Re: [newbie] Mandrake 7.3/8.0 - getting ready

2001-02-06 Thread Daniel B. Haun

   Christopher Molnar wrote:
7.3  NO, No, no.
   
8.0  YES, Yes, yes!
   
Seriously, this will be a lot of major enhancements, this won't be
7.3. And give it a few more months. I am not sure if you already
subscribe, but if you find the list Cooker Changelog you can watch
the progress.
   
-Chris

 Speaking of Updated Distributions, what is the difference between the 
following version of devel Manddrake,  and Cookers version of Development 
distro?   

 daniel in NJ... confoozled as always...:) 


ftp://ftp.grolier.fr/pub/unix/linux/distributions/Mandrake-devel/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/




Re: [newbie] Mandrake 7.3/8.0 - getting ready

2001-02-06 Thread Todd Flinders

I had always heard in the old days to have /var on its
own partition as a security feature.  It prevents a
hacker from getting a log to flood the / partition.

That may be wrong or irrelevant now, though.

--- "Richard T. Waters" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Since my last question was not as dumb as I thought,
 let me see if I can get
 lucky twice.
 
 If I understand what you are suggesting, since I
 have 128 meg of memory, I would
 make the swap 256meg.  It seems to me
 that in the past I have read that once the swap gets
 above 128, Linux doesn't do
 much with the extra size.  Am I totally daffy,
 or was this a limitation that recent releases has
 remedied.
 
 If I have a 10 gig drive, can I assume that boot
 stays at 64 meg?  Would / stay
 at 3.5 or do I want to double that
 and leave the remainder for /home?
 
 Thanks!
 
 Christopher Molnar wrote:
 
 
  I teach some classes for new Linux users. Here is
 what I tell them for a 5
  Gig drive. (OK, I know I am about to be corrected,
 flamed, etc for this but I
  can handle it [sniff] - just remember this is a
 general suggestion and is not
  written in stone).
 
  Do NOT let the installer auto-partition. I have a
 different opinion about
  putting /var onto it's own partition. Don't.
 
  These are in order on how I recommend creating on
 a 5 gig drive:
  /boot = 64 meg
  Swap = 2 times the amount of physical memory in
 your machine. More if a
  server (probably 4 times).
  / = 3.5 Gig
  /home = remainder of all drive space.
 
  This seems to let them do a  full development
 install and it works.
 
  (OK, let me have it!). Anyways, forgive me mailing
 list Gods, but if you are
  near New Haven, CT USA check out the Mandrake
 Campus courses at:
  http://www.innovationsw.com/training.
  -Chris
 
  
   Christopher Molnar wrote:
7.3  NO, No, no.
   
8.0  YES, Yes, yes!
   
Seriously, this will be a lot of major
 enhancements, this won't be 7.3.
And give it a few more months. I am not sure
 if you already subscribe,
but if you find the list Cooker Changelog you
 can watch the progress.
   
-Chris
   
   

 
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices.
http://auctions.yahoo.com/




Re: [newbie] Mandrake 7.3/8.0 - getting ready

2001-02-06 Thread Anthony C. Cheng

What if more memory is added?  How would one increase the swap partition?

On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Todd Flinders wrote:

 I had always heard in the old days to have /var on its
 own partition as a security feature.  It prevents a
 hacker from getting a log to flood the / partition.
 
 That may be wrong or irrelevant now, though.
 
 --- "Richard T. Waters" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Since my last question was not as dumb as I thought,
  let me see if I can get
  lucky twice.
  
  If I understand what you are suggesting, since I
  have 128 meg of memory, I would
  make the swap 256meg.  It seems to me
  that in the past I have read that once the swap gets
  above 128, Linux doesn't do
  much with the extra size.  Am I totally daffy,
  or was this a limitation that recent releases has
  remedied.
  
  If I have a 10 gig drive, can I assume that boot
  stays at 64 meg?  Would / stay
  at 3.5 or do I want to double that
  and leave the remainder for /home?
  
  Thanks!
  
  Christopher Molnar wrote:
  
  
   I teach some classes for new Linux users. Here is
  what I tell them for a 5
   Gig drive. (OK, I know I am about to be corrected,
  flamed, etc for this but I
   can handle it [sniff] - just remember this is a
  general suggestion and is not
   written in stone).
  
   Do NOT let the installer auto-partition. I have a
  different opinion about
   putting /var onto it's own partition. Don't.
  
   These are in order on how I recommend creating on
  a 5 gig drive:
   /boot = 64 meg
   Swap = 2 times the amount of physical memory in
  your machine. More if a
   server (probably 4 times).
   / = 3.5 Gig
   /home = remainder of all drive space.
  
   This seems to let them do a  full development
  install and it works.
  
   (OK, let me have it!). Anyways, forgive me mailing
  list Gods, but if you are
   near New Haven, CT USA check out the Mandrake
  Campus courses at:
   http://www.innovationsw.com/training.
   -Chris
  
   
Christopher Molnar wrote:
 7.3  NO, No, no.

 8.0  YES, Yes, yes!

 Seriously, this will be a lot of major
  enhancements, this won't be 7.3.
 And give it a few more months. I am not sure
  if you already subscribe,
 but if you find the list Cooker Changelog you
  can watch the progress.

 -Chris


 
  
  
 
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices.
 http://auctions.yahoo.com/
 
 





Re: [newbie] Mandrake 7.3/8.0 - getting ready

2001-02-05 Thread Richard T. Waters

Since my last question was not as dumb as I thought, let me see if I can get
lucky twice.

If I understand what you are suggesting, since I have 128 meg of memory, I would
make the swap 256meg.  It seems to me
that in the past I have read that once the swap gets above 128, Linux doesn't do
much with the extra size.  Am I totally daffy,
or was this a limitation that recent releases has remedied.

If I have a 10 gig drive, can I assume that boot stays at 64 meg?  Would / stay
at 3.5 or do I want to double that
and leave the remainder for /home?

Thanks!

Christopher Molnar wrote:


 I teach some classes for new Linux users. Here is what I tell them for a 5
 Gig drive. (OK, I know I am about to be corrected, flamed, etc for this but I
 can handle it [sniff] - just remember this is a general suggestion and is not
 written in stone).

 Do NOT let the installer auto-partition. I have a different opinion about
 putting /var onto it's own partition. Don't.

 These are in order on how I recommend creating on a 5 gig drive:
 /boot = 64 meg
 Swap = 2 times the amount of physical memory in your machine. More if a
 server (probably 4 times).
 / = 3.5 Gig
 /home = remainder of all drive space.

 This seems to let them do a  full development install and it works.

 (OK, let me have it!). Anyways, forgive me mailing list Gods, but if you are
 near New Haven, CT USA check out the Mandrake Campus courses at:
 http://www.innovationsw.com/training.
 -Chris

 
  Christopher Molnar wrote:
   7.3  NO, No, no.
  
   8.0  YES, Yes, yes!
  
   Seriously, this will be a lot of major enhancements, this won't be 7.3.
   And give it a few more months. I am not sure if you already subscribe,
   but if you find the list Cooker Changelog you can watch the progress.
  
   -Chris
  
  
   





Re: [newbie] Mandrake 7.3/8.0 - getting ready

2001-02-04 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan

Can someone please tell me the point of having several partitions on the 
same drive for one GNU/Linux installation? I can't imagine that it would 
be much faster, and there is not really much risk of losing data with 
only one partition, especially with new filesystems like ReiserFS. I 
simply use one partition for everything, and I have had no problems 
whatsoever. If I had several partitions I would be wasting space since 
/boot, / and other partitions would not be full, and so would be robbing 
space from /home.

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, since I'm interested in repartitioning 
my drive to give more room to Linux (about 9GB in total, excluding Swap).


On Sun,  4 Feb 2001 18:48, Christopher Molnar wrote:
 On Saturday 03 February 2001 17:57, Richard T. Waters wrote:
  Whenever a new release comes out I have always been in the habit of
  doing a full install, rather than an upgrade.

 A person after my own heart! Of course doing a backup first of all
 your data is a good idea!

  Of course this entails some backing up and restoring of information.

 Yup!

  I have seen some discussions regarding how many partitions is best
  for an install, and I notice there are (as usual)
  varying opinions.
 
  Is there a general guideline I can follow.  Do I basically want to
  set up /; /boot and /usr?  What should be a good
  rule of thumb for allocating space for the various partitions?

 I teach some classes for new Linux users. Here is what I tell them for
 a 5 Gig drive. (OK, I know I am about to be corrected, flamed, etc for
 this but I can handle it [sniff] - just remember this is a general
 suggestion and is not written in stone).

 Do NOT let the installer auto-partition. I have a different opinion
 about putting /var onto it's own partition. Don't.

 These are in order on how I recommend creating on a 5 gig drive:
 /boot = 64 meg
 Swap = 2 times the amount of physical memory in your machine. More if
 a server (probably 4 times).
 / = 3.5 Gig
 /home = remainder of all drive space.

 This seems to let them do a  full development install and it works.

 (OK, let me have it!). Anyways, forgive me mailing list Gods, but if
 you are near New Haven, CT USA check out the Mandrake Campus courses
 at: http://www.innovationsw.com/training.
 -Chris

  Christopher Molnar wrote:
   7.3  NO, No, no.
  
   8.0  YES, Yes, yes!
  
   Seriously, this will be a lot of major enhancements, this won't be
   7.3. And give it a few more months. I am not sure if you already
   subscribe, but if you find the list Cooker Changelog you can watch
   the progress.
  
   -Chris
  
  
   

-- 
Sridhar Dhanapalan.
"There are two major products that come from Berkeley:
LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence."
-- Jeremy S. Anderson




Re: [newbie] Mandrake 7.3/8.0 - getting ready

2001-02-04 Thread Christopher Molnar

I can answer that in one word - "Updates".

It is far easier and safer to do a clean install than to do an update. Part 
of the clean full install includes formatting. For myself that would be 
deadly as my /home partition has a lot of source code, documents, etc. So 
that is partitioned.

Also, wou will see a performance hit the larger the drive gets. IMHO.

Hope that helps,
-Chris

On Sunday 04 February 2001 09:24, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
 Can someone please tell me the point of having several partitions on the
 same drive for one GNU/Linux installation? I can't imagine that it would
 be much faster, and there is not really much risk of losing data with
 only one partition, especially with new filesystems like ReiserFS. I
 simply use one partition for everything, and I have had no problems
 whatsoever. If I had several partitions I would be wasting space since
 /boot, / and other partitions would not be full, and so would be robbing
 space from /home.

 Someone correct me if I'm wrong, since I'm interested in repartitioning
 my drive to give more room to Linux (about 9GB in total, excluding Swap).

 On Sun,  4 Feb 2001 18:48, Christopher Molnar wrote:
  On Saturday 03 February 2001 17:57, Richard T. Waters wrote:
   Whenever a new release comes out I have always been in the habit of
   doing a full install, rather than an upgrade.
 
  A person after my own heart! Of course doing a backup first of all
  your data is a good idea!
 
   Of course this entails some backing up and restoring of information.
 
  Yup!
 
   I have seen some discussions regarding how many partitions is best
   for an install, and I notice there are (as usual)
   varying opinions.
  
   Is there a general guideline I can follow.  Do I basically want to
   set up /; /boot and /usr?  What should be a good
   rule of thumb for allocating space for the various partitions?
 
  I teach some classes for new Linux users. Here is what I tell them for
  a 5 Gig drive. (OK, I know I am about to be corrected, flamed, etc for
  this but I can handle it [sniff] - just remember this is a general
  suggestion and is not written in stone).
 
  Do NOT let the installer auto-partition. I have a different opinion
  about putting /var onto it's own partition. Don't.
 
  These are in order on how I recommend creating on a 5 gig drive:
  /boot = 64 meg
  Swap = 2 times the amount of physical memory in your machine. More if
  a server (probably 4 times).
  / = 3.5 Gig
  /home = remainder of all drive space.
 
  This seems to let them do a  full development install and it works.
 
  (OK, let me have it!). Anyways, forgive me mailing list Gods, but if
  you are near New Haven, CT USA check out the Mandrake Campus courses
  at: http://www.innovationsw.com/training.
  -Chris
 
   Christopher Molnar wrote:
7.3  NO, No, no.
   
8.0  YES, Yes, yes!
   
Seriously, this will be a lot of major enhancements, this won't be
7.3. And give it a few more months. I am not sure if you already
subscribe, but if you find the list Cooker Changelog you can watch
the progress.
   
-Chris
   
   





Re: [newbie] Mandrake 7.3/8.0 - getting ready

2001-02-04 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan

Thanks for the help so far, Chris.

Does an install really need formatting to be clean? I remember when I 
switched to MDK7.2 from 7.1 I simply deleted everything on my Linux 
partition save /home and then ran Drakx.

So if partitioning is really better, can someone please suggest what I 
should do with my system? I have two drives, one 11.2GB and one 2.4GB. 
The 11.2GB is much faster than the 2.4GB and is set on the primary 
(master) IDE channel, whereas the 2.4GB is a secondary master. I need 
about 3GB for Windows (I only use it nowadays to play the occasional 
game :-)), but Linux is my priority. Swap is not much of a priority, 
as I have 256MB of RAM and I only use swap when either something's 
crashed or if I'm using VMware. I currently have 200MB of Swap and it 
appears to suit my needs well (I regularly check my usage with "free 
-m"). I have a CD-burner on the secondary IDE channel, so I don't want 
to burden this channel with much hard drive traffic (so I can prevent 
coasters). A major reason for the repartitioning is to switch to 
ReiserFS from Ext2 and thus speed up my drive performance so I can 
burn without errors.

Thanks in advance.


On Mon,  5 Feb 2001 02:50, Christopher Molnar wrote:
 I can answer that in one word - "Updates".

 It is far easier and safer to do a clean install than to do an
 update. Part of the clean full install includes formatting. For
 myself that would be deadly as my /home partition has a lot of
 source code, documents, etc. So that is partitioned.

 Also, wou will see a performance hit the larger the drive gets.
 IMHO.

 Hope that helps,
 -Chris

 On Sunday 04 February 2001 09:24, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
  Can someone please tell me the point of having several partitions
  on the same drive for one GNU/Linux installation? I can't imagine
  that it would be much faster, and there is not really much risk of
  losing data with only one partition, especially with new
  filesystems like ReiserFS. I simply use one partition for
  everything, and I have had no problems whatsoever. If I had
  several partitions I would be wasting space since /boot, / and
  other partitions would not be full, and so would be robbing space
  from /home.
 
  Someone correct me if I'm wrong, since I'm interested in
  repartitioning my drive to give more room to Linux (about 9GB in
  total, excluding Swap).
 
  On Sun,  4 Feb 2001 18:48, Christopher Molnar wrote:
   On Saturday 03 February 2001 17:57, Richard T. Waters wrote:
Whenever a new release comes out I have always been in the
habit of doing a full install, rather than an upgrade.
  
   A person after my own heart! Of course doing a backup first of
   all your data is a good idea!
  
Of course this entails some backing up and restoring of
information.
  
   Yup!
  
I have seen some discussions regarding how many partitions is
best for an install, and I notice there are (as usual)
varying opinions.
   
Is there a general guideline I can follow.  Do I basically
want to set up /; /boot and /usr?  What should be a good
rule of thumb for allocating space for the various partitions?
  
   I teach some classes for new Linux users. Here is what I tell
   them for a 5 Gig drive. (OK, I know I am about to be corrected,
   flamed, etc for this but I can handle it [sniff] - just remember
   this is a general suggestion and is not written in stone).
  
   Do NOT let the installer auto-partition. I have a different
   opinion about putting /var onto it's own partition. Don't.
  
   These are in order on how I recommend creating on a 5 gig drive:
   /boot = 64 meg
   Swap = 2 times the amount of physical memory in your machine.
   More if a server (probably 4 times).
   / = 3.5 Gig
   /home = remainder of all drive space.
  
   This seems to let them do a  full development install and it
   works.
  
   (OK, let me have it!). Anyways, forgive me mailing list Gods,
   but if you are near New Haven, CT USA check out the Mandrake
   Campus courses at: http://www.innovationsw.com/training.
   -Chris
  
Christopher Molnar wrote:
 7.3  NO, No, no.

