Re: [PacketFence-users] Node search is very slow from GUI on version 11.0.0

[Jeremy Plumley via PacketFence-users]

I think I had this same issue but got handled thru paid support. It had 
something to do with my bandwidth accounting table growing to large. I could 
truncate the table as a temp fix and it would run for about three days before 
the issue would show up again. A fix was applied but don't know the details and 
I'm presently waiting to see if the issue comes back again. So far so good.

Jeremy Plumley
ITS Network Administrator
Ext 50024

From: Arun Kangle via PacketFence-users 

Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 11:02 PM
To: Zammit, Ludovic 
Cc: Arun Kangle ; packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Node search is very slow from GUI on version 
11.0.0

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the GTCC organization. Do not 
click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the 
content is safe.

Hi Ludovic,
could you please update on this?

Thanks,
- Arun

On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 11:19 AM Arun Kangle 
mailto:akan...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Ludovic,
Any update on this?

Thanks in advance,
- Arun

On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 12:49 PM Arun Kangle 
mailto:akan...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Now I started getting the message "Request Failed with Status code 504" but i 
still can search users from "pfcmd" cli without any issue.

Thanks,
- Arun

On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 7:42 AM Arun Kangle 
mailto:akan...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello Ludovic,
Any update on this please?

Thanks,
- Arun

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 7:19 PM Arun Kangle 
mailto:akan...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>select count(1) from node;

MariaDB [(none)]> use pf
Reading table information for completion of table and column names
You can turn off this feature to get a quicker startup with -A

Database changed
MariaDB [pf]> select count(1) from node;
+--+
| count(1) |
+--+
|   69 |
+--+
1 row in set (0.000 sec)

MariaDB [pf]>

I am running it as a VM with 4 vCPU 16Gig RAM and 110GB Disk

Thanks,
- Arun

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 6:55 PM Zammit, Ludovic 
mailto:luza...@akamai.com>> wrote:
Hello Arun,

You can connect to the database and run that command:

select count(1) from node;

What are the specs on your servers? CPU, RAM and disk.

Thanks,

Ludovic Zammit
Product Support Engineer Principal
[https://www.akamai.com/us/en/multimedia/images/custom/2019/logo-no-tag-93x45.png]
Cell: +1.613.670.8432
Akamai Technologies - Inverse
145 Broadway
Cambridge, MA 02142
Connect with Us:

[PacketFence-users] ArubaOS CX support

[Jeremy Plumley via PacketFence-users]

Not sure if I need to post this in the development forum but are you working on 
support for ArubaOS CX switches? I'm demoing a set of switches and the CLI has 
changed quite a bit. Even port configurations have went away from the 
traditional tag and untag commands to vlan trunk and vlan access commands. I 
would like to get these supported since Aruba is pushing these as their next 
gen switch model. Thanks.

Jeremy Plumley,
ITS Network Administrator
Guilford Technical Community College
Center for Advanced Manufacturing, Rm #1162
6012 W. Gate City Blvd., Greensboro, NC 27407
E-mail: jmplum...@gtcc.edu
Direct: 336.334.4822 ext 50024
Mailing Address: PO Box 309, Jamestown, NC 27282
www.gtcc.edu
[Current_Color_GTCC%20Logo%20smaller]
Supporting success through innovative education, training, and partnerships

E-Mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North 
Carolina Public Records Law and shall be disclosed to third parties when 
required by the statutes (G.S. 132-1.)
___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

[PacketFence-users] ArubaOS 8.x Packetfence

[Jeremy Plumley via PacketFence-users]

Has anyone implemented Packetfence on Aruba wireless controllers running 
ArubaOS 8.x? Newer AP lines appear to require 8.x and may be looking at an 
upgrade in the future. Thanks.

Jeremy Plumley,
ITS Network Administrator
Guilford Technical Community College
Center for Advanced Manufacturing, Rm #1162
6012 W. Gate City Blvd., Greensboro, NC 27407
E-mail: jmplum...@gtcc.edu
Direct: 336.334.4822 ext 50024
Mailing Address: PO Box 309, Jamestown, NC 27282
www.gtcc.edu
[Current_Color_GTCC%20Logo%20smaller]
Supporting success through innovative education, training, and partnerships

E-Mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North 
Carolina Public Records Law and shall be disclosed to third parties when 
required by the statutes (G.S. 132-1.)
___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] Read Only Unregistered Nodes

[Jeremy Plumley via PacketFence-users]

I'm attempting to setup a custom Admin Role in the webgui under Configuration | 
System Configuration | Admin Access. I cloned Node Manager into a new Admin 
Role called Desktop Node Mgmt. When I try to restrict the "Allowed node 
options" to specific roles my Admin users are unable to register a node that 
has "no role" selected. They show up as read only. My goal is to have two 
groups, one that can approve for any role and one that has restrictions to a 
handful of roles. Hope that makes more since.

Jeremy Plumley
ITS Network Administrator
Ext 50024

From: Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users 
[mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 9:43 AM
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Fabrice Durand 
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Read Only Unregistered Nodes


Hello Jeremy,

i am not sure to understand , you mix device role and administration access 
that is completely different.
Regards
Fabrice
E-Mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North 
Carolina Public Records Law and shall be disclosed to third parties when 
required by the statutes (G.S. 132-1.)
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] Read Only Unregistered Nodes

[Jeremy Plumley via PacketFence-users]

Wanted to follow up on this and see if there is a way to add "no role" access 
so I can create role limitations for admin users.

Jeremy Plumley
ITS Network Administrator
Ext 50024

From: Jeremy Plumley via PacketFence-users 
[mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 3:44 PM
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Jeremy Plumley <jmplum...@gtcc.edu>
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Read Only Unregistered Nodes

I found that by removing my select roles limitations and allowed all roles it 
started working again. Seems brand new nodes that show up as unregistered start 
with "no role." This is what was causing an issue and appearing read only. Is 
there a way to allow "no role" access if you decide to restrict node manager 
roles. Thanks.

Jeremy Plumley
ITS Network Administrator
Ext 50024
E-Mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North 
Carolina Public Records Law and shall be disclosed to third parties when 
required by the statutes (G.S. 132-1.)
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] Read Only Unregistered Nodes

[Jeremy Plumley via PacketFence-users]

I found that by removing my select roles limitations and allowed all roles it 
started working again. Seems brand new nodes that show up as unregistered start 
with "no role." This is what was causing an issue and appearing read only. Is 
there a way to allow "no role" access if you decide to restrict node manager 
roles. Thanks.

Jeremy Plumley
ITS Network Administrator
Ext 50024
E-Mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North 
Carolina Public Records Law and shall be disclosed to third parties when 
required by the statutes (G.S. 132-1.)
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

[PacketFence-users] Read Only Unregistered Nodes

[Jeremy Plumley via PacketFence-users]

Has anyone experienced Read Only unregistered nodes in version 7.2.0? I made a 
clone entry for "Node Manager" in Admin access. Only thing I changed is what 
roles this Manager had access to. This Admin role when login sees these read 
only records. Do I need to add an extra permission? Thanks.

Jeremy Plumley,
ITS Network Administrator
Guilford Technical Community College
Applied Technologies, Rm #249
Jamestown Campus, 601 E. Main Street, Jamestown, NC 27282
E-mail: jmplum...@gtcc.edu
Direct: 336.334.4822 ext 50024
Mailing Address: PO Box 309, Jamestown, NC 27282
www.gtcc.edu
[Current_Color_GTCC%20Logo%20smaller]
Supporting success through innovative education, training, and partnerships

E-Mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North 
Carolina Public Records Law and shall be disclosed to third parties when 
required by the statutes (G.S. 132-1.)
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] Aruba Switch Network Configuration

[Jeremy Plumley via PacketFence-users]

I have been working off guides I am finding online. Been finding lots of 
information about configuring from the guide below. Would I be able to see this 
VSA in a debug or log?

https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c05365313

Jeremy Plumley
ITS Network Administrator
Ext 50024

From: Fabrice Durand [mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2018 1:51 PM
To: Jeremy Plumley ; packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Aruba Switch Network Configuration


Hello Jeremy,

do you have any documentation related to the support of the VoIP on the Aruba 
switch ?

There is probably a vsa attribute to return when PacketFence detect that a 
phone is plugged on a switch port.

If the vsa exist then it will be easy to add the VoIP support for the Aruba 
switches.

Regards

Fabrice

E-Mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North 
Carolina Public Records Law and shall be disclosed to third parties when 
required by the statutes (G.S. 132-1.)
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] Aruba Switch Network Configuration

[Jeremy Plumley via PacketFence-users]

I have my demo HPE Aruba 2930M switch now. So far data vlan seems ok but I'm 
having issues with my Cisco VOIP Phones. The Packetfence log is throwing this 
error over my phones.

Jan  3 13:21:48 pf1 packetfence_httpd.aaa: httpd.aaa(3637) WARN: 
[mac:64:00:f1:ab:11:35] RADIUS Authentication of IP Phones is not supported on 
switch type pf::Switch::ArubaSwitch. Please let us know what hardware you are 
using. (pf::Switch::supportsRadiusVoip)

Any ideas on how to support phones on these or should I attempt another switch 
type?

Jeremy Plumley
ITS Network Administrator
Ext 50024

From: Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users 
[mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2017 9:07 PM
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Durand fabrice 
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Aruba Switch Network Configuration


Ok so it should work.

When i did the code the Aruba switches were really new and there were bugs in 
the Aruba OS.

Btw i think that it's fully supported by Clear Pass so it will work with 
PacketFence.
Regards
Fabrice
E-Mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North 
Carolina Public Records Law and shall be disclosed to third parties when 
required by the statutes (G.S. 132-1.)
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] Cisco Catalyst 9300 and 9400 support

[Jeremy Plumley via PacketFence-users]

Best I can tell from Cisco website they run Cisco IOS XE. Think this is no
different than the 4500 series. The reseller just made it sound like it was
different from what I already use and advised I may need some services on
how to configure. I know they are really trying to sell the new Cisco DNA
platform and Cisco ISE. Both Cisco and Aruba really pushing us to get the
ISE or Clearpass NAC.

 

Jeremy Plumley

ITS Network Administrator

Ext 50024

 

From: puz...@man.olsztyn.pl [mailto:puz...@man.olsztyn.pl] On Behalf Of
Tomasz Karczewski
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 6:26 AM
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Jeremy Plumley <jmplum...@gtcc.edu>
Subject: RE: [PacketFence-users] Cisco Catalyst 9300 and 9400 support

 

Does it have different cisco ios?

 

Tomasz Karczewski

Administrator Sieci

 



 

tkarczew...@man.olsztyn.pl <mailto:tkarczew...@man.olsztyn.pl> 

http://www.man.olsztyn.pl   http://www.uwm.edu.pl

tel. (89) 523 45 55  fax. (89) 523 43 47

 

Ośrodek Eksploatacji i Zarządzania

Miejską Siecią Komputerową OLMAN w Olsztynie

Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie

 

From: Jeremy Plumley via PacketFence-users
[mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net] 
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 10:35 PM
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> 
Cc: Jeremy Plumley <jmplum...@gtcc.edu <mailto:jmplum...@gtcc.edu> >
Subject: [PacketFence-users] Cisco Catalyst 9300 and 9400 support

 

Just reaching out to see if anyone has implemented Packetfence on a Cisco
Catalyst 9300 or 9400 model switch? This seems to be Cisco's new line that
will probably phase out 4500 and 6500 model switches.

 

Jeremy Plumley

ITS Network Administrator

Ext 50024

E-Mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and shall be disclosed to third parties when
required by the statutes (G.S. 132-1.) 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

[PacketFence-users] Cisco Catalyst 9300 and 9400 support

[Jeremy Plumley via PacketFence-users]

Just reaching out to see if anyone has implemented Packetfence on a Cisco 
Catalyst 9300 or 9400 model switch? This seems to be Cisco's new line that will 
probably phase out 4500 and 6500 model switches.

Jeremy Plumley
ITS Network Administrator
Ext 50024
E-Mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North 
Carolina Public Records Law and shall be disclosed to third parties when 
required by the statutes (G.S. 132-1.)
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] Aruba Switch Network Configuration

[Jeremy Plumley via PacketFence-users]

Thanks. I will search for clearpass switch setup instructions and follow the 
radius settings for it. If I have issues I will report back.

Jeremy Plumley
ITS Network Administrator
Ext 50024

Sent from Outlook Mobile<https://aka.ms/blhgte>


From: Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users 
<packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 9:06:42 PM
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Durand fabrice
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Aruba Switch Network Configuration


Ok so it should work.

When i did the code the Aruba switches were really new and there were bugs in 
the Aruba OS.

Btw i think that it's fully supported by Clear Pass so it will work with 
PacketFence.

Regards
Fabrice

Le 2017-12-06 à 11:30, Jeremy Plumley via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Vendor confirmed they are running Aruba OS on them.

Jeremy Plumley
ITS Network Administrator
Ext 50024

From: Jeremy Plumley
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2017 11:22 AM
To: 
'packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>'
 
<packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net><mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: RE: [PacketFence-users] Aruba Switch Network Configuration

I venture to say Aruba OS since they are Aruba switches but I know they also 
were bought by HPE. I will double check with my vendor and see. I’m supposed to 
get a demo set of switches to verify they will work before we made a larger 
order.

Jeremy Plumley
ITS Network Administrator
Ext 50024

From: Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users 
[mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2017 10:09 AM
To: 
packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Fabrice Durand <fdur...@inverse.ca<mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca>>
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Aruba Switch Network Configuration


Hello Jeremy,

does the Aruba Switch run Arubas OS or is it something like HP Os ?

Regards

Fabrice

E-Mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North 
Carolina Public Records Law and shall be disclosed to third parties when 
required by the statutes (G.S. 132-1.)


--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot



___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users


--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] Aruba Switch Network Configuration

[Jeremy Plumley via PacketFence-users]

Vendor confirmed they are running Aruba OS on them.

Jeremy Plumley
ITS Network Administrator
Ext 50024

From: Jeremy Plumley
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2017 11:22 AM
To: 'packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net' 

Subject: RE: [PacketFence-users] Aruba Switch Network Configuration

I venture to say Aruba OS since they are Aruba switches but I know they also 
were bought by HPE. I will double check with my vendor and see. I'm supposed to 
get a demo set of switches to verify they will work before we made a larger 
order.

Jeremy Plumley
ITS Network Administrator
Ext 50024

From: Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users 
[mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2017 10:09 AM
To: 
packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Fabrice Durand >
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Aruba Switch Network Configuration


Hello Jeremy,

does the Aruba Switch run Arubas OS or is it something like HP Os ?

Regards

Fabrice

E-Mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North 
Carolina Public Records Law and shall be disclosed to third parties when 
required by the statutes (G.S. 132-1.)
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] Aruba Switch Network Configuration

[Jeremy Plumley via PacketFence-users]

I venture to say Aruba OS since they are Aruba switches but I know they also 
were bought by HPE. I will double check with my vendor and see. I'm supposed to 
get a demo set of switches to verify they will work before we made a larger 
order.

Jeremy Plumley
ITS Network Administrator
Ext 50024

From: Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users 
[mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2017 10:09 AM
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Fabrice Durand 
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Aruba Switch Network Configuration


Hello Jeremy,

does the Aruba Switch run Arubas OS or is it something like HP Os ?

Regards

Fabrice

E-Mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North 
Carolina Public Records Law and shall be disclosed to third parties when 
required by the statutes (G.S. 132-1.)
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] Multiple endpoints behind a single switchport

[Jeremy Plumley via PacketFence-users]

I'm attempting this on Packetfence 7.2 on Cisco switches. Like Derek said I see 
in Packetfence when you click on the node it can see that the switchport has 
other active devices on the port. Appears the "authentication violation 
replace" command that the Packetfence Network guide shows for multiple host 
port config on Cisco only supports one mac address at a time on the access 
vlan. If I have an unmanaged switch with two devices plugged into it with this 
configuration I can watch the terminal flip back and forth between the two mac 
addresses it sees on the port. If I have an active ping going on both devices, 
I can see they are dropping packets each time this happens. Max did you get 
this to work in your environment?

Jeremy Plumley
ITS Network Administrator
Ext 50024

From: Derek Wuelfrath via PacketFence-users 
[mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net]
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 10:34 AM
To: ML PF 
Cc: Derek Wuelfrath 
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Multiple endpoints behind a single switchport

Hey Max,

That means, if per exemple you have a managed switch port with PacketFence 
enforcement configured on it, and that you have a small unmanaged desktop 
switch plugged into that managed switch port, then you can register / 
unregister / apply a violation / close a violation / change the role of all the 
devices plugged into that unmanaged desktop switch.

Managing a device from PacketFence that is plugged into that unmanaged desktop 
switch will inform you that they are other devices with a locationlog opened on 
the same managed switch port and that you can apply the action to all of the 
devices or only on the one you are currently editing.

Does that helps ?

Cheers!
-dw

--
Derek Wuelfrath
dwuelfr...@inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu), 
PacketFence (www.packetfence.org) and Fingerbank 
(www.fingerbank.org)

On Jun 16, 2017, at 16:14, Max McGrath via PacketFence-users 
>
 wrote:

Hello -

I saw in the release notes for version 7.0 a feature which states "Ability to 
manage multiple "active" endpoints behind a single switchport (PR#2034)".

What exactly does this mean?  Does it mean that PacketFence will now work with 
multiple endpoints plugged into a single hub/switch?

I've just tried that and it doesn't seem to function as expected.  Perhaps 
PR#2034 does something different than I'm reading into it.

Thanks!

Max
--
Max McGrath 
[https://static.licdn.com/scds/common/u/img/webpromo/btn_profile_greytxt_80x15.png]
 
Network Administrator
Carthage College
262-551-
mmcgr...@carthage.edu
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! 
http://sdm.link/slashdot___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

E-Mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North 
Carolina Public Records Law and shall be disclosed to third parties when 
required by the statutes (G.S. 132-1.)
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users