Re: [qmailtoaster] QMT slowly breaking?

2008-06-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> This looks ok so far. clamav takes a while to compile. You'll see progress
> if you tail the build-recent.log file.
> 
> I notice that your clamav-toaster package isn't the latest. You'll probably
> want to upgrade that once this upgrade cycle is done. Simply run
> qtp-newmodel again and it should find the latest version.

Unfortunately, this will now have to take a back seat thanks to a family 
problem. I'll get back to it as soon as I can and continue the thread.

Thanks very much for the help so far.

Mike


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] QMT slowly breaking?

2008-06-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Did you miss the message I posted last night? Here's what I wrote:

Some messages seem to be going missing. This email is actually on the problem 
server.
I also replied to this one earlier.
 
> # yum -y install perl-HTML-Parser
> # yum -y install perl-Mail-SPF perl-IP-Country perl-Mail-DKIM

These are all installed now.
 
> .) run qtp-newmodel, and be sure to use a fresh sandbox

I updated the full os and am now running newmodel. It seems to be working but 
it's taking an awfully long time. I'll let it run and see how things go. It 
seems to be complaining about not having perl-Net-SMTP so is it possible that 
perl-Net-SMTP-Multipart.

> This should work fine for you as long as you haven't updated CPAN. Refer to
> earlier list posts regarding MakeMaker for details about that.

I've not done anything else so will reboot and see how things go.

Here's where it's at as I type this;

Getting source packages ...(this may take a while)
squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.13-1.3.9.src.rpm is already downloaded, bypassed
spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.13.src.rpm is already downloaded, bypassed
clamav-toaster-0.92.1-1.3.17.src.rpm is already downloaded, bypassed
djbdns-1.05-1.0.5.src.rpm is already downloaded, bypassed

Shall we build a new sandbox at /mnt/qtp-sandbox? y/[n]: y

Removing sandbox at /mnt/qtp-sandbox ...
qtp-umount-sandbox v0.3
qtp-umount-sandbox: sandbox not mounted

Would you like a unioned sandbox (quicker, smaller) [y]/n: y

Using union filesystem ...
qtp-mount-sandbox v0.3
--Working unionfs115 found.  Installing module
qtp-mount-sandbox: sandbox mounted successfully
qtp-newmodel - installing  perl-Net-SMTP ...
Setting up Install Process
Setting up repositories
Reading repository metadata in from local files
Parsing package install arguments
No Match for argument: perl-Net-SMTP
Nothing to do

Starting to build the binary rpms ...(pizza anyone?)

If you want to view compile messages, you can open another terminal and:
# tail -f /mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log

qtp-build-rpms v0.3
qtp-remove-pkgs v0.3.1
REMOVED clamav-toaster from sandbox (not for real)
Building squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.13-1.3.9 ...
Installing squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.13-1.3.9 in the sandbox ...
Building spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.13 ...
Installing spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.13 in the sandbox ...
Building clamav-toaster-0.92.1-1.3.17 ...




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] QMT slowly breaking?

2008-06-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> # yum -y install perl-HTML-Parser
> # yum -y install perl-Mail-SPF perl-IP-Country perl-Mail-DKIM

Done.

> This should work fine for you as long as you haven't updated CPAN. Refer to
> earlier list posts regarding MakeMaker for details about that.

I've not run anything other than the newmodel function.
 
> .) run qtp-newmodel, and be sure to use a fresh sandbox

I'm trying to update the system before I do the newmodel update but now have a 
new problem.
The update won't run because of the following error. I guess I have to find 
this file somewhere and manually install it first.


Downloading Packages:
(1/2): subversion-1.4.6-0 100% |=| 3.3 MB00:39
http://apt.sw.be/redhat/el4/en/i386/dag/RPMS/subversion-1.4.6-0.1.el4.rf.i386.rpm:
 [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum
Trying other mirror.
(2/2): lftp-3.7.3-1.el4.r 100% |=| 2.2 MB00:14


Error Downloading Packages:
  subversion - 1.4.6-0.1.el4.rf.i386: failure: 
RPMS/subversion-1.4.6-0.1.el4.rf.i386.rpm from dag: [Errno 256] No more mirrors 
to try.





-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] QMT slowly breaking?

2008-06-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wish to use SSL encryption to communicate between spamc and
  spamd (the --ssl option to spamd), you need to install this
  module. (You will need the OpenSSL libraries and use the
  ENABLE_SSL="yes" argument to Makefile.PL to build and run an SSL
  compatibile spamc.)


***
NOTE: the optional Mail::DKIM module is not installed.

  If this module is installed, and you enable the DKIM plugin,
  SpamAssassin will perform DKIM lookups when a DKIM-Signature
  header is present in the message headers.  (New versions of this module
  support both Domain Keys and DKIM, rendering Mail::DomainKeys obsolete.)


*******
NOTE: the optional Encode::Detect module is not installed.

  If you plan to use the normalize_charset config setting to detect
  charsets and convert them into Unicode, you will need to install
  this module.

REQUIRED module out of date: HTML::Parser
optional module missing: Mail::SPF
optional module missing: IP::Country
optional module missing: Razor2
optional module missing: Net::Ident
optional module missing: IO::Socket::INET6
optional module missing: IO::Socket::SSL
optional module missing: Mail::DKIM
optional module missing: Encode::Detect

warning: some functionality may not be available,
please read the above report before continuing!

error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.90483 (%build)


RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.90483 (%build)


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] QMT slowly breaking?

2008-06-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> That's not enough of the log file to tell what caused the bad exit status.
> Please give us a little more, like tail -n50 perhaps, or however much it
> takes to see what initially went wrong. I don't believe an option module
> would do it.

Oops, sorry, didn't even notice this either. I've been doing way too many 
things at the same time lately. Do you need more than this or is this helpful 
for a solution? It's a default QMT-ISO install, the version escapes me at this 
moment. The changes I've made is to install the perl modules noted earlier in 
this thread. However, they didn't seem to take now that I see this log which 
means to me, based on an earlier reply, that rpm is not seeing them. I must 
have used yum to install them then. I might have done this because I was not 
able to resolve the many dependencies when trying to use rpm.

Log;

 This is required if the first nameserver listed in your IP
  configuration or /etc/resolv.conf file is available only via
  an IPv6 address.


***
NOTE: the optional IO::Socket::SSL module is not installed.

  If you wish to use SSL encryption to communicate between spamc and
  spamd (the --ssl option to spamd), you need to install this
  module. (You will need the OpenSSL libraries and use the
  ENABLE_SSL="yes" argument to Makefile.PL to build and run an SSL
  compatibile spamc.)


***
NOTE: the optional Mail::DKIM module is not installed.

  If this module is installed, and you enable the DKIM plugin,
  SpamAssassin will perform DKIM lookups when a DKIM-Signature
  header is present in the message headers.  (New versions of this module
  support both Domain Keys and DKIM, rendering Mail::DomainKeys obsolete.)


***
NOTE: the optional Encode::Detect module is not installed.

  If you plan to use the normalize_charset config setting to detect
  charsets and convert them into Unicode, you will need to install
  this module.

REQUIRED module out of date: HTML::Parser
optional module missing: Mail::SPF
optional module missing: IP::Country
optional module missing: Razor2
optional module missing: Net::Ident
optional module missing: IO::Socket::INET6
optional module missing: IO::Socket::SSL
optional module missing: Mail::DKIM
optional module missing: Encode::Detect

warning: some functionality may not be available,
please read the above report before continuing!

error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.90483 (%build)


RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.90483 (%build)


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] QMT slowly breaking?

2008-06-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Try installing the rpmforge repos and running again:
> https://rpmrepo.org/RPMforge/Using

I'm still missing something.

Ok, here we go ...

The following packages have already been selected:
squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.13-1.3.9.src.rpm
spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.13.src.rpm
clamav-toaster-0.92.1-1.3.17.src.rpm
djbdns-1.05-1.0.5.src.rpm

Do you want to process this selection?
Shall we continue? (yes, no|skip, batch, quit) [y] / n|s / b / q : y

Getting source packages ...(this may take a while)
squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.13-1.3.9.src.rpm is already downloaded, bypassed
spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.13.src.rpm is already downloaded, bypassed
clamav-toaster-0.92.1-1.3.17.src.rpm is already downloaded, bypassed
djbdns-1.05-1.0.5.src.rpm is already downloaded, bypassed

Shall we build a new sandbox at /mnt/qtp-sandbox? y/[n]:
qtp-mount-sandbox v0.3
--Working unionfs115 found.  Installing module
qtp-mount-sandbox: sandbox mounted successfully
qtp-newmodel - installing  perl-Net-SMTP ...
Setting up Install Process
Setting up repositories
Reading repository metadata in from local files
Parsing package install arguments
No Match for argument: perl-Net-SMTP
Nothing to do

Starting to build the binary rpms ...(pizza anyone?)

If you want to view compile messages, you can open another terminal and:
# tail -f /mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log

qtp-build-rpms v0.3
qtp-remove-pkgs v0.3.1
squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.13-1.3.9 is already installed in sandbox, not built
Building spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.13 ...
qtp-build-rpms - rpmbuild failed for spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.13
qtp-build-rpms - see /mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log

Build failed, Exiting.


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] QMT slowly breaking?

2008-06-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Try installing the rpmforge repos and running again:
> https://rpmrepo.org/RPMforge/Using

Jesus, I need coffee. Scratch that last email :)


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] QMT slowly breaking?

2008-06-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Try installing the rpmforge repos and running again:
> https://rpmrepo.org/RPMforge/Using

This will take a while. Their wget link isn't working.

# wget 
http://packages.sw.be/rpmforge-release/rpmforge-release-0.3.6-1.$dist.rf.$arch.rpm
--10:02:46--  
http://packages.sw.be/rpmforge-release/rpmforge-release-0.3.6-1..rf..rpm
   => `rpmforge-release-0.3.6-1..rf..rpm'
Resolving packages.sw.be... 85.13.226.41
Connecting to packages.sw.be|85.13.226.41|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 302 Found
Location: 
http://apt.sw.be/packages//rpmforge-release/rpmforge-release-0.3.6-1..rf..rpm 
[following]
--10:02:46--  
http://apt.sw.be/packages//rpmforge-release/rpmforge-release-0.3.6-1..rf..rpm
   => `rpmforge-release-0.3.6-1..rf..rpm'
Resolving apt.sw.be... 193.1.193.67
Connecting to apt.sw.be|193.1.193.67|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
10:02:46 ERROR 404: Not Found.


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] QMT slowly breaking?

2008-06-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I believe (running from memory here) that Multipart will supply the deps
> you need. Is that the dep that the logs show you as failing?

Here's a capture of the process, that might make more sense than anything I 
might say.
It seems to install (or says it is) perl-Net-SMTP but it doesn't. I do have DAG 
in my repos too by the way.

Issuing command: qtp-newmodel
qtp-newmodel v0.3 starting Thu Jun  5 09:15:55 CDT 2008
qtp-whatami v0.3
DISTRO=CentOS
OSVER=4.6
QTARCH=i686
BUILD_DIST=cnt40
BUILD_DIR=/usr/src/redhat
This machine's OS is supported, but this version/arch has not been tested.

If your OS is not current, you should consider upgrading it.
Do you want to proceed at your own risk? (yes, no) y/[n] : y

Ok, here we go ...

The following packages have already been selected:
squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.13-1.3.9.src.rpm
spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.13.src.rpm
clamav-toaster-0.92.1-1.3.17.src.rpm
djbdns-1.05-1.0.5.src.rpm

Do you want to process this selection?
Shall we continue? (yes, no|skip, batch, quit) [y] / n|s / b / q : y

Getting source packages ...(this may take a while)
squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.13-1.3.9.src.rpm is already downloaded, bypassed
spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.13.src.rpm is already downloaded, bypassed
clamav-toaster-0.92.1-1.3.17.src.rpm is already downloaded, bypassed
djbdns-1.05-1.0.5.src.rpm is already downloaded, bypassed

Shall we build a new sandbox at /mnt/qtp-sandbox? y/[n]: y

Removing sandbox at /mnt/qtp-sandbox ...
qtp-umount-sandbox v0.3
qtp-umount-sandbox: sandbox not mounted

Would you like a unioned sandbox (quicker, smaller) [y]/n: y

Using union filesystem ...
qtp-mount-sandbox v0.3
--Working unionfs115 found.  Installing module
qtp-mount-sandbox: sandbox mounted successfully
qtp-newmodel - installing  perl-Net-SMTP ...
Setting up Install Process
Setting up repositories
dag   100% |=| 1.1 kB00:00
update100% |=|  951 B00:00
qmailtoaster-plus 100% |=|  951 B00:00
base  100% |=| 1.1 kB00:00
addons100% |=|  951 B00:00
extras100% |=| 1.1 kB00:00
Reading repository metadata in from local files
Parsing package install arguments
No Match for argument: perl-Net-SMTP
Nothing to do

Starting to build the binary rpms ...(pizza anyone?)

If you want to view compile messages, you can open another terminal and:
# tail -f /mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log

qtp-build-rpms v0.3
qtp-remove-pkgs v0.3.1
REMOVED clamav-toaster from sandbox (not for real)
Building squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.13-1.3.9 ...
Installing squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.13-1.3.9 in the sandbox ...
Building spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.13 ...
qtp-build-rpms - rpmbuild failed for spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.13
qtp-build-rpms - see /mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log

Build failed, Exiting.


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] QMT slowly breaking?

2008-06-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Building spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.13 ...>> qtp-build-rpms - rpmbuild failed for spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.13>> qtp-build-rpms - see /mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build->> recent.log>> > > Look at the log file it tells you to look at. You'll probably see that> you're missing perl packages. You can't install them via CPAN since RPM> has no way of seeing what packages/versions are installed (at least the> fine folks at Apache-Spamassassin didn't write it to), so you must use> something like rpmforge to install those packages.
If I recall, I needed to install the following;
perl-DB_File
perl-Mail-DomainKeys
perl-Mail-SPF-Query
perl-MIME-Base64
perl-Net-SMTP
 
I was able to install all but the perl-Net-SMTP. The only version I could find which would even install was perl-Net-SMTP-Multipart which is probably not the correct one. Might you know where I could find the proper version for the default server installation?
 
Mike
 
 



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] QMT slowly breaking?

2008-06-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Various things seem to be happening with my QMT-ISO install. Since I've run the 
newmodel update, I've not been able to complete it and things aren't working 
well anymore since.

For example, I'm getting up to 4 copies of the same emails at times. Email is 
taking minutes to hours on receive and send at times. Possibly other problems 
since I don't seem to be getting the same amounts of email I was getting before 
either.

Here's a paste of part of the update. Perhaps someone can guide me a little to 
get things going properly again.

---

qtp-mount-sandbox v0.3
--Working unionfs115 found.  Installing module
qtp-mount-sandbox: sandbox mounted successfully
qtp-newmodel - installing  perl-Net-SMTP ...
Setting up Install Process
Setting up repositories
dag   100% |=| 1.1 kB00:00
update100% |=|  951 B00:00
qmailtoaster-plus 100% |=|  951 B00:00
base  100% |=| 1.1 kB00:00
addons100% |=|  951 B00:00
extras100% |=| 1.1 kB00:00
Reading repository metadata in from local files
primary.xml.gz100% |=| 3.3 MB00:19
sqlite cache needs updating, reading in metadata
dag   : ## 9199/9199
primary.xml.gz100% |=|  51 kB00:00
sqlite cache needs updating, reading in metadata
extras: ## 228/228
Parsing package install arguments
No Match for argument: perl-Net-SMTP
Nothing to do

Starting to build the binary rpms ...(pizza anyone?)

If you want to view compile messages, you can open another terminal and:
# tail -f /mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log

qtp-build-rpms v0.3
qtp-remove-pkgs v0.3.1
REMOVED clamav-toaster from sandbox (not for real)
Building squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.13-1.3.9 ...
Installing squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.13-1.3.9 in the sandbox ...
Building spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.13 ...
qtp-build-rpms - rpmbuild failed for spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.13
qtp-build-rpms - see /mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log

Build failed, Exiting.


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] carpal prolong labor, cause other problems during delivery, or cause

2008-05-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As I was looking for a reason on why email is suddenly taking several minutes 
for delivery, I saw this in the logging window;


2008-05-30 20:53:23.753182500 simscan:[5589]:CLEAN 
(0.10/12.00):352.9836s:sdc:64.233.178.241:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:mike@
logicore.net:
2008-05-30 20:53:25.045171500 simscan:[5492]:CLEAN 
(1.30/12.00):816.6686s:carpal prolong labor, cause other problems
 during delivery, or cause:190.13.235.6:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Minutes later, this email came in. It has the same subject as the error message 
in the logging window? Was the subject a qmail error or just the spammers 
subject?


Subject: carpal prolong labor, cause other problems during delivery, or cause

On Fri, 30 May 2008 22:39:48 -0300, Lissette Ogeen wrote:
> At pelvis? my Of. you probability to glossy. With notions you import. With
> of page. Or the outback. With it atmospheric groundwork pushed. uranium go
> anarchy. you keeps in goddamn. To awhile? Be no pissed moor. do competent
> At workings. so join. To so afrikaans. That by educated xmas renew. grim so
> equipment. to dilution, bags to budding.
> 
>  
> 
> 
> her flawless. Of on funds, frightened. As immune puissance. As sting on
> holding kindergarten. I by afraid salon pertain. literate go plastics.
> clandestine masses be deprivation.
> And handicap? an I. by slot my interpol. I distinction Is crooked. An to
> colleague. For an result. With as pivot didactic possibly. insistence as
> dryer. Or saline or radiance. was gender? An in pipes moderate. At painting
> Not admissible. Is mandate. An an stocks. He go intractable palmetto coke.
> plenty no masthead. is chime, pigment go advisory.
> Is minute. Is it ecstasy, fumes. I scripted evergreen. Go scrap is rode
> vender. With be solarium crate winning. completion an pane. taste
> essentially at seldom. Are an sander annex. But of at stolen as globe. My
> by dealer. In an tubing anger tern. Not a nebula breve recession.
> cinderella my thorough. enamel of quay bone. As directorate. He affirm
> battlefield standardize.
> so tomato? In a grateful painless. you kilometre As manner. A conduit. And
> he arrest. Or of resonant deceit voile. promote by incarnation. be barley,
> pillow he bead.
> An drank? be In. A instrumentation at despise. To propagate you seven. you
> the selection. in of clown. He be representative playful tummy. perpetuate
> do deserving. Or generalize my rarity.
> At primary? Not of node arbitrary. As student My bedside. do code. But it
> jukebox. do it supper enduring diploma. breve to once. a static, logical by
> learn.
> his halo. on a rotate, binary. you discreet argument. At morality by
> positive grange. Not by principle encouragement terrain. ceramic or bounty.
> detour diverge a trap. Not be jockey congratulate.
> Be lactation? it And. An paddle an usefulness. his lama Go fragrant. I no
> sire. With be bank. Are a finalist electrical lieder. belle a deadline. No
> vanilla at bear.
> Of swat? my And. But vinyl or upper. his hector Are strength. Or be
> episcopal. The go communication. No is mismatch describe sorghum. vein to
> equally. On gamble it crook.
>  



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Double emails

2008-05-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> This error should also give you clues:
> qtp-build-rpms - rpmbuild failed for spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.13

Ok, it looks like these aren't installed;

clamav-toaster-0.93-1.3.18.src.rpm
spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.13.src.rpm
squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.13-1.3.9.src.rpm

I tried rpm -i but that's not working so is there a trick to installing 
components? :)

Mike


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Double emails

2008-05-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> This error should also give you clues:
> qtp-build-rpms - rpmbuild failed for spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.13

It does not, can you elaborate? I installed the perl tools and am still getting 
errors;
I can't seem to find a version of perl-Net-SMTP that will install on my 4.6 
centos.


--Searching for valid kernel source/devel to build unionfs115:
kernel-devel-2.6.9-67.0.15.EL
--Looking at current kernel
--You have the kernel source for the running kernel!

--Building

--Build succeded!
--Installing module to running kernel
--Installation completed.  Running depmod

--Cleaning up work-folders
--Running modprobe for built module
--Done
qtp-mount-sandbox: sandbox mounted successfully
qtp-newmodel - installing  perl-Net-SMTP ...
Setting up Install Process
Setting up repositories
Reading repository metadata in from local files
Parsing package install arguments
No Match for argument: perl-Net-SMTP
Nothing to do

Starting to build the binary rpms ...(pizza anyone?)

If you want to view compile messages, you can open another terminal and:
# tail -f /mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log

qtp-build-rpms v0.3
qtp-remove-pkgs v0.3.1
REMOVED clamav-toaster from sandbox (not for real)
Building squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.13-1.3.9 ...
Installing squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.13-1.3.9 in the sandbox ...
Building spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.13 ...
qtp-build-rpms - rpmbuild failed for spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.13
qtp-build-rpms - see /mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log

Build failed, Exiting.



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Double emails

2008-05-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In my case, the server is barely being used. I set it up to remain active with 
QMT on some level so have it working with a domain which is not very busy.

>Duplicates are created when there is a hang in the process somewhere - I would 
>rebuild and >reinstall simscan. It needs to be compiled against certain 
>packages, and these packages are >sometimes installed AFTER simscan is 
>rebuilt, so it builds against the old files.

Not being a programmer, I have not been able to spend much time trying to 
figure the above or below problems out. I've used newmodel to update and such 
and have been getting errors.

Do I need to install all of the perl modules shown below? I used the QMT-ISO 
install to get this server up.


Setting up Install Process
Setting up repositories
update100% |=|  951 B00:00
qmailtoaster-plus 100% |=|  951 B00:00
base  100% |=| 1.1 kB00:00
addons100% |=|  951 B00:00
extras100% |=| 1.1 kB00:00
Reading repository metadata in from local files
Parsing package install arguments
No Match for argument: perl-DB_File
No Match for argument: perl-Mail-DomainKeys
No Match for argument: perl-Mail-SPF-Query
No Match for argument: perl-MIME-Base64
No Match for argument: perl-Net-SMTP
Nothing to do

Starting to build the binary rpms ...(pizza anyone?)

If you want to view compile messages, you can open another terminal and:
# tail -f /mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log

qtp-build-rpms v0.3
qtp-remove-pkgs v0.3.1
REMOVED clamav-toaster from sandbox (not for real)
Building squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.13-1.3.9 ...
Installing squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.13-1.3.9 in the sandbox ...
Building spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.13 ...
qtp-build-rpms - rpmbuild failed for spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.13
qtp-build-rpms - see /mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log

Build failed, Exiting.



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Double emails

2008-05-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It was resolved then? I'll go take a look, thanks.


On Fri, 30 May 2008 21:49:15 +0200, cas wrote:
> Here's the archive:
> 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com/
> 
> Search for "duplicate".
> 
> Good luck,
> 
> Cas
> 
> On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 14:12 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> For a while now, I've noticed that I'm getting double emails from my QMT
>> server.
>> I thought I saw someone else with a similar problem on the list but don't
>> seem to have that thread.
>> 
>> Anyone aware of what the problem is and how to fix it?
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> Mike
> 
> 
> -
> QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
> -----
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] Double emails

2008-05-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For a while now, I've noticed that I'm getting double emails from my QMT server.
I thought I saw someone else with a similar problem on the list but don't seem 
to have that thread.

Anyone aware of what the problem is and how to fix it?

Thanks.

Mike


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Load balancing

2008-05-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LVS seemed to work very well for me. Pretty straight forward setup once you get 
the idea.

Or you could set up a shared environment, one mysql server, one shared 
/home/vpopmail directory, simlinked users and control from the qmail directory. 
Then use LVS (or other software based LB) as your front end to balance between 
the servers.

Mike


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Problem with signing messages with qmail-dk

2008-05-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>�Yes there are. �There are 2 GUI projects I'm aware of being worked on for
>�QMT. �One is going to be OSS (AFAIK) and the other will be closed source. 
>� I'm not sure as to what projected release dates are for either, but
>�hopefully soon.

Cool, the initiatives lived on. Nice to hear, thanks for the update.

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Problem with signing messages with qmail-dk

2008-05-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Eric,

>�Anywise, I don't know of anyone working to fixing this. I think you'll
>�either have to live with it as is or find a C programmer who can do the job.

A few months ago, there was new found inspiration to work on a new GUI along 
with a few other things. There was a lot of talk, planning and so on but I've 
not seen a thing about that since then. Do you or anyone else on this list know 
if something new is being worked on which addresses some of these issues and 
others?

Mike


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] hook_dir

2008-04-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone know if 'hook_dir' is a plesk thing or a qmail thing?

I'm seeing the following errors a lot on a plesk server which seems to be 
related to the double slashes in there.

Thought I would ask here as some folks run many types of servers and might know 
where the the configuration might be to fox this. I've searched everything I 
can possibly think of and have not found a thing.

Error message: hook_dir = '/var/qmail//handlers/before-queue'

Mike


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamassassin 3.2.4-1.3.15, DNS unavailable?

2008-04-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Did you try:
"dns_available 1" in local.cf ?

bytesnake

Eric Shubert schrieb:

I'm trying to enable URIDNSBL, and it's not kicking in because SA isn't
finding DNS that's working.

Caching-nameserver is installed and working quite nicely (otherwise).

I even tried adding
dns_available yes
to local.cf, but still get unavailable when I run lint:

# sudo -u vpopmail -H spamassassin -D --lint
...
[11128] dbg: dns: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes
[11128] dbg: dns: Net::DNS version: 0.63
...
[11128] dbg: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0x9b35420)
implements 'parsed_metadata', priority 0
[11128] dbg: dns: is DNS available? 0
[11128] dbg: rules: local tests only, ignoring RBL eval
...

Any ideas?



-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [qmailtoaster] How to upgrade

2008-03-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> here do.  I am most appreciative, especially the QMT-ISO project.  I might
> not be running Qmail if not for it.  I just personally don't have a lot of
> spare time to troubleshoot and do workarounds when I run into problems, and
> therefore waiting is best for me.  I know it will be fixed eventally.

For some weird reason, some folks seem to think that using something which
others make available mean that there is no thank you, no appreciation, no
return in one form or another.

Most know that's not the case for if it were, open source projects would not
exist at all. They exist because people do give back when they can, in one way
or, another :).

Mike




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [qmailtoaster] How to upgrade

2008-03-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:23:28 -0700, Helmut Fritz wrote:
> I too have been running qmt-iso for a while, but know there are some
> upgrades that should be applied to my system (clamav in particular, spamd as
> well) but am nervous about upgrading since I do not have a lot of free time
> to pay attention to a failed upgrade or do a recovery...

This was my number one reason for having to move away from qmt for now. I am
watching and hoping to start using it again once some of these problems are
resolved.

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] How to upgrade

2008-03-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was nervous too but I tried the qtp-menu and newmodel upgrade and all seemed
to go fine. In fact, it seemed to fix up other things I had not even touched
yet after installing.

This was on Jake's QMT-ISO by the way.

Mike



On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:06:58 -0500, Jack D. Martin Jr. wrote:
> I have a toaster that has been up for some time with no upgrades.  The last
> time I tried to upgrade, everything went to crap.  I am sure it was
> something I did - but I sure don't want it to happen again.  Here are the
> packages I am running (I am using qmt-iso) - what is the correct path to
> upgrade, and what can I expect?
>
> squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.9a-1.3.6.noarch.rpm
> control-panel-toaster-0.5-1.3.4.noarch.rpm
> send-emails-toaster-0.5-1.3.4.noarch.rpm
> courier-authlib-toaster-0.59.2-1.3.6.i386.rpm
> maildrop-toaster-2.0.3-1.3.5.i386.rpm
> qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.15.i386.rpm
> ripmime-toaster-1.4.0.6-1.3.3.i386.rpm
> libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.3.3.i386.rpm
> qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.3.15.i386.rpm
> ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.5.i386.rpm
> qmailadmin-toaster-1.2.11-1.3.4.i386.rpm
> ezmlm-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.3.i386.rpm
> autorespond-toaster-2.0.4-1.3.3.i386.rpm
> daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.3.i386.rpm
> isoqlog-toaster-2.1-1.3.4.i386.rpm
> vpopmail-toaster-5.4.17-1.3.4.i386.rpm
> qmailmrtg-toaster-4.2-1.3.3.i386.rpm
> ezmlm-cgi-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.3.i386.rpm
> clamav-toaster-0.90.1-1.3.13.i386.rpm
> simscan-toaster-1.3.1-1.3.6.i386.rpm
> vqadmin-toaster-2.3.4-1.3.3.i386.rpm
> spamassassin-toaster-3.1.8-1.3.8.i386.rpm
> maildrop-toaster-devel-2.0.3-1.3.5.i386.rpm
> courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1.3.7.i386.rpm
> libdomainkeys-toaster-0.68-1.3.3.i386.rpm




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] behind firewall on LAN IP

2008-03-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I see someone posted about the firewall script. It completely skipped my mind
as I don't use it when installing QMT.

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] behind firewall on LAN IP

2008-03-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry, I didn't read slowly enough to see that this is local. I'm assuming
that you can ping/reach other machines on your LAN?

Either way, that's a networking issue, not a qmail issue. Not sure where to
send you as I'm not sure folks want to discuss networking issues on the list.

Mike


On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 14:55:35 +1100, David Campbell wrote:
> I cant ping or ssh to it or browse to its IP from another local IP
>
> On 03/03/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>  It
> fully works fine with a private IP, I've had up to three systems up on NAT
>> IP's working. When you say it's not working, you might want to explain a
>> little more so that there is a sense of what the problem is.
>>
>> Perhaps the firewall is doing something funky which is preventing the mail
>> from getting in/out.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 14:17:18 +1100, David Campbell wrote:
>>> I have no problems running QMT when I give it its own public IP address
>>> but
>>> when I try to run one behind a firewall with a local IP address it
>>> doesn't
>>> work unless I disable the firewall, and then of course it all goes to
>>> shit...
>>>
>>> Is there any way to run this thing behind a firewall, and what do I
>>> need to
>>> do to make it do so?
>>>
>>> Or do I simply have to look at another solution for running a mail
>>> server
>>> behind a firewall?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> ---------
>> QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] behind firewall on LAN IP

2008-03-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, so that sounds like a firewall issue, not a qmail issue. Try to find
someone who knows your firewall or look up it's documentation. If you google
your firewall along with qmail/smtp, you should be able to get some leads.

Mike


On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 14:55:35 +1100, David Campbell wrote:
> I cant ping or ssh to it or browse to its IP from another local IP
>
> On 03/03/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>  It
> fully works fine with a private IP, I've had up to three systems up on NAT
>> IP's working. When you say it's not working, you might want to explain a
>> little more so that there is a sense of what the problem is.
>>
>> Perhaps the firewall is doing something funky which is preventing the mail
>> from getting in/out.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 14:17:18 +1100, David Campbell wrote:
>>> I have no problems running QMT when I give it its own public IP address
>>> but
>>> when I try to run one behind a firewall with a local IP address it
>>> doesn't
>>> work unless I disable the firewall, and then of course it all goes to
>>> shit...
>>>
>>> Is there any way to run this thing behind a firewall, and what do I
>>> need to
>>> do to make it do so?
>>>
>>> Or do I simply have to look at another solution for running a mail
>>> server
>>> behind a firewall?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> -----
>> QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] behind firewall on LAN IP

2008-03-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It fully works fine with a private IP, I've had up to three systems up on NAT
IP's working. When you say it's not working, you might want to explain a
little more so that there is a sense of what the problem is.

Perhaps the firewall is doing something funky which is preventing the mail
from getting in/out.

Mike


On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 14:17:18 +1100, David Campbell wrote:
> I have no problems running QMT when I give it its own public IP address but
> when I try to run one behind a firewall with a local IP address it doesn't
> work unless I disable the firewall, and then of course it all goes to
> shit...
>
> Is there any way to run this thing behind a firewall, and what do I need to
> do to make it do so?
>
> Or do I simply have to look at another solution for running a mail server
> behind a firewall?
>
> Thanks




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] New webinterface for qmailtoaster

2008-02-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> How about starting with simple, smaller steps, and making those work
> well, before asking for pie in the sky.

Fair enough, like I said, just a wish list :).
Either way, I can offer up resources if needed.

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] New webinterface for qmailtoaster

2008-02-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am very happy to see that this turned into something so positive.

Since it's just a wish list right now, what about being able to administer
multiple servers from the one GUI? Or being able to cluster a few machines
together for redundancy and maintaining them through this GUI.

