Keyboard control surface?

2012-03-30 Thread Poppa Bear
Is anyone using the HOTKEY MATRIX - keyboard Control Surface for Pro Tools? It 
is a shortcut USB key board made for PT. I am considering it, but am not sure 
if anything in voice over will conflict with the short cut functions.  Here it 
is, 

http://dnamusiclabs.com/hotkey-matrix

Nate Kile, Cross Road Recording Studios, specializing in Mixing, Mastering and 
all your audio needs. www.crossroadrecording.com

Two Questions about basic Editing

2012-03-30 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland

OK.

I totally understand that pressing num pad period then enter your number 
then period again will jump you to that marker.  I also totally get that 
hitting num pad period, dial in your number, then press num pad enter will 
let you reassign!  that marker to another location.


What, however I'm not getting is I know that up arrow and down arrow make in 
and out drops.  So what is the difference in a marker, from using up and 
down arrows?


My second even more important question by far is, let's say that I'm working 
on a session, and it's, o... I dono... let's just say speech only.  there is 
no music.


Well, right now, in the edit window, if I interact with the counters 
cluster, I notice that my start, end, and length, are all set based on 
bar/beat.


Well, if this is speech only, we don't wanna move through the file by 
bar/beat.  We'd wanna move by hour, minute, second.


How can I reconfigure my session, so that we can make this happen?

Kevin, I gotta say, I had the hardest time following your tutorial before. 
I think a lot of it was I wasn't concentrating very thoroughly.  I did great 
up until we started editting, and working with the num pad.  Then you 
totally lost me.  Now that I play the file again, it for some reason makes 
sense.  You definitely put me way out of my comfort zone, but that's good! 
I like a challenge.  I think now, I just really need to practice and really 
get good with those commands you gave me.


One thing, when I'm dialing the numbers in, like you kept going to bar 24 in 
that track... so if we want to just go there, we'd do num pad star, 2 5 
period 1, then hit return.


My qu3estion there is, do I have to do 2 5 period 1 on the num pad, or does 
that have to be done from the qwerty numbers, or does it not matter, just so 
you hit return when done, and not num pad enter, as that is used for 
assigning a marker.


Chris. 



Re: Two Questions about basic Editing

2012-03-30 Thread Chris Norman
From what I understand, markers are for saving spots in your project,
whereas arrow keys are for marking regions for editing.

You can change to SMTPE time in the counter display. It says counter
display or something, can't remember.

Anyways, hth,

On 30/03/2012, Christopher-Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:
 OK.

 I totally understand that pressing num pad period then enter your number
 then period again will jump you to that marker.  I also totally get that
 hitting num pad period, dial in your number, then press num pad enter will
 let you reassign!  that marker to another location.

 What, however I'm not getting is I know that up arrow and down arrow make in
 and out drops.  So what is the difference in a marker, from using up and
 down arrows?

 My second even more important question by far is, let's say that I'm working
 on a session, and it's, o... I dono... let's just say speech only.  there is
 no music.

 Well, right now, in the edit window, if I interact with the counters
 cluster, I notice that my start, end, and length, are all set based on
 bar/beat.

 Well, if this is speech only, we don't wanna move through the file by
 bar/beat.  We'd wanna move by hour, minute, second.

 How can I reconfigure my session, so that we can make this happen?

 Kevin, I gotta say, I had the hardest time following your tutorial before.
 I think a lot of it was I wasn't concentrating very thoroughly.  I did great
 up until we started editting, and working with the num pad.  Then you
 totally lost me.  Now that I play the file again, it for some reason makes
 sense.  You definitely put me way out of my comfort zone, but that's good!
 I like a challenge.  I think now, I just really need to practice and really
 get good with those commands you gave me.

 One thing, when I'm dialing the numbers in, like you kept going to bar 24 in
 that track... so if we want to just go there, we'd do num pad star, 2 5
 period 1, then hit return.

 My qu3estion there is, do I have to do 2 5 period 1 on the num pad, or does
 that have to be done from the qwerty numbers, or does it not matter, just so
 you hit return when done, and not num pad enter, as that is used for
 assigning a marker.

 Chris.




-- 
Take care,

Chris Norman.

!-- chris.norm...@googlemail.com --


Re: Keyboard control surface?

2012-03-30 Thread Scott Chesworth
I know a ton of sighted PT dabblers that would love this, but can't really
see how it'd be worth its price tag for a screen reader user. It would help
you get things done if you find it easier to remember an 8x19 matrix of
buttons than standard shortcuts, but given how key-happy VO itself is
before you even load PT, that probably won't apply to anyone here.

As Chuck would say, ymmv...
Scott

On 30 Mar 2012, at 13:13, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote:

I have to say, there's nothing really there that can't be done with
standard keyboard shortcuts. Yes, that might sound attractive to people who
aren't used to remembering modifier combinations but, in general, I think
screen reader users are used to such memorization. I don't know, to me it
seems superfluous although it probably looks pretty cool.

Slau

On Mar 30, 2012, at 3:26 AM, Poppa Bear wrote:

Is anyone using the HOTKEY MATRIX – keyboard Control Surface for Pro Tools?
It is a shortcut USB key board made for PT. I am considering it, but am not
sure if anything in voice over will conflict with the short cut
functions.  Here
it is,

http://dnamusiclabs.com/hotkey-matrix
Nate Kile, Cross Road Recording Studios, specializing in Mixing, Mastering
and all your audio needs. www.crossroadrecording.com


Re: I've read, but still dont' totally get this.

2012-03-30 Thread Slau Halatyn
Chris,

Did you actually look through the Preferences window? In the Mixing tab, the 
very first checkbox is the one. I don't understand why you couldn't find it. 
well, there it is.

best,

Slau

On Mar 30, 2012, at 1:59 AM, Christopher-Mark Gilland wrote:

 I don't see that tab anywhere by the way.
 
 Can you get the exact tab it's on, and what exactly it's called?
 
 Chris.
 
 - Original Message - From: Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 12:48 AM
 Subject: Re: I've read, but still dont' totally get this.
 
 
 Hi Chris,
 
 The reason you're not seeing bus 1-2 is because it's probably either the 
 delay or reverb aux. I don't know why your busses have been named that way 
 but that's what's going on. Normally, one can use the pop-up menu in the 
 sends to send to a new auxiliary track. Pro Tools then automatically creates 
 an Aux track and assigns the proper bus routing and names the bus to 
 correspond with the auxiliary track's name. The way you did it is essentially 
 the manual way. Just an FYI.
 
 One thing you might want to do to ensure the plug-in is getting signal is to 
 set your default send level to unity gain. There's a checkbox in the Pro 
 Tools Preferences window, although I can't remember exactly which tab, that 
 says something like, Sends default to inf which means infinite resistance, 
 in other words zero. Make sure that checkbox is unchecked.
 
 HTH,
 
 Slau
 
 On Mar 30, 2012, at 12:24 AM, Christopher-Mark Gilland wrote:
 
 OK, this is really strange.
 
 I have two tracks in my project.  One is justan mp3 karaoke track I 
 imported.  The other is my vocal track.  So, I added a new stereo track on 
 top of having those other two, and set it to a stereo A U X track.
 
 Then, on the vocal track, I interacted with the sends, ond on send A, I went 
 to buss sub menu, and was going to route it to 1 2 stereo.  I can't though. 
 The only thing I see is things like reverb stereo, delay stereo, etc. then I 
 see 7 8 or 7 etc. etc.  I dont' see one 2.  I went ahead and said what the 
 heck, route it to 7 8.  I did, then went to the A U X track, and set the 
 input path to buss, 7 8.  Again, I'm only doing that as I can't find 1 2 
 anywhere in the buss menu for some weird reason.  If it would help you all 
 for me to send you the session, I'd be happy to send space it off list so 
 you actually can look at what I did.
 
 The bottom line is, in my A U X track, I assigned on insert A, a reverb 
 effect.  Then back on the audio track of my vocal, I hit the send assign 
 button with vo+space.  Here's also where I'm really getting stuck. According 
 to the documentation, there is supposed to be a fader I can move up and down 
 now to determine how much is sent to the A U X track.  The only fader I see 
 is something about a post mix or something fader.  When I interacted with 
 that and tried turning it from where it was which by default was like -100 
 something odd DB, I find no matter how high I turn it, I went all the way to 
 like positive 20.  I still heard nothing.  No difference. I'm guessing 
 that's either 1, not the right slider, or B, it has to do with the fact I 
 routed to an unknown buss with the 7 8.
 
 I feel I got a pretty good handle now on what bgusses are, I just more 
 specifically in p t from a VO perspective am not getting how to do this, nor 
 why the 1 2 they tell me to select in the docs is not showing up.
 
 I must say: I'm perplexed.
 
 Chris.
 



Re: PDF PAGE JUMP

2012-03-30 Thread Slau Halatyn
Command-Option-g works for me all the time. Hmm…

On Mar 30, 2012, at 9:59 AM, Eric Lambier wrote:

 Thanks bro. It seems it only works once when you've opened the PDF. If you 
 want to do it agin, you have to close preveiw and reopen. Kind of  weird 
 pain, but oh well! LOL
 
 thanks
 Eric
 On 2012-03-29, at 5:57 PM, Steve Martin wrote:
 
 use the go to option. its under the go menu or something like that.
 On Mar 29, 2012, at 2:33 PM, Eric Lambier elamb...@rogers.com wrote:
 
 Hello all
 
 Does anyone know how to jump pages in a PDF document? For emaple, I wanna 
 jump to 58 and I'm on page 1. 
 Cheers
 
 



Re: Keyboard control surface?

2012-03-30 Thread Poppa Bear
I can understand what you guys are saying. I guess that my thought is that 
since I am coming over from PC and completely new to voiceover and PT that 
anything with dedacated buttons would possibly help the transition to be a 
little less drastic. It seems that with voiceover there is expenincionally more 
keys that needed to be pressed over say 10 steps than I am used to. Maybe at 
this point it is just looking a little dawnting and I will just have to sourt 
through it like everyone else who has made the switch. 
Thanks 
  - Original Message - 
  From: Slau Halatyn 
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
  Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 4:13 AM
  Subject: Re: Keyboard control surface?


  I have to say, there's nothing really there that can't be done with standard 
keyboard shortcuts. Yes, that might sound attractive to people who aren't used 
to remembering modifier combinations but, in general, I think screen reader 
users are used to such memorization. I don't know, to me it seems superfluous 
although it probably looks pretty cool.


  Slau


  On Mar 30, 2012, at 3:26 AM, Poppa Bear wrote:


Is anyone using the HOTKEY MATRIX – keyboard Control Surface for Pro Tools? 
It is a shortcut USB key board made for PT. I am considering it, but am not 
sure if anything in voice over will conflict with the short cut functions.  
Here it is,

http://dnamusiclabs.com/hotkey-matrix

Nate Kile, Cross Road Recording Studios, specializing in Mixing, Mastering 
and all your audio needs. www.crossroadrecording.com



hooking my soundcard to ProTools

2012-03-30 Thread Jean-Philippe Rykiel
Hi all,
I feel terribly stupid as this question has never been asked on this list, but 
how do I select my inputs and outputs in ProTools?
Is my hardware audio device recognised automatically?
I can't see anything about this on the manual except that it says that I should 
look in my audio devices manual.
It's an RME, asio compatible, its driver is installed, and  it is already 
recognised by my Mac, but I have several inputs and outputs to choose from, 
plus I thought maybe I could use my Mac's internal soundcard for audio feedback 
in some situations.
I bought ProTools as a download so I don't have a demo session to start 
fiddling, but what am I missing here?
Thanks for your help,
Cheers,
JPR


http://www.facebook.com/jprykiel
http://myspace.com/jeanphilipperykiel


Re: hooking my soundcard to ProTools

2012-03-30 Thread Chris Norman
Plug it in, and ensure it's recognised by seeing if it appears in the
sound dialogue of System Preferences.

If it doesn't, make sure the drivers are installed properly.

When you've done that, set your device in the playback whatever it's
called option in the Setup menu of Pro Tools. When it is, go to the
periferals dialogue, and VO-space on the Input page of that box, press
command a (I think), and VO-space on the button that says Delete. Then
click the defaults button on that page, then do the same for the
Output tab.

If anyone else has experience with this, please chip in, because I'm
not 100% sure this is right.

HTH.

On 30/03/2012, Jean-Philippe Rykiel jpryk...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi all,
 I feel terribly stupid as this question has never been asked on this list,
 but how do I select my inputs and outputs in ProTools?
 Is my hardware audio device recognised automatically?
 I can't see anything about this on the manual except that it says that I
 should look in my audio devices manual.
 It's an RME, asio compatible, its driver is installed, and  it is already
 recognised by my Mac, but I have several inputs and outputs to choose from,
 plus I thought maybe I could use my Mac's internal soundcard for audio
 feedback in some situations.
 I bought ProTools as a download so I don't have a demo session to start
 fiddling, but what am I missing here?
 Thanks for your help,
 Cheers,
 JPR


 http://www.facebook.com/jprykiel
 http://myspace.com/jeanphilipperykiel



-- 
Take care,

Chris Norman.

!-- chris.norm...@googlemail.com --


Re: Please help me with documentation

2012-03-30 Thread Keith Reedy
Chris,

Great explanation.
Keith Reedy
Click the link below to download MP3's of Keith Reedy's music as a gift from 
Bibles For The Blind.

http://biblesfortheblind.org/download_music.shtml

God gives His best to those who leave the choice with Him.  J Hudson Taylor.




On Mar 30, 2012, at 12:28 PM, Chris Norman wrote:

 Picture this:
 You have your three singers from your previous example. You've eq'd
 each track, so they sound fine on their own, but you think Wow, I'd
 love to add reverb and delay. If you put both reverb and delay onto
 each track, it'll take up a fair few resources, and you may get some
 odities, because either the reverb will reverberate the delay sound,
 or vice verser. So, you create an Aux send, which you put reverb on.
 Then you could send all the tracks you want the reverb on, to that 1
 track, then you could send another to another channel with delay on.
 This keeps everything isolated, and means if you decide you
 particularly love your reverb sound, you don't need to chuck the same
 settings on multiple tracks.
 
 Also, if you had the hardware, you could use an AUX send for a monitor
 feed, which you could then send to your headphones, or a line of
 monitors or something.
 
 HTH
 
 On 30/03/2012, Steve Martin monkeypushe...@gmail.com wrote:
 I will say this much. your basic understanding of it is on the right track.
 On Mar 29, 2012, at 10:00 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland
 clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I don't even know what they do on a regular board.
 
 Thank you though for your help.
 
 I'll go have a read and see what I can come up with.
 
 Chris.
 
 - Original Message - From: Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 9:54 PM
 Subject: Re: Please help me with documentation
 
 
 Hi Chris,
 
 Find the document called Intro to Pro Tools. I'm using Snow Leopard and
 it's in the following directory:
 Macintosh HDApplicationsDigidesignDocumentationPro tools.
 Open the file and do a search for aux, in other words, type Command-f
 and do a standard search. You should get about 4 results. Move to the
 Outline area and navigate to the second entry. Stop interacting with the
 Outline and move to the left. You'll find a description of auxiliary
 inputs.
 
 Auxiliary inputs are just like any auxiliary inputs on an analog console
 but they're more versatile because they can instantly take their source
 from a bus. Hopefully this will get you started.
 
 Slau
 
 On Mar 29, 2012, at 9:24 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland wrote:
 
 I don't expect you all to help me much until I've done a thorough read on
 this topic, and frankly, that's fair.  I'll come back when I have red and
 need things more clarified, but can someone show me on my Pro tools DVD
 where in the documentation I need to go to read up on what an auxiliary
 track is?  I'm just not getting the whole concept of a aux, a send,
 receive, and a bus is?
 
 I kind a get it, but not really.  Here's what I'd say in my own words.
 Maybe you all can help me.  If I want help here, I need to not just say I
 think I get something a move on.  How can you all help me, if I don't at
 least work with you all and try!?
 
 So, my understanding, with that in mind, of an aux track or is that my
 first misatke right there, it's not a track, it's a send?  Anyway, is,
 it's used for routing certain tracks, be them audio, or midi through
 another empty track which is specifically used more for global
 processwing?  So like, if I had say, a  music track, then I had 3 singers
 that came in my studio to dubb their vocals...  Rather than taking say,
 both the females, and processing them the same exact way on various
 inserts individually, I could route them through an AUX track, then go
 down to that AUX track and on insert A, I may add some say... oh... I
 dono, let's just for sake, sake compression dynamics.  Now, because they
 are both routed to that AUX track, the effects now are gonna be applied
 to both the female tracks at the same time.
 
 Am I getting this correctly, or, honestly, no? Not exactly.
 
 You're looking at me I'm sure saying, no, not even close.  Chris, you
 need to go read.  I know I do!  I'm willing!  Just please tell me what
 file to bring up, and how within that file to search and find the section
 I need to read.
 
 I'll be using Preview within Snow Leopard to access the pdf files.
 
 Thank you.
 
 Chris.
 
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Take care,
 
 Chris Norman.
 
 !-- chris.norm...@googlemail.com --



Re: Please help me with documentation

2012-03-30 Thread Poppa Bear
I put them on the same track quite often, I just adjust the input gain on 
one or the other to adjust the amount of each affect going to the bus or 
track. Not sure how it works in PT, but you can genraly creat a sub bus as 
well to rout say your main reverb bus through, and on the sub bus you would 
put your delay. On most daws, it is a matter of a half dozen clicks to do a 
thing like that.
- Original Message - 
From: Chris Norman chris.norm...@googlemail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 8:28 AM
Subject: Re: Please help me with documentation



Picture this:
You have your three singers from your previous example. You've eq'd
each track, so they sound fine on their own, but you think Wow, I'd
love to add reverb and delay. If you put both reverb and delay onto
each track, it'll take up a fair few resources, and you may get some
odities, because either the reverb will reverberate the delay sound,
or vice verser. So, you create an Aux send, which you put reverb on.
Then you could send all the tracks you want the reverb on, to that 1
track, then you could send another to another channel with delay on.
This keeps everything isolated, and means if you decide you
particularly love your reverb sound, you don't need to chuck the same
settings on multiple tracks.

Also, if you had the hardware, you could use an AUX send for a monitor
feed, which you could then send to your headphones, or a line of
monitors or something.

HTH

On 30/03/2012, Steve Martin monkeypushe...@gmail.com wrote:
I will say this much. your basic understanding of it is on the right 
track.

On Mar 29, 2012, at 10:00 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland
clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:


I don't even know what they do on a regular board.

Thank you though for your help.

I'll go have a read and see what I can come up with.

Chris.

- Original Message - From: Slau Halatyn 
slauhala...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 9:54 PM
Subject: Re: Please help me with documentation


Hi Chris,

Find the document called Intro to Pro Tools. I'm using Snow Leopard 
and

it's in the following directory:
Macintosh HDApplicationsDigidesignDocumentationPro tools.
Open the file and do a search for aux, in other words, type Command-f
and do a standard search. You should get about 4 results. Move to the
Outline area and navigate to the second entry. Stop interacting with the
Outline and move to the left. You'll find a description of auxiliary
inputs.

Auxiliary inputs are just like any auxiliary inputs on an analog console
but they're more versatile because they can instantly take their source
from a bus. Hopefully this will get you started.

Slau

On Mar 29, 2012, at 9:24 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland wrote:

I don't expect you all to help me much until I've done a thorough read 
on
this topic, and frankly, that's fair.  I'll come back when I have red 
and

need things more clarified, but can someone show me on my Pro tools DVD
where in the documentation I need to go to read up on what an auxiliary
track is?  I'm just not getting the whole concept of a aux, a send,
receive, and a bus is?

I kind a get it, but not really.  Here's what I'd say in my own words.
Maybe you all can help me.  If I want help here, I need to not just say 
I
think I get something a move on.  How can you all help me, if I don't 
at

least work with you all and try!?

So, my understanding, with that in mind, of an aux track or is that my
first misatke right there, it's not a track, it's a send?  Anyway, is,
it's used for routing certain tracks, be them audio, or midi through
another empty track which is specifically used more for global
processwing?  So like, if I had say, a  music track, then I had 3 
singers

that came in my studio to dubb their vocals...  Rather than taking say,
both the females, and processing them the same exact way on various
inserts individually, I could route them through an AUX track, then go
down to that AUX track and on insert A, I may add some say... oh... I
dono, let's just for sake, sake compression dynamics.  Now, because 
they

are both routed to that AUX track, the effects now are gonna be applied
to both the female tracks at the same time.

Am I getting this correctly, or, honestly, no? Not exactly.

You're looking at me I'm sure saying, no, not even close.  Chris, you
need to go read.  I know I do!  I'm willing!  Just please tell me what
file to bring up, and how within that file to search and find the 
section

I need to read.

I'll be using Preview within Snow Leopard to access the pdf files.

Thank you.

Chris.








--
Take care,

Chris Norman.

!-- chris.norm...@googlemail.com -- 




Re: MidiIng

2012-03-30 Thread Slau Halatyn
 Hi Chris,

That Intro to Pro Tools pdf we talked about earlier contains all kinds of 
helpful information for people new to Pro Tools. Doing a search for keywords 
like instrument, for example, yields lots of useful instances throughout the 
manual. Of course, the Intro to Pro Tools guide is pretty basic. I'm sure 
you'll get through it in no time. when you're ready for some serious reading, 
the Pro Tools Reference guide is about as detailed as you can get, something 
to really sink your teeth into. Shame on me, dangling prepositions like that… 
Something into which you could sink your teeth—now there's some grammar for ya.
:)
Slau


On Mar 30, 2012, at 5:09 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland wrote:

 First of all, what's the difference in a Midi track, vs. an instrument track?
 
 Second of all, let's say I have a track in 4/4 time, that keeps a constant 
 120BPM from beginning to end, no retards, nothing of sort.  No tempo changes, 
 etc.  It's just a constant 4 4 120.
 
 How now do I quantize a instrument or midi track to a quartern note value?
 
 Finally, if I insert the Xpand!2 plugin on an instrument track, then select 
 say acoustic pianos, and go to like, a warm piano, or what not, I find when I 
 record enable the track, the volume is exceedingly low.  So much so, I'm 
 literally having to ajust the track fader Hi almost all the way up just to 
 get even the slightest volume.  Now, mind you, I'm using the built in midi 
 sounds on the macbook, not the samples from my actual keyboard which are 
 being triggered through my keyboard's midi out.  Would that be a better way a 
 doing it?  If so, that's no issue.  I certainly do have my interface hooked 
 up where that could be done very easily with the push of one button. I'd have 
 to figure out how to re-route that to the midi out of my interface, but that 
 shouldn't be too hard.

 
 Chris. 



FChuck Vin and Slau

2012-03-30 Thread Sonar Switcher
Guys, since I know you're all working with some great equipment I
wanted to tell you about a deal I found for myself. I'm able to get a
D-command with the expansion module making it 24 faders in total along
with a 192 and all cables for $9000. This would be completely my own
money and nothing to do with the studio so it's a big decision to make
very quickly. Basically, if I don't take it this weekend somebody else
will and I don't want to make such a rash decision that I will end up
regretting it. I'm very sure I'm going to stick with PT but the studio
now has a rig in every room and in some rooms even has 2 complete
systems. Even though I have access to them I don't want to be tied to
that and feel I can learn much quicker on my own if I had my own
system. So, can you all chime in a bit on if I should wait for a C24,
Lynx, cards etc or grab this now. I've never used a D-command so
that's another learning curve. Thanks all.


Re: MidiIng

2012-03-30 Thread Brian Howerton
Hello Slau,
Where can we find these two documents you are referencing?  I have a mac and I 
am thinking about switching to protools.  I would like to get ahead and do some 
reading ahead of time though.  Thanks,
Brian
On Mar 30, 2012, at 5:25 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote:

 Hi Chris,
 
 That Intro to Pro Tools pdf we talked about earlier contains all kinds of 
 helpful information for people new to Pro Tools. Doing a search for keywords 
 like instrument, for example, yields lots of useful instances throughout 
 the manual. Of course, the Intro to Pro Tools guide is pretty basic. I'm 
 sure you'll get through it in no time. when you're ready for some serious 
 reading, the Pro Tools Reference guide is about as detailed as you can get, 
 something to really sink your teeth into. Shame on me, dangling prepositions 
 like that… Something into which you could sink your teeth—now there's some 
 grammar for ya.
 :)
 Slau
 
 
 On Mar 30, 2012, at 5:09 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland wrote:
 
 First of all, what's the difference in a Midi track, vs. an instrument track?
 
 Second of all, let's say I have a track in 4/4 time, that keeps a constant 
 120BPM from beginning to end, no retards, nothing of sort.  No tempo 
 changes, etc.  It's just a constant 4 4 120.
 
 How now do I quantize a instrument or midi track to a quartern note value?
 
 Finally, if I insert the Xpand!2 plugin on an instrument track, then select 
 say acoustic pianos, and go to like, a warm piano, or what not, I find when 
 I record enable the track, the volume is exceedingly low.  So much so, I'm 
 literally having to ajust the track fader Hi almost all the way up just to 
 get even the slightest volume.  Now, mind you, I'm using the built in midi 
 sounds on the macbook, not the samples from my actual keyboard which are 
 being triggered through my keyboard's midi out.  Would that be a better way 
 a doing it?  If so, that's no issue.  I certainly do have my interface 
 hooked up where that could be done very easily with the push of one button. 
 I'd have to figure out how to re-route that to the midi out of my interface, 
 but that shouldn't be too hard.
 
 
 Chris. 
 



Re: MidiIng

2012-03-30 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland

OK, I'll again have a look at it.

Chris.

- Original Message - 
From: Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: MidiIng



Hi Chris,


That Intro to Pro Tools pdf we talked about earlier contains all kinds of 
helpful information for people new to Pro Tools. Doing a search for keywords 
like instrument, for example, yields lots of useful instances throughout 
the manual. Of course, the Intro to Pro Tools guide is pretty basic. I'm 
sure you'll get through it in no time. when you're ready for some serious 
reading, the Pro Tools Reference guide is about as detailed as you can 
get, something to really sink your teeth into. Shame on me, dangling 
prepositions like that… Something into which you could sink your teeth—now 
there's some grammar for ya.

:)
Slau


On Mar 30, 2012, at 5:09 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland wrote:

First of all, what's the difference in a Midi track, vs. an instrument 
track?


Second of all, let's say I have a track in 4/4 time, that keeps a constant 
120BPM from beginning to end, no retards, nothing of sort.  No tempo 
changes, etc.  It's just a constant 4 4 120.


How now do I quantize a instrument or midi track to a quartern note value?

Finally, if I insert the Xpand!2 plugin on an instrument track, then 
select say acoustic pianos, and go to like, a warm piano, or what not, I 
find when I record enable the track, the volume is exceedingly low.  So 
much so, I'm literally having to ajust the track fader Hi almost all the 
way up just to get even the slightest volume.  Now, mind you, I'm using 
the built in midi sounds on the macbook, not the samples from my actual 
keyboard which are being triggered through my keyboard's midi out.  Would 
that be a better way a doing it?  If so, that's no issue.  I certainly do 
have my interface hooked up where that could be done very easily with the 
push of one button. I'd have to figure out how to re-route that to the 
midi out of my interface, but that shouldn't be too hard.




Chris.




Re: MidiIng

2012-03-30 Thread Brian Howerton
Oh I gotcha Chris.  
On Mar 30, 2012, at 8:45 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland wrote:

 They're on the DVD.
 
 Chris.
 
 - Original Message - From: Brian Howerton bshowert...@gmail.com
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 8:30 PM
 Subject: Re: MidiIng
 
 
 Hello Slau,
 Where can we find these two documents you are referencing?  I have a mac and 
 I am thinking about switching to protools.  I would like to get ahead and do 
 some reading ahead of time though.  Thanks,
 Brian
 On Mar 30, 2012, at 5:25 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote:
 
 Hi Chris,
 
 That Intro to Pro Tools pdf we talked about earlier contains all kinds of 
 helpful information for people new to Pro Tools. Doing a search for keywords 
 like instrument, for example, yields lots of useful instances throughout 
 the manual. Of course, the Intro to Pro Tools guide is pretty basic. I'm 
 sure you'll get through it in no time. when you're ready for some serious 
 reading, the Pro Tools Reference guide is about as detailed as you can 
 get, something to really sink your teeth into. Shame on me, dangling 
 prepositions like that… Something into which you could sink your teeth—now 
 there's some grammar for ya.
 :)
 Slau
 
 
 On Mar 30, 2012, at 5:09 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland wrote:
 
 First of all, what's the difference in a Midi track, vs. an instrument 
 track?
 
 Second of all, let's say I have a track in 4/4 time, that keeps a constant 
 120BPM from beginning to end, no retards, nothing of sort.  No tempo 
 changes, etc.  It's just a constant 4 4 120.
 
 How now do I quantize a instrument or midi track to a quartern note value?
 
 Finally, if I insert the Xpand!2 plugin on an instrument track, then select 
 say acoustic pianos, and go to like, a warm piano, or what not, I find when 
 I record enable the track, the volume is exceedingly low.  So much so, I'm 
 literally having to ajust the track fader Hi almost all the way up just to 
 get even the slightest volume.  Now, mind you, I'm using the built in midi 
 sounds on the macbook, not the samples from my actual keyboard which are 
 being triggered through my keyboard's midi out.  Would that be a better way 
 a doing it?  If so, that's no issue.  I certainly do have my interface 
 hooked up where that could be done very easily with the push of one button. 
 I'd have to figure out how to re-route that to the midi out of my 
 interface, but that shouldn't be too hard.
 
 
 Chris.
 
 



Wow! Can a compressor really do this if not set right?

2012-03-30 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland

Oh, wow!  Just, wow!

I was singing the song 3 Wooden Crosses by Randy Travis.  I'm sure a lotta 
you know it.


When I reach my double concinants ending with the letter r, for instance...

crosses... preacher, driver, three, growing, children, and promised,

On these words, I sound like I'm doing an R tap/flip, as some call it.  It's 
not a full roll like the double R in spanish, but it's very close.  Take the 
spanish word for Thank you.  Gracias.  it literally sounds like if I said 
the word great, as if I were saying that word with a heavy spanish accent. 
The g r sound makes my r become a tap.


Is  it just I actually sang it that way not knowing it, and the compressor 
is bringing it out to my attention, or is it more likely the compressor 
isn't set right.


I'm thinking the ladder.

Chris. 



Re: FChuck Vin and Slau

2012-03-30 Thread Vinny Pedulla

Hi Joe,
Well sounds like a good deal is on the table...
One thing, does the system come with HD cards? The 192 will need a card. 
Even so, the price for the control surface and interface still make it a 
good deal.
One other thing about the 192. If it's the original one, it will come 
standard with 8 in and out. You will need to get an expansion card to add 
either 8 in or out.

Give us a little more info if you can,
Vin


- Original Message - 
From: Sonar Switcher iamablanksl...@yahoo.com

To: Pro Tools Accessibility ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 8:19 PM
Subject: FChuck Vin and Slau



Guys, since I know you're all working with some great equipment I
wanted to tell you about a deal I found for myself. I'm able to get a
D-command with the expansion module making it 24 faders in total along
with a 192 and all cables for $9000. This would be completely my own
money and nothing to do with the studio so it's a big decision to make
very quickly. Basically, if I don't take it this weekend somebody else
will and I don't want to make such a rash decision that I will end up
regretting it. I'm very sure I'm going to stick with PT but the studio
now has a rig in every room and in some rooms even has 2 complete
systems. Even though I have access to them I don't want to be tied to
that and feel I can learn much quicker on my own if I had my own
system. So, can you all chime in a bit on if I should wait for a C24,
Lynx, cards etc or grab this now. I've never used a D-command so
that's another learning curve. Thanks all. 




Re: MidiIng

2012-03-30 Thread The Oreo Monster
Yes, they do get installed in the DegiDesign or Avid folder in applications. 
They are in a sub folder called documents. A google search for pro tools 9 
reference guide or pro tools 10 reference guide should take you right to it on 
avids site. Not sure about the gettings started guides availability online 
though.
- T.O.M

On Mar 30, 2012, at 11:04 PM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote:

 Yep, they're installed with the Pro Tools installation. You won't have them 
 on your Mac by default, of course. You could also find them somewhere on the 
 Avid site although I'm sure they're not terribly easy to find. A google 
 search might yield something.
 
 Cheers,
 
 slau
 
 On Mar 30, 2012, at 8:30 PM, Brian Howerton wrote:
 
 Hello Slau,
 Where can we find these two documents you are referencing?  I have a mac and 
 I am thinking about switching to protools.  I would like to get ahead and do 
 some reading ahead of time though.  Thanks,
 Brian
 On Mar 30, 2012, at 5:25 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote:
 
 Hi Chris,
 
 That Intro to Pro Tools pdf we talked about earlier contains all kinds of 
 helpful information for people new to Pro Tools. Doing a search for 
 keywords like instrument, for example, yields lots of useful instances 
 throughout the manual. Of course, the Intro to Pro Tools guide is pretty 
 basic. I'm sure you'll get through it in no time. when you're ready for 
 some serious reading, the Pro Tools Reference guide is about as detailed 
 as you can get, something to really sink your teeth into. Shame on me, 
 dangling prepositions like that… Something into which you could sink your 
 teeth—now there's some grammar for ya.
 :)
 Slau
 
 
 On Mar 30, 2012, at 5:09 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland wrote:
 
 First of all, what's the difference in a Midi track, vs. an instrument 
 track?
 
 Second of all, let's say I have a track in 4/4 time, that keeps a constant 
 120BPM from beginning to end, no retards, nothing of sort.  No tempo 
 changes, etc.  It's just a constant 4 4 120.
 
 How now do I quantize a instrument or midi track to a quartern note value?
 
 Finally, if I insert the Xpand!2 plugin on an instrument track, then 
 select say acoustic pianos, and go to like, a warm piano, or what not, I 
 find when I record enable the track, the volume is exceedingly low.  So 
 much so, I'm literally having to ajust the track fader Hi almost all the 
 way up just to get even the slightest volume.  Now, mind you, I'm using 
 the built in midi sounds on the macbook, not the samples from my actual 
 keyboard which are being triggered through my keyboard's midi out.  Would 
 that be a better way a doing it?  If so, that's no issue.  I certainly do 
 have my interface hooked up where that could be done very easily with the 
 push of one button. I'd have to figure out how to re-route that to the 
 midi out of my interface, but that shouldn't be too hard.
 
 
 Chris.