Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION

2000-06-07 Thread GAPrichard

Allan,
(Please note that as I write this on 6/7, I have not checked my email in 
several days.)  Yes, I have learned a lot reading in the newbie list, and 
I've only been doing if for a couple of months.  I've found that sometimes 
others on newbie ask about some problem I about to deal with.  And I did 
submit a couple of my question to this list (though not in the form below); I 
don't know if there have been any responses or I will do so again.  Even just 
having general responses has been very helpful--for instance knowing that 
others ARE able to have WordPerfect and StarOffice helps me.  Suggested 
tactics also help me.  I've stopped reinstalling Mandrake; I'm getting 
confident enough that I might be able to fix problems.  I've been bogged down 
and haven't had a chance to get back to several things.  
And for anybody that didn't read between the lines correctly, whereas 
there is a definite need for professional support (and it's quality reflects 
on McMillian) this list has been far more beneficial to me.  Thanks to all of 
YOU!!  -Gary-


In a message dated 6/3/2000 2:31:53 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

 Garythis newbie list and its partner, the expert list,
 have a much broader knowledge base, especially for solving
 Linux Mandrake specific problems, than any paid email or phone
 support system could possibly have.  I'm sure that you'll be
 able to solve your problem using one or both of these lists. 
 Using them with, perhaps some extra patience, as not everybody
 who participates sees every message that gets posted.
 
 Alan
 
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  Let me be clear, I'm not complaining, rather I'm using my experiences 
and
  expectations to make a point.
  
  Poor support makes Mandrake look bad.  I have been trying to get a 
sound
  configuration failure solved over two weeks and find Linuxcare to be nearly
  useless.  They assume no reply in 48 hours means the problem is solved.
  Well, I'm learning Linux in my "spare time", let alone that I don't get to 
my
  mail that consistently.  But the real problem seems to be that when I 
e-mail
  a reply to their proposed solution, referencing their incident number
  (usually in the subject line), I am assigned a new number each time.  [I do
  not reply on-line as they apparently expect]  [Are they billing based on 
the
  number of incidents solved?]  My "reply" apparently goes to a new support
  person each time.  With the most recent proposed solution the support 
person
  asked what product I had, even though I had refered to three other incident
  numbers [which contained all of the product, equipment  advise 
information]
  as being the same unsolved issue -- (typically?) the support person was too
  rushed to review the matter, too rushed to be useful!  Chunking support
  incidents like this obviously doesn't work.  When one problem takes so long
  to solve, and is handled so poorly, it makes Mandrake look bad.
  Support should also be for everything supplied in the retail package, 
not
  just the basic system install (Linuxcare support said my problem with Word
  Perfect and Star Office corrupting X windows was beyond the scope of the
  support supplied by Mandrake-followed by an ad for paid support).  [Given 
the
  support I have experienced I certainly don't want to purchase support from
  them.]  I bought Mandrake because I wanted to accomplish something, I was 
not
  buying "a new life" trying to make this work.  Since these programs were 
both
  mentioned as "features" on the box (and both enclosed) it seems reasonable
  that if I have a problem getting them set up support for that should be
  included.
  -Gary Prichard-
  




Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION: Security

2000-06-03 Thread Glyn Millington


Right!  That gets my vote too...

Glyn M.



On Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 03:28:17PM -0400, thus spake [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 I agree with Joseph S. Gardner's comment (below).  A firewall as part of 
 the initial installation of Linux-Mandrake (even for a newbie) is a good 
 idea.  Some people will have cable modems and other things that are on all 
 the time and thus have a need for a firewall before they know it or know 
 enough to try to put one in.
 -Gary-

-- 
   **
   * "The soul is greater than the hum of its parts. "  *
   * Douglas Hoftstatder*
   **




Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION

2000-06-03 Thread Alan Shoemaker

Garythis newbie list and its partner, the expert list,
have a much broader knowledge base, especially for solving
Linux Mandrake specific problems, than any paid email or phone
support system could possibly have.  I'm sure that you'll be
able to solve your problem using one or both of these lists. 
Using them with, perhaps some extra patience, as not everybody
who participates sees every message that gets posted.

Alan


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Let me be clear, I'm not complaining, rather I'm using my experiences and
 expectations to make a point.
 
 Poor support makes Mandrake look bad.  I have been trying to get a sound
 configuration failure solved over two weeks and find Linuxcare to be nearly
 useless.  They assume no reply in 48 hours means the problem is solved.
 Well, I'm learning Linux in my "spare time", let alone that I don't get to my
 mail that consistently.  But the real problem seems to be that when I e-mail
 a reply to their proposed solution, referencing their incident number
 (usually in the subject line), I am assigned a new number each time.  [I do
 not reply on-line as they apparently expect]  [Are they billing based on the
 number of incidents solved?]  My "reply" apparently goes to a new support
 person each time.  With the most recent proposed solution the support person
 asked what product I had, even though I had refered to three other incident
 numbers [which contained all of the product, equipment  advise information]
 as being the same unsolved issue -- (typically?) the support person was too
 rushed to review the matter, too rushed to be useful!  Chunking support
 incidents like this obviously doesn't work.  When one problem takes so long
 to solve, and is handled so poorly, it makes Mandrake look bad.
 Support should also be for everything supplied in the retail package, not
 just the basic system install (Linuxcare support said my problem with Word
 Perfect and Star Office corrupting X windows was beyond the scope of the
 support supplied by Mandrake-followed by an ad for paid support).  [Given the
 support I have experienced I certainly don't want to purchase support from
 them.]  I bought Mandrake because I wanted to accomplish something, I was not
 buying "a new life" trying to make this work.  Since these programs were both
 mentioned as "features" on the box (and both enclosed) it seems reasonable
 that if I have a problem getting them set up support for that should be
 included.
 -Gary Prichard-




Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION

2000-06-02 Thread GAPrichard

In a message dated 5/28/2000 12:39:40 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Hugh why not simply us XFdrake ?  

Didn't know I could.  I know that I have a lot to learn, and this is the 
position many others are going to be in as they get fed-up with windows.  One 
tries what one can until they learn better.  Thanks for showing me this one.  
-Gary-




Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION

2000-06-02 Thread GAPrichard

As I have mentioned elsewhere in newbie, I have just installed a couple 
of other "flavors" of Linux.  It helps one appreciate Linux-Mandrake.  One 
can begin doing things more quickly with what Mandrake has put on the 
desktop.  
I suggest, have RPMDrake ask if you want a desktop icon created during 
install of RPMs, especially for such major programs as Word Perfect or Star 
Office.  Supply easy to find (that is, easy for a disoriented beginner) 
information about adding and removing desktop icons.  The sooner one can be 
productive the more pleased with Mandrake they are likely to be.  
An excellent feature, for instance, is RPMDrake.  But a little 
improvement would help some people.  When I have used it, I have occasionally 
gotten an "install failed" message, followed by an "OK" box.  This is not 
helpful.  A useful message would be good, perhaps naming an error-log file.  
The RPM program is removed from the list of 
RPMs not yet installed (and not replaced), so trying to install it again is 
involved when it ought to be simple.  I have (re)installed Mandrake many 
times (it gives a known starting place for traceing problems) and I think I 
was rushing through the RPM installs: it hadn't completed one install and I 
was feeding it the next, and it choked, a mistake a rank beginner wouldn't 
make.  Usually beginners make mistakes experienced people wouldn't make, and 
trying to think of all of the possibilities (for error trapping) is the 
problem.  

Build on your strenth(s),
address your weaknesses,
Live long and prosper (?)
-Gary Prichard-




Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION: Security

2000-06-02 Thread GAPrichard

I agree with Joseph S. Gardner's comment (below).  A firewall as part of 
the initial installation of Linux-Mandrake (even for a newbie) is a good 
idea.  Some people will have cable modems and other things that are on all 
the time and thus have a need for a firewall before they know it or know 
enough to try to put one in.
-Gary-


Anthony Huereca wrote:

 I don't have M7.0 yet, but I like the idea of the different security zones. 
One
 of the main complaints I've heard on this mailing list is lack of 
desciption of
 what the different zones actually do. So tell the user what exactly is
 happening when you select a certain level. Or maybe, have like a checklist,
 where the user can pick and choose what exactly they want to do. That would 
be
 cool. Keep it simple (like 5 levels) for the avearage person, but let the
 expert pick and choose.

 And include some sample firewalls or something like that. Somethign that
 would be useful to the average Dial-up (or cable modem in my case) person, 
who
 doesn't need a lot of exceptions like for a FTP or web server,  but just 
needs a
 good regular firewall.  That way the user doesn't have to figure out all the
 ipchaining rules and stuff; which at the moment totally loses me everytime I
 try to read through the how-to. Of course, maybe it's not a good security 
idea
 for a "one-size-fits-most" firewall, but it's just a thought I had.

 --
 Anthony Huereca
 http://m3000.1wh.com
 Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are.

A newbie firewall.  Now THAT'S a great idea.


--
Joseph S. Gardner
Senior Designer / Technical Support
Kirby Co.,  Cleveland, OH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION

2000-06-02 Thread GAPrichard

Let me be clear, I'm not complaining, rather I'm using my experiences and 
expectations to make a point.

Poor support makes Mandrake look bad.  I have been trying to get a sound 
configuration failure solved over two weeks and find Linuxcare to be nearly 
useless.  They assume no reply in 48 hours means the problem is solved.  
Well, I'm learning Linux in my "spare time", let alone that I don't get to my 
mail that consistently.  But the real problem seems to be that when I e-mail 
a reply to their proposed solution, referencing their incident number 
(usually in the subject line), I am assigned a new number each time.  [I do 
not reply on-line as they apparently expect]  [Are they billing based on the 
number of incidents solved?]  My "reply" apparently goes to a new support 
person each time.  With the most recent proposed solution the support person 
asked what product I had, even though I had refered to three other incident 
numbers [which contained all of the product, equipment  advise information] 
as being the same unsolved issue -- (typically?) the support person was too 
rushed to review the matter, too rushed to be useful!  Chunking support 
incidents like this obviously doesn't work.  When one problem takes so long 
to solve, and is handled so poorly, it makes Mandrake look bad.
Support should also be for everything supplied in the retail package, not 
just the basic system install (Linuxcare support said my problem with Word 
Perfect and Star Office corrupting X windows was beyond the scope of the 
support supplied by Mandrake-followed by an ad for paid support).  [Given the 
support I have experienced I certainly don't want to purchase support from 
them.]  I bought Mandrake because I wanted to accomplish something, I was not 
buying "a new life" trying to make this work.  Since these programs were both 
mentioned as "features" on the box (and both enclosed) it seems reasonable 
that if I have a problem getting them set up support for that should be 
included.
-Gary Prichard-




Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - New Tool

2000-06-02 Thread Marc

Here are some documents that might help you out. Hope it helps allthough I
have not followed this discussion. This is as close as you will get to real
easy compiling
http://www.pcworld.com/heres_how/article/0,1400,13702,00.html
http://www.linuxnewbie.org/nhf/intel/compiling/kernelcomp.html



- Original Message -
From: "Roman Bysh" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 8:33 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - New Tool


| How about a compile wizard or is that asking for too much?
|
| Roman
|
|
| Dacia and AzureRose wrote:
| 
|  That would be s cool!
| 
|  Dacia
|  --- "Joseph S. Gardner" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|   Denis,
|  
|   I'd like to see a tool to assist in the compiling of
|   a new kernel and then
|   INSTALL it!
|  
|  
|   --
|   Joseph S. Gardner
|   Handi Krafts
|   www.handi-krafts.com
|   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|  
|   Linux is like a wigwam...
|   No windows, no gates.
|   Apache inside
|  
|   Registered linux user #1696600
|   ICQ #63389227
|  
|  
| 
|  __
|  Do You Yahoo!?
|  Send instant messages  get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
|  http://im.yahoo.com/
|
|


_
NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
Click here for FREE Internet Access and Email
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html




Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - New Tool

2000-06-02 Thread michael

On Wed, 31 May 2000, you wrote:
 YES
 - Original Message - 
 From: Dacia and AzureRose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 7:58 PM
 Subject: Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - New Tool
 
 
  That would be s cool!
  
  
  Dacia
  --- "Joseph S. Gardner" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Denis,
   
   I'd like to see a tool to assist in the compiling of
   a new kernel and then
   INSTALL it!
   
   
   --
   AMEN
-- 
 
-michael-




Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - New Tool

2000-06-01 Thread rharvey

YES
- Original Message - 
From: Dacia and AzureRose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 7:58 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - New Tool


 That would be s cool!
 
 
 Dacia
 --- "Joseph S. Gardner" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Denis,
  
  I'd like to see a tool to assist in the compiling of
  a new kernel and then
  INSTALL it!
  
  
  --
  Joseph S. Gardner
  Handi Krafts
  www.handi-krafts.com
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  Linux is like a wigwam...
  No windows, no gates.
  Apache inside
  
  Registered linux user #1696600
  ICQ #63389227
  
  
 
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Send instant messages  get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
 http://im.yahoo.com/
 




Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - New Tool

2000-06-01 Thread Roman Bysh

How about a compile wizard or is that asking for too much?

Roman


Dacia and AzureRose wrote:
 
 That would be s cool!
 
 Dacia
 --- "Joseph S. Gardner" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Denis,
 
  I'd like to see a tool to assist in the compiling of
  a new kernel and then
  INSTALL it!
 
 
  --
  Joseph S. Gardner
  Handi Krafts
  www.handi-krafts.com
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Linux is like a wigwam...
  No windows, no gates.
  Apache inside
 
  Registered linux user #1696600
  ICQ #63389227
 
 
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Send instant messages  get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
 http://im.yahoo.com/




Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - Install

2000-05-31 Thread Denis HAVLIK

:~Denis,
:~
:~How about a "Dear Santa, I want it all" selection?  I know I can get that
:~through the expert install but even this is confusing as there is a server /
:~workstation selection (and something else if memory serves me) and this fails
:~to make much sense.

See what i proposed in "Authomatic Install" letter.
-- 
-
Dr. Denis Havlikhttp://www.ap.univie.ac.at/users/havlik
Mandrakesoft||| e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quality Assurance  (@ @)(private: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
---oOO--(_)--OOo-
Newbies aren't necessarily stupid nor uninformed, just lacking in
experience with this specific OS. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])






Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - Way Better Documentation

2000-05-31 Thread Ray Winbush



I think there has to be better documentation on the 
file structure of Linux. I come from a Windows AND MacOS background and 
both of these systems are fairly intuitive in terms of how to save files to 
certain drives. Linux documentation isn't as intuitive.

RayWinbush


Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION: Security

2000-05-30 Thread Joseph S. Gardner

Anthony Huereca wrote:

 I don't have M7.0 yet, but I like the idea of the different security zones. One
 of the main complaints I've heard on this mailing list is lack of desciption of
 what the different zones actually do. So tell the user what exactly is
 happening when you select a certain level. Or maybe, have like a checklist,
 where the user can pick and choose what exactly they want to do. That would be
 cool. Keep it simple (like 5 levels) for the avearage person, but let the
 expert pick and choose.

 And include some sample firewalls or something like that. Somethign that
 would be useful to the average Dial-up (or cable modem in my case) person, who
 doesn't need a lot of exceptions like for a FTP or web server,  but just needs a
 good regular firewall.  That way the user doesn't have to figure out all the
 ipchaining rules and stuff; which at the moment totally loses me everytime I
 try to read through the how-to. Of course, maybe it's not a good security idea
 for a "one-size-fits-most" firewall, but it's just a thought I had.

 --
 Anthony Huereca
 http://m3000.1wh.com
 Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are.

A newbie firewall.  Now THAT'S a great idea.


--
Joseph S. Gardner
Senior Designer / Technical Support
Kirby Co.,  Cleveland, OH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux is like a wigwam...
No windows, no gates.
Apache inside

Registered linux user #1696600
ICQ #63389227





[newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - New Tool

2000-05-30 Thread Joseph S. Gardner

Denis,

I'd like to see a tool to assist in the compiling of a new kernel and then
INSTALL it!


--
Joseph S. Gardner
Handi Krafts
www.handi-krafts.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux is like a wigwam...
No windows, no gates.
Apache inside

Registered linux user #1696600
ICQ #63389227





Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - Install

2000-05-30 Thread Joseph S. Gardner

Denis,

How about a "Dear Santa, I want it all" selection?  I know I can get that
through the expert install but even this is confusing as there is a server /
workstation selection (and something else if memory serves me) and this fails
to make much sense.



--
Joseph S. Gardner
Senior Designer / Technical Support
Kirby Co.,  Cleveland, OH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux is like a wigwam...
No windows, no gates.
Apache inside

Registered linux user #1696600
ICQ #63389227





Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION : NIC/Cable/DSL/ISDN

2000-05-28 Thread Fran Parker

Hi Denis,  This is Bambi (or Fran if you prefer)

Is that the same for my thoughts on the next Mandrake as well Denis? :)

(Hadn't seen any reference to mine either...didn't know if the comments
were not received or not received well, or what :)

Just kidding here, Denis :)

But I would be interested to know your thoughts on my DISCUSSION
comments posted.

I hope the comments were not taken as anything other than what they
were, honest thoughts about a great Linux distribution, that in time
will be even better.

Thanks,

Bambi


Denis HAVLIK wrote:

 :~Since Denis did not comment on my suggestion, I think I have managed to get on
 :~his /dev/null list...

 At the moment noone is on my /dev/null list - I am reading all the mail. I
 did not answer, because I cannot answer this one. I have noted it for
 further discussion and that is all.

 cu
 Denis

  --
 -
 Dr. Denis Havlikhttp://www.ap.univie.ac.at/users/havlik
 Mandrakesoft||| e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Quality Assurance  (@ @)(private: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
 ---oOO--(_)--OOo-




Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION

2000-05-27 Thread Michael

My dreams: a self configuring cd rw install program  that would make it
possible for a stoopoid like me to  use the writing not just the reading
function of his cd burner.

More printer support or mandrake sponsored how-to's not some college
kids hacked driver and cryptical install info...

My praise: All hail to thee mandrakesoft for a stable reliable friendly
user interface and operating system. You are surely worthy of all good
things!

-michael brower-





Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION: Libaries

2000-05-27 Thread Dacia and AzureRose

how much disc space do they need?  Are we talking 10s
or megs or 100s of megs?  Sounds like 7.1 is around
1100 megs for a full install anyway.  Is there a
"minimum" install, what is in it?  Perhaps the extra
space could be gathered by dropping some of the
redundent programs?

If I need an extra 10 megs for these files I would be
very willing to only have 1 cdplayer and lose all of
the games.  It wouldn't bother me to lose the tea
timer or moon clock either.  See where I'm going with
this?


Dacia


--- Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Thu, 25 May 2000, Anthony Huereca wrote:
 
 Wow, a company that actually listens to it's users!
 Amazing! 
 
 The most important thing I can think of is to
 include all the programming
 libaries even in a standard installation. For while
 these people probally won't
 ever program, they will have to compile stuff and
 it's a huge headache to track
 down a missing libary or two. So include all the
 development files that you'd
 include under a programming install, in all of the
 installations. It would
 make a lot of newbies (and me) very very happy.
 
 Good suggestion, but how would you like to see the
 system behave if all
 the devel-packages are selected but there is not
 enough diskspace for it?
 
 (provoking some real discussion here, I know ;)
 Paul
 
 )0(---)0(
 
 Nothing is as easy as it looks.
 
 )0([[EMAIL PROTECTED]]-)0(
 http://nlpagan.net - ICQ 147208
 Registered Linux User 174403
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.
http://invites.yahoo.com/




[newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION : NIC/Cable/DSL/ISDN

2000-05-27 Thread Jaguar

Since Denis did not comment on my suggestion, I think I have managed to get on
his /dev/null list...

I suggest making the Network setup specialized since more people are using
NIC's with their highspeed connections. So possibly MDKSoft could have an
install/DrakX configuaration section specific for highspeed internet, and easy
setup of IPChains/routing for sharing cable/dsl/isdn.

Could someone maybe comment on this so that it doesn't reach Denis' /dev/null
filter again...:)

Jaguar

The Dogma chased the Stigma, and was hit by the Karma.


Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at 
http://webmail.netscape.com.




Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION

2000-05-27 Thread GAPrichard

Linux-Mandrake should build on features it has already in place.  During 
install the helpful information at the bottom of the screen could be actually 
useful, and should occupy more of the screen (it's like an after-thought 
now).  The initial screen could be general info or good practice advice, and 
more detail available when scrolled.  Like a reminded to backup DOS and be 
sure to have a bootable DOS floppy at the start of the Linux install so that 
if there is a problem when setting up dual-booting, for example, they will 
have access to their DOS even with a damaged MBR, for instance, and thus to 
help documents on the Linux CD.  Don't advise people, and even if they 
created the problem they will associate the bad feeling with you because you 
didn't warn them.  State specifically that with a bootable floppy they could 
use DOS to look at the HTML Linux documents for on-the-spot self-rescue and 
assistance.  I haven't been reading newbie that long, but how to remove LILO 
or restore a DOS MBR comes up over and over again.  Another help example: 
when choosing user names there are option buttons; the help indicates the 
name for the abbreviations, I think, but no explaination of what these 
options might mean to you or why you would want to choose or not choose 
these.  
Going further with this idea, there could be a trouble button for more 
information dealing with problems one might encounter, and possible 
corrections or ways to bypass the step until later.
Using InstallUpgrade should actually be useful to reinstall only one 
thing (to bypass install steps not needed), for example, reinstall X windows 
if it should become damaged instead of  this kind of upgrade reinstall 
hanging as it does.  New people such as myself don't know enough to fix 
things and reinstalling is the lesser of the evils since there is nothing 
much to lose.  Redoing one piece is better than having to redo everything.
I suggest more manuals and How-To pages in HTML and made accessible (to 
DOS) on the Mandrake-Linux CDROM so people learn more before they begin and 
can try to solve their install problems themselves.  This was perhaps my main 
 reason for buying Mandrake [I read the HTML documents on the free Mandrake 
disc included with Maximum Linux magazine].  Also, some people will be doing 
installations in the middle of the night when they wouldn't have phone 
support, etc. available, and that even if they made the error that screwed 
things up 
-Gary Prichard-




Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION: Libaries

2000-05-27 Thread Alan Shoemaker

Dacia and AzureRosethat's 1100 meg of compressed data
which translates to between 2.0 and 2.5 gig when installed.

Alan


Dacia and AzureRose wrote:
 
 how much disc space do they need?  Are we talking 10s
 or megs or 100s of megs?  Sounds like 7.1 is around
 1100 megs for a full install anyway.  Is there a
 "minimum" install, what is in it?  Perhaps the extra
 space could be gathered by dropping some of the
 redundent programs?
 
 If I need an extra 10 megs for these files I would be
 very willing to only have 1 cdplayer and lose all of
 the games.  It wouldn't bother me to lose the tea
 timer or moon clock either.  See where I'm going with
 this?
 
 Dacia
 
 --- Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Thu, 25 May 2000, Anthony Huereca wrote:
 
  Wow, a company that actually listens to it's users!
  Amazing!
  
  The most important thing I can think of is to
  include all the programming
  libaries even in a standard installation. For while
  these people probally won't
  ever program, they will have to compile stuff and
  it's a huge headache to track
  down a missing libary or two. So include all the
  development files that you'd
  include under a programming install, in all of the
  installations. It would
  make a lot of newbies (and me) very very happy.
 
  Good suggestion, but how would you like to see the
  system behave if all
  the devel-packages are selected but there is not
  enough diskspace for it?
 
  (provoking some real discussion here, I know ;)
  Paul
 
  )0(---)0(
 
  Nothing is as easy as it looks.
 
  )0([[EMAIL PROTECTED]]-)0(
  http://nlpagan.net - ICQ 147208
  Registered Linux User 174403
 
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.
 http://invites.yahoo.com/




Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION : NIC/Cable/DSL/ISDN

2000-05-27 Thread Denis HAVLIK

:~Since Denis did not comment on my suggestion, I think I have managed to get on
:~his /dev/null list...

At the moment noone is on my /dev/null list - I am reading all the mail. I
did not answer, because I cannot answer this one. I have noted it for
further discussion and that is all.

cu
Denis

 -- 
-
Dr. Denis Havlikhttp://www.ap.univie.ac.at/users/havlik
Mandrakesoft||| e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quality Assurance  (@ @)(private: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
---oOO--(_)--OOo-




Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION

2000-05-27 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Linux-Mandrake should build on features it has already in place.  During 
 install the helpful information at the bottom of the screen could be actually 
 useful, and should occupy more of the screen (it's like an after-thought 
 now).  


In 7.1 if you hit the F1 key you'll get a big screen with a lot of
information.

 Using InstallUpgrade should actually be useful to reinstall only
 one thing (to bypass install steps not needed), for example,
 reinstall X windows if it should become damaged instead of this kind
 of upgrade reinstall hanging as it does.

Hugh why not simply us XFdrake ? 

-- 
MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com
In travel.--Chmouel




Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION: Libaries

2000-05-26 Thread Roman Bysh

Jim wrote:
 
 Great suggestion!
 
 - Original Message -
Excellent. I am looking forward to it.

Roman

 From: "Anthony Huereca" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 4:25 PM
 Subject: Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION: Libaries
 
 Wow, a company that actually listens to it's users! Amazing!
 
 The most important thing I can think of is to include all the programming
 libaries even in a standard installation. For while these people probally
 won't
 ever program, they will have to compile stuff and it's a huge headache to
 track
 down a missing libary or two. So include all the development files that
 you'd
 include under a programming install, in all of the installations. It would
 make a lot of newbies (and me) very very happy.
 
 That's my main suggestion. And since you said you wanted a seperate email
 for
 each topic, there's more on the way.
 
 --
 Anthony Huereca
 http://m3000.1wh.com
 Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are.




Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION: Libaries

2000-05-26 Thread Paul

On Thu, 25 May 2000, Anthony Huereca wrote:

Wow, a company that actually listens to it's users! Amazing! 

The most important thing I can think of is to include all the programming
libaries even in a standard installation. For while these people probally won't
ever program, they will have to compile stuff and it's a huge headache to track
down a missing libary or two. So include all the development files that you'd
include under a programming install, in all of the installations. It would
make a lot of newbies (and me) very very happy.

Good suggestion, but how would you like to see the system behave if all
the devel-packages are selected but there is not enough diskspace for it?

(provoking some real discussion here, I know ;)
Paul

)0(---)0(

Nothing is as easy as it looks.

)0([[EMAIL PROTECTED]]-)0(
http://nlpagan.net - ICQ 147208
Registered Linux User 174403




Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION One Step Installation

2000-05-26 Thread Denis HAVLIK

:~fails and then the computer hangs. Oh you can put in a choice too such as
:~Choose your installation method
:~1) Text install
:~2) DrakX
:~

Already done :-))

In 7.1, just press F1 and read the instruction. 

cu
Denis
-- 
-
Dr. Denis Havlikhttp://www.ap.univie.ac.at/users/havlik
Mandrakesoft||| e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quality Assurance  (@ @)(private: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
---oOO--(_)--OOo-




Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION

2000-05-25 Thread Juvenal

I'm new to this list but been using mandrake for a while now. One thing
(well there may be two) I don't like about Linux mandrake is the installing
of multiple programs
that do the same thing, for example I found 2 versions of icq, 20 or 30
games, who knows how many text
editors, and multimedia software, I think more control of what's being
installed should be given.

Juvenal

-Original Message-
From: Denis HAVLIK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Expert list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Gael Duval [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: May 25, 2000 2:42 PM
Subject: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION


Hi, folks!

What follows is probably a single most important letter I ever posted on
these mailing lists, so please read it very carefully!

[ANNOUNCEMENT]

We (Mandrakesoft) are starting internal discussions about future of
our distributions NOW. We want you to take part in the process of
improving our next distro.

- NOW is a time to ask us whatever you want: tell us what you like, tell
us what you hate, tell us what you dream of!
- NOW is a time for you to influence the future company decisions - start
thinking, and if you come up with a briliant idea, post it here.

Starting NOW, I am going to stop sleeping, eating, or doing any other job
which would interfere with currently most important task: Making sure we
make the best decisions based on whatever input we can get.

[RULES]

* Basically everything you can think of is open for discussion, except
question of including non-free software in the core of our distro, which
is absolute NO-NO.

* Listen to what other people have to say. Try keeping the signal/noise
ratio as high as possible.

* One topic per e-mail and informative subject line help us a lot. ("125
Great ideas!!!" is a very bad subject line.)

* Please, try to avoid any kind of flaming on the list for the next 10
days.

* Finaly, If you have time and skills to pick up ideas from long
discussion threads and write a good summary, please do it, it will help us
a lot.

[TOPICS]

Topics we are particularly interested in at this moment include:

1) ergonomics: What should our user interfaces look like in the
future, what should we improve in our desktop configuration, which things
need polishing...

2) install:Which features of our current installation
  program (DrakX) do you like, which features are you missing, what is not
  clear enough? The same question goes for post-install configuration
  tools.

3) packages:   which packages to add, what to remove from the distro,
 which subset of packages is really nessesary for a minimal install,
 and which packages are "just add-ons"?

4) tools:  which new tools (packages) should we develop ourselves, or
 improve in case we are already developing them? Many great
 programs already  exist out there, so we really badly need to know
 which important linux tools you still miss, in order to
 concentrate on them in the future.

5) system policy:  We want to make our system "logical" by following the
 Linux Standards, and being consistent in the way
 "things" (services, settings) are implemented. Tell us where
 we need to improve.

6) security policy: Closely related to point "6". You know that we care a
 lot about security, don't you? Well, the problem is choosing right
 security settings for various situations.

(If you feel that we have forgotten an important topic, just start a
discusion on it, the list should not be taken too strictly)


I am going to spend a lot of time in reading "newbie" and "expert" mailing
lists during next two weeks. Guillaume  will do the same on the
"cooker" list, and other members of the company may pop-up and take
part in discussion too, for topics they may be particularly interested in
(and if they get time to do it, our schedule is bursting).

At the end of the discussion cycle (in two weeks), I will try to write a
resume of what has been decided and share it with you.

yours
 Denis Havlik
--
-
Dr. Denis Havlikhttp://www.ap.univie.ac.at/users/havlik
Mandrakesoft||| e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quality Assurance  (@ @)(private: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
---oOO--(_)--OOo-







Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION

2000-05-25 Thread bascule

idea= allow setting of options such as 'setserial' for modems during the
install

i suggest this because after discovering that i need to do this after
install to make my modem work (still don't know how to make it
permanent) i tried to do an upgrade and get the cryptographic modules at
the appropriate time, this didn't work, if i coud have set up my modem
properly during install prior to this point then this would have worked
-i think- perhaps this could be an 'expert' option

bascule




Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION: Libaries

2000-05-25 Thread Anthony Huereca

Wow, a company that actually listens to it's users! Amazing! 

The most important thing I can think of is to include all the programming
libaries even in a standard installation. For while these people probally won't
ever program, they will have to compile stuff and it's a huge headache to track
down a missing libary or two. So include all the development files that you'd
include under a programming install, in all of the installations. It would
make a lot of newbies (and me) very very happy.

That's my main suggestion. And since you said you wanted a seperate email for
each topic, there's more on the way.

-- 
Anthony Huereca
http://m3000.1wh.com
Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are. 




Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION: Security

2000-05-25 Thread Anthony Huereca

I don't have M7.0 yet, but I like the idea of the different security zones. One
of the main complaints I've heard on this mailing list is lack of desciption of
what the different zones actually do. So tell the user what exactly is
happening when you select a certain level. Or maybe, have like a checklist,
where the user can pick and choose what exactly they want to do. That would be
cool. Keep it simple (like 5 levels) for the avearage person, but let the
expert pick and choose.

And include some sample firewalls or something like that. Somethign that
would be useful to the average Dial-up (or cable modem in my case) person, who
doesn't need a lot of exceptions like for a FTP or web server,  but just needs a
good regular firewall.  That way the user doesn't have to figure out all the
ipchaining rules and stuff; which at the moment totally loses me everytime I
try to read through the how-to. Of course, maybe it's not a good security idea
for a "one-size-fits-most" firewall, but it's just a thought I had.

-- 
Anthony Huereca
http://m3000.1wh.com
Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are. 




Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION

2000-05-25 Thread linux

 I agree with Juvenal's statement...

 Postfix and Sendmail seems to be the same situation.  I prefer to learn
 Sendmail.  Therefore, I think when under the "Expert" mode of the
 installation, the user should be prompted "Email server: (S)endmail? or
 (P)ostfix?"

 Frank Durante

  I'm new to this list but been using mandrake for a while now. One thing
  (well there may be two) I don't like about Linux mandrake is the
installing
  of multiple programs
  that do the same thing, for example I found 2 versions of icq, 20 or 30
  games, who knows how many text
  editors, and multimedia software, I think more control of what's being
  installed should be given.
 
  Juvenal
 





Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION: Libaries

2000-05-25 Thread Denis HAVLIK

:~Wow, a company that actually listens to it's users! Amazing! 
:~
:~The most important thing I can think of is to include all the programming
:~libaries even in a standard installation. For while these people probally won't
:~ever program, they will have to compile stuff and it's a huge headache to track
:~down a missing libary or two. So include all the development files that you'd
:~include under a programming install, in all of the installations. It would
:~make a lot of newbies (and me) very very happy.
:~

In 7.1, "Upgrade" can be used to add these kind of stuff (use "upgrade",
"custom") withouth too much fuss. And "kernel-sources" have so many
dependencies now, that you have to install good part of the
"developers" tools in order to get kernel-source package on the system.

This is just a temporary workaround though, in the future rpmdrake will
make installing a group of related programs AFTER install a breeze.

cu
Denis
-- 
-
Dr. Denis Havlikhttp://www.ap.univie.ac.at/users/havlik
Mandrakesoft||| e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quality Assurance  (@ @)(private: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
---oOO--(_)--OOo-




Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION: Libaries

2000-05-25 Thread Jim

Great suggestion!

- Original Message -
From: "Anthony Huereca" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 4:25 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION: Libaries


Wow, a company that actually listens to it's users! Amazing!

The most important thing I can think of is to include all the programming
libaries even in a standard installation. For while these people probally
won't
ever program, they will have to compile stuff and it's a huge headache to
track
down a missing libary or two. So include all the development files that
you'd
include under a programming install, in all of the installations. It would
make a lot of newbies (and me) very very happy.

That's my main suggestion. And since you said you wanted a seperate email
for
each topic, there's more on the way.

--
Anthony Huereca
http://m3000.1wh.com
Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are.






RE: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION: Libaries

2000-05-25 Thread Todd Watson

Thanks Anthony. I agree with this as well. I would like to be able to run a
server
that has all the programming tools with it. That way I could do all my
programming
on the same machine and not have to install them individually.

--
Todd Watson
http://www.boogada.org
"Hmm. Hey Marge, did you know they have the internet on computers now?"
-Homer J. Simpson-

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anthony Huereca
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 3:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION: Libaries


Wow, a company that actually listens to it's users! Amazing!

The most important thing I can think of is to include all the programming
libaries even in a standard installation. For while these people probally
won't
ever program, they will have to compile stuff and it's a huge headache to
track
down a missing libary or two. So include all the development files that
you'd
include under a programming install, in all of the installations. It would
make a lot of newbies (and me) very very happy.

That's my main suggestion. And since you said you wanted a seperate email
for
each topic, there's more on the way.

--
Anthony Huereca
http://m3000.1wh.com
Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are.





Re: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION One Step Installation

2000-05-25 Thread Kenny

There seems to be a lot of problems with the installation going into second
stage. I for one am having a current problem with it beginning stage two
then terminating on a signal 9 using the harddisk install method thats with
a floppy, using autoboot I get to where it is loading ramdisk then ramdisk
fails and then the computer hangs. Oh you can put in a choice too such as
Choose your installation method
1) Text install
2) DrakX

Just a thought

Kenny
- Original Message -
From: "Denis HAVLIK" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Expert list"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "Gael Duval" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 2:30 PM
Subject: [newbie] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION


 Hi, folks!

 What follows is probably a single most important letter I ever posted on
 these mailing lists, so please read it very carefully!

 [ANNOUNCEMENT]

 We (Mandrakesoft) are starting internal discussions about future of
 our distributions NOW. We want you to take part in the process of
 improving our next distro.

 - NOW is a time to ask us whatever you want: tell us what you like, tell
 us what you hate, tell us what you dream of!
 - NOW is a time for you to influence the future company decisions - start
 thinking, and if you come up with a briliant idea, post it here.

 Starting NOW, I am going to stop sleeping, eating, or doing any other job
 which would interfere with currently most important task: Making sure we
 make the best decisions based on whatever input we can get.

 [RULES]

 * Basically everything you can think of is open for discussion, except
 question of including non-free software in the core of our distro, which
 is absolute NO-NO.

 * Listen to what other people have to say. Try keeping the signal/noise
 ratio as high as possible.

 * One topic per e-mail and informative subject line help us a lot. ("125
 Great ideas!!!" is a very bad subject line.)

 * Please, try to avoid any kind of flaming on the list for the next 10
 days.

 * Finaly, If you have time and skills to pick up ideas from long
 discussion threads and write a good summary, please do it, it will help us
 a lot.

 [TOPICS]

 Topics we are particularly interested in at this moment include:

 1) ergonomics: What should our user interfaces look like in the
 future, what should we improve in our desktop configuration, which things
 need polishing...

 2) install:Which features of our current installation
   program (DrakX) do you like, which features are you missing, what is not
   clear enough? The same question goes for post-install configuration
   tools.

 3) packages:   which packages to add, what to remove from the distro,
  which subset of packages is really nessesary for a minimal install,
  and which packages are "just add-ons"?

 4) tools:  which new tools (packages) should we develop ourselves, or
  improve in case we are already developing them? Many great
 programs already  exist out there, so we really badly need to know
 which important linux tools you still miss, in order to
 concentrate on them in the future.

 5) system policy:  We want to make our system "logical" by following the
 Linux Standards, and being consistent in the way
 "things" (services, settings) are implemented. Tell us where
 we need to improve.

 6) security policy: Closely related to point "6". You know that we care a
 lot about security, don't you? Well, the problem is choosing right
 security settings for various situations.

 (If you feel that we have forgotten an important topic, just start a
 discusion on it, the list should not be taken too strictly)

 
 I am going to spend a lot of time in reading "newbie" and "expert" mailing
 lists during next two weeks. Guillaume  will do the same on the
 "cooker" list, and other members of the company may pop-up and take
 part in discussion too, for topics they may be particularly interested in
 (and if they get time to do it, our schedule is bursting).

 At the end of the discussion cycle (in two weeks), I will try to write a
 resume of what has been decided and share it with you.

 yours
 Denis Havlik
 --
 -
 Dr. Denis Havlikhttp://www.ap.univie.ac.at/users/havlik
 Mandrakesoft||| e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Quality Assurance  (@ @)(private: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
 ---oOO--(_)--OOo-




_
NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
Click here for FREE Internet Access and Email
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html