Re: PESO - Looking for the Perfect Wave

2010-06-16 Thread Brian Walters
G'day all

Thanks for all the feedback on this shot, particularly on alternative
positioning of the wave and surfer suggested by Ken and Bruce. I hadn't
really considered alternative compositions but I can see their potential
- something to keep in mind next time I'm on the coast.  The focus of
the shot was intended to be the surfer with the wave just providing some
secondary interest.

Jack's second comment adds a bit of ambiguity to the shot that I hadn't
realised.  The surfer is actually heading out, not in, and the small
wave is inbound.  It's interesting how interpretations can vary.

(As an aside, this kind of feedback is one of the reasons that this list
is so valuable).


Cheers

Brian

++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/

On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:50 -0400, paul stenquist
pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
 I agree with Christine. There are a number of options for this type of
 shot, but your execution is excellent. Well done!
 Paul
 On Jun 15, 2010, at 12:47 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
 
  Hi Brian.  The contrasting textures of the water are nice as is the 
  backlight on the surfer in silhouette.   You caught the stride of the 
  surfer just right to my eye.  Ken makes an interesting point about the 
  placement of the wave, but I do like the shot composed as posted.  Could go 
  either way for me. Very nice work.Cheers, Christine
  
  
  
  
  - Original Message - From: Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm
  To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
  Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 7:52 AM
  Subject: PESO - Looking for the Perfect Wave
  
  
  I was trying for a very simple composition here.   It's sort of what I
  wanted but not sure if it quite works:
  
  http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP7062.html
  
  I cropped some off the top and left. K200D and 55-300 mm zoom.
  
  Comments welcome.
  
  
  
  Cheers
  
  Brian
-- 


-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Accessible with your email software
  or over the web


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Looking for the Perfect Wave

2010-06-16 Thread Charles Robinson
On Jun 15, 2010, at 7:52, Brian Walters wrote:

 I was trying for a very simple composition here.   It's sort of what I
 wanted but not sure if it quite works:
 
 http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP7062.html
 
 I cropped some off the top and left. K200D and 55-300 mm zoom.
 

Well, *I* like it!

 -Charles

--
Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com
Minneapolis, MN
http://charles.robinsontwins.org
http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Looking for the Perfect Wave

2010-06-16 Thread Brian Walters
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:47 -0500, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com
wrote:
 On Jun 15, 2010, at 7:52, Brian Walters wrote:
 
  I was trying for a very simple composition here.   It's sort of what I
  wanted but not sure if it quite works:
  
  http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP7062.html
  
  I cropped some off the top and left. K200D and 55-300 mm zoom.
  
 
 Well, *I* like it!
 
  -Charles


Thanks Charles!


Cheers

Brian

++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
-- 


-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Faster than the air-speed velocity of an
  unladen european swallow


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


PESO - Looking for the Perfect Wave

2010-06-15 Thread Brian Walters
I was trying for a very simple composition here.   It's sort of what I
wanted but not sure if it quite works:

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP7062.html

I cropped some off the top and left. K200D and 55-300 mm zoom.

Comments welcome.



Cheers

Brian

++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/

-- 


-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - One of many happy users:
  http://www.fastmail.fm/docs/quotes.html


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Looking for the Perfect Wave

2010-06-15 Thread eckinator
2010/6/15 Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm:

 I was trying for a very simple composition here.   It's sort of what I
 wanted but not sure if it quite works:

 http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP7062.html

 I cropped some off the top and left. K200D and 55-300 mm zoom.

The surfer's hair really brings the shot to froition =)

Cheers
Ecke

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Looking for the Perfect Wave

2010-06-15 Thread frank theriault
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm wrote:
 I was trying for a very simple composition here.   It's sort of what I
 wanted but not sure if it quite works:

 http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP7062.html

 I cropped some off the top and left. K200D and 55-300 mm zoom.


Sure as hell works for me.

Terrific shot!

cheers,
frank

-- 
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.  -Henri Cartier-Bresson

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Looking for the Perfect Wave

2010-06-15 Thread Jack Davis
Well..maybe tomorrow..
Beautifully composed!

Jack

--- On Tue, 6/15/10, frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: PESO - Looking for the Perfect Wave
 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
 Date: Tuesday, June 15, 2010, 6:29 AM
 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:52 AM,
 Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm
 wrote:
  I was trying for a very simple composition here.  
 It's sort of what I
  wanted but not sure if it quite works:
 
  http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP7062.html
 
  I cropped some off the top and left. K200D and 55-300
 mm zoom.
 
 
 Sure as hell works for me.
 
 Terrific shot!
 
 cheers,
 frank
 
 -- 
 Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.  -Henri
 Cartier-Bresson
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
 directly above and follow the directions.
 


  

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Looking for the Perfect Wave

2010-06-15 Thread David J Brooks
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 9:29 AM, frank theriault
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm wrote:
 I was trying for a very simple composition here.   It's sort of what I
 wanted but not sure if it quite works:

 http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP7062.html

 I cropped some off the top and left. K200D and 55-300 mm zoom.


 Sure as hell works for me.

And me

Dave

 Terrific shot!

 cheers,
 frank

 --
 Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.  -Henri Cartier-Bresson

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.




-- 
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Looking for the Perfect Wave

2010-06-15 Thread P. J. Alling

Nicely done.

On 6/15/2010 8:52 AM, Brian Walters wrote:

I was trying for a very simple composition here.   It's sort of what I
wanted but not sure if it quite works:

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP7062.html

I cropped some off the top and left. K200D and 55-300 mm zoom.

Comments welcome.



Cheers

Brian

++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/

   



--
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier 
New;}}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 I've just upgraded to Thunderbird 3.0 and the 
interface subtly weird.\par
}


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Looking for the Perfect Wave

2010-06-15 Thread Ken Waller
The wave in back of him keeps vying for my attention and draws me away from 
the surfer.

Putting the wave in front of the surfer is more complementary.

Nice backlit light.

Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller

- Original Message - 
From: Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm

Subject: PESO - Looking for the Perfect Wave



I was trying for a very simple composition here.   It's sort of what I
wanted but not sure if it quite works:

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP7062.html

I cropped some off the top and left. K200D and 55-300 mm zoom.

Comments welcome.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Looking for the Perfect Wave

2010-06-15 Thread Bruce Dayton
Well, all the elements are there and I can see what you are trying to
do.  I guess one issue is what is the subject - the wave or the
surfer?  As it stands they seem to compete a bit.  If it is the
wave, then the surfer needs to be less dominant - almost out of frame
or upper right corner or something.  If it is the surfer then he is
leading my eyes out of the frame.  He is 3/4s out of the frame and on
his way out.  He needs to be much further to the left side of frame.

-- 
Bruce


Tuesday, June 15, 2010, 5:52:50 AM, you wrote:

BW I was trying for a very simple composition here.   It's sort of what I
BW wanted but not sure if it quite works:

BW http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP7062.html

BW I cropped some off the top and left. K200D and 55-300 mm zoom.

BW Comments welcome.



BW Cheers

BW Brian

BW ++
BW Brian Walters
BW Western Sydney Australia
BW http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/

BW -- 


BW -- 
BW http://www.fastmail.fm - One of many happy users:
BW   http://www.fastmail.fm/docs/quotes.html





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Looking for the Perfect Wave

2010-06-15 Thread Christine Aguila
Hi Brian.  The contrasting textures of the water are nice as is the 
backlight on the surfer in silhouette.   You caught the stride of the surfer 
just right to my eye.  Ken makes an interesting point about the placement of 
the wave, but I do like the shot composed as posted.  Could go either way 
for me. Very nice work.Cheers, Christine





- Original Message - 
From: Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm

To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 7:52 AM
Subject: PESO - Looking for the Perfect Wave



I was trying for a very simple composition here.   It's sort of what I
wanted but not sure if it quite works:

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP7062.html

I cropped some off the top and left. K200D and 55-300 mm zoom.

Comments welcome.



Cheers

Brian

++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/

--


--
http://www.fastmail.fm - One of many happy users:
 http://www.fastmail.fm/docs/quotes.html


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.






--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: PESO - Looking for the Perfect Wave

2010-06-15 Thread Bob W
 
 I was trying for a very simple composition here.   It's sort of what I
 wanted but not sure if it quite works:
 
 http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP7062.html
 
 I cropped some off the top and left. K200D and 55-300 mm zoom.
 
 Comments welcome.

that's great - especially as I thought it was going to be about
hairdressing.

B


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: PESO - Looking for the Perfect Wave

2010-06-15 Thread Bob W
 
  I was trying for a very simple composition here.   It's sort of what
 I
  wanted but not sure if it quite works:
 
  http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP7062.html
 
  I cropped some off the top and left. K200D and 55-300 mm zoom.
 
 The surfer's hair really brings the shot to froition =)

oh, so it _is_ about hairdressing! There's a bit of a mullet going on there.

B


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Looking for the Perfect Wave

2010-06-15 Thread Jack Davis
I previously commented, but let me add that I agree with you, Christine. The 
surfer is leaving the ocean and is separated sufficiently from the small 
outbound wave so as not to conflict or distract. I prefer, as is true in this 
case, that the exiting figure be positioned nearer to the approaching frame 
edge.

Jack

--- On Tue, 6/15/10, Christine Aguila cagu...@earthlink.net wrote:

 From: Christine Aguila cagu...@earthlink.net
 Subject: Re: PESO - Looking for the Perfect Wave
 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
 Date: Tuesday, June 15, 2010, 9:47 AM
 Hi Brian.  The contrasting
 textures of the water are nice as is the backlight on the
 surfer in silhouette.   You caught the stride
 of the surfer just right to my eye.  Ken makes an
 interesting point about the placement of the wave, but I do
 like the shot composed as posted.  Could go either way
 for me. Very nice work.    Cheers, Christine
 
 
 
 
 - Original Message - From: Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm
 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
 Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 7:52 AM
 Subject: PESO - Looking for the Perfect Wave
 
 
  I was trying for a very simple composition
 here.   It's sort of what I
  wanted but not sure if it quite works:
  
  http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP7062.html
  
  I cropped some off the top and left. K200D and 55-300
 mm zoom.
  
  Comments welcome.
  
  
  
  Cheers
  
  Brian
  
  ++
  Brian Walters
  Western Sydney Australia
  http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
  
  -- 
  
  -- http://www.fastmail.fm - One of many happy users:
   http://www.fastmail.fm/docs/quotes.html
  
  
  -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
  PDML@pdml.net
  http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
  to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
 directly above and follow the directions.
  
 
 
 
 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
 directly above and follow the directions.
 


  

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - Looking for the Perfect Wave

2010-06-15 Thread paul stenquist
I agree with Christine. There are a number of options for this type of shot, 
but your execution is excellent. Well done!
Paul
On Jun 15, 2010, at 12:47 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:

 Hi Brian.  The contrasting textures of the water are nice as is the backlight 
 on the surfer in silhouette.   You caught the stride of the surfer just right 
 to my eye.  Ken makes an interesting point about the placement of the wave, 
 but I do like the shot composed as posted.  Could go either way for me. Very 
 nice work.Cheers, Christine
 
 
 
 
 - Original Message - From: Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm
 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
 Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 7:52 AM
 Subject: PESO - Looking for the Perfect Wave
 
 
 I was trying for a very simple composition here.   It's sort of what I
 wanted but not sure if it quite works:
 
 http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP7062.html
 
 I cropped some off the top and left. K200D and 55-300 mm zoom.
 
 Comments welcome.
 
 
 
 Cheers
 
 Brian
 
 ++
 Brian Walters
 Western Sydney Australia
 http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
 
 -- 
 
 
 -- 
 http://www.fastmail.fm - One of many happy users:
 http://www.fastmail.fm/docs/quotes.html
 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
 follow the directions.
 
 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Anybody looking for a Super ME?

2010-05-21 Thread Larry Colen
There's an ad on CL for a Super ME and four lenses.  I'd be interested 
in the A 50/1.4, but they won't sell things separately. There's also a 
28/2.8 and a couple of off brand zooms.


 Original Message 
Subject: Re: Pentax Super ME and 4 Lenses - $100 (larkspur)
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 07:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: Erin Dixon edixon_em...@yahoo.com
To: lrc.red4...@mail.pure-chaos.com lrc.red4...@mail.pure-chaos.com

No, but thank you.

Sent from handheld

On May 20, 2010, at 2:48 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:

** CRAIGSLIST ADVISORY --- AVOID SCAMS BY DEALING LOCALLY
** Avoid:  wiring money, cross-border deals, work-at-home
** Beware: cashier checks, money orders, escrow, shipping
** More Info:  http://www.craigslist.org/about/scams.html

would you have any interest in just selling the 50mm?
Or, possibly, the 50 and the 28?

http://sfbay.craigslist.org/nby/pho/1750988170.html



--
this message was remailed to you via: sale-gsem2-1750988...@craigslist.org
--





--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anyone looking into doing the webcam video from Chicago?

2010-04-30 Thread Joseph McAllister

On Apr 28, 2010, at 11:03 , Mark Roberts wrote:


Cotty wrote:


On 28/4/10, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:


just signed up on ustream.tv and got it working. Bookmark this URL:
http://www.ustream.tv/channel/pdml-photo-annual-gallery-opening
(Requires Flash, I'm afraid)

If we can get an Internet connection at the gallery we should be  
good

to go.


Way to go Mark. That's excellent!!


It will be if we can get an Internet connection at the gallery (I
emailed Sue Barton but haven't received a reply yet). Even better if
it's hard-wired rather than wireless, because it's faster and we'll be
able to go for a better quality feed.

Then again, if it's wireless I could walk the laptop by all the photos
in the exhibit to let viewers around the world seem them on display!



Rent a Hover-Round or borrow one of the local supermarket's electric  
shoppers and bungee your laptop to the basket for a smooth round-room  
pan. If you need it, a light 32° off center will help light the crowds  
as well as even the illumination on the prints.   :-)


Joseph McAllister
Lots of gear, not much time

http://gallery.me.com/jomac
http://web.me.com/jomac/show.me/Blog/Blog.html


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anyone looking into doing the webcam video from Chicago?

2010-04-28 Thread Cotty
On 27/4/10, Stan Halpin, discombobulated, unleashed:

3. Streaming video is a problem though. Most solutions for the Mac build
on OS-X Server tools.

Quicktime Broadcaster!

http://www.apple.com/quicktime/broadcaster/

--


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)  | People, Places, Pastiche
--  http://www.cottysnaps.com
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anyone looking into doing the webcam video from Chicago?

2010-04-28 Thread Matthew Hunt
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:49 PM, Stan Halpin
s...@stans-photography.info wrote:

 3. Streaming video is a problem though. Most solutions for the Mac build on 
 OS-X Server tools.

I've seen my Twitter contacts and such use ustream for streaming
video.  Based on the kinds of things they've used it for, there's no
way they're spending much money or effort on it.

http://www.ustream.tv/

Unfortunately I can't do any research on it at this moment.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anyone looking into doing the webcam video from Chicago?

2010-04-28 Thread Mark Roberts
Cotty wrote:

On 27/4/10, Stan Halpin, discombobulated, unleashed:

3. Streaming video is a problem though. Most solutions for the Mac build
on OS-X Server tools.

Quicktime Broadcaster!

http://www.apple.com/quicktime/broadcaster/

Thanks! I've now got that downloaded and installed on my Dell/Mac. The
software seems to be working but I can't determine how to get it
sending its video out to the rest of the Internet. Any pointers?

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anyone looking into doing the webcam video from Chicago?

2010-04-28 Thread Matthew Hunt
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:

 Thanks! I've now got that downloaded and installed on my Dell/Mac. The
 software seems to be working but I can't determine how to get it
 sending its video out to the rest of the Internet. Any pointers?

http://www.apple.com/quicktime/broadcaster/faq.html

To how many viewers can QuickTime Broadcaster deliver a live event?

QuickTime Broadcaster sends out a single stream that can be viewed by
one QuickTime Player on a standards-compliant device. If more than one
QuickTime Player will view your broadcast you will need access to a
streaming server or a multicast-enabled network. For more information
about using a streaming server with QuickTime Broadcaster or
multicasting please visit QuickTime Broadcaster Help, located under
the Help menu in the application.

Where can I find a list of companies offering webcasting services?

Visit our QuickTime Services page for a list of companies offering
webcasting services and more.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anyone looking into doing the webcam video from Chicago?

2010-04-28 Thread Mark Roberts
Mark Roberts wrote:

Cotty wrote:

On 27/4/10, Stan Halpin, discombobulated, unleashed:

3. Streaming video is a problem though. Most solutions for the Mac build
on OS-X Server tools.

Quicktime Broadcaster!

http://www.apple.com/quicktime/broadcaster/

Thanks! I've now got that downloaded and installed on my Dell/Mac. The
software seems to be working but I can't determine how to get it
sending its video out to the rest of the Internet. Any pointers?

OK, I've got the next step: I need to connect to a streaming server. 
Anyone got one of those kicking around? Didn't think so.

I don't think this live video from the gallery opening is going to
happen.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anyone looking into doing the webcam video from Chicago?

2010-04-28 Thread Stan Halpin

On Apr 28, 2010, at 7:38 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:

 Cotty wrote:
 
 On 27/4/10, Stan Halpin, discombobulated, unleashed:
 
 3. Streaming video is a problem though. Most solutions for the Mac build
 on OS-X Server tools.
 
 Quicktime Broadcaster!
 
 http://www.apple.com/quicktime/broadcaster/
 
 Thanks! I've now got that downloaded and installed on my Dell/Mac. The
 software seems to be working but I can't determine how to get it
 sending its video out to the rest of the Internet. Any pointers?
 
I don't think it will work properly unless you have OS-X Server (not just 
end-user OS-X).

stan
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anyone looking into doing the webcam video from Chicago?

2010-04-28 Thread mike wilson

Mark Roberts wrote:


Cotty wrote:



On 27/4/10, Stan Halpin, discombobulated, unleashed:



3. Streaming video is a problem though. Most solutions for the Mac build
on OS-X Server tools.


Quicktime Broadcaster!

http://www.apple.com/quicktime/broadcaster/



Thanks! I've now got that downloaded and installed on my Dell/Mac. The
software seems to be working but I can't determine how to get it
sending its video out to the rest of the Internet. Any pointers?


I'm over here!

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anyone looking into doing the webcam video from Chicago?

2010-04-28 Thread Mark Roberts
Mark Roberts wrote:

OK, I've got the next step: I need to connect to a streaming server. 
Anyone got one of those kicking around? Didn't think so.