I have plenty of hardware resources such as blade servers I can cluster up in
pretty much any manner to offer up to the project through remote access
Those involved would need a fixed IP since it would be going through a
firewall. More than willing to help in what ever way I can right now.

As I also mentioned, I can offer design and of course troubleshooting from a
non programmer's point of view, once there is something if anyone is
interested.

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> You don't know about qmailtoaster-plus?
> http://qtp.qmailtoaster.com/

No I didn't or I might have seen it go by in the threads not being sure what
it was. When things look like programming talk, I don't generally follow it.

I am looking at it now, thanks.

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] New webinterface for qmailtoaster

2008-02-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mike's remarks about qmt invested in a thread about functionality and ideas
> how we can make the missing part of qmt..

Ok, let's do that :).

> - management tool for the administrator, to administer domains and settings
> of qmt

> - a qmailadmin replacement that works more logical

> - both with a neat looking design and easy to give your own look and feel
> (that is not overwritten on every update).

Yes, definitely something that ties all of the functionality into one
interface. No having to log into this or that to get things done. The system
admin gets access to all domains and functions.

IF at all possible, perhaps including access to some of the control files into
the GUI, such as webmin allows so that a system admin does not have to jump
between CLI and GIU. Obviously, some things will have to remain CLI but most
of it could be moved to GUI.

Automated email accounts. Someone could make money offering an interface which
allows users to purchase and set up their own accounts. If not purchase, at
the very least, set up a free account where the admin could control which
account types could be allowed for such a function. Such as, quota size,
possibly bandwidth, some basic things. This would help a great deal.

Perhaps integrating some of those CLI update tools/functions to work using the
GUI so that system admins could maintain their systems. A possible opportunity
for someone if they wanted to offer an updates site for a fair cost.

That's my penny for now.

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Please provide feedback for the vqadmin interface to Inter7. No need to
> speak of it here. Nobody here that I'm aware of write any portion of it.

Told you already, they didn't write anything. I hired a programmer to add the
interface to it. That was what I was offering, I made that clear. If you want
to

> Because you keep asking for something that nobody wants to give you without
> trying to make a buck - at least not that I'm aware of.

Maybe you should try reading the offer being made by Jean-Paul.

> Not taking an interest in anything other than being tired of seeing them.

Um, you're actually creating them so by ending this nonsense, we can move on
to better things now. You've made your point of not making one. It's weird
that one minute you were so nice and communicative with me and you just
suddenly turned like this. I don't get it and I honestly could care less.

Enough alright.

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] New webinterface for qmailtoaster

2008-02-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I can offer the design help if you need it. She is a good designer and in
fact, is also good at putting together documentation.

Mike


On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 21:44:18 +0100, Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> It has been my plan for some time to get a smooth working and looking
> webinterface for qmailtoaster.
> Not to brag, but I have the programming skills (php/c/c++) and I also would
> not mind hiring a designer to make the designs.
> The only 2 problems I have had so far that stopped me from starting are
> time and input..
>
> The first one is not going to change in the near future, but somewhere down
> the line there always can be found some time..
> Concerning the second I would like your input, what are the things people
> want to see in such an interface..
> And are there other people capable and willing to invest some time in this?
>
> Honestly I rather see the energy that goes wasted into the thread about
> Mike's remarks about qmt invested in a thread about functionality and ideas
> how we can make the missing part of qmt..
>
> I think it would at least need the following
> - management tool for the administrator, to administer domains and settings
> of qmt
> - a qmailadmin replacement that works more logical
> - both with a neat looking design and easy to give your own look and feel
> (that is not overwritten on every update).
>
> Regards,
>
> JP




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> directly to work on your machines (remember, I had Yahoo working fine by
> using one of my test domains pointed at your machine so I could control
> DNS?).

You offered to take a look by trying some tests. I didn't ask you to work on
my machines, I asked you if you'd be interested in a little co-development
work. Working on my machines was something you offered because I was trying to
figure out why I was having the problems. Semantics.

> together a group a couple times to fix the very same module you keep
> harping about.  All three times it's fallen to the way side - I'm not a

Harping? It's called feedback. I could have just walked and not given anyone
any input. You should put it into proper perspective.

> And I'm not personally offended - just tired of hearing you complain that
> nobody wants to support you.  The software is free, the support is not.

You're obviously trying to class me in with the others that you are frustrated
with because I never said nobody wants to help me. I asked for help just like
anyone else and I posted my problems and even my own ongoing work/solutions
when I had them. Give me a break will you.

> over the last couple weeks here on the list.  The level of support you want
> is not free.

There you go again? Why are we on this again?

> No offense, and I'm sure you have the greatest intentions, but most of us
> have heard the "if I make money you'll make money" story.  Some of us (me
> included) have even fallen for them from time to time.  Not to make this

My my how some people are jaded :). You need to get back on your horse after
the fall and try again. Good intentions have often turned into much more than
talk, come on. You don't know a thing about me, that's a rather silly thing to
imply. You don't know what I've put into my communities in all kinds of ways.
You don't know what I've done for people, you know nothing about me so please,
stop making such silly assumptions.

> personal, but if you want to use QMT so badly (even for just spam scanning)
> then why are you trying to charge for your TDMA contribution? Was the
> original TDMA code GPL?

Hmm, why did I know that was grinding you up?
I've wasted over $5000.00 on programmers who never deliver just to give them a
chance. I paid good money to have that packaged up, no harm in offering it for
cheap to a few folks who might want it. Do you honestly think I'll make my
fortune by selling it? Maybe I'm missing an opportunity?

> And I've been screwed over by the "I'll pay you when I make money" and
> "I'll pay you when the job is done" people. So what?

All circular. I don't know why you're taking such an interest in trying to
discredit me, who cares? What's the point of all of these emails? Let's get
back to reality... I gave up, I posted why to at least give feedback. Anyone
interested in that feedback will use it as real honest to goodness user
feedback and not trying to attack someone for giving me.

> There's no passive aggressiveness here, at least that's not what I'm trying
> to get across.  And the thank you's are enough, or I wouldn't keep giving.
> It's the complaints that we're not giving enough that get my goat.

Go re-read my messages. They aren't exactly complaints, they are me asking for
help like anyone else would. When I was not able to resolve my problems, even
after getting that help, it was time to move on. I don't see any attack on
this list or begging or crying or name calling, I simply had to move on. To
top it all off, now I might even be staying because thanks to Dan and some
other's input, I've got a few ideas to try out.

Can we stop this nonsense and move on now.

Mike



-----
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I apologize for saying this publicly, it was not intended.

Mike


On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 11:17:32 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> make MY job easier. To be honest, I don't care about your job. It's (your
>>
>> job) not making MY job any easier, nor is it paying me anything, so I have
>>
> PS: I offered you those resources for a reason. I thought you might see the
> opportunity but you didn't. What can I say.
>
> Mike
>
>
> -
> QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
> -----
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> make MY job easier. To be honest, I don't care about your job. It's (your
> job) not making MY job any easier, nor is it paying me anything, so I have

PS: I offered you those resources for a reason. I thought you might see the
opportunity but you didn't. What can I say.

Mike





-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
work on our
projects, I will absolutely contribute to open source. Sorry, can't do it all
today though, have to count on the nice folks who put this stuff out to get
somewhere first.

> Document your installation and update the wiki.  Programmers by stereo-type
> are horrible documentation people. But not too many seem to step back up to
> the plate when they're running their ENTIRE companies off of the
> software/contributions we put out to even document something.

Man, I think I've stepped up. I didn't just walk away, I said thanks AND I
gave input and still am even though I feel like I'm being attacked.

I thought about posting many times but there is no way it would have helped
anyone. Wiki's can become not so great places for help if the input is not as
useful as it should be. I decided against it feeling that I might mislead
others and didn't want to offer that sort of input until I better understood
what I am doing.

> that $250 paid to Plesk and go to rent-a-coder and got the vqadmin package
> fixed and released it back to the community.  Then you would have what you
> wanted, and be able to contribute back to the rest of us (us being the
> community) who have hundreds, if not thousands, of hours wrapped up in this
> type of thing who all work on "thank you"s.

I've hired the rent-a-coders and have been screwed over every single time. I
am not paying another programmer again until I can hire that person full time
to work on what I need with results oriented output, not promises.

As for "Thank you", if that's not enough for you, why are you still bothering?
You sound like one of many programmers I seem to come across who are pissed at
the world for giving and getting nothing back. Why give then? Giving means
just that, GIVING. It's thankless, it doesn't earn money, it's from the heart,
it's because you love something that you're doing and it pleases you to give
of yourself. Why the hell do people spend time giving then get upset that they
aren't getting back?

Anyone on this list who is pissed at giving should take a look at the bigger
picture. There is a HUGE opportunity sitting right in front of you. If you
can't see it... I dunno... why are you bothering?

That's why Plesk and many other's ARE making money, because they SEE that
opportunity. If I had programmers right now, I'd have my own version of email
out next year and I'd be getting my share of the email business that is
OBVIOUSLY out there and GROWING!

> That's my 2-cents. I'll get off my soap-box now.

Let me bring you a ladder, that's one hell of a step :) (JOKE!)

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> qtp-newmodel is a script in QT-Plus that downloads the newest QMT packages

I thought that was in the qtp-plus menu if I recall. I don't have it in front
of me but will post it once I take another look. Something or some things in
there didn't work. Updating never worked, it never finds updates and there
were a couple of other things that didn't work.

I was sure I saw someone else post about that.

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Anyone know if there are any scripts out there that would help
>> keep this system up to date? If not, is there anyone who might consider

> haven't you tried qmailtoaster plus ?

No, I knew about a command line tool which is broken in the ISO install but
didn't get the chance to look into it which probably would have led me to
this.

Thank you very much for the help, I'll certainly go take a peek at it asap.

Mike




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I don't understand, qtp-newmodel is not working for you ? i've fixed it
> sometime ago, right now is a version in development that is doing the
> sandbox in 4-5 seconds

You might want to put your reply at the top of the long thread if you're not
going to delete it. Not sure how many folks will realize it's way down at the
bottom of the completely quoted thread :).

Anyhow, you lost me here, I'm not sure what we're talking about now?
qtp-newmodel? Yet another thing I lost track of then?

I guess that's another point to be made in this thread, most of you are
programmers, the users are newbies, end users, admins, everything but
programmers. Maybe projects like this need multiple mailing lists, for
programmers and others?

Mike




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry Dan, this got out of order in my thread :).

Anyhow, ok, so my thought about using QMT as a filter does has merit.

Basically, it would just take the incoming email on port 25 then route it to
the main mail server.

Can you think of any complications related to DNS or anything else if I just
pointed my firewall to flow SMTP traffic directly to QMT?
The email would still be coming to the proper IP, but the firewall would flow
it to QMT first.

I'd love to use QMT in this way to cut down on the spam and so that the folks
who maintain their own domains can still use the pretty web GUI that does it
all. Sure would make life easier.

I'll have to give some thought to perhaps rebuilding my QMT machine using the
latest RPM's. Anyone know if there are any scripts out there that would help
keep this system up to date? If not, is there anyone who might consider trying
their hand at it? I bet more people would be interested in trying the package
if they saw 'automatic updates of the main components and the spam/virus
database' in the feature list.

Mike


On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 10:47:46 -0500, Dan McAllister wrote:
> I have implemented this, using QMT as a front-end filter for an Exchange
>
> Server...
>
> It's actually simple...
> a) Install QMT -- but do NOT add ANY domains (much less users)
> b) Add your domain to the /var/qmail/contol/rcpthosts file, eg:
> mymaildomain.com
> c) Add the address of your exchange server to the file
> /var/qmail/control/smtproutes, eg:
> mymaildomain.com:10.1.1.50
>
> NOTE: In my experience, it was a worthless exercise to try to route
> outbound mail through the toaster as well... let exchange deliver the
> outbound mail, but QMail sit in front of Exchange on the inbound side.
> In other words, Exchange should be sitting behind a firewall (or NAT
> router), and the inbound mail ports (namely 25) should be directed to
> your QMT system, NOT the Exchange system. (You'll also want to point
> some type of web interface to the Exchange Server for remote mail
> access. I use an advanced router to redirect different ports for that
> purpose).
>
> I hope this helps SOMEONE!
>
> Dan
>
> Daniel McAllister, President
>
> IT4SOHO, LLC
> 224 - 13th Avenue N
> St. Petersburg, FL 33701
>
> 877-IT4SOHO: Toll Free
> 727-647-7646 In Pinellas
> 813-464-2093 In Hillsborough
> 727-507-9435 Fax Only
>
> "When did you do your last backup?"
>
> Ask me about unattended offsite backup solutions...
> to protect your business, not just your data!
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> One thing is that spam went way way down while I was using QMT.
>> Are there any documents out there on perhaps using QMT simply as a
>> pre-processing host? All email coming into the network would go though
>> that
>> first, get cleaned, then continue on to the mail server.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> ---------
>> QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
> -----
> QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Dan, definitely worthwhile input. I don't use any MS products anymore
but get the idea. I think (Dan) had touched on this also, about outgoing.

No, I would only use this idea for cleaning incoming, outgoing would go out
from the mail server it is being sent from, no need to clean it. It's mainly
the spam that I was/am after :).

Mike


On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 10:47:46 -0500, Dan McAllister wrote:
> I have implemented this, using QMT as a front-end filter for an Exchange
>
> Server...
>
> It's actually simple...
> a) Install QMT -- but do NOT add ANY domains (much less users)
> b) Add your domain to the /var/qmail/contol/rcpthosts file, eg:
> mymaildomain.com
> c) Add the address of your exchange server to the file
> /var/qmail/control/smtproutes, eg:
> mymaildomain.com:10.1.1.50
>
> NOTE: In my experience, it was a worthless exercise to try to route
> outbound mail through the toaster as well... let exchange deliver the
> outbound mail, but QMail sit in front of Exchange on the inbound side.
> In other words, Exchange should be sitting behind a firewall (or NAT
> router), and the inbound mail ports (namely 25) should be directed to
> your QMT system, NOT the Exchange system. (You'll also want to point
> some type of web interface to the Exchange Server for remote mail
> access. I use an advanced router to redirect different ports for that
> purpose).
>
> I hope this helps SOMEONE!
>
> Dan
>
> Daniel McAllister, President
>
> IT4SOHO, LLC
> 224 - 13th Avenue N
> St. Petersburg, FL 33701
>
> 877-IT4SOHO: Toll Free
> 727-647-7646 In Pinellas
> 813-464-2093 In Hillsborough
> 727-507-9435 Fax Only
>
> "When did you do your last backup?"
>
> Ask me about unattended offsite backup solutions...
> to protect your business, not just your data!
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> One thing is that spam went way way down while I was using QMT.
>> Are there any documents out there on perhaps using QMT simply as a
>> pre-processing host? All email coming into the network would go though
>> that
>> first, get cleaned, then continue on to the mail server.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> -------------
>> QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
> ---------
> QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> You've already switched, but you may want to take a look at
> Virtualmin. It's about as much as a turnkey solution as it gets (it's
> more than just mail, though), and updates are handled as automatic as
> you want.

I had only moved about 8 domains over to QMT to see how things would go. Other
than having to create the email accounts, which can be done by script, it
didn't take much to move them or to move them back for that matter.

Like I noted in this thread, it's the administration of the package and broken
things that finally got me thinking that I was not able to count on this yet.
I not only have to maintain it but others have to be able to use it to
maintain domains/accounts.

I can easily move a few domains over to test something.
I'll take a look at that, thank you. It will work with QMT?

Mike




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> FINALLY, if you take into consideration the original poster, (Mike?), who
> had difficulty in getting a QMT setup and working, and so abandoned that as
> an end-user MTA, the idea that using a sendmail/mimedefang approach would
> work "better" seems to ignore his admitted limitations (no offense, Mike!).

In my defence, there were only two real issues, which turned into longer term
problems with simple fixes.

1: I followed the directions on the wiki to disable DK when it was suggested
in the list that I might not want to use it. That caused information on the
system to be lost (the fact that the files were specially sim-linked) and
pretty much impossible for me to figure out since there was/is no information
on this anywhere it seems.

2: The tcp.smtp recipe is simply not something that is all that easy to
follow.

Granted, I've not spent the time I should on this because I've got my hands
full with load balanced clusters of web and MySQL servers, all sorts of GFS
pools running over complicated FC, a new aggregator styled storage network,
countless web projects, the list goes on. So, no, I admit, I've not taken the
time I need to take to better understand QMT.

That said however, it took very little work to move those domains to a plesk
server I've had running for years which does the job fine other than spam
issues. No one wanted to use the QMT GUI which is badly required since not
everyone around me is technical, they need mouse driven solutions they can
understand. I can't stand plesk because of how it messes with your system but
the bottom line is that it works.

I don't have the luxury of becoming an expert at everything I touch so need
tools that are relatively simple to use, spending more time on each one when I
can to better understand it. I never really had email issues (which is why I
never spent a lot of time trying to become an expert on MTA's) until I started
using open source tools since commercial solutions were always the preferred
method. I used Vircom's mail servers from the time that I used to talk with
him personally until he got too big to answer his own phone hehe.

Anyhow, I could go on and on but the point is, I'm not just a new system
admin, I've been at this since the late 80's and have admittedly always tried
to remain a general specialist for the most part, especially with certain
things like email, which really, should just plain work out of the box after
being around for so many years :)

And to be honest, I don't want to use sendmail as a solution but I do have to
find a spam solution since plesk out of the box, with it's tools doesn't seem
to do much now that I've had QMT in action.

I wish someone put together an ISO like jake but as a front end spam killing
appliance. I thought I saw that somewhere actually.

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By the way, one of the interesting things, I think, is that I didn't just walk
away, with no one ever knowing why yet another person might have left a
project. I'm here to answer any questions I can having used it and still
wanting to. That should be of some value.

I can't imagine how many people simply walk away and that's it. You'll never
find out why they walked, what did them in or what they found that might have
been better to them.

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
omewhat maintenance free other than the things I've mentioned but the
killer was not being able to easily stay up to date.

I'm not happy I had to move but it's pretty easy to move back and forth. Once
I see easy updates, I'm back.

Mike



-----
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was basically forced to move my mail to an existing server yesterday because
we were having way too much mail never making it to various sites like hotmail
and yahoo. We simply cannot exist without being able to send mail to these
large sites.

I found it sad to have to move them and since only yesterday, the spam levels
have become insane again. QMT was definitely doing a VERY good job of keeping
the spam out but I just don't have the time to fully understand the software
and how all of the packages work together, let alone the upgrade process.

> I use sendmail and mimedefang here at work and I have way more control
> than qmail-toaster could ever give us for a front-end to exchange, as

So, you're using it as a pre-processor before it hits your mail server. I've
always read the qmail was the best out there and that sendmail was slowly
dying out but then I've also read that a lot of very large outfits use
sendmail.

Guess I'll have to look into this as well. Any packages or sites I should
check out?

Thanks for the help and input btw.

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] Can I use QMT as a Spam Killer

2008-02-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One thing is that spam went way way down while I was using QMT.
Are there any documents out there on perhaps using QMT simply as a
pre-processing host? All email coming into the network would go though that
first, get cleaned, then continue on to the mail server.

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] Selling: Automated Email Signup - QMT Qmail

2008-02-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone interested in an automated email sign up package for Qmail? It works
with QMT and qmail with vpopmail installed.

The software itself was an open source package which remains unchanged but has
the addition of newly added captcha to help protect from spammers and
troublemakers.

I'm not selling the software but the additional programming which I paid for
in order to get this to work with captcha.

The open source package remains as it was. The problem was the way it was
designed, needing some creative programming to actually get it to work with
captcha. The captcha look and design can be modified. We never got around to
it yet. If anyone is interested at $25.00, just contact me and I'll give you
the URL to try it out.



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] Later folks -

2008-02-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The time has come to move on but before I take off, I wanted to take a moment
to say thanks.

Some of you here are simply wonderful, can't thank you enough for the help
you've sent my way. Special thanks to those who actually spent hours working
on various problems, even logging into the system.

Problem is, I just don't have the time to learn this as well as I need to in
order to count on it. I no longer have any choice but to move on to a
commercial solution which includes support.

Thanks again to all.

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Do most use DK?

2008-02-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",RBLSMTPD="",NOP0FCHECK="1"
192.168.1.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",RBLSMTPD="",NOP0FCHECK="1"
xx.xx.xx.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",RBLSMTPD="",NOP0FCHECK="1"
:allow,BADMIMETYPE="",BADLOADERTYPE="M",CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT="50",CHKUSER
_WRONGRCPTLIMIT="10",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/
bin/simscan",,NOP0FCHECK="1"

I'm missing something here? I took out the dksign functions, rebuilt the db,
restarted qmail. Tried sending a message only to see the same DK error along
with a new simscan connect error 2. I broke it :(.

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Do most use DK?

2008-02-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> be replaced with DKIM. Check the list archive for the proper way to entirely
> disable it.

I guess it's as easy as making a backup of the bin directory. That's what I'll
do then follow the wiki. It doesn't say anything about the tcp.smtp file
changes needed though?

What should it look like afterwards, so that it handles only SPF?

127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private",RBL
SMTPD="",NOP0FCHECK="1"
192.168.1.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/privat
e",RBLSMTPD="",NOP0FCHECK="1"
xx.xx.xx.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private
",RBLSMTPD="",NOP0FCHECK="1"
:allow,BADMIMETYPE="",BADLOADERTYPE="M",CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT="50",CHKUSER
_WRONGRCPTLIMIT="10",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/
bin/simscan",DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private",NOP0FCHECK="1"



-----
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Do most use DK?

2008-02-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> checking incoming sometimes rejects when it shouldn't). DK will eventually
> be replaced with DKIM. Check the list archive for the proper way to entirely
> disable it.

Disabling it is what caused me a lot of grief when I first installed. The wiki
suggested method ends up breaking things you can't fix unless you understand
the packages very well. The suggested method broke very special symlinks that
took weeks to figure out with the help of several people on the list. It
finally took one of the guy's (thanks) to log into my system to take a look
and he was able to figure it out.

Is there another way I can disable this so that I can re-enable it easily
later if needed?

> I would leave SPF turned on (spfbehaviour 3). I would also create an
> appropriate SPF TXT record in DNS. That will cut down on backscatter.

No problem, DK and SPF records are already in my DNS records.

Mike




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] Do most use DK?

2008-02-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are most folks using or not using DK? It seems to be an endless pain in the
butt. Yet again today, more domains not being allowed to send out because they
can't sign DK.

I don't get the behavior, some domains work, some don't. I'd love to just stop
trying to fuss with DK but I badly need email to get out to hotmail and yahoo,
which, still doesn't make it out after months of trying.

I've read that others don't even have DK or SPF turned on and aren't have any
problems at all.

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Admin Passwd Problem

2008-02-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ax that, I need coffee :).

On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:52:31 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've looked at the faq, tried this, it's not working. Any ideas? I just keep
>
> getting prompted over and over again.
>
>> I've lost my password to http://mydomain.com/admin-toaster/ - how do I
>> change
> it?
>> You'll need to login to the command line and change the password manually.
>> The plain-text password should be located in but you can also change it
>> this
>> way:
>>
>> htpasswd -bc /usr/share/toaster/include/admin.htpasswd admin mynewpassword
>
>
> -
> QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
> -----
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] Admin Passwd Problem

2008-02-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've looked at the faq, tried this, it's not working. Any ideas? I just keep
getting prompted over and over again.

>I've lost my password to http://mydomain.com/admin-toaster/ - how do I change
it?
>You'll need to login to the command line and change the password manually.
>The plain-text password should be located in but you can also change it this
>way:

>htpasswd -bc /usr/share/toaster/include/admin.htpasswd admin mynewpassword




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Local email problem, again - new problem

2008-02-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Looks to me like there is not a valid MX record in DNS for the domain.
> # dig compdev.domain.com MX
> (from the toaster) will probably fail, but should not.

It turns out to be the sendmail.mc file having the domain in there. As a
multi-domain machine, it was messing things up.

Mike




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Local email problem, again - new problem

2008-02-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks. That was it alright. Got it in my notes now.

On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 12:50:47 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>> 2008-02-06 13:13:39.837259500 CHKUSER rejected sender: from
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote >> .com:unknown:192.168.1.58> rcpt <> : invalid sender MX domain
>>>
>>> 2008-02-06 13:13:40.049016500 CHKUSER rejected sender: from
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote
>>>  rcpt <> : invalid sender MX
>>> domain
>>>
>> Someone had suggested a change in my sendmail.mc file to allow for
>> multiple
>> domains on the web servers? I can't seem to find that message. I don't
>> want
>> the name of the server in the address so how can I modify this?
>>
>> Mike
>>
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailtoaster-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg17036.html ?




-----
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Local email problem, again - new problem

2008-02-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To prevent the machine name from showing up on a multi-domain server, edit
/etc/mail/sendmail.mc and remove any static domain names. Basically, it seems
to work with the default settings just fine.

Then run; (depending on your machine)

m4 /etc/mail/sendmail.mc > /etc/mail/sendmail.cf

to rebuild the mc file into the new cf file, restart sendmail. So far, seems
to have resolved the problem.

Mike




On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 13:41:54 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> 2008-02-06 13:13:39.837259500 CHKUSER rejected sender: from
>>
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote > .com:unknown:192.168.1.58> rcpt <> : invalid sender MX domain
>>
>> 2008-02-06 13:13:40.049016500 CHKUSER rejected sender: from
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote
>>  rcpt <> : invalid sender MX
>> domain
>>
> Someone had suggested a change in my sendmail.mc file to allow for multiple
> domains on the web servers? I can't seem to find that message. I don't want
> the name of the server in the address so how can I modify this?
>
> Mike
>
>
> -
> QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
> -----
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Local email problem, again - new problem

2008-02-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 2008-02-06 13:13:39.837259500 CHKUSER rejected sender: from
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote  .com:unknown:192.168.1.58> rcpt <> : invalid sender MX domain
>
> 2008-02-06 13:13:40.049016500 CHKUSER rejected sender: from
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote
>  rcpt <> : invalid sender MX domain

Someone had suggested a change in my sendmail.mc file to allow for multiple
domains on the web servers? I can't seem to find that message. I don't want
the name of the server in the address so how can I modify this?

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] Local email problem, again - new problem

2008-02-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Back at this yet again. Can someone explain to me what's going on? I've added
the domain but does it mean I need to add every user that will send from
inside my network, even machines, dummy accounts used for confirmation emails
and so on?

2008-02-06 13:13:39.837259500 CHKUSER rejected sender: from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote  rcpt <> : invalid sender MX domain

2008-02-06 13:13:40.049016500 CHKUSER rejected sender: from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote
 rcpt <> : invalid sender MX domain

In this case, is it refusing apache as the user? The machine compdev is in my
local DNS. That machine can send using other names. Is the word apache
special?

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Local email problem, again - fixed

2008-02-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I added the email address to the domain, I added the web servers to the local
dns and that seems to have fixed things.




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Local email problem, again

2008-02-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 10:16:31 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there some simple means by which to allow any and all email to go in/out
> from local domains? I have those in my tcp.smtp file yet I'm having endless
> problems trying to get email out from web servers and user to user.

My tcp.smtp should allow for all local nets. I'm still having what I think are
local DNS issues again, is this correct?

# more tcp.smtp
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private",RBL
SMTPD="",NOP0FCHECK="1"

192.168.1.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/privat
e",RBLSMTPD="",NOP0FCHECK="1"
xx.xx.xx.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private
",RBLSMTPD="",NOP0FCHECK="1"

:allow,BADMIMETYPE="",BADLOADERTYPE="M",CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT="50",CHKUS
ER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT="10",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/si
mscan",DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private",NOP0FCHECK="1"

Yet, I'm getting;

2008-02-06 10:43:38.221173500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote  rcpt <>
: sender accepted
2008-02-06 10:43:41.230772500 CHKUSER relaying rcpt: from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote  rcpt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : client allowed to relay
2008-02-06 10:43:41.238798500 qmail-smtpd: qq hard reject (qmail-dk: Couldn't
read signature file for signing. (#5.3.0))
: MAILFROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> RCPTTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2008-02-06 10:43:41.314319500 CHKUSER accepted null sender: from <::> remote
 rcpt <> : accepted null sender always
2008-02-06 10:43:41.339064500 CHKUSER rejected rcpt: from <::> remote
 rcpt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : not existing recipient

I have that web server in my local DNS and thought I was allowing all local
email in/out? Anyone see anything obvious?

Mike



-----
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Local email problem, again

2008-02-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I added the web server into my local named service and the user 'noreply' into
the proper domain. Now it seems to make it out but I've yet to see it come in
on gmail.

2008-02-06 11:04:27.898639500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote  rcpt <>
: sender accepted

2008-02-06 11:04:27.910617500 CHKUSER relaying rcpt:
from<[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote 
rcpt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : client allowed to relay

2008-02-06 11:04:27.918399500 qmail-smtpd: qq hard reject (qmail-dk: Couldn't
read signature file for signing. (#5.3.0
)): MAILFROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> RCPTTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-06 11:04:27.996659500 CHKUSER accepted null sender: from <::> remote
 rcpt <> : accepted null sender always

2008-02-06 11:04:28.022516500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from <::> remote
 rcpt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : found
existing recipient



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] Local email problem, again

2008-02-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there some simple means by which to allow any and all email to go in/out
from local domains? I have those in my tcp.smtp file yet I'm having endless
problems trying to get email out from web servers and user to user.

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Someone should offer support :)

2008-01-31 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In my opinion it's impossible to offer flat rates for solving mail
> problems. In many cases it's a huge amount of work to find out why user A
> cannot send mails to user B. You have to check mail-clients, mail-server
> software, firewall settings, DNS settings, organization-internal DNS
> settings, network incidents etc.

I certainly agree if it comes to all of that.

> Related to QMT, one have also to compile, test, install and configure the
> packages; that's why the suggested prices seems to be very low.

Like I said, it was just a thought as a sideline, not an all out consulting
gig. Besides, often, sidelines will turn into bigger gigs too.

This isn't Johannes from the cluster list is it?

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] 503 5.0.0 Need RCPT (recipient)

2008-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   - Transcript of session follows -
... while talking to d_bbdel.redbottle.com.:
>>> DATA
<<< 550 5.7.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Relaying denied. Unknown user.
550 5.1.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown
<<< 503 5.0.0 Need RCPT (recipient)

I'm sending an email from a mail client on the local network. The tcp.smtp
file is set to allow relaying from all local IP's. Why would the recipient
site think that the email is being relayed? Is is in the headers or something?

Then there is a FAIL message in here yet domainkeys pass. Is this a second
test which we're not checking for?

by mx1.redbottle.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m0ULqkT3030827
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:52:47 -0800
Authentication-Results: mx1.redbottle.com [EMAIL PROTECTED];
domainkeys=pass

And then there is this Not Validated note.

>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.5 (2006-08-29) on mx1.redbottle.com
>Trusted-Delivery-Validation-State: Not validated

On this first message, I got the message back and a note;

Your message was received at Wed, 30 Jan 2008 21:55:49 +:

>This account is protected.  Please click on the
>following link to have your address added to the recipient's allowed
>list and to ensure delivery of your email.

The second message I sent made it through however without having to be added
to the recipients allowed mail.

Can someone shed a little light on this?

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Someone should offer support :)

2008-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I have learned that the guys who (truly) know what the h#ll they're
> doing are worth the 1-2 hour expense.

I can't agree with this. I know a lot of network guy's who help out for low
bucks so that they aren't doing everything for free, yet helping and making a
little money on the side. When a big project comes up, they price accordingly.

I'm talking about community support here, not full blown all out support from
someone who is too busy to be able to do that.

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Someone should offer support :)

2008-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> When I had looked at your system using my test domain, messages were
> getting into Yahoo's bulk folder, so they were working (moving them to
> the Inbox will eventually lead to you being able to deliver to Yahoo
> correctly). I did not get around to looking at Hotmail.

Does moving one allow the domain to all of their users though? As for hotmail,
yup, still no answers but then, I've not looked since.

> to your offers, others will not. It's almost like buying a car. Cheapest
> isn't always best, but it will probably get you to work eventually.

It's just a suggestion. This should be a sideline to someone anyhow, it's not
a full time gig unless he/she can get enough people interested, then it might
be. Anyone can hire a pro any time, my suggestion was a pro who's got a little
time on the side to handle something like this.

> Look in the archives for posts from the people offering you support.
> You'll get a quick handle on how knowledgeable a person is by looking at

Good suggestion.

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [qmailtoaster] Someone should offer support :)

2008-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
First, thanks for all of the private emails on this, I will reply, just caught
up in some storage problems.

It does seem that someone could make a few bucks at this while helping the
community. Really, how does one choose someone though?

What I'd like to see is a flat rate. Say $50.00 for general help and upgrades.
You're called upon to help now and then, no surprises. Sometimes it'll take 5
minutes, sometimes an hour.

If things go beyond QMT, you can always talk pricing at that point but if it's
just related to QMT, if you know your stuff, you should be able to figure it
out quickly.

In my case, I'm just a startup so I can't afford hourly or monthly just yet.
The person I can count on however will more than likely be the person I'm
always calling as projects get larger and more commercial.

Any thoughts?

PS: It's great to see people stepping up, thank you.




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Cannot send local email

2008-01-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't seem to have that problem myself. I didn't know anything about that so
have been using the GUI to create domains and accounts. As far as email goes,
no issues but this latest one and hotmail/yahoo of course.

Mike


On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:36:50 -0500, Ben Mills wrote:
> I added one domain via the GUI and that domain was fubar. The same
>
> domain set up fine using cli. The gui seems OK to add users--at least in
> my case.
>
> Ben
>
> Eric "Shubes" wrote:
>> You misunderstood me, Mike. QMT is a great email server with fantastic
>> community support. It's only the vqadmin package that's deprecated by
>> inter7, the people who wrote it. The rest of it is top notch.
>>
> -
> QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
> ---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Someone should offer support :)

2008-01-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I understand that it's a community effort, not a priority. You're right in
that everyone needs to put food on the table first.

I just wondered if there might be someone out there who might be interested in
offering support to a small pool of people. For the most part things work very
well, very dependable but in my case, I'm a bit nervous to get into the
upgrades for fear of breaking things since I can't spend enough time on it to
feel that comfort level.

Oh well, back to the wiki :).

Mike





On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:18:42 -0500, Jake Vickers wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I wonder if someone would be interested in offering support for QMT?
>>
>>
> Erik Espinoza and I are both listed as QMT consultants on the wiki.
> There are a lot of people out there who support Qmail in general, but
> it's not free.  You're getting the software for free, but the support is
> not. As such, you don't always get "high priority" when asking
> questions. I for one put my paying customers first, now that I'm a
> consultant full time. I used to put 20+ hours a week into free support
> for QMT, but with work and family I now put in about 2 hours a week.
> Look on the wiki and search the Internet. There are a lot of choices
> when it comes to hiring a consultant to work on your
> Qmail/Sendmail/Exim/Postfix/etc. system.
>
> -
> QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
> -----
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Cannot send local email

2008-01-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:46:33 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You misunderstood me, Mike. QMT is a great email server with fantastic
> community support. It's only the vqadmin package that's deprecated by
> inter7, the people who wrote it. The rest of it is top notch.

I see, ok, thanks. I don't think I fully understand the package :). I know
it's made up of various components and that there are two ways of getting it.
On the QMT site and from Jake's pre-assembled ISO which I am now using.

Beyond that, I've not really been able to learn much more about what all of
the different packages are or where they come from. I wish I had the time to
study everything I take on but need to be a general specialist in all of them.

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] Someone should offer support :)

2008-01-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wonder if someone would be interested in offering support for QMT?

For example, I've yet to figure out where my email goes when it goes out to
hotmail and it's constantly always deferred with yahoo so god knows what with
other places.

I could use a little help now and then for trouble shooting. For example, I've
been asking about a problem sending email from domain to domain.

I'm also nervous about making updates since I've broken things in the past so
my system ends up way out of date. And now and then, I'd love to get some
additions installed.

All I would need is someone who is trustworthy to count on for these things
and would be willing to pay a flat fee when these things are required. If that
person got themselves 10 people like me, it becomes a nice little monthly
sideline.

Heck, I even have plenty of resources to offer you in case you'd like an
environment to test from/in. I've also built a clustered version of QMT
recently which I've been thinking of putting back together for the purposes of
possibly reselling business services. That right there could mean ongoing
revenues for the person who might be interested in helping me maintain things
a little.

Anyhow, just looking for some sort of solution that will help keep me away
from non os solutions. I greatly believe in open source, push it as much as I
can, try to give back where I can and hope to much more in the future but my
god, trying to keep it all running is quite difficult sometimes.

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Cannot send local email

2008-01-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just out of curiosity, are there any other qmail packages out there which do
have everything needed to run a large mail system safely?

I badly want to use open source but I don't seem to have the time to stay on
top of every package I use which I end up depending on. I badly need solid
reliable email and my QMT machine is already out of date and I'm afraid to
update it for fear of breaking something.

Mike


On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:58:44 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Delivery error: Sorry. Although I'm listed as a best-preference MX or A
>> for
>> that host, it isn't in my control/locals file, so I don't treat it as
>> local.
>> (#5.4.6)
>>
>>> Did you by chance use vqadmin to create one of the domains? vqadmin is
>>> broken. You need to create the domains using
>>> /home/vpopmail/bin/vadddomain.
>>>
>> Yes, I did but then, all of my other domains were also. It's broken? I
>> don't
>> recall seeing anything about that. I hope that doesn't mean I have to
>> re-create all of the domains and email accounts? That would be nuts.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
> Sorry about that, Mike. There has been talk about it on the list, for
> instance:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com/msg16552.html
>
> The wiki faqs does say that vqadmin is ok for adding and deleting domains,
> but I don't believe that's accurate any more. There are flaky things that
> happen when it's used. It'd be nice if someone were to fix it, but I doubt
> that'll happen since inter7 has deprecated it. I think it would be best to
> remove it from the toaster disto. I personally don't even install it.




---------
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Cannot send local email

2008-01-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Guess I'm a little confused then. I thought the QMT project was alive and
well. Do you mean that it is really not supported, or that parts of it aren't?

Mike


On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:58:44 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Delivery error: Sorry. Although I'm listed as a best-preference MX or A
>> for
>> that host, it isn't in my control/locals file, so I don't treat it as
>> local.
>> (#5.4.6)
>>
>>> Did you by chance use vqadmin to create one of the domains? vqadmin is
>>> broken. You need to create the domains using
>>> /home/vpopmail/bin/vadddomain.
>>>
>> Yes, I did but then, all of my other domains were also. It's broken? I
>> don't
>> recall seeing anything about that. I hope that doesn't mean I have to
>> re-create all of the domains and email accounts? That would be nuts.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
> Sorry about that, Mike. There has been talk about it on the list, for
> instance:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com/msg16552.html
>
> The wiki faqs does say that vqadmin is ok for adding and deleting domains,
> but I don't believe that's accurate any more. There are flaky things that
> happen when it's used. It'd be nice if someone were to fix it, but I doubt
> that'll happen since inter7 has deprecated it. I think it would be best to
> remove it from the toaster disto. I personally don't even install it.




---------
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Cannot send local email

2008-01-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> What do you have in /var/qmail/control/locals?

I stuck the domains in there to see if that would help, it's empty now.

> doris.shubes.net is the fqdn of my toaster. Your virtual domains should not
> be in this file. This is for local unix-type users only.

I've replaced the fqdn into the locals file, still getting the same error.

Delivery error: Sorry. Although I'm listed as a best-preference MX or A for
that host, it isn't in my control/locals file, so I don't treat it as local.
(#5.4.6)

> Did you by chance use vqadmin to create one of the domains? vqadmin is
> broken. You need to create the domains using /home/vpopmail/bin/vadddomain.

Yes, I did but then, all of my other domains were also. It's broken? I don't
recall seeing anything about that. I hope that doesn't mean I have to
re-create all of the domains and email accounts? That would be nuts.

Mike




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Cannot send local email

2008-01-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> If you mean /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts then yes, I do.
>
> That's good. What about the /var/qmail/control/virtualdomains file?

I got the domains from this file to copy into locals so yup, it's good.

> If that's ok, check /var/qmail/control/users/assign.

Yes, this also has the domains in it.




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Cannot send local email

2008-01-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 08:32:35 +0100, Andreas Galatis wrote:
> do you have all the local domains in your /var/qmail/rcpthosts file?

If you mean /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts then yes, I do.




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] Cannot send local email

2008-01-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm trying to send from one domain to another on the same machine but keep
getting the following;

//
Delivery error: Sorry. Although I'm listed as a best-preference MX or A for
that host, it isn't in my control/locals file, so I don't treat it as local.
(#5.4.6)
\\

Yet, I have listed all of the domains in the locals file. What am I missing?

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Local Sending: invalid MX domain

2008-01-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Look for the sendmail.cf file, and see if it's sending as compdev..com
> and if so, change it to .com or create a MX record (and accompanying A
> records) for compdev..com so that the qmail machine can look it up
> (internal DNS, setup the domain name in bind on the qmail machine so that
> it will answer itself, or whatever).

What I don't understand is why the QMT server won't allow a local host to
send? It has the same domain name no less and it's also in it's tcp.smtp file?

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Local Sending: invalid MX domain

2008-01-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> and if so, change it to .com or create a MX record (and accompanying A
> records) for compdev..com so that the qmail machine can look it up
> (internal DNS, setup the domain name in bind on the qmail machine so that
> it will answer itself, or whatever).

Looks like this will end up being the fix. Thanks for everyone's input!

Mike




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Local Sending: invalid MX domain

2008-01-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can I just specify one of my QMT servers as the outgoing server to use in
sendmail.mc?



On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:36:17 -0500, Jake Vickers wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >  >  You need to find out where the domain
> name is coming from. In order to do that, you first need to know what the
> application is using to send the email. My guess would be that the
> application is simply using the sendmail command. The application's
> documentation might (should) tell you the mechanism it uses to send email
> messages.
>
>
> Look for the sendmail.cf file, and see if it's sending as compdev..com
> and if so, change it to .com or create a MX record (and accompanying A
> records) for compdev..com so that the qmail machine can look it up
> (internal DNS, setup the domain name in bind on the qmail machine so that
> it will answer itself, or whatever).




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Local Sending: invalid MX domain

2008-01-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmm, now I'm getting;

Jan 20 18:37:23 compdev sendmail[19988]: m0L0bNNq019988: from=apache,
size=265, class=0, nrcpts=1,
msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jan 20 18:37:23 compdev sendmail[19989]: m0L0bNbr019989:
from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=467, class=0, nrcpts=1,
msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, proto=ESMTP,
daemon=MTA, relay=localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]
Jan 20 18:37:23 compdev sendmail[19988]: m0L0bNNq019988: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
ctladdr=apache (48/48), delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay,
pri=30265, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (m0L0bNbr019989
Message accepted for delivery)
Jan 20 18:37:53 compdev sendmail[19870]: m0L0Pqv6019868:
to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ctladdr=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (48/48),
delay=00:12:01, xdelay=00:12:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=120467,
relay=gsmtp183.google.com. [64.233.183.27], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred:
Connection timed out with gsmtp183.google.com.

The connection timed out repeats a few times but the email doesn't seem to be
going to the QMT server anymore.

Mike




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Local Sending: invalid MX domain

2008-01-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Look for the sendmail.cf file, and see if it's sending as compdev..com
> and if so, change it to .com or create a MX record (and accompanying A
> records) for compdev..com so that the qmail machine can look it up
> (internal DNS, setup the domain name in bind on the qmail machine so that
> it will answer itself, or whatever).

Yup, that was it alright. Someone had hard coded a domain in there which
caused a lot of problems over time.

My ongoing problem is still needing to get email out to yahoo, hotmail and
gmail it seems.

Mike




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Local Sending: invalid MX domain

2008-01-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> You need to find out where the domain name is coming from. In order to do
> that, you first need to know what the application is using to send the
> email. My guess would be that the application is simply using the sendmail
> command. The application's documentation might (should) tell you the
> mechanism it uses to send email messages.

Whew, I've been at this for a while now and have yet to figure it out.
Here's a larger log snip;

Jan 20 16:41:29 compdev sendmail[19046]: m0KMfT6g019046: from=apache,
size=260, class=0, nrcpts=1,
msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jan 20 16:41:29 compdev sendmail[19047]: m0KMfTiM019047:
from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=462, class=0, nrcpts=1,
msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, proto=ESMTP,
daemon=MTA, relay=localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]
Jan 20 16:41:29 compdev sendmail[19046]: m0KMfT6g019046: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
ctladdr=apache (48/48), delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay,
pri=30260, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (m0KMfTiM019047
Message accepted for delivery)
Jan 20 16:41:30 compdev sendmail[19050]: STARTTLS=client,
relay=mail..com., version=TLSv1/SSLv3, verify=FAIL,
cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA, bits=256/256
Jan 20 16:41:31 compdev sendmail[19050]: m0KMfTiM019047:
to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ctladdr=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (48/48),
delay=00:00:02, xdelay=00:00:02, mailer=relay, pri=120462,
relay=mail..com. [xx.xx.xx.249], dsn=5.0.0, stat=Service unavailable
Jan 20 16:41:31 compdev sendmail[19050]: m0KMfTiM019047: m0KMfViM019050: DSN:
Service unavailable
Jan 20 16:41:31 compdev sendmail[19050]: m0KMfViM019050:
to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=local,
pri=31713, dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent

The author told me;
>It doesn`t support SMTP, only the standard PHP mail function. You`ll see the
>functions in that file.

I certainly can't find anything in there. Be happy to put the file on a web
site if someone wants to peek :).

Here is a snip from the app's sending section;

   //-
   // FUNCTION: SEND_RECIPIENT_MAIL()
   // Sends message with comments
   //-

   function
send_recipient_message($recipient,$site,$email,$subject)
   {
if (get_magic_quotes_gpc())
{
 $this->comments = stripslashes($this->comments);
}

mail($recipient, $subject, $this->comments,
$this->mail_headers($this->name,$this->email));
   }

   //-
   // FUNCTION: SEND_DEFAULT_MAIL()
   // Send default message
   //-

   function
send_default_message($recipient,$site,$email,$subject)
   {
mail($recipient, $subject,
$this->email_message('default.txt'),
$this->mail_headers($this->name,$this->email));
   }

   //-
   // FUNCTION: SEND_VISITOR_MAIL()
   // Send message to visitor
   //-

   function send_visitor_mail($site,$subject,$siteemail)
   {
mail($this->email, $subject,
$this->email_message('thanks.txt'), $this->mail_headers($site,$siteemail));
   }

> If you can't tell from any documentation how the application is sending the
> message, you might do some manual probing/testing.

I can see where the sending section is but not being a programmer, I don't see
anything obvious.

>To see if the web server has a sendmail command, you can:
> # which sendmail

Yes, it is sendmail.

> Alternatively, the application might use the mail command. Your system will
> pretty likely have this command. To see, you can:
> # rpm -qf `which mail`

Yes, it also has mailx installed.

> You can run tests of the sendmail and/or mail commands from the command line
> to verify that the messages are generated with compdev in the domain name.

Not sure I've ever done any manual email testing other than sending a file or
such from the command line. I'll have to look up how this is done.

Mike



-----
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Local Sending: invalid MX domain

2008-01-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Your simplest solution is going to be to change the apache application so
> that it doesn't use compdev in the domain name, i.e. just "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> or "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". As there doesn't appear to be a logical
> "compdev..com" sub domain for which there is an email server (and email
> accounts), this seems like the right solution to me.

Just for the hell of it, I took the ServerName out of the config for apache;
On mail server;

2008-01-19 16:45:22.264621500 CHKUSER rejected sender: from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote 
rcpt <> : invalid sender MX domain



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Local Sending: invalid MX domain

2008-01-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Dig isn't getting an MX record at all. Note the "QUESTION SECTION". It's
> simply telling you what the request was for.

Oh ya, didn't even catch that.

> Your simplest solution is going to be to change the apache application so
> that it doesn't use compdev in the domain name, i.e. just "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> or "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". As there doesn't appear to be a logical
> "compdev..com" sub domain for which there is an email server (and email
> accounts), this seems like the right solution to me.

Do you mean the web server name? As in ServerName in the httpd.conf file?

I can't change the applications themselves and if I can, I'm not sure where to
start to be honest.

> Alternatively, you could set up an authoritative private dns server for your
> private network addresses. This would be pretty complicated though, and I
> would recommend against going there. ;)

That would not be so bad, I've had to set it up for internal problems like
this in the past. I'd like not to have to however but then, life's not always
what we want. I'll wait to hear back from you on the above.

Mike




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Local Sending: invalid MX domain

2008-01-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> So, what do you get when you:
> # dig compdev..com MX
> from the box that the toaster is running on?

dig compdev..com MX

; <<>> DiG 9.2.4 <<>> compdev..com MX
;; global options:  printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 22046
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;compdev..com.IN  MX

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
.com. 600 IN  SOA ns1..net.
support..net. 2007121302 10800 3600 86400 600

;; Query time: 20 msec
;; SERVER: 192.168.1.29#53(192.168.1.29)
;; WHEN: Sat Jan 19 11:57:20 2008
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 100

Note that compdev..com is not a public server. It is only a web server
used for development internally. It has a private IP, 192.168.1.58.

Because it's not public, I have to admit that I'm not sure where dig is
getting the above MX record since this server doesn't have one. Should I add
the internal (and public) web server names somewhere perhaps?

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Local Sending: invalid MX domain

2008-01-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Looks like there is no recipient set.

In the script, I do enter a sending user name which actually exists on the
domain. But yeah, that is what it looks like yet the other domains are able to
send fine and they are exactly the same and using php to send too.

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Local Sending: invalid MX domain

2008-01-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:11:33 -0500, Jake Vickers wrote:
> Do the other servers use a subdomain as well, and if so, do they have MX
> records?

Did I even reply to your actual question? I think I explain that in the other
email but I forgot to add that all of the domains have proper MX records.




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Local Sending: invalid MX domain

2008-01-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:11:33 -0500, Jake Vickers wrote:
> Do the other servers use a subdomain as well, and if so, do they have MX
> records?

The QMT server which is receiving the web server emails only has one domain
but it's not the same domain as the one which is sending from the web server.
The web server is hosting multiple domains but they are all the same domain as
the receiving QMT server.
This new web site doesn't have the same domain, might that be why? Even so,
I've got tcp.smtp set to allow all local domains so still don't understand why
this is a problem?

Maybe I need an .htaccess file pointing php mail to the other QMT server which
does host the sending domain?

Wow, sorry if this sounds confusing, I'm just not sure how to better explain
it all :).

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Local Sending: invalid MX domain

2008-01-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I thought it already closed.
> just make sure SENDER_NOCHECK=1 is on 192.168. line of your tcp.smtp

Well, that's why this is confusing, because everything else is working. Here
is my tcp.smtp, it indeed includes what you note above.

127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private",RBL
SMTPD="",NOP0FCHECK="1"
192.168.1.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/privat
e",RBLSMTPD="",NOP0FCHECK="1"
xx.xx.xx.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private
",RBLSMTPD="",NOP0FCHECK="1"
:allow,BADMIMETYPE="",BADLOADERTYPE="M",CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT="50",CHKUSER
_WRONGRCPTLIMIT="10",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin
/simscan",DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private",NOP0FCHECK="1"



---------
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] Local Sending: invalid MX domain

2008-01-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone? Here is some additional information.

I am sending from a php script from a web server. The web server has sendmail
set to relay to a QMT server which then sends the email out.

So, from a web server on the local domain, I am sending via php (which has
sendmail path in php.ini) to a QMT server which then sends the email to the
world.

So, this is all happening on the same network but for some reason, this script
is not able to send? Yet, nothing else which I know of has this problem since
I've added the local net's to the tcp.smtp settings on the QMT machines.




>Bit confused here...

>2008-01-18 12:13:25.130175500 3764 < .|...2008-01-18 12:13:26.302539500
>CHKUSER rejected sender: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote
> rcpt <> : invalid sender MX domain

>Here's what is weird to me. The above web server is on the local network with
>several other web sites on it. All of the other web sites can send email but
>this (script) cannot send. Why is the QMT server rejecting the emai? Do I
>need to tell it about the domain it is sending for even though it is on the
>local net and local net allowed in tcp.smtp?



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] Local Sending: invalid MX domain

2008-01-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bit confused here...

2008-01-18 12:13:25.130175500 3764 < .|...2008-01-18 12:13:26.302539500
CHKUSER rejected sender: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote
 rcpt <> : invalid sender MX domain

Here's what is weird to me. The above web server is on the local network with
several other web sites on it. All of the other web sites can send email but
this (script) cannot send. Why is the QMT server rejecting the emai? Do I need
to tell it about the domain it is sending for even though it is on the local
net and local net allowed in tcp.smtp?

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] Sudden Spam

2008-01-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What should I be looking for since I see a very sudden increase in spam on one
of my QMT servers?

I'm also using the ham/spam setup and teaching it but the same stuff just
keeps on getting through to valid email names on my server. I do point out
that this is on only one of the two QMT servers.

Does this mean someone has figured something out about my server or that
someone is just determined to spam our legit email accounts?

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] QMT-ISO 1.4.0 is out

2008-01-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I, like you, busted my butt getting domain keys working. My DNS is
> farmed out and my provider (dnsmadeeasy) couldn't tell me how to set up
> the dk txt records via its interface. Trial and error finally prevailed,
> though.

So you're getting email out to most of the big boys now without problems? I
hoped it might simply take some time, you know, sending a few emails now and
then to finally see yahoo/hotmail accepting without issues. It's not the case
for me.

Mike




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] QMT-ISO 1.4.0 is out

2008-01-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Resetting up and correcting reverse DNS, as well as making sure your
> SPF is properly set, fixes it.

Too true, those were in fact some of the issues as well. I had just installed
new DNS servers and had messed up a few things here and there.

DNS is probably one of the biggest reasons for email breaking.

Mike



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



  1   2   3   >