[Rails] Re: An article: interest in rails is waning
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 8:10 PM, DHH> wrote: > >> That article is a joke. Of course Rails training is not as much in demand >> as it was when it was brand new and nobody knew how to work with it. But to >> think that the change in that has anything to do with the rise of >> J2EE/Spring?! Come on. >> >> On Wednesday, July 26, 2017 at 10:54:58 PM UTC-5, vedant agarwala wrote: >>> >>> Hello people, >>> >>> I was mildly shocked to read this article: >>> >>> >>> https://thenextweb.com/dd/2017/07/26/ruby-rails-major-coding-bootcamp-ditches-due-waning-interest/?amp=1 >>> >>> Wanted to know what you think. >>> >>> I kind of agree with the front-end becoming more relevant argument, but >>> projects being started on spring instead of rails. Is it really true, or >>> more importantly, could it be better ? >>> Rails is already embracing JavaScript and SPAs with webpacker. >>> >>> This article wrote that java is challenging for new devs. Seriously? >>> Java is easier than Ruby?! >>> >>> I am a big fan of rails, and personally hate java. But my opinion is >>> quite biased. Rails is the only web framework I've on since I started 5 >>> years ago. So what do you think about the article. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Vedant. >>> >> It's drivel. What difference does the market use of a tool make to people learning to code from a standing start. Unis still teach Logo and Fortran (among other esoteric anachronisms). I've worked at (and set up) a fair share of code-bootcamps. Pandering to the "employers want Java" camp just causes the "employers want .Net" camp to scream louder. The fact of the matter is, the students need to learn to code. Ruby is a good language for that (as are others), and whether or not it's a saleable skill after 10/12/14 weeks of study is irrelevant. The students on the boot camps are taking the first steps in learning to code - often from having never *ever* tried to code before - and if they get a job at the end of the course that they need to be familar with Java (or any other language) for, at the level they're at, it's a trivial task for them to come up to the same level they are at in whatever language they studied on their boot camp. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/08fafaa9-0868-4276-be8c-de93d1d6b604%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[Rails] Time to flounce...
Well, it's been a lovely few (four, I think?) years on the RailsTalk list, but I'm unsubscribing now (and I didn't want to just fade out the side-doors like so many names before). I'm still working with Rails (and will continue to while the contracts are around), but I can't take the volume and quality of emails from this list any more. I offer huge respect to the handful of posters that continue to fight to keep the head of RailsTalk above water - I sincerely hope you win. If you want to get hold of me, please connect on Google+ or LinkedIn, or feel free to email direct. But I shan't be receiving list emails any more. ATB Michael -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] Re: 15min of mentorship asked
On 11 Sep 2012 13:59, Pj M. li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: Hi there, I'm operating on a windows machine. However the kind of advice I'm looking for is not so technical in nature that I need advice how to get RoR running on my machine. With the help of AWDWR I already built the depot app on my machine. Now I'm looking for tips to get the most out of the language in 20 days. Spend the first two days installing and familiarising yourself with Ubuntu and RVM ... it'll repay itself many times over in future savings. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] misleading variable value
On 10 September 2012 02:41, John Merlino stoici...@aol.com wrote: I'm going to invoke action view base from console, passing a string object: 1.9.3p0 :016 ActionView::Base.new('app/views') Look at the return value assigned to @view_paths. It should not be an array. It should be a PathSet object instance It is a PathSet object - the easiest way to check this is to type: ActionView::Base.new('app/views').view_paths.class What you see when you call ActionView::Base.new('app/views') is just a string representation of the object. To assume when you look at the to_s output in the console that the original object is what the to_s produced is like looking at a black and white photograph and assuming the subject of the photo was black and white. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] Object Efficiency
On 10 September 2012 05:03, rails2012 derek...@hotmail.com wrote: In my rufus config file, I have to call MyController.new.checkEmail. Now I set it to run every 5 minutes. So the system creates a new MyController instance every 5 minutes. That's very inefficient right? Normally it would be worth worrying about ten and hundreds of requests a second... I don't think one every five minutes is going to cook the processor. What else can I do? Are there some advanced features in rails to mange object instance more efficiently? What problems are you suffering? Have you measured the degradation in performance on your system? PS I would suggest that if Rufus is polling a method, that method should not be on a controller. It should be on a model, or as a stand-alone lib class. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] Math between Models
On 4 September 2012 18:58, Sachin S. li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: Class Model_1 ActiveRecord::Base ... has_and_belongs_to_many :model_2 def some_method attr_1 * Model_2.find(model_2_id).attr_I_need end If the relationship is HABTM, you won't have a model_2_id attribute to find by, there should be a join table. If you explain in a little more detail what problem you're trying to solve with your relationship and the mathematical operation between them, maybe a solution can be suggested. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] Is it a good idea for me to learn Ruby on Rails?
On 30 August 2012 13:33, Peter Hickman peterhickman...@googlemail.com wrote: For someone who says that they have very little programing knowlege you seem to have your mind already made up. Why did you even come here and ask your question if you already know the answer? So young, so set in your ways. Very sad. http://tinyurl.com/44dznh6 ;-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] Extracting information out of a database column
On 31 August 2012 07:41, Joshua Baldock li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: I have an existing database that im building a rails app on top of. One of my columns 'message' is a long string that I would like to be able to query and split into various attributes to then be able to display each of those attributes in a view. I'm trying to implement this into the controller, but don't seem to be getting any where. Which bit are you having trouble with? Accessing the legacy table? Splitting the string? Displaying it in a view? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] Re: Extracting information out of a database column
On 31 August 2012 08:20, Joshua Baldock li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: Splitting the string and then storing them as additional attributes to the instance variable that contains the rest of the selected table values. Do you have an example of the string; the pattern that similar instances would follow, and the components you need it split into? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] Re: Re: Extracting information out of a database column
On 31 August 2012 08:59, Joshua Baldock li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: Message column and example message looks like this: The [user] is logged in via [hostname] I assume the square brackets are not in the string, so that a real string might look like : The administrator is logged in via michael-desktop ? If so, you'll probably want to play with some string matching methods. http://www.ruby-doc.org/core-1.9.3/String.html match is a good place to start. class MyModel AR::Base # my model has a big string field called note_details, from # which I want to extract the username and hostname values def username note_details.match(/The (\S*) is logged in via (\S*)/)[1] end def hostname note_details.match(/The (\S*) is logged in via (\S*)/)[2] end end in the view you can access @my_model.username and @my_model.hostname like any other attributes. If you have any issue with performance, you could memoize the results, so you only run the .match once. HTH -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] Ensure that only one member of a collection has the current flag set
On 29 August 2012 16:13, Walter Lee Davis wa...@wdstudio.com wrote: I have a model that includes a :current boolean. The idea is that there are many home pages that the admin is working on at any given time, but only one is current at a time. At the moment, I have enforced this with the following: before_save :toggle_current def toggle_current if current? Home.where([current = ? id != ?, true, self.id]).each do |home| home.update_attribute(:current, false) end end end you could use update_all rather than iterate a collection, which would only fire one SQL query. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] Re: A Ruby Book (free to use)
On 28 August 2012 08:32, Karthikeyan A k li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: LOL! All know its absurd, don't u ppl have a sense of humour or something? Is it supposed to be a joke book, or a tutorial? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] Where to store functions
On 25 August 2012 18:40, Dave Castellano li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: Generated questions are generated by a method I write. When a generated question is picked, the method I wrote is called and it returns an instance of the question, its correct answer, and its explanation. Each time the question is called it generates a slightly different version of the question. I plan to have hundreds of these methods. Currently each is a separate file. What do these generated methods look like? Are they very similar to each other? Do they follow some sort of pattern? Could that be turned into some form of configuration information? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[Rails] Quick Poll - Searching
What do you go for (for a Rails 2.x app...)? SearchLogic, or a little scopes plugin? I'm wondering whether I might just as easily get all my dynamic searching done with TrixyScopes [1], or just plump for the market leader. [1] http://rubygems.org/gems/trixy_scopes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] Re: How can I copy records from one table to another?
On 14 Aug 2012 04:38, ZeroModulus brlafreni...@gmail.com wrote: The number of records would vary widely. I thought of doing deleted tables because I had already thought of having an attribute to mark a record as active, but figured I would have to write an exclusion clause every time. Would there be a way to do this without having to write exclusion clauses for every query? Have a look at the acts_as_paranoid gem. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] Re: How can I copy records from one table to another?
On 14 August 2012 11:12, Andrew Vit and...@avit.ca wrote: acts_as_paranoid simply adds a deleted_at flag, it doesn't move records to a separate table. It does a *little more* than simply that... Something like acts_as_archive is a better equivalent. The requirement to move them to another table was because the OP didn't know how to flag records in the same table as deleted and have them auto-magically ignored by finders, etc. If the requirement is to archive them (which *isn't* the same as softly deleting), along with the hassle of managing two sets of tables... then acts_as_archived could be ideal. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] Where to store array(hash)?
On 5 August 2012 20:12, Дмитрий Снегирев rikk...@gmail.com wrote: I have hash: {default_list = { ws = 15, ret= 50}, ret_discount = { 5 = 5000, 10=1, 15=15000, 20=3 }} Where better to keep it? Without database. In memory? In code? As a constant? In a yaml file? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] Pop quiz: Where do you watch for job postings?
On 9 August 2012 16:04, Ed W li...@wildgooses.com wrote: Hi all, I'm looking for some advice on where we should be putting an advert if we are looking to hire a full time rails developer? Or turning it around what websites (or mailing lists) do folks here use to if they feel the need for a change in view from their desk? A few details to narrow down scope since it might affect the advice, apologies in advance, trying to NOT make this an advert in itself: - We are based in London - Looking to hire local, permanent staff - Small company looking for self reliant people who can work independently I look at posts on here, on LRUG and on Jobsite. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] How to encrypt Ruby script..
On 7 August 2012 11:36, Shrikant Lokhande lokhande.shrik...@gmail.com wrote: Its encripted but its not running.. Why would it run? It's no longer a Ruby file, it's *encrypted*! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] How to encrypt Ruby script..
On 7 August 2012 11:46, Shrikant Lokhande lokhande.shrik...@gmail.com wrote: Yes its cool,,, but i want to run one ruby script and script having confidential info. So i need run that in encrypted mode. Drip-feeding information like this is very frustrating. http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html (tl/dr: Please outline your problem, your attempted solutions, and the errors you've had) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] Rspec
On 4 August 2012 06:30, honey ruby emailtohoneyr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all i'm trying to learn Rspec testing can anyone suggest me the best book to learn Rspec with good sample code. The RSpec Book, maybe? http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=rspec+book Is your Google broken... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] How to remove a record if it is duplicate end sum values :val
On 1 August 2012 14:25, Esmerino Costa hakag...@gmail.com wrote: I have a hash like so: That's not a hash, it's an array of hashes. What I would like to learn how to do is how to remove a record if it is duplicate end sum values :val. list.uniq! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] Testing Rails app
On 3 August 2012 06:32, honey ruby emailtohoneyr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone i want to test a rails app and i have no idea on testing the rails app. Can any guide me how to test a rails app and what are the best way to test an app. Have you tried http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=test+rails+app Imagine that each of those results is someone answering your question before you asked it. Read them, and then ask any specific questions you have about implementing their advice. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] Polymorphic one-to-one associations in Rails 3.2 - what's the correct Rails way?
On 1 August 2012 02:17, Neil Mowbray neil.timothy.mowb...@gmail.com wrote: Unless I'm being dumb I cannot find anything on Google search or in the Rails books on how to create a one-to-one polymorphic association (as apposed to a one-to-many polymorphic association). Change the has_many to a has_one, and you should have a 1:1 relationship... - Person generic concept (name, age, nationality, etc) which I want to attach polymorphically to concrete models suchs concrete class contain additional type specific information which I do not want nullable hence STI is not desirable and would result in a sparse table. I would still consider STI for this kind of situation, but I'd give each subclass a different association to the specific information for that model, which would keep the DB nice and 'clean' (I did it yesterday with Vehicles, and sub-classes for Car, Truck, Bus, Motorbike, etc,) class Person AR::Base end class Staff Person # employee number, start date, etc has_one :staff_details end class Mother Person # can't imagine what info mother would need, but there's support for it has_one :mother_details end class Child Person # what does a child need differently? has_one :child_details end Of course, the problem with this approach is what happens when you have a staff member who is a mother? You'd need two records for them (it's easy for me; a Car can't also be a Motorbike :-) In this event you would be better coming from a different angle (like a has_many :employments to determine whether a Person is staff or not, and a has_many :parentings to figure whether they're a mother or father) HTH -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] Integration of barcode Scanner or Reader into Application
On 31 July 2012 08:13, saritha chakilala li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: Can any one help how to integrate barcode reader into my Application. What I want actually is that, By Capturing the value of barcode(registrtion_id) all other fields of that particular record need to autofill. ***I Am Looking For Your Valuable Reply **8 Thanks in Advance. Most barcode scanners are just another type of input device (like a keyboard or mouse). When they scan, they send the series of digits that the barcode represents to the computer as keyboard input - just as if the user had typed them. All you need to do is set up a form with a barcode number input field, which is observed for any changes. That value can be posted to your app and you can return whatever response you want. If you want to get funky, depending on the features of your scanner, you can set the scanner up to send a special character code before it sends the rest of the characters, and you could use javascript to watch out for the special character, and capture everything that comes after... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] update_attributes clears password
On 30 Jul 2012 18:14, jsnark s...@monmouth.com wrote: I have a database table that contains encrypted passwords along with other information relating to users. When I do an update_attributes operation on a row in the table with a hash that does not contain a password, the password gets reset to the empty string. How can I stop this? Remove the password key/value pair from the params hash before the update-attributes call if the password value is blank. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] update_attributes clears password
On 30 July 2012 20:23, jsnark s...@monmouth.com wrote: The hash does not contain a password key/value pair. In spite of this, the password is set to the empty string. What filters run in the model? What observers are operating? It would be worth setting a breakpoint at your update_attribute line and following through from there to see what happens to your password attribute. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] update_attributes clears password
On 30 July 2012 22:39, jsnark s...@monmouth.com wrote: I understand the problem now, but I do not see the solution. The model has a before_save filter that is causing the password to be reset. How do I stop this on an update? The same way I said before - only run it if the password has been populated: def encrypt_password self.encrypted_password = encrypt(self.password) unless self.password.blank? end But you will probably need to add same validation to ensure there is an encrypted_password - otherwise it would be possible to create accounts with blank passwords... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] Same name action and attribute in a model
On 27 July 2012 07:22, Sumit Srivastava sumit.theinvinci...@gmail.com wrote: I have been following following tutorial to make a user login session. http://www.aidanf.net/rails_user_authentication_tutorial I used the following action to encrypt the password. def password #debugger @password1=pass self.salt = SecureRandom.hex(10) if !self.salt? self.password = User.encrypt(@password1, self.salt) end but when it is called following error is generated. SystemStackError (stack level too deep): app/models/user.rb:26:in `password=' app/models/user.rb:27:in `password=' app/controllers/user_controller.rb:31:in `new' app/controllers/user_controller.rb:31:in `createuser' Which (if any) of those lines is line 26 in your UserController? What does the User.encrypt method look like? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] Same name action and attribute in a model
On 27 July 2012 08:07, Michael Pavling pavl...@gmail.com wrote: Which (if any) of those lines is line 26 in your UserController? What does the User.encrypt method look like? Ignore me... I can't even read your error message properly myself. I used the following action to encrypt the password. def password #debugger @password1=pass self.salt = SecureRandom.hex(10) if !self.salt? self.password = User.encrypt(@password1, self.salt) end Right... so where does the value of pass come from? Is there a method that returns it? In the (six year old) tutorial you're following, the method is: def password=(pass) @password=pass self.salt = User.random_string(10) if !self.salt? self.hashed_password = User.encrypt(@password, self.salt) end but you've changed it to not take any attributes, and to update self.password rather than self.hashed_password. It would probably help a little to post a bit more (all) of your model. Also, I'm curious why, if you're following a tutorial, would you change large chunks of the functionality? If you implement it exactly as described, does it work? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] Same name action and attribute in a model
On 27 July 2012 10:42, sumit srivastava sumit.theinvinci...@gmail.com wrote: This is the complete model. I am trying to encrypt the password. def self.hashedpass(login, pass) u=find(:first, :conditions=[login = ?, login]) return nil if u.nil? return u if User.encrypt(pass, u.salt)==u.hashed_password nil end You compare the hashed user input with the u.hashed_password attribute here... def passwordtext=(pass) #debugger @password1=pass self.salt = SecureRandom.hex(10) if !self.salt? self.password = User.encrypt(@password1, self.salt) end ...but here you're setting the password attribute - so is there a hashed_password attribute on the user? And if so, how is it set? I am not exactly following the tutorial. I have customized things according to my requirements. Your requirement was to have a non-working password hashing process?! - as it seems that's all your customization has achieved. What was wrong with the tutorial that didn't work for you? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] Same name action and attribute in a model
On 27 July 2012 11:13, sumit srivastava sumit.theinvinci...@gmail.com wrote: During customizations I have used password as the column where encrypted password shall be saved. So I created my own attr_accessor, i.e., passwordtext. I have named the password_field_tag in my form as passwordtext. But when I do so, it is not executed. Instead if I rename the password_field_tag and the attr_accessor as password only, it is executed but the stackerror comes in. All of this info would have been very helpful in your OP anyway... ... what happens when you try this: def passwordtext=(pass) @passwordtext=pass self.salt = User.random_string(10) if !self.salt? self.password = User.encrypt(@passwordtext, self.salt) end If it's still overflowing, can you post the error message again (since the model has changed since your first post this morning) and the corresponding method from the controller, as it might be something in there behaving weirdly. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] Same name action and attribute in a model
On 27 July 2012 11:37, sumit srivastava sumit.theinvinci...@gmail.com wrote: This is what I receive, SystemStackError (stack level too deep): app/models/user.rb:26:in `password=' app/models/user.rb:27:in `password=' app/controllers/user_controller.rb:31:in `new' app/controllers/user_controller.rb:31:in `createuser' Here createuser action is used to store the user info into database. Line 31 reads as follows, @user = User.new(params[:user]) I would put a breakpoint on that line and then keep stepping into until you see where it's looping :-/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] Same name action and attribute in a model
On 27 July 2012 11:52, sumit srivastava sumit.theinvinci...@gmail.com wrote: That might be another solution. But what I am trying to know is why isn't this method working. And how is the action def password=(pass) actually being called. Because I didn't see any exclusive line where it is being called. My analysis says it is being executed because of the attr_accessor and having name same as that of the column password. Which accessor? The only accessor you have is passwordtext. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] Same name action and attribute in a model
On 27 July 2012 17:31, sumit srivastava sumit.theinvinci...@gmail.com wrote: Right now I have renamed it to passwordtext but originally it was password. I wrote about its behavior when named as password. Okay... so what help is that? What difference does what something *used* to be make?! If you have a problem *now* it's only a concern what the settings are *now*. Have you followed through in the debugger to see what's going on? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] Re: Rails' inflections are messy
On 19 July 2012 20:48, Colin Law clan...@googlemail.com wrote: On 19 July 2012 20:07, Linus Pettersson linus.petters...@gmail.com wrote: At least they should fix the ones that are incorrect... Octopus.pluralize should return Octopuses and NOT Octopi... :) But then all those applications that rely on the current pluralisation of octopus would break when upgraded. Innumerable applications around the internet would come to their knees. :-) Surely all those sites' developers could just override the inflector back to what it used to be, and get on with all the other tasks they need to complete to upgrade to Rails4? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] Nil Class
On 16 July 2012 20:52, Adnan adnan.a...@gmail.com wrote: I've a field in my two db tables called username. when I try to match post author and current username for editing a post @movies.username==current.name in my moviescontroller. It showed nil class or method. Why this is showing??Any ideas?? Check what the values for both @movies and current are at this line. What are they? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Rails] error in runtime controller#view
On 4 July 2012 07:14, Abhishek Sharma asharma...@gmail.com wrote: class PageController ApplicationController before_filter :find_subject def new @page = Page.new(:subject_id = @subject.id) @page_count = @subject.pages.size + 1 @subjects = Subject.order('position ASC') end private def find_subject if params[:subject_id] @subject = Subject.find_by_id(params[:subject_id]) end end end You're calling find_subject on a before_filter, and it may or may not populate a @subject object depending on whether there's a param value. But your action then goes on to expect there to definitely be an @subject instance variable. Put a breakpoint in find_subject, and see what the parameter values are. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en-US.
Re: [Rails] Re: variable symbol
On 3 July 2012 13:04, Aleksey V Zapparov i...@member.fsf.org wrote: I don't speak Deutsch, but I guess I understood you. Sorry it was my mistake (copy-paste is evil): us.bslnk.send :#{tst}= false You're probably going to need a comma in there to separate the parameters being passed to .send us.bslnk.send :#{tst}=, false It may be clearer in this instance to be explicit with parantheses: us.bslnk.send(:#{tst}=, false) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en-US.
Re: [Rails] will_change!
On 27 June 2012 10:56, kengsreng tang li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: Dear all model person id: 1, name: test end i need some explanation about name_will_change! you're not the only one. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] E-Books for RoR 3
On 27 June 2012 12:12, Ankit Kipl ankit.k...@gmail.com wrote: WHAT ARE YOU DOING SENDING 12Meg FILES TO THIS LIST? Not to mention that it's copyright material... Ryan may be in contact with your ISP shortly -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Unit Testing SQL
On 22 June 2012 15:07, Gurdipe Dosanjh rhomobilea...@gmail.com wrote: What is the best way to unit test hard coded sql in a rails application. You don't test SQL, you test methods. Whether the method gets it's results through ActiveRecord, raw SQL, or fairies rummaging around the hard drive, it's irrelevant to the tests. They should just be testing that the expected values are returned by the method. So the answer to your question may be move the SQL to be wrapped by methods, and test those, but without seeing some source code it would be hard to say. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: why use rescue nil?
