date:20010829

IIS tuning

2001-08-29 Thread Martijn Eindhoven


Hey Guys,
Do any of you now a good guide to IIS 5 tuning. I did tuning a lot but
i'd like to see some more resources about it.


Met vriendelijke groet,

M. Eindhoven
W2K System Administrator
Bevelander Internet Services B.V. 
Folkstoneweg 10 
1118 LM SCHIPHOL Zuidoost 
Tel : 020 40 53 900 
Fax : 020 40 53 910 
http://www.bevelander.nl
= 
This communication contains information which is confidential and 
may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), 
please note that any distribution, copying or use of this 
communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. 
If you have received this communication in error, please notify 
the sender immediately and then destroy any copies of it. 
=

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: New Worm on the loose

2001-08-29 Thread Les Bessant


You want try Victoria on a really hot day.

Arrrgggh. 

Les Bessant mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IT Manager, Sanderson Townend & Gilbert
Acting in a personal capacity
http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New, improved and with more bounce!

>-Original Message-
>From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 6:49 PM
>To: NT System Admin Issues
>Subject: RE: New Worm on the loose
>
>
>LOL!  It wasn't "that" bad.  Albeit, the wait for some of the 
>trains was
>excruciating sometimes.  :o)
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:39 AM
>To: NT System Admin Issues
>Subject: RE: New Worm on the loose
>
>
>Poor sod
>
>Clayton Doige 
>IT Manager MCSE, MCP + I
>Gameday International N.V. 
>Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... 
>
>T: +5 999 736 0309 
>C: +5 999 563 1845 
>F: +5 999 733 1259 
>E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 12:34 PM
>To: NT System Admin Issues
>Subject: RE: New Worm on the loose
>
>I have!  A few times...
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Mark L. Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 6:45 PM
>To: NT System Admin Issues
>Subject: RE: New Worm on the loose
>
>
>Someone has been to London and rode the tubes!!
>
>Mark
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 6:50 PM
>To: NT System Admin Issues
>Subject: RE: New Worm on the loose
>
>
>Mind the Gap!
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 3:51 PM
>To: NT System Admin Issues
>Subject: RE: New Worm on the loose
>
>
>Hi ! (notice the space) ("notice the space" is not part of the subject)
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Jay Woody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 2:48 PM
>To: NT System Admin Issues
>Subject: Re: New Worm on the loose
>
>
>Is there a subject line?
>
>JayW
>
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/27/01 03:46PM >>>
>Sorry about the cross posting.
>
>We don't have a lot of specifics on it, but there appears to be a new
>worm on the loose. The payload is a typical Melissa-style worm, where
>its only action is to send mail to all members of the GAL, with the
>following
>message:
>"Hi, how are you ? I am fine here. Please read the page
>http://pcControl.tripod.com/ to get some knowledge and prevent somebody
>hack you. Forword this mail to help all your friends too."
>
>Its plain text, and carries no executables with it, but I haven't
>visited the website yet. More info to follow, but there is zero
>information on the web about it at this point.
>
>Roger
>--
>Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
>Senior Systems Administrator
>Peregrine Systems
>Atlanta, GA
>http://www.peregrine.com 
>
>
>http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
>
>
>http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
>
>
>
>http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
>
>http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
>
>
>
>http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
>
>
>_
>This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
>delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
>information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or 
>alternatively call
>Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
>


The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential
and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If
you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on
0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. 

Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend & Gilbert are neither
given nor endorsed by the firm. 


_
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

Re: SMTP Servers

2001-08-29 Thread Kent Spencer


.. http://www.floosietek.com has good stuff.

Kent

--- Paul Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello All,
>  
> Does anybody know of any good alternatives to Exchange. I have a
> client
> that has about 5 users and doesn't want to pay the price for Exchange
> so
> i am searching for a cheaper, or better yet free, alternative. Any
> recommendations?
> Ûiÿü0ÂË§mém²íÁªÞr¿Û2±§fyb²×!j»^®f


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

Re: IIS tuning

2001-08-29 Thread Kent Spencer


.. look around www.iisfaq.com and you'll probably find something.

Kent

--- Martijn Eindhoven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Guys,
> 
> Do any of you now a good guide to IIS 5 tuning. I did tuning a lot
> but i'd 
> like to see some more resources about it.
> 
> 
> 
> Met vriendelijke groet,
> 
> 
> M. Eindhoven
> W2K System Administrator
> Bevelander Internet Services B.V.
> Folkstoneweg 10
> 1118 LM SCHIPHOL Zuidoost
> Tel : 020 40 53 900
> Fax : 020 40 53 910
> http://www.bevelander.nl
> =
> This communication contains information which is confidential and
> may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the
> intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s),
> please note that any distribution, copying or use of this
> communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited.
> If you have received this communication in error, please notify
> the sender immediately and then destroy any copies of it.
> =
> 
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> 
> 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

Re: Denying TS Access to admin

2001-08-29 Thread Kent Spencer


.. how did you disable the Administrator group to make it break?
   
--- Marc Neiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
 
Under W2K Server; does anybody have some smart idea about how to deny
Terminal Services access to administrators while allowing regular
users ?
 
If I somehow deny access to the administrator group, I end up with
access being denied to all or even the TS logon process impossible
through some secondary effect. 

I want to be sure that whatever happens the Admin logs on the physical
console

thanks in advance,
Marc Neiger


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: Denying TS Access to admin

2001-08-29 Thread Marc Neiger

Hi, 

It seems like my question raised more issues than answers :-)

The TS is going to be in a DMZ and accessible somehow from the internet. For
security, I'd like to restrict access so that it can not be administered if
you do not have physical access, and so, I want to deny TS access to
administrators. Maybe someone can come up with a better principle ?

As for what I tried, it is fairly simple, I tried fiddling with the
permission tab in the RDP connexion, trying to deny access to admin "total
control" or also trying individual rights in the advanced pane. Maybe I
wasn't able to find the proper combination.

Thanks,
Marc Neiger

Groupe Synergie Informatique

> -Original Message-
> From: Kent Spencer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:36 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Denying TS Access to admin
> 
> 
> .. how did you disable the Administrator group to make it break?
>
> --- Marc Neiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>  
> Under W2K Server; does anybody have some smart idea about how to deny
> Terminal Services access to administrators while allowing regular
> users ?
>  
> If I somehow deny access to the administrator group, I end up with
> access being denied to all or even the TS logon process impossible
> through some secondary effect. 
> 
> I want to be sure that whatever happens the Admin logs on the physical
> console
> 
> thanks in advance,
> Marc Neiger
> 
> 
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with 
> Yahoo! Messenger
> http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> 
> 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: User List

2001-08-29 Thread Luke Brumbaugh


net user /domain > user.txt

-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 3:24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: User List


Is there any easy way to print out a current list of all NT user accounts?
I did print screens, but there has to be an easier way.

Joseph L. Heaton, MCSE
NT Administrator
FDI Consulting, Inc.
1610 Arden Way,  Suite 145
Sacramento, CA  95815
(916)921-4390 x.228


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
Enterprise Channel Management Software for Manufacturers 
Visit us at http://www.ultryx.com 


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: SMTP Servers

2001-08-29 Thread Chris


Just my 2 cents here:

I have used SLMail and found it very buggy. Also keep in mind it is not
free. A 25 user license is $299.

Chris

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: Issue with a compaq proliant 7000 and Windows 2000 Adv. Serve r

2001-08-29 Thread Flanagan, Kevin


Matt,


Have you done a System Erase?  When in doubt..



Kevin


+---+
Kevin Flanagan
C/S Planning Engineer III
I/T Implementation Department
Branch Banking & Trust Company
3261 Atlantic Avenue, Suite 116
MC: 172-85-01-00
Raleigh, NC  27604
Voice: 919-716-6209



-Original Message-
From: Goldoff, Erik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 2:04 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Issue with a compaq proliant 7000 and Windows 2000 Adv. Serve r


anything non-standard in your boot.ini ?   And check to see what hardware is
sharing IRQ12.

Erik Goldoff
Systems Manager
The HoneyBaked Ham Company
678-966-3320
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Puckett, Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 2:02 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Issue with a compaq proliant 7000 and Windows 2000 Adv. Server


I have a compaq proliant 7000 server that I am attempting to setup up w2k
adv. serv..  The issue is as follows:  In the boot menus and system
utilities the keyboard and mouse work properly.  As soon as the server loads
and I get the firts setup screen in win2k after the file copy reboot they
stop working.  I have updated the BIOS and can find nothing on compaq's
site.  It is driving me insane.  I have tried a reload 3 times with the same
results.  Has anyone out there seen this?

Matthew Puckett MCSE, MCP+Internet, MCP 
Customer Support Analyst 
Sprint PCS IT Service Delivery 
1-540-642-3753

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

Re:Hello

2001-08-29 Thread Ralph Davis


I live in the USA and I have used this list almost from its inception.  It does
get out of hand at times but it is the best free source of NT information I have
ever found.  The guys (and gals) are generous of their time and expertize. 
Enjoy your stay.

ralph

Reply Separator
Subject:Hello
Author: NT System Admin Issues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:   08/29/2001 1:05 PM

Hi everyone
 
I have recently discovered the group and I am looking forward to sharing
ideas with you.
I live in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia (currently home of the Goodwill
Games) 
I work as a Network Engineer for the Queenslang Government (which means I
get paid overtime and have "Time off in Leu" :)
It also means, living in Australia, that I get most of the email messages
when I arive at work so I have to catch up on what has been discussed over
night. 
 
Thats about it for me... 
 
Colin Leeson
CITEC - Premiers, State Development and Ministerial IT Support
Phone 3224 6626 Premiers and State Development Service Desk
3224 6385 Ministerial Service Desk
Fax  3405 5227

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

Re:Denying TS Access to admin

2001-08-29 Thread Ralph Davis


If I was going to try something like this I would create a group and put all the
domain admins in it and then deny this group the right to access the TS from the
network.

ralph

Reply Separator
Subject:Denying TS Access to admin
Author: NT System Admin Issues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:   08/29/2001 1:50 AM

Hi,
 
Under W2K Server; does anybody have some smart idea about how to deny
Terminal Services access to administrators while allowing regular users ?
 
If I somehow deny access to the administrator group, I end up with access
being denied to all or even the TS logon process impossible through some
secondary effect. 
I want to be sure that whatever happens the Admin logs on the physical
console 
 
thanks in advance,
Marc Neiger

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

NT 4 VPN and TCP/IP only

2001-08-29 Thread Blake R. Fowkes

Title: NT 4 VPN and TCP/IP only





I have just setup a VPN server in our office and am having problems browsing.  When a client connects he is not able to browse the network and the logon script does not run.  When he connects everything appears to be fine.  My server is NT 4 SP 6a and the clients are W2K and Win 95/98.  All of the clients are having this problem.  We are not running Wins and I do not want to load it.  Does anyone know what I am doing wrong or setting that I need to change to get the logon scripts to run and the browsing to work properly?

Thanks,
Blake Fowkes
Waid and Associates




http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: NT 4 VPN and TCP/IP only

2001-08-29 Thread Jason Gauthier

Title: NT 4 VPN and TCP/IP only



Can 
you explain the setup of the network a little? 
Are 
the clients getting IP addresses on the same subnet as the server? Or 
different?
 
can 
you ping the server from the clieht by name?
can 
you ping the client from the server by name?

  -Original Message-From: Blake R. Fowkes 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:56 
  AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: NT 4 VPN and TCP/IP 
  only
  I have just setup a VPN server in our office and am 
  having problems browsing.  When a client connects he is not able to 
  browse the network and the logon script does not run.  When he connects 
  everything appears to be fine.  My server is NT 4 SP 6a and the clients 
  are W2K and Win 95/98.  All of the clients are having this problem.  
  We are not running Wins and I do not want to load it.  Does anyone know 
  what I am doing wrong or setting that I need to change to get the logon 
  scripts to run and the browsing to work properly?
  Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and Associates 
  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: IIS tuning

2001-08-29 Thread Ryan McBride


M$ has just releasded a program call IISFix i think it is. This is a simple
lil gui that u can use to lock down IIS REALLY tight

Opinions??

Ryan

-Original Message-
From: Kent Spencer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 29 August 2001 8:31 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: IIS tuning


.. look around www.iisfaq.com and you'll probably find something.

Kent

--- Martijn Eindhoven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> Do any of you now a good guide to IIS 5 tuning. I did tuning a lot
> but i'd
> like to see some more resources about it.
>
>
>
> Met vriendelijke groet,
>
>
> M. Eindhoven
> W2K System Administrator
> Bevelander Internet Services B.V.
> Folkstoneweg 10
> 1118 LM SCHIPHOL Zuidoost
> Tel : 020 40 53 900
> Fax : 020 40 53 910
> http://www.bevelander.nl
> =
> This communication contains information which is confidential and
> may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the
> intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s),
> please note that any distribution, copying or use of this
> communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited.
> If you have received this communication in error, please notify
> the sender immediately and then destroy any copies of it.
> =
>
>
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
>
>


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: NT 4 VPN and TCP/IP only

2001-08-29 Thread Chris Bodnar

Title: NT 4 VPN and TCP/IP only









Why don’t
you want to use WINS, it would solve you problem?

 

You can
use LMHOSTS files as a replacement.

 

There are
a few issues with running the logon scripts.  How many DC’s? If more than one are you sure the logon script
exists on all DC’s? On the Win 9x clients are they using the windows login
first? If so logon scripts won’t run. Those clients must bypass the Windows
logon when booting up, and then when they validate against the VPN server it
will prompt them to logon , and run the logon scripts.

 

 

Chris Bodnar

The Lehigh Group

610-966-9702 X:134

 

-Original
Message-
From: Blake R. Fowkes
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001
8:56 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: NT 4 VPN and TCP/IP only

 

I have just setup a VPN
server in our office and am having problems browsing.  When a client
connects he is not able to browse the network and the logon script does not
run.  When he connects everything appears to be fine.  My server is
NT 4 SP 6a and the clients are W2K and Win 95/98.  All of the clients are
having this problem.  We are not running Wins and I do not want to load
it.  Does anyone know what I am doing wrong or setting that I need to
change to get the logon scripts to run and the browsing to work properly?

Thanks, 
Blake Fowkes 
Waid and Associates 


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: NT 4 VPN and TCP/IP only

2001-08-29 Thread Blake R. Fowkes

Title: NT 4 VPN and TCP/IP only



Yes 
the clients are getting an IP from the same subnet.
No I 
am not able to ping from the client to the server (or any other machine) by 
name.  Unless it if one of my entries in hosts/lmhosts.
Not 
sure from server to client.  I will try that one right 
now.
 
Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and Associates 
 

  -Original Message-From: Jason Gauthier 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:02 
  AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT 4 VPN and 
  TCP/IP only
  Can you explain the setup of the network a little? 
  Are the clients getting IP addresses on the same subnet as the 
  server? Or different?
   
  can you ping the server from the clieht by name?
  can you ping the client from the server by name?
  
-Original Message-From: Blake R. Fowkes 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:56 
AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: NT 4 VPN and 
TCP/IP only
I have just setup a VPN server in our office and 
am having problems browsing.  When a client connects he is not able to 
browse the network and the logon script does not run.  When he connects 
everything appears to be fine.  My server is NT 4 SP 6a and the clients 
are W2K and Win 95/98.  All of the clients are having this 
problem.  We are not running Wins and I do not want to load it.  
Does anyone know what I am doing wrong or setting that I need to change to 
get the logon scripts to run and the browsing to work properly?
Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and Associates 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htmhttp://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: IIS tuning

2001-08-29 Thread Webb, Brian (Telecom)

I'm not sure I would say that the tool from MS locks it down "really tight"
by itself.  Russ Cooper of NTBUGTRAQ fame (infamy?) did a critique of the
tool and found several things that are lacking.  It is a good start, but
doesn't do everything.

Disclaimer: This is the current user's personal opinion and is not made
on behalf of my employer.

-Original Message-
From: Ryan McBride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:00 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IIS tuning

M$ has just releasded a program call IISFix i think it is. This is a simple
lil gui that u can use to lock down IIS REALLY tight

Opinions??

Ryan

-Original Message-
From: Kent Spencer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 29 August 2001 8:31 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: IIS tuning

.. look around www.iisfaq.com and you'll probably find something.

Kent

--- Martijn Eindhoven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> Do any of you now a good guide to IIS 5 tuning. I did tuning a lot
> but i'd
> like to see some more resources about it.
>
>
>
> Met vriendelijke groet,
>
>
> M. Eindhoven
> W2K System Administrator
> Bevelander Internet Services B.V.
> Folkstoneweg 10
> 1118 LM SCHIPHOL Zuidoost
> Tel : 020 40 53 900
> Fax : 020 40 53 910
> http://www.bevelander.nl
> =
> This communication contains information which is confidential and
> may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the
> intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s),
> please note that any distribution, copying or use of this
> communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited.
> If you have received this communication in error, please notify
> the sender immediately and then destroy any copies of it.
> =
>
>
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
>
>

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

Re: IIS tuning

2001-08-29 Thread Seth M. Kusiak


>to lock down IIS REALLY tight

I wouldn't go that far. I will say that I wouldn't use it for my servers. 

It's good for an admin who hasn't worked with IIS for any length of time. 

~Seth 

Ryan McBride writes: 

> M$ has just releasded a program call IISFix i think it is. This is a simple
> lil gui that u can use to lock down IIS REALLY tight 
> 
> Opinions?? 
> 
> Ryan 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Kent Spencer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 29 August 2001 8:31 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: IIS tuning 
> 
> 
> .. look around www.iisfaq.com and you'll probably find something. 
> 
> Kent 
> 
> --- Martijn Eindhoven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hey Guys, 
>>
>> Do any of you now a good guide to IIS 5 tuning. I did tuning a lot
>> but i'd
>> like to see some more resources about it. 
>>
>> 
>>
>> Met vriendelijke groet, 
>>
>>
>> M. Eindhoven
>> W2K System Administrator
>> Bevelander Internet Services B.V.
>> Folkstoneweg 10
>> 1118 LM SCHIPHOL Zuidoost
>> Tel : 020 40 53 900
>> Fax : 020 40 53 910
>> http://www.bevelander.nl
>> =
>> This communication contains information which is confidential and
>> may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the
>> intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s),
>> please note that any distribution, copying or use of this
>> communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited.
>> If you have received this communication in error, please notify
>> the sender immediately and then destroy any copies of it.
>> = 
>>
>>
>> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 
>>
>>
>  
> 
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
> http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ 
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 
> 
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 
> 
 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: NT 4 VPN and TCP/IP only

2001-08-29 Thread Jason Gauthier

Title: NT 4 VPN and TCP/IP only




  Well, as much as you hate it, the best practice solutions I can think 
  of would be installing and configuring WINS.
   
  Or 
  else install LMHOSTS files on all remote computers. (A potential 
  administrative nightmare, especially adding/removing and changing servers' IP 
  addresses)
   
  Good luck,
   
    Jason

  -Original Message-From: Blake R. Fowkes 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:10 
  AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT 4 VPN and 
  TCP/IP only
  Yes 
  the clients are getting an IP from the same subnet.
  No I 
  am not able to ping from the client to the server (or any other machine) by 
  name.  Unless it if one of my entries in 
  hosts/lmhosts.
  Not 
  sure from server to client.  I will try that one right 
  now.
   
  Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and Associates 
  
   
  
-Original Message-From: Jason Gauthier 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 
8:02 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: NT 4 VPN 
and TCP/IP only
Can you explain the setup of the network a little? 

Are the clients getting IP addresses on the same subnet as the 
server? Or different?
 
can you ping the server from the clieht by name?
can you ping the client from the server by name?

  -Original Message-From: Blake R. Fowkes 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:56 
  AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: NT 4 VPN and 
  TCP/IP only
  I have just setup a VPN server in our office 
  and am having problems browsing.  When a client connects he is not 
  able to browse the network and the logon script does not run.  When 
  he connects everything appears to be fine.  My server is NT 4 SP 6a 
  and the clients are W2K and Win 95/98.  All of the clients are having 
  this problem.  We are not running Wins and I do not want to load 
  it.  Does anyone know what I am doing wrong or setting that I need to 
  change to get the logon scripts to run and the browsing to work 
  properly?
  Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and 
  Associates 
  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htmhttp://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htmhttp://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

Active Directory Installation and Removal

2001-08-29 Thread A. G. Choudhry

Title: Message









 

Hi,

I have a very basic problem. 
It may be very simple But I am missing some
thing. When I want to add second controller in  a domain I get the error message
that “Assess denied You have no permission to change account of the
“compuername$”. A dialog box of new user
name and password is opened. I tried all possible accounts but without success.
I am tha local and domain administrator of these
machines and domain.

Just for test purpose I tried to add the same server as sub/child
domain, and it was successful.

But when I tried to remove that sub domain I get reply
”Active Directory Installation failed The operation failed to replicate
off the changes made locally. The DSA operation is unable to proceed because
DNS lookup failure”

Any Help

Bilal

 




http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




DO NOT read, copy or disseminate this communication unless you are the intended addressee. This e-mail communication contains confidential and/or privileged information intended only for the addressee. If you have received this communication in error, please call us immediately at (907) 561-1250 and ask to speak to the sender of the communication. Also, please e-mail the sender and notify the sender immediately that you have received the communication in error.

RE: NT 4 VPN and TCP/IP only

2001-08-29 Thread Blake R. Fowkes

Title: RE: NT 4 VPN and TCP/IP only





I do not run wins anywhere else for and browsing work fine.  The only time I have a problem with browsing is RAS/VPN and I really do not want to install it just for that.  LMHOSTS can work but as said before can be a big nightmare.  I have 2 DC's and yes I am doing replication for the logon scripts and yes it is working.  Just tried again on a 95 client without login in to 95 and when I made the VPN connection the logon script did run.

Now on the next little bit for that one, what about my W2K clients that have to logon to be able to use the machine?  How do I get the logon script to run for them?

As log as the logon script will run I really do not care about browsing.  None of the people would have a need to browse as long as the logon script ran.

Thanks, 
Blake Fowkes 
Waid and Associates 


-Original Message-
From: Chris Bodnar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:11 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NT 4 VPN and TCP/IP only



Why don't you want to use WINS, it would solve you problem?
 
You can use LMHOSTS files as a replacement.
 
There are a few issues with running the logon scripts.  How many DC's? If more than one are you sure the logon script exists on all DC's? On the Win 9x clients are they using the windows login first? If so logon scripts won't run. Those clients must bypass the Windows logon when booting up, and then when they validate against the VPN server it will prompt them to logon , and run the logon scripts.

 
 
Chris Bodnar
The Lehigh Group
610-966-9702 X:134
 
-Original Message-
From: Blake R. Fowkes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:56 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: NT 4 VPN and TCP/IP only
 
I have just setup a VPN server in our office and am having problems browsing.  When a client connects he is not able to browse the network and the logon script does not run.  When he connects everything appears to be fine.  My server is NT 4 SP 6a and the clients are W2K and Win 95/98.  All of the clients are having this problem.  We are not running Wins and I do not want to load it.  Does anyone know what I am doing wrong or setting that I need to change to get the logon scripts to run and the browsing to work properly?

Thanks, 
Blake Fowkes 
Waid and Associates 


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

Re: SMTP Servers

2001-08-29 Thread Seth M. Kusiak


Merak Mail Server Standard 4.00 can be had for $280.00 and it works very 
well. See http://www.icewarp.com/

~Seth 

Paul Armstrong writes: 

> Hello All,
>  
> Does anybody know of any good alternatives to Exchange. I have a client
> that has about 5 users and doesn't want to pay the price for Exchange so
> i am searching for a cheaper, or better yet free, alternative. Any
> recommendations?
> Ûiÿü0ÂË§mém²íÁªÞr¿Û2±§fyb²×!j»^®f
 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

Wierd characters...

2001-08-29 Thread Richard McClary


Does anyone but me get this kind of jibberish in the subject and sender 
lines on this list?  I've been getting more and more of them lately.  FWIW, 
I use linux sendmail  for SMTP and IMAP for POP3 services.  I use Eudora 
5.x for a client.

Oh, yeah, this particular message is from far-off and exotic North Carolina...

>From: =?utf-8?B?RmxhbmFnYW4sIEtldmlu?=
>Subject: =?utf-8?B?UkU6IFNNVFAgU2VydmVycw==?=

--
Richard D. McClary| Systems Administrator
ASPCA Animal Poison Control Center| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1717 S. Philo Rd, Suite 36, Urbana, IL| (217) 337-5030 ext. 261


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: SMTP Servers

2001-08-29 Thread Flanagan, Kevin


I'd pull an old Pentium Pro 200 type box out, or get one cheap at auction.
install Linux, and set up sendmail with IMAP, there are web interfaces
available, all for free.  5 users just doesn't justify the expense of
exchange on a real server.  You can get a Proliant pro200 server really
cheap these days.


+---+
Kevin Flanagan
C/S Planning Engineer III
I/T Implementation Department
Branch Banking & Trust Company
3261 Atlantic Avenue, Suite 116
MC: 172-85-01-00
Raleigh, NC  27604
Voice: 919-716-6209



-Original Message-
From: Paul Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SMTP Servers


Hello All,
 
Does anybody know of any good alternatives to Exchange. I have a client that
has about 5 users and doesn't want to pay the price for Exchange so i am
searching for a cheaper, or better yet free, alternative. Any
recommendations? i0˧mmಇ
r   21fyb!j;^f

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: Active Directory Installation and Removal

2001-08-29 Thread Mier, Juan

Title: Message

Just
like the error message says, DNS is always the first thing to look at with AD
problems. Is it configured correctly?

-Original Message-From: A. G. Choudhry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 6:30
AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Active Directory
Installation and Removal

Hi,
I have a very basic problem. It may be very simple But I am missing some thing. When I want to add second
controller in
a domain I get the error message that “Assess denied You have no
permission to change account of the “compuername$”.
A dialog box of new user name and password is opened. I tried all possible
accounts but without success. I am tha local and
domain administrator of these machines and
domain.
Just for test purpose I tried to add the same server
as sub/child domain, and it was successful.
But when I tried to remove that sub domain I get reply ”Active Directory Installation failed The
operation failed to replicate off the changes made locally. The DSA operation
is unable to proceed because DNS lookup failure”
Any Help
Bilal
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
DO NOT read, copy or disseminate this communication
unless you are the intended addressee. This e-mail communication contains
confidential and/or privileged information intended only for the addressee. If
you have received this communication in error, please call us immediately at
(907) 561-1250 and ask to speak to the sender of the communication. Also,
please e-mail the sender and notify the sender immediately that you have
received the communication in error.
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

Re: NT 4 VPN and TCP/IP only

2001-08-29 Thread Peter Pearson

Title: RE: NT 4 VPN and TCP/IP only



Browsing may work 'fine' but is it efficient? i.e. 
network traffic? Why the resistance to implement WINS?
 
http://www.win2000mag.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=5215
 
 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Blake R. Fowkes 
  
  To: NT System Admin Issues 
  Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:29 
  AM
  Subject: RE: NT 4 VPN and TCP/IP 
  only
  
  I do not run wins anywhere else for and browsing work 
  fine.  The only time I have a problem with browsing is RAS/VPN and I 
  really do not want to install it just for that.  LMHOSTS can work but as 
  said before can be a big nightmare.  I have 2 DC's and yes I am doing 
  replication for the logon scripts and yes it is working.  Just tried 
  again on a 95 client without login in to 95 and when I made the VPN connection 
  the logon script did run.
  Now on the next little bit for that one, what about my W2K 
  clients that have to logon to be able to use the machine?  How do I get 
  the logon script to run for them?
  As log as the logon script will run I really do not care about 
  browsing.  None of the people would have a need to browse as long as the 
  logon script ran.
  Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and Associates 
  -Original Message- From: Chris 
  Bodnar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:11 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: NT 4 
  VPN and TCP/IP only 
  Why don't you want to use WINS, it would solve you 
  problem?   You can use 
  LMHOSTS files as a replacement.   
  There are a few issues with running the logon scripts.  
  How many DC's? If more than one are you sure the logon script exists on all 
  DC's? On the Win 9x clients are they using the windows login first? If so 
  logon scripts won't run. Those clients must bypass the Windows logon when 
  booting up, and then when they validate against the VPN server it will prompt 
  them to logon , and run the logon scripts.
      Chris Bodnar The Lehigh Group 610-966-9702 X:134   -Original Message- From: Blake R. 
  Fowkes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:56 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: NT 4 VPN 
  and TCP/IP only   I have 
  just setup a VPN server in our office and am having problems browsing.  
  When a client connects he is not able to browse the network and the logon 
  script does not run.  When he connects everything appears to be 
  fine.  My server is NT 4 SP 6a and the clients are W2K and Win 
  95/98.  All of the clients are having this problem.  We are not 
  running Wins and I do not want to load it.  Does anyone know what I am 
  doing wrong or setting that I need to change to get the logon scripts to run 
  and the browsing to work properly?
  Thanks, Blake Fowkes Waid and Associates 
  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 
  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 
  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

Re: IIS tuning

2001-08-29 Thread Peter Pearson


Martijn,

Not sure if you're interested in locking down your server or performance tuning it 
however this
White Paper may help you.

http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/techinfo/administration/web/tuning.asp


- Original Message -
From: "Ryan McBride" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "NT System Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:00 AM
Subject: RE: IIS tuning


M$ has just releasded a program call IISFix i think it is. This is a simple
lil gui that u can use to lock down IIS REALLY tight

Opinions??

Ryan

-Original Message-
From: Kent Spencer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 29 August 2001 8:31 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: IIS tuning


.. look around www.iisfaq.com and you'll probably find something.

Kent

--- Martijn Eindhoven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> Do any of you now a good guide to IIS 5 tuning. I did tuning a lot
> but i'd
> like to see some more resources about it.
>
>
>
> Met vriendelijke groet,
>
>
> M. Eindhoven
> W2K System Administrator
> Bevelander Internet Services B.V.
> Folkstoneweg 10
> 1118 LM SCHIPHOL Zuidoost
> Tel : 020 40 53 900
> Fax : 020 40 53 910
> http://www.bevelander.nl
> =
> This communication contains information which is confidential and
> may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the
> intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s),
> please note that any distribution, copying or use of this
> communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited.
> If you have received this communication in error, please notify
> the sender immediately and then destroy any copies of it.
> =
>
>
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
>
>


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

Unsuscribe me from the mailing list

2001-08-29 Thread Sushant Kumar Lenka




Dear Sir, 
 
My all other mails are blocked. Please unsuscribe 
my mail Account [EMAIL PROTECTED]  from the 
mailing list. and 
 
Thanks
 
Regards
 
Sushant
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: Denying TS Access to admin

2001-08-29 Thread Ryan McBride

Just curious, wouldnt the Domain Admin group override it???

-Original Message-
From: Ralph Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 29 August 2001 10:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re:Denying TS Access to admin

If I was going to try something like this I would create a group and put all
the
domain admins in it and then deny this group the right to access the TS from
the
network.

ralph

Reply Separator
Subject:Denying TS Access to admin
Author: NT System Admin Issues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:   08/29/2001 1:50 AM

Hi,

Under W2K Server; does anybody have some smart idea about how to deny
Terminal Services access to administrators while allowing regular users ?

If I somehow deny access to the administrator group, I end up with access
being denied to all or even the TS logon process impossible through some
secondary effect.
I want to be sure that whatever happens the Admin logs on the physical
console

thanks in advance,
Marc Neiger

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: SMTP Servers

2001-08-29 Thread Givens, Mike


I agree...

QMail or Postfix  Not Sendmail  To many security problems.

-Original Message-
From: Kelly Borndale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: SMTP Servers


Qmail is a good free alternative.  It also does pop3, and fowarding, there
are modules for lists as well.  All free.

-K

- Original Message -
From: "Paul Armstrong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "NT System Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:35 PM
Subject: SMTP Servers


> Hello All,
>
> Does anybody know of any good alternatives to Exchange. I have a client
> that has about 5 users and doesn't want to pay the price for Exchange so
> i am searching for a cheaper, or better yet free, alternative. Any
> recommendations?
>   m jr۱yj׻


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: Denying TS Access to admin

2001-08-29 Thread Richard McClary


Members of it _could_ override it, but it would probably work.  I know it's 
possible for DomainAdmin members to deny themselves certain permissions and 
find themselves in deep doo-doo.

At 11:53 PM 8/29/2001 +1000, you wrote:
>Just curious, wouldnt the Domain Admin group override it???
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Ralph Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, 29 August 2001 10:43 PM
>To: NT System Admin Issues
>Subject: Re:Denying TS Access to admin
>
>
>If I was going to try something like this I would create a group and put all
>the
>domain admins in it and then deny this group the right to access the TS from
>the
>network.

--
Richard D. McClary| Systems Administrator
ASPCA Animal Poison Control Center| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1717 S. Philo Rd, Suite 36, Urbana, IL| (217) 337-5030 ext. 261


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: What do you get for Over Time

2001-08-29 Thread Dewar Charles R

Really?! That's only 50 hours a week. I work a minimum of 45 hours a week.

-Original Message-
From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 8:46 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What do you get for Over Time

40 hours OT in a month seems really extreme.

I knew getting into the game long hours and weekends were part of the deal.
And little appreciation is the other "benefit".

Like some of the others, my boss knows what I am doing for the company, and
gives me a lot of room time wise.  If I drag myself in late a few days, she
doesn't worry about it.  If I knock off an hour early here and there, that's
cool too.  As long as the ship is sailing, I have a lot of flexibility.
Officially, no one else in the company has to know about it.  I put in my
more than my fair share of time, and everyone realizes that.  It all boils
down to how tight you are with your boss.

-Original Message-
From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 9:11 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: What do you get for Over Time

I was wondering if anyone has any policies set up for Over Time.

The reason I ask is one of the other network guys and myself have put in
about 40 hours over time this month and we receive nothing for it. 

Just wondering what policies are set up at other companies to compensate for
over time.

We consistently work about 8-12 hours over a month and we get no time off or
anything for this.  

Management keeps telling us it is just part of our job and we can not get
any comp time even though we are only scheduled for 

40 hours a week.

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

OT E-Mail Disclaimers

2001-08-29 Thread Banyas, Pat F. Civ

Title: OT E-Mail Disclaimers





I have been considering adding a disclaimer to all outgoing mail from my mail server.  Anyone who does not mind sharing of their disclaimer ideas please feel free to forward them to me.  Thanks in advance for the assistance.

Pat Banyas MCSE
System/Network Administrator
U.S. Naval Hospital Guantanamo Bay
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
011-5399-72440



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: What do you get for Over Time

2001-08-29 Thread Dewar Charles R


I don't think that is the case in Texas. Are you talking about ALASKA DOL?

-Original Message-
From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 11:51 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What do you get for Over Time


I've been a salaried, non-exempt employee for the past 3 years and I've
always gotten time and a half for any over-time I put in. However, our HR
person recently contacted the Department of Labor and found out some
interesting facts. Anyone who is not in a position where 2 or more people
work directly under them, is considered a non-exempt employee (at least in
our case). 

Regards,
 
Sean Martin, MCSE
Network Administrator
Ribelin Lowell & Company
Insurance Brokers, Inc.
3111 C Street, Suite 300
Anchorage, Alaska 99503
Ph: (907) 561-1250
Fax: (907) 561-4315
Cell: (907) 229-0885
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  


-Original Message-
From: Greg Page [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 8:29 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What do you get for Over Time


I didn't think you did, I was pointing out the math.

Greg


-Original Message-
From: Seth M. Kusiak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 12:17 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: What do you get for Over Time


It was ONLY an example. I don't make 10K a year.

Greg Page writes: 

> If you made $10,000 a year that would be $5.00 and hour.
> 
> I haven't had and overtime paying job in years but we've always 
> managed to snag lots of extra time off when we can. The nature of the 
> IT beast is that sometimes there is OT involved and long nights and 
> weekends. Just part of the job.
> 
> Greg
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Seth M. Kusiak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 9:25 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: What do you get for Over Time 
> 
> 
> I'm salaried, but if I work over 45 hours in a week then for each hour 
> that
> I work past 45, I get half of my base rate. Example: 
> 
> If I make $10,000 a year and my hourly rate is $10.00, for each hour 
> that I
> work past 45, I would get $5.00 an hour that is paid quarterly.  
> 
> I really like this because I usually end up with a few thousand extra 
> each
> quarter.  
> 
> ~Seth
> 
> Mathews, James E. writes:
> 
>> I was wondering if anyone has any policies set up for Over Time.
>> 
>> The reason I ask is one of the other network guys and myself have put
>> in about 40 hours over time this month and we receive nothing for it. 
>> 
>> Just wondering what policies are set up at other companies to
>> compensate for over time. 
>> 
>> We consistently work about 8-12 hours over a month and we get no time 
>> off
> or
>> anything for this.
>> 
>> Management keeps telling us it is just part of our job and we can not
>> get any comp time even though we are only scheduled for 
>> 
>> 40 hours a week.
>> 
>>   
>> 
>> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
>> 
>   
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
> 
 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
DO NOT read, copy or disseminate this communication unless you are the
intended addressee. This e-mail communication contains confidential and/or
privileged information intended only for the addressee. If you have received
this communication in error, please call us immediately at (907) 561-1250
and ask to speak to the sender of the communication. Also, please e-mail the
sender and notify the sender immediately that you have received the
communication in error.

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

OT: mounting hardware

2001-08-29 Thread Chris Bodnar


Does anyone know of a vendor that carries plastic AT mounting rails like
these anymore:


http://shop.store.yahoo.com/repc/railspair.html


I have tried Dalco and CDW but have been unsuccessful. 


TIA



Chris Bodnar
The Lehigh Group
610-966-9702 X:134


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

Re: OT E-Mail Disclaimers

2001-08-29 Thread Kelly Borndale

Title: OT E-Mail Disclaimers



They are annoying, and they mean little to 
nothing.
K.Borndale
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -home 
email

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Banyas, Pat F. Civ 
  To: NT System Admin Issues 
  Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:33 
  AM
  Subject: OT E-Mail Disclaimers
  
  I have been considering adding a disclaimer to all 
  outgoing mail from my mail server.  Anyone who does not mind sharing of 
  their disclaimer ideas please feel free to forward them to me.  Thanks in 
  advance for the assistance.
  Pat Banyas MCSE System/Network Administrator U.S. Naval Hospital Guantanamo Bay [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  011-5399-72440 
  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: New Worm on the loose

2001-08-29 Thread Ian Kelly


I reckon the Picadilly line gives it a good run for it's money!
Glad to be on the other side of the Atlantic now!

Ian

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Adding manpower to a late software project makes it later.  - Brook


-Original Message-
From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 29 August 2001 06:04
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: New Worm on the loose


You want try Victoria on a really hot day.

Arrrgggh. 

Les Bessant mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IT Manager, Sanderson Townend & Gilbert
Acting in a personal capacity
http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New, improved and with more bounce!

>-Original Message-
>From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 6:49 PM
>To: NT System Admin Issues
>Subject: RE: New Worm on the loose
>
>
>LOL!  It wasn't "that" bad.  Albeit, the wait for some of the
>trains was
>excruciating sometimes.  :o)
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:39 AM
>To: NT System Admin Issues
>Subject: RE: New Worm on the loose
>
>
>Poor sod
>
>Clayton Doige
>IT Manager MCSE, MCP + I
>Gameday International N.V. 
>Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... 
>
>T: +5 999 736 0309
>C: +5 999 563 1845 
>F: +5 999 733 1259 
>E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 12:34 PM
>To: NT System Admin Issues
>Subject: RE: New Worm on the loose
>
>I have!  A few times...
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Mark L. Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 6:45 PM
>To: NT System Admin Issues
>Subject: RE: New Worm on the loose
>
>
>Someone has been to London and rode the tubes!!
>
>Mark
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 6:50 PM
>To: NT System Admin Issues
>Subject: RE: New Worm on the loose
>
>
>Mind the Gap!
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 3:51 PM
>To: NT System Admin Issues
>Subject: RE: New Worm on the loose
>
>
>Hi ! (notice the space) ("notice the space" is not part of the subject)
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Jay Woody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 2:48 PM
>To: NT System Admin Issues
>Subject: Re: New Worm on the loose
>
>
>Is there a subject line?
>
>JayW
>
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/27/01 03:46PM >>>
>Sorry about the cross posting.
>
>We don't have a lot of specifics on it, but there appears to be a new 
>worm on the loose. The payload is a typical Melissa-style worm, where 
>its only action is to send mail to all members of the GAL, with the 
>following
>message:
>"Hi, how are you ? I am fine here. Please read the page 
>http://pcControl.tripod.com/ to get some knowledge and prevent somebody

>hack you. Forword this mail to help all your friends too."
>
>Its plain text, and carries no executables with it, but I haven't 
>visited the website yet. More info to follow, but there is zero 
>information on the web about it at this point.
>
>Roger
>--
>Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
>Senior Systems Administrator
>Peregrine Systems
>Atlanta, GA
>http://www.peregrine.com
>
>
>http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
>
>
>http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
>
>
>
>http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
>
>http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
>
>
>
>http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
>
>
>_
>This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet 
>delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further 
>information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively 
>call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
>


The information in this communication and any attachments is
confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for
the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review,
dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please
notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message
and any copies of it. 

Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do
not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend & Gilbert are
neither given nor endorsed by the firm. 


_
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Se

RE: Denying TS Access to admin

2001-08-29 Thread Andrew Baker


No.

Deny ACLs override everything else.

 
- ASB
 


-Original Message-
From: Ryan McBride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:54 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Denying TS Access to admin


Just curious, wouldnt the Domain Admin group override it???

-Original Message-
From: Ralph Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 29 August 2001 10:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re:Denying TS Access to admin


If I was going to try something like this I would create a group and put all
the
domain admins in it and then deny this group the right to access the TS from
the
network.

ralph

Reply Separator
Subject:Denying TS Access to admin
Author: NT System Admin Issues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:   08/29/2001 1:50 AM

Hi,

Under W2K Server; does anybody have some smart idea about how to deny
Terminal Services access to administrators while allowing regular users ?

If I somehow deny access to the administrator group, I end up with access
being denied to all or even the TS logon process impossible through some
secondary effect.
I want to be sure that whatever happens the Admin logs on the physical
console

thanks in advance,
Marc Neiger


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: Denying TS Access to admin

2001-08-29 Thread Correa, Andre


This comes from an earlier email in this list on how to add additional users
to log in to WIN2K Terminal Server in remote admin mode.

-
Open Terminal Services Configuration (it's in Administrative Tools)
In the command pane (the left-hand pane of the MMC console), click on
"Connections."
In the right-hand pane, you'll see an icon representing a connection (a hard
disk atop a network connection) and the words "RDP-Tcp," "tcp," and
"Microsoft RDP 5.0." Double-click the icon to bring up its Properties
dialog, or just right-click the icon and choose "Properties." You'll see a
property page labeled "RDP-Tcp Properties."
Click the "Permissions" tab.
Note that right now, the tab shows only the System account and the local
Administrators group. Add any person or group that you like, and they'll be
able to log onto the server via Terminal Services
---

My guess is if you removed the Domain Admins from the local admin group on
the Terminal Server, and included the Domain Users group into the
Permissions Tab, you should be good to go.  Create a local admin account, or
alternatively add one user account to the local admin group, and if you want
to, you should be able to deny access for that account in the permissions
tab in Terminal Services Configuration.  That way the one account that can
administer the server, can only do so from the console.

Again, this is theory, as I cannot test this out, but I am sure one of the
incredibly bright and professional individuals who I am happy to call
colleagues will be able to find any holes in my advice.  I hope this helps
you, and I apologize if I offended you with my comments, I was just trying
to be clever.


 -Original Message-
From:   Ralph Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:43 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:Re:Denying TS Access to admin

If I was going to try something like this I would create a group and put all
the
domain admins in it and then deny this group the right to access the TS from
the
network.

ralph

Reply Separator
Subject:Denying TS Access to admin
Author: NT System Admin Issues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:   08/29/2001 1:50 AM

Hi,

Under W2K Server; does anybody have some smart idea about how to deny
Terminal Services access to administrators while allowing regular users ?

If I somehow deny access to the administrator group, I end up with access
being denied to all or even the TS logon process impossible through some
secondary effect.
I want to be sure that whatever happens the Admin logs on the physical
console

thanks in advance,
Marc Neiger

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: OT E-Mail Disclaimers

2001-08-29 Thread Correa, Andre

Title: OT E-Mail Disclaimers









Do they
serve some legal purpose?  

 

-Original
Message-
From: Kelly Borndale
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001
10:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT E-Mail Disclaimers

 

They are
annoying, and they mean little to nothing.


K.Borndale

 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] -home email




-
Original Message - 



From: Banyas,
Pat F. Civ 



To: NT System Admin Issues 

Sent: Wednesday, August 29,
2001 10:33 AM

Subject: OT
E-Mail Disclaimers

 

I have
been considering adding a disclaimer to all outgoing mail from my mail
server.  Anyone who does not mind sharing of their disclaimer ideas please
feel free to forward them to me.  Thanks in advance for the assistance.

Pat Banyas MCSE 
System/Network
Administrator 
U.S. Naval
Hospital Guantanamo Bay

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
011-5399-72440 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: OT E-Mail Disclaimers

2001-08-29 Thread Erik Sojka

Title: Message



We 
should discuss this on the Swynk Exchange list (ls.swynk.com) They love 
discussing email disclaimers and do it quite often.

  
  -Original Message-From: Correa, Andre 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:03 
  AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OT E-Mail 
  Disclaimers
  
  Do 
  they serve some legal purpose?  
  
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: Kelly 
  Borndale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:45 
  AMTo: NT System Admin 
  IssuesSubject: Re: OT E-Mail 
  Disclaimers
   
  They are 
  annoying, and they mean little to nothing.
  K.Borndale
   
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] -home 
  email
  
  - Original 
  Message - 
  
  From: Banyas, 
  Pat F. Civ 
  
  To: NT System Admin Issues 
  
  Sent: Wednesday, August 
  29, 2001 10:33 AM
  Subject: OT E-Mail 
  Disclaimers
   
  I have been 
  considering adding a disclaimer to all outgoing mail from my mail 
  server.  Anyone who does not mind sharing of their disclaimer ideas 
  please feel free to forward them to me.  Thanks in advance for the 
  assistance.
  Pat Banyas 
  MCSE 
  System/Network 
  Administrator 
  U.S. Naval 
  Hospital Guantanamo Bay [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 011-5399-72440 
  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htmhttp://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

Re: OT E-Mail Disclaimers

2001-08-29 Thread Kelly Borndale

Title: OT E-Mail Disclaimers



I don't think that has ever really been tested in a court of 
law.  Same thing with a fax -a fax is sent, and is visible to anyone 
physically on the receiving side.  Email can not really be verified, 
either.
K.Borndale
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -home 
email

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Correa, Andre 
  
  To: NT System Admin Issues 
  Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:03 
  AM
  Subject: RE: OT E-Mail Disclaimers
  
  
  Do 
  they serve some legal purpose?  
  
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: Kelly 
  Borndale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:45 
  AMTo: NT System Admin 
  IssuesSubject: Re: OT E-Mail 
  Disclaimers
   
  They 
  are annoying, and they mean little to nothing.
  K.Borndale
   
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] -home 
  email
  
  - Original 
  Message - 
  
  From: Banyas, 
  Pat F. Civ 
  
  To: NT System Admin Issues 
  
  Sent: Wednesday, August 
  29, 2001 10:33 AM
  Subject: OT E-Mail 
  Disclaimers
   
  I have been 
  considering adding a disclaimer to all outgoing mail from my mail 
  server.  Anyone who does not mind sharing of their disclaimer ideas 
  please feel free to forward them to me.  Thanks in advance for the 
  assistance.
  Pat Banyas 
  MCSE 
  System/Network 
  Administrator 
  U.S. Naval 
  Hospital Guantanamo Bay [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 011-5399-72440 
  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htmhttp://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: OT E-Mail Disclaimers

2001-08-29 Thread Waters, Jeff

Title: Message



They are just plain evil, I would highly recommend going over to the 
Exchange list and asking the question.  Just put on your flame suit 
first.
Jeff
 

  -Original Message-From: Erik Sojka 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:03 
  AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OT E-Mail 
  Disclaimers
  We 
  should discuss this on the Swynk Exchange list (ls.swynk.com) They love 
  discussing email disclaimers and do it quite often.
  

-Original Message-From: Correa, Andre 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 
11:03 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OT 
E-Mail Disclaimers

Do 
they serve some legal purpose?  

 
-Original 
Message-From: Kelly 
Borndale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:45 
AMTo: NT System Admin 
IssuesSubject: Re: OT 
E-Mail Disclaimers
 
They are 
annoying, and they mean little to nothing.
K.Borndale
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -home 
email

- Original 
Message - 

From: Banyas, Pat F. Civ 


To: NT System Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Wednesday, August 
29, 2001 10:33 AM
Subject: OT E-Mail 
Disclaimers
 
I have been 
considering adding a disclaimer to all outgoing mail from my mail 
server.  Anyone who does not mind sharing of their disclaimer ideas 
please feel free to forward them to me.  Thanks in advance for the 
assistance.
Pat Banyas 
MCSE 
System/Network 
Administrator 
U.S. Naval 
Hospital Guantanamo Bay [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 011-5399-72440 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htmhttp://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htmhttp://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: IIS tuning

2001-08-29 Thread Jay Woody


Aside from the 50,000,000 given last week?  Nope, not really.  :)

JayW

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/29/01 08:00AM >>>
M$ has just releasded a program call IISFix i think it is. This is a simple
lil gui that u can use to lock down IIS REALLY tight

Opinions??

Ryan

-Original Message-
From: Kent Spencer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, 29 August 2001 8:31 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: IIS tuning


.. look around www.iisfaq.com and you'll probably find something.

Kent

--- Martijn Eindhoven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> Do any of you now a good guide to IIS 5 tuning. I did tuning a lot
> but i'd
> like to see some more resources about it.
>
>
>
> Met vriendelijke groet,
>
>
> M. Eindhoven
> W2K System Administrator
> Bevelander Internet Services B.V.
> Folkstoneweg 10
> 1118 LM SCHIPHOL Zuidoost
> Tel : 020 40 53 900
> Fax : 020 40 53 910
> http://www.bevelander.nl 
> =
> This communication contains information which is confidential and
> may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the
> intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s),
> please note that any distribution, copying or use of this
> communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited.
> If you have received this communication in error, please notify
> the sender immediately and then destroy any copies of it.
> =
>
>
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 
>
>


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

FW: License manager

2001-08-29 Thread Mal Sasalu

Title: Need a hand changing service account passwords



 

  Hi All
   
  I am 
  sorry if this turns out to be a long question. I have joined new in this 
  company. We have some wiered problems with licensing. The domain 
  controller (which is also our exchange) license manager shows like 
  this
   
  product    
  per seat 
  purchased    
  per seat alocated    per server 
  purchased    
  per server reached
   
  Microsoft exchange 
  5.5    
  0    
  0    
  0    
  0
  
  Microsoft exchange 
  5.5    
  0    
  0    
  0    
  0
  
  Microsoft exchange 
  5.5    
  0    
  0    
  0    
  0
  
  Microsoft exchange 
  5.5    
  0  313   
  0  
  126
  Microsoft SQL 
  Server    
  0  
  565 
  220    
  574
   
  I am failing to 
  interpret this. We have around 130 people working here. 
   
  Thanks
  Mal
   
   
   
   
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

1 2 >

1 - 100 of 171 matches

Mail list logo