 8.0  YES, Yes, yes!

 Seriously, this will be a lot of major enhancements, this
 won't be 7.3. And give it a few more months. I am not sure
 if you already subscribe, but if you find the list Cooker
 Changelog you can watch the progress.

 -Chris


 

-- 
Sridhar Dhanapalan.
"There are two major products that come from Berkeley:
LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence."
-- Jeremy S. Anderson




Re: [newbie] Mandrake 7.3/8.0 - getting ready

2001-02-03 Thread Richard T. Waters

Whenever a new release comes out I have always been in the habit of doing a full
install, rather than an upgrade.
Of course this entails some backing up and restoring of information.

I have seen some discussions regarding how many partitions is best for an
install, and I notice there are (as usual)
varying opinions.

Is there a general guideline I can follow.  Do I basically want to set up /;
/boot and /usr?  What should be a good
rule of thumb for allocating space for the various partitions?

Christopher Molnar wrote:

 7.3  NO, No, no.

 8.0  YES, Yes, yes!

 Seriously, this will be a lot of major enhancements, this won't be 7.3. And
 give it a few more months. I am not sure if you already subscribe, but if you
 find the list Cooker Changelog you can watch the progress.

 -Chris


 





Re: [newbie] Mandrake 7.3/8.0 - getting ready

2001-02-03 Thread Digital Wokan

I'm with you on that, Richard.  But then, I don't have a "production"
system.  My current setup is to have a /, a /backup, and a swap
partition.  Everything that's truly important gets copied to /backup
regularly so I don't have to reset everything if I do a reinstall at the
next Mandrake release.  (Or if I go brain dead and try another distro
instead.)

"Richard T. Waters" wrote:
 Whenever a new release comes out I have always been in the habit of doing a full
 install, rather than an upgrade.
 Of course this entails some backing up and restoring of information.
 I have seen some discussions regarding how many partitions is best for an
 install, and I notice there are (as usual)
 varying opinions.
 Is there a general guideline I can follow.  Do I basically want to set up /;
 /boot and /usr?  What should be a good
 rule of thumb for allocating space for the various partitions?
-- 
Digital Wokan, Tribal Mage of the Electronics Age
Guerilla Linux Warrior




Re: [newbie] Mandrake 7.3/8.0 - getting ready

2001-02-03 Thread Christopher Molnar

On Saturday 03 February 2001 17:57, Richard T. Waters wrote:
 Whenever a new release comes out I have always been in the habit of doing a
 full install, rather than an upgrade.

A person after my own heart! Of course doing a backup first of all your data 
is a good idea!

 Of course this entails some backing up and restoring of information.

Yup!


 I have seen some discussions regarding how many partitions is best for an
 install, and I notice there are (as usual)
 varying opinions.

 Is there a general guideline I can follow.  Do I basically want to set up
 /; /boot and /usr?  What should be a good
 rule of thumb for allocating space for the various partitions?

I teach some classes for new Linux users. Here is what I tell them for a 5 
Gig drive. (OK, I know I am about to be corrected, flamed, etc for this but I 
can handle it [sniff] - just remember this is a general suggestion and is not 
written in stone).

Do NOT let the installer auto-partition. I have a different opinion about 
putting /var onto it's own partition. Don't.

These are in order on how I recommend creating on a 5 gig drive:
/boot = 64 meg
Swap = 2 times the amount of physical memory in your machine. More if a 
server (probably 4 times).
/ = 3.5 Gig
/home = remainder of all drive space.

This seems to let them do a  full development install and it works.

(OK, let me have it!). Anyways, forgive me mailing list Gods, but if you are 
near New Haven, CT USA check out the Mandrake Campus courses at:
http://www.innovationsw.com/training.
-Chris


 Christopher Molnar wrote:
  7.3  NO, No, no.
 
  8.0  YES, Yes, yes!
 
  Seriously, this will be a lot of major enhancements, this won't be 7.3.
  And give it a few more months. I am not sure if you already subscribe,
  but if you find the list Cooker Changelog you can watch the progress.
 
  -Chris