Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions
It is usually, except in SuSE flavors (and we also used SLES at oldjob), pretty easy to match up rpms to a redhat version and more difficult in a debian or ubuntu environment. Both package management environments aren't the best (apt-/dpkg vs yum/rpm), though I think redhat gets the tip because apt-cache and dpkg --get-selections are just weird to anyone not used to them. When Debian is installed it's configured to point to the specific repository for that release, such as Wheezy, which I'm currently running. So every package I can see in the repository is a Wheezy package. It also seems that maybe you don't understand the Debian pkg mgmt system very well. There isn't a dpkg --get command, there's however dpkg -i which is similar to the rpm -i command to install a specific package and manually deal with any dependencies. apt is akin to yum in that it will attempt to install the package and any dependencies. Apt-get is the command you were thinking of. Aptitude provides more pkg. mgmt intelligence than apt and is the officially sanctioned package manager, which you didn't mention. apt-cache is for searching through the apt software package cache and getting package info. I rarely use it. For me, the pkg mgmt system played a huge factor in my distro choice. The APT package mgmt system and all its tools make so much sense to me. are so easy to use and useful. Crunchbang (Debian Wheezy w. Openbox) runs in less than a 150 MB and that makes me squeal w. joy! I guess that's what makes Linux so great, there's a flavor for everyone. ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions
I had a need for a small VM at my last job, for SSH forwarding. I bounced around between a few different distros, but I really liked both Mint and Crunchbang. I think it's likely I'd go with one of them if I were to build a Linux desktop/laptop. And this is coming from someone with a lot more RedHat/CentOS experience than with the Debian derivatives. Rich On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 12:50 AM Mike C. mconno...@gmail.com wrote: It is usually, except in SuSE flavors (and we also used SLES at oldjob), pretty easy to match up rpms to a redhat version and more difficult in a debian or ubuntu environment. Both package management environments aren't the best (apt-/dpkg vs yum/rpm), though I think redhat gets the tip because apt-cache and dpkg --get-selections are just weird to anyone not used to them. When Debian is installed it's configured to point to the specific repository for that release, such as Wheezy, which I'm currently running. So every package I can see in the repository is a Wheezy package. It also seems that maybe you don't understand the Debian pkg mgmt system very well. There isn't a dpkg --get command, there's however dpkg -i which is similar to the rpm -i command to install a specific package and manually deal with any dependencies. apt is akin to yum in that it will attempt to install the package and any dependencies. Apt-get is the command you were thinking of. Aptitude provides more pkg. mgmt intelligence than apt and is the officially sanctioned package manager, which you didn't mention. apt-cache is for searching through the apt software package cache and getting package info. I rarely use it. For me, the pkg mgmt system played a huge factor in my distro choice. The APT package mgmt system and all its tools make so much sense to me. are so easy to use and useful. Crunchbang (Debian Wheezy w. Openbox) runs in less than a 150 MB and that makes me squeal w. joy! I guess that's what makes Linux so great, there's a flavor for everyone. ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions
What is the intended purpose of you soon to be new Linux box ? -pete On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Jim Webb jimwebb...@gmail.com wrote: I'm going to start using Linux again. I'm interested in a run of the mill distribution that works well and isn't cutting edge. What do you suggest? ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions
I have been using Mint with XFCE as a desktop for many years and across two jobs. I tend to work with about a dozen desktops (workspaces) and the behavior of XFCE suits me, or I've just become accustomed to it. Any instability has historically been due to a specific hardware component/driver. I also support customers that typically are running RHEL with a few Debian installs too, and have a number of VMs running varieties of versions of Debian and Centos with different versions of our software. (opennms.org/com, we do open source enterprise network managment software) Not a big fan of systemd for the dubious individual heading it and their approach/vision, but change is. We tend to favor redhat-based distros mostly because it reflects our customer base. They use it under heavy loads in large environments and it has been very stable. Maybe the largest differentiating factor I have noticed is that binary packages *I use* tend to come in rpms more than deb. It is usually, except in SuSE flavors (and we also used SLES at oldjob), pretty easy to match up rpms to a redhat version and more difficult in a debian or ubuntu environment. Both package management environments aren't the best (apt-/dpkg vs yum/rpm), though I think redhat gets the tip because apt-cache and dpkg --get-selections are just weird to anyone not used to them. A lot of this is very conditional and depends on what you're doing with linux. I had a coworker at oldjob that would buid the most minimal BSD and tiny kernel he could. I also had another that did similarly with Arch. Part of their enjoyment of *nix was they could do that and accepted the difficulties (or lack of) that came with those approaches. I'm not a fan of extra cruft, and vanilla installs come with plenty, but not to the point that I wanted to create a custom install approach. Just put together a small, low-power desktop based on the ASRock N3700-ITX (6W TDP) with Mint 17.2 and am in a holding pattern for Intel to release a Skylake video driver for Linux. Might be a good time to try other distros/desktops and see how they do with the hardware until drivers are available. -- Ken PGP Key Fingerprint 7F29 C36C 4607 8C14 C82D 5DEA 1C1D F5D9 DBA0 F9AF ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions
I've been running and administering different versions (stable and testing) of vanilla Debian and Debian derived distros for about a decade. There are more than 300 Debian derived distros with about half of that number still active today. One that I've been running very happily for the past few years is Crunchbang It runs the Openbox Window Manager. It's a super light, no fluff, fast distro! I don't know too many people that run a full fledged Linux distro on a $300 netbook circa 2011. But I do. Debian is nothing if not cutting edge and super stable/reliable. They test for years before an distro upgrade is released. Apt is a great package manager with user friendly tools such as Synaptic and Aptitude for software installation and management without any fluff. Debian also has a huge software repository and you can pull from free, contrib of non-free repositories. If that's something that matters to you. The current version, Debian 8, Jessie , was released in April 2015. Systemd is the default init system. Debian also supports a wide array of system architecture. lastly, Debian also has a social contract, a great community, lots of support, docs, tutorials, and the versions are named after Toy Story characters. Yeah, I'm a Debianhead for life. It's always treated me right, so no need to try anything else. http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/05/debian-8-linuxs-most-reliable-distro-makes-its-biggest-change-since-1993/ https://crunchbangplusplus.org/about/ Cheers!, Mike ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions
I tend to use a LTS Mint at home, and CentOS at work. The advantage of Mint is that it comes with packages that will play DVDs or mp3 files. You can do this for CentOS, but you have to find third-party packages to install. The advantage of CentOS is that it's super stable. Which can also mean that you can have a problem installing third party software after a few years. For example, the newest release of chrome won't run on a CentOS 6 system, because it demands newer versions of some libraries. Ali ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions
Jim == Jim Webb jimwebb...@gmail.com writes: Jim I'm just considering running a desktop on my home network. I've been using Gnome Ubuntu 14.04.x on most of my desktops, which is pretty easily tunable (about 6 settings using Tweak Tool) to have a reasonable traditional-ish desktop experience, not like that Unity Crap(TM) ;-) -- Russell Senior, President russ...@personaltelco.net ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions
I may as well pitch in about my Linux since the experience has been surprisingly good. I've got a 2008 Thinkpad R500 which is running Linux Mint 17, I'm still using 17.1 Rebecca to avoid being too cutting-edge. I'm using the Xfce version, and it runs very light/fast while still having everything I'd want in a desktop. The computer runs as though it is five years newer. The installer is so good, I didn't need to tinker with multimedia. I haven't had any major problems, and there seems to be a great support community and good documentation. :Brian: ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, King Beowulf wrote: On 08/19/2015 05:51 PM, Nathan Williams wrote: I'll echo the endorsement for CentOS 7. It's reasonably new enough to offer new-ish packages for desktop use, while also being the gold standard for stability and long term support (EOL in June 2024). Add in EPEL and elrepo for extras, and you've got a pretty solid system that you won't have to totally replace every 6 months. CentOS is no longer an independent project, more like a test bed for Redhat. This is misleading. While the CentOS project's governance has changed a bit of late, the CentOS distribution is doing no more and no less than it always has: rebuilding the Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) source RPMs in such a way as to mimic as closely as possible the upstream RHEL release. If you know of specific details how the governance has changed *the end CentOS product*, I'd like to hear them. Being supported for 10 years is great for a server, not so much for end-user desktops. For a desktop, some system files just can't be upgraded past a certain point without compromising system stability. While this is true, the assessment is incomplete. There are a few variables in play: * How long has the CentOS release been available before you install it? If you install CentOS 6, which has been around for several years, then you'll end up with older software. CentOS 7, which is much newer, still has a couple years of being close to current. * What's the distribution doing? You have to ask that question whether the target platform is a server or a desktop. If the desktop is doing work that requires the latest software, that's one thing. If someone is just running a few terminal windows and ssh-ing to other machines, an older distribution might be just fine. -- Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com 45°38' N, 122°6' W___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 22:17 -0700, King Beowulf wrote: On 08/19/2015 05:51 PM, Nathan Williams wrote: I'll echo the endorsement for CentOS 7. It's reasonably new enough to offer new-ish packages for desktop use, while also being the gold standard for stability and long term support (EOL in June 2024). Add in EPEL and elrepo for extras, and you've got a pretty solid system that you won't have to totally replace every 6 months. CentOS is no longer an independent project, more like a test bed for Redhat. I'd dispute this phrasing (specifically in re: independence). Red Hat is indeed a major contributor/supporter, with a majority of seats on the governance board, but CentOS is and remains a community led/developed distribution, certainly to a greater extent than e.g. Ubuntu is independent of Canonical. I have yet to see Ubuntus lack of independence mentioned as a reason to avoid Ubuntu as an end-user. As for being a test-bed, it's certainly a more innovative CentOS community than in the past, but most of that work is going on in SIGs, so doesn't have a lot of impact for someone using core CentOS and not one of the SIG-derived products like RDO, Atomic or the Cloud images. Being supported for 10 years is great for a server, not so much for end-user desktops. For a desktop, some system files just can't be upgraded past a certain point without compromising system stability. Agreed. I'd expect a desktop user to upgrade distros on average every 3 -5 years, basically following typical hardware upgrade lifecycles. In addition, it's got that new-fangled systemd init system that all the major distros are going to be on within the next year or so, so you won't end up having a really core piece of the system be different from what everyone else is running (better supportability if you need help down the road). Cheers, Nathan W the OP may want to hold off on any distro jumping on systemd. While the issues and controversy concerning systemd may not mean much to end users, it does to DEVELOPERS. You know, the guys and gals that create the software that creates a linux distribution and the various programs we want to use. I knew I'd regret mentioning this as an advantage the moment I sent it, and I'm guessing from the tone of the reply that it struck a nerve. If so, I'm sorry, and I sympathize. But, given the broad range of distros who are consolidating around systemd, it seems reasonable to conclude that the majority of the developers who do build linux distributions are in favor. As you noted, it probably doesn't matter much to an end-user either way. What does typically matter quite a lot to end-users, and the reason I mentioned it at all, is the availability of support for issues. Since an undeniable majority of Linux users either already are, or shortly will be using systemd-based distros, I figured I'd mention it as a point in favor (sticking with the herd), but that's truly the limit of the degree of the intended endorsement. Personally, I'm pretty ambiguous about it overall (migrating was rather unexciting, both for workstation and servers), though I'm happy for many of the new resource-control capabilities that the integration with cgroups has made available to me as an administrator. Regards, Nathan W -Ed ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions
I've been using Arch Linux with the cinnamon desktop. Works great once you get it installed. I used the guide in Linux Voice magazine. I suggest reading some of those magazines, and taking a look at distrowatch.com . As mostly a user now I find Linux Mint (LTS versions) with the Mate desktop manager works great. For servers I've started moving to Debian. I started with Redhat 3.0.3, moved up the version chain with them for awhile, then did Fedora, finally CentOS (and with a smattering of the other Redhat based spin offs.) Rod -- On 08/19/2015 07:38 AM, Jim Webb wrote: I'm going to start using Linux again. I'm interested in a run of the mill distribution that works well and isn't cutting edge. What do you suggest? ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Jim Webb wrote: It's good to see that you are still on the list. You are a fervent supporter of PLUG. Why Slackware? Jim, 1. It stays far back from the bleeding edges. 2. It is suitable for modern and older systems. 3. You can install just as much as you want or need; highly customizable. 4. Great support on mail lists. linuxquestions.org, and elsewhere. 5. A super group of developers/supporters who provide Slackware packages for just about anything not included in the base distribution. Look at www.slackbuilds.org. 6. More stable than the ground on which we live. 7. Patches when needed to remove vulnerabilities. 8. Distribution upgrades every now and then, not on a fixed schedule. 9. One of the original linux distributions and still going strong. Rich ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions
It's good to see that you are still on the list. You are a fervent supporter of PLUG. Why Slackware? On Aug 19, 2015 9:40 AM, Rich Shepard rshep...@appl-ecosys.com wrote: On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Jim Webb wrote: I'm going to start using Linux again. I'm interested in a run of the mill distribution that works well and isn't cutting edge. What do you suggest? Slackware. Rich ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions
On 08/19/2015 07:40 AM, Rich Shepard wrote: On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Jim Webb wrote: I'm going to start using Linux again. I'm interested in a run of the mill distribution that works well and isn't cutting edge. What do you suggest? Slackware. Rich Indeed. Slackware. http://www.slackware.com http://www.slackbuilds.org http://www.studioware.org http://docs.slackware.com/ -Ed ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions
I remember you as well. Didn't you use to run a Linux page somewhere? Tell me more rewarding EPEL and ElRopo. I've been following from a distance and haven't heard of these entities. Yo On Aug 19, 2015 10:22 AM, Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com wrote: On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Jim Webb wrote: I'm going to start using Linux again. I'm interested in a run of the mill distribution that works well and isn't cutting edge. What do you suggest? My reading of your request is that you'd prefer stability over having the latest and greatest features. With that in mind... Ubuntu is easy to install and has gobs of packages available. If you stick to one of the LTS (long-term support) releases, you won't have to upgrade very often. CentOS is (to my mind) the gold standard for distributions with long-term stability. You'll have to learn how to add additional repositories like EPEL or ELRepo for access to a wider variety of packages, but it's not too difficult. CentOS 7 is relatively new and will likely outlast your current hardware. :-) Debian stable isn't quite as easy to install as Ubuntu, but it's rock solid and easy to manage. Some engineers at my last company absolutely loved Linux Mint (as others in this thread obviously do as well), but I don't have any hands-on experience with it. -- Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com 45°38' N, 122°6' W ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions
I recommend Mint Linux. 1) So easy to install even a management person could do it. 2) Derived from the stable and proven Debian Linux distribution. 3) Codecs are included in the base install. Multimedia support is excellent. 4) Libre Office is part of the base install. Note: I have used Linux and OpenBSD as my exclusive desktop since 2000. I have never had a windows computer. I went from DOS 3.3 to SuSE 6.4 ( I briefly used Red Hat 6.0 and Mandrake) On Aug 19, 2015 7:39 AM, Jim Webb jimwebb...@gmail.com wrote: I'm going to start using Linux again. I'm interested in a run of the mill distribution that works well and isn't cutting edge. What do you suggest? ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Jim Webb wrote: I'm going to start using Linux again. I'm interested in a run of the mill distribution that works well and isn't cutting edge. What do you suggest? Slackware. Rich ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions
Rich, I just looked at the Slackware site and I'm concerned that they haven't done much since 2013. I used to use Redhat in the past. Jim On Aug 19, 2015 9:40 AM, Rich Shepard rshep...@appl-ecosys.com wrote: On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Jim Webb wrote: I'm going to start using Linux again. I'm interested in a run of the mill distribution that works well and isn't cutting edge. What do you suggest? Slackware. Rich ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions
As mostly a user now I find Linux Mint (LTS versions) with the Mate desktop manager works great. For servers I've started moving to Debian. I started with Redhat 3.0.3, moved up the version chain with them for awhile, then did Fedora, finally CentOS (and with a smattering of the other Redhat based spin offs.) Rod -- On 08/19/2015 07:38 AM, Jim Webb wrote: I'm going to start using Linux again. I'm interested in a run of the mill distribution that works well and isn't cutting edge. What do you suggest? ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions
I used Mint some and liked it a lot. Not as a real desktop though, just for a lightweight VM. For the OP, it could be helpful for people to hear some more specifics about what you want to do with the box. Is this for a home desktop system, are you a developer, what is the scenario you're using it for? What kind of hardware are you running it on? For my $0.02 I think something like Mint could be good, as well as Ubuntu or CentOS. Some of these options have live images that you can download and boot off of to try them for yourself. I've used Debian also and thought it was a decent desktop, although I really wasn't doing multimedia on it. I think Slackware would be near the bottom on my list but maybe that's just ignorance, I haven't used it in a long time. Rich On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 8:22 AM Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com wrote: On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Jim Webb wrote: I'm going to start using Linux again. I'm interested in a run of the mill distribution that works well and isn't cutting edge. What do you suggest? My reading of your request is that you'd prefer stability over having the latest and greatest features. With that in mind... Ubuntu is easy to install and has gobs of packages available. If you stick to one of the LTS (long-term support) releases, you won't have to upgrade very often. CentOS is (to my mind) the gold standard for distributions with long-term stability. You'll have to learn how to add additional repositories like EPEL or ELRepo for access to a wider variety of packages, but it's not too difficult. CentOS 7 is relatively new and will likely outlast your current hardware. :-) Debian stable isn't quite as easy to install as Ubuntu, but it's rock solid and easy to manage. Some engineers at my last company absolutely loved Linux Mint (as others in this thread obviously do as well), but I don't have any hands-on experience with it. -- Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com 45°38' N, 122°6' W___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
[PLUG] Linux distributions
I'm going to start using Linux again. I'm interested in a run of the mill distribution that works well and isn't cutting edge. What do you suggest? ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Jim Webb wrote: I'm going to start using Linux again. I'm interested in a run of the mill distribution that works well and isn't cutting edge. What do you suggest? My reading of your request is that you'd prefer stability over having the latest and greatest features. With that in mind... Ubuntu is easy to install and has gobs of packages available. If you stick to one of the LTS (long-term support) releases, you won't have to upgrade very often. CentOS is (to my mind) the gold standard for distributions with long-term stability. You'll have to learn how to add additional repositories like EPEL or ELRepo for access to a wider variety of packages, but it's not too difficult. CentOS 7 is relatively new and will likely outlast your current hardware. :-) Debian stable isn't quite as easy to install as Ubuntu, but it's rock solid and easy to manage. Some engineers at my last company absolutely loved Linux Mint (as others in this thread obviously do as well), but I don't have any hands-on experience with it. -- Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com 45°38' N, 122°6' W___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Jim Webb wrote: Rich, I just looked at the Slackware site and I'm concerned that they haven't done much since 2013. I used to use Redhat in the past. Jim, I used Red Hat from 4.0 (1997) to 7.1 (2003) and Slackware since then. I don't recall when 14.1 (the current distribution version) was released, but there have been a ton of patches since then. 14.2 or 15.0 is supposedly almost ready for prime time, but I don't follow the development, just use it for everything I need. Many distributions want to upgrade versions frequently. While I suppose they have their reasons for doing so, I don't know how necessary that is. Pat and crew put out patches as needed to remove vulnerabilities. I use slackpkg every Friday to check for updates on installed packages here; I have them from 3 repositories. So the same distribution number for a couple of years does not mean the distribution is rusty, corroded, or collecting dust. :-) Rich ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Jim Webb wrote: I remember you as well. Didn't you use to run a Linux page somewhere? I used to edit Computer Bits, the local computer magazine. That may be what you remember. Tell me more rewarding EPEL and ElRopo. I've been following from a distance and haven't heard of these entities. EPEL and ELRepo are repositories of packages that work with Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) and its workalikes: CentOS, Scientific Linux, etc. * ELRepo focuses on supporting hardware (wi-fi, video, networking): http://elrepo.org/tiki/About * EPEL provides a range of packages: development, administration, networking: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL Even with those repositories, the amount of software available to CentOS (etc) is dwarfed by that available via Ubuntu or Debian. But if CentOS has the packages you want, you'll find it extremely stable. -- Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com 45°38' N, 122°6' W___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 08:16:39AM -0700, Nat Taylor wrote: I've been using Arch Linux with the cinnamon desktop. Works great once you get it installed. I used the guide in Linux Voice magazine. I suggest reading some of those magazines, and taking a look at distrowatch.com . As mostly a user now I find Linux Mint (LTS versions) with the Mate desktop manager works great. For servers I've started moving to Debian. My terse reply of Not Arch was made before seeing this message. The OP wrote isn't cutting edge. I don't know of a distribution that is less cutting edge than Arch. How they manage to keep it organized and well functioning is a mystery. But they do. And I get the very current versions of the photo and video editors that drew me to it. But if you're not looking for that level of upstream tracking, stay away. OK, pacman is also a very excellent package manager. I'm going to start using Linux again. I'm interested in a run of the mill distribution that works well and isn't cutting edge. What do you suggest? ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug -- Michael Rasmussen, Portland Oregon Be Appropriate Follow Your Curiosity If you only knock long enough and loud enough at the gate you are bound to wake up somebody. ~ Henry Wadsworth Longfellow ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:38:08AM -0500, Jim Webb wrote: I'm going to start using Linux again. I'm interested in a run of the mill distribution that works well and isn't cutting edge. What do you suggest? Not Arch -- Michael Rasmussen, Portland Oregon Be Appropriate Follow Your Curiosity Success is moving from one failure to another with great enthusiasm. ~ Winston Churchill as quoted by Robert Rodriguez https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAThPRDDKxk ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions
Jim: I use Linux Mint for some multimedia stuff, stuff like Audacity for audio recording, etc. It comes with all the CODECs, etc. I also often set up any friends who are trying Linux for the first time with Linux Mint. But, I haven't found Linux Mint to be terribly stable. For industrial control system projects or anything that I really care about, I use Slackware. I have found it to be extremely stable. Slackware is a very conservative distribution and uses a standard kernel as released by the kernel developers. Slackware makes more than one sites list of top 10 distributions. Distrowatch.com http://distrowatch.com/dwres.php?resource=major comments that, if you learn Red Hat, you'll know Red Hat, but if you learn Slackware, you'll know Linux. It also comments that Slackware is one of the least buggy distributions available today. Wayne On 08/19/2015 07:38 AM, Jim Webb wrote: I'm going to start using Linux again. I'm interested in a run of the mill distribution that works well and isn't cutting edge. What do you suggest? ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Michael Rasmussen mich...@jamhome.us wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 08:16:39AM -0700, Nat Taylor wrote: I've been using Arch Linux with the cinnamon desktop. Works great once you get it installed. I used the guide in Linux Voice magazine. I suggest reading some of those magazines, and taking a look at distrowatch.com . As mostly a user now I find Linux Mint (LTS versions) with the Mate desktop manager works great. For servers I've started moving to Debian. My terse reply of Not Arch was made before seeing this message. The OP wrote isn't cutting edge. I don't know of a distribution that is less cutting edge than Arch. How they manage to keep it organized and well functioning is a mystery. But they do. And I get the very current versions of the photo and video editors that drew me to it. But if you're not looking for that level of upstream tracking, stay away. OK, pacman is also a very excellent package manager. Looks like it's been 3 years since I installed Arch on this box, never had a problem with an upgrade, although it looks like there are only 12 packages i've installed from the AUR, all but three of them done by hand (did just install yaourt recently for a more automated process) I guess it is cutting edge though, I figured it was right up there with slackware for ease of installation, and learning about linux while you install. It's always been stable for me. I think I started with mandrake 5 and debian woody, moved to ubuntu for a while, then deserted and hopped distros for a while before landing on Mint then Arch Mint might be a good choice for low effort install, as would Ubuntu LTS. I didn't desire an ubuntu flame war so I didn't mention it. I'm going to start using Linux again. I'm interested in a run of the mill distribution that works well and isn't cutting edge. What do you suggest? ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug -- Michael Rasmussen, Portland Oregon Be Appropriate Follow Your Curiosity If you only knock long enough and loud enough at the gate you are bound to wake up somebody. ~ Henry Wadsworth Longfellow ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 01:56:53PM -0700, Nat Taylor wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Michael Rasmussen mich...@jamhome.us wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 08:16:39AM -0700, Nat Taylor wrote: I've been using Arch Linux with the cinnamon desktop. Works great once you get it installed. I used the guide in Linux Voice magazine. I suggest reading some of those magazines, and taking a look at distrowatch.com . As mostly a user now I find Linux Mint (LTS versions) with the Mate desktop manager works great. For servers I've started moving to Debian. My terse reply of Not Arch was made before seeing this message. The OP wrote isn't cutting edge. I don't know of a distribution that is less cutting edge than Arch. How they manage to keep it organized and well functioning is a mystery. But they do. And I get the very current versions of the photo and video editors that drew me to it. But if you're not looking for that level of upstream tracking, stay away. OK, pacman is also a very excellent package manager. Looks like it's been 3 years since I installed Arch on this box, never had a problem with an upgrade, although it looks like there are only 12 packages i've installed from the AUR, all but three of them done by hand (did just install yaourt recently for a more automated process) I guess it is cutting edge though, I figured it was right up there with slackware for ease of installation, and learning about linux while you install. It's always been stable for me. I think I started with mandrake 5 and debian woody, moved to ubuntu for a while, then deserted and hopped distros for a while before landing on Mint then Arch Everything you say agrees completely with my experience. As an added point my last distro before Arch was Kubuntu LTS and it was a much bigger PTIA to maintain. My response was based on the OP's stated preferences. No matter how good Arch is it's not a match for his described target. -- Michael Rasmussen, Portland Oregon Be Appropriate Follow Your Curiosity The fastest way to become rich is to socialize with the poor; the fastest way to become poor is to socialize with the rich. ~ Nassim Taleb ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions
I'll echo the endorsement for CentOS 7. It's reasonably new enough to offer new-ish packages for desktop use, while also being the gold standard for stability and long term support (EOL in June 2024). Add in EPEL and elrepo for extras, and you've got a pretty solid system that you won't have to totally replace every 6 months. In addition, it's got that new-fangled systemd init system that all the major distros are going to be on within the next year or so, so you won't end up having a really core piece of the system be different from what everyone else is running (better supportability if you need help down the road). Cheers, Nathan W On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 5:04 PM Michael Rasmussen mich...@jamhome.us wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 01:56:53PM -0700, Nat Taylor wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Michael Rasmussen mich...@jamhome.us wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 08:16:39AM -0700, Nat Taylor wrote: I've been using Arch Linux with the cinnamon desktop. Works great once you get it installed. I used the guide in Linux Voice magazine. I suggest reading some of those magazines, and taking a look at distrowatch.com . As mostly a user now I find Linux Mint (LTS versions) with the Mate desktop manager works great. For servers I've started moving to Debian. My terse reply of Not Arch was made before seeing this message. The OP wrote isn't cutting edge. I don't know of a distribution that is less cutting edge than Arch. How they manage to keep it organized and well functioning is a mystery. But they do. And I get the very current versions of the photo and video editors that drew me to it. But if you're not looking for that level of upstream tracking, stay away. OK, pacman is also a very excellent package manager. Looks like it's been 3 years since I installed Arch on this box, never had a problem with an upgrade, although it looks like there are only 12 packages i've installed from the AUR, all but three of them done by hand (did just install yaourt recently for a more automated process) I guess it is cutting edge though, I figured it was right up there with slackware for ease of installation, and learning about linux while you install. It's always been stable for me. I think I started with mandrake 5 and debian woody, moved to ubuntu for a while, then deserted and hopped distros for a while before landing on Mint then Arch Everything you say agrees completely with my experience. As an added point my last distro before Arch was Kubuntu LTS and it was a much bigger PTIA to maintain. My response was based on the OP's stated preferences. No matter how good Arch is it's not a match for his described target. -- Michael Rasmussen, Portland Oregon Be Appropriate Follow Your Curiosity The fastest way to become rich is to socialize with the poor; the fastest way to become poor is to socialize with the rich. ~ Nassim Taleb ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions
On 08/19/2015 05:51 PM, Nathan Williams wrote: I'll echo the endorsement for CentOS 7. It's reasonably new enough to offer new-ish packages for desktop use, while also being the gold standard for stability and long term support (EOL in June 2024). Add in EPEL and elrepo for extras, and you've got a pretty solid system that you won't have to totally replace every 6 months. CentOS is no longer an independent project, more like a test bed for Redhat. Being supported for 10 years is great for a server, not so much for end-user desktops. For a desktop, some system files just can't be upgraded past a certain point without compromising system stability. In addition, it's got that new-fangled systemd init system that all the major distros are going to be on within the next year or so, so you won't end up having a really core piece of the system be different from what everyone else is running (better supportability if you need help down the road). Cheers, Nathan W the OP may want to hold off on any distro jumping on systemd. While the issues and controversy concerning systemd may not mean much to end users, it does to DEVELOPERS. You know, the guys and gals that create the software that creates a linux distribution and the various programs we want to use. -Ed ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions concern...
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Michael Robinson plu...@robinson-west.comwrote: I run CentOS 5.3, I try to keep updated because it's CentOS and CentOS sadly is way behind as far as Linux distributions go. People who run CentOS want something that just plain works and they don't expect to reinstall their operating system every 6 months or sooner. Ubuntu seems to be the most popular Linux distribution for desktops and it seems to be more current, but I'm not sure I like Ubuntu. I don't like having to maintain 2 different Linux distributions. Games like Dirk Dashing Secret Agent noticeably don't work quite right on CentOS. The latest release of Dirk Dashing doesn't seem to work at all on CentOS, I am not sure why. Where is Linux going in the future? What is getting the most attention right now across the board in general? Wine and ReactOS still have a long ways to go. Dirk Dashing is a native Linux program, but it doesn't work equally well on all Linux distributions. Are the various Linux distributions, enterprise and desktop editions, going to get closer in time features wise? Is there going to be a 2.8.xyz kernel soon? The kernels that CentOS uses stock are quite old as far as the 2.6 branch goes. I am using 2.6.18 and the current kernel is like 2.6.27 or something. In CentOS, the mesa drivers seem to be ancient. Graphics support in CentOS seems to be weak even if you have updated as far as you can. I'm wondering when CentOS 6 is going to come out? Enterprise Linux Distributions are supposed to be for people who need a system that just works. But do these distributions have to be so far behind the bleeding edge? I'm surprised there aren't repositories for CentOS to make it more bleeding edge so that you don't have to maintain a whole entire different Linux distribution. ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug You have to decide what you want your machine to do and what you value more. If you value something super stable and not bleeding edge then something like CentOS is a good bet. Slackware is the same in many respects although that project isn't beholden to an upstream distro for updates in the vein of CentOS. I really stayed away from the Ubuntu train only because when I first tried is many many releases ago it just wasn't my thing. I have run more recent releases to play with and I do find it has really matured and supports all the things that I want to run/do. I am currently running Fedora 11 though and have found it to be stable, easy to work with and prompt with updates. So you're at the cross roads. Move to something else or stick with something you're familiar with. Unfortunately with the way open source and it's dependency and code re-use goes (which I find to be a good thing) .. changes with games and such aren't going to work on a distro that doesn't release the latest and greatest graphics updates. Drew- ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions concern...
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Michael Robinsonplu...@robinson-west.com wrote: I run CentOS 5.3, I try to keep updated because it's CentOS and CentOS sadly is way behind as far as Linux distributions go. People who run CentOS want something that just plain works and they don't expect to reinstall their operating system every 6 months or sooner. Ubuntu seems to be the most popular Linux distribution for desktops and it seems to be more current, but I'm not sure I like Ubuntu. I don't like having to maintain 2 different Linux distributions. Well, You could always use the LTS version of both server and desktop. snipped from website Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Desktop: Released April 2008 and maintained until April 2011 – ideal for large deployments. Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Server: Released April 2008 and maintained until April 2013 – ideal for large deployments Games like Dirk Dashing Secret Agent noticeably don't work quite right on CentOS. The latest release of Dirk Dashing doesn't seem to work at all on CentOS, I am not sure why. Where is Linux going in the future? What is getting the most attention right now across the board in general? Wine and ReactOS still have a long ways to go. Dirk Dashing is a native Linux program, but it doesn't work equally well on all Linux distributions. Are the various Linux distributions, enterprise and desktop editions, going to get closer in time features wise? Is there going to be a 2.8.xyz kernel soon? The kernels that CentOS uses stock are quite old as far as the 2.6 branch goes. I am using 2.6.18 and the current kernel is like 2.6.27 or something. In CentOS, the mesa drivers seem to be ancient. Graphics support in CentOS seems to be weak even if you have updated as far as you can. I'm wondering when CentOS 6 is going to come out? Enterprise Linux Distributions are supposed to be for people who need a system that just works. But do these distributions have to be so far behind the bleeding edge? I'm surprised there aren't repositories for CentOS to make it more bleeding edge so that you don't have to maintain a whole entire different Linux distribution. ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions concern...
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 6:02 AM, Larry Brigman larry.brig...@gmail.comwrote: On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Michael Robinsonplu...@robinson-west.com wrote: I run CentOS 5.3, I try to keep updated because it's CentOS and CentOS sadly is way behind as far as Linux distributions go. People who run CentOS want something that just plain works and they don't expect to reinstall their operating system every 6 months or sooner. Ubuntu seems to be the most popular Linux distribution for desktops and it seems to be more current, but I'm not sure I like Ubuntu. I don't like having to maintain 2 different Linux distributions. Well, You could always use the LTS version of both server and desktop. snipped from website Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Desktop: Released April 2008 and maintained until April 2011 – ideal for large deployments. Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Server: Released April 2008 and maintained until April 2013 – ideal for large deployments One of the nice advantages of CentOS piggy-backing on RHEL is that it is supported for what seems like forever. There is still a stable release of CentOS 3 with backports and updates. For these kind of distributions there should not be a 3 or 5 year cut off since the systems they are used to build will be running for much longer and need to be extremely stable. When you run CentOS you should thinking about uptime. (I wonder what distro google uses... ) ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions concern...
will be running for much longer and need to be extremely stable. When you run CentOS you should thinking about uptime. (I wonder what distro google uses... ) I brought a ubuntu system to a google office to offload a few gig of video files. I'll boot our gobuntu cd will be able to read your raid and write to the FS in our data center. That's all I know. I will let the reader extrapolate. -- Carl K ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions concern...
On Wed, September 2, 2009 8:53 am, Dan Colish wrote: On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 6:02 AM, Larry Brigman larry.brig...@gmail.comwrote: On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Michael Robinsonplu...@robinson-west.com wrote: I run CentOS 5.3, I try to keep updated because it's CentOS and CentOS sadly is way behind as far as Linux distributions go. -- snip -- One of the nice advantages of CentOS piggy-backing on RHEL is that it is supported for what seems like forever. There is still a stable release of CentOS 3 with backports and updates. For these kind of distributions there should not be a 3 or 5 year cut off since the systems they are used to build will be running for much longer and need to be extremely stable. When you run CentOS you should thinking about uptime. (I wonder what distro google uses... ) Google is large enough that using it's own distribution could make economic sense -- since it's not distributing it 'out of house' I suspect that it could even keep it's own changes private, if it wanted to. But that's just supposition -- I'd like to know too. -- Tim Wescott Control systems and communications consulting http://www.wescottdesign.com Land line: 503.631.7815 Cell: 503.349.8432 ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions concern...
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Dan Colishdcol...@gmail.com wrote: run CentOS you should thinking about uptime. (I wonder what distro google uses... ) I was under the impression that Google largely uses its own customized Linux distro, though I'm not sure it can be called a distro if it isn't distributed ... in any case, I think Google's Linux is its own thing. Michael M. -- Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual. --Thomas Jefferson ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions concern...
As a former Googler I can say we did use a custom Ubuntu called Goobuntu. No real secret sauce to it. Just bundled with some tools we used in house of course I can't say what because of that darned NDA :) Drew On 9/2/09, Tim Wescott t...@wescottdesign.com wrote: On Wed, September 2, 2009 8:53 am, Dan Colish wrote: On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 6:02 AM, Larry Brigman larry.brig...@gmail.comwrote: On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Michael Robinsonplu...@robinson-west.com wrote: I run CentOS 5.3, I try to keep updated because it's CentOS and CentOS sadly is way behind as far as Linux distributions go. -- snip -- One of the nice advantages of CentOS piggy-backing on RHEL is that it is supported for what seems like forever. There is still a stable release of CentOS 3 with backports and updates. For these kind of distributions there should not be a 3 or 5 year cut off since the systems they are used to build will be running for much longer and need to be extremely stable. When you run CentOS you should thinking about uptime. (I wonder what distro google uses... ) Google is large enough that using it's own distribution could make economic sense -- since it's not distributing it 'out of house' I suspect that it could even keep it's own changes private, if it wanted to. But that's just supposition -- I'd like to know too. -- Tim Wescott Control systems and communications consulting http://www.wescottdesign.com Land line: 503.631.7815 Cell: 503.349.8432 ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug -- Sent from my mobile device ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions concern...
Where is Linux going in the future? Well, I'm pretty sure a direction it's *not* going is toward One Distribution to Bind Them All, though Ubuntu is about as close as it gets. We're a very fractured community. If something seems works well one one distro, it's likely to be taken up by the others, but if we wanted to run the same thing everyone else is running, we wouldn't be using Linux to begin with. So why do you run Linux? Because you want to keep your skills sharp? Because you like the flexibility? For the freedom? Whatever it is, there's probably a distro that's best for those reasons. CentOS/RHEL is meant to run on servers. If you want to stick with the Red Hat paradigm, but trade some stability for desktop performance, then try Fedora. If you don't mind moving away from RPMs altogether and you want recent packages with a large community and a lot of support, then Ubuntu is the obvious choice. If you want to micromanage your computer and you don't mind stuff breaking whenever you upgrade, then give Gentoo a try. Burn yourself some LiveCDs. Just about every major distribution has a LiveCD that will run the OS free of commitment. -Nick ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions concern...
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Nick Aubertnickaub...@gmail.com wrote: Burn yourself some LiveCDs. Just about every major distribution has a LiveCD that will run the OS free of commitment. And then there are virtual environments where you can run them all. Regards, - Robert ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
[PLUG] Linux distributions concern...
I run CentOS 5.3, I try to keep updated because it's CentOS and CentOS sadly is way behind as far as Linux distributions go. People who run CentOS want something that just plain works and they don't expect to reinstall their operating system every 6 months or sooner. Ubuntu seems to be the most popular Linux distribution for desktops and it seems to be more current, but I'm not sure I like Ubuntu. I don't like having to maintain 2 different Linux distributions. Games like Dirk Dashing Secret Agent noticeably don't work quite right on CentOS. The latest release of Dirk Dashing doesn't seem to work at all on CentOS, I am not sure why. Where is Linux going in the future? What is getting the most attention right now across the board in general? Wine and ReactOS still have a long ways to go. Dirk Dashing is a native Linux program, but it doesn't work equally well on all Linux distributions. Are the various Linux distributions, enterprise and desktop editions, going to get closer in time features wise? Is there going to be a 2.8.xyz kernel soon? The kernels that CentOS uses stock are quite old as far as the 2.6 branch goes. I am using 2.6.18 and the current kernel is like 2.6.27 or something. In CentOS, the mesa drivers seem to be ancient. Graphics support in CentOS seems to be weak even if you have updated as far as you can. I'm wondering when CentOS 6 is going to come out? Enterprise Linux Distributions are supposed to be for people who need a system that just works. But do these distributions have to be so far behind the bleeding edge? I'm surprised there aren't repositories for CentOS to make it more bleeding edge so that you don't have to maintain a whole entire different Linux distribution. ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions concern...
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Michael Robinson plu...@robinson-west.comwrote: CentOS sadly is way behind as far as Linux distributions go. Indeed. People who run CentOS want something that just plain works and they don't expect to reinstall their operating system every 6 months or sooner. So too do those in the Debian Stable crowd, but their lives are more functional, more manageable, and more full of joy. Ubuntu seems to be the most popular Linux distribution for desktops and it seems to be more current, but I'm not sure I like Ubuntu. I don't like having to maintain 2 different Linux distributions. I think it's nearly fair to say that Ubuntu has pretty much killed everything else in the Desktop arena. Except for a few rogue funbois who still play with other stuff (e.g. lots of people on this list.) Games like Dirk Dashing Secret Agent noticeably don't work quite right on CentOS. The latest release of Dirk Dashing doesn't seem to work at all on CentOS, I am not sure why. Using the mesa driver probably isn't helping. Where is Linux going in the future? What is getting the most attention right now across the board in general? Ubuntu. Wine and ReactOS still have a long ways to go. You can look at it that way. really, I think these projects should be abandoned and that development should be invested into our native applications. Dirk Dashing is a native Linux program, but it doesn't work equally well on all Linux distributions. Are the various Linux distributions, enterprise and desktop editions, going to get closer in time features wise? Is there going to be a 2.8.xyz kernel soon? Probably. They'll all run apt* package management and look like [KX]?Ubuntu. The kernels that CentOS uses stock are quite old as far as the 2.6 branch goes. I am using 2.6.18 and the current kernel is like 2.6.27 or something. In CentOS, the mesa drivers seem to be ancient. Boy, that is ancient. You should run Fedora, if you like the redhat thing. FC11 is at 2.6.29 right now. Debian Stable is at 2.6.26, and Ubuntu Latest is at 2.6.28. Graphics support in CentOS seems to be weak even if you have updated as far as you can. I'm wondering when CentOS 6 is going to come out? Whenever RHEL6 does -- likely not in the next year. http://lwn.net/Articles/286885/ Enterprise Linux Distributions are supposed to be for people who need a system that just works. But do these distributions have to be so far behind the bleeding edge? I'm surprised there aren't repositories for CentOS to make it more bleeding edge so that you don't have to maintain I think you're talking about Fedora. Or Debian Stable if you don't like the Red Hat thing. I don't. ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions concern...
centos is based on redhat enterprise. and very few enterprise shops are going to care about running games or even having opengl. they care about running web, mail, database, etc services. and they want those things to not have interface changes over a long lifetime. so redhat picks a stable version of the various tools and does a lot of work to backport security and bug fixes to that original version so that your core enterprise functionality is not impacted. only recently have they decided that upgrading firefox is better than trying to patch things because that kind of program doesn't need the same level of stability as sendmail, apache, mysql, etc. ubuntu is certainly more desktop friendly. so is fedora. but fedora is not sanity friendly because they go to the other end of the spectrum and grab the latest and greatest toys and throw them in the blender and hope that enough alcohol will kill the taste :-). i have only recently started running ubuntu on a netbook, and since i don't really get under the hood very much, that works fine for me. thunderbird, firefox, ssh all work like i expect. but i run centos on every server i deal with. ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions concern...
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Russell Johnson ru...@dimstar.net wrote: On Sep 1, 2009, at 4:29 PM, Jameson Williams wrote: The kernels that CentOS uses stock are quite old as far as the 2.6 branch goes. I am using 2.6.18 and the current kernel is like 2.6.27 or something. In CentOS, the mesa drivers seem to be ancient. Boy, that is ancient. You should run Fedora, if you like the redhat thing. FC11 is at 2.6.29 right now. Debian Stable is at 2.6.26, and Ubuntu Latest is at 2.6.28. You have to understand the ideology behind the distro before comparing it. CentOS has a stated goal to be as like RHEL as possible, without infringing on Redhat IP. RHEL has a stated goal to be stable for two years. Stable is defined as, What ran on RHEL 5.2 at release will run on RHEL 5.2 with all updates. (I'm paraphrasing... ) They don't release kernel updates unless there is a compelling reason to do so. Most kernel updates will wait until the next major update of the OS. Basically, CentOS will release kernel updates when RHEL publishes kernel updates. They would be subverting their own stated objectives if they were to release their own kernel update. Fedora, on the other hand, is the Redhat playground. It's not stable, not for production, shouldn't be used for 'real work'. YMMV. None of what I have stated in this message should be considered as gospel, or as a statement from, about, pro, or con against any particular distribution. I'm simply restating, in my own way. Constructive comments welcome. Flames and/or distro-war fodder / dev/null. if( STDFLAME_FILENO != open( centos_complaints, O_CREAT ) ) exit( EXIT_FAILURE ); I agree with what you have said, in so far as it is similar to what I have read and believe to be the common view of the topic. In practice, the CentOS machines I've used (often without root access) for real work have been out of date to the point of hindering productivity. As you start compiling more and more recent versions of things you need, ~/ starts to look like /. Additionally, I have not found that open bugs in Fedora Core have created problems either. As a general rule of thumb, my opinion is that Fedora (CURRENT_RELEASE - 1) is usually better than whatever CentOS is doing. CentOS is fine for servers that humans don't actually directly use, I suppose: content servers, etc. Lousy for a build/development machine, though. ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions concern...
On Sep 1, 2009, at 9:27 PM, Larry Brigman wrote: Yet approx every 6 months they release a major update. RHEL 5.3 was released in Feb 09. 5.4 is in beta now with expected release late Sept or early Oct. They do major back ports to support newer hardware. We have RHEL 5.3 running on IBM I7 hardware with 10Gb interfaces. And, as implied in my first message, ALL updates that RHEL has released that do not violate the IP of RH, have in turn been released for CentOS. Russell Johnson ru...@dimstar.net ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug