[meteorite-list] Alert on iranian meteorites - dishonnest sellers there (Afshin Km and Hot Desert Meteorites)

2016-11-28 Thread Pierre Rochette via Meteorite-list
Dear list

this is to say that the meteorites Pierre Marie is talking about are under 
classification in our lab and that we have all reasons to trust their finders. 
The negotiation between Pierre-Marie and them has apparently not been 
successful but that does not mean they are dishonest.
 We repeatedly receive meteorites from Iran through postal service or DHL 
without problems. 

Pierre Rochette




__

Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the 
Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] WHO IS THE BEST AND MOST SUCCESSFUL METEORITE HUNTER OUT THERE?

2009-07-20 Thread rochette

Dear list

I saw Jeff Grossman rightfully mentioned Antarctic search leaders on 
top of that contest, but the point was dismissed, someone even 
suggesting that collecting meteorite in Antarctica is not hunting 
but fishing; myself I hunt and fish animals and I have collected 
meteorites both in Antarctica and hot deserts. Recovering meteorite 
in Antarctica is not like going to Tucson show, it requires a lot of 
walking, and expertise is spotting the right rock (the story about a 
single black stone among a 100% pure ice surface is only a small part 
of it). Even when done on snowmobile, that is not such a fun when the 
skin of you face fell frozen or when you risk ending in a crevasse. 
It requires also a personal engagement (who is ready not to have a 
shower and fresh food for months?) that is not equaled by tours in 
hot deserts. Remember that the Japanese are out of there home for 
more than one year when they go for meteorites.
So definitely Antarctic recovery expedition is hunting, unless you 
disqualify as hunters people being paid by governments to collect 
meteorites.

--
Pierre


__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] WHO IS THE BEST AND MOST SUCCESSFUL METEORITE HUNTER OUT THERE?

2009-07-20 Thread rochette
as a response to Martin, yes one could consider that those who 
recover meteorite for a living are hunters and those who do it for 
Science and academic carrier are searchers, but this leaves apart 
those that are not academics but do this as a passion and live on 
another job.  Moreover the activity is the same, the only difference 
being the source of money on the personal bank account. I hunt 
animals for fun, not for feeding my family; still I consider myself 
as a hunter in that activity.

--
Pierre


__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] (no subject)

2009-06-09 Thread rochette

dear list members

for a research project I am looking for meteorites from the Sahara or 
Dhofar that may have been used by prehistoric man. If you think you 
have such man shaped artefact in your NWAs (or other collection area) 
please contact me off-list; we can expertise it.

regards
--
Pierre
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] prehistoric artefact made of meteorites

2009-06-09 Thread rochette

(sorry for not including a subject in my previous post)
dear list members

for a research project I am looking for meteorites from the Sahara or 
Dhofar* that may have been used by prehistoric man. If you think you 
have such man shaped artefact in your NWAs (or other collection area) 
please contact me off-list; we can expertise it.

regards
*and more generally Africa and Middle East
--
Pierre
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Researchers find ancient meteorite dust

2008-11-24 Thread rochette

Dear Jason

thanks for the news. The PNAS paper can be downloaded here:
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2008/11/14/0806049105.abstract
note that L. Folco is not from Pisa but Siena
--
Pierre
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] WOW magnetic south?

2003-11-19 Thread Pierre Rochette
Dear list

following Rob message, I would say some knowledge exists on the core 
behavior and the reversal processes. You can see more at the adress 
below, including a movie of a simulated reversal.
http://www.psc.edu/science/Glatzmaier/glatzmaier.html

The uneasy thing to understand in the reversing dynamo is that you do 
not have to reverse the sense of liquid flow to reverse the field: 
the same flow pattern can sustain both sense of magnetic field (and 
coupled electric currents). Second usual misconception is that the 
axial rotation part (constant distance to Earth center) of the flow 
does not create any field, it is just the vertical flow (due to heat 
exchange) that matters, although this flow is organized through 
Coriolis force by the Earth rotation.
--
Pierre

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Franco L3.8

2003-10-14 Thread Pierre Rochette
Dear list

this is to confirm that the L3.8 M. Franco is selling under the unofficial
name SWA01003  (or no name at all) has been examined by various experts
and classified in agreement with the Nom Com rules (by A. Jambon in Paris).
What delayed the publication in MetBull seems to be that M. Franco ask that
his meteorites should not get a NWA name (meaning nobody knows exactly
where they come from and to which they are paired) but get the same
privilege as the Labennes' Saharas, i.e. having a precise relative position
but undisclosed absolute position. The commitee is probably reluctant to
multiply these privileges and adhoc names, but may not use the same
coordinate system as for the Sahara as the undisclosed reference point
should be different for Franco and Labennes... However I am sure that they
will come to an agreement, mostly because it is the obvious interest of the
community to have one Sahara like entry for hundreds of paired specimens
instead of hundreds of different NWA entries like when different samples of
the same fall is classified in  different labs leading to the use of
unecessary lab and researcher time.
So everybody can get these really nice chondrites (I got a big one
myself...) for little money and be reassured that they will get an official
name in next Bulletin.


Pierre



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] avoirdupois ?

2003-06-09 Thread rochette
Sterling wrote:
Hi, Tom aka James,

Avoirdupois is the fancy French term for common British measures
..

Well list I object!

 this is not genuine french, just a british expression forged to look 
like french. In the Web page: 
http://dictionary.reference.com/wordoftheday/archive/2000/08/29.html
you read:

avoirdupois is from Middle English avoir de pois, goods sold by 
weight, from Old French aveir de peis, literally, goods of weight, 
from aveir, property, goods (from aveir, to have, from Latin habere, 
to have, to hold, to possess property) + de, from (from the Latin) + 
peis, weight (from Latin pensum, weight).

Avoirdupois weight is a system of weights based on a pound containing 
16 ounces or 7,000 grains. Compare apothecaries' weight and troy 
weight.

The correct French could be avoir du poids, which in fact describe 
someone suffering obesity or being important in the society! In 
french there is no such term avoirdupois to describe prescientific 
units still in use by remote tribes who have still not taken profit 
of the second leg of arithmetic (multiplication, the first being 
addition) when making measurements. We just use the local name. By 
the way in latin languages thinking and weighing have the same 
origin. Interesting, isn't it?
--
Pierre

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Galim (a) and Galim(b) question??????

2003-04-03 Thread rochette
Dear dave
here is the answer:
Title:
The Galim LL/EH polymict breccia: Evidence for impact-induced exchange
between reduced and oxidized meteoritic material
Authors:
Rubin, Alan E.
Journal:
Meteoritics, vol. 32, pages 489-492
Publication Date:
07/1997
Origin:
METIC
Bibliographic Code:
1997MPS...32..489R
Abstract
Galim is a polymict breccia consisting of a heavily shocked (shock stage
S6) LL6 chondrite [Galim (a)] and an impact-melted EH chondrite [Galim
(b)]. Relict chondrules in Galim (b) served as nucleation sites for
euhedral enstatite grains crystallizing from the impact melt. Many of the
reduced phases typical of EH chondrites (e.g., Si-bearing metallic Fe-Ni;
Ti-bearing troilite) are absent. Galim (b) was probably shock-melted while
in contact with a more oxidized source, i.e., Galim (a); during this event
Si was oxidized from the metal and Ti was oxidized from troilite. Galim (a)
contains shock veins and recrystallized, unzoned olivine. The absence of
evidence for reduction in Galim (a) may indicate that the amount of LL
material greatly exceeded that of EH material; shock metamorphism may have
taken place on the LL parent body. Shock-induced redox reactions such as
those inferred for the Galim breccia appear to be restricted mainly to
asteroids because the low-end tail of their relative-velocity distribution
permits mixing of intact disparate materials (including accretion of
projectiles of different oxidation states) whereas the peak of the
distribution leads to high equilibration shock pressures (allowing
impact-induced exchange between previously accreted, disequilibrated
materials). Galim probably formed by a two-stage process: (1) accretion to
the LL parent body of an intact EH projectile at low relative velocities,
and (2) shock metamorphism of the assemblage by the subsequent impact of
another projectile at significantly higher relative velocities.

conclusion: a single fall can be made of different classes. The fall place
is heavily vegetated so there is no chance that accidentally an older fall
(b) was found in the strewnfielf of a)...


Pierre



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Use of magnets for meteorite hunting

2003-03-05 Thread rochette
rob says:

P.S.  Perhaps a compass can be used as a weaning device?
It generates a minimal magnetic field, and yet is sensitive
enough to detect most H- and L-chondrites.

yes compass is able to detect (by a small deviation from N when you
approach the stone) the magnetization of a say L or H. But it is tricky.
The problem is that the effect is quite different in the natural state and
on a piece that has already been submitted to high field (touching with a
magnet or lightning stroke). For example a LL after magnet exposure make a
larger deviation on the compass than a H in its natural state

and then:  It can easily discriminate between LL and L, L and H or even
eucrite
 and howardite, for example.

Ahhh, but what about weathering?  If you can't see into the interior
of a meteorite, you'll know nothing about its weathering grade.  The
range of responses corresponding to the various weathering grades of
an H (for instance) will easily intersect that of the L's and probably
even unweathered LL's.  Presumably similar difficulties will be
encountered with achondrites.  --Rob

Right again (but I was told that efficient communication should convey only
one message per time!). So lesson 2 is: a strongly (W2-3) weathered H is as
magnetic as a fresh L

then Mark says:
Hi Robert and list

I'm curious about this latent magnetic field. If its anything like that used
for paleomag, of what real interest is it except that the meteorite came
from a body large enough to develope a magnetic field which, if my
understanding of magnetics is fair enough would only tell you the body
developed a field. And this may be debatable if there was enough heat around
the area where the meteorite came from that the field isn't set in stone
because of a major impact or something ripped the parent body apart (as may
be the case with irons and mesosiderites and such). If the rock is still
plastic when this occurs, the field is subject to many other factors and may
not even represent the parent body's field anyway.
Mark

There are instances where this paleomagnetic signal is of high interest,
but of course it's very complicated and a lot of meteorites are rather dumb
in this field. But taking the example of martians, the paleomagnetic signal
of SNC has triggered many scientific publications (among which 3 in Science
I guess) discussing for example the low temperature transfer of ALH84001
from Mars to Earth and thus the possibility that Earth may have already
been contaminated by martian bugs in the past (see e.g.:
http://www.spaceref.com/Directory/Astrobiology_and_Life_Science/panspermia/, ver
y controversial, I warn you!).
Unfortunately every Saharan or Omani SNC has been tested with a magnet and
therefore are definitively useless to investigate further this issue.


Pierre



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorites Expeditions n Magnetic Destruction

2003-03-04 Thread rochette
Rafael wrote:
Thats kinda a hard view point, cuz it test us between 2 things.
Destroying a meteorite for science or obtaining more items to our
collections. Of course I dont want to harm any meteorites for
science, even though they are only for collection. But one collector
never knows when will the meteorites will be used for science...and
more if its a unique find... is this a matter of ethics?...Is there
another way for not destroying this record?

yes there is a way, both preserving the magnetic memory and highly
improving the magnetic discrimination: a simple magnetic
susceptibility probe, pocket sized, that gives you in a second a
quantitative estimate of the amount of metal or magnetite in a piece
of rock. It costs 1800 $. Seller is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (I don't
have any interest in that company!). It can easily discriminate
between LL and L , L and H or even eucrite and howardite, for example. I
can provide
oflist as an attachment a leaflet for this device as well as a chart
of magnetic susceptibility versus meteorite class. I will probably be in next
Ensisheim show, in particular to demonstrate this instrument.


Pierre



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorites Expeditions

2003-03-04 Thread rochette
Hi Pierre,
Like most tools, one uses it with some degree of discretion. I
learned about it from Steve Schoner, one of the greatest hunters
ever. I first used one with him in an L/LL strewn field and he, at least,
did so with excellent results. So, at least some people consider it
to be of some use.
Of course, I do not suggest attempting to use a screw driver to
hammer nails, but that does not make a screw driver useless.
Michael

Right (as I said in my first message)! If you are combing Holbrook or Gold
Basin strewfields the cane may be useful; besides, what you will recover
has anyhow not a tremendous scientific value. But the thrill of research
and hunting is also to have a chance to find something unexpected. If you
narrow your selection to only the material that sticks you may loose the
Lafayette sister that was hiden among your L/LL strewnfield...


Pierre



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorites Expeditions

2003-03-03 Thread rochette
.. But
I have just one question: How do u use the meteorite cane?...

I have a big magnet from a floppy disk, small in size, but man its powerful.
Do I use it to sweep the area with it? or just when a rock looks
different?...I have that big magnet attached to a cane, plus smaller magnets
for checking rocks. How does a meteorite cane works the best?

Ola Rafael

This is more less a repost from about one year ago: use of strong magnet
cause irreversible damage to the magnetic memory of a meteorite and
therefore decreases its scientific interest. Besides if you collect only
rocks sticking to your cane you will get slags but leave on the ground
almost all rarities: rumurutites, angrites, eucrites,diogenite, howardite,
martian, lunars, even some LL and CV. If you try to increase magnet power
to compensate, you may collect terrestrial basalts. So what's the use of
it, unless you know you are in a L or H strewfield???


Pierre



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Question About Iturralde Structure, Bolivia

2003-02-24 Thread rochette
Abstract to be presented by Wasilewski et al. at the IUGG Meeting Sapporo
Japan (July 2003):

ITURRALDE: A POSSIBLE IMPACT STRUCTURE AT THE EDGE OF THE AMAZON IN
NORTHERN BOLIVIA
The Iturralde structure is possibly the Earth's most recent big impact
event recording a collision with a meteor or comet that might have occurred
between 11,000 and 30,000 years ago. The most convincing evidence for the
existence of a crater comes from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission
(SRTM) image of the structure. The feature appears as a quasi-circular
closed depression about 20 meters in depth resembling a cookie cutter
cutting heavily vegetated soft sediments and pampas at the edge of the
Bolivian Amazon. A barometric traverse from inside the crater to outside
the rim supports the 20 meter depth contrast suggested by the SRTM data. A
magnetic survey across the crater was able to define a symmetry along an
east-west axis with the center being lower than the rim. Base station
records were able to identify the Equatorial Electrojet (EEJ) geomagnetic
diurnal signal attributed to a narrow electric current sheet flowing
eastward along the magnetic dip equator. The soil magnetic susceptibility
remains low and featureless until about 1 meter depth where lateritic
nodules identifiable with the downward migration of iron are found. As yet
there are no identifiable evidences of shocked quartz in the quartz sand
collected in soil pits inside the crater, along river cuts, and at the
rim. The expedition did not yield the smoking gun required for
verification. There does exist oil exploration geophysical survey data (
gravity, magnetics) which include the Iturralde structure in the survey
areas and there are seismic lines near the structure. We hope to be able to
obtain this information perhaps by presentation time. The vegetation inside
the crater appears different from that outside the crater but this may
simply reflect the inundated nature of the depressed structure which may be
underwater for a good portion of the rainy season. A return to the
structure to drill for evidence of shocked material may be the only way to
prove that the structure is a crater.

(sounds rather unconclusive)


Pierre



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] A Metallic Asteroid May Have Coincided WithThe Fall Of Rome

2003-02-10 Thread rochette
Dear Sterling

thanks for your in depth historical discussion. I agree that the historical
record is not so plain, and that the epoch was not the one of Plinius or
Ciceron.
However as we talk about St Augustine, if he was writing after the
impact(I did not check the dates, anyhow the dating of the Sirente
crater rim has an error bar also), then mentionning it would have been a
very poweful argument for his thesis: the destruction of Roma is the will
of God...
I just want to precise following your question  This
implies excavation. Do cows excavate?, that I agree there is evidence for
excavation but I wrote  shepherds simply dig them as a reservoir or
wells. Of course this is a suggestion, I have no evidence, but I would say
it fits better the sum of evidences in Ormo et al. paper.


Pierre



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Re: [meteorite-list] A Metallic Asteroid May Have Coincided WithThe Fall Of Rome

2003-02-09 Thread rochette
http://www.guardian.co.uk/online/science/story/0,12450,889308,00.html

A metallic asteroid may have coincided with the fall of Rome, says 
Duncan Steel

The Guardian (United Kingdom)
February 6, 2003

..

No matter what the trajectory of the asteroid entry, it would have
been a phenomenal sight from Rome, and scarier still for those closer
to ground zero.
..

dear list

 sorry to be asteroid skeptic again but this newspaper article goes 
really beyond acceptable journalistic extrapolation.

The Sirente crater lies about 60 km E of Roma and they are various 
moutain ridges up to 2500 m in between the two places. Roma is near 
sea level and the first mountain range eastward is only 15 km away. 
So if the trajectory was westward, no way that  it would have been a 
phenomenal sight from Rome.

even if the trajectory was in sight, can fear trigger the fall of 
Rome? These people were educated, they knew about comets and 
eclipses, they were used to natural disasters, frequent floods and 
earthquakes, volcanic eruption (remember Pompei!). A 100 m crater has 
negligible climatic effect.

If the event was so phenomenal how come that there is no historical 
record (again compare to Pompei)??? We are not talking about a remote 
place in Homeric time.
All this scenario is mere nonsense in terms of history.

But the biggest trouble is that the Sirente crater lacks to fulfill 
any of the criteria for asteroid impact, despite careful search by 
Ormo et al: no evidence of shock or fused material, not a single 
extraterrestrial crumb found (just Ni free rust), no real ejecta 
layer (just a 10 m wide 1-2 m high rim of reworked soil and sediment, 
which is quite small for a 100 m wide crater!), no geophysical 
anomaly, no nothing, just a circular pond and a bunch of meter sized 
depressions... A reasonable explanation for all these structures, 
knowing that the place has been frequented for many centuries by 
millions of cattle looking for water, rare in these calcareous 
ranges, is that the shepherds simply dig them as a reservoir or wells.
--
Pierre

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] triolite inclusions

2003-01-28 Thread rochette
Steve / Steve:

 Isn't Pyrrhotite Fe(1-x)S?

True.  Troilite is distinct from Pyrrhotite. It was simply the best
terrestrial analog, found in abundance on Earth and easily referenced,
that I could come up with at the time for S. Arnold's post.


to be more precise there are different sorts of pyrrhotite: a first one
that is very like troilite (FeS): non magnetic (in fact
antiferromagnetic) with formula Fe9S10 and hexagonal system, and the second
one (not mentionning extra and more exotic forms) Fe7S8 which is magnetic
and monoclinic. The last one is more common in terrestrial rocks, but also
present in SNC and Rumuritites (probably as a mixture with Fe9S10)


Pierre



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Re: [meteorite-list] triolite inclusions

2003-01-28 Thread rochette
>Hello Pierre and list,
>
>Now I am really confused.  "Rocks From Space" both first and second edition
>list troilite as a magnetic iron sulfide.  

Wrong!  But it was common in the old days to misinterprete monoclinic pyrrhotite as troilite. Real pure troilite is less magnetic than olivine.

Though it is ignored in the
>general index of both it is listed in the glossaries.  In "The Cambridge
>Encyclopedia Of Meteorites" it is ignored in the index but is listed in
>Appendix C Minerals in Meteorites.  This entry states that it "is not
>magnetic".  I have a Gibeon slice with a large inclusion (2"x1.25") which I
>have always assumed to be troilite.  This inclusion is quite magnetic.
>

Well here it is probably really troilite but with numerous micro inclusions of metal (or even magnetite as in the graphite inclusions), thus accounting for the magnetism of  the bulk. XRD is a good way to check.

PS:how can you judge that the inclusion is magnetic by itself and not as a side effect if it is surrounded by metal

Pierre

__ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 

[meteorite-list] (no subject)

2003-01-14 Thread rochette

John inquired:
> Can anyone tell me if any of the different numbered NWA
> R-chondrites are paired? Like NWA 753 and 978, both R3.8's


Hello John and List,

According to the Meteoritical Bulletin #85,
NWA 753 is a R3.9 rumurutiite chondrite,
and its fayalite is Fa38.6±3.2 (range Fa20-41)

and:

NWA 978 is classified as an R3.8 chondrite
in Met.Bull. #86 with a slightly higher Fa
value of: Fa41.9±0.2

In other words, they are probably unpaired.

well difference between 3.8 and 3.9 is a bit relative to the observer and by definition of type 3, fayalite amount is highly variable so it cannot be used for pairing purposes!



Pierre

__ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 

Re: [meteorite-list] NWA R-chondrite pairings

2003-01-13 Thread rochette
Dear John

I posted a very similar message about 6 months ago, without great
success... So here is my personal feeling: it looks unlikely statistically
that two different R3.8 or R4 come out of NWA, but not impossible : there
are 2 nakhlites and 4 shergottites in NWA. It is true that 753 and 978 or
800 and Ouzina show different weathering and colors, but this happens on
different pieces of the same fall.

What I would bet very highly unlikely is that more than 2 different R3.8 or
R4 exist!

No type of detailed study can solve the problem definitely, as even if
every chemical and petrographic features would be the same in 753 and 978
for example, it does not tell for sure that they are the same fall: they
may be different fall from the same asteroidal outcrop; there are many
examples of that in ordinary chondrites (undistinguishable different
falls). Once again we touch the major drawback of NWAs: no precise location
means unsolvable incertitude in pairing. We can just talk about probability
and with the squeletic R population, statistics are nearly meaningless.

(My unconvinced bet is that 753 and 978 are the same fall, but I would not
be surprised of the opposite)


Pierre



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Re: [meteorite-list] Juvinas?

2002-10-21 Thread rochette
Hello List, Juvinas seems to be a meteorite that is hard to find info on. ??

Strange! There are several tens of scientific publications on this typical
eucrite since 1821 (see Catalogue of Meteorites). Ask Bernt for a listing...
Over the 91 kg collected, there is still an impressive pumpkin sized piece
in Paris Museum (I saw it), with amazing freshness: highly glossy fusion
crust and sparkling disseminated metal flakes, no traces of oxidation... A
lot of museums have pieces of several 100g.
The place of fall is SE Massif Central, in the Ardèche region. Juvinas is a
very small mountain village, country of chestnuts, goat cheese and trouts,
granitic basement toped by volcanoes among the most recent in France (40-80
ka). Great place to visit!


Pierre



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Re: [meteorite-list] Sahara Sand and Michigan Dirt

2002-08-08 Thread rochette

repost from Saturday. It seemed lost. Sorry if you got it already

Hello

black magnetic spherules in Michigan soils: for sure it is industrial ashes
(from steel work, coal burning, cementery, engine mufflers etc.) for which
the fallout is numerous orders of magnitude above micrometeorite fallout,
even at long distance from industrial area.

Magnetic grains in Saharan sands: iron oxydes (mostly hematite and
goethite, but also maghemite, titanomaghemite(magnetite)) are practically
the second constituent of Saharan sands after quartz. They again have much
probably nothing to do with meteorites, but are remains of weter climates
producing iron concentration is soils. Rare earth magnets do attract
hematite. Besides various regions of Sahara (southern Morroco, Hoggar,
Tibesti, SE Egypt...) have been covered once by volcanic rocks, very rich
in magnetic grains.

Sorry for these chilling points


Pierre



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite Question

2002-07-13 Thread rochette

Dear Rhett,Bernd and list

In general when obtaining a measurement outside the norm (here Fa% for H
within 17-20), the inference  this is an anomalous meteorite should not
be put forward before answering the questions:

-does the norm apply to this case? (obviously not for type 3 which by
definition show a large range in Fa%, with an average showing a standard
deviation of several %)
-then is there systematic bias? (possible for weathered finds, oxidation of
olivine starts by turning Fe to rust therefore decreasing Fa%)
-is the Fa% measurement well calibrated and what is the error bar? (It is
really difficult to get absolute precision  below half a percent for this
parameter)
-is the studied sample representative?
-is the meteorite correctly classified? (possible case of Oviedo which may
turn to be an L)

excluding type 3, finds and incompletely classified meteorites and allowing
for a half percent error leave practically no anomalies in Bernd's list!
By the way why is Burnwell not fully classified?


Pierre



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



[meteorite-list] NWA889

2002-07-08 Thread rochette

Dear list

several pieces from Matteo that were analysed carefully (microprobe, and so
on) revealed that the clasts are not exotic (i.e. carbonaceous or
achondritic) but just L6: black is impact melt and gray is moderately
shocked, the matrix being L3.8. It remains to be demonstrated that Matteo's
pieces are really paired with Dean's. The pictures are not so similar


Pierre



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



[meteorite-list] Saharan R4s

2002-06-25 Thread rochette

Dear list

does someone have a clear idea of the status of the R4s bought in Morroco?
Ouzina is the oldest (metbull 2000), NWA800 is not yet declared, NWA845 and
851 are in the provisional MetBull2002, Bessey dumped recently unnamed
material, the Labennes also have R4... Are these possibly all paired, which
ones are clearly from different strewfields? In particular the analyses
quoted for Ouzina and NWA800 are not significantly different...

Thanks in advance


Pierre



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



[meteorite-list] Earth nearly hit by large asteroid??

2002-06-21 Thread rochette

Dear list

I am a bit surprised by all this fuss in the media every few months about
how lucky we are escaping once again the big hit. As a scientist I can say
that the probability that an asteroid cruising nearer to earth than the
Moon actually hit the earth is 1/1*; the public will laugh about these
threatening news long before the 1th anoucement like the one we just
have...
As a hunter when my bullet hit the ground 100** meters away from the deer I
do not shout Yeah, I almost got it, I try to disappear into the hole,
full of shame..

*: if you want a more precise figure: square of the ratio of earth radius
to moon-earth distance.
* equivalent size ratio with the deer being the Earth.


Pierre



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



[meteorite-list] weird spanish meteorite/slag

2002-06-13 Thread rochette

Dear list

there is a PhD thesis just finishing on this stone (Getafe) in Madrid
museum. So we should have more news in the near future. If it is a
meteorite it is an extremely weird one, the closest could be d'Orbigny (no
chondrules, not magnetic, lot of large bubbles). The C14 data seems to
imply industrial origin but on the other hand various features do not fit
with common slag, in particular the testimony of the car driver (the stone
hit while he was driving in open country without any trucks, bridge, cliff,
people etc. around) who seems to be a reasonable person...


Pierre



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Re: [meteorite-list] Help with a Strange Rock

2002-06-05 Thread rochette
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

it also exhibits a very weak magnetic field.  I have never heard of this associated with a meteorite.  Any ideas of what it might be?

Thanks,
Ron

What do you mean? That the rock deviates a compass? Once you have "treated" it with a magnet most meteorites as well as various terrestrial rocks, slags, etc. do deviate a compass because they have acquired a large remanence by exposure to the magnet stray field. Please describe more precisely your "magnetic experiment" and a more precise answer can be formulated!

Cheers


Pierre

__ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 

Re: Vs: [meteorite-list] Re:Kaali meteorite - Estonia, 400BC?

2002-06-04 Thread rochette

Hello list

a short comment on Pytheas, who was a greek citizen of Phocea, now
Marseille in SE France. He may have been the first geophysicist as he is
renown for his proposal that tide is linked to the movement of Moon and Sun
relative to Earth. He formed this idea probably by being the first Greek to
sail in North Sea (finding a way to circonvene Carthage blocus on
Gibraltar), so to experience much bigger tides than the few tens of cm
available in his home mediteranean sea. His legendary travel to collect
amber (in Baltica) and tin (in Cornwall and possibly Scotland)  and find
trade routes independent of Carthage rule is said to have ended in an
extraordinary way: feared of affronting Carthage troops again (he escape
miraculously the first time thanks to huge fog and to the outgoing surface
current in Gibraltar strait), he is reported to have sailed from
practically Kaali to the Black sea, partly using lakes and rivers (from
Ladoga to the Dniepr?) and partly sliding his boot on land!! He succeeded
to get back home safe after a few years of travelling. More impressive than
Ulysse's pleasant cruise, isn't it?
Unfortunately his original writing are not preserved and his book has been
rebuilt using fragments quoted by other authors, so one must be cautious.
But his visit to Kaali freshly formed crater area is among the most likely
part of the story.





Pierre



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Re: [meteorite-list] TRINITITE

2002-05-29 Thread rochette

Hi list

 I am ready to accept that this material is safe, it is just the idea that
some kind of nuclear waste be object of collection that puzzle me!

besides [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

And I am tired of the conspiracy theorist-- there are boards for that
elsewhere and I am tired of non scientific based speculation ad nausea  I
am tired of being tired...

Well I am not at all supporting this theory, neither non-scientific
speculations. The plutonium injection experiment I was referring to is just
plain public truth, that makes you wonder about the confidence to give in
official accounts about military based activity, that's all... For those in
the list who do not know the story, here is an official US gov. site on it:
http://tis.eh.doe.gov/ohre/roadmap/roadmap/part1.html#Ch1Intro

And it is a scientific fact that trinitite is loaded with artificial high
activity isotopes of Pu, Cs,etc.(it is even advertised as a sure way to
check the authenticity of their trinitite sample by some sellers!) the
question is just how much of these elements is still there and if this
amount is negligible in terms of safety or not.

Anyhow, each one is free to collect what he likes to, even atomic garbage,
but I should win some reward for trigerring the list activity on a subject
neither meteoritic nor commercial or slanderous


Pierre



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Re: [meteorite-list] TRINITITE

2002-05-28 Thread rochette

I am amazed that some people dare collecting this material!

Army people say its radioactivity should have come now to acceptable
level, but first who is able to trust 100% such quote (from people who
experimented injection of plutonium into humans without telling them) and
second even if on average this material may be relatively safe, one cannot
exclude that a given sample is by chance loaded with a speck of plutonium...

so no thanks, even if cheaper than natural impact glass!


Pierre



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorites that fell into the water

2002-05-04 Thread rochette

In Grady catalog there are several meteorites from Pacific Ocean. They have
been dredged on the sea floor at several km depth by a Russian
oceanographic vessel.

Pierre



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



[meteorite-list] FREE METEORITE CONTEST TWO! NWA's!

2002-05-03 Thread rochette

African meteorites are cool because they don't pretend, no pedigree, no
academic record, no Saint Machin no Something County, no sophisticated
outfit, they just offer you what they are, an unnamed flower of the
universe, just for the thrill of the last explorers, the crude nakedness of
outer space and Sahara emptyness, the spirit of warm all star nights of the
mother of all mankind and civilizations: AFRICA

Pierre



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



[meteorite-list] lunar/martian magnetism

2002-04-01 Thread rochette

Hello list

as argued in preceeding post the answer is it magnetic cannot be answered
by yes or no. With a strong magnet the most magnetic Martian, Los Angeles,
can be weakly attracted, due to its content of magnetite (1-2%), may be
NWA817 also. Al the others are too weak (half a percent of magnetite or
magnetic sulfide).
For lunar I have no personal experience but regolith breccia can contain up
to 2% of metallic iron, while maria basalt has one per mil at most.
Therefore some lunar should be (weakly) attracted by NdFeB magnets. However
this metal is heterogeneously distributed so some fragments will be
attracted, some not.
I have a quantitative magnetic chart for all meteorite types; ask me for
the file off list.

Michael Groetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Am a little afraid to try it on the purchased
 specimens I own as I may loose them :-)

What do you mean? As for the harm done by magnet on samples and the dubious
utility of this test please refer to my February 16 post and subsequent
discussion!

Joyeuses Paques

Pierre



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Re: [meteorite-list] Nutcase Relativity

2002-03-09 Thread rochette

Dear Pierre,

My apologies if I seemed to be blaming French scientists for ignorance
re the true nature of meteorites.

no offense! IYou just gave me a good opportunity to highlight the
contribution of Biot (who happens to be more famous for his work on
magnetism) on l'Aigle...

Prof. P. Rochette
 CEREGE  University of Aix-Marseille 3
BP 80, Europôle de l'Arbois
13545 Aix en Provence Cedex 4 FRANCE
Tel : 04 42 97 15 62  Fax : 04 42 97 15 95  



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Re: [meteorite-list] Nutcase Relativity

2002-03-08 Thread rochette

In earlier ages, people who claimed to have seen stones fall from the
sky, were they too considered to be a little touched?

French peasent:  I have seen stones falling from the heavens!!
French professor:  Uneducated dolt.  Nutcase!!


Charlie


about arrogant French professors: in 1803 the French academy was, besides
strong individuals around Europe like Chladni and Howard, a leading group
for the historical acceptance of the reality of meteorites So a bad
example (but I admit there are good examples).

Now about the totally non-scientific discourse of Hoagland Webpage
(http://www.enterprisemission.com/samp5.htm)  here are clear examples:

 By contrast, the arches are regularly spaced, nearly identical in length
and breadth, and wrap around the surrounding features (a highly reflective
glass tube!). They have completely different albedo
properties than the surrounding terrain (indicating they are made from
different material), and are restricted to the specific area of the glass
tunnel. Note also that they are sharp edged and tubular,
suggesting that they are individual structural features rather than
drifting mounds of piled up sand.

In JGR planet issue E10 from 2001, there are tens of pictures showing that
Mars is covered by regularly spaced nearly identical in length and breadth
dunes (that 's a consequence of wind and sand pile dynamics) with sharp
edge and different albedo from the basement just because the basement is
solid rock or not the same material. Go along the beach after a windstorm
and you will be able to shoot similar pictures of drifting small dunes on a
wet flat sand surface or on pavement.

To try and explain away such unique and obviously non-geologic objects as
the products of mere wind erosion is laughable. What these object appear to
be are the supports for some sort of
underground tunnel or transportation system. 

No comments! If you do not accept the possibility of alternative
explanations from the beginning there is no science.

To their marginal credit, scientists at MSSS have at least acknowledged
the (geologically) inexplicable nature of these features. According to
MSSS's Ken Edgett:


classical argument of nutcases: look science do not explain everything,
that means I am right in choosing the answer of faith (in ET) rather than
science. Science relies on the acceptance that there is always something
unknown and that Truth is not given to us but built by us. Secondly the
scientists were not talking about the specific features in these pictures!

Now this guy should care about worms on asteroids too: look at the last
picture (120 m) of the descent of NEAR (http://near.jhuapl.edu/): there is
obviously the tail of a big snake frightened by the probe and trying to
escape. Probably NASA officials classified the bottom part of the picture
where the head of the monster was visible, but they know now that it has
swallowed the precious probe (so they fear that environmentalists will sue
them for threatening the survival of this animal by feeding it with
hazardous items)

Pierre



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Re: [meteorite-list] Strange Martian Surface Feature

2002-03-06 Thread rochette

Hi, List,

Ok, it's a little off topic, but... A friend of mine belongs
to a group one of whom found the following site displaying an
image of a Martian surface feature:
http://www.enterprisemission.com/samp5.htm
This site is one maintained by a notorious whacko and
fringe-theorist, Hoagland, the author of Monuments of Mars, so I
told them he was a nutcase; forget it. And they properly came
back me with Forget about the nutcase; what the Hell is this?
And I didn't have a good answer. In fact, I don't think I've got
any answer. Enigmatic is the best description I could come up
with and that's just a word for an excuse.
Since the link to the original Mars Observer Narrow Angle
Camera image on the Hoagland site is broken, here's the correct
link for those that want to puzzle over it in greater detail:
http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/ab1_m04/images/M0400291.html
Any ideas? What the Hell is this?

Sterling K. Webb

obviously a set of dunes, chanelled by topography. Dunes are much more
common on Mars than ET. The uncommon thing is the chanelling of the dunes
but it is easely accounted for by the valley topography.

Pierre



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Re: [meteorite-list] Article wanted

2002-03-05 Thread rochette

Hello all- I am in search of a copy of the article:
The Mbale meteorite shower. Meteoritics. vol. 29 no. 2. March 1994. pp. 246-254
Can anyone out there provide me with a photocopy, back issue, or on-line archive?
Thanks in advance,

Bonjour

go to this page: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/article_service.html
and you can download for free all old Meteoritics articles you want! Pierre

__ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 

[meteorite-list] NWA978 and El Tigre

2002-02-23 Thread rochette
Dear list

I have two enquiries 

1. I just got on E-bay a slice of NWA978. A beautiful R3, no doubt! However the seller just mention "classified by UCLA". Is someone aware of a published account on this rare NWA? I am wondering about pairing with NWA573...

2. a fellow collector has got a while ago from a US dealer:
El Tigre	Mexico	1993 Dec. 23	L6
however it is not officially declared, a surprising situation for a meteorite fallen 8 years ago. Anyone knows about this meteorite?
(it looks effectively like a fresh L6)

Thanks in advance!

Pierre

__ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 

Re: [meteorite-list] have mercy for meteorite memory!

2002-02-17 Thread rochette

Tracy wrote:

I would be interested in the results of a study on the paleomagnetic
memory of meteorites.  Who did it, and what specifically was found about
ALH8001, and the initial energy state of the solar system/universe? or
what did you expect to find?

besides Bernd answer, see this page:
http://www.gps.caltech.edu/users/jkirschvink/pdfs/panspermia.pdf
(PS: I do not share Kirschvink's conclusions...)

Unfortunately, I expect that many meteorite hunters will continue to use
the magnet as a base test for determing whether a suspect rock is a
meteorite.  It's cheap, easy, and saves time and effort if you have to
decide whether a rock is worth packing out of an inacessible location.

good:  next time you leave a 50 kg martian or lunar on the ground because
it is not magnetic and too far from your car trunk, let me know the place,
I am ready to rent an helicopter...

Rick wrote:

Which meteorites would NOT be attracted to a magnet.
Lunar and Mars meteorites to my knowledge anymore out their??

I wrote in my fisrt message: a lot of rare meteorites (angrite, HED, SNC, R
and CM chondrites, some LL and aubrites) are not attracted by a magnet.

I can add some CV. If you have some Allende: it is not magnetic (in the
sense of the magnet; with the right probe, it has a strong magnetic signal!)

Prof. P. Rochette
 CEREGE  University of Aix-Marseille 3
BP 80, Europôle de l'Arbois
13545 Aix en Provence Cedex 4 FRANCE
Tel : 04 42 97 15 62  Fax : 04 42 97 15 95  



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



[meteorite-list] metric system

2002-02-17 Thread rochette



Here is another one that crossed my mind. If light
travels 18600 miles per second. How long will it
take in TIME for light to travel 3/8 of an inch???

Rick, please reformulate your query in metric system and any schoolboy (at
least european ) can answer
Metric system was designed more than two centuries ago by some bright
people (mostly french!); it has saved innumerable time and mental energy
since for billions of people. May be you should try it!

Prof. P. Rochette
 CEREGE  University of Aix-Marseille 3
BP 80, Europôle de l'Arbois
13545 Aix en Provence Cedex 4 FRANCE
Tel : 04 42 97 15 62  Fax : 04 42 97 15 95  



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list