Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions

2015-08-29 Thread Mike C.
It is usually, except in SuSE flavors (and we also used SLES at oldjob),
pretty easy to match up
rpms to a redhat version and more difficult in a debian or ubuntu environment.
Both package management environments aren't the best (apt-/dpkg vs
yum/rpm), though I think redhat gets the tip because apt-cache and dpkg
--get-selections are just weird to anyone not used to
them.

When Debian is installed it's configured to point to the specific
repository for that release, such as Wheezy, which I'm currently running.
So every package I can see in the repository is a Wheezy package.

It also seems that maybe you don't understand the Debian pkg mgmt system
very well. There isn't a dpkg --get command, there's however dpkg -i
which is similar to the rpm -i command to install a specific package and
manually deal with any dependencies.

apt is akin to yum in that it will attempt to install the package and
any dependencies. Apt-get is the command you were thinking of. Aptitude
provides more pkg. mgmt intelligence than apt and is the officially
sanctioned package manager, which you didn't mention.

apt-cache is for searching through the apt software package cache and
getting package info. I rarely use it.

For me, the pkg mgmt system played a huge factor in my distro choice. The
APT package mgmt system and all its tools make so much sense to me. are so
easy to use and useful.

Crunchbang (Debian Wheezy w. Openbox) runs in less than a 150 MB and that
makes me squeal w. joy!

I guess that's what makes Linux so great, there's a flavor for everyone.
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions

2015-08-29 Thread Rich Burroughs
I had a need for a small VM at my last job, for SSH forwarding. I bounced
around between a few different distros, but I really liked both Mint and
Crunchbang. I think it's likely I'd go with one of them if I were to build
a Linux desktop/laptop.

And this is coming from someone with a lot more RedHat/CentOS experience
than with the Debian derivatives.



Rich

On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 12:50 AM Mike C. mconno...@gmail.com wrote:

 It is usually, except in SuSE flavors (and we also used SLES at oldjob),
 pretty easy to match up
 rpms to a redhat version and more difficult in a debian or ubuntu
 environment.
 Both package management environments aren't the best (apt-/dpkg vs
 yum/rpm), though I think redhat gets the tip because apt-cache and dpkg
 --get-selections are just weird to anyone not used to
 them.

 When Debian is installed it's configured to point to the specific
 repository for that release, such as Wheezy, which I'm currently running.
 So every package I can see in the repository is a Wheezy package.

 It also seems that maybe you don't understand the Debian pkg mgmt system
 very well. There isn't a dpkg --get command, there's however dpkg -i
 which is similar to the rpm -i command to install a specific package and
 manually deal with any dependencies.

 apt is akin to yum in that it will attempt to install the package and
 any dependencies. Apt-get is the command you were thinking of. Aptitude
 provides more pkg. mgmt intelligence than apt and is the officially
 sanctioned package manager, which you didn't mention.

 apt-cache is for searching through the apt software package cache and
 getting package info. I rarely use it.

 For me, the pkg mgmt system played a huge factor in my distro choice. The
 APT package mgmt system and all its tools make so much sense to me. are so
 easy to use and useful.

 Crunchbang (Debian Wheezy w. Openbox) runs in less than a 150 MB and that
 makes me squeal w. joy!

 I guess that's what makes Linux so great, there's a flavor for everyone.
 ___
 PLUG mailing list
 PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
 http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions

2015-08-29 Thread Pete Lancashire
What is the intended purpose of you soon to be new Linux box ?

-pete

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Jim Webb jimwebb...@gmail.com wrote:

 I'm going to start using Linux again. I'm interested in a run of the mill
 distribution that works well and isn't cutting edge. What do you suggest?
 ___
 PLUG mailing list
 PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
 http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions

2015-08-28 Thread Ken Eshelby
I have been using Mint with XFCE as a desktop for many years and across two
jobs. I tend to work with about a dozen desktops (workspaces) and the
behavior of XFCE suits me, or I've just become accustomed to it.  Any
instability has historically been due to a specific hardware
component/driver.

I also support customers that typically are running RHEL with a few Debian
installs too, and have a number of VMs running varieties of versions of
Debian and Centos with different versions of our software.  (opennms.org/com,
we do open source enterprise network managment software)  Not a big fan of
systemd for the dubious individual heading it and their approach/vision,
but change is.  We tend to favor redhat-based distros mostly because it
reflects our customer base.  They use it under heavy loads in large
environments and it has been very stable.

Maybe the largest differentiating factor I have noticed is that binary
packages *I use* tend to come in rpms more than deb.  It is usually, except
in SuSE flavors (and we also used SLES at oldjob), pretty easy to match up
rpms to a redhat version and more difficult in a debian or ubuntu
environment.  Both package management environments aren't the best
(apt-/dpkg vs yum/rpm), though I think redhat gets the tip because
apt-cache and dpkg --get-selections are just weird to anyone not used to
them.

A lot of this is very conditional and depends on what you're doing with
linux.  I had a coworker at oldjob that would buid the most minimal BSD and
tiny kernel he could.  I also had another that did similarly with Arch.
Part of their enjoyment of *nix was they could do that and accepted the
difficulties (or lack of) that came with those approaches.  I'm not a fan
of extra cruft, and vanilla installs come with plenty, but not to the point
that I wanted to create a custom install approach.

Just put together a small, low-power desktop based on the ASRock N3700-ITX
(6W TDP) with Mint 17.2 and am in a holding pattern for Intel to release a
Skylake video driver for Linux. Might be a good time to try other
distros/desktops and see how they do with the hardware until drivers are
available.

-- 
Ken

PGP Key Fingerprint
7F29 C36C 4607 8C14 C82D  5DEA 1C1D F5D9 DBA0 F9AF
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions

2015-08-25 Thread Mike C.
I've been running and administering different versions (stable and testing)
of vanilla Debian and Debian derived distros for about a decade. There are
more than 300 Debian derived distros with about half of that number still
active today.

One that I've been running very happily for the past few years is
Crunchbang It runs the Openbox Window Manager. It's a super light, no
fluff, fast distro! I don't know too many people that run a full fledged
Linux distro on a $300 netbook circa 2011. But I do.

Debian is nothing if not cutting edge and super stable/reliable. They test
for years before an distro upgrade is released. Apt is a great package
manager with user friendly tools such as Synaptic and Aptitude for software
installation and management without any fluff. Debian also has a huge
software repository and you can pull from free, contrib of non-free
repositories. If that's something that matters to you.

The current version, Debian 8, Jessie , was released in April 2015.
Systemd is the default init system. Debian also supports a wide array of
system architecture.

lastly, Debian also has a social contract, a great community, lots of
support, docs, tutorials, and the versions are named after Toy Story
characters.

Yeah, I'm a Debianhead for life. It's always treated me right, so no need
to try anything else.

http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/05/debian-8-linuxs-most-reliable-distro-makes-its-biggest-change-since-1993/

https://crunchbangplusplus.org/about/

Cheers!,

Mike
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions

2015-08-21 Thread Ali Corbin
I tend to use a LTS Mint at home, and CentOS at work.

The advantage of Mint is that it comes with packages that will play
DVDs or mp3 files.  You can do this for CentOS, but you have to find
third-party packages to install.

The advantage of CentOS is that it's super stable.  Which can also
mean that you can have a problem installing third party software after
a few years.  For example, the newest release of chrome won't run on a
CentOS 6 system, because it demands newer versions of some libraries.

Ali
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions

2015-08-21 Thread Russell Senior
 Jim == Jim Webb jimwebb...@gmail.com writes:

Jim I'm just considering running a desktop on my home network.

I've been using Gnome Ubuntu 14.04.x on most of my desktops, which is
pretty easily tunable (about 6 settings using Tweak Tool) to have a
reasonable traditional-ish desktop experience, not like that Unity
Crap(TM) ;-)


-- 
Russell Senior, President
russ...@personaltelco.net
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions

2015-08-20 Thread Brian Scrivner
I may as well pitch in about my Linux since the experience has been 
surprisingly good. I've got a 2008 Thinkpad R500 which is running Linux 
Mint 17, I'm still using 17.1 Rebecca to avoid being too cutting-edge. 
I'm using the Xfce version, and it runs very light/fast while still 
having everything I'd want in a desktop. The computer runs as though it 
is five years newer. The installer is so good, I didn't need to tinker 
with multimedia. I haven't had any major problems, and there seems to be 
a great support community and good documentation.

  :Brian:
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions

2015-08-20 Thread Paul Heinlein

On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, King Beowulf wrote:


On 08/19/2015 05:51 PM, Nathan Williams wrote:
I'll echo the endorsement for CentOS 7. It's reasonably new enough 
to offer new-ish packages for desktop use, while also being the 
gold standard for stability and long term support (EOL in June 
2024). Add in EPEL and elrepo for extras, and you've got a pretty 
solid system that you won't have to totally replace every 6 months.


CentOS is no longer an independent project, more like a test bed for 
Redhat.


This is misleading. While the CentOS project's governance has changed 
a bit of late, the CentOS distribution is doing no more and no less 
than it always has: rebuilding the Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 
source RPMs in such a way as to mimic as closely as possible the 
upstream RHEL release.


If you know of specific details how the governance has changed *the 
end CentOS product*, I'd like to hear them.


Being supported for 10 years is great for a server, not so much for 
end-user desktops.  For a desktop, some system files just can't be 
upgraded past a certain point without compromising system stability.


While this is true, the assessment is incomplete. There are a few 
variables in play:


* How long has the CentOS release been available before you install
  it? If you install CentOS 6, which has been around for several
  years, then you'll end up with older software. CentOS 7, which
  is much newer, still has a couple years of being close to
  current.

* What's the distribution doing? You have to ask that question
  whether the target platform is a server or a desktop. If the
  desktop is doing work that requires the latest software, that's
  one thing. If someone is just running a few terminal windows
  and ssh-ing to other machines, an older distribution might be
  just fine.

--
Paul Heinlein
heinl...@madboa.com
45°38' N, 122°6' W___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions

2015-08-20 Thread Nathan Williams
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 22:17 -0700, King Beowulf wrote:
 On 08/19/2015 05:51 PM, Nathan Williams wrote:
  I'll echo the endorsement for CentOS 7. It's reasonably new enough
  to offer
  new-ish packages for desktop use, while also being the gold
  standard for
  stability and long term support (EOL in June 2024). Add in EPEL and
  elrepo
  for extras, and you've got a pretty solid system that you won't
  have to
  totally replace every 6 months.
 
  CentOS is no longer an independent project, more like a test bed for
 Redhat.

I'd dispute this phrasing (specifically in re: independence). Red Hat
is indeed a major contributor/supporter, with a majority of seats on
the governance board, but CentOS is and remains a community
led/developed distribution, certainly to a greater extent than e.g.
Ubuntu is independent of Canonical. I have yet to see Ubuntus lack of
independence mentioned as a reason to avoid Ubuntu as an end-user.

As for being a test-bed, it's certainly a more innovative CentOS
community than in the past, but most of that work is going on in SIGs,
so doesn't have a lot of impact for someone using core CentOS and not
one of the SIG-derived products like RDO, Atomic or the Cloud images.

   Being supported for 10 years is great for a server, not so much
 for end-user desktops.  For a desktop, some system files just can't
 be
 upgraded past a certain point without compromising system stability.
 

Agreed. I'd expect a desktop user to upgrade distros on average every 3
-5 years, basically following typical hardware upgrade lifecycles.

  
  In addition, it's got that new-fangled systemd init system that all
  the
  major distros are going to be on within the next year or so, so you
  won't
  end up having a really core piece of the system be different from
  what
  everyone else is running (better supportability if you need help
  down the
  road).
  
  Cheers,
  
  Nathan W
  
 
 the OP may want to hold off on any distro jumping on systemd.  While
 the
 issues and controversy concerning systemd may not mean much to end
 users, it does to DEVELOPERS.  You know, the guys and gals that
 create
 the software that creates a linux distribution and the various
 programs
 we want to use.

I knew I'd regret mentioning this as an advantage the moment I sent it,
and I'm guessing from the tone of the reply that it struck a nerve. If
so, I'm sorry, and I sympathize.

But, given the broad range of distros who are consolidating around
systemd, it seems reasonable to conclude that the majority of the
developers who do build linux distributions are in favor. As you noted,
it probably doesn't matter much to an end-user either way.

What does typically matter quite a lot to end-users, and the reason I
mentioned it at all, is the availability of support for issues. Since
an undeniable majority of Linux users either already are, or shortly
will be using systemd-based distros, I figured I'd mention it as a
point in favor (sticking with the herd), but that's truly the limit of
the degree of the intended endorsement.

Personally, I'm pretty ambiguous about it overall (migrating was rather
unexciting, both for workstation and servers), though I'm happy for
many of the new resource-control capabilities that the integration with
cgroups has made available to me as an administrator.

Regards,

Nathan W


 
 -Ed
 
 ___
 PLUG mailing list
 PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
 http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions

2015-08-19 Thread Nat Taylor
I've been using Arch Linux with the cinnamon desktop.  Works great once you
get it installed.  I used the guide in Linux Voice magazine.  I suggest
reading some of those magazines, and taking a look at distrowatch.com .
As mostly a user now I find Linux Mint (LTS versions) with the Mate
desktop manager works great.  For servers I've started moving to Debian.

I started with Redhat 3.0.3, moved up the version chain with them for
awhile, then did Fedora, finally CentOS (and with a smattering of the
other Redhat based spin offs.)



Rod
--
On 08/19/2015 07:38 AM, Jim Webb wrote:
 I'm going to start using Linux again. I'm interested in a run of the mill
 distribution that works well and isn't cutting edge. What do you suggest?
 ___
 PLUG mailing list
 PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
 http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions

2015-08-19 Thread Rich Shepard
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Jim Webb wrote:

 It's good to see that you are still on the list. You are a fervent
 supporter of PLUG. Why Slackware?

Jim,

   1.  It stays far back from the bleeding edges.

   2.  It is suitable for modern and older systems.

   3.  You can install just as much as you want or need; highly customizable.

   4.  Great support on mail lists. linuxquestions.org, and elsewhere.

   5.  A super group of developers/supporters who provide Slackware packages
for just about anything not included in the base distribution. Look
at www.slackbuilds.org.

   6.  More stable than the ground on which we live.

   7.  Patches when needed to remove vulnerabilities.

   8.  Distribution upgrades every now and then, not on a fixed schedule.

   9.  One of the original linux distributions and still going strong.

Rich
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions

2015-08-19 Thread Jim Webb
It's good to see that you are still on the list. You are a fervent
supporter of PLUG. Why Slackware?
On Aug 19, 2015 9:40 AM, Rich Shepard rshep...@appl-ecosys.com wrote:

 On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Jim Webb wrote:

  I'm going to start using Linux again. I'm interested in a run of the mill
  distribution that works well and isn't cutting edge. What do you suggest?

Slackware.

 Rich
 ___
 PLUG mailing list
 PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
 http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions

2015-08-19 Thread King Beowulf
On 08/19/2015 07:40 AM, Rich Shepard wrote:
 On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Jim Webb wrote:
 
 I'm going to start using Linux again. I'm interested in a run of the mill
 distribution that works well and isn't cutting edge. What do you suggest?
 
Slackware.
 
 Rich

Indeed. Slackware.

http://www.slackware.com
http://www.slackbuilds.org
http://www.studioware.org
http://docs.slackware.com/

-Ed


___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions

2015-08-19 Thread Jim Webb
I remember you as well. Didn't you use to run a Linux page somewhere?

Tell me more rewarding EPEL and ElRopo. I've been following from a distance
and haven't heard of these entities. Yo
On Aug 19, 2015 10:22 AM, Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com wrote:

 On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Jim Webb wrote:

 I'm going to start using Linux again. I'm interested in a run of the mill
 distribution that works well and isn't cutting edge. What do you suggest?


 My reading of your request is that you'd prefer stability over having the
 latest and greatest features. With that in mind...

 Ubuntu is easy to install and has gobs of packages available. If you stick
 to one of the LTS (long-term support) releases, you won't have to upgrade
 very often.

 CentOS is (to my mind) the gold standard for distributions with long-term
 stability. You'll have to learn how to add additional repositories like
 EPEL or ELRepo for access to a wider variety of packages, but it's not too
 difficult. CentOS 7 is relatively new and will likely outlast your current
 hardware. :-)

 Debian stable isn't quite as easy to install as Ubuntu, but it's rock
 solid and easy to manage.

 Some engineers at my last company absolutely loved Linux Mint (as others
 in this thread obviously do as well), but I don't have any hands-on
 experience with it.

 --
 Paul Heinlein
 heinl...@madboa.com
 45°38' N, 122°6' W
 ___
 PLUG mailing list
 PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
 http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions

2015-08-19 Thread Jonathan Drews
I recommend Mint Linux.
1) So easy to install even a management person could do it.
2) Derived from the stable and proven Debian Linux distribution.
3) Codecs are included in the base install. Multimedia support is excellent.
4) Libre Office is part of the base install.

Note: I have used Linux and OpenBSD as my exclusive desktop since 2000. I
have never had a windows computer. I went from DOS 3.3 to SuSE 6.4 ( I
briefly used Red Hat 6.0 and Mandrake)
On Aug 19, 2015 7:39 AM, Jim Webb jimwebb...@gmail.com wrote:

 I'm going to start using Linux again. I'm interested in a run of the mill
 distribution that works well and isn't cutting edge. What do you suggest?
 ___
 PLUG mailing list
 PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
 http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions

2015-08-19 Thread Rich Shepard
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Jim Webb wrote:

 I'm going to start using Linux again. I'm interested in a run of the mill
 distribution that works well and isn't cutting edge. What do you suggest?

   Slackware.

Rich
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions

2015-08-19 Thread Jim Webb
Rich, I just looked at the Slackware site and I'm concerned that they
haven't done much since 2013. I used to use Redhat in the past.

Jim
On Aug 19, 2015 9:40 AM, Rich Shepard rshep...@appl-ecosys.com wrote:

 On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Jim Webb wrote:

  I'm going to start using Linux again. I'm interested in a run of the mill
  distribution that works well and isn't cutting edge. What do you suggest?

Slackware.

 Rich
 ___
 PLUG mailing list
 PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
 http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions

2015-08-19 Thread Roderick Anderson
As mostly a user now I find Linux Mint (LTS versions) with the Mate 
desktop manager works great.  For servers I've started moving to Debian.

I started with Redhat 3.0.3, moved up the version chain with them for 
awhile, then did Fedora, finally CentOS (and with a smattering of the 
other Redhat based spin offs.)



Rod
-- 
On 08/19/2015 07:38 AM, Jim Webb wrote:
 I'm going to start using Linux again. I'm interested in a run of the mill
 distribution that works well and isn't cutting edge. What do you suggest?
 ___
 PLUG mailing list
 PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
 http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions

2015-08-19 Thread Rich Burroughs
I used Mint some and liked it a lot. Not as a real desktop though, just for
a lightweight VM.

For the OP, it could be helpful for people to hear some more specifics
about what you want to do with the box. Is this for a home desktop system,
are you a developer, what is the scenario you're using it for? What kind of
hardware are you running it on?

For my $0.02 I think something like Mint could be good, as well as Ubuntu
or CentOS. Some of these options have live images that you can download and
boot off of to try them for yourself.

I've used Debian also and thought it was a decent desktop, although I
really wasn't doing multimedia on it. I think Slackware would be near the
bottom on my list but maybe that's just ignorance, I haven't used it in a
long time.


Rich

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 8:22 AM Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com wrote:

 On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Jim Webb wrote:

  I'm going to start using Linux again. I'm interested in a run of the
  mill distribution that works well and isn't cutting edge. What do
  you suggest?

 My reading of your request is that you'd prefer stability over having
 the latest and greatest features. With that in mind...

 Ubuntu is easy to install and has gobs of packages available. If you
 stick to one of the LTS (long-term support) releases, you won't have
 to upgrade very often.

 CentOS is (to my mind) the gold standard for distributions with
 long-term stability. You'll have to learn how to add additional
 repositories like EPEL or ELRepo for access to a wider variety of
 packages, but it's not too difficult. CentOS 7 is relatively new and
 will likely outlast your current hardware. :-)

 Debian stable isn't quite as easy to install as Ubuntu, but it's rock
 solid and easy to manage.

 Some engineers at my last company absolutely loved Linux Mint (as
 others in this thread obviously do as well), but I don't have any
 hands-on experience with it.

 --
 Paul Heinlein
 heinl...@madboa.com
 45°38' N, 122°6' W___
 PLUG mailing list
 PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
 http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


[PLUG] Linux distributions

2015-08-19 Thread Jim Webb
I'm going to start using Linux again. I'm interested in a run of the mill
distribution that works well and isn't cutting edge. What do you suggest?
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions

2015-08-19 Thread Paul Heinlein

On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Jim Webb wrote:

I'm going to start using Linux again. I'm interested in a run of the 
mill distribution that works well and isn't cutting edge. What do 
you suggest?


My reading of your request is that you'd prefer stability over having 
the latest and greatest features. With that in mind...


Ubuntu is easy to install and has gobs of packages available. If you 
stick to one of the LTS (long-term support) releases, you won't have 
to upgrade very often.


CentOS is (to my mind) the gold standard for distributions with 
long-term stability. You'll have to learn how to add additional 
repositories like EPEL or ELRepo for access to a wider variety of 
packages, but it's not too difficult. CentOS 7 is relatively new and 
will likely outlast your current hardware. :-)


Debian stable isn't quite as easy to install as Ubuntu, but it's rock 
solid and easy to manage.


Some engineers at my last company absolutely loved Linux Mint (as 
others in this thread obviously do as well), but I don't have any 
hands-on experience with it.


--
Paul Heinlein
heinl...@madboa.com
45°38' N, 122°6' W___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions

2015-08-19 Thread Rich Shepard
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Jim Webb wrote:

 Rich, I just looked at the Slackware site and I'm concerned that they
 haven't done much since 2013. I used to use Redhat in the past.

Jim,

   I used Red Hat from 4.0 (1997) to 7.1 (2003) and Slackware since then.

   I don't recall when 14.1 (the current distribution version) was released,
but there have been a ton of patches since then. 14.2 or 15.0 is supposedly
almost ready for prime time, but I don't follow the development, just use it
for everything I need.

   Many distributions want to upgrade versions frequently. While I suppose
they have their reasons for doing so, I don't know how necessary that is.

   Pat and crew put out patches as needed to remove vulnerabilities. I use
slackpkg every Friday to check for updates on installed packages here; I
have them from 3 repositories. So the same distribution number for a couple
of years does not mean the distribution is rusty, corroded, or collecting
dust. :-)

Rich
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions

2015-08-19 Thread Paul Heinlein

On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Jim Webb wrote:


I remember you as well. Didn't you use to run a Linux page somewhere?


I used to edit Computer Bits, the local computer magazine. That may 
be what you remember.



Tell me more rewarding EPEL and ElRopo. I've been following from a distance
and haven't heard of these entities.


EPEL and ELRepo are repositories of packages that work with Red Hat 
Enterprise Linux (RHEL) and its workalikes: CentOS, Scientific Linux, 
etc.


* ELRepo focuses on supporting hardware (wi-fi, video, networking):
  http://elrepo.org/tiki/About

* EPEL provides a range of packages: development, administration,
  networking: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL

Even with those repositories, the amount of software available to 
CentOS (etc) is dwarfed by that available via Ubuntu or Debian.


But if CentOS has the packages you want, you'll find it extremely 
stable.


--
Paul Heinlein
heinl...@madboa.com
45°38' N, 122°6' W___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions

2015-08-19 Thread Michael Rasmussen
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 08:16:39AM -0700, Nat Taylor wrote:
 I've been using Arch Linux with the cinnamon desktop.  Works great once you
 get it installed.  I used the guide in Linux Voice magazine.  I suggest
 reading some of those magazines, and taking a look at distrowatch.com .
 As mostly a user now I find Linux Mint (LTS versions) with the Mate
 desktop manager works great.  For servers I've started moving to Debian.

My terse reply of Not Arch was made before seeing this message.

The OP wrote isn't cutting edge. I don't know of a distribution that is less
cutting edge than Arch. How they manage to keep it organized and well 
functioning
is a mystery. But they do. And I get the very current versions of the photo
and video editors that drew me to it. 

But if you're not looking for that level of upstream tracking, stay away. 

OK, pacman is also a very excellent package manager. 

  I'm going to start using Linux again. I'm interested in a run of the mill
  distribution that works well and isn't cutting edge. What do you suggest?
  ___
  PLUG mailing list
  PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
  http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
 
 ___
 PLUG mailing list
 PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
 http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
 ___
 PLUG mailing list
 PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
 http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
 

-- 
  Michael Rasmussen, Portland Oregon  
Be Appropriate  Follow Your Curiosity
If you only knock long enough and loud enough at the gate you are bound to wake 
up somebody.
~ Henry Wadsworth Longfellow
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions

2015-08-19 Thread Michael Rasmussen
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:38:08AM -0500, Jim Webb wrote:
 I'm going to start using Linux again. I'm interested in a run of the mill
 distribution that works well and isn't cutting edge. What do you suggest?

Not Arch


-- 
  Michael Rasmussen, Portland Oregon  
Be Appropriate  Follow Your Curiosity
Success is moving from one failure to another with great enthusiasm.
~ Winston Churchill as quoted by Robert Rodriguez 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAThPRDDKxk
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions

2015-08-19 Thread Wayne E. Van Loon Sr.
Jim:
I use Linux Mint for some multimedia stuff, stuff like Audacity for 
audio recording, etc. It comes with all the CODECs, etc. I also often 
set up any friends who are trying Linux for the first time with Linux 
Mint. But, I haven't found Linux Mint to be terribly stable.

For industrial control system projects or anything that I really care 
about, I use Slackware. I have found it to be extremely stable. 
Slackware is a very conservative distribution and uses a standard 
kernel as released by the kernel developers.

Slackware makes more than one sites list of top 10 distributions. 
Distrowatch.com http://distrowatch.com/dwres.php?resource=major 
comments that, if you learn Red Hat, you'll know Red Hat, but if you 
learn Slackware, you'll know Linux. It also comments that Slackware is 
one of the least buggy distributions available today.

Wayne

On 08/19/2015 07:38 AM, Jim Webb wrote:
 I'm going to start using Linux again. I'm interested in a run of the mill
 distribution that works well and isn't cutting edge. What do you suggest?
 ___
 PLUG mailing list
 PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
 http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions

2015-08-19 Thread Nat Taylor
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Michael Rasmussen mich...@jamhome.us
wrote:

 On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 08:16:39AM -0700, Nat Taylor wrote:
  I've been using Arch Linux with the cinnamon desktop.  Works great once
 you
  get it installed.  I used the guide in Linux Voice magazine.  I suggest
  reading some of those magazines, and taking a look at distrowatch.com .
  As mostly a user now I find Linux Mint (LTS versions) with the Mate
  desktop manager works great.  For servers I've started moving to Debian.

 My terse reply of Not Arch was made before seeing this message.

 The OP wrote isn't cutting edge. I don't know of a distribution that is
 less
 cutting edge than Arch. How they manage to keep it organized and well
 functioning
 is a mystery. But they do. And I get the very current versions of the photo
 and video editors that drew me to it.

 But if you're not looking for that level of upstream tracking, stay away.

 OK, pacman is also a very excellent package manager.


Looks like it's been 3 years since I installed Arch on this box, never had
a problem with an upgrade,
although it looks like there are only 12 packages i've installed from the
AUR, all but three of them done
by hand (did just install yaourt recently for a more automated process)

I guess it is cutting edge though, I figured it was right up there with
slackware for ease of installation,
and learning about linux while you install.  It's always been stable for me.

I think I started with mandrake 5 and debian woody, moved to ubuntu for a
while, then deserted
and hopped distros for a while before landing on Mint then Arch

Mint might be a good choice for low effort install, as would Ubuntu LTS.  I
didn't desire an ubuntu flame
war so I didn't mention it.






   I'm going to start using Linux again. I'm interested in a run of the
 mill
   distribution that works well and isn't cutting edge. What do you
 suggest?
   ___
   PLUG mailing list
   PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
   http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
  
  ___
  PLUG mailing list
  PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
  http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
  ___
  PLUG mailing list
  PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
  http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
 

 --
   Michael Rasmussen, Portland Oregon
 Be Appropriate  Follow Your Curiosity
 If you only knock long enough and loud enough at the gate you are bound to
 wake up somebody.
 ~ Henry Wadsworth Longfellow
 ___
 PLUG mailing list
 PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
 http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions

2015-08-19 Thread Michael Rasmussen
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 01:56:53PM -0700, Nat Taylor wrote:
 On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Michael Rasmussen mich...@jamhome.us
 wrote:
  On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 08:16:39AM -0700, Nat Taylor wrote:
   I've been using Arch Linux with the cinnamon desktop.  Works great once
  you
   get it installed.  I used the guide in Linux Voice magazine.  I suggest
   reading some of those magazines, and taking a look at distrowatch.com .
   As mostly a user now I find Linux Mint (LTS versions) with the Mate
   desktop manager works great.  For servers I've started moving to Debian.
 
  My terse reply of Not Arch was made before seeing this message.
 
  The OP wrote isn't cutting edge. I don't know of a distribution that is
  less
  cutting edge than Arch. How they manage to keep it organized and well
  functioning
  is a mystery. But they do. And I get the very current versions of the photo
  and video editors that drew me to it.
 
  But if you're not looking for that level of upstream tracking, stay away.
 
  OK, pacman is also a very excellent package manager.
 
 
 Looks like it's been 3 years since I installed Arch on this box, never had
 a problem with an upgrade,
 although it looks like there are only 12 packages i've installed from the
 AUR, all but three of them done
 by hand (did just install yaourt recently for a more automated process)
 
 I guess it is cutting edge though, I figured it was right up there with
 slackware for ease of installation,
 and learning about linux while you install.  It's always been stable for me.
 
 I think I started with mandrake 5 and debian woody, moved to ubuntu for a
 while, then deserted and hopped distros for a while before landing on Mint 
 then Arch

Everything you say agrees completely with my experience. As an added point my 
last distro before Arch was Kubuntu LTS and it was a much bigger PTIA to 
maintain.

My response was based on the OP's stated preferences. No matter how good Arch 
is it's 
not a match for his described target.

-- 
  Michael Rasmussen, Portland Oregon  
Be Appropriate  Follow Your Curiosity
The fastest way to become rich is to socialize with the poor; 
the fastest way to become poor is to socialize with the rich.
~ Nassim Taleb
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions

2015-08-19 Thread Nathan Williams
I'll echo the endorsement for CentOS 7. It's reasonably new enough to offer
new-ish packages for desktop use, while also being the gold standard for
stability and long term support (EOL in June 2024). Add in EPEL and elrepo
for extras, and you've got a pretty solid system that you won't have to
totally replace every 6 months.

In addition, it's got that new-fangled systemd init system that all the
major distros are going to be on within the next year or so, so you won't
end up having a really core piece of the system be different from what
everyone else is running (better supportability if you need help down the
road).

Cheers,

Nathan W

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 5:04 PM Michael Rasmussen mich...@jamhome.us
wrote:

 On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 01:56:53PM -0700, Nat Taylor wrote:
  On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Michael Rasmussen mich...@jamhome.us
  wrote:
   On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 08:16:39AM -0700, Nat Taylor wrote:
I've been using Arch Linux with the cinnamon desktop.  Works great
 once
   you
get it installed.  I used the guide in Linux Voice magazine.  I
 suggest
reading some of those magazines, and taking a look at
 distrowatch.com .
As mostly a user now I find Linux Mint (LTS versions) with the Mate
desktop manager works great.  For servers I've started moving to
 Debian.
  
   My terse reply of Not Arch was made before seeing this message.
  
   The OP wrote isn't cutting edge. I don't know of a distribution that
 is
   less
   cutting edge than Arch. How they manage to keep it organized and well
   functioning
   is a mystery. But they do. And I get the very current versions of the
 photo
   and video editors that drew me to it.
  
   But if you're not looking for that level of upstream tracking, stay
 away.
  
   OK, pacman is also a very excellent package manager.
  
 
  Looks like it's been 3 years since I installed Arch on this box, never
 had
  a problem with an upgrade,
  although it looks like there are only 12 packages i've installed from the
  AUR, all but three of them done
  by hand (did just install yaourt recently for a more automated process)
 
  I guess it is cutting edge though, I figured it was right up there with
  slackware for ease of installation,
  and learning about linux while you install.  It's always been stable for
 me.
 
  I think I started with mandrake 5 and debian woody, moved to ubuntu for a
  while, then deserted and hopped distros for a while before landing on
 Mint then Arch

 Everything you say agrees completely with my experience. As an added point
 my
 last distro before Arch was Kubuntu LTS and it was a much bigger PTIA to
 maintain.

 My response was based on the OP's stated preferences. No matter how good
 Arch is it's
 not a match for his described target.

 --
   Michael Rasmussen, Portland Oregon
 Be Appropriate  Follow Your Curiosity
 The fastest way to become rich is to socialize with the poor;
 the fastest way to become poor is to socialize with the rich.
 ~ Nassim Taleb
 ___
 PLUG mailing list
 PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
 http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions

2015-08-19 Thread King Beowulf
On 08/19/2015 05:51 PM, Nathan Williams wrote:
 I'll echo the endorsement for CentOS 7. It's reasonably new enough to offer
 new-ish packages for desktop use, while also being the gold standard for
 stability and long term support (EOL in June 2024). Add in EPEL and elrepo
 for extras, and you've got a pretty solid system that you won't have to
 totally replace every 6 months.

 CentOS is no longer an independent project, more like a test bed for
Redhat.  Being supported for 10 years is great for a server, not so much
for end-user desktops.  For a desktop, some system files just can't be
upgraded past a certain point without compromising system stability.

 
 In addition, it's got that new-fangled systemd init system that all the
 major distros are going to be on within the next year or so, so you won't
 end up having a really core piece of the system be different from what
 everyone else is running (better supportability if you need help down the
 road).
 
 Cheers,
 
 Nathan W
 

the OP may want to hold off on any distro jumping on systemd.  While the
issues and controversy concerning systemd may not mean much to end
users, it does to DEVELOPERS.  You know, the guys and gals that create
the software that creates a linux distribution and the various programs
we want to use.

-Ed

___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions concern...

2009-09-02 Thread drew wymore
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Michael Robinson
plu...@robinson-west.comwrote:

 I run CentOS 5.3, I try to keep updated because it's CentOS and CentOS
 sadly is way behind as far as Linux distributions go.

 People who run CentOS want something that just plain works and they
 don't expect to reinstall their operating system every 6 months or
 sooner.

 Ubuntu seems to be the most popular Linux distribution for desktops
 and it seems to be more current, but I'm not sure I like Ubuntu.
 I don't like having to maintain 2 different Linux distributions.

 Games like Dirk Dashing Secret Agent noticeably don't work quite right
 on CentOS.  The latest release of Dirk Dashing doesn't seem to work at
 all on CentOS, I am not sure why.

 Where is Linux going in the future?  What is getting the most attention
 right now across the board in general?  Wine and ReactOS still have a
 long ways to go.  Dirk Dashing is a native Linux program, but it doesn't
 work equally well on all Linux distributions.  Are the various Linux
 distributions, enterprise and desktop editions, going to get closer in
 time features wise?  Is there going to be a 2.8.xyz kernel soon?

 The kernels that CentOS uses stock are quite old as far as the 2.6
 branch goes.  I am using 2.6.18 and the current kernel is like 2.6.27
 or something.  In CentOS, the mesa drivers seem to be ancient.
 Graphics support in CentOS seems to be weak even if you have
 updated as far as you can.  I'm wondering when CentOS 6 is going to
 come out?

 Enterprise Linux Distributions are supposed to be for people who need a
 system that just works.  But do these distributions have to be so far
 behind the bleeding edge?  I'm surprised there aren't repositories for
 CentOS to make it more bleeding edge so that you don't have to maintain
 a whole entire different Linux distribution.

 ___
 PLUG mailing list
 PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
 http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


You have to decide what you want your machine to do and what you value more.
If you value something super stable and not bleeding edge then something
like CentOS is a good bet. Slackware is the same in many respects although
that project isn't beholden to an upstream distro for updates in the vein of
CentOS.

I really stayed away from the Ubuntu train only because when I first tried
is many many releases ago it just wasn't my thing. I have run more recent
releases to play with and I do find it has really matured and supports all
the things that I want to run/do. I am currently running Fedora 11 though
and have found it to be stable, easy to work with and prompt with updates.

So you're at the cross roads. Move to something else or stick with something
you're familiar with. Unfortunately with the way open source and it's
dependency and code re-use goes (which I find to be a good thing) .. changes
with games and such aren't going to work on a distro that doesn't release
the latest and greatest graphics updates.

Drew-
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions concern...

2009-09-02 Thread Larry Brigman
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Michael
Robinsonplu...@robinson-west.com wrote:
 I run CentOS 5.3, I try to keep updated because it's CentOS and CentOS
 sadly is way behind as far as Linux distributions go.

 People who run CentOS want something that just plain works and they
 don't expect to reinstall their operating system every 6 months or
 sooner.

 Ubuntu seems to be the most popular Linux distribution for desktops
 and it seems to be more current, but I'm not sure I like Ubuntu.
 I don't like having to maintain 2 different Linux distributions.
Well, You could always use the LTS version of both server and desktop.

snipped from website
Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Desktop: Released April 2008 and maintained until
April 2011 – ideal for large deployments.
Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Server: Released April 2008 and maintained until April
2013 – ideal for large deployments


 Games like Dirk Dashing Secret Agent noticeably don't work quite right
 on CentOS.  The latest release of Dirk Dashing doesn't seem to work at
 all on CentOS, I am not sure why.

 Where is Linux going in the future?  What is getting the most attention
 right now across the board in general?  Wine and ReactOS still have a
 long ways to go.  Dirk Dashing is a native Linux program, but it doesn't
 work equally well on all Linux distributions.  Are the various Linux
 distributions, enterprise and desktop editions, going to get closer in
 time features wise?  Is there going to be a 2.8.xyz kernel soon?

 The kernels that CentOS uses stock are quite old as far as the 2.6
 branch goes.  I am using 2.6.18 and the current kernel is like 2.6.27
 or something.  In CentOS, the mesa drivers seem to be ancient.
 Graphics support in CentOS seems to be weak even if you have
 updated as far as you can.  I'm wondering when CentOS 6 is going to
 come out?

 Enterprise Linux Distributions are supposed to be for people who need a
 system that just works.  But do these distributions have to be so far
 behind the bleeding edge?  I'm surprised there aren't repositories for
 CentOS to make it more bleeding edge so that you don't have to maintain
 a whole entire different Linux distribution.

 ___
 PLUG mailing list
 PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
 http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions concern...

2009-09-02 Thread Dan Colish
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 6:02 AM, Larry Brigman larry.brig...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Michael
 Robinsonplu...@robinson-west.com wrote:
  I run CentOS 5.3, I try to keep updated because it's CentOS and CentOS
  sadly is way behind as far as Linux distributions go.
 
  People who run CentOS want something that just plain works and they
  don't expect to reinstall their operating system every 6 months or
  sooner.
 
  Ubuntu seems to be the most popular Linux distribution for desktops
  and it seems to be more current, but I'm not sure I like Ubuntu.
  I don't like having to maintain 2 different Linux distributions.
 Well, You could always use the LTS version of both server and desktop.

 snipped from website
 Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Desktop: Released April 2008 and maintained until
 April 2011 – ideal for large deployments.
 Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Server: Released April 2008 and maintained until April
 2013 – ideal for large deployments



One of the nice advantages of CentOS piggy-backing on RHEL is that it is
supported for what seems like forever. There is still a stable release of
CentOS 3 with backports and updates. For these kind of distributions there
should not be a 3 or 5 year cut off since the systems they are used to build
will be running for much longer and need to be extremely stable. When you
run CentOS you should thinking about uptime. (I wonder what distro google
uses... )
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions concern...

2009-09-02 Thread Carl Karsten
 will be running for much longer and need to be extremely stable. When you
 run CentOS you should thinking about uptime. (I wonder what distro google
 uses... )

I brought a ubuntu system to a google office to offload a few gig of
video files.  I'll boot our gobuntu cd will be able to read your raid
and write to the FS in our data center.

That's all I know.  I will let the reader extrapolate.

-- 
Carl K
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions concern...

2009-09-02 Thread Tim Wescott

On Wed, September 2, 2009 8:53 am, Dan Colish wrote:
 On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 6:02 AM, Larry Brigman
 larry.brig...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Michael
 Robinsonplu...@robinson-west.com wrote:
  I run CentOS 5.3, I try to keep updated because it's CentOS and CentOS
  sadly is way behind as far as Linux distributions go.
 

 -- snip --

 One of the nice advantages of CentOS piggy-backing on RHEL is that it is
 supported for what seems like forever. There is still a stable release of
 CentOS 3 with backports and updates. For these kind of distributions there
 should not be a 3 or 5 year cut off since the systems they are used to
 build
 will be running for much longer and need to be extremely stable. When you
 run CentOS you should thinking about uptime. (I wonder what distro google
 uses... )

Google is large enough that using it's own distribution could make
economic sense -- since it's not distributing it 'out of house' I suspect
that it could even keep it's own changes private, if it wanted to.

But that's just supposition -- I'd like to know too.

-- 
Tim Wescott
Control systems and communications consulting
http://www.wescottdesign.com

Land line: 503.631.7815
Cell: 503.349.8432

___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions concern...

2009-09-02 Thread Michael M. Moore
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Dan Colishdcol...@gmail.com wrote:

 run CentOS you should thinking about uptime. (I wonder what distro google
 uses... )

I was under the impression that Google largely uses its own customized
Linux distro, though I'm not sure it can be called a distro if it
isn't distributed ... in any case, I think Google's Linux is its own
thing.

Michael M.

-- 
Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within
limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add
'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's
will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual.
--Thomas Jefferson
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions concern...

2009-09-02 Thread drew wymore
As a former Googler I can say we did use a custom Ubuntu called
Goobuntu. No real secret sauce to it. Just bundled with some tools we
used in house of course I can't say what because of that darned NDA :)

Drew

On 9/2/09, Tim Wescott t...@wescottdesign.com wrote:

 On Wed, September 2, 2009 8:53 am, Dan Colish wrote:
 On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 6:02 AM, Larry Brigman
 larry.brig...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Michael
 Robinsonplu...@robinson-west.com wrote:
  I run CentOS 5.3, I try to keep updated because it's CentOS and CentOS
  sadly is way behind as far as Linux distributions go.
 

  -- snip --

 One of the nice advantages of CentOS piggy-backing on RHEL is that it is
 supported for what seems like forever. There is still a stable release of
 CentOS 3 with backports and updates. For these kind of distributions there
 should not be a 3 or 5 year cut off since the systems they are used to
 build
 will be running for much longer and need to be extremely stable. When you
 run CentOS you should thinking about uptime. (I wonder what distro google
 uses... )

 Google is large enough that using it's own distribution could make
 economic sense -- since it's not distributing it 'out of house' I suspect
 that it could even keep it's own changes private, if it wanted to.

 But that's just supposition -- I'd like to know too.

 --
 Tim Wescott
 Control systems and communications consulting
 http://www.wescottdesign.com

 Land line: 503.631.7815
 Cell: 503.349.8432

 ___
 PLUG mailing list
 PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
 http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


-- 
Sent from my mobile device
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions concern...

2009-09-02 Thread Nick Aubert
 Where is Linux going in the future?

Well, I'm pretty sure a direction it's *not* going is toward One
Distribution to Bind Them All, though Ubuntu is about as close as it
gets.  We're a very fractured community.  If something seems works
well one one distro, it's likely to be taken up by the others, but if
we wanted to run the same thing everyone else is running, we wouldn't
be using Linux to begin with.

So why do you run Linux?  Because you want to keep your skills sharp?
Because you like the flexibility?  For the freedom?  Whatever it is,
there's probably a distro that's best for those reasons.

CentOS/RHEL is meant to run on servers.  If you want to stick with the
Red Hat paradigm, but trade some stability for desktop performance,
then try Fedora.  If you don't mind moving away from RPMs altogether
and you want recent packages with a large community and a lot of
support, then Ubuntu is the obvious choice.  If you want to
micromanage your computer and you don't mind stuff breaking whenever
you upgrade, then give Gentoo a try.

Burn yourself some LiveCDs.  Just about every major distribution has a
LiveCD that will run the OS free of commitment.

-Nick
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions concern...

2009-09-02 Thread Robert Citek
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Nick Aubertnickaub...@gmail.com wrote:
 Burn yourself some LiveCDs.  Just about every major distribution has a
 LiveCD that will run the OS free of commitment.

And then there are virtual environments where you can run them all.

Regards,
- Robert
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


[PLUG] Linux distributions concern...

2009-09-01 Thread Michael Robinson
I run CentOS 5.3, I try to keep updated because it's CentOS and CentOS
sadly is way behind as far as Linux distributions go.

People who run CentOS want something that just plain works and they
don't expect to reinstall their operating system every 6 months or 
sooner.

Ubuntu seems to be the most popular Linux distribution for desktops
and it seems to be more current, but I'm not sure I like Ubuntu.  
I don't like having to maintain 2 different Linux distributions.

Games like Dirk Dashing Secret Agent noticeably don't work quite right
on CentOS.  The latest release of Dirk Dashing doesn't seem to work at
all on CentOS, I am not sure why.

Where is Linux going in the future?  What is getting the most attention
right now across the board in general?  Wine and ReactOS still have a
long ways to go.  Dirk Dashing is a native Linux program, but it doesn't
work equally well on all Linux distributions.  Are the various Linux
distributions, enterprise and desktop editions, going to get closer in
time features wise?  Is there going to be a 2.8.xyz kernel soon?

The kernels that CentOS uses stock are quite old as far as the 2.6
branch goes.  I am using 2.6.18 and the current kernel is like 2.6.27
or something.  In CentOS, the mesa drivers seem to be ancient.  
Graphics support in CentOS seems to be weak even if you have 
updated as far as you can.  I'm wondering when CentOS 6 is going to
come out?

Enterprise Linux Distributions are supposed to be for people who need a
system that just works.  But do these distributions have to be so far
behind the bleeding edge?  I'm surprised there aren't repositories for
CentOS to make it more bleeding edge so that you don't have to maintain
a whole entire different Linux distribution.

___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions concern...

2009-09-01 Thread Jameson Williams
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Michael Robinson
plu...@robinson-west.comwrote:

 CentOS sadly is way behind as far as Linux distributions go.


Indeed.


 People who run CentOS want something that just plain works and they
 don't expect to reinstall their operating system every 6 months or
 sooner.


So too do those in the Debian Stable crowd, but their lives are more
functional, more manageable, and more full of joy.


 Ubuntu seems to be the most popular Linux distribution for desktops
 and it seems to be more current, but I'm not sure I like Ubuntu.
 I don't like having to maintain 2 different Linux distributions.


I think it's nearly fair to say that Ubuntu has pretty much killed
everything else in the Desktop arena. Except for a few rogue funbois who
still play with other stuff (e.g. lots of people on this list.)


 Games like Dirk Dashing Secret Agent noticeably don't work quite right
 on CentOS.  The latest release of Dirk Dashing doesn't seem to work at
 all on CentOS, I am not sure why.


Using the mesa driver probably isn't helping.


 Where is Linux going in the future?  What is getting the most attention
 right now across the board in general?


Ubuntu.


 Wine and ReactOS still have a
 long ways to go.


You can look at it that way. really, I think these projects should be
abandoned and that development should be invested into our native
applications.


 Dirk Dashing is a native Linux program, but it doesn't
 work equally well on all Linux distributions.  Are the various Linux
 distributions, enterprise and desktop editions, going to get closer in
 time features wise?  Is there going to be a 2.8.xyz kernel soon?


Probably. They'll all run apt* package management and look like [KX]?Ubuntu.


 The kernels that CentOS uses stock are quite old as far as the 2.6
 branch goes.  I am using 2.6.18 and the current kernel is like 2.6.27
 or something.  In CentOS, the mesa drivers seem to be ancient.


Boy, that is ancient. You should run Fedora, if you like the redhat thing.
FC11 is at 2.6.29 right now. Debian Stable is at 2.6.26, and Ubuntu Latest
is at 2.6.28.


 Graphics support in CentOS seems to be weak even if you have
 updated as far as you can.  I'm wondering when CentOS 6 is going to
 come out?


Whenever RHEL6 does -- likely not in the next year.
http://lwn.net/Articles/286885/


 Enterprise Linux Distributions are supposed to be for people who need a
 system that just works.  But do these distributions have to be so far
 behind the bleeding edge?  I'm surprised there aren't repositories for
 CentOS to make it more bleeding edge so that you don't have to maintain


I think you're talking about Fedora.

Or Debian Stable if you don't like the Red Hat thing. I don't.
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions concern...

2009-09-01 Thread Joe Pruett
centos is based on redhat enterprise.  and very few enterprise shops are 
going to care about running games or even having opengl.  they care about 
running web, mail, database, etc services.  and they want those things to 
not have interface changes over a long lifetime.  so redhat picks a stable 
version of the various tools and does a lot of work to backport security 
and bug fixes to that original version so that your core enterprise 
functionality is not impacted.

only recently have they decided that upgrading firefox is better than 
trying to patch things because that kind of program doesn't need the same 
level of stability as sendmail, apache, mysql, etc.

ubuntu is certainly more desktop friendly.  so is fedora.  but fedora is 
not sanity friendly because they go to the other end of the spectrum and 
grab the latest and greatest toys and throw them in the blender and hope 
that enough alcohol will kill the taste :-).

i have only recently started running ubuntu on a netbook, and since i 
don't really get under the hood very much, that works fine for me. 
thunderbird, firefox, ssh all work like i expect.  but i run centos on 
every server i deal with.
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions concern...

2009-09-01 Thread Jameson Williams
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Russell Johnson ru...@dimstar.net wrote:


 On Sep 1, 2009, at 4:29 PM, Jameson Williams wrote:

 
  The kernels that CentOS uses stock are quite old as far as the 2.6
  branch goes.  I am using 2.6.18 and the current kernel is like 2.6.27
  or something.  In CentOS, the mesa drivers seem to be ancient.
 
 
  Boy, that is ancient. You should run Fedora, if you like the redhat
  thing.
  FC11 is at 2.6.29 right now. Debian Stable is at 2.6.26, and Ubuntu
  Latest
  is at 2.6.28.

 You have to understand the ideology behind the distro before comparing
 it.

 CentOS has a stated goal to be as like RHEL as possible, without
 infringing on Redhat IP. RHEL has a stated goal to be stable for two
 years.

 Stable is defined as, What ran on RHEL 5.2 at release will run on
 RHEL 5.2 with all updates. (I'm paraphrasing... )

 They don't release kernel updates unless there is a compelling reason
 to do so. Most kernel updates will wait until the next major update of
 the OS.

 Basically, CentOS will release kernel updates when RHEL publishes
 kernel updates. They would be subverting their own stated objectives
 if they were to release their own kernel update.

 Fedora, on the other hand, is the Redhat playground. It's not stable,
 not for production, shouldn't be used for 'real work'. YMMV.

 None of what I have stated in this message should be considered as
 gospel, or as a statement from, about, pro, or con against any
 particular distribution. I'm simply restating, in my own way.

 Constructive comments welcome. Flames and/or distro-war fodder  /
 dev/null.


if( STDFLAME_FILENO != open( centos_complaints, O_CREAT ) )
exit( EXIT_FAILURE );

I agree with what you have said, in so far as it is similar to what I have
read and believe to be the common view of the topic. In practice, the CentOS
machines I've used (often without root access) for real work have been out
of date to the point of hindering productivity. As you start compiling more
and more recent versions of things you need, ~/ starts to look like /.
Additionally, I have not found that open bugs in Fedora Core have created
problems either. As a general rule of thumb, my opinion is that Fedora
(CURRENT_RELEASE - 1) is usually better than whatever CentOS is doing.
CentOS is fine for servers that humans don't actually directly use, I
suppose: content servers, etc. Lousy for a build/development machine,
though.
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug


Re: [PLUG] Linux distributions concern...

2009-09-01 Thread Russell Johnson

On Sep 1, 2009, at 9:27 PM, Larry Brigman wrote:

 Yet approx every 6 months they release a major update.  RHEL 5.3 was  
 released in
 Feb 09.  5.4 is in beta now with expected release late Sept or early  
 Oct.
 They do major back ports to support newer hardware.  We have RHEL  
 5.3 running
 on IBM I7 hardware with 10Gb interfaces.


And, as implied in my first message, ALL updates that RHEL has  
released that do not violate the IP of RH, have in turn been released  
for CentOS.

Russell Johnson
ru...@dimstar.net




___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug