Re: [NTG-context] MKIV caption separator, revisited
Am 22.04.2014 um 02:57 schrieb Rik Kabel cont...@rik.users.panix.com: Has any progress been made in the past few years implementing modifiable separators for captions under MKIV? This was raised as an issue by (at least) Mojca Miklavec in December 2010 (http://www.mail-archive.com/ntg-context%40ntg.nl/msg51542.html) and by Andy Thomas 18 months later (http://www.mail-archive.com/ntg-context%40ntg.nl/msg63937.html). (Their issues with stopper have been resolved. In MKIV it is numberstopper.) Here is an MWE demonstrating the problem. It compiles cleanly, but the separator remains the default period. With MKII, it generates a figure with a hyphen and not a period. \setupcaptions[separator=-] \setupcaptions[prefixconnector=-] Wolfgang___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] MKIV caption separator, revisited
On 2014-04-22 02:25, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 22.04.2014 um 02:57 schrieb Rik Kabel cont...@rik.users.panix.com mailto:cont...@rik.users.panix.com: Has any progress been made in the past few years implementing modifiable separators for captions under MKIV? This was raised as an issue by (at least) Mojca Miklavec in December 2010 (http://www.mail-archive.com/ntg-context%40ntg.nl/msg51542.html) and by Andy Thomas 18 months later (http://www.mail-archive.com/ntg-context%40ntg.nl/msg63937.html http://www.mail-archive.com/ntg-context@ntg.nl/msg63937.html). (Their issues with stopper have been resolved. In MKIV it is numberstopper.) Here is an MWE demonstrating the problem. It compiles cleanly, but the separator remains the default period. With MKII, it generates a figure with a hyphen and not a period. \setupcaptions[separator=-] \setupcaptions[prefixconnector=-] Wolfgang As always, thank you. I have updated the wiki page for setupcaptions. The updated includes a reworded description of the suffix key and new descriptions for the stopper/numberstopper and separator/prefixconnector keys. (There are many other keys that are not documented, and a few at least that differ between MKII and MKIV, but I do not have the time at the moment to test all of them.) -- Rik Kabel ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] MKIV caption separator, revisited
Has any progress been made in the past few years implementing modifiable separators for captions under MKIV? This was raised as an issue by (at least) Mojca Miklavec in December 2010 (http://www.mail-archive.com/ntg-context%40ntg.nl/msg51542.html) and by Andy Thomas 18 months later (http://www.mail-archive.com/ntg-context%40ntg.nl/msg63937.html). (Their issues with stopper have been resolved. In MKIV it is numberstopper.) Here is an MWE demonstrating the problem. It compiles cleanly, but the separator remains the default period. With MKII, it generates a figure with a hyphen and not a period. \setupcaptions[separator=-] \setupexternalfigures[location=default] \starttext \chapter{Chaptername} \section{Sectionname} \placefigure[here][fig:1]{Caption}{\externalfigure[cow.pdf]} \in{See Figure}{.}[fig:1] \stoptext -- Rik Kabel ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \triangledown placed too low in Palatino
Hi, The \triangle operator is used for instance in the « symmetric difference » of two subsets: if $E$ is a set and $A \subset E$, and $B \susbet E$, then one defines \startformula A \triangle B := (A \cup B) \setminus (A \cap B). \stopformula Then the mapping $(A,B) \mapsto A \triangle B$ is a commutative, associative binary operator on the subsets of $E$. Some people use instead $A \Delta B$, but this is not the traditional, nor the correct way, to write this « symmetric difference » of two sets. This is why, I guess, in TeX \triangle is an operator. I have seen also \triangledown as an operator, but I don’t recall the context in which it was used… Regarding the notation \nabla to denote the gradient, and \Delta, to denote the Laplace operator (which by the way can be defined as $\Delta u := \nabla \cdot (\nabla u)$), Mikael Sundqvist gave the correct observations. Best regards: OK On 11 avr. 2014, at 05:48, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote: On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote: Jannik, You are right. \nabla looks much nicer and is placed correctly. (I still think the \triangledown placement is slightly off.) My environment files from MkII days have \def\nabla{\triangledown}, so I never tried the true \nabla until your suggestion. In MkIV: \triangledown is mapped to 0x25BD while nabla is mapped to 0x2207. These are different glyphs. IIUC, the difference in placement is because \triangledown is defined as a mathop (and hence centered on the math-axis) while \nabla is defined as a mathord. Compare: \startformula \nabla T \quad \triangledown T \quad \mathop{\nabla} T \stopformula From what I remember, I was the one who added the mappings for triangledown as a mathop based on, I believe, unicode-math package in LaTeX. I don't understand what all the triangle operators are supposed to do. As such, I cannot say whether the wrong placement is due to the wrong font metrics or the wrong mapping (mathop vs mathord) by ConTeXt. Aditya ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \triangledown placed too low in Palatino
Jannik, You are right. \nabla looks much nicer and is placed correctly. (I still think the \triangledown placement is slightly off.) My environment files from MkII days have \def\nabla{\triangledown}, so I never tried the true \nabla until your suggestion. Thank you. -Sanjoy Jannik Voges researchj...@icloud.com writes: I think you are using the wrong symbol. Or at least I would prefer \nabla as gradient operator. Jannik ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \triangledown placed too low in Palatino
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote: Jannik, You are right. \nabla looks much nicer and is placed correctly. (I still think the \triangledown placement is slightly off.) My environment files from MkII days have \def\nabla{\triangledown}, so I never tried the true \nabla until your suggestion. In MkIV: \triangledown is mapped to 0x25BD while nabla is mapped to 0x2207. These are different glyphs. IIUC, the difference in placement is because \triangledown is defined as a mathop (and hence centered on the math-axis) while \nabla is defined as a mathord. Compare: \startformula \nabla T \quad \triangledown T \quad \mathop{\nabla} T \stopformula From what I remember, I was the one who added the mappings for triangledown as a mathop based on, I believe, unicode-math package in LaTeX. I don't understand what all the triangle operators are supposed to do. As such, I cannot say whether the wrong placement is due to the wrong font metrics or the wrong mapping (mathop vs mathord) by ConTeXt. Aditya ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Multiple bibliographies (bib-module, mkiv)
On 7 Apr 2014, at 12:00 , Peng Zhang pczh...@gmail.com wrote I am searching for a solution where I can use two different sources of bib files separately. I found that the same question was asked before at this mail list. Since it was few years old, could I ask if there is any new work done towards it? Thanks! Peng http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2010/048290.html Hello Peng, For a Bibliography with separate sections you can use the following work-around: Suppose you want a section primary sources, for which you have the bibfile, say, ps.bib, and a section secundary sources, for which have the bibfile ss.bib. The first step is tro to make for each of them a .bbl-file with, what I would call, a bbl-generator.tex: \setupbibtex[database=ps.bib,sort=author] %\setupbibtex[database=ss.bib,sort=author] \setuppublications[alternative=apa] %or any other style \starttext \stoptext ++ This can be processed with mkii or mkiv. It generates a lot of auxiliary files, including an empty pdf, but the only important one is bbl-generator.bbl, which you rename to ps.bbl or ss.bbl according to which of the two bib-files you used.(= did not comment out) The other files you need are two .tex-files with the complete set of \nocite[]'s of the two databases. Personally I never used \nocite{*}. If you use a Mac with BibDesk it is quite easy to make such a file. It gives you some extra flexibility. You can then generate the sectioned bibliography with: ++ \input(Your setups, including those for your Bibliography setup) \starttext \startchapter[bookmark=,label=,list=,marking=,reference=Bibliography,title={Bibliography} \section{Primary sources} \input ps.bbl \input ps-nocite.tex \placepublications[criterium=cite] \section{Secundary sources} \input ss.bbl \input ss-nocite.tex \placepublications[criterium=cite] \stopchapter \stoptext +++ That's all. I hope it works for you. Best regards, Robert Blackstone___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Multiple bibliographies (bib-module, mkiv)
Hi Robert, Thank you very much for this workaround! It does work. Would it be possible that I can make two fake/invisible sections? (without showing primary sources and secondary sources in your example) I am doing my CV. I just want two separate reference lists, one for journal and one for published abstracts. I am copying the CV template from wiki. \definehead[CVHEAD][subject] \setuphead[subject][style=\bfa,after={\blank[medium]}] \definehead[SUBCVHEAD][subsubject] \setuphead[subsubject][style=\bf,after={\blank[small]},before={\blank[small]}] I want something like \CVHEAD{References} \SUBCVHEAD{Pulished Journal Articles} list 1 \SUBCVHEAD{Pulished Abstracts} list 2 Could I put two fake/invisible sections within those subcvhead? Thanks, Peng On 04/07/2014 10:34 AM, Robert Blackstone wrote: On 7 Apr 2014, at 12:00 , Peng Zhang pczh...@gmail.com mailto:pczh...@gmail.com wrote I am searching for a solution where I can use two different sources of bib files separately. I found that the same question was asked before at this mail list. Since it was few years old, could I ask if there is any new work done towards it? Thanks! Peng http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2010/048290.html Hello Peng, For a Bibliography with separate sections you can use the following work-around: Suppose you want a section primary sources, for which you have the bibfile, say, ps.bib, and a section secundary sources, for which have the bibfile ss.bib. The first step is tro to make for each of them a .bbl-file with, what I would call, a bbl-generator.tex: \setupbibtex[database=ps.bib,sort=author] %\setupbibtex[database=ss.bib,sort=author] \setuppublications[alternative=apa] %or any other style \starttext \stoptext ++ This can be processed with mkii or mkiv. It generates a lot of auxiliary files, including an empty pdf, but the only important one is bbl-generator.bbl, which you rename to ps.bbl or ss.bbl according to which of the two bib-files you used.(= did not comment out) The other files you need are two .tex-files with the complete set of \nocite[]'s of the two databases. Personally I never used \nocite{*}. If you use a Mac with BibDesk it is quite easy to make such a file. It gives you some extra flexibility. You can then generate the sectioned bibliography with: ++ \input(Your setups, including those for your Bibliography setup) \starttext \startchapter[bookmark=,label=,list=,marking=,reference=Bibliography,title={Bibliography} \section{Primary sources} \input ps.bbl \input ps-nocite.tex \placepublications[criterium=cite] \section{Secundary sources} \input ss.bbl \input ss-nocite.tex \placepublications[criterium=cite] \stopchapter \stoptext +++ That's all. I hope it works for you. Best regards, Robert Blackstone ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] page reference to figure fails when figure location is none
Using a recent MkIV beta (2014.03.27), it seems that a page reference to a figure fails if the figure location is none. Here is a minimal example: \starttext \input knuth \placefigure[none][regularref]{}{\pagereference[workaroundref] \externalfigure[cow.pdf]} \input knuth See \at{page}[workaroundref] or \at{page}[regularref] \stoptext The log file has references unknown reference '[][regularref]' and the .pdf file has See page 1 or page ?? That is, the \at{page}[regularref] doesn't work. (But the workaround reference does work.) If the figure's location key is changed from none to nonumber or just deleted, then the regularref page reference works. It also works with MkII (with or without none), so I am guessing that it is a bug in MkIV. -Sanjoy ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] page reference to figure fails when figure location is none
On 4/6/2014 12:14 PM, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote: Using a recent MkIV beta (2014.03.27), it seems that a page reference to a figure fails if the figure location is none. Here is a minimal example: \starttext \input knuth \placefigure[none][regularref]{}{\pagereference[workaroundref] \externalfigure[cow.pdf]} \input knuth See \at{page}[workaroundref] or \at{page}[regularref] \stoptext The log file has references unknown reference '[][regularref]' and the .pdf file has See page 1 or page ?? That is, the \at{page}[regularref] doesn't work. (But the workaround reference does work.) If the figure's location key is changed from none to nonumber or just deleted, then the regularref page reference works. It also works with MkII (with or without none), so I am guessing that it is a bug in MkIV. more a side effect .. in mkii we store refs independently, in mkiv they can also travel with other properties (like lists and here we have no list entry in the next beta this will work ok \starttext \placefigure [none] [regularref-1] {} {\hbox{\pagereference[workaroundref-1]\externalfigure[cow.pdf]}} \placefigure [here] [regularref-2] {} {\hbox{\pagereference[workaroundref-2]\externalfigure[cow.pdf]}} See \at{page}[workaroundref-1] or \at{page}[regularref-1] See \at{page}[workaroundref-2] or \at{page}[regularref-2] \blank \placelist[figure][criterium=text] \stoptext - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] page reference to figure fails when figure location is none
Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl writes: more a side effect .. in mkii we store refs independently, in mkiv they can also travel with other properties (like lists and here we have no list entry in the next beta this will work ok That make sense. I will try it out. I have found a few other buglets with placefigure for which I will make minimal examples. -- -Sanjoy ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \definelabel
On 3/31/2014 4:55 PM, Herbert Voss wrote: Hi all, this worked some time ago: \definelabel[video][text=Video,location=inmargin] \starttext \video foo \nextvideo bar \currentvideo[video1] baz \page see \at[video1]. \incrementvideo \video foobar \resetvideo \video foobarbaz \stoptext now \currentvideo and \incrementvideo are undefined in mkii labels were also used for some mechanisms but that has changed which is why i rmeoved some of these auto-generated commands in fact, \current* is somewhat dangerous as there can be other \current's already i've added the current one for labels but increment is the same as next so that one is gone \incrementcounter[video] \decrementcounter[video] are of course also there Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] mirrored leftmarginwidth in enumerations
If anyone has a suggestion for putting enumeration texts toward the right edge of the left margin, I would be grateful. In MkII enumerations, I would put a triangle (fig.2) in the left margin using \defineenumeration [pause] [title=no, text={\externalfigure[fig.2][height=1em]}, location=inleft, number=no, ] The triangle was automatically aligned toward the right side of the left margin (fill glue on the left), which was what I wanted, on even and odd pages. In MkIV, the marginal text is automatically aligned to the left side. I restored the MkII effect using this hack (using a instead of the triangle, to make the example more self contained): \defineenumeration [pause] [title=no, text={\hbox to \leftmarginwidth{\hfil $$}}, number=no, alternative=inleft, ] But I just realized that the hack doesn't work for double-sided layouts. Using the leftmarginwidth is correct on the odd pages, but it is too big for the even pages. Thus, on page 2 of the example below, the overlaps the question text. Is there a more idiomatic MkIV replacement for my hack? Or is my hack okay, but ConTeXt should be updated to interpret leftmarginwidth to mean the leftmarginwidth, as appropriate for an odd or an even page? Here is the example: \setuplayout[marking=on,location=middle, backspace=1.25in, leftmargindistance=0.125in, leftmargin=0.625in, width=4.75in, rightmargindistance=0.25in, rightmargin=0.25in, ] \setuppagenumbering[alternative={doublesided}] \defineenumeration [pause] [title=no, text={\hbox to \leftmarginwidth{\hfil $$}}, number=no, alternative=inleft, ] \def\question#1{\startpause\relax #1 \stoppause} \showframe \starttext \question{hello} \page \question{hello} \stoptext ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] mirrored leftmarginwidth in enumerations
Am 30.03.2014 um 20:00 schrieb Sanjoy Mahajan san...@mit.edu: If anyone has a suggestion for putting enumeration texts toward the right edge of the left margin, I would be grateful. In MkII enumerations, I would put a triangle (fig.2) in the left margin using \defineenumeration [pause] [title=no, text={\externalfigure[fig.2][height=1em]}, location=inleft, number=no, ] The triangle was automatically aligned toward the right side of the left margin (fill glue on the left), which was what I wanted, on even and odd pages. In MkIV, the marginal text is automatically aligned to the left side. I restored the MkII effect using this hack (using a instead of the triangle, to make the example more self contained): \defineenumeration [pause] [title=no, text={\hbox to \leftmarginwidth{\hfil $$}}, number=no, alternative=inleft, ] But I just realized that the hack doesn't work for double-sided layouts. Using the leftmarginwidth is correct on the odd pages, but it is too big for the even pages. Thus, on page 2 of the example below, the overlaps the question text. Is there a more idiomatic MkIV replacement for my hack? Or is my hack okay, but ConTeXt should be updated to interpret leftmarginwidth to mean the leftmarginwidth, as appropriate for an odd or an even page? Here is the example: \setuplayout[marking=on,location=middle, backspace=1.25in, leftmargindistance=0.125in, leftmargin=0.625in, width=4.75in, rightmargindistance=0.25in, rightmargin=0.25in, ] \setuppagenumbering[alternative={doublesided}] \defineenumeration [pause] [title=no, text={\hbox to \leftmarginwidth{\hfil $$}}, number=no, alternative=inleft, ] \def\question#1{\startpause\relax #1 \stoppause} \showframe \starttext \question{hello} \page \question{hello} \stoptext \defineenumeration [pause] [title=no, text={\symbol[triangle]}, width=fit, number=no, alternative=inleft] Wolfgang ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] lower superscripts in MkIV -- too low?
we have a more modern implementation in the next beta I tested the following with various flavors: $ x\mathstrut_{3} x_{3} x^3 x\mathstrut^3 x^\circ x\mathstrut^\circ 20\mathstrut^\circ 20^\circ $ Flavors that I tried: 2014.03.27 MkIV 2014.02.14 MkIV 2013.06.07 MkII (from latest beta) pdfTeX 1.40.14 (from Debian TL 2013) (wrapping in \(start|stop)text or ending with \bye, as appropriate). My observations: The MkII and pdftex subscripts look too high. I know that's sacreligious, since it is what Knuth must have intended, and I am surprised that I didn't notice it before. The 2014.02.14 MkIV subscript with the strut looks too low, although the x^3 with the strut looks reasonable, or is maybe just slightly too high. The x^\circ looks fine. The x\mathstrut^\circ is too high. But the 20\mathstrut^\circ looks right (and looks too low without the strut). In 2014.03.27 MkIV, the subscript- and subscript heights are unchanged by the strut. The subscript heights look right. The superscript heights all look okay, except for the 20\mathstrut^\circ, which is too low (same height as without the strut). In earlier versions, one could raise the \circ using a \mathstrut, but that no longer has an effect. The other change, and maybe I am hallucinating this one, is that the horizontal spacing between the x and the 3 is now slightly different with and without the strut: It is tighter with the strut. I think it looks better without the strut, but am not sure. So, overall I think it has improved. I also wonder: 1. about the right horizontal spacing (how tight it should be) 2. how to raise the \circ in 20^\circ -Sanjoy ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] what happened to hangaround?
Am 2014-03-24 um 12:09 schrieb Philipp Gesang philipp.ges...@alumni.uni-heidelberg.de: Hi again, I’d like to flow some text around a picture. There was undocumented \starthangaround (it’s still in cont-new.mkiv in the garden), but it’s unknown in latest beta. Is there a replacement? Try the hanging environment: \setupexternalfigures [location=default] \starttext \starthanging{\externalfigure [cow.pdf][width=3.141cm]} \input ward \stophanging \stoptext I think it is supposed to be the successor to hangaround. Dankeschön! I updated the wiki page: http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Using_Graphics#Flow_text_around_a_picture There are some issues: - \starthanging doesn’t accept parameters (using \setuphanging for every second picture is evil) - As you can see in wiki, the picture stands on the first line of the text. This is a MkII problem, it works with MkIV. - If you try several paragraphs or \startlines, then only the first paragraph flows. Greetlings, Hraban --- http://www.fiee.net/texnique/ http://wiki.contextgarden.net https://www.cacert.org (I'm an assurer) ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] what happened to hangaround?
Am 24.03.2014 um 09:02 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm te...@fiee.net: Am 2014-03-24 um 12:09 schrieb Philipp Gesang philipp.ges...@alumni.uni-heidelberg.de: Hi again, I’d like to flow some text around a picture. There was undocumented \starthangaround (it’s still in cont-new.mkiv in the garden), but it’s unknown in latest beta. Is there a replacement? Try the hanging environment: \setupexternalfigures [location=default] \starttext \starthanging{\externalfigure [cow.pdf][width=3.141cm]} \input ward \stophanging \stoptext I think it is supposed to be the successor to hangaround. Dankeschön! I updated the wiki page: http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Using_Graphics#Flow_text_around_a_picture There are some issues: - \starthanging doesn’t accept parameters (using \setuphanging for every second picture is evil) - As you can see in wiki, the picture stands on the first line of the text. This is a MkII problem, it works with MkIV. - If you try several paragraphs or \startlines, then only the first paragraph flows. The hanging environment in MkII isn’t the same as the hanging in MkIV. The original name for the environment was hang around but when Hans added a few new features (e.g. to move the picture to the right side) he changed in MKIV the name to hanging, a command which all already existed. Wolfgang ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] what happened to hangaround?
Am 2014-03-24 um 14:11 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com: - \starthanging doesn’t accept parameters (using \setuphanging for every second picture is evil) - As you can see in wiki, the picture stands on the first line of the text. This is a MkII problem, it works with MkIV. - If you try several paragraphs or \startlines, then only the first paragraph flows. The hanging environment in MkII isn’t the same as the hanging in MkIV. The original name for the environment was hang around but when Hans added a few new features (e.g. to move the picture to the right side) he changed in MKIV the name to hanging, a command which all already existed. Thanks for the explanation. But is there a way to flow several paragraphs (or „lines“) around a picture? I tried a vbox, but then the picture moves down into the following paragraph. Greetlings, Hraban --- http://www.fiee.net/texnique/ http://wiki.contextgarden.net https://www.cacert.org (I'm an assurer) ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] what happened to hangaround?
On Mar 24, 2014, at 4:43 AM, Henning Hraban Ramm te...@fiee.net wrote: Am 2014-03-24 um 14:11 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com: - \starthanging doesn’t accept parameters (using \setuphanging for every second picture is evil) - As you can see in wiki, the picture stands on the first line of the text. This is a MkII problem, it works with MkIV. - If you try several paragraphs or \startlines, then only the first paragraph flows. The hanging environment in MkII isn’t the same as the hanging in MkIV. The original name for the environment was hang around but when Hans added a few new features (e.g. to move the picture to the right side) he changed in MKIV the name to hanging, a command which all already existed. Thanks for the explanation. But is there a way to flow several paragraphs (or „lines“) around a picture? I tried a vbox, but then the picture moves down into the following paragraph. Why not use \placefigure[left,none]{}{} Aditya ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] lower superscripts in MkIV -- too low?
Hi Sanjoy, I agree with you to say that the position of subscripts and superscripts in mkiv is not perfect: the same remark applies to the position of the derivative sign « prime » as $u’(t)$. Actually in mkii (and also in plain TeX) the positions of the superscripts in your example are the same, but this is not the case with subscripts: $x_{3}\ x\mathstrut_{3}$ that is in mkii the latter $x\mathstrut_{3}$ gives a lower subscript, while in plain TeX both subscripts are positioned at an identical depth. I would say the position of subscripts and superscripts in mkiv should be identical with one gets with the latest beta (version 2014.03.20 16:59) in the following example \starttext $x\mathstrut_{3}$ and $x\mathstrut^{3}$ \stoptext However as Hans pointed out, regarding maths typesetting in mkiv there are also some font related issues. Best regards: OK On 21 mars 2014, at 17:34, Sanjoy Mahajan san...@mit.edu wrote: Dear math typesetting aficianados, In the following example, \starttext $x^3\ x\mathstrut^3$ \stoptext the superscript without the strut is about 2pt lower than with the strut, using MkIV. With MkII or plain TeX, they are the same height (at the higher position obtained by using the \mathstrut in MkIV). My eye tells me that the higher position looks more right. Do others agree? Or, if it's a matter of taste, is the difference configurable so that one can get the MkII behavior even without the \mathstrut? -- -Sanjoy ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] lower superscripts in MkIV -- too low?
On 3/22/2014 8:17 AM, Otared Kavian wrote: Hi Sanjoy, I agree with you to say that the position of subscripts and superscripts in mkiv is not perfect: the same remark applies to the position of the derivative sign « prime » as $u’(t)$. Actually in mkii (and also in plain TeX) the positions of the superscripts in your example are the same, but this is not the case with subscripts: $x_{3}\ x\mathstrut_{3}$ that is in mkii the latter $x\mathstrut_{3}$ gives a lower subscript, while in plain TeX both subscripts are positioned at an identical depth. I would say the position of subscripts and superscripts in mkiv should be identical with one gets with the latest beta (version 2014.03.20 16:59) in the following example \starttext $x\mathstrut_{3}$ and $x\mathstrut^{3}$ \stoptext However as Hans pointed out, regarding maths typesetting in mkiv there are also some font related issues. we have a more modern implementation in the next beta - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Placing arbitrary pdf bookmarks
Hi Pablo, Le 22 mars 2014 à 17:31, Pablo Rodriguez oi...@gmx.es a écrit : On 03/22/2014 04:35 PM, Jean-Philippe Rey wrote: Hello all, I am willing to use ConTeXt to produce a bunch of stickers. My stickers are grouped into categories but I don't want any headers or titles to interfere with the layout of the stickers, so I didn't use \startchapter and the likes. I think there is workaround for your case: not placing heads in document. Very good hint, thank you. It works perfectly fine with MkII. With MkIV, although the head is not printed, some whitespace is added that disturbs the layout. I tried \setuphead[chapter,section][placehead=hidden] and got rid of the spurious whitespace ... but also of the pdf bookmarks :-( \setuphead[chapter,section][placehead=no,page=no,before=,after=] don't work either. Here is an example to demonstrate the problem (again, it works fine with MkII, unfortunately I am using lua to compose my stickers). \setupinteraction[state=start] \placebookmarks[chapter,section] \setuphead[chapter,section][placehead=no] \starttext \chapter{B1} \section{A1} Sticker 1 Sticker 2 \page Sticker 3 \section{A2} Sticker 4 \page \chapter{B2} Sticker 5 \section{A3} Sticker 6 \stoptext -- Jean-Philippe Rey Professeur - École Centrale Paris jean-philippe@ecp.fr 92295 Châtenay-Malabry Cedex - France Empreinte PGP : 807A 5B2C 69E4 D4B5 783A 428A 1B5E E83E 261B BF51 ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Placing arbitrary pdf bookmarks
On 03/22/2014 07:11 PM, Jean-Philippe Rey wrote: [...] Very good hint, thank you. It works perfectly fine with MkII. With MkIV, although the head is not printed, some whitespace is added that disturbs the layout. I tried \setuphead[chapter,section][placehead=hidden] and got rid of the spurious whitespace ... but also of the pdf bookmarks :-( \setuphead[chapter,section][placehead=no,page=no,before=,after=] don't work either. Jean-Philippe, my fault, this is the right head configuration: \setuphead[chapter,section][placehead=empty,before=,after=,] This should work now: \showgrid \setupinteraction[state=start] \placebookmarks[chapter,section] \setuphead[chapter,section][placehead=empty,before=,after=,] \starttext \chapter{B1} \section{A1} Sticker 1 Sticker 2 \page Sticker 3 \section{A2} Sticker 4 \page \chapter{B2} Sticker 5 \section{A3} Sticker 6 \stoptext I hope it helps now, Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] lower superscripts in MkIV -- too low?
Dear math typesetting aficianados, In the following example, \starttext $x^3\ x\mathstrut^3$ \stoptext the superscript without the strut is about 2pt lower than with the strut, using MkIV. With MkII or plain TeX, they are the same height (at the higher position obtained by using the \mathstrut in MkIV). My eye tells me that the higher position looks more right. Do others agree? Or, if it's a matter of taste, is the difference configurable so that one can get the MkII behavior even without the \mathstrut? -- -Sanjoy ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Euler with fallback
Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu writes: This is to announce that the latest beta supports creating virtual math fonts with fallback. The main test case is to use Euler font with missing characters taken from Pagella but the mechanism is general and can be used to replace a specific set of math glyphs from a font. This feature is not extensively tested. As such it will be useful if everyone interested in math fallback mechanism could test this out and report any bugs or inconsistencies. One inconsistency or maybe bug is that text subscripts come out in Euler instead of Palatino. Here's an example (using 2014.02.14 beta). The Sun subscript using _{\tf Sun} or _{\rm Sun} was in Palatino in the corresponding MkII setup, but is in Euler now. The workaround of an hbox with \tfxx or \tfx doesn't get quite the right size. \usetypescriptfile[euler] \definetypeface [mainface] [rm] [serif] [pagella] [default] \definetypeface [mainface] [tt] [mono] [dejavu] [default] [rscale=0.9] \definetypeface [mainface] [mm] [math] [pagellaovereuler] [default] \setupbodyfont[mainface] \appendtoks \rm \to \everymathematics \setupmathematics[lcgreek=normal, ucgreek=normal] \starttext \placeformula\startformula M_{\rm Sun}\quad M_{\hbox{\tfx Sun}} \quad M_{\hbox{\tfxx Sun}} \quad M_{\tf Sun} \stopformula \stoptext ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Euler with fallback
On Mon, 3 Mar 2014, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote: Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu writes: This is to announce that the latest beta supports creating virtual math fonts with fallback. The main test case is to use Euler font with missing characters taken from Pagella but the mechanism is general and can be used to replace a specific set of math glyphs from a font. This feature is not extensively tested. As such it will be useful if everyone interested in math fallback mechanism could test this out and report any bugs or inconsistencies. One inconsistency or maybe bug is that text subscripts come out in Euler instead of Palatino. Here's an example (using 2014.02.14 beta). The Sun subscript using _{\tf Sun} or _{\rm Sun} was in Palatino in the corresponding MkII setup, but is in Euler now. The workaround of an hbox with \tfxx or \tfx doesn't get quite the right size. That is because in math mode, \rm is symonym with \mathrm etc. The standard way to write this is _{\text{Sun}}. Aditya ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Euler with fallback
Aditya, Here's an example (using 2014.02.14 beta). The Sun subscript using _{\tf Sun} or _{\rm Sun} was in Palatino in the corresponding MkII setup, but is in Euler now. The workaround of an hbox with \tfxx or \tfx doesn't get quite the right size. That is because in math mode, \rm is symonym with \mathrm etc. The standard way to write this is _{\text{Sun}}. I agree about \rm. However, _{\tf blah} once (in MkII) selected the text font. e.g. \starttext \placeformula\startformula M_{\tf Sun} \stopformula \stoptext Is the II-IV change in \tf semantics intended? It's not hard to adjust for by using 'sed'. I raise the issue only in case the change is not intended. Actually, the example just as above (i.e. using modern fonts) works fine works in MkII and MkIV. It also works if \setupbodyfont[palatino] is inserted as the first line. It's fails only when using Palatino with Euler (at least, in the way that I did it). That data doesn't say what the right behavior is. But it may help you decide. -Sanjoy ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] how to set the CropBox in MkIV?
What is the MkIV/LuaTeX way to set the CropBox? In MkII/PDFTeX, I used \pdfpagesattr = {/CropBox [54 72 558 720]} With MkIV, I've tried \pdfcompresslevel 0 \pdfbackendsetpagesattribute{CropBox}{[54 72 558 720]} \starttext \input knuth \stoptext but that set the CropBox as a string, and didn't override the A4 setting: /Type/Pages /CropBox ([54 72 558 720])/Count 1/Kids[16 0 R] I also tried \pdfcompresslevel 0 \startluacode local box = lpdf.array{54, 72, 558, 720} lpdf.addtopagesattributes(CropBox,box) \stopluacode \starttext \input knuth \stoptext and that produced an improved line in the Pages object: /Type/Pages /CropBox [ 54 72 558 720 ]/Count 1/Kids[16 0 R] but the actual cropbox for the page is unchanged (A4), probably because the page object itself (object #16) overrides the CropBox with this: /CropBox [ 0. 0. 595.2756 841.8898 ] (This is all with the 2014.02.14 beta.) Regards, -Sanjoy ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] [Math in ConTeXt]
Thanks Otared for the offer to look into math issues. Here are a few I noticed when TeXing an MK2 set of notes with MK4. Matthias \starttext \startformula \text{\bf R}^n = R^n ={\bf R}^n= \mathbb{R}^n \stopformula %spacing of exponent is in Mk4 wider than in Mk2 \startformula \left| \int_{a_{i-1}}^b e^x\, dx \right| \stopformula % lower bound runs into \left| % space between integral sign and integrand too wide \startformula r'=r'' \stopformula This $\int_{a}^b e^x\, dx $ is not good. % Inline math integrals need limits at the side. Spacing with lines below and above is awkward otherwise. \startformula area(f) = \iint_{\Omega} |{f_u\times f_v}|\, du dv \stopformula % limit not centered over double integral \placeformula[-] \stoptext On Feb 16, 2014, at 5:30 AM, Otared Kavian ota...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, After a series of exchanges on the list, on the topic of how mathematics typesetting is and should be in ConTeXt, I am writing you this message to ask all those who use ConTeXt to typeset mathematics and who encounter various types of difficulties, or shortcomings, to send me their remarks, either on list or off list. I will check the problems with Aditya Mahajan and Mikael Sundqvist, and then submit feature requests or bug reports to Hans and Aditya who will try to fix the issues (I have asked these people about this, and they all agree…). In order to help me manage efficiently the task, please add the following tag [Math on ConTeXt] to the Subject field of your message. The issues which may be addressed are of the following categories: 1. Differences in the output of ConTeXt mkiv vs mkii (due to differences in engine) 2. Differences in the output of ConTeXt mkiv vs LuaLaTeX + Opentype math fonts (due to differences in macro package) 3. Differences in the output of ConTeXt mkiv vs PDFLaTeX + AMSMath (due to differences in expectation) 4. Bug reports (regarding commands of plain TeX missing in ConTeXt, the position of math accents, etc…) Indeed some of the issues may have their origin in the fonts (therefore not easy to fix thouroughly), but others may be fixed once the expectations are clearly expressed. As usual, please give minimal examples imbedded in \starttext ……… \stoptext so that we can test the issue you are reporting. Thanks for your attention and cooperation, Best regards: OK ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Euler with fallback
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote: \project testproject \startcomponent test \input knuth \stopcomponent Because of font loading, is this recommended way to use components (rather than the old way of the \project line after \startcomponent)? If so, I'll make a note on the wiki. Yes. This is one of the changes from MkII to MkIV. I think that Hans had a This Way document on this. Aditya ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] [Math in ConTeXt]
Hi all, After a series of exchanges on the list, on the topic of how mathematics typesetting is and should be in ConTeXt, I am writing you this message to ask all those who use ConTeXt to typeset mathematics and who encounter various types of difficulties, or shortcomings, to send me their remarks, either on list or off list. I will check the problems with Aditya Mahajan and Mikael Sundqvist, and then submit feature requests or bug reports to Hans and Aditya who will try to fix the issues (I have asked these people about this, and they all agree…). In order to help me manage efficiently the task, please add the following tag [Math on ConTeXt] to the Subject field of your message. The issues which may be addressed are of the following categories: 1. Differences in the output of ConTeXt mkiv vs mkii (due to differences in engine) 2. Differences in the output of ConTeXt mkiv vs LuaLaTeX + Opentype math fonts (due to differences in macro package) 3. Differences in the output of ConTeXt mkiv vs PDFLaTeX + AMSMath (due to differences in expectation) 4. Bug reports (regarding commands of plain TeX missing in ConTeXt, the position of math accents, etc…) Indeed some of the issues may have their origin in the fonts (therefore not easy to fix thouroughly), but others may be fixed once the expectations are clearly expressed. As usual, please give minimal examples imbedded in \starttext ……… \stoptext so that we can test the issue you are reporting. Thanks for your attention and cooperation, Best regards: OK ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] OT: Reflections on usability ConTeXt for typesetting of mathematics
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Keith J. Schultz schul...@uni-trier.dewrote: Hi Mikael, Basically, I see your problem with ConTeXts handling of math as a matter of taste! That is you want LaTeX syntax. It is easy enough to get the results you want. The only place where I see a bug is that a single prime is set larger than multple primes. regards Keith Hi Keith, I do not agree with you. It is not so important to have the same syntax as in LaTeX (exception: it would be nice to get double bars from \| since it does not make sense to have \| yield a single bar since | does), but to be able to write very common formulas (look at the example with double derivative with respect to x in my examples above, and tell me how to do that correctly in ConTeXt!) in an acceptable way. Best regards, Mikael Am 11.02.2014 um 14:18 schrieb Mikael P. Sundqvist mic...@gmail.com: On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Keith J. Schultz schul...@uni-trier.dewrote: Am 11.02.2014 um 09:57 schrieb Mikael P. Sundqvist mic...@gmail.com: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: On 2/10/2014 9:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: Hi, I used ConTeXt (mkii) to write my PhD thesis in Mathematics in 2008. It worked just fine. At the moment I write some exams and hand-outs using ConTeXt, but research using LaTeX (since the journals do not really accept ConTeXt and my collaborators dont know ConTeXt). It certainly works OK to write math in ConTeXt, but I have a feeling that there are some things that are somewhat broken or not finetuned to output what mathematicians expect. Look at the attached pdf files [1] l.pdf (from LaTeX) and c.pdf (from latest standalone ConTeXt), with source l.tex and c.tex for some examples. In mkiv we follow some alternative approaches compared to mkii (and probably other tex macro packages) and some aspects indeed might need tuning (or more configuration options) .. I try hard to get away from hackery solutions (for several reasons). I agree it is good to avoid hackery as long as possible, and I for sure is ready to relearn how to write some things. With the examples I gave in the previous email in mind: * How am I supposed to write first derivative (f') and second derivative (f'') in such a way that they have the same type of prime (the prime in the first derivative is the one I prefer)? No sure if to call this a bug! It seems that a single prime is always larger than multiple ones! You can always change its size! I think the user should not have to change its size. All primes should have the same size, independent if they are one or several. * How am I supposed to write f_xx'' to get the output as in the LaTeX example (i.e. so that the primes are over the xx)? have to switch things around: f''_xx or f''_{xx} depending on the actual result you want. I know about the grouping. Please have a look at my example files in my earlier post in this thread. * Could the default placement of limits in integrals be changed (integral=nolimits)? This is how it is done in almost all math books). Not sure what you want here! example? can be LateX As above, I gave examples... Best regards, Mikael * What about the size and finetuning of placement of indices in integrals and sums (and probably products, unions, ...)? * I remember I suggested that \| should be double bars in a previous thread on this list. Is there any drawback in giving double bars for \|? Of course I can relearn and use \lVert and \rVert, but I have a feeling that if we want people moving from LaTeX to ConTeXt, then this is the kind of things that should just work as expected... Best regards, Mikael regards Keith ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg
Re: [NTG-context] OT: Reflections on usability ConTeXt for typesetting of mathematics
Hi Mikael, Basically, I see your problem with ConTeXts handling of math as a matter of taste! That is you want LaTeX syntax. It is easy enough to get the results you want. The only place where I see a bug is that a single prime is set larger than multple primes. regards Keith Am 11.02.2014 um 14:18 schrieb Mikael P. Sundqvist mic...@gmail.com: On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Keith J. Schultz schul...@uni-trier.de wrote: Am 11.02.2014 um 09:57 schrieb Mikael P. Sundqvist mic...@gmail.com: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: On 2/10/2014 9:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: Hi, I used ConTeXt (mkii) to write my PhD thesis in Mathematics in 2008. It worked just fine. At the moment I write some exams and hand-outs using ConTeXt, but research using LaTeX (since the journals do not really accept ConTeXt and my collaborators dont know ConTeXt). It certainly works OK to write math in ConTeXt, but I have a feeling that there are some things that are somewhat broken or not finetuned to output what mathematicians expect. Look at the attached pdf files [1] l.pdf (from LaTeX) and c.pdf (from latest standalone ConTeXt), with source l.tex and c.tex for some examples. In mkiv we follow some alternative approaches compared to mkii (and probably other tex macro packages) and some aspects indeed might need tuning (or more configuration options) .. I try hard to get away from hackery solutions (for several reasons). I agree it is good to avoid hackery as long as possible, and I for sure is ready to relearn how to write some things. With the examples I gave in the previous email in mind: * How am I supposed to write first derivative (f') and second derivative (f'') in such a way that they have the same type of prime (the prime in the first derivative is the one I prefer)? No sure if to call this a bug! It seems that a single prime is always larger than multiple ones! You can always change its size! I think the user should not have to change its size. All primes should have the same size, independent if they are one or several. * How am I supposed to write f_xx'' to get the output as in the LaTeX example (i.e. so that the primes are over the xx)? have to switch things around: f''_xx or f''_{xx} depending on the actual result you want. I know about the grouping. Please have a look at my example files in my earlier post in this thread. * Could the default placement of limits in integrals be changed (integral=nolimits)? This is how it is done in almost all math books). Not sure what you want here! example? can be LateX As above, I gave examples... Best regards, Mikael * What about the size and finetuning of placement of indices in integrals and sums (and probably products, unions, ...)? * I remember I suggested that \| should be double bars in a previous thread on this list. Is there any drawback in giving double bars for \|? Of course I can relearn and use \lVert and \rVert, but I have a feeling that if we want people moving from LaTeX to ConTeXt, then this is the kind of things that should just work as expected... Best regards, Mikael regards Keith ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] OT: Reflections on usability ConTeXt for typesetting of mathematics
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: On 2/10/2014 9:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: Hi, I used ConTeXt (mkii) to write my PhD thesis in Mathematics in 2008. It worked just fine. At the moment I write some exams and hand-outs using ConTeXt, but research using LaTeX (since the journals do not really accept ConTeXt and my collaborators dont know ConTeXt). It certainly works OK to write math in ConTeXt, but I have a feeling that there are some things that are somewhat broken or not finetuned to output what mathematicians expect. Look at the attached pdf files [1] l.pdf (from LaTeX) and c.pdf (from latest standalone ConTeXt), with source l.tex and c.tex for some examples. In mkiv we follow some alternative approaches compared to mkii (and probably other tex macro packages) and some aspects indeed might need tuning (or more configuration options) .. I try hard to get away from hackery solutions (for several reasons). I agree it is good to avoid hackery as long as possible, and I for sure is ready to relearn how to write some things. With the examples I gave in the previous email in mind: * How am I supposed to write first derivative (f') and second derivative (f'') in such a way that they have the same type of prime (the prime in the first derivative is the one I prefer)? * How am I supposed to write f_xx'' to get the output as in the LaTeX example (i.e. so that the primes are over the xx)? * Could the default placement of limits in integrals be changed (integral=nolimits)? This is how it is done in almost all math books). * What about the size and finetuning of placement of indices in integrals and sums (and probably products, unions, ...)? * I remember I suggested that \| should be double bars in a previous thread on this list. Is there any drawback in giving double bars for \|? Of course I can relearn and use \lVert and \rVert, but I have a feeling that if we want people moving from LaTeX to ConTeXt, then this is the kind of things that should just work as expected... Best regards, Mikael When it comes to math environments, I think that thanks to the environments in http://dl.contextgarden.net/myway/mathalign.pdf http://dl.contextgarden..net/myway/mathalign.pdf we are OK. I sometimes miss the multline(d) environment from LaTeX. Best regards, Mikael [1] The attachments were too big, so I decided to put the pdf files on http://www.maths.lth.se/~mickep/l.pdf and http://www.maths.lth.se/~mickep/c.pdf On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Jaroslav Hajtmar hajt...@gyza.cz mailto:hajt...@gyza.cz wrote: Hello ConTeXist. I am very sorry for this OFF TOPIC contribution. For writing of this text led me several hours of searching on internet. I was looking for ways to typing of non-elementary math in ConTeXt Already a long time I use ConTeXt typesetting lot of different things and I am very satisfied. In the many things, of which I typed, was maths represented only marginally and minimally. Now I need to type some mathematics (at secondary school level) and I found that I came across borders of my knowledge of ConTeXt, or on possibilities of ConTeXt for typesetting of mathematics. I do not in any way call into question the ability of ConTeXt typesetting mathematics, although I think that who wants to type mathematics then use LaTeX. I want find experience of users of ConTeXt for real using of ConTeXt for typesetting of mathematics. I wonder how users use possible math modules (exist anything?) to be usable results. I have a few questions: 0. Do you think that this is only a problem for beginners of ConText or it is a general problem of ConTeXt? 1. How many of ConTeXt users use this tool for typesetting of non-elementary mathematics? 2. Are you satisfied with the results, which produces ConTeXt (thinking in the field of mathematics rate)? 3. What things do you need to have in ConTeXt study that one could bet mathematics at a reasonable level? 4. Is ConTeXt able to substitute LaTeX to typesetting of math (e.g. in the future)? 5. Can you think of any more questions that should be here? I hope that my question will help other beginners who would like to typing of mathematics use ConText - this unique and useful tool. Thanks for all the answers. Jaroslav Hajtmar ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl mailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/__listinfo/ntg-context http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/__projects/contextrev/ http://foundry.supelec.fr
Re: [NTG-context] OT: Reflections on usability ConTeXt for typesetting of mathematics
Hi, Unless I am mistaken, Cambria is a font available for Windows. I'm using Linux, is it possible to install ? Is it free ? If yes, where can I download it ? Xits, I do not know. Is it possible to put the uppercase = right in math mode with Pagella ? thank you, Fabrice 2014-02-11 9:57 GMT+01:00 Mikael P. Sundqvist mic...@gmail.com: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: On 2/10/2014 9:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: Hi, I used ConTeXt (mkii) to write my PhD thesis in Mathematics in 2008. It worked just fine. At the moment I write some exams and hand-outs using ConTeXt, but research using LaTeX (since the journals do not really accept ConTeXt and my collaborators dont know ConTeXt). It certainly works OK to write math in ConTeXt, but I have a feeling that there are some things that are somewhat broken or not finetuned to output what mathematicians expect. Look at the attached pdf files [1] l.pdf (from LaTeX) and c.pdf (from latest standalone ConTeXt), with source l.tex and c.tex for some examples. In mkiv we follow some alternative approaches compared to mkii (and probably other tex macro packages) and some aspects indeed might need tuning (or more configuration options) .. I try hard to get away from hackery solutions (for several reasons). I agree it is good to avoid hackery as long as possible, and I for sure is ready to relearn how to write some things. With the examples I gave in the previous email in mind: * How am I supposed to write first derivative (f') and second derivative (f'') in such a way that they have the same type of prime (the prime in the first derivative is the one I prefer)? * How am I supposed to write f_xx'' to get the output as in the LaTeX example (i.e. so that the primes are over the xx)? * Could the default placement of limits in integrals be changed (integral=nolimits)? This is how it is done in almost all math books). * What about the size and finetuning of placement of indices in integrals and sums (and probably products, unions, ...)? * I remember I suggested that \| should be double bars in a previous thread on this list. Is there any drawback in giving double bars for \|? Of course I can relearn and use \lVert and \rVert, but I have a feeling that if we want people moving from LaTeX to ConTeXt, then this is the kind of things that should just work as expected... Best regards, Mikael When it comes to math environments, I think that thanks to the environments in http://dl.contextgarden.net/myway/mathalign.pdf http://dl.contextgarden..net/myway/mathalign.pdf we are OK. I sometimes miss the multline(d) environment from LaTeX. Best regards, Mikael [1] The attachments were too big, so I decided to put the pdf files on http://www.maths.lth.se/~mickep/l.pdf and http://www.maths.lth.se/~mickep/c.pdf On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Jaroslav Hajtmar hajt...@gyza.cz mailto:hajt...@gyza.cz wrote: Hello ConTeXist. I am very sorry for this OFF TOPIC contribution. For writing of this text led me several hours of searching on internet. I was looking for ways to typing of non-elementary math in ConTeXt Already a long time I use ConTeXt typesetting lot of different things and I am very satisfied. In the many things, of which I typed, was maths represented only marginally and minimally. Now I need to type some mathematics (at secondary school level) and I found that I came across borders of my knowledge of ConTeXt, or on possibilities of ConTeXt for typesetting of mathematics. I do not in any way call into question the ability of ConTeXt typesetting mathematics, although I think that who wants to type mathematics then use LaTeX. I want find experience of users of ConTeXt for real using of ConTeXt for typesetting of mathematics. I wonder how users use possible math modules (exist anything?) to be usable results. I have a few questions: 0. Do you think that this is only a problem for beginners of ConText or it is a general problem of ConTeXt? 1. How many of ConTeXt users use this tool for typesetting of non-elementary mathematics? 2. Are you satisfied with the results, which produces ConTeXt (thinking in the field of mathematics rate)? 3. What things do you need to have in ConTeXt study that one could bet mathematics at a reasonable level? 4. Is ConTeXt able to substitute LaTeX to typesetting of math (e.g. in the future)? 5. Can you think of any more questions that should be here? I hope that my question will help other beginners who would like to typing of mathematics use ConText - this unique and useful tool. Thanks for all the answers. Jaroslav Hajtmar ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add
Re: [NTG-context] OT: Reflections on usability ConTeXt for typesetting of mathematics
Am 11.02.2014 um 09:57 schrieb Mikael P. Sundqvist mic...@gmail.com: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: On 2/10/2014 9:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: Hi, I used ConTeXt (mkii) to write my PhD thesis in Mathematics in 2008. It worked just fine. At the moment I write some exams and hand-outs using ConTeXt, but research using LaTeX (since the journals do not really accept ConTeXt and my collaborators dont know ConTeXt). It certainly works OK to write math in ConTeXt, but I have a feeling that there are some things that are somewhat broken or not finetuned to output what mathematicians expect. Look at the attached pdf files [1] l.pdf (from LaTeX) and c.pdf (from latest standalone ConTeXt), with source l.tex and c.tex for some examples. In mkiv we follow some alternative approaches compared to mkii (and probably other tex macro packages) and some aspects indeed might need tuning (or more configuration options) .. I try hard to get away from hackery solutions (for several reasons). I agree it is good to avoid hackery as long as possible, and I for sure is ready to relearn how to write some things. With the examples I gave in the previous email in mind: * How am I supposed to write first derivative (f') and second derivative (f'') in such a way that they have the same type of prime (the prime in the first derivative is the one I prefer)? No sure if to call this a bug! It seems that a single prime is always larger than multiple ones! You can always change its size! * How am I supposed to write f_xx'' to get the output as in the LaTeX example (i.e. so that the primes are over the xx)? have to switch things around: f''_xx or f''_{xx} depending on the actual result you want. * Could the default placement of limits in integrals be changed (integral=nolimits)? This is how it is done in almost all math books). Not sure what you want here! example? can be LateX * What about the size and finetuning of placement of indices in integrals and sums (and probably products, unions, ...)? * I remember I suggested that \| should be double bars in a previous thread on this list. Is there any drawback in giving double bars for \|? Of course I can relearn and use \lVert and \rVert, but I have a feeling that if we want people moving from LaTeX to ConTeXt, then this is the kind of things that should just work as expected... Best regards, Mikael regards Keith___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] OT: Reflections on usability ConTeXt for typesetting of mathematics
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Keith J. Schultz schul...@uni-trier.dewrote: Am 11.02.2014 um 09:57 schrieb Mikael P. Sundqvist mic...@gmail.com: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: On 2/10/2014 9:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: Hi, I used ConTeXt (mkii) to write my PhD thesis in Mathematics in 2008. It worked just fine. At the moment I write some exams and hand-outs using ConTeXt, but research using LaTeX (since the journals do not really accept ConTeXt and my collaborators dont know ConTeXt). It certainly works OK to write math in ConTeXt, but I have a feeling that there are some things that are somewhat broken or not finetuned to output what mathematicians expect. Look at the attached pdf files [1] l.pdf (from LaTeX) and c.pdf (from latest standalone ConTeXt), with source l.tex and c.tex for some examples. In mkiv we follow some alternative approaches compared to mkii (and probably other tex macro packages) and some aspects indeed might need tuning (or more configuration options) .. I try hard to get away from hackery solutions (for several reasons). I agree it is good to avoid hackery as long as possible, and I for sure is ready to relearn how to write some things. With the examples I gave in the previous email in mind: * How am I supposed to write first derivative (f') and second derivative (f'') in such a way that they have the same type of prime (the prime in the first derivative is the one I prefer)? No sure if to call this a bug! It seems that a single prime is always larger than multiple ones! You can always change its size! I think the user should not have to change its size. All primes should have the same size, independent if they are one or several. * How am I supposed to write f_xx'' to get the output as in the LaTeX example (i.e. so that the primes are over the xx)? have to switch things around: f''_xx or f''_{xx} depending on the actual result you want. I know about the grouping. Please have a look at my example files in my earlier post in this thread. * Could the default placement of limits in integrals be changed (integral=nolimits)? This is how it is done in almost all math books). Not sure what you want here! example? can be LateX As above, I gave examples... Best regards, Mikael * What about the size and finetuning of placement of indices in integrals and sums (and probably products, unions, ...)? * I remember I suggested that \| should be double bars in a previous thread on this list. Is there any drawback in giving double bars for \|? Of course I can relearn and use \lVert and \rVert, but I have a feeling that if we want people moving from LaTeX to ConTeXt, then this is the kind of things that should just work as expected... Best regards, Mikael regards Keith ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] OT: Reflections on usability ConTeXt for typesetting of mathematics
Hi Martin, Sorry, but I do not find fonts cambria and cambria math to install with Debian. thank you, Fabrice 2014-02-11 14:18 GMT+01:00 Mikael P. Sundqvist mic...@gmail.com: On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Keith J. Schultz schul...@uni-trier.dewrote: Am 11.02.2014 um 09:57 schrieb Mikael P. Sundqvist mic...@gmail.com: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: On 2/10/2014 9:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: Hi, I used ConTeXt (mkii) to write my PhD thesis in Mathematics in 2008. It worked just fine. At the moment I write some exams and hand-outs using ConTeXt, but research using LaTeX (since the journals do not really accept ConTeXt and my collaborators dont know ConTeXt). It certainly works OK to write math in ConTeXt, but I have a feeling that there are some things that are somewhat broken or not finetuned to output what mathematicians expect. Look at the attached pdf files [1] l.pdf (from LaTeX) and c.pdf (from latest standalone ConTeXt), with source l.tex and c.tex for some examples. In mkiv we follow some alternative approaches compared to mkii (and probably other tex macro packages) and some aspects indeed might need tuning (or more configuration options) .. I try hard to get away from hackery solutions (for several reasons). I agree it is good to avoid hackery as long as possible, and I for sure is ready to relearn how to write some things. With the examples I gave in the previous email in mind: * How am I supposed to write first derivative (f') and second derivative (f'') in such a way that they have the same type of prime (the prime in the first derivative is the one I prefer)? No sure if to call this a bug! It seems that a single prime is always larger than multiple ones! You can always change its size! I think the user should not have to change its size. All primes should have the same size, independent if they are one or several. * How am I supposed to write f_xx'' to get the output as in the LaTeX example (i.e. so that the primes are over the xx)? have to switch things around: f''_xx or f''_{xx} depending on the actual result you want. I know about the grouping. Please have a look at my example files in my earlier post in this thread. * Could the default placement of limits in integrals be changed (integral=nolimits)? This is how it is done in almost all math books). Not sure what you want here! example? can be LateX As above, I gave examples... Best regards, Mikael * What about the size and finetuning of placement of indices in integrals and sums (and probably products, unions, ...)? * I remember I suggested that \| should be double bars in a previous thread on this list. Is there any drawback in giving double bars for \|? Of course I can relearn and use \lVert and \rVert, but I have a feeling that if we want people moving from LaTeX to ConTeXt, then this is the kind of things that should just work as expected... Best regards, Mikael regards Keith ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] OT: Reflections on usability ConTeXt for typesetting of mathematics
Hi, I used ConTeXt (mkii) to write my PhD thesis in Mathematics in 2008. It worked just fine. At the moment I write some exams and hand-outs using ConTeXt, but research using LaTeX (since the journals do not really accept ConTeXt and my collaborators dont know ConTeXt). It certainly works OK to write math in ConTeXt, but I have a feeling that there are some things that are somewhat broken or not finetuned to output what mathematicians expect. Look at the attached pdf files [1] l.pdf (from LaTeX) and c.pdf (from latest standalone ConTeXt), with source l.tex and c.tex for some examples. When it comes to math environments, I think that thanks to the environments in http://dl.contextgarden.net/myway/mathalign.pdf we are OK. I sometimes miss the multline(d) environment from LaTeX. Best regards, Mikael [1] The attachments were too big, so I decided to put the pdf files on http://www.maths.lth.se/~mickep/l.pdf and http://www.maths.lth.se/~mickep/c.pdf On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Jaroslav Hajtmar hajt...@gyza.cz wrote: Hello ConTeXist. I am very sorry for this OFF TOPIC contribution. For writing of this text led me several hours of searching on internet. I was looking for ways to typing of non-elementary math in ConTeXt Already a long time I use ConTeXt typesetting lot of different things and I am very satisfied. In the many things, of which I typed, was maths represented only marginally and minimally. Now I need to type some mathematics (at secondary school level) and I found that I came across borders of my knowledge of ConTeXt, or on possibilities of ConTeXt for typesetting of mathematics. I do not in any way call into question the ability of ConTeXt typesetting mathematics, although I think that who wants to type mathematics then use LaTeX. I want find experience of users of ConTeXt for real using of ConTeXt for typesetting of mathematics. I wonder how users use possible math modules (exist anything?) to be usable results. I have a few questions: 0. Do you think that this is only a problem for beginners of ConText or it is a general problem of ConTeXt? 1. How many of ConTeXt users use this tool for typesetting of non-elementary mathematics? 2. Are you satisfied with the results, which produces ConTeXt (thinking in the field of mathematics rate)? 3. What things do you need to have in ConTeXt study that one could bet mathematics at a reasonable level? 4. Is ConTeXt able to substitute LaTeX to typesetting of math (e.g. in the future)? 5. Can you think of any more questions that should be here? I hope that my question will help other beginners who would like to typing of mathematics use ConText - this unique and useful tool. Thanks for all the answers. Jaroslav Hajtmar ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/ listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ c.tex Description: TeX document l.tex Description: TeX document ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] OT: Reflections on usability ConTeXt for typesetting of mathematics
On 2/10/2014 9:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: Hi, I used ConTeXt (mkii) to write my PhD thesis in Mathematics in 2008. It worked just fine. At the moment I write some exams and hand-outs using ConTeXt, but research using LaTeX (since the journals do not really accept ConTeXt and my collaborators dont know ConTeXt). It certainly works OK to write math in ConTeXt, but I have a feeling that there are some things that are somewhat broken or not finetuned to output what mathematicians expect. Look at the attached pdf files [1] l.pdf (from LaTeX) and c.pdf (from latest standalone ConTeXt), with source l.tex and c.tex for some examples. In mkiv we follow some alternative approaches compared to mkii (and probably other tex macro packages) and some aspects indeed might need tuning (or more configuration options) .. I try hard to get away from hackery solutions (for several reasons). When it comes to math environments, I think that thanks to the environments in http://dl.contextgarden.net/myway/mathalign.pdf http://dl.contextgarden..net/myway/mathalign.pdf we are OK. I sometimes miss the multline(d) environment from LaTeX. Best regards, Mikael [1] The attachments were too big, so I decided to put the pdf files on http://www.maths.lth.se/~mickep/l.pdf and http://www.maths.lth.se/~mickep/c.pdf On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Jaroslav Hajtmar hajt...@gyza.cz mailto:hajt...@gyza.cz wrote: Hello ConTeXist. I am very sorry for this OFF TOPIC contribution. For writing of this text led me several hours of searching on internet. I was looking for ways to typing of non-elementary math in ConTeXt Already a long time I use ConTeXt typesetting lot of different things and I am very satisfied. In the many things, of which I typed, was maths represented only marginally and minimally. Now I need to type some mathematics (at secondary school level) and I found that I came across borders of my knowledge of ConTeXt, or on possibilities of ConTeXt for typesetting of mathematics. I do not in any way call into question the ability of ConTeXt typesetting mathematics, although I think that who wants to type mathematics then use LaTeX. I want find experience of users of ConTeXt for real using of ConTeXt for typesetting of mathematics. I wonder how users use possible math modules (exist anything?) to be usable results. I have a few questions: 0. Do you think that this is only a problem for beginners of ConText or it is a general problem of ConTeXt? 1. How many of ConTeXt users use this tool for typesetting of non-elementary mathematics? 2. Are you satisfied with the results, which produces ConTeXt (thinking in the field of mathematics rate)? 3. What things do you need to have in ConTeXt study that one could bet mathematics at a reasonable level? 4. Is ConTeXt able to substitute LaTeX to typesetting of math (e.g. in the future)? 5. Can you think of any more questions that should be here? I hope that my question will help other beginners who would like to typing of mathematics use ConText - this unique and useful tool. Thanks for all the answers. Jaroslav Hajtmar ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl mailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/__listinfo/ntg-context http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/__projects/contextrev/ http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ -- - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] getting text outside cropmarks to work
Am 05.02.2014 um 17:30 schrieb Lars Huttar lars_hut...@sil.org: On 2/5/2014 11:03 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 05.02.2014 um 16:45 schrieb Lars Huttar lars_hut...@sil.org: Hello, Under mkii we used to have a running footer that appeared below the crop marks. Under mkiv I can't get that to work. The MWE I'm trying (with ConTeXt mkiv from the TeXLive 2013 CD): \def\TopText { Top Text } \def\BottomText { Bottom Text } \def\pagecutmarksymbol {\the\realpageno} \def\pagecutmarklength {.5cm} \let\pagecutmarktoptext \TopText \let\pagecutmarkbottomtext \BottomText \setuplayout[marking=text] %\setuplayout[marking=on] \starttext \input knuth \stoptext Code like this used to work for us in mkii. Redefining internal commands isn’t a good solution, what you can do is to use a layer to place your texts. Thanks for your reply. When you say redefining internal commands, is that referring to statements like \let\pagecutmarktoptext \TopText ? AFAICT this is the recommended solution, both on the current wiki (http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Imposition#Cut_marks) and by Hans (http://context.markmail.org/thread/kpayudrtabsti76i) albeit several years ago; the current ref man (section 3.4 Page design / page composition) also lists marking=TEXT as an option for \setuplayout. If this is correct, how is one supposed to specify the text to display? Am I misunderstanding the documentation, or is it just obsolete? If we need to implement this using layers, does anyone have a recent example of using a layer to place a running footer outside the crop marks? \setuppapersize[A4][A3] \setuplayout[location=middle,marking=on] \setupbodyfont[modern] \definelayer[cropmark][width=\paperwidth,height=\paperheight] \setupbackgrounds[page][background=cropmark] \setlayer[cropmark][preset=middlebottom,y=-\lineheight]{Bottom Text} \setlayer[cropmark][preset=middletop,y=-\lineheight]{Top Text} \starttext \input knuth \stoptext Wolfgang___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] getting text outside cropmarks to work
Hello, Under mkii we used to have a running footer that appeared below the crop marks. Under mkiv I can't get that to work. The MWE I'm trying (with ConTeXt mkiv from the TeXLive 2013 CD): \def\TopText { Top Text } \def\BottomText { Bottom Text } \def\pagecutmarksymbol {\the\realpageno} \def\pagecutmarklength {.5cm} \let\pagecutmarktoptext \TopText \let\pagecutmarkbottomtext \BottomText \setuplayout[marking=text] %\setuplayout[marking=on] \starttext \input knuth \stoptext Code like this used to work for us in mkii. I tried it with both marking=text and marking=on, but in either case, I get neither crop marks nor the text. (In our real document, I was able to get crop marks with [marking=on]. But not text. And haven't figured out how to get crop marks in a MWE.) Relevant guidance I've been trying to follow: http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Imposition#Cut_marks http://context.markmail.org/thread/kpayudrtabsti76i Thanks for any help on how to get text (pagecutmarkbottomtext) to appear outside the crop marks. Lars ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] getting text outside cropmarks to work
Am 05.02.2014 um 16:45 schrieb Lars Huttar lars_hut...@sil.org: Hello, Under mkii we used to have a running footer that appeared below the crop marks. Under mkiv I can't get that to work. The MWE I'm trying (with ConTeXt mkiv from the TeXLive 2013 CD): \def\TopText { Top Text } \def\BottomText { Bottom Text } \def\pagecutmarksymbol {\the\realpageno} \def\pagecutmarklength {.5cm} \let\pagecutmarktoptext \TopText \let\pagecutmarkbottomtext \BottomText \setuplayout[marking=text] %\setuplayout[marking=on] \starttext \input knuth \stoptext Code like this used to work for us in mkii. Redefining internal commands isn’t a good solution, what you can do is to use a layer to place your texts. Wolfgang ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] getting text outside cropmarks to work
On 2/5/2014 11:03 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 05.02.2014 um 16:45 schrieb Lars Huttar lars_hut...@sil.org: Hello, Under mkii we used to have a running footer that appeared below the crop marks. Under mkiv I can't get that to work. The MWE I'm trying (with ConTeXt mkiv from the TeXLive 2013 CD): \def\TopText { Top Text } \def\BottomText { Bottom Text } \def\pagecutmarksymbol {\the\realpageno} \def\pagecutmarklength {.5cm} \let\pagecutmarktoptext \TopText \let\pagecutmarkbottomtext \BottomText \setuplayout[marking=text] %\setuplayout[marking=on] \starttext \input knuth \stoptext Code like this used to work for us in mkii. Redefining internal commands isn’t a good solution, what you can do is to use a layer to place your texts. Thanks for your reply. When you say redefining internal commands, is that referring to statements like \let\pagecutmarktoptext \TopText ? AFAICT this is the recommended solution, both on the current wiki (http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Imposition#Cut_marks) and by Hans (http://context.markmail.org/thread/kpayudrtabsti76i) albeit several years ago; the current ref man (section 3.4 Page design / page composition) also lists marking=TEXT as an option for \setuplayout. If this is correct, how is one supposed to specify the text to display? Am I misunderstanding the documentation, or is it just obsolete? If we need to implement this using layers, does anyone have a recent example of using a layer to place a running footer outside the crop marks? Thanks, Lars ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Metafun: numeric=color
On 1/29/2014 9:41 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: Hi, With the latest beta, ConTeXt ver: 2013.06.07 17:34 MKII fmt: 2014.1.29 in a file typeset with mkii I have a bunch of metapost macros (drawing a logo…) which used to typeset correctly until last week, I get an error message saying: Preloading the plain mem file, version 1.004 for metafun ii cyan (0,1,1) ! Equation cannot be performed (numeric=color). Unfortunately I cannot reproduce this error message in a minimal example, but can anyone tell me whether something has changed in MetaPost? fixed - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] Metafun: numeric=color
Hi, With the latest beta, ConTeXt ver: 2013.06.07 17:34 MKII fmt: 2014.1.29 in a file typeset with mkii I have a bunch of metapost macros (drawing a logo…) which used to typeset correctly until last week, I get an error message saying: Preloading the plain mem file, version 1.004 for metafun ii cyan (0,1,1) ! Equation cannot be performed (numeric=color). Unfortunately I cannot reproduce this error message in a minimal example, but can anyone tell me whether something has changed in MetaPost? Best regards: OK ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Change the default text colour for entire document
On 1/27/2014 12:24 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 22.01.2014 um 02:15 schrieb Thangalin thanga...@gmail.com: Hi, In ConTeXt to change the default text colour for the entire document, there are at least two settings that need to be configured: \setupcolors[textcolor=red] \setupinmargin[line=13,color=red,style=slanted,] The border colour for tables remains black: \setupcolors[textcolor=red] \setupinmargin[color=red] \starttext {\bTABLE \bTR \bTD One \eTD \bTD Two \eTD \eTR \eTABLE} \stoptext How can you override *all* instances of black? (Ideally there would be a single setting that is inherited by all.) That is, it is difficult to know all the various aspects of a ConTeXt document that use the default black colour -- margins, body text, table borders, and possibly more that I don't know about. Notes (local notes excluded because they use a different placement system) and margin texts ignore the global text color because both mechanism reset colors and many other settings to avoid unwanted output from local changes in the main text etc. Even though there is a comment about this problem for margin notes in the source it wasn’t fixed yet but I think it makes sense to to so. \appendtoks \inheritmaintextcolor \to \everybeforenoteinsert \appendtoks \inheritmaintextcolor \to \everymargindatacontent could work, but it needs testing as we cannot predict side effects The problem with the black frames for natural tables are a result of the explicit framecolor setup for it (I guess to avoid problems when you use metapost backgrounds which use the framecolor value). A possible way to fix this is to add a framecolor setup to \setupcolors which argument is now used as default color for the frame of natural tables, this way can use this color also in other commands (core functions as well as third party modules) to set a default value. needs some thinking \setupTABLE [framecolor=\maintextcolor] some settings date from mkii times but again we need to think of side effects Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Change the default text colour for entire document
Hi Everybody, If I remember right colors can be defined in ConTeXt, right? So why not just redefine black! If this is stupid, the defaults get initialize before a redefined occurs! forget it! Just a stupid simplistic idea! regards Keith. Am 27.01.2014 um 12:10 schrieb Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl: On 1/27/2014 12:24 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 22.01.2014 um 02:15 schrieb Thangalin thanga...@gmail.com: Hi, In ConTeXt to change the default text colour for the entire document, there are at least two settings that need to be configured: \setupcolors[textcolor=red] \setupinmargin[line=13,color=red,style=slanted,] The border colour for tables remains black: \setupcolors[textcolor=red] \setupinmargin[color=red] \starttext {\bTABLE \bTR \bTD One \eTD \bTD Two \eTD \eTR \eTABLE} \stoptext How can you override *all* instances of black? (Ideally there would be a single setting that is inherited by all.) That is, it is difficult to know all the various aspects of a ConTeXt document that use the default black colour -- margins, body text, table borders, and possibly more that I don't know about. Notes (local notes excluded because they use a different placement system) and margin texts ignore the global text color because both mechanism reset colors and many other settings to avoid unwanted output from local changes in the main text etc. Even though there is a comment about this problem for margin notes in the source it wasn’t fixed yet but I think it makes sense to to so. \appendtoks \inheritmaintextcolor \to \everybeforenoteinsert \appendtoks \inheritmaintextcolor \to \everymargindatacontent could work, but it needs testing as we cannot predict side effects The problem with the black frames for natural tables are a result of the explicit framecolor setup for it (I guess to avoid problems when you use metapost backgrounds which use the framecolor value). A possible way to fix this is to add a framecolor setup to \setupcolors which argument is now used as default color for the frame of natural tables, this way can use this color also in other commands (core functions as well as third party modules) to set a default value. needs some thinking \setupTABLE [framecolor=\maintextcolor] some settings date from mkii times but again we need to think of side effects Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] Misplaced \widehat and \widetilde in mkiv?
Hi Hans, It seems that with the latest beta mkiv, version ConTeXt ver: 2014.01.23 01:55 MKIV beta fmt: 2014.1.23 \widetilde and \widehat in mathmode are misplaced (and this is so in any of the fonts I tried). Please compare the result of the following in mkii (where everything is correct) and in mkiv: begin tilde-hat.tex \starttext We set ${\widetilde n}(t) := n(1 - t)$, and ${\widehat u}(\xi) := \int_{{\Bbb R}}\exp(-{\rm i}x\xi)f(x)dx$. \stoptext end tilde-hat.tex The attached PDF is obtained with mkiv. Best regards: OK bug-widetilde.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Misplaced \widehat and \widetilde in mkiv?
The minimal example works fine with the latest beta (ConTeXt ver: 2014.01.24 10:20 MKIV beta fmt: 2014.1.24). Am 23.01.2014 um 21:52 schrieb Otared Kavian otared.kav...@gmail.com: Hi Hans, It seems that with the latest beta mkiv, version ConTeXt ver: 2014.01.23 01:55 MKIV beta fmt: 2014.1.23 \widetilde and \widehat in mathmode are misplaced (and this is so in any of the fonts I tried). Please compare the result of the following in mkii (where everything is correct) and in mkiv: begin tilde-hat.tex \starttext We set ${\widetilde n}(t) := n(1 - t)$, and ${\widehat u}(\xi) := \int_{{\Bbb R}}\exp(-{\rm i}x\xi)f(x)dx$. \stoptext end tilde-hat.tex The attached PDF is obtained with mkiv. Best regards: OK bug-widetilde.pdf___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Misplaced \widehat and \widetilde in mkiv?
Yes that’s correct! Thanks Hans for the quick fix (I tried a dozen different fonts, and they are all fine). Best regards: OK On 24 janv. 2014, at 13:09, Jannik Voges researchj...@icloud.com wrote: The minimal example works fine with the latest beta (ConTeXt ver: 2014.01.24 10:20 MKIV beta fmt: 2014.1.24). Am 23.01.2014 um 21:52 schrieb Otared Kavian otared.kav...@gmail.com: Hi Hans, It seems that with the latest beta mkiv, version ConTeXt ver: 2014.01.23 01:55 MKIV beta fmt: 2014.1.23 \widetilde and \widehat in mathmode are misplaced (and this is so in any of the fonts I tried). Please compare the result of the following in mkii (where everything is correct) and in mkiv: begin tilde-hat.tex \starttext We set ${\widetilde n}(t) := n(1 - t)$, and ${\widehat u}(\xi) := \int_{{\Bbb R}}\exp(-{\rm i}x\xi)f(x)dx$. \stoptext end tilde-hat.tex The attached PDF is obtained with mkiv. Best regards: OK bug-widetilde.pdf___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] Misplaced \widehat and \widetilde in mkiv?
Hi Hans, It seems that with the latest beta mkiv, version ConTeXt ver: 2014.01.23 01:55 MKIV beta fmt: 2014.1.23 \widetilde and \widehat in mathmode are misplaced (and this is so in any of the fonts I tried). Please compare the result of the following in mkii (where everything is correct) and in mkiv: begin tilde-hat.tex \starttext We set ${\widetilde n}(t) := n(1 - t)$, and ${\widehat u}(\xi) := \int_{{\Bbb R}}\exp(-{\rm i}x\xi)f(x)dx$. \stoptext end tilde-hat.tex The attached PDF is obtained with mkiv. Best regards: OK bug-widetilde.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] unknown library 'loc'
Hi Hans, Suppressing the message of a loc that is not needed would be the cleanest method. IMHO, it should not be even causing a warning. regards Keith. Am 12.01.2014 um 23:50 schrieb Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl: On 1/12/2014 11:23 AM, Keith J. Schultz wrote: Hi Hans, Am 07.01.2014 um 00:24 schrieb Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl: On 1/3/2014 2:33 PM, H. van der Meer wrote: Has someone an idee what causes the unknown library message as in the log below? Is it harmful? fontstypescripts unknown library 'loc' you can add a file type-loc.mkiv someplace in your local tree with % dummy file \endinput this file can be used for local overrides (just some mkii compatible feature). If this is the case, should not the the dummy-file be in the distribution! That way if somebody has local overrides they can modify it if needed, and the rest of have one lees message we need to worry, about? It depends ... there are some more loc files, like cont-loc.mkiv and we don't ship these either. Normally users would put such files in texmf-local nowadays but in the past that tree has changes positions in texlive (loading order) so we make no assumptions i.e. it can even be in the main base path which in turn means that we need to make sure it doesn't get overwritten. Easier is probably to suppress the message (ugly but doable). Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] unknown library 'loc'
Hi Hans, Am 07.01.2014 um 00:24 schrieb Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl: On 1/3/2014 2:33 PM, H. van der Meer wrote: Has someone an idee what causes the unknown library message as in the log below? Is it harmful? fontstypescripts unknown library 'loc' you can add a file type-loc.mkiv someplace in your local tree with % dummy file \endinput this file can be used for local overrides (just some mkii compatible feature). If this is the case, should not the the dummy-file be in the distribution! That way if somebody has local overrides they can modify it if needed, and the rest of have one lees message we need to worry, about? regards Keith. ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] unknown library 'loc'
On 1/12/2014 11:23 AM, Keith J. Schultz wrote: Hi Hans, Am 07.01.2014 um 00:24 schrieb Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl: On 1/3/2014 2:33 PM, H. van der Meer wrote: Has someone an idee what causes the unknown library message as in the log below? Is it harmful? fontstypescripts unknown library 'loc' you can add a file type-loc.mkiv someplace in your local tree with % dummy file \endinput this file can be used for local overrides (just some mkii compatible feature). If this is the case, should not the the dummy-file be in the distribution! That way if somebody has local overrides they can modify it if needed, and the rest of have one lees message we need to worry, about? It depends ... there are some more loc files, like cont-loc.mkiv and we don't ship these either. Normally users would put such files in texmf-local nowadays but in the past that tree has changes positions in texlive (loading order) so we make no assumptions i.e. it can even be in the main base path which in turn means that we need to make sure it doesn't get overwritten. Easier is probably to suppress the message (ugly but doable). Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] setuphead for in-paragraph head ?
On 9 janv. 2014, at 15:48, Jaroslav Hajtmar hajt...@gyza.cz wrote: Hello Otared. I will throw this one... Thanx. Once I was using exercise-answer package for LaTeX. Is there anything like this to use in ConTeXt? Thanx Jaroslav Hajtmar Hello Jaroslav, I have something like the following which was given to me by Hans a long time ago: unfortunately for some reason this does not work anymore with ConTeXt mkiv, but it is quite fine with mkii: %%% begin question-hint-answer.tex \defineblock[question] \defineblock[hint] \defineblock[answer] \defineenumeration[question][location=hanging,text={Question},stopper={.}] \defineenumeration[hint][location=hanging,text={Hint for question},stopper={.}] \defineenumeration[answer][location=hanging,text={Answer to question},stopper={.}] \hideblocks[hint] \hideblocks[answer] \starttext \section{Questions} \beginquestion \question Compute $4\times 5$. \beginhint \hint Use the fact that $2\times 5 = 10$. \endhint \beginanswer \answer $20$. \endanswer \endquestion \beginquestion \question What is the value of $100 / 10$? \beginhint \hint Remember that $10\times 10 = 100$. \endhint \beginanswer \answer $10$ \endanswer \endquestion \section{Hints} \useblocks[hint] \section{Answers} \useblocks[answer] \stoptext %%% end question-hint-answer.tex Best regards: OK Dne 9.1.2014 15:19, Otared Kavian napsal(a): %%% begin example-exercise.tex %%% % defining \startexo, \stopexo as an enumeration: \startsetups style:simple \defineenumeration[exo] [alternative=hanging, width=fit, stopper={.}, text=Exercise, %between=, before=, after=\blank] \stopsetups % style:simple \startsetups style:textrule \definenumber[MyExoNumber][way=bysection,sectionumber=yes] \setuptextrules[rulecolor=darkred] \define\ExoCommand{\incrementnumber[MyExoNumber] \textrule[top]{Exercise \getnumber[MyExoNumber]} \startbackground[frame=off,leftframe=on,backgroundcolor=white, framecolor=darkred]} \defineenumeration[exo] [alternative=hanging, width=fit, text={}, number=hide, number=no, before={\ExoCommand}, after={\stopbackground\blank}] \stopsetups % style:textrule % end defining \startexo, \stopexo as an enumeration %%% %defining numbered questions \defineconversion[exercise][\numbers] %\setupitemize[packed] \def\StartQuestions{% \startitemize[exercise][width=2em,packed,style=bold,stopper=,right=)]} \def\StopQuestions{\stopitemize} \def\q{\item} % trye each of the following \setups[style:simple] %\setups[style:textrule] \starttext \startexo Prove that for all $a,b\in {\Bbb K}$, a field of characteristic 2, one has $(a+b)^2 = a^2 + b^2$. \stopexo \startexo Prove that for all $a,b\in {\Bbb K}$, a field of characteristic 2, one has $(a+b)^4 = a^4 + b^4$. \stopexo \startexo \StartQuestions \q Prove that \startformula \sum_{n=1}^\infty{1 \over n^2} = {\pi^2 \over 6}. \stopformula \q Prove that for any $n \geq 1$ integer one has \startformula \sum_{k=1}^n k^3 = \left({n(n+1) \over 2}\right)^2. \stopformula \StopQuestions \stopexo \stoptext %%% end example-exercise.tex ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] setuphead for in-paragraph head ?
On Thu, 9 Jan 2014, Otared Kavian wrote: On 9 janv. 2014, at 15:48, Jaroslav Hajtmar hajt...@gyza.cz wrote: Hello Otared. I will throw this one... Thanx. Once I was using exercise-answer package for LaTeX. Is there anything like this to use in ConTeXt? Thanx Jaroslav Hajtmar Hello Jaroslav, I have something like the following which was given to me by Hans a long time ago: unfortunately for some reason this does not work anymore with ConTeXt mkiv, but it is quite fine with mkii: (Untested): Change location=hanging to alternative=hanging. %%% begin question-hint-answer.tex \defineblock[question] \defineblock[hint] \defineblock[answer] \defineenumeration[question][location=hanging,text={Question},stopper={.}] \defineenumeration[hint][location=hanging,text={Hint for question},stopper={.}] \defineenumeration[answer][location=hanging,text={Answer to question},stopper={.}] Aditya ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] setuphead for in-paragraph head ?
Am 09.01.2014 um 16:36 schrieb Otared Kavian ota...@gmail.com: On 9 janv. 2014, at 15:48, Jaroslav Hajtmar hajt...@gyza.cz wrote: Hello Otared. I will throw this one... Thanx. Once I was using exercise-answer package for LaTeX. Is there anything like this to use in ConTeXt? Thanx Jaroslav Hajtmar Hello Jaroslav, I have something like the following which was given to me by Hans a long time ago: unfortunately for some reason this does not work anymore with ConTeXt mkiv, but it is quite fine with mkii: Add \keepblocks[question]. Wolfgang___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] setuphead for in-paragraph head ?
Hi Wolfgang, Hi Aditya, Thanks for your attention. Unfortunately adding \keepblocks[question] the example I sent before does not work in mkiv, and changing location=hanging to alternative=hanging does not help neither… The error message in mkiv is: \dostopnormalblock ...meter \c!after \par \egroup argument ...fact that $2\times 5 = 10$. \dostopnormalblock \dostartnormalblock {hint}... \dodowithpar ...dler \v!construction \endcsname #1 \csname \??constructionsto… So I don’t know what to do if one has to use mkiv. Best regards: OK On 9 janv. 2014, at 18:23, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote: Am 09.01.2014 um 16:36 schrieb Otared Kavian ota...@gmail.com: On 9 janv. 2014, at 15:48, Jaroslav Hajtmar hajt...@gyza.cz wrote: Hello Otared. I will throw this one... Thanx. Once I was using exercise-answer package for LaTeX. Is there anything like this to use in ConTeXt? Thanx Jaroslav Hajtmar Hello Jaroslav, I have something like the following which was given to me by Hans a long time ago: unfortunately for some reason this does not work anymore with ConTeXt mkiv, but it is quite fine with mkii: Add \keepblocks[question]. Wolfgang ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] unknown library 'loc'
On 1/3/2014 2:33 PM, H. van der Meer wrote: Has someone an idee what causes the unknown library message as in the log below? Is it harmful? fontstypescripts unknown library 'loc' you can add a file type-loc.mkiv someplace in your local tree with % dummy file \endinput this file can be used for local overrides (just some mkii compatible feature). (/Users/hansm/tex/context-16/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/type-imp-texgyre.mkiv){/Users/hansm/tex/context-16/tex/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/lm/lm-math.map}{/Users/hansm/tex/context-16/tex/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/lm/lm-rm.map}{/Users/hansm/tex/context-16/tex/texmf-context/fonts/map/pdftex/context/mkiv-base.map}) ConTeXt ver: 2013.12.26 12:50 MKIV beta fmt: 2013.12.29 int: english/english Hans van der Meer ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ -- - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt hyphenation patterns for Indic languages
i uploaded a beta that has the patterns and language definitions .. but up to you to check it and provide better settings if needed Thanks, Hans! Now mkiv correctly loads the patterns and hyphenation works (though even with \language[ml], log says language 'en' is active). Is there a way to also enable mkii/texexec to load the patterns? I did copy-paste the section from lang-def.mkiv to lang-ind.mkii and also added an entry in lang-def.lua but the log does not show pattern for ml loaded, in addition to mentioning language ml is undefined. Okay, is the best way to install beta to use the Standalone ConTeXt mechanism? Is it advisable to uninstall ConTeXt from TeXLive if so? (wiki says Context Standalone for Linux 32 bit is complied with glibc-2.3.6 while I have glibc-2.17). just install it in a different place and it will run independently from texlive Installed on a separate location and works fine. ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt hyphenation patterns for Indic languages
On 12/18/2013 11:17 PM, Rajeesh K Nambiar wrote: i uploaded a beta that has the patterns and language definitions .. but up to you to check it and provide better settings if needed Thanks, Hans! Now mkiv correctly loads the patterns and hyphenation works (though even with \language[ml], log says language 'en' is active). \language is a local command, use \mainlanguage instead Is there a way to also enable mkii/texexec to load the patterns? I did copy-paste the section from lang-def.mkiv to lang-ind.mkii and probably some more is needed, but in mkii you then also need tp use utf 8 i guess and have the right 8 bit fonts also added an entry in lang-def.lua but the log does not show pattern for ml loaded, in addition to mentioning language ml is undefined. forget about mkii, using 8 bit tex is a bit of a nightmare for ml i think Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt hyphenation patterns for Indic languages
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: On 12/18/2013 11:17 PM, Rajeesh K Nambiar wrote: i uploaded a beta that has the patterns and language definitions .. but up to you to check it and provide better settings if needed Thanks, Hans! Now mkiv correctly loads the patterns and hyphenation works (though even with \language[ml], log says language 'en' is active). \language is a local command, use \mainlanguage instead Does not seem to have an effect here. MWE: \starttext %\language[ml] \mainlanguage[ml] \definedfont[file:rachana*default] കോണ്ടെക്സ്റ്റില് മലയാളം ടൈപ്പ്സെറ്റ് ചെയ്തത് \stoptext The font, Rachana, could be found here: http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/smc/fonts/malayalam-fonts-6.0/Rachana/Rachana.ttf Is there a way to also enable mkii/texexec to load the patterns? I did copy-paste the section from lang-def.mkiv to lang-ind.mkii and probably some more is needed, but in mkii you then also need tp use utf 8 i guess and have the right 8 bit fonts also added an entry in lang-def.lua but the log does not show pattern for ml loaded, in addition to mentioning language ml is undefined. forget about mkii, using 8 bit tex is a bit of a nightmare for ml i think Indeed, but I am using mkii with XeTeX backend (texexec --xetex). I'm trying to make Malayalam shaping work on mkiv (taking Devanagari font-odv.lua as example) but it is quite complex, till then I'm depending on mkii+xetex. ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \startpagefigure[file.pdf][page=1, ...]\stoppagefigure
Am 09.12.2013 um 11:19 schrieb Xan dxpublica at telefonica.net: Hi, When I use: \startpagefigure[file.pdf][page=X]\stoppagefigure with page = 2 does not work. Always it puts the first page. I run MKIV. Is it a bug? It’s a change of the behavior of the command and I won’t say it’s a bad change. To understand the change you have to know that pagefigure is combination of \startTeXpage and \externalfigure and you get the same result with \startTEXpage \externalfigure[filename] \stopTEXpage The first parameter of the page figure command is the name of the graphic and the second argument let you change the values for TeXpage, in the old MkII code the second parameter was also used as second argument for \externalfigure. A problem in MkII was that you had something in the second parameter which was used by \startTEXpage *and* \externalfigure and the output wasn’t what you expected. I guess to avoid this Hans doesn’t pass the values of the second argument to \externalfigure anymore. To select now a certain page from your external document just use the \startTEXpage and \externalfigure combination: \startTEXpage \externalfigure[filename][page=number] \stopTEXpage Wolfgang Thanks, Wolfgang, for all. So there is a real bug with the command which previously I used. @Hans could be fix it Thanks, Xan ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \startpagefigure[file.pdf][page=1, ...]\stoppagefigure
Am 09.12.2013 um 11:19 schrieb Xan dxpubl...@telefonica.net: Hi, When I use: \startpagefigure[file.pdf][page=X]\stoppagefigure with page = 2 does not work. Always it puts the first page. I run MKIV. Is it a bug? It’s a change of the behavior of the command and I won’t say it’s a bad change. To understand the change you have to know that pagefigure is combination of \startTeXpage and \externalfigure and you get the same result with \startTEXpage \externalfigure[filename] \stopTEXpage The first parameter of the page figure command is the name of the graphic and the second argument let you change the values for TeXpage, in the old MkII code the second parameter was also used as second argument for \externalfigure. A problem in MkII was that you had something in the second parameter which was used by \startTEXpage *and* \externalfigure and the output wasn’t what you expected. I guess to avoid this Hans doesn’t pass the values of the second argument to \externalfigure anymore. To select now a certain page from your external document just use the \startTEXpage and \externalfigure combination: \startTEXpage \externalfigure[filename][page=number] \stopTEXpage Wolfgang ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] vertical square root upstroke (instead of having a slant)
On 12/1/2013 8:57 PM, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote: With the following minimal file on MkIV (2013.05.28 00:36 MKIV current), the upstroke of the square root is vertical instead of having the usual slant toward the right. With MkII it has the usual slant. I see this problem only with certain arrangements of variables (that recur often in my book chapter on springs and piano strings). For example, it goes away after changing the \rho to a b. \starttext \startformula \sqrt{Tb^2\over \rho}. \stopformula \stoptext I know that the big math symbols are constructed differently in MkIV and MkII. Does the example above show an intended difference? a radical has a couple of increasing sizes (discrete steps, if they have a slant depends of the font designer) before it switches to an extensible that then normally has no slant (in context one can hook in a mp variant that keeps the slant) (if needed we can make it an option to omit steps and always use upright) Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] bibliography - maybeyear
On 11/28/2013 06:37 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: Hello, Using \setuppublications [alternative=num] for example, should not append letters to the publication years when encountering multiple publications by the same author(s) per year. So, in the use of bibliographies, I have not understood how to control \maybeyear. In the bibl-xxx.tex files, it is defined as \def\maybeyear#1{#1} or \def\maybeyear#1{} as needed. Perhaps this is for mkii. In bibl-bib.mkiv, one has \appendtoks \doifelse{\bibtexpublicationsparameter\c!maybeyear}\v!off {\let\maybeyear\gobbleoneargument} {\let\maybeyear\firstofoneargument}% \to \everysetupbibtexlistplacement which seems to then use the keyword maybeyear. I guess that \setupbibtexpublications [maybeyear=off] in my source would turn off the appended letters, but this is not correct. I have tried many variants (\setuppublications, \setupbibtex). What am I misunderstanding? Or is this a bug? \setuppublicationlist [maybeyear=off] maybeyear is one of the areas that need fixing. The simple on/off mechanism is not sufficient, because the behavior needs to be more complex: 1. If the citation style does not use the year as a key, do not append letters. 2. If the citation style uses year as key and only one publication/year of an author is quoted and listed (even if there are several in the bib file) do not append letter. 3. Append letter if citation style uses year AND more than one publication/year for given author is quoted and listed. I assume that in order for this to work, Hans will have to rewrite the code which produces the .bbl file from the bib. Right now, AFAICS, the .bbl contains the entire .bib database. It should only contain the entries which are cited. Alan, does that make sense to you? Thomas ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Unexpected behaviour of enumeration in mkiv
2013/11/19 Thomas Möbius kont...@thomasmoebius.de: 2013/11/18 Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com: Am 15.11.2013 um 17:02 schrieb Thomas Möbius kont...@thomasmoebius.de: Hi, please have a look at the minimal example at the bottom. I am typesetting theorems and lemmata which are numbered consecutively within chapters in a book. I used the same code for a document written in mkii, and I thought I could just reuse it in mkiv. Obviously, there is something I am missing. Question: How do I get the same output when compiling the following code with 'context' as when compiled with 'texexec'. When compiled with 'context', the chapter number is missing in the numbering of theorems. Lemmas are not numbered at all. ~~~snip~~~ \setupenumerations [title=yes, style=normal, list=all, before={\blank[big]}, after={\blank[big]}, location=serried, Change “location=serried” to “alternative=serried”. width=broad, distance=0.5em, headstyle=bold, titlestyle=bold, way=bychapter, conversion=numbers] You have to change “conversion” to “numberconversion” but this isn’t necessary because numbers are the default conversion format. To have chapter numbers as part of the counter add “prefix=yes”. \defineenumeration [theorem] [text=Theorem, listtext={Theorem }] \defineenumeration [lemma] [text=Lemma, listtext={Lemma }, number=theorem] To use the counter of another enumeration use “counter=theorem”, not “name=theorem”. Wolfgang Thanks Wolfgang for the quick answer. I changed my code accordingly. The prefix=yes option, though, does not entirely do as I expect it. It adds the chapter+section number as a prefix to each theorem (and lemma). As I have way=bychapter in my options, though, it doesn't reset after a new section started (which is what I want!). The effect is odd as you can see in the minimal example. I only want to have the chapter number as a prefix. It's probably simple? difficult? Minimal example: ~~~snip~~~ \setupenumerations [title=yes, style=normal, list=all, before={\blank[big]}, after={\blank[big]}, alternative=serried, width=broad, distance=0.5em, headstyle=bold, titlestyle=bold, way=bychapter, prefix=yes] \defineenumeration [theorem] [text=Theorem, listtext={Theorem }] \defineenumeration [lemma] [text=Lemma, listtext={Lemma }, counter=theorem] \starttext \chapter{First chapter} \section{First section} \theorem Hello \theorem Hello \lemma Hello \theorem Hello \section{Second section} \lemma Hello \theorem Hello \chapter{Second chapter} \section{First section} \theorem Hello \lemma Hello \section{Second section} \lemma Hello \theorem Hello \stoptext ~~~snip~~~ To answer my own question, adding way=bychapter, prefixsegments=chapter, did the job! ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] bibliography - maybeyear
On 11/20/2013 9:12 AM, Alan Braslau wrote: Hello, Using \setuppublications [alternative=num] for example, should not append letters to the publication years when encountering multiple publications by the same author(s) per year. So, in the use of bibliographies, I have not understood how to control \maybeyear. In the bibl-xxx.tex files, it is defined as \def\maybeyear#1{#1} or \def\maybeyear#1{} as needed. Perhaps this is for mkii. In bibl-bib.mkiv, one has \appendtoks \doifelse{\bibtexpublicationsparameter\c!maybeyear}\v!off {\let\maybeyear\gobbleoneargument} {\let\maybeyear\firstofoneargument}% \to \everysetupbibtexlistplacement which seems to then use the keyword maybeyear. I guess that \setupbibtexpublications [maybeyear=off] in my source would turn off the appended letters, but this is not correct. I have tried many variants (\setuppublications, \setupbibtex). What am I misunderstanding? Or is this a bug? \setuppublicationlist [maybeyear=off] you can deduce that from \bibtexpublicationsparameter which you can read as \bibtexpublicationsparameter i.e. it is bound to \setupbibtexpublications Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] bibliography - maybeyear
Hello, Using \setuppublications [alternative=num] for example, should not append letters to the publication years when encountering multiple publications by the same author(s) per year. So, in the use of bibliographies, I have not understood how to control \maybeyear. In the bibl-xxx.tex files, it is defined as \def\maybeyear#1{#1} or \def\maybeyear#1{} as needed. Perhaps this is for mkii. In bibl-bib.mkiv, one has \appendtoks \doifelse{\bibtexpublicationsparameter\c!maybeyear}\v!off {\let\maybeyear\gobbleoneargument} {\let\maybeyear\firstofoneargument}% \to \everysetupbibtexlistplacement which seems to then use the keyword maybeyear. I guess that \setupbibtexpublications [maybeyear=off] in my source would turn off the appended letters, but this is not correct. I have tried many variants (\setuppublications, \setupbibtex). What am I misunderstanding? Or is this a bug? Alan ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] bibliography - maybeyear
On 11/20/2013 9:12 AM, Alan Braslau wrote: Hello, Using \setuppublications [alternative=num] for example, should not append letters to the publication years when encountering multiple publications by the same author(s) per year. So, in the use of bibliographies, I have not understood how to control \maybeyear. In the bibl-xxx.tex files, it is defined as \def\maybeyear#1{#1} or \def\maybeyear#1{} as needed. Perhaps this is for mkii. In bibl-bib.mkiv, one has \appendtoks \doifelse{\bibtexpublicationsparameter\c!maybeyear}\v!off {\let\maybeyear\gobbleoneargument} {\let\maybeyear\firstofoneargument}% \to \everysetupbibtexlistplacement which seems to then use the keyword maybeyear. I guess that \setupbibtexpublications [maybeyear=off] in my source would turn off the appended letters, but this is not correct. I have tried many variants (\setuppublications, \setupbibtex). What am I misunderstanding? Or is this a bug? example needed - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] context with mavericks: broken
On 11/19/2013 7:52 AM, Otared Kavian wrote: Hi Andrea, According to Wolfgang Schuster and some others removing the file Skia.ttf may solve the problem. Please read the thread no, it's a ruby issue (mkii related) switching to mkiv solves the problem http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2013/075689.html and more precisely http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2013/075701.html Best regards: OK On 19 nov. 2013, at 00:59, Andrea Valle va...@di.unito.it mailto:va...@di.unito.it wrote: Dear, long time since I have posted to the list but still a dedicated ConTeXt user… Now, I’ve upgraded to Mavericks. No way to use ConTeXt. I’ve also installed texlive 2013 and I installed the available updates. But still my ConTeXt is broken (I’m typesetting from TeXShop via GUI menu). I always get this: /System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:45:in `require': /usr/local/texlive/2013/texmf-dist/scripts/context/ruby/base/switch.rb:501: invalid multibyte escape: /\xFF/ (SyntaxError) from /System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:45:in `require' from /usr/local/texlive/2013/texmf-dist/scripts/context/ruby/texexec.rb:11:in `main’ I can understand it has something to do with ruby but nothing else. ? Many thanks Best -a- -- Andrea Valle -- CIRMA - StudiUm Università degli Studi di Torino -- http://www.cirma.unito.it/andrea/ -- http://www.fonurgia.unito.it/andrea/ -- http://www.flickr.com/photos/vanderaalle/sets/ -- http://vimeo.com/vanderaalle -- http://www.youtube.com/user/vanderaalle -- andrea.va...@unito.it mailto:andrea.va...@unito.it -- This is a very complicated case, Maude. You know, a lotta ins, a lotta outs, a lotta what-have-yous. (Jeffrey 'The Dude' Lebowski) -- Andrea Valle -- CIRMA - StudiUm Università degli Studi di Torino -- http://www.cirma.unito.it/andrea/ -- http://www.fonurgia.unito.it/andrea/ -- http://www.flickr.com/photos/vanderaalle/sets/ -- http://vimeo.com/vanderaalle -- http://www.youtube.com/user/vanderaalle -- andrea.va...@unito.it mailto:andrea.va...@unito.it -- This is a very complicated case, Maude. You know, a lotta ins, a lotta outs, a lotta what-have-yous. (Jeffrey 'The Dude' Lebowski) ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl mailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ -- - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] context with mavericks: broken
On 19 Nov 2013, at 10:25, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: On 11/19/2013 7:52 AM, Otared Kavian wrote: Hi Andrea, According to Wolfgang Schuster and some others removing the file Skia.ttf may solve the problem. Please read the thread no, it's a ruby issue (mkii related) Mavericks' ruby is: $ ruby --version ruby 2.0.0p247 (2013-06-27 revision 41674) [universal.x86_64-darwin13] ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] context with mavericks: broken
Akira Kakuto suggested me this: Please add a line #encoding: ASCII-8BIT at the top of /usr/local/texlive/2013/texmf-dist/scripts/context/ruby/base/switch.rb that fixed my problem, which is related to the texlive distro according to Hans, which is older than current thanks to all! -a- PS: btw, should I consider to switch to MkIV? I mean, at the moment I’m not interested into Lua capabilities, but is mkII intended as a leggy support? -- Andrea Valle -- CIRMA - StudiUm Università degli Studi di Torino -- http://www.cirma.unito.it/andrea/ -- http://www.fonurgia.unito.it/andrea/ -- http://www.flickr.com/photos/vanderaalle/sets/ -- http://vimeo.com/vanderaalle -- http://www.youtube.com/user/vanderaalle -- andrea.va...@unito.it -- This is a very complicated case, Maude. You know, a lotta ins, a lotta outs, a lotta what-have-yous. (Jeffrey 'The Dude' Lebowski) On 19 Nov 2013, at 11:19, Taco Hoekwater t...@elvenkind.com wrote: On 19 Nov 2013, at 10:25, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: On 11/19/2013 7:52 AM, Otared Kavian wrote: Hi Andrea, According to Wolfgang Schuster and some others removing the file Skia.ttf may solve the problem. Please read the thread no, it's a ruby issue (mkii related) Mavericks' ruby is: $ ruby --version ruby 2.0.0p247 (2013-06-27 revision 41674) [universal.x86_64-darwin13] ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] context with mavericks: broken
but is mkII intended as a leggy support? legacy! :) damn corrector -- Andrea Valle -- CIRMA - StudiUm Università degli Studi di Torino -- http://www.cirma.unito.it/andrea/ -- http://www.fonurgia.unito.it/andrea/ -- http://www.flickr.com/photos/vanderaalle/sets/ -- http://vimeo.com/vanderaalle -- http://www.youtube.com/user/vanderaalle -- andrea.va...@unito.it -- This is a very complicated case, Maude. You know, a lotta ins, a lotta outs, a lotta what-have-yous. (Jeffrey 'The Dude' Lebowski) On 19 Nov 2013, at 11:19, Taco Hoekwater t...@elvenkind.com wrote: On 19 Nov 2013, at 10:25, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: On 11/19/2013 7:52 AM, Otared Kavian wrote: Hi Andrea, According to Wolfgang Schuster and some others removing the file Skia.ttf may solve the problem. Please read the thread no, it's a ruby issue (mkii related) Mavericks' ruby is: $ ruby --version ruby 2.0.0p247 (2013-06-27 revision 41674) [universal.x86_64-darwin13] ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] context with mavericks: broken
On 11/19/2013 11:40 AM, Andrea Valle wrote: PS: btw, should I consider to switch to MkIV? I mean, at the moment I’m not interested into Lua capabilities, but is mkII intended as a leggy support? it will stay but unchanged ... eventually the minimals will default to luatex only (leaner and meaner) so mkiv is the way to go Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Unexpected behaviour of enumeration in mkiv
2013/11/18 Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com: Am 15.11.2013 um 17:02 schrieb Thomas Möbius kont...@thomasmoebius.de: Hi, please have a look at the minimal example at the bottom. I am typesetting theorems and lemmata which are numbered consecutively within chapters in a book. I used the same code for a document written in mkii, and I thought I could just reuse it in mkiv. Obviously, there is something I am missing. Question: How do I get the same output when compiling the following code with 'context' as when compiled with 'texexec'. When compiled with 'context', the chapter number is missing in the numbering of theorems. Lemmas are not numbered at all. ~~~snip~~~ \setupenumerations [title=yes, style=normal, list=all, before={\blank[big]}, after={\blank[big]}, location=serried, Change “location=serried” to “alternative=serried”. width=broad, distance=0.5em, headstyle=bold, titlestyle=bold, way=bychapter, conversion=numbers] You have to change “conversion” to “numberconversion” but this isn’t necessary because numbers are the default conversion format. To have chapter numbers as part of the counter add “prefix=yes”. \defineenumeration [theorem] [text=Theorem, listtext={Theorem }] \defineenumeration [lemma] [text=Lemma, listtext={Lemma }, number=theorem] To use the counter of another enumeration use “counter=theorem”, not “name=theorem”. Wolfgang Thanks Wolfgang for the quick answer. I changed my code accordingly. The prefix=yes option, though, does not entirely do as I expect it. It adds the chapter+section number as a prefix to each theorem (and lemma). As I have way=bychapter in my options, though, it doesn't reset after a new section started (which is what I want!). The effect is odd as you can see in the minimal example. I only want to have the chapter number as a prefix. It's probably simple? difficult? Minimal example: ~~~snip~~~ \setupenumerations [title=yes, style=normal, list=all, before={\blank[big]}, after={\blank[big]}, alternative=serried, width=broad, distance=0.5em, headstyle=bold, titlestyle=bold, way=bychapter, prefix=yes] \defineenumeration [theorem] [text=Theorem, listtext={Theorem }] \defineenumeration [lemma] [text=Lemma, listtext={Lemma }, counter=theorem] \starttext \chapter{First chapter} \section{First section} \theorem Hello \theorem Hello \lemma Hello \theorem Hello \section{Second section} \lemma Hello \theorem Hello \chapter{Second chapter} \section{First section} \theorem Hello \lemma Hello \section{Second section} \lemma Hello \theorem Hello \stoptext ~~~snip~~~ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] context with mavericks: broken
thanks, got it -a- -- Andrea Valle -- CIRMA - StudiUm Università degli Studi di Torino -- http://www.cirma.unito.it/andrea/ -- http://www.fonurgia.unito.it/andrea/ -- http://www.flickr.com/photos/vanderaalle/sets/ -- http://vimeo.com/vanderaalle -- http://www.youtube.com/user/vanderaalle -- andrea.va...@unito.it -- This is a very complicated case, Maude. You know, a lotta ins, a lotta outs, a lotta what-have-yous. (Jeffrey 'The Dude' Lebowski) On 19 Nov 2013, at 13:17, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: On 11/19/2013 11:40 AM, Andrea Valle wrote: PS: btw, should I consider to switch to MkIV? I mean, at the moment I’m not interested into Lua capabilities, but is mkII intended as a leggy support? it will stay but unchanged ... eventually the minimals will default to luatex only (leaner and meaner) so mkiv is the way to go Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] Unexpected behaviour of enumeration in mkiv
Hi, please have a look at the minimal example at the bottom. I am typesetting theorems and lemmata which are numbered consecutively within chapters in a book. I used the same code for a document written in mkii, and I thought I could just reuse it in mkiv. Obviously, there is something I am missing. Question: How do I get the same output when compiling the following code with 'context' as when compiled with 'texexec'. When compiled with 'context', the chapter number is missing in the numbering of theorems. Lemmas are not numbered at all. ~~~snip~~~ \setupenumerations [title=yes, style=normal, list=all, before={\blank[big]}, after={\blank[big]}, location=serried, width=broad, distance=0.5em, headstyle=bold, titlestyle=bold, way=bychapter, conversion=numbers] \defineenumeration [theorem] [text=Theorem, listtext={Theorem }] \defineenumeration [lemma] [text=Lemma, listtext={Lemma }, number=theorem] \starttext \chapter{First chapter} \theorem Hello \theorem Hello \lemma Hello \theorem Hello \stoptext ~~~snip~~~ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Unexpected behaviour of enumeration in mkiv
Am 15.11.2013 um 17:02 schrieb Thomas Möbius kont...@thomasmoebius.de: Hi, please have a look at the minimal example at the bottom. I am typesetting theorems and lemmata which are numbered consecutively within chapters in a book. I used the same code for a document written in mkii, and I thought I could just reuse it in mkiv. Obviously, there is something I am missing. Question: How do I get the same output when compiling the following code with 'context' as when compiled with 'texexec'. When compiled with 'context', the chapter number is missing in the numbering of theorems. Lemmas are not numbered at all. ~~~snip~~~ \setupenumerations [title=yes, style=normal, list=all, before={\blank[big]}, after={\blank[big]}, location=serried, Change “location=serried” to “alternative=serried”. width=broad, distance=0.5em, headstyle=bold, titlestyle=bold, way=bychapter, conversion=numbers] You have to change “conversion” to “numberconversion” but this isn’t necessary because numbers are the default conversion format. To have chapter numbers as part of the counter add “prefix=yes”. \defineenumeration [theorem] [text=Theorem, listtext={Theorem }] \defineenumeration [lemma] [text=Lemma, listtext={Lemma }, number=theorem] To use the counter of another enumeration use “counter=theorem”, not “name=theorem”. Wolfgang ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] Integral limits
Hi, In MkII, it was possible to change the limits on integrals using \setupmathematics[integral=...] % limits, nolimits, displaylimits that would affect how \int, \iint, \iiint, \oint, etc behaved. I can see two ways of definining a similar feature in MkIV. 1. Define \intop, \iintop, etc in char-def.lua and then somewhere define: \define\int{\intop\intlimits} \define\iint{\intop\intlimits} etc. 2. Define a new mathclass intop and use that in char-def.lua. Then, in the appropriate math-*.lua file, map intop to the appropriate macro. What would be the best way to go? Thanks, Aditya ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Integral limits
On 11/18/2013 9:41 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: Hi, In MkII, it was possible to change the limits on integrals using \setupmathematics[integral=...] % limits, nolimits, displaylimits that would affect how \int, \iint, \iiint, \oint, etc behaved. I can see two ways of definining a similar feature in MkIV. 1. Define \intop, \iintop, etc in char-def.lua and then somewhere define: \define\int{\intop\intlimits} \define\iint{\intop\intlimits} etc. 2. Define a new mathclass intop and use that in char-def.lua. Then, in the appropriate math-*.lua file, map intop to the appropriate macro. What would be the best way to go? i prefer 2 (as these set the defaults) and we can make a definer for specific variants if needed (at all) is intop the best name? (we don't need to be sparse) Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] announcement and call
Hi Thomas, Am 14.11.2013 um 21:55 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz thomas.schm...@uni-bonn.de: On 11/14/2013 09:40 PM, Philipp Gesang wrote: What I’d consider the most pressing issue, pertaining both to Context and to TeX as a whole, would be text streams a.k.a. parallel typesetting. It was discussed on the list a couple times already and at one point someone collected examples [1]. Also, I sketched the current state of parallel texts elsewhere [2]. For certain values of pressing :-) Two pessimistic remarks about that: (1) I experimented with a mechanism that Hans build for mkii a while ago, and I found it difficult to decide how to define what was expected of parallel typesetting. In the end, I wasn't convinced that an entirely automated version was possible at all. (2) I'm afraid that's not part of the present project and is related neither to critical editions nor to bibliographies. I have to strongly disagree with you here. A critical edition is only a specialized case of parallel texts! You two or more editions that are contrasted/compared to each other. Naturally, it must be bibliographically annotated and there are the comments of the author of the critical edition. The editions have to be typeset in parallel. There are many ways how an author can lay this out. In the far past it was common just to stack the contrasted versions on top of each other! Very very ugly. Lots of examples in libraries. More recent ways are to use column. Yet, the more editions involved the harder it is to place on one page. For such cases it would be best to spread them across two facing pages. The problem with the two page setup is synchronizing the comments, notes, discussion of the critical edition's author. For a half way pleasing layout these should interplaced between the contrasted editions across the two pages. Yes, not an easy task. I agree that it is hard to automate the synchronization of text passages. The only viable approach would be at the paragraph level. A line level approach can only be achieved by interaction of the author of the critical edition with synchronization marks of some sort inside the editions. Early, in my education in Computer Linguistics, decades ago, we had project where we wrote a program for entry of critical editions. The editions/texts and comments were entered in parallel on the tty-terminal screen and stored in a database. At that time we where no interested in fancy output and used a simple stacked output. As you probably know yourself, it is the entry and synchronization of the editions that is the problem an not as much the layout itself, though that is hard enough by itself. I do not see any way to do this in a normal linear single pass process. The question is in how far ConTeXt can support this task. 1) provide possibilities of laying out the texts synchronized in columns, stacks and two page layouts. Footnotes, under, columns, pages or across either. Another, nice feature would be the availability of marginals in a synchronized way. This should be a generalized module or set of commands as it can be used in many other fields be critical editions. In other words a parallel texts layout package: \defineparalleltextlayout[name][…] \setupparalleltextlayout[name][…]{…} \defineparalleltextpart[name][..] \setupparalleltextpart[name][…]{…} \startparalleltext[name][…] \stopparalleltext . . . 2) providing commands that define which parts belong together I would suggest that this be done mostly on the Lua side as you can then develop a database of sorts and worry about the layout/typesetting of the critical edition later. A package for marking up the editions directly. \defineeditionslayout[name][…] \setupeditionslayout[name][…]{…} \defineedition[name][..] \setupedition[name][…]{…} \starteditionsl[name][…] \stopeditions \starteditiontext{name}{text} \stopeditiontext \startauthorremarks \stopauthorsremarks . . . desired MWE: % definitions and setups \starttext % some text \starteditions[style1] \starteditiontext{edition1} % some text
Re: [NTG-context] announcement and call
On 11/15/2013 11:31 AM, Keith J. Schultz wrote: Hi Thomas, Am 14.11.2013 um 21:55 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz thomas.schm...@uni-bonn.de: On 11/14/2013 09:40 PM, Philipp Gesang wrote: What I’d consider the most pressing issue, pertaining both to Context and to TeX as a whole, would be text streams a.k.a. parallel typesetting. It was discussed on the list a couple times already and at one point someone collected examples [1]. Also, I sketched the current state of parallel texts elsewhere [2]. For certain values of pressing :-) Two pessimistic remarks about that: (1) I experimented with a mechanism that Hans build for mkii a while ago, and I found it difficult to decide how to define what was expected of parallel typesetting. In the end, I wasn't convinced that an entirely automated version was possible at all. (2) I'm afraid that's not part of the present project and is related neither to critical editions nor to bibliographies. I have to strongly disagree with you here. A critical edition is only a specialized case of parallel texts! You two or more editions that are contrasted/compared to each other. Naturally, it must be bibliographically annotated and there are the comments of the author of the critical edition. The editions have to be typeset in parallel. There are many ways how an author can lay this out. In the far past it was common just to stack the contrasted versions on top of each other! Very very ugly. Lots of examples in libraries. More recent ways are to use column. Yet, the more editions involved the harder it is to place on one page. For such cases it would be best to spread them across two facing pages. The problem with the two page setup is synchronizing the comments, notes, discussion of the critical edition's author. For a half way pleasing layout these should interplaced between the contrasted editions across the two pages. Yes, not an easy task. a lot depends on proper coding ... typesetting parallel texts is not per se the same as multiple streams ... it all depends on what one wants to achieve also, if 1 page is used then we should not limit to 2 pages (or columns) in parallel I agree that it is hard to automate the synchronization of text passages. The only viable approach would be at the paragraph level. A line level approach can only be achieved by interaction of the author of the critical edition with synchronization marks of some sort inside the editions. indeed. one cannot have the best of all worlds (perfect justification, perfect note handling, perfect synchronization) because the solition space gets too small (one thing Thomas and I discussed shortly is more advanced pdf's with more embedded info and so ... something for later) we also need to look into ebook like things ... Early, in my education in Computer Linguistics, decades ago, we had project where we wrote a program for entry of critical editions. The editions/texts and comments were entered in parallel on the tty-terminal screen and stored in a database. At that time we where no interested in fancy output and used a simple stacked output. As you probably know yourself, it is the entry and synchronization of the editions that is the problem an not as much the layout itself, though that is hard enough by itself. I do not see any way to do this in a normal linear single pass process. The question is in how far ConTeXt can support this task. ... time, motivation, etc ... I have just a brain stormed possible starting point. It as you can see it has quite some felixiblity as to how the texts is entered and ConTeXt does some rearranging during typesetting. One type of critical edition we have not discussed is when the author whats to work on a word basis. But, that is even a bigger can of worms for collating the data/texts. Most of what I have describe it probably obvious to you, yet well, keep collecting demands and examples ... best that we know what is needed (and by how many people, for how many years to come, as it makes no sense to develop code that is used once and then discarded because one moves to newer technologies) ... we also need to keep in mind that this kind of things are author driven as publishers are not paying for this kind of things nor willing to invest / support development of tools (if they are interested in anything else than 25-50% profits at all). Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki
[NTG-context] how to reduce \lineskiplimit in ConTeXt grid layout
As you know, in plain TeX, \lineskiplimit tunes the vertical glue algorithm by specifying the minimum amount of space between the bottom edge of one line and the top edge of the following line. But in ConTeXt, it appears that \lineskiplimit is set to zero, at least in grid mode. We're using grid mode, and we have some occasional high ascenders, e.g. capital letters with diacritics on top. We have bodyfont size 8.1pt, and interlinespace = 9.3pt. We realize this is less than the recommended ratio of 1.2. Understandably, when those tall characters occur, we sometimes get a blank line above them. It looks like the \lineskiplimit would be violated if the 9.3pt interlinespace were enforced, so ConTeXt adds some space (analogous to \lineskip in TeX?). But since we're on a grid, more space has to be added in order to conform to the grid. All that makes sense, but we would like to be able typeset the lines closer together, and judge for ourselves whether it looks too bad. (When we used to typeset the same text at 8.1pt/9.3pt using mkii, blank lines did not occur.) Is there something similar to \lineskiplimit that we can tweak? I've been reading section 5.5 Line Spacing in the context ref manual, but I don't see anything there about changing a threshold analogous to \lineskiplimit. I tried setting \lineskiplimit=-2pt, but that caused a worse problem: a blank line across both columns, instead of just one. Thanks, Lars Version: mkiv luatex in Tex Live 2013. ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] how to reduce \lineskiplimit in ConTeXt grid layout
On 11/15/2013 9:49 PM, Lars Huttar wrote: As you know, in plain TeX, \lineskiplimit tunes the vertical glue algorithm by specifying the minimum amount of space between the bottom edge of one line and the top edge of the following line. But in ConTeXt, it appears that \lineskiplimit is set to zero, at least in grid mode. We're using grid mode, and we have some occasional high ascenders, e.g. capital letters with diacritics on top. We have bodyfont size 8.1pt, and interlinespace = 9.3pt. We realize this is less than the recommended ratio of 1.2. Understandably, when those tall characters occur, we sometimes get a blank line above them. It looks like the \lineskiplimit would be violated if the 9.3pt interlinespace were enforced, so ConTeXt adds some space (analogous to \lineskip in TeX?). But since we're on a grid, more space has to be added in order to conform to the grid. All that makes sense, but we would like to be able typeset the lines closer together, and judge for ourselves whether it looks too bad. (When we used to typeset the same text at 8.1pt/9.3pt using mkii, blank lines did not occur.) Is there something similar to \lineskiplimit that we can tweak? I've been reading section 5.5 Line Spacing in the context ref manual, but I don't see anything there about changing a threshold analogous to \lineskiplimit. I tried setting \lineskiplimit=-2pt, but that caused a worse problem: a blank line across both columns, instead of just one. you can try to choose a more strict grid snapping method (see spac-ver.mkiv line 1375 etc ... some methods have tolerance, some snap always ..) Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] announcement and call
On 11/14/2013 09:40 PM, Philipp Gesang wrote: What I’d consider the most pressing issue, pertaining both to Context and to TeX as a whole, would be text streams a.k.a. parallel typesetting. It was discussed on the list a couple times already and at one point someone collected examples [1]. Also, I sketched the current state of parallel texts elsewhere [2]. For certain values of pressing :-) Two pessimistic remarks about that: (1) I experimented with a mechanism that Hans build for mkii a while ago, and I found it difficult to decide how to define what was expected of parallel typesetting. In the end, I wasn't convinced that an entirely automated version was possible at all. (2) I'm afraid that's not part of the present project and is related neither to critical editions nor to bibliographies. Looking forward to status reports! Will the improvements be directly merged into Context or do you prefer releasing it as a self-contained module? During development, we need to keep the code separate since we need to document what we do for our funding agency, but it will be part of ConTeXt. Thomas ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] installing a true-type font: can't find ttf2afm
On 11/5/2013 7:55 PM, Lars Huttar wrote: On 11/4/2013 4:56 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Lars Huttar wrote: On 11/4/2013 3:34 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: - you can find Gentium at http://www.ctan.org/pkg/gentium-tug (also in TeX Live and in the ConTeXt distribution) Thank you ... that was key information I didn't have. I was instead downloading the TTF files from sil.org. That TTF should work as well. The only difference is that you might need slightly different commands to set it up (there were recent changes/improvements in that, other users should tell you how exactly that can be done). I will look for that, because it turns out that I still need to use a TTF font. Gentium Plus does not include bold and bold-italic weights, and Gentium Basic doesn't include all the characters ranges I need. We have a customized version of Gentium Basic with bold weight, with an extra character added, and it's a TTF. We had it working with mkii but not yet with mkiv. in that case yoiu can put the fonts somewhere and write a typescript .. see type-imp-mscore.mkiv for exmaples ... that way you have complete control over what gets loaded Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] installing a true-type font: can't find ttf2afm
On 11/4/2013 4:56 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Lars Huttar wrote: On 11/4/2013 3:34 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: - you can find Gentium at http://www.ctan.org/pkg/gentium-tug (also in TeX Live and in the ConTeXt distribution) Thank you ... that was key information I didn't have. I was instead downloading the TTF files from sil.org. That TTF should work as well. The only difference is that you might need slightly different commands to set it up (there were recent changes/improvements in that, other users should tell you how exactly that can be done). I will look for that, because it turns out that I still need to use a TTF font. Gentium Plus does not include bold and bold-italic weights, and Gentium Basic doesn't include all the characters ranges I need. We have a customized version of Gentium Basic with bold weight, with an extra character added, and it's a TTF. We had it working with mkii but not yet with mkiv. When you say out of the box, I think you're referring to the gentium-tug package box, not the ConTeXt box... in other words, I should not expect Gentium to work just because I installed ConTeXt; I have to also install gentium-tug, right? The font is installed by default when installing the ConTeXt distribution. I thought it was also installed by default with the ConTeXt scheme in TeX Live, but apparently I was wrong. I can fix this. The scheme already contains a bunch of nice fonts and Gentium could/probably should be among them. Just to confirm the above: After installing TeX Live context scheme on Linux, Gentium was not in my names.tma. And when I tried to use \setmainfont[Gentium], I got errors, 'simplefonts font ''gentium'' not found'. After installing the gentium-tug package (sudo /usr/local/bin/tlmgr install gentium-tug), and compiling a .tex file using \setmainfont[Gentium], the errors went away, and my names.tma now includes several variants of Gentium. At no point did I run mtxrun (knowingly). On the other hand, on Windows, I had installed TeX Live context scheme as well, and have not installed gentium-tug. But I did install Gentium as an OS font (using TTF files). I then ran mtxrun --generate (as suggested by Hans), and after that, gentium* showed up in names.tma, and I was then able to successfully compile a .tex file using \setmainfont[Gentium] with mkiv context. (But that didn't work before I ran mtxrun --generate.) Just a couple of data points in case they're relevant. Lars ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] installing a true-type font: can't find ttf2afm
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Lars Huttar wrote: Hi all, I'm following the instructions at http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Installing_a_TrueType_font,_step_by_step because I want to install a TTF (Gentium in fact) for ConTeXt to use. Please note that: - the top of the page says NOTE: The contents of this page are OLD /.../ - nobody in the ConTeXt community bothers about MKII (pdfTeX) any longer - texfont.pl has always been a bit problematic and is definitely not really maintained any longer - you can find Gentium at http://www.ctan.org/pkg/gentium-tug (also in TeX Live and in the ConTeXt distribution) - Gentium works out-of-the-box in ConTeXt (see the documentation of gentium-tug) This is under TeX Live 2013, the context scheme, and I've been using ConTeXt mkiv. So why bother about pdfTeX? The conversion is/was only ever needed for MKII. In MKIV all fonts work out of the box. Other than what the package provides, Wolfgang Schuster's new additions (is there any link to point the users to?) make that even easier for users. It's probably easiest to use the package now, but even if the package wasn't provided, setting up the font in MKIV is relatively straightforward without the need for any conversions of any kind. I can't find ttf2afm anywhere. Is it part of pdfTex? Do I have to have the pdftex scheme installed in order to install True-type fonts? It's part of ttfutils, collection-fontutils. You cannot install an additional scheme in TeX Live (or at least I think so, I'm not 100% sure), but you can install an additional package or collection. But really ... you don't need that program just for the sake of using Gentium. Mojca ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt standalone - in what situations is it better?
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013, Lars Huttar wrote: Hello, I was looking into simplefonts (http://wiki.contextgarden.net/simplefonts) and noticed the clause if you’re running ConTeXt Standalone http://wiki.contextgarden.net/ConTeXt_Standalone (which is a better option) Well I'm using TeXLive, but am happy to take good advice, so I looked at http://wiki.contextgarden.net/ConTeXt_Standalone to see why it would be a better option. The basic reason I can see is that Standalone is updated more frequently. Three or four years ago, when ConTeXt was moving from MkII to MkIV, you had to run through hoops to get context working with TL. Since the last two years, ConTeXt works out of the box in TL. So if you're using bleeding-edge features of ConTeXt (including recent fixes to simplefonts?), I can see wanting to use Standalone and have access to the latest features and fixes. On the other hand, if you're working on a large production project that has to be careful of stability, is there any advantage to Standalone over TeXLive? Sure, you can keep a standalone version frozen in place, but then that seems equivalent to staying with an existing version of TeXLive. No. In some sense, it is better to use the frozen version that is part of TL rather than an arbitrary beta version from standalone. Every once in a while, the beta version has bugs (those are usually fixed in a matter of hours). But it can be tricky to decide which version to freeze for a long term production environment. On the other hand, the version of ConTeXt that ships with TL is tested more thoroughly. So, there is some guarantee that it will not include any serious bugs. Aditya___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \mframed not aligned in mkiv
Hi Aditya, I wikified your remarks, http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Math/Display#Shaded_background_for_part_of_a_displayed_equation but unfortunately the snippet of code does not compile on ConTeXt Garden: is there a way to typeset mkiv code there? Best regards: OK On 21 oct. 2013, at 22:18, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote: On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Otared Kavian wrote: Dear Hans, I noticed a difference between mkii and mkiv in the behavior of \mframed: it seems that in mkiv the frame is not vertically aligned with the the + sign in the following example (or rather it is not vertically centered, please see the attached PDF produced with ConTeXt ver: 2013.10.15 13:52 MKIV). Does one have to use now a new key to require this sort of alignment? Best regard: OK begin mframed-example.tex \setupcolors[state=start] \def\graymath{\mframed[frame=off, background=color, backgroundcolor=lightgray, backgroundoffset=2pt ]} \starttext Since for $|x| 1$ we have \startformula \log(1+x) = \graymath{x- \displaystyle{x^2\over2}} + {x^3 \over 3} + \cdots \stopformula we may write $\log(1+x) = x + O(x^2)$. \stoptext end mframed-example.tex Search for Alignment in inmframed in the mailing list archives. % The next statement is part of the core. Included it here for % illustration. \definemathframed[mcframed] [location=mathematics] \starttext \startformula \ln (1+x) = \mcframed[background=color,backgroundcolor=red,foregroundcolor=white,frame=off]{x - {\frac {x^2}{\frac{x^3}{\frac{x^3}{3} + \frac{x^3}{3}-\cdots. \stopformula \startformula \ln (1+x) = \mcframed{x - {\frac {x^2}{\frac{x^3}{\frac{x^3}{3} + \frac{x^3}{3}-\cdots. \stopformula \stoptext ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] \mframed not aligned in mkiv
Dear Hans, I noticed a difference between mkii and mkiv in the behavior of \mframed: it seems that in mkiv the frame is not vertically aligned with the the + sign in the following example (or rather it is not vertically centered, please see the attached PDF produced with ConTeXt ver: 2013.10.15 13:52 MKIV). Does one have to use now a new key to require this sort of alignment? Best regard: OK begin mframed-example.tex \setupcolors[state=start] \def\graymath{\mframed[frame=off, background=color, backgroundcolor=lightgray, backgroundoffset=2pt ]} \starttext Since for $|x| 1$ we have \startformula \log(1+x) = \graymath{x- \displaystyle{x^2\over2}} + {x^3 \over 3} + \cdots \stopformula we may write $\log(1+x) = x + O(x^2)$. \stoptext end mframed-example.tex mframe.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \mframed not aligned in mkiv
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Otared Kavian wrote: Dear Hans, I noticed a difference between mkii and mkiv in the behavior of \mframed: it seems that in mkiv the frame is not vertically aligned with the the + sign in the following example (or rather it is not vertically centered, please see the attached PDF produced with ConTeXt ver: 2013.10.15 13:52 MKIV). Does one have to use now a new key to require this sort of alignment? Best regard: OK begin mframed-example.tex \setupcolors[state=start] \def\graymath{\mframed[frame=off, background=color, backgroundcolor=lightgray, backgroundoffset=2pt ]} \starttext Since for $|x| 1$ we have \startformula \log(1+x) = \graymath{x- \displaystyle{x^2\over2}} + {x^3 \over 3} + \cdots \stopformula we may write $\log(1+x) = x + O(x^2)$. \stoptext end mframed-example.tex Search for Alignment in inmframed in the mailing list archives. % The next statement is part of the core. Included it here for % illustration. \definemathframed[mcframed] [location=mathematics] \starttext \startformula \ln (1+x) = \mcframed[background=color,backgroundcolor=red,foregroundcolor=white,frame=off]{x - {\frac {x^2}{\frac{x^3}{\frac{x^3}{3} + \frac{x^3}{3}-\cdots. \stopformula \startformula \ln (1+x) = \mcframed{x - {\frac {x^2}{\frac{x^3}{\frac{x^3}{3} + \frac{x^3}{3}-\cdots. \stopformula \stoptext ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \mframed not aligned in mkiv
Thanks Aditya! I overlooked this change in mkiv… Best regards: OK On 21 oct. 2013, at 22:18, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote: On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Otared Kavian wrote: Dear Hans, I noticed a difference between mkii and mkiv in the behavior of \mframed: it seems that in mkiv the frame is not vertically aligned with the the + sign in the following example (or rather it is not vertically centered, please see the attached PDF produced with ConTeXt ver: 2013.10.15 13:52 MKIV). Does one have to use now a new key to require this sort of alignment? Best regard: OK begin mframed-example.tex \setupcolors[state=start] \def\graymath{\mframed[frame=off, background=color, backgroundcolor=lightgray, backgroundoffset=2pt ]} \starttext Since for $|x| 1$ we have \startformula \log(1+x) = \graymath{x- \displaystyle{x^2\over2}} + {x^3 \over 3} + \cdots \stopformula we may write $\log(1+x) = x + O(x^2)$. \stoptext end mframed-example.tex Search for Alignment in inmframed in the mailing list archives. % The next statement is part of the core. Included it here for % illustration. \definemathframed[mcframed] [location=mathematics] \starttext \startformula \ln (1+x) = \mcframed[background=color,backgroundcolor=red,foregroundcolor=white,frame=off]{x - {\frac {x^2}{\frac{x^3}{\frac{x^3}{3} + \frac{x^3}{3}-\cdots. \stopformula \startformula \ln (1+x) = \mcframed{x - {\frac {x^2}{\frac{x^3}{\frac{x^3}{3} + \frac{x^3}{3}-\cdots. \stopformula \stoptext ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Bug: Reloading Font
them. there's always xetex as alternative -) Except I can’t use it :) even with MkII as there is zero support for XeTeX’s (rudimentary) RTL model. (unless you're referring to wanting to use the microsoft word math renderer trickery -) I never set math actually :) unless I’m testing a math font, but I can use plain for that. One important aspect is that when using tex, one also wants flexibility and control and so a font system will have hooks and such. Using a mixed library / lua / tex approach would become pretty complex. Sure, the current lua code is not trivial either but can probably be simplified over time once settled down. One reason for me not to use xetex (plus its libs) is inflexibility. If we hadn't started luatex I might as well have opt out of tex altogether, especially because only with luatex i can do some of our projects within acceotable bounds (dev time, speed of machinery, flexibility). I don’t think much of LuaTeX’s flexibility (or XeTeX’s inflexibility) is related to the OpenType layout engine used. I can imagine cases where things happen before shaping that have to be taken into account when shaping, and also that shaping signals things to be done later ... once we start thinking out of the box ... but, i don't see a problem in having multiple shapers (dozens) as long as (in context) they can cooperate, be isolated, controlled, etc. My main point is that I don't like a hard coded choice in luatex (also performance wise). The current core components still resemble tex. I absolutely agree. All I wanted to know is whether ConTeXt can consider integrating an optional different font machinery, so to not waste time on something that will be of little use to me. Regards, Khaled ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Bug: Reloading Font
was a big system, but nowadays the tds tree is relatively small; unless something magic happens, i think that at some point the complexity of all these big things will explode (one can according to the evangelists get a ruby on rails app up and running in minutes ... but try to update one a few years later) ... with respect to tex: the source tree/build is not trivial (how many folks know all ins-and-outs?) and it makes me already feel quite dependent .. it's the instability of the whole eco system that bothers me well, the formats don't evolve that much, at least not with respect to what we need in tex ... most features are rather generic, but tex user demands evolve and those will always influence matters; also, in the (context) machinery at some point i want to play with other approaches and then the only thing that matters is having data available (we already have some par optimizing code in place for instance) (i'm more worried about inconsistencies and a mess in fonts than in the opentype standard ... many characters / scripts / languages have well properties, so in fact designers could do with predefined sets of features and rules ... sort of the reverse of making shapes and then the features: instead of for each font reinventing the wheel, choose a set of logic, make shapes etc ... positioning is probably most of the issue then; but that's another disucssion) There are already few parts of OpenType that I’m not able to use in my fonts for years because they break the fonts with LuaTeX horribly. I understand the priorities of the team, that is why I think that offloading font support is beneficial to everyone. break in what sense? what features (just curious) ... anyway, The mark filtering sets we discussed few years ago, for instance; I had to redo the whole font in a much more complex way with few more thousands of glyphs to avoid using them so the font remains usable with ConTeXt, and I still get crashes every now and then that I stopped bothering with reporting them. Well, I can't fix something if I don't know about it ... one thing I learned the last years, is that one needs examples of usage (and I'm pretty sure that some of the implementation of an opentype engine is not a direct consequence if the standards but of usage). Teaser: if another app doesn't crash, it doesn't mean that it does it right. But its behaviour could become the standard expected. I'm not saying that this is true in your case, but we need to keep this option open. Also, when something is non trivial (and I've had enough discussions to know that the spec is not always that clear) one might wonder about the spec in the first place ... trial and error (due to lack of fonts and examples) is part of opentype implementation development (ok, for much other dev too). Which reminds me: on the agenda is to have a few more fields in glyph nodes so that we can simplify some of the code, but that's a something we will look into end-of-year when some other backend cleanup has happened. I still remember a talk at bachotex where someone went through all version of indesign pointing out in which ones ligatures did / didn't work, workes differently. And look at opentype math ... some reverse engineering is needed. To me opentype is not a real standard but m ore reversed application specification where we have to look at what the inventors do and try to adapt to that. there's always xetex as alternative -) Except I can’t use it :) even with MkII as there is zero support for XeTeX’s (rudimentary) RTL model. (unless you're referring to wanting to use the microsoft word math renderer trickery -) I never set math actually :) unless I’m testing a math font, but I can use plain for that. One important aspect is that when using tex, one also wants flexibility and control and so a font system will have hooks and such. Using a mixed library / lua / tex approach would become pretty complex. Sure, the current lua code is not trivial either but can probably be simplified over time once settled down. One reason for me not to use xetex (plus its libs) is inflexibility. If we hadn't started luatex I might as well have opt out of tex altogether, especially because only with luatex i can do some of our projects within acceotable bounds (dev time, speed of machinery, flexibility). I don’t think much of LuaTeX’s flexibility (or XeTeX’s inflexibility) is related to the OpenType layout engine used. I can imagine cases where things happen before shaping that have to be taken into account when shaping, and also that shaping signals things to be done later ... once we start thinking out of the box ... but, i don't see a problem in having multiple shapers (dozens) as long as (in context) they can cooperate, be isolated, controlled, etc. My main point is that I don't like a hard coded choice in luatex (also performance wise). The current core components still resemble tex. I absolutely agree. All I wanted to know
Re: [NTG-context] fighting fonts
On 10/10/2013 1:15 AM, Ciro A. Soto wrote: Hi everyone, I am trying to reproduce a novel I wrote with context years ago. This time is spanish. I use context only for books, not daily, so now I can't figure out how to use fonts. I have been going around and around for days avoiding to look for help here for such a simple thing, but I surrendered. My last attempt was using the simplefonts module. Here is what I get (linux-64 ubuntu): * texexec --pdf novel.tex* you mix up old an new (mkii an dmkiv) run this: context novel.tex - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Possibly bug in ConTexT with TikZ
On 2013–10–10 Xan wrote: Minimal example: % Regime \enableregime[utf] Not required if you use MkIV does not work. It works here with 2013.10.09 10:36 using MkIV and MkII. At least I don't get an error and a PDF with a few green blots is created. What's the error message you get for that minimal example? Are you running MkII or MkIV? Without \coordinate it works. What fails? If you remove \coordinate it should fail actually, since the coordinate for (F) is unknown. Or did you mean you replaced (F) with a coordinate like (0,2)? Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Possibly bug in ConTexT with TikZ
On 2013–10–10 Xan wrote: Minimal example: % Regime \enableregime[utf] Not required if you use MkIV does not work. It works here with 2013.10.09 10:36 using MkIV and MkII. At least I don't get an error and a PDF with a few green blots is created. What's the error message you get for that minimal example? Are you running MkII or MkIV? MKIV (read above) [xan@rulot proves-context]$ context prova.tex mtx-context | run 1: luatex --fmt=/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-cache/luatex-cache/context/5fe67e0bfe781ce0dde776fb1556f32e/formats/luatex/cont-en --jobname=prova --lua=/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-cache/luatex-cache/context/5fe67e0bfe781ce0dde776fb1556f32e/formats/luatex/cont-en.lui --no-parse-first-line --c:currentrun=1 --c:fulljobname=./prova.tex --c:input=./prova.tex --c:kindofrun=1 --c:maxnofruns=8 cont-yes.mkiv This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.76.0-2013040516 (rev 4627) \write18 enabled. (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/cont-yes.mkiv ConTeXt ver: 2013.10.09 10:36 MKIV beta fmt: 2013.10.10 int: english/english system 'cont-new.mkiv' loaded (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/cont-new.mkiv) system files jobname 'prova', input './prova', result 'prova' fontslatin modern fonts are not preloaded languageslanguage 'en' is active (/home/xan/fems/proves-context/prova.tex resolversmodules 'tikz' is loaded (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/context/pgf/frontendlayer/t-tikz.tex loading ConTeXt User Module / tikz (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/context/pgf/basiclayer/t-pgf.tex loading ConTeXt User Module / pgf (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/context/pgf/basiclayer/t-pgfcor.tex loading ConTeXt User Module / pgfcor (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/context/pgf/systemlayer/t-pgfsys.tex loading ConTeXt User Module / pgfsys (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/context/pgf/utilities/t-pgfrcs.tex loading ConTeXt User Module / pgfrcs (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/context/pgf/utilities/t-pgfmod.tex loading ConTeXt User Module / pgfmodules ) (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/generic/pgf/utilities/pgfutil-common.tex) (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/generic/pgf/utilities/pgfutil-context.def) (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/generic/pgf/utilities/pgfrcs.code.tex)) (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/generic/pgf/systemlayer/pgfsys.code.tex (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/generic/pgf/utilities/pgfkeys.code.tex (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/generic/pgf/utilities/pgfkeysfiltered.code.tex)) (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/generic/pgf/systemlayer/pgf.cfg) (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/generic/pgf/systemlayer/pgfsys-pdftex.def (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/generic/pgf/systemlayer/pgfsys-common-pdf.def)) (prova.pgf)) (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/generic/pgf/systemlayer/pgfsyssoftpath.code.tex) (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/generic/pgf/systemlayer/pgfsysprotocol.code! .tex)) (/ usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/generic/pgf/basiclayer/pgfcore.code.tex (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/generic/pgf/math/pgfmath.code.tex (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/generic/pgf/math/pgfmathcalc.code.tex (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/generic/pgf/math/pgfmathutil.code.tex fontsbeware: no fonts are loaded yet, using 'lm mono' in box ) (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/generic/pgf/math/pgfmathparser.code.tex) (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/generic/pgf/math/pgfmathfunctions.code.tex (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/generic/pgf/math/pgfmathfunctions.basic.code.tex) (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/generic/pgf/math/pgfmathfunctions.trigonometric.code.tex) (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/generic/pgf/math/pgfmathfunctions.random.code.tex) (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/generic/pgf/math/pgfmathfunctions.comparison.code.tex) (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/generic/pgf/math/pgfmathfunctions.base.code.tex) (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/generic/pgf/math/pgfmathfunctions.round.code.tex) (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/generic/pgf/math/pgfmathfunctions.misc.code.tex) (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/generic/pgf/math/pgfmathfunctions.integerarithmetics.code.tex))) (/usr/local/bin/! context/t ex/texmf-modules/tex/generic/pgf/math/pgfmathfloat.code.tex)) (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/generic/pgf/basiclayer/pgfcorepoints.code.tex) (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/generic/pgf/basiclayer/pgfcorepathconstruct.code.tex) (/usr/local/bin/context/tex/texmf-modules/tex/generic