Re: [TANKS] Re: Remote kill switch

2014-11-18 Thread isaac goldman
^^Great, itll be just like FIRST robotics; first we will loiter around for
15 minutes while an IT guru does something so we can connect. And every
fourth battle someone will randomly glitch out and the battle will be
ordered replayed. I can hardly wait. Can we also ban all 2.4Ghz gear? That
digital stuff is too noise-resistant; real men battle for control against
everything and anything leaking RF :P

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Frank Pittelli frank.pitte...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Skynet?  That's like a dial-up modem network from the late 70's compared
 to the Tri-Pact Battlefield Management Network scheduled to become
 self-aware sometime in 2015.

 On 11/17/2014 7:39 PM, Mike Lyons wrote:

 I'm invoking the Skynet clause of our friendship agreement.


 --
 --
 You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
 To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
 To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat

 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups R/C Tank Combat group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




-- 
Isaac Goldman
5142334423

This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.

-- 
-- 
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups R/C 
Tank Combat group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [TANKS] Re: Remote kill switch

2014-11-18 Thread Frank Pittelli
Actually, we see a random glitch out every battle, but it's not the 
electronics, it's the humanoid operating the electronics ;-)


The Tri-Pact Battlefield Management System (TP-BMS) will eliminate all 
such problems ... and we do mean eliminate!


On 11/18/2014 7:52 AM, isaac goldman wrote:

And every fourth battle someone will randomly glitch out and the
battle will be ordered replayed. I can hardly wait.


--
--
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups R/C Tank Combat group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [TANKS] Re: Remote kill switch

2014-11-18 Thread 'jvragu47' via R/C Tank Combat
When referring to 1970 you must consider Mr Forbin's, Project Colossus.  
LOL.   

On Monday, November 17, 2014 9:30:18 PM UTC-5, Frank Pittelli wrote:

 Skynet?  That's like a dial-up modem network from the late 70's compared 
 to the Tri-Pact Battlefield Management Network scheduled to become 
 self-aware sometime in 2015. 

 On 11/17/2014 7:39 PM, Mike Lyons wrote: 
  I'm invoking the Skynet clause of our friendship agreement. 


-- 
-- 
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups R/C 
Tank Combat group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [TANKS] Re: Remote kill switch

2014-11-18 Thread Frank Pittelli
Yes, indeed.  The good ole days when all we had to worry about was 
cooperation between two U.S. and Soviet computers intent on destroying 
the world with nuclear weapons.  Nowadays, there are over 1 billion 
(that's with a 'b') personal computers in use around the world (not to 
mention smart phones, tablets and embedded controllers), which are each 
approx 1 billion (that's with a 'b') times more powerful than the 
computers that inspired Mr. Forbin's pet project. When some insidious 
computer virus hooks them all together under one user's control, then we 
have something to worry about.  Fortunately, most of those computers are 
kept very busy sending/receiving email, buying/selling unnecessary stuff 
and, of course, downloading porn.


On 11/18/2014 9:11 AM, 'jvragu47' via R/C Tank Combat wrote:

When referring to 1970 you must consider Mr Forbin's, Project Colossus.


--
--
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups R/C Tank Combat group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [TANKS] Re: Remote kill switch

2014-11-18 Thread TyngTech
The Forbin Project!  Good movie and one of my favorite book series.  In the 
second book we find an Earth at piece being run by the AI created by the 
old US and Soviet computers.  For a non-violent entertainment, the AI 
converts the old human Naval warships into remote controlled fleets for 
remote controlled battles.  If I remember correctly, Maryland had the 
champion fleet.  Sound familiar?

ST

On Tuesday, November 18, 2014 9:11:50 AM UTC-5, jvragu47 wrote:

 When referring to 1970 you must consider Mr Forbin's, Project Colossus.  
 LOL.   

 On Monday, November 17, 2014 9:30:18 PM UTC-5, Frank Pittelli wrote:

 Skynet?  That's like a dial-up modem network from the late 70's compared 
 to the Tri-Pact Battlefield Management Network scheduled to become 
 self-aware sometime in 2015. 

 On 11/17/2014 7:39 PM, Mike Lyons wrote: 
  I'm invoking the Skynet clause of our friendship agreement. 



-- 
-- 
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups R/C 
Tank Combat group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [TANKS] Re: Remote kill switch

2014-11-18 Thread Joe Sommer

On Tuesday, November 18, 2014 2:56:12 PM UTC-5, TyngTech wrote:

 If I remember correctly, Maryland had the champion fleet.  Sound familiar?


I'm sorry Dave,  I'm afraid I can't remember that.  Daisy ... Daisy ... 
give me
your answer do ...

  

-- 
-- 
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups R/C 
Tank Combat group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [TANKS] Re: Remote kill switch

2014-11-17 Thread todjones
Some remotes Like the Spectrum remotes have full channel failsafe. This means 
that at low battery voltage or loss of radio signal they will go to the 
failsafe position on all channels. This could be used to kill the tank in these 
situations. They also make an add on failsafe to control 1 channel. these are 
usually used to kill the throttle on RC cars so they don't run away when they 
run out of radio range or low battery. 
  
Tod 

- Original Message -

From: Jacob jacobweber2...@hotmail.com 
To: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com 
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2014 11:53:25 PM 
Subject: [TANKS] Re: Remote kill switch 

This is where a league rules have to be determined as to how many tanks are to 
be in a battle.  Its not hard to come up with a remote control, 10 or 12 
channel switch, that could be individually installed into each tank (up to 12 
tanks)..  Here is a 12 channel remote control: 

http://www.ebay.com/itm/DC12V-12Channel-Relay-RF-Switch-Remote-Control-Transmitter-Receiver-315MHz-/151373480251?pt=Home_Automation_Controls_Touchscreenshash=item233e90013b
 

On Friday, November 7, 2014 9:50:26 AM UTC-7, TyngTech wrote: 



This is something I'd like to see but it needs to be expanded to a global 
remote to kill all tanks in an event.  Though our tanks are supposed to have 
external kill switches, the fact is that I doubt any of our battlers could 
easily shut their vehicles down (manually) while it was running full bore over 
uneven ground.  I know I'd have an issue killing an errant Cromwell. 

ST 


On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 10:22:51 PM UTC-4, Replicant wrote: 
blockquote

Long time lurker here. I thought this was an interesting idea. Not exactly how 
viable it is with all the radio controls and interference.  

Remote Kill Switch 

Christopher 'lots of ideas yet to start' Crabb  




/blockquote




-- 
-- 
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group. 
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com 
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups R/C 
Tank Combat group. 
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com . 
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout . 

-- 
-- 
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups R/C 
Tank Combat group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [TANKS] Re: Remote kill switch

2014-11-17 Thread Frank Pittelli
Way back in the stone age, my doctoral thesis was on the design of 
fault-tolerant electronics.  A lot has changed in the 25+ years, but 
reliability theory hasn't changed much since Roman times when the 
historian Juvenal coined the phrase Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes? 
(i.e., But who will guard the guardians themselves?) and an anonymous 
sanitation engineer coined the phrase Custodite Hoc est simplex 
stultus (i.e., Keep It Simple Stupid).


So, I ask the question: Is it more reliable or less reliable to add a 
secondary RC-based control system to a vehicle as a safety cut-off for 
the primary RC-based control system?


Typically, the following topics are addressed when trying to answer such 
a question:


1) Will the RC-based kill system handle all of the same fault scenarios 
as the manual cutoff system?


2) Will the RC-based kill system introduce additional fault scenarios 
that must be handled?


3) Will the RC-based kill system use electro-mechanical parts that are 
more or less reliable than both the primary RC-based control system and 
the manual kill system?


--
--
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups R/C Tank Combat group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [TANKS] Re: Remote kill switch

2014-11-17 Thread TyngTech
All excellent points.  At our current mobilization level, a hobby 
standardized kill system is a moot point anyway.  Besides, the Cromwell's 
remote kill system has already been tested and validated.  I just have to 
make sure Marty's van is parked at the correct spot when something goes 
wrong!  ;-)

ST

On Monday, November 17, 2014 11:38:50 AM UTC-5, Frank Pittelli wrote:

 Way back in the stone age, my doctoral thesis was on the design of 
 fault-tolerant electronics.  A lot has changed in the 25+ years, but 
 reliability theory hasn't changed much since Roman times when the 
 historian Juvenal coined the phrase Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes? 
 (i.e., But who will guard the guardians themselves?) and an anonymous 
 sanitation engineer coined the phrase Custodite Hoc est simplex 
 stultus (i.e., Keep It Simple Stupid). 

 So, I ask the question: Is it more reliable or less reliable to add a 
 secondary RC-based control system to a vehicle as a safety cut-off for 
 the primary RC-based control system? 

 Typically, the following topics are addressed when trying to answer such 
 a question: 

 1) Will the RC-based kill system handle all of the same fault scenarios 
 as the manual cutoff system? 

 2) Will the RC-based kill system introduce additional fault scenarios 
 that must be handled? 

 3) Will the RC-based kill system use electro-mechanical parts that are 
 more or less reliable than both the primary RC-based control system and 
 the manual kill system? 


-- 
-- 
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups R/C 
Tank Combat group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: [TANKS] Re: Remote kill switch

2014-11-17 Thread Doug Conn
The “Marty’s Van” kill switch technique worked for me, too. It must be a magnet 
for out of control RCTC vehicles.

 

From: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com [mailto:rctankcombat@googlegroups.com] On 
Behalf Of TyngTech
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 11:45 AM
To: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [TANKS] Re: Remote kill switch

 

All excellent points.  At our current mobilization level, a hobby 
standardized kill system is a moot point anyway.  Besides, the Cromwell's 
remote kill system has already been tested and validated.  I just have to make 
sure Marty's van is parked at the correct spot when something goes wrong!  ;-)


ST


On Monday, November 17, 2014 11:38:50 AM UTC-5, Frank Pittelli wrote:

Way back in the stone age, my doctoral thesis was on the design of 
fault-tolerant electronics.  A lot has changed in the 25+ years, but 
reliability theory hasn't changed much since Roman times when the 
historian Juvenal coined the phrase Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes? 
(i.e., But who will guard the guardians themselves?) and an anonymous 
sanitation engineer coined the phrase Custodite Hoc est simplex 
stultus (i.e., Keep It Simple Stupid). 

So, I ask the question: Is it more reliable or less reliable to add a 
secondary RC-based control system to a vehicle as a safety cut-off for 
the primary RC-based control system? 

Typically, the following topics are addressed when trying to answer such 
a question: 

1) Will the RC-based kill system handle all of the same fault scenarios 
as the manual cutoff system? 

2) Will the RC-based kill system introduce additional fault scenarios 
that must be handled? 

3) Will the RC-based kill system use electro-mechanical parts that are 
more or less reliable than both the primary RC-based control system and 
the manual kill system? 

-- 
-- 
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com 
mailto:rctankcombat@googlegroups.com 
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
mailto:rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups R/C 
Tank Combat group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
mailto:rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com .
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
-- 
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups R/C 
Tank Combat group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [TANKS] Re: Remote kill switch

2014-11-17 Thread Frank Pittelli
For the record, I must note that the out of control examples cited by 
both Mr. Tyng and Rocket Man were both operator malfunctions.  In both 
cases, the RC systems were working as designed :-)


To my knowledge, in 10+ years of battling, we've never had a situation 
where the tank was running across the field in a manner that required 
the kill switch to stop it.


Of course, we've had numerous examples where the kill switch was 
inadvertently activated during a battle, thereby rendering the vehicle a 
sitting (aka. dead) duck.