I don't think this live video from the gallery opening is going to
happen.

Oops, spoke too soon: The Quicktime thing isn't going to happen but I
just signed up on ustream.tv and got it working. Bookmark this URL:
http://www.ustream.tv/channel/pdml-photo-annual-gallery-opening
(Requires Flash, I'm afraid)

If we can get an Internet connection at the gallery we should be good
to go.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anyone looking into doing the webcam video from Chicago?

2010-04-28 Thread Cotty
On 28/4/10, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:

I
just signed up on ustream.tv and got it working. Bookmark this URL:
http://www.ustream.tv/channel/pdml-photo-annual-gallery-opening
(Requires Flash, I'm afraid)

If we can get an Internet connection at the gallery we should be good
to go.

Way to go Mark. That's excellent!!

--


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)  | People, Places, Pastiche
--  http://www.cottysnaps.com
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anyone looking into doing the webcam video from Chicago?

2010-04-28 Thread Mark Roberts
Cotty wrote:

On 28/4/10, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:

just signed up on ustream.tv and got it working. Bookmark this URL:
http://www.ustream.tv/channel/pdml-photo-annual-gallery-opening
(Requires Flash, I'm afraid)

If we can get an Internet connection at the gallery we should be good
to go.

Way to go Mark. That's excellent!!

It will be if we can get an Internet connection at the gallery (I
emailed Sue Barton but haven't received a reply yet). Even better if
it's hard-wired rather than wireless, because it's faster and we'll be
able to go for a better quality feed.

Then again, if it's wireless I could walk the laptop by all the photos
in the exhibit to let viewers around the world seem them on display!


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anyone looking into doing the webcam video from Chicago?

2010-04-28 Thread caguila
I just got off the phone with Sue.  The entire DANK building has unsecured 
wireless.  She said she has gotten decent reception in the gallery. HTH.  
Cheers, Christine

 


-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com
Sent: Apr 28, 2010 1:03 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Anyone looking into doing the webcam video from Chicago?

Cotty wrote:

On 28/4/10, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:

just signed up on ustream.tv and got it working. Bookmark this URL:
http://www.ustream.tv/channel/pdml-photo-annual-gallery-opening
(Requires Flash, I'm afraid)

If we can get an Internet connection at the gallery we should be good
to go.

Way to go Mark. That's excellent!!

It will be if we can get an Internet connection at the gallery (I
emailed Sue Barton but haven't received a reply yet). Even better if
it's hard-wired rather than wireless, because it's faster and we'll be
able to go for a better quality feed.

Then again, if it's wireless I could walk the laptop by all the photos
in the exhibit to let viewers around the world seem them on display!


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anyone looking into doing the webcam video from Chicago?

2010-04-28 Thread Cotty
On 28/4/10, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:

Then again, if it's wireless I could walk the laptop by all the photos
in the exhibit to let viewers around the world seem them on display!

A personal tour - love it :)



--


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)  | People, Places, Pastiche
--  http://www.cottysnaps.com
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anyone looking into doing the webcam video from Chicago?

2010-04-28 Thread mike wilson

Mark Roberts wrote:


Cotty wrote:



On 28/4/10, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:



just signed up on ustream.tv and got it working. Bookmark this URL:
http://www.ustream.tv/channel/pdml-photo-annual-gallery-opening
(Requires Flash, I'm afraid)

If we can get an Internet connection at the gallery we should be good
to go.


Way to go Mark. That's excellent!!



It will be if we can get an Internet connection at the gallery (I
emailed Sue Barton but haven't received a reply yet). Even better if
it's hard-wired rather than wireless, because it's faster and we'll be
able to go for a better quality feed.

Then again, if it's wireless I could walk the laptop by all the photos
in the exhibit to let viewers around the world seem them on display!


If anyone has one of those firewire video cameras you could do it in 
(for the internet) HD.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Anyone looking into doing the webcam video from Chicago?

2010-04-27 Thread mark
Is anyone seriously investigating this? Seems like a cool idea (if we
can get an Internet connection at the gallery). I have a Lenovo laptop
running Windows 7 and a Dell netbook running Mac OSX 10.6.2 and both
have teleconferencing cameras. If someone wants to have a go just tell
me which one I should bring.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anyone looking into doing the webcam video from Chicago?

2010-04-27 Thread Cotty
On 27/4/10, m...@robertstech.com, discombobulated, unleashed:

Dell netbook running Mac OSX 10.6.2

I gagged on my cup of tea just then.

--


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)  | People, Places, Pastiche
--  http://www.cottysnaps.com
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anyone looking into doing the webcam video from Chicago?

2010-04-27 Thread P. J. Alling

On 4/27/2010 10:34 AM, Cotty wrote:

On 27/4/10, m...@robertstech.com, discombobulated, unleashed:

   

Dell netbook running Mac OSX 10.6.2
 

I gagged on my cup of tea just then.
   


What, you've never heard of a hachentosh before?


--


Cheers,
   Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)  | People, Places, Pastiche
--  http://www.cottysnaps.com
_



   



--
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier 
New;}}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 I've just upgraded to Thunderbird 3.0 and the 
interface subtly weird.\par
}


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anyone looking into doing the webcam video from Chicago?

2010-04-27 Thread Larry Colen

On 4/27/2010 4:48 AM, m...@robertstech.com wrote:

Is anyone seriously investigating this? Seems like a cool idea (if we
can get an Internet connection at the gallery). I have a Lenovo laptop
running Windows 7 and a Dell netbook running Mac OSX 10.6.2 and both
have teleconferencing cameras. If someone wants to have a go just tell
me which one I should bring.

   
Along those lines, there was discussion of a gallery of the photos that 
didn't make it into the book.  I'd love to see those presented as a 
slide show.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Anyone looking into doing the webcam video from Chicago?

2010-04-27 Thread Stan Halpin
I have done a little Google research on this. Note that so far I was assuming 
use of my Mac, have not delved into what may be available on the Windows side.
1. Skype allows conference calls but I suspect this is an expensive and 
cumbersome way to go.
2. There are many programs that support video upload, e.g. to your own web site 
or to YouTube.
3. Streaming video is a problem though. Most solutions for the Mac build on 
OS-X Server tools. 
4. I skipped by a couple of high-dollar commercial solutions.

5.. This may be a likely cross-platform solution, but my initial impression is 
that it requires a higher geek factor than I am able to bring to bear.

http://www.videolan.org/vlc/

stan

On Apr 27, 2010, at 6:48 AM, m...@robertstech.com wrote:

 Is anyone seriously investigating this? Seems like a cool idea (if we
 can get an Internet connection at the gallery). I have a Lenovo laptop
 running Windows 7 and a Dell netbook running Mac OSX 10.6.2 and both
 have teleconferencing cameras. If someone wants to have a go just tell
 me which one I should bring.
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO Through the Looking Glass

2010-04-07 Thread Toine
great capture. the framing/crop is also well done.
Toine

On 6 April 2010 16:44, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=10884615

 K7, DA* 60-250/4, f4, 1/500th, AF540 flash in hi-speed synch mode


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO Through the Looking Glass

2010-04-07 Thread paul stenquist
Thanks Toine. And thanks to all who commented or had a look.
Paul
On Apr 7, 2010, at 2:31 AM, Toine wrote:

 great capture. the framing/crop is also well done.
 Toine
 
 On 6 April 2010 16:44, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=10884615
 
 K7, DA* 60-250/4, f4, 1/500th, AF540 flash in hi-speed synch mode
 
 
 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.
 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


PESO Through the Looking Glass

2010-04-06 Thread P N Stenquist

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=10884615

K7, DA* 60-250/4, f4, 1/500th, AF540 flash in hi-speed synch mode


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO Through the Looking Glass

2010-04-06 Thread Cotty
On 6/4/10, P N Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=10884615

K7, DA* 60-250/4, f4, 1/500th, AF540 flash in hi-speed synch mode

Very sweet :)

--


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)  | People, Places, Pastiche
--  http://www.cottysnaps.com
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO Through the Looking Glass

2010-04-06 Thread Bruce Dayton
Cool shot, Paul.  You have just the right amount of haze on the
window to effectively show her and the environment around her.
Nicely done.

-- 
Best regards,
Bruce


Tuesday, April 6, 2010, 7:44:57 AM, you wrote:

PNS http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=10884615

PNS K7, DA* 60-250/4, f4, 1/500th, AF540 flash in hi-speed synch mode





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO Through the Looking Glass

2010-04-06 Thread David J Brooks
Lovely moment there Paul.

Dave

On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:44 AM, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=10884615

 K7, DA* 60-250/4, f4, 1/500th, AF540 flash in hi-speed synch mode


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.




-- 
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO Through the Looking Glass

2010-04-06 Thread Bob Sullivan
Paul,
Very nice, almost in a 'space ship'.
Regards,  Bob S.

On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:44 AM, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=10884615

 K7, DA* 60-250/4, f4, 1/500th, AF540 flash in hi-speed synch mode


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Interesting device for those looking into external HD storage

2010-03-28 Thread Boris Liberman

On 3/21/2010 6:32 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:

http://news.cnet.com/2300-1041_3-10002863-7.html

I might have to get one of these things.




Mark, we have a number of such devices in our company. They work, but my 
impression (potentially wrong) that they are not extremely reliable. 
That of course, given our local and rather extremely dusty environment, 
even indoors.


Boris


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Interesting device for those looking into external HD, storage

2010-03-23 Thread John Sessoms

From: Rob Studdert

Brendan MacRae...wrote:

I think you meant to say doesn't support an eSATA connection.
But I don't see why this is a factor since USB 3.0 is supposed to
be faster than eSATA anyway.


Theoretically, but there's little to be gained using an interface 
that's faster than the drive interface. My unit provides eSATA, 
Firewire and USB 2, I wouldn't purposefully buy anything that's USB 3

 for a few years at least.


What I got to attach it to doesn't have USB 3 anyway, and new computer 
equipment doesn't look to be in my immediate future.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Interesting device for those looking into external HD,, storage

2010-03-23 Thread John Sessoms

From: Doug Franklin

On 2010-03-21 17:07, John Sessoms wrote:


 No, I meant eSATA drives.
 I may be wrong, but I did write what I meant. ;-D


I think you're mistaken on this, John.  The drives themselves are SATA. 
  If you install them inside the computer case, they connect using the 
SATA interface.  If you put a SATA drive in an external case, the 
external case can supply an eSATA connection back to the computer.


Right. I understand that NOW. Trouble from reading email BEFORE I make 
coffee in the morning.


I misunderstood it to not support a newer style of SATA drive, rather 
than not supporting a newer external SATA interface.


And come to that, I think I'll go put a pot of coffee on.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Interesting device for those looking into external HD, storage

2010-03-23 Thread John Sessoms

From: Ken Waller

Questioning the need for this at all ?

Do you have internal HDs laying around that you're using as external HDs?

Seems better to outright buy an external HD from the start - no need for 
this device.


What am I missing?


Seems to be for hot swapping multiple hard drives.

I just ran into a use for them yesterday. Went back to my old school to 
apply for readmission; planning to reenter for summer semester.


School now has a requirement that every student have a 100GB or larger 
hard-drive. Must be formatted FAT so it will work on both PC and Mac.


All the workstations have these docks. You keep your work on the drive 
until you upload it to the instructor.


Finishing and correction is heavily digital workflow.

Other interesting changes -

When I started in 2005 every student was required to have a medium 
format camera. With this academic year, every student has to have a 
DSLR, and the students are assigned a medium format camera from the 
school's inventory.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Interesting device for those looking into external HD storage

2010-03-22 Thread Ken Waller

Questioning the need for this at all ?

Do you have internal HDs laying around that you're using as external HDs?

Seems better to outright buy an external HD from the start - no need for 
this device.


What am I missing?

Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f

- Original Message - 
From: steve harley p...@paper-ape.com

Subject: Re: Interesting device for those looking into external HD storage



On 2010-03-21 11:57 , John Francis wrote:

How often would you plan on using it?

For under $10 you can get a cable which does the same thing
(and even, in some cases, one which will also support SATA).


i have such a cable and i also have a dock -- the dock is so much more 
convenient than the cable (which is really two cables, one for power and 
one for SATA to USB) that i use the cable only for ad hoc use of DVD 
burners, which don't fit in docks and for which external cases often cost 
more than the burners themselves


the cables units are cheap but so are the docks; i got my in in a 
MicroCenter clearance bin for $30-something, and it does FireWire, eSATA  
USB



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Interesting device for those looking into external HD storage

2010-03-22 Thread steve harley

On 2010-03-22 09:14 , Ken Waller wrote:

Questioning the need for this at all ?

Do you have internal HDs laying around that you're using as external HDs?


not exactly; i do have a few extra bare hard drives, but when i use them 
it isn't for permanent storage



Seems better to outright buy an external HD from the start - no need for
this device.


the dock has a price advantage (unless you really cheap out on cases) 
and a flexibility advantage; it has a bit of a complexity disadvantage 
for those used to plug-and-play external hard drives




What am I missing?


i mostly use my dock for utility purposes, such as for temporarily 
replacing a drive when another fails, or for testing whether it's a 
drive or a case that is malfunctioning, or for getting data off the 2.5 
drive that was inside a broken laptop before sending the laptop in for 
repair; but there are also many people who have stacks of bare drives 
that they rotate through a dock like this for backups, some also move 
those backups to another location until they rotate back in


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Interesting device for those looking into external HD storage

2010-03-22 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
 http://news.cnet.com/2300-1041_3-10002863-7.html

 I might have to get one of these things.

I have a two-slot version of this device. It's useful when I need to
swap stuff to and from a number of bare drives that I don't use often.
The one I have was cheap, only USB2, but works for what I need it for.
I use four-interface enclosures from OWC for regular use (USB2, FW400,
FW800, eSATA) ... much faster, quieter.

-- 
Godfrey
  godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Interesting device for those looking into external HD storage

2010-03-22 Thread Ken Waller

Thanks Steve.

Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f

- Original Message - 
From: steve harley p...@paper-ape.com

Subject: Re: Interesting device for those looking into external HD storage



On 2010-03-22 09:14 , Ken Waller wrote:

Questioning the need for this at all ?

Do you have internal HDs laying around that you're using as external HDs?


not exactly; i do have a few extra bare hard drives, but when i use them 
it isn't for permanent storage



Seems better to outright buy an external HD from the start - no need for
this device.


the dock has a price advantage (unless you really cheap out on cases) and 
a flexibility advantage; it has a bit of a complexity disadvantage for 
those used to plug-and-play external hard drives




What am I missing?


i mostly use my dock for utility purposes, such as for temporarily 
replacing a drive when another fails, or for testing whether it's a drive 
or a case that is malfunctioning, or for getting data off the 2.5 drive 
that was inside a broken laptop before sending the laptop in for repair; 
but there are also many people who have stacks of bare drives that they 
rotate through a dock like this for backups, some also move those backups 
to another location until they rotate back in



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Interesting device for those looking into external HD storage

2010-03-21 Thread Mark Roberts
http://news.cnet.com/2300-1041_3-10002863-7.html

I might have to get one of these things.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Interesting device for those looking into external HD storage

2010-03-21 Thread paul stenquist

On Mar 21, 2010, at 12:32 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:

 http://news.cnet.com/2300-1041_3-10002863-7.html
 
 I might have to get one of these things.
 
 
I have three of them. Various companies make similar docking stations. They 
work well and are quite handy.
Paul

 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Interesting device for those looking into external HD storage

2010-03-21 Thread Igor Roshchin

Mark,

There are similar units from other manufacturers as well.
You can choose by type of connectivity.
Also, what is important is how well the HDD is cooled. Some of
such toaster type devices are reported to heat up considerably.

I heard good recommendations about Voyager from NewerTech:
This one supports eSATA and Firewire connection, but not USB3 (only
USB2 so far):
http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Newer%20Technology/FWU2ES2HDK/

If you don't care for Firewire, this model supports USB2 + eSATA:
http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Newer%20Technology/U2ES2HDK/


USB3 is not widely supported yet (AFAIK).

The manufacturer of iNeo also has eSATA and other models:
http://www.neo2tech.com/index-product.html#usb30

HTH,

Igor

On Mar 21, 2010, at 12:32 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:

 http://news.cnet.com/2300-1041_3-10002863-7.html
 
 I might have to get one of these things.
 
 



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: Interesting device for those looking into external HD storage

2010-03-21 Thread John Sessoms

From: Mark Roberts

http://news.cnet.com/2300-1041_3-10002863-7.html

I might have to get one of these things.



Shop around. That one doesn't support eSATA drives, and I know there are 
others on the market that do.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Interesting device for those looking into external HD storage

2010-03-21 Thread John Francis
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 12:32:17PM -0400, Mark Roberts wrote:
 http://news.cnet.com/2300-1041_3-10002863-7.html
 
 I might have to get one of these things.

How often would you plan on using it?

For under $10 you can get a cable which does the same thing
(and even, in some cases, one which will also support SATA).


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Interesting device for those looking into external HD storage

2010-03-21 Thread Brendan MacRae




- Original Message 
 From: John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com
 To: pdml@pdml.net
 Sent: Sun, March 21, 2010 10:25:37 AM
 Subject: RE: Interesting device for those looking into external HD storage
 
 From: Mark Roberts
  href=http://news.cnet.com/2300-1041_3-10002863-7.html; target=_blank 
 http://news.cnet.com/2300-1041_3-10002863-7.html
 
 I might 
 have to get one of these things.
 

Shop around. That one doesn't 
 support eSATA drives, and I know there are others on the market that 
 do.

I think you meant to say doesn't support an eSATA connection. But I don't see 
why this is a factor since USB 3.0 is supposed to be faster than eSATA anyway. 

http://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-10141810-76.html

-Brendan


  

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Interesting device for those looking into external HD, storage

2010-03-21 Thread John Sessoms

From: Brendan MacRae

From: John Sessoms

From: Mark Roberts

href=http://news.cnet.com/2300-1041_3-10002863-7.html;
target=_blank 
http://news.cnet.com/2300-1041_3-10002863-7.html


I might have to get one of these things.



Shop around. That one doesn't

support eSATA drives, and I know there are others on the market
that do.


I think you meant to say doesn't support an eSATA connection. But I
don't see why this is a factor since USB 3.0 is supposed to be faster
than eSATA anyway.

http://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-10141810-76.html


No, I meant eSATA drives.

I may be wrong, but I did write what I meant. ;-D

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Interesting device for those looking into external HD, storage

2010-03-21 Thread Brendan MacRae




- Original Message 
 From: John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com
 To: pdml@pdml.net
 Sent: Sun, March 21, 2010 2:07:03 PM
 Subject: Re: Interesting device for those looking into external HD, storage
 
 From: Brendan MacRae
 From: John Sessoms
 From: Mark 
 Roberts
 
 href=http://news.cnet.com/2300-1041_3-10002863-7.html;
 
 target=_blank  target=_blank 
 http://news.cnet.com/2300-1041_3-10002863-7.html
 
 
 I might have to get one of these things.
 
 
 
 Shop around. That one doesn't
 support eSATA 
 drives, and I know there are others on the market
 that 
 do.
 
 I think you meant to say doesn't support an eSATA 
 connection. But I
 don't see why this is a factor since USB 3.0 is 
 supposed to be faster
 than eSATA anyway.
 
 
 http://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-10141810-76.html

No, I meant eSATA 
 drives.

I may be wrong, but I did write what I meant. ;-D

You are wrong, but coming from me this means practically nothing ;-)


  

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Interesting device for those looking into external HD storage

2010-03-21 Thread Rob Studdert
On 22/03/2010, Brendan MacRae brendanmacrae1...@yahoo.com wrote:

 I think you meant to say doesn't support an eSATA connection. But I don't 
 see why this is a factor since USB 3.0 is supposed to be faster than eSATA 
 anyway.

Theoretically, but there's little to be gained using an interface
that's faster than the drive interface. My unit provides eSATA,
Firewire and USB 2, I wouldn't purposefully buy anything that's USB 3
for a few years at least.

-- 
Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Interesting device for those looking into external HD, storage

2010-03-21 Thread Doug Franklin

On 2010-03-21 17:07, John Sessoms wrote:


No, I meant eSATA drives.
I may be wrong, but I did write what I meant. ;-D


I think you're mistaken on this, John.  The drives themselves are SATA. 
 If you install them inside the computer case, they connect using the 
SATA interface.  If you put a SATA drive in an external case, the 
external case can supply an eSATA connection back to the computer.


--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Interesting device for those looking into external HD storage

2010-03-21 Thread Brendan MacRae




- Original Message 
 From: Rob Studdert distudio.p...@gmail.com
 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
 Sent: Sun, March 21, 2010 5:24:54 PM
 Subject: Re: Interesting device for those looking into external HD storage
 
 On 22/03/2010, Brendan MacRae  ymailto=mailto:brendanmacrae1...@yahoo.com; 
 href=mailto:brendanmacrae1...@yahoo.com;brendanmacrae1...@yahoo.com 
 wrote:

 I think you meant to say doesn't support an eSATA 
 connection. But I don't see why this is a factor since USB 3.0 is supposed 
 to 
 be faster than eSATA anyway.

Theoretically, but there's little to be 
 gained using an interface
that's faster than the drive interface. My unit 
 provides eSATA,
Firewire and USB 2, I wouldn't purposefully buy anything 
 that's USB 3
for a few years at least.

-- 
Rob Studdert 
 (Digital  Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, 
 eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio


That's a good point, Rob. Of course, the solid state drives are supposed to be 
much faster that traditional HD's which is where things seemed to be headed.

-Brendan



  

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Interesting device for those looking into external HD storage

2010-03-21 Thread Rob Studdert
On 22/03/2010, Brendan MacRae brendanmacrae1...@yahoo.com wrote:

 That's a good point, Rob. Of course, the solid state drives are supposed to 
 be much faster that traditional HD's which is where things seemed to be 
 headed.

Indeed, but currently the best drives generally don't come close to
exceeding the interface capabilities WRT raw data rates (even SSHDs).

I'm running WD VelociRaptors in all my speed critical boxes and they
certainly aren't being performance limited.

Cheers,

-- 
Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Interesting device for those looking into external HD storage

2010-03-21 Thread steve harley

On 2010-03-21 11:57 , John Francis wrote:

How often would you plan on using it?

For under $10 you can get a cable which does the same thing
(and even, in some cases, one which will also support SATA).


i have such a cable and i also have a dock -- the dock is so much more 
convenient than the cable (which is really two cables, one for power and 
one for SATA to USB) that i use the cable only for ad hoc use of DVD 
burners, which don't fit in docks and for which external cases often 
cost more than the burners themselves


the cables units are cheap but so are the docks; i got my in in a 
MicroCenter clearance bin for $30-something, and it does FireWire, eSATA 
 USB


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: It looks like Sigma announced some interesting looking lenses

2010-02-25 Thread mike wilson

 Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote: 
 On 23 February 2010 04:06, mike wilson m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com wrote:
 
   Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
  So, on the one hand I'm expecting a very good lens, on the other hand
  I'm expecting to have my kidney to send over to BH. We'll see...
 
 
  We're sorry, the price is two kidneys.  PLease find enclosed one lens 
  hood.
 
 At least it's an adjustable lens hood so I can also use it on my
 Pentax FF, whose release is inevitable (if the other thread is to be
 believed).
 
 I think that flexibility is worth the extra kidney.

Plus postage.  Please send your liver.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: It looks like Sigma announced some interesting looking lenses

2010-02-23 Thread mike wilson

 Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote: 
 So, on the one hand I'm expecting a very good lens, on the other hand
 I'm expecting to have my kidney to send over to BH. We'll see...


We're sorry, the price is two kidneys.  PLease find enclosed one lens hood.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: It looks like Sigma announced some interesting looking lenses

2010-02-23 Thread Miserere
On 23 February 2010 04:06, mike wilson m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com wrote:

  Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
 So, on the one hand I'm expecting a very good lens, on the other hand
 I'm expecting to have my kidney to send over to BH. We'll see...


 We're sorry, the price is two kidneys.  PLease find enclosed one lens hood.

At least it's an adjustable lens hood so I can also use it on my
Pentax FF, whose release is inevitable (if the other thread is to be
believed).

I think that flexibility is worth the extra kidney.


 --M.



-- 

http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


It looks like Sigma announced some interesting looking lenses

2010-02-22 Thread Larry Colen
I was poking around in the silly hope that the various colors of K-x  
announced for Europe would be coming to the states.  As most people  
expected, there weren't really any announcements from Pentax, though  
Sigma seems to have announced some lenses that could be rather  
interesting if they have good image quality for the cost. Fast glass  
is always appealing to me.


My 20/1.8 is back from Sigma and the nasty bumpiness in the focus may  
be gone. Time will tell, and I've been happy with the optics on it.


85/1.4  http://www.dpreview.com/news/1002/10022015sigma85mm.asp

I've been surprised at how often the 2/3 stop of 1.4 over 1.8 comes in  
handy.  The little bit of extra reach and especially speed of this  
over my 77/1.8 could be handy. I'm sure the optics would be better  
than the Korean 85/1.4. Though I love my 77/1.8 so much that it's hard  
to imagine my using anything else in it's range when I didn't  
absolutely need the little extra bit of speed.


70-200/2.8  http://www.dpreview.com/news/1002/10022016sigma70mm200mm.asp

I doubt it would be nearly as nice as the Pentax 80-200/2.8, but it'd  
probably be a lot more affordable.


17-50 / 2.8 http://www.dpreview.com/news/1002/10022014sigma17mm50mm.asp

Same as above but with the 16-50.

8-16mm F4.5-5.6 rectilinear  
http://www.dpreview.com/news/1002/10022011sigma8mm16mm.asp
If you're going to go wide, this could be very interesting.

--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est





--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: It looks like Sigma announced some interesting looking lenses

2010-02-22 Thread Miserere
Larry,

I also have the 77 Ltd, but sometimes I just need that extra 2/3 stop
(for example when shooting live music). I'm waiting to see what the
price on this Sigma 85mm is going to be, but I suspect it won't be
cheap. This from DPR talking to Sigma Chief Operating Officer, Kazuto
Yamaki, at the PMA 2010:

FLD elements are also used in the [Sigma] 85mm F1.4, which has been
attracting a lot of attention at the show. 'It's similar in concept to
the 50mm F1.4 - it's bigger, heavier and more expensive than OEM
lenses but achieves higher performance,' says Yamaki.

'We've made this for professional and advance amateur photographers,'
he explained: 'we've tried to achieve better performance [than the OEM
equivalents], particularly when using fully open apertures on the
latest DSLRs.'


So, on the one hand I'm expecting a very good lens, on the other hand
I'm expecting to have my kidney to send over to BH. We'll see...


 --M



-- 

http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment




On 22 February 2010 06:33, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
 I was poking around in the silly hope that the various colors of K-x
 announced for Europe would be coming to the states.  As most people
 expected, there weren't really any announcements from Pentax, though Sigma
 seems to have announced some lenses that could be rather interesting if they
 have good image quality for the cost. Fast glass is always appealing to me.

 My 20/1.8 is back from Sigma and the nasty bumpiness in the focus may be
 gone. Time will tell, and I've been happy with the optics on it.

 85/1.4  http://www.dpreview.com/news/1002/10022015sigma85mm.asp

 I've been surprised at how often the 2/3 stop of 1.4 over 1.8 comes in
 handy.  The little bit of extra reach and especially speed of this over my
 77/1.8 could be handy. I'm sure the optics would be better than the Korean
 85/1.4. Though I love my 77/1.8 so much that it's hard to imagine my using
 anything else in it's range when I didn't absolutely need the little extra
 bit of speed.

 70-200/2.8  http://www.dpreview.com/news/1002/10022016sigma70mm200mm.asp

 I doubt it would be nearly as nice as the Pentax 80-200/2.8, but it'd
 probably be a lot more affordable.

 17-50 / 2.8 http://www.dpreview.com/news/1002/10022014sigma17mm50mm.asp

 Same as above but with the 16-50.

 8-16mm F4.5-5.6 rectilinear
  http://www.dpreview.com/news/1002/10022011sigma8mm16mm.asp
 If you're going to go wide, this could be very interesting.

 --
 Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: It looks like Sigma announced some interesting looking lenses

2010-02-22 Thread Larry Colen


On Feb 22, 2010, at 5:20 PM, Miserere wrote:


Larry,


  ___ Sigma 85/1.4 ___



So, on the one hand I'm expecting a very good lens, on the other hand
I'm expecting to have my kidney to send over to BH. We'll see...



I really don't need to hear about great lenses that are not cheap.   
John did me the favor of loaning me his 16-50 to shoot the belt tests  
at the dojo.  I haven't seen the pictures yet, but from a sheer  
usability level I'm afraid that I like it just a little bit too much.


--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est





--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Hockney on looking and seeing

2009-12-29 Thread Bob W
Sound, with some of his personal photographs from the episode:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8424000/8424343.stm

Bob

Despair young and never look back
--- Samuel Becket 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Sigma 28/1.8 shots [was Looking for something wide and fast]

2009-12-02 Thread Thibouille
Thank you.
I'm sure she will be happy to learn about it ;)

On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
 
  That shot of the woman's eyes is superb
 

 Thank you :) LR does marvels sometimes...
 I love it as well but I'm very subjective since the eye is
 the one of my wife :D

 Your wife is very beautiful!



 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.




-- 
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs
--
Photo: K-7, Sigma 28/1.8 macro, FA50/1.4, DA40Ltd, K30/2.8, DA16-45,
DA50-135, DA50-200, 360FGZ ...
Laptop: Macbook 13 Unibody SnowLeo/Win7
Programing: Delphi 2009

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Sigma 28/1.8 shots [was Looking for something wide and fast]

2009-12-02 Thread Boris Liberman
Cool stuff!!! My regards to your wife. Either you got excellent copy
of that Sigma or you're really good photographer, or actually both.

I might as well try to reproduce your mouse shot with our guinea pig.

On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com wrote:
 Here are a couple shots I took with my Sigma 28/1.8 (EX DG Macro
 version, current one).
 Taken with various aperture settings and ISO, including f/1.8 of course:

 This lens exists as 24 and 20mm as well. Some love those lenses some
 hate them, probably because of samples variation (heh.. Sigma !).

 http://picasaweb.google.com/pentaxlist/Sigma28mmF18#

 --
 Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs
 --
 Photo: K-7, Sigma 28/1.8 macro, FA50/1.4, DA40Ltd, K30/2.8, DA16-45,
 DA50-135, DA50-200, 360FGZ ...
 Laptop: Macbook 13 Unibody SnowLeo/Win7
 Programing: Delphi 2009

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.




-- 
Boris

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Sigma 28/1.8 shots [was Looking for something wide and fast]

2009-12-02 Thread David J Brooks
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 2:51 AM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
 Here are a couple shots I took with my Sigma 28/1.8 (EX DG
 Macro version, current one).
 Taken with various aperture settings and ISO, including f/1.8
 of course:

 This lens exists as 24 and 20mm as well. Some love those
 lenses some hate them, probably because of samples variation
 (heh.. Sigma !).

 http://picasaweb.google.com/pentaxlist/Sigma28mmF18#


 That shot of the woman's eyes is superb

Agreed. The rest are nice and sharp, looks like you bought a keeper

Dave



 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.




-- 
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Sigma 28/1.8 shots [was Looking for something wide and fast]

2009-12-01 Thread Thibouille
Here are a couple shots I took with my Sigma 28/1.8 (EX DG Macro
version, current one).
Taken with various aperture settings and ISO, including f/1.8 of course:

This lens exists as 24 and 20mm as well. Some love those lenses some
hate them, probably because of samples variation (heh.. Sigma !).

http://picasaweb.google.com/pentaxlist/Sigma28mmF18#

-- 
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs
--
Photo: K-7, Sigma 28/1.8 macro, FA50/1.4, DA40Ltd, K30/2.8, DA16-45,
DA50-135, DA50-200, 360FGZ ...
Laptop: Macbook 13 Unibody SnowLeo/Win7
Programing: Delphi 2009

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: Sigma 28/1.8 shots [was Looking for something wide and fast]

2009-12-01 Thread Bob W
 Here are a couple shots I took with my Sigma 28/1.8 (EX DG 
 Macro version, current one).
 Taken with various aperture settings and ISO, including f/1.8 
 of course:
 
 This lens exists as 24 and 20mm as well. Some love those 
 lenses some hate them, probably because of samples variation 
 (heh.. Sigma !).
 
 http://picasaweb.google.com/pentaxlist/Sigma28mmF18#
 

That shot of the woman's eyes is superb



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Sigma 28/1.8 shots [was Looking for something wide and fast]

2009-12-01 Thread Thibouille

 That shot of the woman's eyes is superb


Thank you :) LR does marvels sometimes...
I love it as well but I'm very subjective since the eye is the one of my wife :D

-- 
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs
--
Photo: K-7, Sigma 28/1.8 macro, FA50/1.4, DA40Ltd, K30/2.8, DA16-45,
DA50-135, DA50-200, 360FGZ ...
Laptop: Macbook 13 Unibody SnowLeo/Win7
Programing: Delphi 2009

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: Sigma 28/1.8 shots [was Looking for something wide and fast]

2009-12-01 Thread Bob W
 
  That shot of the woman's eyes is superb
 
 
 Thank you :) LR does marvels sometimes...
 I love it as well but I'm very subjective since the eye is 
 the one of my wife :D

Your wife is very beautiful!



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Looking for something wide and fast

2009-11-25 Thread Derby Chang

Larry Colen wrote:

I keep finding myself needing a lens that is wide, fast and
preferably reasonably sharp. Pretty much all I have wider than 31 are
my 18-55 and my 18-250. I'm thinking of diverting some of the money
from selling my racecar to buying glass.

I think that the ideal lens would be a 16-50, and I keep bumming that
I never went for the one on craigslist just before I got laid off.

Poking around on ebay, I've found a few options. 


Pentax 16-50 seems to go for $750-800
A Zenitar K MC 2.8 16mm for $180
A couple of Pentax SMC DA 14mm f2.8 ED for around $590
SIGMA 17-35mm f2.8-4 DG EX $300
Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5 DC $370

How do folks feel about these various lenses?

  

Hi Larry

Only have two of these. The Zenitar is the best bang per buck. Not the 
highest quality lens, but lots of fun, on digital and film.


The DA14 is a fine lens, and a darn bit lighter than the old K mount 
15mm and the Tokina AF14/2.8 that I have at the back of my cupboard. 
Your low light and mobile requirements would probably make this lens a 
serious candidate.


D

--

der...@iinet.net.au
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Looking for something wide and fast

2009-11-24 Thread Thomas Cakalic
I agree.  I love my 31/1.8 LTD which is not really wide but definitely
fast and pretty sharp even wide open.  The 20/1.8 would have some
definite appeal for night photography, if also very sharp.


On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:40 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
 On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:05:33PM -0600, Thomas Cakalic wrote:
 Not arguing or being argumentative, but if one already has two zooms
 that start at 18mm, then buying additional zooms that have a wide
 limit of 1 or 2 mm more is not getting him much, maybe a little speed,

 In theory, the 16-50 is a lot sharper than my 18-250, which is sharper
 than my 18-55. It's also about 2/3 stop faster (3.5 vs 2.8).

 depending on the lens. However, if the intent in purchasing is to use
 it mainly as a wide angle, then a fast prime makes more sense in my
 book, but then I'm not spending the money.

 I do like fast primes, and that's what I mostly shoot with. However
 until Boris mentioned the Sigma 20/1.8 I didn't know of much that was
 wider than 30 and faster than 2.8.

 From what I hear, the 16-50 is as sharp as a prime, and apart from the
 sigma mentioned above, as fast as anything shorter than 30mm. The
 weather sealing is also a big plus.


 I hear plenty fast and things like that.  How fast a lens is and
 whether it's speed is satisfactory is dependent largely on shooting
 conditions, is it not?  I'd want the fastest lens
 available/affordable, because just when you think your lense is fast
 enough, it's not.

 If f/3.5 were fast enough at 18, I could get by with the 18-250,
 despite it's lack of sharpness, which isn't really that bad for a lot
 of work. But, I keep wanting something faster than it, especially for
 night photography.


 --
 The first step is learning to take great photos,
 the second step is learning to throw away ones that are merely good.
 Larry Colen             l...@red4est.com            http://www.red4est.com/lrc


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Looking for something wide and fast

2009-11-24 Thread Larry Colen
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 07:55:33AM +0200, Boris Liberman wrote:

 Larry, the fastest widest lens you can buy for K mount is Sigma
 20/1.8. 

This sounds very interesting. It seems to be a lens that some people
love, others loathe. There also seems to be a 24/1.8.

 I am thinking that anything else starts at f/2.8. I am
 thinking that likes of DA 21 and DA 15 might be good options for you
 though they are not as fast. Or you can try DA 14.

I hadn't realized that there was a DA 14/2.8 until I started poking around
today. I thought that they were 4.0, but looking at my shots from the
pdml gathering I guess that it was a 15mm.


 If you want a single lens solution then Sigma 17-70 is an option.
 Thanks to Jaume I had a chance of using it and mechanically it is ok.
 Given the darkness outdoors I cannot say too much about its optical
 performance though it seemed ok.

It may not be as fast as I like at the long end, but I'm mostly
looking for speed at the wide end, as I have primes for 30 on up. 
Can anyone tell me how fast it is at 30mm?


 
 There is also Tamron 17-35/2.8-4.0 that rivals similar Sigma lens that
 is an option too. Both Sigma and Tamron are full frame lenses which
 may prove useful later on or if you shoot film. Yet another option is
 Tamron 17-50/2.8 which I often recommend due to its price/performance
 ratio.

Those all seem interesting. It seems that the wealth of possibilities
may spare my pocketbook just through the mechanism of indecision. 

Last year at Dickens Fair (which starts again next weekend), I was
thinking about the lens I needed for it, and pretty much came up with
16-50 f/2.8, without knowing that the lens already existed.



-- 
The first step is learning to take great photos, 
the second step is learning to throw away ones that are merely good.
Larry Colen l...@red4est.comhttp://www.red4est.com/lrc


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Looking for something wide and fast

2009-11-24 Thread Thibouille
Larry, Sigma produces 20,24 and 28mm 'macro'  Full frame lenses. All
are all f/1.8 and have an aperture ring :)
I can post some pictures if you want, taken with the 28/1.8. The nice
things about those is the very very close focussing distance (hence
'macro') which combined with the f/1.8 renders some very interesting
DOF effects.
I wouldn't call those sharpest lenses ever produced wide open tough.

On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
 On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:05:33PM -0600, Thomas Cakalic wrote:
 Not arguing or being argumentative, but if one already has two zooms
 that start at 18mm, then buying additional zooms that have a wide
 limit of 1 or 2 mm more is not getting him much, maybe a little speed,

 In theory, the 16-50 is a lot sharper than my 18-250, which is sharper
 than my 18-55. It's also about 2/3 stop faster (3.5 vs 2.8).

 depending on the lens. However, if the intent in purchasing is to use
 it mainly as a wide angle, then a fast prime makes more sense in my
 book, but then I'm not spending the money.

 I do like fast primes, and that's what I mostly shoot with. However
 until Boris mentioned the Sigma 20/1.8 I didn't know of much that was
 wider than 30 and faster than 2.8.

 From what I hear, the 16-50 is as sharp as a prime, and apart from the
 sigma mentioned above, as fast as anything shorter than 30mm. The
 weather sealing is also a big plus.


 I hear plenty fast and things like that.  How fast a lens is and
 whether it's speed is satisfactory is dependent largely on shooting
 conditions, is it not?  I'd want the fastest lens
 available/affordable, because just when you think your lense is fast
 enough, it's not.

 If f/3.5 were fast enough at 18, I could get by with the 18-250,
 despite it's lack of sharpness, which isn't really that bad for a lot
 of work. But, I keep wanting something faster than it, especially for
 night photography.


 --
 The first step is learning to take great photos,
 the second step is learning to throw away ones that are merely good.
 Larry Colen             l...@red4est.com            http://www.red4est.com/lrc


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.




-- 
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs
--
Photo: K-7, Sigma 28/1.8 macro, FA50/1.4, DA40Ltd, K30/2.8, DA16-45,
DA50-135, DA50-200, 360FGZ ...
Laptop: Macbook 13 Unibody SnowLeo/Win7
Programing: Delphi 2009

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Looking for something wide and fast

2009-11-24 Thread eckinator
2009/11/24 Larry Colen l...@red4est.com:

 Pentax 16-50 seems to go for $750-800
 How do folks feel about these various lenses?

The 16-50 is nice if you have money to burn.
The 18-55 WR is also OK, weather sealed and el mucho cheapo.
Have no experience with any of the others as I am still struggling
what to sell and what to get next...
Cheers
Ecke

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Looking for something wide and fast

2009-11-24 Thread Boris Liberman
Hi!

On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
 This sounds very interesting. It seems to be a lens that some people
 love, others loathe. There also seems to be a 24/1.8.

Larry, Sigma produces 28/1.8, 24/1.8 and 20/1.8 lenses. Due to
significant sample variation, the reviews range from very contained
all the way to ecstatic. Personally, I decided for now to not buy
20/1.8 or 24/1.8 though it does look tempting. The reasons being that
I am not exactly happy with the way Sigma lenses render color. Also
where I live, it will be virtually impossible to arrange proper cherry
picking. And these lenses are rather big in size and heavy in weight.
Thus, my decision to go look for FA* 24/2 which is argued to be better
optically and smaller physically.

There is another Sigma lens, one which I would buy in an instant if I
find a good sample - AF 24/2.8 Macro II. I had this one borrowed from
a friend. Wonderful optic. Read somewhere that it was either
co-developed or co-produced or co-something with Leica. As sharp as A
24/2.8, slightly more prone to flare, good bokeh and AF. Just as small
and light (52 mm filter diameter). On digital it would make close to
ideal street shooter's autofocus lens of angle of view of 36 mm with
DOF of 24 mm lens.

-- 
Boris

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Looking for something wide and fast

2009-11-24 Thread mike wilson

 Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote: 
 I keep finding myself needing a lens that is wide, fast and
 preferably reasonably sharp. Pretty much all I have wider than 31 are
 my 18-55 and my 18-250. I'm thinking of diverting some of the money
 from selling my racecar to buying glass.
 
 I think that the ideal lens would be a 16-50, and I keep bumming that
 I never went for the one on craigslist just before I got laid off.
 
 Poking around on ebay, I've found a few options. 
 
 Pentax 16-50 seems to go for $750-800
 A Zenitar K MC 2.8 16mm for $180
 A couple of Pentax SMC DA 14mm f2.8 ED for around $590
 SIGMA 17-35mm f2.8-4 DG EX $300
 Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5 DC $370
 
 How do folks feel about these various lenses?

_IF_ you get a good one, the Zenitar is a good lens; for the price it is 
outstanding.  It has only two major problems - the quality control and the poor 
lens cap design.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Looking for something wide and fast

2009-11-24 Thread Boris Liberman
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:10 AM, mike wilson m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com wrote:
 _IF_ you get a good one, the Zenitar is a good lens; for the price it is 
 outstanding.  It has only two major problems - the quality control and the 
 poor lens cap design.

I second that having witnessed your copy first hand ;-), sir Mike.

-- 
Boris

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Looking for something wide and fast

2009-11-24 Thread Larry Colen
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 09:39:07AM +0100, Thibouille wrote:
 Larry, Sigma produces 20,24 and 28mm 'macro'  Full frame lenses. All
 are all f/1.8 and have an aperture ring :)
 I can post some pictures if you want, taken with the 28/1.8. The nice
 things about those is the very very close focussing distance (hence
 'macro') which combined with the f/1.8 renders some very interesting
 DOF effects.

Very interesting, as in paper thin?

 I wouldn't call those sharpest lenses ever produced wide open tough.

I see myself having two uses for the 20/1.8.  The first is indoor
dance photography. The lighting tends to be very challenging, i.e. ISO
3200, 1/6 - 1/20 second at f/1.8, with the subjects moving. I suspect
that in those conditions a little softness in the lens may not be
noticed.

I've also been doing some landscape work, particularly
nightscapes. Exposures tend to be ISO 400, f/1.8 and 10-30
seconds. My 18-250 simply isn't fast enough to get much good shots,
especially at ISO 400 (cue snickering by Dave Savage).

Would you guess that the lens would not be the significant weak link
in those situations?

How sharp is it at f/2.8 or 3.5?  At 3.5 is it noticably worse than
the 18-55 AL or the 18-250 at 20mm?

At times like this, I envy the Canikon crowd, because one of them
could probably find someone locally that had the lenses and try them
out.


-- 
The first step is learning to take great photos, 
the second step is learning to throw away ones that are merely good.
Larry Colen l...@red4est.comhttp://www.red4est.com/lrc


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Looking for something wide and fast

2009-11-24 Thread Carlos R



Boris Liberman escribió:




There is another Sigma lens, one which I would buy in an instant if I
find a good sample - AF 24/2.8 Macro II. I had this one borrowed from
a friend. Wonderful optic. Read somewhere that it was either
co-developed or co-produced or co-something with Leica. As sharp as A
24/2.8, slightly more prone to flare, good bokeh and AF. Just as small
and light (52 mm filter diameter). On digital it would make close to
ideal street shooter's autofocus lens of angle of view of 36 mm with
DOF of 24 mm lens.




I have one of those and your words describe it very accurately. It is a 
gem of a lens, pity it doesn't have the improved anti reflection 
coatings of the EX series lenses. I had a Pentax FA* 24 mm. 2.0 which I 
liked a lot on film, less on the digital bodies and finally sold it. The 
FA* has many virtues: it is fast, well built, focuses fast and it is 
very contrasty. On the other hand, it shows red-green CA, easily 
correctable in post processing though.


I also have a Sigma EX 28 mm. 1.8 which I like a lot, except for its 
weight and bulk.


Carlos

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Looking for something wide and fast

2009-11-24 Thread John Sessoms

From: Adam Maas

The 16-45's got QSF as its sole advantage.


Why would a zoom lens need the Quebec Special Forces? ;-D

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Looking for something wide and fast

2009-11-24 Thread David J Brooks
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:19 AM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
 From: Adam Maas

 The 16-45's got QSF as its sole advantage.

 Why would a zoom lens need the Quebec Special Forces?

That's becasue, wait for it...: No one expects the Quebec
Special Forces.

Dave

;-D

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.




-- 
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Looking for something wide and fast

2009-11-24 Thread John Sessoms

From: David J Brooks

On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:19 AM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:

 From: Adam Maas


 The 16-45's got QSF as its sole advantage.


 Why would a zoom lens need the Quebec Special Forces?


That's becasue, wait for it...: No one expects the Quebec
Special Forces.

Dave


I thought that was supposed to be

*NO ONE* expects the Quebec Special Forces!

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Looking for something wide and fast

2009-11-24 Thread David J Brooks
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:56 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
 From: David J Brooks

 On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:19 AM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com
 wrote:

  From: Adam Maas

 
  The 16-45's got QSF as its sole advantage.

 
  Why would a zoom lens need the Quebec Special Forces?

 That's becasue, wait for it...: No one expects the Quebec
 Special Forces.

 Dave

 I thought that was supposed to be

 *NO ONE* expects the Quebec Special Forces!

mY cAPS lOCK iS bROKEN

dAVE

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.




-- 
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Looking for something wide and fast

2009-11-23 Thread Larry Colen
I keep finding myself needing a lens that is wide, fast and
preferably reasonably sharp. Pretty much all I have wider than 31 are
my 18-55 and my 18-250. I'm thinking of diverting some of the money
from selling my racecar to buying glass.

I think that the ideal lens would be a 16-50, and I keep bumming that
I never went for the one on craigslist just before I got laid off.

Poking around on ebay, I've found a few options. 

Pentax 16-50 seems to go for $750-800
A Zenitar K MC 2.8 16mm for $180
A couple of Pentax SMC DA 14mm f2.8 ED for around $590
SIGMA 17-35mm f2.8-4 DG EX $300
Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5 DC $370

How do folks feel about these various lenses?

-- 
The first step is learning to take great photos, 
the second step is learning to throw away ones that are merely good.
Larry Colen l...@red4est.comhttp://www.red4est.com/lrc


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Looking for something wide and fast

2009-11-23 Thread Anthony Farr
Just reading the title of this thread made me think of a Lamborghini Murcielago.

Or Bette Midler ;-)

regards, Anthony

   Of what use is lens and light
to those who lack in mind and sight
   (Anon)

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Looking for something wide and fast

2009-11-23 Thread paul stenquist
I was thinking of a middle linebacker. Maybe Brian Urlacher or Lawrence Taylor.
Paul
On Nov 23, 2009, at 8:04 PM, Anthony Farr wrote:

 Just reading the title of this thread made me think of a Lamborghini 
 Murcielago.
 
 Or Bette Midler ;-)
 
 regards, Anthony
 
Of what use is lens and light
to those who lack in mind and sight
   (Anon)
 
 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Looking for something wide and fast

2009-11-23 Thread Thomas Cakalic
I have the Zenitar and the DA 14/2.8.

I prefer primes in general, but especially at the focal lengths that
would be considered the wide and narrow ranges of a given zoom.

The Zenitar is worth it's money, but tends to be easily susceptible to
flare/reduced contrast in the center of the image circle.  I much
prefer the DA 14 for it's flare resistance, large lens hood, and of
course AF.

Tom

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
 I keep finding myself needing a lens that is wide, fast and
 preferably reasonably sharp. Pretty much all I have wider than 31 are
 my 18-55 and my 18-250. I'm thinking of diverting some of the money
 from selling my racecar to buying glass.

 I think that the ideal lens would be a 16-50, and I keep bumming that
 I never went for the one on craigslist just before I got laid off.

 Poking around on ebay, I've found a few options.

 Pentax 16-50 seems to go for $750-800
 A Zenitar K MC 2.8 16mm for $180
 A couple of Pentax SMC DA 14mm f2.8 ED for around $590
 SIGMA 17-35mm f2.8-4 DG EX $300
 Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5 DC $370

 How do folks feel about these various lenses?

 --
 The first step is learning to take great photos,
 the second step is learning to throw away ones that are merely good.
 Larry Colen             l...@red4est.com            http://www.red4est.com/lrc


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Looking for something wide and fast

2009-11-23 Thread paul stenquist
I love my DA* 16-50. It's plenty fast and very sharp and contrasty throughout 
the range. But I also like the DA 12-24. Not as fast at f4 wide open, but very 
good performance, and that extra chunk of angle of view comes in handy now and 
then. I frequently use it to shoot automobile and home interiors.
Paul
On Nov 23, 2009, at 7:18 PM, Larry Colen wrote:

 I keep finding myself needing a lens that is wide, fast and
 preferably reasonably sharp. Pretty much all I have wider than 31 are
 my 18-55 and my 18-250. I'm thinking of diverting some of the money
 from selling my racecar to buying glass.
 
 I think that the ideal lens would be a 16-50, and I keep bumming that
 I never went for the one on craigslist just before I got laid off.
 
 Poking around on ebay, I've found a few options. 
 
 Pentax 16-50 seems to go for $750-800
 A Zenitar K MC 2.8 16mm for $180
 A couple of Pentax SMC DA 14mm f2.8 ED for around $590
 SIGMA 17-35mm f2.8-4 DG EX $300
 Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5 DC $370
 
 How do folks feel about these various lenses?
 
 -- 
 The first step is learning to take great photos, 
 the second step is learning to throw away ones that are merely good.
 Larry Colen l...@red4est.comhttp://www.red4est.com/lrc
 
 
 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Looking for something wide and fast

2009-11-23 Thread Mark Roberts
Larry Colen wrote:

I keep finding myself needing a lens that is wide, fast and
preferably reasonably sharp. Pretty much all I have wider than 31 are
my 18-55 and my 18-250. I'm thinking of diverting some of the money
from selling my racecar to buying glass.

I think that the ideal lens would be a 16-50, and I keep bumming that
I never went for the one on craigslist just before I got laid off.

Poking around on ebay, I've found a few options. 

Pentax 16-50 seems to go for $750-800
A Zenitar K MC 2.8 16mm for $180
A couple of Pentax SMC DA 14mm f2.8 ED for around $590
SIGMA 17-35mm f2.8-4 DG EX $300
Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5 DC $370

How about the Pentax 16-45? Slower than the 16-50 but smaller and
cheaper.




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Looking for something wide and fast

2009-11-23 Thread paul stenquist

On Nov 23, 2009, at 10:17 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:

 Larry Colen wrote:
 
 I keep finding myself needing a lens that is wide, fast and
 preferably reasonably sharp. Pretty much all I have wider than 31 are
 my 18-55 and my 18-250. I'm thinking of diverting some of the money
 from selling my racecar to buying glass.
 
 I think that the ideal lens would be a 16-50, and I keep bumming that
 I never went for the one on craigslist just before I got laid off.
 
 Poking around on ebay, I've found a few options. 
 
 Pentax 16-50 seems to go for $750-800
 A Zenitar K MC 2.8 16mm for $180
 A couple of Pentax SMC DA 14mm f2.8 ED for around $590
 SIGMA 17-35mm f2.8-4 DG EX $300
 Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5 DC $370
 
 How about the Pentax 16-45? Slower than the 16-50 but smaller and
 cheaper.
 
Good point. That's an excellent lens as well. I'd be hard pressed to tell the 
difference between that lens and the 16-50 at f 5.6 or so. I sold mine and 
bought the 16-50 because I need the speed for weddings and other indoor events, 
but in every other way, the performance was comparable.
Paul
 
 
 
 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Looking for something wide and fast

2009-11-23 Thread Adam Maas
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
 I keep finding myself needing a lens that is wide, fast and
 preferably reasonably sharp. Pretty much all I have wider than 31 are
 my 18-55 and my 18-250. I'm thinking of diverting some of the money
 from selling my racecar to buying glass.

 I think that the ideal lens would be a 16-50, and I keep bumming that
 I never went for the one on craigslist just before I got laid off.

 Poking around on ebay, I've found a few options.

 Pentax 16-50 seems to go for $750-800
 A Zenitar K MC 2.8 16mm for $180
 A couple of Pentax SMC DA 14mm f2.8 ED for around $590
 SIGMA 17-35mm f2.8-4 DG EX $300
 Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5 DC $370

 How do folks feel about these various lenses?


Here's a strong recommendation for teh Sigma 17-70. I had it for a
while when I had my K10D. You give up QSF, but get a lens which is as
fast or faster throughout its range than the DA 16-45 and is better
built, is a very good performer optically, offers 1:2.3 magnification
and has a zoom lock which locks it at 17mm


I generally used it as a 17mm prime with reach when I needed it,
mostly left it locked at 17mm. And I wish I still had it, it would
have been nice on my DS.

-- 
M. Adam Maas
http://www.mawz.ca
Explorations of the City Around Us.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >