Re: Netscape 6.01 terminally flawed

2001-05-11 Thread Mickey Segal

fuss was raised during the beta program such backward compatibility was added so
that an applet signed using Netscape signing for Netscape 4.x would run under
Netscape 6.  I can't comment on Java to JavaScript communication since we do not
use it, but don't give up on the ability to do basic signing.  We use a Thawte
multipurpose certificate and it works fine:
http://www.thawte.com/certs/developer/diffapps.html

"Mark A Gregory" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
9dd33m$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9dd33m$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> It has been posted that Netscape 6.01 is not Java compatible and
> prevents signed applets from running.
>
> Signed applets cannot communicate with Javascript on web pages.
>
> Netscape has released a product that breaks most applets being used
> today and prevents customers from supporting netscape on their
> websites.
>
> When does netscape plan to release a 6.xx version that is not broken
> but supports Java and java applet to javascript communication?
>
> This question has been put to Netscape and Sun officials but there is
> no response forthcoming.







Re: Netscape 6.01 terminally flawed

2001-05-10 Thread Mark Dixon

Yeah well, it ain't finished. It was a mistake to release it.

The latest open source release, Mozilla 0.9 is usable (0.8 was the first
release that could be considered usable for anything other than testing
sites)

Don't think they've ironed out all the java issues yet though, and I _know_
LiveConnect is still not switched on (although if you build it yourself,
there's probably a way to do this).

Mark


"Up-state NY, U.S.A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Mark--I can't agree with you more. And I can't possibly tell you how
disappointed I was with my attempt at using Netscape 6. I sent away for
Netscape's CD rather than download the whole package. Once installed, I
found Netscape 6 to be:

   * Very slow (although it did tell me it needed a minimum of 233 MHz
 and 64 MB of Ram).
   * My Logitech mouse was no longer able to page...
   * My attempt at doing e-mail off-line failed. Never did figure out
 where the e-mail went?
   * When I un-installed Netscape 6, I found that it had corrupted
 Windows98 thumbnail view for jpg and gif files.
   * I played with Netscape 6 for about two days and gave up...

So I'm now back running Netscape 4.7 and much happier with it.
Apparently I never reached the point you did; however, I'm also very
disappointed to learn about the Java problem...

Have a nice day, Gary

Mark A Gregory wrote:

> It has been posted that Netscape 6.01 is not Java compatible and
> prevents signed applets from running.
>
> Signed applets cannot communicate with Javascript on web pages.
>
> Netscape has released a product that breaks most applets being used
> today and prevents customers from supporting netscape on their
> websites.
>
> When does netscape plan to release a 6.xx version that is not broken
> but supports Java and java applet to javascript communication?
>
> This question has been put to Netscape and Sun officials but there is
> no response forthcoming.







Re: Netscape 6.01 terminally flawed

2001-05-10 Thread Fabian Guisset

Up-state NY, U.S.A. wrote:

> Mark--I can't agree with you more.  And I can't possibly tell you how
> disappointed I was with my attempt at using Netscape 6.  I sent away for
> Netscape's CD rather than download the whole package.  Once installed, I
> found Netscape 6 to be:
> 
>* Very slow (although it did tell me it needed a minimum of 233 MHz
>  and 64 MB of Ram).
>* My Logitech mouse was no longer able to page...
>* My attempt at doing e-mail off-line failed.  Never did figure out
>  where the e-mail went?
>* When I un-installed Netscape 6, I found that it had corrupted
>  Windows98 thumbnail view for jpg and gif files.
>* I played with Netscape 6 for about two days and gave up...


Hi Gary,

Since you bothered to come to a Mozilla newsgroup to complain about 
Netscape 6, I'm going to give a Mozillian answer :)
Download Mozilla 0.9, and enjoy :)

Fabian.


> 
> So I'm now back running Netscape 4.7 and much happier with it. 
> Apparently I never reached the point you did; however, I'm also very
> disappointed to learn about the Java problem...
> 
> Have a nice day, Gary
> 
> Mark A Gregory wrote:
> 
> 
>>It has been posted that Netscape 6.01 is not Java compatible and
>>prevents signed applets from running.
>>
>>Signed applets cannot communicate with Javascript on web pages.
>>
>>Netscape has released a product that breaks most applets being used
>>today and prevents customers from supporting netscape on their
>>websites.
>>
>>When does netscape plan to release a 6.xx version that is not broken
>>but supports Java and java applet to javascript communication?
>>
>>This question has been put to Netscape and Sun officials but there is
>>no response forthcoming.
>>
> 






Re: Netscape 6.01 terminally flawed

2001-05-10 Thread Carlfish

On Thu, 10 May 2001 06:18:47 -0400, Up-state NY, U.S.A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
 somehow managed to type:
>Mark--I can't agree with you more.=A0 And I can't possibly tell you how
>disappointed I was with my attempt at using Netscape 6.

Netscape 6 was a marketing decision. Netscape saw a series of negative
(and somewhat ignorant) press reports about how long it was taking to
finish the next version of their browser. They reacted by forcing through
a release of a product that was not even remotely ready.

Netscape branded products are also off-topic for the mozilla 
newsgroups. Followups set.

Charles Miller




Re: Netscape 6.01 terminally flawed

2001-05-10 Thread Up-state NY, U.S.A.

Mark--I can't agree with you more.  And I can't possibly tell you how
disappointed I was with my attempt at using Netscape 6.  I sent away for
Netscape's CD rather than download the whole package.  Once installed, I
found Netscape 6 to be:

   * Very slow (although it did tell me it needed a minimum of 233 MHz
 and 64 MB of Ram).
   * My Logitech mouse was no longer able to page...
   * My attempt at doing e-mail off-line failed.  Never did figure out
 where the e-mail went?
   * When I un-installed Netscape 6, I found that it had corrupted
 Windows98 thumbnail view for jpg and gif files.
   * I played with Netscape 6 for about two days and gave up...

So I'm now back running Netscape 4.7 and much happier with it. 
Apparently I never reached the point you did; however, I'm also very
disappointed to learn about the Java problem...

Have a nice day, Gary

Mark A Gregory wrote:

> It has been posted that Netscape 6.01 is not Java compatible and
> prevents signed applets from running.
>
> Signed applets cannot communicate with Javascript on web pages.
>
> Netscape has released a product that breaks most applets being used
> today and prevents customers from supporting netscape on their
> websites.
>
> When does netscape plan to release a 6.xx version that is not broken
> but supports Java and java applet to javascript communication?
>
> This question has been put to Netscape and Sun officials but there is
> no response forthcoming.





Re: Netscape 6.01 terminally flawed

2001-05-09 Thread Alex

Mark A Gregory wrote:

> It has been posted that Netscape 6.01 is not Java compatible and
> prevents signed applets from running.
> 
> Signed applets cannot communicate with Javascript on web pages.
> 
> Netscape has released a product that breaks most applets being used
> today and prevents customers from supporting netscape on their
> websites.
> 
> When does netscape plan to release a 6.xx version that is not broken
> but supports Java and java applet to javascript communication?
> 
> This question has been put to Netscape and Sun officials but there is
> no response forthcoming.