On 11/17/2014 12:15 PM, Doug Conn wrote:

The “Marty’s Van” kill switch technique worked for me, too. It must be a
magnet for out of control RCTC vehicles.


--
--
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups R/C Tank Combat group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [TANKS] Re: Remote kill switch

2014-11-17 Thread Mike Lyons
Then we need to solve the correct problem.
I propose a remote-controlled device be attached to each operator
with the capability to remove said operator from the control process.

For testing purposes the phasers should be set to Stun.


On Monday, November 17, 2014 12:36:57 PM UTC-5, Frank Pittelli wrote:

 For the record, I must note that the out of control examples cited by 
 both Mr. Tyng and Rocket Man were both operator malfunctions.  In both 
 cases, the RC systems were working as designed :-) 
 ...

-- 
-- 
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups R/C 
Tank Combat group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [TANKS] Re: Remote kill switch

2014-11-17 Thread Frank Pittelli
True Story:  Before the Internet existed, a company called Tandem 
Computers was started by some database exports on the West Coast for the 
purpose of developing and selling fault-tolerant computer systems to 
support non-stop database applications.  One of the pioneers of such 
work was Dr. Jim Gray and he conducted a series of real-world studies 
based on *all* problems cited by Tandem customers over multi-year 
periods.  The overwhelming conclusion of those studies was that people, 
not hardware, were the cause of most problems.  Bear in mind, disk 
drives crashed in those days relatively often, compared to modern disk 
drives, so Tandem computers had duplicates of everything, including 
disks, CPUs, power supplies, back-planes, etc.


In many situations, the trained maintenance personnel themselves were 
responsible for crashing the system.  More often than not, the person 
shutting down half the system to replace a failed disk or power supply 
(which was routine back then) would shut down the wrong half.  The 
ironic solution was to eliminate certain types of routine maintenance 
and just let the system keep running.  For example, they might need N 
disks to run, but started with N+4 disks.  When the first and second 
disk fails, they do nothing, waiting until the 3rd disk fails to replace 
all three.  That way, they reduced the likelihood of stupid mistakes, 
without compromising system reliability.


Based on those studies, we should remove all humans from the equation 
and just let the tanks battle each other.  Unfortunately, that means 
that the Pittelli X-Prize Problem (i.e., autonomous tank operation) 
needs to be solved and that probably won't happen anytime soon :-)


On 11/17/2014 12:57 PM, Mike Lyons wrote:

Then we need to solve the correct problem.
I propose a remote-controlled device be attached to each operator
with the capability to remove said operator from the control process.


--
--
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups R/C Tank Combat group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [TANKS] Re: Remote kill switch

2014-11-17 Thread Mike Lyons
I'm invoking the Skynet clause of our friendship agreement.


On Monday, November 17, 2014 1:43:31 PM UTC-5, Frank Pittelli wrote:

 ... 

Based on those studies, we should remove all humans from the equation 
 and just let the tanks battle each other.

...

-- 
-- 
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups R/C 
Tank Combat group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [TANKS] Re: Remote kill switch

2014-11-17 Thread Frank Pittelli
Skynet?  That's like a dial-up modem network from the late 70's compared 
to the Tri-Pact Battlefield Management Network scheduled to become 
self-aware sometime in 2015.


On 11/17/2014 7:39 PM, Mike Lyons wrote:

I'm invoking the Skynet clause of our friendship agreement.


--
--
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups R/C Tank Combat group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[TANKS] Re: Remote kill switch

2014-11-16 Thread Jacob
This is where a league rules have to be determined as to how many tanks are 
to be in a battle.  Its not hard to come up with a remote control, 10 or 12 
channel switch, that could be individually installed into each tank (up to 
12 tanks)..  Here is a 12 channel remote control:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/DC12V-12Channel-Relay-RF-Switch-Remote-Control-Transmitter-Receiver-315MHz-/151373480251?pt=Home_Automation_Controls_Touchscreenshash=item233e90013b

On Friday, November 7, 2014 9:50:26 AM UTC-7, TyngTech wrote:

 This is something I'd like to see but it needs to be expanded to a global 
 remote to kill all tanks in an event.  Though our tanks are supposed to 
 have external kill switches, the fact is that I doubt any of our battlers 
 could easily shut their vehicles down (manually) while it was running full 
 bore over uneven ground.  I know I'd have an issue killing an errant 
 Cromwell.

