Re: Current Cameras with TTL Flash Metering?

2002-12-28 Thread Paul Franklin Stregevsky
I have three bodies: Super Program (TTL); Ricoh XR-2s (no TTL, no flash
used), and Ricoh XR-P (TTL). I've been using a Ritz Quantaray QTB-9000A
tilt/swivel/bounce flash with the SP. The beauty of a Quantaray modular
flash (or ProMaster, the actual maker) is that you can use it in TTL on
Pentax manual-focus, Pentax autofocus, and Ricoh manual focus by changing
the $15 module. In fact, the Pentax and Ricoh manual-focus modules merged a
while back; a single model covers both brands of manual-focus TTL body. 

The newer, motorized AF Quantarays and ProMasters are fully dedicated; they
cannot be used on manual-focus Pentax (or Ricoh) bodies. Too bad, because
these AF models--as well as AF models from Sigma and others--let you shoot
with a 28mm lens without needing a diffuser. Some of the Quantarays and
ProMasters do, too, but not the powerful tilt/swivel models, like mine.

This evening I ordered a new Ricoh/Pentax module and a used QTB-9500A, which
(unlike the older 9000) can be used with third-party quick-cycle external
batteries. I also ordered a Quantaray off-camera flash bracket for $30.

While I was at it, I ordered a pair of Omni-Bounce diffusers for my two
Quantarays from Sto-Fen (http://www.stofen.com) for $20 each.

I can now use the Quantaray/OmniBounce flash, on or off-camera, on my Pentax
or my Ricoh TTL camera. I now have a spare flash for each TTL camera. And if
I ever get an autofocus Pentax, a $15 module is all I'll need to buy.

Anyone thinking of getting a high-end flash should check out a used unit.
Used flashes seem to be a buyer's market; supply exceeds demand. I picked up
my top-of-the-line 9500A for $30, about one-third the new price.

Ritz Camera is at http://www.ritzcamera.com .
ProMaster flash is at http://www.promaster.com/flashes.html .

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 





Re: Current Cameras with TTL Flash Metering?

2002-12-28 Thread Peter Alling
The MZ-M does not support TTL flash of any kind.  The rest of
the MZ line should work with the 280 but I'd check the camera
manual to be sure.

At 05:58 PM 12/28/2002 -0800, you wrote:

Hello All,

Say, can someone tell me which current Pentax cameras can
properly use a AF 280t or a AF 200t flash?  I seem to
remember an analog vs digital issue involved here, but I
ignored that discussion as my gear is basically all
screwmount.  I was thinking of buying either a ZX-M or a
ZX-5N and would hope one of these flashes would work with it.
 Maybe a ZX-L would be better if it accepts these flashes.

Be kind, I am waiting for a crown to be put on a tooth in
another week and am suffering through the temporary filling!

Dave



__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com


Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.  --Groucho Marx




Re: Current Cameras with TTL Flash Metering?

2002-12-28 Thread Alan Chan
Say, can someone tell me which current Pentax cameras can
properly use a AF 280t or a AF 200t flash?  I seem to
remember an analog vs digital issue involved here, but I
ignored that discussion as my gear is basically all
screwmount.  I was thinking of buying either a ZX-M or a
ZX-5N and would hope one of these flashes would work with it.
 Maybe a ZX-L would be better if it accepts these flashes.


ZX-M doesn't have TTL flash, although it still works with analog flashes in 
Auto mode. The flash capability issue with Pentax is the exact opppsite of 
Nikon. Pentax AF bodies (digital) can do TTL flash with all Pentax TTL 
flashes, analog or digital. However, Pentax manual focus bodies must use 
analog flashes to do TTL. All those Pentax flashes specifically designed for 
AF bodies won't do TTL flash on manual focus bodies. That means you can keep 
your 280T or 200T for any AF bodies you use.

regards,
Alan Chan

_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 3 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail&xAPID=42&PS=47575&PI=7324&DI=7474&SU= 
http://www.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/getmsg&HL=1216hotmailtaglines_addphotos_3mf



Re: Current Cameras with TTL Flash Metering?

2002-12-29 Thread Lon Williamson
By all means, Boris

Grin.  I find I can help so rarely in here that
when I can, I go overboard.  Wifey, BTW, _loves_
her ZX-L.  Even the complications (lotsa stuff for
a mid-to-low-level cost).

Listen to Boris.  He SHOOTS with it.

Boris Liberman wrote:
> 
> May I say a word, though you turn to Lon? Thanks :).




Re: Current Cameras with TTL Flash Metering?

2002-12-29 Thread William Kane
Chris,

  The lens you had trouble with was indoubtably a PKA/R mount.  The R 
part of the mount is indeed the flange that gets stuck in the Pentax 
power zoom contact.  THe R prart, if I remember right, was created by 
Rioch when they adapted the K-mount to their camera's prior to the 
Pentax AF lenses and camera line.  

Chris Brogden wrote:

On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Boris Liberman wrote:

 

I happen to own ZX-L. I am not very good in flash photography so I
skip the flash part. As for the older lenses, ZX-L accepts all, I
repeat, all K-mount lenses.
   


Essentially true, but with one big caveat.  Some older third-party lenses
may lock onto an MZ/ZX series body.  I'm not sure how to identify these
lenses visually, but I understand it has something to do with a piece on
the lens getting stuck in a slot on the camera's lens mount meant for a
power zoom contact.  Or something like that.  Happened to me once when I
was demo'ing the great compatibility of Pentax's AF bodies with older
K-mount lenses.  Oops.

chris



 


--
William Kane
  http://www.KaneScience.com
IABT Advisory Board Member
  http://www.iabt.net
Tinley Park High School
  6111 W. 175th Street
  Tinley Park, IL  60477
  V: 708/532-1900 ext 3909
  http://www.bhsd228.com





Re: Current Cameras with TTL Flash Metering?

2002-12-29 Thread Mark Roberts
Here's a question I've been pondering lately: How, exactly, does TTL flash
metering work? Obviously, the light meter in the camera takes readings
"through the lens" and passes that information to the flash. But flash
exposure is very dependent on distance. For any given flash output really
close objects will be overexposed and very distant objects will be
underexposed, while objects some distance in between will be properly
exposed. So what I'm wondering is, how does TTL flash work without the flash
having any information about the distance to the objects being illuminated?

I have no doubt that it *does* work; I've been getting quite good at outdoor
fill flash lately, using either the PZ-1p or MZ-S with an AF400FTZ. I'd just
to know why what I'm doing works as well as it does.

-- 
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com




Re: Current Cameras with TTL Flash Metering?

2002-12-29 Thread Herb Chong
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>So what I'm wondering is, how does TTL flash work without the flash
having any information about the distance to the objects being
illuminated?<

it does on an AF body. the camera knows how far away it focused on
something.

Herb




Re: Current Cameras with TTL Flash Metering?

2002-12-29 Thread Lawrence Kwan
On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Herb Chong wrote:
> >So what I'm wondering is, how does TTL flash work without the flash
> >having any information about the distance to the objects being
> >illuminated?
> it does on an AF body. the camera knows how far away it focused on
> something.

But this distance info is not used in Pentax TTL or P-TTL flash system.
The original TTL does not need distance info (see Bob S. reply on the same
thread for how TTL works).  P-TTL uses a pre-flash and the 6 segment
metering; and it is also lens type independent.

One of the flash systems I know of which uses distance info is Nikon's 3D
Matrix flash system.

-- 
--Lawrence Kwan--SMS Info Service/Ringtone Convertor--PGP:finger/www--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.vex.net/~lawrence/ -Key ID:0x6D23F3C4--




Re: Current Cameras with TTL Flash Metering?

2002-12-30 Thread Peter Alling
It works pretty much the way ttl metering works without flash.  Segmented
metering will do some kind of magic based on a proprietary algorithm to 
properly
expose what it thinks is important.  Cameras like the LX with only center 
weighted
metering simply quench the flash when they average 18% grey.  Distance is 
un-important
it's the amount of light reaching the film.

At 07:35 PM 12/29/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Here's a question I've been pondering lately: How, exactly, does TTL flash
metering work? Obviously, the light meter in the camera takes readings
"through the lens" and passes that information to the flash. But flash
exposure is very dependent on distance. For any given flash output really
close objects will be overexposed and very distant objects will be
underexposed, while objects some distance in between will be properly
exposed. So what I'm wondering is, how does TTL flash work without the flash
having any information about the distance to the objects being illuminated?

I have no doubt that it *does* work; I've been getting quite good at outdoor
fill flash lately, using either the PZ-1p or MZ-S with an AF400FTZ. I'd just
to know why what I'm doing works as well as it does.

--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com


Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.  --Groucho Marx




Re: Current Cameras with TTL Flash Metering?

2002-12-30 Thread Cotty
>Think of it like this.  Your flash has only one brightness level, not like a 
>three way lamp in your house.  It always puts out light at the same rate.  
>TTL simply controls how long the lamp stays on.  If the object is close by, 
>the lamp is shut off quickly thru the marvels of electronics.  The returning 
>light is measured thru the lens and the camera's sensor sends the quench 
>signal to the flash.
>
>If the object is far away, the lamp is kept burning until it gets enough 
>light back thru the lens, or the flash runs out of juice (electricity).  So 
>the process is similar.  The in camera sensor counts the light returning 
>until it sees enough illumination, then sends the quench signal to the flash.
>
>With TTL, I've found that you can be too close, especially in Macro.  The 
>flash is so close to the subject, that it needs to be shut down 
>immediately.  
>The electronics isn't fast enough to quench it this quickly and things get 
>overexposed.

This is a nice way of explaining it, Bob. Another brand of camera who 
shall remain nameless puts 2 flashes together, one after the other in 
rapid succession.

Here's what happens: the shutter button is pressed, the mirror swings up, 
flash one fires, a TTL reading is taken of the scene and the flash is 
quenched, the image is analysed and the exposure assessed depending on 
whether spot/center-weighted/matrix mode is chosen, any necessary 
adjustment is made to flash duration, shutter blades open, second flash 
fires and exposure is made onto chip/film, shutter closes, end of 
sequence.

This happens so fast, I did not realise it was happening until I read it. 
The 2 flashes are almost impossible to seperate, and the exposures are 
usually flawless. Bounce flash, white ceiling at 7'6" height, camera 
about 4 feet off the floor, flash directed at ceiling slightly in front 
of camera, cam to subject distance about 8 to ten feet or so. And my oh 
my, a square crop!

http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/portraits/images/pic18.html

(NB image prepared on a Mac, but brightness level determined as a 
compromise between PC and Mac gamma. If viewing on a PC, it may look 
slightly dark, on a Mac, slightly bright. Take my word, it's all there ;-)

However, it is not flawless and sometimes spuriously underexposes, having 
to dial in a couple of stops of compensation.

The only thing I would add to Bob's explanation is that some flash units 
will allow a flash setting (usually manual) that provides for a flash 
burst with reduced intensity, say about a quarter-power if you like. The 
AF280T is a good example with the H and L settings on manual.

.02,

Cotty


Oh, swipe me! He paints with light!
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/

Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at
http://www.macads.co.uk/






Re: Current Cameras with TTL Flash Metering?

2002-12-30 Thread Rfsindg
Cotty,

Good addition.  I think this is how anybody doing Matrix Metered TTL flash 
must operate.  What is amazing is the time scales here.  1/10,000's of a 
second look like minutes to the electronics. So they light the scene, take a 
meter reading, evaluate it, and then set the appropriate power output.  All 
in the twinkle of an eye.

Does the new Pentax do matrix TTL metering?

Regards,  Bob S. 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

>  Another brand of camera who shall remain nameless puts 2 flashes
>  together, one after the other in rapid succession.
>  
>  Here's what happens: the shutter button is pressed, the mirror swings up, 
>  flash one fires, a TTL reading is taken of the scene and the flash is 
>  quenched, the image is analysed and the exposure assessed depending on 
>  whether spot/center-weighted/matrix mode is chosen, any necessary 
>  adjustment is made to flash duration, shutter blades open, second flash 
>  fires and exposure is made onto chip/film, shutter closes, end of 
>  sequence.
>  
>  This happens so fast, I did not realise it was happening until I read it. 
>  The 2 flashes are almost impossible to seperate, and the exposures are 
>  usually flawless. Bounce flash, white ceiling at 7'6" height, camera 
>  about 4 feet off the floor, flash directed at ceiling slightly in front 
>  of camera, cam to subject distance about 8 to ten feet or so. And my oh 
>  my, a square crop!
>  
>  http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/portraits/images/pic18.html




Re: Current Cameras with TTL Flash Metering?

2002-12-30 Thread Mark Roberts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>Think of it like this.  Your flash has only one brightness level, not like a 
>three way lamp in your house.  It always puts out light at the same rate.  
>TTL simply controls how long the lamp stays on.  If the object is close by, 
>the lamp is shut off quickly thru the marvels of electronics. 

That's the part I'm interested in: How does the system know if the object is
close by?

> The returning 
>light is measured thru the lens and the camera's sensor sends the quench 
>signal to the flash.

How could the returning light from the flash be measured through the lens?
(I'm not using an LX)

-- 
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com




Re: Current Cameras with TTL Flash Metering?

2002-12-30 Thread Mark Roberts
Lawrence Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Herb Chong wrote:
>> >So what I'm wondering is, how does TTL flash work without the flash
>> >having any information about the distance to the objects being
>> >illuminated?
>> it does on an AF body. the camera knows how far away it focused on
>> something.
>
>But this distance info is not used in Pentax TTL or P-TTL flash system.
>The original TTL does not need distance info

Also, in many cases (most, for me) the subject being illuminated is not at
the distance at which the lens is focussed (it's usually much closer for
outdoor fill flash).

-- 
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com




Re: Current Cameras with TTL Flash Metering?

2002-12-30 Thread Mark Roberts
Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Another brand of camera who shall remain nameless puts 2 flashes 
>together, one after the other in rapid succession.
>
>Here's what happens: the shutter button is pressed, the mirror swings up, 
>flash one fires, a TTL reading is taken of the scene 

So a TTL reading is taken while the mirror is up? I assume then that we're
talking about a camera that does off-the-film metering. I'm concerned with
how TTL flash metering works in my PZ-1p and MZ-S, neither of which do OTF
metering or a pre-shutter-firing test flash (I believe this is P-TTL with
the AF360FTG), yet both cameras seem to meter flash very well.



-- 
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com




RE: Current Cameras with TTL Flash Metering?

2002-12-30 Thread tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Raimo Korhonen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
> Except if it reads OTF - which I find more probable. MZ-S
> has black shutter curtains which is not good for any light
> measurement.

It has to be off the film. If not, the flash would be firing while the
shutter is closed which wouldn't make any sense except  possibly in
the case of the pre-fire of the AF360.

tv






Re: Current Cameras with TTL Flash Metering?

2002-12-30 Thread Cotty
>What is amazing is the time scales here.  1/10,000's of a 
>second look like minutes to the electronics. So they light the scene, take a 
>meter reading, evaluate it, and then set the appropriate power output.  All 
>in the twinkle of an eye.

Hi Bob. Yah. It's serious stuff, isn't it! Aside from P-TTL, the other 
feature that I'm trying to get my head around is high speed flash sync, 
whereby the use of any shutter speed (focal plane shutter) can be used 
with flash. My understanding is that the actual second flash duration is 
lengthened considerably to accomodate a shutter exposure of anything 
between (in my case) 200th sec and 4000th.

So: the button is pressed, the mirror pops up, the pre-flash fires, the 
exposure is read and calculated, any adjustments are made to the flash, 
(then, crucially) the second flash fires and continues to fire while the 
shutter opens, the exposure is made, the shutter closes, and finally the 
second flash finishes.

This is the only way that I can see how flash can be used with a speed, 
say, of 1/1000th sec. So, I assume that for any given exposure with the 
flash switched to high speed sync, the flash power must be reduced to 
compensate for the necessary longer duration.

If the normal flash duration is 1/15,000 sec (say) at X power, then in 
high speed sync mode the flash duration must be increased to about 
1/200th sec (my normal flash sync speed) at Y power (which would be less 
powerful I presume). This would then be able to cope with any exposure 
faster than normal flash sync speed of the camera up to the fastest 
shutter speed of the camera. I also presume this method will be that 
employed by any camera/flash manufacturer.

Anybody know if I'm still on track here, or have I hit a patch of oil and 
heading for the scene of th accident?

Regards,

Cotty


Oh, swipe me! He paints with light!
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/

Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at
http://www.macads.co.uk/






Re: Current Cameras with TTL Flash Metering?

2002-12-30 Thread Cotty
>So a TTL reading is taken while the mirror is up? I assume then that we're
>talking about a camera that does off-the-film metering. I'm concerned with
>how TTL flash metering works in my PZ-1p and MZ-S, neither of which do OTF
>metering or a pre-shutter-firing test flash (I believe this is P-TTL with
>the AF360FTG), yet both cameras seem to meter flash very well.

My D60 has a small meter dedicated to just the flash, metering TTL before 
exposure - I assume that Pentax cameras with this facility must also have 
a dedicated meter?

Cotty


Oh, swipe me! He paints with light!
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/

Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at
http://www.macads.co.uk/






Re: Current Cameras with TTL Flash Metering?

2002-12-30 Thread Rfsindg
Cotty,

I can't say for sure how high speed synchro flash modes work.

My guess would be something like this for film cameras...
Because the camera gets to 1/1,000 or 1/4,000 of a second exposure by using a narrower 
and narrower slit that travels across the face of the film (1st to 2nd shutter curtain 
distance), I would pulse the flash.  Say I used 200 (or 2,000) pulses of flash in that 
1/4,000 of a second.  I could get about any exposure I wanted and the illumination 
would end up being even because I fired the flash when the slit was at the top of the 
film and at the bottom and everywhere in between.  Kind of a strobe, but very fast.  I 
wouldn't have to get the mechanical parts to be perfect, there could be some slop in 
when the flash started and ended.  Just so long as the flash was pulsing when the slit 
first opened until it finally closed.

Regards,  Bob S.


[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> So: the button is pressed, the mirror pops up, the pre-flash fires, the 
> exposure is read and calculated, any adjustments are made to the flash, 
> (then, crucially) the second flash fires and continues to fire while the 
> shutter opens, the exposure is made, the shutter closes, and finally the 
> second flash finishes.
> 
> This is the only way that I can see how flash can be used with a speed, 
> say, of 1/1000th sec. So, I assume that for any given exposure with the 
> flash switched to high speed sync, the flash power must be reduced to 
> compensate for the necessary longer duration.
> 
> If the normal flash duration is 1/15,000 sec (say) at X power, then in 
> high speed sync mode the flash duration must be increased to about 
> 1/200th sec (my normal flash sync speed) at Y power (which would be less 
> powerful I presume). This would then be able to cope with any exposure 
> faster than normal flash sync speed of the camera up to the fastest 
> shutter speed of the camera. I also presume this method will be that 
> employed by any camera/flash manufacturer.
> 
> Anybody know if I'm still on track here, or have I hit a 
> patch of oil and heading for the scene of th accident?




Re: Current Cameras with TTL Flash Metering?

2002-12-30 Thread Cotty
Hi Lon,

>> The only thing I would add to Bob's explanation is that some flash units
>> will allow a flash setting (usually manual) that provides for a flash
>> burst with reduced intensity, say about a quarter-power if you like. The
>> AF280T is a good example with the H and L settings on manual.
>
>Cotty,
>
>Of course I want to know your opinions on Pi, irrational numbers, and
>the pluperfect subjective tense.  But also

Don't get me started!

>Don't you use the L setting on the AF280T often just to get a bit of
>sparkle in the eyes?  I seem to remember reading that in one of the
>weeks in which PDML, for some reason, wasn't struggling with larger
>issues.  How far away, typically, gives good results?

Yah, I used a 280T on an LX for fill-in with a modified switch inspired 
by Steve Larson. I found that setting the flash on MS-L and using it in 
conjunction with a normally metered shot, say of a person about 6 to 10 
feet away, produced just enough fill to lose the black holes under the 
eyebrows.

BTW, the only Pi I like is filled with cherries :-)

Cotty

PS:

>Hi speed synch is a series of very rapid bursts.
>Each drains the capacitor a bit, so you must be closer
>to your subject than the max flash distance.  A lot closer.

Aha! I like a good light show. Thanx.



Oh, swipe me! He paints with light!
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/

Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at
http://www.macads.co.uk/






Re: Current Cameras with TTL Flash Metering?

2002-12-30 Thread Lawrence Kwan
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Cotty wrote:
> Aside from P-TTL, the other feature that I'm trying to get my head
> around is high speed flash sync, So: the button is pressed, the mirror
> pops up, the pre-flash fires, the exposure is read and calculated, any
> adjustments are made to the flash, (then, crucially) the second flash
> fires and continues to fire while the

For P-TTL, the first pre-flash occurs *before* the mirror swings up.
It uses the viewfinder's 6 segment metering to calculate the exposure (not
possible once the mirror swings up); and the usual off-the-film TTL flash
sensor in the mirror box is not used.  Once the exposure is set, the
mirror pops up, shutter opens and the main flash is fired at the preset
level.

High speed sync works closely with P-TTL with the same pre-flash; then
after the mirror pops up, the flash fires in a series of multiple bursts
as the shutter blades sweep across the film.


-- 
--Lawrence Kwan--SMS Info Service/Ringtone Convertor--PGP:finger/www--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.vex.net/~lawrence/ -Key ID:0x6D23F3C4--




Re: Current Cameras with TTL Flash Metering?

2002-12-31 Thread Cotty
>My guess would be something like this for film cameras...
>Because the camera gets to 1/1,000 or 1/4,000 of a second exposure by 
>using a narrower and narrower slit that travels across the face of the 
>film (1st to 2nd shutter curtain distance), I would pulse the flash.  Say 
>I used 200 (or 2,000) pulses of flash in that 1/4,000 of a second.  I 
>could get about any exposure I wanted and the illumination would end up 
>being even because I fired the flash when the slit was at the top of the 
>film and at the bottom and everywhere in between.  Kind of a strobe, but 
>very fast.  I wouldn't have to get the mechanical parts to be perfect, 
>there could be some slop in when the flash started and ended.  Just so 
>long as the flash was pulsing when the slit first opened until it finally 
>closed.

That sounds a perfectly good explanation to me. I'll buy it. You take 
Paypal?

:-)

Cot


Oh, swipe me! He paints with light!
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/

Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at
http://www.macads.co.uk/






Re: Re: Current Cameras with TTL Flash Metering?

2002-12-30 Thread David Brooks
Humm.
Thanks Cotty.I think you may have answered part of my fill flash 
question i just asked on the list.(not all but part)
BTW is that picture from the D60?

Dave
 Begin Original Message 

From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The only thing I would add to Bob's explanation is that some flash 
units 
will allow a flash setting (usually manual) that provides for a 
flash 
burst with reduced intensity, say about a quarter-power if you like. 
The 
AF280T is a good example with the H and L settings on manual.

.02,

Cotty


Oh, swipe me! He paints with light!
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/

Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at
http://www.macads.co.uk/





 End Original Message 




Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario Canada
"Art needs to be in a frame.That way we know when the art 
stops and the wall begins"--Frank Zappa
http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj/
http://brooks1952.tripod.com/myhorses
Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail