Re: [RBW] Re: Which Compass tires for a Sam Hillborne riden on pavement
Well, he discounted air drag from fatter tires; but I think I find that fatter, and taller too, tires slow me down in a strong headwind compared to 28s or 32s. And big fat 29er knobbies definitely have more wind drag in headwinds! On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 5:48 PM, John Stowewrote: > Jan's testing method involves actually riding down a road, so air > resistance should play into his results - at least at testing speeds (wind > drag rises with the square of velocity) - which is another reason to trust > his results more than those from a smooth, stationary roller. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "RBW Owners Bunch" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- *30% Supply and Demand discount, listmembers only, on all resume, LinkedIn, and writing services, until Demand equals Supply! And there's more! 10% kickback for any referral resulting in fully paid, list-price contract. And still more! I am offering services in trade for a road bike, or frame and parts, that are period compatible with my AM hub, circa 1937 to 1961. See my website for what I do and what I charge; email for details.* Resumes, LinkedIn profiles, bios, and letters that get interviews. By-the-hour resume and LinkedIn coaching. Other professional writing services. http://www.resumespecialties.com/ www.linkedin.com/in/patrickmooreresumespec/ Patrick Moore Alburquerque, Nouvelle Mexique, Vereinigte Staaten ** ** -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: Which Compass tires for a Sam Hillborne riden on pavement
Jan's testing method involves actually riding down a road, so air resistance should play into his results - at least at testing speeds (wind drag rises with the square of velocity) - which is another reason to trust his results more than those from a smooth, stationary roller. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: Which Compass tires for a Sam Hillborne riden on pavement
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 10:32 AM, panogwrote: > Actually 3 questions, if we add the "where to stop adding more suppleness > to an already supple tire?". > True. > > [...] To me and my cycling exposure, the need for the extralight casings > is just noise; I do use open tubular type clinchers with supple walls and > there I draw the line for a number of reasons. When and if I need lower > rolling resistance then I use latex tubes. > I've used many less-than top quality road tires because my principal road bikes have had 26" wheels, and top quality tires haven't been readily available for the 559 and 571 sizes. So when Jan put the Elk Pass on the market, I was thrilled. Frankly, I've not ridden "standard casing" Compass tires, so I can't really say if, or by how much, the ELs reduce rolling resistance (the Elk Pass comes only in the EL casing). But the improvement over the already very decent 1.35" Kojaks was so noticeable that I spent almost $1K in stocking up. (I had swapped 622 35 mm Kojaks on my erstwhile Ram for original issue Challenge Parigi Roubaix -- as delicate a tire, I may add, as any I've used -- and, while the difference was quite noticeable, it wasn't as noticeable as between the 559 X 1.35 Ks and the Elk Passes. > Another consideration on wheel performance, when taken to the nth degree > via extralight casings etc, is the effect of aerodynamic drag on the > fendered, high spoke, box rimed, bulbous profile wheel which makes one > bring into prospective where to draw the line on dialing the rubber rolling > resistance. > > Very true. I think Jan discounts tire air drag as negligible, but I certainly feel something when I'm pushing 29", 2"+ wide tires against one of our Spring headwinds! Even more so if the tire has fat, tall knobs (that is to say, the resistance of the knobs to rolling on pavement is very noticeably less than when a headwind is added). I also think fenders, or at least Velo Orange flaps, catch wind; at least, my 2003 Riv with Elk Passes and a 70" gear doesn't seem as easy to pedal as my identical, as to position and tires '99 gofast, sans fenders and with a 76" gear. Jan did say that, from his wind tunnel tests, the fenders on the bike or bikes he tested didn't add to drag. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: Which Compass tires for a Sam Hillborne riden on pavement
Actually 3 questions, if we add the "where to stop adding more suppleness to an already supple tire?". I absolutely agree with your statement regarding the esoteric nature of the perceived handling differences between wheel sizes simply due to the fact that the absolute judge of what feels best (beyond the kool-aid dispersed by the experts) is one's self and one can only judge what they are aware of or most often perceive as being best. I dont remember if it was a published BQ article or a JH blog entry that once said that JH found loosing "nimbleness" on 700c wheels when tire size exceeded 32 mm and that was the predominant reason behind moving to 650Bx38 or x42 to regain it. What this means? To me, nothing more than that JH prefers 650Bx38 over 700cx35 or wider for his riding. Same with Jan's preference of the super supple (extralight) over the standard supple casings. Should the casual rider be influenced by JH's preferences? IMO, I tend to be between Maybe and Not, because they may never realize the benefits they believe exist. Should the higher performance rider be influenced by JH's preferences? IMO, if one's riding style, ability, cadence, posture etc are similar to Jan's and they are riding on similar tarmac and for as long as Jan does then one would expect some gains to be harvested by mimicking what Jan does. After having drunk my fair share of kool-aid over the years I have come to the realization that with bicycles in particular, one needs to separate between what's merely true and what's important. To me and my cycling exposure, the need for the extralight casings is just noise; I do use open tubular type clinchers with supple walls and there I draw the line for a number of reasons. When and if I need lower rolling resistance then I use latex tubes. Another consideration on wheel performance, when taken to the nth degree via extralight casings etc, is the effect of aerodynamic drag on the fendered, high spoke, box rimed, bulbous profile wheel which makes one bring into prospective where to draw the line on dialing the rubber rolling resistance. On Tuesday, May 2, 2017 at 5:52:57 AM UTC-4, Patrick Moore wrote: > > ...*snipped*. > > We've got 2 questions going on here, optimum wheel size and casing > suppleness. I rather think that the question of how wheel size affects > handling is more "esoteric" than that of casing suppleness, which I guess > is available to anyone who rides above a jogging speed. > > On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 7:47 PM, panog> wrote: > >> The principal benefit of the greater suppleness is reduced rolling >> resistance, reduced hysteric losses and thus greater speed for the same >> watt input. >> The real question though is at which point we have diminishing returns. I >> dont think that this is a one-answer-fits-all as I believe its greatly >> dependent on the ability and expertise of the rider and his equipment to >> harness the marginal increase in performance. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: Which Compass tires for a Sam Hillborne riden on pavement
Yes, the benefit of casing suppleness is principally lower rolling resistance, though I find that more supple tires are also more comfortable at a given tire pressure (and, OTOH, that they often require a higher pressure to avoid sidewall flop than do tires with stiffer sidewalls). We've got 2 questions going on here, optimum wheel size and casing suppleness. I rather think that the question of how wheel size affects handling is more "esoteric" than that of casing suppleness, which I guess is available to anyone who rides above a jogging speed. On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 7:47 PM, panogwrote: > The principal benefit of the greater suppleness is reduced rolling > resistance, reduced hysteric losses and thus greater speed for the same > watt input. > The real question though is at which point we have diminishing returns. I > dont think that this is a one-answer-fits-all as I believe its greatly > dependent on the ability and expertise of the rider and his equipment to > harness the marginal increase in performance. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: Which Compass tires for a Sam Hillborne riden on pavement
And how much he or she cares about that difference -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: Which Compass tires for a Sam Hillborne riden on pavement
The principal benefit of the greater suppleness is reduced rolling resistance, reduced hysteric losses and thus greater speed for the same watt input. The real question though is at which point we have diminishing returns. I dont think that this is a one-answer-fits-all as I believe its greatly dependent on the ability and expertise of the rider and his equipment to harness the marginal increase in performance. On Monday, May 1, 2017 at 5:04:29 PM UTC-4, Patrick Moore wrote: > Yeah, but his tests were to my judgment not conclusive. How do you "prove" > that this handling is better than that? And for whom? Once again, my own > experience, which is extensive, if not as extensive as Jan's, contradicts > this opinion. > > > The principal benefits of the extralights is not weight, or principally > weight, as far as I know, it's the greater suppleness of the casings. > > > > > > > On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 12:51 PM, panogwrote: > > Yes he did and he included a series of his tests in BQ to back up the claim. > I dont think JH is alone on the assessment of the 32s being optimum size for > 700c wheels. Another who comes to mind is Mike Kone of Boulder Bicycle. > I am of the understanding that sizes beyond that are focused more in comfort > at the expense of handling or speed. Furthermore, one aspect that appears to > be often overlooked is the effect of a significantly taller tire installed on > a road bicycle originally designed for a BB spaced to accommodate up to 32mm > tires, regardless if such tire fits the fork or chainstays. > Granted, unless one pushes the bike up to higher performance ranges (and has > a bike that is specifically designed to comply to such actions), these > theories maybe largely insignificant although true. However, if that's the > case, why one would care about sacrificing the incremental benefits of the > extralights over the standard casings? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: Which Compass tires for a Sam Hillborne riden on pavement
Yeah, but his tests were to my judgment not conclusive. How do you "prove" that this handling is better than that? And for whom? Once again, my own experience, which is extensive, if not as extensive as Jan's, contradicts this opinion. The principal benefits of the extralights is not weight, or principally weight, as far as I know, it's the greater suppleness of the casings. On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 12:51 PM, panogwrote: > Yes he did and he included a series of his tests in BQ to back up the > claim. I dont think JH is alone on the assessment of the 32s being optimum > size for 700c wheels. Another who comes to mind is Mike Kone of Boulder > Bicycle. > I am of the understanding that sizes beyond that are focused more in > comfort at the expense of handling or speed. Furthermore, one aspect that > appears to be often overlooked is the effect of a significantly taller tire > installed on a road bicycle originally designed for a BB spaced to > accommodate up to 32mm tires, regardless if such tire fits the fork or > chainstays. > Granted, unless one pushes the bike up to higher performance ranges (and > has a bike that is specifically designed to comply to such actions), these > theories maybe largely insignificant although true. However, if that's the > case, why one would care about sacrificing the incremental benefits of the > extralights over the standard casings? > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[RBW] Re: Which Compass tires for a Sam Hillborne riden on pavement
I have several compass tires on various bikes. All standard casing. Very pleased and frankly spoiled by them. Love supple tires! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[RBW] Re: Which Compass tires for a Sam Hillborne riden on pavement
Yes he did and he included a series of his tests in BQ to back up the claim. I dont think JH is alone on the assessment of the 32s being optimum size for 700c wheels. Another who comes to mind is Mike Kone of Boulder Bicycle. I am of the understanding that sizes beyond that are focused more in comfort at the expense of handling or speed. Furthermore, one aspect that appears to be often overlooked is the effect of a significantly taller tire installed on a road bicycle originally designed for a BB spaced to accommodate up to 32mm tires, regardless if such tire fits the fork or chainstays. Granted, unless one pushes the bike up to higher performance ranges (and has a bike that is specifically designed to comply to such actions), these theories maybe largely insignificant although true. However, if that's the case, why one would care about sacrificing the incremental benefits of the extralights over the standard casings? On Monday, May 1, 2017 at 8:55:36 AM UTC-4, Jay in Tel Aviv wrote: > > I remember Jan saying something about 32s being the optimal size for 700c > on pavement. I can fit true 38s under my fenders, but perhaps that would be > better suited to dirt or gravel. Or has the thinking moved on since then? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[RBW] Re: Which Compass tires for a Sam Hillborne riden on pavement
I was just looking for a similar tire for my wife's bike. The compass tires were all sold out, and I thought she might not appreciate tan sidewalls. So I went with Schwalbe Kojack, 700x35, folding tires, which weigh a respectable 330 grams On Monday, May 1, 2017 at 10:47:40 AM UTC-4, Geir Bentzen wrote: > > Hi, > I use the extra light 38 mm on my Hunqapillar. I could use the 42 mm, but > they came on sale after I bought the ones I have. Which means I have used > them for about 10 months now and had no flats at all. I weigh above 110 > kilos or 245 pounds and I ride on both gravel roads and asphalt. I have > come to love the Compass tires and will absolutely recommend them. > > Geir > > On Sunday, April 30, 2017 at 2:05:00 PM UTC-4, Jay in Tel Aviv wrote: >> >> I'm thinking about making the move to Compass tires on my commuter Sam. >> Which ones would you all recommend for an urban commute on not great >> roads? >> I would use Stan's or similar in Schwalbe extralight tubes to try and >> keep the weight reasonable and still reduce the number of flats as close to >> my ideal (0) as possible. >> What say you wise ones? >> >> Jay >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[RBW] Re: Which Compass tires for a Sam Hillborne riden on pavement
I ride Rat Trap Pass 2.3" tires on my mtb commuter. In addition to greatly reducing vibration/shocks, the lower pressures enabled by such large volume greatly reduces the likelihood of flatting. I regularly roll over broken glass on my RTP's that would have pierced the 28mm Marathon Supremes on my old commuter due to their higher pressure. I haven't had a flat since switching in December in hundreds of miles of riding over the glass strewn streets of Seattle vs about 1 flat/mo with the Supremes (wee problem with car break-ins/public drinking here). Last, the wide contact patch of these tires allows me to pretty much ignore the line I'm taking on pavement. Seattle DOT commonly uses concrete mat street paving with >1" wide seems between the mats and no pitch seal. I used to have to carefully negotiate these seems on my old tires but can now blissfully ignore 'em. Huge reduction in stress and increase in riding bliss! With all that said, I wouldn't buy a bike today that could take less than a 42mm tire. And the suppler the better! On Sunday, April 30, 2017 at 11:05:00 AM UTC-7, Jay in Tel Aviv wrote: > > I'm thinking about making the move to Compass tires on my commuter Sam. > Which ones would you all recommend for an urban commute on not great roads? > I would use Stan's or similar in Schwalbe extralight tubes to try and keep > the weight reasonable and still reduce the number of flats as close to my > ideal (0) as possible. > What say you wise ones? > > Jay > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[RBW] Re: Which Compass tires for a Sam Hillborne riden on pavement
Hi, I use the extra light 38 mm on my Hunqapillar. I could use the 42 mm, but they came on sale after I bought the ones I have. Which means I have used them for about 10 months now and had no flats at all. I weigh above 110 kilos or 245 pounds and I ride on both gravel roads and asphalt. I have come to love the Compass tires and will absolutely recommend them. Geir On Sunday, April 30, 2017 at 2:05:00 PM UTC-4, Jay in Tel Aviv wrote: > > I'm thinking about making the move to Compass tires on my commuter Sam. > Which ones would you all recommend for an urban commute on not great roads? > I would use Stan's or similar in Schwalbe extralight tubes to try and keep > the weight reasonable and still reduce the number of flats as close to my > ideal (0) as possible. > What say you wise ones? > > Jay > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: Which Compass tires for a Sam Hillborne riden on pavement
Jan theorizes that there is an optimum diameter -- and absolute number -- for optimum handing, and that this correlates more or less to 622 X 32, 584 X 40 or 42, and 559 X 50. I don't buy it, since the best handling bikes (thanks again, Grant!) I've ridden were designed for 559 wheels with tires ranging from 1" to 35 mm. So, if you don't buy this theory, choose your tire for speed or cushioning or the best combination of both. me, I find that 28 mm is a sweet spot for road, and 50 mm is a sweet spot for our sandy soil; this regardless of bead seat diameter. Note that I ride Elk Passes, 27 to 29 mm depending on rim, on firm dirt with glee and comfort; and my 51 mm [622] F Freds roll very nicely on pavement, thank you (the [559] Rat Trap Pass rolls even better, I'm told). So, me, if I were riding mostly on pavement, even roughish pavement, and I had all the choices in the world, I'd choose something narrower than 32, though a Compass EL 32 wouldn't scare me off by any means. For mostly dirt, unless it is smoother than what we get around here, I'd certainly prefer 38s to 32a. On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 6:55 AM, Jay in Tel Avivwrote: > I remember Jan saying something about 32s being the optimal size for 700c > on pavement. I can fit true 38s under my fenders, but perhaps that would be > better suited to dirt or gravel. Or has the thinking moved on since then? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "RBW Owners Bunch" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- *30% Supply and Demand discount, listmembers only, on all resume, LinkedIn, and writing services, until Demand equals Supply! And there's more! 10% kickback for any referral resulting in fully paid, list-price contract. And still more! I am offering services in trade for a road bike, or frame and parts, that are period compatible with my AM hub, circa 1937 to 1961. See my website for what I do and what I charge; email for details.* Resumes, LinkedIn profiles, bios, and letters that get interviews. By-the-hour resume and LinkedIn coaching. Other professional writing services. http://www.resumespecialties.com/ www.linkedin.com/in/patrickmooreresumespec/ Patrick Moore Alburquerque, Nouvelle Mexique, Vereinigte Staaten ** ** -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[RBW] Re: Which Compass tires for a Sam Hillborne riden on pavement
I remember Jan saying something about 32s being the optimal size for 700c on pavement. I can fit true 38s under my fenders, but perhaps that would be better suited to dirt or gravel. Or has the thinking moved on since then? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[RBW] Re: Which Compass tires for a Sam Hillborne riden on pavement
I use the standard casing Bon Jon 35's on my Riv commuter. Haven't seen the need for the extralights, particularly while commuting. Another good choice is the Soma Supple Vitesse at 33 or 38 mm (Panaracer made clincher tire with tubular sidewalls, also offered in standard and extralight casings). Significantly less expensive than the Compass due to their availability from competing online retailers. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[RBW] Re: Which Compass tires for a Sam Hillborne riden on pavement
I ride Barlow Pass ELs under fenders without a hitch. I haven't flatted yet but I also didn't use that wheelset for my commute. Commuting (also less than desirable roads) I used 40mm Mondials under fenders also with no clearance problems. I REALLY like the Compass Barlow Pass tires. I was initially bummed that the Bon Jon Pass (35mm) came out right after I ordered but, in hindsight, I'm glad I have the wider tires. If I was using them for commuting rather than just fun, I may have bought the standard casings for the extra protection. That said, I pump the ELs up to about 40# and the cush seems to soak up any problems with debris, railroad tracks and holes in the roads. Also have been riding them on some gravel trails with no problems. John On Sunday, April 30, 2017 at 11:05:00 AM UTC-7, Jay in Tel Aviv wrote: > > I'm thinking about making the move to Compass tires on my commuter Sam. > Which ones would you all recommend for an urban commute on not great roads? > I would use Stan's or similar in Schwalbe extralight tubes to try and keep > the weight reasonable and still reduce the number of flats as close to my > ideal (0) as possible. > What say you wise ones? > > Jay > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[RBW] Re: Which Compass tires for a Sam Hillborne riden on pavement
I agree. Having used both I have found that the riding difference is very small between the two so I have zero problem saving some money and getting the standard casing. I have a set of light casings on my Roadeo. Unless someone is really concerned about weight I would actually suggest saving the money and going the standard route. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[RBW] Re: Which Compass tires for a Sam Hillborne riden on pavement
For reference, I have 35 mm Hypers on there now. I use 32 or 35 Supremes under fenders in the winter. On Sunday, April 30, 2017 at 9:05:00 PM UTC+3, Jay in Tel Aviv wrote: > > I'm thinking about making the move to Compass tires on my commuter Sam. > Which ones would you all recommend for an urban commute on not great roads? > I would use Stan's or similar in Schwalbe extralight tubes to try and keep > the weight reasonable and still reduce the number of flats as close to my > ideal (0) as possible. > What say you wise ones? > > Jay > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.