RE: [NF] Search Sucks!
On Friday, August 15, 2008 1:47 PM Jeff Johnson wrote: >David: I am no whipper-snapper. When I was in college I knew what to do with my card stack if I dropped them on the floor >and they got out of order and when I was a kid, I ice skated the 10 miles to school! LOL! >Google brags about answering your query in .58 seconds but it takes you five minutes to get past the pay for click >croud to get to what you want. Yeah, but they don't guarantee it is the right answer. Plus, how else would their stock be worth $500 a share! David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Search Sucks!
On Friday, August 15, 2008 12:22 PM Jeff Johnson wrote: >Ricardo: Thank you for your reply. The point of my post is the increased frustration at finding what I want quickly. You >found the below information in five minutes and had to put in USA. If I had just been presented with all teams for 2000 I >could have selected USA, but I couldn't even find that. I use Google in my work for finding answers quickly and as far as >I am concerned five minutes is way too much. These young wiper-snappers these days want everything now... I remember back in old days when I walked 5 miles in a foot of snow with no shoes to the library and had to open books to find information. 8-) Sure, everyone wants it all and wants it now! David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Dems clarify their position on domestic drilling
On Wednesday, August 13, 2008 5:53 PM Nicholas Geti wrote: >What in the world makes you think it is only oil prices? Grocery stores do it the same way minute by minute. Computerized >inventory makes this easy. >You get the current price at the checkout counter after the item is scanned in. It is common practice; you shouldn't be >surprised. If prices were totally consistent, you can assume there is a monopoly going on. Since the vary drastically, >market forces are at work. No, I don't see prices change _daily_ at the grocery store. Unless they get a new produce shipment but the price will stay the same until the next shipment. Only at the gas station does the price change by a penny from the previous day in the retail market. David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Dems clarify their position on domestic drilling
On Wednesday, August 13, 2008 1:01 PM Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: >I would rather stay away from any hybrids. For an off road, any terrain vehicle, I would like the all diesel VW Touareg. >Which of the following vehilces would be the most dangerous to drive ? >1. Gas - electric hybrid >2. Gas - nuclear hybrid >3. All nuclear vehicle, which would be a kind of dirty bomb driving all around the country. LOL >http://www.vw.com/touareg/en/us/ I would like to see the maintenance bill for the nuclear car being repaired for a bad reactor... Would be worse than $4K battery in an electric hybrid! David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Dems clarify their position on domestic drilling
On Wednesday, August 13, 2008 9:39 AM Stephen Russell wrote: >http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/08/07/BUCS126BML. DTL >So Oil barrel price has fallen by 20% but prices at the pump by 9-11% WTF? >Why will airlines fight to bring you in but oil companies keep it inflated and not undercut one another? >Is there something totally illegal about how the oil products sold in America don't behave like all other goods and >services? I agree that the gas prices are a mess. I don't think folks would be talking about it as much if the prices were consistent. Last night, I filled up at a Sheetz (independent dealer) and paid $3.999 a gallon and the Exxon across the street was at $4.299 for premium. I remember in the 1970's "energy crisis" where my social studies teacher said it takes like 6 months for the oil get to the states from the middle east. Yet, the local gas station increases there prices right away based on the current price of a barrel of oil. YMMV David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Need for handheld scanner app
On Monday, August 11, 2008 11:01 AM Michael wrote: >I must admit that the inner geek in me was hoping he'd give the green light to RFID tags, but I'm guessing he perceives the >investment to be too much and/or that his workforce would be too hard and/or careless on the electronic tags and break >them. The Marines use the RFID tags for their shipments around the world. I know the technology has gotten better and smaller. They were talking about them being so small that they would have them on products in grocery/department stores. David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/%(listmsgid)s ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Edwards admits sexual affair; lied as presidential candidate
On Sunday, August 10, 2008 2:16 PM Michael wrote: >There's no metric available I'd bet, but I wonder if blondes are more promiscuous than non-blondes? >Nope, redheads are if you believe this: >http://www.plime.com/sex/l/56168/1/ I am voting for Paris Hilton, even though I don't agree with a pink White House... David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/%(listmsgid)s ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Need for handheld scanner app
On Sunday, August 10, 2008 2:50 PM Michael wrote: >Likewise, I'm looking for recommendations on handheld barcode scanners you've used in the past with great success, as well >as printers for delivering barcoded tags onto these pallets of wood. Client wants to staple them onto the wood bundles and >then use that for scanning through the plant as well as for recounting. I had pitched the use of RFID tags a few years >back but I don't think they want to go that route due to expense (or fear of it not working as well as a simple stapled >label). In my previous job, at a defense contractor, I worked with Symbol scanners and Zebra printers. They worked pretty well with a VFP app. BTW, we also did RF tags that was fun to play with... HTH! David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/%(listmsgid)s ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Fiscal conservative
http://www.bestpicever.com/pic-4460-Fiscal-conservative David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Britney is much more like McSame
http://extras.sltrib.com/bagley/content/08012008.jpg ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] The One
On Friday, August 01, 2008 4:32 PM Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: >Obama says he's "the one" and McCain says he's "the One", but , thank heaven, neither "one" says I'm the "Decider". LOL The "Decider" has moved to Electoral College and Dubya has become the "Lame Duck." >From Dubyaspeak.com: "A buddy of mine said, well, what about the reefs? So I'm concerned about the reefs. I'm a fisherman, I like to fish. Reefs are important for fisheries." Dubya finds a selfless reason to protect reefs. God bless him. White House, Jul. 15, 2008 David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Obama not a good investment
On Thursday, July 31, 2008 12:39 PM Larry Miller wrote: >Especially if the drug saturated teenie-boppers elect the Obamessiah! Just like in the 60s... David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Obama not a good investment
On Thursday, July 31, 2008 12:29 PM Michael Madigan wrote: >Well Mad-Again is correct. Look how the young voters came out for Kerry. With all the lefty rockers like >Springsteen and Bon Jovi devoting a whole tour to get Kerry elected, it turned out nobody bothered to come out. Four years ago. >Many college kids, those blinded by unrealistic idealism and Obama supporters, are all in college and unlikely >to get an absantee ballot. Maybe or maybe not... >Blacks don't vote, and if they do vote it will be in Democratic states anyway. See above. >Obama is currently behind McCain, in the only poll that matters, "Likely" voters, by 4 points. >Obama's going down big time! Considering the margin of error is 4 percent it is tied up. David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Obama not a good investment
On Thursday, July 31, 2008 9:47 AM Michael wrote: >"Huge DNC Contributor to Treasurer: Obama a bad investment" >http://directorblue.blogspot.com/ >Seems to me like many Republicans don't like McCain, and many Democrats don't like Obama. So what's new about >politics in the US? Seems like the same ol' same ol' to me..."who's the candidate I dislike the least...I'll >vote for him." I would have to say it has been that way for that past couple elections. To me it interesting how both parties just can't come up with any better candidates. Also, I disagree with Mad-again that young and minorities will stay home at this election. That is opposite of the reports I have heard that the O-man is attracting those groups. Time for a revolution and start over... David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] Cautionary cartoon
http://xkcd.com/456/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] - Smart Car Extension for Luggage
On Wednesday, July 30, 2008 4:06 AM Adam Buckland wrote: >http://carcino.gen.nz/images/index.php/00b9a680/3406a907 Nice angle on the shot. It could happen: http://www.smartcarofamerica.com/gallery/displayimage.php?imageid=2281 Or http://tinyurl.com/5dns8d I would rather have this one: http://www.smartcarofamerica.com/gallery/displayimage.php?imageid=3218 Or http://tinyurl.com/6j2u6r -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Buckland Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 4:06 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: [OT] - Smart Car Extension for Luggage http://carcino.gen.nz/images/index.php/00b9a680/3406a907 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP9-Internal messages
On Thursday, July 24, 2008 12:36 PM Sytze de Boer wrote: >Why, my current method doesn't Ok, it is would use the network messaging then... I was thinking the network is Windows. David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Fwd: The Yahoo! Music Store Will Be Closing; Important Information About Backing Up Your Music Files
On Thursday, July 24, 2008 12:33 PM Michael wrote: >I did hear that vinyl is making a comeback. Are you buying vinyl records again? I (like many) would have to >go out and buy a record player again. That sounds funny to say that...like we're in the "way back" machine >with Mr. Peabody and Sherman. ;-) >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mr._Peabody Yeah and tubes sound better as well... :-) Look for a record player that connects to your computer via USB... David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP9-Internal messages
On Thursday, July 24, 2008 12:19 PM Sytze de Boer wrote: >I have a very tiny routine in my main application that allows me to send a message to all users logged into >this application. >e.g. Paul bought the scones for morning tea >I'm not happy with the method, but before I invent another wheel, does anyone have a system they care to share >? >(I prefer a fox method rather than windows messaging) Why? Fox is just going to use windows messaging anyway... David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] John Edwards caught with mistress in Beverly Hills
On Wednesday, July 23, 2008 1:47 PM Vince Teachout wrote: >I don't care, just PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE >Pleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleas epleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepl>easepleasepleaseplease >don't let the trial be televised! Tell us how you really feel... I would bet it will not be on TV except for maybe Court TV. David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] John Edwards caught with mistress in Beverly Hills
On Wednesday, July 23, 2008 12:55 PM Michael wrote: >Michael Oke, II wrote: >> OJ was found to be liable in the civil trial which is not the same as >> being found guilty. >Very truethanks for the correction! >From wikipedia.org: "In 1997, a default judgment against Simpson was awarded for their wrongful deaths in civil court by an all white jury, but to date he has paid little of the $33.5 million judgment.[1] He gained further notoriety in late 2006 when he wrote a book titled If I Did It. The book, which purports to be a first-person fictional account of the murder had he actually committed it, was withdrawn by the publisher just before its release. The book was later released by the Goldman family and the title of the book was expanded to If I Did It: Confessions of the Killer (ISBN 978-0825305887). In September 2007, Simpson faced more legal troubles, as he was arrested[2] and subsequently charged with numerous felonies, including robbery with a deadly weapon, burglary with a firearm, assault with a deadly weapon, first-degree kidnapping with use of a deadly weapon (which carries possible life sentence), coercion with use of a deadly weapon, conspiracy to commit robbery, conspiracy to commit kidnapping, and conspiracy to commit a crime." I was wondering what happed with hotel theft. Seems the trial has been reset to September 8, 2008. I guess until then he gets to play golf in FL... David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Fat Slobs struggle to put food on the table. LMAO
On Sunday, July 20, 2008 5:09 PM Paul Hill wrote: >Generally the cheapest food is cheap vegetables, pulses etc. You don't have to buy quality organic produce, >I'm sure US supermarkets stock 'value' vegetables & meat. >These people get fat because they eat processed crap, and probably don't know how to prepare a meal from >scratch. I work with a guy who is seriously obese. He came to my house last Friday and we had to stop for a >breather on the way from the train station. My 65 year old mother wouldn't need to stop (admittedly I live at >the top of a hill...). He's only 32. It is a simple formula to lose weight: eat less and exercise more. The human body does used to a size it is and unless you burn more calories than coming in then nothing is going to change. David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Fat Slobs struggle to put food on the table. LMAO
On Sunday, July 20, 2008 10:12 PM Pete Theisen wrote: >It turned sour for me in 1979 and has never come back. Thanks, Jimmy. >Since then I got a lot of higher education that has spiced up the variety of my conversation but has not been >worth even a penny of income. Education is a fraud in the absence of jobs for the graduates. I love it when folks blame a president (especially one 30 years ago) for their own failures. You made your own choices that got your where you are today. I would not be where I am now if it wasn't for my degree. I took night classes and got my employer to pay for most it. Plus, I don't have any school loans. I have heard some folks having huge school loans for a International Affairs degree. Where is the payback for that job? >I am probably older than you. Once you can't work 18 hours a day for straight time any more they have no use >for you. If you love what you do then you would never work a day in your life... David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] I've had enough; I'm taking matters into my own hands.
On Wednesday, July 16, 2008 7:26 PM Ed Leafe wrote: > Sorry, hit 'send' too soon. Here's the link: > http://leafe.com/screencasts/elect.html That is funny! I will be sure to do my write in vote... Or not... :-) David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] "The world should share the cost" ofrebuildingthe Afghanarmy -- McCain from today's speech
On Wednesday, July 16, 2008 2:46 PM Stephen Wolfe wrote: >But we did not take over the country. Are you sure?Is that why they keep killing our troops so we don't take over their country? David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] New Yorker cartoon cover?
On Monday, July 14, 2008 12:25 PM Kenneth Kixmoeller wrote: >Yes, that's right. Satire is hard to do well. Maybe if they also had the McCains in similar stereotype on the same cover >it would have worked better... Like 1 foot in the grave... ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] New Yorker cartoon cover?
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/07/14/politics/politico/main4257077. shtml?source=mostpop_story Or http://tinyurl.com/6n688v Is this Mad-a-gain's next t-shirt? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Pickens Plan
On Friday, July 11, 2008 12:08 PM Michael Madigan wrote: >http://www.pickensplan.com/ Yeah, we can take all the hot air from the politicians to make his windmills go faster! 8-) David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Nearly $11,000 later, the divorce still isn't done
On Friday, July 11, 2008 11:08 AM Michael Madigan wrote: >This guy makes me look like a feminist. LOL >This guy is on O'Reilly all the time. He's turned misogyny into a very nice business. One comment he said, that I don't agree with, is that women have greater sex drive than men... He approves of abortion, but that the women should share in the cost of it... I wonder if the women thought it through and had pay up as well would they be so quick to jump into bed? David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Need recommendation for web site code to allow clients touploaddata
On Friday, July 11, 2008 10:08 AM Virgil Bierschwale wrote: >I just got through doing a job at wachovia. >They totally lock down all email sites such as yahoo, gmail, hotmail, etc.. >They also lock down sites such as idrive, etc.. >I too used to use gmail to transfer files to my home computer to work on them at night and unfortunately I'm finding out >that for the large corporations, this ability won't be around too much longer I don't think. >Wachovia even locked out the usb ports so that a flash drive wouldn't work. About 2 years ago, a lady here brought in a flash drive that she was listening to the music. But, also was infected with a virus. It practically shut us down for a full day! BTW, welcome back! David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Nearly $11,000 later, the divorce still isn't done
Heard this guy on the Mike O'Meara show and has some interesting points about the marriage/divorce system: http://www.thenononsenseman.com/ David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Nearly $11,000 later, the divorce still isn't done
On Thursday, July 10, 2008 8:59 AM Cathy Pountney wrote: >Christof changed his last name to his wife's .. so heck .. maybe from now on the men should start changing their name like >he did. He's a trend setter! I always wondered why??? IMHO, It wasn't like he went to a better last name... I guess he thought so. David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] How many refineries?
On Wednesday, July 09, 2008 2:14 PM Pete Theisen wrote: >I count 161, I have seen news reports that there are only 3. Who's right? Of course, Fox News is correct and Wikipedia couldn't be wrong! David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] God Almighty action figure
Gotta get one! http://www.bestpicever.com/pic-4204-God-almighty Look it is Edgar Winter! http://www.edgarwinter.com/home.php ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] How strong is your commitment?
On Thursday, July 03, 2008 10:05 AM Stephen Russell wrote: >Last half of today's reading: Gospel - Jn 20:24-29 Didn't know we were in Sunday School? >27: Then he said to Thomas, "Put your finger here, and see my hands; and put out your hand, and place it in my side; do >not be faithless, but believing." >28: Thomas answered him, "My Lord and my God!" >29: Jesus said to him, "Have you believed because you have seen me? >Blessed are those who have not seen and yet believe." I have yelled his name a few times. Cheese an Rice! :-) That I believe... >Around here we would consider that Thomas was from Missouri, the "Show Me" state. >Are you prepared to let little things get in your way? I don't know if I would consider that a little thing? No, I try not to sweat the small stuff (because it is all small stuff-good book, BTW).. But, sometimes saying his name makes it go away like magic! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Obama courting evangelicals
On Wednesday, July 02, 2008 4:33 PM Vince Teachout wrote: >Loudoun County?! >They had to do that, in order to pay for the FMLA software I'm writing for them. Seriously! >Sorry. If you want, I'll give you a free copy of the software, though :-) Sure, glad to see my tax dollars doing some good... David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Obama courting evangelicals
On Wednesday, July 02, 2008 3:18 PM Michael wrote: >Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > >> 4) Allow real estate prices to fall in line with income. >> >I wonder if the California folks would like that or not? Surely their real estate prices are astronomically out of line >with their incomes? >Comments from those residents? (Paul, Lou, ?) Well, in Loudoun County in Virginia, our property taxes went up 18% last year and my salary increase was no where near that! David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Took a dip today
On Tuesday, July 01, 2008 12:01 AM >I took a dip in the [OT] waters today and am struck by the continued inanity and Ed's willingness to give up precious >bandwidth and storage space to send and archive such drivel. >I think everyone should masturbate more. No judgment there... David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Subaru Legacy Boxer Diesel
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/FirstDrives/articleId=124553 Or http://tinyurl.com/26nmzk The Business Case for Diesel At present, Subaru's new diesel engine is destined only for Europe, but Subaru is taking a wait-and-see approach to its introduction in Japan and the U.S. At present, the engine will not meet California's stringent air emissions regulations. "We would only introduce the car in the U.S. if it was legal in every state," says Yamamoto. "Meeting the California legislation is very hard and very expensive. We are researching it, but there is no timetable." Subaru estimates that fitting the particulate filter needed to make the engine fully compliant would add around $1,500 to the price of the car. Nevertheless, Hirofumi Senoo, the general manager of Subaru's European test center tells us, "Diesel is the main focus for the U.S. market. It has more potential than hybrid gasoline engines because hybrids are only good for the city." Subaru will let others take the lead in the introduction of diesel to the U.S., but will be ready to strike if the market becomes receptive. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] DC Mayor gets a smart
On Tuesday, July 01, 2008 11:53 AM Pete Theisen wrote: >If I had to get something right now I would want a Yaris. 4 seats and can top 100 if the boogieman is after you. 30 + mpg >at average speeds is doable, on the other hand. >Of course, the most economical car is the one you already have. >Depreciation is still the biggest cost. The smart is not for everyone. As is the Hummer. The Honda Accord is popular that thieves love them! The smart has a governor to limit the top speed to 90 MPH but the speed odometer goes to 100 MPH. I have gone 80 MPH with no problem. Yes, officer, I was just coasting down the mountain with tail wind and trying to keep up with the truckers.. One lady asked me if it swayed on the highway and I said no. Then she called me a lying... Well, it does have electronic stabilization so it doesn't sway that much. One time I was on a highway in high winds and a gust came up and kinda woke me up. But, I think any car would felt the same way. Normally, I would not buy a brand new car because I don't want to pay for that depreciation. I get more smiles per mile with my smart to make up the difference. :-) David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] DC Mayor gets a smart
On Friday, June 27, 2008 6:12 PM Stephen Russell wrote: >I saw a pitch about it on TV, and I think that he bought it himself. No, it did say in the article that the city bought the car. >He is proud of doing the right thing and wish more people would follow the lead. I have seen them on eBay for $20K... So, it might be worth it or wait almost 2 years... David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] DC Mayor gets a smart
They only sell the gas version in the US. I have heard the diesel is supposed to be out in a couple years. Damn US gov'ment! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete Theisen Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 8:12 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] DC Mayor gets a smart David Crooks wrote: > http://www.wtopnews.com/?nid=596&sid=1421214 > > He bought it from the same dealer I got my car. > > David L. Crooks Hi David! Did he get the gas or diesel? -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Anders Altberg
On Tuesday, July 01, 2008 7:37 AM Gérard Lochon wrote: >He's also still active in our french community, AtoutFox. I think I scared him away from here... It was shortly after we went to visit him that he stopped coming around here. I don't know what I said or did... David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] DC Mayor gets a smart
On Friday, June 27, 2008 3:56 PM Michael wrote: >No, that's so crackhead former Mayor Marion Barry--when >re-elected---will be able to get to his drug deal that much sooner >without the traffic slowing him up. >Can you believe they re-elected that guy after he was convicted of >buying crack cocaine while serving as mayor? (iirc) I am not sure "Mayor for Life" is eligible to run any more? If I recall correctly, he is now in charge of some city council district. BTW, I saw where some drug dealer trained pigeons to deliver his drugs for him on the news last night... "What a country!" David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] DC Mayor gets a smart
On Friday, June 27, 2008 3:51 PM Michael wrote: >I wonder if he agreed to keep the dealer's license plate holders and/or other dealership markings on the car for >increased dealer publicity? ;-) I did appreciate that my car does not have any dealership markings on it. I saw that the smart center in Maryland puts their badge on the car. David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] DC Mayor gets a smart
On Friday, June 27, 2008 3:17 PM Kenneth Kixmoeller wrote: >"Oh, gee. Let me think: If I sell a car to John Doe, he gets a car. >If I sell it to The Dishonorable Mayor Babykisser, he gets a car and I get $100,000 worth of publicity. Decisions, >decisions..." I think I should get a commission for all time I have spent answering questions about the car... David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] DC Mayor gets a smart
On Friday, June 27, 2008 3:16 PM Michael Oke, II wrote: >Not "technically", the city bought it. Seems like a photo-op to me and I'm sure that the dealership that sold it knew >that from the git. I'm sure that he'll drive around in it. The dealership is owned by Roger Penske who is responsible for bringing the smart to the USA. David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] DC Mayor gets a smart
On Friday, June 27, 2008 3:11 PM Michael Madigan wrote: >Once again a politician gets preferential treatment "Because he's the mayor, Fenty's ride has one option that most Smart Cars don't have. He had flashing lights and a siren installed." When you are the mayor of the most powerful city in the world, what do you expect? David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] DC Mayor gets a smart
On Friday, June 27, 2008 2:55 PM Michael Oke, II wrote: >You mean that the city bought it. Yeah, technically the city did buy it. They were lucky to only wait 2 months for it. I had to wait 11 months and have heard of others that waited even longer. David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] DC Mayor gets a smart
http://www.wtopnews.com/?nid=596&sid=1421214 He bought it from the same dealer I got my car. David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Court Rules in Favor of Second Amendment Gun Right
On Thursday, June 26, 2008 11:44 AM Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: >Here it is in a nutshell: >http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf I saw a bumper sticker that said that the Supreme Court was wrong about slavery with regards to abortion. David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT]High price of gas
On Tuesday, June 24, 2008 11:02 AM Michael wrote: >I thought you didn't like O'Reilly?!?!?! I don't. I was just switching stations and heard him talk about this topic. I also like that when I do a Google search for him...This pops up: "Bill O'Reilly is big blubbering vagina." David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT]High price of gas
On Tuesday, June 24, 2008 2:37 PM Stephen Russell wrote: >Let's put it in Iowa, because nothing bad ever happens there. And if something does the people are just so happy thet >they carry on and don't complain. Right. Those floods were such a good thing... They were just trying to grow genetically-modified foods there... HMMM.. I wonder who has the technology to make it rain a lot??? David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: What Price Dinner?
On Tuesday, June 24, 2008 10:34 AM Michael Oke, II wrote: >Presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama on June 24 will mingle with the Southland's Democratic elite, who will pony up >$28,500 per couple to join a glittering VIP dinner and reception at the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion. >And you get a magnanimous 30 minutes to eat before you get to "participate" in the general reception. It is called fund raising. Based the last e-mail you sent, something that Billary needed to do better at... LOL David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT]High price of gas
On Tuesday, June 24, 2008 10:28 AM Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: >If I understand correctly, there has not been any new development of nuclear power plant in the USA for over 30 years. >I do not understand how all this improvement in safety occurred, since such problems are usually worked out as bugs >occur or are discovered, but thanks for the assurances that no more accidents are possible. LOL It really put my >mind at ease. I'll sleep like a baby tonight knowing that the use of >all nuclear power as a source of energy has been made failsafe. I listened to a part of Bill O'Reilly yesterday driving to lunch. He said that the #1 liberal country (where does he get this stuff?) Sweden is more that 50% nuclear power and France (I think he said was #3 liberal country in the world) ran mostly on nuclear energy. David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT]Campaign Debt
On Tuesday, June 24, 2008 10:20 AM Michael Oke, II wrote: >She's abandoned her dream, for this presidential election cycle, but that doesn't mean that you shouldn't stop giving >her money. >http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/06/24/clinton-wants-help-with -campaign-debt/ She lost the primaries... Just because she is $20 million in debt isn't my problem. David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] George Carlin
On Monday, June 23, 2008 8:27 AM Ed Leafe wrote: > Sorry to read that the old ticker finally gave out on him. He was (well, still is) one of my all-time favorites. > Trivia: when I was 14, a local record store had a Fridays-only sale: >you could buy any 3 albums for $10. I bought my first three albums: >John Lennon's _Imagine_, Black Sabbath's _Master of Reality_, and George Carlin's _Class Clown_. Yes, I was sorry to hear he has passed on. I saw him at the Warner Theater in Washington, DC and he was great! Always enjoyed his "Brain Droppings." BTW, I also saw Harvey Korman (who also recently passed at 81 yo in May) and Tim Conway at the Warner Theater a couple years ago. Of course, they did there skit with Tim being a dentist. Always a good laugh! David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Audiophiles out there?
On Wednesday, June 11, 2008 4:37 PM Paul Hill wrote: >Pediphile? Would that be someone who has an obsession with feet? :-) I thought if you cross an Audiophile with a Pediphile, you would get someone who likes to listen to kids? 8-) ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Date Modified
On Wednesday, June 11, 2008 2:09 AM Michael Madigan wrote: >Is that the difference between your time zone and Greenwich Mean Time? No, I am in Eastern Daylight Savings time and that is how the PCs are set. David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] Date Modified
I am experiencing some strange behavior with the time of files. Believe it or not, I still get some files via modem. Recently, the files are coming in with times 7 hours in the future. I have checked the clocks on the PC they are all correct and in the right time zone. Any idea why the Modified time would be soo far off? David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] The Stupid Saga Continues
On Tuesday, June 10, 2008 5:56 PM Jean Laeremans wrote: >Still driving that Saab cabrio ? I don't remember. It probably was a Saab. The trip was in 2003. David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] The Stupid Saga Continues
On Tuesday, June 10, 2008 5:45 PM Jean Laeremans wrote: >So you met Anders, nice man isn't he and a walking fp & SQL encyclopedia . >I met him a few years ago in the Provence at the home of the parents of another fox MVP. Yeah, he and his wife took us around the town and were great hosts. David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] The Stupid Saga Continues
On Tuesday, June 10, 2008 5:31 PM Michael wrote: >When my kids are grown, unless folks tell me it's terrible there, I wouldn't mind living in Sweden or Netherlands or one of those countries. > Surely there's bad things over there and I'll have to do research to find out what, but for some reason (perhaps the high percentage >population supposedly of blondes, and that I'm single again), it's appealing to me. Just don't tell my Brazilian girlfriend I said that. >(hahaha). Actually, she's great. It's one of those things where you think "omG, do women like this really exist? Tell me what's BAD about >this one?!?!?" -- Those who've come out of a shitty relationship onto >a better life know exactly what I'm talking about. It's nice to be appreciated and respected again! My wife and I went to Sweden few years ago and visited some relatives. We also visited Anders Altberg who used to be part of this group. It was a great vacation where they spoke better English than me. I think one of the hardest part living there would be the winters where it is dark most of the time. YMMV David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Moral McCain
On Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:04 AM Larry Miller wrote: >Considering who some of the superdelegates are... it's a reasonable argument to make. ;-) I like the ones that wear a cape: http://www.dailysquib.co.uk/?c=117&a=1294 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Obama: Messiah in our Midst
On Friday, June 06, 2008 11:25 AM Michael Madigan >Out of the horse's mouth >http://youtube.com/watch?v=LYY73RO_egw&feature=related I listened to it twice and not once did I hear the word 'white.' I know...Don't feed the trolls... David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Obama: Messiah in our Midst
On Friday, June 06, 2008 10:59 AM Adam Buckland wrote: >Finally proof that Madigan is a racist... Finally? Been that way for years... ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Obama: Messiah in our Midst
On Friday, June 06, 2008 10:57 AM Michael wrote: >LOL! Good Lordwonder how many others get that same impression of her? When they get their info from the Onion... ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: SQL Passthru and long commands
On Wednesday, June 04, 2008 11:56 AM Garrett Fitzgerald wrote: >It makes people online ask questions when you turn out to be overly cute. >In other words, <*snip*>. Oh... I thought it was new key word... Never mind... :-) David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: SQL Passthru and long commands
On Wednesday, June 04, 2008 11:30 AM Garrett Fitzgerald wrote: >I mentioned earlier this year that I was using tricks when building statements to send through SQL passthru. I just ran across the >following one, and figured I'd share FWIW. >I put lcQueryFormat on the first page of the report: then I strip everything out that the server's going to choke on. >TEXT TO lcQueryFormat NOSHOW >SELECT Person.searchName, Person.patientId, Person.dateOfBirth ; > SNIP ; > FROM ml.Person Person ; > SNIP ; > LEFT JOIN ml.Problem ON Person.pID = Problem.pID ; > AND (Problem.code LIKE 'ICD-578.9%' ; && GI bleeding && > OR Problem.code LIKE 'ICD-599.7%' ; && Hematuria && > OR Problem.code LIKE 'ICD-924.9%' ; && Hematoma && > OR Problem.code LIKE 'ICD-432.9%' ; && Intracranial hemorrhage && > OR Problem.code LIKE 'ICD-287.9%' ; && Bleeding disorder && > ) >ENDTEXT > >LcQueryFormat = CHRTRAN(lcQueryFormat, ";", "") >lcQuery = CHRTRAN(lcQueryFormat ; > , CHR(9) + CHR(10) + CHR(13) ; > , " ") >lcComment = "&" + "&" && For obvious reasons... >lcQuery = RegExp(lcQuery, lcComment + "[^&]+" + lcComment, 1, "") What does the SNIP key word do? I did not find it in the SQL Server help... David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] smart Hydrogen Electric car
On Tuesday, June 03, 2008 11:54 AM Michael wrote: >I just figured that in this day and age, Power Steering is as common as a CD player in the car. I agree. I didn't think I would have to spend $450 additional for power steering. Like I said, I do not really miss it. I have been on a tractor that was harder to steer than my smart. David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] smart Hydrogen Electric car
On Tuesday, June 03, 2008 11:37 AM Pete Theisen wrote: >Is AC at least available? >From smartusa.com: Factory installed options: Air conditioning with automatic temperature control (incl. dust, pollen filter) $600 Metallic paint (metallic red, metallic blue, metallic silver) $225 Silver metallic tridion safety cell $175 Alarm system $160 Panorama roof (sun screen included) $350 Power steering $450 Heated seats $220 smart radio (AM/FM, single CD; incl. 2 speakers, aux input jack for mp3 device [radio 9]) $350 smart premium radio (AM/FM, mp3-compatible 6 disc CD changer; incl. 2 speakers, aux input jack for mp3 device [radio 10]) $495 I have the Passion model which came with A/C, Panorama roof, and the radio 9... The car really doesn't need power steering. I have driven both and the car is soo light (1800 lbs) doesn't need it. David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] smart Hydrogen Electric car
On Tuesday, June 03, 2008 11:13 AM Pete Theisen wrote: >They don't say it has AC, impractical without it. Yeah, I know. smart has a Pure model that comes standard without A/C and wind up windows. Yet, it costs $11,590 (base price). Reminds me of my 1973 VW bug David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] smart Hydrogen Electric car
On Tuesday, June 03, 2008 11:03 AM Michael Madigan wrote: >It says the electriv version is available now. Is it really? Yeah, I saw a video comparing the gas and electric version in Europe. I did not know they were available in the US. I have also heard they are pricey... I will see if I can find more info... David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] smart Hydrogen Electric car
http://www.azsmartcar.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Vista and random network drive mappings
On Monday, June 02, 2008 4:04 PM Allen wrote: >Your lucky, my XP machine has started to lose drive mappings I had already set up. I have one server that I can't seem to keep connected since I patched to SP3. Then I have co-workers who don't have the issue... David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] .Net need not apply
On Monday, June 02, 2008 11:50 AM Ed Leafe wrote: > Better and faster than what? Than previous versions (like you say below:)... > .Net is much better than the previous Windows development tools that preceeded it, but it isn't all that different than many of the >other development systems out there. They took Java and the library design of Java as their starting point, and developed a very similar >framework; they were smart enough to avoid some of the bad decisions made in Java (although not all!). > The current state-of-the-art for development in Java probably surpasses that of .Net, given Java's head start. So if you're looking >for an rich, IDE-based development environment, you've got your pick. I agree and since I work at MSFT shop that choice is .NET. David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] .Net need not apply
On Monday, June 02, 2008 11:37 AM Bill Anderson wrote: >That .NET is revolutionary! Don't you see it? >(Still looking...) There are very few computer software/products that are revolutionary. I would say that .NET is evolutionary and does now have some very advanced features that make programming applications better and faster. YMMV David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] What is God all about?
On Friday, May 30, 2008 11:18 AM Stephen Russell wrote: >The verse you quoted shows us that the church is the net. Many will come into it the haul and at their death there will be a >separation. The good will go into the boats and the bad are tossed. >So will you be part of the Just or part of the Wicked? ;-> I know that you don't care either way. So, I guess we are not all the same under the eyes of God? Religion is all about control and the biggest separation that claim they are 'better' than anyone else. Because _they_ say so... David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Need help creating an icon file
On Thursday, May 29, 2008 2:55 PM Michael wrote: >I've got a graphic (GIF, JPG, or BMP...can't recall ottomh) and I want to snag a piece of it and turn that portion into an icon file. >M$ has a page that recommends using Illustrator or Freehand (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms997636.aspx), but I have neither, >and MS Paint doesn't do the job either. >If there's a kind soul who can help me, please email me offlist. >Thanks!!! I have Icon Constructor that should be able to do the trick... Send it on my way... David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Desert code camp Phx May 31
On Thursday, May 29, 2008 12:37 PM Michael wrote: >Very cool! Thanks. It'd be nice to attend one of those, but it'll need to be out here on the East Coast within driving distance for me. Keep an eye on this website: http://www.cmap-online.org/CodeCamp/ They probably have the next one in the fall. David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] smart car was: Scott McClellan comes clean
On Wednesday, May 28, 2008 3:42 PM Pete Theisen wrote: >Did she pile into something while thus distracted? No, but it is crazy. Another time I driving on Route 70 in Maryland about 65 MPH (the speed limit) at night and this car flies up near me. Then I see this flash and he come closer and then another flash as he takes pictures of my car. Then just takes off into the night. David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] smart car was: Scott McClellan comes clean
On Wednesday, May 28, 2008 2:31 PM Michael Madigan wrote: >"don't come a knockin if my Smart Car is a Rockin" That is funny, right there...! LOL! David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] smart car was: Scott McClellan comes clean
On Wednesday, May 28, 2008 2:33 PM Michael wrote: >Really? You should add your links to your sig like MM does to get more exposure. I will post the link when I get some designs up going... David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] smart car was: Scott McClellan comes clean
On Wednesday, May 28, 2008 1:48 PM Pete Theisen wrote: >Michael Madigan can probably hook you right up. Probably, but I already have my own CafePress account I want to start using more often. David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] smart car was: Scott McClellan comes clean
On Wednesday, May 28, 2008 12:22 PM Michael Madigan wrote: >Actually I would buy it for her. It would act like a chastity belt. LOL I have some cute girls go crazy for the car. One was going down a highway in a big SUV taking pictures of my car with her cell phone. David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] smart car was: Scott McClellan comes clean
On Wednesday, May 28, 2008 11:31 AM Michael wrote: >Hey, I like that car! I am thinking about getting a bumper sticker that says: I'd rather pay $16K and get 40MPG than pay $40K and get 16MPG David L. Crooks http://www.im-smrt.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Scott McClellan comes clean
On Wednesday, May 28, 2008 10:59 AM Michael Madigan wrote: >This coming from a guy who drives the weasle mobile? LOL >http://cache.jalopnik.com/cars/images/smart_car_orders.jpg Hey, I like my car more every time I fill it up and getting 46 MPG. Even at $4.15 a gallon it doesn't cost me $30 to fill up. Can you say that??? This past weekend a guy in a Cadillac Escalade wanting to trade... No thanks... David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Scott McClellan comes clean
On Wednesday, May 28, 2008 10:46 AM Michael Madigan wrote: >He was actually fired for looking too much like an ineffectual weasel. It is a shame the same can't be done with Dubya! David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] How do you position your labels relative to their input controls(left, right, on top)?
On Thursday, May 22, 2008 1:09 PM Malcolm Greene wrote: >When laying out your forms (VFP, HTML, ), how do you position your labels relative their associated input controls >and why? >Do you use multiple layout styles in the same application? >1. Left justify labels against their left margin > [ ] >lll [ ] >ll [ ] >2. Right justify labels against their associated control > [ ] > lll [ ] > ll [ ] >3. Place your labels on top of their associated control > >[ ] >lll >[ ] >ll >[ ] The Microsoft Windows standard is option 1. For some reason, I associate that with Access applications. It must be the wizard placing the labels and controls. I prefer option 2 (with a colon) to keep the label and data closer together. Option 3 seems to 'waste' more space and I might use on a dialog box. HTH! David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Next Presidental candidate I might vote for
I said _might_ vote for... Then there is this: http://www.chbn.com/Clip.aspx?key=8BF2D6BFC8CACD0C David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Next Presidental candidate I might vote for
He was a Republican for 30 years... http://www.bobbarr2008.com/ David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Egg attack on Steve Ballmer
On Wednesday, May 21, 2008 3:41 PM Michael wrote: >http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080521/ap_on_hi_te/microsoft_ballmer_egged ;_ylt=AhEylRubs3y.rMTG.OFejpdk24cA >The student missed, however. ;-) It was amazing how calm the guy was and I liked the follow up question. David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Chap of Quiddick's number coming up.
On Wednesday, May 21, 2008 9:40 AM Ed Leafe wrote: > It's available in both the Fiction and Sadism sections. Is that the Old and New Testament? I have always considered the Bible to be a pretty good novel... "Be still, and know that I am God." (Ps 46:10, NIV) David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Straight Talk?
Ok, here is the quote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpGH02DtIws David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Straight Talk?
On Tuesday, May 20, 2008 9:05 AM Larry Miller wrote: >Sorry Pete, you apparently missed the quote from Hussein Obama that he had taken his campaign to all 57 states and he had one more to >go, Alaska and Hawaii. The drive by media wouldn't report such a thing unless an R had said it. I wish I could find that sound bite. I have heard it on the Mike O'Meara show a couple of times. To me is sounded like he meant 47 and instead he said 57. Then the quote would have sense. He had one more state to go and his staff would not let him go to Alaska and Hawaii. David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Silverlight or Moonlight you pick a platform.
On Monday, May 19, 2008 5:05 PM Allen wrote: >So why does microsoft insist on downloading silverlight at every opportunaty ? It is the new virus and way to take over the world... David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Silverlight or Moonlight you pick a platform.
On Monday, May 19, 2008 5:14 PM Pete Theisen wrote: >It could be a Gentoo problem. I am going to try a different distro one of these days when I get my other stuff caught up. Nothing >worthwhile on Flash anyway, it is all bs stuff. Anything of substance is always prose text. I think the same applies to p*rn. All eye candy! Much rather read about it... David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Silverlight or Moonlight you pick a platform.
On Monday, May 19, 2008 3:26 PM Stephen Russell wrote: >You are the only one I know of that has had a hard time with flash, and your on Linux as well. I agree. It is probably a bad graphics card... David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Straight Talk?
On Monday, May 19, 2008 4:08 PM Pete Theisen wrote: >It might be part of being a senator. Seems that John Kerry did something like that when he said he voted for war funding and then voted >against it. I know, it is only bad when an R does it. All politicians are waffles! It is part of the job description. They have to keep everyone happy which causes flip flopping based which way the wind is blowing (pun intended). Also, there are the bills that are worded badly or include pork that cause it to be rejected. David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Smart car gets top crash rating
On Friday, May 16, 2008 10:54 AM Michael Madigan wrote: >Another issue with motorcycle accidents is that many riders are a-holes. Every time I see a motorcycle weaving through traffic, going >100 MPH, or doing wheelies on a highway, you know they're in for a rude awakening. I have heard of statistic (so it must be true... ) that 25% of folks on those crotch rockets end up dead or major injuries. A co-worker told me a friend of his wrecked his bike by hitting a pothole and slide like 30-40 feet. I will stay on my 4 wheels, thank you very much... David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
