanks, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] -= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-
Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX 1.1.5
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jules Bean) writes: On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 04:38:09PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: As usual, RPMs for Redhat Linux/i386 will be available shortly from ftp://ftp.sylvan.com/pub/lyx/ And DEBs for Debian Linux/woody (unstable) will be prepared next week, after my exams finish (sorry debian lyx fans!). I've made a quick''n'dirty recompilation using the latest Debian customizations from the unstable version. So Debian users already running Potato might want to check out ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian/unofficial/potato/binary/lyx_1.1.5-0.potato.0_i386.deb The proper entry for "/etc/apt/sources.list" is: deb ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian unofficial/ Cheers, P. *8^) -- ---- Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] - African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany --- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX 1.1.5
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jules Bean) writes:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 04:38:09PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > As usual, RPMs for Redhat Linux/i386 will be available shortly from
> > ftp://ftp.sylvan.com/pub/lyx/
>
> And DEBs for Debian Linux/woody (unstable) will be prepared next week,
> after my exams finish (sorry debian lyx fans!).
>
I've made a quick''n'dirty recompilation using the latest Debian
customizations from the unstable version. So Debian users already
running Potato might want to check out
ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian/unofficial/potato/binary/lyx_1.1.5-0.potato.0_i386.deb
The proper entry for "/etc/apt/sources.list" is:
deb ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian unofficial/
Cheers, P. *8^)
--
Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
--- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
[FYI] ANN: e:doc, the WYSIWYM frontend for Latex and HTML released in version 0.1.2
Hi ! I would like to inform all of you, that you can download the new release of e:doc at "http://members.nextra.at/hfbuch/edoc/" e:doc has now reached a quite well-developed state, so you could do almost everything except nested lists and equations. The most improved parts of this version are: (+) Table objects within the document (looks very nice) (+) Search Replace dialog using regular expressions for serach AND replace terms (+) Improved API for extending e:doc with your own embeded objects (+) Backend specific tags that are only transformed into one of the backends (+) Image objects within the document ... and much more ... I would like to hear from you (installation problems, suggestions for improvements, etc.) ciao, thomas. -- Thomas Schmickl, Department for zoology Karl Franzens University Graz, Austria. Visit the GPL e:doc-project on http://members.magnet.at/hfbuch/edoc or mail me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[FYI] ANN: e:doc, the WYSIWYM frontend for Latex and HTML released in version 0.1.2
Hi ! I would like to inform all of you, that you can download the new release of e:doc at "http://members.nextra.at/hfbuch/edoc/" e:doc has now reached a quite well-developed state, so you could do almost everything except nested lists and equations. The most improved parts of this version are: (+) Table objects within the document (looks very nice) (+) Search & Replace dialog using regular expressions for serach AND replace terms (+) Improved API for extending e:doc with your own embeded objects (+) Backend specific tags that are only transformed into one of the backends (+) Image objects within the document ... and much more ... I would like to hear from you (installation problems, suggestions for improvements, etc.) ciao, thomas. -- Thomas Schmickl, Department for zoology Karl Franzens University Graz, Austria. Visit the GPL e:doc-project on http://members.magnet.at/hfbuch/edoc or mail me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Did anyone try TeXMacs?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes:
[ TeXmacs ]
Did anyone try it out? Is it any good?
It's impressive! This seems to be real WYSIWYG with LaTeX which i
find rather astounding. The user interface is not very ergonomic
(tear-off menus would be handy) and the functionality too (no undo).
But this is under development and will change according to the
included notes. It's a bit heavy on resources because the WYSIWYG
obviously - unlike LyX - consumes quite some CPU power. It didn't
feel very responsive on my iP233MMX with 64MB RAM.
Cheers, P. *8^)
--
Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
--- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: Did anyone try TeXMacs?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes: [ TeXmacs ] > > Did anyone try it out? Is it any good? > It's impressive! This seems to be real WYSIWYG with LaTeX which i find rather astounding. The user interface is not very ergonomic (tear-off menus would be handy) and the functionality too (no undo). But this is under development and will change according to the included notes. It's a bit heavy on resources because the WYSIWYG obviously - unlike LyX - consumes quite some CPU power. It didn't feel very responsive on my iP233MMX with 64MB RAM. Cheers, P. *8^) -- ---- Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany --- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: [Fwd: LyX on Debian]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I used LyX on RedHat without problems, but on Debian it works as
well, but can't use Latex. It says while compiling that latex was
found (it is there) but it is not usable.
Is your tetex setup configured correctly?
Do you know that as common problem ?
No, not at all.
Every thing is installed fine regarding my Debian system.
Are you really sure? Does LaTeX work at all when invoked on the
commandline or from Emacs with a tex file?
I'm using LyX since some two or three years on various flavours of
Debian Linux and i'm currently running Debian/potato with the very
latest Debian LyX package:
ii lyx 1.1.4-0pre1 High Level Word Processor
My current tetex setup is as follows:
ii tetex-base 1.0-7 teTeX library files
ii tetex-bin 1.0.6-3 teTeX binary files
ii tetex-extra 1.0-7 teTeX library files
ii tetex-lib 1.0.6-3 libkpathsea for teTeX
ii tetex-nonfree 1.0-7 teTeX library files
Needless to say that it works flawlessly.
I guess you need to give some more concrete information before we can
give you any advice. Why didn't you BTW write the Debian maintainer
for LyX about you problem?
Good luck, P. *8^)
--
Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
--- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: [Fwd: LyX on Debian]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I used LyX on RedHat without problems, but on Debian it works as
> well, but can't use Latex. It says while compiling that latex was
> found (it is there) but it is not usable.
>
Is your tetex setup configured correctly?
> Do you know that as common problem ?
>
No, not at all.
> Every thing is installed fine regarding my Debian system.
>
Are you really sure? Does LaTeX work at all when invoked on the
commandline or from Emacs with a tex file?
I'm using LyX since some two or three years on various flavours of
Debian Linux and i'm currently running Debian/potato with the very
latest Debian LyX package:
ii lyx 1.1.4-0pre1 High Level Word Processor
My current tetex setup is as follows:
ii tetex-base 1.0-7 teTeX library files
ii tetex-bin 1.0.6-3 teTeX binary files
ii tetex-extra 1.0-7 teTeX library files
ii tetex-lib 1.0.6-3 libkpathsea for teTeX
ii tetex-nonfree 1.0-7 teTeX library files
Needless to say that it works flawlessly.
I guess you need to give some more concrete information before we can
give you any advice. Why didn't you BTW write the Debian maintainer
for LyX about you problem?
Good luck, P. *8^)
--
Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
--- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: Diffs for modification to allow Fraktur and Blackboard Boldfonts
On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Justin Smith wrote: Here they are. They were taken from the Dec 1 version of the 1.1.4cvs source: [snip] [ Part 4, "xfonts.tar.gz" Application/X-GZIP 3.4MB. ] You must have completely lost your marbles sending out a 3.4MB file to a mailing list. Learn some basic netiquette please and upload such a file to the LyX FTP site next time. Very annoyed, P. *8^( -- - Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany --- http://www.uni-mainz.de/~pseelig -
Re: Diffs for modification to allow Fraktur and Blackboard Boldfonts
On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Justin Smith wrote: > Here they are. They were taken from the Dec 1 version of the 1.1.4cvs source: > [snip] > [ Part 4, "xfonts.tar.gz" Application/X-GZIP 3.4MB. ] > You must have completely lost your marbles sending out a 3.4MB file to a mailing list. Learn some basic netiquette please and upload such a file to the LyX FTP site next time. Very annoyed, P. *8^( -- - Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany --- http://www.uni-mainz.de/~pseelig -
Re: gnoLyX
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dick Knol) writes: I'm looking forward to cooperate with you guys, it's just that when I got the idea, I didn't think about contacting you. That's my mistake. Furthermore this is my first real project, so I'm learning a lot. Are you already aware of "http://www.mx.lyx.org/glyx/"? Maybe there could be a get together somehow? Thanks, P. *8^) -- ---- Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] - African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany --- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: gnoLyX
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dick Knol) writes: > I'm looking forward to cooperate with you guys, it's just that when I > got the idea, I didn't think about contacting you. That's my mistake. > Furthermore this is my first real project, so I'm learning a lot. > Are you already aware of "http://www.mx.lyx.org/glyx/"? Maybe there could be a get together somehow? Thanks, P. *8^) -- ---- Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany --- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: New Prerelease lyx-1.1.1pre2
On 14-Oct-99 Gorik De Samblanx wrote: Question : I was not able to use lyx1.0.4, since it is compiled against an unavailable library : bash$ ldd /usr/bin/X11/lyx1.0.4 libforms.so.0.89 = not found Usually it's best to compile by yourself. You can get a Debian binary for slink linked against libforms.so.0.88 and with the "export HTML"-patch applied here: "ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian/unofficial/binary/" The file in question is called "lyx_1.0.4-0slink1_i386.deb" and is a recompilation of the official Debian package plus mentioned patch. Cheers, P. *8^) -- If not specific to HP please always reply to "Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: New Prerelease lyx-1.1.1pre2
On 14-Oct-99 Gorik De Samblanx wrote:
> >
> > Question :
> > I was not able to use lyx1.0.4, since it is compiled against an
> > unavailable library :
> >
> > bash$ ldd /usr/bin/X11/lyx1.0.4
> > libforms.so.0.89 => not found
>
Usually it's best to compile by yourself. You can get a Debian binary for
slink linked against libforms.so.0.88 and with the "export HTML"-patch
applied here: "ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian/unofficial/binary/"
The file in question is called "lyx_1.0.4-0slink1_i386.deb" and is a
recompilation of the official Debian package plus mentioned patch.
Cheers, P. *8^)
--
If not specific to HP please always reply to
"Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
Some support for russian (fwd)
Hey, what's wrong here? Who is forking my email address? I never sent this mail to the list! :-( A little bit annoyed, P. *8^( -- Please always reply to "Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- Forwarded message (attachments deleted) -- Received: from trudi.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [134.93.8.159]) by localhost.sowi.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8/Debian/GNU) with ESMTP id IAA18128 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 08:44:50 +0200 Received: (from pseelig@localhost) by trudi.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA06733 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 08:39:24 +0200 (MET DST) From: Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from wierdlmpc.msci.memphis.edu (wierdlmpc.msci.memphis.edu [141.225.11.87]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA01077 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 08:39:19 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (qmail 24954 invoked by uid 514); 3 Sep 1999 06:39:27 - Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 24944 invoked from network); 3 Sep 1999 06:39:10 - Organization: TPU To: LyX Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Some support for russian Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 10:01:03 +0800 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.17] Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; boundary="Boundary-=_nWlrBbmQBhCDarzOwKkYHIDdqSCD" MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hello. I'm maintaining LyX package for KSI Linux (russian/ukrainian Linux distribution) and have to patch source to support our languages. Maybe some parts of my patches will be acceptable for inclusion in official source tree?... lyx-1.0.4pre4-ru.patch description: * added support for cyrillic inputenc encodings (koi8-r, koi8-u, cp1251, cp866). * enabled support of cyrillic letters in math mode (we need that). If cyrillic encodings will be accepted, we can also include in distribution russian ru_splash.lyx (lyx-1.0.4pre4-rusplash.patch). Note it uses `koi8-r' encoding. -- With Best Wishes, Const
Some support for russian (fwd)
Hey, what's wrong here? Who is forking my email address? I never sent this mail to the list! >:-( A little bit annoyed, P. *8^( -- Please always reply to "Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" -- Forwarded message (attachments deleted) -- Received: from trudi.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [134.93.8.159]) by localhost.sowi.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8/Debian/GNU) with ESMTP id IAA18128 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 08:44:50 +0200 Received: (from pseelig@localhost) by trudi.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA06733 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 08:39:24 +0200 (MET DST) From: Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from wierdlmpc.msci.memphis.edu (wierdlmpc.msci.memphis.edu [141.225.11.87]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA01077 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 08:39:19 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (qmail 24954 invoked by uid 514); 3 Sep 1999 06:39:27 - Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 24944 invoked from network); 3 Sep 1999 06:39:10 - Organization: TPU To: LyX Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Some support for russian Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 10:01:03 +0800 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.17] Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; boundary="Boundary-=_nWlrBbmQBhCDarzOwKkYHIDdqSCD" MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hello. I'm maintaining LyX package for KSI Linux (russian/ukrainian Linux distribution) and have to patch source to support our languages. Maybe some parts of my patches will be acceptable for inclusion in official source tree?... lyx-1.0.4pre4-ru.patch description: * added support for cyrillic inputenc encodings (koi8-r, koi8-u, cp1251, cp866). * enabled support of cyrillic letters in math mode (we need that). If cyrillic encodings will be accepted, we can also include in distribution russian ru_splash.lyx (lyx-1.0.4pre4-rusplash.patch). Note it uses `koi8-r' encoding. -- With Best Wishes, Const
Re: spreadsheet LyX
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just installed Xess 4.2, a commercial UNIX spreadsheet program, which is
now available for $69 from www.ais.com. This is a major new release, and
they slashed the price (from $199).
It has an "export LaTeX tabular" facility, which generates code of
sufficient quality to be translated by reLyX, so that tables from the
spreadsheet appear just like the tables you enter by hand. Also,
bold, italic and underline are successfully passed to LaTeX code,
and are properly handled by reLyX.
People interested in a free (as in "free speech") spreadsheet
exporting LaTeX table code might want to take a look at the recently
released "gnumeric-0.32". See "http://www.gnome.org/gnumeric/" for
more information.
Cheers, P. *8^)
--
- Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
--- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: spreadsheet LyX
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I just installed Xess 4.2, a commercial UNIX spreadsheet program, which is
> now available for $69 from www.ais.com. This is a major new release, and
> they slashed the price (from $199).
>
> It has an "export LaTeX tabular" facility, which generates code of
> sufficient quality to be translated by reLyX, so that tables from the
> spreadsheet appear just like the tables you enter by hand. Also,
> bold, italic and underline are successfully passed to LaTeX code,
> and are properly handled by reLyX.
>
People interested in a free (as in "free speech") spreadsheet
exporting LaTeX table code might want to take a look at the recently
released "gnumeric-0.32". See "http://www.gnome.org/gnumeric/" for
more information.
Cheers, P. *8^)
--
- Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
--- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: LyX 1.01 (Debian Linux 2.1) Bug
Try the Debian package for lyx-1.0.3 i uploaded to master.debian.org a few days ago. It has been compiled on a Debian 2.1 (aka slink) system. Cheers, P. *8^)
Re: LyX 1.01 (Debian Linux 2.1) Bug
Try the Debian package for lyx-1.0.3 i uploaded to master.debian.org a few days ago. It has been compiled on a Debian 2.1 (aka slink) system. Cheers, P. *8^)
Re: [comp.os.linux.announce] use Lyx-1.0.1 to write Chinese article
On 20 Mar 1999, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: PS Anybody has already seen this? yes. (or was that a rethorical question?) No, not at all. I was actually referring to --- snip - Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 15:52:16 GMT From: "zhao.jia.wei" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: use Lyx-1.0.1 to write Chinese article -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Get http://hpws3.ihep.ac.cn/~zhaojw/chineselyxwrap.tgz and try to make the Lyx a Chinese document composer. ( see http://www.ihep.ac.cn/~yumj to get the chinput package.) - -- This article has been digitally signed by the moderator, using PGP. http://www.iki.fi/mjr/cola-public-key.asc has PGP key for validating signature. Send submissions for comp.os.linux.announce to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PLEASE remember a short description of the software and the LOCATION. This group is archived at http://www.iki.fi/mjr/linux/cola.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: latin1 iQCVAgUBNuvbMVrUI/eHXJZ5AQEvbwP+JY8AbWh6iibZwBWiqOqwqa04dhsupc4D tGbigXOqs3aydhHw8CXfV41lW+Vpyk0CX8J6vDJ2uUdVzfrKezOsg4ktVIeTLLyk fpfmSmU+rNVnp1VkSu4Pv+GtJmvlanmJUenIDmXHzHPPCa+nAqW5Stbm/Ui+AIEe 5CPs5kZa7TI= =YlFX -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- snip - and not to PS --Multipart_Fri_Mar_19_23:23:53_1999-1 Content-Type: text/plain; PS charset=US-ASCII Sorry for the confusion, P. *8^) -- - Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany --- http://www.uni-mainz.de/~pseelig -
Re: [comp.os.linux.announce] use Lyx-1.0.1 to write Chinese article
On 20 Mar 1999, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > PS> Anybody has already seen this? > > yes. (or was that a rethorical question?) > No, not at all. I was actually referring to --- snip - Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 15:52:16 GMT From: "zhao.jia.wei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: use Lyx-1.0.1 to write Chinese article -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Get http://hpws3.ihep.ac.cn/~zhaojw/chineselyxwrap.tgz and try to make the Lyx a Chinese document composer. ( see http://www.ihep.ac.cn/~yumj to get the chinput package.) - -- This article has been digitally signed by the moderator, using PGP. http://www.iki.fi/mjr/cola-public-key.asc has PGP key for validating signature. Send submissions for comp.os.linux.announce to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PLEASE remember a short description of the software and the LOCATION. This group is archived at http://www.iki.fi/mjr/linux/cola.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: latin1 iQCVAgUBNuvbMVrUI/eHXJZ5AQEvbwP+JY8AbWh6iibZwBWiqOqwqa04dhsupc4D tGbigXOqs3aydhHw8CXfV41lW+Vpyk0CX8J6vDJ2uUdVzfrKezOsg4ktVIeTLLyk fpfmSmU+rNVnp1VkSu4Pv+GtJmvlanmJUenIDmXHzHPPCa+nAqW5Stbm/Ui+AIEe 5CPs5kZa7TI= =YlFX -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- snip - and not to > PS> --Multipart_Fri_Mar_19_23:23:53_1999-1 Content-Type: text/plain; > PS> charset=US-ASCII Sorry for the confusion, P. *8^) -- - Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany --- http://www.uni-mainz.de/~pseelig -
Re: toolkit agnosticism
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard E. Hawkins Esq.) writes: asger aspirated, 3) Fun. It was fun to see the new abstract painter working when we had the Copenhagen meeting. It will be fun to see the curses version on the screen. Fun? I could seriously use the curses version at the moment. Just two drop my two euro: I'm as well very keen on a ncurses or SLang based LyX. Actually this sounds to me more attractive then the X toolkit stuff. Hah, eat this, hideous StarOffice, slayer of RAM! ;-) Small *is* beautiful, P. *8^) -- - Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany --- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: toolkit agnosticism
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard E. Hawkins Esq.) writes: > asger aspirated, > > > 3) Fun. It was fun to see the new abstract painter working when we had the > > Copenhagen meeting. It will be fun to see the curses version on the screen. > > Fun? I could seriously use the curses version at the moment. > Just two drop my two euro: I'm as well very keen on a ncurses or SLang based LyX. Actually this sounds to me more attractive then the X toolkit stuff. Hah, eat this, hideous StarOffice, slayer of RAM! ;-) Small *is* beautiful, P. *8^) -- - Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany --- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: corrections to announcement
On Fri, 5 Feb 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: And most importantly, people should begin to prepare these binary distributions and upload them! Just a small remark: I tried uploading the Debian binary i made to both "ftp.devel.lyx.org" and "ftp.lyx.org" into their respective "incoming" directory more than half an hour ago. But neither was writeable. So what now? Maybe someone could rather fetch it from "ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian/unofficial/binary/"? Thank you, P. *8^) -- - Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany --- http://www.uni-mainz.de/~pseelig -
Re: corrections to announcement
On Fri, 5 Feb 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> And most importantly, people should begin to prepare these binary
> distributions and upload them!
>
Just a small remark: I tried uploading the Debian binary i made to
both "ftp.devel.lyx.org" and "ftp.lyx.org" into their respective
"incoming" directory more than half an hour ago. But neither was
writeable. So what now? Maybe someone could rather fetch it from
"ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian/unofficial/binary/"?
Thank you, P. *8^)
--
- Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
--- http://www.uni-mainz.de/~pseelig -
Re: Where's Martin?
On Wed, 3 Feb 1999, Larry S. Marso wrote: I thought Martin was shepparding the PR. And he seems to be pretty good at it. Even posted it to debian-devel! :-) Somehow we have Freshmeat publishing the wrong text and no one at Slashdot paying attention. /. is actually pretty lame nowadays. But check for http://slashdot.org/articles/99/02/02/2314241.shtml: "ja wrote in to say that LyX, TeX a frontend for dummies has officially hit v1.0" Sounds s nice, doesn't it? :-/ Martin, after all the contributions from the community into the PR, are you in fact devoting any time and effort to distributing it? Yes he does and he does well IMHO. cola usually takes quite a lot of time and /. is a completely different matter... Cheers, P. *8^) -- - Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany --- http://www.uni-mainz.de/~pseelig -
Re: Where's Martin?
On Wed, 3 Feb 1999, Larry S. Marso wrote: > I thought Martin was shepparding the PR. > And he seems to be pretty good at it. Even posted it to debian-devel! :-) > Somehow we have Freshmeat publishing the wrong text and no one at Slashdot > paying attention. > /. is actually pretty lame nowadays. But check for http://slashdot.org/articles/99/02/02/2314241.shtml: "ja wrote in to say that LyX, TeX a frontend for dummies has officially hit v1.0" Sounds s nice, doesn't it? :-/ > Martin, after all the contributions from the community into the PR, are > you in fact devoting any time and effort to distributing it? > Yes he does and he does well IMHO. cola usually takes quite a lot of time and /. is a completely different matter... Cheers, P. *8^) -- - Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany --- http://www.uni-mainz.de/~pseelig -
Unofficial lyx_1.0.0-0.1_i386.deb available
Check out "ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian/unofficial/" for unofficial libc6 binaries and debianized sources: source/lyx_1.0.0-0.1.diff.gz source/lyx_1.0.0-0.1.dsc source/lyx_1.0.0.orig.tar.gz (this is just the renamed original tar ball) binary/lyx_1.0.0-0.1_i386.deb It cleanly built out of the box without any complaints! :-)
LANG=de confusion
Running lyx-1.0.0 on Debian Linux (2.0). When i set LANG=de the tutorial documents are displayed in their German version, but the menu entries don't change at all. For a screenshot as illustration see "http://ntama.uni-mainz.de/~pseelig/lyxsshot.jpg". The binary i used "ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian/unofficial/binary/lyx_1.0.0-0.1_i386.deb". Thank you, P. *8^) -- - Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany --- http://www.uni-mainz.de/~pseelig -
Re: LANG=de confusion
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Seelig) writes: Running lyx-1.0.0 on Debian Linux (2.0). When i set LANG=de the tutorial documents are displayed in their German version, but the menu entries don't change at all. For a screenshot as illustration see "http://ntama.uni-mainz.de/~pseelig/lyxsshot.jpg". The binary i used "ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian/unofficial/binary/lyx_1.0.0-0.1_i386.deb". Okay, this unfortunately was a false alarm. It turned out that a bug in my own Debian packaging was the culprit. It just didn't show up earlier because i virtually never use any program with any LANG setting defined other than the preset default standard we all use to communicate with each other. People interested in a fixed Debian binary can fetch an updated version "lyx_1.0.0-0.1_i386.deb" at the URL above. I'm sorry for the unnecessary confusion... Thank you, P. *8^) -- - Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany --- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: slashdot, freshmeat?
On Tue, 2 Feb 1999, Larry S. Marso wrote: It's February 2nd, approaching midnight. No mention of LyX at slashdot or freshmeat. Check out "http://linuxtoday.com/". :-)
Unofficial lyx_1.0.0-0.1_i386.deb available
Check out "ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian/unofficial/" for unofficial libc6 binaries and debianized sources: source/lyx_1.0.0-0.1.diff.gz source/lyx_1.0.0-0.1.dsc source/lyx_1.0.0.orig.tar.gz (this is just the renamed original tar ball) binary/lyx_1.0.0-0.1_i386.deb It cleanly built out of the box without any complaints! :-)
LANG=de confusion
Running lyx-1.0.0 on Debian Linux (2.0). When i set LANG=de the tutorial documents are displayed in their German version, but the menu entries don't change at all. For a screenshot as illustration see "http://ntama.uni-mainz.de/~pseelig/lyxsshot.jpg". The binary i used "ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian/unofficial/binary/lyx_1.0.0-0.1_i386.deb". Thank you, P. *8^) -- - Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany --- http://www.uni-mainz.de/~pseelig -
Re: LANG=de confusion
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Seelig) writes:
> Running lyx-1.0.0 on Debian Linux (2.0). When i set LANG=de the
> tutorial documents are displayed in their German version, but the menu
> entries don't change at all. For a screenshot as illustration see
> "http://ntama.uni-mainz.de/~pseelig/lyxsshot.jpg". The binary i used
> "ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian/unofficial/binary/lyx_1.0.0-0.1_i386.deb".
>
Okay, this unfortunately was a false alarm. It turned out that a bug
in my own Debian packaging was the culprit. It just didn't show up
earlier because i virtually never use any program with any LANG
setting defined other than the preset default standard we all use to
communicate with each other. People interested in a fixed Debian
binary can fetch an updated version "lyx_1.0.0-0.1_i386.deb" at the
URL above. I'm sorry for the unnecessary confusion...
Thank you, P. *8^)
--
- Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
--- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de
Re: slashdot, freshmeat?
On Tue, 2 Feb 1999, Larry S. Marso wrote: > It's February 2nd, approaching midnight. No mention of LyX at > slashdot or freshmeat. > Check out "http://linuxtoday.com/". :-)
lyx_1.0.0pre6-0.1_i386.deb available
Well, the subject already says it all, so here is my christmas present for all interested parties: "ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian/unofficial/" Don't complain if it doesn't work for you and better fix it. You'll find the debianized original sources in the same place. Merry xmas, P. *8^) -- - Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany --- http://www.uni-mainz.de/~pseelig -
lyx_1.0.0pre6-0.1_i386.deb available
Well, the subject already says it all, so here is my christmas present for all interested parties: "ftp://ntama.uni-mainz.de/pub/debian/unofficial/" Don't complain if it doesn't work for you and better fix it. You'll find the debianized original sources in the same place. Merry xmas, P. *8^) -- - Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany --- http://www.uni-mainz.de/~pseelig -
