Anyone know how to monitor this?

2000-02-28 Thread Michael Boman

I want MRTG to monitor my mail traffic such like:

Incoming email's (per domain?)
Outgoing email's (per domain?)
POP3 connections (per domain?)
The number of messages in the queue
Average size of email (per domain?)
Average number of recipitiens
etc etc etc.. =)

My setup:
qmail 1.03
vpopmail 3.4.11.released
Linux 2.2.14

I use splogger for logging my traffic to syslog. My pop3 daemon is
qmail's own as well as my SMTP..

Please advice
 Michael Boman

-- 
W I Z O F F I C E . C O M   P T E   L T D  -  Your Online Office Wizard
16 Tannery Lane, Crystal Time Building, #06-00, Singapore 347778
Voice : (+65) 844 3228 [extension 118]  Fax : (+65) 842 7228
Pager : (+65) 92 93 29 49   ICQ : 5566009
eMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]   URL : http://www.wizoffice.com



qmail-inject and attchments

2000-02-28 Thread TAG

Hi,

Is there a way of specifying a subject and attaching files using
qmail-inject from the command line - the man page is not helpful in this
respect??

Thanks

Tonino



qmail Digest 28 Feb 2000 11:00:01 -0000 Issue 925

2000-02-28 Thread qmail-digest-help


qmail Digest 28 Feb 2000 11:00:01 - Issue 925

Topics (messages 37817 through 37828):

Re: qmqp and local delivery
37817 by: Tracy R Reed

Problem: Error while saving mail messages
37818 by: Romanian Village Webmaster
37822 by: iv0

qmail/ezmlm question
37819 by: John P. Looney
37820 by: Chris Johnson
37821 by: John P. Looney

Re: qmail pop3
37823 by: Spades

IMAP and clients
37824 by: Eric Hutchinson
37826 by: RaTao von J

Re: qmail-ifc-len-patch (ipme.c) (fwd)
37825 by: lioux.uol.com.br

Anyone know how to monitor this?
37827 by: Michael Boman

qmail-inject and attchments
37828 by: TAG

Administrivia:

To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To bug my human owner, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To post to the list, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--



On Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 03:36:23PM +0900, Tetsu Ushijima wrote:
> You might want to have two qmail installations: a normal
> qmail installation for usual deliveries, and a mini-qmail
> installation for mailing lists.

Brilliant! This is the solution I need. Thanks.

--
Tracy Reed  http://www.ultraviolet.org




 A couple of my users have the following error message come up when they
try to read their emails.

"An error occurred while saving mail messages"

I did some searching at http:// www.deja.com and it looks like I need to
delete this specific message from their queue.

I tried a 'mail -f /home/username/Mailbox' to look a their email
messages, but nothing is there. Why not? How can I get my hands on
the queue for this specific user to look at his messages and delete the
one that gives him trouble.

Any clue is welcome.  I tried to use qmHandle to look at the messages,
but the program just seems to hang, without any output, unless I reqest
the message numbers only. And doing do, I have no clue to whom that
message belongs!

Maybe there is another way to view the queue for a specific user?

Thanks in advance,
   Will





Romanian Village Webmaster wrote:
> 
>  A couple of my users have the following error message come up when they
> try to read their emails.
> 
> "An error occurred while saving mail messages"
> 
> I did some searching at http:// www.deja.com and it looks like I need to
> delete this specific message from their queue.
> 
> I tried a 'mail -f /home/username/Mailbox' to look a their email
> messages, but nothing is there. Why not? How can I get my hands on
> the queue for this specific user to look at his messages and delete the
> one that gives him trouble.
> 
> Any clue is welcome.  I tried to use qmHandle to look at the messages,
> but the program just seems to hang, without any output, unless I reqest
> the message numbers only. And doing do, I have no clue to whom that
> message belongs!
> 
> Maybe there is another way to view the queue for a specific user?
> 
> Thanks in advance,
>Will

I saw something almost identical last Friday. Using netscape MUA 
and qmail pop server. We we went to pick up the
emails via pop we saw the same message you saw. It turned out to be
one particular email message. Maybe around 4K. Unfortunately it was
deleted before we saved a copy on the disk. Once we removed the
'bad' email, everything started working fine.

Ken Jones




 I'm justing installing/setting up ezmlm, but it's not working, and I just
wanted some clarification as to how the .qmail-* files work.

 After installing ezmlm, there are the following new .qmail files in my
jplooney account:

lrwxrwxrwx jplooney .qmail-listname -> /home/jplooney/listname/editor
lrwxrwxrwx jplooney .qmail-listname-default -> /home/jplooney/listname/manager
lrwxrwxrwx jplooney .qmail-listname-owner -> /home/jplooney/listname/owner
lrwxrwxrwx jplooney .qmail-listname-return-default -> /home/jplooney/listname/bouncer

 Now, I'm supposed to mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
but this always bounces. I was wondering - is it supposed to invoke
whatever pipes are listed in .qmail-listname, or is this and installation
problem ? (I can post to test lists, if I'm subscribed via ezmlm-sub,
etc).

Kate


 PGP signature



On Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 03:08:26PM +, John P. Looney wrote:
>  I'm justing installing/setting up ezmlm, but it's not working, and I just
> wanted some clarification as to how the .qmail-* files work.
> 
>  After installing ezmlm, there are the following new .qmail files in my
> jplooney account:
> 
> lrwxrwxrwx jplooney .qmail-listname -> /home/jplooney/listname/editor
> lrwxrwxrwx jplooney .qmail-listname-default -> /home/jplooney/listname/manager
> lrwxrwxrwx jplooney .qmail-listname-owner -> /home/jplooney/listname/owner
> lrwxrwxrwx jplooney .qmail-listname-return-default -> /home/jplooney/listname/bouncer
> 
>  Now, I'm supposed to mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
> but this always bounces.

Re: Anyone know how to monitor this?

2000-02-28 Thread Tracy R Reed

On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 04:06:22PM +0800, Michael Boman wrote:
> I want MRTG to monitor my mail traffic such like:

Get qmail-mrtg. I don't have a url but you should be able to find it with a
little searching.

--
Tracy Reed  http://www.ultraviolet.org



Re: Anyone know how to monitor this?

2000-02-28 Thread Magnus Bodin

On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 03:11:20AM -0800, Tracy R Reed wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 04:06:22PM +0800, Michael Boman wrote:
> > I want MRTG to monitor my mail traffic such like:
> 
> Get qmail-mrtg. I don't have a url but you should be able to find it with a
> little searching.

I haven't found any other than Russells directory, so I packeted one version
that did traffic and queue:

http://x42.com/qmail/mrtg/

Please let me know if there is any further additions that could be made
here. 
 
/magnus

-- 
http://x42.com/



Is my server being used as a SPAM relay?

2000-02-28 Thread Albert Hopkins


I can't see how/why it is happening, but it appears that our qmail server
is relaying email from outside senders to outside recipients (I thought
qmail by default doesn't do this).  My /var/qmail/control/locals and
/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts only have *.dynacare.com addresses in
them.  However qmail appears to be delivering to outside addresses even
though the source address is outside as well.

I've included a bounced bounce.  The original caller has an outside
address.

-- 
Albert Hopkins
Dynacare, Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- Forwarded message --
Date: 25 Feb 2000 23:48:11 -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: failure notice

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mail.dynacare.com.
I tried to deliver a bounce message to this address, but the bounce bounced!

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Connected to 38.163.208.152 but sender was rejected.
Remote host said: 501 bogus mail from

--- Below this line is the original bounce.

Return-Path: <>
Received: (qmail 9314 invoked for bounce); 25 Feb 2000 23:48:09 -
Date: 25 Feb 2000 23:48:09 -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: failure notice

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mail.dynacare.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
216.32.243.136 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 550 Requested action not taken:user account inactive
Giving up on 216.32.243.136.

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
204.68.24.19 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 550 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User has cancelled account
Giving up on 204.68.24.19.

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
128.11.68.146 failed after I sent the message.
Remote host said: 552 qdirdel.1 error 100:This user does not have a yahoo.com account 
([EMAIL PROTECTED])

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
209.240.198.91 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 550 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown
Giving up on 209.240.198.91.

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
209.240.198.91 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 550 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown
Giving up on 209.240.198.91.

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
192.25.158.11 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 550 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown
Giving up on 192.25.158.11.

--- Below this line is a copy of the message.

Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: (qmail 9045 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2000 23:46:57 -
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (205.178.138.2)
  by 172.31.128.10 with SMTP; 25 Feb 2000 23:46:57 -
X-See-Also: 08CFF0A5B
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 18:49:55
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service [26.4.456.1] (Solaris; Sparc2)
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MessageID: 
X-Other-References: 0756BABAB
X-Accept-Language: en
Subject: Private Cyber Club Pays You By the Minute!
Sensitivity: Personal
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-References: 034941195, 09CA5AFED
References: 00016DC50


Hi,

I just want you to take a quick look at this TRULY
PHENOMENAL one-of-a-kind, PRIVATE OFFSHORE Wealth
Building Program.

It's a PRIVATE By-Invitation-Only OFFSHORE CLUB,
where many of us are earning $500 to $3,500 per DAY!

We get paid BY-THE-MINUTE directly into our Private
Offshore Bank Accounts - 24 hrs a day, 7 days a week
AS PEOPLE JOIN! We are talking about some serious
money here. You'll want to further investigate this
opportunity.

People are JOINING US FAST and you earn $500 EACH.
And that's just from ONE Income Stream - there are
3 MORE! Many are making $80,000 to $100,000 in just
10 to 12 weeks. Yes - it is REALLY TRUE!

Some people are already making 5 figures PER WEEK
from ONE of the other Income Streams that requires
absolutely NO SPONSORING! That's right - this great
program works for everyone. Sales ability is not
required.


GREAT NEWS FOR INTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURS

This AMAZING 100% Private Offshore Wealth Building
Program WORKS for people living IN EVERY country in
the WORLD - USA, Australia, Canada, Mexico, Japan,
Brazil, Italy, England, Norway, Germany, France.
EVERY COUNTRY - now 80 countries in just 20 weeks.


MEMBERS PRIVILEDGES INCLUDE:

+ Legal Private Offshore Class 'A' Bank Account.

+ Private International Gold MasterCard Credit Card.
NO daily Cash Limit!!!

+ Private Encrypted Banking Software Program. Allows
you to manage your Offshore account from anywhere in
the world at anytime.

+ Private Secure Encrypted Email Account.

+ Access to International Investment Opportunities.
(PHENOMENAL High Yield)

+ Receive your own complete marketing web site when
you join. People can sign up on-line on it from
around the world 24 hours a day 7 days a week.

This is a LEGAL and LEGITIMATE business opportunity,
that WILL MAKE YOU MORE MONEY than you've ever made
in your life !!  Some Members have retired in just
120 days.


ARE YOU INTERESTED IN LEARNING MORE ?

If you like what you've read so far, and want to
hear about real people who are making m

Re: Is my server being used as a SPAM relay?

2000-02-28 Thread Petr Novotny

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 28 Feb 00, at 8:32, Albert Hopkins wrote:

> I can't see how/why it is happening, but it appears that our qmail
> server is relaying email from outside senders to outside recipients (I
> thought qmail by default doesn't do this).  My
> /var/qmail/control/locals and /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts only have
> *.dynacare.com addresses in them.  However qmail appears to be
> delivering to outside addresses even though the source address is
> outside as well.

A few possibilities:
1. Misspelled name of "rcpthosts" file
2. RELAYCLIENT variable set to empty string system-wide
3. RELAYCLIENT variable set to empty due to error in tcpserver 
database or inetd wrappers syntax
4. Hacked qmail installation
5. You are a "smart host" for an open relay somewhere inside your 
network (doesn't look like that from the headers though)
6. A local user (or user on local network) does the spamming.


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.0.2 -- QDPGP 2.60 
Comment: http://community.wow.net/grt/qdpgp.html

iQA/AwUBOLp6XVMwP8g7qbw/EQLqhQCg8HmSFqmvhdHtHFbgESB1mUn8LnUAoNa5
X72B3fTf81U1Ojg0dk8vXxKq
=/hTt
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Petr Novotny, ANTEK CS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.antek.cz
PGP key ID: 0x3BA9BC3F
-- Don't you know there ain't no devil there's just God when he's drunk.
 [Tom Waits]



Re: qmqp and local delivery

2000-02-28 Thread Fred Lindberg

On Fri, 25 Feb 2000 16:18:41 -0800, Tracy R Reed wrote:

>via QMQP. As I understand it my qmail-qmqpc uploads a copy of the message and
>a list of recipients to the qmqpd machine and that machine does the remote
>deliveries. This should save me quite a bit of bandwidth. However, I still

ezmlm-idx-0.40 has built-in support for QMQP. It sends posts via
qmail-qmqpc and administrative mail via qmail-queue. No need for extra
installations.

If your link is slow, increase the read timeout in qmail-qmqpc.
Otherwise, you sometimes get duplications because it doesn't hand
around long enough to get the final "OK" from the server and thus
assumes the delivery has failed. 5 min seems to work fine
trans-ISDN+trans-continentally.

This also keeps you lists responsive to sub/unsub/archive/mod.


-Sincerely, Fred

(Frederik Lindberg, Infectious Diseases, WashU, St. Louis, MO, USA)




Re: concurrencyremote setting

2000-02-28 Thread Dave Sill

"DeChavez , Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>I just would like to find out the highest value anyone has set
>concurrencyremote conf file?

I've got it at 500 on my list server.

>Any impact on system performance as it gets higher?

Yeah, it goes down. :-)

-Dave



Connected_to_x.x.x.x_but_connection_died

2000-02-28 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer


[I'm not subscribed to the list, so I would appreciate a copy of replies.]

I have a qmail 1.01 host which previously sent mail by UUCP. Now, it sends 
everything to a smart host with SMTP. Sometimes, it works and sometimes, *all* 
the messages trigger a:

Feb 28 15:39:43 cachin qmail: 951748783.154132 delivery 6: deferral: 
Connected_to_x.x.x.x_but_connection_died._Possible_duplicate!/

(IP address hidden because it is a RFC 1918, anyway).

Searching the archives of the mailing list, I find very often this problem but 
no solution.

Telnetting to the smart host (which uses Sendmail 8.9.3 and which is not under 
my control) and running SMTP commands by hand works fine.

My machine is a RedHat 5 (yes, it's old, I know). stracing qmail-remote shows:

bortz@cachin$   sudo strace -p 26038
oldselect(4, [3], NULL, NULL, {996, 94}) = 0 (Timeout)
shutdown(3, 0 /* receive */)= 0
oldselect(4, NULL, [3], NULL, {1200, 0}) = 1 (out [3], left {1200, 0})
write(3, "QUIT\r\n", 6) = 6
oldselect(4, [3], NULL, NULL, {1200, 0}) = 1 (in [3], left {1200, 0})
read(3, "", 128)= 0
write(1, "ZConnected to x.x.x.x but "..., 70) = 70
_exit(0)= ?








Re: qmail-inject and attchments

2000-02-28 Thread markd

On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 11:50:25AM +0200, TAG wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Is there a way of specifying a subject and attaching files using
> qmail-inject from the command line - the man page is not helpful in this
> respect??

You need to use a full user-agent. qmail-inject is little more than what
it's name implies. Namely an injector or mail, not a composer of mail.

For a command line program that composes a mail with attachments, you
could do worse than mutt.


Regards.



Re: qmail-inject and attchments

2000-02-28 Thread Russ Allbery

TAG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Is there a way of specifying a subject and attaching files using
> qmail-inject from the command line - the man page is not helpful in this
> respect??

No.  qmail-inject doesn't know enough about the message structure to be
able to do that.  But there are certainly packages that can do this; I
believe Mutt is one of them.

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 



Re: qmail-inject and attchments

2000-02-28 Thread Russell Nelson

Russ Allbery writes:
 > TAG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
 > 
 > > Is there a way of specifying a subject and attaching files using
 > > qmail-inject from the command line - the man page is not helpful in this
 > > respect??
 > 
 > No.  qmail-inject doesn't know enough about the message structure to be
 > able to do that.  But there are certainly packages that can do this; I
 > believe Mutt is one of them.

I think he's looking for /var/qmail/bin/mailsubj.  It doesn't "attach
files" unless you consider the following an attachment method :)
uuencode "file-you-wanted" | \
mailsubj "this is the file you wanted" [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free software  | PGPok | "Ask not what your country
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | can force other people to
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  | +1 315 268 9201 FAX   | do for you..."  -Perry M.



where to get cyclog

2000-02-28 Thread Robert Sander

Hi!

My question is now, where do I get cyclog from? I just downloaded 
daemontools-0.61 (all my sources state that it is included there), but after 
compiling nothing looks like an executable named cyclog...

Greetings
-- 
Robert Sander www.gurubert.de



Re: where to get cyclog

2000-02-28 Thread Dave Sill

Robert Sander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>My question is now, where do I get cyclog from? I just downloaded 
>daemontools-0.61 (all my sources state that it is included there), but after 
>compiling nothing looks like an executable named cyclog...

Cyclog has been replaced by multilog in daemontools 0.61. Note that
0.61 is not a drop-in replacement for 0.53. If you have scripts or
instructions based on 0.53, they won't work for 0.61.

-Dave



Re: qmail-inject and attchments

2000-02-28 Thread Russ Allbery

Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ Allbery writes:
>> TAG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>>> Is there a way of specifying a subject and attaching files using
>>> qmail-inject from the command line - the man page is not helpful in
>>> this respect??

>> No.  qmail-inject doesn't know enough about the message structure to be
>> able to do that.  But there are certainly packages that can do this; I
>> believe Mutt is one of them.

> I think he's looking for /var/qmail/bin/mailsubj.  It doesn't "attach
> files" unless you consider the following an attachment method :)
>   uuencode "file-you-wanted" | \
>   mailsubj "this is the file you wanted" [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Given that he wants to attach a file, I believe he's looking for Mutt,
which can do real file attachments from the command line IIRC.

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 



RE: Encryption and t-shirts

2000-02-28 Thread Dave Sill

"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Let's face it. We're not just fans of qmail, we're fans of djb. I
>think we need some t-shirts printed. Let's see: 
>
>   "I'm with djb"
>
>or maybe
>
>   "Qmail is Qool"
>
>or
>
>   "cr.yp.to"
>
>Hmm. Maybe,
>
>   "UTC for me"
>
>Or how about
>
>   Front: "Don't queue mail with sendmail"
>   Back: "Send mail with qmail"
>
>or
>
>   "cdb. cdb run. run, cdb, run."
>
>Help me out here, guys.

Here are a couple of djb's old .sig lines:

  Sick of sendmail? Don't get mad; get qmail.
  Secure, reliable, efficient. Pick three.

Other djbisms like "Reliability means never having to say you're
sorry", "Profile, don't speculate", and Len Budney's .sig quotes are
possibilities, too.

I've been kicking around the idea of a qmail t-shirt for some time,
but I've been too busy to actually do it.

I'll buy at least one if:

 1) I like the design[1],
 2) the cost is reasonable[2], and
 3) my size (XXL)[3] is available.

-Dave

[1] I prefer my dolphin logo to the Q w/arrows logo, but that wouldn't
stop me from buying one. :-)
[2] Depends on quality of shirt, number of colors/sides printed, etc., 
but $25 delivered is generous, and more than many will spend on a
t-shirt.
[3] I'm not obese (6', 230 lbs), but I have a long torso.



RE: Encryption and t-shirts

2000-02-28 Thread Soffen, Matthew

Gee.. I thought I was bad wearing a 2x ( but I am  6', 280ish lbs with a 56"
chest..) 

Matt

> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Sill [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 1:28 PM
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:  RE: Encryption and t-shirts
> 
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> >Let's face it. We're not just fans of qmail, we're fans of djb. I
> >think we need some t-shirts printed. Let's see: 
> >
> > "I'm with djb"
> >
> >or maybe
> >
> > "Qmail is Qool"
> >
> >or
> >
> > "cr.yp.to"
> >
> >Hmm. Maybe,
> >
> > "UTC for me"
> >
> >Or how about
> >
> > Front: "Don't queue mail with sendmail"
> > Back: "Send mail with qmail"
> >
> >or
> >
> > "cdb. cdb run. run, cdb, run."
> >
> >Help me out here, guys.
> 
> Here are a couple of djb's old .sig lines:
> 
>   Sick of sendmail? Don't get mad; get qmail.
>   Secure, reliable, efficient. Pick three.
> 
> Other djbisms like "Reliability means never having to say you're
> sorry", "Profile, don't speculate", and Len Budney's .sig quotes are
> possibilities, too.
> 
> I've been kicking around the idea of a qmail t-shirt for some time,
> but I've been too busy to actually do it.
> 
> I'll buy at least one if:
> 
>  1) I like the design[1],
>  2) the cost is reasonable[2], and
>  3) my size (XXL)[3] is available.
> 
> -Dave
> 
> [1] I prefer my dolphin logo to the Q w/arrows logo, but that wouldn't
> stop me from buying one. :-)
> [2] Depends on quality of shirt, number of colors/sides printed, etc., 
> but $25 delivered is generous, and more than many will spend on a
> t-shirt.
> [3] I'm not obese (6', 230 lbs), but I have a long torso.



Slow delivery (part 2)

2000-02-28 Thread Matthew Bloch

I've managed to narrow down my earlier problem, though I'm still confused.  

To reiterate, whenever I qmail-inject anything into the mail queue, it
sits in /var/qmail/control/mess/... without any control files present.  
Then maybe 1-2 hours later it is delivered (the log concurs with this).  
Running /etc/init.d/qmail restart makes all the mail go off immediately,
but sending an ALRM signal to qmail-send doesn't.

I've still no idea, anyone else care to help?

-- 
Matthew   ( http://www.soup-kitchen.demon.co.uk/ )





Re: Problem with ~/alias

2000-02-28 Thread Daniel Carlos

Hi,

I correct the error now it's functioning ok!!!  
the function getpwnam(auto_usera) was failing.
Thank's everybody!

Is there a ezmlm support for Mysql working on FreeBSD???
I find a patch for linux RedHat, but I need for FreeBSD. 
Somebody know where I can to download it ???


 Daniel Carlos
 www.atarde.com.br
 Bahia, Brazil





  

On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Rogerio Brito wrote:

> On Feb 24 2000, Dave Sill wrote:
> > The "Unable to find alias user!" message means getpwent("alias")
> > failed, which means it's either not there, or the process checking
> > couldn't access the file.
> 
>   It might also help to see the output of qmail-showctl (it
>   shows what it thinks is the alias uid).
> 
> 
>   []s, Roger...
> 
> -- 
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>   Rogerio Brito - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/
>  Nectar homepage: http://www.linux.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/opeth/
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> 



RE: Encryption and t-shirts

2000-02-28 Thread Vern Hart

Today, Dave Sill wrote:
> 
> I've been kicking around the idea of a qmail t-shirt for some time,
> but I've been too busy to actually do it.

There are a lot of good ideas here!
Usually when I'm asked to make a qmail shirt, ideas are few and far
between.

> I'll buy at least one if:
> 
>  1) I like the design[1],

What about this design:  http://vern.com/tshirts/qmail/
If people like it, I could have it available for online ordering
within a week.

>  2) the cost is reasonable[2], and

Should cost $17.50 plus shipping.

>  3) my size (XXL)[3] is available.

XXL is $2 extra (XXXL is $3 extra).

> [1] I prefer my dolphin logo to the Q w/arrows logo, but that wouldn't
> stop me from buying one. :-)

I could easily give two (or more!) options.  Do you have a large,
clean version of your dolphon logo?

Cheers,
Vern
-- 
\ \   / __| _ \  \ |   Vern Hart
 \ \ /  _|/ .  |   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  \_/  ___|_|_\_|\_|




Re: Slow delivery (part 2)

2000-02-28 Thread richard

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Matthew Bloch wrote:

> I've managed to narrow down my earlier problem, though I'm still confused.  
> 
> To reiterate, whenever I qmail-inject anything into the mail queue, it
> sits in /var/qmail/control/mess/... without any control files present.  
> Then maybe 1-2 hours later it is delivered (the log concurs with this).  
> Running /etc/init.d/qmail restart makes all the mail go off immediately,
> but sending an ALRM signal to qmail-send doesn't.

what are the permissions, etc in /var/qmail/queue/lock:
- -rw---   1 qmails   qmail   0 Jul 21  1999 sendmutex
- -rw-r--r--   1 qmailr   qmail1024 Feb 16 22:52 tcpto
prw--w--w-   1 qmails   qmail   0 Feb 28 19:03 trigger
^^ very important, if your permisions do not match this then
qmail-send won't get triggered properly when new mail is added to the
queue

RjL
==
You know that. I know that. But when  ||  Austin, Texas
you talk to a monkey you have to  ||  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
grunt and wave your arms  -ck ||

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBOLrIE56bDk8vHTn1AQFLDQP+JXy4teedjJ4obmrrxMPJ+odXwA8rZxDU
X/vr8q/1qXKDF0Uz95Mcd2gfqE9v335nrIDuVeYiRO2+bAHMM/9D11ZYOHnf8t0h
+j7Qe5YW+fHOPwN36M3AUBgVhOUIOMqxKynB/7m7UDwnd3TDjRa2QPPssd2T6XnN
LLKxFTeq6ug=
=Nhfs
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Question with concurrencyremote

2000-02-28 Thread chChen

hi all

 i just install qmail-1.03 on FreeBSD-3.3RELEASE.

and my problem is ,enev i put the number(120) in 
/var/qmail/control/concurrencyremote

and i use qmail-showctl. i can see the number of concurrencyremote is 120

but my qmail-send didn;t fork so much children to send mail.

sometime many (60~80) sometime very low(1~10) ...

my server lording is low(about 1~2), and max file discriptor is 8192

and retome server is ok.

I want to make it to delivery the mail out af Max speed

could you tell me what should i do.thx.

chChen



RE: Encryption and t-shirts

2000-02-28 Thread Kai MacTane

At 12:13 PM 2/28/2000 -0700, Vern Hart wrote or quoted:
 >
>What about this design:  http://vern.com/tshirts/qmail/
>If people like it, I could have it available for online ordering
>within a week.

My US$.02 on this design:

* I prefer black t-shirts; I pretty much only wear white t-shirts on
   laundry day.
* People often wear t-shirts underneath sweatshirts, jackets, or
   other things that cover the back but not the front. Putting the
   sendmail logo on the front and the qmail logo on the back can
   easily defeat the purpose of this shirt.
* I don't know what the legal considerations are in using the
   sendmail logo without permission; since they're now "Sendmail,
   Inc.", they may well have trademarked that logo.

I suggest putting both sentences on the front, with just the qmail logo.

-
  Kai MacTane
  System Administrator
   Online Partners.com, Inc.
-
 From the Jargon File: (v4.0.0, 25 Jul 1996)

house wizard /n./

A hacker occupying a technical-specialist, R&D, or systems position
at a commercial shop. A really effective house wizard can have influ-
ence out of all proportion to his/her ostensible rank and still not
have to wear a suit.



Re: Slow delivery (part 2)

2000-02-28 Thread Matthew Bloch

On Mon, 28 Feb 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> > Then maybe 1-2 hours later it is delivered (the log concurs with this).  
> > Running /etc/init.d/qmail restart makes all the mail go off immediately,
> > but sending an ALRM signal to qmail-send doesn't.
> 
> what are the permissions, etc in /var/qmail/queue/lock:
> - -rw---   1 qmails   qmail   0 Jul 21  1999 sendmutex
> - -rw-r--r--   1 qmailr   qmail1024 Feb 16 22:52 tcpto
> prw--w--w-   1 qmails   qmail   0 Feb 28 19:03 trigger
> ^^ very important, if your permisions do not match this then
> qmail-send won't get triggered properly when new mail is added to the
> queue

Hurrah! This sorts it nicely, thankyou.  The permissions were set to 600
rather than 622; change 'em and it works nicely.  Do you have any idea how
the permissions might have been set wrong in the first place?  It worked
fine when I'd installed the Debian package, then after some fiddling with
fetchmail I got this weird delay.  Anyhow, it's not important, it'd just
be nice to know.

thanks very much,

-- 
Matthew   ( http://www.soup-kitchen.demon.co.uk/ )






RE: Encryption and t-shirts

2000-02-28 Thread Dave Sill

Vern Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>There are a lot of good ideas here!
>Usually when I'm asked to make a qmail shirt, ideas are few and far
>between.

Well, this is qmail HQ. :-)

>What about this design:  http://vern.com/tshirts/qmail/
>If people like it, I could have it available for online ordering
>within a week.

Kai's probably right about the sendmail logo. Maybe a (send)whale
would be better. :-)

>I could easily give two (or more!) options.  Do you have a large,
>clean version of your dolphon logo?

When I get home, I'll send you the best I've got.

-Dave



RE: Encryption and t-shirts

2000-02-28 Thread John Gonzalez/netMDC admin


I'll take two and make the bidness pay for them. But i would also like to
have a few diff. choices, some of the other 'slogans' mentioned were also
good.

On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Vern Hart wrote:

>Today, Dave Sill wrote:
>> 
>> I've been kicking around the idea of a qmail t-shirt for some time,
>> but I've been too busy to actually do it.
>
>There are a lot of good ideas here!
>Usually when I'm asked to make a qmail shirt, ideas are few and far
>between.
>
>> I'll buy at least one if:
>> 
>>  1) I like the design[1],
>
>What about this design:  http://vern.com/tshirts/qmail/
>If people like it, I could have it available for online ordering
>within a week.
>
>>  2) the cost is reasonable[2], and
>
>Should cost $17.50 plus shipping.
>
>>  3) my size (XXL)[3] is available.
>
>XXL is $2 extra (XXXL is $3 extra).
>
>> [1] I prefer my dolphin logo to the Q w/arrows logo, but that wouldn't
>> stop me from buying one. :-)
>
>I could easily give two (or more!) options.  Do you have a large,
>clean version of your dolphon logo?
>
>Cheers,
>Vern
>-- 
>\ \   / __| _ \  \ |   Vern Hart
> \ \ /  _|/ .  |   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  \_/  ___|_|_\_|\_|
>
>
>

  ___   _  __   _  
__  /___ ___    /__  John Gonzalez/Net.Tech
__  __ \ __ \  __/_  __ `__ \/ __  /_  ___/ MDC Computers/netMDC!
_  / / / `__/ /_  / / / / / / /_/ / / /__ (505)437-7600/fax-437-3052
/_/ /_/\___/\__/ /_/ /_/ /_/\__,_/  \___/ http://www.netmdc.com
[-[system info]---]
  1:15pm  up 34 days, 21:12,  4 users,  load average: 0.12, 0.13, 0.12



RE: Encryption and t-shirts

2000-02-28 Thread Vern Hart

Today, Kai MacTane wrote:
> 
> My US$.02 on this design:
> 
> * I prefer black t-shirts; I pretty much only wear white t-shirts on
>laundry day.

I prefer black as well, but I can do gray, white, and tan much
quicker and cheaper in one-off runs.  If enough of us decide we want
black, we can take orders, have them printed and then distributed.
This is easy enough but it will take longer and the price will
depend on how many we make.

> * People often wear t-shirts underneath sweatshirts, jackets, or
>other things that cover the back but not the front. Putting the
>sendmail logo on the front and the qmail logo on the back can
>easily defeat the purpose of this shirt.

I don't think I own a tshirt that doesn't have a logo on the front.
Oh, you probably mean the most prominent logo is the sendmail one...
Well, we could switch them and/or put all the words on the back with
a small qmail logo on the front...

> * I don't know what the legal considerations are in using the
>sendmail logo without permission; since they're now "Sendmail,
>Inc.", they may well have trademarked that logo.

Actually, it's not the sendmail logo.  To avoid copying it too
closely I drew it from memory and if you ask me, I only barely
matched the basic design.  http://www.sendmail.org/gif/batorng.gif

Also, sendmail, inc has a different logo.
http://www2.sendmail.com/img/logo.gif

But if people don't like it, we can easily get rid of it.

Cheers,
Vern
-- 
\ \   / __| _ \  \ |   Vern Hart
 \ \ /  _|/ .  |   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  \_/  ___|_|_\_|\_|




RE: Encryption and t-shirts

2000-02-28 Thread Vern Hart

Today, John Gonzalez/netMDC admin wrote:
> 
> I'll take two and make the bidness pay for them. But i would also like to
> have a few diff. choices, some of the other 'slogans' mentioned were also
> good.

I can do one or two more "taglines".  What are people's top "second"
choices?

Vern
-- 
\ \   / __| _ \  \ |   Vern Hart
 \ \ /  _|/ .  |   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  \_/  ___|_|_\_|\_|




Error in /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current

2000-02-28 Thread Robert Holder

Can someone help me out here?  /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current is full of this:

@400038bad9c40841e24c tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out IP address
for 501
@400038bad9c50d89724c tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out IP address
for 501
@400038bad9c612ecb03c tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out IP address
for 501

and qmail is queuing messages, but it won't deliver them and they never
leave the queue (as reported by qmail-qstat and qmail-qread).   here are the
relevant entries for my /etc/group file:

[root@mail smtpd]# grep 50 /etc/group
nofiles:x:501:
qmail:x:502:

...so... my guess is that my tcprules are hosed?

any help would be greatly appreciated.

robert holder



Re: Error in /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current

2000-02-28 Thread markd

On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 01:27:35PM -0700, Robert Holder wrote:
> Can someone help me out here?  /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current is full of this:
> 
> @400038bad9c40841e24c tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out IP address
> for 501
> @400038bad9c50d89724c tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out IP address
> for 501
> @400038bad9c612ecb03c tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out IP address
> for 501
> 
> and qmail is queuing messages, but it won't deliver them and they never
> leave the queue (as reported by qmail-qstat and qmail-qread).   here are the
> relevant entries for my /etc/group file:
> 
> [root@mail smtpd]# grep 50 /etc/group
> nofiles:x:501:
> qmail:x:502:
> 
> ...so... my guess is that my tcprules are hosed?

My guess is that the IP address you've given tcpserver is wrong or you've
given it a hostname that it cannot resolve. How is tcpserver started and
what's on the command line?


Regards.



RE: Error in /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current

2000-02-28 Thread Robert Holder

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> 
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 01:27:35PM -0700, Robert Holder wrote:
> > Can someone help me out here?  /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current is full of
this:
> > 
> > @400038bad9c40841e24c tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out IP
address for 501
> > @400038bad9c50d89724c tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out IP
address for 501
> > @400038bad9c612ecb03c tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out IP
address for 501
> > 
> > and qmail is queuing messages, but it won't deliver them and they never
> > leave the queue (as reported by qmail-qstat and qmail-qread).   here are
the
> > relevant entries for my /etc/group file:
> > 
> > [root@mail smtpd]# grep 50 /etc/group
> > nofiles:x:501:
> > qmail:x:502:
> > 
> > ...so... my guess is that my tcprules are hosed?
> 
> My guess is that the IP address you've given tcpserver is wrong or you've
> given it a hostname that it cannot resolve. How is tcpserver started and
> what's on the command line?
> 
> 
> Regards.
 
/var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run contains:

#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild`
NOFILESGID=`id -g qmaild`
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 200 \
  /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -p -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb \
  -u $QMAILUID -g $NOFILESGID 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1

thank you very much for the help mark!  i set qmail up according to Sill's
"Life with qmail", and now am wondering about the "-p" option to tcpserver.
i am going to look at these env variables and try to figure out what i've
done wrong, but if it's obvious to you, please let me know.  thanks again
for the help!

Robert Holder
Lakewood, Colorado



Re: Encryption and t-shirts

2000-02-28 Thread Rogerio Brito

On Feb 28 2000, Dave Sill wrote:
> [1] I prefer my dolphin logo to the Q w/arrows logo, but that wouldn't
> stop me from buying one. :-)

You did that dolphin? Wow... It's cute...

> [2] Depends on quality of shirt, number of colors/sides printed,
> etc., but $25 delivered is generous, and more than many will spend
> on a t-shirt.

Well, I'd love to have one... Please if anybody makes one,
please do think about the poor souls of other countries that
will have to pay for the international money order and also
for the expensive overseas shipping rates... :-(

> [3] I'm not obese (6', 230 lbs), but I have a long torso.

That's also a problem. I don't know what size I'd use in the
US standards... :-)


[]s, Roger...

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
  Rogerio Brito - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/
 Nectar homepage: http://www.linux.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/opeth/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=



Re: Encryption and t-shirts

2000-02-28 Thread Lars Uffmann

On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 01:22:38PM -0700, Vern Hart wrote:
> Today, John Gonzalez/netMDC admin wrote:
> > 
> > I'll take two and make the bidness pay for them. But i would also like to
> > have a few diff. choices, some of the other 'slogans' mentioned were also
> > good.
> 
> I can do one or two more "taglines".  What are people's top "second"
> choices?

I would like

front: '# chmod 0 /usr/lib/sendmail' + qmail logo
back: a cool djb .signature

Lars



Re: Error in /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current

2000-02-28 Thread markd

> > > @400038bad9c40841e24c tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out IP
> address for 501

> > My guess is that the IP address you've given tcpserver is wrong or you've
> > given it a hostname that it cannot resolve. How is tcpserver started and
> > what's on the command line?
> > 
> > 
> > Regards.
>  
> /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run contains:
> 
> #!/bin/sh
> QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild`
> NOFILESGID=`id -g qmaild`
> exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 200 \
>   /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -p -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb \
>   -u $QMAILUID -g $NOFILESGID 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1
> 
> thank you very much for the help mark!  i set qmail up according to Sill's
> "Life with qmail", and now am wondering about the "-p" option to tcpserver.
> i am going to look at these env variables and try to figure out what i've
> done wrong, but if it's obvious to you, please let me know.  thanks again
> for the help!

Yep. What's 501 in /etc/passwd and /etc/group?

My guess is that $NOFILESGID has multiple values in it. I don't know why
that would be. Are you running on Linux or some other OS? The id command
varies considerably amongst OSes.


Regards.



Re: qmail-ifc-len-patch (ipme.c)

2000-02-28 Thread Jos Backus

This was a kernel bug indeed. The following commit fixes it; no patches to the
qmail port are needed.

guido   2000/02/28 11:30:27 PST

  Modified files:
sys/net  if.c
  Log:
  This fixes a problem where the SIOCGIFCONF ioctl goes wrong.  This
  is triggered when qmail is used with INET6 enabled.  The bug
  manifests itself in that the space variable can become negative
  and that in the comparison in the guards of the 2 loops, this was
  not noticed because sizeof() returns an unsigned and thus the signed
  variable gets promoted to unsigned. I decided not to make space
  unsigned because I think we should guard against this from happening.
  Thus panic() in case space becomes negative.

  Approved by:  jkh

  Revision  ChangesPath
  1.85  +10 -2 src/sys/net/if.c

-- 
Jos Backus  _/ _/_/_/  "Reliability means never
   _/ _/   _/   having to say you're sorry."
  _/ _/_/_/ -- D. J. Bernstein
 _/  _/ _/_/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  _/_/  _/_/_/  use Std::Disclaimer;



Re: Is my server being used as a SPAM relay?

2000-02-28 Thread Albert Hopkins


Figured out that the last configuration line for tcpserver was
allow,RELAYCLIENT=""

Thanks for all those who gave suggestions.

-- 
Albert Hopkins
Dynacare, Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Encryption and t-shirts

2000-02-28 Thread Vern Hart

Today, Rogerio Brito wrote:
> 
>   How much would it be for shipping to Brazil?

Looks like international shipping would be:

   4-6 weeks (USPS Surface)  $3  plus $2 per item.
   7-10 days (USPS Air)  $6  plus $3 per item.
   3 days(USPS Express)  $25 plus $3 per item.

Unless you want a black shirt, then I'd have to figure out what
shipping would be on an individual basis.

Cheers,
Vern
-- 
\ \   / __| _ \  \ |   Vern Hart
 \ \ /  _|/ .  |   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  \_/  ___|_|_\_|\_|




Re: Encryption and t-shirts

2000-02-28 Thread Rogerio Brito

On Feb 28 2000, Vern Hart wrote:
> What about this design:  http://vern.com/tshirts/qmail/
> If people like it, I could have it available for online ordering
> within a week.

I think that I like it. But the dolphin would be nicer, IMVHO,
and more consistent also with sendmail's bat (if there aren't
any legal problems with that, as mentioned in other messages).

BTW, I'd vote for the front/back design (here where I live is
hot and I usually don't wear anything over t-shirts).

> >  2) the cost is reasonable[2], and
> 
> Should cost $17.50 plus shipping.

How much would it be for shipping to Brazil?


[]s, Roger...

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
  Rogerio Brito - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/
 Nectar homepage: http://www.linux.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/opeth/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=



Re: Encryption and t-shirts

2000-02-28 Thread Adrian Urquhart

Ok, I'll have a couple.

Can I put in an official order?

Is there to be a choice of colour and front/back logos?

Adrian

Vern Hart wrote:
> 
> Today, Rogerio Brito wrote:
> >
> >   How much would it be for shipping to Brazil?
> 
> Looks like international shipping would be:
> 
>4-6 weeks (USPS Surface)  $3  plus $2 per item.
>7-10 days (USPS Air)  $6  plus $3 per item.
>3 days(USPS Express)  $25 plus $3 per item.
> 
> Unless you want a black shirt, then I'd have to figure out what
> shipping would be on an individual basis.
> 
> Cheers,
> Vern
> --
> \ \   / __| _ \  \ |   Vern Hart
>  \ \ /  _|/ .  |   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   \_/  ___|_|_\_|\_|



Re: Encryption and t-shirts

2000-02-28 Thread Vern Hart

Today, Rogerio Brito wrote:
> 
>   Well, I'd love to have one... Please if anybody makes one,
>   please do think about the poor souls of other countries that
>   will have to pay for the international money order and also
>   for the expensive overseas shipping rates... :-(

The online service I will use accepts credit cards (via SSL or
telephone) so foreigners shouldn't have any problems.

>   That's also a problem. I don't know what size I'd use in the
>   US standards... :-)

If you measure your chest with a tape measure (under your arms,
around the widest part)  I think the conventional sizes are as
follows:

   Size Inches
   Small34-36
   Medium   38-40
   Large42-44
   XLarge   46-48
   XXLarge  50-52
   XXXLarge 54-56

Most people like to wear tshirts loose and so choose the next larger
size.

Cheers,
Vern
-- 
\ \   / __| _ \  \ |   Vern Hart
 \ \ /  _|/ .  |   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  \_/  ___|_|_\_|\_|




Re: Encryption and t-shirts

2000-02-28 Thread Ted Deppner

On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 10:16:52PM +0100, Lars Uffmann wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 01:22:38PM -0700, Vern Hart wrote:
> > Today, John Gonzalez/netMDC admin wrote:
> > > 
> > > I'll take two and make the bidness pay for them. But i would also like to
> > > have a few diff. choices, some of the other 'slogans' mentioned were also
> > > good.
> > 
> > I can do one or two more "taglines".  What are people's top "second"
> > choices?
> 
> I would like
> 
> front: '# chmod 0 /usr/lib/sendmail' + qmail logo
> back: a cool djb .signature

I'd personally like something showing the package manager...

'pkg_mgr --remove-pkg sendmail'

chmod 0 while quick to be recognized by unix admins doesn't represent the
finality that --remove-pkg imparts.

(I'm a linux background, so I'm trying not to suggest rpm or dpkg, and I don't
know what other unices use for pkg management... adjust as necessary).

-- 
Ted Deppner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.psyber.com



Re: Encryption and t-shirts

2000-02-28 Thread Vern Hart

Today, Adrian Urquhart wrote:
> 
> Ok, I'll have a couple.
> 
> Can I put in an official order?

I'll let everyone know when orders will be possible and the URL for
ordering.

> Is there to be a choice of colour and front/back logos?

I will take one or two other slogans and make them available with
either logo.  The shirt color choices will only be ash (gray),
white, and natural (tan).  Of the three choices, I like the natural
best.  You will make the choices at the time of ordering.

I had planned on making two varieties of each slogan.  One with the
Q-arrows logo (small, on the left front) and the slogan and Q-arrows
logo on the back (big).  The second variation would be the same with
the dolphin logo substituted.  Should I be bothered with making a
variation with different logos on the front versus the back?

Cheers,
Vern
-- 
\ \   / __| _ \  \ |   Vern Hart
 \ \ /  _|/ .  |   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  \_/  ___|_|_\_|\_|




Path

2000-02-28 Thread Lee Trotter



Ok new qmail/linux user here so please for my lack of 
knowledge here, and you'll probley be hearing lots more from me.
 
After installing qmail, the /sbin directoy was removed 
from the path or I suspect the path is acutally being over written.  This 
only occures when I logon though telnet, if I logon though the console it's 
fine.  Here is the path from a telnet login.
 
bash: 
/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/home/lee/bin: No such file or 
directory
 
Also quick question what does the No such file or directory 
mean?  I found that happens if I have more then 1 directory in the 
path.
 
Thanks for any help.
 
Lee Trotter


Re: POP Toaster

2000-02-28 Thread Paul Gregg

Stephen Remillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,

> I just finished installing qmail on my Linux box.  I would like to replace
> our NT mail server with qmail running on Linux.  There are no local users on
> this Linux box so everyone will get their e-mail using POP3.

> I have a few beginner's questions for you.

> I am reading the FAQ on how to setup a "POP Toaster" and I am a little
> confused.
> Could someone explain to me the purpose of the checkpassword utility.
> Is it to maintain the list of authorized people without creating user
> account on Linux? Can I do without it?

> Also is there a more detailed document on how to setup qmail-pop3d.

In short Qmail is completely modular.  The checkpassword you choose is entirely
dependent on which method of authentication you wish to use:
/etc/password
plaintext password file (other than /etc/passwd)
LDAP
cdb password file
Mysql Database
Radius
etc
etc

In setting up "qmail-pop3d" you need to understand that qmail-pop3d provides
nothing more than the POP3 functions to operate on a users Maildir - it does
not collect useranem/password or arrange the authentication of the user.

Qmail operates as a sequence of programs doing their thing then running the
next program in the chain, e.g.  you could setup the following scenario:
Using Daemontools, and the UCSPI packages you may wish to launch the
qmail-pop* system from tcpserver (which listens on port 110), further you
may wish to run tcpserver under a supervisory process, so the execution
"string" would be something like:

echo "Starting POP3 daemon."
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -p -lmail.mydom.net -t2 -u 888 -g 888 0 110 \
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup mail.mydom.net \
/var/qmail/bin/checkpoppasswd \
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 2>&1 | \
/var/qmail/bin/splogger pop3d &

The only real variable in this is getting your checkpasswd/checkpoppasswd
functioning  - advice on testing your checkpasswd is available on www.qmail.org

Paul Gregg
-- 
Email pgregg at tibus.net  |  T: +44 (0)  1232 424190  |  CLUB24  INTERNET  | 
Technical Director |  F: +44 (0)  1232 424709  |Free  Access| 
The Internet Business Ltd  |  W: http://www.tibus.net  |  www.club24.co.uk  | 



can't stop qmail (supervise-scripts)

2000-02-28 Thread Smoerk

Hello,

I installed Bruce Guenter's qmail rpm. I have two problems:

1. I cannot stop qmail or qmail-smtpd. The init.d script says it's
already down and if I try to kill it, it's restarted (by supervise)?
Did I install something wrong or do you know how I could stop it?

2. qmail-smtpd does not care about /etc/tcprules/smtp.cdb. I cannot
send mails localy via smtp, because the smtp does not relay. I put
127.0.0.1:allow, RELAYCLIENT=""
in smtp.rules and make a new smtp.cdb with tcprules, but it doesn't
help. Is there anything I have to configure, before smtp.cdb is used?



Re: can't stop qmail (supervise-scripts)

2000-02-28 Thread Chris Johnson

On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 12:28:34AM +0100, Smoerk wrote:
> 2. qmail-smtpd does not care about /etc/tcprules/smtp.cdb. I cannot
> send mails localy via smtp, because the smtp does not relay. I put
> 127.0.0.1:allow, RELAYCLIENT=""
  ^
Take the space out of there.

Chris



POP3 Slowdown solved (I think)

2000-02-28 Thread Jose de Leon

I soved the problem I was having earlier with POP3 authentication going very
slow (30 secs to more than minute) or sometimes timing out.

Server reboot.  Not just a stop and start of the qmail-pop3 or tcpserver
daemon.  Just a plain cold restart.

Probably a memory leak somewhere.

Jose




Re: Encryption and t-shirts

2000-02-28 Thread Tom Reinertson

On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Vern Hart wrote:
> I had planned on making two varieties of each slogan.  One with the
> Q-arrows logo (small, on the left front) and the slogan and Q-arrows
> logo on the back (big).  The second variation would be the same with
> the dolphin logo substituted.  Should I be bothered with making a
> variation with different logos on the front versus the back?
> 

Personally, I wouldn't mix logos -- I like the styles you've listed.  I do have
one suggestion, though.  I would prefer to pay a little more and get a really
high quality, heavy t-shirt.  I can't stand light weight, flimsy,
see-thru t-shirts.

Thanks for all your work on putting this together.

Tom



Re: Encryption and t-shirts

2000-02-28 Thread Vern Hart

Today, Tom Reinertson wrote:
> 
> Personally, I wouldn't mix logos -- I like the styles you've
> listed.  I do have one suggestion, though.  I would prefer to pay
> a little more and get a really high quality, heavy t-shirt.  I
> can't stand light weight, flimsy, see-thru t-shirts.

I agree.  The basic shirt is a Haynes Beefy-T, Heavyweight. 
The sweatshirt option is a Jerzees 50/50 7.5 oz fleece.
The sweatshirt costs about $5 more.

If you want a more heavyweight tshirt, you could get a Henley (tshirt
with three buttons) which is made by Cotton Deluxe and is a nice 7
ounces.  But the Henley costs about $10 more.

Cheers,
Vern
-- 
\ \   / __| _ \  \ |   Vern Hart
 \ \ /  _|/ .  |   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  \_/  ___|_|_\_|\_|




how can I unsubscribe

2000-02-28 Thread tao tao



sorry,but I have a question:I used the qmail last year.for 
some reasons, we have choised aonther commerical product.so how can I 
unsubscribe?


Re: Encryption and t-shirts

2000-02-28 Thread Edward S. Marshall

On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Vern Hart wrote:
> I had planned on making two varieties of each slogan.  One with the
> Q-arrows logo (small, on the left front) and the slogan and Q-arrows
> logo on the back (big).  The second variation would be the same with
> the dolphin logo substituted.  Should I be bothered with making a
> variation with different logos on the front versus the back?

The dolphin would be great, especially if you could contrast it with a
forlorn-looking bat...*grin* Maybe:

"Don't queue mail with Sendmail..." 

   "Send mail with QMail!"

or some such. But then again, I have no taste, so take this with a grain
of salt.

I'll also second the request for higher-quality material. Heavy-weight
shirt or sweatshirt is definitely what I'd prefer, personally...

-- 
Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   http://www.nyx.net/~emarshal/
---
[  Felix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.  ]



How to impliment qmail-pop3d?

2000-02-28 Thread Eric Lalonde

In Paul Gregg's "Single-UID based pop3 box HOWTO" He says:
When using Qmail with Maildir format, you will need to use qmail-popup ->
checkpasswd -> qmail-pop3d.

I'm not sure how to impliment this in my startup scripts. I am using his
'checkpoppasswd'. Its located in /var/qmail/users. my passwd file is
/var/qmail/users/poppasswd.
How do I set up this scheme?

Eric



Sender domain "invalid"

2000-02-28 Thread Stein Ma




Dear all,
    I am new to qmail and have a 
problem here.
    I have added the follwoing in 
the .bash_profile
    
MAILUSER=my_isp_username
    
MAILHOST=my_isp_domain
    QMAILINJECT=f
    export MAILUSER MAILHOST 
QMAILINJECT
 
Thank you,
Stein Ma
 
= qmail bounced the following messages 

 
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at durian.fidamy.com.I'm afraid I 
wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.This is a 
permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:Connected to 
208.230.135.220 but sender was rejected.Remote host said: 501 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Sender 
domain must exist;
;
;
 


Re: Sender domain "invalid"

2000-02-28 Thread Magnus Bodin

On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 03:22:03PM +0800, Stein Ma wrote:
> Dear all,
> I am new to qmail and have a problem here.
> I have added the follwoing in the .bash_profile
> MAILUSER=my_isp_username
> MAILHOST=my_isp_domain
> QMAILINJECT=f
> export MAILUSER MAILHOST QMAILINJECT
> 
> Thank you,
> Stein Ma
> 
> = qmail bounced the following messages 
> 
> Hi. This is the qmail-send program at durian.fidamy.com.
> I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
> This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
> 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Connected to 208.230.135.220 but sender was rejected.
> Remote host said: 501 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Sender domain must exist

You probably don't run plain vanilla qmail. You are probably using a patched
version of qmail that validates whether the senders domain is valid in DNS or
not. Alternatively, you run some spam-check delivery plug-in for the user
that handles mail for the address above. Either such a spam check or a
patched qmail is doing the bouncing.

Read instructions to the patch/spamchecker and correct behavior.

/magnus

-- 
http://x42.com/



Re: Sender domain "invalid"

2000-02-28 Thread Anand Buddhdev

On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 03:22:03PM +0800, Stein Ma wrote:

>Dear all,
>
>I am new to qmail and have a problem here.
>
>I have added the follwoing in the .bash_profile
>
>MAILUSER=my_isp_username
>
>MAILHOST=my_isp_domain
>
>QMAILINJECT=f

You must also set QMAILSUSER=my_isp_username and
QMAILSHOST=my_isp_domain to set your envelope sender correctly.

>
>export MAILUSER MAILHOST QMAILINJECT
>
>
>
>Thank you,
>
>Stein Ma
>
>
>
>= qmail bounced the following messages 
>
>
>
>Hi. This is the qmail-send program at durian.fidamy.com.
>I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following
>addresses.
>This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
><[1][EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>Connected to 208.230.135.220 but sender was rejected.
>Remote host said: 501 <[2][EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Sender domain
>must exist
>;
>
>;
>
>;
> 
> References
> 
>1. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>2. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
See complete headers for more info