This is a newsgroup for the Mozilla Open Source Project, not a Netscape.

Indirectly, Mozilla is the basis of Netscape 6, and has been improving 
since the release of Netscape 6.0. When will Netscape release a newer 
version of 6.xx based on much more recent and advance Mozilla builds? 
Well that's for Netscape to decide, and Mozilla is still moving along to 
reach 1.0 later this year.

-- 
Alex<:3)~~
http://www.gerbilbox.com/newzilla/





TID: Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-23 Thread Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.


ravi narayan wrote:
> 
> Duke Ellington wrote:
> 
> >
> > People with C.B.Es etc don't go around all the time with those initials
> > attached to their names when write letters to people, so why do you attach
> > C.E.T (a thing that is of far less worth than "C.B.E"s etc) when all that
> > people want to see is your actual name or a nom de plume?
> >
> 
> not that any of this is even remotely germane to the list/newsgroup, but
> having seen this thread refuse to die, i have a question: what is so
> much more worthy about a "CBE" than a "CET"? seems like the latter
> (which seems to be some sort of certification?) is awarded based on some
> objective criteria (testing?) and the former is an arbitrary recognition
> by an outdated authority.
> 
> --ravi
> 
> ps: perhaps the "queen" uses some objective criteria also, but perhaps
> if you can adopt the "nom de plume" of "duke ellington" you can humour
> someone else adding some letters to his or her name?
> 
> --
> 
> man is said to be a rational animal. i do not know why he has not been defined
> as an affective or feeling animal. more often i have seen a cat reason than
> laugh or weep. perhaps it weeps or laughs inwardly - but then perhaps, also
> inwardly, the crab resolves equations of the 2nd degree. -- alasdair macintyre.

THREAD IS DEAD!

This "thread is Dead". Please! 

Lets get on to curing the ills of Mozilla / N6, Making it the best Mail
& News Client, and Web Browser in the world bar none.

So we can beat the socks of MicroSoft.

THREAD IS DEAD!
-- 
--
Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street|Who's Who. PHONE:540-632-5045, FAX:540-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112-1809|[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
--

If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!




Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-23 Thread ravi narayan

Duke Ellington wrote:

> 
> People with C.B.Es etc don't go around all the time with those initials 
> attached to their names when write letters to people, so why do you attach 
> C.E.T (a thing that is of far less worth than "C.B.E"s etc) when all that 
> people want to see is your actual name or a nom de plume?
> 

not that any of this is even remotely germane to the list/newsgroup, but
having seen this thread refuse to die, i have a question: what is so
much more worthy about a "CBE" than a "CET"? seems like the latter
(which seems to be some sort of certification?) is awarded based on some
objective criteria (testing?) and the former is an arbitrary recognition
by an outdated authority.

--ravi


ps: perhaps the "queen" uses some objective criteria also, but perhaps
if you can adopt the "nom de plume" of "duke ellington" you can humour
someone else adding some letters to his or her name?

-- 

man is said to be a rational animal. i do not know why he has not been defined
as an affective or feeling animal. more often i have seen a cat reason than
laugh or weep. perhaps it weeps or laughs inwardly - but then perhaps, also
inwardly, the crab resolves equations of the 2nd degree. -- alasdair macintyre.






Re: TID: Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-22 Thread Garth Wallace

"Duke Ellington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> In netscape.public.mozilla.seamonkey the people heard Robert Ennis say
> these wise words:
>
> >...and I spoke to a PHD today who calls himself Dr. So you're right.
>
> A person who holds a PhD IS a Doctor.

Doctor of Philosophy. Yes.






Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-22 Thread Gervase Markham

> No - IMHO, it makes you look like a social-climbing poser prat!

_Please_ can we take the personal abuse elsewhere? We don't care if
Phillip calls himself Santa Claus as long as he keeps contributing as he
has been.

Gerv




Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-15 Thread Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.


Garth Wallace wrote:
> 
> "Robert Ennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >
> > And as far as Mr. CET is concerned, he can call himself whatever he
> > wants, but if you think CET is anything close to Duke Ellington, then we
> > really do have something to quarrel about. I know what CET is and I know
> > plenty of CET's, and let me tell you something, there isn't a Duke among
> > them.
> 
> Okay, am I missing something? I thought that "Duke
> Ellington" was just showing his love of jazz. What
> does his pseudonym have to do with CET?

Nothing.

The thread which I thought using TID: at my last post indicated the
Thread is Dead (or Deteriorating)
 had gone from the subject at hand to a discussion on the CET
designation after my name. Some of the threads were tongue in cheek some
was serious.

Evidently to some My using the designation after my Name infuriates some?
-- 
--
Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street|Who's Who. PHONE:540-632-5045, FAX:540-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112-1809|[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
--

If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!




Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-15 Thread Garth Wallace

"Robert Ennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> And as far as Mr. CET is concerned, he can call himself whatever he
> wants, but if you think CET is anything close to Duke Ellington, then we
> really do have something to quarrel about. I know what CET is and I know
> plenty of CET's, and let me tell you something, there isn't a Duke among
> them.

Okay, am I missing something? I thought that "Duke
Ellington" was just showing his love of jazz. What
does his pseudonym have to do with CET?






Re: netscape-6.01

2001-02-15 Thread Ian Davey

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, AhmetAA 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>N6.5 is quite pesimistic.. 6.1 or 6.2 could be ok.. But 6.01 is yes, unusable.

>From what I've heard it sounds like 6.5 will be the next release. If it does 
turn out to be 6.1, then I'd recommend that one (or whatever version of NS 
that coincides with Mozilla 1.0).

>But beware, if your Computer does not have 64M or more RAM (64 is acceptable
> but more
>is better) or if you have very slow CPU (like slower than 266-300Mhz) Mozilla
> or N6
>might be quite painful, at least for now.

I've run it on my P2 NT4 233Mhz machine with 64MB and it works fine, easily 
fast enough once you've got it running. I don't run the Java plugin though.

ian.



 \ /
(@_@)  http://www.eclipse.co.uk/sweetdespise/ (dark literature)
/(&)\  http://www.eclipse.co.uk/sweetdespise/libertycaptions/ (art)
 | |




Re: netscape-6.01

2001-02-14 Thread Daniel Veditz

Tim Larson wrote:
> 
> Does anyone know where one could find a change log online, to see
> exactly what was fixed?

bonsai.mozilla.org will show exactly what was checked into the tree for any
slice of time you'd like.

6.01 was based on the branch tag Netscape_2922_BRANCH, and you'd want
everything checked in after 6.0 shipped (11/8/2000)

-Dan Veditz




Re: netscape-6.01

2001-02-14 Thread Tim Larson

Does anyone know where one could find a change log online, to see
exactly what was fixed?

-- 
Tim Larson  -  web programming guru
Red 5 Interactive, Inc.  -  www.r5i.com
4549 Fleur Dr.  Des Moines, IA  50321




Re: TID: Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-14 Thread Robert Ennis

...and I spoke to a PHD today who calls himself Dr. So you're right.

Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:

> Dear Robert:
> 
> Let's either get back to the real thread at hand or kill the thread.
> 
> I know I am not a Duke (Ellington, Of Earl or otherwise). My postings
> about the subject of CET was to enlighten people and to dispute the
> implication that people that are CET's have intelligence of little
> better than a turnip. (Whether said or implied.)
> 
> It's just a habit I've gotten into and is part of my signature line and
> or my email address. It nothing to get bent out of shape over. BTW: I
> have run into people that do use ME and EE after their names.
> 
> Robert Ennis wrote:
> 
>> Dear Cand. wirtsch. ing. Sebastian Späth:
>> 
>> Well now that you got that off your chest, how are you? And what do you
>> know about "such guys like me"? Such guys like me? How do you know what
>> such a guy like me is anyhow? How do you know who you're talking to?
>> "Childish ranting"? Give me a break. I'm sick of you Newsgroup Police
>> with authoritarian personalities (where does that come from??) -
>> individuals who think it's their responsibility to scold people saying
>> things they somehow find offensive to the NG. Please forgive me. Sir.
>> 
>> I say this with the greatest respect, Cand. wirtsch. ing. Sebastian
>> Späth, since I would never accuse you of ranting childishly, even if
>> what you said was insightful and intelligent, and who knows, someday it
>> might be.
>> 
>> And as far as Mr. CET is concerned, he can call himself whatever he
>> wants, but if you think CET is anything close to Duke Ellington, then we
>> really do have something to quarrel about. I know what CET is and I know
>> plenty of CET's, and let me tell you something, there isn't a Duke among
>> them.
>> 
>> Do you follow me Cand. wirtsch. ing. Sebastian Späth?
>> 
>> Cand. wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Tue, 13 Feb 2001 07:00:52 -0500, Robert Ennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
 I mean, with due respect all around, I operate in a world of eBiz and IT
 and there are so many "certified" techs of all description running
 around that it's a joke. None of them, I might add, adds the title to
 his/her name. Certification is not like a PHD. It's about learning what
 you can from a few books and taking a test. I know this because I'm
 involved in the process. There is no social or academic status attached
 to it.
 
 But the guy uses a middle initial too. So it kind of adds up doesn't it?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I usually am really patient with such guys like you, but I have to say
>>> that *you* really added up a lot shit too. I am damn close to find out
>>> how kill files work and I never had to use that feature before.
>>> 
>>> It is not that I don't have a sense of humour but your childish
>>> ranting in several NGs is really annoying.
>>> And if people want to use four middle names I wouldn't care, if that
>>> is what people want to be called.
>>> It seems to be Netiquette here to use your real life names (which is
>>> ok), but what the heck is it your business if people feel their title
>>> belongs to their name? Who are you to judge that, please?
>>> It might be much important to people in other countries, cultures or
>>> another education than yours, ever thought of that?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Sorry, could not resist,
>>> Cand. wirtsch. ing. Sebastian Späth
>> 





Re: netscape-6.01

2001-02-14 Thread Mark Anderson

AhmetAA wrote:
> 
> Hi
> N6.5 is quite pesimistic.. 

Not if you consider that it's probably the next .x release, given
Netscape's marketing




TID: Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-14 Thread Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.

Dear Robert:

Let's either get back to the real thread at hand or kill the thread.

I know I am not a Duke (Ellington, Of Earl or otherwise). My postings
about the subject of CET was to enlighten people and to dispute the
implication that people that are CET's have intelligence of little
better than a turnip. (Whether said or implied.)

It's just a habit I've gotten into and is part of my signature line and
or my email address. It nothing to get bent out of shape over. BTW: I
have run into people that do use ME and EE after their names.

Robert Ennis wrote:
> 
> Dear Cand. wirtsch. ing. Sebastian Späth:
> 
> Well now that you got that off your chest, how are you? And what do you
> know about "such guys like me"? Such guys like me? How do you know what
> such a guy like me is anyhow? How do you know who you're talking to?
> "Childish ranting"? Give me a break. I'm sick of you Newsgroup Police
> with authoritarian personalities (where does that come from??) -
> individuals who think it's their responsibility to scold people saying
> things they somehow find offensive to the NG. Please forgive me. Sir.
> 
> I say this with the greatest respect, Cand. wirtsch. ing. Sebastian
> Späth, since I would never accuse you of ranting childishly, even if
> what you said was insightful and intelligent, and who knows, someday it
> might be.
> 
> And as far as Mr. CET is concerned, he can call himself whatever he
> wants, but if you think CET is anything close to Duke Ellington, then we
> really do have something to quarrel about. I know what CET is and I know
> plenty of CET's, and let me tell you something, there isn't a Duke among
> them.
> 
> Do you follow me Cand. wirtsch. ing. Sebastian Späth?
> 
> Cand. wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 13 Feb 2001 07:00:52 -0500, Robert Ennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I mean, with due respect all around, I operate in a world of eBiz and IT
> >> and there are so many "certified" techs of all description running
> >> around that it's a joke. None of them, I might add, adds the title to
> >> his/her name. Certification is not like a PHD. It's about learning what
> >> you can from a few books and taking a test. I know this because I'm
> >> involved in the process. There is no social or academic status attached
> >> to it.
> >>
> >> But the guy uses a middle initial too. So it kind of adds up doesn't it?
> >
> >
> > I usually am really patient with such guys like you, but I have to say
> > that *you* really added up a lot shit too. I am damn close to find out
> > how kill files work and I never had to use that feature before.
> >
> > It is not that I don't have a sense of humour but your childish
> > ranting in several NGs is really annoying.
> > And if people want to use four middle names I wouldn't care, if that
> > is what people want to be called.
> > It seems to be Netiquette here to use your real life names (which is
> > ok), but what the heck is it your business if people feel their title
> > belongs to their name? Who are you to judge that, please?
> > It might be much important to people in other countries, cultures or
> > another education than yours, ever thought of that?
> >
> >
> > Sorry, could not resist,
> > Cand. wirtsch. ing. Sebastian Späth

-- 
--
Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street|Who's Who. PHONE:540-632-5045, FAX:540-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112-1809|[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
--

If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!




Re: netscape-6.01

2001-02-14 Thread AhmetAA

Hi
N6.5 is quite pesimistic.. 6.1 or 6.2 could be ok.. But 6.01 is yes, unusable. For
Moz 0.8, i agree that it shall replace Netscape 4.x (or N6) easily.. although there
are quite a lot of  known bugs, even nightly builds are much better, comparing to N
4.x or N6 in terms of stability and functionality.
But beware, if your Computer does not have 64M or more RAM (64 is acceptable but more
is better) or if you have very slow CPU (like slower than 266-300Mhz) Mozilla or N6
might be quite painful, at least for now.


Ian Davey wrote:

> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Zsolt Koppany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >a couple of weeks ago I tried netscape-6.0 under Linux. The software was
> >simple unusable. Should I try 6.01? I can hardly imagine that a lot of
> >bugs were fixed in a couple of weeks. Right now I use 4.76 and it is
> >stable.
>
> You should wait for Mozilla 0.8 which should be out very soon (sometime this
> week hopefully) and install that. The recently nightlies have been excellent
> under Linux, and quite a bit faster than Mozilla 0.7. I'd wait until Netscape
> 6.5 before performing an upgrade from NS4.75.
>
> ian.
>
>  \ /
> (@_@)  http://www.eclipse.co.uk/sweetdespise/ (dark literature)
> /(&)\  http://www.eclipse.co.uk/sweetdespise/libertycaptions/ (art)
>  | |





Re: netscape-6.01

2001-02-14 Thread Ian Davey

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Zsolt Koppany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>a couple of weeks ago I tried netscape-6.0 under Linux. The software was
>simple unusable. Should I try 6.01? I can hardly imagine that a lot of
>bugs were fixed in a couple of weeks. Right now I use 4.76 and it is
>stable.

You should wait for Mozilla 0.8 which should be out very soon (sometime this 
week hopefully) and install that. The recently nightlies have been excellent 
under Linux, and quite a bit faster than Mozilla 0.7. I'd wait until Netscape 
6.5 before performing an upgrade from NS4.75.

ian.

 \ /
(@_@)  http://www.eclipse.co.uk/sweetdespise/ (dark literature)
/(&)\  http://www.eclipse.co.uk/sweetdespise/libertycaptions/ (art)
 | |




Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-13 Thread Robert Ennis

Okay, okay. I'm sorry. You deserve the title.

Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:

> Actually in the case of CET's you can't take the Journeyman level test,
> until you have 2 years experience in trade your taking the Test.
> 
> The exam is two part.
> 
> 75 on Basic Electronics (Theory)
> 75 Journeyman level Test (based on knowledge of the field to which you
> work). 
> 
> Some of the Journeyman test are:
> 
> "Consumer Electronics" (Radio/Tv/Stereo/DVD/HDTV)
> 
> "Computer"  (Equivalent to the A+ exam for Computer Technicians)
> 
> "Communications" (It and 25 question Rules exam is equivalent to 2ND
> Class FCC exam which allow work on Two - way Communications equipment)
> 
> "Radar" (taking this test makes it eaier for Radar Technicians to get
> jobs in the Airline industry)
> 
> While you may or may not be impressed with Titles. CET is not to be
> taken lightly.
> 
> On the other hand When I worked as the sole Electronics Technician for a
> 25 - school, school system; I ran into many Phd's that although they had
> plenty of book knowledge; they had the common sense of a turnip.
> 
> I did run into some though that didn't put up pretenses, didn't stick
> their noses in the air, and look down on the masses, and had plenty of
> Common sense.
> 
> Most CET's after they pass the exam use the title after their name, it tradition.
> 
> Robert Ennis wrote:
> 
>> I mean, with due respect all around, I operate in a world of eBiz and IT
>> and there are so many "certified" techs of all description running
>> around that it's a joke. None of them, I might add, adds the title to
>> his/her name. Certification is not like a PHD. It's about learning what
>> you can from a few books and taking a test. I know this because I'm
>> involved in the process. There is no social or academic status attached
>> to it.
>> 
>> But the guy uses a middle initial too. So it kind of adds up doesn't it?
>> 
>> Duke Ellington wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> In netscape.public.mozilla.general the people heard Robert Ennis say
>>> these wise words:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
 I'm much more impressed with your title, Duke. Certified techs are a
 dime a dozen and adding the letters to a name is kind of laughable. But
 a Duke is something else...
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> seeya.
>>> 
>>> The Duke
>> 





Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-13 Thread Robert Ennis

Dear Cand. wirtsch. ing. Sebastian Späth:

Well now that you got that off your chest, how are you? And what do you 
know about "such guys like me"? Such guys like me? How do you know what 
such a guy like me is anyhow? How do you know who you're talking to? 
"Childish ranting"? Give me a break. I'm sick of you Newsgroup Police 
with authoritarian personalities (where does that come from??) - 
individuals who think it's their responsibility to scold people saying 
things they somehow find offensive to the NG. Please forgive me. Sir.

I say this with the greatest respect, Cand. wirtsch. ing. Sebastian 
Späth, since I would never accuse you of ranting childishly, even if 
what you said was insightful and intelligent, and who knows, someday it 
might be.

And as far as Mr. CET is concerned, he can call himself whatever he 
wants, but if you think CET is anything close to Duke Ellington, then we 
really do have something to quarrel about. I know what CET is and I know 
plenty of CET's, and let me tell you something, there isn't a Duke among 
them.

Do you follow me Cand. wirtsch. ing. Sebastian Späth?


Cand. wrote:

> On Tue, 13 Feb 2001 07:00:52 -0500, Robert Ennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> 
> 
>> I mean, with due respect all around, I operate in a world of eBiz and IT 
>> and there are so many "certified" techs of all description running 
>> around that it's a joke. None of them, I might add, adds the title to 
>> his/her name. Certification is not like a PHD. It's about learning what 
>> you can from a few books and taking a test. I know this because I'm 
>> involved in the process. There is no social or academic status attached 
>> to it.
>> 
>> But the guy uses a middle initial too. So it kind of adds up doesn't it?
> 
> 
> I usually am really patient with such guys like you, but I have to say
> that *you* really added up a lot shit too. I am damn close to find out
> how kill files work and I never had to use that feature before.
> 
> It is not that I don't have a sense of humour but your childish
> ranting in several NGs is really annoying.
> And if people want to use four middle names I wouldn't care, if that
> is what people want to be called. 
> It seems to be Netiquette here to use your real life names (which is
> ok), but what the heck is it your business if people feel their title
> belongs to their name? Who are you to judge that, please?
> It might be much important to people in other countries, cultures or
> another education than yours, ever thought of that?
> 
> 
> Sorry, could not resist,
> Cand. wirtsch. ing. Sebastian Späth





Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-13 Thread Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.

Actually in the case of CET's you can't take the Journeyman level test,
until you have 2 years experience in trade your taking the Test.

The exam is two part.

75 on Basic Electronics (Theory)
75 Journeyman level Test (based on knowledge of the field to which you
work). 

Some of the Journeyman test are:

"Consumer Electronics" (Radio/Tv/Stereo/DVD/HDTV)

"Computer"  (Equivalent to the A+ exam for Computer Technicians)

"Communications" (It and 25 question Rules exam is equivalent to 2ND
Class FCC exam which allow work on Two - way Communications equipment)

"Radar" (taking this test makes it eaier for Radar Technicians to get
jobs in the Airline industry)

While you may or may not be impressed with Titles. CET is not to be
taken lightly.

On the other hand When I worked as the sole Electronics Technician for a
25 - school, school system; I ran into many Phd's that although they had
plenty of book knowledge; they had the common sense of a turnip.

I did run into some though that didn't put up pretenses, didn't stick
their noses in the air, and look down on the masses, and had plenty of
Common sense.

Most CET's after they pass the exam use the title after their name, it tradition.

Robert Ennis wrote:
> 
> I mean, with due respect all around, I operate in a world of eBiz and IT
> and there are so many "certified" techs of all description running
> around that it's a joke. None of them, I might add, adds the title to
> his/her name. Certification is not like a PHD. It's about learning what
> you can from a few books and taking a test. I know this because I'm
> involved in the process. There is no social or academic status attached
> to it.
> 
> But the guy uses a middle initial too. So it kind of adds up doesn't it?
> 
> Duke Ellington wrote:
> 
> > In netscape.public.mozilla.general the people heard Robert Ennis say
> > these wise words:
> >
> >
> >> I'm much more impressed with your title, Duke. Certified techs are a
> >> dime a dozen and adding the letters to a name is kind of laughable. But
> >> a Duke is something else...
> >
> >
> > 
> >
> >
> > seeya.
> >
> > The Duke

-- 
--
Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street|Who's Who. PHONE:540-632-5045, FAX:540-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112-1809|[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
--

If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!




RE: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-13 Thread Thomas Mann

My real name is Lord Lucan :-O

-Original Message-
From: Cand.wirtsch.ing.Sebastian.Spä[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Cand.wirtsch.ing.Sebastian.Spä[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 February 2001 15:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake


On Tue, 13 Feb 2001 07:00:52 -0500, Robert Ennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>I mean, with due respect all around, I operate in a world of eBiz and IT 
>and there are so many "certified" techs of all description running 
>around that it's a joke. None of them, I might add, adds the title to 
>his/her name. Certification is not like a PHD. It's about learning what 
>you can from a few books and taking a test. I know this because I'm 
>involved in the process. There is no social or academic status attached 
>to it.
>
>But the guy uses a middle initial too. So it kind of adds up doesn't it?

I usually am really patient with such guys like you, but I have to say
that *you* really added up a lot shit too. I am damn close to find out
how kill files work and I never had to use that feature before.

It is not that I don't have a sense of humour but your childish
ranting in several NGs is really annoying.
And if people want to use four middle names I wouldn't care, if that
is what people want to be called. 
It seems to be Netiquette here to use your real life names (which is
ok), but what the heck is it your business if people feel their title
belongs to their name? Who are you to judge that, please?
It might be much important to people in other countries, cultures or
another education than yours, ever thought of that?


Sorry, could not resist,
Cand. wirtsch. ing. Sebastian Späth



This message has been checked for all known viruses, by Star Internet, 
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. 
For further information visit:
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp


This message has been checked for all known viruses, by Star Internet, 
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. 
For further information visit:
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp




Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-13 Thread Cand . wirtsch . ing . Sebastian . Späth

On Tue, 13 Feb 2001 07:00:52 -0500, Robert Ennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>I mean, with due respect all around, I operate in a world of eBiz and IT 
>and there are so many "certified" techs of all description running 
>around that it's a joke. None of them, I might add, adds the title to 
>his/her name. Certification is not like a PHD. It's about learning what 
>you can from a few books and taking a test. I know this because I'm 
>involved in the process. There is no social or academic status attached 
>to it.
>
>But the guy uses a middle initial too. So it kind of adds up doesn't it?

I usually am really patient with such guys like you, but I have to say
that *you* really added up a lot shit too. I am damn close to find out
how kill files work and I never had to use that feature before.

It is not that I don't have a sense of humour but your childish
ranting in several NGs is really annoying.
And if people want to use four middle names I wouldn't care, if that
is what people want to be called. 
It seems to be Netiquette here to use your real life names (which is
ok), but what the heck is it your business if people feel their title
belongs to their name? Who are you to judge that, please?
It might be much important to people in other countries, cultures or
another education than yours, ever thought of that?


Sorry, could not resist,
Cand. wirtsch. ing. Sebastian Späth




Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-13 Thread Robert Ennis

I mean, with due respect all around, I operate in a world of eBiz and IT 
and there are so many "certified" techs of all description running 
around that it's a joke. None of them, I might add, adds the title to 
his/her name. Certification is not like a PHD. It's about learning what 
you can from a few books and taking a test. I know this because I'm 
involved in the process. There is no social or academic status attached 
to it.

But the guy uses a middle initial too. So it kind of adds up doesn't it?

Duke Ellington wrote:

> In netscape.public.mozilla.general the people heard Robert Ennis say
> these wise words: 
> 
> 
>> I'm much more impressed with your title, Duke. Certified techs are a 
>> dime a dozen and adding the letters to a name is kind of laughable. But 
>> a Duke is something else...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> seeya.
> 
> The Duke





Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-12 Thread Robert Ennis

I'm much more impressed with your title, Duke. Certified techs are a 
dime a dozen and adding the letters to a name is kind of laughable. But 
a Duke is something else...

Duke Ellington wrote:

> In netscape.public.mozilla.seamonkey the people heard Phillip M. Jones,
> C.E.T. say these wise words: 
> 
> 
>> The title is used similar to EE or ME (electrical Engineer or Mechanical
>> Engineer), PhD, Md or so on. I passed an exam and have a right to use
>> the title. I even sign my name on personal checks withe the CET at the
>> end. 
>> 
>> If you have a More impressive title feel free to use it. I'm not trying
>> to impress anyone its just part of my name now.
>> 
>> I had to pass a rather rigorous exam in order to use it.
> 
> 
> But aren't titles that go at the front of one's name of much more worth to 
> the one who holds the title?
> 
> 
> seeya.
> 
> The Duke





Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-11 Thread Steve Bowen

Hi
I've got a broken nightly that does, wish I could
turn it off. Every time that I open the mail program
it opens the default POP3 server and checks for mail.
I can't turn it off.

Darrin wrote:

> On Thu, 08 Feb 2001 20:00:04 -0500, Robert Ennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> 
> 
>> I think I have it automatically checking mail. Go to Mail/News Account 
>> Settings under "Edit" and click on "Server" for any or all of your mail 
>> accounts. In there is an option to check mail with time options.
>> 
> 
> 
> Been there, done that. The option is there. No matter what I set it
> for, it doesn't make a difference. It doesn't check for mail.
> It also doesn't check for mail when start NS6, like Communicator does.


-- 
steve
http://www.skeeter-s.com/svg
SVG examples for Mozilla





Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-10 Thread Robert Ennis

However, I know a lot of MBA's and PHD's who don't entitle themselves, 
and I don't think you should either. We're all simple folks here. As a 
matter of fact, I met an OBE the other day, and he doesn't use it (Order 
Of The British Empire). Come to think of it, Paul McCartney is not only 
an OBE but a Knight of the Garter, and he doesn't call himself Sir Paul, 
or add OBE to his name.

It's really unnecessary, and a trifle pretentious, and compared to an 
OBE, PHD or Knight of the Garter, it ain't much.

Robert Ennis wrote:

> I respect the tile and the credibilty it signifies.
> 
> Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
> 
>> The title is used similar to EE or ME (electrical Engineer or Mechanical
>> Engineer), PhD, Md or so on. I passed an exam and have a right to use
>> the title. I even sign my name on personal checks withe the CET at the
>> end.
>> If you have a More impressive title feel free to use it. I'm not trying
>> to impress anyone its just part of my name now.
>> 
>> I had to pass a rather rigorous exam in order to use it.
>> 
>> Robert Ennis wrote:
>> 
>>> Great. Well I have a more impressive title, and I think I'm going to
>>> start using it. I invite everybody on this forum with more impressive
>>> titles to start using them.
>>> 
>>> With all due respect to certified individuals and people who take this
>>> forum too bloody seriously.
>>> 
>>> Katsuhiko Momoi wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
 Asa Dotzler wrote:
 
 
> Robert Ennis wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> Right! And what the hell is C.E.T.?
> 
> 
> Central European Time?  Not sure.  But personal attacks are not 
> welcome here.
 
 
 
 Probably, Certified Electronics Technician.
 
 - Kat
 
 
 
> --Asa
 
 





Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-10 Thread Robert Ennis

I respect the tile and the credibilty it signifies.

Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:

> The title is used similar to EE or ME (electrical Engineer or Mechanical
> Engineer), PhD, Md or so on. I passed an exam and have a right to use
> the title. I even sign my name on personal checks withe the CET at the
> end. 
> 
> If you have a More impressive title feel free to use it. I'm not trying
> to impress anyone its just part of my name now.
> 
> I had to pass a rather rigorous exam in order to use it.
> 
> Robert Ennis wrote:
> 
>> Great. Well I have a more impressive title, and I think I'm going to
>> start using it. I invite everybody on this forum with more impressive
>> titles to start using them.
>> 
>> With all due respect to certified individuals and people who take this
>> forum too bloody seriously.
>> 
>> Katsuhiko Momoi wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> Asa Dotzler wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
 Robert Ennis wrote:
 
 
 
> Right! And what the hell is C.E.T.?
 
 Central European Time?  Not sure.  But personal attacks are not welcome here.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Probably, Certified Electronics Technician.
>>> 
>>> - Kat
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
 --Asa
>>> 





Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-10 Thread Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.

The title is used similar to EE or ME (electrical Engineer or Mechanical
Engineer), PhD, Md or so on. I passed an exam and have a right to use
the title. I even sign my name on personal checks withe the CET at the
end. 

If you have a More impressive title feel free to use it. I'm not trying
to impress anyone its just part of my name now.

I had to pass a rather rigorous exam in order to use it.

Robert Ennis wrote:
> 
> Great. Well I have a more impressive title, and I think I'm going to
> start using it. I invite everybody on this forum with more impressive
> titles to start using them.
> 
> With all due respect to certified individuals and people who take this
> forum too bloody seriously.
> 
> Katsuhiko Momoi wrote:
> 
> > Asa Dotzler wrote:
> >
> >> Robert Ennis wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Right! And what the hell is C.E.T.?
> >>
> >> Central European Time?  Not sure.  But personal attacks are not welcome here.
> >
> >
> > Probably, Certified Electronics Technician.
> >
> > - Kat
> >
> >
> >> --Asa

-- 
--
Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street|Who's Who. PHONE:540-632-5045, FAX:540-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112-1809|[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
--

If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!




Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-10 Thread Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.

Asa

Thanks for the support even if i don't get wording or Phrasing right.

btw:

C.E.T. = Certified Electronics Technician
ISCET = International Society of Certified Electronics Technicians
NESDA = National Electronics Service Dealers Association
ETA = Electronics Technicians Association - International
VPEA = Virginia professional Electronics Association

Asa Dotzler wrote:
> 
> Robert Ennis wrote:
> 
> > Right! And what the hell is C.E.T.?
> 
> Central European Time?  Not sure.  But personal attacks are not welcome here.
> 
> --Asa

-- 
--
Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street|Who's Who. PHONE:540-632-5045, FAX:540-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112-1809|[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
--

If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!




Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-10 Thread Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.

Certified Electronics Technician

Robert Ennis wrote:
> 
> Right! And what the hell is C.E.T.? I mean, I'll bet a lot of us have
> titles we could use
> 
> Asa Dotzler wrote:
> 
> > Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
> >
> >
> > 
> >
> >> In Mozilla to hide read messages only works if its set to all in
> >> messages unread in sort no other combination works.  This even includes
> >> build 10:10020208 which is last monday's nightly (or latest)
> >
> >
> > There you go again.  Please consider using statements which begin with
> > "In my experience ..." or "I have been unable to ..." rather than
> > "In Mozilla you can't ..." or "In Mozilla ... it does not work".  I'm not
> > disagreeing with you that there are many areas that have functionality
> > which is not as strong as other products but I am bothered that you
> > continue to state your experiences with Mozilla as if they are the rule and
> > the experiences of everyone else.  Mozilla is designed and built to be
> > cross platform and so it has many problems that affect everyone.  It also
> > has problems which only seem to affect specific platforms or configurations.
> > When you state (as if it was fact and equally applicable to everyone) that
> > something does not work in Mozilla you are doing a disservice to the effort
> > to improve the product by clouding the issues and confusing the boundaries
> > of problems.
> > --Asa

-- 
--
Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street|Who's Who. PHONE:540-632-5045, FAX:540-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112-1809|[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
--

If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!




Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-10 Thread Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.

Okay In My Experience on Mac Platform. Could possibly affect PC Platform.

Asa Dotzler wrote:
> 
> Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > In Mozilla to hide read messages only works if its set to all in
> > messages unread in sort no other combination works.  This even includes
> > build 10:10020208 which is last monday's nightly (or latest)
> 
> There you go again.  Please consider using statements which begin with
> "In my experience ..." or "I have been unable to ..." rather than
> "In Mozilla you can't ..." or "In Mozilla ... it does not work".  I'm not
> disagreeing with you that there are many areas that have functionality
> which is not as strong as other products but I am bothered that you
> continue to state your experiences with Mozilla as if they are the rule and
> the experiences of everyone else.  Mozilla is designed and built to be
> cross platform and so it has many problems that affect everyone.  It also
> has problems which only seem to affect specific platforms or configurations.
> When you state (as if it was fact and equally applicable to everyone) that
> something does not work in Mozilla you are doing a disservice to the effort
> to improve the product by clouding the issues and confusing the boundaries
> of problems.
> 
> --Asa

-- 
--
Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street|Who's Who. PHONE:540-632-5045, FAX:540-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112-1809|[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
--

If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!




Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-10 Thread Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.


Chris Hill wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 09 Feb 2001 17:58:11 -0500, "Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T."
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Communicator has the best email newsgroup handling of any system on the
> >Market Bar none. Whoever designed its layout and message hadling should
> >have a Nobel Proze for science.
> 
> If Communicator is the best mail program or newsreader you've ever
> used, you should really try more programs.
> 
> Chris Hill
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I've tried OE, Eudora, and one of the NewsWatcher programs for news
(been a while so I can't remembert whether it was Ya- or MT- Newswatcher.

-- 
--
Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street|Who's Who. PHONE:540-632-5045, FAX:540-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112-1809|[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
--

If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!




Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-10 Thread Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.

Mozilla and Netscape6 are works  in progress and  currently shouldn't be
recommend as your day to day news reader or Web browser There is more
work to be done.

My appologies if my Phrasing is wrong.

Robert Ennis wrote:
> 
> I'm not "flipping off" anybody. I'm trying to make a person's life
> easier, rather than complicate it further, which is your approach. If
> somebody gets satisfaction from one product and not another, simple
> common sense suggests that he use the one giving him what he needs.
> 
> "Don't flip off"..right.
> 
> Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
> 
> >
> > Robert Ennis wrote:
> >
> >> So use Communicator...
> >>
> >> Darrin wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Thu, 08 Feb 2001 20:00:04 -0500, Robert Ennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
>  I think I have it automatically checking mail. Go to Mail/News Account
>  Settings under "Edit" and click on "Server" for any or all of your mail
>  accounts. In there is an option to check mail with time options.
> 
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Been there, done that. The option is there. No matter what I set it
> >>> for, it doesn't make a difference. It doesn't check for mail.
> >>> It also doesn't check for mail when start NS6, like Communicator does.
> >>
> >
> > Don't flip off someone because a feature doesn't work by saying then use
> > Communicator. Mozilla/N6 is supposed to replace Communicator
> > unfortunately although some webpages render better, Mail and News still
> > doesn't hold a candle  to Communicator. Until someone opens Communicator
> > and use the email Client and sees how its "supposed" to work. no one
> > here will get it.
> >
> > Communicator has the best email newsgroup handling of any system on the
> > Market Bar none. Whoever designed its layout and message hadling should
> > have a Nobel Proze for science.
> >
> > another problem that Mozilla/N6 has is:
> >
> > Hiding of read messages (on Mozilla or N6) is "still" handled improperly.
> >
> > In communicator all read messages can be hidden if View > Sort > is set
> > for "Threaded" and  View > messages > "unread" are set. All read
> > messages are hidden as soon as as you go to another folder or newsgroup
> > and do not return until you change from unread to all.
> >
> > In Mozilla to hide read messages only works if its set to all in
> > messages unread in sort no other combination works.  This even includes
> > build 10:10020208 which is last monday's nightly (or latest)

-- 
--
Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street|Who's Who. PHONE:540-632-5045, FAX:540-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112-1809|[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
--

If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!




Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-10 Thread Robert Ennis

Great. Well I have a more impressive title, and I think I'm going to 
start using it. I invite everybody on this forum with more impressive 
titles to start using them.

With all due respect to certified individuals and people who take this 
forum too bloody seriously.

Katsuhiko Momoi wrote:

> Asa Dotzler wrote:
> 
>> Robert Ennis wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> Right! And what the hell is C.E.T.?
>> 
>> Central European Time?  Not sure.  But personal attacks are not welcome here.
> 
> 
> Probably, Certified Electronics Technician.
> 
> - Kat
> 
> 
>> --Asa





Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-10 Thread Robert Ennis

Listen. This is not a personal attack and stop policing this forum. A 
little humour might help some of you.

Asa Dotzler wrote:

> Robert Ennis wrote:
> 
>> Right! And what the hell is C.E.T.?
> 
> 
> Central European Time?  Not sure.  But personal attacks are not welcome 
> here.
> 
> --Asa





Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-09 Thread Katsuhiko Momoi

Asa Dotzler wrote:
> 
> Robert Ennis wrote:
> 
> > Right! And what the hell is C.E.T.?
> 
> Central European Time?  Not sure.  But personal attacks are not welcome here.

Probably, Certified Electronics Technician.

- Kat

> 
> --Asa

-- 
Katsuhiko Momoi
Web standards/Embedding/Evangelism
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-09 Thread Asa Dotzler

Robert Ennis wrote:

> Right! And what the hell is C.E.T.?

Central European Time?  Not sure.  But personal attacks are not welcome here.

--Asa





Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-09 Thread Robert Ennis

Right! And what the hell is C.E.T.? I mean, I'll bet a lot of us have 
titles we could use

Asa Dotzler wrote:

> Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> In Mozilla to hide read messages only works if its set to all in
>> messages unread in sort no other combination works.  This even includes
>> build 10:10020208 which is last monday's nightly (or latest)
> 
> 
> There you go again.  Please consider using statements which begin with
> "In my experience ..." or "I have been unable to ..." rather than
> "In Mozilla you can't ..." or "In Mozilla ... it does not work".  I'm not
> disagreeing with you that there are many areas that have functionality 
> which is not as strong as other products but I am bothered that you 
> continue to state your experiences with Mozilla as if they are the rule and
> the experiences of everyone else.  Mozilla is designed and built to be 
> cross platform and so it has many problems that affect everyone.  It also
> has problems which only seem to affect specific platforms or configurations.
> When you state (as if it was fact and equally applicable to everyone) that
> something does not work in Mozilla you are doing a disservice to the effort
> to improve the product by clouding the issues and confusing the boundaries
> of problems. 
> --Asa





Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-09 Thread Asa Dotzler

Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:




> In Mozilla to hide read messages only works if its set to all in
> messages unread in sort no other combination works.  This even includes
> build 10:10020208 which is last monday's nightly (or latest)

There you go again.  Please consider using statements which begin with
"In my experience ..." or "I have been unable to ..." rather than
"In Mozilla you can't ..." or "In Mozilla ... it does not work".  I'm not
disagreeing with you that there are many areas that have functionality 
which is not as strong as other products but I am bothered that you 
continue to state your experiences with Mozilla as if they are the rule and
the experiences of everyone else.  Mozilla is designed and built to be 
cross platform and so it has many problems that affect everyone.  It also
has problems which only seem to affect specific platforms or configurations.
When you state (as if it was fact and equally applicable to everyone) that
something does not work in Mozilla you are doing a disservice to the effort
to improve the product by clouding the issues and confusing the boundaries
of problems.  

--Asa






Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-09 Thread Chris Hill

On Fri, 09 Feb 2001 17:58:11 -0500, "Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Communicator has the best email newsgroup handling of any system on the
>Market Bar none. Whoever designed its layout and message hadling should
>have a Nobel Proze for science.

If Communicator is the best mail program or newsreader you've ever
used, you should really try more programs.

Chris Hill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-09 Thread Robert Ennis

I'm not "flipping off" anybody. I'm trying to make a person's life 
easier, rather than complicate it further, which is your approach. If 
somebody gets satisfaction from one product and not another, simple 
common sense suggests that he use the one giving him what he needs.

"Don't flip off"..right.

Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:

> 
> Robert Ennis wrote:
> 
>> So use Communicator...
>> 
>> Darrin wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Thu, 08 Feb 2001 20:00:04 -0500, Robert Ennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
 I think I have it automatically checking mail. Go to Mail/News Account
 Settings under "Edit" and click on "Server" for any or all of your mail
 accounts. In there is an option to check mail with time options.
 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Been there, done that. The option is there. No matter what I set it
>>> for, it doesn't make a difference. It doesn't check for mail.
>>> It also doesn't check for mail when start NS6, like Communicator does.
>> 
> 
> Don't flip off someone because a feature doesn't work by saying then use
> Communicator. Mozilla/N6 is supposed to replace Communicator
> unfortunately although some webpages render better, Mail and News still
> doesn't hold a candle  to Communicator. Until someone opens Communicator
> and use the email Client and sees how its "supposed" to work. no one
> here will get it.
> 
> Communicator has the best email newsgroup handling of any system on the
> Market Bar none. Whoever designed its layout and message hadling should
> have a Nobel Proze for science.
> 
> another problem that Mozilla/N6 has is:
> 
> Hiding of read messages (on Mozilla or N6) is "still" handled improperly.
> 
> In communicator all read messages can be hidden if View > Sort > is set
> for "Threaded" and  View > messages > "unread" are set. All read
> messages are hidden as soon as as you go to another folder or newsgroup
> and do not return until you change from unread to all.
> 
> In Mozilla to hide read messages only works if its set to all in
> messages unread in sort no other combination works.  This even includes
> build 10:10020208 which is last monday's nightly (or latest)





Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-09 Thread Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.


Robert Ennis wrote:
> 
> So use Communicator...
> 
> Darrin wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 08 Feb 2001 20:00:04 -0500, Robert Ennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I think I have it automatically checking mail. Go to Mail/News Account
> >> Settings under "Edit" and click on "Server" for any or all of your mail
> >> accounts. In there is an option to check mail with time options.
> >>
> >
> >
> > Been there, done that. The option is there. No matter what I set it
> > for, it doesn't make a difference. It doesn't check for mail.
> > It also doesn't check for mail when start NS6, like Communicator does.

Don't flip off someone because a feature doesn't work by saying then use
Communicator. Mozilla/N6 is supposed to replace Communicator
unfortunately although some webpages render better, Mail and News still
doesn't hold a candle  to Communicator. Until someone opens Communicator
and use the email Client and sees how its "supposed" to work. no one
here will get it.

Communicator has the best email newsgroup handling of any system on the
Market Bar none. Whoever designed its layout and message hadling should
have a Nobel Proze for science.

another problem that Mozilla/N6 has is:

Hiding of read messages (on Mozilla or N6) is "still" handled improperly.

In communicator all read messages can be hidden if View > Sort > is set
for "Threaded" and  View > messages > "unread" are set. All read
messages are hidden as soon as as you go to another folder or newsgroup
and do not return until you change from unread to all.

In Mozilla to hide read messages only works if its set to all in
messages unread in sort no other combination works.  This even includes
build 10:10020208 which is last monday's nightly (or latest)
-- 
--
Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street|Who's Who. PHONE:540-632-5045, FAX:540-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112-1809|[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
--

If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!




Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-08 Thread Robert Ennis

Boy, are you strict!

Daniel Veditz wrote:

> Darrin wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, 08 Feb 2001 20:00:04 -0500, Robert Ennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> I think I have it automatically checking mail. Go to Mail/News Account
>>> Settings under "Edit" and click on "Server" for any or all of your mail
>>> accounts. In there is an option to check mail with time options.
>>> 
>> 
>> Been there, done that. The option is there. No matter what I set it
>> for, it doesn't make a difference. It doesn't check for mail.
>> It also doesn't check for mail when start NS6, like Communicator does.
> 
> 
> The mozilla groups are dedicated to the development of the Mozilla open
> source browser. That feature is working in current Mozilla builds, while
> Netscape 6 (even 6.01) is based on an extremely old Mozilla version.
> Comments based on Netscape 6 are generally quite inappropriate here unless
> you've reproduced the problem in a recent Mozilla build.
> 
> For netscape support see http://www.ufaq.org for lots of good links.
> 
> -Dan Veditz





Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-08 Thread Robert Ennis

So use Communicator...

Darrin wrote:

> On Thu, 08 Feb 2001 20:00:04 -0500, Robert Ennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> 
> 
>> I think I have it automatically checking mail. Go to Mail/News Account 
>> Settings under "Edit" and click on "Server" for any or all of your mail 
>> accounts. In there is an option to check mail with time options.
>> 
> 
> 
> Been there, done that. The option is there. No matter what I set it
> for, it doesn't make a difference. It doesn't check for mail.
> It also doesn't check for mail when start NS6, like Communicator does.





Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-08 Thread Daniel Veditz

Darrin wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 08 Feb 2001 20:00:04 -0500, Robert Ennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> 
> >I think I have it automatically checking mail. Go to Mail/News Account
> >Settings under "Edit" and click on "Server" for any or all of your mail
> >accounts. In there is an option to check mail with time options.
> >
> 
> Been there, done that. The option is there. No matter what I set it
> for, it doesn't make a difference. It doesn't check for mail.
> It also doesn't check for mail when start NS6, like Communicator does.

The mozilla groups are dedicated to the development of the Mozilla open
source browser. That feature is working in current Mozilla builds, while
Netscape 6 (even 6.01) is based on an extremely old Mozilla version.
Comments based on Netscape 6 are generally quite inappropriate here unless
you've reproduced the problem in a recent Mozilla build.

For netscape support see http://www.ufaq.org for lots of good links.

-Dan Veditz




Re: Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake

2001-02-08 Thread Robert Ennis

All I can say so far is that it's a much better build. Let's see...

Gervase Markham wrote:

> Given the evidence before my eyes at:
> 
> ftp://ftp.netscape.com/pub/netscape6/english/6.01/
> 
> I have no option but to declare Jerry Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> the
> winner of the Netscape 6.01 Sweepstake, with a guess of 2001-01-15, which
> is only off by a couple of weeks. Most people, Netscape entrants included,
> thought it would be far sooner than this, and only two people (barring
> Sebastian Spaeth's 2002-12-31 entry) thought it would be later...
> 
> Congratulations to Jerry. He wins bragging rights.
> 
> Let's just hope www.netscape.com is now giving people this build!
> 
> Gerv