[qmailtoaster] Anti-Spam Features

[Gabriel Lai]

Hi All,

Can we integrate new Anti-Spam features? I've read some info here where they 
implement this technology.

http://www.skypoint.com/bulletins/031215.shtml

Cheers
Gabriel




   

Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. 
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. 
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433

RE: [qmailtoaster] QmailAdmin - No Menu entries

[Phil Leinhauser]

Very strange, I just installed VQadmin myself.  I used it to create 2 domains.  
The domains show in the vqadmin list, in mySQL but NOT in the isoQlogs domain 
list and my qmailadmin menu for both of those domains looks exactly like 
Everett's.  I can't make a new user, forward, nothing.  There is no list of 
things to do.  My domains are not sub domains.  I'm going to remove them and 
recreate them from CL and see what happens.


-Original message-
From: "Helmut Fritz" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:11:27 -0400
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] QmailAdmin - No Menu entries

> did you create the domains with vqadmin first?
>  
> what happens if you try to log into [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>   _  
> 
> From: Everett Batey (WA6CRE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 7:52 AM
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Subject: [qmailtoaster] QmailAdmin - No Menu entries
> 
> 
> CREATED a new domain?n.originaldomain.org.??In my DNS I have?
> www.n.originaldomain.org, mail.n.originaldomain.org?
> otheraliasas.n.originaldomain.org
> 
> Used qmailadmin alternately to add create domain or and domain?
> aliases for this add on domain.
> 
> When I log in (gui) as [EMAIL PROTECTED] there are?
> NO menu lines to add / delete users, forwards, etc.
> 
> What may I have overlooked?
> 
> Tia. ? Everett.
> 
> If allowed "main menu", "n.originaldomain.org", "Main Menu" pic?
> is attached.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info

[Erik A. Espinoza]

3.2.1 is on the devel site as of now.

Erik

On 6/18/07, slamp slamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

the issue i am having is that the communication between simscan and
clamd is not immediate. i have to wait at least two minutes for mail
to start coming in.

connect(): No such file or directory

by the way, spamassassin 3.2.1 and 3.1.9 are out. when can we see them
for the current toaster?

On 6/18/07, Erik A. Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is very peculiar. I have not been able to reproduce any of the
> clamav problems stated on this list.
>
> Perhaps we need to start doing profiling and submitting issues to the
> clamav group.
>
> Thus far I have ten different production boxes running the latest
> clamav (some x86_64, some centos4 and one centos3) with no adverse
> activiity.
>
> In addition, I am running a full spamassassin 3.2.0 with no issues. I
> did have to yum install a bunch of perl modules from rpmforge repo to
> get everything working properly though.
>
> Erik
>
> On 6/18/07, Phil Leinhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The Clamd ver 90.1 hogged my CPU indefinitely.  I had to stop it to et the 
machine back.
> >
> > After my upgrade problems (self induced), I see what you are talking about. 
 I haven't looked at what it is doing exactly but it runs for me at 100% for about 5 
minutes then calms down.
> >
> > My QMT server is a VMware virtual server running on an AMD 3.0G host along 
with 2 other virtual servers all using iSCSI connection to Linux iSCSI target.  
Vmachines are so cheap I chose not to run anything but QMT on this server.  Running 
webs etc. on my mail server will certainly overload it once I go into full production.
> >
> > I'm willing to live with a 5 minute spike in CPU as long as it does it's 
job.
> >
> > Phil
> >
> >
> > -Original message-
> > From: "A M" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:05:41 -0400
> > To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> > Subject: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I just had a server downgrade (due to a fried processor) fom a 3.2 GHz to
> > > a 2.6GHz and from 4GB Ram to 2GB ram and noticed this:
> > >
> > > when starting clamd loads the entire database to memory while
> > > doing some sort of checksum verification??? anyone can verify this???
> > >
> > > the server has about a zillion sites on it plus some other services 
besides
> > > QMT. The result is that clamd loads de signatures for about 2 minutes 
hoging
> > > the CPU during this time, and fails to respond to simscan, originating
> > > deferals
> > > for smtp.
> > >
> > > At this point I did som test in other servers and  I  realized that
> > > 90.3takes a lot
> > > more time to read the signatures than previous versions.
> > >
> > > Well just my experience since I've seen a lot of pelople with some issues
> > > with
> > > 0.90.3.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > --
> > > AM
> > > agmsoft(at)gmail.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> > -
> >  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
> -
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info

[A M]

Just for curiosity I checked one of the oldest servers I've running wich
handles mail for 30 domains or so
(P3 800MHz, 512MB, 80GB IDE SoftRAID)
running suse 10.1 and it takes 45 seconds...

06-18 20:16:38 Shutting down the main socket.
06-18 20:16:38 Closing the main socket.
06-18 20:16:38 Socket file removed.
06-18 20:16:38 --- Stopped at Mon Jun 18 20:16:38 2007
06-18 20:16:42 clamd daemon 0.90.3 (OS: linux-gnu, ARCH: i386, CPU: i686)
06-18 20:16:42 Log file size limited to 1048576 bytes.
06-18 20:16:42 Reading databases from /usr/share/clamav
06-18 20:17:26 Loaded 127795 signatures.
06-18 20:17:26 Unix socket file /tmp/clamd
06-18 20:17:26 Setting connection queue length to 15
06-18 20:17:26 Listening daemon: PID: 12151
06-18 20:17:26 Archive: Archived file size limit set to 15728640 bytes.
06-18 20:17:26 Archive: Recursion level limit set to 10.
06-18 20:17:26 Archive: Files limit set to 1500.
06-18 20:17:26 Archive: Compression ratio limit set to 300.
06-18 20:17:26 Archive support enabled.
06-18 20:17:26 Algorithmic detection enabled.
06-18 20:17:26 Portable Executable support enabled.
06-18 20:17:26 ELF support enabled.
06-18 20:17:26 Detection of broken executables enabled.
06-18 20:17:26 Mail files support enabled.
06-18 20:17:26 Mail: Recursion level limit set to 64.
06-18 20:17:26 OLE2 support enabled.
06-18 20:17:26 PDF support enabled.
06-18 20:17:26 HTML support enabled.
06-18 20:17:26 Self checking every 600 seconds.

and on a x86_64 x2, 2GB RAM, SCSI RAID 5,  I get 27 seconds...


06-18 20:25:12 Shutting down the main
socket.
06-18 20:25:12 Closing the main
socket.
06-18 20:25:12 Socket file
removed.
06-18 20:25:12 --- Stopped at Mon Jun 18 20:25:12
2007
06-18 20:25:12 clamd daemon 0.90.3 (OS: linux-gnu, ARCH: x86_64, CPU:
x86_64)
06-18 20:25:12 Log file size limited to 1048576
bytes.
06-18 20:25:12 Reading databases from
/usr/share/clamav
06-18 20:25:39 Loaded 127795
signatures.
06-18 20:25:39 Unix socket file
/tmp/clamd
06-18 20:25:39 Setting connection queue length to
15
06-18 20:25:39 Listening daemon: PID:
17400
06-18 20:25:39 Archive: Archived file size limit set to 15728640
bytes.
06-18 20:25:39 Archive: Recursion level limit set to
8.
06-18 20:25:39 Archive: Files limit set to
1000.
06-18 20:25:39 Archive: Compression ratio limit set to
250.
06-18 20:25:39 Archive support
enabled.
06-18 20:25:39 Algorithmic detection
enabled.
06-18 20:25:39 Portable Executable support
enabled.
06-18 20:25:39 ELF support
enabled.
06-18 20:25:39 Detection of broken executables
enabled.
06-18 20:25:39 Mail files support
enabled.
06-18 20:25:39 Mail: Recursion level limit set to
64.
06-18 20:25:39 OLE2 support
enabled.
06-18 20:25:39 PDF support
disabled.
06-18 20:25:39 HTML support
enabled.
06-18 20:25:39 Self checking every 600
seconds.

Now that's confusing. ?

Both systems running same packages...


2007/6/18, Erik A. Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:


Thanks Sir.

Erik

On 6/18/07, A M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Humm...
>
> Well basic mods are eMPF, sophie support in simscan (for sophos AV
support),
> experimental enable in some clamav (not all).
>
> Nevertheless i'm setting up another toaster today on a regular machine
> (Intel Core Duo - 2GB ram - sata raid)
> so i'll give it a try in centos with standard install and see what
happens.
>
> I'll post the news tomorrow.
>
> 2007/6/18, Erik A. Espinoza < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Perhaps you introduced a bug during the modifications?
> >
> > On 6/18/07, A M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Yes it is 64bit, but I'v noticed this delay in 32bits also.
> > >
> > > The packages were rebuilt (all) on update.
> > >
> > > All servers are runing sligthy modified versions of the latest or
> > > very recent packages of QMT
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2007/6/18, Phil Leinhauser < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > The SUSE you are running, is it 64bit?
> > > >
> > > > Erik,
> > > > If you want to start a profile, here's mine;
> > > > Fedora 6 x86_64
> > > > The machine was built specifically for QMT with nothing on it but
what
> the
> > > QMT installer put there and I also installed webmin.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -Original message-
> > > > From: "A M" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:47:18 -0400
> > > > To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> > > > Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Phil,
> > > > >
> > > > > this a virtualization server... 2xXEON 3,2GHz(now 2,6GHz), 16GB
ram
> (now
> > > > > 12), 4 dedicated RAID 1 Volumes  running SUSE 10.2 with XEN
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > checking back 0.90.2 didn't have this issue. didn't try out
> 0.90.1...
> > > > >
> > > > > 2007/6/18, Phil Leinhauser < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Clamd ver 90.1 hogged my CPU indefinitely.  I had to stop
it
> to et
> > > the
> > > > > > machine back.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > After my upgrade problems (self induced), I see what you are
> talking
> > > > > > about.  I haven't looked at what it is doing e

Re: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info

[Erik A. Espinoza]

Thanks Sir.

Erik

On 6/18/07, A M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Humm...

Well basic mods are eMPF, sophie support in simscan (for sophos AV support),
experimental enable in some clamav (not all).

Nevertheless i'm setting up another toaster today on a regular machine
(Intel Core Duo - 2GB ram - sata raid)
so i'll give it a try in centos with standard install and see what happens.

I'll post the news tomorrow.

2007/6/18, Erik A. Espinoza < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Perhaps you introduced a bug during the modifications?
>
> On 6/18/07, A M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes it is 64bit, but I'v noticed this delay in 32bits also.
> >
> > The packages were rebuilt (all) on update.
> >
> > All servers are runing sligthy modified versions of the latest or
> > very recent packages of QMT
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2007/6/18, Phil Leinhauser < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > The SUSE you are running, is it 64bit?
> > >
> > > Erik,
> > > If you want to start a profile, here's mine;
> > > Fedora 6 x86_64
> > > The machine was built specifically for QMT with nothing on it but what
the
> > QMT installer put there and I also installed webmin.
> > >
> > >
> > > -Original message-
> > > From: "A M" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:47:18 -0400
> > > To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> > > Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info
> > >
> > > > Hi Phil,
> > > >
> > > > this a virtualization server... 2xXEON 3,2GHz(now 2,6GHz), 16GB ram
(now
> > > > 12), 4 dedicated RAID 1 Volumes  running SUSE 10.2 with XEN
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > checking back 0.90.2 didn't have this issue. didn't try out
0.90.1...
> > > >
> > > > 2007/6/18, Phil Leinhauser < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Clamd ver 90.1 hogged my CPU indefinitely.  I had to stop it
to et
> > the
> > > > > machine back.
> > > > >
> > > > > After my upgrade problems (self induced), I see what you are
talking
> > > > > about.  I haven't looked at what it is doing exactly but it runs
for
> > me at
> > > > > 100% for about 5 minutes then calms down.
> > > > >
> > > > > My QMT server is a VMware virtual server running on an AMD 3.0G
host
> > along
> > > > > with 2 other virtual servers all using iSCSI connection to Linux
iSCSI
> > > > > target.  Vmachines are so cheap I chose not to run anything but
QMT on
> > this
> > > > > server.  Running webs etc. on my mail server will certainly
overload
> > it once
> > > > > I go into full production.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm willing to live with a 5 minute spike in CPU as long as it
does
> > it's
> > > > > job.
> > > > >
> > > > > Phil
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -Original message-
> > > > > From: "A M" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:05:41 -0400
> > > > > To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> > > > > Subject: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I just had a server downgrade (due to a fried processor) fom a
3.2
> > GHz
> > > > > to
> > > > > > a 2.6GHz and from 4GB Ram to 2GB ram and noticed this:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > when starting clamd loads the entire database to memory while
> > > > > > doing some sort of checksum verification??? anyone can verify
> > this???
> > > > > >
> > > > > > the server has about a zillion sites on it plus some other
services
> > > > > besides
> > > > > > QMT. The result is that clamd loads de signatures for about 2
> > minutes
> > > > > hoging
> > > > > > the CPU during this time, and fails to respond to simscan,
> > originating
> > > > > > deferals
> > > > > > for smtp.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > At this point I did som test in other servers and  I  realized
that
> > > > > > 90.3takes a lot
> > > > > > more time to read the signatures than previous versions.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Well just my experience since I've seen a lot of pelople with
some
> > > > > issues
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > 0.90.3.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > AM
> > > > > > agmsoft(at)gmail.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> >
-
> > > > >  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> > > > >
> >
-
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > AM
> > > > agmsoft(at)gmail.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
-
> > >  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted < http://www.vr.org>
> > >
> >
-
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > AM
> > agmsoft(at)gmail.com
>
>
-
>  Qmai

Re: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info

[A M]

Humm...

Well basic mods are eMPF, sophie support in simscan (for sophos AV support),
experimental enable in some clamav (not all).

Nevertheless i'm setting up another toaster today on a regular machine
(Intel Core Duo - 2GB ram - sata raid)
so i'll give it a try in centos with standard install and see what happens.

I'll post the news tomorrow.

2007/6/18, Erik A. Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:


Perhaps you introduced a bug during the modifications?

On 6/18/07, A M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes it is 64bit, but I'v noticed this delay in 32bits also.
>
> The packages were rebuilt (all) on update.
>
> All servers are runing sligthy modified versions of the latest or
> very recent packages of QMT
>
>
>
>
> 2007/6/18, Phil Leinhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > The SUSE you are running, is it 64bit?
> >
> > Erik,
> > If you want to start a profile, here's mine;
> > Fedora 6 x86_64
> > The machine was built specifically for QMT with nothing on it but what
the
> QMT installer put there and I also installed webmin.
> >
> >
> > -Original message-
> > From: "A M" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:47:18 -0400
> > To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> > Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info
> >
> > > Hi Phil,
> > >
> > > this a virtualization server... 2xXEON 3,2GHz(now 2,6GHz), 16GB ram
(now
> > > 12), 4 dedicated RAID 1 Volumes  running SUSE 10.2 with XEN
> > >
> > >
> > > checking back 0.90.2 didn't have this issue. didn't try out 0.90.1..
.
> > >
> > > 2007/6/18, Phil Leinhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > >
> > > > The Clamd ver 90.1 hogged my CPU indefinitely.  I had to stop it
to et
> the
> > > > machine back.
> > > >
> > > > After my upgrade problems (self induced), I see what you are
talking
> > > > about.  I haven't looked at what it is doing exactly but it runs
for
> me at
> > > > 100% for about 5 minutes then calms down.
> > > >
> > > > My QMT server is a VMware virtual server running on an AMD 3.0Ghost
> along
> > > > with 2 other virtual servers all using iSCSI connection to Linux
iSCSI
> > > > target.  Vmachines are so cheap I chose not to run anything but
QMT on
> this
> > > > server.  Running webs etc. on my mail server will certainly
overload
> it once
> > > > I go into full production.
> > > >
> > > > I'm willing to live with a 5 minute spike in CPU as long as it
does
> it's
> > > > job.
> > > >
> > > > Phil
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -Original message-
> > > > From: "A M" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:05:41 -0400
> > > > To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> > > > Subject: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I just had a server downgrade (due to a fried processor) fom a
3.2
> GHz
> > > > to
> > > > > a 2.6GHz and from 4GB Ram to 2GB ram and noticed this:
> > > > >
> > > > > when starting clamd loads the entire database to memory while
> > > > > doing some sort of checksum verification??? anyone can verify
> this???
> > > > >
> > > > > the server has about a zillion sites on it plus some other
services
> > > > besides
> > > > > QMT. The result is that clamd loads de signatures for about 2
> minutes
> > > > hoging
> > > > > the CPU during this time, and fails to respond to simscan,
> originating
> > > > > deferals
> > > > > for smtp.
> > > > >
> > > > > At this point I did som test in other servers and  I  realized
that
> > > > > 90.3takes a lot
> > > > > more time to read the signatures than previous versions.
> > > > >
> > > > > Well just my experience since I've seen a lot of pelople with
some
> > > > issues
> > > > > with
> > > > > 0.90.3.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > AM
> > > > > agmsoft(at)gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> -
> > > >  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> > > >
> -
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > AM
> > > agmsoft(at)gmail.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> -
> >  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> >
> -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> AM
> agmsoft(at)gmail.com

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





--
AM
agmsoft(at)gmail.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info

[Erik A. Espinoza]

Perhaps you introduced a bug during the modifications?

On 6/18/07, A M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Yes it is 64bit, but I'v noticed this delay in 32bits also.

The packages were rebuilt (all) on update.

All servers are runing sligthy modified versions of the latest or
very recent packages of QMT




2007/6/18, Phil Leinhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The SUSE you are running, is it 64bit?
>
> Erik,
> If you want to start a profile, here's mine;
> Fedora 6 x86_64
> The machine was built specifically for QMT with nothing on it but what the
QMT installer put there and I also installed webmin.
>
>
> -Original message-
> From: "A M" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:47:18 -0400
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info
>
> > Hi Phil,
> >
> > this a virtualization server... 2xXEON 3,2GHz(now 2,6GHz), 16GB ram (now
> > 12), 4 dedicated RAID 1 Volumes  running SUSE 10.2 with XEN
> >
> >
> > checking back 0.90.2 didn't have this issue. didn't try out 0.90.1...
> >
> > 2007/6/18, Phil Leinhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > > The Clamd ver 90.1 hogged my CPU indefinitely.  I had to stop it to et
the
> > > machine back.
> > >
> > > After my upgrade problems (self induced), I see what you are talking
> > > about.  I haven't looked at what it is doing exactly but it runs for
me at
> > > 100% for about 5 minutes then calms down.
> > >
> > > My QMT server is a VMware virtual server running on an AMD 3.0G host
along
> > > with 2 other virtual servers all using iSCSI connection to Linux iSCSI
> > > target.  Vmachines are so cheap I chose not to run anything but QMT on
this
> > > server.  Running webs etc. on my mail server will certainly overload
it once
> > > I go into full production.
> > >
> > > I'm willing to live with a 5 minute spike in CPU as long as it does
it's
> > > job.
> > >
> > > Phil
> > >
> > >
> > > -Original message-
> > > From: "A M" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:05:41 -0400
> > > To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> > > Subject: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I just had a server downgrade (due to a fried processor) fom a 3.2
GHz
> > > to
> > > > a 2.6GHz and from 4GB Ram to 2GB ram and noticed this:
> > > >
> > > > when starting clamd loads the entire database to memory while
> > > > doing some sort of checksum verification??? anyone can verify
this???
> > > >
> > > > the server has about a zillion sites on it plus some other services
> > > besides
> > > > QMT. The result is that clamd loads de signatures for about 2
minutes
> > > hoging
> > > > the CPU during this time, and fails to respond to simscan,
originating
> > > > deferals
> > > > for smtp.
> > > >
> > > > At this point I did som test in other servers and  I  realized that
> > > > 90.3takes a lot
> > > > more time to read the signatures than previous versions.
> > > >
> > > > Well just my experience since I've seen a lot of pelople with some
> > > issues
> > > > with
> > > > 0.90.3.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > AM
> > > > agmsoft(at)gmail.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
-
> > >  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> > >
-
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > AM
> > agmsoft(at)gmail.com
> >
> >
>
>
-
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
>
-
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>



--

AM
agmsoft(at)gmail.com


-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info

[A M]

Yes it is 64bit, but I'v noticed this delay in 32bits also.

The packages were rebuilt (all) on update.

All servers are runing sligthy modified versions of the latest or
very recent packages of QMT



2007/6/18, Phil Leinhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:


The SUSE you are running, is it 64bit?

Erik,
If you want to start a profile, here's mine;
Fedora 6 x86_64
The machine was built specifically for QMT with nothing on it but what the
QMT installer put there and I also installed webmin.


-Original message-
From: "A M" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:47:18 -0400
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info

> Hi Phil,
>
> this a virtualization server... 2xXEON 3,2GHz(now 2,6GHz), 16GB ram (now
> 12), 4 dedicated RAID 1 Volumes  running SUSE 10.2 with XEN
>
>
> checking back 0.90.2 didn't have this issue. didn't try out 0.90.1...
>
> 2007/6/18, Phil Leinhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > The Clamd ver 90.1 hogged my CPU indefinitely.  I had to stop it to et
the
> > machine back.
> >
> > After my upgrade problems (self induced), I see what you are talking
> > about.  I haven't looked at what it is doing exactly but it runs for
me at
> > 100% for about 5 minutes then calms down.
> >
> > My QMT server is a VMware virtual server running on an AMD 3.0G host
along
> > with 2 other virtual servers all using iSCSI connection to Linux iSCSI
> > target.  Vmachines are so cheap I chose not to run anything but QMT on
this
> > server.  Running webs etc. on my mail server will certainly overload
it once
> > I go into full production.
> >
> > I'm willing to live with a 5 minute spike in CPU as long as it does
it's
> > job.
> >
> > Phil
> >
> >
> > -Original message-
> > From: "A M" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:05:41 -0400
> > To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> > Subject: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I just had a server downgrade (due to a fried processor) fom a 3.2GHz
> > to
> > > a 2.6GHz and from 4GB Ram to 2GB ram and noticed this:
> > >
> > > when starting clamd loads the entire database to memory while
> > > doing some sort of checksum verification??? anyone can verify
this???
> > >
> > > the server has about a zillion sites on it plus some other services
> > besides
> > > QMT. The result is that clamd loads de signatures for about 2
minutes
> > hoging
> > > the CPU during this time, and fails to respond to simscan,
originating
> > > deferals
> > > for smtp.
> > >
> > > At this point I did som test in other servers and  I  realized that
> > > 90.3takes a lot
> > > more time to read the signatures than previous versions.
> > >
> > > Well just my experience since I've seen a lot of pelople with some
> > issues
> > > with
> > > 0.90.3.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > --
> > > AM
> > > agmsoft(at)gmail.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> > -
> >  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> AM
> agmsoft(at)gmail.com
>
>

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





--
AM
agmsoft(at)gmail.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info

[Erik A. Espinoza]

Have you rebuilt simscan since the upgrade? Occasionally simscan needs
to be rebuilt against the latest libs.

Erik

On 6/18/07, Phil Leinhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

The SUSE you are running, is it 64bit?

Erik,
If you want to start a profile, here's mine;
Fedora 6 x86_64
The machine was built specifically for QMT with nothing on it but what the QMT 
installer put there and I also installed webmin.


-Original message-
From: "A M" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:47:18 -0400
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info

> Hi Phil,
>
> this a virtualization server... 2xXEON 3,2GHz(now 2,6GHz), 16GB ram (now
> 12), 4 dedicated RAID 1 Volumes  running SUSE 10.2 with XEN
>
>
> checking back 0.90.2 didn't have this issue. didn't try out 0.90.1...
>
> 2007/6/18, Phil Leinhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > The Clamd ver 90.1 hogged my CPU indefinitely.  I had to stop it to et the
> > machine back.
> >
> > After my upgrade problems (self induced), I see what you are talking
> > about.  I haven't looked at what it is doing exactly but it runs for me at
> > 100% for about 5 minutes then calms down.
> >
> > My QMT server is a VMware virtual server running on an AMD 3.0G host along
> > with 2 other virtual servers all using iSCSI connection to Linux iSCSI
> > target.  Vmachines are so cheap I chose not to run anything but QMT on this
> > server.  Running webs etc. on my mail server will certainly overload it once
> > I go into full production.
> >
> > I'm willing to live with a 5 minute spike in CPU as long as it does it's
> > job.
> >
> > Phil
> >
> >
> > -Original message-
> > From: "A M" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:05:41 -0400
> > To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> > Subject: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I just had a server downgrade (due to a fried processor) fom a 3.2 GHz
> > to
> > > a 2.6GHz and from 4GB Ram to 2GB ram and noticed this:
> > >
> > > when starting clamd loads the entire database to memory while
> > > doing some sort of checksum verification??? anyone can verify this???
> > >
> > > the server has about a zillion sites on it plus some other services
> > besides
> > > QMT. The result is that clamd loads de signatures for about 2 minutes
> > hoging
> > > the CPU during this time, and fails to respond to simscan, originating
> > > deferals
> > > for smtp.
> > >
> > > At this point I did som test in other servers and  I  realized that
> > > 90.3takes a lot
> > > more time to read the signatures than previous versions.
> > >
> > > Well just my experience since I've seen a lot of pelople with some
> > issues
> > > with
> > > 0.90.3.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > --
> > > AM
> > > agmsoft(at)gmail.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> > -
> >  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> AM
> agmsoft(at)gmail.com
>
>

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] my battle against spam

[Sam Clippinger]

Great!  Thanks for the offers -- I'll email you guys off list to 
coordinate details.


-- Sam Clippinger

Erik A. Espinoza wrote:

Hey Sam,

We can use the QmailToaster wiki for this. All you'd need then is a
mailing list. Or you can write into the qmailwiki project. No need to
setup a full wiki for a small package.

Erik

On 6/18/07, Helmut Fritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Sam,
I am guessing you are the dev for spamdyke?  I would be glad to start 
a mail

list for the community.  I could throw up a wiki as well.  I have the
servers and the disk space and the bandwidth.  Feel free to e-mail me off
list if you want to discuss.

-Original Message-
From: Sam Clippinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 8:49 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] my battle against spam

That is a valid concern, though I try to respond to every spamdyke 
email I

get.

There's no wiki, mailing list, forum, blog at this point only because 
no one
has set one up -- spamdyke is just too new.  I'd be happy to 
participate in
any of those things but I just don't have the time to administer 
them.  If

anyone feels like starting one, let me know. :)

-- Sam Clippinger

PakOgah wrote:
>> If spamdyke fixes qmail's dubious logging, I think it's worth rolling
>> into the toaster immediately! :)
>>
>
> Yup it sure look good and have a lot of nice features but when I check
> the website there aren't any type of support like forum, milist or 
wiki?

>
> only the coder email address, I am not sure if I have a problem will
> get quick answer from him. Yes, I hv read those long manual, but then
> I am still need a personal guide.
> like this milist or openspf's milis...
>
>
> -
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.9.0/853 - Release Date: 6/18/2007
3:02 PM



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info

[Helmut Fritz]

I am running 90.1, and have seen no issues.  Of course I get the message to
upgrade to 90.3, but seeing all the issues folks are having I am not willing
to mess with it.  I installed qmt iso 1.2, running on dual athlon 1800's
with 2GB ram. 

-Original Message-
From: Erik A. Espinoza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 10:35 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info

This is very peculiar. I have not been able to reproduce any of the clamav
problems stated on this list.

Perhaps we need to start doing profiling and submitting issues to the clamav
group.

Thus far I have ten different production boxes running the latest clamav
(some x86_64, some centos4 and one centos3) with no adverse activiity.

In addition, I am running a full spamassassin 3.2.0 with no issues. I did
have to yum install a bunch of perl modules from rpmforge repo to get
everything working properly though.

Erik

On 6/18/07, Phil Leinhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Clamd ver 90.1 hogged my CPU indefinitely.  I had to stop it to et the
machine back.
>
> After my upgrade problems (self induced), I see what you are talking
about.  I haven't looked at what it is doing exactly but it runs for me at
100% for about 5 minutes then calms down.
>
> My QMT server is a VMware virtual server running on an AMD 3.0G host along
with 2 other virtual servers all using iSCSI connection to Linux iSCSI
target.  Vmachines are so cheap I chose not to run anything but QMT on this
server.  Running webs etc. on my mail server will certainly overload it once
I go into full production.
>
> I'm willing to live with a 5 minute spike in CPU as long as it does it's
job.
>
> Phil
>
>
> -Original message-
> From: "A M" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:05:41 -0400
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Subject: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just had a server downgrade (due to a fried processor) fom a 3.2 
> > GHz to a 2.6GHz and from 4GB Ram to 2GB ram and noticed this:
> >
> > when starting clamd loads the entire database to memory while doing 
> > some sort of checksum verification??? anyone can verify this???
> >
> > the server has about a zillion sites on it plus some other services 
> > besides QMT. The result is that clamd loads de signatures for about 
> > 2 minutes hoging the CPU during this time, and fails to respond to 
> > simscan, originating deferals for smtp.
> >
> > At this point I did som test in other servers and  I  realized that 
> > 90.3takes a lot more time to read the signatures than previous 
> > versions.
> >
> > Well just my experience since I've seen a lot of pelople with some 
> > issues with 0.90.3.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > AM
> > agmsoft(at)gmail.com
> >
> >
>
> -
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.9.0/853 - Release Date: 6/18/2007
3:02 PM



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info

[Phil Leinhauser]

The SUSE you are running, is it 64bit?

Erik,
If you want to start a profile, here's mine;
Fedora 6 x86_64
The machine was built specifically for QMT with nothing on it but what the QMT 
installer put there and I also installed webmin.


-Original message-
From: "A M" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:47:18 -0400
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info

> Hi Phil,
> 
> this a virtualization server... 2xXEON 3,2GHz(now 2,6GHz), 16GB ram (now
> 12), 4 dedicated RAID 1 Volumes  running SUSE 10.2 with XEN
> 
> 
> checking back 0.90.2 didn't have this issue. didn't try out 0.90.1...
> 
> 2007/6/18, Phil Leinhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > The Clamd ver 90.1 hogged my CPU indefinitely.  I had to stop it to et the
> > machine back.
> >
> > After my upgrade problems (self induced), I see what you are talking
> > about.  I haven't looked at what it is doing exactly but it runs for me at
> > 100% for about 5 minutes then calms down.
> >
> > My QMT server is a VMware virtual server running on an AMD 3.0G host along
> > with 2 other virtual servers all using iSCSI connection to Linux iSCSI
> > target.  Vmachines are so cheap I chose not to run anything but QMT on this
> > server.  Running webs etc. on my mail server will certainly overload it once
> > I go into full production.
> >
> > I'm willing to live with a 5 minute spike in CPU as long as it does it's
> > job.
> >
> > Phil
> >
> >
> > -Original message-
> > From: "A M" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:05:41 -0400
> > To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> > Subject: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I just had a server downgrade (due to a fried processor) fom a 3.2 GHz
> > to
> > > a 2.6GHz and from 4GB Ram to 2GB ram and noticed this:
> > >
> > > when starting clamd loads the entire database to memory while
> > > doing some sort of checksum verification??? anyone can verify this???
> > >
> > > the server has about a zillion sites on it plus some other services
> > besides
> > > QMT. The result is that clamd loads de signatures for about 2 minutes
> > hoging
> > > the CPU during this time, and fails to respond to simscan, originating
> > > deferals
> > > for smtp.
> > >
> > > At this point I did som test in other servers and  I  realized that
> > > 90.3takes a lot
> > > more time to read the signatures than previous versions.
> > >
> > > Well just my experience since I've seen a lot of pelople with some
> > issues
> > > with
> > > 0.90.3.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > --
> > > AM
> > > agmsoft(at)gmail.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> > -
> >  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> AM
> agmsoft(at)gmail.com
> 
> 

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] my battle against spam

[Erik A. Espinoza]

Hey Sam,

We can use the QmailToaster wiki for this. All you'd need then is a
mailing list. Or you can write into the qmailwiki project. No need to
setup a full wiki for a small package.

Erik

On 6/18/07, Helmut Fritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Sam,
I am guessing you are the dev for spamdyke?  I would be glad to start a mail
list for the community.  I could throw up a wiki as well.  I have the
servers and the disk space and the bandwidth.  Feel free to e-mail me off
list if you want to discuss.

-Original Message-
From: Sam Clippinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 8:49 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] my battle against spam

That is a valid concern, though I try to respond to every spamdyke email I
get.

There's no wiki, mailing list, forum, blog at this point only because no one
has set one up -- spamdyke is just too new.  I'd be happy to participate in
any of those things but I just don't have the time to administer them.  If
anyone feels like starting one, let me know. :)

-- Sam Clippinger

PakOgah wrote:
>> If spamdyke fixes qmail's dubious logging, I think it's worth rolling
>> into the toaster immediately! :)
>>
>
> Yup it sure look good and have a lot of nice features but when I check
> the website there aren't any type of support like forum, milist or wiki?
>
> only the coder email address, I am not sure if I have a problem will
> get quick answer from him. Yes, I hv read those long manual, but then
> I am still need a personal guide.
> like this milist or openspf's milis...
>
>
> -
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.9.0/853 - Release Date: 6/18/2007
3:02 PM



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [qmailtoaster] my battle against spam

[Helmut Fritz]

Sam,
I am guessing you are the dev for spamdyke?  I would be glad to start a mail
list for the community.  I could throw up a wiki as well.  I have the
servers and the disk space and the bandwidth.  Feel free to e-mail me off
list if you want to discuss. 

-Original Message-
From: Sam Clippinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 8:49 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] my battle against spam

That is a valid concern, though I try to respond to every spamdyke email I
get.

There's no wiki, mailing list, forum, blog at this point only because no one
has set one up -- spamdyke is just too new.  I'd be happy to participate in
any of those things but I just don't have the time to administer them.  If
anyone feels like starting one, let me know. :)

-- Sam Clippinger

PakOgah wrote:
>> If spamdyke fixes qmail's dubious logging, I think it's worth rolling 
>> into the toaster immediately! :)
>>
> 
> Yup it sure look good and have a lot of nice features but when I check 
> the website there aren't any type of support like forum, milist or wiki?
> 
> only the coder email address, I am not sure if I have a problem will 
> get quick answer from him. Yes, I hv read those long manual, but then 
> I am still need a personal guide.
> like this milist or openspf's milis...
> 
> 
> -
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.9.0/853 - Release Date: 6/18/2007
3:02 PM



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info

[slamp slamp]

the issue i am having is that the communication between simscan and
clamd is not immediate. i have to wait at least two minutes for mail
to start coming in.

connect(): No such file or directory

by the way, spamassassin 3.2.1 and 3.1.9 are out. when can we see them
for the current toaster?

On 6/18/07, Erik A. Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

This is very peculiar. I have not been able to reproduce any of the
clamav problems stated on this list.

Perhaps we need to start doing profiling and submitting issues to the
clamav group.

Thus far I have ten different production boxes running the latest
clamav (some x86_64, some centos4 and one centos3) with no adverse
activiity.

In addition, I am running a full spamassassin 3.2.0 with no issues. I
did have to yum install a bunch of perl modules from rpmforge repo to
get everything working properly though.

Erik

On 6/18/07, Phil Leinhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Clamd ver 90.1 hogged my CPU indefinitely.  I had to stop it to et the 
machine back.
>
> After my upgrade problems (self induced), I see what you are talking about.  
I haven't looked at what it is doing exactly but it runs for me at 100% for about 
5 minutes then calms down.
>
> My QMT server is a VMware virtual server running on an AMD 3.0G host along 
with 2 other virtual servers all using iSCSI connection to Linux iSCSI target.  
Vmachines are so cheap I chose not to run anything but QMT on this server.  
Running webs etc. on my mail server will certainly overload it once I go into full 
production.
>
> I'm willing to live with a 5 minute spike in CPU as long as it does it's job.
>
> Phil
>
>
> -Original message-
> From: "A M" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:05:41 -0400
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Subject: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just had a server downgrade (due to a fried processor) fom a 3.2 GHz to
> > a 2.6GHz and from 4GB Ram to 2GB ram and noticed this:
> >
> > when starting clamd loads the entire database to memory while
> > doing some sort of checksum verification??? anyone can verify this???
> >
> > the server has about a zillion sites on it plus some other services besides
> > QMT. The result is that clamd loads de signatures for about 2 minutes hoging
> > the CPU during this time, and fails to respond to simscan, originating
> > deferals
> > for smtp.
> >
> > At this point I did som test in other servers and  I  realized that
> > 90.3takes a lot
> > more time to read the signatures than previous versions.
> >
> > Well just my experience since I've seen a lot of pelople with some issues
> > with
> > 0.90.3.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > AM
> > agmsoft(at)gmail.com
> >
> >
>
> -
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info

[A M]

Hi Phil,

this a virtualization server... 2xXEON 3,2GHz(now 2,6GHz), 16GB ram (now
12), 4 dedicated RAID 1 Volumes  running SUSE 10.2 with XEN


checking back 0.90.2 didn't have this issue. didn't try out 0.90.1...

2007/6/18, Phil Leinhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:


The Clamd ver 90.1 hogged my CPU indefinitely.  I had to stop it to et the
machine back.

After my upgrade problems (self induced), I see what you are talking
about.  I haven't looked at what it is doing exactly but it runs for me at
100% for about 5 minutes then calms down.

My QMT server is a VMware virtual server running on an AMD 3.0G host along
with 2 other virtual servers all using iSCSI connection to Linux iSCSI
target.  Vmachines are so cheap I chose not to run anything but QMT on this
server.  Running webs etc. on my mail server will certainly overload it once
I go into full production.

I'm willing to live with a 5 minute spike in CPU as long as it does it's
job.

Phil


-Original message-
From: "A M" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:05:41 -0400
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info

> Hi,
>
> I just had a server downgrade (due to a fried processor) fom a 3.2 GHz
to
> a 2.6GHz and from 4GB Ram to 2GB ram and noticed this:
>
> when starting clamd loads the entire database to memory while
> doing some sort of checksum verification??? anyone can verify this???
>
> the server has about a zillion sites on it plus some other services
besides
> QMT. The result is that clamd loads de signatures for about 2 minutes
hoging
> the CPU during this time, and fails to respond to simscan, originating
> deferals
> for smtp.
>
> At this point I did som test in other servers and  I  realized that
> 90.3takes a lot
> more time to read the signatures than previous versions.
>
> Well just my experience since I've seen a lot of pelople with some
issues
> with
> 0.90.3.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> AM
> agmsoft(at)gmail.com
>
>

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





--
AM
agmsoft(at)gmail.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info

[Erik A. Espinoza]

This is very peculiar. I have not been able to reproduce any of the
clamav problems stated on this list.

Perhaps we need to start doing profiling and submitting issues to the
clamav group.

Thus far I have ten different production boxes running the latest
clamav (some x86_64, some centos4 and one centos3) with no adverse
activiity.

In addition, I am running a full spamassassin 3.2.0 with no issues. I
did have to yum install a bunch of perl modules from rpmforge repo to
get everything working properly though.

Erik

On 6/18/07, Phil Leinhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

The Clamd ver 90.1 hogged my CPU indefinitely.  I had to stop it to et the 
machine back.

After my upgrade problems (self induced), I see what you are talking about.  I 
haven't looked at what it is doing exactly but it runs for me at 100% for about 
5 minutes then calms down.

My QMT server is a VMware virtual server running on an AMD 3.0G host along with 
2 other virtual servers all using iSCSI connection to Linux iSCSI target.  
Vmachines are so cheap I chose not to run anything but QMT on this server.  
Running webs etc. on my mail server will certainly overload it once I go into 
full production.

I'm willing to live with a 5 minute spike in CPU as long as it does it's job.

Phil


-Original message-
From: "A M" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:05:41 -0400
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info

> Hi,
>
> I just had a server downgrade (due to a fried processor) fom a 3.2 GHz to
> a 2.6GHz and from 4GB Ram to 2GB ram and noticed this:
>
> when starting clamd loads the entire database to memory while
> doing some sort of checksum verification??? anyone can verify this???
>
> the server has about a zillion sites on it plus some other services besides
> QMT. The result is that clamd loads de signatures for about 2 minutes hoging
> the CPU during this time, and fails to respond to simscan, originating
> deferals
> for smtp.
>
> At this point I did som test in other servers and  I  realized that
> 90.3takes a lot
> more time to read the signatures than previous versions.
>
> Well just my experience since I've seen a lot of pelople with some issues
> with
> 0.90.3.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> AM
> agmsoft(at)gmail.com
>
>

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Outgoing Domainkeys

[curt . qt]

I am aware that the entries are not active. For starters, the domain I'm trying
to get dk working on is agroupmail.com. I had to temporarily (hopefully) disable
the dk policy & selector entries in DNS until I can figure out how to actually
get the messages signed - otherwise, Yahoo will completely reject all messages
since it will be expecting the specified public key in the email header.

I have been through the wiki as well as several other googled sources looking
for ideas, and the domain has SPF set up correctly.

As I said, getting the necessary DNS domainkey entries happening is not the
problem - I simply need to get Qmail to insert the key specified in tcp.smtp's
DKSIGN. Has anyone gotten this to work?

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Has anyone had any luck getting QT to sign outgoing messages with Domainkeys?
> Yup, I had
>> I read somewhere in the wiki that "domainkeys was broken",  but the
>> instructions
>> regarding the issue point to incoming queue elements. I was able to create 
>> the
>> private/public key pair and update the zone file to reflect these values, but
>> I
>> can't seem to get it to actually put the value in the header of outgoing
>> emails.
>>
>> Steps taken:
>> created /var/qmail/control/domainkeys subdir (tried actual domain name, even
>> localhost.localdomain for fun)
>> used dknewkey to create private/public key pair, changed 
>> ownership/permissions
>> on private key
>> configured DNS with policy & selector records - verified via sourceforge,
>> yahoo,
>> & skylist
>>
> the instruction for creating domainkeys is in here
> http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Domainkeys
> have you check them on http://www.dnsstuff.com/ ?
> on the hostname test column
> choose TXT type and enter the policy and selector records
> I get this output
>
> *No TXT records exist for _domainkey.agroup.com, and _domainkey.agroup.com 
> does
> not exist.* [Neg TTL=1800 seconds]
>
> have you tried spf for verification?
> it simple and qmt support it also. All you have to do is add spf records
> on you dns zone.
> for details and wizard creating spf record, you can go to openspf.org
> and maybe join their milist to consult
>> updated tcp.smtp with proper DKSIGN value (tried both with % and with 
>> absolute
>> path for single domain)
>>
>> Is there an error log somewhere that would show DKSIGN failing? Any ideas?
>>
>>
>
>
> -
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info

[Phil Leinhauser]

The Clamd ver 90.1 hogged my CPU indefinitely.  I had to stop it to et the 
machine back.  

After my upgrade problems (self induced), I see what you are talking about.  I 
haven't looked at what it is doing exactly but it runs for me at 100% for about 
5 minutes then calms down.  

My QMT server is a VMware virtual server running on an AMD 3.0G host along with 
2 other virtual servers all using iSCSI connection to Linux iSCSI target.  
Vmachines are so cheap I chose not to run anything but QMT on this server.  
Running webs etc. on my mail server will certainly overload it once I go into 
full production.

I'm willing to live with a 5 minute spike in CPU as long as it does it's job.

Phil


-Original message-
From: "A M" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:05:41 -0400
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info

> Hi,
> 
> I just had a server downgrade (due to a fried processor) fom a 3.2 GHz to
> a 2.6GHz and from 4GB Ram to 2GB ram and noticed this:
> 
> when starting clamd loads the entire database to memory while
> doing some sort of checksum verification??? anyone can verify this???
> 
> the server has about a zillion sites on it plus some other services besides
> QMT. The result is that clamd loads de signatures for about 2 minutes hoging
> the CPU during this time, and fails to respond to simscan, originating
> deferals
> for smtp.
> 
> At this point I did som test in other servers and  I  realized that
> 90.3takes a lot
> more time to read the signatures than previous versions.
> 
> Well just my experience since I've seen a lot of pelople with some issues
> with
> 0.90.3.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> -- 
> AM
> agmsoft(at)gmail.com
> 
> 

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Outgoing Domainkeys

[PakOgah]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone had any luck getting QT to sign outgoing messages with Domainkeys? 

Yup, I had

I read somewhere in the wiki that "domainkeys was broken",  but the instructions
regarding the issue point to incoming queue elements. I was able to create the
private/public key pair and update the zone file to reflect these values, but I
can't seem to get it to actually put the value in the header of outgoing emails.

Steps taken:
created /var/qmail/control/domainkeys subdir (tried actual domain name, even
localhost.localdomain for fun)
used dknewkey to create private/public key pair, changed ownership/permissions
on private key
configured DNS with policy & selector records - verified via sourceforge, yahoo,
& skylist
  

the instruction for creating domainkeys is in here
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Domainkeys
have you check them on http://www.dnsstuff.com/ ?
on the hostname test column
choose TXT type and enter the policy and selector records
I get this output

*No TXT records exist for _domainkey.agroup.com, and _domainkey.agroup.com does 
not exist.* [Neg TTL=1800 seconds]

have you tried spf for verification?
it simple and qmt support it also. All you have to do is add spf records 
on you dns zone.
for details and wizard creating spf record, you can go to openspf.org 
and maybe join their milist to consult

updated tcp.smtp with proper DKSIGN value (tried both with % and with absolute
path for single domain)

Is there an error log somewhere that would show DKSIGN failing? Any ideas?

  



-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info

[A M]

Hi,

I just had a server downgrade (due to a fried processor) fom a 3.2 GHz to
a 2.6GHz and from 4GB Ram to 2GB ram and noticed this:

when starting clamd loads the entire database to memory while
doing some sort of checksum verification??? anyone can verify this???

the server has about a zillion sites on it plus some other services besides
QMT. The result is that clamd loads de signatures for about 2 minutes hoging
the CPU during this time, and fails to respond to simscan, originating
deferals
for smtp.

At this point I did som test in other servers and  I  realized that
90.3takes a lot
more time to read the signatures than previous versions.

Well just my experience since I've seen a lot of pelople with some issues
with
0.90.3.

Regards,

--
AM
agmsoft(at)gmail.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] my battle against spam

[davide bozzelli]

Sam Clippinger wrotes

to every spamdyke email I get.

There's no wiki, mailing list, forum, blog at this point only because 
no one has set one up -- spamdyke is just too new.  I'd be happy to 
participate in any of those things but I just don't have the time to 
administer them.  If anyone feels like starting one, let me know. :)


I know this is not the right place to ask but... what about considering 
put  all the greylist stuff in a mysql db ? in this way an array of smtp 
server could share the same greylist infos 



Have fun,
Davide

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] my battle against spam

[Sam Clippinger]

That is a valid concern, though I try to respond to every spamdyke email 
I get.


There's no wiki, mailing list, forum, blog at this point only because no 
one has set one up -- spamdyke is just too new.  I'd be happy to 
participate in any of those things but I just don't have the time to 
administer them.  If anyone feels like starting one, let me know. :)


-- Sam Clippinger

PakOgah wrote:

If spamdyke fixes qmail's dubious logging, I think it's worth rolling
into the toaster immediately! :)



Yup it sure look good and have a lot of nice features but when I check the
website there aren't any type of support like forum, milist or wiki?

only the coder email address, I am not sure if I have a problem will get
quick answer from him. Yes, I hv read those long manual, but then I am
still need a personal guide.
like this milist or openspf's milis...


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] Outgoing Domainkeys

[curt . qt]

Has anyone had any luck getting QT to sign outgoing messages with Domainkeys? I
read somewhere in the wiki that "domainkeys was broken",  but the instructions
regarding the issue point to incoming queue elements. I was able to create the
private/public key pair and update the zone file to reflect these values, but I
can't seem to get it to actually put the value in the header of outgoing emails.

Steps taken:
created /var/qmail/control/domainkeys subdir (tried actual domain name, even
localhost.localdomain for fun)
used dknewkey to create private/public key pair, changed ownership/permissions
on private key
configured DNS with policy & selector records - verified via sourceforge, yahoo,
& skylist
updated tcp.smtp with proper DKSIGN value (tried both with % and with absolute
path for single domain)

Is there an error log somewhere that would show DKSIGN failing? Any ideas?


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] multitail conf

[PakOgah]

A M wrote:



2007/6/18, PakOgah <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>:


A M wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been using multitail for some time version 3.something...
> Anyway during maintenance I've changed somethings on
multitail.conf and
> noticed the color conf I've made for QMT so it follows.
> hope it helps you to read those logs... ;)
>
>

do you a screenshots of it? atleast it'll give me ideas before putting
something to my machine.
and I am using CentOS 4.4 where I should paste those color schemes ?
thx


Hi,

color schemes go in /etc/multitail.conf - I've placed mine at the end 
of default colorschemes.


Sorry, no screenshots, but it simply highlights with relevant colors 
what's going on


eg.: in send log deferrals go yellow, failures go red, and success 
goes bright white


and so on...


oh. so I am only need to create /etc/multitail.conf and put your 
colorschemes there.

Great, now I can see watchall script in color
(looking at Jack hoping it will added to next qmtiso ;P )

thanks, it gave my eye to relax and only react to something in color.


-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] Re: qmailmrtg graph

[daniel nita]

i have installed the qmail toaster with qmailgrapf, in the *`Monthly' Graph
(2 Hour Average) *i see that i have 24weeks and is counting to 0, what is
means, what to expect when is reach 0?
regards

Re: [qmailtoaster] multitail conf

[A M]

2007/6/18, PakOgah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:


A M wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been using multitail for some time version 3.something...
> Anyway during maintenance I've changed somethings on multitail.conf and
> noticed the color conf I've made for QMT so it follows.
> hope it helps you to read those logs... ;)
>
>

do you a screenshots of it? atleast it'll give me ideas before putting
something to my machine.
and I am using CentOS 4.4 where I should paste those color schemes ?
thx

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Hi,

color schemes go in /etc/multitail.conf - I've placed mine at the end of
default colorschemes.

Sorry, no screenshots, but it simply highlights with relevant colors what's
going on

eg.: in send log deferrals go yellow, failures go red, and success goes
bright white

and so on...



--
AM
agmsoft(at)gmail.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] multitail conf

[PakOgah]

A M wrote:

Hi all,

I've been using multitail for some time version 3.something...
Anyway during maintenance I've changed somethings on multitail.conf and
noticed the color conf I've made for QMT so it follows.
hope it helps you to read those logs... ;)




do you a screenshots of it? atleast it'll give me ideas before putting 
something to my machine.

and I am using CentOS 4.4 where I should paste those color schemes ?
thx

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]