Re: [MBZ] OT Road Bicycling and Walking Vs. Drivers

2007-05-30 Thread Fmiser
It seems than at Tue, 29 May 2007 17:57:29 -0500, R wrote:

 Please bear in mind that folks who drive larger vehicles have some
 difficulty in safely passing you in traffic. I have had a Suburban
 and now a couple of F150's. I don't want to clip some poor cyclist
 with my mirror while trying to get around him and not hit the
 car/truck in the lane next to me. After holding up traffic behind me
 to cleanly get around the cyclist, it really irks me to have him
 pass me at the next light and have to do it all over again in the
 next block or two.

 I understand folks who wish to ride as they want the exersize or
 don't have a car. I have friends who do it but I don't plan to join
 them and I really think that city traffic is a lousy place to
 ride. I think a cyclist really needs to be mindful of how much
 bigger and heavier a truck is. I can't stop on a dime and any error
 on their part or my part is gonna hurt. Do do yourself a favour and
 stay as far away from trucks as you can. Don't push the rules of the
 road or your luck as you aren't going to win. Please be safe out
 there. I'm gonna lose sleep if I ever run one of you over.

 I gave up my Honda Goldwing for similar reasons. I was able to keep
 up with traffic obviously, but the fools in the trucks were willing
 to ride 2 feet from my back fender. I try to give motorcycles a
 whole lot of room as I remember how I felt. However, the common
 thing is that if I leave a little too much room, some other fool
 pulls into the space between me and the bike so it doesn't always do
 much good to be nice.
 
 Randy (climbing gingerly down from his soapbox)

Right on!

And realize that most of the above also applies to cars relative to
big trucks. By big truck I mean the class 7 or class 8 trucks often
referred to as diesels or semis.

--  Philip, with time spent behind a big steering wheel.



Re: [MBZ] OT Road Bicycling and Walking Vs. Drivers

2007-05-29 Thread Jim Cathey
 (And no, I am not in support of bicyclists arrogantly taking up too 
much

space in the roadway - they do not have the right to do so).


If there is not room to safely share the lane, the cyclist may and 
should
ride far enough to the left to force passing traffic to wait until it 
is

safe to change lanes to pass. It's not arrogance.


Last time I checked here, a bicycle _is_ a car so far as the
law is concerned.  You treat them like such, and you ride them
like such.

And it stinks, last time I was forced to (single, and having my
truck worked on at at shop that wasn't particularly close to
work) ride on city streets some asshole in a new Hummer (pre-H2)
nearly clipped me as he roared past me on the left in the turn
lane.  (I was preparing to make my turn to the left.)  Totally
a ticketable offense, but where's a cop when you need him?

Next time I am forced to ride on city streets I think it would
be very prudent to sling my Garand across my back.

I'd leave the clip at home.  The first time!

-- Jim




Re: [MBZ] OT Road Bicycling and Walking Vs. Drivers

2007-05-29 Thread Mike Canfield
I've often thought of carrying my Nagant on my motorcycle as well but 
figured some hotshot rookie cop would want to give me a bunch of shit over 
it.


Mike
- Original Message - 
From: Jim Cathey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 9:34 AM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT Road Bicycling and Walking Vs. Drivers



 (And no, I am not in support of bicyclists arrogantly taking up too
much
space in the roadway - they do not have the right to do so).


If there is not room to safely share the lane, the cyclist may and
should
ride far enough to the left to force passing traffic to wait until it
is
safe to change lanes to pass. It's not arrogance.


Last time I checked here, a bicycle _is_ a car so far as the
law is concerned.  You treat them like such, and you ride them
like such.

And it stinks, last time I was forced to (single, and having my
truck worked on at at shop that wasn't particularly close to
work) ride on city streets some asshole in a new Hummer (pre-H2)
nearly clipped me as he roared past me on the left in the turn
lane.  (I was preparing to make my turn to the left.)  Totally
a ticketable offense, but where's a cop when you need him?

Next time I am forced to ride on city streets I think it would
be very prudent to sling my Garand across my back.

I'd leave the clip at home.  The first time!

-- Jim


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com 





Re: [MBZ] OT Road Bicycling and Walking Vs. Drivers

2007-05-29 Thread Jim Cathey

I've often thought of carrying my Nagant on my motorcycle as well but
figured some hotshot rookie cop would want to give me a bunch of shit 
over

it.


I figured a short polite conversation with them about it
would probably swing them completely to your side, once
they'd had a minute or two to think about it.

They scrape up way too many bike riders.

-- Jim




Re: [MBZ] OT Road Bicycling and Walking Vs. Drivers

2007-05-29 Thread Allan Streib
Jim Cathey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Last time I checked here, a bicycle _is_ a car so far as the law is
 concerned.  You treat them like such, and you ride them like such.

 And it stinks, last time I was forced to (single, and having my
 truck worked on at at shop that wasn't particularly close to work)
 ride on city streets some asshole in a new Hummer (pre-H2) nearly
 clipped me as he roared past me on the left in the turn lane.  (I
 was preparing to make my turn to the left.)  Totally a ticketable
 offense, but where's a cop when you need him?

I sympathize, though here in this college town it's the bicycles and
pedestrians who don't pay attention.

How many times have I had to stand on the brakes to avoid clobbering
some ipod-wearing, text-message-absorbed student who simply crosses
the street without so much as a glance to the side.

Or the bicyclists who pass a line of cars on the right, run a stop
sign, and then flip you the finger when you give them a little heads
up beep on the horn.

Allan
-- 
1983 300D
1966 230



Re: [MBZ] OT Road Bicycling and Walking Vs. Drivers

2007-05-29 Thread Mike Canfield

You do have a very good point there...

Mike
- Original Message - 
From: Jim Cathey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 9:44 AM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT Road Bicycling and Walking Vs. Drivers



I've often thought of carrying my Nagant on my motorcycle as well but
figured some hotshot rookie cop would want to give me a bunch of shit 
over

it.


I figured a short polite conversation with them about it
would probably swing them completely to your side, once
they'd had a minute or two to think about it.

They scrape up way too many bike riders.

-- Jim


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com




Re: [MBZ] OT Road Bicycling and Walking Vs. Drivers

2007-05-29 Thread John Robbins

Allan Streib wrote:

How many times have I had to stand on the brakes to avoid clobbering
some ipod-wearing, text-message-absorbed student who simply crosses
the street without so much as a glance to the side.


Not that this forgives them any (or keep them from cleaning up the gene 
pool) but on most college campuses the pedestrians have the right-away 
and students don't need to look in the crosswalks (it is at MSU at 
least!).  So it might be an out of habit kind of thing.


John



Re: [MBZ] OT Road Bicycling and Walking Vs. Drivers

2007-05-29 Thread Zoltan Finks

You know, I was very surprised when I heard that passing a line of stopped
cars on the right is illegal! I am totally opposed to this law, if it
is really a law, because it effectively takes away the one advantage that
bike riding provides - the ability to avoid traffic snarls! I just look at
the people sitting motionless in their cars and feel a huge scream
suckers!! in my mind. I for one will continue to blow by lines of stopped
cars lined up at traffic lights, and will continue to feel the JOY of
knowing that while cars can get there faster and with more conveniene and
safety, I do have this one huge advantage.

It is only just that cyclists should be able to enjoy this advantage.
Childish - yes - I admit it, but I love the feeling of passing some clown
that has dangerously veered toward me (yes, sometimes on purpose) as he
passed me a few moments ago. And I will confront them when I catch up to
them. I have never had anyone with the courage to back up their cowardly
behavior conducted from the safety of their steel cage that wisks them away
from consequences.

Yes, cyclists do need to obey stop signs, though I will blow one if there is
no one around (something I will much more rarely do in a car, since if I
miss something behind the wheel, I am liable for major damage). But if there
are cars to interact with at an intersection I will conduct myself exactly
by the rules of automotive driving (which, by the way, most people really
don't play by - instead they like to play the get eye contact and wave the
other person on game). It should be about whose car stopped at the
appropriate place first, and if there's a tie, the person on the right goes
first - nice and simple.

Brian
Before anyone says it - yes, I do need help, and I wouldn't have it any
other way.


Allan wrote:
Or the bicyclists who pass a line of cars on the right, run a stop
sign, and then flip you the finger when you give them a little heads
up beep on the horn.



On 5/29/07, Allan Streib [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Jim Cathey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Last time I checked here, a bicycle _is_ a car so far as the law is
 concerned.  You treat them like such, and you ride them like such.

 And it stinks, last time I was forced to (single, and having my
 truck worked on at at shop that wasn't particularly close to work)
 ride on city streets some asshole in a new Hummer (pre-H2) nearly
 clipped me as he roared past me on the left in the turn lane.  (I
 was preparing to make my turn to the left.)  Totally a ticketable
 offense, but where's a cop when you need him?

I sympathize, though here in this college town it's the bicycles and
pedestrians who don't pay attention.

How many times have I had to stand on the brakes to avoid clobbering
some ipod-wearing, text-message-absorbed student who simply crosses
the street without so much as a glance to the side.

Or the bicyclists who pass a line of cars on the right, run a stop
sign, and then flip you the finger when you give them a little heads
up beep on the horn.

Allan
--
1983 300D
1966 230

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] OT Road Bicycling and Walking Vs. Drivers

2007-05-29 Thread Allan Streib
Zoltan Finks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 You know, I was very surprised when I heard that passing a line of
 stopped cars on the right is illegal! I am totally opposed to this
 law, if it is really a law, because it effectively takes away the
 one advantage that bike riding provides - the ability to avoid
 traffic snarls!

Bikes are supposed to obey all the same traffic laws as cars.  I don't
know of any jurisdictions where this is not the case.  Passing on the
right or the shoulder is not a legal manuver.  I could see a valid
exception if an explicit bicycle lane is marked...

 [...] I admit it, but I love the feeling of passing some clown that
 has dangerously veered toward me (yes, sometimes on purpose) as he
 passed me a few moments ago. And I will confront them when I catch
 up to them. I have never had anyone with the courage to back up
 their cowardly behavior conducted from the safety of their steel
 cage that wisks them away from consequences.

Hope you never do.  If you happen to piss off the wrong driver, you
lose.  Big time.

-- 
1983 300D
1966 230



Re: [MBZ] OT Road Bicycling and Walking Vs. Drivers

2007-05-29 Thread Redghost
I would be quite pleased if the cyclist by me would obey traffic  
signals.  We have a very nice trail system that crosses many an  
intersection through neighborhoods and commercial areas.  Each  
intersection is posted with a stop sign for the cyclist/trail user  
but this does not ensure that they actually stop.  Most of them go  
ripping across traffic and are incensed that you did not yield to  
them.  Blasting across the sidewalks causing mothers with  
perambulators to veer madly to avoid collisions as well as forcing  
vehicles to slam on brakes.  If ever there were a need for aggressive  
cyclist demise, it would be for these folks.  That includes the  
inline skater and other speeding personage of limited mental  
capacity.  Used to be you were expected to walk your bike across the  
street.


On May 29, 2007, at 10:10 AM, Zoltan Finks wrote:

You know, I was very surprised when I heard that passing a line of  
stopped

cars on the right is illegal! I am totally opposed to this law, if it
is really a law, because it effectively takes away the one  
advantage that
bike riding provides - the ability to avoid traffic snarls! I just  
look at

the people sitting motionless in their cars and feel a huge scream
suckers!! in my mind. I for one will continue to blow by lines of  
stopped

cars lined up at traffic lights, and will continue to feel the JOY of
knowing that while cars can get there faster and with more  
conveniene and

safety, I do have this one huge advantage.

It is only just that cyclists should be able to enjoy this advantage.
Childish - yes - I admit it, but I love the feeling of passing some  
clown
that has dangerously veered toward me (yes, sometimes on purpose)  
as he
passed me a few moments ago. And I will confront them when I catch  
up to
them. I have never had anyone with the courage to back up their  
cowardly
behavior conducted from the safety of their steel cage that wisks  
them away

from consequences.

Yes, cyclists do need to obey stop signs, though I will blow one if  
there is
no one around (something I will much more rarely do in a car, since  
if I
miss something behind the wheel, I am liable for major damage). But  
if there
are cars to interact with at an intersection I will conduct myself  
exactly
by the rules of automotive driving (which, by the way, most people  
really
don't play by - instead they like to play the get eye contact and  
wave the

other person on game). It should be about whose car stopped at the
appropriate place first, and if there's a tie, the person on the  
right goes

first - nice and simple.

Brian
Before anyone says it - yes, I do need help, and I wouldn't have it  
any

other way.


Allan wrote:
Or the bicyclists who pass a line of cars on the right, run a stop
sign, and then flip you the finger when you give them a little heads
up beep on the horn.



On 5/29/07, Allan Streib [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Jim Cathey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


Last time I checked here, a bicycle _is_ a car so far as the law is
concerned.  You treat them like such, and you ride them like such.

And it stinks, last time I was forced to (single, and having my
truck worked on at at shop that wasn't particularly close to work)
ride on city streets some asshole in a new Hummer (pre-H2) nearly
clipped me as he roared past me on the left in the turn lane.  (I
was preparing to make my turn to the left.)  Totally a ticketable
offense, but where's a cop when you need him?


I sympathize, though here in this college town it's the bicycles and
pedestrians who don't pay attention.

How many times have I had to stand on the brakes to avoid clobbering
some ipod-wearing, text-message-absorbed student who simply crosses
the street without so much as a glance to the side.

Or the bicyclists who pass a line of cars on the right, run a stop
sign, and then flip you the finger when you give them a little heads
up beep on the horn.

Allan
--
1983 300D
1966 230

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com




--
Clay
Seattle Bioburner

1972 220D - Gump
1995 E300D - Cleo
1987 300SDL - POS - DOA
The FSM would drive a Diesel Benz




Re: [MBZ] OT Road Bicycling and Walking Vs. Drivers

2007-05-29 Thread Zoltan Finks

Interesting you mention this. Just yesterday, I must admit, I did not notice
one of these little signs posted at the right edge of the bike trail. And I
was upset that two cars did not yield to me. I honestly did not think they
had the right of way to cross into the straight-line path of bicycle traffic
on the trail. Wife pointed out the miniature stop sign to me. That's cool.

But I wonder, as with stop signs posted in shopping centers, if they are
actually legally enforceable?

brian


On 5/29/07, Redghost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I would be quite pleased if the cyclist by me would obey traffic
signals.  We have a very nice trail system that crosses many an
intersection through neighborhoods and commercial areas.  Each
intersection is posted with a stop sign for the cyclist/trail user
but this does not ensure that they actually stop.  Most of them go
ripping across traffic and are incensed that you did not yield to
them.  Blasting across the sidewalks causing mothers with
perambulators to veer madly to avoid collisions as well as forcing
vehicles to slam on brakes.  If ever there were a need for aggressive
cyclist demise, it would be for these folks.  That includes the
inline skater and other speeding personage of limited mental
capacity.  Used to be you were expected to walk your bike across the
street.

On May 29, 2007, at 10:10 AM, Zoltan Finks wrote:

 You know, I was very surprised when I heard that passing a line of
 stopped
 cars on the right is illegal! I am totally opposed to this law, if it
 is really a law, because it effectively takes away the one
 advantage that
 bike riding provides - the ability to avoid traffic snarls! I just
 look at
 the people sitting motionless in their cars and feel a huge scream
 suckers!! in my mind. I for one will continue to blow by lines of
 stopped
 cars lined up at traffic lights, and will continue to feel the JOY of
 knowing that while cars can get there faster and with more
 conveniene and
 safety, I do have this one huge advantage.

 It is only just that cyclists should be able to enjoy this advantage.
 Childish - yes - I admit it, but I love the feeling of passing some
 clown
 that has dangerously veered toward me (yes, sometimes on purpose)
 as he
 passed me a few moments ago. And I will confront them when I catch
 up to
 them. I have never had anyone with the courage to back up their
 cowardly
 behavior conducted from the safety of their steel cage that wisks
 them away
 from consequences.

 Yes, cyclists do need to obey stop signs, though I will blow one if
 there is
 no one around (something I will much more rarely do in a car, since
 if I
 miss something behind the wheel, I am liable for major damage). But
 if there
 are cars to interact with at an intersection I will conduct myself
 exactly
 by the rules of automotive driving (which, by the way, most people
 really
 don't play by - instead they like to play the get eye contact and
 wave the
 other person on game). It should be about whose car stopped at the
 appropriate place first, and if there's a tie, the person on the
 right goes
 first - nice and simple.

 Brian
 Before anyone says it - yes, I do need help, and I wouldn't have it
 any
 other way.


 Allan wrote:
 Or the bicyclists who pass a line of cars on the right, run a stop
 sign, and then flip you the finger when you give them a little heads
 up beep on the horn.



 On 5/29/07, Allan Streib [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Jim Cathey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Last time I checked here, a bicycle _is_ a car so far as the law is
 concerned.  You treat them like such, and you ride them like such.

 And it stinks, last time I was forced to (single, and having my
 truck worked on at at shop that wasn't particularly close to work)
 ride on city streets some asshole in a new Hummer (pre-H2) nearly
 clipped me as he roared past me on the left in the turn lane.  (I
 was preparing to make my turn to the left.)  Totally a ticketable
 offense, but where's a cop when you need him?

 I sympathize, though here in this college town it's the bicycles and
 pedestrians who don't pay attention.

 How many times have I had to stand on the brakes to avoid clobbering
 some ipod-wearing, text-message-absorbed student who simply crosses
 the street without so much as a glance to the side.

 Or the bicyclists who pass a line of cars on the right, run a stop
 sign, and then flip you the finger when you give them a little heads
 up beep on the horn.

 Allan
 --
 1983 300D
 1966 230

 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change 

Re: [MBZ] OT Road Bicycling and Walking Vs. Drivers

2007-05-29 Thread Allan Streib
Not sure if you're trolling a little bit here, but, are surely you not
saying you'd prefer the satisfaction of disregarding a non-enforcable
stop sign to being alive?

Anyway, public bike paths are government-owned and thus any signage is
very likely enforcable.

Zoltan Finks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Interesting you mention this. Just yesterday, I must admit, I did
 not notice one of these little signs posted at the right edge of the
 bike trail. And I was upset that two cars did not yield to me. I
 honestly did not think they had the right of way to cross into the
 straight-line path of bicycle traffic on the trail. Wife pointed out
 the miniature stop sign to me. That's cool.

 But I wonder, as with stop signs posted in shopping centers, if they
 are actually legally enforceable?

 brian


-- 
1983 300D
1966 230



Re: [MBZ] OT Road Bicycling and Walking Vs. Drivers

2007-05-29 Thread John Robbins

Allan Streib wrote:

Not sure if you're trolling a little bit here, but, are surely you not
saying you'd prefer the satisfaction of disregarding a non-enforcable
stop sign to being alive?


No kidding!  I don't really care if they are enforceable or not...  if 
there isn't a stop sign for the cars, I'm stopping.


John



Re: [MBZ] OT Road Bicycling and Walking Vs. Drivers

2007-05-29 Thread Zoltan Finks

Actually don't know what trolling means :) but what I was saying is that
were a legal dispute to arise, would a court be able to enforce the
miniature stop sign (or the stop sign on the private property of the
shopping center). Just wondering.

Wasn't saying, guys, that I would like to be at once right and dead. In fact
I tell my wife and anyone else I'd like to annoy with my admonitions, that
no stop sign or traffic light will protect you from a moving vehicle.

Brian


On 5/29/07, Allan Streib [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Not sure if you're trolling a little bit here, but, are surely you not
saying you'd prefer the satisfaction of disregarding a non-enforcable
stop sign to being alive?

Anyway, public bike paths are government-owned and thus any signage is
very likely enforcable.

Zoltan Finks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Interesting you mention this. Just yesterday, I must admit, I did
 not notice one of these little signs posted at the right edge of the
 bike trail. And I was upset that two cars did not yield to me. I
 honestly did not think they had the right of way to cross into the
 straight-line path of bicycle traffic on the trail. Wife pointed out
 the miniature stop sign to me. That's cool.

 But I wonder, as with stop signs posted in shopping centers, if they
 are actually legally enforceable?

 brian


--
1983 300D
1966 230

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] OT Road Bicycling and Walking Vs. Drivers

2007-05-29 Thread Zoltan Finks

See, this is really amazing to me: It is literally expected that a bicyclist
will stop way back from a red light - sometimes a half a mile or more - and
wait beside the car that they are next to? And this gets confusing when you
consider which car to choose to wait beside. I mean it's a law, right, so
let's follow it exactly.

If traffic is already stopped and backed up at a light, you are required to
pull up along side the rear-most car and wait there?

And if you are cruising along side traffic and it slows and stops in a line
at a light, you are to  find a car that is about to roll to its stop, and
pick it as your car to wait beside?

If it sounds crazy, I think it is!

I don't consider advancing past stopped traffic at a red light passing
(though I know it is legally considered so). I simply consider it advancing
along in my legitimate and legal bike area (the rightmost margin of the
roadway). If there is not another bike in my way, I will advance all the way
up to the intersection then wait, or go if the light is green by such time.

I'm sure I can be proven wrong legally, but that doesn't make it any less a
stupid law. And yes, I realize the reason for the law is to avoid the danger
of a car pulling out to the right and into the path of the cyclist.

All this said, just remember that laws are broken all day, every day, and
they always will be. It's known as human nature. I don't remember the last
time I saw someone actually come to a complete stop at a stop sign, for
instance. And it's extremely rare to find anyone obeying the speed limit. So
I am not going to negate the great advantage of riding a bicycle by obeying
this urealistic and unreasonable law.

Fun, ain't it?

Brian

Allan wrote:
Bikes are supposed to obey all the same traffic laws as cars.  I don't
know of any jurisdictions where this is not the case.  Passing on the
right or the shoulder is not a legal manuver.  I could see a valid
exception if an explicit bicycle lane is marked...


Re: [MBZ] OT Road Bicycling and Walking Vs. Drivers

2007-05-29 Thread Redghost
All the signs the local cyclist disregard are standard size DOT  
signage and placed in public right of way.  If you are on private  
property like a mall, then you fall under the purview of what ever  
nazi regulations they choose to enforce.


clay

On May 29, 2007, at 12:26 PM, Zoltan Finks wrote:

Interesting you mention this. Just yesterday, I must admit, I did  
not notice
one of these little signs posted at the right edge of the bike  
trail. And I
was upset that two cars did not yield to me. I honestly did not  
think they
had the right of way to cross into the straight-line path of  
bicycle traffic
on the trail. Wife pointed out the miniature stop sign to me.  
That's cool.


But I wonder, as with stop signs posted in shopping centers, if  
they are

actually legally enforceable?

brian


On 5/29/07, Redghost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I would be quite pleased if the cyclist by me would obey traffic
signals.  We have a very nice trail system that crosses many an
intersection through neighborhoods and commercial areas.  Each
intersection is posted with a stop sign for the cyclist/trail user
but this does not ensure that they actually stop.  Most of them go
ripping across traffic and are incensed that you did not yield to
them.  Blasting across the sidewalks causing mothers with
perambulators to veer madly to avoid collisions as well as forcing
vehicles to slam on brakes.  If ever there were a need for aggressive
cyclist demise, it would be for these folks.  That includes the
inline skater and other speeding personage of limited mental
capacity.  Used to be you were expected to walk your bike across the
street.

On May 29, 2007, at 10:10 AM, Zoltan Finks wrote:


You know, I was very surprised when I heard that passing a line of
stopped
cars on the right is illegal! I am totally opposed to this law,  
if it

is really a law, because it effectively takes away the one
advantage that
bike riding provides - the ability to avoid traffic snarls! I just
look at
the people sitting motionless in their cars and feel a huge scream
suckers!! in my mind. I for one will continue to blow by lines of
stopped
cars lined up at traffic lights, and will continue to feel the  
JOY of

knowing that while cars can get there faster and with more
conveniene and
safety, I do have this one huge advantage.

It is only just that cyclists should be able to enjoy this  
advantage.

Childish - yes - I admit it, but I love the feeling of passing some
clown
that has dangerously veered toward me (yes, sometimes on purpose)
as he
passed me a few moments ago. And I will confront them when I catch
up to
them. I have never had anyone with the courage to back up their
cowardly
behavior conducted from the safety of their steel cage that wisks
them away
from consequences.

Yes, cyclists do need to obey stop signs, though I will blow one if
there is
no one around (something I will much more rarely do in a car, since
if I
miss something behind the wheel, I am liable for major damage). But
if there
are cars to interact with at an intersection I will conduct myself
exactly
by the rules of automotive driving (which, by the way, most people
really
don't play by - instead they like to play the get eye contact and
wave the
other person on game). It should be about whose car stopped at the
appropriate place first, and if there's a tie, the person on the
right goes
first - nice and simple.

Brian
Before anyone says it - yes, I do need help, and I wouldn't have it
any
other way.


Allan wrote:
Or the bicyclists who pass a line of cars on the right, run a stop
sign, and then flip you the finger when you give them a little  
heads

up beep on the horn.



On 5/29/07, Allan Streib [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Jim Cathey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Last time I checked here, a bicycle _is_ a car so far as the  
law is

concerned.  You treat them like such, and you ride them like such.

And it stinks, last time I was forced to (single, and having my
truck worked on at at shop that wasn't particularly close to work)
ride on city streets some asshole in a new Hummer (pre-H2) nearly
clipped me as he roared past me on the left in the turn lane.  (I
was preparing to make my turn to the left.)  Totally a ticketable
offense, but where's a cop when you need him?


I sympathize, though here in this college town it's the bicycles  
and

pedestrians who don't pay attention.

How many times have I had to stand on the brakes to avoid  
clobbering

some ipod-wearing, text-message-absorbed student who simply crosses
the street without so much as a glance to the side.

Or the bicyclists who pass a line of cars on the right, run a stop
sign, and then flip you the finger when you give them a little  
heads

up beep on the horn.

Allan
--
1983 300D
1966 230

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: