mysql slave replication with master-retry-count

2008-09-09 Thread Frederic Belleudy

hello, I would like to set that option in mysql 5.0.45 on my slave server:
|master-retry-count=800

my slave status:
Slave_IO_State: Queueing master event to the relay log
   Master_Host: xx.xx.xx.xx
   Master_User: fmRepl
   Master_Port: 3306
 Connect_Retry: 60
   Master_Log_File: mysql-bin.000132
   Read_Master_Log_Pos: 353589900
Relay_Log_File: relay-bin.34
 Relay_Log_Pos: 26881417
 Relay_Master_Log_File: mysql-bin.000154
  Slave_IO_Running: Yes
 Slave_SQL_Running: No
   Replicate_Do_DB:
   Replicate_Ignore_DB:
Replicate_Do_Table:
Replicate_Ignore_Table:
   Replicate_Wild_Do_Table:
Replicate_Wild_Ignore_Table:
Last_Errno: 0
Last_Error:
  Skip_Counter: 0
   Exec_Master_Log_Pos: 474572276
   Relay_Log_Space: 21673882767
   Until_Condition: None
Until_Log_File:
 Until_Log_Pos: 0
Master_SSL_Allowed: No
Master_SSL_CA_File:
Master_SSL_CA_Path:
   Master_SSL_Cert:
 Master_SSL_Cipher:
Master_SSL_Key:
 Seconds_Behind_Master: NULL

Yes I know the SQL_THREAD is off but this is because of a script that 
keeps a reasonable delay.

Anyway, so I put those options in my.cnf :
master-connect-retry=30
master-retry-count=500

I stoped the slave then deleted the master.info file
connect-retry is working fine when I do a :
show slave status \G;

but master-retry-count doesn't show up. I tried to get the info with:
show variables;

No success... is there a way to be sure that the value is set properly.
Let me know!
Tks
|

--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



MySQL 5.0.27 replication problems

2007-09-28 Thread Andrew Braithwaite
Hi,

I keep getting the below in the error log.  I can't see any problems (no
other errors and replication is working) and the master DB is available
the whole time. 
 
070928 12:07:31 [Note] Slave: received end packet from server, apparent
master shutdown:
070928 12:07:31 [Note] Slave I/O thread: Failed reading log event,
reconnecting to retry, log 'mysql-bin.000346' position 69110563
070928 12:07:32 [Note] Slave: connected to master 'username@ip
address:3306',replication resumed in log 'mysql-bin.000346' at position
69110563
070928 12:07:32 [Note] Slave: received end packet from server, apparent
master shutdown:
070928 12:07:32 [Note] Slave I/O thread: Failed reading log event,
reconnecting to retry, log 'mysql-bin.000346' position 69110563
070928 12:07:32 [Note] Slave: connected to master 'username@ip
address:3306',replication resumed in log 'mysql-bin.000346' at position
69110563

Any ideas what is wrong?

Cheers,

Andrew

Sql, query


LOVEFiLM International Limited is a company registered in England and Wales. 
Registered Number: 04392195. Registered Office: No.9, 6 Portal Way, London W3 
6RU, United Kingdom. 

This e-mail is confidential to the ordinary user of the e-mail address to which 
it was addressed. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your 
system and notify the sender immediately.

This message has been scanned for viruses by BlackSpider MailControl - 
www.blackspider.com

--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MYSQL data replication

2007-06-09 Thread Baron Schwartz
I don't run any master with that many slaves, for reasons that are irrelevant to 
this thread, but I know there is a point at which the slaves begin to place too 
much load on the master because they are all asking to read the binlog.  I don't 
know what that point is exactly, but perhaps others can give some advice on 
that.  I would expect, given the workload you describe, that 50 slaves might 
work okay -- but you should not listen to me.


However, you can do multi-tier replication.  Let's imagine the limit is ten 
slaves, just for a round number.  You can chain ten slaves off the master, 
configure them with log-slave-updates, and then chain ten more slaves off each 
of them.  Now you can scale the system to 110 slaves with two tiers.


Baron

sol beach wrote:

Can 1 Master scale to replicate to 50 - 60 slaves?
I have limit experience with Master/Slave replication  doubt I can 
round up

the hardware to test a 50 node configuration.


On 6/8/07, Baron Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi sol,

sol beach wrote:
 I have limited experience with MYSQL replication; which is why I am
hoping
 others with more experience can answer a question or two.
 Let's say I have a MASTER MYSQL database.
 Let's say there are 50 - 60 other systems where I'd like to have MYSQL
 running on these slave systems.
 These slave systems need to be kept in synch with the Master, but it
does
 NOT need to be anywhere near real time.
 The data in the slaves could lag as much a an hour or two.
 The amount of data in total in the MASTER is in the range of 100MB -
250MB
 The rate of changes to the data is in the range 2000 - 5000 DML per 24
hour
 day.
 We control the application so we can/will include date/time each record
is
 created or modified.
 You can assume that no records ever get physically deleted; only INSERT

 UPDATE (no DELETE).

 What are some alternative ways to keep the slave systems current?

The best, easiest, simplest way to do this is just to use MySQL's 
built-in

replication.
Once you learn its (many) strengths and (relatively few) weaknesses, it
works
extremely well.

If you want to avoid some of the gotchas, I have written about my
experiences here:

http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/01/20/how-to-make-mysql-replication-reliable/ 



Hand-rolling replication is a bad idea in my opinion, so I don't have any
alternative
methods to suggest.  However, if you just need to sync some data
efficiently, try MySQL
Table Sync (http://mysqltoolkit.sourceforge.net/).

Cheers
Baron





--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MYSQL data replication

2007-06-08 Thread Jimmy Guerrero

Hello,

Hmmm, I just reread your post and noticed the requirement of 50-60 
slaves hanging off a single master. DRBD would NOT be the right solution 
here.


-- Jimmy

Jimmy Guerrero wrote:

Hello,

Although you state that there is no requirement for near real time 
synchronization, an alternative might be to look into DRBD. Which if you 
are not familiar with, is block-level replication.


See: http://www.mysql.com/products/enterprise/drbd.html

Combining DRBD with Linux Heartbeat also gives you failover capabilities.

Mohd posted a blog on his experience yesterday.

See: http://blog.irwan.name/?p=118

Jimmy Guerrero
Sr Product Manager
MySQL, Inc
Houston, TX

sol beach wrote:
I have limited experience with MYSQL replication; which is why I am 
hoping

others with more experience can answer a question or two.
Let's say I have a MASTER MYSQL database.
Let's say there are 50 - 60 other systems where I'd like to have MYSQL
running on these slave systems.
These slave systems need to be kept in synch with the Master, but it does
NOT need to be anywhere near real time.
The data in the slaves could lag as much a an hour or two.
The amount of data in total in the MASTER is in the range of 100MB - 
250MB
The rate of changes to the data is in the range 2000 - 5000 DML per 24 
hour

day.
We control the application so we can/will include date/time each 
record is

created or modified.
You can assume that no records ever get physically deleted; only INSERT 
UPDATE (no DELETE).

What are some alternative ways to keep the slave systems current?

TIA  HAND!





--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MYSQL data replication

2007-06-08 Thread Jimmy Guerrero

Hello,

Although you state that there is no requirement for near real time 
synchronization, an alternative might be to look into DRBD. Which if you 
are not familiar with, is block-level replication.


See: http://www.mysql.com/products/enterprise/drbd.html

Combining DRBD with Linux Heartbeat also gives you failover capabilities.

Mohd posted a blog on his experience yesterday.

See: http://blog.irwan.name/?p=118

Jimmy Guerrero
Sr Product Manager
MySQL, Inc
Houston, TX

sol beach wrote:

I have limited experience with MYSQL replication; which is why I am hoping
others with more experience can answer a question or two.
Let's say I have a MASTER MYSQL database.
Let's say there are 50 - 60 other systems where I'd like to have MYSQL
running on these slave systems.
These slave systems need to be kept in synch with the Master, but it does
NOT need to be anywhere near real time.
The data in the slaves could lag as much a an hour or two.
The amount of data in total in the MASTER is in the range of 100MB - 250MB
The rate of changes to the data is in the range 2000 - 5000 DML per 24 hour
day.
We control the application so we can/will include date/time each record is
created or modified.
You can assume that no records ever get physically deleted; only INSERT 
UPDATE (no DELETE).

What are some alternative ways to keep the slave systems current?

TIA  HAND!



--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MYSQL data replication

2007-06-08 Thread Baron Schwartz

Hi sol,

sol beach wrote:

I have limited experience with MYSQL replication; which is why I am hoping
others with more experience can answer a question or two.
Let's say I have a MASTER MYSQL database.
Let's say there are 50 - 60 other systems where I'd like to have MYSQL
running on these slave systems.
These slave systems need to be kept in synch with the Master, but it does
NOT need to be anywhere near real time.
The data in the slaves could lag as much a an hour or two.
The amount of data in total in the MASTER is in the range of 100MB - 250MB
The rate of changes to the data is in the range 2000 - 5000 DML per 24 hour
day.
We control the application so we can/will include date/time each record is
created or modified.
You can assume that no records ever get physically deleted; only INSERT 
UPDATE (no DELETE).

What are some alternative ways to keep the slave systems current?


The best, easiest, simplest way to do this is just to use MySQL's built-in replication. 
 Once you learn its (many) strengths and (relatively few) weaknesses, it works 
extremely well.


If you want to avoid some of the gotchas, I have written about my experiences 
here:
http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/01/20/how-to-make-mysql-replication-reliable/

Hand-rolling replication is a bad idea in my opinion, so I don't have any alternative 
methods to suggest.  However, if you just need to sync some data efficiently, try MySQL 
Table Sync (http://mysqltoolkit.sourceforge.net/).


Cheers
Baron

--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



MYSQL data replication

2007-06-07 Thread sol beach

I have limited experience with MYSQL replication; which is why I am hoping
others with more experience can answer a question or two.
Let's say I have a MASTER MYSQL database.
Let's say there are 50 - 60 other systems where I'd like to have MYSQL
running on these slave systems.
These slave systems need to be kept in synch with the Master, but it does
NOT need to be anywhere near real time.
The data in the slaves could lag as much a an hour or two.
The amount of data in total in the MASTER is in the range of 100MB - 250MB
The rate of changes to the data is in the range 2000 - 5000 DML per 24 hour
day.
We control the application so we can/will include date/time each record is
created or modified.
You can assume that no records ever get physically deleted; only INSERT 
UPDATE (no DELETE).

What are some alternative ways to keep the slave systems current?

TIA  HAND!


MySQL docs: Replication Chapter Revamped

2007-02-13 Thread Stefan Hinz
Replication Chapter Revamped

We have completely reworked the replication chapter for the 5.1 manual.
This targets a number of issues, including a major redesign (to make it
easier to read and find topics), some updates to the information and
processes, and incorporation of numerous bug fixes. You can see the new
chapter here:

* http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/replication.html

The main features:

* New layout. We've ripped apart the old chapter format and replaced it
  with a new one. No information has been lost, although a lot of it has
  been moved around.

* We now have four distinct sections:
  - Replication Configuration - includes details on setup (including How
To notes), options and variables, replication formats, and a new
section on common replication tasks.
  - Replication Solutions - this is designed to feature specific
scenarios where replication is used. For example, it contains the
scale-out solution that was in the FAQ, along with specific notes
and guides on backups, splitting replication, and SSL.
  - Replication Notes and Tips - this collects together sections that
were spread about the old structure, including upgrades,
compatibility, known features and issues and the FAQ.
  - Replication Implementation - the innards of the replication system
and how it works.

In all cases we've either rewritten or hugely expanded the information,
and there are also new illustrations with a consistent look and feel to
describe layouts and architecture. The new structure will make it easier
to add new functionality, scenarios and background information. For
example, one other section that is planned, but not in the current
documentation yet, is Replication Topologies. Other planned mprovements,
such as the MBR/SBR/RBR decision table and implicit commit tables now
have a more suitable home in the Replication Implementation section.

Regards,

Stefan
-- 
Stefan Hinz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MySQL AB Documentation Team Lead. Berlin, Germany (UTC +1:00)
Skype:stefanhinz Cell:+491777841069 Desk:+493082702940 Fax:+493082702941

-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MySQL docs: Replication Chapter Revamped

2007-02-13 Thread David Griffiths


Very cool - looking forward to reading it with the new replication 
options in 5.1


David

Stefan Hinz wrote:

Replication Chapter Revamped

We have completely reworked the replication chapter for the 5.1 manual.
This targets a number of issues, including a major redesign (to make it
easier to read and find topics), some updates to the information and
processes, and incorporation of numerous bug fixes. You can see the new
chapter here:

* http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/replication.html

The main features:

* New layout. We've ripped apart the old chapter format and replaced it
  with a new one. No information has been lost, although a lot of it has
  been moved around.

* We now have four distinct sections:
  - Replication Configuration - includes details on setup (including How
To notes), options and variables, replication formats, and a new
section on common replication tasks.
  - Replication Solutions - this is designed to feature specific
scenarios where replication is used. For example, it contains the
scale-out solution that was in the FAQ, along with specific notes
and guides on backups, splitting replication, and SSL.
  - Replication Notes and Tips - this collects together sections that
were spread about the old structure, including upgrades,
compatibility, known features and issues and the FAQ.
  - Replication Implementation - the innards of the replication system
and how it works.

In all cases we've either rewritten or hugely expanded the information,
and there are also new illustrations with a consistent look and feel to
describe layouts and architecture. The new structure will make it easier
to add new functionality, scenarios and background information. For
example, one other section that is planned, but not in the current
documentation yet, is Replication Topologies. Other planned mprovements,
such as the MBR/SBR/RBR decision table and implicit commit tables now
have a more suitable home in the Replication Implementation section.

Regards,

Stefan
  


--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Free chapter of O'Reilly High Performance MySQL on replication

2006-10-06 Thread Curious George

Thought this might be of interest to some on the list:
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/hpmysql/chapter/ch07.pdf

--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



MySQL Binlog/Replication and SET @variables

2005-06-24 Thread Markus Benning
Hello,

i have a problem with my replication setup and SET statments.
The SET statments seem to be not logged with the queries.

An example:

CREATE TABLE blablub (ID INT NOT NULL auto_increment PRIMARY KEY, bla text, 
blub text);
SET @bla='bla';
SET @blub='blub';
INSERT INTO blablub VALUES(NULL, @bla, @blub);

Now the table blablub on the Master:

++--+--+
| ID | bla  | blub |
++--+--+
|  1 | bla  | blub |
++--+--+

And on the Slave:

++--+--+
| ID | bla  | blub |
++--+--+
|  2 | NULL | NULL |
++--+--+

Here's the binlog entry for the INSERT:

#050624 16:46:54 server id 1  log_pos 9162  Intvar
SET INSERT_ID=1;
# at 9190
#050624 16:46:54 server id 1  log_pos 9190  Query   thread_id=7 exec_tim
e=0 error_code=0
SET TIMESTAMP=1119624414;
INSERT INTO blablub VALUES(NULL, @bla, @blub);


Same should happen when the binlog is replayed while restoring a backup.
I'm using mysql release 4.0.24.

regards,
Markus
-- 
Siemens AG  ITO AS 4 Internetteam

-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MySQL Binlog/Replication and SET @variables

2005-06-24 Thread Ware Adams

On Jun 24, 2005, at 10:56 AM, Markus Benning wrote:


i have a problem with my replication setup and SET statments.
The SET statments seem to be not logged with the queries.


This is a replication limitation in versions prior to 4.1:

Update statements that refer to user variables (that is, variables  
of the form @var_name) are badly replicated in 3.23 and 4.0. This  
is fixed in 4.1. Note that user variable names are case insensitive  
starting from MySQL 5.0. You should take this into account when  
setting up replication between 5.0 and an older version.


http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/replication-features.html

--Ware

--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MySQL Binlog/Replication and SET @variables

2005-06-24 Thread Gleb Paharenko
Hello.



It seems like a documented bug. Switch to 4.1.12. See:

  http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/replication-features.html









Markus Benning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hello,

 

 i have a problem with my replication setup and SET statments.

 The SET statments seem to be not logged with the queries.

 

 An example:

 

 CREATE TABLE blablub (ID INT NOT NULL auto_increment PRIMARY KEY, bla text, 
 blub text);

 SET @bla='bla';

 SET @blub='blub';

 INSERT INTO blablub VALUES(NULL, @bla, @blub);

 

 Now the table blablub on the Master:

 

 ++--+--+

 | ID | bla  | blub |

 ++--+--+

 |  1 | bla  | blub |

 ++--+--+

 

 And on the Slave:

 

 ++--+--+

 | ID | bla  | blub |

 ++--+--+

 |  2 | NULL | NULL |

 ++--+--+

 

 Here's the binlog entry for the INSERT:

 

 #050624 16:46:54 server id 1  log_pos 9162  Intvar

 SET INSERT_ID=1;

 # at 9190

 #050624 16:46:54 server id 1  log_pos 9190  Query   thread_id=7 
 exec_tim

 e=0 error_code=0

 SET TIMESTAMP=1119624414;

 INSERT INTO blablub VALUES(NULL, @bla, @blub);

 

 

 Same should happen when the binlog is replayed while restoring a backup.

 I'm using mysql release 4.0.24.

 

 regards,

 Markus



-- 
For technical support contracts, goto https://order.mysql.com/?ref=ensita
This email is sponsored by Ensita.NET http://www.ensita.net/
   __  ___ ___   __
  /  |/  /_ __/ __/ __ \/ /Gleb Paharenko
 / /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/_/  /_/\_, /___/\___\_\___/   MySQL AB / Ensita.NET
   ___/   www.mysql.com




-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



mysql total replication question

2005-06-05 Thread Shannon R.
Hi All!

I'm using the latest mysql 4.0.x and I've successfully
set-up database replication on it over 2 machines.

I have noticed though that mysql doesn't seem to
replicate CREATE TABLE operations on the master to the
slave. Is this a limitation? Or I just missed
something. If so, can someone please give me a clue or
point me to the right place documentations?

Also, is it possible to setup replication so that
everything in the master is replicated to the slave,
included CREATE DATABASE operations?

Many Thanks!
Shannon


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mysql total replication question

2005-06-05 Thread Gleb Paharenko
Hello.



In my replication setup with 4.1.11 master and 5.0.4 slave

CREATE TABLE and CREATE DATABASE  statements are replicated

perfectly.







Shannon R. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi All!

 

 I'm using the latest mysql 4.0.x and I've successfully

 set-up database replication on it over 2 machines.

 

 I have noticed though that mysql doesn't seem to

 replicate CREATE TABLE operations on the master to the

 slave. Is this a limitation? Or I just missed

 something. If so, can someone please give me a clue or

 point me to the right place documentations?

 

 Also, is it possible to setup replication so that

 everything in the master is replicated to the slave,

 included CREATE DATABASE operations?

 

 Many Thanks!

 Shannon

 

 

 __

 Do You Yahoo!?

 Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 

 http://mail.yahoo.com 

 



-- 
For technical support contracts, goto https://order.mysql.com/?ref=ensita
This email is sponsored by Ensita.NET http://www.ensita.net/
   __  ___ ___   __
  /  |/  /_ __/ __/ __ \/ /Gleb Paharenko
 / /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/_/  /_/\_, /___/\___\_\___/   MySQL AB / Ensita.NET
   ___/   www.mysql.com




-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Upgrade MySQL and replication dies

2005-04-06 Thread Jacob Friis Larsen
I use Debian Sarge as my Linux distribution on two servers who replicate MySQL.
Every time I upgrade the MySQL package my replication dies.
Any ideas why?

Thanks,
Jacob

-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Upgrade MySQL and replication dies

2005-04-06 Thread Gleb Paharenko
Hello.



Does Debian package preserve a master.info and relay-log.info files?

Do you stop slave before the upgrade? What does the 'SHOW SLAVE STATUS'

statement report?





Jacob Friis Larsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I use Debian Sarge as my Linux distribution on two servers who replicate 
 MySQL.

 Every time I upgrade the MySQL package my replication dies.

 Any ideas why?

 

 Thanks,

 Jacob

 



-- 
For technical support contracts, goto https://order.mysql.com/?ref=ensita
This email is sponsored by Ensita.NET http://www.ensita.net/
   __  ___ ___   __
  /  |/  /_ __/ __/ __ \/ /Gleb Paharenko
 / /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/_/  /_/\_, /___/\___\_\___/   MySQL AB / Ensita.NET
   ___/   www.mysql.com




-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Upgrade MySQL and replication dies

2005-04-06 Thread Jacob Friis Larsen
 Does Debian package preserve a master.info and relay-log.info files?

I'll check with some Debian experts.
 
 Do you stop slave before the upgrade?

No.

 What does the 'SHOW SLAVE STATUS'
 statement report?

Before that everything is ok, after I don't know now that it is
running ok, but I'll check next time.

Thanks,
Jacob

 Jacob Friis Larsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I use Debian Sarge as my Linux distribution on two servers who replicate 
  MySQL.
 
  Every time I upgrade the MySQL package my replication dies.
 
  Any ideas why?
 
 
 
  Thanks,
 
  Jacob
 
 
 
 --
 For technical support contracts, goto https://order.mysql.com/?ref=ensita
 This email is sponsored by Ensita.NET http://www.ensita.net/
__  ___ ___   __
   /  |/  /_ __/ __/ __ \/ /Gleb Paharenko
  / /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 /_/  /_/\_, /___/\___\_\___/   MySQL AB / Ensita.NET
___/   www.mysql.com
 
 --
 MySQL General Mailing List
 For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
 To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Oracle 2 MySQL updates/replication?

2004-07-13 Thread Carl Edwards
Hello,

I found a question about Oracle 2 MySQL replication in the
archive on Sep. 2001 but no mention since?

We have a  department using Oracle 8.1.7 and I'm running MySQL
4.0 and neither of us wants to change :-)

I could call a Perl, C++ or Java program from cron to periodically
update the MySQL instance from Oracle but was hoping to use a
trigger/stored procedure to initiate the update so it seems more
real time.  Does this seem possible?

Of course it may turn out non-trivial to write the synchronization
code so I'll take suggestions on that front also.

Thanks for any ideas,
-Carl Edwards



--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Oracle 2 MySQL updates/replication?

2004-07-13 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 06:11:22PM -0700, Carl Edwards wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I found a question about Oracle 2 MySQL replication in the
 archive on Sep. 2001 but no mention since?
 
 We have a  department using Oracle 8.1.7 and I'm running MySQL
 4.0 and neither of us wants to change :-)
 
 I could call a Perl, C++ or Java program from cron to periodically
 update the MySQL instance from Oracle but was hoping to use a
 trigger/stored procedure to initiate the update so it seems more
 real time.  Does this seem possible?
 
 Of course it may turn out non-trivial to write the synchronization
 code so I'll take suggestions on that front also.

Golden Gate Software makes a product that does this.  I'd have a look
at what they offer.

Jeremy
-- 
Jeremy D. Zawodny |  Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  http://jeremy.zawodny.com/

[book] High Performance MySQL -- http://highperformancemysql.com/

-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Oracle 2 MySQL updates/replication?

2004-07-13 Thread Justin Swanhart
An option would be a log reader program that uses
Oracle log miner to only show commited transactions
from the redo logs.  You could then replay the SQL
that is being executed on the oracle box on the mysql
server as long as the tables are defined the same.

9i has an enhanced log miner that can be used to read
8i redo logs as well, so you might want to use the
newer 9i client if you go this way.

Updates to the oracle database could be processed the
same way using the mysql binary log as long as no
mysql extensions were used like inserting multiple
rows with a single insert statement.

--- Jeremy Zawodny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 06:11:22PM -0700, Carl
 Edwards wrote:
  Hello,
  
  I found a question about Oracle 2 MySQL
 replication in the
  archive on Sep. 2001 but no mention since?
  
  We have a  department using Oracle 8.1.7 and I'm
 running MySQL
  4.0 and neither of us wants to change :-)
  
  I could call a Perl, C++ or Java program from cron
 to periodically
  update the MySQL instance from Oracle but was
 hoping to use a
  trigger/stored procedure to initiate the update so
 it seems more
  real time.  Does this seem possible?
  
  Of course it may turn out non-trivial to write the
 synchronization
  code so I'll take suggestions on that front also.
 
 Golden Gate Software makes a product that does this.
  I'd have a look
 at what they offer.
 
 Jeremy
 -- 
 Jeremy D. Zawodny |  Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux
 Magazine, Yahoo!
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  http://jeremy.zawodny.com/
 
 [book] High Performance MySQL --
 http://highperformancemysql.com/
 
 -- 
 MySQL General Mailing List
 For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
 To unsubscribe:   

http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Is there any good soul out there who can help me with mysql 4.0.17 replication.

2004-06-02 Thread Ravi T
Hi,
 
I am new to mysql and having some trouble with replication.  Simple stuff like,
 
1.  How to restart the stopped resplication,
2.  How to check if the replication is working,
3.  How to bring the  slave into master status when master crashes,
4.  How to restore master and re-enable replication.
 
Thanks and appreciate very much if some one could donate the time and help.
 
Ravi T.


-
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends.  Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger

Re: MySQL 4.1 replication relay log control

2003-10-11 Thread Christopher L. Everett
Victoria Reznichenko wrote:

relay-log-purge is available from 4.1.1. Do you use 4.1.1 or 4.1.0?

Is it in the manual because relay-log-purge is available in 4.0.x?

AFAICT, 4.1.1 isn't available for download from the mysql.com site.
4.1.0-alpha is.  How would one obtain 4.1.1?
Would this work to manage the relay log size:

1. restart the slave server to make it start a new realy log
2. monitor the slave server status until we see that its on the new
relay log
3. at that point stop the slave server again
4. delete the extra logs and edit the relay log index by hand.
5. start the slave server.




--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: MySQL 4.1 replication relay log control

2003-10-11 Thread Paul DuBois
At 13:26 -0500 10/11/03, Christopher L. Everett wrote:
Victoria Reznichenko wrote:

relay-log-purge is available from 4.1.1. Do you use 4.1.1 or 4.1.0?

Is it in the manual because relay-log-purge is available in 4.0.x?
Sorry, what?

AFAICT, 4.1.1 isn't available for download from the mysql.com site.
4.1.0-alpha is.  How would one obtain 4.1.1?
It's available from the BitKeeper repository:

http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/Installing_source_tree.html

Would this work to manage the relay log size:

1. restart the slave server to make it start a new realy log
2. monitor the slave server status until we see that its on the new
relay log
3. at that point stop the slave server again
4. delete the extra logs and edit the relay log index by hand.
5. start the slave server.
You don't need to stop and restart the server to make it start
a new relay log.  Just issue a FLUSH LOGS statement...
--
Paul DuBois, Senior Technical Writer
Madison, Wisconsin, USA
MySQL AB, www.mysql.com
Are you MySQL certified?  http://www.mysql.com/certification/

--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: MySQL 4.1 replication relay log control

2003-10-10 Thread Victoria Reznichenko
Christopher L. Everett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The online manual at http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/Replication_Options.html
 
 says that these two variables:
 
 max-relay-log-size=#
 relay-log-purge=0|1
 
 exist to control the size of the relay log.  But when I try to start my 
 slave server
 with:
 
 set-variable = max-relay-log-size=192MB
 set-variable = relay-log-purge=1
 
 in my.cnf it won't start.  Am I using them right?
 
 

relay-log-purge is available from 4.1.1. Do you use 4.1.1 or 4.1.0?


-- 
For technical support contracts, goto https://order.mysql.com/?ref=ensita
This email is sponsored by Ensita.net http://www.ensita.net/
   __  ___ ___   __
  /  |/  /_ __/ __/ __ \/ /Victoria Reznichenko
 / /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/_/  /_/\_, /___/\___\_\___/   MySQL AB / Ensita.net
   ___/   www.mysql.com





-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



MySQL 4.1 replication relay log control

2003-10-09 Thread Christopher L. Everett
The online manual at http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/Replication_Options.html

says that these two variables:

max-relay-log-size=#
relay-log-purge=0|1
exist to control the size of the relay log.  But when I try to start my 
slave server
with:

set-variable = max-relay-log-size=192MB
set-variable = relay-log-purge=1
in my.cnf it won't start.  Am I using them right?

--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


MySQL crash (replication?)

2003-10-02 Thread Partap Davis
Hi folks,

I just set up a slave server and it seemed to be working alright, 
catching up with the new data, and then the server suddenly went away.   
Looking at the slave's data directory, there are approximately 2 
relay-bin files.  I can't even restart the server now, because it gets a 
signal 11 immediately.  Most of the relay-bin files have nothing in 
them, but the ones that do have data give me something like this:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] data]# mysqlbinlog stout-relay-bin.1588
# at 4
#700101  0:00:00 server id 3  log_pos 0 Rotate to 
kazoo-binlog.020  pos: 560177478
ERROR: Error in Log_event::read_log_event(): 'read error', data_len: 
302717, event_type: 2
ERROR: Could not read entry at offset 47 : Error in log format or read error
[EMAIL PROTECTED] data]#

I'm not even sure where to start here...I figure I'm going to have to 
get a fresh copy of all the data from the master, but it's about 350 
gigs so that will take a while.  Meanwhile I'm trying to figure out how 
to make this not happen again...

Here's a bit from my .err file:
030929 15:28:29  mysqld started
030929 15:28:30  InnoDB: Started
030929 15:28:30  Found invalid password for user: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; Ignoring 
user
/usr/sbin/mysqld-max: ready for connections.
Version: '4.0.14-Max'  socket: '/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock'  port: 3306
030929 19:39:59  mysqld started
030929 19:40:00  InnoDB: Started
030929 19:40:00  Found invalid password for user: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; Ignoring 
user
/usr/sbin/mysqld-max: ready for connections.
Version: '4.0.14-Max'  socket: '/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock'  port: 3306
mysqld got signal 11;
This could be because you hit a bug. It is also possible that this binary
or one of the libraries it was linked against is corrupt, improperly built,
or misconfigured. This error can also be caused by malfunctioning hardware.
We will try our best to scrape up some info that will hopefully help 
diagnose
the problem, but since we have already crashed, something is definitely 
wrong
and this may fail.

key_buffer_size=268435456
read_buffer_size=2093056
max_used_connections=2
max_connections=100
threads_connected=2
It is possible that mysqld could use up to
key_buffer_size + (read_buffer_size + sort_buffer_size)*max_connections 
= 1187439 K
bytes of memory
Hope that's ok; if not, decrease some variables in the equation.

thd=0x885ff10
Attempting backtrace. You can use the following information to find out
where mysqld died. If you see no messages after this, something went
terribly wrong...
Cannot determine thread, fp=0x41f08b78, backtrace may not be correct.
Stack range sanity check OK, backtrace follows:
0x80dbe1f
0x40037f75
0x420828fc
0x8351165
0x8350f93
0x8350f54
0x8350f54
0x8350f54
0x8350f54
0x8351b6f
0x83711b9
0x837118d
0x83711c9
0x837118d
0x83711c9
0x837118d
0x837118d
0x83711c9
0x837118d
0x83709b9
0x83520fa
0x8351ed5
0x83508df
0x8136669
0x81108b8
0x814d74c
0x814cf7c
0x80e9363
0x80ea88b
0x80e5ed3
0x80ebe0e
0x80e50bf
0x40034fef
0x420e779a
New value of fp=(nil) failed sanity check, terminating stack trace!
Please read http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/Using_stack_trace.html and 
follow instructions on how to resolve the stack trace. Resolved
stack trace is much more helpful in diagnosing the problem, so please do
resolve it
Trying to get some variables.
Some pointers may be invalid and cause the dump to abort...
thd-query at 0x8870968 = load data local infile 
'/db2/data/tmp/FcstHr_ece.txt' replace into table FcstHr_ece
thd-thread_id=49
The manual page at http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/Crashing.html contains
information that should help you find out what is causing the crash.

Number of processes running now: 0
031001 00:57:10  mysqld restarted
031001  0:57:11  InnoDB: Started
031001  0:57:11  Found invalid password for user: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; Ignoring 
user
/usr/sbin/mysqld-max: ready for connections.
Version: '4.0.14-Max'  socket: '/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock'  port: 3306
mysqld got signal 11;
This could be because you hit a bug. It is also possible that this binary
or one of the libraries it was linked against is corrupt, improperly built,
or misconfigured. This error can also be caused by malfunctioning hardware.
We will try our best to scrape up some info that will hopefully help 
diagnose
the problem, but since we have already crashed, something is definitely 
wrong
and this may fail.

key_buffer_size=268435456
read_buffer_size=2093056
max_used_connections=1
max_connections=100
threads_connected=1
It is possible that mysqld could use up to
key_buffer_size + (read_buffer_size + sort_buffer_size)*max_connections 
= 1187439 K
bytes of memory
Hope that's ok; if not, decrease some variables in the equation.

thd=0x88323e8
Attempting backtrace. You can use the following information to find out
where mysqld died. If you see no messages after this, something went
terribly wrong...
Cannot determine thread, fp=0x41ed7b48, backtrace may not be correct.
Stack range sanity check OK, backtrace follows:
0x80dbe1f
0x40037f75

Fw: mysql 4.0.14 + replication + windows XP PROF

2003-08-20 Thread I.P.

 No one has replied to my post.

 - Original Message - 
 From: I.P. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 1:01 PM
 Subject: mysql 4.0.14 + replication + windows XP PROF


 Hi, it's my story.

  I have two  4.0.14 mysql server on one machine with win XP Professional
  polish version.
 
  First acts as master: on port 3300
  Second acts as slave: on port 3301
 
  below my configuration:
 
  ### FOR MASTER #
  # This will be passed to all mysql clients
  [client]
  #password=my_password
  port=3300
  #socket=MySQL
 
  # Here is entries for some specific programs
  # The following values assume you have at least 32M ram
 
  # The MySQL server
  [mysqld]
  basedir = c:/mysql4/
  datadir = c:/mysql4/data/
  port=3300
  language=polish
  default-character-set=latin2
  log-bin
  server-id=1
  log-warnings
 
  set-variable = key_buffer=16K
  set-variable = max_allowed_packet=1M
  set-variable = thread_stack=64K
  set-variable = table_cache=4
  set-variable = sort_buffer=64K
  set-variable = net_buffer_length=2K
  query_cache_size = 1024K
  # Uncomment the following if you are using Innobase tables
  innodb_data_file_path = ibdata1:50M
  innodb_data_home_dir = d:\\innodb\\mysql4\\master\\ibdata
  innodb_log_group_home_dir = d:\\innodb\\mysql4\\master\\iblogs
  innodb_log_arch_dir = d:\\innodb\\mysql4\\master\\iblogs
 
 
 
  set-variable = innodb_mirrored_log_groups=1
  set-variable = innodb_log_files_in_group=3
  set-variable = innodb_log_file_size=5M
  set-variable = innodb_log_buffer_size=8M
  innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit=1
  innodb_log_archive=0
  set-variable = innodb_buffer_pool_size=16M
  set-variable = innodb_additional_mem_pool_size=2M
  set-variable = innodb_file_io_threads=4
  set-variable = innodb_lock_wait_timeout=50
  [mysqldump]
  quick
  set-variable = max_allowed_packet=16M
 
  [mysql]
  no-auto-rehash
  # Remove the next comment character if you are not familiar with SQL
  #safe-updates
 
  [isamchk]
  set-variable = key_buffer=8M
  set-variable = sort_buffer=8M
 
  [myisamchk]
  set-variable = key_buffer=8M
  set-variable = sort_buffer=8M
 
  [mysqlhotcopy]
  interactive-timeout
 
 
  ###
  ###FOR SLAVE  #
  # This will be passed to all mysql clients
  [client]
  #password=my_password
  port=3301
  #socket=MySQL
 
  # Here is entries for some specific programs
  # The following values assume you have at least 32M ram
 
  # The MySQL server
  [mysqld]
  basedir = c:/mysql4_slave/
  datadir = c:/mysql4_slave/data/
  port=3301
  language=polish
  default-character-set=latin2
  server-id=2
  # log-bin
  # log-slave-updates
  master-host=127.0.0.1
  master-user=irek
  master-password=XX
  master-port=3300
  master-connect-retry=30
 
 
  # log-update=log_updates.log
  log-warnings
 
  set-variable = key_buffer=16K
  set-variable = max_allowed_packet=1M
  set-variable = thread_stack=64K
  set-variable = table_cache=4
  set-variable = sort_buffer=64K
  set-variable = net_buffer_length=2K
  query_cache_size = 1024K
  # Uncomment the following if you are using Innobase tables
 
  innodb_data_file_path = ibdata1:50M
  innodb_data_home_dir = d:\\innodb\\mysql4\\slave\\ibdata
  innodb_log_group_home_dir = d:\\innodb\\mysql4\\slave\\iblogs
  innodb_log_arch_dir = d:\\innodb\\mysql4\\slave\\iblogs
 
  set-variable = innodb_mirrored_log_groups=1
  set-variable = innodb_log_files_in_group=3
  set-variable = innodb_log_file_size=5M
  set-variable = innodb_log_buffer_size=8M
  innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit=1
  innodb_log_archive=0
  set-variable = innodb_buffer_pool_size=16M
  set-variable = innodb_additional_mem_pool_size=2M
  set-variable = innodb_file_io_threads=4
  set-variable = innodb_lock_wait_timeout=50
  [mysqldump]
  quick
  set-variable = max_allowed_packet=16M
 
  [mysql]
  no-auto-rehash
  # Remove the next comment character if you are not familiar with SQL
  #safe-updates
 
  [isamchk]
  set-variable = key_buffer=8M
  set-variable = sort_buffer=8M
 
  [myisamchk]
  set-variable = key_buffer=8M
  set-variable = sort_buffer=8M
 
  ## END configuration
 
 
  So i have noticed this things.
 
  I start replication with master and slave:
 
 
  1)
  Master is running ...
 
  ---
  Slave is running ... and at console can i see:
 
  030804 22:55:36  InnoDB: Started
  030804 22:55:36  Slave I/O thread: connected to master
  '[EMAIL PROTECTED]:3300',  r
  eplication started in log 'FIRST' at position 4
  030804 22:55:36  Slave SQL thread initialized, starting replication in
log
  'FIRS
  T' at position 0, relay log '.\hq-relay-bin.001' position: 4
  mysqld-max-nt: ready for connections.
  Version: '4.0.14-max-nt'  socket: ''  port: 3301
  ---
 
  That is ok.
 
  3) checked master data dir:
  hq-bin.001
  hq-bin.index
 
  4) checked slave data dir:
  hq-relay-bin.001
  hq-relay-bin.index
  master.info
  relay

mysql 4.0.14 + replication + windows XP PROF

2003-08-18 Thread I.P.
Hi, it's my story.

I have two  4.0.14 mysql server on one machine with win XP Professional
polish version.

First acts as master: on port 3300
Second acts as slave: on port 3301

below my configuration:

### FOR MASTER #
# This will be passed to all mysql clients
[client]
#password=my_password
port=3300
#socket=MySQL

# Here is entries for some specific programs
# The following values assume you have at least 32M ram

# The MySQL server
[mysqld]
basedir = c:/mysql4/
datadir = c:/mysql4/data/
port=3300
language=polish
default-character-set=latin2
log-bin
server-id=1
log-warnings

set-variable = key_buffer=16K
set-variable = max_allowed_packet=1M
set-variable = thread_stack=64K
set-variable = table_cache=4
set-variable = sort_buffer=64K
set-variable = net_buffer_length=2K
query_cache_size = 1024K
# Uncomment the following if you are using Innobase tables
innodb_data_file_path = ibdata1:50M
innodb_data_home_dir = d:\\innodb\\mysql4\\master\\ibdata
innodb_log_group_home_dir = d:\\innodb\\mysql4\\master\\iblogs
innodb_log_arch_dir = d:\\innodb\\mysql4\\master\\iblogs



set-variable = innodb_mirrored_log_groups=1
set-variable = innodb_log_files_in_group=3
set-variable = innodb_log_file_size=5M
set-variable = innodb_log_buffer_size=8M
innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit=1
innodb_log_archive=0
set-variable = innodb_buffer_pool_size=16M
set-variable = innodb_additional_mem_pool_size=2M
set-variable = innodb_file_io_threads=4
set-variable = innodb_lock_wait_timeout=50
[mysqldump]
quick
set-variable = max_allowed_packet=16M

[mysql]
no-auto-rehash
# Remove the next comment character if you are not familiar with SQL
#safe-updates

[isamchk]
set-variable = key_buffer=8M
set-variable = sort_buffer=8M

[myisamchk]
set-variable = key_buffer=8M
set-variable = sort_buffer=8M

[mysqlhotcopy]
interactive-timeout


###
###FOR SLAVE  #
# This will be passed to all mysql clients
[client]
#password=my_password
port=3301
#socket=MySQL

# Here is entries for some specific programs
# The following values assume you have at least 32M ram

# The MySQL server
[mysqld]
basedir = c:/mysql4_slave/
datadir = c:/mysql4_slave/data/
port=3301
language=polish
default-character-set=latin2
server-id=2
# log-bin
# log-slave-updates
master-host=127.0.0.1
master-user=irek
master-password=XX
master-port=3300
master-connect-retry=30


# log-update=log_updates.log
log-warnings

set-variable = key_buffer=16K
set-variable = max_allowed_packet=1M
set-variable = thread_stack=64K
set-variable = table_cache=4
set-variable = sort_buffer=64K
set-variable = net_buffer_length=2K
query_cache_size = 1024K
# Uncomment the following if you are using Innobase tables

innodb_data_file_path = ibdata1:50M
innodb_data_home_dir = d:\\innodb\\mysql4\\slave\\ibdata
innodb_log_group_home_dir = d:\\innodb\\mysql4\\slave\\iblogs
innodb_log_arch_dir = d:\\innodb\\mysql4\\slave\\iblogs

set-variable = innodb_mirrored_log_groups=1
set-variable = innodb_log_files_in_group=3
set-variable = innodb_log_file_size=5M
set-variable = innodb_log_buffer_size=8M
innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit=1
innodb_log_archive=0
set-variable = innodb_buffer_pool_size=16M
set-variable = innodb_additional_mem_pool_size=2M
set-variable = innodb_file_io_threads=4
set-variable = innodb_lock_wait_timeout=50
[mysqldump]
quick
set-variable = max_allowed_packet=16M

[mysql]
no-auto-rehash
# Remove the next comment character if you are not familiar with SQL
#safe-updates

[isamchk]
set-variable = key_buffer=8M
set-variable = sort_buffer=8M

[myisamchk]
set-variable = key_buffer=8M
set-variable = sort_buffer=8M

## END configuration


So i have noticed this things.

I start replication with master and slave:


1)
Master is running ...

---
Slave is running ... and at console can i see:

030804 22:55:36  InnoDB: Started
030804 22:55:36  Slave I/O thread: connected to master
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]:3300',  r
eplication started in log 'FIRST' at position 4
030804 22:55:36  Slave SQL thread initialized, starting replication in log
'FIRS
T' at position 0, relay log '.\hq-relay-bin.001' position: 4
mysqld-max-nt: ready for connections.
Version: '4.0.14-max-nt'  socket: ''  port: 3301
---

That is ok.

3) checked master data dir:
hq-bin.001
hq-bin.index

4) checked slave data dir:
hq-relay-bin.001
hq-relay-bin.index
master.info
relay-log.info

5) I stopped slave - shutdown nicely.

6) I stopped and started master 3 times.

7) I checked master data dir and i can see:
hq-bin.001
hq-bin.002
hq-bin.003
hq-bin.004
hq-bin.index

8) I started master.

9) master data dir:
hq-bin.001
hq-bin.002
hq-bin.003
hq-bin.004
hq-bin.005
hq-bin.index

10) I started a slave:
030804 23:07:36  InnoDB: Started
030804 23:07:36  Slave I/O thread: connected to master
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]:3300',  r
eplication started in log 'hq-bin.001' at position 79
030804 23:07:36  Slave SQL thread initialized, 

Re: MySQL Secure Replication

2003-01-22 Thread Michael T. Babcock
Ivan Hoo wrote:


how do you secure the replication link between the master  and the slave
using SSH. i understand that you can do that over mysql client and its
server. pls enlighten me coz i m looking high and low for a solution on this issue.
 


On the slave:

ssh --local-forward(?) 3307:localhost:3306 foreignhost

...then set up the info for master (on the slave) to be localhost:3307.

--
Michael T. Babcock
C.T.O., FibreSpeed Ltd.
http://www.fibrespeed.net/~mbabcock



-
Before posting, please check:
  http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
  http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




Re: MySQL Secure Replication

2003-01-22 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 02:27:40PM -0500, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
 Ivan Hoo wrote:
 
 how do you secure the replication link between the master  and the slave
 using SSH. i understand that you can do that over mysql client and its
 server. pls enlighten me coz i m looking high and low for a solution on this issue.
   
 
 
 On the slave:
 
 ssh --local-forward(?) 3307:localhost:3306 foreignhost
 
 ...then set up the info for master (on the slave) to be localhost:3307.

You mean 127.0.0.1:3307, right?

Jeremy
-- 
Jeremy D. Zawodny |  Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  http://jeremy.zawodny.com/

MySQL 4.0.8: up 4 days, processed 119,323,583 queries (341/sec. avg)

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




Re: MySQL Secure Replication

2003-01-17 Thread Tonu Samuel
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 08:51, Ivan Hoo wrote:
 is there any way you can implement a secure replication via ssh or sth else?

Who can implement? 

As user you can use SSH tunnel with it. There are many tutorial about
making SSH tunneling in the internet. I believe if MySQL will have some
kind of transport security, it will be SSL (as industry de facto
standard for similar things). 

As usually - if somebody is really interested for new features then they
can be speed up if you do the deal with MySQL AB. Otherwise you are one
of 5 million MySQL users and MySQL AB develops things in order of own
priorities and this is understandable. 

   Tõnu


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




Re: MySQL Secure Replication

2003-01-16 Thread Ivan Hoo
  there seem to be a lack of documentation on this part.

 Mostly because it can't be done (that I'm aware of).

if it can't be done, why is it in the documentation already. i can
understand that if 4.0.x is still in alpha or beta stage. but now it is
almost near release (gamma).

the official mysql documentation
(http://www.mysql.com/documentation/mysql/bychapter/manual_MySQL_Database_Ad
ministration.html#Replication_Options) actually defines a few variables
pertaining to ssl replication (master-ssl, master-ssl-key, master-ssl-cert).
doesn't this tell you that ssl replication is already supported?

regards,
ivan


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




Re: MySQL Secure Replication

2003-01-16 Thread Tonu Samuel
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 20:47, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:

  has anyone been able to setup ssl secure replication for mysql?
 
 I don't believe you can do that yet.  There's now way to specify the
 necessary credentials in the slave setup.
 
  how do i know whether the replication is actually done over ssl?

There are many variables about SSL shown in SHOW STATUS output. They
also include cipher currently in use and other similar stuff. This is
right way to detect SSL usage because SSL has also ciphers which have no
actual encryption at all. Paranoid people must verify if key length in
use is long enough.

Also I must note that using SSL without having appropriate ACL structure
is nonsense. You must use GRANT blahblah REQUIRE SSL CIPHER blahblah.
Then MySQL server just won't allow nonencrpyted connection. Otherwise
default fallback mechanism will work.

 
 You'd have to sniff the network traffic and see.

This is always must be done :)
 
  there seem to be a lack of documentation on this part.
 
 Mostly because it can't be done (that I'm aware of).

I think so too.

  Tõnu




-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




Re: MySQL Secure Replication

2003-01-16 Thread Paul DuBois
At 23:17 +0800 1/16/03, Ivan Hoo wrote:

   there seem to be a lack of documentation on this part.


 Mostly because it can't be done (that I'm aware of).


if it can't be done, why is it in the documentation already. i can
understand that if 4.0.x is still in alpha or beta stage. but now it is
almost near release (gamma).

the official mysql documentation
(http://www.mysql.com/documentation/mysql/bychapter/manual_MySQL_Database_Ad
ministration.html#Replication_Options) actually defines a few variables
pertaining to ssl replication (master-ssl, master-ssl-key, master-ssl-cert).
doesn't this tell you that ssl replication is already supported?


No, it cannot be done.  Those options have been added, yes, but they
do nothing at the moment.  You can specify the options and they'll
be parsed, but nothing is done with their values yet.



regards,
ivan



-
Before posting, please check:
  http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
  http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




Re: MySQL Secure Replication

2003-01-16 Thread Ivan Hoo
is there any way you can implement a secure replication via ssh or sth else?

regards,
ivan

 At 23:17 +0800 1/16/03, Ivan Hoo wrote:
 there seem to be a lack of documentation on this part.
 
   Mostly because it can't be done (that I'm aware of).
 
 if it can't be done, why is it in the documentation already. i can
 understand that if 4.0.x is still in alpha or beta stage. but now it is
 almost near release (gamma).
 
 the official mysql documentation

(http://www.mysql.com/documentation/mysql/bychapter/manual_MySQL_Database_A
d
 ministration.html#Replication_Options) actually defines a few variables
 pertaining to ssl replication (master-ssl, master-ssl-key,
master-ssl-cert).
 doesn't this tell you that ssl replication is already supported?

 No, it cannot be done.  Those options have been added, yes, but they
 do nothing at the moment.  You can specify the options and they'll
 be parsed, but nothing is done with their values yet.

 


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




Re: MySQL Secure Replication

2003-01-15 Thread Michael T. Babcock
Jeremy Zawodny wrote:


there seem to be a lack of documentation on this part.
   


Mostly because it can't be done (that I'm aware of).
 


Except with stunnel (often recommended) or SSH (which I've had running 
for months doing this).  PS, as with the MySQL daemon, I run my ssh 
tunnel under 'supervise' so as to make sure its always there and 
restarts if it gets killed / dies / is stupid / upgraded.

--
Michael T. Babcock
C.T.O., FibreSpeed Ltd.
http://www.fibrespeed.net/~mbabcock



-
Before posting, please check:
  http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
  http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php



RE: MySQL Secure Replication

2003-01-15 Thread Basil Hussain
 Mostly because it can't be done (that I'm aware of).

 Except with stunnel (often recommended) or SSH (which I've had running
 for months doing this).

Another option is CIPE, a method for secure tunnelling of any IP protocol
using virtual network interfaces. I believe CIPE comes as standard with
RedHat 7.x and above.

Regards,

Basil Hussain
---
Internet Developer, Kodak Weddings
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


(filter bait: sql, query, queries, smallint)


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




Re: MySQL Secure Replication

2003-01-15 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 09:18:50AM -0500, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
 Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
 
 there seem to be a lack of documentation on this part.
 
 
 
 Mostly because it can't be done (that I'm aware of).
   
 
 
 Except with stunnel (often recommended) or SSH (which I've had running 
 for months doing this).  PS, as with the MySQL daemon, I run my ssh 
 tunnel under 'supervise' so as to make sure its always there and 
 restarts if it gets killed / dies / is stupid / upgraded.

Right.  I should have said there's no built-in way it can be done
because folks have doing secure replication via ssh/stunnel for years
now. :-)

Jeremy
-- 
Jeremy D. Zawodny |  Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  http://jeremy.zawodny.com/

MySQL 3.23.51: up 31 days, processed 1,039,952,222 queries (381/sec. avg)

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




Re: MySQL Secure Replication

2003-01-15 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 04:49:03PM -, Basil Hussain wrote:
  Mostly because it can't be done (that I'm aware of).
 
  Except with stunnel (often recommended) or SSH (which I've had running
  for months doing this).
 
 Another option is CIPE, a method for secure tunnelling of any IP protocol
 using virtual network interfaces. I believe CIPE comes as standard with
 RedHat 7.x and above.

Right.

And if we're shooting for an exhaustive list, some routers have
proprietary encryption/tunneling systems.  And you could use a more
off-the-shelf IPSec or similar VPN scheme.  It may be overkill, but
they are options. :-)

Jeremy
-- 
Jeremy D. Zawodny |  Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  http://jeremy.zawodny.com/

MySQL 3.23.51: up 31 days, processed 1,040,383,036 queries (381/sec. avg)

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




Re: MySQL Secure Replication

2003-01-15 Thread Ivan Hoo
 
  Except with stunnel (often recommended) or SSH (which I've had running
  for months doing this).  PS, as with the MySQL daemon, I run my ssh
  tunnel under 'supervise' so as to make sure its always there and
  restarts if it gets killed / dies / is stupid / upgraded.

 Right.  I should have said there's no built-in way it can be done
 because folks have doing secure replication via ssh/stunnel for years
 now. :-)


how do you secure the replication link between the master  and the slave
using SSH. i understand that you can do that over mysql client and its
server. pls enlighten me coz i m looking high and low for a solution on this
issue.

regards,
ivan

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude AntiVirus]


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




Re: MySQL Secure Replication

2003-01-14 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 02:46:45PM +0800, Ivan Hoo wrote:
 hi All,
 
 has anyone been able to setup ssl secure replication for mysql?

I don't believe you can do that yet.  There's now way to specify the
necessary credentials in the slave setup.

 how do i know whether the replication is actually done over ssl?

You'd have to sniff the network traffic and see.

 there seem to be a lack of documentation on this part.

Mostly because it can't be done (that I'm aware of).

 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude AntiVirus]

Congratulations.  Why do I care which [anti]virus product you use?
-- 
Jeremy D. Zawodny |  Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  http://jeremy.zawodny.com/

MySQL 3.23.51: up 30 days, processed 1,007,087,318 queries (381/sec. avg)

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




MySQL Secure Replication

2003-01-12 Thread Ivan Hoo
hi All,

has anyone been able to setup ssl secure replication for mysql? how do i
know whether the replication is actually done over ssl? there seem to be a
lack of documentation on this part. appreciate a lot if someone could
provide some feedback on this. i m currently running mysql-4.0.7-gamma
(compiled from source --with-vio --with-openssl=/usr/local/ssl) on a
standard redhat linux 7.3.

regards,
ivan

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude AntiVirus]


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




MySQL 3.23.47 Replication - Failed Read

2002-10-12 Thread Khor, TBS Software

Dear Sir/Madam,

I have tried the config below, and I successfully see the replicated record in
client side but only ONCE.
After I have seen the replication works. I continued with my normal
transactional work including altering table structure.
But later when I checked the replication status. Well, it has been in the
state of frozen for some time described below.

Now the server position keep in position 69 (show master status) and client
side keep staying in position 29 (show slave status).
Previously the server position keep staying in 73 but after I done a series of
reset master, reset slave and flush logs in
server side, it turned to 69 and stay there.
The client side is showing the message Waiting to reconnect after failed
read (read using show processlist)

Here's the series of same error log generated in client-side (mysql.err)
020816 15:31:21  Slave: connected to master '[EMAIL PROTECTED]:3306',
replication started in log 'FIRST' at position 29
020816 15:31:21  Slave: received 0 length packet from server, apparent master
shutdown:  (0)
020816 15:31:21  Slave: Failed reading log event, reconnecting to retry, log
'FIRST' position 29
020816 15:31:48  Slave: reconnected to master
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]:3306',replication resumed in log 'FIRST' at position 29
020816 15:31:48  Slave: received 0 length packet from server, apparent master
shutdown:  (0)
020816 15:32:49  Slave: Failed reading log event, reconnecting to retry, log
'FIRST' position 29
...

I have tried turning off both servers, overwriting of server database over to
client's database folder.
Deleting off the bin logs and restarting server-side mysql and client-side
mysql but it still stay in the position I described
above

Well, I hope I could get something from MySQL soon. Thank you!


The following are my servers settings

Both servers are using version 3.23.47
Server (win2000 professional, IP 192.168.100.30) side ini settings
[mysqld]
basedir=C:/MYSQL
#bind-address=192.168.100.30
datadir=C:/MYSQL/data
#language=C:/MYSQL/share/your language directory
#slow query log#=
#tmpdir#=
#port=3306
#set-variable=key_buffer=16M
server-id=3
binlog-do-db=DISYS_DB
log-bin=C:/MYSQL/MyLog/mykhorep.log

Client (win98, IP 192.168.100.4) side ini settings
[mysqld]
basedir=D:/MYSQL
#bind-address=192.168.100.4
datadir=D:/MYSQL/data
#language=D:/MYSQL/share/your language directory
#slow query log#=
#tmpdir#=
#port=3306
#set-variable=key_buffer=16M
master-host=192.168.100.30
master-user=repl
master-password=password
master-port=3306
server-id=3
master-connect-retry=60
replicate-do-db=DISYS_DB


Regards,
Khor

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude antiVirus]


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




MySQL Bothway Replication - Fail Back - Hold Master while Slave is Synchronizing.

2002-08-20 Thread johan . vanroose

MySQL Bothway Replication - Fail Back - Hold Master while Slave is
Synchronizing.

I have the following question:
Is it possible to have a slave on machine M1 synchronizing with a master
on another machine M2 while the master on the first machine M1 does not
accept requests yet (i.e. it is not available to a client yet)?

Background info:
Why do I want this? Well, I have a configuration where two machines run
MySQL. They are configured to replicate each others updates. Although
two masters are effectively running, only one is used at a time. This is
taken care of by the client. When the first machine fails, the client
detects this and goes to the other machine. So for so good.

When machine M1 comes on-line again then our client immediately starts
to use it (fail-back) (it has - let's say - a preferred machine and I
can't disable this). The database, however, is not correct yet. The
slave needs to synchronize with M2 still. So we read old data.

This situation could be avoided if we can let the master on M1 wait
until the salve on M1 has completed its synchronization, and the
databases are in sync again.

Thanks,

Johan.




-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




Re: MySQL 4.0.2 replication circle broken?

2002-08-14 Thread Artem V. Ryabov

Hello all,

I was check up 4.0.3 (from the Development Source Tree), bug still exist.

Description:
aor I use replication circle (A-B, B-A) with 3.23.51 - all ok.
aor But I got problem, when upgrade both my servers to 4.0.2.
aor Mysqld create 30 new bin-log files every second at both servers:
aor ---
aor [www2:/opt/mysql-dev/var]:1303# ls -1 www2-bin.* | wc -l
aor2268
aor [www2:/opt/mysql-dev/var]:1306# l www2-bin.00*
aor -rw-rw1 mysqlmysql 137 Aug 12 16:31 www2-bin.001
aor -rw-rw1 mysqlmysql  62 Aug 12 16:31 www2-bin.002
aor -rw-rw1 mysqlmysql  62 Aug 12 16:31 www2-bin.003
aor -rw-rw1 mysqlmysql  62 Aug 12 16:31 www2-bin.004
aor -rw-rw1 mysqlmysql  62 Aug 12 16:31 www2-bin.005
aor -rw-rw1 mysqlmysql  62 Aug 12 16:31 www2-bin.006
aor -rw-rw1 mysqlmysql  62 Aug 12 16:31 www2-bin.007
aor -rw-rw1 mysqlmysql  62 Aug 12 16:31 www2-bin.008
aor -rw-rw1 mysqlmysql  62 Aug 12 16:31 www2-bin.009
   
aor [www2:/opt/mysql-dev/var]:1304# ../bin/mysqlbinlog www2-bin.001
aor # at 4
aor #020812 16:29:30 server id 1  log_pos 4 Start: binlog v 3, server v 4.0.
aor 2-alpha-log created 020812 16:29:30
aor # at 79
aor #020812 16:31:13 server id 2  log_pos 79Rotate to www2-bin.002 pos: 4
aor # at 118
aor #020812 16:31:13 server id 1  log_pos 118   Stop
aor [www2:/opt/mysql-dev/var]:1305# ../bin/mysqlbinlog www2-bin.002
aor # at 4
aor #020812 16:31:13 server id 2  log_pos 4 Rotate to www2-bin.003 pos: 4
aor # at 43
aor #020812 16:31:13 server id 1  log_pos 43Stop
aor [www2:/opt/mysql-dev/var]:1307# ../bin/mysqlbinlog www2-bin.003
aor # at 4
aor #020812 16:31:13 server id 2  log_pos 4 Rotate to www2-bin.004 pos: 4
aor # at 43
aor #020812 16:31:13 server id 1  log_pos 43Stop
aor [www2:/opt/mysql-dev/var]:1308#
aor --
aor and so on.

aor Will be fixed this error in 4.0.3?


How-To-Repeat:

Fix:


Submitter-Id:  submitter ID
Originator:Artem Ryabov
Organization:
 
MySQL support: none
Synopsis:  too many bin-log files
Severity:  serious
Priority:  medium
Category:  mysql
Class: sw-bug
Release:   mysql-4.0.2-alpha (Source distribution)

Environment:

aor System: Linux www2.osp.ru 2.2.19 #2 Wed Aug 15 16:02:45 MSD 2001 i686 unknown
aor Architecture: i686

aor Some paths:  /usr/local/bin/perl /usr/bin/make /usr/bin/gmake /usr/bin/gcc 
/usr/bin/cc
aor GCC: Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/2.96/specs
aor gcc version 2.96 2731 (Red Hat Linux 7.1 2.96-85)
aor Compilation info: CC='gcc'  CFLAGS=''  CXX='g++'  CXXFLAGS=''  LDFLAGS=''
aor LIBC: 
aor lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   11 Nov 25  2000 /lib/libc.so.6 - 
libc-2.2.so
aor -rwxr-xr-x1 root root  5155229 Jan 11  2001 /lib/libc-2.2.so
aor -rw-r--r--1 root root 24498288 Jan 11  2001 /usr/lib/libc.a
aor -rw-r--r--1 root root  178 Jan 11  2001 /usr/lib/libc.so
aor configure command: ./configure --with-mysqld-ldflags=-all-static --disable-shared 
--prefix=/opt/mysql-dev --with-charset=cp1251

-- 
Best regards,
 Artemmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




Re: Mysql database replication

2002-08-14 Thread Gerald Clark

I highly recommend you update the slave to the same version as the master.


Mark D. Wallace wrote:

 I'm trying to set up a replication database and cannot get the slave 
 to parse the log files on the master.
 The slave is connecting to the master as indicated in the log file.

 I have tried to connect directly to the master database from the mysql 
 client on the slave and have no problem using the replication username 
 and password.

 The master server is mysql-3.23.37-pc-linux-gnu-i686
 The slave server is mysql mysql-3.23.51-pc-linux-gnu-i686
 From the Mysql site, these two are compatible as a slave master pair.

 The error message from the slaves error log reads.


 14:28:38 Slave: connected to master '[EMAIL PROTECTED]:3306', 
 replication started in
 log 'FIRST' at position 4

 020813 14:28:38 Could not parse log event entry, check the master for 
 binlog corruption
 This may also be a network problem, or just a bug in
 the master or slave code.

 (WHAT IS THE NAME OF THE LOG FILE THE SLAVE IS TRYING TO READ 
 mysql.log?)

 020813 14:28:38 Error running query, slave aborted. Fix the problem, 
 and re-start the slave thread with
 mysqladmin start-slave. We stopped at log 'FIRST' position 4

 020813 14:28:38 Slave thread exiting, replication
 stopped in log 'FIRST' at position 4


 WHAT is log 'FIRST' at position 4 referencing?


 Thanks for any help you can provide.

 Mark Wallace


 -
 Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

 To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe, e-mail 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php





-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




Mysql database replication

2002-08-13 Thread Mark D. Wallace

I'm trying to set up a replication database and cannot get the slave to 
parse the log files on the master.
The slave is connecting to the master as indicated in the log file.

I have tried to connect directly to the master database from the mysql 
client on the slave and have no problem using the replication username and 
password.

The master server is mysql-3.23.37-pc-linux-gnu-i686
The slave server is mysql mysql-3.23.51-pc-linux-gnu-i686
 From the Mysql site, these two are compatible as a slave master pair.

The error message from the slaves error log reads.


14:28:38 Slave: connected to master '[EMAIL PROTECTED]:3306', 
replication started in
log 'FIRST' at position 4

020813 14:28:38 Could not parse log event entry, check the master for 
binlog corruption
This may also be a network problem, or just a bug in
the master or slave code.

(WHAT IS THE NAME OF THE LOG FILE THE SLAVE IS TRYING TO READ mysql.log?)

020813 14:28:38 Error running query, slave aborted. Fix the problem, and 
re-start the slave thread with
mysqladmin start-slave. We stopped at log 'FIRST' position 4

020813 14:28:38 Slave thread exiting, replication
stopped in log 'FIRST' at position 4


WHAT is log 'FIRST' at position 4 referencing?


Thanks for any help you can provide.

Mark Wallace


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




MySQL 4.0.2 replication circle broken?

2002-08-12 Thread artem

Description:
I use replication circle (A-B, B-A) with 3.23.51 - all ok.
But I got problem, when upgrade both my servers to 4.0.2.
Mysqld create 30 new bin-log files every second at both servers:
---
[www2:/opt/mysql-dev/var]:1303# ls -1 www2-bin.* | wc -l
   2268
[www2:/opt/mysql-dev/var]:1306# l www2-bin.00*
-rw-rw1 mysqlmysql 137 Aug 12 16:31 www2-bin.001
-rw-rw1 mysqlmysql  62 Aug 12 16:31 www2-bin.002
-rw-rw1 mysqlmysql  62 Aug 12 16:31 www2-bin.003
-rw-rw1 mysqlmysql  62 Aug 12 16:31 www2-bin.004
-rw-rw1 mysqlmysql  62 Aug 12 16:31 www2-bin.005
-rw-rw1 mysqlmysql  62 Aug 12 16:31 www2-bin.006
-rw-rw1 mysqlmysql  62 Aug 12 16:31 www2-bin.007
-rw-rw1 mysqlmysql  62 Aug 12 16:31 www2-bin.008
-rw-rw1 mysqlmysql  62 Aug 12 16:31 www2-bin.009
   
[www2:/opt/mysql-dev/var]:1304# ../bin/mysqlbinlog www2-bin.001
# at 4
#020812 16:29:30 server id 1  log_pos 4 Start: binlog v 3, server v 4.0.
2-alpha-log created 020812 16:29:30
# at 79
#020812 16:31:13 server id 2  log_pos 79Rotate to www2-bin.002 pos: 4
# at 118
#020812 16:31:13 server id 1  log_pos 118   Stop
[www2:/opt/mysql-dev/var]:1305# ../bin/mysqlbinlog www2-bin.002
# at 4
#020812 16:31:13 server id 2  log_pos 4 Rotate to www2-bin.003 pos: 4
# at 43
#020812 16:31:13 server id 1  log_pos 43Stop
[www2:/opt/mysql-dev/var]:1307# ../bin/mysqlbinlog www2-bin.003
# at 4
#020812 16:31:13 server id 2  log_pos 4 Rotate to www2-bin.004 pos: 4
# at 43
#020812 16:31:13 server id 1  log_pos 43Stop
[www2:/opt/mysql-dev/var]:1308#
--
and so on.

Will be fixed this error in 4.0.3?


How-To-Repeat:

Fix:


Submitter-Id:  submitter ID
Originator:Artem Ryabov
Organization:
 
MySQL support: none
Synopsis:  too many bin-log files
Severity:  serious
Priority:  medium
Category:  mysql
Class: sw-bug
Release:   mysql-4.0.2-alpha (Source distribution)

Environment:

System: Linux www2.osp.ru 2.2.19 #2 Wed Aug 15 16:02:45 MSD 2001 i686 unknown
Architecture: i686

Some paths:  /usr/local/bin/perl /usr/bin/make /usr/bin/gmake /usr/bin/gcc /usr/bin/cc
GCC: Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/2.96/specs
gcc version 2.96 2731 (Red Hat Linux 7.1 2.96-85)
Compilation info: CC='gcc'  CFLAGS=''  CXX='g++'  CXXFLAGS=''  LDFLAGS=''
LIBC: 
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   11 Nov 25  2000 /lib/libc.so.6 - libc-2.2.so
-rwxr-xr-x1 root root  5155229 Jan 11  2001 /lib/libc-2.2.so
-rw-r--r--1 root root 24498288 Jan 11  2001 /usr/lib/libc.a
-rw-r--r--1 root root  178 Jan 11  2001 /usr/lib/libc.so
configure command: ./configure --with-mysqld-ldflags=-all-static --disable-shared 
--prefix=/opt/mysql-dev --with-charset=cp1251


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




Re: MySQL 4.0.2 replication going bonkers?

2002-07-18 Thread Jeremy Zawodny

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 12:02:08PM +0300, Heikki Tuuri wrote:
 Jon,
 
 replication 4.0.1 - 4.0.2 does not work because the format in the 4.0
 series has evolved. Currently, if your master of the 4.0 series, your slave
 must be of the exact same release.

How likely is that to happen again?  I just upgraded my last slave to
4.0.3 and all the othres are running various builds of 4.0.2.  The master
is running 3.23.51.  I'm planning to upgrade it to 4.0.x after OSCON.  But
if this is likely to happen a few more times, I'll wait.  I don't want
upgrades to be an all servers or no servers situation.

Thanks,

Jeremy
-- 
Jeremy D. Zawodny |  Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  http://jeremy.zawodny.com/

MySQL 3.23.51: up 50 days, processed 1,073,978,230 queries (247/sec. avg)

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




Re: MySQL 4.0.2 replication going bonkers?

2002-07-18 Thread Heikki Tuuri

Jeremy,

- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Zawodny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Heikki Tuuri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jon Frisby [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 7:17 AM
Subject: Re: MySQL 4.0.2 replication going bonkers?


 On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 12:02:08PM +0300, Heikki Tuuri wrote:
  Jon,
 
  replication 4.0.1 - 4.0.2 does not work because the format in the 4.0
  series has evolved. Currently, if your master of the 4.0 series, your
slave
  must be of the exact same release.

 How likely is that to happen again?  I just upgraded my last slave to
 4.0.3 and all the othres are running various builds of 4.0.2.  The master
 is running 3.23.51.  I'm planning to upgrade it to 4.0.x after OSCON.  But
 if this is likely to happen a few more times, I'll wait.  I don't want
 upgrades to be an all servers or no servers situation.

4.0.1 was 6 months old when 4.0.2 came. I guess no changes, except bug
fixes, in the 4.0 series happen any more; they are put to to the 4.1 branch.

 Thanks,

 Jeremy
 --
 Jeremy D. Zawodny |  Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  http://jeremy.zawodny.com/

 MySQL 3.23.51: up 50 days, processed 1,073,978,230 queries (247/sec. avg)

Best regards,

Heikki Tuuri
Innobase Oy
---
InnoDB - transactions, row level locking, and foreign key support for MySQL
See http://www.innodb.com, download MySQL-Max from http://www.mysql.com






-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




Re: MySQL 4.0.2 replication going bonkers?

2002-07-17 Thread Heikki Tuuri

Jon,

replication 4.0.1 - 4.0.2 does not work because the format in the 4.0
series has evolved. Currently, if your master of the 4.0 series, your slave
must be of the exact same release.

All 3.23 versions after 3.23.33 can be replicated from each other

4.0.0 can only replicate to/from 4.0.0.

4.0.1 slave can replicate from a 3.23.33 and newer 3.23 master, and can only
replicate from a 4.0.1 master in the 4.0  branch.

4.0.2 slave can replicate from a 3.23 master, and can only replicate from a
4.0.2 master in the 4.0 branch.

   || Master
   || 3.23.33 and up | 4.0.0 | 4.0.1 | 4.0.2
 Slave | 3.23.33 and up | yes| no| no| no
   | 4.0.0  | no | yes   | no| no
   | 4.0.1  | yes| no| yes   | no
   | 4.0.2  | yes| no| no| yes

Best regards,

Heikki Tuuri
Innobase Oy
---
Order technical MySQL/InnoDB support at https://order.mysql.com/
See http://www.innodb.com for the online manual and latest news on InnoDB

- Original Message -
From: Jon Frisby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: mailing.database.mysql
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 4:30 AM
Subject: RE: MySQL 4.0.2 replication going bonkers?


 This seems to have not gotten through...  Perhaps the spam filter ate it?
 (sql, query)

 -JF

  -Original Message-
  From: Jon Frisby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 4:27 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: MySQL 4.0.2 replication going bonkers?
 
 
  We recently set up a 4.0.2 slave, which worked fine -- we loaded
  our data snapshot (taken via mysqldump) and were able to perform
  complex queries without problems...
 
  However, as soon as we tried to get this machine to act as a
  slave to a 4.0.1 server it crashed.  Immediately upon executing
  SLAVE START, we get messages like this in the error log:
 
  020714 01:32:03  mysqld started
  020714  1:32:05  InnoDB: Started
  /usr/sbin/mysqld-max: ready for connections
  020714  8:00:28  Slave SQL thread initialized, starting
  replication in log 'server2-bin.035' at position 579285542, relay
  log './db1-relay-bin.001' position: 4
  020714  8:00:29  Slave I/O thread: connected to master
  '[EMAIL PROTECTED]:3306',  replication started in log
  'server2-bin.035' at position 579285542 ERROR: 1146  Table
  'test.response' doesn't exist
  020714  8:00:30  Slave: error 'Table 'test.response' doesn't
  exist' on query 'INSERT INTO response SET
  connect_time=0.073868989944458, page_time=1.53695404529572,
  site_id='Apt'', error_code=1146
  020714  8:00:30  Error running query, slave SQL thread aborted.
  Fix the problem, and restart the slave SQL thread with SLAVE
  START. We stopped at log 'server2-bin.035' position 579285542
  020714  8:00:30  Slave SQL thread exiting, replication stopped in
  log  'server2-bin.035' at position 579285542
  020714  8:00:54  Error reading packet from server:  (server_errno=1159)
  020714  8:00:54  Slave I/O thread killed while reading event
  020714  8:00:54  Slave I/O thread exiting, read up to log
  'server2-bin.035', position 579993154
  020714  8:01:58  /usr/sbin/mysqld-max: Normal shutdown
 
  020714  8:01:58  InnoDB: Starting shutdown...
  020714  8:02:05  InnoDB: Shutdown completed
  020714  8:02:06  /usr/sbin/mysqld-max: Shutdown Complete
 
  020714 08:02:06  mysqld ended
 
  020714 08:02:16  mysqld started
  020714  8:02:17  InnoDB: Started
  /usr/sbin/mysqld-max: ready for connections
  020714  8:02:34  Slave SQL thread initialized, starting
  replication in log 'FIRST' at position 0, relay log
  './db1-relay-bin.001' position: 4
  ERROR: 1146  Table 'test.response' doesn't exist
  020714  8:02:34  Slave: error 'Table 'test.response' doesn't
  exist' on query 'INSERT INTO response SET
  connect_time=0.073868989944458, page_time=1.53695404529572, site_id='Apt
  '', error_code=1146
  020714  8:02:34  Error running query, slave SQL thread aborted.
  Fix the problem, and restart the slave SQL thread with SLAVE
  START. We stopped at log 'FIRST' position 0
  020714  8:02:34  Slave SQL thread exiting, replication stopped in
  log  'FIRST' at position 0
  020714  8:02:34  Slave I/O thread: connected to master
  '[EMAIL PROTECTED]:3306',  replication started in log
  'server2-bin.035' at position 579993154
  020714  8:03:02  Error reading packet from server:  (server_errno=1159)
  020714  8:03:02  Slave I/O thread killed while reading event
  020714  8:03:02  Slave I/O thread exiting, read up to log
  'server2-bin.035', position 579993478
  020714  8:03:25  /usr/sbin/mysqld-max: Normal shutdown
 
  020714  8:03:25  InnoDB: Starting shutdown...
  020714  8:03:28  InnoDB: Shutdown completed
  020714  8:03:28  /usr/sbin/mysqld-max: Shutdown Complete
 
  020714 08:03:28  mysqld ended
 
  020714 08:03:36  mysqld started
  020714  8:03:38  InnoDB: Started
  /usr/sbin/mysqld-max: ready for connections
  020714  8:04:02  Slave SQL thread initialized, starting

MySQL 4.0.2 replication going bonkers?

2002-07-15 Thread Jon Frisby

We recently set up a 4.0.2 slave, which worked fine -- we loaded our data
snapshot (taken via mysqldump) and were able to perform complex queries
without problems...

However, as soon as we tried to get this machine to act as a slave to a
4.0.1 server it crashed.  Immediately upon executing SLAVE START, we get
messages like this in the error log:

020714 01:32:03  mysqld started
020714  1:32:05  InnoDB: Started
/usr/sbin/mysqld-max: ready for connections
020714  8:00:28  Slave SQL thread initialized, starting replication in log
'server2-bin.035' at position 579285542, relay log './db1-relay-bin.001'
position: 4
020714  8:00:29  Slave I/O thread: connected to master
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]:3306',  replication started in log 'server2-bin.035' at
position 579285542 ERROR: 1146  Table 'test.response' doesn't exist
020714  8:00:30  Slave: error 'Table 'test.response' doesn't exist' on query
'INSERT INTO response SET connect_time=0.073868989944458,
page_time=1.53695404529572, site_id='Apt'', error_code=1146
020714  8:00:30  Error running query, slave SQL thread aborted. Fix the
problem, and restart the slave SQL thread with SLAVE START. We stopped at
log 'server2-bin.035' position 579285542
020714  8:00:30  Slave SQL thread exiting, replication stopped in log
'server2-bin.035' at position 579285542
020714  8:00:54  Error reading packet from server:  (server_errno=1159)
020714  8:00:54  Slave I/O thread killed while reading event
020714  8:00:54  Slave I/O thread exiting, read up to log 'server2-bin.035',
position 579993154
020714  8:01:58  /usr/sbin/mysqld-max: Normal shutdown

020714  8:01:58  InnoDB: Starting shutdown...
020714  8:02:05  InnoDB: Shutdown completed
020714  8:02:06  /usr/sbin/mysqld-max: Shutdown Complete

020714 08:02:06  mysqld ended

020714 08:02:16  mysqld started
020714  8:02:17  InnoDB: Started
/usr/sbin/mysqld-max: ready for connections
020714  8:02:34  Slave SQL thread initialized, starting replication in log
'FIRST' at position 0, relay log './db1-relay-bin.001' position: 4
ERROR: 1146  Table 'test.response' doesn't exist
020714  8:02:34  Slave: error 'Table 'test.response' doesn't exist' on query
'INSERT INTO response SET connect_time=0.073868989944458,
page_time=1.53695404529572, site_id='Apt
'', error_code=1146
020714  8:02:34  Error running query, slave SQL thread aborted. Fix the
problem, and restart the slave SQL thread with SLAVE START. We stopped at
log 'FIRST' position 0
020714  8:02:34  Slave SQL thread exiting, replication stopped in log
'FIRST' at position 0
020714  8:02:34  Slave I/O thread: connected to master
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]:3306',  replication started in log 'server2-bin.035' at
position 579993154
020714  8:03:02  Error reading packet from server:  (server_errno=1159)
020714  8:03:02  Slave I/O thread killed while reading event
020714  8:03:02  Slave I/O thread exiting, read up to log 'server2-bin.035',
position 579993478
020714  8:03:25  /usr/sbin/mysqld-max: Normal shutdown

020714  8:03:25  InnoDB: Starting shutdown...
020714  8:03:28  InnoDB: Shutdown completed
020714  8:03:28  /usr/sbin/mysqld-max: Shutdown Complete

020714 08:03:28  mysqld ended

020714 08:03:36  mysqld started
020714  8:03:38  InnoDB: Started
/usr/sbin/mysqld-max: ready for connections
020714  8:04:02  Slave SQL thread initialized, starting replication in log
'FIRST' at position 0, relay log './db1-relay-bin.001' position: 4
mysqld got signal 11;
This could be because you hit a bug. It is also possible that this binary or
one of the libraries it was linked against is corrupt, improperly built, or
misconfigured. This error can also be caused by malfunctioning hardware. We
will try our best to scrape up some info that will hopefully help diagnose
the problem, but since we have already crashed, something is definitely
wrong and this may fail.

key_buffer_size=67104768
record_buffer=16773120
sort_buffer=16777208
max_used_connections=0
max_connections=100
threads_connected=1
It is possible that mysqld could use up to
key_buffer_size + (record_buffer + sort_buffer)*max_connections = 3341931 K
bytes of memory
Hope that's ok; if not, decrease some variables in the equation.

thd=0x85204a0
Attempting backtrace. You can use the following information to find out
where mysqld died. If you see no messages after this, something went
terribly wrong...
Cannot determine thread, fp=0xbfe3f248, backtrace may not be correct.
Stack range sanity check OK, backtrace follows:
0x80722d8
0x82de908
0x82cb534
0x80e9a58
0x80af595
0x80b04f4
0x80ebf71
0x80ece8f
0x82dbf1c
0x831193a
New value of fp=(nil) failed sanity check, terminating stack trace!
Please read http://www.mysql.com/doc/U/s/Using_stack_trace.html and follow
instructions on how to resolve the stack trace. Resolved
stack trace is much more helpful in diagnosing the problem, so please do
resolve it
Trying to get some variables.
Some pointers may be invalid and cause the dump to abort...
thd-query at (nil)  is invalid pointer
thd-thread_id=3

Successfully dumped 

RE: MySQL 4.0.2 replication going bonkers?

2002-07-15 Thread Jon Frisby

This seems to have not gotten through...  Perhaps the spam filter ate it?
(sql, query)

-JF

 -Original Message-
 From: Jon Frisby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 4:27 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: MySQL 4.0.2 replication going bonkers?


 We recently set up a 4.0.2 slave, which worked fine -- we loaded
 our data snapshot (taken via mysqldump) and were able to perform
 complex queries without problems...

 However, as soon as we tried to get this machine to act as a
 slave to a 4.0.1 server it crashed.  Immediately upon executing
 SLAVE START, we get messages like this in the error log:

 020714 01:32:03  mysqld started
 020714  1:32:05  InnoDB: Started
 /usr/sbin/mysqld-max: ready for connections
 020714  8:00:28  Slave SQL thread initialized, starting
 replication in log 'server2-bin.035' at position 579285542, relay
 log './db1-relay-bin.001' position: 4
 020714  8:00:29  Slave I/O thread: connected to master
 '[EMAIL PROTECTED]:3306',  replication started in log
 'server2-bin.035' at position 579285542 ERROR: 1146  Table
 'test.response' doesn't exist
 020714  8:00:30  Slave: error 'Table 'test.response' doesn't
 exist' on query 'INSERT INTO response SET
 connect_time=0.073868989944458, page_time=1.53695404529572,
 site_id='Apt'', error_code=1146
 020714  8:00:30  Error running query, slave SQL thread aborted.
 Fix the problem, and restart the slave SQL thread with SLAVE
 START. We stopped at log 'server2-bin.035' position 579285542
 020714  8:00:30  Slave SQL thread exiting, replication stopped in
 log  'server2-bin.035' at position 579285542
 020714  8:00:54  Error reading packet from server:  (server_errno=1159)
 020714  8:00:54  Slave I/O thread killed while reading event
 020714  8:00:54  Slave I/O thread exiting, read up to log
 'server2-bin.035', position 579993154
 020714  8:01:58  /usr/sbin/mysqld-max: Normal shutdown

 020714  8:01:58  InnoDB: Starting shutdown...
 020714  8:02:05  InnoDB: Shutdown completed
 020714  8:02:06  /usr/sbin/mysqld-max: Shutdown Complete

 020714 08:02:06  mysqld ended

 020714 08:02:16  mysqld started
 020714  8:02:17  InnoDB: Started
 /usr/sbin/mysqld-max: ready for connections
 020714  8:02:34  Slave SQL thread initialized, starting
 replication in log 'FIRST' at position 0, relay log
 './db1-relay-bin.001' position: 4
 ERROR: 1146  Table 'test.response' doesn't exist
 020714  8:02:34  Slave: error 'Table 'test.response' doesn't
 exist' on query 'INSERT INTO response SET
 connect_time=0.073868989944458, page_time=1.53695404529572, site_id='Apt
 '', error_code=1146
 020714  8:02:34  Error running query, slave SQL thread aborted.
 Fix the problem, and restart the slave SQL thread with SLAVE
 START. We stopped at log 'FIRST' position 0
 020714  8:02:34  Slave SQL thread exiting, replication stopped in
 log  'FIRST' at position 0
 020714  8:02:34  Slave I/O thread: connected to master
 '[EMAIL PROTECTED]:3306',  replication started in log
 'server2-bin.035' at position 579993154
 020714  8:03:02  Error reading packet from server:  (server_errno=1159)
 020714  8:03:02  Slave I/O thread killed while reading event
 020714  8:03:02  Slave I/O thread exiting, read up to log
 'server2-bin.035', position 579993478
 020714  8:03:25  /usr/sbin/mysqld-max: Normal shutdown

 020714  8:03:25  InnoDB: Starting shutdown...
 020714  8:03:28  InnoDB: Shutdown completed
 020714  8:03:28  /usr/sbin/mysqld-max: Shutdown Complete

 020714 08:03:28  mysqld ended

 020714 08:03:36  mysqld started
 020714  8:03:38  InnoDB: Started
 /usr/sbin/mysqld-max: ready for connections
 020714  8:04:02  Slave SQL thread initialized, starting
 replication in log 'FIRST' at position 0, relay log
 './db1-relay-bin.001' position: 4
 mysqld got signal 11;
 This could be because you hit a bug. It is also possible that
 this binary or one of the libraries it was linked against is
 corrupt, improperly built, or misconfigured. This error can also
 be caused by malfunctioning hardware. We will try our best to
 scrape up some info that will hopefully help diagnose the
 problem, but since we have already crashed, something is
 definitely wrong and this may fail.

 key_buffer_size=67104768
 record_buffer=16773120
 sort_buffer=16777208
 max_used_connections=0
 max_connections=100
 threads_connected=1
 It is possible that mysqld could use up to
 key_buffer_size + (record_buffer + sort_buffer)*max_connections =
 3341931 K bytes of memory
 Hope that's ok; if not, decrease some variables in the equation.

 thd=0x85204a0
 Attempting backtrace. You can use the following information to
 find out where mysqld died. If you see no messages after this,
 something went terribly wrong...
 Cannot determine thread, fp=0xbfe3f248, backtrace may not be correct.
 Stack range sanity check OK, backtrace follows:
 0x80722d8
 0x82de908
 0x82cb534
 0x80e9a58
 0x80af595
 0x80b04f4
 0x80ebf71
 0x80ece8f
 0x82dbf1c
 0x831193a
 New value of fp=(nil) failed sanity check, terminating stack trace

Is mySQL support replication ??

2002-06-24 Thread Alice

Hi, all,

May i know is mySQL support replication  

regards,
alice 

/---\

Confidential and/ or privileged information may be contained in this
e-mail and any attachments transmitted with it ('Message'). If you are
not the addressee indicated in this Message (or responsible for 
delivery of this Message to such person),you are hereby notified that
any dissemination, distribution, printing or copying of this Message or
any part thereof is prohibited. Please delete this Message if received 
in  error and advise the sender by return e-mail. Opinions, conclusions
and other information in this Message that do not relate to the 
official business of this company shall be understood as neither given
nor endorsed by this company.

This mail is certified Virus Free by *ProtectNow! (InternetNow Sdn Bhd) 
*Scanner Engine powered by Norman Virus Control

\--/


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




Re: Is mySQL support replication ??

2002-06-24 Thread Bhavin Vyas

Yes it does.
http://www.mysql.com/doc/R/e/Replication_Implementation.html
- Original Message -
From: Alice [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 6:52 PM
Subject: Is mySQL support replication ??


 Hi, all,

 May i know is mySQL support replication 

 regards,
 alice


/---
\

 Confidential and/ or privileged information may be contained in this
 e-mail and any attachments transmitted with it ('Message'). If you are
 not the addressee indicated in this Message (or responsible for
 delivery of this Message to such person),you are hereby notified that
 any dissemination, distribution, printing or copying of this Message or
 any part thereof is prohibited. Please delete this Message if received
 in  error and advise the sender by return e-mail. Opinions, conclusions
 and other information in this Message that do not relate to the
 official business of this company shall be understood as neither given
 nor endorsed by this company.

 This mail is certified Virus Free by *ProtectNow! (InternetNow Sdn Bhd)
 *Scanner Engine powered by Norman Virus Control


\--/


 -
 Before posting, please check:
http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

 To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe, e-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php



-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




MySql Database Replication Question

2002-03-07 Thread Thi Cao

All,

How can I notify an application running on the slave server that the slave
database has just updated itself by means of replication.  The reason I ask
is that I know MySql currently doesn't support triggers, but my application
needs to be notified when an update on the slave has just taken place.  Once
again, thanks for your time.

Thi

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




Re: MySql Database Replication Question

2002-03-07 Thread Jeremy Zawodny

On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 08:37:00AM -0600, Thi Cao wrote:
 All,
 
 How can I notify an application running on the slave server that the
 slave database has just updated itself by means of replication.  The
 reason I ask is that I know MySql currently doesn't support
 triggers, but my application needs to be notified when an update on
 the slave has just taken place.  Once again, thanks for your time.

Hm, that's a little unusual.   Could the application look at the
output of SHOW SLAVE STATUS once in a while, maybe?
-- 
Jeremy D. Zawodny, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Technical Yahoo - Yahoo Finance
Desk: (408) 349-7878   Fax: (408) 349-5454   Cell: (408) 685-5936

MySQL 3.23.47-max: up 28 days, processed 988,263,631 queries (407/sec. avg)

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




RE: MySql Database Replication Question

2002-03-07 Thread Thi Cao

Jeremy,

I'm not sure I follow.  What information from that command would the app be
looking for specifically.  Maybe you're saying the app should look at the
position of the master's binary log file.  Is that what you suggest?

Thi

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Zawodny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 10:42 AM
To: Thi Cao
Cc: MySQL
Subject: Re: MySql Database Replication Question


On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 08:37:00AM -0600, Thi Cao wrote:
 All,
 
 How can I notify an application running on the slave server that the
 slave database has just updated itself by means of replication.  The
 reason I ask is that I know MySql currently doesn't support
 triggers, but my application needs to be notified when an update on
 the slave has just taken place.  Once again, thanks for your time.

Hm, that's a little unusual.   Could the application look at the
output of SHOW SLAVE STATUS once in a while, maybe?
-- 
Jeremy D. Zawodny, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Technical Yahoo - Yahoo Finance
Desk: (408) 349-7878   Fax: (408) 349-5454   Cell: (408) 685-5936

MySQL 3.23.47-max: up 28 days, processed 988,263,631 queries (407/sec. avg)

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




RE: MySQL Database Replication

2002-03-07 Thread ds

On Wed, 2002-03-06 at 14:26, Thi Cao wrote:
 When I grant privileges as follows, the slave gets updated:
 
 GRANT FILE ON *.* to repl@'%' identified by 'some_password';
 
 Could someone please tell me why I must grant the FILE privilege on all
 databases for the repl (slave) to be able to update one particular database?

MySQL Manual:
4.2.7 Privileges Provided by MySQL:

The file privilege gives you permission to read and write files on the
server using the LOAD DATA INFILE and SELECT ... INTO OUTFILE
statements. Any user to whom this privilege is granted can read or write
any file that the MySQL server can read or write.

4.10.3 How To Set Up Replication
2.  Set up special a replication user on the master with the FILE 
privilege and permission to connect from all the slaves. If the user is
only doing replication (which is recommended), you don't need to grant
any additional privileges. For example, to create a user named repl
which can access your master from any host, you might use this command:
GRANT FILE ON *.* TO repl@% IDENTIFIED BY 'password';


 
 Thi Cao wrote:
  
  Hello everyone,
  
  This is my first attempt at MySQL database replication.  Can't seem to get
  it to work yet.  The problem reported in the error log of the slave server
  is as follows:
  
  Error reading packet from server:  Access denied for user
 'repl@slave_host'
  (Using password: YES) (read_errno 0,server_errno=1045)
  
  I believe it has something to do with the way I granted privileges to the
  user repl.  I did the following:
  
  GRANT FILE ON dbname.* to repl@'%' identified by 'some_password';
  
 
 Did you do a FLUSH PRIVILIGES after that?  That is needed in some cases.


You don't need to flush privileges when using grant/revoke commands.


-- 
dsoares
(sql)

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




RE: MySQL Database Replication

2002-03-07 Thread Thi Cao

ds,

If I understand you correctly, that also means that the user repl can access
the mysql database where all the privilege info is stored and see the
permissions, passwords, and such.  Yes/No?

Thi


-Original Message-
From: ds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 11:02 AM
To: Thi Cao
Cc: MySQL
Subject: RE: MySQL Database Replication


On Wed, 2002-03-06 at 14:26, Thi Cao wrote:
 When I grant privileges as follows, the slave gets updated:
 
 GRANT FILE ON *.* to repl@'%' identified by 'some_password';
 
 Could someone please tell me why I must grant the FILE privilege on all
 databases for the repl (slave) to be able to update one particular
database?

MySQL Manual:
4.2.7 Privileges Provided by MySQL:

The file privilege gives you permission to read and write files on the
server using the LOAD DATA INFILE and SELECT ... INTO OUTFILE
statements. Any user to whom this privilege is granted can read or write
any file that the MySQL server can read or write.

4.10.3 How To Set Up Replication
2.  Set up special a replication user on the master with the FILE 
privilege and permission to connect from all the slaves. If the user is
only doing replication (which is recommended), you don't need to grant
any additional privileges. For example, to create a user named repl
which can access your master from any host, you might use this command:
GRANT FILE ON *.* TO repl@% IDENTIFIED BY 'password';


 
 Thi Cao wrote:
  
  Hello everyone,
  
  This is my first attempt at MySQL database replication.  Can't seem to
get
  it to work yet.  The problem reported in the error log of the slave
server
  is as follows:
  
  Error reading packet from server:  Access denied for user
 'repl@slave_host'
  (Using password: YES) (read_errno 0,server_errno=1045)
  
  I believe it has something to do with the way I granted privileges to
the
  user repl.  I did the following:
  
  GRANT FILE ON dbname.* to repl@'%' identified by 'some_password';
  
 
 Did you do a FLUSH PRIVILIGES after that?  That is needed in some cases.


You don't need to flush privileges when using grant/revoke commands.


-- 
dsoares
(sql)

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




RE: MySQL Database Replication

2002-03-07 Thread Luc Foisy

rep1 would gain FILE access to all ( not sure what the really entails )
it would not have SELECT access, so can not read from it

mind you if they have enough info to get in with rep1 access, then they
could just replicate everything on thier own server and read till thier
hearts content

-Original Message-
From: Thi Cao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 12:04 PM
To: Thi Cao
Cc: MySQL
Subject: RE: MySQL Database Replication


ds,

If I understand you correctly, that also means that the user repl can access
the mysql database where all the privilege info is stored and see the
permissions, passwords, and such.  Yes/No?

Thi


-Original Message-
From: ds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 11:02 AM
To: Thi Cao
Cc: MySQL
Subject: RE: MySQL Database Replication


On Wed, 2002-03-06 at 14:26, Thi Cao wrote:
 When I grant privileges as follows, the slave gets updated:
 
 GRANT FILE ON *.* to repl@'%' identified by 'some_password';
 
 Could someone please tell me why I must grant the FILE privilege on all
 databases for the repl (slave) to be able to update one particular
database?

MySQL Manual:
4.2.7 Privileges Provided by MySQL:

The file privilege gives you permission to read and write files on the
server using the LOAD DATA INFILE and SELECT ... INTO OUTFILE
statements. Any user to whom this privilege is granted can read or write
any file that the MySQL server can read or write.

4.10.3 How To Set Up Replication
2.  Set up special a replication user on the master with the FILE 
privilege and permission to connect from all the slaves. If the user is
only doing replication (which is recommended), you don't need to grant
any additional privileges. For example, to create a user named repl
which can access your master from any host, you might use this command:
GRANT FILE ON *.* TO repl@% IDENTIFIED BY 'password';


 
 Thi Cao wrote:
  
  Hello everyone,
  
  This is my first attempt at MySQL database replication.  Can't seem to
get
  it to work yet.  The problem reported in the error log of the slave
server
  is as follows:
  
  Error reading packet from server:  Access denied for user
 'repl@slave_host'
  (Using password: YES) (read_errno 0,server_errno=1045)
  
  I believe it has something to do with the way I granted privileges to
the
  user repl.  I did the following:
  
  GRANT FILE ON dbname.* to repl@'%' identified by 'some_password';
  
 
 Did you do a FLUSH PRIVILIGES after that?  That is needed in some cases.


You don't need to flush privileges when using grant/revoke commands.


-- 
dsoares
(sql)

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




RE: MySQL Database Replication

2002-03-06 Thread Thi Cao

Yes, I did flush the privileges when nothing else worked but that didn't do
the trick either.  Thanks for trying.

-Original Message-
From: James Housley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 6:00 PM
To: Thi Cao
Cc: MySQL
Subject: Re: MySQL Database Replication


Thi Cao wrote:
 
 Hello everyone,
 
 This is my first attempt at MySQL database replication.  Can't seem to get
 it to work yet.  The problem reported in the error log of the slave server
 is as follows:
 
 Error reading packet from server:  Access denied for user
'repl@slave_host'
 (Using password: YES) (read_errno 0,server_errno=1045)
 
 I believe it has something to do with the way I granted privileges to the
 user repl.  I did the following:
 
 GRANT FILE ON dbname.* to repl@'%' identified by 'some_password';
 

Did you do a FLUSH PRIVILIGES after that?  That is needed in some cases.

Jim
-- 
/\   ASCII Ribbon Campaign  .
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail  .
 X  - NO Word docs in e-mail .
/ \ -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power to Serve
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.TheHousleys.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.SimTel.Net
-
Studies show that 1 out of every 4 Americans suffer some form of
mental illness.  So look at your three best friends, if they
are okay it is YOU!

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




RE: MySQL Database Replication

2002-03-06 Thread Thi Cao

When I grant privileges as follows, the slave gets updated:

GRANT FILE ON *.* to repl@'%' identified by 'some_password';

Could someone please tell me why I must grant the FILE privilege on all
databases for the repl (slave) to be able to update one particular database?

Thanks everyone.

Thi

-Original Message-
From: James Housley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 6:00 PM
To: Thi Cao
Cc: MySQL
Subject: Re: MySQL Database Replication


Thi Cao wrote:
 
 Hello everyone,
 
 This is my first attempt at MySQL database replication.  Can't seem to get
 it to work yet.  The problem reported in the error log of the slave server
 is as follows:
 
 Error reading packet from server:  Access denied for user
'repl@slave_host'
 (Using password: YES) (read_errno 0,server_errno=1045)
 
 I believe it has something to do with the way I granted privileges to the
 user repl.  I did the following:
 
 GRANT FILE ON dbname.* to repl@'%' identified by 'some_password';
 

Did you do a FLUSH PRIVILIGES after that?  That is needed in some cases.

Jim
-- 
/\   ASCII Ribbon Campaign  .
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail  .
 X  - NO Word docs in e-mail .
/ \ -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power to Serve
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.TheHousleys.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.SimTel.Net
-
Studies show that 1 out of every 4 Americans suffer some form of
mental illness.  So look at your three best friends, if they
are okay it is YOU!

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




MySQL Database Replication

2002-03-05 Thread Thi Cao

Hello everyone,

This is my first attempt at MySQL database replication.  Can't seem to get
it to work yet.  The problem reported in the error log of the slave server
is as follows:

Error reading packet from server:  Access denied for user 'repl@slave_host'
(Using password: YES) (read_errno 0,server_errno=1045)


I believe it has something to do with the way I granted privileges to the
user repl.  I did the following:

GRANT FILE ON dbname.* to repl@'%' identified by 'some_password';

In the slave config file, I have the correct password to connect to the
master, so I don't believe that that is the problem.  Also included in the
config file is replicate-do-db=dbname.

If someone has any idea of what I can or should do, your help would be much
appreciated.  If not, thanks for your time.

Thi


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




Re: MySQL Database Replication

2002-03-05 Thread James Housley

Thi Cao wrote:
 
 Hello everyone,
 
 This is my first attempt at MySQL database replication.  Can't seem to get
 it to work yet.  The problem reported in the error log of the slave server
 is as follows:
 
 Error reading packet from server:  Access denied for user 'repl@slave_host'
 (Using password: YES) (read_errno 0,server_errno=1045)
 
 I believe it has something to do with the way I granted privileges to the
 user repl.  I did the following:
 
 GRANT FILE ON dbname.* to repl@'%' identified by 'some_password';
 

Did you do a FLUSH PRIVILIGES after that?  That is needed in some cases.

Jim
-- 
/\   ASCII Ribbon Campaign  .
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail  .
 X  - NO Word docs in e-mail .
/ \ -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power to Serve
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.TheHousleys.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.SimTel.Net
-
Studies show that 1 out of every 4 Americans suffer some form of
mental illness.  So look at your three best friends, if they
are okay it is YOU!

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




MySql and replication

2001-11-30 Thread Fabien R.

Hello,

I have 2 application running in  a master/slave mode.
- Application A linked to a database D
- Application A' linked to a database D'

While A is master, A' is in standby mode and D' replicates D.
If a problem occurs on A, A' becomes master and D must replicate D'.

1) Is it possible for a master MySql database to become slave ?
2) Is it possible for A' to tell D' to become master (by lauching a
script for instance) ?

Thanks in advance,
Fabien


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




Re: FW: mysql db replication security across the internet

2001-09-06 Thread Ed Carp

Duc Chau ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) writes:

 Can anyone tell me or point me to documentation on how to securely do
 database replication over the internet?
 
 I need to replicate to machines in datacenters in diffrent states.  How
 feasible is this? Has anyone done it? What are the security concerns with
 doing this via the net?  Thanks

Not a problem. Use secure shell's port forwarding feature (look in the VPN HOWTO at 
http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/VPN-HOWTO.html for more info).
--
Ed Carp, N7EKG  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  -  214/341-4420 - http://www.pobox.com/~erc

Squished Mosquito, Inc.
Internet Applications Development
Escapade Server-Side Scripting Language Development Team
http://www.squishedmosquito.com
Pensacola - Dallas - Dresden - London

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




FW: mysql db replication security across the internet

2001-09-05 Thread Duc Chau


Can anyone tell me or point me to documentation on how to securely do
database replication over the internet?

I need to replicate to machines in datacenters in diffrent states.  How
feasible is this? Has anyone done it? What are the security concerns with
doing this via the net?  Thanks

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




RE: mysql db replication security across the internet

2001-09-05 Thread Duc Chau



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 3:50 PM
To: Duc Chau
Subject: Re: mysql db replication security across the internet 


Your message cannot be posted because it appears to be either spam or
simply off topic to our filter. To bypass the filter you must include
one of the following words in your message:

database,sql,query,table

If you just reply to this message, and include the entire text of it in the
reply, your reply will go through. However, you should
first review the text of the message to make sure it has something to do
with MySQL. Just typing the word MySQL once will be sufficient, for example.

You have written the following:

Can anyone tell me or point me to documentation on how to securely do data
replication over the internet?

I need to replicate to machines in datacenters in diffrent states.  How
feasible is this? Has anyone done it? What are the security concerns with
doing this via the net?  Thanks

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




MySQL and replication?

2001-06-22 Thread Daniel Åkerud

Anyone has any experience with mySQL in combination with data replication? Are there 
products available out there that allows this?

Thanks

Daniel Åkerud




Re: MySQL Database Replication

2001-05-24 Thread Jeremy Zawodny

On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 01:18:42PM -0500, David Gullett wrote:
 
 I have 10 or so MySQL servers in the field, all writing data to a
 database of the same name.  I would like to set up replication from
 all masters back to a single slave server and have each master write
 to a different database.  Is there an easy way to do this, short of
 running multiple instances of MySQL on the slave server?

Currently, each slave can only have a single master. So you're looking
at multiple slave instances.

If you don't need completely real-time replication, you might consider
rsync or something similar.

Jeremy
-- 
Jeremy D. Zawodny, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Technical Yahoo - Yahoo Finance
Desk: (408) 349-7878Fax: (408) 349-5454Cell: (408) 439-9951

MySQL 3.23.29: up 5 days, processed 35,090,354 queries (79/sec. avg)

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




MySQL Database Replication

2001-05-19 Thread David Gullett


I have 10 or so MySQL servers in the field, all writing data to a database
of the same name.  I would like to set up replication from all masters back
to a single slave server and have each master write to a different database.
Is there an easy way to do this, short of running multiple instances of
MySQL on the slave server?

Thanks,

David Gullett
Circuits Maximus, LLC.


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php