RE: Time sync

2013-01-07 Thread Ken Cornetet
Lol, how many times do you need 64 vCPUs or 4TB of guest Ram versus needing to 
extend a disk?

From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 8:50 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Time sync

Can ESX support 64  vCPUs or 4TB RAM per guest yet? Or 64 hosts per cluster? 
Seems like there are all sorts of corner cases where one product has 
functionality the other doesn't yet. For 99% of things they are feature 
compatible. It's all about the management and operations tools now. Hypervisors 
are almost commoditised, and will be within the next version or two.

Cheers
Ken

From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:ken.corne...@kimball.com]
Sent: Saturday, 5 January 2013 6:26 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Time sync

Cost.

HyperV give something that VMWare doesn't? I laughed so hard I think I peed 
myself a little...  Sheesh, you can't even extend disks on a running virtual 
under HyperV.

From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 11:43 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Time sync

I was thinking the same thing. Actually IMHO VM still does more than Hyper-V 
does...

Z

Edward E. Ziots, CISSP, Security +, Network +
Security Engineer
Lifespan Organization
ezi...@lifespan.orgmailto:ezi...@lifespan.org



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: Replacement for SteadyState

2013-01-07 Thread Glen Johnson
We teach classes and let the students make any and all changes to the desktop 
environment.
Here's one example.  Student comes in and sets the desktop wallpaper to his 
favorite pinup gal.  Next student doesn't like it, but is a beginner and 
doesn't know how to change it to something else.  Reboot and the pin up gal is 
gone.
Also, I've seen some programs/apps that can now be installed without admin 
rights, Google Chrome for example.
Not a problem with Deep Freeze.

I'm sure there are other ways to do this, but DeepFreeze works great in our 
environment.

From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2013 4:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

I've worked at a lot of customers that use DeepFreeze and similar products and 
I'm not a huge fan of the concept in general. It makes the overall lifecycle 
maintenance of a desktop environment a heck of a lot more complicated.

The question I always pose (and usually don't get much of a response to), is 
what problems/issues is DeepFreeze protecting you from that running as a local 
user wouldn't solve?

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132

From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2013 11:33 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

Not free, but we could not function at the school without DeepFreeze.

From: Bambi J Saastad [mailto:bambi.j.saas...@seagate.com]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 11:36 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Replacement for SteadyState

Hello
I was wondering if any of you could suggest a replacement for SteadyState.
I have a roomful of pc's that the factory users use for browsing etc that I am 
replacing with Windows 7 Pro that need to be locked down.

Can anyone suggest a product that does the same thing, wipe out any changes on 
reboot?

TIA
B


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: Replacement for SteadyState

2013-01-07 Thread David Lum
Word. Domain-joined system but they auto-login as a local user that belongs to 
the guest group in Vista, with a few other lockdowns that mimic Steadystate. 
Public machines are a completely different can of worms, and even the above 
isn't perfect but I can go several months at a time (been almost a year I think 
at this point) before getting a call for support on them.

Dave

From: Crawford, Scott [mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2013 7:39 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

I'm glad someone asked. I always assumed I was missing something. We've got lab 
computers for a couple thousand students and have any issues to speak of.

Sent from my Windows Phone

From: Brian Desmond
Sent: 1/6/2013 3:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState
I've worked at a lot of customers that use DeepFreeze and similar products and 
I'm not a huge fan of the concept in general. It makes the overall lifecycle 
maintenance of a desktop environment a heck of a lot more complicated.

The question I always pose (and usually don't get much of a response to), is 
what problems/issues is DeepFreeze protecting you from that running as a local 
user wouldn't solve?

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132

From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2013 11:33 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

Not free, but we could not function at the school without DeepFreeze.

From: Bambi J Saastad [mailto:bambi.j.saas...@seagate.com]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 11:36 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Replacement for SteadyState

Hello
I was wondering if any of you could suggest a replacement for SteadyState.
I have a roomful of pc's that the factory users use for browsing etc that I am 
replacing with Windows 7 Pro that need to be locked down.

Can anyone suggest a product that does the same thing, wipe out any changes on 
reboot?

TIA
B


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: Occasional local admin needed

2013-01-07 Thread David Lum
Thanks for everyone's replies on this!

Dave

From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 7:53 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Occasional local admin needed

Do a domain account as you describe and set the account to expire tomorrow.  
When they need it you re-enable it and set it to expire again the next day. 
Still manual intervention on your part but the automatic expire solves the 
ongoing access issue.

From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 10:41 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Occasional local admin needed

How would you guys handle this? I have a server that the developers use that 
they occasionally (once a month or so) need local admin access for to 
install/upgrade an app or feature they use. This is a new-ish server that 
previously I have just added a user (it's the same one each time) to the local 
admin group then a week later took them out, but that's cumbersome and I become 
the single point of failure on remembering to back them out.

I could 1. create a special AD account for this user to be local admin, or 2. 
create an  AD group, put this person in it, then GPO that group into local 
admins on that server.

Suggestions?
David Lum
Sr. Systems Engineer // NWEATM
Office 503.548.5229 // Cell (voice/text) 503.267.9764


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Re: Replacement for SteadyState

2013-01-07 Thread kz20fl
You could achieve much the same end with Citrix Provisioning Services, except 
you'd have the options of personal vDisk as well.

I have to admit I'm not a fan of the DeepFreeze/SteadyState approaches - some 
threats don't need to be persistent beyond a reboot to wreak havoc. I'm more 
inclined towards good GPOs and app management coupled with maybe PVS and 
StrataApps.

Cheers,


JR


Sent from my Blackberry, which may be an antique but delivers email RELIABLY

-Original Message-
From: Glen Johnson gjohn...@vhcc.edu
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 13:42:08 
To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Reply-To: NT System Admin Issues 
ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.comSubject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

We teach classes and let the students make any and all changes to the desktop 
environment.
Here's one example.  Student comes in and sets the desktop wallpaper to his 
favorite pinup gal.  Next student doesn't like it, but is a beginner and 
doesn't know how to change it to something else.  Reboot and the pin up gal is 
gone.
Also, I've seen some programs/apps that can now be installed without admin 
rights, Google Chrome for example.
Not a problem with Deep Freeze.

I'm sure there are other ways to do this, but DeepFreeze works great in our 
environment.

From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2013 4:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

I've worked at a lot of customers that use DeepFreeze and similar products and 
I'm not a huge fan of the concept in general. It makes the overall lifecycle 
maintenance of a desktop environment a heck of a lot more complicated.

The question I always pose (and usually don't get much of a response to), is 
what problems/issues is DeepFreeze protecting you from that running as a local 
user wouldn't solve?

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132

From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2013 11:33 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

Not free, but we could not function at the school without DeepFreeze.

From: Bambi J Saastad [mailto:bambi.j.saas...@seagate.com]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 11:36 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Replacement for SteadyState

Hello
I was wondering if any of you could suggest a replacement for SteadyState.
I have a roomful of pc's that the factory users use for browsing etc that I am 
replacing with Windows 7 Pro that need to be locked down.

Can anyone suggest a product that does the same thing, wipe out any changes on 
reboot?

TIA
B


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


Re: Time sync

2013-01-07 Thread Michael Leone
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Ken Cornetet ken.corne...@kimball.com wrote:
 Lol, how many times do you need 64 vCPUs or 4TB of guest Ram versus needing
 to extend a disk?

I run VMware ESXi 5.0, and I know I have had to extend a disk any
number of times. And Win2008 makes extending the boot disk so much
easier, too.

My largest VM has 16G of RAM, and I was even leery of that. And I have
6 hosts with 512G RAM each ...

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


RE: Replacement for SteadyState

2013-01-07 Thread Glen Johnson
No on the student login.  We use a generic account per classroom.
We've talked about moving to a individual student login, but I'm not sure we 
need or want that.
For others that have gone that route, how do you handle situations where 
students don't logout before they leave.
You either have a locked computer, logged on as said student or if not locked, 
then student 2 has access to student 1's account.

From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 9:32 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

Sure so scenarios where you're teaching classes that require changes to the OS 
to accomplish the class makes good sense and I'd not argue against a solution 
like DeepFreeze in that case.

In the case of things like wallpaper and user profile stuff, are you not using 
named user accounts for your students? That solves a bunch of this on the spot.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132

From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 7:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

We teach classes and let the students make any and all changes to the desktop 
environment.
Here's one example.  Student comes in and sets the desktop wallpaper to his 
favorite pinup gal.  Next student doesn't like it, but is a beginner and 
doesn't know how to change it to something else.  Reboot and the pin up gal is 
gone.
Also, I've seen some programs/apps that can now be installed without admin 
rights, Google Chrome for example.
Not a problem with Deep Freeze.

I'm sure there are other ways to do this, but DeepFreeze works great in our 
environment.

From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2013 4:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

I've worked at a lot of customers that use DeepFreeze and similar products and 
I'm not a huge fan of the concept in general. It makes the overall lifecycle 
maintenance of a desktop environment a heck of a lot more complicated.

The question I always pose (and usually don't get much of a response to), is 
what problems/issues is DeepFreeze protecting you from that running as a local 
user wouldn't solve?

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132

From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2013 11:33 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

Not free, but we could not function at the school without DeepFreeze.

From: Bambi J Saastad [mailto:bambi.j.saas...@seagate.com]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 11:36 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Replacement for SteadyState

Hello
I was wondering if any of you could suggest a replacement for SteadyState.
I have a roomful of pc's that the factory users use for browsing etc that I am 
replacing with Windows 7 Pro that need to be locked down.

Can anyone suggest a product that does the same thing, wipe out any changes on 
reboot?

TIA
B


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security 

RE: Replacement for SteadyState

2013-01-07 Thread Glen Johnson
And that's why there are choices.
I could achieve the same with Citrix... but that's another expense, learning 
and such.
Not saying it's good or bad, just that what we are using works well for us, so 
no plans to change at the moment.

From: kz2...@googlemail.com [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 9:40 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Replacement for SteadyState

You could achieve much the same end with Citrix Provisioning Services, except 
you'd have the options of personal vDisk as well.

I have to admit I'm not a fan of the DeepFreeze/SteadyState approaches - some 
threats don't need to be persistent beyond a reboot to wreak havoc. I'm more 
inclined towards good GPOs and app management coupled with maybe PVS and 
StrataApps.

Cheers,


JR
Sent from my Blackberry, which may be an antique but delivers email RELIABLY

From: Glen Johnson gjohn...@vhcc.edumailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 13:42:08 +
To: NT System Admin 
Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
ReplyTo: NT System Admin Issues 
ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

We teach classes and let the students make any and all changes to the desktop 
environment.
Here's one example.  Student comes in and sets the desktop wallpaper to his 
favorite pinup gal.  Next student doesn't like it, but is a beginner and 
doesn't know how to change it to something else.  Reboot and the pin up gal is 
gone.
Also, I've seen some programs/apps that can now be installed without admin 
rights, Google Chrome for example.
Not a problem with Deep Freeze.

I'm sure there are other ways to do this, but DeepFreeze works great in our 
environment.

From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2013 4:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

I've worked at a lot of customers that use DeepFreeze and similar products and 
I'm not a huge fan of the concept in general. It makes the overall lifecycle 
maintenance of a desktop environment a heck of a lot more complicated.

The question I always pose (and usually don't get much of a response to), is 
what problems/issues is DeepFreeze protecting you from that running as a local 
user wouldn't solve?

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132

From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2013 11:33 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

Not free, but we could not function at the school without DeepFreeze.

From: Bambi J Saastad [mailto:bambi.j.saas...@seagate.com]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 11:36 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Replacement for SteadyState

Hello
I was wondering if any of you could suggest a replacement for SteadyState.
I have a roomful of pc's that the factory users use for browsing etc that I am 
replacing with Windows 7 Pro that need to be locked down.

Can anyone suggest a product that does the same thing, wipe out any changes on 
reboot?

TIA
B


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com

RE: Time sync

2013-01-07 Thread Ken Cornetet
We are running ESX 5. To conserve SAN storage, we provision virtuals with the 
bare minimum needed disk space because it is so easy to extend disks later 
(extend the VMDK in VMWare, extend in Windows, done). No down time, and no 
wasted disk. We don't have to spend a lot of time trying to anticipate how big 
the disks will get and wasting disk if we guess too high.

In HyperV, you can't extend disks without shutting down the virtual - 
seriously. 

I can't for the life of me figure out why MS isn't fixing this instead of 
adding silly features like 4TB of guest RAM. And, I also wonder why HyperV 
users aren't howling about this.

-Original Message-
From: Michael Leone [mailto:oozerd...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 9:43 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Time sync

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Ken Cornetet ken.corne...@kimball.com wrote:
 Lol, how many times do you need 64 vCPUs or 4TB of guest Ram versus 
 needing to extend a disk?

I run VMware ESXi 5.0, and I know I have had to extend a disk any number of 
times. And Win2008 makes extending the boot disk so much easier, too.

My largest VM has 16G of RAM, and I was even leery of that. And I have
6 hosts with 512G RAM each ...

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin



RE: Replacement for SteadyState

2013-01-07 Thread Kennedy, Jim

 how do you handle situations where students don't logout before they 
leave.. then student 2 has access to student 1's account.

Self-correcting problem.  Student 2 deletes all of Students 1's stuff and 
Student 1 never does it again. With 7,000 students we have very little trouble 
with this issue actually.

Also we set inactivity timeouts so they auto log out.

I would not go with generic accounts. There is no accountability, no tracking 
of what they do


From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 10:04 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

No on the student login.  We use a generic account per classroom.
We've talked about moving to a individual student login, but I'm not sure we 
need or want that.
For others that have gone that route, how do you handle situations where 
students don't logout before they leave.
You either have a locked computer, logged on as said student or if not locked, 
then student 2 has access to student 1's account.

From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 9:32 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

Sure so scenarios where you're teaching classes that require changes to the OS 
to accomplish the class makes good sense and I'd not argue against a solution 
like DeepFreeze in that case.

In the case of things like wallpaper and user profile stuff, are you not using 
named user accounts for your students? That solves a bunch of this on the spot.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132

From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 7:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

We teach classes and let the students make any and all changes to the desktop 
environment.
Here's one example.  Student comes in and sets the desktop wallpaper to his 
favorite pinup gal.  Next student doesn't like it, but is a beginner and 
doesn't know how to change it to something else.  Reboot and the pin up gal is 
gone.
Also, I've seen some programs/apps that can now be installed without admin 
rights, Google Chrome for example.
Not a problem with Deep Freeze.

I'm sure there are other ways to do this, but DeepFreeze works great in our 
environment.

From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2013 4:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

I've worked at a lot of customers that use DeepFreeze and similar products and 
I'm not a huge fan of the concept in general. It makes the overall lifecycle 
maintenance of a desktop environment a heck of a lot more complicated.

The question I always pose (and usually don't get much of a response to), is 
what problems/issues is DeepFreeze protecting you from that running as a local 
user wouldn't solve?

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132

From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2013 11:33 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

Not free, but we could not function at the school without DeepFreeze.

From: Bambi J Saastad [mailto:bambi.j.saas...@seagate.com]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 11:36 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Replacement for SteadyState

Hello
I was wondering if any of you could suggest a replacement for SteadyState.
I have a roomful of pc's that the factory users use for browsing etc that I am 
replacing with Windows 7 Pro that need to be locked down.

Can anyone suggest a product that does the same thing, wipe out any changes on 
reboot?

TIA
B


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~


Re: Replacement for SteadyState

2013-01-07 Thread kz20fl
If they leave the computer locked, power it off and on. If they lose work - 
then learn not to leave it locked.

Sent from my Blackberry, which may be an antique but delivers email RELIABLY

-Original Message-
From: Glen Johnson gjohn...@vhcc.edu
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 14:57:13 
To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Reply-To: NT System Admin Issues 
ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.comSubject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

No on the student login.  We use a generic account per classroom.
We've talked about moving to a individual student login, but I'm not sure we 
need or want that.
For others that have gone that route, how do you handle situations where 
students don't logout before they leave.
You either have a locked computer, logged on as said student or if not locked, 
then student 2 has access to student 1's account.

From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 9:32 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

Sure so scenarios where you're teaching classes that require changes to the OS 
to accomplish the class makes good sense and I'd not argue against a solution 
like DeepFreeze in that case.

In the case of things like wallpaper and user profile stuff, are you not using 
named user accounts for your students? That solves a bunch of this on the spot.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132

From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 7:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

We teach classes and let the students make any and all changes to the desktop 
environment.
Here's one example.  Student comes in and sets the desktop wallpaper to his 
favorite pinup gal.  Next student doesn't like it, but is a beginner and 
doesn't know how to change it to something else.  Reboot and the pin up gal is 
gone.
Also, I've seen some programs/apps that can now be installed without admin 
rights, Google Chrome for example.
Not a problem with Deep Freeze.

I'm sure there are other ways to do this, but DeepFreeze works great in our 
environment.

From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2013 4:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

I've worked at a lot of customers that use DeepFreeze and similar products and 
I'm not a huge fan of the concept in general. It makes the overall lifecycle 
maintenance of a desktop environment a heck of a lot more complicated.

The question I always pose (and usually don't get much of a response to), is 
what problems/issues is DeepFreeze protecting you from that running as a local 
user wouldn't solve?

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132

From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2013 11:33 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

Not free, but we could not function at the school without DeepFreeze.

From: Bambi J Saastad [mailto:bambi.j.saas...@seagate.com]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 11:36 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Replacement for SteadyState

Hello
I was wondering if any of you could suggest a replacement for SteadyState.
I have a roomful of pc's that the factory users use for browsing etc that I am 
replacing with Windows 7 Pro that need to be locked down.

Can anyone suggest a product that does the same thing, wipe out any changes on 
reboot?

TIA
B


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 

RE: DC server 2003 Time service

2013-01-07 Thread itli...@imcu.com
From my PC:

(Looks like I have everything working except the first one.  It is an
old 2003 DC.)  Why is it being so difficult?

All the other 2008 DC's and 2003 DC's are behaving except it?

Where can I look?

 

C:\windows\system32w32tm /monitor

030405MF663P44.IMCU.local[10.0.10.5:123]:

ICMP: 6ms delay

NTP: +0.0225576s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local

RefID: tick.usno.navy.mil [192.5.41.40]

Stratum: 2

0304090304zu55.IMCU.local[10.0.50.205:123]:

ICMP: 0ms delay

NTP: +0.0127904s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local

RefID: 081012210GL255.IMCU.local [10.0.50.2]

Stratum: 4

0302040304zu77.IMCU.local[10.0.90.205:123]:

ICMP: 13ms delay

NTP: +0.0002909s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local

RefID: 081012210GL255.IMCU.local [10.0.50.2]

Stratum: 4

0810123404XB44.IMCU.local[10.0.10.2:123]:

ICMP: 9ms delay

NTP: +0.0136959s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local

RefID: 081012210GL255.IMCU.local [10.0.50.2]

Stratum: 4

081012210GL255.IMCU.local *** PDC ***[10.0.50.2:123]:

ICMP: 0ms delay

NTP: +0.000s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local

RefID: white.web-ster.com [65.182.224.39]

Stratum: 3

08101223061O77.IMCU.local[10.0.90.2:123]:

ICMP: 10ms delay

NTP: +0.0069312s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local

RefID: 081012210GL255.IMCU.local [10.0.50.2]

Stratum: 4

 

From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com] 
Posted At: Friday, January 4, 2013 12:05 AM
Posted To: itli...@imcu.com
Conversation: DC server 2003 Time service
Subject: RE: DC server 2003 Time service

 

You need to read this:

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc773013(v=ws.10).aspx

 

Cheers

Ken

 

From: itli...@imcu.com [mailto:itli...@imcu.com] 
Sent: Friday, 4 January 2013 3:33 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: DC server 2003 Time service

 

I am bringing 2008 R2 servers on line to take the FSMO jobs.

I have set one of them as a W32time server but my pc's are still getting
time from the old

2003 DC SNTP server???

Any ideas on how to correct this?

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: Time sync

2013-01-07 Thread Michael B. Smith
Because the overhead associated with dynamic disks in Hyper-V v3 is in the very 
low single digits. We don't spend any time on this process, thin provisioning 
still works seamlessly, and we get on with our lives. 

:)

-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:ken.corne...@kimball.com] 
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 10:06 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Time sync

We are running ESX 5. To conserve SAN storage, we provision virtuals with the 
bare minimum needed disk space because it is so easy to extend disks later 
(extend the VMDK in VMWare, extend in Windows, done). No down time, and no 
wasted disk. We don't have to spend a lot of time trying to anticipate how big 
the disks will get and wasting disk if we guess too high.

In HyperV, you can't extend disks without shutting down the virtual - 
seriously. 

I can't for the life of me figure out why MS isn't fixing this instead of 
adding silly features like 4TB of guest RAM. And, I also wonder why HyperV 
users aren't howling about this.

-Original Message-
From: Michael Leone [mailto:oozerd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 9:43 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Time sync

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Ken Cornetet ken.corne...@kimball.com wrote:
 Lol, how many times do you need 64 vCPUs or 4TB of guest Ram versus 
 needing to extend a disk?

I run VMware ESXi 5.0, and I know I have had to extend a disk any number of 
times. And Win2008 makes extending the boot disk so much easier, too.

My largest VM has 16G of RAM, and I was even leery of that. And I have
6 hosts with 512G RAM each ...

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin



RE: Replacement for SteadyState

2013-01-07 Thread Brian Desmond
Yeah ... For all the universities I've worked at and had this discussion, this 
perceived problem has never morphed into an actual issue.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132

From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 9:09 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState


 how do you handle situations where students don't logout before they 
leave.. then student 2 has access to student 1's account.

Self-correcting problem.  Student 2 deletes all of Students 1's stuff and 
Student 1 never does it again. With 7,000 students we have very little trouble 
with this issue actually.

Also we set inactivity timeouts so they auto log out.

I would not go with generic accounts. There is no accountability, no tracking 
of what they do


From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 10:04 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

No on the student login.  We use a generic account per classroom.
We've talked about moving to a individual student login, but I'm not sure we 
need or want that.
For others that have gone that route, how do you handle situations where 
students don't logout before they leave.
You either have a locked computer, logged on as said student or if not locked, 
then student 2 has access to student 1's account.

From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 9:32 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

Sure so scenarios where you're teaching classes that require changes to the OS 
to accomplish the class makes good sense and I'd not argue against a solution 
like DeepFreeze in that case.

In the case of things like wallpaper and user profile stuff, are you not using 
named user accounts for your students? That solves a bunch of this on the spot.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132

From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 7:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

We teach classes and let the students make any and all changes to the desktop 
environment.
Here's one example.  Student comes in and sets the desktop wallpaper to his 
favorite pinup gal.  Next student doesn't like it, but is a beginner and 
doesn't know how to change it to something else.  Reboot and the pin up gal is 
gone.
Also, I've seen some programs/apps that can now be installed without admin 
rights, Google Chrome for example.
Not a problem with Deep Freeze.

I'm sure there are other ways to do this, but DeepFreeze works great in our 
environment.

From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2013 4:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

I've worked at a lot of customers that use DeepFreeze and similar products and 
I'm not a huge fan of the concept in general. It makes the overall lifecycle 
maintenance of a desktop environment a heck of a lot more complicated.

The question I always pose (and usually don't get much of a response to), is 
what problems/issues is DeepFreeze protecting you from that running as a local 
user wouldn't solve?

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132

From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2013 11:33 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

Not free, but we could not function at the school without DeepFreeze.

From: Bambi J Saastad [mailto:bambi.j.saas...@seagate.com]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 11:36 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Replacement for SteadyState

Hello
I was wondering if any of you could suggest a replacement for SteadyState.
I have a roomful of pc's that the factory users use for browsing etc that I am 
replacing with Windows 7 Pro that need to be locked down.

Can anyone suggest a product that does the same thing, wipe out any changes on 
reboot?

TIA
B


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ 

RE: 'Dementia' Wipes Out Attacker Footprints In Memory - Dark Reading

2013-01-07 Thread Ziots, Edward
Seen it already... its another tool in the anti-forensics suite...

 

Z

 

Edward E. Ziots, CISSP, Security +, Network +

Security Engineer

Lifespan Organization

ezi...@lifespan.org

 

From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 10:05 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: 'Dementia' Wipes Out Attacker Footprints In Memory - Dark
Reading

 

http://www.darkreading.com/advanced-threats/167901091/security/attacks-b
reaches/240145524/dementia-wipes-out-attacker-footprints-in-memory.html

You have to be sure to use more than one method of data extraction in
live forensics, to ensure that you're not dealing with an anti-forensics
mechanism... 

 

ASB

http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker 

Providing Expert Technology Consulting Services for the SMB market...

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Re: Time sync

2013-01-07 Thread Andrew S. Baker
You do know you can thin provision in both VMWare and HyperV, right?

Thus, you can stipulate that a disk have a max size of 200GB, but if you're
only using 50GB, it will only be 50GB in size.

Thus, no reason for Windows users to howl.

Plus, Windows doesn't mind extending non-boot disks, but it's not all that
happy about having its boot disk extended, no matter what the underlying
hypervisor.





*ASB
**http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker*
**Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations  Information Security) for
the SMB market…***





On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Ken Cornetet ken.corne...@kimball.comwrote:

 We are running ESX 5. To conserve SAN storage, we provision virtuals with
 the bare minimum needed disk space because it is so easy to extend disks
 later (extend the VMDK in VMWare, extend in Windows, done). No down time,
 and no wasted disk. We don't have to spend a lot of time trying to
 anticipate how big the disks will get and wasting disk if we guess too high.

 In HyperV, you can't extend disks without shutting down the virtual -
 seriously.

 I can't for the life of me figure out why MS isn't fixing this instead of
 adding silly features like 4TB of guest RAM. And, I also wonder why HyperV
 users aren't howling about this.

 -Original Message-
 From: Michael Leone [mailto:oozerd...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 9:43 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: Re: Time sync

 On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Ken Cornetet ken.corne...@kimball.com
 wrote:
  Lol, how many times do you need 64 vCPUs or 4TB of guest Ram versus
  needing to extend a disk?

 I run VMware ESXi 5.0, and I know I have had to extend a disk any number
 of times. And Win2008 makes extending the boot disk so much easier, too.

 My largest VM has 16G of RAM, and I was even leery of that. And I have
 6 hosts with 512G RAM each ...

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
 http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin





  *ASB*

*http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker**

*Providing Expert Technology Consulting Services for the SMB market…*

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: Replacement for SteadyState

2013-01-07 Thread David Lum
+1.   Requires mindset change and buy-in of powers-that-be, which sometimes can 
be a hurdle...

From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 7:09 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState


 how do you handle situations where students don't logout before they 
leave.. then student 2 has access to student 1's account.

Self-correcting problem.  Student 2 deletes all of Students 1's stuff and 
Student 1 never does it again. With 7,000 students we have very little trouble 
with this issue actually.

Also we set inactivity timeouts so they auto log out.

I would not go with generic accounts. There is no accountability, no tracking 
of what they do


From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 10:04 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

No on the student login.  We use a generic account per classroom.
We've talked about moving to a individual student login, but I'm not sure we 
need or want that.
For others that have gone that route, how do you handle situations where 
students don't logout before they leave.
You either have a locked computer, logged on as said student or if not locked, 
then student 2 has access to student 1's account.

From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 9:32 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

Sure so scenarios where you're teaching classes that require changes to the OS 
to accomplish the class makes good sense and I'd not argue against a solution 
like DeepFreeze in that case.

In the case of things like wallpaper and user profile stuff, are you not using 
named user accounts for your students? That solves a bunch of this on the spot.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132

From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 7:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

We teach classes and let the students make any and all changes to the desktop 
environment.
Here's one example.  Student comes in and sets the desktop wallpaper to his 
favorite pinup gal.  Next student doesn't like it, but is a beginner and 
doesn't know how to change it to something else.  Reboot and the pin up gal is 
gone.
Also, I've seen some programs/apps that can now be installed without admin 
rights, Google Chrome for example.
Not a problem with Deep Freeze.

I'm sure there are other ways to do this, but DeepFreeze works great in our 
environment.

From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2013 4:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

I've worked at a lot of customers that use DeepFreeze and similar products and 
I'm not a huge fan of the concept in general. It makes the overall lifecycle 
maintenance of a desktop environment a heck of a lot more complicated.

The question I always pose (and usually don't get much of a response to), is 
what problems/issues is DeepFreeze protecting you from that running as a local 
user wouldn't solve?

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132

From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2013 11:33 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

Not free, but we could not function at the school without DeepFreeze.

From: Bambi J Saastad [mailto:bambi.j.saas...@seagate.com]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 11:36 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Replacement for SteadyState

Hello
I was wondering if any of you could suggest a replacement for SteadyState.
I have a roomful of pc's that the factory users use for browsing etc that I am 
replacing with Windows 7 Pro that need to be locked down.

Can anyone suggest a product that does the same thing, wipe out any changes on 
reboot?

TIA
B


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an 

RE: Replacement for SteadyState

2013-01-07 Thread Glen Johnson
Yes, and after 10 times, the computer is corrupted and has to be reloaded, 10 
calls to the helpdesk and wasted time.
Not an issue with DeepFreeze.  Power it off 100 times and still no corruption

From: kz2...@googlemail.com [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 10:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Replacement for SteadyState

If they leave the computer locked, power it off and on. If they lose work - 
then learn not to leave it locked.
Sent from my Blackberry, which may be an antique but delivers email RELIABLY

From: Glen Johnson gjohn...@vhcc.edumailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 14:57:13 +
To: NT System Admin 
Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
ReplyTo: NT System Admin Issues 
ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

No on the student login.  We use a generic account per classroom.
We've talked about moving to a individual student login, but I'm not sure we 
need or want that.
For others that have gone that route, how do you handle situations where 
students don't logout before they leave.
You either have a locked computer, logged on as said student or if not locked, 
then student 2 has access to student 1's account.

From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 9:32 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

Sure so scenarios where you're teaching classes that require changes to the OS 
to accomplish the class makes good sense and I'd not argue against a solution 
like DeepFreeze in that case.

In the case of things like wallpaper and user profile stuff, are you not using 
named user accounts for your students? That solves a bunch of this on the spot.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132

From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 7:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

We teach classes and let the students make any and all changes to the desktop 
environment.
Here's one example.  Student comes in and sets the desktop wallpaper to his 
favorite pinup gal.  Next student doesn't like it, but is a beginner and 
doesn't know how to change it to something else.  Reboot and the pin up gal is 
gone.
Also, I've seen some programs/apps that can now be installed without admin 
rights, Google Chrome for example.
Not a problem with Deep Freeze.

I'm sure there are other ways to do this, but DeepFreeze works great in our 
environment.

From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2013 4:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

I've worked at a lot of customers that use DeepFreeze and similar products and 
I'm not a huge fan of the concept in general. It makes the overall lifecycle 
maintenance of a desktop environment a heck of a lot more complicated.

The question I always pose (and usually don't get much of a response to), is 
what problems/issues is DeepFreeze protecting you from that running as a local 
user wouldn't solve?

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132

From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2013 11:33 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

Not free, but we could not function at the school without DeepFreeze.

From: Bambi J Saastad [mailto:bambi.j.saas...@seagate.com]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 11:36 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Replacement for SteadyState

Hello
I was wondering if any of you could suggest a replacement for SteadyState.
I have a roomful of pc's that the factory users use for browsing etc that I am 
replacing with Windows 7 Pro that need to be locked down.

Can anyone suggest a product that does the same thing, wipe out any changes on 
reboot?

TIA
B


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 

Re: Replacement for SteadyState

2013-01-07 Thread Vicky Spelshaus
If they lose work - then learn not to leave it locked.

This exactly!  As we use DeepFreeze in the labs, this is also how our
students remember to not save to the desktop.

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 9:15 AM, kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:

 If they leave the computer locked, power it off and on. If they lose work
 - then learn not to leave it locked.

 Sent from my Blackberry, which may be an antique but delivers email
 RELIABLY
 --
 *From: * Glen Johnson gjohn...@vhcc.edu
 *Date: *Mon, 7 Jan 2013 14:57:13 +
 *To: *NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
 *ReplyTo: * NT System Admin Issues 
 ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
 *Subject: *RE: Replacement for SteadyState

  No on the student login.  We use a generic account per classroom.

 We’ve talked about moving to a individual student login, but I’m not sure
 we need or want that.

 For others that have gone that route, how do you handle situations where
 students don’t logout before they leave.

 You either have a locked computer, logged on as said student or if not
 locked, then student 2 has access to student 1’s account.

 ** **

 *From:* Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
 *Sent:* Monday, January 07, 2013 9:32 AM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* RE: Replacement for SteadyState

 ** **

 *Sure so scenarios where you’re teaching classes that require changes to
 the OS to accomplish the class makes good sense and I’d not argue against a
 solution like DeepFreeze in that case.*

 * *

 *In the case of things like wallpaper and user profile stuff, are you not
 using named user accounts for your students? That solves a bunch of this on
 the spot. *

 * *

 *Thanks,*

 *Brian Desmond*

 *br...@briandesmond.com*

 * *

 *w – 312.625.1438 | c – 312.731.3132*

 * *

 *From:* Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
 *Sent:* Monday, January 7, 2013 7:42 AM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* RE: Replacement for SteadyState

 ** **

 We teach classes and let the students make any and all changes to the
 desktop environment.

 Here’s one example.  Student comes in and sets the desktop wallpaper to
 his favorite pinup gal.  Next student doesn’t like it, but is a beginner
 and doesn’t know how to change it to something else.  Reboot and the pin up
 gal is gone.

 Also, I’ve seen some programs/apps that can now be installed without admin
 rights, Google Chrome for example.

 Not a problem with Deep Freeze.

 ** **

 I’m sure there are other ways to do this, but DeepFreeze works great in
 our environment.

 ** **

 *From:* Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.combr...@briandesmond.com]

 *Sent:* Sunday, January 06, 2013 4:36 PM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* RE: Replacement for SteadyState

 ** **

 *I’ve worked at a lot of customers that use DeepFreeze and similar
 products and I’m not a huge fan of the concept in general. It makes the
 overall lifecycle maintenance of a desktop environment a heck of a lot more
 complicated.*

 * *

 *The question I always pose (and usually don’t get much of a response
 to), is “what problems/issues is DeepFreeze protecting you from that
 running as a local user wouldn’t solve?”*

 * *

 *Thanks,*

 *Brian Desmond*

 *br...@briandesmond.com*

 * *

 *w – 312.625.1438 | c – 312.731.3132*

 * *

 *From:* Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
 *Sent:* Friday, January 4, 2013 11:33 AM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* RE: Replacement for SteadyState

 ** **

 Not free, but we could not function at the school without DeepFreeze.

 ** **

 *From:* Bambi J Saastad 
 [mailto:bambi.j.saas...@seagate.combambi.j.saas...@seagate.com]

 *Sent:* Friday, January 04, 2013 11:36 AM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* Replacement for SteadyState

 ** **

 Hello

 I was wondering if any of you could suggest a replacement for SteadyState.
 

 I have a roomful of pc's that the factory users use for browsing etc that
 I am replacing with Windows 7 Pro that need to be locked down.

 ** **

 Can anyone suggest a product that does the same thing, wipe out any
 changes on reboot?

 TIA
 B
 

 ** **

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ 

Re: Replacement for SteadyState

2013-01-07 Thread Jonathan Link
Universities are a much different beast than primary and secondary schools.

1) Logging out was part of the Acceptable Use Policy, meaning it is the
student's responsibility to log out.
2) Teachers were taught to double check that students logged out.
3) Teachers in labs, put it on their syllabus, and those who used labs
regularly but were not actually in a lab, did so, as well, to remind
students that not logging off could result in a loss of work.
4) Make sure that you give teachers some mechanism for resetting student
passwords to some default password, and unlocking the account.  This became
a huge problem in the school I worked at previously.  I had to roll my own
solution at the time.  Having a solution for this in place before you
switch over will make life so much easier.
5) Disable locking of the computer for student accounts.

I'm probably missing something, but it's been 7 years since I left that job.






On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.comwrote:

  *Yeah ... For all the universities I’ve worked at and had this
 discussion, this perceived problem has never morphed into an actual issue.
 *

 * *

 *Thanks,*

 *Brian Desmond*

 *br...@briandesmond.com*

 * *

 *w – 312.625.1438 | c – 312.731.3132*

 * *

 *From:* Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
 *Sent:* Monday, January 7, 2013 9:09 AM

 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* RE: Replacement for SteadyState

  ** **

 ** **

 “…….. how do you handle situations where students don’t logout before they
 leave…… then student 2 has access to student 1’s account.”

 ** **

 Self-correcting problem.  Student 2 deletes all of Students 1’s stuff and
 Student 1 never does it again. With 7,000 students we have very little
 trouble with this issue actually.

 ** **

 Also we set inactivity timeouts so they auto log out.

 ** **

 I would not go with generic accounts. There is no accountability, no
 tracking of what they do….

 ** **

 ** **

 *From:* Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
 *Sent:* Monday, January 07, 2013 10:04 AM

 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* RE: Replacement for SteadyState

  ** **

 No on the student login.  We use a generic account per classroom.

 We’ve talked about moving to a individual student login, but I’m not sure
 we need or want that.

 For others that have gone that route, how do you handle situations where
 students don’t logout before they leave.

 You either have a locked computer, logged on as said student or if not
 locked, then student 2 has access to student 1’s account.

 ** **

 *From:* Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.combr...@briandesmond.com]

 *Sent:* Monday, January 07, 2013 9:32 AM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* RE: Replacement for SteadyState

 ** **

 *Sure so scenarios where you’re teaching classes that require changes to
 the OS to accomplish the class makes good sense and I’d not argue against a
 solution like DeepFreeze in that case.*

 * *

 *In the case of things like wallpaper and user profile stuff, are you not
 using named user accounts for your students? That solves a bunch of this on
 the spot. *

 * *

 *Thanks,*

 *Brian Desmond*

 *br...@briandesmond.com*

 * *

 *w – 312.625.1438 | c – 312.731.3132*

 * *

 *From:* Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
 *Sent:* Monday, January 7, 2013 7:42 AM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* RE: Replacement for SteadyState

 ** **

 We teach classes and let the students make any and all changes to the
 desktop environment.

 Here’s one example.  Student comes in and sets the desktop wallpaper to
 his favorite pinup gal.  Next student doesn’t like it, but is a beginner
 and doesn’t know how to change it to something else.  Reboot and the pin up
 gal is gone.

 Also, I’ve seen some programs/apps that can now be installed without admin
 rights, Google Chrome for example.

 Not a problem with Deep Freeze.

 ** **

 I’m sure there are other ways to do this, but DeepFreeze works great in
 our environment.

 ** **

 *From:* Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.combr...@briandesmond.com]

 *Sent:* Sunday, January 06, 2013 4:36 PM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* RE: Replacement for SteadyState

 ** **

 *I’ve worked at a lot of customers that use DeepFreeze and similar
 products and I’m not a huge fan of the concept in general. It makes the
 overall lifecycle maintenance of a desktop environment a heck of a lot more
 complicated.*

 * *

 *The question I always pose (and usually don’t get much of a response
 to), is “what problems/issues is DeepFreeze protecting you from that
 running as a local user wouldn’t solve?”*

 * *

 *Thanks,*

 *Brian Desmond*

 *br...@briandesmond.com*

 * *

 *w – 312.625.1438 | c – 312.731.3132*

 * *

 *From:* Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
 *Sent:* Friday, January 4, 2013 11:33 AM
 *To:* NT 

RE: DC server 2003 Time service

2013-01-07 Thread Coleman, Hunter
On the old 2003 DC, check 
HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\W32Time\Parameters\Type. It should be 
NT5D5. If it shows NTP, then the DC is synchronizing time with an external 
time source. It was probably the forest root PDCe in the past, but if it no 
longer is then on that DC run
Net stop w32time
W32tm /unregister
W32tm /register
Net start w32time

That will clear out the old time configuration and reset it to a domain 
hierarchy configuration.

From: itli...@imcu.com [mailto:itli...@imcu.com]
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 8:22 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DC server 2003 Time service

From my PC:
(Looks like I have everything working except the first one.  It is an old 2003 
DC.)  Why is it being so difficult?
All the other 2008 DC's and 2003 DC's are behaving except it?
Where can I look?

C:\windows\system32w32tm /monitor
030405MF663P44.IMCU.local[10.0.10.5:123]:
ICMP: 6ms delay
NTP: +0.0225576s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local
RefID: tick.usno.navy.mil [192.5.41.40]
Stratum: 2
0304090304zu55.IMCU.local[10.0.50.205:123]:
ICMP: 0ms delay
NTP: +0.0127904s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local
RefID: 081012210GL255.IMCU.local [10.0.50.2]
Stratum: 4
0302040304zu77.IMCU.local[10.0.90.205:123]:
ICMP: 13ms delay
NTP: +0.0002909s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local
RefID: 081012210GL255.IMCU.local [10.0.50.2]
Stratum: 4
0810123404XB44.IMCU.local[10.0.10.2:123]:
ICMP: 9ms delay
NTP: +0.0136959s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local
RefID: 081012210GL255.IMCU.local [10.0.50.2]
Stratum: 4
081012210GL255.IMCU.local *** PDC ***[10.0.50.2:123]:
ICMP: 0ms delay
NTP: +0.000s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local
RefID: white.web-ster.com [65.182.224.39]
Stratum: 3
08101223061O77.IMCU.local[10.0.90.2:123]:
ICMP: 10ms delay
NTP: +0.0069312s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local
RefID: 081012210GL255.IMCU.local [10.0.50.2]
Stratum: 4

From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Posted At: Friday, January 4, 2013 12:05 AM
Posted To: itli...@imcu.commailto:itli...@imcu.com
Conversation: DC server 2003 Time service
Subject: RE: DC server 2003 Time service

You need to read this:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc773013(v=ws.10).aspx

Cheers
Ken

From: itli...@imcu.commailto:itli...@imcu.com [mailto:itli...@imcu.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 January 2013 3:33 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: DC server 2003 Time service

I am bringing 2008 R2 servers on line to take the FSMO jobs.
I have set one of them as a W32time server but my pc's are still getting time 
from the old
2003 DC SNTP server???
Any ideas on how to correct this?

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: Time sync

2013-01-07 Thread Ken Cornetet
Thin provisioning seems risky to me. Seems like you are always in danger of 
non-critical virtuals deciding to use more disk space thus exhausting  physical 
space which would cause critical VMs to pause if they happen to need more space.

We tried thin provisioning  back in the old VirtualServer days, and I ran into 
this problem a few times.

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 10:28 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Time sync

Because the overhead associated with dynamic disks in Hyper-V v3 is in the very 
low single digits. We don't spend any time on this process, thin provisioning 
still works seamlessly, and we get on with our lives. 

:)

-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:ken.corne...@kimball.com]
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 10:06 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Time sync

We are running ESX 5. To conserve SAN storage, we provision virtuals with the 
bare minimum needed disk space because it is so easy to extend disks later 
(extend the VMDK in VMWare, extend in Windows, done). No down time, and no 
wasted disk. We don't have to spend a lot of time trying to anticipate how big 
the disks will get and wasting disk if we guess too high.

In HyperV, you can't extend disks without shutting down the virtual - 
seriously. 

I can't for the life of me figure out why MS isn't fixing this instead of 
adding silly features like 4TB of guest RAM. And, I also wonder why HyperV 
users aren't howling about this.

-Original Message-
From: Michael Leone [mailto:oozerd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 9:43 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Time sync

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Ken Cornetet ken.corne...@kimball.com wrote:
 Lol, how many times do you need 64 vCPUs or 4TB of guest Ram versus 
 needing to extend a disk?

I run VMware ESXi 5.0, and I know I have had to extend a disk any number of 
times. And Win2008 makes extending the boot disk so much easier, too.

My largest VM has 16G of RAM, and I was even leery of that. And I have
6 hosts with 512G RAM each ...

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin



Re: Time sync

2013-01-07 Thread Michael Leone
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote:

 You do know you can thin provision in both VMWare and HyperV, right?

 Thus, you can stipulate that a disk have a max size of 200GB, but if you're 
 only using 50GB, it will only be 50GB in size.

I never use think disks, personally. Not for production use - possibly
for a test VM. I'd be afraid of what would happen if the disk needed
to expand, and there wasn't enough available disk space. With
(hopefully) sensibly sized thick disks, you know the running machines
will continue to run, up to the assigned disk maximum. And with an
alerting system that notifies you of free disk left, you can deal with
the situation ahead of time (usually). If a production server needs
space in the middle of the night, and there's not enough room on that
datastore, that can be bad  altho I guess storage profiles (for
VMware) might be able to help with that. I guess Hyper-V has a similar
feature, to move VMs between datastores based on pre-defined profiles.

 Thus, no reason for Windows users to howl.

 Plus, Windows doesn't mind extending non-boot disks, but it's not all that 
 happy about having its boot disk extended, no matter what the underlying 
 hypervisor.

True. But it's a lot better and easier with Win2008, and I imagine at
least as easy with 2012.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


RE: Replacement for SteadyState

2013-01-07 Thread Brian Desmond
When I worked for a K-12 (~450K students), we issued accounts to all students 
at any school that was using our central AD. I've seen the same practice at the 
other K-12 districts I've worked at.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132

From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 10:12 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Replacement for SteadyState

Universities are a much different beast than primary and secondary schools.

1) Logging out was part of the Acceptable Use Policy, meaning it is the 
student's responsibility to log out.
2) Teachers were taught to double check that students logged out.
3) Teachers in labs, put it on their syllabus, and those who used labs 
regularly but were not actually in a lab, did so, as well, to remind students 
that not logging off could result in a loss of work.
4) Make sure that you give teachers some mechanism for resetting student 
passwords to some default password, and unlocking the account.  This became a 
huge problem in the school I worked at previously.  I had to roll my own 
solution at the time.  Having a solution for this in place before you switch 
over will make life so much easier.
5) Disable locking of the computer for student accounts.

I'm probably missing something, but it's been 7 years since I left that job.





On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Brian Desmond 
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com wrote:
Yeah ... For all the universities I've worked at and had this discussion, this 
perceived problem has never morphed into an actual issue.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438tel:312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132tel:312.731.3132

From: Kennedy, Jim 
[mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgmailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 9:09 AM

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState


 how do you handle situations where students don't logout before they 
leave.. then student 2 has access to student 1's account.

Self-correcting problem.  Student 2 deletes all of Students 1's stuff and 
Student 1 never does it again. With 7,000 students we have very little trouble 
with this issue actually.

Also we set inactivity timeouts so they auto log out.

I would not go with generic accounts. There is no accountability, no tracking 
of what they do


From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 10:04 AM

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

No on the student login.  We use a generic account per classroom.
We've talked about moving to a individual student login, but I'm not sure we 
need or want that.
For others that have gone that route, how do you handle situations where 
students don't logout before they leave.
You either have a locked computer, logged on as said student or if not locked, 
then student 2 has access to student 1's account.

From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 9:32 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

Sure so scenarios where you're teaching classes that require changes to the OS 
to accomplish the class makes good sense and I'd not argue against a solution 
like DeepFreeze in that case.

In the case of things like wallpaper and user profile stuff, are you not using 
named user accounts for your students? That solves a bunch of this on the spot.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438tel:312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132tel:312.731.3132

From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 7:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

We teach classes and let the students make any and all changes to the desktop 
environment.
Here's one example.  Student comes in and sets the desktop wallpaper to his 
favorite pinup gal.  Next student doesn't like it, but is a beginner and 
doesn't know how to change it to something else.  Reboot and the pin up gal is 
gone.
Also, I've seen some programs/apps that can now be installed without admin 
rights, Google Chrome for example.
Not a problem with Deep Freeze.

I'm sure there are other ways to do this, but DeepFreeze works great in our 
environment.

From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2013 4:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

I've worked at a lot of customers that use DeepFreeze and similar products and 
I'm not a huge fan of the concept in general. It makes the overall lifecycle 
maintenance of a desktop environment a heck of a lot more complicated.

The question I always pose (and usually don't get much of a response to), is 
what problems/issues is DeepFreeze protecting you from that running as a local 
user wouldn't solve?

Thanks,

Re: Time sync

2013-01-07 Thread Andrew S. Baker
Yes, over subscribing can be an issue if you don't manage your capacity
properly.

It hasn't proved to be an issue in any of the environments where I have
been.





*ASB
**http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker*
**Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations  Information Security) for
the SMB market…***





On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Ken Cornetet ken.corne...@kimball.comwrote:

 Thin provisioning seems risky to me. Seems like you are always in danger
 of non-critical virtuals deciding to use more disk space thus exhausting
  physical space which would cause critical VMs to pause if they happen to
 need more space.

 We tried thin provisioning  back in the old VirtualServer days, and I ran
 into this problem a few times.

 -Original Message-
 From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
 Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 10:28 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Time sync

 Because the overhead associated with dynamic disks in Hyper-V v3 is in the
 very low single digits. We don't spend any time on this process, thin
 provisioning still works seamlessly, and we get on with our lives.

 :)

 -Original Message-
 From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:ken.corne...@kimball.com]
 Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 10:06 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Time sync

 We are running ESX 5. To conserve SAN storage, we provision virtuals with
 the bare minimum needed disk space because it is so easy to extend disks
 later (extend the VMDK in VMWare, extend in Windows, done). No down time,
 and no wasted disk. We don't have to spend a lot of time trying to
 anticipate how big the disks will get and wasting disk if we guess too high.

 In HyperV, you can't extend disks without shutting down the virtual -
 seriously.

 I can't for the life of me figure out why MS isn't fixing this instead of
 adding silly features like 4TB of guest RAM. And, I also wonder why HyperV
 users aren't howling about this.

 -Original Message-
 From: Michael Leone [mailto:oozerd...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 9:43 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: Re: Time sync

 On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Ken Cornetet ken.corne...@kimball.com
 wrote:
  Lol, how many times do you need 64 vCPUs or 4TB of guest Ram versus
  needing to extend a disk?

 I run VMware ESXi 5.0, and I know I have had to extend a disk any number
 of times. And Win2008 makes extending the boot disk so much easier, too.

 My largest VM has 16G of RAM, and I was even leery of that. And I have
 6 hosts with 512G RAM each ...





  *ASB*

*http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker**

*Providing Expert Technology Consulting Services for the SMB market…*

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: Replacement for SteadyState

2013-01-07 Thread Glen Johnson
Good to know.
Now, the other biggie for use, user account management.
We don't yet have an automated way to create/delete the accounts.
Richmond is working on a system for that, but the vendor they contracted wants 
mega bucks to set up our server to sync with their domain.


From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 10:32 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

Yeah ... For all the universities I've worked at and had this discussion, this 
perceived problem has never morphed into an actual issue.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132

From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 9:09 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState


 how do you handle situations where students don't logout before they 
leave.. then student 2 has access to student 1's account.

Self-correcting problem.  Student 2 deletes all of Students 1's stuff and 
Student 1 never does it again. With 7,000 students we have very little trouble 
with this issue actually.

Also we set inactivity timeouts so they auto log out.

I would not go with generic accounts. There is no accountability, no tracking 
of what they do


From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 10:04 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

No on the student login.  We use a generic account per classroom.
We've talked about moving to a individual student login, but I'm not sure we 
need or want that.
For others that have gone that route, how do you handle situations where 
students don't logout before they leave.
You either have a locked computer, logged on as said student or if not locked, 
then student 2 has access to student 1's account.

From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 9:32 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

Sure so scenarios where you're teaching classes that require changes to the OS 
to accomplish the class makes good sense and I'd not argue against a solution 
like DeepFreeze in that case.

In the case of things like wallpaper and user profile stuff, are you not using 
named user accounts for your students? That solves a bunch of this on the spot.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132

From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 7:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

We teach classes and let the students make any and all changes to the desktop 
environment.
Here's one example.  Student comes in and sets the desktop wallpaper to his 
favorite pinup gal.  Next student doesn't like it, but is a beginner and 
doesn't know how to change it to something else.  Reboot and the pin up gal is 
gone.
Also, I've seen some programs/apps that can now be installed without admin 
rights, Google Chrome for example.
Not a problem with Deep Freeze.

I'm sure there are other ways to do this, but DeepFreeze works great in our 
environment.

From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2013 4:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

I've worked at a lot of customers that use DeepFreeze and similar products and 
I'm not a huge fan of the concept in general. It makes the overall lifecycle 
maintenance of a desktop environment a heck of a lot more complicated.

The question I always pose (and usually don't get much of a response to), is 
what problems/issues is DeepFreeze protecting you from that running as a local 
user wouldn't solve?

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132

From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2013 11:33 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

Not free, but we could not function at the school without DeepFreeze.

From: Bambi J Saastad [mailto:bambi.j.saas...@seagate.com]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 11:36 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Replacement for SteadyState

Hello
I was wondering if any of you could suggest a replacement for SteadyState.
I have a roomful of pc's that the factory users use for browsing etc that I am 
replacing with Windows 7 Pro that need to be locked down.

Can anyone suggest a product that does the same thing, wipe out any changes on 
reboot?

TIA
B


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ 

Re: Replacement for SteadyState

2013-01-07 Thread Jonathan Link
Oh, I did it in the school I was in, too.  I had a huge amount of
resistance that needed to be overcome.


On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.comwrote:

  *When I worked for a K-12 (~450K students), we issued accounts to all
 students at any school that was using our central AD. I’ve seen the same
 practice at the other K-12 districts I’ve worked at. *

 * *

 *Thanks,*

 *Brian Desmond*

 *br...@briandesmond.com* br...@briandesmond.com**

 * *

 *w – 312.625.1438 | c – 312.731.3132*

 * *

 *From:* Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
 *Sent:* Monday, January 7, 2013 10:12 AM

 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* Re: Replacement for SteadyState

 ** **

 Universities are a much different beast than primary and secondary schools.
 

 ** **

 1) Logging out was part of the Acceptable Use Policy, meaning it is the
 student's responsibility to log out.

 2) Teachers were taught to double check that students logged out.

 3) Teachers in labs, put it on their syllabus, and those who used labs
 regularly but were not actually in a lab, did so, as well, to remind
 students that not logging off could result in a loss of work.

 4) Make sure that you give teachers some mechanism for resetting student
 passwords to some default password, and unlocking the account.  This became
 a huge problem in the school I worked at previously.  I had to roll my own
 solution at the time.  Having a solution for this in place before you
 switch over will make life so much easier.

 5) Disable locking of the computer for student accounts.

 ** **

 I'm probably missing something, but it's been 7 years since I left that
 job.

 ** **

 ** **

 ** **

 ** **

 ** **

 On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com
 wrote:

  *Yeah ... For all the universities I’ve worked at and had this
 discussion, this perceived problem has never morphed into an actual issue.
 *

 * *

 *Thanks,*

 *Brian Desmond*

 *br...@briandesmond.com* br...@briandesmond.com

 * *

 *w – **312.625.1438* 312.625.1438* | c – **312.731.3132* 312.731.3132*
 ***

 * *

 *From:* Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
 *Sent:* Monday, January 7, 2013 9:09 AM


 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* RE: Replacement for SteadyState

  

  

 “…….. how do you handle situations where students don’t logout before they
 leave…… then student 2 has access to student 1’s account.”

  

 Self-correcting problem.  Student 2 deletes all of Students 1’s stuff and
 Student 1 never does it again. With 7,000 students we have very little
 trouble with this issue actually.

  

 Also we set inactivity timeouts so they auto log out.

  

 I would not go with generic accounts. There is no accountability, no
 tracking of what they do….

  

  

 *From:* Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
 *Sent:* Monday, January 07, 2013 10:04 AM


 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* RE: Replacement for SteadyState

  

 No on the student login.  We use a generic account per classroom.

 We’ve talked about moving to a individual student login, but I’m not sure
 we need or want that.

 For others that have gone that route, how do you handle situations where
 students don’t logout before they leave.

 You either have a locked computer, logged on as said student or if not
 locked, then student 2 has access to student 1’s account.

  

 *From:* Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.combr...@briandesmond.com]

 *Sent:* Monday, January 07, 2013 9:32 AM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* RE: Replacement for SteadyState

  

 *Sure so scenarios where you’re teaching classes that require changes to
 the OS to accomplish the class makes good sense and I’d not argue against a
 solution like DeepFreeze in that case.*

 * *

 *In the case of things like wallpaper and user profile stuff, are you not
 using named user accounts for your students? That solves a bunch of this on
 the spot. *

 * *

 *Thanks,*

 *Brian Desmond*

 *br...@briandesmond.com* br...@briandesmond.com

 * *

 *w – **312.625.1438* 312.625.1438* | c – **312.731.3132* 312.731.3132*
 ***

 * *

 *From:* Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
 *Sent:* Monday, January 7, 2013 7:42 AM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* RE: Replacement for SteadyState

  

 We teach classes and let the students make any and all changes to the
 desktop environment.

 Here’s one example.  Student comes in and sets the desktop wallpaper to
 his favorite pinup gal.  Next student doesn’t like it, but is a beginner
 and doesn’t know how to change it to something else.  Reboot and the pin up
 gal is gone.

 Also, I’ve seen some programs/apps that can now be installed without admin
 rights, Google Chrome for example.

 Not a 

RE: Replacement for SteadyState

2013-01-07 Thread Kennedy, Jim
I am K-12 so a different setup probably..but just to get you thinking.

Do you have your own student information system? That contains everything you 
need I would think. Ours  lists all the students, grade, school and student ID 
number.  It is maintained in part by the State, our enrollment office and 
administrative staff. But it is complete and ready to go.  We just export that 
info and powershell create the accounts.

During the school year as students transfer in Media Techs (librarians) have a 
limited ADUC to create new student login accounts. Their home folders 
self-create. Media Techs can also change passwords, reset lockouts. I 
transitioned us to this about 4 years ago. It was a non-event and works well.

I could take it a step further and do an auto export every night from the 
student information system and script deletions and new users but for the few 
we get it is not worth it. At the end of the school year I mass delete and 
start over fresh.

From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 12:20 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

Good to know.
Now, the other biggie for use, user account management.
We don't yet have an automated way to create/delete the accounts.
Richmond is working on a system for that, but the vendor they contracted wants 
mega bucks to set up our server to sync with their domain.


From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 10:32 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

Yeah ... For all the universities I've worked at and had this discussion, this 
perceived problem has never morphed into an actual issue.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132

From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 9:09 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState


 how do you handle situations where students don't logout before they 
leave.. then student 2 has access to student 1's account.

Self-correcting problem.  Student 2 deletes all of Students 1's stuff and 
Student 1 never does it again. With 7,000 students we have very little trouble 
with this issue actually.

Also we set inactivity timeouts so they auto log out.

I would not go with generic accounts. There is no accountability, no tracking 
of what they do


From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 10:04 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

No on the student login.  We use a generic account per classroom.
We've talked about moving to a individual student login, but I'm not sure we 
need or want that.
For others that have gone that route, how do you handle situations where 
students don't logout before they leave.
You either have a locked computer, logged on as said student or if not locked, 
then student 2 has access to student 1's account.

From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 9:32 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

Sure so scenarios where you're teaching classes that require changes to the OS 
to accomplish the class makes good sense and I'd not argue against a solution 
like DeepFreeze in that case.

In the case of things like wallpaper and user profile stuff, are you not using 
named user accounts for your students? That solves a bunch of this on the spot.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132

From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 7:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

We teach classes and let the students make any and all changes to the desktop 
environment.
Here's one example.  Student comes in and sets the desktop wallpaper to his 
favorite pinup gal.  Next student doesn't like it, but is a beginner and 
doesn't know how to change it to something else.  Reboot and the pin up gal is 
gone.
Also, I've seen some programs/apps that can now be installed without admin 
rights, Google Chrome for example.
Not a problem with Deep Freeze.

I'm sure there are other ways to do this, but DeepFreeze works great in our 
environment.

From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2013 4:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

I've worked at a lot of customers that use DeepFreeze and similar products and 
I'm not a huge fan of the concept in general. It makes the overall lifecycle 
maintenance of a desktop environment a heck of a lot more complicated.

The question I always pose (and usually don't get much of a response to), is 
what problems/issues is DeepFreeze protecting you from that running as a local 
user wouldn't solve?

Thanks,
Brian Desmond

Re: DC server 2003 Time service

2013-01-07 Thread Kurt Buff
Would not this:

w32tm /config /syncfromflags:domhier /update

have the same effect, or is it a less reliable option?

Kurt

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Coleman, Hunter hcole...@mt.gov wrote:
 On the old 2003 DC, check
 HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\W32Time\Parameters\Type. It should be
 “NT5D5”. If it shows “NTP”, then the DC is synchronizing time with an
 external time source. It was probably the forest root PDCe in the past, but
 if it no longer is then on that DC run

 Net stop w32time

 W32tm /unregister

 W32tm /register

 Net start w32time



 That will clear out the old time configuration and reset it to a domain
 hierarchy configuration.



 From: itli...@imcu.com [mailto:itli...@imcu.com]
 Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 8:22 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: DC server 2003 Time service



 From my PC:

 (Looks like I have everything working except the first one.  It is an old
 2003 DC.)  Why is it being so difficult?

 All the other 2008 DC’s and 2003 DC’s are behaving except it?

 Where can I look?



 C:\windows\system32w32tm /monitor

 030405MF663P44.IMCU.local[10.0.10.5:123]:

 ICMP: 6ms delay

 NTP: +0.0225576s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local

 RefID: tick.usno.navy.mil [192.5.41.40]

 Stratum: 2

 0304090304zu55.IMCU.local[10.0.50.205:123]:

 ICMP: 0ms delay

 NTP: +0.0127904s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local

 RefID: 081012210GL255.IMCU.local [10.0.50.2]

 Stratum: 4

 0302040304zu77.IMCU.local[10.0.90.205:123]:

 ICMP: 13ms delay

 NTP: +0.0002909s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local

 RefID: 081012210GL255.IMCU.local [10.0.50.2]

 Stratum: 4

 0810123404XB44.IMCU.local[10.0.10.2:123]:

 ICMP: 9ms delay

 NTP: +0.0136959s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local

 RefID: 081012210GL255.IMCU.local [10.0.50.2]

 Stratum: 4

 081012210GL255.IMCU.local *** PDC ***[10.0.50.2:123]:

 ICMP: 0ms delay

 NTP: +0.000s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local

 RefID: white.web-ster.com [65.182.224.39]

 Stratum: 3

 08101223061O77.IMCU.local[10.0.90.2:123]:

 ICMP: 10ms delay

 NTP: +0.0069312s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local

 RefID: 081012210GL255.IMCU.local [10.0.50.2]

 Stratum: 4



 From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
 Posted At: Friday, January 4, 2013 12:05 AM
 Posted To: itli...@imcu.com
 Conversation: DC server 2003 Time service
 Subject: RE: DC server 2003 Time service



 You need to read this:

 http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc773013(v=ws.10).aspx



 Cheers

 Ken



 From: itli...@imcu.com [mailto:itli...@imcu.com]
 Sent: Friday, 4 January 2013 3:33 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: DC server 2003 Time service



 I am bringing 2008 R2 servers on line to take the FSMO jobs.

 I have set one of them as a W32time server but my pc’s are still getting
 time from the old

 2003 DC SNTP server???

 Any ideas on how to correct this?

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin



RE: DC server 2003 Time service

2013-01-07 Thread Coleman, Hunter
That would work as well, though you would want to include the /reliable:no 
flag.

-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 10:54 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: DC server 2003 Time service

Would not this:

w32tm /config /syncfromflags:domhier /update

have the same effect, or is it a less reliable option?

Kurt

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Coleman, Hunter hcole...@mt.gov wrote:
 On the old 2003 DC, check
 HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\W32Time\Parameters\Type. It 
 should be “NT5D5”. If it shows “NTP”, then the DC is synchronizing 
 time with an external time source. It was probably the forest root 
 PDCe in the past, but if it no longer is then on that DC run

 Net stop w32time

 W32tm /unregister

 W32tm /register

 Net start w32time



 That will clear out the old time configuration and reset it to a 
 domain hierarchy configuration.



 From: itli...@imcu.com [mailto:itli...@imcu.com]
 Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 8:22 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: DC server 2003 Time service



 From my PC:

 (Looks like I have everything working except the first one.  It is an 
 old
 2003 DC.)  Why is it being so difficult?

 All the other 2008 DC’s and 2003 DC’s are behaving except it?

 Where can I look?



 C:\windows\system32w32tm /monitor

 030405MF663P44.IMCU.local[10.0.10.5:123]:

 ICMP: 6ms delay

 NTP: +0.0225576s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local

 RefID: tick.usno.navy.mil [192.5.41.40]

 Stratum: 2

 0304090304zu55.IMCU.local[10.0.50.205:123]:

 ICMP: 0ms delay

 NTP: +0.0127904s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local

 RefID: 081012210GL255.IMCU.local [10.0.50.2]

 Stratum: 4

 0302040304zu77.IMCU.local[10.0.90.205:123]:

 ICMP: 13ms delay

 NTP: +0.0002909s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local

 RefID: 081012210GL255.IMCU.local [10.0.50.2]

 Stratum: 4

 0810123404XB44.IMCU.local[10.0.10.2:123]:

 ICMP: 9ms delay

 NTP: +0.0136959s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local

 RefID: 081012210GL255.IMCU.local [10.0.50.2]

 Stratum: 4

 081012210GL255.IMCU.local *** PDC ***[10.0.50.2:123]:

 ICMP: 0ms delay

 NTP: +0.000s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local

 RefID: white.web-ster.com [65.182.224.39]

 Stratum: 3

 08101223061O77.IMCU.local[10.0.90.2:123]:

 ICMP: 10ms delay

 NTP: +0.0069312s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local

 RefID: 081012210GL255.IMCU.local [10.0.50.2]

 Stratum: 4



 From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com] Posted At: Friday, 
 January 4, 2013 12:05 AM Posted To: itli...@imcu.com
 Conversation: DC server 2003 Time service
 Subject: RE: DC server 2003 Time service



 You need to read this:

 http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc773013(v=ws.10).aspx



 Cheers

 Ken



 From: itli...@imcu.com [mailto:itli...@imcu.com]
 Sent: Friday, 4 January 2013 3:33 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: DC server 2003 Time service



 I am bringing 2008 R2 servers on line to take the FSMO jobs.

 I have set one of them as a W32time server but my pc’s are still 
 getting time from the old

 2003 DC SNTP server???

 Any ideas on how to correct this?

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
 http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
 http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
 http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: DC server 2003 Time service

2013-01-07 Thread itli...@imcu.com
A Haa.
NTP time software running on that old DC.
Uninstalled
Rebooted.
Did all of the below
And w32tm /resync
Now w32tm /monitor reads perfectly.
Now on the PDC and I point to a local unbuntu server I have added as the first 
NTP server to try?


-Original Message-
From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:hcole...@mt.gov] 
Posted At: Monday, January 7, 2013 1:40 PM
Posted To: itli...@imcu.com
Conversation: DC server 2003 Time service
Subject: RE: DC server 2003 Time service

That would work as well, though you would want to include the /reliable:no 
flag.

-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 10:54 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: DC server 2003 Time service

Would not this:

w32tm /config /syncfromflags:domhier /update

have the same effect, or is it a less reliable option?

Kurt

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Coleman, Hunter hcole...@mt.gov wrote:
 On the old 2003 DC, check
 HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\W32Time\Parameters\Type. It 
 should be “NT5D5”. If it shows “NTP”, then the DC is synchronizing 
 time with an external time source. It was probably the forest root 
 PDCe in the past, but if it no longer is then on that DC run

 Net stop w32time

 W32tm /unregister

 W32tm /register

 Net start w32time



 That will clear out the old time configuration and reset it to a 
 domain hierarchy configuration.



 From: itli...@imcu.com [mailto:itli...@imcu.com]
 Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 8:22 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: DC server 2003 Time service



 From my PC:

 (Looks like I have everything working except the first one.  It is an 
 old
 2003 DC.)  Why is it being so difficult?

 All the other 2008 DC’s and 2003 DC’s are behaving except it?

 Where can I look?



 C:\windows\system32w32tm /monitor

 030405MF663P44.IMCU.local[10.0.10.5:123]:

 ICMP: 6ms delay

 NTP: +0.0225576s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local

 RefID: tick.usno.navy.mil [192.5.41.40]

 Stratum: 2

 0304090304zu55.IMCU.local[10.0.50.205:123]:

 ICMP: 0ms delay

 NTP: +0.0127904s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local

 RefID: 081012210GL255.IMCU.local [10.0.50.2]

 Stratum: 4

 0302040304zu77.IMCU.local[10.0.90.205:123]:

 ICMP: 13ms delay

 NTP: +0.0002909s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local

 RefID: 081012210GL255.IMCU.local [10.0.50.2]

 Stratum: 4

 0810123404XB44.IMCU.local[10.0.10.2:123]:

 ICMP: 9ms delay

 NTP: +0.0136959s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local

 RefID: 081012210GL255.IMCU.local [10.0.50.2]

 Stratum: 4

 081012210GL255.IMCU.local *** PDC ***[10.0.50.2:123]:

 ICMP: 0ms delay

 NTP: +0.000s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local

 RefID: white.web-ster.com [65.182.224.39]

 Stratum: 3

 08101223061O77.IMCU.local[10.0.90.2:123]:

 ICMP: 10ms delay

 NTP: +0.0069312s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local

 RefID: 081012210GL255.IMCU.local [10.0.50.2]

 Stratum: 4



 From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com] Posted At: Friday, 
 January 4, 2013 12:05 AM Posted To: itli...@imcu.com
 Conversation: DC server 2003 Time service
 Subject: RE: DC server 2003 Time service



 You need to read this:

 http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc773013(v=ws.10).aspx



 Cheers

 Ken



 From: itli...@imcu.com [mailto:itli...@imcu.com]
 Sent: Friday, 4 January 2013 3:33 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: DC server 2003 Time service



 I am bringing 2008 R2 servers on line to take the FSMO jobs.

 I have set one of them as a W32time server but my pc’s are still 
 getting time from the old

 2003 DC SNTP server???

 Any ideas on how to correct this?

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
 http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
 http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
 http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 

RE: Time sync

2013-01-07 Thread Ken Cornetet
How do you manage your capacity properly? I'm not being facetious - I really 
want to know since it looks like we are switching to HyperV.

Microsoft's recommendation is to create thin disks for more than you ever think 
you need. Then, when creating the OS, use disk manager to create the file 
system with the minimum you can get by with. This allows the VHD file to only 
grow up to the size of the file system it contains.

Then, if a virtual's file system runs out of space, you can use storage 
management to extend the disk into some the free space you allocated in the VHD 
file.  This allows you to have room for expansion, but keeps any one virtual 
from exhausting free physical disk.

For example: Let's say we need a SQL server. We think we can get by with the 
following disks:
C: - 40GB (os)
D: - 30GB (logs)
E: - 100GB (data)

Microsoft is telling us to create thin disks of, say,  1TB each. However, when 
we install the OS, we create NTFS file systems on each disk with the desired 
sizes of 40GB, 30GB, and 100GB. We now know that in the current state, this 
virtual can only grow its thin disks to a total of 170GB.  If the E:  runs out 
of space, we can use disk manager to extend the NTFS file system, which will 
grow the thin disk up to the new NTFS file system size. This gives you the 
ability to easily grow disks at will, but prevents any one virtual from hogging 
all the free host disk.

This sort of seems reasonable, but it complicates disk management immensely. 
Now, in order to know the max my virtuals might take, I have to look at each 
host store, find all of the virtual machines with VHD files on that store, then 
figure out each virtual's drive letter for that VHD (is that even possible?), 
then add up all the file system sizes. Seems like a lot of work, even if you 
script it up.

From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 12:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Time sync

Yes, over subscribing can be an issue if you don't manage your capacity 
properly.

It hasn't proved to be an issue in any of the environments where I have been.





ASB
http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBakerhttp://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker
Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations  Information Security) for the 
SMB market...




On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Ken Cornetet 
ken.corne...@kimball.commailto:ken.corne...@kimball.com wrote:
Thin provisioning seems risky to me. Seems like you are always in danger of 
non-critical virtuals deciding to use more disk space thus exhausting  physical 
space which would cause critical VMs to pause if they happen to need more space.

We tried thin provisioning  back in the old VirtualServer days, and I ran into 
this problem a few times.

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith 
[mailto:mich...@smithcons.commailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 10:28 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Time sync

Because the overhead associated with dynamic disks in Hyper-V v3 is in the very 
low single digits. We don't spend any time on this process, thin provisioning 
still works seamlessly, and we get on with our lives.

:)

-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet 
[mailto:ken.corne...@kimball.commailto:ken.corne...@kimball.com]
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 10:06 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Time sync

We are running ESX 5. To conserve SAN storage, we provision virtuals with the 
bare minimum needed disk space because it is so easy to extend disks later 
(extend the VMDK in VMWare, extend in Windows, done). No down time, and no 
wasted disk. We don't have to spend a lot of time trying to anticipate how big 
the disks will get and wasting disk if we guess too high.

In HyperV, you can't extend disks without shutting down the virtual - seriously.

I can't for the life of me figure out why MS isn't fixing this instead of 
adding silly features like 4TB of guest RAM. And, I also wonder why HyperV 
users aren't howling about this.

-Original Message-
From: Michael Leone [mailto:oozerd...@gmail.commailto:oozerd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 9:43 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Time sync

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Ken Cornetet 
ken.corne...@kimball.commailto:ken.corne...@kimball.com wrote:
 Lol, how many times do you need 64 vCPUs or 4TB of guest Ram versus
 needing to extend a disk?

I run VMware ESXi 5.0, and I know I have had to extend a disk any number of 
times. And Win2008 makes extending the boot disk so much easier, too.

My largest VM has 16G of RAM, and I was even leery of that. And I have
6 hosts with 512G RAM each ...


ASB

http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBakerhttp://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker

Providing Expert Technology Consulting Services for the SMB market...



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 

RE: Replacement for SteadyState

2013-01-07 Thread Brian Desmond
FIM is dirt cheap for EDU. The services cost of an implementation to simply 
sync HR and SIS with AD is not a whole lot.

If you want to do it quick and dirty, a PowerShell or VB Script that reads a 
flat file or view off your ERP system each night and syncs it with AD would be 
straight forward to write.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132

From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 11:13 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

Good to know.
Now, the other biggie for use, user account management.
We don't yet have an automated way to create/delete the accounts.
Richmond is working on a system for that, but the vendor they contracted wants 
mega bucks to set up our server to sync with their domain.


From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 10:32 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

Yeah ... For all the universities I've worked at and had this discussion, this 
perceived problem has never morphed into an actual issue.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132

From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 9:09 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState


 how do you handle situations where students don't logout before they 
leave.. then student 2 has access to student 1's account.

Self-correcting problem.  Student 2 deletes all of Students 1's stuff and 
Student 1 never does it again. With 7,000 students we have very little trouble 
with this issue actually.

Also we set inactivity timeouts so they auto log out.

I would not go with generic accounts. There is no accountability, no tracking 
of what they do


From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 10:04 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

No on the student login.  We use a generic account per classroom.
We've talked about moving to a individual student login, but I'm not sure we 
need or want that.
For others that have gone that route, how do you handle situations where 
students don't logout before they leave.
You either have a locked computer, logged on as said student or if not locked, 
then student 2 has access to student 1's account.

From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 9:32 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

Sure so scenarios where you're teaching classes that require changes to the OS 
to accomplish the class makes good sense and I'd not argue against a solution 
like DeepFreeze in that case.

In the case of things like wallpaper and user profile stuff, are you not using 
named user accounts for your students? That solves a bunch of this on the spot.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132

From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 7:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

We teach classes and let the students make any and all changes to the desktop 
environment.
Here's one example.  Student comes in and sets the desktop wallpaper to his 
favorite pinup gal.  Next student doesn't like it, but is a beginner and 
doesn't know how to change it to something else.  Reboot and the pin up gal is 
gone.
Also, I've seen some programs/apps that can now be installed without admin 
rights, Google Chrome for example.
Not a problem with Deep Freeze.

I'm sure there are other ways to do this, but DeepFreeze works great in our 
environment.

From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2013 4:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

I've worked at a lot of customers that use DeepFreeze and similar products and 
I'm not a huge fan of the concept in general. It makes the overall lifecycle 
maintenance of a desktop environment a heck of a lot more complicated.

The question I always pose (and usually don't get much of a response to), is 
what problems/issues is DeepFreeze protecting you from that running as a local 
user wouldn't solve?

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132

From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2013 11:33 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

Not free, but we could not function at the school without DeepFreeze.

From: Bambi J Saastad [mailto:bambi.j.saas...@seagate.com]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 11:36 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Replacement for SteadyState

Hello
I was wondering if any of you could suggest a replacement for SteadyState.
I have a roomful of pc's that the 

RE: DC server 2003 Time service

2013-01-07 Thread Coleman, Hunter
Use this as a basis for configuring your current PDC: 
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc794937(v=WS.10).aspx


-Original Message-
From: itli...@imcu.com [mailto:itli...@imcu.com] 
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 12:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DC server 2003 Time service

A Haa.
NTP time software running on that old DC.
Uninstalled
Rebooted.
Did all of the below
And w32tm /resync
Now w32tm /monitor reads perfectly.
Now on the PDC and I point to a local unbuntu server I have added as the first 
NTP server to try?


-Original Message-
From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:hcole...@mt.gov] Posted At: Monday, January 7, 
2013 1:40 PM Posted To: itli...@imcu.com
Conversation: DC server 2003 Time service
Subject: RE: DC server 2003 Time service

That would work as well, though you would want to include the /reliable:no 
flag.

-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 10:54 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: DC server 2003 Time service

Would not this:

w32tm /config /syncfromflags:domhier /update

have the same effect, or is it a less reliable option?

Kurt

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Coleman, Hunter hcole...@mt.gov wrote:
 On the old 2003 DC, check
 HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\W32Time\Parameters\Type. It 
 should be “NT5D5”. If it shows “NTP”, then the DC is synchronizing 
 time with an external time source. It was probably the forest root 
 PDCe in the past, but if it no longer is then on that DC run

 Net stop w32time

 W32tm /unregister

 W32tm /register

 Net start w32time



 That will clear out the old time configuration and reset it to a 
 domain hierarchy configuration.



 From: itli...@imcu.com [mailto:itli...@imcu.com]
 Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 8:22 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: DC server 2003 Time service



 From my PC:

 (Looks like I have everything working except the first one.  It is an 
 old
 2003 DC.)  Why is it being so difficult?

 All the other 2008 DC’s and 2003 DC’s are behaving except it?

 Where can I look?



 C:\windows\system32w32tm /monitor

 030405MF663P44.IMCU.local[10.0.10.5:123]:

 ICMP: 6ms delay

 NTP: +0.0225576s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local

 RefID: tick.usno.navy.mil [192.5.41.40]

 Stratum: 2

 0304090304zu55.IMCU.local[10.0.50.205:123]:

 ICMP: 0ms delay

 NTP: +0.0127904s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local

 RefID: 081012210GL255.IMCU.local [10.0.50.2]

 Stratum: 4

 0302040304zu77.IMCU.local[10.0.90.205:123]:

 ICMP: 13ms delay

 NTP: +0.0002909s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local

 RefID: 081012210GL255.IMCU.local [10.0.50.2]

 Stratum: 4

 0810123404XB44.IMCU.local[10.0.10.2:123]:

 ICMP: 9ms delay

 NTP: +0.0136959s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local

 RefID: 081012210GL255.IMCU.local [10.0.50.2]

 Stratum: 4

 081012210GL255.IMCU.local *** PDC ***[10.0.50.2:123]:

 ICMP: 0ms delay

 NTP: +0.000s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local

 RefID: white.web-ster.com [65.182.224.39]

 Stratum: 3

 08101223061O77.IMCU.local[10.0.90.2:123]:

 ICMP: 10ms delay

 NTP: +0.0069312s offset from 081012210GL255.IMCU.local

 RefID: 081012210GL255.IMCU.local [10.0.50.2]

 Stratum: 4



 From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com] Posted At: Friday, 
 January 4, 2013 12:05 AM Posted To: itli...@imcu.com
 Conversation: DC server 2003 Time service
 Subject: RE: DC server 2003 Time service



 You need to read this:

 http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc773013(v=ws.10).aspx



 Cheers

 Ken



 From: itli...@imcu.com [mailto:itli...@imcu.com]
 Sent: Friday, 4 January 2013 3:33 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: DC server 2003 Time service



 I am bringing 2008 R2 servers on line to take the FSMO jobs.

 I have set one of them as a W32time server but my pc’s are still 
 getting time from the old

 2003 DC SNTP server???

 Any ideas on how to correct this?

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
 http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
 http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
 with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
 http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

 ---
 To manage subscriptions click here:
 http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
 or send an email to 

RE: Replacement for SteadyState

2013-01-07 Thread Brian Desmond
I could take it a step further and do an auto export every night from the 
student information system and script deletions and new users but for the few 
we get it is not worth it. At the end of the school year I mass delete and 
start over fresh.

If you added that nightly sync, you wouldn't have to do the mass cleanup. A 
student's identity could persist throughout their relationship with your 
district. As long as you have the SIS primary key in AD (e.g. the student/empl 
ID), that sync should be really easy.


Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132

From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 11:33 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

I am K-12 so a different setup probably..but just to get you thinking.

Do you have your own student information system? That contains everything you 
need I would think. Ours  lists all the students, grade, school and student ID 
number.  It is maintained in part by the State, our enrollment office and 
administrative staff. But it is complete and ready to go.  We just export that 
info and powershell create the accounts.

During the school year as students transfer in Media Techs (librarians) have a 
limited ADUC to create new student login accounts. Their home folders 
self-create. Media Techs can also change passwords, reset lockouts. I 
transitioned us to this about 4 years ago. It was a non-event and works well.

I could take it a step further and do an auto export every night from the 
student information system and script deletions and new users but for the few 
we get it is not worth it. At the end of the school year I mass delete and 
start over fresh.

From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 12:20 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

Good to know.
Now, the other biggie for use, user account management.
We don't yet have an automated way to create/delete the accounts.
Richmond is working on a system for that, but the vendor they contracted wants 
mega bucks to set up our server to sync with their domain.


From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 10:32 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

Yeah ... For all the universities I've worked at and had this discussion, this 
perceived problem has never morphed into an actual issue.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132

From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 9:09 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState


 how do you handle situations where students don't logout before they 
leave.. then student 2 has access to student 1's account.

Self-correcting problem.  Student 2 deletes all of Students 1's stuff and 
Student 1 never does it again. With 7,000 students we have very little trouble 
with this issue actually.

Also we set inactivity timeouts so they auto log out.

I would not go with generic accounts. There is no accountability, no tracking 
of what they do


From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 10:04 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

No on the student login.  We use a generic account per classroom.
We've talked about moving to a individual student login, but I'm not sure we 
need or want that.
For others that have gone that route, how do you handle situations where 
students don't logout before they leave.
You either have a locked computer, logged on as said student or if not locked, 
then student 2 has access to student 1's account.

From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 9:32 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

Sure so scenarios where you're teaching classes that require changes to the OS 
to accomplish the class makes good sense and I'd not argue against a solution 
like DeepFreeze in that case.

In the case of things like wallpaper and user profile stuff, are you not using 
named user accounts for your students? That solves a bunch of this on the spot.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com

w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132

From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 7:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Replacement for SteadyState

We teach classes and let the students make any and all changes to the desktop 
environment.
Here's one example.  Student comes in and sets the desktop wallpaper to his 
favorite pinup gal.  Next student doesn't like it, but is a beginner and 
doesn't know how to change it to something else.  Reboot and the pin up gal is 
gone.
Also, I've seen some programs/apps that can now be installed 

Re: Lumension Intelligent Whitelisting

2013-01-07 Thread kz20fl
Don't think it works with the latest versions of XenApp, although it is a good 
six months or so since I came across this issue and may have been updated

Sent from my Blackberry, which may be an antique but delivers email RELIABLY

-Original Message-
From: Richard Stovall rich...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 16:18:44 
To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Reply-To: NT System Admin Issues 
ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.comSubject: Lumension Intelligent 
Whitelisting

Anyone out there using Lumension products?  I'm particularly interested in
the Intelligent Whitelisting bundle that includes patching, A/V and
application whitelisting.

Any experiences or thoughts you wouldn't mind sharing?

Thanks,
RS

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


Re: Time sync

2013-01-07 Thread Andrew S. Baker
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/systemcenter/hh278293Well, I wouldn't
use a 1TB as the range, but let's use your example and say we doubled all
of our expected minimums.

Then you have all the flexibility that you pointed out before.



*Now, in order to know the max my virtuals might take, I have to look at
each host store, find all of the virtual machines with VHD files on that
store, then figure out each virtual’s drive letter for that VHD (is that
even possible?), then add up all the file system sizes. *

Why do you have to do that?

I'd expect that you'd be using something like System Center VM
Managerhttp://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/systemcenter/hh278293to
manage your virtual hosts and give you a comprehensive view of storage
consumption, utilization, etc.

Right?



*ASB
**http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker*
**Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations  Information Security) for
the SMB market…***





On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Ken Cornetet ken.corne...@kimball.comwrote:

 How do you “manage your capacity properly”? I’m not being facetious – I
 really want to know since it looks like we are switching to HyperV.

 ** **

 Microsoft’s recommendation is to create thin disks for more than you ever
 think you need. Then, when creating the OS, use disk manager to create the
 file system with the minimum you can get by with. This allows the VHD file
 to only grow up to the size of the file system it contains.

 ** **

 Then, if a virtual’s file system runs out of space, you can use storage
 management to extend the disk into some the free space you allocated in the
 VHD file.  This allows you to have room for expansion, but keeps any one
 virtual from exhausting free physical disk.

 ** **

 For example: Let’s say we need a SQL server. We think we can get by with
 the following disks:

 C: - 40GB (os)

 D: - 30GB (logs)

 E: - 100GB (data)

 ** **

 Microsoft is telling us to create thin disks of, say,  1TB each. However,
 when we install the OS, we create NTFS file systems on each disk with the
 desired sizes of 40GB, 30GB, and 100GB. We now know that in the current
 state, this virtual can only grow its thin disks to a total of 170GB.  If
 the E:  runs out of space, we can use disk manager to extend the NTFS file
 system, which will grow the thin disk up to the new NTFS file system size.
 This gives you the ability to easily grow disks at will, but prevents any
 one virtual from hogging all the free host disk.

 ** **

 This sort of seems reasonable, but it complicates disk management
 immensely. Now, in order to know the max my virtuals might take, I have to
 look at each host store, find all of the virtual machines with VHD files on
 that store, then figure out each virtual’s drive letter for that VHD (is
 that even possible?), then add up all the file system sizes. Seems like a
 lot of work, even if you script it up.

 ** **

 

 *From:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
 *Sent:* Monday, January 07, 2013 12:08 PM

 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* Re: Time sync

 ** **

 Yes, over subscribing can be an issue if you don't manage your capacity
 properly.

 ** **

 It hasn't proved to be an issue in any of the environments where I have
 been.

  

  

 *ASB
 **http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker*
 **Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations  Information Security)
 for the SMB market…*

  

 ** **

 On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Ken Cornetet ken.corne...@kimball.com
 wrote:

 Thin provisioning seems risky to me. Seems like you are always in danger
 of non-critical virtuals deciding to use more disk space thus exhausting
  physical space which would cause critical VMs to pause if they happen to
 need more space.

 We tried thin provisioning  back in the old VirtualServer days, and I ran
 into this problem a few times.


 -Original Message-
 From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
 Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 10:28 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues

 Subject: RE: Time sync

 Because the overhead associated with dynamic disks in Hyper-V v3 is in the
 very low single digits. We don't spend any time on this process, thin
 provisioning still works seamlessly, and we get on with our lives.

 :)

 -Original Message-
 From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:ken.corne...@kimball.com]

 Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 10:06 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues

 Subject: RE: Time sync

 We are running ESX 5. To conserve SAN storage, we provision virtuals with
 the bare minimum needed disk space because it is so easy to extend disks
 later (extend the VMDK in VMWare, extend in Windows, done). No down time,
 and no wasted disk. We don't have to spend a lot of time trying to
 anticipate how big the disks will get and wasting disk if we guess too high.

 In HyperV, you can't extend disks without shutting down the virtual -
 seriously.

 I 

RE: Time sync

2013-01-07 Thread Ken Schaefer
You might not want them - but other people might. Personally I've never had to 
extend a VM disk outside a maintenance window, so it's never really been an 
issue for me.

Hyper-V supports shared-nothing migration as well - does VMWare do that?

Actually, the statement was that Hyper-V has nothing that VMWare doesn't have. 
That statement is patently untrue. That was the point I was trying to make.

Cheers
Ken

From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:ken.corne...@kimball.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2013 12:31 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Time sync

Lol, how many times do you need 64 vCPUs or 4TB of guest Ram versus needing to 
extend a disk?

From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 8:50 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Time sync

Can ESX support 64  vCPUs or 4TB RAM per guest yet? Or 64 hosts per cluster? 
Seems like there are all sorts of corner cases where one product has 
functionality the other doesn't yet. For 99% of things they are feature 
compatible. It's all about the management and operations tools now. Hypervisors 
are almost commoditised, and will be within the next version or two.

Cheers
Ken

From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:ken.corne...@kimball.com]
Sent: Saturday, 5 January 2013 6:26 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Time sync

Cost.

HyperV give something that VMWare doesn't? I laughed so hard I think I peed 
myself a little...  Sheesh, you can't even extend disks on a running virtual 
under HyperV.

From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 11:43 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Time sync

I was thinking the same thing. Actually IMHO VM still does more than Hyper-V 
does...

Z

Edward E. Ziots, CISSP, Security +, Network +
Security Engineer
Lifespan Organization
ezi...@lifespan.orgmailto:ezi...@lifespan.org



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: Time sync

2013-01-07 Thread Ken Schaefer
Seriously?

Are you an ITIL shop? Do you not have capacity management plans and 
systems/tools in place? Or do you just fly by the seat of your pants? 
Everything should be monitored, and you're getting nice trending graphs. Sure, 
sometimes things go unexpectedly wrong - but that can happen for all sorts of 
reasons and is a fact of IT - you need a proper incident system and recovery to 
handle it. This whole cloud thing you hear about is making sure you have 
resilient services

Cheers
Ken

From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:ken.corne...@kimball.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2013 7:33 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Time sync

How do you manage your capacity properly? I'm not being facetious - I really 
want to know since it looks like we are switching to HyperV.

Microsoft's recommendation is to create thin disks for more than you ever think 
you need. Then, when creating the OS, use disk manager to create the file 
system with the minimum you can get by with. This allows the VHD file to only 
grow up to the size of the file system it contains.

Then, if a virtual's file system runs out of space, you can use storage 
management to extend the disk into some the free space you allocated in the VHD 
file.  This allows you to have room for expansion, but keeps any one virtual 
from exhausting free physical disk.

For example: Let's say we need a SQL server. We think we can get by with the 
following disks:
C: - 40GB (os)
D: - 30GB (logs)
E: - 100GB (data)

Microsoft is telling us to create thin disks of, say,  1TB each. However, when 
we install the OS, we create NTFS file systems on each disk with the desired 
sizes of 40GB, 30GB, and 100GB. We now know that in the current state, this 
virtual can only grow its thin disks to a total of 170GB.  If the E:  runs out 
of space, we can use disk manager to extend the NTFS file system, which will 
grow the thin disk up to the new NTFS file system size. This gives you the 
ability to easily grow disks at will, but prevents any one virtual from hogging 
all the free host disk.

This sort of seems reasonable, but it complicates disk management immensely. 
Now, in order to know the max my virtuals might take, I have to look at each 
host store, find all of the virtual machines with VHD files on that store, then 
figure out each virtual's drive letter for that VHD (is that even possible?), 
then add up all the file system sizes. Seems like a lot of work, even if you 
script it up.


From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 12:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Time sync

Yes, over subscribing can be an issue if you don't manage your capacity 
properly.

It hasn't proved to be an issue in any of the environments where I have been.





ASB
http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBakerhttp://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker
Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations  Information Security) for the 
SMB market...




On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Ken Cornetet 
ken.corne...@kimball.commailto:ken.corne...@kimball.com wrote:
Thin provisioning seems risky to me. Seems like you are always in danger of 
non-critical virtuals deciding to use more disk space thus exhausting  physical 
space which would cause critical VMs to pause if they happen to need more space.

We tried thin provisioning  back in the old VirtualServer days, and I ran into 
this problem a few times.

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith 
[mailto:mich...@smithcons.commailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 10:28 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Time sync

Because the overhead associated with dynamic disks in Hyper-V v3 is in the very 
low single digits. We don't spend any time on this process, thin provisioning 
still works seamlessly, and we get on with our lives.

:)

-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet 
[mailto:ken.corne...@kimball.commailto:ken.corne...@kimball.com]
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 10:06 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Time sync

We are running ESX 5. To conserve SAN storage, we provision virtuals with the 
bare minimum needed disk space because it is so easy to extend disks later 
(extend the VMDK in VMWare, extend in Windows, done). No down time, and no 
wasted disk. We don't have to spend a lot of time trying to anticipate how big 
the disks will get and wasting disk if we guess too high.

In HyperV, you can't extend disks without shutting down the virtual - seriously.

I can't for the life of me figure out why MS isn't fixing this instead of 
adding silly features like 4TB of guest RAM. And, I also wonder why HyperV 
users aren't howling about this.

-Original Message-
From: Michael Leone [mailto:oozerd...@gmail.commailto:oozerd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 9:43 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Time sync

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Ken Cornetet 
ken.corne...@kimball.commailto:ken.corne...@kimball.com wrote:
 Lol, how many times do you need 64 vCPUs or 4TB