Re: [newbie] error on install

2003-06-05 Thread Kaj Haulrich
On Wednesday 04 June 2003 02:04 pm, Neal Johnson wrote:
 system:  dell inspiron 8000 with ati rage mobility 32mb
 video card i have made it to the point where i need to
 select my monitor, video driver etc.  no matter what
 configuration i try to use i get the error that screens were
 found but non are usable.  i have been through all the
 generic settings, all of the dell laptop monitor settings,
 and i cannot get it to work. has anyone else had this
 problem and found a solution? thanks
 neal

That reminds me : I have an ATI Rage Pro card, and every 
attempt to test during the install failed, even though MDK 
found the correct driver (UTAH). However, just bypassing the 
test and carrying on solved the problem. I guess the *test* 
script is defunct somehow, at least on ATI cards.

HTH

Kaj Haulrich. 
-- 
Registered Linux user  # 214073 at http://counter.li.org
Powered by Linux  -  Mandrake 9.1 -   kernel 2.4.21
Brought to you from my 100 % Micro$oft-free computer. 


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] error on install

2003-06-05 Thread eric huff
The test script worked on my ati radeon...

 That reminds me : I have an ATI Rage Pro card, and every
 attempt to test during the install failed, even though MDK
 found the correct driver (UTAH). However, just bypassing the
 test and carrying on solved the problem. I guess the *test*
 script is defunct somehow, at least on ATI cards.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] error on install

2003-06-05 Thread Kaj Haulrich
On Wednesday 04 June 2003 05:29 pm, eric huff wrote:
 The test script worked on my ati radeon...

  That reminds me : I have an ATI Rage Pro card, and every
  attempt to test during the install failed, even though MDK
  found the correct driver (UTAH). However, just bypassing
  the test and carrying on solved the problem. I guess the
  *test* script is defunct somehow, at least on ATI cards.

Yes, during my install-woes I had to do some googling on the 
matter, and it seems that Radeons are well supported, but 
Rages aren't : one has to use XFree86-3.6 to get 3D 
accelerated support, XFree86-4.3 can do 2D only. Furthermore, 
the ATI page says that the UTAH-project is dormant.

Kaj Haulrich.
-- 
Registered Linux user  # 214073 at http://counter.li.org
Powered by Linux  -  Mandrake 9.1 -   kernel 2.4.21
Brought to you from my 100 % Micro$oft-free computer. 


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[newbie] Error during Install

2002-02-03 Thread Greg Smith

I have a Dell  PC with a PII-333 processor, 384MB RAM, an on-board ATI Rage
3D video card and two 10GB hard drives.  Windows 2000 Pro is installed on a
partition on the first hard drive and I'm trying to install Mandrake 8.1 on
the second hard drive.  I chose the auto allocate fuction in the partition
section during install.

Everything goes fine until it tries to configure X when the following message
pops up.

Can't call method set_active on an undefined value.

There is an OK button available to click on, but no matter how many times I
click the OK button, the screen cycles back to this same message.  My only
option at this point is to manually re-boot the machine.  After re-boot, the
machine starts in console mode.  When I try to startx it won't start.

Please help.  I'm new.

Greg Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] error trying install LM8.0, somebody help me

2001-06-20 Thread Paul

It was Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:22:49 -0400 when jgarrido wrote:

Must be indeed a problem with the harddisk. on mandrakeuser.org I found that
someone went around the problem by installing things directly from an ISO
file. Don't know how or what, but there are possibilities...

Paul

I am getting an error trying to install Mandrake 8.0.  During the
initial
setup I get an error indicating it cannot uncompress the second stage
RAM
disk.  I press enter and it continues with the installation, however
after
formatting my partitions I get another error indicating an invalid entry
in
my hdlist file.  I am assuming this is because the RAM disk never
actually
got created or some such thing.  This error forces me to abort the
installtion.

I suspect a problem with the CD I am installing from, and therefore
suspect
I may have gotten some bad data on my download, however before I
download
another 600+ Meg file, does anyone have any other suggestions?

--
Well begun is half done.
-Aristotle

http://nlpagan.net - Registered Linux User 174403
   Linux Mandrake 7.2 - Sylpheed 0.4.99
** http://www.care2.com - when you care **




Re: [newbie] error with install of tar.gz files

2000-06-27 Thread GAPrichard

I have MS and get brain-glitches at times myself.  Mostly it's that I'm 
so tired (all the time) that I can't think clearly--dangerous when working as 
root!  Everybody please be patient with us.  -Gary-




Re: [newbie] error with install of tar.gz files

2000-06-23 Thread Tom Brinkman

On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, you wrote:
 thanks so much...you were right...I was missing these packages !!!
 I installed them...and then tried again...to install "screem"
 and got the attached error...what's wrong NOW?
 it went fine until I got this error...I then installed both ...
 
 pixbuf 0.7.0   and its devel package...and still I got the attached
 error
 
 WHY?

 Well, I don't see your error (did you attach it?).  My advice
is to go back from the beginning and try again.  A sure bet is to
delete the /dir that you untar'd the source to and start over from
there, unpacking the source all over again.  Sometimes a 'make
mrproper' (before (./config) will clean up the source.  Sometimes
some source won't compile on some hardware. A good clue for this
case is if the compile errors out at different places and/or with
different error messages. Many compiles really strain the system's
cpu/cache/ram so it could be a hardware problem.  Even in this
case, often just keep trying over and over till the compile is
successful.  Depends on how stubborn you are ;)    or maybe you
forgot to 'su' to root before running 'make install' ?   ;)
-- 
~~   Tom Brinkman[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 
 Tom Brinkman wrote:
  
  On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, you wrote:
  
   attached is the error, I get when trying to install
   the latest SCREEM html editor...
   why am I getting this...anyone know...
  
   and why isn't my C compiler functioning?
   I've tried uninstalling all the gcc stuff
   on the CD...then re-installing...still I get this error.
   is there some other packages that also need to be
   operational...to allow C compiler to function...?
  
 YES
  http://www.mandrakeuser.org/basics/bsource.html
  
look 'bout half way down the page an you'll see a list of
  everything that's usually needed to compile most all source.
  It's mostly 'devel' and 'lib' packages you're prob'ly missing
  
  While you're there, read the whole section MOF, the whole site
  is invaluable ;-)
  
  --
  ~~   Tom Brinkman[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [newbie] error with install of tar.gz files

2000-06-23 Thread KompuKit

well, did what you said...and still nothing...
attached is the latest error.txt

I remind you...that I did install PIXBUF

Tom Brinkman wrote:
 
 On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, you wrote:
  thanks so much...you were right...I was missing these packages !!!
  I installed them...and then tried again...to install "screem"
  and got the attached error...what's wrong NOW?
  it went fine until I got this error...I then installed both ...
 
  pixbuf 0.7.0   and its devel package...and still I got the attached
  error
 
  WHY?
 
  Well, I don't see your error (did you attach it?).  My advice
 is to go back from the beginning and try again.  A sure bet is to
 delete the /dir that you untar'd the source to and start over from
 there, unpacking the source all over again.  Sometimes a 'make
 mrproper' (before (./config) will clean up the source.  Sometimes
 some source won't compile on some hardware. A good clue for this
 case is if the compile errors out at different places and/or with
 different error messages. Many compiles really strain the system's
 cpu/cache/ram so it could be a hardware problem.  Even in this
 case, often just keep trying over and over till the compile is
 successful.  Depends on how stubborn you are ;)    or maybe you
 forgot to 'su' to root before running 'make install' ?   ;)
 --
 ~~   Tom Brinkman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
  Tom Brinkman wrote:
  
   On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, you wrote:
   
attached is the error, I get when trying to install
the latest SCREEM html editor...
why am I getting this...anyone know...
   
and why isn't my C compiler functioning?
I've tried uninstalling all the gcc stuff
on the CD...then re-installing...still I get this error.
is there some other packages that also need to be
operational...to allow C compiler to function...?
  
  YES
   http://www.mandrakeuser.org/basics/bsource.html
  
 look 'bout half way down the page an you'll see a list of
   everything that's usually needed to compile most all source.
   It's mostly 'devel' and 'lib' packages you're prob'ly missing
  
   While you're there, read the whole section MOF, the whole site
   is invaluable ;-)
  
   --
   ~~   Tom Brinkman[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
   Registered Linux User:73821
===KompuKit===
Kit Goins  ICQ# 7110071
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Lowell, Mass.
Web Designer  http://kitdesigns.bizhosting.com
WebServer:http://kompukit.dyndns.org
(Server Runs between M-F 6pm-12am,S+S 12pm-12am EST)
===KompuKit===

[root@kompukit kit]# cd /root/tmp/screem-0.2.6
[root@kompukit screem-0.2.6]# ./configure --prefix=/usr
creating cache ./config.cache
checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... no
checking for working aclocal... missing
checking for working autoconf... missing
checking for working automake... missing
checking for working autoheader... missing
checking for working makeinfo... missing
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler (gcc  ) works... yes
checking whether the C compiler (gcc  ) is a cross-compiler... no
checking whether we are using GNU C... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for POSIXized ISC... no
checking for gcc... (cached) gcc
checking whether the C compiler (gcc -g -O2 ) works... yes
checking whether the C compiler (gcc -g -O2 ) is a cross-compiler... no
checking whether we are using GNU C... (cached) yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... (cached) yes
checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E
checking for ANSI C header files... yes
checking host system type... i586-pc-linux-gnu
checking build system type... i586-pc-linux-gnu
checking for ranlib... ranlib
checking for ld used by GCC... /usr/bin/ld
checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes
checking for BSD-compatible nm... /usr/bin/nm -B
checking whether ln -s works... yes
updating cache ./config.cache
loading cache ./config.cache within ltconfig
checking for object suffix... o
checking for executable suffix... no
checking for gcc option to produce PIC... -fPIC
checking if gcc PIC flag -fPIC works... yes
checking if gcc supports -c -o file.o... yes
checking if gcc supports -c -o file.lo... yes
checking if gcc supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions ... yes
checking if gcc static flag -static works... -static
checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes
checking whether the linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes
checking command to parse /usr/bin/nm -B output... ok
checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate
checking for /usr/bin/ld option to reload object files... -r
checking dynamic linker characteristics... Linux ld.so
checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build static libraries... yes

Re: [newbie] error with install of tar.gz files

2000-06-23 Thread Tom Brinkman

On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, you wrote:
 
 well, did what you said...and still nothing...
 attached is the latest error.txt
 
 I remind you...that I did install PIXBUF

 Jeezzz,  I'm in over my head.  don't you know I'm an ol'
man redneck NASCAR fan (I'm an Earnhardt fan you see, I live an 'die
by #3)  'Sides I've got a brain disease (MS), and I've been watchin'
qualifyin at Sears Point and drinkin beer with my friends ?? huh ??
You did notice rusty got'a nother pole today, ...right ?

  Lighten up.. all is not lost

  try try again  http://www.mandrakeuser.org/basics/bsource.html

   it's a hell'uva lot smart'n me 

  if'n it still doesn't work, my diagnosis (from this far a'way)
is my usual.  Wait!! I use it on myself when workin to a solution.
I've found that people that have the most problems, usually try the
reverse of the below

Check the:
  1)  the interface 'tween the keyboard/mouse/chair 
  2)  hardware  (yeah, includin that new store bought) 
  3)  application (could be the source sux, maybe ?)
  4)  the OS  (in this case.. RTFM)

  forgive me, I'm from Texas  รถ 
-- 
~~   Tom Brinkman[EMAIL PROTECTED]



  
 Tom Brinkman wrote:
  
  On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, you wrote:
   thanks so much...you were right...I was missing these packages !!!
   I installed them...and then tried again...to install "screem"
   and got the attached error...what's wrong NOW?
   it went fine until I got this error...I then installed both ...
  
   pixbuf 0.7.0   and its devel package...and still I got the attached
   error
  
   WHY?
  
   Well, I don't see your error (did you attach it?).  My advice
  is to go back from the beginning and try again.  A sure bet is to
  delete the /dir that you untar'd the source to and start over from
  there, unpacking the source all over again.  Sometimes a 'make
  mrproper' (before (./config) will clean up the source.  Sometimes
  some source won't compile on some hardware. A good clue for this
  case is if the compile errors out at different places and/or with
  different error messages. Many compiles really strain the system's
  cpu/cache/ram so it could be a hardware problem.  Even in this
  case, often just keep trying over and over till the compile is
  successful.  Depends on how stubborn you are ;)    or maybe you
  forgot to 'su' to root before running 'make install' ?   ;)
  --
  ~~   Tom Brinkman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
   Tom Brinkman wrote:
   
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, you wrote:

 attached is the error, I get when trying to install
 the latest SCREEM html editor...
 why am I getting this...anyone know...

 and why isn't my C compiler functioning?
 I've tried uninstalling all the gcc stuff
 on the CD...then re-installing...still I get this error.
 is there some other packages that also need to be
 operational...to allow C compiler to function...?
   
   YES
http://www.mandrakeuser.org/basics/bsource.html
   
  look 'bout half way down the page an you'll see a list of
everything that's usually needed to compile most all source.
It's mostly 'devel' and 'lib' packages you're prob'ly missing
   
While you're there, read the whole section MOF, the whole site
is invaluable ;-)





Re: [newbie] error with install of tar.gz files

2000-06-22 Thread KompuKit

thanks so much...you were right...I was missing these packages !!!
I installed them...and then tried again...to install "screem"
and got the attached error...what's wrong NOW?
it went fine until I got this error...I then installed both ...

pixbuf 0.7.0   and its devel package...and still I got the attached
error

WHY?

Tom Brinkman wrote:
 
 On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, you wrote:
 
  attached is the error, I get when trying to install
  the latest SCREEM html editor...
  why am I getting this...anyone know...
 
  and why isn't my C compiler functioning?
  I've tried uninstalling all the gcc stuff
  on the CD...then re-installing...still I get this error.
  is there some other packages that also need to be
  operational...to allow C compiler to function...?
 
YES
 http://www.mandrakeuser.org/basics/bsource.html
 
   look 'bout half way down the page an you'll see a list of
 everything that's usually needed to compile most all source.
 It's mostly 'devel' and 'lib' packages you're prob'ly missing
 
 While you're there, read the whole section MOF, the whole site
 is invaluable ;-)
 
 --
 ~~   Tom Brinkman[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
   Registered Linux User:73821
===KompuKit===
Kit Goins  ICQ# 7110071
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Lowell, Mass.
Web Designer  http://kitdesigns.bizhosting.com
WebServer:http://kompukit.dyndns.org
(Server Runs between M-F 6pm-12am,S+S 12pm-12am EST)
===KompuKit===




Re: [newbie] error with install of tar.gz files

2000-06-21 Thread Tom Brinkman

On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, you wrote:
 
 attached is the error, I get when trying to install
 the latest SCREEM html editor...
 why am I getting this...anyone know...
 
 and why isn't my C compiler functioning?
 I've tried uninstalling all the gcc stuff
 on the CD...then re-installing...still I get this error.
 is there some other packages that also need to be
 operational...to allow C compiler to function...?

   YES
http://www.mandrakeuser.org/basics/bsource.html

  look 'bout half way down the page an you'll see a list of
everything that's usually needed to compile most all source.
It's mostly 'devel' and 'lib' packages you're prob'ly missing

While you're there, read the whole section MOF, the whole site
is invaluable ;-)

-- 
~~   Tom Brinkman[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[newbie] error with install of tar.gz files

2000-06-20 Thread KompuKit

attached is the error, I get when trying to install
the latest SCREEM html editor...
why am I getting this...anyone know...
-- 
   Registered Linux User:73821
===KompuKit===
Kit Goins  ICQ# 7110071
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Lowell, Mass.
Web Designer  http://kitdesigns.bizhosting.com
WebServer:http://kompukit.dyndns.org
(Server Runs between M-F 6pm-12am,S+S 12pm-12am EST)
===KompuKit===

[root@kompukit screem-0.2.6]# ./configure
creating cache ./config.cache
checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... no
checking for working aclocal... missing
checking for working autoconf... missing
checking for working automake... missing
checking for working autoheader... missing
checking for working makeinfo... missing
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler (gcc  ) works... no
configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot create 
executables.