Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2010-01-02 Thread Jörgen Hansson
Hi there, I am also intrested in those plugs, and I'd like to hear how they 
sound like.

Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, January 02, 2010 3:38 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo



High Sunshine,
Vacuum tube stereo receivers have been discontinued cense 1967.
But however, there are still some integrated amplifiers on the market that 
uses tubes, but they are very costly.

They are $5000 and up.
But you can get a very low powered tube integrated amp from:
www.tubedepot.com
for about $200.
I would like to see how the plug ins you spoke of works.
I have Winamp 5.571
If you can, would you please send them to me?
Thinks in advance for doing this for me.
My best regards.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 7:33 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo



i can deffinitly agree with this one.
btw for those of you who want that tube/balbe sound i can recomand a 
really
need combo of vsts that can give this to you. you will need winamp, the 
vst
bridge 1.16 and the two vsts i have but for a computer sulation in 
software
it works great. but still wish there was a way to get the valve 
sound/tube

sound with out having to use vsts to do so.
on another note are there any recievers that can produce the tub/valve
sounds like we have been disscussing?
- Original Message - 
From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


But that really makes no difference as a sub-woofer only gives you base 
(and
nothing else!  So whether it's in mono or stereo, out of the 
sub-woofer,

you hear base..either way.
Tom Kaufman


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org





To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2010-01-02 Thread Michael D. Barber

Actually, I think I heard something about this on television not long ago.
- Original Message - 
From: Norma A. Boge nab...@mchsi.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


This thread reminds me of why I wondered why the remastering of the 
Beatles albums is such a big deal.  I can appreciate Sir George and Giles 
Martin producing, but wouldn't all this only really sound good if on 
vinyl?  IMHO, there is music that isn't meant to be digitized
Seems there are more albums being made available on vinyl.  I figure this 
is due to boomers with disposable income wanting to hear music as they did 
in their youth.


Just my 2 cents...
Norma



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
signature database 4737 (20100102) __


The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com






__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature 
database 4737 (20100102) __

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2010-01-02 Thread Adrian Spratt

John,

Perhaps I shouldn't question an artifact you can check against, but the date 
makes no historical sense. Brian Wilson began formulating good vibrations 
some time during the Pet Sounds sessions. As an aside, you can hear stereo 
mixes of the rehearsals in the box set, The Pet Sounds Sessions. The Pet 
Sounds LP wasn't released until May of 1966, and good Vibrations came out 
several months later.


No Beach Boys albums appeared in stereo up to that time because Brian Wilson 
was deaf in one ear and seems to have had complete control over production, 
which in every other way was a good thing. Surgery apparently restored some 
hearing in the deaf ear, and Friends, three albums later, came out in 
stereo. In the past two decade, stereo remixes of Beach Boys material at 
their height have appeared in drips and drabs, the best being on that Pet 
sounds Sessions box set, which includes a wonderful stereo remix of the 
album itself.


Regarding the Beatles Stereo Set, something to keep in mind is that 
Capital's versions of the Beatles albums not only differed in content from 
those released in the UK, but the LPs were also, I believe, inferior in 
quality. The stereo set's Sergeant Pepper's is light years ahead of the US 
LP. I don't have the UK LP of that album. However, I have the UK Beetles 
for Sale LP, and it compares favorably with the stereo set version. Still, 
the stereo set is very well done, the sound is terrific, and the convenience 
of a CD undeniably surpasses that of an LP.

- Original Message -
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 9:10 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

High Ford, That isn't true. I have an old 12 inch copy of that song that was 
done in stereo. The date on this old record, is March 5, 1965. My best 
regards. John.

- Original Message -
From: Ford Blackwell blackwe...@ameritech.net
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 4:11 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

Wouldn't matter. Good Vibrations ws recorded and released only in mono.
- Original Message -
From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

Okay..I'm thinking of the Beach Boys' Good Vibrations..LOL! Seriously..the 
stereo isn't in my bedroom, so afraid that wouldn't work for me either! But 
hey..interesting thought, Robert! Tom Kaufman


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2010-01-02 Thread Brett Boyer

really. Like what for instance.
bb
- Original Message - 
From: Michael D. Barber m.bar...@mchsi.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, January 02, 2010 7:50 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo



Actually, I think I heard something about this on television not long ago.
- Original Message - 
From: Norma A. Boge nab...@mchsi.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


This thread reminds me of why I wondered why the remastering of the 
Beatles albums is such a big deal.  I can appreciate Sir George and Giles 
Martin producing, but wouldn't all this only really sound good if on 
vinyl?  IMHO, there is music that isn't meant to be digitized
Seems there are more albums being made available on vinyl.  I figure this 
is due to boomers with disposable income wanting to hear music as they 
did in their youth.


Just my 2 cents...
Norma



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
signature database 4737 (20100102) __


The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com






__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
signature database 4737 (20100102) __


The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2010-01-02 Thread Brett Boyer
Yes good vibrations was supposed to be on smile until it got scrapped. Brian 
had the song and was busy recording it in 4 studios. However officially no 
stereo version existed until the bootlegs started coming out. There were 
several mock stereo version using overdubs from an alternate take of good 
vibrations.

bb
- Original Message - 
From: Adrian Spratt adr...@adrianspratt.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, January 02, 2010 9:53 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo



John,

Perhaps I shouldn't question an artifact you can check against, but the 
date makes no historical sense. Brian Wilson began formulating good 
vibrations some time during the Pet Sounds sessions. As an aside, you 
can hear stereo mixes of the rehearsals in the box set, The Pet Sounds 
Sessions. The Pet Sounds LP wasn't released until May of 1966, and good 
Vibrations came out several months later.


No Beach Boys albums appeared in stereo up to that time because Brian 
Wilson was deaf in one ear and seems to have had complete control over 
production, which in every other way was a good thing. Surgery apparently 
restored some hearing in the deaf ear, and Friends, three albums later, 
came out in stereo. In the past two decade, stereo remixes of Beach Boys 
material at their height have appeared in drips and drabs, the best being 
on that Pet sounds Sessions box set, which includes a wonderful stereo 
remix of the album itself.


Regarding the Beatles Stereo Set, something to keep in mind is that 
Capital's versions of the Beatles albums not only differed in content from 
those released in the UK, but the LPs were also, I believe, inferior in 
quality. The stereo set's Sergeant Pepper's is light years ahead of the 
US LP. I don't have the UK LP of that album. However, I have the UK 
Beetles for Sale LP, and it compares favorably with the stereo set 
version. Still, the stereo set is very well done, the sound is terrific, 
and the convenience of a CD undeniably surpasses that of an LP.

- Original Message -
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 9:10 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

High Ford, That isn't true. I have an old 12 inch copy of that song that 
was done in stereo. The date on this old record, is March 5, 1965. My best 
regards. John.

- Original Message -
From: Ford Blackwell blackwe...@ameritech.net
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 4:11 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

Wouldn't matter. Good Vibrations ws recorded and released only in mono.
- Original Message -
From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

Okay..I'm thinking of the Beach Boys' Good Vibrations..LOL! 
Seriously..the stereo isn't in my bedroom, so afraid that wouldn't work 
for me either! But hey..interesting thought, Robert! Tom Kaufman


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2010-01-02 Thread DJ DOCTOR P

High Adrian,
It's not an LP, it's just a long playing record with the same song on it 
over and over again.
On the other side of it, is just the song with just the backup singers with 
the lead singer removed.

Some of those tracks, don't have any singers of any kind at all!
This record was imported from Japanned in March 5, 1965.
As I stated in an earlier post, these are my parents and grand parent's old 
records.

I think this one, belonged to my father.
How he got his hands on it, is way be-on me.
My best regards.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Adrian Spratt adr...@adrianspratt.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, January 02, 2010 11:53 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo



John,

Perhaps I shouldn't question an artifact you can check against, but the 
date makes no historical sense. Brian Wilson began formulating good 
vibrations some time during the Pet Sounds sessions. As an aside, you 
can hear stereo mixes of the rehearsals in the box set, The Pet Sounds 
Sessions. The Pet Sounds LP wasn't released until May of 1966, and good 
Vibrations came out several months later.


No Beach Boys albums appeared in stereo up to that time because Brian 
Wilson was deaf in one ear and seems to have had complete control over 
production, which in every other way was a good thing. Surgery apparently 
restored some hearing in the deaf ear, and Friends, three albums later, 
came out in stereo. In the past two decade, stereo remixes of Beach Boys 
material at their height have appeared in drips and drabs, the best being 
on that Pet sounds Sessions box set, which includes a wonderful stereo 
remix of the album itself.


Regarding the Beatles Stereo Set, something to keep in mind is that 
Capital's versions of the Beatles albums not only differed in content from 
those released in the UK, but the LPs were also, I believe, inferior in 
quality. The stereo set's Sergeant Pepper's is light years ahead of the 
US LP. I don't have the UK LP of that album. However, I have the UK 
Beetles for Sale LP, and it compares favorably with the stereo set 
version. Still, the stereo set is very well done, the sound is terrific, 
and the convenience of a CD undeniably surpasses that of an LP.

- Original Message -
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 9:10 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

High Ford, That isn't true. I have an old 12 inch copy of that song that 
was done in stereo. The date on this old record, is March 5, 1965. My best 
regards. John.

- Original Message -
From: Ford Blackwell blackwe...@ameritech.net
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 4:11 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

Wouldn't matter. Good Vibrations ws recorded and released only in mono.
- Original Message -
From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

Okay..I'm thinking of the Beach Boys' Good Vibrations..LOL! 
Seriously..the stereo isn't in my bedroom, so afraid that wouldn't work 
for me either! But hey..interesting thought, Robert! Tom Kaufman


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2010-01-02 Thread robert Doc Wright
Fire sign theatre did something that cd will never accomplish. they put out 
an album that one record had three sides. Side two was grooved in a way that 
when the needle was set in one groove to get side two then the next groove 
over for side three. As a blind person this could raise havack.
- Original Message - 
From: Norma A. Boge nab...@mchsi.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 7:30 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


This thread reminds me of why I wondered why the remastering of the 
Beatles albums is such a big deal.  I can appreciate Sir George and Giles 
Martin producing, but wouldn't all this only really sound good if on 
vinyl?  IMHO, there is music that isn't meant to be digitized
Seems there are more albums being made available on vinyl.  I figure this 
is due to boomers with disposable income wanting to hear music as they did 
in their youth.


Just my 2 cents...
Norma



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2010-01-01 Thread Tom Kaufman
Okay..I'm thinking of the Beach Boys' Good Vibrations..LOL!  Seriously..the 
stereo isn't in my bedroom, so afraid that wouldn't work for me either!  But 
hey..interesting thought, Robert!
Tom Kaufman 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2010-01-01 Thread Ford Blackwell

Wouldn't matter.  Good Vibrations ws recorded and released only in mono.
- Original Message - 
From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Okay..I'm thinking of the Beach Boys' Good Vibrations..LOL! 
Seriously..the stereo isn't in my bedroom, so afraid that wouldn't work 
for me either!  But hey..interesting thought, Robert!

Tom Kaufman

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2010-01-01 Thread Tom Kaufman
But that really makes no difference as a sub-woofer only gives you base (and 
nothing else!  So whether it's in mono or stereo, out of the sub-woofer, 
you hear base..either way.
Tom Kaufman 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2010-01-01 Thread Sunshine
i can deffinitly agree with this one.
btw for those of you who want that tube/balbe sound i can recomand a  really 
need combo of vsts that can give this to you. you will need winamp, the vst 
bridge 1.16 and the two vsts i have but for a computer sulation in software 
it works great. but still wish there was a way to get the valve sound/tube 
sound with out having to use vsts to do so.
on another note are there any recievers that can produce the tub/valve 
sounds like we have been disscussing?
- Original Message - 
From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


But that really makes no difference as a sub-woofer only gives you base (and
nothing else!  So whether it's in mono or stereo, out of the sub-woofer,
you hear base..either way.
Tom Kaufman


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2010-01-01 Thread DJ DOCTOR P

High Ford,
That isn't true.
I have an old 12 inch copy of that song that was done in stereo.
The date on this old record, is March 5, 1965.
My best regards.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Ford Blackwell blackwe...@ameritech.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 4:11 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo



Wouldn't matter.  Good Vibrations ws recorded and released only in mono.
- Original Message - 
From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Okay..I'm thinking of the Beach Boys' Good Vibrations..LOL! 
Seriously..the stereo isn't in my bedroom, so afraid that wouldn't work 
for me either!  But hey..interesting thought, Robert!

Tom Kaufman

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2010-01-01 Thread DJ DOCTOR P

High Sunshine,
No, I was talking about music discs.
SACD, AKA, super audio compact disc, is record in AC3 encoding with a64 bit 
rate and 11486 KHZ.

But in order to play those, you will need a SACD player.
You can also find that at your loco hi end stereo shop too as well.
My best regards.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 10:28 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo



these are the kind you can  record on correct?
- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 7:20 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


High Sunshine,
Try any high end stereo shop in your area.
They run somewhere in between $25 $30.
My best regards.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 8:01 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo



can yu give me an idea of where i can look for them and  how much they
cost?
- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 5:07 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


High Sunshine,
I still have one of those old vacuum tube systems.
What you said about the CD, is true on one hand.
But on the other hand, it isn't.
Some CD's, are being recorded at 32 bits with PCM encoding which yields a
way better sound.
But however, they are only sailing them to the AUDIO PHIAL people.
The sound quality of CD's that are made like that, are top notch.
But don't expect to find CD's like these in WAL-MART, you won't find them
there.
I had allot of luck finding them at a specialty stereo shop.
My best regards.
 John.
PS. I still have a pare of those speakers, they sound really nice!
- Original Message - 
From: Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 3:18 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo



you know brent, and others.
todays music systems that are purely digital, are a bit if not totally
disapointing.
from what i know aabout digital  files such as those that are made from
cds.
the  quality is what you get, if i  remember correctly the underlying
actuall, audio is a wav file that has been made in 16 bit, 44100 khz
standards such as the red book standard.
The tube sound or vacume tube/valve sound of the earlier systems, made
sound
quality stars above any digital sounding system i have heard.
I am in my 30's and can remember a lot of stereo equipment from those
days.
what i would love to see is a very high quality audio file stereo system
with  ripping aviable in the unit, with a way to transfer the ripped
files
to a portable device/ or computer.
Also on another note digital speakers vs analog speakers i will take the
analog speakers over the digital ones any day.
the frequency response of a pure analog speaker system also sounds much
better.
does anyone remember the panasonic thruster 750's? for analog speakers?
- Original Message - 
From: Brett Boyer bboyer...@gmail.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 9:08 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


absolutely. Everything is now digitized, quantized, and crappy!
bb
- Original Message - 
From: Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo



also tom, and others, the sound that was produced back in the
60s,70s,80s
has that warm, deep sound that has depth, spectural, clariety, and a
sound
that is more human then digital sounding recordings. of todays  cd
quality
music.
The analog sound that came out of the past  years  in the 60s,70s, has 
a

lot
of clariety that todays equipment doesn't have in my own thoughts.
- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


High Tom,
I think the change took place in the mid 80's when CD's replaced 8 
track

tapes.
Also at the same time, you couldn't buy music on open reels anymore
either.
To me, the open real tapes sounded a whole lot better then 8 track and
cassette tapes put together.
My best regards.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo



In my opinion, I don't think they'll

Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2010-01-01 Thread Norma A. Boge
This thread reminds me of why I wondered why the remastering of the 
Beatles albums is such a big deal.  I can appreciate Sir George and 
Giles Martin producing, but wouldn't all this only really sound good 
if on vinyl?  IMHO, there is music that isn't meant to be digitized
Seems there are more albums being made available on vinyl.  I figure 
this is due to boomers with disposable income wanting to hear music 
as they did in their youth.


Just my 2 cents...
Norma

  



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2010-01-01 Thread Sunshine
Ok, you would need the winamp  vst bridge, version 1.16 cause it has a 
second  part to load the other vst.
what version of foobar are you using? and how are you loading the vsts? that 
you use?
email me off list and i will send them to you.
- Original Message - 
From: Brett Boyer bboyer...@gmail.com
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 7:42 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


I'd be interested to hear these vsts. I use foobar 2000 but I also have
winamp. It might be fun to try it.
What do I need?
bb
- Original Message - 
From: Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 5:33 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


i can deffinitly agree with this one.
 btw for those of you who want that tube/balbe sound i can recomand a
 really
 need combo of vsts that can give this to you. you will need winamp, the
 vst
 bridge 1.16 and the two vsts i have but for a computer sulation in
 software
 it works great. but still wish there was a way to get the valve sound/tube
 sound with out having to use vsts to do so.
 on another note are there any recievers that can produce the tub/valve
 sounds like we have been disscussing?
 - Original Message - 
 From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 6:20 PM
 Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


 But that really makes no difference as a sub-woofer only gives you base
 (and
 nothing else!  So whether it's in mono or stereo, out of the
 sub-woofer,
 you hear base..either way.
 Tom Kaufman


 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2010-01-01 Thread DJ DOCTOR P

High Sunshine,
Vacuum tube stereo receivers have been discontinued cense 1967.
But however, there are still some integrated amplifiers on the market that 
uses tubes, but they are very costly.

They are $5000 and up.
But you can get a very low powered tube integrated amp from:
www.tubedepot.com
for about $200.
I would like to see how the plug ins you spoke of works.
I have Winamp 5.571
If you can, would you please send them to me?
Thinks in advance for doing this for me.
My best regards.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 7:33 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo



i can deffinitly agree with this one.
btw for those of you who want that tube/balbe sound i can recomand a 
really
need combo of vsts that can give this to you. you will need winamp, the 
vst
bridge 1.16 and the two vsts i have but for a computer sulation in 
software

it works great. but still wish there was a way to get the valve sound/tube
sound with out having to use vsts to do so.
on another note are there any recievers that can produce the tub/valve
sounds like we have been disscussing?
- Original Message - 
From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


But that really makes no difference as a sub-woofer only gives you base 
(and
nothing else!  So whether it's in mono or stereo, out of the 
sub-woofer,

you hear base..either way.
Tom Kaufman


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2010-01-01 Thread DJ DOCTOR P

High Norma,
That is true.
I don't know about the boomers you spoke of, but I am still a record 
collector.

I collect allot of jazz records.
You can get them either way.
You can get them on LP or CD.
But to my ears, the LP's sound a whole lot better.
The newest amp that I have, is an Eastern Electric M-520 integrated vacuum 
tube amp that I bought almost 2 years ago.
But most of my sound equipment, is vintage equipment that my parents had 
when they were alive.
When they passed on, I got it and restored it all to working order so that I 
could use it.

My best regards.
John.
- Original Message - 
From: Norma A. Boge nab...@mchsi.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 9:30 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


This thread reminds me of why I wondered why the remastering of the 
Beatles albums is such a big deal.  I can appreciate Sir George and Giles 
Martin producing, but wouldn't all this only really sound good if on 
vinyl?  IMHO, there is music that isn't meant to be digitized
Seems there are more albums being made available on vinyl.  I figure this 
is due to boomers with disposable income wanting to hear music as they did 
in their youth.


Just my 2 cents...
Norma



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2010-01-01 Thread Casey

Hi how do this plug ins or this dsp bridge effect the sound in winamp?
If I had it and first played one of my mp3's just using winamp on its own.
Then played that same file using that bridge would I notice a sound 
difference from when I played the file when I wasn't using it and or over 
when I played it when I was using it?
And also what all configuring need to be done to get it to sound nice and 
what settings do you need to set to get the best quality out of it?

Also where do you get these files from and are they free?

Casey
- Original Message - 
From: Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 8:31 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo



Ok, you would need the winamp  vst bridge, version 1.16 cause it has a
second  part to load the other vst.
what version of foobar are you using? and how are you loading the vsts? 
that

you use?
email me off list and i will send them to you.
- Original Message - 
From: Brett Boyer bboyer...@gmail.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 7:42 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


I'd be interested to hear these vsts. I use foobar 2000 but I also have
winamp. It might be fun to try it.
What do I need?
bb
- Original Message - 
From: Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 5:33 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo



i can deffinitly agree with this one.
btw for those of you who want that tube/balbe sound i can recomand a
really
need combo of vsts that can give this to you. you will need winamp, the
vst
bridge 1.16 and the two vsts i have but for a computer sulation in
software
it works great. but still wish there was a way to get the valve 
sound/tube

sound with out having to use vsts to do so.
on another note are there any recievers that can produce the tub/valve
sounds like we have been disscussing?
- Original Message - 
From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


But that really makes no difference as a sub-woofer only gives you base
(and
nothing else!  So whether it's in mono or stereo, out of the
sub-woofer,
you hear base..either way.
Tom Kaufman


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-31 Thread Sunshine
you know brent, and others.
todays music systems that are purely digital, are a bit if not totally 
disapointing.
from what i know aabout digital  files such as those that are made from cds. 
the  quality is what you get, if i  remember correctly the underlying 
actuall, audio is a wav file that has been made in 16 bit, 44100 khz 
standards such as the red book standard.
The tube sound or vacume tube/valve sound of the earlier systems, made sound 
quality stars above any digital sounding system i have heard.
I am in my 30's and can remember a lot of stereo equipment from those days.
what i would love to see is a very high quality audio file stereo system 
with  ripping aviable in the unit, with a way to transfer the ripped files 
to a portable device/ or computer.
Also on another note digital speakers vs analog speakers i will take the 
analog speakers over the digital ones any day.
the frequency response of a pure analog speaker system also sounds much 
better.
does anyone remember the panasonic thruster 750's? for analog speakers?
- Original Message - 
From: Brett Boyer bboyer...@gmail.com
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 9:08 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


absolutely. Everything is now digitized, quantized, and crappy!
bb
- Original Message - 
From: Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


 also tom, and others, the sound that was produced back in the 60s,70s,80s
 has that warm, deep sound that has depth, spectural, clariety, and a sound
 that is more human then digital sounding recordings. of todays  cd quality
 music.
 The analog sound that came out of the past  years  in the 60s,70s, has a
 lot
 of clariety that todays equipment doesn't have in my own thoughts.
 - Original Message - 
 From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 5:25 PM
 Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


 High Tom,
 I think the change took place in the mid 80's when CD's replaced 8 track
 tapes.
 Also at the same time, you couldn't buy music on open reels anymore
 either.
 To me, the open real tapes sounded a whole lot better then 8 track and
 cassette tapes put together.
 My best regards.
  John.
 - Original Message - 
 From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 11:41 AM
 Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


 In my opinion, I don't think they'll ever be able to re-create that sound
 they had back then as the world of digital equipment just doesn't allow
 for it!  But even a lot of the music of the seventies still had that
 good,
 wide, stereo; I don't know when it changed..and don't really know why it
 changed!
 Tom Kaufman

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-31 Thread DJ DOCTOR P

High Tom,
This is why I'm still using my father's stereo receiver.
It is more then 50 years old.
The phono stage in all of these newer receivers, I found to be a joke.
They can't reproduce the high quality sound that comes from my Fisher 500-s 
receiver.

Oh ya, this receiver has vacuum tubes in it.
No transistors anywhere in sight.
This is the reason I'm keeping it working and operational because I love its 
sound.

Today's stereo and surround receivers, can't come close to even touching it.
My best regards.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 11:05 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Well Brett and list: To show you how it's gotten to be, I have a friend 
(great steel guitarist)..he recorded some songs..I guess it was fifteen 
years ago..maybe more..a few years ago, he put those tunes on a CD (along 
with some other stuff he'd done)..well I have a cassette tape of this one 
song (the click track is still on it)..but the tone of that steel just 
sounds so nice!  Well when they put it on CD, although it's the same guy; 
same tune and all..it doesn't have that good, smooth tone as it has on 
that old cassette I have of him doing it!  I remember him telling me that 
(and I've found this out for myself)..in the digital world, if you turn 
the volume down, it goes down to a point; then just cuts off!  It's this 
way on my JVC stereo receiver; when it gets to a certain point, instead of 
the sound continuing to taper off, it just cuts off completely!

Tom Kaufman (aka Tomcat)

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-31 Thread DJ DOCTOR P

High Sunshine,
I still have one of those old vacuum tube systems.
What you said about the CD, is true on one hand.
But on the other hand, it isn't.
Some CD's, are being recorded at 32 bits with PCM encoding which yields a 
way better sound.

But however, they are only sailing them to the AUDIO PHIAL people.
The sound quality of CD's that are made like that, are top notch.
But don't expect to find CD's like these in WAL-MART, you won't find them 
there.

I had allot of luck finding them at a specialty stereo shop.
My best regards.
 John.
PS. I still have a pare of those speakers, they sound really nice!
- Original Message - 
From: Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 3:18 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo



you know brent, and others.
todays music systems that are purely digital, are a bit if not totally
disapointing.
from what i know aabout digital  files such as those that are made from 
cds.

the  quality is what you get, if i  remember correctly the underlying
actuall, audio is a wav file that has been made in 16 bit, 44100 khz
standards such as the red book standard.
The tube sound or vacume tube/valve sound of the earlier systems, made 
sound

quality stars above any digital sounding system i have heard.
I am in my 30's and can remember a lot of stereo equipment from those 
days.

what i would love to see is a very high quality audio file stereo system
with  ripping aviable in the unit, with a way to transfer the ripped files
to a portable device/ or computer.
Also on another note digital speakers vs analog speakers i will take the
analog speakers over the digital ones any day.
the frequency response of a pure analog speaker system also sounds much
better.
does anyone remember the panasonic thruster 750's? for analog speakers?
- Original Message - 
From: Brett Boyer bboyer...@gmail.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 9:08 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


absolutely. Everything is now digitized, quantized, and crappy!
bb
- Original Message - 
From: Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo



also tom, and others, the sound that was produced back in the 60s,70s,80s
has that warm, deep sound that has depth, spectural, clariety, and a 
sound
that is more human then digital sounding recordings. of todays  cd 
quality

music.
The analog sound that came out of the past  years  in the 60s,70s, has a
lot
of clariety that todays equipment doesn't have in my own thoughts.
- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


High Tom,
I think the change took place in the mid 80's when CD's replaced 8 track
tapes.
Also at the same time, you couldn't buy music on open reels anymore
either.
To me, the open real tapes sounded a whole lot better then 8 track and
cassette tapes put together.
My best regards.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


In my opinion, I don't think they'll ever be able to re-create that 
sound
they had back then as the world of digital equipment just doesn't 
allow

for it!  But even a lot of the music of the seventies still had that
good,
wide, stereo; I don't know when it changed..and don't really know why it
changed!
Tom Kaufman

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-31 Thread Sunshine
can yu give me an idea of where i can look for them and  how much they cost?
- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 5:07 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


High Sunshine,
I still have one of those old vacuum tube systems.
What you said about the CD, is true on one hand.
But on the other hand, it isn't.
Some CD's, are being recorded at 32 bits with PCM encoding which yields a
way better sound.
But however, they are only sailing them to the AUDIO PHIAL people.
The sound quality of CD's that are made like that, are top notch.
But don't expect to find CD's like these in WAL-MART, you won't find them
there.
I had allot of luck finding them at a specialty stereo shop.
My best regards.
  John.
PS. I still have a pare of those speakers, they sound really nice!
- Original Message - 
From: Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 3:18 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


 you know brent, and others.
 todays music systems that are purely digital, are a bit if not totally
 disapointing.
 from what i know aabout digital  files such as those that are made from
 cds.
 the  quality is what you get, if i  remember correctly the underlying
 actuall, audio is a wav file that has been made in 16 bit, 44100 khz
 standards such as the red book standard.
 The tube sound or vacume tube/valve sound of the earlier systems, made
 sound
 quality stars above any digital sounding system i have heard.
 I am in my 30's and can remember a lot of stereo equipment from those
 days.
 what i would love to see is a very high quality audio file stereo system
 with  ripping aviable in the unit, with a way to transfer the ripped files
 to a portable device/ or computer.
 Also on another note digital speakers vs analog speakers i will take the
 analog speakers over the digital ones any day.
 the frequency response of a pure analog speaker system also sounds much
 better.
 does anyone remember the panasonic thruster 750's? for analog speakers?
 - Original Message - 
 From: Brett Boyer bboyer...@gmail.com
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 9:08 PM
 Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


 absolutely. Everything is now digitized, quantized, and crappy!
 bb
 - Original Message - 
 From: Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 4:30 PM
 Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


 also tom, and others, the sound that was produced back in the 60s,70s,80s
 has that warm, deep sound that has depth, spectural, clariety, and a
 sound
 that is more human then digital sounding recordings. of todays  cd
 quality
 music.
 The analog sound that came out of the past  years  in the 60s,70s, has a
 lot
 of clariety that todays equipment doesn't have in my own thoughts.
 - Original Message - 
 From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 5:25 PM
 Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


 High Tom,
 I think the change took place in the mid 80's when CD's replaced 8 track
 tapes.
 Also at the same time, you couldn't buy music on open reels anymore
 either.
 To me, the open real tapes sounded a whole lot better then 8 track and
 cassette tapes put together.
 My best regards.
  John.
 - Original Message - 
 From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 11:41 AM
 Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


 In my opinion, I don't think they'll ever be able to re-create that
 sound
 they had back then as the world of digital equipment just doesn't
 allow
 for it!  But even a lot of the music of the seventies still had that
 good,
 wide, stereo; I don't know when it changed..and don't really know why it
 changed!
 Tom Kaufman

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-31 Thread Brett Boyer
When I went to a studio. I saw a guy playing drums by dragging and dropping 
beats I almost crapped myself. I'm not talking about electronic music with 
sampling or remixing. This guy had a regular drummer who came in and hit 
certain drums and this guy drew the beats together.

Then I knew the days of pure music are over.
nn
- Original Message - 
From: Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 1:18 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo



you know brent, and others.
todays music systems that are purely digital, are a bit if not totally
disapointing.
from what i know aabout digital  files such as those that are made from 
cds.

the  quality is what you get, if i  remember correctly the underlying
actuall, audio is a wav file that has been made in 16 bit, 44100 khz
standards such as the red book standard.
The tube sound or vacume tube/valve sound of the earlier systems, made 
sound

quality stars above any digital sounding system i have heard.
I am in my 30's and can remember a lot of stereo equipment from those 
days.

what i would love to see is a very high quality audio file stereo system
with  ripping aviable in the unit, with a way to transfer the ripped files
to a portable device/ or computer.
Also on another note digital speakers vs analog speakers i will take the
analog speakers over the digital ones any day.
the frequency response of a pure analog speaker system also sounds much
better.
does anyone remember the panasonic thruster 750's? for analog speakers?
- Original Message - 
From: Brett Boyer bboyer...@gmail.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 9:08 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


absolutely. Everything is now digitized, quantized, and crappy!
bb
- Original Message - 
From: Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo



also tom, and others, the sound that was produced back in the 60s,70s,80s
has that warm, deep sound that has depth, spectural, clariety, and a 
sound
that is more human then digital sounding recordings. of todays  cd 
quality

music.
The analog sound that came out of the past  years  in the 60s,70s, has a
lot
of clariety that todays equipment doesn't have in my own thoughts.
- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


High Tom,
I think the change took place in the mid 80's when CD's replaced 8 track
tapes.
Also at the same time, you couldn't buy music on open reels anymore
either.
To me, the open real tapes sounded a whole lot better then 8 track and
cassette tapes put together.
My best regards.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


In my opinion, I don't think they'll ever be able to re-create that 
sound
they had back then as the world of digital equipment just doesn't 
allow

for it!  But even a lot of the music of the seventies still had that
good,
wide, stereo; I don't know when it changed..and don't really know why it
changed!
Tom Kaufman

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-31 Thread Brett Boyer

wasn't there a sound card that uses tubes?
bb
- Original Message - 
From: Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 6:01 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


can yu give me an idea of where i can look for them and  how much they 
cost?
- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 5:07 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


High Sunshine,
I still have one of those old vacuum tube systems.
What you said about the CD, is true on one hand.
But on the other hand, it isn't.
Some CD's, are being recorded at 32 bits with PCM encoding which yields a
way better sound.
But however, they are only sailing them to the AUDIO PHIAL people.
The sound quality of CD's that are made like that, are top notch.
But don't expect to find CD's like these in WAL-MART, you won't find them
there.
I had allot of luck finding them at a specialty stereo shop.
My best regards.
 John.
PS. I still have a pare of those speakers, they sound really nice!
- Original Message - 
From: Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 3:18 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo



you know brent, and others.
todays music systems that are purely digital, are a bit if not totally
disapointing.
from what i know aabout digital  files such as those that are made from
cds.
the  quality is what you get, if i  remember correctly the underlying
actuall, audio is a wav file that has been made in 16 bit, 44100 khz
standards such as the red book standard.
The tube sound or vacume tube/valve sound of the earlier systems, made
sound
quality stars above any digital sounding system i have heard.
I am in my 30's and can remember a lot of stereo equipment from those
days.
what i would love to see is a very high quality audio file stereo system
with  ripping aviable in the unit, with a way to transfer the ripped 
files

to a portable device/ or computer.
Also on another note digital speakers vs analog speakers i will take the
analog speakers over the digital ones any day.
the frequency response of a pure analog speaker system also sounds much
better.
does anyone remember the panasonic thruster 750's? for analog speakers?
- Original Message - 
From: Brett Boyer bboyer...@gmail.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 9:08 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


absolutely. Everything is now digitized, quantized, and crappy!
bb
- Original Message - 
From: Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


also tom, and others, the sound that was produced back in the 
60s,70s,80s

has that warm, deep sound that has depth, spectural, clariety, and a
sound
that is more human then digital sounding recordings. of todays  cd
quality
music.
The analog sound that came out of the past  years  in the 60s,70s, has a
lot
of clariety that todays equipment doesn't have in my own thoughts.
- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


High Tom,
I think the change took place in the mid 80's when CD's replaced 8 track
tapes.
Also at the same time, you couldn't buy music on open reels anymore
either.
To me, the open real tapes sounded a whole lot better then 8 track and
cassette tapes put together.
My best regards.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo



In my opinion, I don't think they'll ever be able to re-create that
sound
they had back then as the world of digital equipment just doesn't
allow
for it!  But even a lot of the music of the seventies still had that
good,
wide, stereo; I don't know when it changed..and don't really know why 
it

changed!
Tom Kaufman

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email

Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-31 Thread DJ DOCTOR P

High Sunshine,
Try any high end stereo shop in your area.
They run somewhere in between $25 $30.
My best regards.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 8:01 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


can yu give me an idea of where i can look for them and  how much they 
cost?
- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 5:07 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


High Sunshine,
I still have one of those old vacuum tube systems.
What you said about the CD, is true on one hand.
But on the other hand, it isn't.
Some CD's, are being recorded at 32 bits with PCM encoding which yields a
way better sound.
But however, they are only sailing them to the AUDIO PHIAL people.
The sound quality of CD's that are made like that, are top notch.
But don't expect to find CD's like these in WAL-MART, you won't find them
there.
I had allot of luck finding them at a specialty stereo shop.
My best regards.
 John.
PS. I still have a pare of those speakers, they sound really nice!
- Original Message - 
From: Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 3:18 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo



you know brent, and others.
todays music systems that are purely digital, are a bit if not totally
disapointing.
from what i know aabout digital  files such as those that are made from
cds.
the  quality is what you get, if i  remember correctly the underlying
actuall, audio is a wav file that has been made in 16 bit, 44100 khz
standards such as the red book standard.
The tube sound or vacume tube/valve sound of the earlier systems, made
sound
quality stars above any digital sounding system i have heard.
I am in my 30's and can remember a lot of stereo equipment from those
days.
what i would love to see is a very high quality audio file stereo system
with  ripping aviable in the unit, with a way to transfer the ripped 
files

to a portable device/ or computer.
Also on another note digital speakers vs analog speakers i will take the
analog speakers over the digital ones any day.
the frequency response of a pure analog speaker system also sounds much
better.
does anyone remember the panasonic thruster 750's? for analog speakers?
- Original Message - 
From: Brett Boyer bboyer...@gmail.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 9:08 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


absolutely. Everything is now digitized, quantized, and crappy!
bb
- Original Message - 
From: Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


also tom, and others, the sound that was produced back in the 
60s,70s,80s

has that warm, deep sound that has depth, spectural, clariety, and a
sound
that is more human then digital sounding recordings. of todays  cd
quality
music.
The analog sound that came out of the past  years  in the 60s,70s, has a
lot
of clariety that todays equipment doesn't have in my own thoughts.
- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


High Tom,
I think the change took place in the mid 80's when CD's replaced 8 track
tapes.
Also at the same time, you couldn't buy music on open reels anymore
either.
To me, the open real tapes sounded a whole lot better then 8 track and
cassette tapes put together.
My best regards.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo



In my opinion, I don't think they'll ever be able to re-create that
sound
they had back then as the world of digital equipment just doesn't
allow
for it!  But even a lot of the music of the seventies still had that
good,
wide, stereo; I don't know when it changed..and don't really know why 
it

changed!
Tom Kaufman

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio

Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-31 Thread Tom Kaufman
I don't know if this has anything to do with it..but I find (with this JVC 
stereo receiver I have)..I'm running some old Technique speakers..and while 
the base response is adequate, it's not a real hard thumping base; don't 
know if it's the speakers or the stereo receiver itself (I keep the base 
wide-open..and it's there..but wouldn't mind a little bit more!
Tom Kaufman P.SO.  John: I'd say to you hold on to that system you got for 
as long as you can run it! 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-31 Thread Sunshine
these are the kind you can  record on correct?
- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 7:20 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


High Sunshine,
Try any high end stereo shop in your area.
They run somewhere in between $25 $30.
My best regards.
  John.
- Original Message - 
From: Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 8:01 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


 can yu give me an idea of where i can look for them and  how much they
 cost?
 - Original Message - 
 From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 5:07 AM
 Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


 High Sunshine,
 I still have one of those old vacuum tube systems.
 What you said about the CD, is true on one hand.
 But on the other hand, it isn't.
 Some CD's, are being recorded at 32 bits with PCM encoding which yields a
 way better sound.
 But however, they are only sailing them to the AUDIO PHIAL people.
 The sound quality of CD's that are made like that, are top notch.
 But don't expect to find CD's like these in WAL-MART, you won't find them
 there.
 I had allot of luck finding them at a specialty stereo shop.
 My best regards.
  John.
 PS. I still have a pare of those speakers, they sound really nice!
 - Original Message - 
 From: Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 3:18 AM
 Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


 you know brent, and others.
 todays music systems that are purely digital, are a bit if not totally
 disapointing.
 from what i know aabout digital  files such as those that are made from
 cds.
 the  quality is what you get, if i  remember correctly the underlying
 actuall, audio is a wav file that has been made in 16 bit, 44100 khz
 standards such as the red book standard.
 The tube sound or vacume tube/valve sound of the earlier systems, made
 sound
 quality stars above any digital sounding system i have heard.
 I am in my 30's and can remember a lot of stereo equipment from those
 days.
 what i would love to see is a very high quality audio file stereo system
 with  ripping aviable in the unit, with a way to transfer the ripped
 files
 to a portable device/ or computer.
 Also on another note digital speakers vs analog speakers i will take the
 analog speakers over the digital ones any day.
 the frequency response of a pure analog speaker system also sounds much
 better.
 does anyone remember the panasonic thruster 750's? for analog speakers?
 - Original Message - 
 From: Brett Boyer bboyer...@gmail.com
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 9:08 PM
 Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


 absolutely. Everything is now digitized, quantized, and crappy!
 bb
 - Original Message - 
 From: Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 4:30 PM
 Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


 also tom, and others, the sound that was produced back in the
 60s,70s,80s
 has that warm, deep sound that has depth, spectural, clariety, and a
 sound
 that is more human then digital sounding recordings. of todays  cd
 quality
 music.
 The analog sound that came out of the past  years  in the 60s,70s, has a
 lot
 of clariety that todays equipment doesn't have in my own thoughts.
 - Original Message - 
 From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 5:25 PM
 Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


 High Tom,
 I think the change took place in the mid 80's when CD's replaced 8 track
 tapes.
 Also at the same time, you couldn't buy music on open reels anymore
 either.
 To me, the open real tapes sounded a whole lot better then 8 track and
 cassette tapes put together.
 My best regards.
  John.
 - Original Message - 
 From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 11:41 AM
 Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


 In my opinion, I don't think they'll ever be able to re-create that
 sound
 they had back then as the world of digital equipment just doesn't
 allow
 for it!  But even a lot of the music of the seventies still had that
 good,
 wide, stereo; I don't know when it changed..and don't really know why
 it
 changed!
 Tom Kaufman

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr

Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-31 Thread robert Doc Wright

Why not invest in a subwoofer?
- Original Message - 
From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 8:09 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


I don't know if this has anything to do with it..but I find (with this JVC 
stereo receiver I have)..I'm running some old Technique speakers..and 
while the base response is adequate, it's not a real hard thumping base; 
don't know if it's the speakers or the stereo receiver itself (I keep the 
base wide-open..and it's there..but wouldn't mind a little bit more!
Tom Kaufman P.SO.  John: I'd say to you hold on to that system you got 
for as long as you can run it!


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-31 Thread Tom Kaufman
The speakers have woofers in them (I assume they're sub-woofers..another 
speaker; just would be what I need for this already crammed up room! 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-31 Thread robert Doc Wright
No, a subwoofer is a stand alone speaker that specifically concentrates on 
bass output. they can be passive (no amp) or active (has its own 
amplification) they are made to enhance the bass of your other speakers.
- Original Message - 
From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 9:10 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


The speakers have woofers in them (I assume they're sub-woofers..another 
speaker; just would be what I need for this already crammed up room!


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-31 Thread Tom Kaufman
Yup..I know what they are (I have one for the speakers that are connected to 
my computer)..am sure it would help if I had one on my stereo system..but as 
I said..just don't have a place to put one!
Tom Kaufman 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-31 Thread Kenbu
Say  out there! It sounds like this joint stero   si merely two systems are 
hooked up thus; 4 track results?  Just wondering; Ken B
- Original Message - 
From: robert Doc Wright talmi...@wrightplaceinc.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 10:30 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo



Why not invest in a subwoofer?
- Original Message - 
From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 8:09 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


I don't know if this has anything to do with it..but I find (with this JVC 
stereo receiver I have)..I'm running some old Technique speakers..and 
while the base response is adequate, it's not a real hard thumping base; 
don't know if it's the speakers or the stereo receiver itself (I keep the 
base wide-open..and it's there..but wouldn't mind a little bit more!
Tom Kaufman P.SO.  John: I'd say to you hold on to that system you got 
for as long as you can run it!


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-31 Thread robert Doc Wright
sure you do. Stick it under your bed.  Just imagine feeling those 
vibrations.
- Original Message - 
From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Yup..I know what they are (I have one for the speakers that are connected 
to my computer)..am sure it would help if I had one on my stereo 
system..but as I said..just don't have a place to put one!

Tom Kaufman

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-31 Thread Brett Boyer

Nice one Robert. Sounds kinda fun!!
bb
- Original Message - 
From: robert Doc Wright talmi...@wrightplaceinc.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 4:24 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


sure you do. Stick it under your bed.  Just imagine feeling those 
vibrations.
- Original Message - 
From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Yup..I know what they are (I have one for the speakers that are connected 
to my computer)..am sure it would help if I had one on my stereo 
system..but as I said..just don't have a place to put one!

Tom Kaufman

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-31 Thread DJ DOCTOR P

High Tom,
Just as long as I can get my hands on replacement vacuum tubes, I'll keep 
this old receiver going for many years.
My father ran it strait for about 20 years before any work had to be done on 
it.

Nock on wood, I ran it strait for about 15 years without any problems.
But just in case a tube blows out, I have some replacement tubes on hands to 
get it back working again.

My best regards.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 10:09 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


I don't know if this has anything to do with it..but I find (with this JVC 
stereo receiver I have)..I'm running some old Technique speakers..and 
while the base response is adequate, it's not a real hard thumping base; 
don't know if it's the speakers or the stereo receiver itself (I keep the 
base wide-open..and it's there..but wouldn't mind a little bit more!
Tom Kaufman P.SO.  John: I'd say to you hold on to that system you got 
for as long as you can run it!


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-30 Thread Gary Petraccaro

That's sad to hear.  My sincerest condolences.

- Original Message - 
From: Richard Costa rtco...@optonline.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 11:45 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


To all concerned,

I have sad news.
Richard passed on December 12, 2009 of a heart attack.
Some may know already, however, I'm sending this information to all of
Richards email contacts.
It was so sudden with no warning.
I know Richard receives many emails each day and I want to inform all those
who contacted him.

Sincerely,
Anthony and Teresa Costa

- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


High Garry,
Have you tried using another audio file converter?
I use Switch to convert audio files from one format to another.
Mostly, I convert them to MP3's so that I can put them on my cell phone.
I have it sat to normal stereo and constant bit rate for highest quality
sound.
This is just a suggestion that I thought mite help you solve your problem.
My best regards.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Gary Petraccaro garyp...@verizon.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 1:53 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


The problem I'm having is that my system won't produce regular stereo.
Everything comes out in joint and variable bit rate regardless of software
settings.  It's Winamp which I'm using to tell me what my stats on a
particular file happen to be.  Any thoughts?
Thanks.

- Original Message - 
From: Kevin Lloyd kevin.llo...@sky.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


My understanding is that joint stereo is a psychoacoustic trick to try and
make lower bit rate encoded files sound better in terms of their channel
separation.  I don't believe the monoblock analogy is strictly correct.  All
the advice I have seen is to use normal stereo for decent encoded files at
bit rates of 192kbps and higher and only use the joint stereo psychoacoustic
trick on very poor files encoded at lower bit rates.

Regards.

Kevin
E-mail: kevin.llo...@sky.com
- Original Message - 
From: Jörgen Hansson hansson.jo...@spray.se

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Hi!
aha, that make sence, thanks so much for this info.
then I will set it to joint stereo for further conversions.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


High George,
Joint stereo is, like you have a pare of speakers, but you have a mono block
amplifier on each one.
Regular stereo, is having those same pare of speakers hooked up to a stereo
amplifier.
The joint stereo, gives better stereo channel separation then the regular
stereo.
Hope this helps.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Jörgen Hansson hansson.jo...@spray.se

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 9:39 AM
Subject: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Hi all!
I have a question which is making me curious. when I'm converting wave to
mp3 in a convertion program or so, I can see something called joint stereo,
and I can also choose if I would like to have it in joint stereo or just
stereo.
my question is, what's the difference between joint stereo and stereo, I
can't seem to hear any difference at all there.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4722 (20091228) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com




__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4722 (20091228) __


The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-30 Thread Gary Petraccaro

I have tried Nero 7 and Express Rip.  Same results.

- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


High Garry,
Have you tried using another audio file converter?
I use Switch to convert audio files from one format to another.
Mostly, I convert them to MP3's so that I can put them on my cell phone.
I have it sat to normal stereo and constant bit rate for highest quality
sound.
This is just a suggestion that I thought mite help you solve your problem.
My best regards.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Gary Petraccaro garyp...@verizon.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 1:53 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


The problem I'm having is that my system won't produce regular stereo.
Everything comes out in joint and variable bit rate regardless of software
settings.  It's Winamp which I'm using to tell me what my stats on a
particular file happen to be.  Any thoughts?
Thanks.

- Original Message - 
From: Kevin Lloyd kevin.llo...@sky.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


My understanding is that joint stereo is a psychoacoustic trick to try and
make lower bit rate encoded files sound better in terms of their channel
separation.  I don't believe the monoblock analogy is strictly correct.  All
the advice I have seen is to use normal stereo for decent encoded files at
bit rates of 192kbps and higher and only use the joint stereo psychoacoustic
trick on very poor files encoded at lower bit rates.

Regards.

Kevin
E-mail: kevin.llo...@sky.com
- Original Message - 
From: Jörgen Hansson hansson.jo...@spray.se

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Hi!
aha, that make sence, thanks so much for this info.
then I will set it to joint stereo for further conversions.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


High George,
Joint stereo is, like you have a pare of speakers, but you have a mono block
amplifier on each one.
Regular stereo, is having those same pare of speakers hooked up to a stereo
amplifier.
The joint stereo, gives better stereo channel separation then the regular
stereo.
Hope this helps.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Jörgen Hansson hansson.jo...@spray.se

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 9:39 AM
Subject: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Hi all!
I have a question which is making me curious. when I'm converting wave to
mp3 in a convertion program or so, I can see something called joint stereo,
and I can also choose if I would like to have it in joint stereo or just
stereo.
my question is, what's the difference between joint stereo and stereo, I
can't seem to hear any difference at all there.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-30 Thread Gary Petraccaro
I'm not sure what other programs to check with.  And, your right, I'm 
beginning to be suspicious.


- Original Message - 
From: Kevin Lloyd kevin.llo...@sky.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 7:51 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


I'd be suspicious of Winamp then if you're saying that you're choosing
stereo rather than joint but Winamp keeps telling  you that your results are
joint.  Have you checked by looking at the properties in windows explorer or
any other programs that provide  MP3 file informaition?

Kevin
E-mail: kevin.llo...@sky.com
- Original Message - 
From: Gary Petraccaro garyp...@verizon.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 6:53 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


The problem I'm having is that my system won't produce regular stereo.
Everything comes out in joint and variable bit rate regardless of software
settings.  It's Winamp which I'm using to tell me what my stats on a
particular file happen to be.  Any thoughts?
Thanks.

- Original Message - 
From: Kevin Lloyd kevin.llo...@sky.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


My understanding is that joint stereo is a psychoacoustic trick to try and
make lower bit rate encoded files sound better in terms of their channel
separation.  I don't believe the monoblock analogy is strictly correct.  All
the advice I have seen is to use normal stereo for decent encoded files at
bit rates of 192kbps and higher and only use the joint stereo psychoacoustic
trick on very poor files encoded at lower bit rates.

Regards.

Kevin
E-mail: kevin.llo...@sky.com
- Original Message - 
From: Jörgen Hansson hansson.jo...@spray.se

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Hi!
aha, that make sence, thanks so much for this info.
then I will set it to joint stereo for further conversions.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


High George,
Joint stereo is, like you have a pare of speakers, but you have a mono block
amplifier on each one.
Regular stereo, is having those same pare of speakers hooked up to a stereo
amplifier.
The joint stereo, gives better stereo channel separation then the regular
stereo.
Hope this helps.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Jörgen Hansson hansson.jo...@spray.se

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 9:39 AM
Subject: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Hi all!
I have a question which is making me curious. when I'm converting wave to
mp3 in a convertion program or so, I can see something called joint stereo,
and I can also choose if I would like to have it in joint stereo or just
stereo.
my question is, what's the difference between joint stereo and stereo, I
can't seem to hear any difference at all there.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-30 Thread Les Gordon
hi, you might want to check to see that settings are saved. it sounds like 
the program is defaulting to a specific setting.
once you select normal stereo and save that setting, it should stay 
selected.

les.

Cd/Dvd Duplication  Custom Printing

Customer Service

Les Gordon
Phone: (267)329-8150
email: sa...@cdrdvdr.com
web: http://www.cdrdvdr.com




- Original Message - 
From: Gary Petraccaro garyp...@verizon.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 4:07 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


I have tried Nero 7 and Express Rip.  Same results.

- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


High Garry,
Have you tried using another audio file converter?
I use Switch to convert audio files from one format to another.
Mostly, I convert them to MP3's so that I can put them on my cell phone.
I have it sat to normal stereo and constant bit rate for highest quality
sound.
This is just a suggestion that I thought mite help you solve your problem.
My best regards.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Gary Petraccaro garyp...@verizon.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 1:53 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


The problem I'm having is that my system won't produce regular stereo.
Everything comes out in joint and variable bit rate regardless of software
settings.  It's Winamp which I'm using to tell me what my stats on a
particular file happen to be.  Any thoughts?
Thanks.

- Original Message - 
From: Kevin Lloyd kevin.llo...@sky.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


My understanding is that joint stereo is a psychoacoustic trick to try and
make lower bit rate encoded files sound better in terms of their channel
separation.  I don't believe the monoblock analogy is strictly correct.  All
the advice I have seen is to use normal stereo for decent encoded files at
bit rates of 192kbps and higher and only use the joint stereo psychoacoustic
trick on very poor files encoded at lower bit rates.

Regards.

Kevin
E-mail: kevin.llo...@sky.com
- Original Message - 
From: Jörgen Hansson hansson.jo...@spray.se

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Hi!
aha, that make sence, thanks so much for this info.
then I will set it to joint stereo for further conversions.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


High George,
Joint stereo is, like you have a pare of speakers, but you have a mono block
amplifier on each one.
Regular stereo, is having those same pare of speakers hooked up to a stereo
amplifier.
The joint stereo, gives better stereo channel separation then the regular
stereo.
Hope this helps.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Jörgen Hansson hansson.jo...@spray.se

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 9:39 AM
Subject: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Hi all!
I have a question which is making me curious. when I'm converting wave to
mp3 in a convertion program or so, I can see something called joint stereo,
and I can also choose if I would like to have it in joint stereo or just
stereo.
my question is, what's the difference between joint stereo and stereo, I
can't seem to hear any difference at all there.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-30 Thread Victoria Vaughan

Hi, Thanks John, for the explanation.

Vicky
- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 8:56 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


High Vicky,
No, the voice is always in the middle.
It just gives better separation of the other instruments.
It is like having the keyboards in one speaker, the percussions in the other
speaker.
While the drums and bass are pan to both speakers.
In the late 50's and early 60's, that is how early stereo was recorded.
The music in one speaker, while the voices were in the other speaker.
In the mid to late 60's, they got away from that.
Putting the voices in the middle is pretty much the norm and has been cense
1965.
Hope this helps you.
My best regards.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Victoria Vaughan vrvaug...@mailzone.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 5:24 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Hi, When you say, Better separation, does this separate voices into one
speaker and the music into the other?  I wouldn't like that.

However, when I had a base and treble equalizer, I could bring specific
sounds into prominence, which I really liked.  Sadly, it died.

Vicky
- Original Message - 
From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


As a footnote to this I'm sure I've read somewhere in the LAME documentation
that Joint Stereo should be used for encoding at variable and lower bit
rates so perhaps your explanation of joint stereo below goes some way to
explaining this statement smile.


On 27/12/2009, at 1:53 AM, DJ DOCTOR P wrote:


High George,
Joint stereo is, like you have a pare of speakers, but you have a mono 
block amplifier on each one.
Regular stereo, is having those same pare of speakers hooked up to a 
stereo amplifier.
The joint stereo, gives better stereo channel separation then the regular 
stereo.

Hope this helps.
John.
- Original Message - From: Jörgen Hansson 
hansson.jo...@spray.se

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 9:39 AM
Subject: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Hi all!
I have a question which is making me curious. when I'm converting wave to 
mp3 in a convertion program or so, I can see something called joint 
stereo, and I can also choose if I would like to have it in joint stereo 
or just stereo.
my question is, what's the difference between joint stereo and stereo, I 
can't seem to hear any difference at all there.

Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



**

Dane Trethowan

From Melton Victoria Australia

mailto:grtd...@internode.on.net
Twitter: http://twitter.com/grtdane
blog: http://www.grtdane.wordpress.com
Phone United Kingdom
02032874641
Phone Australia
0390058589
Phone United States
8159261869
Fax:
+61 3 9743 7954x
MSN grtd...@dane-trethowan.net
skype:grtdane12

**





To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-30 Thread DJ DOCTOR P

High Tom,
I wasn't born in the 60's, I was born in 1972.
But however, I have allot of old records that my mom dad grandpa and grandma 
had.

My record collection goes all the way back to the mid 20's.
But oh yes, I get what you are talking about.
Some jazz musicians are trying to bring that 50's/60's sound back, but I 
don't think they're doing to well with it.

But to me, it sounds really cool!
But somehow, MP3's leaves something more to be desired.
I wish there was a portable media player that could play ape wave and or any 
other lossless audio files.

My best regards.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 9:11 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Yeah..and now it doesn't even have that same intensity anymore; when I 
listen to a stereo recording, it almost sounds now like the same 
instruments are coming through both channels!  Not so in the 60s; fact 
is..if you didn't have both speakers on, you didn't get all the 
instrumentation!

Tom Kaufman

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-30 Thread Tom Kaufman
In my opinion, I don't think they'll ever be able to re-create that sound 
they had back then as the world of digital equipment just doesn't allow 
for it!  But even a lot of the music of the seventies still had that good, 
wide, stereo; I don't know when it changed..and don't really know why it 
changed!
Tom Kaufman 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-30 Thread DJ DOCTOR P

High Tom,
I think the change took place in the mid 80's when CD's replaced 8 track 
tapes.

Also at the same time, you couldn't buy music on open reels anymore either.
To me, the open real tapes sounded a whole lot better then 8 track and 
cassette tapes put together.

My best regards.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


In my opinion, I don't think they'll ever be able to re-create that sound 
they had back then as the world of digital equipment just doesn't allow 
for it!  But even a lot of the music of the seventies still had that good, 
wide, stereo; I don't know when it changed..and don't really know why it 
changed!

Tom Kaufman

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-30 Thread Sunshine
also tom, and others, the sound that was produced back in the 60s,70s,80s 
has that warm, deep sound that has depth, spectural, clariety, and a sound 
that is more human then digital sounding recordings. of todays  cd quality 
music.
The analog sound that came out of the past  years  in the 60s,70s, has a lot 
of clariety that todays equipment doesn't have in my own thoughts.
- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


High Tom,
I think the change took place in the mid 80's when CD's replaced 8 track
tapes.
Also at the same time, you couldn't buy music on open reels anymore either.
To me, the open real tapes sounded a whole lot better then 8 track and
cassette tapes put together.
My best regards.
  John.
- Original Message - 
From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


 In my opinion, I don't think they'll ever be able to re-create that sound
 they had back then as the world of digital equipment just doesn't allow
 for it!  But even a lot of the music of the seventies still had that good,
 wide, stereo; I don't know when it changed..and don't really know why it
 changed!
 Tom Kaufman

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-30 Thread Jörgen Hansson

Hey sunshine!
I can agree with you on that, When I'm producing music, I try to make it 
warm and clear to the listener.

Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
- Original Message - 
From: Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 12:30 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo



also tom, and others, the sound that was produced back in the 60s,70s,80s
has that warm, deep sound that has depth, spectural, clariety, and a sound
that is more human then digital sounding recordings. of todays  cd quality
music.
The analog sound that came out of the past  years  in the 60s,70s, has a 
lot

of clariety that todays equipment doesn't have in my own thoughts.
- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


High Tom,
I think the change took place in the mid 80's when CD's replaced 8 track
tapes.
Also at the same time, you couldn't buy music on open reels anymore 
either.

To me, the open real tapes sounded a whole lot better then 8 track and
cassette tapes put together.
My best regards.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo



In my opinion, I don't think they'll ever be able to re-create that sound
they had back then as the world of digital equipment just doesn't allow
for it!  But even a lot of the music of the seventies still had that 
good,

wide, stereo; I don't know when it changed..and don't really know why it
changed!
Tom Kaufman

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org





To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-30 Thread Jörgen Hansson

Hi!
oh yeah, reel to reel tapes, wow! I simply love those things. I'm still 
looking for some good reel to reel tape recorders, cause I have some which 
I'd like to go through and digitalize, cause on some of them, I have 
recordings of a passed away friend of mine and I when we were doing music 
together.

Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 12:25 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo



High Tom,
I think the change took place in the mid 80's when CD's replaced 8 track 
tapes.
Also at the same time, you couldn't buy music on open reels anymore 
either.
To me, the open real tapes sounded a whole lot better then 8 track and 
cassette tapes put together.

My best regards.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


In my opinion, I don't think they'll ever be able to re-create that sound 
they had back then as the world of digital equipment just doesn't allow 
for it!  But even a lot of the music of the seventies still had that 
good, wide, stereo; I don't know when it changed..and don't really know 
why it changed!

Tom Kaufman

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org





To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-30 Thread DJ DOCTOR P

High Sunshine,
I am incline to agree with you.
In the 60's and 70's, allot of the recordings were made on recording 
equipment that had vacuum tubes in it.

This is where that warm deep sound came from.
There are still peaces of equipment that could be bought today that still 
uses vacuum tubes to enhance the recording of music.
But it all falls apart when the signal goes in to either a computer and or a 
CD recorder.

Because those machines, converts the signal from analog to digital.
The only way to counter react that is, to put the tubes on the input and the 
output of the computer's sound card and or the CD recorder.
As far as CD recorders for both studio and hi phi use, no manufacturer has 
thought about doing that yet.
Because if they did, the music would sound a whole lot better then it would 
without the tubes not being in the signal path.

My best regards.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 6:30 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo



also tom, and others, the sound that was produced back in the 60s,70s,80s
has that warm, deep sound that has depth, spectural, clariety, and a sound
that is more human then digital sounding recordings. of todays  cd quality
music.
The analog sound that came out of the past  years  in the 60s,70s, has a 
lot

of clariety that todays equipment doesn't have in my own thoughts.
- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


High Tom,
I think the change took place in the mid 80's when CD's replaced 8 track
tapes.
Also at the same time, you couldn't buy music on open reels anymore 
either.

To me, the open real tapes sounded a whole lot better then 8 track and
cassette tapes put together.
My best regards.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo



In my opinion, I don't think they'll ever be able to re-create that sound
they had back then as the world of digital equipment just doesn't allow
for it!  But even a lot of the music of the seventies still had that 
good,

wide, stereo; I don't know when it changed..and don't really know why it
changed!
Tom Kaufman

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-30 Thread DJ DOCTOR P

High George,
How are you going about doing that?
Are you using anything that has tubes in it?
I'm asking because that is the only way you will be able to do that.
You can do it in analog first, then go to digital.
This is how I mix everything down in my own recording studio.
My best regards.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Jörgen Hansson hansson.jo...@spray.se

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 6:59 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Hey sunshine!
I can agree with you on that, When I'm producing music, I try to make it
warm and clear to the listener.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
- Original Message - 
From: Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 12:30 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo



also tom, and others, the sound that was produced back in the 60s,70s,80s
has that warm, deep sound that has depth, spectural, clariety, and a sound
that is more human then digital sounding recordings. of todays  cd quality
music.
The analog sound that came out of the past  years  in the 60s,70s, has a 
lot

of clariety that todays equipment doesn't have in my own thoughts.
- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


High Tom,
I think the change took place in the mid 80's when CD's replaced 8 track
tapes.
Also at the same time, you couldn't buy music on open reels anymore 
either.

To me, the open real tapes sounded a whole lot better then 8 track and
cassette tapes put together.
My best regards.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo



In my opinion, I don't think they'll ever be able to re-create that sound
they had back then as the world of digital equipment just doesn't allow
for it!  But even a lot of the music of the seventies still had that 
good,

wide, stereo; I don't know when it changed..and don't really know why it
changed!
Tom Kaufman

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org





To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-30 Thread Tom Kaufman
Amen and Amen!  And you'd think as the equipment supposedly has gotten 
better, the sound would be better; not necessarily so!
Tom Kaufman 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-30 Thread Brett Boyer

absolutely. Everything is now digitized, quantized, and crappy!
bb
- Original Message - 
From: Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo



also tom, and others, the sound that was produced back in the 60s,70s,80s
has that warm, deep sound that has depth, spectural, clariety, and a sound
that is more human then digital sounding recordings. of todays  cd quality
music.
The analog sound that came out of the past  years  in the 60s,70s, has a 
lot

of clariety that todays equipment doesn't have in my own thoughts.
- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


High Tom,
I think the change took place in the mid 80's when CD's replaced 8 track
tapes.
Also at the same time, you couldn't buy music on open reels anymore 
either.

To me, the open real tapes sounded a whole lot better then 8 track and
cassette tapes put together.
My best regards.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo



In my opinion, I don't think they'll ever be able to re-create that sound
they had back then as the world of digital equipment just doesn't allow
for it!  But even a lot of the music of the seventies still had that 
good,

wide, stereo; I don't know when it changed..and don't really know why it
changed!
Tom Kaufman

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-30 Thread Tom Kaufman
Well Brett and list: To show you how it's gotten to be, I have a friend 
(great steel guitarist)..he recorded some songs..I guess it was fifteen 
years ago..maybe more..a few years ago, he put those tunes on a CD (along 
with some other stuff he'd done)..well I have a cassette tape of this one 
song (the click track is still on it)..but the tone of that steel just 
sounds so nice!  Well when they put it on CD, although it's the same guy; 
same tune and all..it doesn't have that good, smooth tone as it has on that 
old cassette I have of him doing it!  I remember him telling me that (and 
I've found this out for myself)..in the digital world, if you turn the 
volume down, it goes down to a point; then just cuts off!  It's this way on 
my JVC stereo receiver; when it gets to a certain point, instead of the 
sound continuing to taper off, it just cuts off completely!
Tom Kaufman (aka Tomcat) 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-30 Thread Brett Boyer

It would be interesting to hear that comparison. I truly believe it.
bb
- Original Message - 
From: Tom Kaufman tomca...@comcast.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 9:05 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Well Brett and list: To show you how it's gotten to be, I have a friend 
(great steel guitarist)..he recorded some songs..I guess it was fifteen 
years ago..maybe more..a few years ago, he put those tunes on a CD (along 
with some other stuff he'd done)..well I have a cassette tape of this one 
song (the click track is still on it)..but the tone of that steel just 
sounds so nice!  Well when they put it on CD, although it's the same guy; 
same tune and all..it doesn't have that good, smooth tone as it has on 
that old cassette I have of him doing it!  I remember him telling me that 
(and I've found this out for myself)..in the digital world, if you turn 
the volume down, it goes down to a point; then just cuts off!  It's this 
way on my JVC stereo receiver; when it gets to a certain point, instead of 
the sound continuing to taper off, it just cuts off completely!

Tom Kaufman (aka Tomcat)

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-29 Thread Victoria Vaughan
Hi, When you say, Better separation, does this separate voices into one 
speaker and the music into the other?  I wouldn't like that.


However, when I had a base and treble equalizer, I could bring specific 
sounds into prominence, which I really liked.  Sadly, it died.


Vicky
- Original Message - 
From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


As a footnote to this I'm sure I've read somewhere in the LAME documentation 
that Joint Stereo should be used for encoding at variable and lower bit 
rates so perhaps your explanation of joint stereo below goes some way to 
explaining this statement smile.



On 27/12/2009, at 1:53 AM, DJ DOCTOR P wrote:


High George,
Joint stereo is, like you have a pare of speakers, but you have a mono 
block amplifier on each one.
Regular stereo, is having those same pare of speakers hooked up to a 
stereo amplifier.
The joint stereo, gives better stereo channel separation then the regular 
stereo.

Hope this helps.
John.
- Original Message - From: Jörgen Hansson 
hansson.jo...@spray.se

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 9:39 AM
Subject: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Hi all!
I have a question which is making me curious. when I'm converting wave to 
mp3 in a convertion program or so, I can see something called joint 
stereo, and I can also choose if I would like to have it in joint stereo 
or just stereo.
my question is, what's the difference between joint stereo and stereo, I 
can't seem to hear any difference at all there.

Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



**

Dane Trethowan

From Melton Victoria Australia

mailto:grtd...@internode.on.net
Twitter: http://twitter.com/grtdane
blog: http://www.grtdane.wordpress.com
Phone United Kingdom
02032874641
Phone Australia
0390058589
Phone United States
8159261869
Fax:
+61 3 9743 7954x
MSN grtd...@dane-trethowan.net
skype:grtdane12

**





To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-29 Thread DJ DOCTOR P

High Vicky,
No, the voice is always in the middle.
It just gives better separation of the other instruments.
It is like having the keyboards in one speaker, the percussions in the other 
speaker.

While the drums and bass are pan to both speakers.
In the late 50's and early 60's, that is how early stereo was recorded.
The music in one speaker, while the voices were in the other speaker.
In the mid to late 60's, they got away from that.
Putting the voices in the middle is pretty much the norm and has been cense 
1965.

Hope this helps you.
My best regards.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Victoria Vaughan vrvaug...@mailzone.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 5:24 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Hi, When you say, Better separation, does this separate voices into one
speaker and the music into the other?  I wouldn't like that.

However, when I had a base and treble equalizer, I could bring specific
sounds into prominence, which I really liked.  Sadly, it died.

Vicky
- Original Message - 
From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


As a footnote to this I'm sure I've read somewhere in the LAME documentation
that Joint Stereo should be used for encoding at variable and lower bit
rates so perhaps your explanation of joint stereo below goes some way to
explaining this statement smile.


On 27/12/2009, at 1:53 AM, DJ DOCTOR P wrote:


High George,
Joint stereo is, like you have a pare of speakers, but you have a mono 
block amplifier on each one.
Regular stereo, is having those same pare of speakers hooked up to a 
stereo amplifier.
The joint stereo, gives better stereo channel separation then the regular 
stereo.

Hope this helps.
John.
- Original Message - From: Jörgen Hansson 
hansson.jo...@spray.se

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 9:39 AM
Subject: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Hi all!
I have a question which is making me curious. when I'm converting wave to 
mp3 in a convertion program or so, I can see something called joint 
stereo, and I can also choose if I would like to have it in joint stereo 
or just stereo.
my question is, what's the difference between joint stereo and stereo, I 
can't seem to hear any difference at all there.

Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



**

Dane Trethowan

From Melton Victoria Australia

mailto:grtd...@internode.on.net
Twitter: http://twitter.com/grtdane
blog: http://www.grtdane.wordpress.com
Phone United Kingdom
02032874641
Phone Australia
0390058589
Phone United States
8159261869
Fax:
+61 3 9743 7954x
MSN grtd...@dane-trethowan.net
skype:grtdane12

**





To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-29 Thread Tom Kaufman
Yeah..and now it doesn't even have that same intensity anymore; when I 
listen to a stereo recording, it almost sounds now like the same instruments 
are coming through both channels!  Not so in the 60s; fact is..if you didn't 
have both speakers on, you didn't get all the instrumentation!
Tom Kaufman 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-28 Thread Kevin Lloyd
I'd be suspicious of Winamp then if you're saying that you're choosing 
stereo rather than joint but Winamp keeps telling  you that your results are 
joint.  Have you checked by looking at the properties in windows explorer or 
any other programs that provide  MP3 file informaition?


Kevin
E-mail: kevin.llo...@sky.com
- Original Message - 
From: Gary Petraccaro garyp...@verizon.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 6:53 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


The problem I'm having is that my system won't produce regular stereo.
Everything comes out in joint and variable bit rate regardless of software
settings.  It's Winamp which I'm using to tell me what my stats on a
particular file happen to be.  Any thoughts?
Thanks.

- Original Message - 
From: Kevin Lloyd kevin.llo...@sky.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


My understanding is that joint stereo is a psychoacoustic trick to try and
make lower bit rate encoded files sound better in terms of their channel
separation.  I don't believe the monoblock analogy is strictly correct.  All
the advice I have seen is to use normal stereo for decent encoded files at
bit rates of 192kbps and higher and only use the joint stereo psychoacoustic
trick on very poor files encoded at lower bit rates.

Regards.

Kevin
E-mail: kevin.llo...@sky.com
- Original Message - 
From: Jörgen Hansson hansson.jo...@spray.se

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Hi!
aha, that make sence, thanks so much for this info.
then I will set it to joint stereo for further conversions.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


High George,
Joint stereo is, like you have a pare of speakers, but you have a mono block
amplifier on each one.
Regular stereo, is having those same pare of speakers hooked up to a stereo
amplifier.
The joint stereo, gives better stereo channel separation then the regular
stereo.
Hope this helps.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Jörgen Hansson hansson.jo...@spray.se

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 9:39 AM
Subject: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Hi all!
I have a question which is making me curious. when I'm converting wave to
mp3 in a convertion program or so, I can see something called joint stereo,
and I can also choose if I would like to have it in joint stereo or just
stereo.
my question is, what's the difference between joint stereo and stereo, I
can't seem to hear any difference at all there.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-28 Thread DJ DOCTOR P

High Garry,
Have you tried using another audio file converter?
I use Switch to convert audio files from one format to another.
Mostly, I convert them to MP3's so that I can put them on my cell phone.
I have it sat to normal stereo and constant bit rate for highest quality 
sound.

This is just a suggestion that I thought mite help you solve your problem.
My best regards.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Gary Petraccaro garyp...@verizon.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 1:53 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


The problem I'm having is that my system won't produce regular stereo.
Everything comes out in joint and variable bit rate regardless of software
settings.  It's Winamp which I'm using to tell me what my stats on a
particular file happen to be.  Any thoughts?
Thanks.

- Original Message - 
From: Kevin Lloyd kevin.llo...@sky.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


My understanding is that joint stereo is a psychoacoustic trick to try and
make lower bit rate encoded files sound better in terms of their channel
separation.  I don't believe the monoblock analogy is strictly correct.  All
the advice I have seen is to use normal stereo for decent encoded files at
bit rates of 192kbps and higher and only use the joint stereo psychoacoustic
trick on very poor files encoded at lower bit rates.

Regards.

Kevin
E-mail: kevin.llo...@sky.com
- Original Message - 
From: Jörgen Hansson hansson.jo...@spray.se

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Hi!
aha, that make sence, thanks so much for this info.
then I will set it to joint stereo for further conversions.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


High George,
Joint stereo is, like you have a pare of speakers, but you have a mono block
amplifier on each one.
Regular stereo, is having those same pare of speakers hooked up to a stereo
amplifier.
The joint stereo, gives better stereo channel separation then the regular
stereo.
Hope this helps.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Jörgen Hansson hansson.jo...@spray.se

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 9:39 AM
Subject: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Hi all!
I have a question which is making me curious. when I'm converting wave to
mp3 in a convertion program or so, I can see something called joint stereo,
and I can also choose if I would like to have it in joint stereo or just
stereo.
my question is, what's the difference between joint stereo and stereo, I
can't seem to hear any difference at all there.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-28 Thread Richard Costa

To all concerned,

I have sad news.
Richard passed on December 12, 2009 of a heart attack.
Some may know already, however, I'm sending this information to all of
Richards email contacts.
It was so sudden with no warning.
I know Richard receives many emails each day and I want to inform all those
who contacted him.

Sincerely,
Anthony and Teresa Costa

- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


High Garry,
Have you tried using another audio file converter?
I use Switch to convert audio files from one format to another.
Mostly, I convert them to MP3's so that I can put them on my cell phone.
I have it sat to normal stereo and constant bit rate for highest quality
sound.
This is just a suggestion that I thought mite help you solve your problem.
My best regards.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Gary Petraccaro garyp...@verizon.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 1:53 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


The problem I'm having is that my system won't produce regular stereo.
Everything comes out in joint and variable bit rate regardless of software
settings.  It's Winamp which I'm using to tell me what my stats on a
particular file happen to be.  Any thoughts?
Thanks.

- Original Message - 
From: Kevin Lloyd kevin.llo...@sky.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


My understanding is that joint stereo is a psychoacoustic trick to try and
make lower bit rate encoded files sound better in terms of their channel
separation.  I don't believe the monoblock analogy is strictly correct.  All
the advice I have seen is to use normal stereo for decent encoded files at
bit rates of 192kbps and higher and only use the joint stereo psychoacoustic
trick on very poor files encoded at lower bit rates.

Regards.

Kevin
E-mail: kevin.llo...@sky.com
- Original Message - 
From: Jörgen Hansson hansson.jo...@spray.se

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Hi!
aha, that make sence, thanks so much for this info.
then I will set it to joint stereo for further conversions.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


High George,
Joint stereo is, like you have a pare of speakers, but you have a mono block
amplifier on each one.
Regular stereo, is having those same pare of speakers hooked up to a stereo
amplifier.
The joint stereo, gives better stereo channel separation then the regular
stereo.
Hope this helps.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Jörgen Hansson hansson.jo...@spray.se

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 9:39 AM
Subject: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Hi all!
I have a question which is making me curious. when I'm converting wave to
mp3 in a convertion program or so, I can see something called joint stereo,
and I can also choose if I would like to have it in joint stereo or just
stereo.
my question is, what's the difference between joint stereo and stereo, I
can't seem to hear any difference at all there.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4722 (20091228) __


The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com




__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4722 (20091228) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com





To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-27 Thread Gary Petraccaro
The problem I'm having is that my system won't produce regular stereo. 
Everything comes out in joint and variable bit rate regardless of software 
settings.  It's Winamp which I'm using to tell me what my stats on a 
particular file happen to be.  Any thoughts?

Thanks.

- Original Message - 
From: Kevin Lloyd kevin.llo...@sky.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


My understanding is that joint stereo is a psychoacoustic trick to try and
make lower bit rate encoded files sound better in terms of their channel
separation.  I don't believe the monoblock analogy is strictly correct.  All
the advice I have seen is to use normal stereo for decent encoded files at
bit rates of 192kbps and higher and only use the joint stereo psychoacoustic
trick on very poor files encoded at lower bit rates.

Regards.

Kevin
E-mail: kevin.llo...@sky.com
- Original Message - 
From: Jörgen Hansson hansson.jo...@spray.se

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Hi!
aha, that make sence, thanks so much for this info.
then I will set it to joint stereo for further conversions.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


High George,
Joint stereo is, like you have a pare of speakers, but you have a mono block
amplifier on each one.
Regular stereo, is having those same pare of speakers hooked up to a stereo
amplifier.
The joint stereo, gives better stereo channel separation then the regular
stereo.
Hope this helps.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Jörgen Hansson hansson.jo...@spray.se

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 9:39 AM
Subject: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Hi all!
I have a question which is making me curious. when I'm converting wave to
mp3 in a convertion program or so, I can see something called joint stereo,
and I can also choose if I would like to have it in joint stereo or just
stereo.
my question is, what's the difference between joint stereo and stereo, I
can't seem to hear any difference at all there.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 




To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-27 Thread Les Gordon
something doesnt seem right there because you can control in the software 
the type of bitrates, and stereo types. and once those are saved then they 
dont change. i am using itunes. and all my settings are saved perminently.


les

Cd/Dvd Duplication  Custom Printing

Customer Service

Les Gordon
Phone: (267)329-8150
email: sa...@cdrdvdr.com
web: http://www.cdrdvdr.com




- Original Message - 
From: Gary Petraccaro garyp...@verizon.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 1:53 AM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


The problem I'm having is that my system won't produce regular stereo.
Everything comes out in joint and variable bit rate regardless of software
settings.  It's Winamp which I'm using to tell me what my stats on a
particular file happen to be.  Any thoughts?
Thanks.

- Original Message - 
From: Kevin Lloyd kevin.llo...@sky.com

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


My understanding is that joint stereo is a psychoacoustic trick to try and
make lower bit rate encoded files sound better in terms of their channel
separation.  I don't believe the monoblock analogy is strictly correct.  All
the advice I have seen is to use normal stereo for decent encoded files at
bit rates of 192kbps and higher and only use the joint stereo psychoacoustic
trick on very poor files encoded at lower bit rates.

Regards.

Kevin
E-mail: kevin.llo...@sky.com
- Original Message - 
From: Jörgen Hansson hansson.jo...@spray.se

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Hi!
aha, that make sence, thanks so much for this info.
then I will set it to joint stereo for further conversions.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


High George,
Joint stereo is, like you have a pare of speakers, but you have a mono block
amplifier on each one.
Regular stereo, is having those same pare of speakers hooked up to a stereo
amplifier.
The joint stereo, gives better stereo channel separation then the regular
stereo.
Hope this helps.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Jörgen Hansson hansson.jo...@spray.se

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 9:39 AM
Subject: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Hi all!
I have a question which is making me curious. when I'm converting wave to
mp3 in a convertion program or so, I can see something called joint stereo,
and I can also choose if I would like to have it in joint stereo or just
stereo.
my question is, what's the difference between joint stereo and stereo, I
can't seem to hear any difference at all there.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-26 Thread Jörgen Hansson
Hi all!
I have a question which is making me curious. when I'm converting wave to mp3 
in a convertion program or so, I can see something called joint stereo, and I 
can also choose if I would like to have it in joint stereo or just stereo.
my question is, what's the difference between joint stereo and stereo, I can't 
seem to hear any difference at all there.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-26 Thread DJ DOCTOR P

High George,
Joint stereo is, like you have a pare of speakers, but you have a mono block 
amplifier on each one.
Regular stereo, is having those same pare of speakers hooked up to a stereo 
amplifier.
The joint stereo, gives better stereo channel separation then the regular 
stereo.

Hope this helps.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Jörgen Hansson hansson.jo...@spray.se

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 9:39 AM
Subject: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Hi all!
I have a question which is making me curious. when I'm converting wave to 
mp3 in a convertion program or so, I can see something called joint stereo, 
and I can also choose if I would like to have it in joint stereo or just 
stereo.
my question is, what's the difference between joint stereo and stereo, I 
can't seem to hear any difference at all there.

Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-26 Thread Jörgen Hansson

Hi!
aha, that make sence, thanks so much for this info.
then I will set it to joint stereo for further conversions.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


High George,
Joint stereo is, like you have a pare of speakers, but you have a mono block
amplifier on each one.
Regular stereo, is having those same pare of speakers hooked up to a stereo
amplifier.
The joint stereo, gives better stereo channel separation then the regular
stereo.
Hope this helps.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Jörgen Hansson hansson.jo...@spray.se

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 9:39 AM
Subject: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Hi all!
I have a question which is making me curious. when I'm converting wave to
mp3 in a convertion program or so, I can see something called joint stereo,
and I can also choose if I would like to have it in joint stereo or just
stereo.
my question is, what's the difference between joint stereo and stereo, I
can't seem to hear any difference at all there.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-26 Thread Dane Trethowan
As a footnote to this I'm sure I've read somewhere in the LAME documentation 
that Joint Stereo should be used for encoding at variable and lower bit rates 
so perhaps your explanation of joint stereo below goes some way to explaining 
this statement smile.


On 27/12/2009, at 1:53 AM, DJ DOCTOR P wrote:

 High George,
 Joint stereo is, like you have a pare of speakers, but you have a mono block 
 amplifier on each one.
 Regular stereo, is having those same pare of speakers hooked up to a stereo 
 amplifier.
 The joint stereo, gives better stereo channel separation then the regular 
 stereo.
 Hope this helps.
 John.
 - Original Message - From: Jörgen Hansson hansson.jo...@spray.se
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 9:39 AM
 Subject: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo
 
 
 Hi all!
 I have a question which is making me curious. when I'm converting wave to mp3 
 in a convertion program or so, I can see something called joint stereo, and I 
 can also choose if I would like to have it in joint stereo or just stereo.
 my question is, what's the difference between joint stereo and stereo, I 
 can't seem to hear any difference at all there.
 Regards,
 Jörgen Hansson!
 Tel +46 703-601296
 www.jorgenhansson.com
 skype: djtropical4532
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 
 
 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


**

Dane Trethowan
From Melton Victoria Australia
mailto:grtd...@internode.on.net
Twitter: http://twitter.com/grtdane
blog: http://www.grtdane.wordpress.com
Phone United Kingdom
02032874641
Phone Australia
0390058589
Phone United States
8159261869
Fax:
+61 3 9743 7954x
MSN grtd...@dane-trethowan.net
skype:grtdane12

**





To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo

2009-12-26 Thread Kevin Lloyd
My understanding is that joint stereo is a psychoacoustic trick to try and 
make lower bit rate encoded files sound better in terms of their channel 
separation.  I don't believe the monoblock analogy is strictly correct.  All 
the advice I have seen is to use normal stereo for decent encoded files at 
bit rates of 192kbps and higher and only use the joint stereo psychoacoustic 
trick on very poor files encoded at lower bit rates.


Regards.

Kevin
E-mail: kevin.llo...@sky.com
- Original Message - 
From: Jörgen Hansson hansson.jo...@spray.se

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Hi!
aha, that make sence, thanks so much for this info.
then I will set it to joint stereo for further conversions.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
- Original Message - 
From: DJ DOCTOR P djdoct...@att.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


High George,
Joint stereo is, like you have a pare of speakers, but you have a mono block
amplifier on each one.
Regular stereo, is having those same pare of speakers hooked up to a stereo
amplifier.
The joint stereo, gives better stereo channel separation then the regular
stereo.
Hope this helps.
 John.
- Original Message - 
From: Jörgen Hansson hansson.jo...@spray.se

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 9:39 AM
Subject: a question about joint stereo and normal stereo


Hi all!
I have a question which is making me curious. when I'm converting wave to
mp3 in a convertion program or so, I can see something called joint stereo,
and I can also choose if I would like to have it in joint stereo or just
stereo.
my question is, what's the difference between joint stereo and stereo, I
can't seem to hear any difference at all there.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Joint Stereo

2008-04-16 Thread Gary Petraccaro
I have just tried ripping a cd with Nero 7 and EZCD Extractor 9.  Both gave 
me joint stereo.  I want stereo.  I had Nero set for constant bit-rate and 
tried all quality settings.  Any ideas?



Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


The Latest on Joint Stereo

2007-05-31 Thread Bruce Toews
I'm back to believing the problem to be with Easy CD-Da Extractor, not 
Winamp. I just realized taht the file I thought I had created with Gold 
Wave was actually created with Easy CD-Da Extractor. So it does appear 
that whenever you extract to any format with Easy CD-Da Extractor, you get 
joint stereo, not true stereo.

Bruce

-- 
Bruce Toews
Skype ID: o.canada
E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LiveJournal: http://brucetola.livejournal.com
Radio Show and Podcast: http://www.totw.net
Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net
Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com


Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Joint Stereo Issue May be a Winamp Issue

2007-05-30 Thread Bruce Toews
I think the joint stereo issue may in fact be a Winamp issue. Winamp is 
reporting everything being joint stereo, even stuff I know for a fact I 
saved as true stereo using Gold Wave. Is there any way to find out 
definitively whether or not a file is in joint stereo?

Bruce

-- 
Bruce Toews
Skype ID: o.canada
E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LiveJournal: http://brucetola.livejournal.com
Radio Show and Podcast: http://www.totw.net
Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net
Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com


Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Joint Stereo Question

2007-05-26 Thread Kevin Lloyd
Hi Dave.

The followign is from the CDEX manual.  Basically, don't use Joint Stereo 
unless you're dealing with very low bit rates like 128kbps.  For these files 
joint stereo will do some messing with the file to try and enhance the 
stereo image of the music.

With the LAME encoder, you can specify how the file is encoded. The default 
stereo option is recommended, but at lower
bit-rates, the Joint-stereo or Forced stereo can yield better sound quality.
Stereo: In this mode, the encoder makes no use of potential similarity 
between the two input channels. It can,
however, negotiate the bit demand between both channels, i.e. give one 
channel more bits if the other contains
silence.
Joint stereo: In this mode, the encoder will make use of a correlation 
between both channels. The signal will be
matrixed into a sum (mid) and difference (side) signal. For quasi-mono 
signals, this will give a significant gain in
encoding quality. This mode does not destroy phase information like IS 
stereo that may be used by other encoders.
This setting can be used to encode DOLBY ProLogic surround signals.
force joint stereo:  This mode will force MS joint stereo on all frames. 
It's faster and it uses some special mid and
side masking threshold.
Mono: This option will forcibly generate a mono file; if the input file is a 
stereo file, the input stream will be read as a
mono by averaging the left and right channels.

Kevin
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - 
From: Dave Marthouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list.  Pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 5:14 PM
Subject: Joint Stereo Question


I was just playing around with AudioGrabber and saw a term that I am not 
familiar with.  That is joint stereo.  What is the difference between joint 
stereo and standard stereo?  Any information would be appreciated.


 Dave Marthouse
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 



Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Joint Stereo Question

2007-05-24 Thread Dave Marthouse
I was just playing around with AudioGrabber and saw a term that I am not 
familiar with.  That is joint stereo.  What is the difference between joint 
stereo and standard stereo?  Any information would be appreciated.


Dave Marthouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Joint Stereo - what is it?

2006-01-04 Thread Brian Olesen
Hi,
Joint stereo is only the next best, but it saves space and there by makes the 
file a bit smaller.

Here are some definitions of what it is.

. A specific coding mode in Layer II audio coding. In the joint stereo mode, 
the upper frequencies of a stereo signal are joined and coded as intensity
stereo in order to conserve valuable bits and improve overall quality.
www.sidetrips.com/support/glossary_a_l.asp

. A method that takes advantage of the similarities between the left and right 
channels in an audio file so that it requires less data to compress it. (cp.
dual channel) (more..)
www.animemusicvideos.org/guides/avtech/glossary.html

. Joint stereo, in audio engineering, is the technique of encoding stereo audio 
into a mid channel which is a full channel average of the combined left
and right channels, with a side channel which has separation information on how 
to re-create two distinct stereo signals. This can aid compression for
a large majority of music, and may be used in MP3, AAC and Ogg Vorbis audio 
encoding techniques.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_stereo

Best regards
Brian
- Original Message - 
From: Gary Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list.  Pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: Joint Stereo - what is it?


 Hi Brent!  From what has been stated, Joint Stereo is a good thing when 
 using MP3's!
 - Original Message - 
 From: Brent Harding [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: PC audio discussion list.  Pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 8:06 PM
 Subject: Re: Joint Stereo - what is it?
 
 
 Oh, thought Joint stereo was either a mono feed played over both channels,
 or the mix you'd get if one imagined hooking the left and right outputs on 
 a
 device to separate channels on a board and putting it in the center as a
 mono feed.

 - Original Message - 
 From: Gary Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: PC audio discussion list.  Pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 1:20 AM
 Subject: Re: Joint Stereo - what is it?


 Soundforge can do batch conversions!
 - Original Message - 
 From: DOC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: PC audio discussion list.  Pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 1:57 PM
 Subject: Re: Joint Stereo - what is it?


 Where can this program be downloaded and how much does it cost?  Can it
 do
 batch conversions?
 - Original Message -
 From: Kevin Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: PC audio discussion list.  Pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 8:23 AM
 Subject: Re: Joint Stereo - what is it?


 Hi Arthur.

 Joint stereo is specifically used to enhance the sound of MP3 files 
 that
 have been ripped at a very low bit rate such as 128kbps.  There is some
 math
 involved in the way that the stereo information is analysed and then
 used
 to
 enhance the sound but I don't have that depth of detail at hand.

 Regards.

 Kevin
 E-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 - Original Message -
 From: arthur Pirika [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 5:36 AM
 Subject: Joint Stereo - what is it?


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Hi, I've notice that mp3's at 128 kbps joint stereo seem to be better
 quality than normal stereo mp3's. So, what is joint-stereo and why is
 the
 quality difference present?
 
 
 
  Thanks,
 
  Arthur.
 
 
 
  ___
  No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding.
  Make My Way  your home on the Web - http://www.myway.com
 
 
 
  ___
  PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
  http://www.pc-audio.org
 
  To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists
  we
 offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists 
 we
 offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we
 offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com




 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we
 offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com



 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc

Re: Joint Stereo - what is it?

2006-01-03 Thread Brent Harding
Oh, thought Joint stereo was either a mono feed played over both channels, 
or the mix you'd get if one imagined hooking the left and right outputs on a 
device to separate channels on a board and putting it in the center as a 
mono feed.

- Original Message - 
From: Gary Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list.  Pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 1:20 AM
Subject: Re: Joint Stereo - what is it?


 Soundforge can do batch conversions!
 - Original Message - 
 From: DOC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: PC audio discussion list.  Pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 1:57 PM
 Subject: Re: Joint Stereo - what is it?


 Where can this program be downloaded and how much does it cost?  Can it 
 do
 batch conversions?
 - Original Message -
 From: Kevin Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: PC audio discussion list.  Pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 8:23 AM
 Subject: Re: Joint Stereo - what is it?


 Hi Arthur.

 Joint stereo is specifically used to enhance the sound of MP3 files that
 have been ripped at a very low bit rate such as 128kbps.  There is some
 math
 involved in the way that the stereo information is analysed and then 
 used
 to
 enhance the sound but I don't have that depth of detail at hand.

 Regards.

 Kevin
 E-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 - Original Message -
 From: arthur Pirika [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 5:36 AM
 Subject: Joint Stereo - what is it?


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Hi, I've notice that mp3's at 128 kbps joint stereo seem to be better
 quality than normal stereo mp3's. So, what is joint-stereo and why is 
 the
 quality difference present?
 
 
 
  Thanks,
 
  Arthur.
 
 
 
  ___
  No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding.
  Make My Way  your home on the Web - http://www.myway.com
 
 
 
  ___
  PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
  http://www.pc-audio.org
 
  To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists
  we
 offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we
 offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we
 offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com




 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we 
 offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
 


___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, 
visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


Re: Joint Stereo - what is it?

2006-01-03 Thread Bruce Toews
I've heard that refered to as dual mono, joint mono or composite mono.

Bruce

-- 
Bruce Toews
E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net
Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com

On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Brent Harding wrote:

 Oh, thought Joint stereo was either a mono feed played over both channels,
 or the mix you'd get if one imagined hooking the left and right outputs on a
 device to separate channels on a board and putting it in the center as a
 mono feed.

 - Original Message -
 From: Gary Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: PC audio discussion list.  Pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 1:20 AM
 Subject: Re: Joint Stereo - what is it?


 Soundforge can do batch conversions!
 - Original Message -
 From: DOC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: PC audio discussion list.  Pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 1:57 PM
 Subject: Re: Joint Stereo - what is it?


 Where can this program be downloaded and how much does it cost?  Can it
 do
 batch conversions?
 - Original Message -
 From: Kevin Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: PC audio discussion list.  Pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 8:23 AM
 Subject: Re: Joint Stereo - what is it?


 Hi Arthur.

 Joint stereo is specifically used to enhance the sound of MP3 files that
 have been ripped at a very low bit rate such as 128kbps.  There is some
 math
 involved in the way that the stereo information is analysed and then
 used
 to
 enhance the sound but I don't have that depth of detail at hand.

 Regards.

 Kevin
 E-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 - Original Message -
 From: arthur Pirika [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 5:36 AM
 Subject: Joint Stereo - what is it?









 Hi, I've notice that mp3's at 128 kbps joint stereo seem to be better
 quality than normal stereo mp3's. So, what is joint-stereo and why is
 the
 quality difference present?



 Thanks,

 Arthur.



 ___
 No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding.
 Make My Way  your home on the Web - http://www.myway.com



 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists
 we
 offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we
 offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we
 offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com




 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we
 offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com



 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we 
 offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, 
visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


Re: Joint Stereo - what is it?

2006-01-03 Thread Gary Wood
Hi Brent!  From what has been stated, Joint Stereo is a good thing when 
using MP3's!
- Original Message - 
From: Brent Harding [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list.  Pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: Joint Stereo - what is it?


 Oh, thought Joint stereo was either a mono feed played over both channels,
 or the mix you'd get if one imagined hooking the left and right outputs on 
 a
 device to separate channels on a board and putting it in the center as a
 mono feed.

 - Original Message - 
 From: Gary Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: PC audio discussion list.  Pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 1:20 AM
 Subject: Re: Joint Stereo - what is it?


 Soundforge can do batch conversions!
 - Original Message - 
 From: DOC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: PC audio discussion list.  Pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 1:57 PM
 Subject: Re: Joint Stereo - what is it?


 Where can this program be downloaded and how much does it cost?  Can it
 do
 batch conversions?
 - Original Message -
 From: Kevin Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: PC audio discussion list.  Pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 8:23 AM
 Subject: Re: Joint Stereo - what is it?


 Hi Arthur.

 Joint stereo is specifically used to enhance the sound of MP3 files 
 that
 have been ripped at a very low bit rate such as 128kbps.  There is some
 math
 involved in the way that the stereo information is analysed and then
 used
 to
 enhance the sound but I don't have that depth of detail at hand.

 Regards.

 Kevin
 E-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 - Original Message -
 From: arthur Pirika [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 5:36 AM
 Subject: Joint Stereo - what is it?


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Hi, I've notice that mp3's at 128 kbps joint stereo seem to be better
 quality than normal stereo mp3's. So, what is joint-stereo and why is
 the
 quality difference present?
 
 
 
  Thanks,
 
  Arthur.
 
 
 
  ___
  No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding.
  Make My Way  your home on the Web - http://www.myway.com
 
 
 
  ___
  PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
  http://www.pc-audio.org
 
  To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists
  we
 offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists 
 we
 offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we
 offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com




 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we
 offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com



 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we 
 offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
 



___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, 
visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


Re: Joint Stereo - what is it?

2006-01-02 Thread Kevin Lloyd
Hi Arthur.

Joint stereo is specifically used to enhance the sound of MP3 files that
have been ripped at a very low bit rate such as 128kbps.  There is some math
involved in the way that the stereo information is analysed and then used to
enhance the sound but I don't have that depth of detail at hand.

Regards.

Kevin
E-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - 
From: arthur Pirika [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 5:36 AM
Subject: Joint Stereo - what is it?









 Hi, I've notice that mp3's at 128 kbps joint stereo seem to be better
quality than normal stereo mp3's. So, what is joint-stereo and why is the
quality difference present?



 Thanks,

 Arthur.



 ___
 No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding.
 Make My Way  your home on the Web - http://www.myway.com



 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we
offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, 
visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


Re: Joint Stereo - what is it?

2006-01-02 Thread DOC
Where can this program be downloaded and how much does it cost?  Can it do
batch conversions?
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list.  Pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 8:23 AM
Subject: Re: Joint Stereo - what is it?


 Hi Arthur.

 Joint stereo is specifically used to enhance the sound of MP3 files that
 have been ripped at a very low bit rate such as 128kbps.  There is some
math
 involved in the way that the stereo information is analysed and then used
to
 enhance the sound but I don't have that depth of detail at hand.

 Regards.

 Kevin
 E-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 - Original Message -
 From: arthur Pirika [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 5:36 AM
 Subject: Joint Stereo - what is it?


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Hi, I've notice that mp3's at 128 kbps joint stereo seem to be better
 quality than normal stereo mp3's. So, what is joint-stereo and why is the
 quality difference present?
 
 
 
  Thanks,
 
  Arthur.
 
 
 
  ___
  No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding.
  Make My Way  your home on the Web - http://www.myway.com
 
 
 
  ___
  PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
  http://www.pc-audio.org
 
  To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we
 offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we
offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, 
visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


Re: Joint Stereo - what is it?

2006-01-02 Thread Bruce Toews
It's not a program as such, it's an encoding technique. The latest version 
of Gold Wave has joint stereo options, for example.

Bruce

-- 
Bruce Toews
E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net
Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com

On Mon, 2 Jan 2006, DOC wrote:

 Where can this program be downloaded and how much does it cost?  Can it do
 batch conversions?
 - Original Message -
 From: Kevin Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: PC audio discussion list.  Pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 8:23 AM
 Subject: Re: Joint Stereo - what is it?


 Hi Arthur.

 Joint stereo is specifically used to enhance the sound of MP3 files that
 have been ripped at a very low bit rate such as 128kbps.  There is some
 math
 involved in the way that the stereo information is analysed and then used
 to
 enhance the sound but I don't have that depth of detail at hand.

 Regards.

 Kevin
 E-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 - Original Message -
 From: arthur Pirika [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 5:36 AM
 Subject: Joint Stereo - what is it?









 Hi, I've notice that mp3's at 128 kbps joint stereo seem to be better
 quality than normal stereo mp3's. So, what is joint-stereo and why is the
 quality difference present?



 Thanks,

 Arthur.



 ___
 No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding.
 Make My Way  your home on the Web - http://www.myway.com



 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we
 offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we
 offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we 
 offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, 
visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


Re: Joint Stereo - what is it?

2006-01-02 Thread Gary Wood
I think you can get joint stereo as one  of the choices in the CDex program.
- Original Message - 
From: DOC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list.  Pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 1:57 PM
Subject: Re: Joint Stereo - what is it?


 Where can this program be downloaded and how much does it cost?  Can it do
 batch conversions?
 - Original Message -
 From: Kevin Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: PC audio discussion list.  Pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 8:23 AM
 Subject: Re: Joint Stereo - what is it?


 Hi Arthur.

 Joint stereo is specifically used to enhance the sound of MP3 files that
 have been ripped at a very low bit rate such as 128kbps.  There is some
 math
 involved in the way that the stereo information is analysed and then used
 to
 enhance the sound but I don't have that depth of detail at hand.

 Regards.

 Kevin
 E-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 - Original Message -
 From: arthur Pirika [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 5:36 AM
 Subject: Joint Stereo - what is it?


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Hi, I've notice that mp3's at 128 kbps joint stereo seem to be better
 quality than normal stereo mp3's. So, what is joint-stereo and why is the
 quality difference present?
 
 
 
  Thanks,
 
  Arthur.
 
 
 
  ___
  No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding.
  Make My Way  your home on the Web - http://www.myway.com
 
 
 
  ___
  PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
  http://www.pc-audio.org
 
  To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists 
  we
 offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we
 offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we 
 offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
 



___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, 
visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


Re: Joint Stereo - what is it?

2006-01-02 Thread Gary Wood
Soundforge can do batch conversions!
- Original Message - 
From: DOC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list.  Pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 1:57 PM
Subject: Re: Joint Stereo - what is it?


 Where can this program be downloaded and how much does it cost?  Can it do
 batch conversions?
 - Original Message -
 From: Kevin Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: PC audio discussion list.  Pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 8:23 AM
 Subject: Re: Joint Stereo - what is it?


 Hi Arthur.

 Joint stereo is specifically used to enhance the sound of MP3 files that
 have been ripped at a very low bit rate such as 128kbps.  There is some
 math
 involved in the way that the stereo information is analysed and then used
 to
 enhance the sound but I don't have that depth of detail at hand.

 Regards.

 Kevin
 E-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 - Original Message -
 From: arthur Pirika [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 5:36 AM
 Subject: Joint Stereo - what is it?


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Hi, I've notice that mp3's at 128 kbps joint stereo seem to be better
 quality than normal stereo mp3's. So, what is joint-stereo and why is the
 quality difference present?
 
 
 
  Thanks,
 
  Arthur.
 
 
 
  ___
  No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding.
  Make My Way  your home on the Web - http://www.myway.com
 
 
 
  ___
  PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
  http://www.pc-audio.org
 
  To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists 
  we
 offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we
 offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we 
 offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
 



___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, 
visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


Joint Stereo - what is it?

2006-01-01 Thread arthur Pirika







Hi, I've notice that mp3's at 128 kbps joint stereo seem to be better quality 
than normal stereo mp3's. So, what is joint-stereo and why is the quality 
difference present?



Thanks,

Arthur.



___
No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding.
Make My Way  your home on the Web - http://www.myway.com



___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, 
visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


Re: Joint Stereo

2005-11-30 Thread Steve Matzura
Joint_Stereo is a data-saving technique which only keeps one copy of
sound data that appears on both channels, rather than two.  On older,
slower machines, regular (vs. joint) stereo MP3's sometimes produced a
wavy effect when playing back because the slower processor couldn't
keep up with encoding what was essentially two streams containing some
common elements and keep them in total synchronization.  Joint_stereo
fixes this problem by removing the common data from  one of the
channels and copying it from the other one.  Files recorded in
joint_stereo are sometimes a little smaller than those recorded in
plain regular stereo.

Can LAME be set to produce stereo (not joint) output?  Sure can. What
wrapper do you use for LAME--Easy CDDA Extractor perhaps?  This
program lets you configure every known option there is for the LAME
encoder.

Hope this helps.


___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, 
visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


Joint Stereo

2005-11-27 Thread Bruce Toews
The Lame MP3 Encoder produces MP3's in joint stereo. What exactly, in 
layperson's terms, is joint stereo? Is there a way I can get an encoder 
that encodes in true stereo? Is there a reason I'd want to do this?

Bruce

-- 
Bruce Toews
E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net
Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com

___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, 
visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


Re: Joint Stereo

2005-11-27 Thread Gary Petraccaro
Lousy.  I've heard instrument placement where voices and instruments shifted.  
Perhaps it's quality depended?  I would hope so.  Can't answer your other 
question.

  - Original Message - 
  From: Bruce Toews 
  To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org 
  Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2005 11:15 AM
  Subject: Joint Stereo


  The Lame MP3 Encoder produces MP3's in joint stereo. What exactly, in 
  layperson's terms, is joint stereo? Is there a way I can get an encoder 
  that encodes in true stereo? Is there a reason I'd want to do this?

  Bruce

  -- 
  Bruce Toews
  E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net
  Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com

  ___
  PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
  http://www.pc-audio.org

  To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we 
offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, 
visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


Re: Joint Stereo

2005-11-27 Thread Denny Daughters
Bruce,
I have a program called Razorlame that uses the lame engine.  Yes you 
can get regular stereo files from this as well as joint stereo.  I'm not 
sure what joint stereo is either.  Razorlame provides a really nice 
interface to the lame engine so you don't have to memorize a bunch of 
commands.  Email me off list and I can send you the files.  I also have a 
file that tells you how to get started with Window-eyes and how to set it 
up.
Denny 



___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, 
visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


Re: Joint Stereo

2005-11-27 Thread Sun Sparkle
Denny,
could you please send it to me as well.
- Original Message - 
From: Denny Daughters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list.  Pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2005 6:50 PM
Subject: Re: Joint Stereo


 Bruce,
I have a program called Razorlame that uses the lame engine.  Yes you
 can get regular stereo files from this as well as joint stereo.  I'm not
 sure what joint stereo is either.  Razorlame provides a really nice
 interface to the lame engine so you don't have to memorize a bunch of
 commands.  Email me off list and I can send you the files.  I also have a
 file that tells you how to get started with Window-eyes and how to set it
 up.
 Denny



 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we 
 offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com

 


___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, 
visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


Re: Joint stereo

2005-03-17 Thread TerriStimmel
Hi Gary and list,

I'm not really sure how a person does that to a file, but I certainly agree
that it sounds awful.

It seems as though I'm always getting this stuff, rather it be music or
books.

What I really don't understand, is why anyone would want their files to be
like this.

The way I understand it, and someone please correct me if I'm wrong, is that
a joint stereo file has one of the channels placed over top of the other
one.
In other words, they aren't two separate channels like they should be.

Someone else can probably explain it better than I can.  But that's the way
I've understood it to be.

What I'd like to know, is that if you get files like this, is there a way to
fix them?

I'm thinking probably not, but I'm hoping I am wrong.

If you can fix them, what do you have to do?

Can you just resave them?

I doubt it can be that simple.

Gary I hope this has helped you in some way.  If not, I apologize.

Everyone have a terrific day.

Terri



-- 
Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.6.2 - Release Date: 3/4/2005


___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Joint stereo

2005-03-16 Thread Gary Petraccaro
I've just heard two samples of joint stereo where instruments move from spot 
to spot making recordings unpleasant to hear.  What programs use it and how 
do you make sure they're not doing it?  Sounds really bad. 


___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Question concerning VBR and Joint Stereo on Standard CD

2004-05-03 Thread Kevin Lloyd
Hi Larry.

Using variable bit rates and joint stereo really apply to the ripping stage
where you're taking tracks from an audio CD and converting to MP3.  It
doesn't really apply to burning them to CD.

You can re-encode MP3 that's at a higher bit rate and reduce it using
variable bit rates.  For example, if you had MP3's at a bit rate of 256kbps,
you could reduce these to around 128kbps using variable bit rates.  This
would ensure that the quality never dropped below 128kbps but would give you
more bits per second where the music needed it.  This would result in the
files being slightly larger than if encoded with a constant bit rate of
128kbps but you should hear some improvement in the quality.

I've pasted some details below on the different bit rate methods that can be
used that my be of interest.

Bitrate Options:




There are three types of bitrate options that you can specify for each the
encoder (although some encoders may not allow any options).

1) Constant Bitrate (CBR)

This is the default encoding mode, and also the most basic. In this mode,
the  bitrate will be the same throughout the whole file.  So, a second of
audio from one part of the file takes just as much disk space as a second
from any other part of that file -- regardless of whether either part is
silence, acoustically simple, or quite complex.  This means that you are
likely to hear distortion more in the complex parts than in the simple
parts.  The advantage of CBR formats is that even older players understand
them, and that you can reliably predict the file size from the duration of
the sound (or vice versa).


2) Average Bitrate (ABR)

In this mode, you tell the encoder to aim for an average bitrate that you
specify, skimping on the simpler parts of the music, and using higher
bitrates for the parts of your music that are more complex. The result will
be of higher quality than you'd get in a CBR encoded file of the same size.
This mode is highly recommended over CBR. This encoding mode is similar to
VBR.

3) Variable bitrate (VBR)

In this mode, you say what level of quality you want in the output file, and
the encoder compresses each second as best it can to get just that level of
quality -- using less information to represent simpler parts of the song,
and more information to represent the more complex parts. However, this mode
relies heavily on the encoder's model of how you perceive quality, and could
lead to a few bad choices in the encoding process. If possible, you may
want to specify a minimum bitrate (e.g., 64 Kbps) to avoid those potential
errors.





Kevin
- Original Message -
From: Larry N [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 5:18 PM
Subject: Question concerning VBR and Joint Stereo on Standard CD


Hi everyone. I have a data CD which consists of assorted MP3 files. My plan
was to simply copy those files, paste them into  folders and burn them onto
standard audio CDs. A friend claims that for best results I should burn
using a variable bit rate in joint stereo mode. It is my understanding that
VBR and joint stereo apply to the encoding and editing of MP3's and MP3 CD's
rather than to the process of burning MP3 files onto a standard CD. My
question then is how do I take existing MP3's and apply VBR and joint stereo
to a project involving such files? Additionally, if neither Nero nor Easy
CD-DA extractor can perform the task, what screen reader compatible software
would you suggest?

Thanks in advance for any ideas.

Larry
___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Question concerning VBR and Joint Stereo on Standard CD

2004-05-03 Thread Brett Scarr
Joint stereo is crap, especially if you are going to be listening to your
music through good speakers. You can always tell a joint stereo file because
the top end, especially the simples tend to oscillate between the speakers.



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Larry N
Sent: Friday, 30 April 2004 2:18 AM
To: PC audio discussion list.
Subject: Question concerning VBR and Joint Stereo on Standard CD


Hi everyone. I have a data CD which consists of assorted MP3 files. My plan
was to simply copy those files, paste them into  folders and burn them onto
standard audio CDs. A friend claims that for best results I should burn
using a variable bit rate in joint stereo mode. It is my understanding that
VBR and joint stereo apply to the encoding and editing of MP3's and MP3 CD's
rather than to the process of burning MP3 files onto a standard CD. My
question then is how do I take existing MP3's and apply VBR and joint stereo
to a project involving such files? Additionally, if neither Nero nor Easy
CD-DA extractor can perform the task, what screen reader compatible software
would you suggest?

Thanks in advance for any ideas.

Larry
___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Question concerning VBR and Joint Stereo on Standard CD

2004-04-30 Thread Alexandra Grünauer
Hi Lary,
you could use CDEX to re-convert the tracks, but I wouldn't recommend it
because you will always lose a bit of the sound quality when you do that.
What your friend probably meant was if you encoded wav or cda-files into
mp3.

Alex


___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]