Re: More Yipping from the PUG Guy

2001-09-01 Thread Rodger Whitlock

On Fri, 31 Aug 2001 at 15:27:49 -0600, William Robb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] held forth, quoting Shel Belinkoff in his
Creature's Comfort guise:

  Just so we're all clear about this: the PUG submission must be
  made with a Pentax brand camera and a Pentax brand lens - no
  third party zooms, no Ricoh bodies with Pentax lenses, etc. 
  Pentax bodies and Pentax lenses only.  Correct?

 I think we are going to discuss this further.
 What do you think we should do here??


There seem to be various levels of restrictiveness you might
reasonably consider:

1. Most general: any equipment at all: Canon, Nikon, whatever.

2. Next: any M42 or K-mount equipment (i.e. Pentax-compatible, thus 
including 6x7, 645, and Auto 110 compatible equipment. Have I missed 
anything?

3. Next: body *or* lens must be Pentax branded

4. Next: Body must be Pentax; or, alternatively, lens must be Pentax

5. Last and most restrictive: body *and* lens must be Pentax.


WRT #3-5, what do we do about lenses made by Pentax but branded as
Cosmicar? What about lenses branded as Pentax but made by Tamron?

I plump for #2: both body and lens must be Pentax-brand *or*
Pentax-compatible.

Reasoning: the purpose of the gallery is to show what people are
doing with Pentax equipment. An LX with a Vivitar macro demonstrates
Pentax equipment usage, but also an alternative in lenses; a Ricoh
body with a 77mm Limited lens demonstrates Pentax equipment usage,
but also an alternative in bodies. How can we then reject the same
Ricoh body with the same Vivitar lens? Both demonstrate alternatives
for Pentax users.

This business of showing off the results of other-brand lenses is 
especially important, I think, in view of the Pentax system's 
backward compatibility. There are a devil of a lot of older lenses 
that are still usable, and seeing how well they work is more than a 
little valuable.

-- 
Rodger Whitlock
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: More Yipping from the PUG Guy

2001-09-01 Thread John Mustarde

On Fri, 31 Aug 2001 20:27:29 -0700, you wrote:

The way I understand your definition is that I can use a Leica and
Leica glass since the Leica takes Pentax lenses, and a Leica lens
would be compatible with the Pentax-compatible camera body.

Would a Ricoh with a K-mount Lentar lens and a Vivitar flash be
considered acceptable, as both the camera and lens, although not
Pentax, are both Pentax-compatible?

What about Pentax lenses converted to Nikon mount (which has been done
more than once) using a Nikon body?

I've just read the guidelines, which I quote below:

Submissions must have been made using Pentax PS,
Digital, 6x7, 645, K-Mount or M-42 screw mount camera
equipment. Third party equipment is welcome if it is
Pentax compatible, and either the body or lens is
Asahi/Pentax.

I am now very comfortable with the guidelines above.
They fit my idea of a Pentax Users Gallery very well.

-- 
Happy Trails,
Texdance
http://members.fortunecity.com/texdance
http://members1.clubphoto.com/john8202
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: More Yipping from the PUG Guy

2001-08-31 Thread Creature's Comfort

Just so we're all clear about this: the PUG submission must be made
with a Pentax brand camera and a Pentax brand lens - no third party
zooms, no Ricoh bodies with Pentax lenses, etc.  Pentax bodies and
Pentax lenses only.  Correct?

William Robb wrote:

 changed the submission criteria slightly. We will no longer be
 publishing submissions taken with non Pentax cameras and lenses.

-- 
Sheldon Belinkoff
CREATURE'S COMFORT
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: More Yipping from the PUG Guy

2001-08-31 Thread William Robb

- Original Message -
From: Creature's Comfort
Subject: Re: More Yipping from the PUG Guy


 Just so we're all clear about this: the PUG submission must be
made
 with a Pentax brand camera and a Pentax brand lens - no third
party
 zooms, no Ricoh bodies with Pentax lenses, etc.  Pentax bodies
and
 Pentax lenses only.  Correct?

I think we are going to discuss this further.
What do you think we should do here??
William Robb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: More Yipping from the PUG Guy

2001-08-31 Thread Creature's Comfort

William Robb wrote:
 
 I think we are going to discuss this further.
 What do you think we should do here??


I'm in favor of a purely Pentax gallery.  There are many places where
one can use other brands of cameras and lenses.  Many people have
their own web sites and home pages, and there are many opportunities
to post photos in other public galleries.  IMO, the idea of the Pentax
gallery is to showcase what Pentax users can do with their Pentax
equipment.  If I want to post a picture I've made with a Leica, I'll
swing over to one of the leica galleries.  However, my position does
not, of course, preclude one from showing their work here, via links
to web sites and home pages, made with other equipment.
-- 
Sheldon Belinkoff
CREATURE'S COMFORT
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: More Yipping from the PUG Guy

2001-08-31 Thread Steve Larson

As always I try to adhere by the rules, but I must disagree with the new
guidelines. It will be far removed from a relaxed atmosphere as it was
with the previous guidelines of Pentax lens or body. Since all the bodies
I own are Pentax, and a good lot of Pentax glass, I would hate to be
excluded because of third party glass, but if that`s the way it`s going
to be, so be it, but I`m not happy about it.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message - 
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 1:54 PM
Subject: More Yipping from the PUG Guy


 I have to get away from this computer..
 
 I have had another look at the PUG Gallery submission
 guidelines, and after conferring with past maintainers have
 changed the submission criteria slightly. We will no longer be
 publishing submissions taken with non Pentax cameras and lenses.
 
 Please take a few moments to refamiliarize yourselves with the
 submission guidelines at:
 
 http://pug.komkon.org/general/autosubmit.html
 and
 http://pug.komkon.org/general/submit.html
 
 Thank you
 William Robb
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: More Yipping from the PUG Guy

2001-08-31 Thread Cotty

Submissions must have been made using Pentax camera equipment. Submissions 
identifed as being taken with non Pentax equipment will not be displayed 
in the PUG.

Bill,

Can you please clear something up for me? The quote above is from the web 
page. The quote below is from your email:

We will no longer be
publishing submissions taken with non Pentax cameras and lenses.

Does this mean that if I submit a shot taken with an LX and a Tokina 
lens, it will NOT qualify?

Does this mean that if I submit a shot with a (say) Ricoh and Pentax 
lens, it will NOT qualify?

I own several Pentax bodies, and yet only two Pentax lenses, an A*85mm 
f1.4 and a SMC-M 28 2.8. The rest of my 6 lenses are third party make. 
Does this mean that either I will have to

A/ submit only pics taken with a Pentax camera and a pentax lens?

B/ submit a pic and withhold information that might otherwise cause the 
pic to be disqualified?

C/ submit a pic and lie about certain equipment used (should I wish to 
continue to submit pics to the PUG).

A bit of guidance please sir.

Cheers,

Cotty

___
Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MacAds traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check out the UK Macintosh ads 
www.macads.co.uk
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: More Yipping from the PUG Guy

2001-08-31 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Artur Ledschowski said:
 However, I support
 the idea to exclude any non-K-mount equipment from the exhibition.

Uh, speaking of not throwing out the baby with the bathwater,
let's keep the Pentax 645, Pentax 67, and M42 equipment in
the running, along with Pentax PS.  And isn't there at least
one list member with pre-M42 (and therefore also pre-Pentax-name)
Asahi gear?

-- Glenn
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: More Yipping from the PUG Guy

2001-08-31 Thread Frits J. Wüthrich

 Submissions must have been made using Pentax camera equipment.
 Submissions
 identifed as being taken with non Pentax equipment will not be displayed
 in the PUG.

I assume submissions taken with non Pentax equipment are so easily
recognised as being of lesser quality, that it is possible to identify them
as being taken with non Pentax equipment. Interesting...


Frits
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: More Yipping from the PUG Guy

2001-08-31 Thread Artur Ledóchowski

- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: More Yipping from the PUG Guy


| Artur Ledschowski said:
|  However, I support
|  the idea to exclude any non-K-mount equipment from the exhibition.
|
| Uh, speaking of not throwing out the baby with the bathwater,
| let's keep the Pentax 645, Pentax 67, and M42 equipment in
| the running, along with Pentax PS.  And isn't there at least
| one list member with pre-M42 (and therefore also pre-Pentax-name)
| Asahi gear?

I meant, of course, only 35mm stuff, obviously forgetting about any other
format. My mistake and sorry for that. I'm, however, somehow excused for
that, becouse the problem with non-Pentax equipment relates mostly to the
35mm format. :) And I also forgot about PS cameras - but just because I
never use them:)
Greetz
Artur
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: More Yipping from the PUG Guy

2001-08-31 Thread Tom Rittenhouse

I would be up for limiting the PUG submissions to current PDML subscribers. That you 
could automate.
Just compare the submission to the mailing list. I the submitter is not there, just 
send a rejection
form back to them with a rejection.

This list is in my opinion no longer supported by Pentax, so it should be run for the 
benefit of the
subscribers. Since it is no longer a Pentax USA thing I see no real reason to limit it 
exclusively
to Pentax gear, but I do see a real reason to limit it to list members.

--graywolf (Tom)


William Robb wrote:
 
 I have to get away from this computer..
 
 I have had another look at the PUG Gallery submission
 guidelines, and after conferring with past maintainers have
 changed the submission criteria slightly. We will no longer be
 publishing submissions taken with non Pentax cameras and lenses.
 
 Please take a few moments to refamiliarize yourselves with the
 submission guidelines at:
 
 http://pug.komkon.org/general/autosubmit.html
 and
 http://pug.komkon.org/general/submit.html
 
 Thank you
 William Robb
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

-- 
Tom Graywolf Rittenhouse
Graywolf Photo, Charlotte, NC, USA
--
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: More Yipping from the PUG Guy

2001-08-31 Thread bc

On 31 Aug 2001, at 14:54, William Robb wrote:

 I have to get away from this computer..
 
 I have had another look at the PUG Gallery submission
 guidelines, and after conferring with past maintainers have
 changed the submission criteria slightly. We will no longer be
 publishing submissions taken with non Pentax cameras and lenses.
 
 Please take a few moments to refamiliarize yourselves with the
 submission guidelines at:
 
 http://pug.komkon.org/general/autosubmit.html
 and
 http://pug.komkon.org/general/submit.html

Looks fine to me, I humbly suggest that point #9 be updated
to include Pentax 645 and 67 equipment, and PS?

Cheers!
Brian
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: More Yipping from the PUG Guy

2001-08-31 Thread Ken Archer

I would say as long as the picture is taken with a Pentax camera or 
Pentax lens or both, it should qualify.

On Friday 31 August 2001 16:27, William Robb wrote:
 - Original Message -
 From: Creature's Comfort
 Subject: Re: More Yipping from the PUG Guy

  Just so we're all clear about this: the PUG submission must be

 made

  with a Pentax brand camera and a Pentax brand lens - no third

 party

  zooms, no Ricoh bodies with Pentax lenses, etc.  Pentax bodies

 and

  Pentax lenses only.  Correct?

 I think we are going to discuss this further.
 What do you think we should do here??
 William Robb
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

-- 
Kenneth Archer + San Antonio, Texas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   ICQ #24980801
Powered by Linux ++ Mailed by Kmail
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: More Yipping from the PUG Guy

2001-08-31 Thread John Mustarde

On Fri, 31 Aug 2001 15:27:49 -0600, you wrote:

I think we are going to discuss this further.
What do you think we should do here??
William Robb


I *don't* think we should limit the Pentax Users
Gallery to photographs taken using only Pentax. brand
lenses, cameras, and accessories. 

Instead, I suggest a guideline of A gallery for users
of Pentax brand and Pentax-compatible photo gear.

Don't adopt a narrow definition of Pentax User.  We'd
lose one of the best parts of being a Pentax user,
which is the extensive selection of lenses and bodies
spanning many years, many manufacturers, and even many
formats.

So PUGsters should leave out the Nikon and Canon and
Minolta and Holga and RB67 shots, but feel free to
submit photos taken with Pentax-compatible third-party
lenses, bodies, flash, etc. - which I suppose now
includes Leica since the Pentax Limited lenses are sold
in Leica mount.

--
John Mustarde
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: More Yipping from the PUG Guy

2001-08-31 Thread Kevin Thornsberry

I have had situations where I submitted an image while I was temporarily unsubscribed 
due to list volume conflicting with my e-mail quota.

-Original Message-
From:   Tom Rittenhouse [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Friday, August 31, 2001 6:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: More Yipping from the PUG Guy

 
I would be up for limiting the PUG submissions to current PDML subscribers. That you 
could automate.
Just compare the submission to the mailing list. I the submitter is not there, just 
send a rejection
form back to them with a rejection.

This list is in my opinion no longer supported by Pentax, so it should be run for the 
benefit of the
subscribers. Since it is no longer a Pentax USA thing I see no real reason to limit it 
exclusively
to Pentax gear, but I do see a real reason to limit it to list members.

--graywolf (Tom)


William Robb wrote:
 
 I have to get away from this computer..
 
 I have had another look at the PUG Gallery submission
 guidelines, and after conferring with past maintainers have
 changed the submission criteria slightly. We will no longer be
 publishing submissions taken with non Pentax cameras and lenses.
 
 Please take a few moments to refamiliarize yourselves with the
 submission guidelines at:
 
 http://pug.komkon.org/general/autosubmit.html
 and
 http://pug.komkon.org/general/submit.html
 
 Thank you
 William Robb
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

-- 
Tom Graywolf Rittenhouse
Graywolf Photo, Charlotte, NC, USA
--
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

[demime 0.98e removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: More Yipping from the PUG Guy

2001-08-31 Thread PAUL STENQUIST

In the past, third party lenses have always been okay. Ditto Pentax
lenses on other bodies. I don't see any reason to be more exclusionary
than we have been. 
Paul Stenquist

Creature's Comfort wrote:
 
 Just so we're all clear about this: the PUG submission must be made
 with a Pentax brand camera and a Pentax brand lens - no third party
 zooms, no Ricoh bodies with Pentax lenses, etc.  Pentax bodies and
 Pentax lenses only.  Correct?
 
 William Robb wrote:
 
  changed the submission criteria slightly. We will no longer be
  publishing submissions taken with non Pentax cameras and lenses.
 
 --
 Sheldon Belinkoff
 CREATURE'S COMFORT
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: More Yipping from the PUG Guy

2001-08-31 Thread RK

Right, here's my 2 cents worth:
My favourite kind of shots are macros- come to think of it, 90% of the photos I
take are macros.

I use Pentax bodies with a Tamron 90/2.8 macro lens (bought a couple of years
earlier when life was a lot harder and the Pentax 100/2.8 was something I could
only dream about)

I think it's a little unfair that I should be left out of the gallery because
circumstances forced me to go third party; on the other hand, I can see that
putting up the gallery month after month is an enormous task and the people who
do this have every right to stipulate what can go in.

My present PUG entry is taken with a Kodak PS digital. I hope my entry didn't
have anything to do with sparking this off as I had checked the submission
guidelines very carefully before submitting.
RK
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Subject: Re: More Yipping from the PUG Guy

2001-08-31 Thread Pentxuser

In a message dated 8/31/01 2:24:16 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Subject: Re: More Yipping from the PUG Guy
  That's crazy. We enjoy Pentax cameras and lenses but give me a break. Third 
party lens makers are an important part of most photographer's arsenals. I 
for one own two Tokina ATX lenses that I consider better than anything Pentax 
makes in that size (Tokina 100-300F4 ATX and 90F2.5 macro). I don't write 
down what lens I use to take a picture, it's not that important to me. i use 
a Pentax camera and the best lens I can to get the picture. it's the picture 
that counts not the lens used to take it... 
I can undertstand that all pics be taken with a pentax camera but you won't 
convince me on the lenses
vic
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .