Re: DNS bug: CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily

[Vu Xuan Ngoc]

Thank you for everybody.
I have succeeded. I have deleted all and install again, now it don't infor the
error

virtualdomains

[Nick]

My question is about virtualdomains file

test.com:peter
this puts the .qmail-alias files in /home/peter
say I want all qmail alias files to be in /home/peter/qmail directory.

Is this possible ?

-
Regards 
Nick 
Wildthing Communications 
 ICQ# 64851373 
-

qmail security

[Suyanta Satria]

dear all,
 
i have mail server using qmail and running 
properly.
how can i testing my mail server ? (secure or 
not)
what kind of testing that i sould do ?
 
regards
 
 
 
yayan

installation testing and logging failure

[Indra Riawan]

i've read all available docs ,..

i've complete my installation.
but i thing something wrong there.i could not find anything in my
/var/log/maillog, so i couldn't
send any messages to local or remote users. so how i fix this ???

and, next i try using starting script to star my qmail but i got wrong
there,. i machhine is RH 6.2 and my qmail is 1.03 i've been tried to
writing by hand and it wrong, and then i try to download from crypto but
give same error, how could i fix ???

++
| SaveOurCountry |
++

Re: Maildir problem

[Martin Kong]

Adding Maildir to /etc/skel is only good for users you'll be creating in
the future.  For all existing users, you need to run
/var/qmail/bin/maildirmake in each of the $HOME directory.

> Helena Zhang wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I installed qmail version 1.03 on my Red Hat 6.0 machine, and it is
> working fine. I selected Maildir as the default delivery method. The
> manual told me to add the directoy Maildir/ in to /etc/skel and to all
> other users, and so I did. but when I telnet my port 110, the
> following error will appear:
> 
> Trying 216.237.57.142...
> Connected to 216.237.57.142.
> escape character is '^]'.
> +OK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> user helena
> pass 123*
> -ERR this user has no $HOME/Maildir
> Connection closed by foreign host.
> 
> * not the real password
> 
> but the $HOME/Maildir/ directory is there. After that I removed the
> user and create it again, which worked. Now I want to do it to the
> user root, but I can't remove root and created one again. Can anyone
> help me with that?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Helena Zhang

Re: Maildir problem

[Dushyanth Harinath]

hi,
for root u dont create Maildir ...create a dot qmail file for root in
/var/qmail/alias and do whatever u want with it.
man dot-qmail for more details

regards
dushyanth

> Hi,
> 
> I installed qmail version 1.03 on my Red Hat 6.0 machine, and it is
> working fine. I selected Maildir as the default delivery method. The
> manual told me to add the directoy Maildir/ in to /etc/skel and to all
> other users, and so I did. but when I telnet my port 110, the following
> error will appear:
> 
>Trying 216.237.57.142...
>Connected to 216.237.57.142.
>escape character is '^]'.
>+OK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>user helena
>pass 123*
>-ERR this user has no $HOME/Maildir
>Connection closed by foreign host.
> 
> * not the real password
> 
> but the $HOME/Maildir/ directory is there. After that I removed the
> user and create it again, which worked. Now I want to do it to the user
> root, but I can't remove root and created one again. Can anyone help me
> with that?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Helena Zhang


-- 
Dushyanth Harinath
Archean Infotech Limited
Ph No:091-040-3228666,6570704,3228674
http://www.archeanit.com



-
This email was sent using SquirrelMail.
   "Webmail for nuts!"
http://squirrelmail.org/

Maildir problem

[Helena Zhang]

Hi,
 
I installed qmail version 1.03 on my Red Hat 6.0 
machine, and it is working fine. I selected Maildir as the default delivery 
method. The manual told me to add the directoy Maildir/ in to /etc/skel and 
to all other users, and so I did. but when I telnet my port 110, the following 
error will appear:
 
    Trying 
216.237.57.142...
    Connected to 
216.237.57.142.
    escape character is 
'^]'.
    +OK <3094.995952119@mail.astroburst.com> 
    user 
helena
pass 123*
    -ERR this user has no 
$HOME/Maildir
    Connection closed by foreign 
host.
 
* not the real password
 
but the $HOME/Maildir/ directory is there. 
After that I removed the user and create it again, which worked. Now I want to 
do it to the user root, but I can't remove root and created one again. Can 
anyone help me with that?
 
Regards,
 
Helena Zhang

How can we Inplement the mailing list in qmail

[Sandeep Goel]

How can we implement mailing list in qmail-ldap

Re: several /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd and bin/qmail-queue

[alexus]

i can send you today's log.. but its really nothing intersting there

what i found intesting is

tcpserver servver shows 0/40

- Original Message - 
From: "Greg White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 10:23 PM
Subject: Re: several /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd and bin/qmail-queue


> On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 09:58:04PM -0400, alexus wrote:
> > i was checking something and i founds this
> > 
> > my mail server seems to have tons of 
> > /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd and bin/qmail-queue
> > 
> > running at the same time.. about 30 of them
> > 
> 
> The process actually listening on port 25 forks a qmail-smtpd for every
> incoming conneciton. qmail-queue is then run to place the mail safely in
> the queue.
> 
> > any ideas why?
> 
> Read /var/qmail/doc/INTERNALS.
> > 
> > nothin intersting in maillog
> > 
> 
> I find that hard to believe. At the moment you see that many
> qmail-queues hanging around, qmail-smtpd's logs should read something
> like so, if logged through tcpserver:
> 
> @40003b5cd7620a221bcc tcpserver: status: 30/xx
> 
> where xx is either 40 or whatever is specified in the 'run' file for
> qmail-smtpd. ISTR that inetd does some sort of logging of how many
> processes it has opened, but it's been so long since I used inetd for
> anything that I've forgotten.
> 
> -- 
> Greg White
> 

Outbound e-mail

[Alex Tsang]

Dear all

Is there any method can auto forward a outbound e-mail to an other e-mail
account? E.g. user a ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) send a e-mail to outside user b
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Then this e-mail will auto forward a copy to admin
([EMAIL PROTECTED]).

Regards

Alex Tsang

Re: Compiling on Solaris 8

[Keary Suska]

Install gcc, and use it instead.

Keary Suska
Esoteritech, Inc.
"Leveraging Open Source for a better Internet"

> From: "Mike Jimenez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 17:14:10 -0700
> To: "Qmail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Compiling on Solaris 8
> 
> When I try to compile I get this error what do I need to do to fix?
> Thanks
> 
> bash-2.03# make setup check
> ( cat warn-auto.sh; \
> echo CC=\'`head -1 conf-cc`\'; \
> echo LD=\'`head -1 conf-ld`\' \
> ) > auto-ccld.sh
> cat auto-ccld.sh make-load.sh > make-load
> chmod 755 make-load
> cat auto-ccld.sh find-systype.sh > find-systype
> chmod 755 find-systype
> ./find-systype > systype
> ( cat warn-auto.sh; ./make-load "`cat systype`" ) > load
> chmod 755 load
> cat auto-ccld.sh make-compile.sh > make-compile
> chmod 755 make-compile
> ( cat warn-auto.sh; ./make-compile "`cat systype`" ) > \
> compile
> chmod 755 compile
> ( ( ./compile tryvfork.c && ./load tryvfork ) >/dev/null \
> 2>&1 \
> && cat fork.h2 || cat fork.h1 ) > fork.h
> rm -f tryvfork.o tryvfork
> ./compile qmail-local.c
> /usr/ucb/cc:  language optional software package not installed
> make: *** [qmail-local.o] Error 1
> bash-2.03# 
> 
> 

Re: several /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd and bin/qmail-queue

[Greg White]

On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 09:58:04PM -0400, alexus wrote:
> i was checking something and i founds this
> 
> my mail server seems to have tons of 
> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd and bin/qmail-queue
> 
> running at the same time.. about 30 of them
> 

The process actually listening on port 25 forks a qmail-smtpd for every
incoming conneciton. qmail-queue is then run to place the mail safely in
the queue.

> any ideas why?

Read /var/qmail/doc/INTERNALS.
> 
> nothin intersting in maillog
> 

I find that hard to believe. At the moment you see that many
qmail-queues hanging around, qmail-smtpd's logs should read something
like so, if logged through tcpserver:

@40003b5cd7620a221bcc tcpserver: status: 30/xx

where xx is either 40 or whatever is specified in the 'run' file for
qmail-smtpd. ISTR that inetd does some sort of logging of how many
processes it has opened, but it's been so long since I used inetd for
anything that I've forgotten.

-- 
Greg White

several /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd and bin/qmail-queue

[alexus]

i was checking something and i founds this

my mail server seems to have tons of 
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd and bin/qmail-queue

running at the same time.. about 30 of them

any ideas why?

nothin intersting in maillog

Re: Inode allocation / qmail-queue?

[Adrian Ho]

On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 01:30:01PM +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
> I'm currently about to go live with new ReiserFS based Qmail servers, and
> haven't noticed any problem. If there is, I'd certainly like to know... :-)

I'm running qmail on several boxen, all ReiserFS-only.  Not a single
problem to date, though I did use Bruce Guenter's syncdir patch, so that
could be construed as "cheating".  8-)

Also read the Qmail-ReiserFS Integration HOWTO:
.

-- 
Adrian HoTinker, Drifter, Fixer, Bum   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archived @:  
Useful URLs:  
  

Re: Inode allocation / qmail-queue?

[Jason Haar]

On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 01:45:57AM +0200, Lordy wrote:
> Hi Mike,
> 
> this is a known issue with ReiserFS. As you might now, Ext2 and ReiserFS
> have many differences and you are just experiencing one of them. The whole
> problem is documented unter www.namesys.com (the homepage of ReiserFS)
> so you will find the information you need there.

Hmm, according to the ReiserFS FAQ (http://www.namesys.com/faq.html#qmail),
the only issue affecting ReiserFS is the same one affecting ext2: namely
that link() and unlink() are synchronous operations.

I see no "special" problems... 

I'm currently about to go live with new ReiserFS based Qmail servers, and
haven't noticed any problem. If there is, I'd certainly like to know... :-)

-- 
Cheers

Jason Haar

Unix/Special Projects, Trimble NZ
Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417

Vmailmgr compile problems

[Gary MacKay]

I've setup a new qmail/courier-imap server and all is well except for
vmailmgr. I can not get it to compile. I had the same problem on an
older machine, figured, oh well, it's probably outdated. Not so.


 I've searched the archives and found lots of others with the same error
and no solutions. Due to the high volume of messages from people running
it, I'm sure it is a great package, but I'd like to try it myself. I
even have people finding my previous newsgroup requests for help and
emailing me offline!! Obviously I'm not the only one having this
problem.


HP e800 PIII 866
RedHat 7.1 (updated)
 9.1 gig SCSI
18.1 gig SCSI
640mg ram

Errors:
make  all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/qmail/vmailmgr-0.96.9'
Making all in python
make[2]: Entering directory
`/usr/local/src/qmail/vmailmgr-0.96.9/python'
echo "sysconfdir = '/usr/local/etc'" >local.py
python -c 'import __init__'
python -O -c 'import __init__'
python -c 'import constants'
python -O -c 'import constants'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/qmail/vmailmgr-0.96.9/python'
Making all in php
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/qmail/vmailmgr-0.96.9/php'
make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/qmail/vmailmgr-0.96.9/php'
Making all in lib
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/qmail/vmailmgr-0.96.9/lib'
Making all in misc
make[3]: Entering directory
`/usr/local/src/qmail/vmailmgr-0.96.9/lib/misc'
c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I..-g -O2 -fno-rtti
-fno-exceptions -Wall -W -c crc32.cc
In file included from crc32.cc:1:
crc32.h:48:8: warning: extra tokens at end of #endif directive
c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I..-g -O2 -fno-rtti
-fno-exceptions -Wall -W -c exec.cc
exec.cc: In function `int presetenv (const char *, const mystring &)':
exec.cc:29: `strlen' undeclared (first use this function)
exec.cc:29: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each
function it appears in.)
exec.cc:31: `strcpy' undeclared (first use this function)
make[3]: *** [exec.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/usr/local/src/qmail/vmailmgr-0.96.9/lib/misc'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/qmail/vmailmgr-0.96.9/lib'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/qmail/vmailmgr-0.96.9'
make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
[gary@www vmailmgr-0.96.9]$



- Gary

Re: Inode allocation / qmail-queue?

[MarkD]

Er whatever other issues may or may not be associated with ReiserFS,
re-use of inodes does not present a problem for qmail and is commonly
seen on UFS.

If you look at the log fragment carefully you'll see that the inode is
only reused after the message has been delivered and thus the file
deleted.

It would be a problem if the same inode was in use at the same time,
but the log fragment doesn't show that.

By way of an example, on a FreeBSD 4.2 UFS queue I see that the same
inode has been re-used over 100 times for some 1200 deliveries.

$ grep 'info msg' /var/log/qmail/current | cut -f4 -d' ' | cut -f1 -d: |
sort -n | uniq -c | sort -nr

 177 8097707
 165 8097716
 118 8097715
  83 8097913
  75 8097709
  71 8097768
  62 8097947
  48 8097699
  42 8097909
  33 8097990
  29 8097701
  23 8097755
  16 8097879
  16 8097769
  15 8097910
  14 8097943
  14 8097914
  14 8097712
  13 8097719
  11 8097753
  10 8097998
  10 8097997
   8 8097984
   ...


Regards.



On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 01:45:57AM +0200, Lordy allegedly wrote:
> Hi Mike,
> 
> this is a known issue with ReiserFS. As you might now, Ext2 and ReiserFS
> have many differences and you are just experiencing one of them. The whole
> problem is documented unter www.namesys.com (the homepage of ReiserFS)
> so you will find the information you need there.
> 
> In general you have two options:
> 
> 1) Moving the qMail partition back to ext2 (probably /var)
> 2) Patching qMail with the ReiserFS patch. (I think that one is available 
> through
> a link on www.namesys.com too).
> 
> Just for your information: I have a linux box running qMail and I have 
> moved /home
> which contains the pop-boxes to ReiserFS but /var remains ext2. This makes sure
> that mail is "securely" stored once it is delivered and if your queue (or 
> the partition)
> crashed you won't have much chances to restore it anyway.
> 
> Hope this help,
> Lordy
> 
> At 14:41 23.07.2001 -0600, you wrote:
> >Hello there.
> >I have been noticing slightly out of the ordinary things happening in my
> >qmail-send logs after changing the queue filesystem over to reiserfs.
> >I am seeing the same inode used for multiple messages. Is this normal?
> >
> >(other users email has been blanked, as has all senders. mine is known
> >to all of you, so why bother typing to cover mine eh? )
> >
> >excerpts from my qmail-queue log piped thru tai64nlocal
> >
> >2001-07-23 14:29:38.294512500 new msg 405006
> >2001-07-23 14:29:38.294529500 info msg 405006: bytes 2531 from 
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 28395 uid 1016
> >2001-07-23 14:29:38.388694500 starting delivery 689: msg 405006 to local 
> >vdomain-vuser@vdomain
> >2001-07-23 14:29:38.388713500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
> >2001-07-23 14:29:38.442249500 delivery 689: success: 
> >POP_user_does_not_exist,_but_will_deliver_to_/users/catchall/dir/did_0+0+1/
> >2001-07-23 14:29:38.442273500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
> >2001-07-23 14:29:38.442278500 end msg 405006
> >2001-07-23 14:32:30.228899500 new msg 405006
> >2001-07-23 14:32:30.228916500 info msg 405006: bytes 4242 from 
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 28405 uid 1016
> >2001-07-23 14:32:30.305868500 starting delivery 690: msg 405006 to local 
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >2001-07-23 14:32:30.305886500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
> >2001-07-23 14:32:30.376295500 delivery 690: success: did_0+0+1/
> >2001-07-23 14:32:30.376313500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
> >2001-07-23 14:32:30.376319500 end msg 405006
> >2001-07-23 14:32:32.722033500 new msg 405006
> >2001-07-23 14:32:32.722049500 info msg 405006: bytes 1827 from 
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 28409 uid 1016
> >2001-07-23 14:32:32.814920500 starting delivery 691: msg 405006 to local 
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >2001-07-23 14:32:32.814937500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
> >2001-07-23 14:32:32.847071500 delivery 691: success: did_0+0+1/
> >2001-07-23 14:32:32.847089500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
> >2001-07-23 14:32:32.847094500 end msg 405006
> >
> >Mike
> >
> >--
> >Mike Hodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 

Compiling on Solaris 8

[Mike Jimenez]

When I try to compile I get this error what do I need to do to fix?
Thanks

bash-2.03# make setup check
( cat warn-auto.sh; \
echo CC=\'`head -1 conf-cc`\'; \
echo LD=\'`head -1 conf-ld`\' \
) > auto-ccld.sh
cat auto-ccld.sh make-load.sh > make-load
chmod 755 make-load
cat auto-ccld.sh find-systype.sh > find-systype
chmod 755 find-systype
./find-systype > systype
( cat warn-auto.sh; ./make-load "`cat systype`" ) > load
chmod 755 load
cat auto-ccld.sh make-compile.sh > make-compile
chmod 755 make-compile
( cat warn-auto.sh; ./make-compile "`cat systype`" ) > \
compile
chmod 755 compile
( ( ./compile tryvfork.c && ./load tryvfork ) >/dev/null \
2>&1 \
&& cat fork.h2 || cat fork.h1 ) > fork.h
rm -f tryvfork.o tryvfork
./compile qmail-local.c
/usr/ucb/cc:  language optional software package not installed
make: *** [qmail-local.o] Error 1
bash-2.03# 
  

Re: Inode allocation / qmail-queue?

[Lordy]

Hi Mike,

this is a known issue with ReiserFS. As you might now, Ext2 and ReiserFS
have many differences and you are just experiencing one of them. The whole
problem is documented unter www.namesys.com (the homepage of ReiserFS)
so you will find the information you need there.

In general you have two options:

1) Moving the qMail partition back to ext2 (probably /var)
2) Patching qMail with the ReiserFS patch. (I think that one is available 
through
a link on www.namesys.com too).

Just for your information: I have a linux box running qMail and I have 
moved /home
which contains the pop-boxes to ReiserFS but /var remains ext2. This makes sure
that mail is "securely" stored once it is delivered and if your queue (or 
the partition)
crashed you won't have much chances to restore it anyway.

Hope this help,
Lordy

At 14:41 23.07.2001 -0600, you wrote:
>Hello there.
>I have been noticing slightly out of the ordinary things happening in my
>qmail-send logs after changing the queue filesystem over to reiserfs.
>I am seeing the same inode used for multiple messages. Is this normal?
>
>(other users email has been blanked, as has all senders. mine is known
>to all of you, so why bother typing to cover mine eh? )
>
>excerpts from my qmail-queue log piped thru tai64nlocal
>
>2001-07-23 14:29:38.294512500 new msg 405006
>2001-07-23 14:29:38.294529500 info msg 405006: bytes 2531 from 
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 28395 uid 1016
>2001-07-23 14:29:38.388694500 starting delivery 689: msg 405006 to local 
>vdomain-vuser@vdomain
>2001-07-23 14:29:38.388713500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
>2001-07-23 14:29:38.442249500 delivery 689: success: 
>POP_user_does_not_exist,_but_will_deliver_to_/users/catchall/dir/did_0+0+1/
>2001-07-23 14:29:38.442273500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
>2001-07-23 14:29:38.442278500 end msg 405006
>2001-07-23 14:32:30.228899500 new msg 405006
>2001-07-23 14:32:30.228916500 info msg 405006: bytes 4242 from 
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 28405 uid 1016
>2001-07-23 14:32:30.305868500 starting delivery 690: msg 405006 to local 
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>2001-07-23 14:32:30.305886500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
>2001-07-23 14:32:30.376295500 delivery 690: success: did_0+0+1/
>2001-07-23 14:32:30.376313500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
>2001-07-23 14:32:30.376319500 end msg 405006
>2001-07-23 14:32:32.722033500 new msg 405006
>2001-07-23 14:32:32.722049500 info msg 405006: bytes 1827 from 
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 28409 uid 1016
>2001-07-23 14:32:32.814920500 starting delivery 691: msg 405006 to local 
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>2001-07-23 14:32:32.814937500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
>2001-07-23 14:32:32.847071500 delivery 691: success: did_0+0+1/
>2001-07-23 14:32:32.847089500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
>2001-07-23 14:32:32.847094500 end msg 405006
>
>Mike
>
>--
>Mike Hodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: qmail newbie

[Noel Mistula]

Hi Joy,

The new script can be found on this link;
Make sure that you add the -i flags on all grep commands
so that it will not miss uppercase characters.

 
http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2001/03/msg01041.html

The script includes the instructions on how to use it. Please read it
carefully. You cannot use the script like what you are doing. e.g. using
it
together with condredirect. Just read the instructions.

If you want to redirect the mail just edit the checkhab script. it is
document in there.

cheers.
-- 
Noel G. Mistula
Network & Systems Administrator
Meriton Apartments Pty Ltd


Joy Hundley wrote:
> 
> I'm completely new to qmail, and I've read the man pages on condredirect but
> I'm having no luck getting this to work.  If someone could please enlighten
> me, I would be forever grateful.
> 
> Facts:  I'm running qmail 1.03 on a RH 7.0 box.
> 
> Problem:  I copied the following program into /var/qmail/bin/checkattach:
> 
> ___
> #!/bin/sh
> #
> # qmail -- checkattach
> # Author: Noel G. Mistula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> # Date: 28 June 1999 Version: 0.1
> # I appreciate any comment to this quick and dirty way of filtering
> attachment.
> #
> # Modified: 7 July 1999 Version: 0.3
> # Modified: 7 May 2000 Version: 0.4
> 
> # This is release under the GNU/GPL.
> # This is a very crude program. Use at your own risk.
> # This will bounce incoming email with executable,
> # video and other attachments. Just remove/add
> # whichever filetype (e.g. EXE, AVI, COM) is required.
> #
> # I use this in a user's .qmail file
> # by adding the line
> # |/usr/local/bin/checkattach
> # before the ./Maildir/
> #
> # Make sure to chmod 555 /usr/local/bin/checkattach
> # so that qmail users can execute it.
> 
> # Start program here.
> ### This part is the new version (ver. 0.3)
> printmsg () {
> echo "The reason your email was rejected is you sent an attachment that can
> cause problems."
> echo "Sorry, the attachment you sent is in violation of our company's
> policy because it can cause problems like virus, or increase traffic load,
> or delete file(s) and/or among others."
> echo "Please disable HTML formatting when sending email because Visual
> Basic Script Worms/Virus normally exploits this."
> echo "--- Attachment filetype you sent is $ATTYPE"
> }
> 
> #
> # Check for NOT allowed attachment.
> # Here you can include more filetype you want.
> #
> checktype () {
> case $ATTYPE in
> VBS | VBE | JSE | CSS | WSH | SCT | HTA | VXD | EXE | HTM |
> DOT | HLP | PAK | DAT | PCX | PPS | COM | BAT | CMD | AVI | MOV | RAM | OCX
> | CAB | SHS | CLA | RA | BMP | MPE | MPG | MP3 | MP4 | WAV | AUD | AU | DLL)
> printmsg $ATTYPE
> exit 100;;
> *)
> ;;
> esac
> }
> 
> #ATTACHTYPE=`grep "filename=" - | gawk '{split($NF, results, ".");
> r=toupper(results[2]); print r}' | cut -c -3`
> Below doesn't work if more than 2 fields in name=
> #ATTACHTYPE=`grep "name=" - | gawk '{split($NF, results, ".");
> r=toupper(results[3]); print r}' | cut -c -3`
>  End of ver. 0.3
> 
> Below works OK
> ## This part is recently modified (7may2000) because I noticed that the gawk
> part in the
> ## ATTACHTYPE above, doesn't properly check when you have a filename like
> ## THIS.IS.A.VBS.VIRUS.txt.vbs
> ## The ATTACHTYPE below resolves this problem ;).
> ATTACHTYPE=`grep "name=" - | gawk 'BEGIN {FS="."}; {print toupper($NF)}' |
> cut -c -3`
> for ATTYPE in $ATTACHTYPE
> do
> checktype $ATTYPE
> done
>  End of ver. 0.4
> 
> exit 0
> 
> 
> 
> I then added a .qmail file with the following information in user's home
> directories:
> |condredirect [EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/qmail/bin/checkattach
> ./Maildir/
> 
> My problem is that it is redirecting everything to the address to be
> forwarded to, not just the emails with attachments.  What's up with this and
> why is it happening?  Like I said -- I'm new to qmail and I've read the man
> pages and I'm just not having any luck with this.  It is probably something
> very simple, and I would really appreciate it if someone could explain it to
> me.
> 
> Joy Hundley

RE: How to piss people off easily (Was: How to create dynamic use rs for IMAP Email services) Reply-To: robin@socha.net

[Kirti S. Bajwa]

Sorry Business manners have nothing to do whether you pay or not.

Kirti "Kirt" S. Bajwa
Chief Technical Officer
TIB Computer Systems, Inc.
Mountain City, TN 37683-0049

Tel: (423) 727-3001   Fax: (423) 727-3002
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Felix von Leitner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 11:56 AM
To: Kirti S. Bajwa
Subject: Re: How to piss people off easily (Was: How to create dynamic
use rs for IMAP Email services) Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thus spake Kirti S. Bajwa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > If you are too incompetent to use a
> > search engine, why are you running a mail server?
> I am just wondering if hurdling insults at the first opportunity is the
> direction this list is heading towards. What happened to common decency
and
> business manners?

You want business manners?  You pay for them.

You want free help?  You ask for it nicely and show me that you don't
waste my time.

Re: Auto CC

[Nathan Cook]

Thank you.  After reading the mail from Peter I was able to solve my problem by
putting this in the .qmail file in the home directory.

./Maildir/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Nathan Cook
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 2:01 PM
Subject: Re: Auto CC


> I just went through some gyrations with the .qmail file... and I think
> that is where the solution is for you.
>
> If you make a .qmail file like this:
>
> ./Maildir/
> |YourCCScript ccaddress
>
> That should take care of delivering the mail to this account and
> then forwarding it as well.  The thing that wasn't clear to me
> from the documentation was that you could have something in the
> .qmail file that doesn't interfere with normal delivery... that
> is why you start out with the ./Maildir/ (or mbox if you use that)
> and then list your script.
>
> I'm using this method to send notification when an email arrives to
> another email address and for vacation messages.  Have a look for some
> .qmail scripts on qmail.org.  I hacked one of the vacation scripts
> I found there to do what I wanted.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Steve
>
> > Is there any way that I can make it so all inbound messages to a
> > specific account will deliver to that inbox and CC another specific
> > account?
> >
> > Nathan Cook
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>

Re: Stopping server relays

[Greg White]

On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 01:30:18PM -0600, David J Jackson wrote:
> Greg --
> Thanks for your reply... this has me somewhat perplexed?
> 
> There is no other boxes Windoz or other wise on pickledbeans.com if that's what you 
>mean? Just me and my 24K dailup to Qwest.net??
> 
> > 1. control/rcpthosts empty.
>   /var/qmail/crontrol/rcpthosts :
>   mail.pickledbeans.com # box sitting on my desk 
>   pickledbeans.com# domain mapped -> mail.pickledbeans.com (dyndns)

OK, no possibility there.
> 
> > 2. RELAYCLIENT set for all/wrong addresses in /etc/tcp.smtp[.cdb]
> > (or wherever you keep that file) if using tcpserver
>   not using tcpserver

Using inetd then? Ugh. ;)
> 
> > 3. RELAYCLIENT set for all addresses in /etc/hosts.allow if using inetd.
>   /etc/hosts.allow is emtpy /etc/hosts.deny is empty
>   /etc/host.equiv:
>   localhost
>   mail.pickledbeans.com pickledbeans.com

host.equiv is not relevant to this discussion. So, you're not setting
RELAYCLIENT there...
> 
> 
> > 4. An insecure .cgi script on your machine (not possible if not running
> > a cgi-capable webserver on your mail host), and RELAYCLIENT set for
> > localhost.
> > 
>   I suppose it could be except I only have one cgi script a simple chat 
>   room thing?

Not likely. So, you're not setting RELAYCLIENT for anyone? Noone uses
this server to send mail at all (except scripts on the mailserver, of
course)? That's odd, but possible. Check out Dave's possibility (I too
almost got burned by this one -- apparently M$ Exchange makes it
non-trivial to turn _off_ percenthack, and enables it by default). Other
than that (an evil 'smarthost' setup), I can't see how anyone could be
relaying through you, except legitimately.

Hey, since you're on dialup and dyndns, isn't it possible that some
Windoze user dialed up, got an old IP address that at one time was
pickledbeans.com's dyndns, and sent this mail? The mail you forwarded
specifically said 'from your IP address'??? If you're not setting
RELAYCLIENT anywhere, then even your local LAN cannot be sending this
mail... Just a thought.

-- 
Greg White

Re: Auto CC

[Peter van Dijk]

On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 01:51:57PM -0600, Nathan Cook wrote:
> Is there any way that I can make it so all inbound messages to a specific
> account will deliver to that inbox and CC another specific account?

man dot-qmail

Greetz, Peter
-- 
Against Free Sex!   http://www.dataloss.nl/Megahard_en.html

Auto CC

[Nathan Cook]

Is there any way that I can make it so all inbound messages to a specific
account will deliver to that inbox and CC another specific account?

Nathan Cook
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Stopping server relays

[David J Jackson]

Make --
Thanks I'll take at look at it

Dave
> What i use, that works good as I'm hosting mail domains for a few
> friends who all have dynamic IP's, rather than allow the world to send,
> I use the vpopmail roaming users option. It implements a pop-before-smtp
> method of authing SMTP.  As of yet, i havent gotten it to
> IMAP-before-smtp, however the only person who probably even knows IMAP
> exists, is myself, and I'm on the same lan as it is. very easy to add
> 192.168.100.* :)
> 
> I reccommend you check that out.  Plus there are other patches to qmail
> itself, not requiring vpopmail from inter7.
> The url for vpopmail is www.inter7.com. 
> 
> Mike
> 
> -- 
> Mike Hodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 

Re: Stopping server relays

[Mike Hodson]

On Mon, 23 Jul 2001 12:40:22 -0600
David J Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Greetings ---
> How can I stop my server from being used to relay mail?  
> I got an email from a admin somewhere claiming that emails were being
> sent from my server with virus attached? It's only me and one other person
> has access to this box?
> 
> Related question could this be the source of the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (I set up an .qmail-52 aliases to try to catch these emails)
> 
> 
> This question is part of the Forged Emails post I sent eailer from
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> David Jackson

What i use, that works good as I'm hosting mail domains for a few
friends who all have dynamic IP's, rather than allow the world to send,
I use the vpopmail roaming users option. It implements a pop-before-smtp
method of authing SMTP.  As of yet, i havent gotten it to
IMAP-before-smtp, however the only person who probably even knows IMAP
exists, is myself, and I'm on the same lan as it is. very easy to add
192.168.100.* :)

I reccommend you check that out.  Plus there are other patches to qmail
itself, not requiring vpopmail from inter7.
The url for vpopmail is www.inter7.com. 

Mike

-- 
Mike Hodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Stopping server relays

[David J Jackson]

Greg --
Thanks for your reply... this has me somewhat perplexed?

There is no other boxes Windoz or other wise on pickledbeans.com if that's what you 
mean? Just me and my 24K dailup to Qwest.net??

> 1. control/rcpthosts empty.
/var/qmail/crontrol/rcpthosts :
mail.pickledbeans.com # box sitting on my desk 
pickledbeans.com# domain mapped -> mail.pickledbeans.com (dyndns)

> 2. RELAYCLIENT set for all/wrong addresses in /etc/tcp.smtp[.cdb]
> (or wherever you keep that file) if using tcpserver
not using tcpserver

> 3. RELAYCLIENT set for all addresses in /etc/hosts.allow if using inetd.
/etc/hosts.allow is emtpy /etc/hosts.deny is empty
/etc/host.equiv:
localhost
mail.pickledbeans.com pickledbeans.com


> 4. An insecure .cgi script on your machine (not possible if not running
> a cgi-capable webserver on your mail host), and RELAYCLIENT set for
> localhost.
> 
I suppose it could be except I only have one cgi script a simple chat 
room thing?


Thanks again for you time
David Jackson

fastforward setup

[Mike Wright]

Hi all,

I have two qmail setups. Their qmail/control directories are
identical except for their individual hostnames. Their
qmail/alias directories are identical. The only difference
that I can find is that one is on RedHat6.1 and the other is
on RedHat7.1.The goal is to have a forwarder with no local
deliveries i.e. everything is a virtualdomain and everything
is routed according to etc/aliases.cdb.

The RH61 qmail works and forwards according to the rules in
aliases.cdb but the RH7.1 qmail doesn't.

The log shows that mail is being routed correctly up to a
point. i.e through qmail-inject, qmail-queue and qmail-send
but appears to fail within qmail-local.

starting delivery 5: msg 112266 to local
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
status local 1/10 remote 0/20
delivery 5: failure:
Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name._(#5.1.1)
status local 0/10 remote 0/20
bounce msg 112266 qp 5607

Another note: the RedHat6.1 setup was done many, many months
ago. The RedHat7.1 setup is brand new. I've been trying to
figure this out for 5 days. I can only guess that I've
skipped a step somewhere but have been staring at the docs
for so long that I couldn't see it if it were on my nose:(

Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Mike Wright

Re: Stopping server relays

[Dave Sill]

Greg White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>You really have to try to make qmail relay. Possible sources of relay:
>
>1. control/rcpthosts empty.
>2. RELAYCLIENT set for all/wrong addresses in /etc/tcp.smtp[.cdb]
>(or wherever you keep that file) if using tcpserver
>3. RELAYCLIENT set for all addresses in /etc/hosts.allow if using inetd.
>4. An insecure .cgi script on your machine (not possible if not running
>a cgi-capable webserver on your mail host), and RELAYCLIENT set for
>localhost.

One more that's bitten me in the past is a catch-all that forwards to
a smart host. Since the message is coming from a trusted host, the
smart host honors the relay request.

E.g., spammer sends message to host A addressed to
"victim%hostc@hosta". Host A, running qmail, has no "victim%hostc"
user or alias, but does have a ~alias/.qmail-default that forwards
undeliverable mail to a Sendmail or PMDF "smart" host, host B.

Host B receives the message addressed to "victim%hostc@hostb". It
trusts host A, and implements the percent hack, so it relays the
message to victim@hostc.

The fix is to check for funny chars in addresses (%!@) before
forwarding to the smart host.

-Dave

Re: Stopping server relays

[Greg White]

On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 12:40:22PM -0600, David J Jackson wrote:
> Greetings ---
> How can I stop my server from being used to relay mail?  
> I got an email from a admin somewhere claiming that emails were being
> sent from my server with virus attached? It's only me and one other person
> has access to this box?

I doubt you're being used by a third party to relay. It seems much more
likely that some Windoze box on your network is infected, and that's
where the source of this problem is. Get a good virus scanner.

You really have to try to make qmail relay. Possible sources of relay:

1. control/rcpthosts empty.
2. RELAYCLIENT set for all/wrong addresses in /etc/tcp.smtp[.cdb]
(or wherever you keep that file) if using tcpserver
3. RELAYCLIENT set for all addresses in /etc/hosts.allow if using inetd.
4. An insecure .cgi script on your machine (not possible if not running
a cgi-capable webserver on your mail host), and RELAYCLIENT set for
localhost.

> Related question could this be the source of the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (I set up an .qmail-52 aliases to try to catch these emails)

I suppose it might be. Read some of the caught mail. The virus looked
like 'Snow White' tho, and that uses a null envelope sender, just like a
bounce message does.
> 
> 
> This question is part of the Forged Emails post I sent eailer from
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In future, please keep things on the same topic in the same thread --
some of us use threaded mail readers for just this purpose. ;)

-- 
Greg White

Stopping server relays

[David J Jackson]

Greetings ---
How can I stop my server from being used to relay mail?  
I got an email from a admin somewhere claiming that emails were being
sent from my server with virus attached? It's only me and one other person
has access to this box?

Related question could this be the source of the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(I set up an .qmail-52 aliases to try to catch these emails)


This question is part of the Forged Emails post I sent eailer from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thanks,
David Jackson

rblsmtpd

[NDSoftware]

Hi,
Where i can fin a exemple of a qmail startup-script like in
lifewithqmail.org for http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/rblsmtpd.html ?

Can you help me to setup it ?
Where i can find a update because the mail-abuse.org need money :(

Thanks for your help.

Re: Re: SMTP Auth Patch Question

[alexus]

inter7 told me that 1000 of users not having this problem

although it very same time there are was few users who said otherwise...

so ... whatever...

some people doesn't have problems .. probably who uses linux.. maybe inter7
was able to fully tested on linux only.. I don't know..

so like I said whatever.. should I forward all those e-mails that I'm
getting to you so you can tell them that they are stupid and can't figure
something out? and they having  lack of logical thinking skills? huh?

let's just drop this whole thing.. I don't really care

like I said I'm not against of inter7.. their products is great..and I never
said otherwise.. everyone have bugs.. its just some people acknowledge them
and some people don't.. heh as everyone saying microsoft claims those bugs
as a features:) heh..

- Original Message -
From: "John Chapman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "alexus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 1:24 PM
Subject: Re: Re: SMTP Auth Patch Question


>
> >
> > even though I didn't had very pleasant experience with inter7 I still
> > get trying to help all of people who search their mailing list and who
> > send me e-mails because of those bugs ( just trying to follow open
> > source license) ..
> >
> > so robin so you can go and ... yourself
>
>
> Well now. I found the info and documentation from Inter7 to be
> straightforward. Installed. Tweaked. Worked. Works great.
>
> So seems to me that it is technical and logical thinking skills that
> are lacking on your part.
>
> MOST Sincerely,
>
> John Chapman
>

Re: Re: SMTP Auth Patch Question

[John Chapman]

> 
> even though I didn't had very pleasant experience with inter7 I still
> get trying to help all of people who search their mailing list and who
> send me e-mails because of those bugs ( just trying to follow open
> source license) ..
> 
> so robin so you can go and ... yourself


Well now. I found the info and documentation from Inter7 to be 
straightforward. Installed. Tweaked. Worked. Works great.

So seems to me that it is technical and logical thinking skills that 
are lacking on your part.

MOST Sincerely,

John Chapman

Re: Re: SMTP Auth Patch Question

[alexus]

man..

I was asked question on this list.. I replay, I suggested something.. how
did we get to all this?

even though I didn't had very pleasant experience with inter7 I still get
trying to help all of people who search their mailing list and who send me
e-mails because of those bugs ( just trying to follow open source license)
..

so robin so you can go and ... yourself

and for future references.. if you have something to say tell it to me
inperson and not on the list

I don't think this is an appropriate place to discuss this kind of things

- Original Message -
From: "Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 5:05 AM
Subject: Re: Re: SMTP Auth Patch Question


> On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 04:15:49AM -0400, alexus wrote:
>
> Dear alexus,
>
> > let me just end my lines with that even though looks like inter7 is
> > bunch of  i'm sure they are still a good people:)
>
> Let me begin my assessment of your ad hominem attack with an exec
> summary: you suck.
>
> Having proven over an extended period of time that your are an
> incompetent luser with the technical expertise of an amoeba, you are
> now publicly attacking members of a company that offers a whole host
> of free software (very good software at that).
>
> Now, apart from the fact that you do not leave the impression of being
> able to assess inter7's technical expertise due to the fact that your
> technical understanding does not extend beyond clicking on setup.exe,
> I have also yet to see someone using their MUA in the way you do and
> yet be able to competently run a mail server.
>
> It may come as a surprise to you, but this is not the correct place to
> discuss your intellectual shortcomings, your very own non-qmail
> related technical problems (like, not wasting everyone's bandwidth
> (for which some people have to pay, you know?) with your luser
> software) or your personal problems with some help-desk staff
> somewhere on this planet.
>
> And while we're at it: 3rd party patches, MySQL and all of inter7's
> software do not belong here, either. "Not belong" as in "go read the
> instructions on cr.yp.to and then unsubscribe or - preferably - die".
> --
> Robin S. Socha - Your Worst Network Nightmare(tm).
> `In Germany, they are not referred to as network administrators. They
> prefer to be called "Sons Of The Third Reich".' (Kate: www.katewerk.com)
>

Re: question about local mail and fqdns

[Dave Sill]

"Dahnke, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>... On the numerous development and production web servers it
>is always nice to put qmail on them and I configure it with the
>./config-fast nextsource.com because receiving mailers want a fqdn when they
>receive messages from these hosts. But the eternal problem is that messages
>to our own domain; to root, or postmaster, or [EMAIL PROTECTED] will
>never leave the system because qmail treats them as local.

Why don't you just empty control/locals?

>Do I HAVE to register all the development servers as fqdns and configure via
>./config-fast dev1.nextsource.com ?

No, but you could. And why would you use config-fast?

>And if I do this are messages to *@nextsource.com no longer treated
>as local?

Yes.

-Dave

Qmail and Maildrop

[Fábio Gomes]

Hi,

I'm newbie using qmail and I have a question about qmail with maildrop.

Do I need to replace my original qmail-queue binary using qmail-filter
patch to use maildrop?

The user lookup will still to be done by qmail or that will be done by
maildrop?

Is there some documentation about using qmail with maildrop?

I'm actually using qmail-ldap patch.

Regards,
Fábio Gomes


-- 
@_{2**2..6*6}=split//,"áiGsDDbooe  eoin m-IsvveoF Tenlmt";print
values%_,"\n"

Re: Forged headers (email)

[Lars Hansson]

Do you have any other users than yourself? If not, then either someone is relaying 
thru yourserver or you are the one infecfted with the Hybris virus. Since i've enver 
heard of the Hybris virus being able to find out open mailrelays by itself it is most 
likely that it's either one of your users or you that are infected.

On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 09:28:07AM -0600, David J Jackson wrote:
> Sorry -- 
> Here's the orginal email:
[snip]

-- 
Lars Hansson  Technical Consultant/System Administrator
UNET, Inc.Makati City, Philippines
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Public key: http://www.unet.net.ph/~lars/gpgkey.txt

Re: Forged headers (email)

[David J Jackson]

Sorry -- 
Here's the orginal email:
eturn-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 17743 invoked by alias); 23 Jul 2001 04:52:05 -
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 17739 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2001 04:52:04 -
Received: from quarantine1.messagelabs.com (195.216.16.211)
  by mdialup92.dnvr.uswest.net with SMTP; 23 Jul 2001 04:52:04 -
Received: (qmail 3004 invoked by uid 0); 17 Jul 2001 12:45:32 -
Date: 17 Jul 2001 12:45:32 -
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: abuse@[206.196.128.6], postmaster@[206.196.128.6], abuse@[209.180.243.92],
  postmaster@[209.180.243.92],
Subject: Hybris virus originating from your IP address
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Length: 1527
Lines: 37

Hi, 

I work for an ISP, and we have detected the Hybris virus originating
in emails coming from your mail server. The emails have a forged
sender address, and therefore we are unable to contact the message
sender directly. I would therefore be grateful if you could trace
and contact the message sender from the original email headers
supplied below and politely inform them that they have a virus
infection, and ask them to stop sending the virus.

By the way, it is unlikely that the sender is aware that they are
sending these emails. This is part of the effect of the virus.

Please could you inform me of the result, using the email address
below (replying to this email using the reply button will cause your
email to go to an account which catches domains with no postmaster address)

Regards,

Alex Shipp
Virus Technologist
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
Our ref: 502982_995372476

Received: (qmail 6105 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2001 12:21:15 -
Received: from dnvrpop4.dnvr.uswest.net (206.196.128.6)
  by server-12.tower-4.starlabs.net with SMTP; 17 Jul 2001 12:21:15 -
Received: (qmail 43445 invoked by uid 0); 17 Jul 2001 12:22:45 -
Received: from mdialup92.dnvr.uswest.net (HELO ea21i) (209.180.243.92)
  by dnvrpop4.dnvr.uswest.net with SMTP; 17 Jul 2001 12:22:45 -
From: "Hahaha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Snowhite and the Seven Dwarfs - The REAL story!
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--VESDANSDIVCXEJ01MRGTAJ"







On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 05:10:51PM +0200, Johan Almqvist wrote:
> * David J Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010723 16:41]:
> > I got the following email claiming someone is using emails containing
> > vivrus from my domain ?pickedbeans.com? using a forged header? Does that
> > mean the mail is being routed threw my server?
> 
> You forgot the attachment...
> 
> -Johan
> -- 
> Johan Almqvist
> http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/

Re: How to piss people off easily (Was: How to create dynamic use rs for IMAP Email services) Reply-To: robin@socha.net

[Brian S. Craigie]

Henning Brauer wrote:

>On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 03:00:50PM +0100, Brian S. Craigie wrote:
>
>>I agree.  We're here to help, aren't we?  Otherwise, what's the list 
>>for?  
>>
>
>Not for posting FAQs every few minutes.
>We already had this discussion, stop it. Now.
>
Goodbye.  Thanks to all who have helped me over the years.  I've had 
enough of this childish behaviour.

Brian

Forged headers from me ??

[David J Jackson]

Greeting --
I got the following email claiming someone is using emails containing
vivrus from my domain ?pickedbeans.com? using a forged header? Does that
mean the mail is being routed threw my server?

How to can confirm this and what can I do prevent it the furture ...

Thanks,
David

Re: How to piss people off easily

[Lars Hansson]

On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 09:34:06AM -0400, Kirti S. Bajwa wrote:
> I am just wondering if hurdling insults at the first opportunity is the
> direction this list is heading towards. What happened to common decency and
> business manners?
> 

My guess is that it died with the dumbing down of the IT industry...

-- 
Lars Hansson  Technical Consultant/System Administrator
UNET, Inc.Makati City, Philippines
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Public key: http://www.unet.net.ph/~lars/gpgkey.txt

Re: mail groups, LDAP

[Henning Brauer]

On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 10:12:06AM -0400, Francois Meehan wrote:
> What is the best way to create simple mailgroup in LDAP for Qmail? 
> I want to be able to manage the mailgroup from within LDAP. Mailing list
> (like ezmlm) is an overkill
> for this purpose.

If you use qmail-ldap, it's as simple as creating an user account with
multiple "mailForwardingAddress" attributes.

And please use the qmail-ldap list for qmail-ldap related questions. 


-- 
* Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de *
* Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany   *
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)

mail groups, LDAP

[Francois Meehan]

What is the best way to create simple mailgroup in LDAP for Qmail?

I want to be able to manage the mailgroup from within LDAP. Mailing list
(like ezmlm) is an overkill
for this purpose.

Any suggestions?

###
#  Francois Meehan, vive "l'Open source" et Linux #
#  committed to open source and Linux #
# #
###

OT - ezmlm site down?

[Michael Geier, CDM Systems Admin]

http://www.ezmlm.org

Does anyone know what happened to the site?
Is there a mirror up?

---
Michael Geier
CDM Sports, Inc. - Systems Administrator
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone: 314.991.1511 x 6505
pager: 314.318.9414

Re: How to piss people off easily (Was: How to create dynamic use rs for IMAP Email services) Reply-To: robin@socha.net

[Henning Brauer]

On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 03:00:50PM +0100, Brian S. Craigie wrote:
> 
> I agree.  We're here to help, aren't we?  Otherwise, what's the list 
> for?  

Not for posting FAQs every few minutes.
We already had this discussion, stop it. Now.

-- 
* Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de *
* Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany   *
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)

Re: How to piss people off easily (Was: How to create dynamic use rs for IMAP Email services) Reply-To: robin@socha.net

[Brian S. Craigie]

I agree.  We're here to help, aren't we?  Otherwise, what's the list 
for?  Let's be nice to each other.  I get enough bitching from the ex.

Warmest Regards,
Brian

Kirti S. Bajwa wrote:

>>If you are too incompetent to use a
>>search engine, why are you running a mail server?
>>
>
>I am just wondering if hurdling insults at the first opportunity is the
>direction this list is heading towards. What happened to common decency and
>business manners?
>
>

flame-qmail-newbies (WAS: How to piss people off easily)

[John Hogan]

> > If you are too incompetent to use a
> > search engine, why are you running a mail server?
>
>I am just wondering if hurdling insults at the first opportunity is the
>direction this list is heading towards. What happened to common decency and
>business manners?

that's the way some of the people on this list act... sad but true - a few 
are funny, a few are rude :-(

i used to think that the list name should be 'flame-qmail-newbies' - lurk 
and learn, eh?

- hogan

RE: How to piss people off easily (Was: How to create dynamic users for IMAP Email services) Reply-To: robin@socha.net

[Kirti S. Bajwa]

> If you are too incompetent to use a
> search engine, why are you running a mail server?

I am just wondering if hurdling insults at the first opportunity is the
direction this list is heading towards. What happened to common decency and
business manners?


Kirti "Kirt" S. Bajwa
GM/CTO
TIB, Inc.
Mountain City, TN 37683-0049

Tel: (423) 727-3001   Fax: (423) 727-3002
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: KK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 3:33 AM
To: Robin S. Socha
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How to piss people off easily (Was: How to create dynamic
users for IMAP Email services) Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Hi All -

I apologize for overlooking the fact that this is not a linux system admin
mailing list. Anyway, thanks for all the help. I am not running any mail
server; being a new bee, am just experimenting with various options
available to configure qmail with other add-ons.

- Original Message -
From: Robin S. Socha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2001 1:11 PM
Subject: How to piss people off easily (Was: How to create dynamic users for
IMAP Email services) Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


> On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 12:09:43PM +0530, KK wrote:
> > Can I create dynamic system users using the command "useradd" from
> > inside a perl script/java servlet which need not run as "root"? I
> > suppose that only "root" has the privilege to create system users.
> > Is there a way around this?
>
> I presume that your are well aware of the fact that this has nothing
> to do whatsoever with qmail. If you are too incompetent to use a
> search engine, why are you running a mail server?
>
> RTFM: man 5 sudoers:
> Cmnd_Alias  USERADD=/sbin/useradd
> www ALL=NOPASSWD: USERADD
>
> > Any suggestions/help is appreciated.
>
> http://learn.to/edit_messages/ - before your EVER submit mail to a
> technical mailing list again.
> --
> Robin S. Socha - Your Worst Network Nightmare(tm).
> `In Germany, they are not referred to as network administrators. They
> prefer to be called "Sons Of The Third Reich".' (Kate: www.katewerk.com)
>

Re: A word on blocking

[Roger Walker]

You Wrote:

>My suggestion is: when you configure MTA to not accept e-mail from a
>source, it should allow that source to send mail to at least root,
>postmaster and hostmaster, or some other configurable accounts.

I disagree. That would defeat the purpose of dropping the
connection before having to deal with a transaction. I get around this by
providing a URL from which a message can be sent, and this URL appears in
any (reasonable) bounce message as a result of being blocked.

-- 
Roger Walker
Tier III Messaging/News Team
Internet Applications, National Consumer IP
TELUS Corporation 780-493-2471

qmail newbie

[Joy Hundley]

I'm completely new to qmail, and I've read the man pages on condredirect but
I'm having no luck getting this to work.  If someone could please enlighten
me, I would be forever grateful.

Facts:  I'm running qmail 1.03 on a RH 7.0 box.

Problem:  I copied the following program into /var/qmail/bin/checkattach:

___
#!/bin/sh
#
# qmail -- checkattach
# Author: Noel G. Mistula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
# Date: 28 June 1999 Version: 0.1
# I appreciate any comment to this quick and dirty way of filtering
attachment.
#
# Modified: 7 July 1999 Version: 0.3
# Modified: 7 May 2000 Version: 0.4

# This is release under the GNU/GPL.
# This is a very crude program. Use at your own risk.
# This will bounce incoming email with executable,
# video and other attachments. Just remove/add
# whichever filetype (e.g. EXE, AVI, COM) is required.
#
# I use this in a user's .qmail file
# by adding the line
# |/usr/local/bin/checkattach
# before the ./Maildir/
#
# Make sure to chmod 555 /usr/local/bin/checkattach
# so that qmail users can execute it.

# Start program here.
### This part is the new version (ver. 0.3)
printmsg () {
echo "The reason your email was rejected is you sent an attachment that can
cause problems."
echo "Sorry, the attachment you sent is in violation of our company's
policy because it can cause problems like virus, or increase traffic load,
or delete file(s) and/or among others."
echo "Please disable HTML formatting when sending email because Visual
Basic Script Worms/Virus normally exploits this."
echo "--- Attachment filetype you sent is $ATTYPE"
}

#
# Check for NOT allowed attachment.
# Here you can include more filetype you want.
#
checktype () {
case $ATTYPE in
VBS | VBE | JSE | CSS | WSH | SCT | HTA | VXD | EXE | HTM |
DOT | HLP | PAK | DAT | PCX | PPS | COM | BAT | CMD | AVI | MOV | RAM | OCX
| CAB | SHS | CLA | RA | BMP | MPE | MPG | MP3 | MP4 | WAV | AUD | AU | DLL)
printmsg $ATTYPE
exit 100;;
*)
;;
esac
}

#ATTACHTYPE=`grep "filename=" - | gawk '{split($NF, results, ".");
r=toupper(results[2]); print r}' | cut -c -3`
Below doesn't work if more than 2 fields in name=
#ATTACHTYPE=`grep "name=" - | gawk '{split($NF, results, ".");
r=toupper(results[3]); print r}' | cut -c -3`
 End of ver. 0.3

Below works OK
## This part is recently modified (7may2000) because I noticed that the gawk
part in the
## ATTACHTYPE above, doesn't properly check when you have a filename like
## THIS.IS.A.VBS.VIRUS.txt.vbs
## The ATTACHTYPE below resolves this problem ;).
ATTACHTYPE=`grep "name=" - | gawk 'BEGIN {FS="."}; {print toupper($NF)}' |
cut -c -3`
for ATTYPE in $ATTACHTYPE
do
checktype $ATTYPE
done
 End of ver. 0.4

exit 0





I then added a .qmail file with the following information in user's home
directories:
|condredirect [EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/qmail/bin/checkattach
./Maildir/

My problem is that it is redirecting everything to the address to be
forwarded to, not just the emails with attachments.  What's up with this and
why is it happening?  Like I said -- I'm new to qmail and I've read the man
pages and I'm just not having any luck with this.  It is probably something
very simple, and I would really appreciate it if someone could explain it to
me.


Joy Hundley

Re: The mythical 52@pickledbeans.com

[Karsten W. Rohrbach]

David J Jackson([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.07.20 16:01:09 +:
> Greetings ---
> 
> This is the second email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] (my local box), who of course 
>doesn't exist both from  @list_dommain_or_another? Am I missing something here? A 
>well known secruity flaw in some email systems? There's no 50,51 or 53 ...
> just [EMAIL PROTECTED]? Also What danger would there be in creating an 52 user
> and see what I catch.

they grabbed it from your netscape navigator's email header?

/k

-- 
> As a computing professional, I believe it would be unethical for me to
> advise, recommend, or support the use (save possibly for personal
> amusement) of any product that is or depends on any Microsoft product.
> --David H. Wolfskill
KR433/KR11-RIPE -- WebMonster Community Founder -- nGENn GmbH Senior Techie
http://www.webmonster.de/ -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de/ -- http://www.ngenn.net/
karsten&rohrbach.de -- alpha&ngenn.net -- alpha&scene.org -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG 0x2964BF46 2001-03-15 42F9 9FFF 50D4 2F38 DBEE  DF22 3340 4F4E 2964 BF46
Please do not remove my address from To: and Cc: fields in mailing lists. 10x

 PGP signature

Re: Can't send mail , Mail blocked

[Robin S. Socha]

On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 02:44:35PM +0100, james wrote:
>  Also, can someone tell me how to stop queering the ORBS database ?

vim /service/smtp/run and remove the offending line, then restart
smtp.

Can't send mail , Mail blocked

[james]

 Hi ,
I get a problem with our mail server when we try 
to send a mail with outlook express  it 
, responds: "An error occurred while sending mail. The 
main server responded: MAIL BLOCKED; see http://www.e-scrub.com/orbs/ Please check the 
main  recipients and try again." Also, can someone 
tell me how to stop queering the ORBS database ? I am using qmail 
with Corel Linux if that helps. Regards,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

What do you think?

[luke]

I need ezmlm subscribe (sub-ok) and unsubscribe (unsub-ok) emails to have
dynamic subject depending on mailing list.

Details of the implementation below. I am inviting critisisms :)  so I can
improve on it. What do you think?

Thanks


Luke




1) I added a function "getSubjectFrom1stLine()" to ezmlm-manage.c which
basically reads the above mentioned file and extract to first line, upto 50
chars.

==
char *getSubjectFrom1stLine( char *dir, char *fname ) {
  static char subj[61] = "Subject: GoodOrient.com";
  char fn[255];
  FILE *fp;

  strcpy( fn, dir );
  strcat( fn, "/" );
  strcat( fn, fname );
  if( fd = fopen( fn, "r" ) )
if( fgets( fn, 50, fd ) )
  strcpy( ( subj+9), fn );  // to overwrite text after "Subject: "
  fclose( fd );
  return subj;
}
==

2) Next, I replace line "qmail_puts( &qq, TXT )" in geton() and getoff()
with...
"qmail_puts( &qq, getSubjectFrom1stLine( workdir, "text/sub-ok" ) );" for
geton()
"qmail_puts( &qq, getSubjectFrom1stLine( workdir, "text/ubsub-ok" ) );" for
getoff()

Re: How to piss people off easily (Was: How to create dynamic users for IMAP Email services) Reply-To: robin@socha.net

[KK]

Hi All -

I apologize for overlooking the fact that this is not a linux system admin
mailing list. Anyway, thanks for all the help. I am not running any mail
server; being a new bee, am just experimenting with various options
available to configure qmail with other add-ons.

- Original Message -
From: Robin S. Socha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2001 1:11 PM
Subject: How to piss people off easily (Was: How to create dynamic users for
IMAP Email services) Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


> On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 12:09:43PM +0530, KK wrote:
> > Can I create dynamic system users using the command "useradd" from
> > inside a perl script/java servlet which need not run as "root"? I
> > suppose that only "root" has the privilege to create system users.
> > Is there a way around this?
>
> I presume that your are well aware of the fact that this has nothing
> to do whatsoever with qmail. If you are too incompetent to use a
> search engine, why are you running a mail server?
>
> RTFM: man 5 sudoers:
> Cmnd_Alias  USERADD=/sbin/useradd
> www ALL=NOPASSWD: USERADD
>
> > Any suggestions/help is appreciated.
>
> http://learn.to/edit_messages/ - before your EVER submit mail to a
> technical mailing list again.
> --
> Robin S. Socha - Your Worst Network Nightmare(tm).
> `In Germany, they are not referred to as network administrators. They
> prefer to be called "Sons Of The Third Reich".' (Kate: www.katewerk.com)
>

Re: Re: SMTP Auth Patch Question

[Robin S. Socha]

On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 04:15:49AM -0400, alexus wrote:

Dear alexus,

> let me just end my lines with that even though looks like inter7 is
> bunch of  i'm sure they are still a good people:)

Let me begin my assessment of your ad hominem attack with an exec
summary: you suck.

Having proven over an extended period of time that your are an
incompetent luser with the technical expertise of an amoeba, you are
now publicly attacking members of a company that offers a whole host
of free software (very good software at that). 

Now, apart from the fact that you do not leave the impression of being
able to assess inter7's technical expertise due to the fact that your
technical understanding does not extend beyond clicking on setup.exe,
I have also yet to see someone using their MUA in the way you do and
yet be able to competently run a mail server.

It may come as a surprise to you, but this is not the correct place to
discuss your intellectual shortcomings, your very own non-qmail
related technical problems (like, not wasting everyone's bandwidth
(for which some people have to pay, you know?) with your luser
software) or your personal problems with some help-desk staff
somewhere on this planet.

And while we're at it: 3rd party patches, MySQL and all of inter7's
software do not belong here, either. "Not belong" as in "go read the
instructions on cr.yp.to and then unsubscribe or - preferably - die".
-- 
Robin S. Socha - Your Worst Network Nightmare(tm).
`In Germany, they are not referred to as network administrators. They
prefer to be called "Sons Of The Third Reich".' (Kate: www.katewerk.com)

Re: A word on blocking

[Adrian Ho]

On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 03:55:34AM -0400, Jeff Palmer wrote:
> Or you might want to consider RFC compliance.

Since you mentioned it, please reread RFC 2821, section 4.5.1, last
para, cross-referencing RFC 2119 for the definition of "SHOULD".

In the matter under discussion (a grevious spam attack against mail
providers hosting thousands of users), blocking all incoming mail from
a specific IP address does /not/ contravene any RFC I've seen.

It's also a step I don't take lightly.  If I block off all mail from
your IP address, instead of simply filtering out the offending stuff or
telling my users to delete it and get on with their lives, it means you
committed a grevious faux pas, intentional or otherwise, against my site
and my users.  If I'm not up to my eyeballs in support calls, I might
take the time to craft and apply an appropriate filter.  Otherwise,
I slam the door shut and get on with the other stuff.

And as I mentioned, it's not as if I'm cutting off the only means that the
offending site admin can communicate with me, nor does it take a lot of
effort to discover those other channels.

> Of course,  everyone has their own opinions.   Mine happens to be "comply
> with the standards. Thats what they were written for."

If you can find a standards document anywhere that says unequivocally
that mail to postmaster MUST be accepted under any and all circumstances,
and therefore that my choice of actions is wrong in a "legal" sense,
please let me know where I can find it.

-- 
Adrian HoTinker, Drifter, Fixer, Bum   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archived @:  
Useful URLs:  
  

Re: A word on blocking

[Jeff Palmer]

Or you might want to consider RFC compliance.

Loosely stated in the RFC's for the SMTP protocal..   'postmaster' should
be a valid mailbox.  and should always work.   I would assume it should
even work for domains you blacklist. (There COULD be a legit need for a
blackholed domain to get in touch with the mail administrator.  For
example "Hello,  you've blocked me,  what should I do to secure my
mailserver?  would you be so kind as to help?")

If you allow mail from all domains to 'postmaster'   none of your
customers/clients will recieve the spam.   only tme mail administrator
will. He/She can take whatever steps they decide upon.  Including but not
limited to..   sending an email to the mail admin of the domain in
question,  reporting it to various third party organizations (al la
spamcop.net) or simply deleting the email.


Of course,  everyone has their own opinions.   Mine happens to be "comply
with the standards. Thats what they were written for."

Jeff Palmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Re: SMTP Auth Patch Question

[alexus]

its not even near like that

i do know what open source means

and inter7 also offering a commercial support.. which only showed me and my
company that inter7 doesn't really handle it on professional level .. maybe
i'm wrong.. its just my opinion and i can't say that their products is bad..
i really like their products and use most of them .. apparantly there is two
different departments with different people who developed this software and
who suppoorts it.. its just when i was keep telling them about their bugs
they didn't seem to want to accept that .. and people keep e-mailing me with
this specific issues that i've tryed to discuess with inter7 on their
mailing lists.. and instead of fixing those problems not only inter7 refuses
to acknowledge them they also basically asked me and other folks whoever was
activly discussing this issue to take this matter some place else due to we
were making a bit more traffic with their mailing lists then its usually is
which is almost nothing .. if you'd sign up on their courier imapd or
sqwebmail .. those lists are almost dead.. and when we start discussin them
for uknown to me reasons inter7 wasn't very happy about all that... also
some people (i'm not going say their names) at inter7 doesn't seem to know
basics as well.. one of the bugs was related to mysql .. user permitions and
such.. their suggests was to use root.. apparantly not everyone seems to
like that idea.. so people wanted to create another user with right
privilages and use this user instead.. inter7 had no clue how all privilages
in mysql works.. anyway.. i'm sure its very boring for most of the people
and its not really related to our subject... so i'll stop.. let me just end
my lines with that even though looks like inter7 is bunch of  i'm
sure they are still a good people:)

- Original Message -
From: "Dushyanth Harinath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 3:34 AM
Subject: Re: Re: SMTP Auth Patch Question


> a perfect example of the saying "A bad craftsman blames his tools"...its
> really painful to see people using open source products without knowing
> what the word "Open source" means.
>
> regards
> dushyanth
>
> > unfortunately I didn't had quite pleasure experience with inter7
> >
> > they doesn't really "enjoying" with support of their products.. I found
> > at least 2 bugs and when I was pointing it out for them it took me
> > quite a while to convince them that this is a bug.. they fixed one bug
> > in new development version and refuse to accept that they have one more
> > bug.. which I keep getting e-mails from other's people who looked at
> > archive.. and inter7 wants to kick us out from their list 'cause
> > supposedly I was making too much traffic while explain them and the
> > whole list about those glitches in their software...
>
> > so unless you know exactly what you doing I'd suggest you think twice
> > before installing any of inter7's product.. other then that I think
> > inter7 have a great products and very shitty support, my company called
> > them to make commercial support for one of their products.. it seems to
> > us that either they don't know nothing about those products themselves
> > or else I don't know...
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "alexus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2001 10:00 PM
> > Subject: Re: Re: SMTP Auth Patch Question
> >
> >
> >> hello alexus
> >>
> >> Could u tell me how to do it via vpopmail?Are there some doc about
> >> it?I
> > search inter7.com website but get nothing about it.
> >> please tell me detail.
> >> thanks a lot
> >>
> >> best regard
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >can someone suggest me place where to look how to make qmail smtp
> >> >auth?
> >> >
> >> >i was able to do it via vpopmail but i'm sure there is more "native"
> > way:)
> >> >
> >> >- Original Message -
> >> >From: "Keary Suska" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >To: "Qmail List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2001 5:07 PM
> >> >Subject: SMTP Auth Patch Question
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> Does anyone have comments, recommendations, or warnings over the
> > various
> >> >> SMTP Auth patches available? I can't seem to find any hard
> >> >> information
> > to
> >> >> compare them.
> >> >>
> >> >> Keary Suska
> >> >> Esoteritech, Inc.
> >> >> "Leveraging Open Source for a better Internet"
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> tengteng
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> --
> Dushyanth Harinath
> Archean Infotech Limited
> Ph No:091-040-3228666,6570704,3228674
> http://www.archeanit.com
>
>
>
> -
> This email was sent using SquirrelMail.
>"Webmail for nuts!"
> http://squirrelmail.org/
>
>
>

Re: Re: SMTP Auth Patch Question

[Dushyanth Harinath]

a perfect example of the saying "A bad craftsman blames his tools"...its
really painful to see people using open source products without knowing 
what the word "Open source" means.

regards
dushyanth

> unfortunately I didn't had quite pleasure experience with inter7
> 
> they doesn't really "enjoying" with support of their products.. I found
> at least 2 bugs and when I was pointing it out for them it took me
> quite a while to convince them that this is a bug.. they fixed one bug
> in new development version and refuse to accept that they have one more
> bug.. which I keep getting e-mails from other's people who looked at
> archive.. and inter7 wants to kick us out from their list 'cause
> supposedly I was making too much traffic while explain them and the
> whole list about those glitches in their software...

> so unless you know exactly what you doing I'd suggest you think twice
> before installing any of inter7's product.. other then that I think
> inter7 have a great products and very shitty support, my company called
> them to make commercial support for one of their products.. it seems to
> us that either they don't know nothing about those products themselves
> or else I don't know...
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "alexus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2001 10:00 PM
> Subject: Re: Re: SMTP Auth Patch Question
> 
> 
>> hello alexus
>>
>> Could u tell me how to do it via vpopmail?Are there some doc about
>> it?I
> search inter7.com website but get nothing about it.
>> please tell me detail.
>> thanks a lot
>>
>> best regard
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >can someone suggest me place where to look how to make qmail smtp
>> >auth?
>> >
>> >i was able to do it via vpopmail but i'm sure there is more "native"
> way:)
>> >
>> >- Original Message -
>> >From: "Keary Suska" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >To: "Qmail List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2001 5:07 PM
>> >Subject: SMTP Auth Patch Question
>> >
>> >
>> >> Does anyone have comments, recommendations, or warnings over the
> various
>> >> SMTP Auth patches available? I can't seem to find any hard
>> >> information
> to
>> >> compare them.
>> >>
>> >> Keary Suska
>> >> Esoteritech, Inc.
>> >> "Leveraging Open Source for a better Internet"
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>> tengteng
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
Dushyanth Harinath
Archean Infotech Limited
Ph No:091-040-3228666,6570704,3228674
http://www.archeanit.com



-
This email was sent using SquirrelMail.
   "Webmail for nuts!"
http://squirrelmail.org/