 ST


 On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 10:22:51 PM UTC-4, Replicant wrote:

 Long time lurker here. I thought this was an interesting idea. Not 
 exactly how viable it is with all the radio controls and interference. 

 Remote Kill Switch http://www.instructables.com/id/Remote-Kill-Switch

 Christopher 'lots of ideas yet to start' Crabb 



-- 
-- 
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups R/C 
Tank Combat group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [TANKS] Re: Remote kill switch

2014-11-09 Thread 'jvragu47' via R/C Tank Combat
Gee guys, I hope that the NHTSA (national hobby tank safety administration) 
Czar is not a lurker on this site. Otherwise we might have speed limits 
imposed if you keep up this type of chatter. LOL.

On Friday, November 7, 2014 2:15:59 PM UTC-5, lo...@fieldofarmortanks.com 
wrote:

 Let alone catch up with your monster at full speed? I run marathon, and 7 
 mph is a healthy speed in cross country!


-- 
-- 
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups R/C 
Tank Combat group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[TANKS] Re: Remote kill switch

2014-11-09 Thread Caleb Smith
Up for hire, 100% certified tank catching services.  We have years of 
experience catching errant tanks that have stopped responding to 
the operator's commands.  Just give us the description of the tank, the 
designation number, its speed, and general direction it was last seen 
going, and we will be back within a week with your beloved tank.  

We haven't lost one yet!

All claims in this add may not be 100% true.  Any damage sustained while 
catching the tank are the responsibility of the owner.  We are not 
responsible for the loss of the tank in the event that we cannot find it.

On Friday, November 7, 2014 11:50:26 AM UTC-5, TyngTech wrote:

 This is something I'd like to see but it needs to be expanded to a global 
 remote to kill all tanks in an event.  Though our tanks are supposed to 
 have external kill switches, the fact is that I doubt any of our battlers 
 could easily shut their vehicles down (manually) while it was running full 
 bore over uneven ground.  I know I'd have an issue killing an errant 
 Cromwell.

 ST


 On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 10:22:51 PM UTC-4, Replicant wrote:

 Long time lurker here. I thought this was an interesting idea. Not 
 exactly how viable it is with all the radio controls and interference. 

 Remote Kill Switch http://www.instructables.com/id/Remote-Kill-Switch

 Christopher 'lots of ideas yet to start' Crabb 



-- 
-- 
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups R/C 
Tank Combat group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[TANKS] Re: Remote kill switch

2014-11-09 Thread 'jvragu47' via R/C Tank Combat
Excellent advertisement.  And the fee?   LOLOLOLOL.

On Sunday, November 9, 2014 10:31:20 AM UTC-5, Caleb Smith wrote:

 Up for hire, 100% certified tank catching services.  We have years of 
 experience catching errant tanks that have stopped responding to 
 the operator's commands.  Just give us the description of the tank, the 
 designation number, its speed, and general direction it was last seen 
 going, and we will be back within a week with your beloved tank.  

 We haven't lost one yet!

 All claims in this add may not be 100% true.  Any damage sustained while 
 catching the tank are the responsibility of the owner.  We are not 
 responsible for the loss of the tank in the event that we cannot find it.

 On Friday, November 7, 2014 11:50:26 AM UTC-5, TyngTech wrote:

 This is something I'd like to see but it needs to be expanded to a global 
 remote to kill all tanks in an event.  Though our tanks are supposed to 
 have external kill switches, the fact is that I doubt any of our battlers 
 could easily shut their vehicles down (manually) while it was running full 
 bore over uneven ground.  I know I'd have an issue killing an errant 
 Cromwell.

 ST


 On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 10:22:51 PM UTC-4, Replicant wrote:

 Long time lurker here. I thought this was an interesting idea. Not 
 exactly how viable it is with all the radio controls and interference. 

 Remote Kill Switch http://www.instructables.com/id/Remote-Kill-Switch

 Christopher 'lots of ideas yet to start' Crabb 



-- 
-- 
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups R/C 
Tank Combat group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[TANKS] Re: Remote kill switch

2014-11-09 Thread Caleb Smith
Fee  No fee, we work solely for the pleasure of seeing the smile on our 
customer's face when his tank is returned to him.  Though we do appreciate 
a generous donation to the company. ;)  

On Sunday, November 9, 2014 6:13:35 PM UTC-5, jvragu47 wrote:

 Excellent advertisement.  And the fee?   LOLOLOLOL.

 On Sunday, November 9, 2014 10:31:20 AM UTC-5, Caleb Smith wrote:

 Up for hire, 100% certified tank catching services.  We have years of 
 experience catching errant tanks that have stopped responding to 
 the operator's commands.  Just give us the description of the tank, the 
 designation number, its speed, and general direction it was last seen 
 going, and we will be back within a week with your beloved tank.  

 We haven't lost one yet!

 All claims in this add may not be 100% true.  Any damage sustained while 
 catching the tank are the responsibility of the owner.  We are not 
 responsible for the loss of the tank in the event that we cannot find it.

 On Friday, November 7, 2014 11:50:26 AM UTC-5, TyngTech wrote:

 This is something I'd like to see but it needs to be expanded to a 
 global remote to kill all tanks in an event.  Though our tanks are supposed 
 to have external kill switches, the fact is that I doubt any of our 
 battlers could easily shut their vehicles down (manually) while it was 
 running full bore over uneven ground.  I know I'd have an issue killing an 
 errant Cromwell.

 ST


 On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 10:22:51 PM UTC-4, Replicant wrote:

 Long time lurker here. I thought this was an interesting idea. Not 
 exactly how viable it is with all the radio controls and interference. 

 Remote Kill Switch http://www.instructables.com/id/Remote-Kill-Switch

 Christopher 'lots of ideas yet to start' Crabb 



-- 
-- 
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups R/C 
Tank Combat group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[TANKS] Re: Remote kill switch

2014-11-07 Thread TyngTech
This is something I'd like to see but it needs to be expanded to a global 
remote to kill all tanks in an event.  Though our tanks are supposed to 
have external kill switches, the fact is that I doubt any of our battlers 
could easily shut their vehicles down (manually) while it was running full 
bore over uneven ground.  I know I'd have an issue killing an errant 
Cromwell.

ST


On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 10:22:51 PM UTC-4, Replicant wrote:

 Long time lurker here. I thought this was an interesting idea. Not exactly 
 how viable it is with all the radio controls and interference. 

 Remote Kill Switch http://www.instructables.com/id/Remote-Kill-Switch

 Christopher 'lots of ideas yet to start' Crabb 


-- 
-- 
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups R/C 
Tank Combat group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


RE: [TANKS] Re: Remote kill switch

2014-11-07 Thread loic Anthian
Let alone catch up with your monster at full speed? I run marathon, and 7 mph 
is a healthy speed in cross country!

-- 
-- 
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups R/C 
Tank Combat group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
attachment: Loic Anthian.vcf

[TANKS] Re: Remote kill switch

2014-11-06 Thread Jacob
Good idea but i still want a manual emergency kill switch on a RC vehicle.

On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 8:22:51 PM UTC-6, Replicant wrote:

 Long time lurker here. I thought this was an interesting idea. Not exactly 
 how viable it is with all the radio controls and interference. 

 Remote Kill Switch http://www.instructables.com/id/Remote-Kill-Switch

 Christopher 'lots of ideas yet to start' Crabb 


-- 
-- 
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups R/C 
Tank Combat group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rctankcombat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.