Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-11 Thread Pål Audun Jensen

Nah, he's more like The Who


No. Nitin is right. What should be targeted are those who start these 
innocent totally off-topic threads. Does people never learn?
This is a Pentax forum and everything else is going to start flame wars.

Pål
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-11 Thread Bob Rapp

I am very sorry, all. I started it as a respect for a unique individual. I
did no mean it to go WELL OFF TOPIC!

Bob
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: The Queen Mum

2002-04-10 Thread Collin Brendemuehl

And I've even stayed out of this one! :)

Collin
*
From: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: RE: The Queen Mum 

KILL THIS THREAD. 
IT DOESNT BELONG HERE! 

JCO 
*

--

Collin Brendemuehl, KC8TKA

---
Get over it.
Dr. Laura

--
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: The Queen Mum

2002-04-10 Thread Mick Maguire

In the light of his statements does anybody else find it ironic that Nitin
chooses attend a college which was originally set up by the colonial
British?

Regards,
/\/\ick...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-10 Thread Mark Roberts

Cotty wrote:

He lives! Nitin, Mafud 2. Out now!

Mafud version 2.0 doesn't seem to be much of an upgrade.
(Except in regards to speed: made it into my kill file in record time weeks
ago.)

-- 
Mark Roberts
www.robertstech.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: The Queen Mum

2002-04-10 Thread Mick Maguire

Oops, didn't realize the cries for the thread to be killed off... I'll say
no more.

Regards,
/\/\ick...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-10 Thread Daniel J. Matyola

If modern democratic monarch isn't an oxymoron, then nothing can be.  The very
concept of an hereditary monachy is offensive to the equality of all people,
regardless of race, religion, gender, nationality and status of birth.  The best
that can be said for the Queen Mum (what a strange phrase, and so terribly
British) is that she was not born a Windsor  (a name created to disguise a German
line of rulers).

John Coyle wrote:

  The function of a modern democratic monarch is to be the head of
 state, in whose name and position all things are done by the government of the
 day, and to whom the armed services and other security forces owe and swear
 allegiance.

--
Daniel J. Matyola  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stanley, Powers  Matyola  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Suite203, 1170 US Highway 22 East  http://danmatyola.com
Bridgewater, NJ 08807  (908)725-3322  fax: (908)707-0399
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-10 Thread Bill Owens

 Right and churchill (and many before him) was just the PM and the first
 colonizers were just businessmen and explorers, the british personnel in
 colonies were just poor sobs seeking employment far away from mother
 england. Nobody had anything todo with colonization and the aboriginals
 and red indians just happened to (almost) vanish. The riches of the
 colonies spontaneously moved to england on its own.
 
 He lives! Nitin, Mafud 2. Out now!
 
 My absolute last word on this thread. Promise.
 

Nah, he's more like The Who

Bill  KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-10 Thread Bob Blakely

From: Nitin Garg [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 And yes, i dont know anything about your country, about her personal
 life or her family. That doenst change what happened to some colonial
 regions and the opinion of some people there.

Nor does it make her responsible.

 Similarly, you know
 nothing about my country and what people there went through.

It's not about your country. No one is attacking your country. YOU were personally
attacked. I agree with James and yes, you would be right to take it personally. You 
jumped
up on your personal soapbox and started spitting. Did you expect that no one would 
react
to your lack of understanding of the times? Did you expect that no one would react to 
your
lack of understanding who is/was responsible for whatever? Did you expect that no one
would react to your lack of tact?

 If you
 think stating that not everyone considered her dear is being an asshole
 then i rather be one :)

I didn't consider her dear as I didn't know her. On the other hand, I didn't disparage 
her
either. This difference appears to be something difficult for some to grasp. Your hate 
is
becoming infectious. I am beginning to assimilate it. It is not directed where you
intended it.

Now where exactly are you from, Nitin? Let us delve deeply into the history of your
nation. Let us put your people's past under the microscope of current thought as you do
with others. Given the current trend in balanced judgment as exemplified by you, 
let's
discuss only the evil and leave any good out of the balance. Further, lets focus the 
evil
on the spouses of those in who were the sons of those in power when the evils were
perpetrated.

Regards,
Bob...

Citizen, former British colony.
---
In the carboniferous epoch
we were promised perpetual peace.
They swore if we gave up our weapons
that the wars of the tribes would cease.
But when we disarmed they sold us,
and delivered us, bound, to our foe.
And the gods of the copybook headings said,
'Stick to the devil you know.' 
--Rudyard Kipling

 On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 08:33:10PM -0700, James Adams wrote:
  I don't know what was arrogant about the original message, but I find the
  mindless comments from Nitin offensive. Bob's message was a genuine and
  heart felt comment on someone whom he felt significant enough to share a
  personal farewell.
 
  Whether you liked her Nitin is irrelevant, you are insignificant, you know
  nothing about my country, you know nothing about her or her family. She made
  a significant impact on the lives of  more people than you ever will. She
  was dear to many peoples around the world, and she is being given the honour
  and respect she deserves. She won't be forgotten, but what will your
  memorial be? Very little I suspect, you will be go like an insignificant
  fart in the wind. I was not going to say this, but were you born an asshole,
  or did you have to take a course.
  James
  Unsubscribing.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-10 Thread Nitin Garg

Japan and most of east asia (china, phillipines etc) are still not on
the best of terms. What is history and what is recent past are very
subjective. Its great that many animosities went by in a couple of
generations -- that is source of hope that things turn out well. It is
also true that some didn't -- and that is a warning that things can go
wrong.

Blind optimism that all animosity goes away is idiocy. Some of it needs
harder scrubbing to wipe out. You need to understand that. Being
optimistic about it is correct attitude as long as you realize it doesnt
happen that way always. Each of these case is different enough that the
only rule you can carry over from one to the next is: everyones better
off if its worked out instead of letting it smoulder.

You dont whack bin laden on the head and say dude, be enlightened. Dont
harbor hatred of centuries past. That wont work. He already has it. He
is a gone case. What is important is to realise that whether its
unenlightened or not, such hatred exists and its better dealth with
before it causes a disaster.

And all this has nothing to do with the queen. This is even more OT and
only started because I responded to someone's post about not pulling up
things from long ago.

And I am not learning history at princeton. On the contrary, I avoid all
current news which isnt of immediate significant impact to my day to day
life.
 

On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:05:39AM -0700, Bob Blakely wrote:
 Idiocy!
 
 The Canadians (then actually the Brits) burned down our White House! This is 
history. Now
 we are the best of friends. My Mom cherishes a book titled Between Friends. It's a 
photo
 essay with photographs of every inch of the Canadian - American boarder. The Brits
 declared war on us after the revolution (often referred to as the rebellion in 
Briton) -
 the War of 1812. When we had our Civil War, they sided with the Confederacy. Today 
we are
 the best of friends. Japan was once our enemy having bombed Pearl Harbor and 
destroying
 most of our Navy. We fought a long and bloody war with them and with Germany as well.
 Today we are friends with both, and Americans think very highly of Japan and 
Germany. They
 are not a danger to us any more, nor are we a danger to them. We are the best of 
friends.
 Vietnam is over and we lost. We still have within us some serious negative feelings 
about
 each other, but we are both trying to normalize relations. The present vestiges of
 animosity will dissipate when my generation is gone. History is to learn from, not to
 ferment the hate of centuries from.
 
 September 11 is a clear and present danger, not just to the US, but to the entire
 civilized world. It is not history. It is current events with current impact. It 
comes
 with the danger of the same persons spawning further, similar incidents. When all is 
past
 into history and the danger is (hopefully) over, we will eventually be friends. This 
is
 considerably more enlightened thought than the harboring the hatred of centuries 
past.
 
 It amazes me that you appear unable to see the difference. What the hell are you 
doing at
 Princeton? Learning only the events of history and non of it's lessons?
 
 Regards,
 Bob...
 ---
 In the carboniferous epoch
 we were promised perpetual peace.
 They swore if we gave up our weapons
 that the wars of the tribes would cease.
 But when we disarmed they sold us,
 and delivered us, bound, to our foe.
 And the gods of the copybook headings said,
 'Stick to the devil you know.' 
 --Rudyard Kipling
 
 From: Nitin Garg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
  On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:14:35PM -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote:
   Nitin Garg wrote:
   
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 04:39:59PM -0700, Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
  Nitin wrote:

   
Doesnt always work. Did the US govt say that to sept 11 and move on ?
  
   That has nothing to do with the death of a lady who was incidental to
   world politics. You are not thinking very clearly, Nitin.
 
  It has if u bother to stop and think about what it was said in response
  to. You dont always let go of something which happens saying oh, its
  becuase of a heap of history. No one thinks bin laden was a victim and
  pushed into terrorism (well maybe his supporters do). You hold him
  RESPONSIBLE for what he did. You dont say well so and so things happened
  in his life which made him do so but otherwise he is good man. So you
  cant say hey she just happened to become queen and her ancestors did all
  the colonization. She continued it and by that endorsed it. Even though
  one is not responsible for what was done in past but one can become a
  party to it depending upon how you choose to react to it. Some do
  remember what your predecessors did and DO hold you responsible (you can
  say its shouldnt be so, but if it is, it is). Sept 11 wouldnt have
  happened if no one was like that. No one is going to land a plane in
  buckingham palace but some do hold its present and past 

Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-10 Thread Bob Blakely

More idiocy!

Regards,
Bob...
---
In the carboniferous epoch
we were promised perpetual peace.
They swore if we gave up our weapons
that the wars of the tribes would cease.
But when we disarmed they sold us,
and delivered us, bound, to our foe.
And the gods of the copybook headings said,
'Stick to the devil you know.' 
--Rudyard Kipling

From: Nitin Garg [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 09:22:21AM -0700, Bob Blakely wrote:
  From: Nitin Garg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
   And yes, i dont know anything about your country, about her personal
   life or her family. That doenst change what happened to some colonial
   regions and the opinion of some people there.
 
  Nor does it make her responsible.

 It does when the same colonial rule continues in the same way during her
 time as well.

You do not understand responsibility. To be responsible for anything, you have to have
control or authority over it. The Queen Mum had no control or authority over anything 
of
the like.

   Similarly, you know
   nothing about my country and what people there went through.
 
  It's not about your country. No one is attacking your country. YOU were personally
  attacked.  I agree with James and yes, you would be right to take it
  personally. You jumped up on your personal soapbox and started
  spitting.

 Now whos doing what here ? I didnt attack anyone on the list personally.
 I say the queen is responsible and i say it again. Defend that if you
 must. Dont bunk the strawman.

Again, you cannot demonstrate that the Queen Mum had any control or authority to change
British policity.

  Did you expect that no one would react to your lack of understanding
  of the times?

 No, but if someone feels so i expect a better addressal than above.

  Did you expect that no one would react to your lack of understanding
  who is/was responsible for whatever?

 See above.

  Did you expect that no one would react to your lack of tact?

 tact-schmact. If you have problems with HOW i said things, that is fine.
 I can change my tact if someone has a problem but address WHAT i said
 as well.

I have a problem with your lack of understanding of responsibility. It is paticularly
obnoxous to me that you attempt to make the Queen Mum responsible for something over 
which
she had no control or authority.

   If you think stating that not everyone considered her dear is being
   an asshole then i rather be one :)
 
  I didn't consider her dear as I didn't know her. On the other hand, I didn't 
disparage
her
  either. This difference appears to be something difficult for some to grasp. Your 
hate
is
  becoming infectious. I am beginning to assimilate it. It is not directed where you
  intended it.

 If saying she was responsible (in part) for colonial evils done during
 her time as queen is disparaging her and having hate for her, then yes i
 did it.

She may have been Queen, but she had NO AUTHORITY. She was titled Queen because her
husband George VI was King. Rail against him if you must. The authority actually rested
squarely with the British Parliament. You, being Indian, should know this.

  Now where exactly are you from, Nitin? Let us delve deeply into the history of your
  nation. Let us put your people's past under the microscope of current thought as 
you
do
  with others. Given the current trend in balanced judgment as exemplified by you,
let's
  discuss only the evil and leave any good out of the balance. Further, lets focus 
the
evil
  on the spouses of those in who were the sons of those in power when the evils were
  perpetrated.
 

 India. People there have done wrong too (and sadly they do it more
 to each other everyday). I still hold some of them dear but I wont deny
 that they are responsible for their actions (or failure to take action).

So there we are. You are nothing but piss and hate.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-10 Thread tom

On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 11:06:46 -0700, Bob Blakely wrote:
More idiocy!


Ok, who the hell woke up Bob?

tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-10 Thread Bob Blakely

From: Nitin Garg [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Japan and most of east asia (china, phillipines etc) are still not on
 the best of terms. What is history and what is recent past are very
 subjective. Its great that many animosities went by in a couple of
 generations -- that is source of hope that things turn out well. It is
 also true that some didn't -- and that is a warning that things can go
 wrong.

Yes. There are many persons like you in this world willing to dig the knife into old
wounds.

 Blind optimism that all animosity goes away is idiocy.

Nothing I said suggests that blind optimism, or any kind of optimism for that matter. 
All
was said to show that things can be different.

 Some of it needs harder scrubbing to wipe out.

This is work, an internal work of the heart, and you are unwilling to do it. No one 
else
can do it for you. Ultimately, it is a choice.

 You need to understand that. Being
 optimistic about it is correct attitude as long as you realize it doesnt
 happen that way always.

Nor have I suggested that it does, as you seem to imply that I did.

 Each of these case is different enough that the
 only rule you can carry over from one to the next is: everyones better
 off if its worked out instead of letting it smoulder.

You not only let it smolder, you've fanned it to flames. This is clearly evident from 
this
thread. You espouse one thing and do another.

 You dont whack bin laden on the head and say dude, be enlightened. Dont
 harbor hatred of centuries past. That wont work. He already has it. He
 is a gone case. What is important is to realise that whether its
 unenlightened or not, such hatred exists and its better dealth with
 before it causes a disaster.

Again, you fail to grasp what was said concerning things that are a present danger and
those things that no longer present any threat.

 . What is important is to realise that whether its
 unenlightened or not, such hatred exists and its better dealth with
 before it causes a disaster.

Yes, and the hatred that exists that is the topic of this thread is in your heart. So 
far,
you have been unwilling to deal with it in any manner other than fermentation of the
hatred and justification for fermentation of the hatred.

 And I am not learning history at princeton. On the contrary, I avoid all
 current news which isnt of immediate significant impact to my day to day
 life.

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it! - George Santayana. One 
of
the lessons of history is what happens when a people cannot let go of the past.


Regards,
Bob...
---
In the carboniferous epoch
we were promised perpetual peace.
They swore if we gave up our weapons
that the wars of the tribes would cease.
But when we disarmed they sold us,
and delivered us, bound, to our foe.
And the gods of the copybook headings said,
'Stick to the devil you know.' 
--Rudyard Kipling
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-10 Thread Nitin Garg

On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 11:06:46AM -0700, Bob Blakely wrote:
 More idiocy!

bah.

  
   Nor does it make her responsible.
 
  It does when the same colonial rule continues in the same way during her
  time as well.
 
 You do not understand responsibility. To be responsible for anything, you have to 
have
 control or authority over it. The Queen Mum had no control or authority over 
anything of
 the like.

She had the privileges. By remaining silent on it, she (and all british
folks of that time) implicitly take responsibility for it because they
all enjoyed the benefits of it. She gets to represent the responsibility
becuase she was the queen (the king does too but we arent talking about
that here). Did she ever express so much as a belief that colonialism's
impact might be harmful? An ordinary person's opinion might not have
mattered. Hers would have. She is morally responsible. Legally,
maybe not.

 
  Now whos doing what here ? I didnt attack anyone on the list personally.
  I say the queen is responsible and i say it again. Defend that if you
  must. Dont bunk the strawman.
 
 Again, you cannot demonstrate that the Queen Mum had any control or authority to 
change
 British policity.
 

Did any member of royal family ever say (even unofficially) that
colonialism was harming the native population in places where it
obviously was ? Present british folks I have met admit wrongs were done
and that is enough for me. I know the british govt helped in ways it
could after India became independent. But was there an admission of
wrong-doing? no. What does that mean ?


  tact-schmact. If you have problems with HOW i said things, that is fine.
  I can change my tact if someone has a problem but address WHAT i said
  as well.
 
 I have a problem with your lack of understanding of responsibility. It is paticularly
 obnoxous to me that you attempt to make the Queen Mum responsible for something over 
which
 she had no control or authority.
 
 She may have been Queen, but she had NO AUTHORITY. She was titled Queen because her
 husband George VI was King. Rail against him if you must. The authority actually 
rested
 squarely with the British Parliament. You, being Indian, should know this.
 

England took great amounts of wealth from india (at the cost of welfare
of the people there) over a long time. You say the british parliament is
responsible ? Who elected them ? Whose bidding were they doing ? The
people of england. The queen is part of the people of england. They all
share in some of the responsibility. Why was her stand particularly
important ? She was the queen. No authority or control you say ? Thats a
lame excuse. She had the capacity to do something about it. She didnt.
Did she ever say she should have ? No.

 
  India. People there have done wrong too (and sadly they do it more
  to each other everyday). I still hold some of them dear but I wont deny
  that they are responsible for their actions (or failure to take action).
 
 So there we are. You are nothing but piss and hate.

Its so convenient to use insults when you dont have anything better to
say.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-10 Thread Nitin Garg

On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 11:06:46AM -0700, Bob Blakely wrote:
 
  Japan and most of east asia (china, phillipines etc) are still not on
  the best of terms. What is history and what is recent past are very
  subjective. Its great that many animosities went by in a couple of
  generations -- that is source of hope that things turn out well. It is
  also true that some didn't -- and that is a warning that things can go
  wrong.
 
 Yes. There are many persons like you in this world willing to dig the
 knife into old wounds.

old wounds and new wounds are subjective. Deep wounds tend to take
longer to heal.

 
  Blind optimism that all animosity goes away is idiocy.
 
 Nothing I said suggests that blind optimism, or any kind of optimism
 for that matter.  All was said to show that things can be different.

And there was no need to show that. If that is all you wanted to show,
it was irrelevant or it meant to me what i said above.

 
  Some of it needs harder scrubbing to wipe out.
 
 This is work, an internal work of the heart, and you are unwilling to
 do it. No one else can do it for you. Ultimately, it is a choice.
 

That would have made a good movie dialogue but is completely pointless
when you try saying that to the victims. What are you trying to imply
by me unwilling to do it ? What are you referring to ? Since this is
totally tangential to QM's thread, what are you talking about ?

 
  Each of these case is different enough that the only rule you can
  carry over from one to the next is: everyones better off if its
  worked out instead of letting it smoulder.
 
 You not only let it smolder, you've fanned it to flames. This is
 clearly evident from this thread. You espouse one thing and do
 another.

Really ? And how did you conclude this ?


  You dont whack bin laden on the head and say dude, be enlightened.
  Dont harbor hatred of centuries past. That wont work. He already
  has it.  He is a gone case. What is important is to realise that
  whether its unenlightened or not, such hatred exists and its better
  dealth with before it causes a disaster.
 
 Again, you fail to grasp what was said concerning things that are a
 present danger and those things that no longer present any threat.

and you fail to grasp what could become a danger in future.

 
  . What is important is to realise that whether its
  unenlightened or not, such hatred exists and its better dealth with
  before it causes a disaster.
 
 Yes, and the hatred that exists that is the topic of this thread is in
 your heart. 

And the idiocy in your head. And there are plenty more convenient lines
that can be thrown around here to only make this more surreal. What
hatred in this thread are you talking about? Sept 11 ? animosity between
nations ? You are mixing up 2 OT threads. As it is, i dont hate the QM.

 So far, you have been unwilling to deal with it in any manner other
 than fermentation of the hatred and justification for fermentation of
 the hatred.

What are you talking about ?

 
  And I am not learning history at princeton. On the contrary, I avoid
  all current news which isnt of immediate significant impact to my
  day to day life.
 
 Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it! -
 George Santayana.

*immediate significant impact* has some meaning.

 One of the lessons of history is what happens when a people cannot let
 go of the past.
 

It would be nice if you can impart this lesson to women who were used as
sex slave by japanese during WWII and convince them to not ask for a
japnese apology. The lesson is not to let go of it but how to handle it.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: The Queen Mum

2002-04-10 Thread ukasz Kacperczyk

I didn't want to be rude, but when the @#$% will you shut up? The name of
this list is Pentax Discussion Mail List! I'm sick of this thread.
ukasz
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-10 Thread frank theriault

Hi, Evan,

Uh-huh!  I had at least 10 responses composed, and then deleted them without
sending them.  I know that I indulge in OT discussions from time to time, but
this one was (is) just too emotionally charged.  It got to a point (and
seemingly continues!) that no one was going to change anyone's mind, and so ends
up with insults and mud-slinging - and most unfortunately to at least one list
member may be gone for a while.

Can the participants not see that by perpetuating this it only baits the other
side?  I'm sure that it's not intentional, but every response guarantees
another, and another...

Oh well.  Nice weather we had today in Toronto.  About time...

regards,
frank

Evan Hanson wrote:

 I'm with you Frank.  I had actually spent a lot of time writing a
 long and detailed response; having spent way too much time
 studying colonialism and post colonialism, and then I decided to
 kill the message before I sent it.  In the end isn't enough that
 we all love Pentax.


--
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert
Oppenheimer
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-09 Thread Nitin Garg

The whole world might not agree. She was the colonial ruler of a lot of
places which werent thrilled with the british rule :)


On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 01:05:43PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Queen Mum,
 
  May she rest in peace. 
 
 There goes one of the true heroes of the 20th Century. She stood tall when 
 her people needed her most. As England stood alone against the German bombs 
 she rallied her people by word and example. Great Britain, alas the whole 
 world, owes a debt, to her and Churchill. The civilized world owes a debt to 
 our greatest ally, England. G-d save the Queen Mum. May she rest in peace.
 Burt Yust
 NYC
 USA
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-09 Thread David Brooks

We liked her up hereG

Dave

 Begin Original Message 

From: Nitin Garg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 13:20:21 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The Queen Mum


The whole world might not agree. She was the colonial ruler of a lot 
of
places which werent thrilled with the british rule :)


On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 01:05:43PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Queen Mum,
 
  May she rest in peace. 
 
 There goes one of the true heroes of the 20th Century. She stood 
tall when 
 her people needed her most. As England stood alone against the 
German bombs 
 she rallied her people by word and example. Great Britain, alas the 
whole 
 world, owes a debt, to her and Churchill. The civilized world owes 
a debt to 
 our greatest ally, England. G-d save the Queen Mum. May she rest in 
peace.
 Burt Yust
 NYC
 USA
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .



 End Original Message 




Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario Canada
http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj

Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail 
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-09 Thread Paul Stenquist

The Queen Mum wasn't the ruler of anything and had nothing to do with
colonization. She was the wife of the King. And she was a heroic and
charming lady.
Paul

Nitin Garg wrote:
 
 The whole world might not agree. She was the colonial ruler of a lot of
 places which werent thrilled with the british rule :)
 
 On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 01:05:43PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Queen Mum,
 
   May she rest in peace. 
 
  There goes one of the true heroes of the 20th Century. She stood tall when
  her people needed her most. As England stood alone against the German bombs
  she rallied her people by word and example. Great Britain, alas the whole
  world, owes a debt, to her and Churchill. The civilized world owes a debt to
  our greatest ally, England. G-d save the Queen Mum. May she rest in peace.
  Burt Yust
  NYC
  USA
  -
  This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
  go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
  visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-09 Thread Nitin Garg

On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 02:12:21PM -0700, James Adams wrote:
 She didn't have a lot of choice in the matter, yes she married a Prince who
 was next in line to be King. Prior to King Edward's abdication, she had
 probably given little or no thought to becoming Queen Consort, or to taking
 on any of the titles that went with the job.
 
 Don't forget that after the English Civil War, it was Parliament that took
 on the role of governing the Colonies/Dominions. The Queens and Kings of the
 20th/21st centuries are little more than a figureheads.


Then she doesnt deserve the laurels either :)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-09 Thread Nitin Garg

Right and churchill (and many before him) was just the PM and the first
colonizers were just businessmen and explorers, the british personnel in
colonies were just poor sobs seeking employment far away from mother
england. Nobody had anything todo with colonization and the aboriginals
and red indians just happened to (almost) vanish. The riches of the
colonies spontaneously moved to england on its own.


On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:56:59PM -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote:
 The Queen Mum wasn't the ruler of anything and had nothing to do with
 colonization. She was the wife of the King. And she was a heroic and
 charming lady.
 Paul
 
 Nitin Garg wrote:
  
  The whole world might not agree. She was the colonial ruler of a lot of
  places which werent thrilled with the british rule :)
  
  On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 01:05:43PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Queen Mum,
  
May she rest in peace. 
  
   There goes one of the true heroes of the 20th Century. She stood tall when
   her people needed her most. As England stood alone against the German bombs
   she rallied her people by word and example. Great Britain, alas the whole
   world, owes a debt, to her and Churchill. The civilized world owes a debt to
   our greatest ally, England. G-d save the Queen Mum. May she rest in peace.
   Burt Yust
   NYC
   USA
   -
   This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
   go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
   visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
  -
  This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
  go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
  visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-09 Thread Bill D. Casselberry

 Nitin wrote:
 
 Right, and Churchill ... snip ... riches of the
 colonies spontaneously moved to england on its own.

C'mon. Let's please not get into dredging up accusations
regarding things of the past - we are all where we are
today (be that what it might be) due to the accumulated
bits of history - the good, the bad  the ugly combined.

Bill
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-09 Thread Nitin Garg

On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 04:39:59PM -0700, Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
  Nitin wrote:
  
  Right, and Churchill ... snip ... riches of the
  colonies spontaneously moved to england on its own.
 
   C'mon. Let's please not get into dredging up accusations
   regarding things of the past - we are all where we are
   today (be that what it might be) due to the accumulated
   bits of history - the good, the bad  the ugly combined.


Doesnt always work. Did the US govt say that to sept 11 and move on ?
All I am saying is, not the whole world thinks of the queen mum as
heroic or charming or whatever. There are people to whom she was (and
justifiably so to themselves) the symbol of their continuing misery. To
them it doesnt matter if she was charming and a well mannered polite
person. For them her civilized behaviour only makes her uglier and
disgusting in what she silently supported.

So while many may rightly feel loss at her death, there are others in
the world who are, again rightly, not at all unhappy about her death.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-09 Thread Paul Stenquist

Nitin Garg wrote:
 
 On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 04:39:59PM -0700, Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
   Nitin wrote:
 

 
 Doesnt always work. Did the US govt say that to sept 11 and move on ?

That has nothing to do with the death of a lady who was incidental to
world politics. You are not thinking very clearly, Nitin.
 
 So while many may rightly feel loss at her death, there are others in
 the world who are, again rightly, not at all unhappy about her death.

Only a mindless few.
Paul
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-09 Thread Paul Stenquist

Much of the United States was once part of the British Empire, ditto
Australia and Canada. I don't think any of us feel that our years as
subjects of the crown deprived us in any way. In fact, I believe that
much of the prosperity and societal comfort that we enjoy today is a
direct result of our British heritage. I think the same is true of many
other former colonies, although a few of them may not be mature enough
to realize it. Nor are some of their peoples.
Paul

Nitin Garg wrote:
 
 On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:00:52PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  In a message dated 4/9/2002 7:29:56 PM Central Daylight Time,
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 
   All I am saying is, not the whole world thinks of the queen mum as
   heroic or charming or whatever. There are people to whom she was (and
   justifiably so to themselves) the symbol of their continuing misery.
 
  The majority of the colonies over which her husband was King-Emperor are,
  today, independent nations. The Queen Mother outlasted the Empire.
 
  I haven't been keeping up with world news lately, but haven't heard that the
  British colonial subjects in -- let's see, where are there still some?
  Bermuda? Cayman Islands? -- are all that miserable.
 
 
 I said *WAS*. A rape victim being healthy many years later doesnt mean
 she wasnt raped right ? Many arent going to stop hating bin laden 10 yrs
 down the road right ?
 
 Present colonial subjects being happy does not change the fact that
 (some) previous ones suffered.
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-09 Thread Nitin Garg

Right, she just continued to let the blood being sucked out of holes
made by her ancestors. Innocent little girl.


On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:07:53PM -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote:
 No, you're wrong again. The explorers, merchants and rulers all had a
 lot to do with colonization. The Queen Mum did not. Go back to school
 boy. And take a cold shower.
 Paul
 
 Nitin Garg wrote:
  
  Right and churchill (and many before him) was just the PM and the first
  colonizers were just businessmen and explorers, the british personnel in
  colonies were just poor sobs seeking employment far away from mother
  england. Nobody had anything todo with colonization and the aboriginals
  and red indians just happened to (almost) vanish. The riches of the
  colonies spontaneously moved to england on its own.
  
  On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:56:59PM -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote:
   The Queen Mum wasn't the ruler of anything and had nothing to do with
   colonization. She was the wife of the King. And she was a heroic and
   charming lady.
   Paul
  
   Nitin Garg wrote:
   
The whole world might not agree. She was the colonial ruler of a lot of
places which werent thrilled with the british rule :)
   
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 01:05:43PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Queen Mum,

  May she rest in peace. 

 There goes one of the true heroes of the 20th Century. She stood tall when
 her people needed her most. As England stood alone against the German bombs
 she rallied her people by word and example. Great Britain, alas the whole
 world, owes a debt, to her and Churchill. The civilized world owes a debt to
 our greatest ally, England. G-d save the Queen Mum. May she rest in peace.
 Burt Yust
 NYC
 USA
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
   -
   This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
   go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
   visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
  -
  This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
  go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
  visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-09 Thread Robert Woerner

I'd rather be ruled by the British Monarchy than by those who believe as you
seem to.  Give it a rest already.   Sheesh! :-)

Britain and the Allies saved the world from the likes of Hitler.

Red-blooded American and PROUD.

Robert
- Original Message -
From: Nitin Garg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 9:23 PM
Subject: Re: The Queen Mum


 On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:00:52PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  In a message dated 4/9/2002 7:29:56 PM Central Daylight Time,
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 
   All I am saying is, not the whole world thinks of the queen mum as
   heroic or charming or whatever. There are people to whom she was (and
   justifiably so to themselves) the symbol of their continuing misery.
 
  The majority of the colonies over which her husband was King-Emperor
are,
  today, independent nations. The Queen Mother outlasted the Empire.
 
  I haven't been keeping up with world news lately, but haven't heard that
the
  British colonial subjects in -- let's see, where are there still some?
  Bermuda? Cayman Islands? -- are all that miserable.
 

 I said *WAS*. A rape victim being healthy many years later doesnt mean
 she wasnt raped right ? Many arent going to stop hating bin laden 10 yrs
 down the road right ?

 Present colonial subjects being happy does not change the fact that
 (some) previous ones suffered.
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-09 Thread Ken Archer

Who was it that once said something to the effect that it's not what 
youth know, but rather that what they know just ain't so?

On Tuesday 09 April 2002 09:26 pm, Nitin Garg wrote:
 Right, she just continued to let the blood being sucked out of holes
 made by her ancestors. Innocent little girl.
-- 
Kenneth Archer, San Antonio, Texas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: The Queen Mum

2002-04-09 Thread J. C. O'Connell

KILL THIS THREAD.
IT DOESNT BELONG HERE!

JCO
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-09 Thread Nitin Garg

On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:23:44PM -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote:
 Much of the United States was once part of the British Empire, ditto
 Australia and Canada. I don't think any of us feel that our years as
 subjects of the crown deprived us in any way. 

Do red indians (native americans as they are now called) share the same
opinion ? and australian aborignals ?

 I think the same is true of many other former colonies, although a few
 of them may not be mature enough to realize it. Nor are some of their
 peoples.

This is probably a classic sign of a abuser who thinks the abused
actually needs it and he/she is doing them a favor. I wonder if
surviving families of those who died in the jalianwala bagh massacre
would like to goto Dyer's grave and say thank you for saving us to him
(yeah i know this didnt happen in mum's time but equivalent pain
happened in all reigns).
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-09 Thread Nitin Garg

On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:14:35PM -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote:
 Nitin Garg wrote:
  
  On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 04:39:59PM -0700, Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
Nitin wrote:
  
 
  
  Doesnt always work. Did the US govt say that to sept 11 and move on ?
 
 That has nothing to do with the death of a lady who was incidental to
 world politics. You are not thinking very clearly, Nitin.

It has if u bother to stop and think about what it was said in response
to. You dont always let go of something which happens saying oh, its
becuase of a heap of history. No one thinks bin laden was a victim and
pushed into terrorism (well maybe his supporters do). You hold him
RESPONSIBLE for what he did. You dont say well so and so things happened
in his life which made him do so but otherwise he is good man. So you
cant say hey she just happened to become queen and her ancestors did all
the colonization. She continued it and by that endorsed it. Even though
one is not responsible for what was done in past but one can become a
party to it depending upon how you choose to react to it. Some do
remember what your predecessors did and DO hold you responsible (you can
say its shouldnt be so, but if it is, it is). Sept 11 wouldnt have
happened if no one was like that. No one is going to land a plane in
buckingham palace but some do hold its present and past inhabitants
responsible for a lot (even if it was done passively).

  
  So while many may rightly feel loss at her death, there are others in
  the world who are, again rightly, not at all unhappy about her death.
 
 Only a mindless few.

Even if they indeed are few and are mindless, they exist and exist in
this world. Which is what i said to begin with. Not everyone is sad to
see her die. Also this is a dangerous classification to make. For eg, I
KNOW a fair fraction of indians dont like british in general (and
british authorities in particular). With a population of over a billion,
that is NOT FEW (Its more than the population of US itself if I
extrapolate from fractions I know). Second, calling them mindless is
only refusing to try to see WHY they might have such an opinion. And
that is only inviting disasters in future (like sept 11 was). One may
wipe out taliban once but what about 20yrs down the line when their
children grow up remembering the bombs that destroyed their lives ? Its
likely they will grow up hating a lot of things (of course its possible
to do something to prevent/control this).
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-09 Thread Nitin Garg

On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:04:39PM -0400, Robert Woerner wrote:
 I'd rather be ruled by the British Monarchy than by those who believe as you
 seem to.  Give it a rest already.   Sheesh! :-)

And what is it that i seem to believe ?

 
 Britain and the Allies saved the world from the likes of Hitler.
 

And that absolves them of everything ?
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: The Queen Mum

2002-04-09 Thread James Adams

I don't know what was arrogant about the original message, but I find the
mindless comments from Nitin offensive. Bob's message was a genuine and
heart felt comment on someone whom he felt significant enough to share a
personal farewell.

Whether you liked her Nitin is irrelevant, you are insignificant, you know
nothing about my country, you know nothing about her or her family. She made
a significant impact on the lives of  more people than you ever will. She
was dear to many peoples around the world, and she is being given the honour
and respect she deserves. She won't be forgotten, but what will your
memorial be? Very little I suspect, you will be go like an insignificant
fart in the wind. I was not going to say this, but were you born an asshole,
or did you have to take a course.
James
Unsubscribing.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-09 Thread Nitin Garg

Thats a pointless cliche which doesnt change anything about the innocent
little girl.


On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:47:48PM -0500, Ken Archer wrote:
 Who was it that once said something to the effect that it's not what 
 youth know, but rather that what they know just ain't so?
 
 On Tuesday 09 April 2002 09:26 pm, Nitin Garg wrote:
  Right, she just continued to let the blood being sucked out of holes
  made by her ancestors. Innocent little girl.
 -- 
 Kenneth Archer, San Antonio, Texas
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-09 Thread Otis Wright, Jr.

Just pull up your socks and send them nicely and pleasantly on their way.  We
did.  No need to get upset.  Just set your course and sail on.

Otis

Nitin Garg wrote:

 The whole world might not agree. She was the colonial ruler of a lot of
 places which werent thrilled with the british rule :)

 On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 01:05:43PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Queen Mum,
 
   May she rest in peace. 
 
  There goes one of the true heroes of the 20th Century. She stood tall when
  her people needed her most. As England stood alone against the German bombs
  she rallied her people by word and example. Great Britain, alas the whole
  world, owes a debt, to her and Churchill. The civilized world owes a debt to
  our greatest ally, England. G-d save the Queen Mum. May she rest in peace.
  Burt Yust
  NYC
  USA
  -
  This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
  go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
  visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-09 Thread Nitin Garg

Of course she made significant impact. Just that it was negative for some.
My memorial, impact or remembrance is irrelevant. A single insignificant
person never counts but a collection does. I am as small a fart (or
maybe even smaller) than you are but lots of small farts together can be
awfully stinking :)


On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 08:33:10PM -0700, James Adams wrote:
 I don't know what was arrogant about the original message, but I find the
 mindless comments from Nitin offensive. Bob's message was a genuine and
 heart felt comment on someone whom he felt significant enough to share a
 personal farewell.
 
 Whether you liked her Nitin is irrelevant, you are insignificant, you know
 nothing about my country, you know nothing about her or her family. She made
 a significant impact on the lives of  more people than you ever will. She
 was dear to many peoples around the world, and she is being given the honour
 and respect she deserves. She won't be forgotten, but what will your
 memorial be? Very little I suspect, you will be go like an insignificant
 fart in the wind. I was not going to say this, but were you born an asshole,
 or did you have to take a course.
 James
 Unsubscribing.
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-09 Thread Nitin Garg

And yes, i dont know anything about your country, about her personal
life or her family. That doenst change what happened to some colonial
regions and the opinion of some people there. Similarly, you know
nothing about my country and what people there went through. If you
think stating that not everyone considered her dear is being an asshole
then i rather be one :)



On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 08:33:10PM -0700, James Adams wrote:
 I don't know what was arrogant about the original message, but I find the
 mindless comments from Nitin offensive. Bob's message was a genuine and
 heart felt comment on someone whom he felt significant enough to share a
 personal farewell.
 
 Whether you liked her Nitin is irrelevant, you are insignificant, you know
 nothing about my country, you know nothing about her or her family. She made
 a significant impact on the lives of  more people than you ever will. She
 was dear to many peoples around the world, and she is being given the honour
 and respect she deserves. She won't be forgotten, but what will your
 memorial be? Very little I suspect, you will be go like an insignificant
 fart in the wind. I was not going to say this, but were you born an asshole,
 or did you have to take a course.
 James
 Unsubscribing.
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-09 Thread Otis Wright, Jr.

SICK?

Nitin Garg wrote:

 Right, she just continued to let the blood being sucked out of holes
 made by her ancestors. Innocent little girl.

 On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:07:53PM -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote:
  No, you're wrong again. The explorers, merchants and rulers all had a
  lot to do with colonization. The Queen Mum did not. Go back to school
  boy. And take a cold shower.
  Paul
 
  Nitin Garg wrote:
  
   Right and churchill (and many before him) was just the PM and the first
   colonizers were just businessmen and explorers, the british personnel in
   colonies were just poor sobs seeking employment far away from mother
   england. Nobody had anything todo with colonization and the aboriginals
   and red indians just happened to (almost) vanish. The riches of the
   colonies spontaneously moved to england on its own.
  
   On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:56:59PM -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote:
The Queen Mum wasn't the ruler of anything and had nothing to do with
colonization. She was the wife of the King. And she was a heroic and
charming lady.
Paul
   
Nitin Garg wrote:

 The whole world might not agree. She was the colonial ruler of a lot of
 places which werent thrilled with the british rule :)

 On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 01:05:43PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Queen Mum,
 
   May she rest in peace. 
 
  There goes one of the true heroes of the 20th Century. She stood tall 
when
  her people needed her most. As England stood alone against the German bombs
  she rallied her people by word and example. Great Britain, alas the whole
  world, owes a debt, to her and Churchill. The civilized world owes a debt 
to
  our greatest ally, England. G-d save the Queen Mum. May she rest in peace.
  Burt Yust
  NYC
  USA
  -
  This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
  go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
  visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
   -
   This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
   go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
   visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
  -
  This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
  go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
  visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: The Queen Mum

2002-04-09 Thread Nitin Garg

And there was nothing arrogant about the original message. Nor do I
think its mindless to (politely) add on a mailing list that not everyone
shares the sentiment.

ok, ok, no more on this :)


On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 08:33:10PM -0700, James Adams wrote:
 I don't know what was arrogant about the original message, but I find the
 mindless comments from Nitin offensive. Bob's message was a genuine and
 heart felt comment on someone whom he felt significant enough to share a
 personal farewell.
 
 Whether you liked her Nitin is irrelevant, you are insignificant, you know
 nothing about my country, you know nothing about her or her family. She made
 a significant impact on the lives of  more people than you ever will. She
 was dear to many peoples around the world, and she is being given the honour
 and respect she deserves. She won't be forgotten, but what will your
 memorial be? Very little I suspect, you will be go like an insignificant
 fart in the wind. I was not going to say this, but were you born an asshole,
 or did you have to take a course.
 James
 Unsubscribing.
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Pentax is what we have in common! (was RE: The Queen Mum )

2002-04-09 Thread Mark Erickson

James wrote:
I don't know what was arrogant about the original message, but I find the
mindless comments from Nitin offensive. Bob's message was a genuine and
heart felt comment on someone whom he felt significant enough to share a
personal farewell.

 [cut, snip]


What was arrogant about the original message was the assumption that we all
care to hear a heart felt comment about a member of the British royal
family on this list.  This is a mailing list about Pentax equipment and
photography.  We share a bond, but that doesn't mean that we agree (or
indeed should agree) about anything else.  Especially international history
and politics.

Obviously, some people here love the British Empire, and some hate the
British Empire.  But don't we all love Pentax gear?  Let's get back to what
bonds us together as an international community.

Mark

p.s., what's your favorite macro lens?
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .