Re: [MBZ] OT fedora server
It's rather easy to blank a Windoze password. I have a bootable USB thumb drive that I use for that Luther KB5QHUForest Park, IL '87 300SDL (325,xxx mi) On 4/23/2012 9:45 PM, Dieselhead wrote: Thanks Ed, and all. The consensus is to install the winders server or install it as a VM on a lightweight host. Now all I need is time to git'er done. The company closed, building was sold. New owner will be making similar product so some info on the existing computers might be useful, so it is good to keep that info available. Plan is to use Acronis product to make an image of each existing desktop, Save to dvd and server. Wipe drives, and do clean installs of XP and software. On hearty enough machines, install VM with the old machine restored with its image. So far all I have managed to do is crack passwords and look at what is there. Today I did the accounting machine. Being a manufacturing business, this one computer was basically the heat of the companies info. I found the administrator was ___ Yep, blank password. Wow! I am guessing someone else already broke it. I have seen lots of things that make it little wonder the business went under. Plenty of people have pointed out SAMBA, and SAMBA makes a great drop in replacement for a Windows SMB file server environment. However, I think everyone has conveniently glossed over what you are actually asking for, group policies. I work for a medium business with multiple locations with an eclectic mix of operating systems. I'm here to tell you that our Windows desktops talk to a Windows server specifically for group policy reasons. Our *NIX servers, regardless of what flavor, don't talk to the desktops directly. GPO works via an implicit trust relationship between server and workstation. *NIX has a lot of Windows networking replacement parts, but there is no way to implement the implicit trust relationship that is required to perform Active Directory group policy decisions. There *are* ways to force them from *NIX, but they are all very cludgy. To sum up, if you are installing this for a client that wants and Active Directory trusted domain, install Windows Server and save yourself the headache. -- Das beste oder nichts. - *Gottlieb Daimler* ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT fedora server
If it can wait a day, I just use one of the many rainbow table services (loginrecovery free edition, etc) and get the original pass. Or I boot the NTHack floppy/cd and do some registry manipulation! :D Walt On May 11, 2012 9:31 AM, Benz Hogs benz-n-h...@gulseth.net wrote: It's rather easy to blank a Windoze password. I have a bootable USB thumb drive that I use for that Luther KB5QHUForest Park, IL '87 300SDL (325,xxx mi) On 4/23/2012 9:45 PM, Dieselhead wrote: Thanks Ed, and all. The consensus is to install the winders server or install it as a VM on a lightweight host. Now all I need is time to git'er done. The company closed, building was sold. New owner will be making similar product so some info on the existing computers might be useful, so it is good to keep that info available. Plan is to use Acronis product to make an image of each existing desktop, Save to dvd and server. Wipe drives, and do clean installs of XP and software. On hearty enough machines, install VM with the old machine restored with its image. So far all I have managed to do is crack passwords and look at what is there. Today I did the accounting machine. Being a manufacturing business, this one computer was basically the heat of the companies info. I found the administrator was ___ Yep, blank password. Wow! I am guessing someone else already broke it. I have seen lots of things that make it little wonder the business went under. Plenty of people have pointed out SAMBA, and SAMBA makes a great drop in replacement for a Windows SMB file server environment. However, I think everyone has conveniently glossed over what you are actually asking for, group policies. I work for a medium business with multiple locations with an eclectic mix of operating systems. I'm here to tell you that our Windows desktops talk to a Windows server specifically for group policy reasons. Our *NIX servers, regardless of what flavor, don't talk to the desktops directly. GPO works via an implicit trust relationship between server and workstation. *NIX has a lot of Windows networking replacement parts, but there is no way to implement the implicit trust relationship that is required to perform Active Directory group policy decisions. There *are* ways to force them from *NIX, but they are all very cludgy. To sum up, if you are installing this for a client that wants and Active Directory trusted domain, install Windows Server and save yourself the headache. -- Das beste oder nichts. - *Gottlieb Daimler* __**_ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/**archive/http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/**mailman/listinfo/mercedes_**okiebenz.comhttp://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT fedora server
Thanks Ed, and all. The consensus is to install the winders server or install it as a VM on a lightweight host.Now all I need is time to git'er done. The company closed, building was sold. New owner will be making similar product so some info on the existing computers might be useful, so it is good to keep that info available. Plan is to use Acronis product to make an image of each existing desktop, Save to dvd and server. Wipe drives, and do clean installs of XP and software. On hearty enough machines, install VM with the old machine restored with its image. So far all I have managed to do is crack passwords and look at what is there. Today I did the accounting machine. Being a manufacturing business, this one computer was basically the heat of the companies info. I found the administrator was ___ Yep, blank password. Wow! I am guessing someone else already broke it. I have seen lots of things that make it little wonder the business went under. Plenty of people have pointed out SAMBA, and SAMBA makes a great drop in replacement for a Windows SMB file server environment. However, I think everyone has conveniently glossed over what you are actually asking for, group policies. I work for a medium business with multiple locations with an eclectic mix of operating systems. I'm here to tell you that our Windows desktops talk to a Windows server specifically for group policy reasons. Our *NIX servers, regardless of what flavor, don't talk to the desktops directly. GPO works via an implicit trust relationship between server and workstation. *NIX has a lot of Windows networking replacement parts, but there is no way to implement the implicit trust relationship that is required to perform Active Directory group policy decisions. There *are* ways to force them from *NIX, but they are all very cludgy. To sum up, if you are installing this for a client that wants and Active Directory trusted domain, install Windows Server and save yourself the headache. -- Das beste oder nichts. - *Gottlieb Daimler* ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT fedora server
Also consider using the free VMware Converter to create virtual machines for each of the running servers and workstations. You can run the free VMware player to boot them up to make sure they are working. I have had issues in the past converting domain controllers. They stop working after the built in certificates expire. Not sure if that's still an issue. If so install from scratch then promote to a DC and move all the roles over manually. Dave Walton On Apr 23, 2012, at 10:45 PM, Dieselhead 126die...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Ed, and all. The consensus is to install the winders server or install it as a VM on a lightweight host.Now all I need is time to git'er done. The company closed, building was sold. New owner will be making similar product so some info on the existing computers might be useful, so it is good to keep that info available. Plan is to use Acronis product to make an image of each existing desktop, Save to dvd and server. Wipe drives, and do clean installs of XP and software. On hearty enough machines, install VM with the old machine restored with its image. So far all I have managed to do is crack passwords and look at what is there. Today I did the accounting machine. Being a manufacturing business, this one computer was basically the heat of the companies info. I found the administrator was ___ Yep, blank password. Wow! I am guessing someone else already broke it. I have seen lots of things that make it little wonder the business went under. Plenty of people have pointed out SAMBA, and SAMBA makes a great drop in replacement for a Windows SMB file server environment. However, I think everyone has conveniently glossed over what you are actually asking for, group policies. I work for a medium business with multiple locations with an eclectic mix of operating systems. I'm here to tell you that our Windows desktops talk to a Windows server specifically for group policy reasons. Our *NIX servers, regardless of what flavor, don't talk to the desktops directly. GPO works via an implicit trust relationship between server and workstation. *NIX has a lot of Windows networking replacement parts, but there is no way to implement the implicit trust relationship that is required to perform Active Directory group policy decisions. There *are* ways to force them from *NIX, but they are all very cludgy. To sum up, if you are installing this for a client that wants and Active Directory trusted domain, install Windows Server and save yourself the headache. -- Das beste oder nichts. - *Gottlieb Daimler* ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT fedora server
No DCs in the existing setup. Just peer to peer Good info to know. Thanks Also consider using the free VMware Converter to create virtual machines for each of the running servers and workstations. You can run the free VMware player to boot them up to make sure they are working. I have had issues in the past converting domain controllers. They stop working after the built in certificates expire. Not sure if that's still an issue. If so install from scratch then promote to a DC and move all the roles over manually. Dave Walton ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT fedora server
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Dieselhead 126die...@gmail.com wrote: picked up a dell 2650 with a fresh install of fedora. Anybody familiar with this OS for a server? I am wondering if it has something like AD group policies similar to M$ Server 2000/2003/2008. If so, I can learn to use it. Otherwise I can put 2003R2 on it. Its intended use will be data storage for a small business with 4 or 5 computers (XP) and same number of users. Fortunately none of the computers I have looked at so far are Wissta. I would like to use the GPOs to redirect the users' My Documents to the server, among other things. (such as severely restricting what users can do.) Plenty of people have pointed out SAMBA, and SAMBA makes a great drop in replacement for a Windows SMB file server environment. However, I think everyone has conveniently glossed over what you are actually asking for, group policies. I work for a medium business with multiple locations with an eclectic mix of operating systems. I'm here to tell you that our Windows desktops talk to a Windows server specifically for group policy reasons. Our *NIX servers, regardless of what flavor, don't talk to the desktops directly. GPO works via an implicit trust relationship between server and workstation. *NIX has a lot of Windows networking replacement parts, but there is no way to implement the implicit trust relationship that is required to perform Active Directory group policy decisions. There *are* ways to force them from *NIX, but they are all very cludgy. To sum up, if you are installing this for a client that wants and Active Directory trusted domain, install Windows Server and save yourself the headache. -- Das beste oder nichts. - *Gottlieb Daimler* ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT fedora server
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO#Implementing_Group_Policies_.28GPO.29_in_a_Samba4_domain Hope that helps! Walt On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Ed Booher edboo...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Dieselhead 126die...@gmail.com wrote: picked up a dell 2650 with a fresh install of fedora. Anybody familiar with this OS for a server? I am wondering if it has something like AD group policies similar to M$ Server 2000/2003/2008. If so, I can learn to use it. Otherwise I can put 2003R2 on it. Its intended use will be data storage for a small business with 4 or 5 computers (XP) and same number of users. Fortunately none of the computers I have looked at so far are Wissta. I would like to use the GPOs to redirect the users' My Documents to the server, among other things. (such as severely restricting what users can do.) Plenty of people have pointed out SAMBA, and SAMBA makes a great drop in replacement for a Windows SMB file server environment. However, I think everyone has conveniently glossed over what you are actually asking for, group policies. I work for a medium business with multiple locations with an eclectic mix of operating systems. I'm here to tell you that our Windows desktops talk to a Windows server specifically for group policy reasons. Our *NIX servers, regardless of what flavor, don't talk to the desktops directly. GPO works via an implicit trust relationship between server and workstation. *NIX has a lot of Windows networking replacement parts, but there is no way to implement the implicit trust relationship that is required to perform Active Directory group policy decisions. There *are* ways to force them from *NIX, but they are all very cludgy. To sum up, if you are installing this for a client that wants and Active Directory trusted domain, install Windows Server and save yourself the headache. -- Das beste oder nichts. - *Gottlieb Daimler* ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT fedora server
There are a few GPO options for *nix, some better than others: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/06/24/group_policy_implementation/ On Apr 16, 2012 11:32 PM, Dieselhead 126die...@gmail.com wrote: picked up a dell 2650 with a fresh install of fedora. Anybody familiar with this OS for a server? I am wondering if it has something like AD group policies similar to M$ Server 2000/2003/2008. If so, I can learn to use it. Otherwise I can put 2003R2 on it. Its intended use will be data storage for a small business with 4 or 5 computers (XP) and same number of users. Fortunately none of the computers I have looked at so far are Wissta. I would like to use the GPOs to redirect the users' My Documents to the server, among other things. (such as severely restricting what users can do.) ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT fedora server
Seems like the consensus is wipe and install 2003R2. Two more questions: 1. would it be worth considering an install of linux and then run server 2003R2 as a VM? Or is that just wasting resources? Dell 2650 xeon 2.8 4 gig memory. 2. Has anyone heard of insurance costing more if the business is running open source software? Not to be a snob, but I wouldn't use Fedora; use CentOS or Debian for a production server. Fedora is a test distribution, so while it's as stable as, say, VistaSP1, it's not quite a real server IMO. That said, since the user is used to Windows and is otherwise going to be running Windows, I'd use the 2003 license and never look back. It is hard to get an IT guy who knows both Windows and Linux well, and even if you get it set up at first they will hate you forever - plus they will have to call you for every little thing, and resent every billable minute. Now, you could set up 2003 in a VM as the DC (or use an existing external server if there is one?), and then share the file systems from Linux using Samba. From Windows' perspective the Linux box is just another machine in the domain so you could certainly do redirects. That setup would be easy enough to maintain with good performance, but honestly it strikes me as over-complicated for such a small user base. You can set up permissions on Linux shares, but once you start into DC/BDC the Windows servers are really the way to go. Best, Tim On Apr 16, 2012 11:32 PM, Dieselhead 126die...@gmail.com wrote: picked up a dell 2650 with a fresh install of fedora. Anybody familiar with this OS for a server? I am wondering if it has something like AD group policies similar to M$ Server 2000/2003/2008. If so, I can learn to use it. Otherwise I can put 2003R2 on it. Its intended use will be data storage for a small business with 4 or 5 computers (XP) and same number of users. Fortunately none of the computers I have looked at so far are Wissta. I would like to use the GPOs to redirect the users' My Documents to the server, among other things. (such as severely restricting what users can do.) ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT fedora server
You are absolutely further ahead if you start with a virtualized platform. Use ESXi (free) as the operating system and load 2003 on it in a VM. It's much more stable than running windows or Linux as the host. The overhead is minimal. In fact it de-duplucates memory blocks so if you have 2 VMs running the same OS, it will use less memory than the sum of it's parts. You will need to use a different workstation to log in to the virtualized machine. Under ESXi the console is a stripped down custom Linux kernel used for maintenance and loading drivers. You need to run their custom interface to get to the console of the VM for BIOS level access. Once you get things running you can use remote desktop or LogMeIn, or whatever. -Dave Walton On Apr 19, 2012, at 10:47 AM, Dieselhead 126die...@gmail.com wrote: Seems like the consensus is wipe and install 2003R2. Two more questions: 1. would it be worth considering an install of linux and then run server 2003R2 as a VM? Or is that just wasting resources? Dell 2650 xeon 2.8 4 gig memory. 2. Has anyone heard of insurance costing more if the business is running open source software? Not to be a snob, but I wouldn't use Fedora; use CentOS or Debian for a production server. Fedora is a test distribution, so while it's as stable as, say, VistaSP1, it's not quite a real server IMO. That said, since the user is used to Windows and is otherwise going to be running Windows, I'd use the 2003 license and never look back. It is hard to get an IT guy who knows both Windows and Linux well, and even if you get it set up at first they will hate you forever - plus they will have to call you for every little thing, and resent every billable minute. Now, you could set up 2003 in a VM as the DC (or use an existing external server if there is one?), and then share the file systems from Linux using Samba. From Windows' perspective the Linux box is just another machine in the domain so you could certainly do redirects. That setup would be easy enough to maintain with good performance, but honestly it strikes me as over-complicated for such a small user base. You can set up permissions on Linux shares, but once you start into DC/BDC the Windows servers are really the way to go. Best, Tim On Apr 16, 2012 11:32 PM, Dieselhead 126die...@gmail.com wrote: picked up a dell 2650 with a fresh install of fedora. Anybody familiar with this OS for a server? I am wondering if it has something like AD group policies similar to M$ Server 2000/2003/2008. If so, I can learn to use it. Otherwise I can put 2003R2 on it. Its intended use will be data storage for a small business with 4 or 5 computers (XP) and same number of users. Fortunately none of the computers I have looked at so far are Wissta. I would like to use the GPOs to redirect the users' My Documents to the server, among other things. (such as severely restricting what users can do.) ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT fedora server
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:47:10 -0500 Dieselhead 126die...@gmail.com wrote: 2. Has anyone heard of insurance costing more if the business is running open source software? Say what? Craig ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT fedora server
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Dieselhead 126die...@gmail.com wrote: Seems like the consensus is wipe and install 2003R2. Two more questions: 1. would it be worth considering an install of linux and then run server 2003R2 as a VM? Or is that just wasting resources? Dell 2650 xeon 2.8 4 gig memory. On that machine I would either: - run ESXi with 2003 as a guest with the appropriate roles, and then a CentOS server as another guest for file serving, or - run 2003 bare metal and use it as a file server directly. As Dave says I wouldn't run VMWare server inside another OS. I don't know if your 2650 is 64-bit, and if it is if it supports 64-bit virtualization; if you want to break 4GB or install a 64b Windows version (like 2008R2) you might have to run on bare metal, I know there were at least a couple generations of HPs from this era that were this way. You will need to check your server against the ESXi 4.0+ HCL, unfortunately I'm coming up empty - I'm sure someone will know if you google the Xeon revision. At home I used to have a setup like the first, but recently switched over to the second (well, 2008 but the same idea). For security and reliability the first is better, but for me it's harder to maintain two servers well. [That said I do miss being able to roll back OS changes and creating duplicate servers before deployment.] And despite what I said above, I will probably install VMWare server on Windows and move my remaining Linux VM; it seems silly to keep powering my ESXi machine with one VM on it. :) Still that's a management VM, not production; I wouldn't want to have a production file server under an OS-based virtualization technology. Windows is serving my file shares at this point, and doing an okay job, though of course there are only five of us in the house and son2 can't use a computer reliably. :) Best, -Tim 2. Has anyone heard of insurance costing more if the business is running open source software? Honestly never thought about it. Seems like it would be the reverse, since Windows is (or at least used to be) more likely to be subject to virus/exploit attacks. ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT fedora server
Is the setup of ESXi strictly command line? if so, is there a sample somewhere of the commands to set it up and install a vm, then start that vm? There is only one *nix command I remember because it is so unlike the commands of other os's for the same thing: delete a file is rm (filename). It took me so long to find out what the rm command was that I still remember it. There is no way I will get along with a command line thing unless there example cheatsheets that I can copy and change the variables like the machine names, IP number, subnet mask, etc. You are absolutely further ahead if you start with a virtualized platform. Use ESXi (free) as the operating system and load 2003 on it in a VM. It's much more stable than running windows or Linux as the host. The overhead is minimal. In fact it de-duplucates memory blocks so if you have 2 VMs running the same OS, it will use less memory than the sum of it's parts. You will need to use a different workstation to log in to the virtualized machine. Under ESXi the console is a stripped down custom Linux kernel used for maintenance and loading drivers. You need to run their custom interface to get to the console of the VM for BIOS level access. Once you get things running you can use remote desktop or LogMeIn, or whatever. -Dave Walton On Apr 19, 2012, at 10:47 AM, Dieselhead 126die...@gmail.com wrote: Seems like the consensus is wipe and install 2003R2. Two more questions: 1. would it be worth considering an install of linux and then run server 2003R2 as a VM? Or is that just wasting resources? Dell 2650 xeon 2.8 4 gig memory. 2. Has anyone heard of insurance costing more if the business is running open source software? ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT fedora server
A friend of mine said he has seen instances of insurance companies charging more if the business uses linux, open office/libre office and so forth. I am wondering if anyone who uses open source in business has heard of any of this. It could be localized, or it could be regional or national. On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:47:10 -0500 Dieselhead 126die...@gmail.com wrote: 2. Has anyone heard of insurance costing more if the business is running open source software? Say what? Craig ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT fedora server
Should cost less. Years ago I worked for a CAD company in Boston. When customers came to us saying their computers were stolen or burned or whatever we had to remind them to include the software cost as part of their insurance claim. The program was licensed to a particular processor and they cut no one any slack. Sun had processors with serial numbers readable by the software at the time. Same thing today if someone steals your laptop - Windows goes with it and is part of the replacement cost. -Dave Walton On Apr 19, 2012, at 1:09 PM, Craig diese...@pisquared.net wrote: On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:47:10 -0500 Dieselhead 126die...@gmail.com wrote: 2. Has anyone heard of insurance costing more if the business is running open source software? Say what? Craig ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT fedora server
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Dieselhead 126die...@gmail.com wrote: Is the setup of ESXi strictly command line? if so, is there a sample somewhere of the commands to set it up and install a vm, then start that vm? No, there is a remote GUI front end. ESXi is interesting because there's not really an interface on the machine itself, you have to remote manage everything. That's great for companies with lots of computers, maybe not so much if you have to do work on the machine itself. There is only one *nix command I remember because it is so unlike the commands of other os's for the same thing: delete a file is rm (filename). It took me so long to find out what the rm command was that I still remember it. They all kind of make sense, just like DOS kind of made sense: cd = cd (you know that one :) echo = echo (that one too) ifconfig = ipconfig mkdir = make directory ls = list mount = mount a drive umount = unmount a drive chmod = change modes (attrib) cat = equivalent of type, give or take. There is no way I will get along with a command line thing unless there example cheatsheets that I can copy and change the variables like the machine names, IP number, subnet mask, etc. Really easy to do all of these - IMO easier than on Windows - but in reality that's stuff you'd do on the guest, not the ESXi server. Still I think that's a high bar, I'd be more inclined to set it up that way at home and get used to it before I inflicted it on someone else, and even then I'd be concerned about long term maintenance after I was NLA. Best, -Tim You are absolutely further ahead if you start with a virtualized platform. Use ESXi (free) as the operating system and load 2003 on it in a VM. It's much more stable than running windows or Linux as the host. The overhead is minimal. In fact it de-duplucates memory blocks so if you have 2 VMs running the same OS, it will use less memory than the sum of it's parts. You will need to use a different workstation to log in to the virtualized machine. Under ESXi the console is a stripped down custom Linux kernel used for maintenance and loading drivers. You need to run their custom interface to get to the console of the VM for BIOS level access. Once you get things running you can use remote desktop or LogMeIn, or whatever. -Dave Walton On Apr 19, 2012, at 10:47 AM, Dieselhead 126die...@gmail.com wrote: Seems like the consensus is wipe and install 2003R2. Two more questions: 1. would it be worth considering an install of linux and then run server 2003R2 as a VM? Or is that just wasting resources? Dell 2650 xeon 2.8 4 gig memory. 2. Has anyone heard of insurance costing more if the business is running open source software? ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT fedora server
My question would be, How do they know? Not to mention that it might be a business process that requires a Linux OS, so what bearing would that have as far as exposure is concerned? Hmm. I would certainly challenge an insurance agent who was questioning my use of software platforms. Dan On Apr 19, 2012, at 2:07 PM, Dieselhead 126die...@gmail.com wrote: A friend of mine said he has seen instances of insurance companies charging more if the business uses linux, open office/libre office and so forth. I am wondering if anyone who uses open source in business has heard of any of this. It could be localized, or it could be regional or national. On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:47:10 -0500 Dieselhead 126die...@gmail.com wrote: 2. Has anyone heard of insurance costing more if the business is running open source software? Say what? Craig ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT fedora server
Dieselhead wrote: Seems like the consensus is wipe and install 2003R2. Two more questions: 1. would it be worth considering an install of linux and then run server 2003R2 as a VM? Fedora _is_ linux! -- Philip ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT fedora server
I don't know why open source would be more expensive. Makes no sense to me. Open source is more stable, more secure, the last I checked, and much cheaper, therefore not potentially as big of a claim on ins. It is some potential liability they are afraid of. Somehow, some genius in some insco cubicle came up with the notion that open source is a greater liability, or makes the company more vulnerable to lawsuits than Winblows. The caveat is that what I heard is heresay, so I am looking for verification. My question would be, How do they know? Not to mention that it might be a business process that requires a Linux OS, so what bearing would that have as far as exposure is concerned? Hmm. I would certainly challenge an insurance agent who was questioning my use of software platforms. Dan On Apr 19, 2012, at 2:07 PM, Dieselhead 126die...@gmail.com wrote: A friend of mine said he has seen instances of insurance companies charging more if the business uses linux, open office/libre office and so forth. I am wondering if anyone who uses open source in business has heard of any of this. It could be localized, or it could be regional or national. On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:47:10 -0500 Dieselhead 126die...@gmail.com wrote: 2. Has anyone heard of insurance costing more if the business is running open source software? Say what? Craig ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT fedora server
Yabbut others suggested debian or centos I was just trying to make it generic. Dieselhead wrote: Seems like the consensus is wipe and install 2003R2. Two more questions: 1. would it be worth considering an install of linux and then run server 2003R2 as a VM? Fedora _is_ linux! -- Philip ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT fedora server
I'd think it would be in the IT press, Gartner reports, etc. if there was an insurance issue with open source, and I've never seen, read, nor heard about any such thing. Sounds like hogwash to me . . . On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Dieselhead 126die...@gmail.com wrote: I don't know why open source would be more expensive. Makes no sense to me. Open source is more stable, more secure, the last I checked, and much cheaper, therefore not potentially as big of a claim on ins. It is some potential liability they are afraid of. Somehow, some genius in some insco cubicle came up with the notion that open source is a greater liability, or makes the company more vulnerable to lawsuits than Winblows. The caveat is that what I heard is heresay, so I am looking for verification. -- OK Don 2001 ML320 1992 300D 2.5T 1990 300D 2.5T 1997 Plymouth Grand Voyager ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT fedora server
Dieselhead wrote: picked up a dell 2650 with a fresh install of fedora. Anybody familiar with this OS for a server? Fedora is a distribution of Linux. Formerly RedHat. I am wondering if it has something like AD group policies similar to M$ Server 2000/2003/2008. If so, I can learn to use it. Otherwise I can put 2003R2 on it. Can't comment on the comparison to MSWin - I'm pretty clueless there. But by default it will at least have the EXT user/group/other with read/write/execute. Its intended use will be data storage for a small business with 4 or 5 computers (XP) and same number of users. Fortunately none of the computers I have looked at so far are Wissta. It should be a fine Samba server... I would like to use the GPOs to redirect the users' My Documents to the server, among other things. (such as severely restricting what users can do.) Whew! To much MSWin-speak for me to follow. Sorry I can't guide you further. But I have heard Linux with Samba is better a serving MS shares than a MSWin server. -- Philip ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT fedora server
Not to be a snob, but I wouldn't use Fedora; use CentOS or Debian for a production server. Fedora is a test distribution, so while it's as stable as, say, VistaSP1, it's not quite a real server IMO. That said, since the user is used to Windows and is otherwise going to be running Windows, I'd use the 2003 license and never look back. It is hard to get an IT guy who knows both Windows and Linux well, and even if you get it set up at first they will hate you forever - plus they will have to call you for every little thing, and resent every billable minute. Now, you could set up 2003 in a VM as the DC (or use an existing external server if there is one?), and then share the file systems from Linux using Samba. From Windows' perspective the Linux box is just another machine in the domain so you could certainly do redirects. That setup would be easy enough to maintain with good performance, but honestly it strikes me as over-complicated for such a small user base. You can set up permissions on Linux shares, but once you start into DC/BDC the Windows servers are really the way to go. Best, Tim On Apr 16, 2012 11:32 PM, Dieselhead 126die...@gmail.com wrote: picked up a dell 2650 with a fresh install of fedora. Anybody familiar with this OS for a server? I am wondering if it has something like AD group policies similar to M$ Server 2000/2003/2008. If so, I can learn to use it. Otherwise I can put 2003R2 on it. Its intended use will be data storage for a small business with 4 or 5 computers (XP) and same number of users. Fortunately none of the computers I have looked at so far are Wissta. I would like to use the GPOs to redirect the users' My Documents to the server, among other things. (such as severely restricting what users can do.) __**_ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/**archive/http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/**mailman/listinfo/mercedes_**okiebenz.comhttp://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
[MBZ] OT fedora server
picked up a dell 2650 with a fresh install of fedora. Anybody familiar with this OS for a server? I am wondering if it has something like AD group policies similar to M$ Server 2000/2003/2008. If so, I can learn to use it. Otherwise I can put 2003R2 on it. Its intended use will be data storage for a small business with 4 or 5 computers (XP) and same number of users. Fortunately none of the computers I have looked at so far are Wissta. I would like to use the GPOs to redirect the users' My Documents to the server, among other things. (such as severely restricting what users can do.) ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] OT fedora server
SAMBA should do most of that, iirc it did AD stuff. Sorry I can't be much more help, I just tolerate windows now, much prefer the penguin. Walt On Apr 16, 2012 11:32 PM, Dieselhead 126die...@gmail.com wrote: picked up a dell 2650 with a fresh install of fedora. Anybody familiar with this OS for a server? I am wondering if it has something like AD group policies similar to M$ Server 2000/2003/2008. If so, I can learn to use it. Otherwise I can put 2003R2 on it. Its intended use will be data storage for a small business with 4 or 5 computers (XP) and same number of users. Fortunately none of the computers I have looked at so far are Wissta. I would like to use the GPOs to redirect the users' My Documents to the server, among other things. (such as severely restricting what users can do.) __**_ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/**archive/http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/**mailman/listinfo/mercedes_**okiebenz.comhttp://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com