On 20 June 2012 01:55, John Merlino stoici...@aol.com wrote: ok I thought it would return nil It would take 30seconds to try it out in a console... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: Associations join
On 20 June 2012 08:51, Timen E. li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: #card_controller.rb class CardController ApplicationController def show @card = Card.all end end h1Card#show/h1 pFind me in app/views/card/show.html.erb/p %= @card.user % undefined method `user' for #Array:0x3c81ac8 Extracted source (around line #3): @card is a collection of cards (that's how you populate it in the show action. If it needs to be a single card, you need to find it by ID (or some other attribute), if it's supposed to be a collection of every card, you need to iterate it in the view and print the user for each card. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] how to update a table which is connected with joins
On 13 June 2012 08:31, hanish jadala emailtohoneyr...@gmail.com wrote: hi all help me out guys thanks in advance On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:07 PM, hanish jadala emailtohoneyr...@gmail.com wrote: no with our changing the relationship can i update values. We did - you refused to do it :-/ Let's just restate your position: You want to have a habtm join, with extra information in the join table. This type of join typically does not have a model, and thus no way of updating those extra fields (although a feature of Rails does/did extend columns in the join table to both sides of the association). You don't want to add a new model and join through it (the way it would be done normally). So you see the circular problem you have... Let's take one step back; rather than demanding that people help you out, maybe you can explain *why* you don't want to change your association... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] how to update a table which is connected with joins
On 13 June 2012 10:20, hanish jadala emailtohoneyr...@gmail.com wrote: hi Michael Pavling i can not change my relationship because i have used in many other places if i change relationship i have to make more changes in my app that is y i can not change my relationship. So instead of doing a refactor to support the new functionality you want (a moderately fiddly job to change many other places - but an opportunity to DRY them up...), you're going to plan to bodge in something that will make it practically impossible to ever refactor this area of code in the future. This will make any future functionality changes in this area an absolute nightmare. Google technical debt. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] I can't install ruby on rails on my mac - Sorry I know it's been posted 1 million times before
If it's been posted a million times before, have you read all the responses to those questions?... On 13 June 2012 11:33, blakeh92 handson.bl...@gmail.com wrote: This is the guide i've been following: http://hivelogic.com/articles/ruby_rails_lighttpd_mysql_tiger/ You're following a 7-year-old thread guide?! Can you not find one that's a bit more recent? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] how to update a table which is connected with joins
On 12 June 2012 10:31, honey ruby emailtohoneyr...@gmail.com wrote: hi all there are two tables Student and Batch in there model i have has_and_belongs_to_many :graduated_batches, :class_name = 'Batch', :join_table = 'batch_students' in Student table i have added a new column to batch_students table and i want to update the value in batch_students table. How can i update values in batch_students table where there is no model for that table so that i can update directly.how to update table which is in joins. Sounds like you want to change those habtm relationships to has_many :through = :batch_students -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: if else statement
On 11 June 2012 10:19, Paul McGuane li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: thanks for the tips, i cleaned up the code a bit, and used some other logic which produced this def win_lose_tie if self.for.to_i == self.against.to_i then :tie elsif self.for.to_i self.against.to_i then :win else :lose end end So you turned a Ruby two line method into a PHP 7-liner? If you prefer Well, as long as you see the direction the code should go, you can always make it more Ruby later ;-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] installing ruby on rails 1.9.3 on windows 7
On 11 June 2012 19:19, nishant g. li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: C:\Sites\railsinstaller_demorails s C:/RailsInstaller/Ruby1.9.3/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/execjs-1.4.0/lib/execjs/run times.rb:51:in `autodetect': Could not find a JavaScript runtime. See https://gi thub.com/sstephenson/execjs for a list of available runtimes. Please guide me what to do.. Install a javascript runtime? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: if else statement
On 10 June 2012 01:12, Paul McGuane li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: Hi Michael, I have tried the code you suggested, though all i seem to get is every result as a tie. this is what I have in my #model def win_lose_tie return :tie if if schedule.for.to_i == schedule.against.to_i schedule.for.to_i schedule.against.to_i ? :win : :lose end end end Hiya, The code I posted was a rough, un-run, first draft typed straight into the email client, but even so, I did a little re-arrangement and DRYing while composing, and left an extraneous if on the first line of win_lose_tie. This is what it should look like (the if condition at the end of the line is a modifier, or guard - not a construct that PHP supports AFAIK ;-) def win_lose_tie return :tie if schedule.for.to_i == schedule.against.to_i schedule.for.to_i schedule.against.to_i ? :win : :lose end Bear in mind that I haven't run it - so it may need a little debugging. The intention of my post is that you see more clearly the direction the code should be heading towards (rather than having huge logical constructs in your views). i even tried what you would do in php and had a variable set us :result To be honest, I don't really see how trying in PHP is going to go any way to solving a problem you have in Ruby - it's certainly not one of the first debugging steps I would recommend :-/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Modeling one way associations
On 9 June 2012 16:45, Jason Walsh li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: I am working on a project where I have a Process object that references a Node object. I have tried adding a node_id column in the Process table and created an has_one relationship in the Process model. Change that relationship definition to a belongs_to rather than a has_one. http://guides.rubyonrails.org/association_basics.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] if else statement
On 9 June 2012 17:26, Paul McGuane li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: undefined method `' for nil:NilClass Extracted source (around line #47): The error is telling you that the thing you are calling greater than on is nil. Looking at line 47, that thing is schedule.for - this value, although you *think* it may be an integer is nil. First off, look into debugging your app to get to the bottom of these issues faster for yourself: http://guides.rubyonrails.org/debugging_rails_applications.html Secondly, a bodge fix would be to call to_i on the values before you compare them: % if schedule.for.to_i schedule.against.to_i % Thirdly. this sort of logic should really live in the model, or a helper (or split between both), certainly not in the view. #Schedule model def win_lose_tie return :tie if if schedule.for.to_i == schedule.against.to_i schedule.for.to_i schedule.against.to_i ? :win : :lose end #helper def win_lose_tie_display(value) case value when :win W when :lose L when :tie T else unknown win/lose/tie value end end #view strong%= win_lose_tie_display(schedule.win_lose_tie) %/strong -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Modeling one way associations
On 9 June 2012 17:51, Colin Law clan...@googlemail.com wrote: @Michael, perhaps we should work in shifts. Colin :-D -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: Problem with array of hashes
On 5 June 2012 19:19, cyber c. li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: Yah i get it. I wanted to convert this array of hash into an array of class objects. How do i do that in ruby? They are class objects - hashes are instances of Hash class ... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: validation not called on create, only update
On 1 June 2012 04:31, flaps flaps2...@gmail.com wrote: THanks for your response. The validation methods are not called on a create, allowing the save method to be called, unprotected. I dont want the save to be called let alone fail. Is there any chance you could post your controller code. I wonder whether you've got a .save false in the create action... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] warning: already initialized constant
On 30 May 2012 10:44, Gurdipe Dosanjh rhomobilea...@gmail.com wrote: Loading development environment (Rails 2.1.0) /denorm_brag_report.rb:423: warning: already initialized constant MAIN_CATEGORIES Does your code include the denorm_brag_report.rb file more than once? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] warning: already initialized constant
On 30 May 2012 12:07, Gurdipe Dosanjh rhomobilea...@gmail.com wrote: I have checked and its not been called anywhere else, but may be im missing something simple it always gives a warning on the last entry of the set of values in assigned to the constants I would recommend putting a breakpoint on the line that defines the constant, and then the second time it gets there have a look at the call stack to see how it's ending up there twice. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Rails developer required.
On 22 May 2012 09:00, cmittal cmitta...@gmail.com wrote: what's wrong with this? It doesn't demonstrate *any* willingness by the OP to put in effort into recruiting for their position. Typically, the stage of trying to attract people is when you try your hardest to put on a good show; so if this is an indication of what it's like when they're on best form, imagine what actually working there will be like... More measurably, it contains no information about the role's requirements, the location, the employer's expectations, the hours of work, the remuneration... let me ask you - do you think there might be anything good about the ad? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Rails developer required.
On 21 May 2012 22:57, Suraj B. li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: If you are experienced rails developer please let me know. worst job ad ever -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] loop in rails view
On 22 May 2012 15:36, amvis vgrkrish...@gmail.com wrote: basically with that if condition, i need to show different div, % @update_coupon.each do |doc| % % if doc[value] == 2 % //code %elsif doc[value] == 5 % //code %elsif doc[value] == 6 % //code %end% %end% You need a case statement as a starting point: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/948135/how-to-write-a-switch-statement-in-ruby -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] can someone explain how map! / connect! works in this case?
On 18 May 2012 04:57, Christopher D. li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: ary = [0,1,1,1,1,3] ary.map! { |num| %w(zero one two three)[num] } I just don't get it, how does it know which value to write out? you're taking the numbers 0,1,1,1,1,3 and for each of them you're populating an array with the values from another array at the index that corresponds to the number you're operating on at the time. It doesn't know which number to write out, you're telling it to go get whatever element is at the index. If I change the array number say to 10 instead of three and change the word three to ten in the block it comes as nil... If you change one of them to 10, then the map is not going to find an element in your %w(zero one two three) array at index 10, so it returns nil. is there something special about 1..3 that I am missing? No, but it would probably be best to familiarise yourself with the Enumerable methods' documentation. Or maybe go through the Ruby koans to experiment. BTW What on earth are you trying to achieve with this code? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Ror code please just help me in findng solution
On May 16, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Prajwal B. wrote: or else even i can talk vulgar than you see how this rascal. *ker-splunk* Another one in the ignore filter pool... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Rails, you are so nice
Just feel like it's time to put some love out there. I've spent the day chopping up years-old scripts that did lots of querying and looping (pesky PHP coders trying to write Ruby...) and have replaced tonnes of methods with a few nicely chained named_scopes (I'm still mired in Rails2.1 for this project). The reports run ten-times quicker; the code is a tenth of the size; it's all beautiful Ruby, and all's good in the world :-) Thanks, Matz, DHH, Koz, Katz, et al. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] how to prevent the user from accessing the app.after logout with back button(rails only)
On 10 May 2012 07:54, honey ruby emailtohoneyr...@gmail.com wrote: after logging out of my site if i click back button it is going back how can i restrict this problem It's a browser caching issue, so you need to tell the browser not to cache. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/711418/how-to-prevent-browser-page-caching-in-rails -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] how to prevent the user from accessing the app.after logout with back button(rails only)
On 10 May 2012 08:46, hanish jadala emailtohoneyr...@gmail.com wrote: thanks for your reply i have added your code and i checked it. if i click back button after logout it is still going back to app but it is give me the error undefined method `username' for nil:NilClass it shows it going back to app. It's not my code - it's sample code from the Internet. Your error is now in your code - probably in the handling of controller actions when users are not logged in. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] how to encryption and decryption a string or integer in ruby
On 10 May 2012 11:01, honey ruby emailtohoneyr...@gmail.com wrote: i want to encrypt and decrypt a number or string in RoR. is there any gem or plug-in for that. http://lmgtfy.com/?q=ruby+encrypt+decrypt -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Sorting of users depending on
On 9 May 2012 07:34, Ajit Teli li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: Currently I am sorting (order) users depending on email id. I would like to sort the users depending on checkbox status so that selected (checked) users will be listed first and then other emails will be listed in the order of email. The first step is to get that finder out of the view, and move it into the User model. Then you can call it on the @current_user instance and do all of your sorting and shuffling in one place: Class User AR::Base def accessible_users return [] unless role == excelfore User.all( :order = :email, :conditions = ( [role != 'excelfore'] ) ).sort_by { |u| u.receiving_group_email? } end def receiving_group_email? # some calculation here that returns whether or not users are at the top of the list - or even better, move it into the conditions of the finder... end end # in the view % @current_user.accessible_users.each_with_index do |u,i| % etc -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: does it really achieve the productivity advantages it claims?
On 9 May 2012 10:46, Peter Hickman peterhickman...@googlemail.com wrote: I'm pretty sure that no one ever claimed that Rails makes you psychic. I could sense you were gonna type that... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: Sorting of users depending on
On 9 May 2012 11:51, Ajit Teli li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: Can I do it by using sorttable.js ? I have included table headers, sorttable.js. And also I have changed the table class to class=sortable. But it is not working. No idea - that's nothing to do with Rails AFAIK - it's all front-end stuff; JS manipulation of data that's been sent to the browser. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] validating input values(integer)
On 4 May 2012 08:16, Soichi Ishida li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: But interestingly, if I input, say, 'this' in the input form, it directs to the next page and the '0' (an integer, though) value is inserted in the DB. I do not have any default value to 'price'. If you pop open a Rails console and type: 'this'.to_i What result do you get? Yep - zero is an integer. Rails casts the values from params to map to the DB fields, so if you want validate the values the user typed rather than the values Rails has translated them to, you may need to write a custom validation and check the before_typecast value. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: validating input values(integer)
On 4 May 2012 09:41, Soichi Ishida li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: 1.9.3-p0 :008 'this'.to_i = 0 1.9.3-p0 :009 It's zero...it does not seem good at all ;) That's a different thread entirely ;-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: Re: Hosting application on private network.
On 3 May 2012 13:10, Ajit Teli li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: Fy final idea is to host the application worldwide. All the http requests to public ip (122.166.7.181) with port 8050 should be directed to my system and users should be able to browse the app. I have configured the router for port-forwarding. But it is not working. If you know how to host the web application then suggest me. This sounds like an Apache/router issue, not a Rails issue. If you can get a flat, HTML-only site working internally, then a Rails app should be able to slot into the configuration. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Why I have to set two unnecessary params in controller action after i send form_tag?
On 3 May 2012 15:16, regedarek dariusz.fins...@gmail.com wrote: https://gist.github.com/2585733 This is my code. send is an critically important method in Ruby - probably best to name your action something else. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] CSV Import Issue
On 1 May 2012 17:29, Rahul B. li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: I am getting an error NoMethodError. The error would have told you which line and file the error was on. If you can share that information, then it may be easier to help suggest solutions. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Is my developer dodgy?
On 27 April 2012 14:57, Emanresu craiglba...@gmail.com wrote: I need some help... Didn't you post this three days ago? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Missing Method as Filter
On 26 April 2012 00:31, Christopher D. li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: User.find_by_username(Tom)? 1 : 0 How would I find out Tom's corresponding id? For example I'm looking for something along the lines of: User.find_by_username(Tom).id (user = User.find_by_username(Tom)) ? user.id : 0 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: To developers of Rails: Feeble documentation - weakness of Ruby and the Ruby on Rails (2nd edition)
2012/4/26 Karthikeyan A.K mindas...@gmail.com: I strongly feel Rails community should have a good documentation like PHP people have. that will surely increase number people who want to learn and use Rails. Again *which* bit of documentation needs to be better... how many times have you honestly been confounded by not finding something in the docs? (and when you did, did you contribute to fill the hole?) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: To developers of Rails: Feeble documentation - weakness of Ruby and the Ruby on Rails (2nd edition)
On 26 April 2012 14:13, Scott Ribe scott_r...@elevated-dev.com wrote: On Apr 26, 2012, at 1:36 AM, Michael Pavling wrote: Again *which* bit of documentation needs to be better Nearly every frickin' time I look something up. Rails docs are really awful compared Now, this is where I'm flummoxed, because I just don't find that. I've learned loads from the docs and source. But I do agree that not everyone works the same way, or learns the same way, and it may be that the docs as they are are not right for a large section of the readership. But this comes back to the thought that if there needs to be a different style to some of the documentation, then those that need it need to start writing it rather than just complaining about it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: To developers of Rails: Feeble documentation - weakness of Ruby and the Ruby on Rails (2nd editi
On 25 April 2012 06:03, Sergey Ezhov li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: There is a set of examples where people approached more responsibly to documentation creation, for example: http://www.yiiframework.com, http://kohanaframework.org, http://framework.zend.com/ There is an Agile methodology argument that documentation should be written by those that need it. Perhaps you could pair with a developer and help to contribute, as you have very clear ideas of what would be useful. I suppose, they reflected on convenience of use of tools to developers. From my own experience, I find that I can't necessarily write the clearest documentation for the code I write; just like I can't do UI design, colour-palette mixing, or a host of other associated skills. The skill of being able to write good documentation isn't always going to overlap with being able to write good code - so maybe the lack of good docs is more down to a lack of people who are able to write the docs contributing, rather than any malicious intent of the core developers. As and aside; if you compare the Rails core to lots of other frameworks (particularly some of those written in PHP that you cite) the source is a *lot* more self documenting when it's written well in Ruby. And it's a million times better than *badly* written PHP. So given the choice, I'd rather have good code with sparse docs, than poor code with good docs. YMMV -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: To developers of Rails: Feeble documentation - weakness of Ruby and the Ruby on Rails (2nd editi
On 25 April 2012 09:50, Sergey Ezhov li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: I assume that because you're using Ruby Forum, you're not quoting. Please bear in mind that the forum is just a wrapper that some people use to hide the mailing list. For those of us who use the mailing list, un-quoted replies are barely legible. And how about a good documentary code and all as good documentation to it? Of course, that's the ideal situation :-) Which of those frameworks has that? ;-) For some reason developers of PHP weren't too lazy to create documentation design team. Again, you're confusing PHP the language, with Rails the framework. Ruby has *very good* (in my opinion) API documentation - much better than the comment/discussion-ridden PHP documentation. Let me just let you know, in case you were assuming, I'm nothing to do with Rails - I'm just a developer like yourself. But I do wince when I read phrases like too lazy, as that implies a concious decision - an allegation that's liable to rile some people. I'm happy to give you the benefit of the doubt, as you've said that English is not your first language (although, I think you're making a great effort if you're not using a translator *applauds*). But you haven't answered my suggestion that if you think the core team are lacking in documentation skills, could you help contribute? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: To developers of Rails: Feeble documentation - weakness of Ruby and the Ruby on Rails (2nd editi
On 25 April 2012 10:20, Sergey Ezhov li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: I don't know, what advantage is received by developers from popularity of language, from popularity of framework. Again, you're posting without quoting, so I have no idea what you're referring to. Really very many people stop and leave from Ruby and Ruby on Rails use only in the absence of good documentation. What documentation *is* missing? There are dozens of getting started with Rails books, and indeed, if you type that phrase into your search engine of choice, you get a massive amount of results, including: http://guides.rubyonrails.org/getting_started.html http://railscasts.com/episodes/310-getting-started-with-rails https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/rails3 And let's not forget what I already referred to as the great Ruby API docs: http://www.ruby-doc.org/core-1.8.6/ http://www.ruby-doc.org/core-1.8.7/ http://www.ruby-doc.org/core-1.9.3/ And the very handy Rails API docs: http://api.rubyonrails.org/ So what *is* extra that is needed in your view? If you've got a great idea, then awesome! Please contribute it, I'd love to see it. And you suggest to rush to study of source codes directly. It very much frightens off beginners. No, I *didn't* suggest it (and if you'd quoted what I said, you would see it). I said that *I* find well-written-source-code-with-poor-docs better than poorly-written-code-with-good-docs, but I *never* said I agreed with you that the Ruby/Rails docs are poor. Personally, I think they're perfectly good, and the associated contributions from the community are of varying quality, but generally good/excellent. But I'm happy to discuss with you your disagreement. There's always room for more tutorials... please contribute! :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: Re: To developers of Rails: Feeble documentation - weakness of Ruby and the Ruby on Rails (2nd e
On 25 April 2012 11:11, Sergey Ezhov li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: Try, for example, to find a method method_missing. Fail! http://rubydoc.info/stdlib/core/1.9.3/BasicObject#method_missing-instance_method example fail... How I can trust documentation in which methods about which I already know aren't described? A null hypothesis. And the very handy Rails API docs: http://api.rubyonrails.org/ Bad documentation! There are no descriptions of many classes, there are no descriptions of many methods, there are no descriptions of parameters of methods, there are no descriptions of ALL possible parameter values of methods. *sigh* so write them... or ask about specific places where you're stuck. Look, you're talking about things being difficult for beginners, and then wave method_missing as an example - to play with that is pretty serious meta-programming which will blow up horribly if you don't know what you're doing. There *is* plenty of reference for *how* to use method_missing if you look for it, even if it is not mentioned in the core docs. If you expect *everything* to be totally complete before you start using it, then you're going to be disappointed (in life, not just in Ruby/Rails). In all seriousness, if a few holes in documentation frustrate someone so much that they stop and leave from Ruby and Rails then maybe it wasn't for them in the first place - it takes all sorts to run the world, and everything is not for everyone :-/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: To developers of Rails: Feeble documentation - weakness of Ruby and the Ruby on Rails (2nd editi
On 25 April 2012 15:36, Kevin Bedell kbed...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Robert Walker li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: Languages are MUCH smaller in scope than frameworks. According to ohloh.net, rails has about 250,000 lines of code, while Ruby recently eclipsed 1 million lines of code. scope != LoC -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: beginning_of_month problem
On 12 April 2012 13:41, Colin Law clan...@googlemail.com wrote: Life would be much simpler if the world did not go round. Or if we decimalised time ;-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: What Model Association?
On 5 April 2012 01:54, Mark P. li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: I just realized CarWashStation might be misleading. Each station refers to one activity location that the car mush move through per wash. A few example instances might be: - Soap Application Station - Bristle Brush Station - Wax Station - Dry Station That sounds like a CarWashing should have a state-machine to manage transitions between stations (rather than stations being models of their own). You could have sub-types of CarWashing that would provide different combinations of states (for the simple Wash'n'Wax to the full-on hand-finished-chamois-wipe-down-with-under-body-jet-wash). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] What Model Association?
On 4 April 2012 22:39, Mark 01 li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: I have the following two models and am not quite sure how they should be associated. - Car - CarWashStation At any given time, an instance of Car will be at (belong to?) one of a dozen car wash stations. What associations should I use (if any) between these models? I would anticipate a CarWashing model, which has_one Car and one CarWashStation, along with details about the time of the washing, what soap was used, and which attendants conducted it (through an AttendantsCarWashings join table), etc. A Car would then have many CarWashings, and a named scope could give the current_car_washing. Or something like that. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] issues with model in ruby on rails
On 3 April 2012 09:12, amvis vgrkrish...@gmail.com wrote: class User ActiveRecord::Base has_one :system_admin end @user = User.find_by_user_name(user_name) if !@user.system_admins.nil? puts 'am a sys_admin' The above code gives error Since you've defined the association as a has_one, you should use it in the singular: if !@user.system_admin.nil? but !...nil? is a bit stinky; either use: if @user.system_admin or unless @user.system_admins.nil? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: semi-OT: Is there an NNTP accessible version of this lis
On 26 March 2012 08:28, THUFIR H. li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: Or, you could just use a newsreader, which, presumably, is what the OP was after -- gmane.* groups. It's an e-mail = nntp gateway, the web interface isn't really necessary at all. ??? Is this night of the living dead thread? 7 years old... do you think the OP is still watching for your answer?! ;-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] gsub
On 23 March 2012 10:36, Aaron Schmitz a.schmitz...@googlemail.com wrote: hi, im getting tired on this one. i want to replace all forwardslashes with backwardslashes. irb: r = C:/RAILS/ r.gsub(/, \\) or r.gsub(/) {('\'} both give me: C:\\RAILS\\ how can i use gsub to display only one \? It's escaping it to show in the console, the string does have only one backslash. = \\.size 1 ;-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] gsub
On 23 March 2012 12:49, Aaron Schmitz a.schmitz...@googlemail.com wrote: next question! :D system(i_view32.exe C:\Rails\test.png /convert=C:\Rails\test.jpg) doesn't work. What happens when you try: system(i_view32.exe C:\\Rails\\test.png /convert=C:\\Rails\\test.jpg) ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] gsub
On 23 March 2012 13:46, Aaron Schmitz a.schmitz...@googlemail.com wrote: is it a permission issue on win xp? the command is ok, i tested it in cmd.exe Probably... I recommend a nice Linux install (even just a VM... ;-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Modifying a gem, best way to deploy
On 21 March 2012 02:45, c...@eq4.andreas-s.net wrote: For a project I used the gem 'event_calendar'. However, there were a couple things I had to manually change within the gem source to suit my needs. How would I go about to deploy this in production 'the rails way'? A few choices: * Vendorize it * Package your own gem from the altered code * Monkey-patch the gem in your lib folder There's probably more options. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: Agile web development with rails 4th edition adding sizes to the product
On 18 March 2012 10:10, Shaban K. li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: What am I doing wrong? You're not going through the whole tutorial, understanding it, and then moving on to develop your own projects. By all means twiddle with the example code, but always be able to get back to how the book says it should be, or else you may have troubles with the next exercise. My source code is attached. You're missing an end from your products_controller, but that wouldn't cause the error message you describe; it's more likely a cut'n'paste error... but if you make one pasting error you might make more. Also, do you intend to have two Add to Cart forms posting to different routes? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] The uniqueness for a field
On 18 March 2012 10:52, Soichi Ishida li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: Is there anyway to allow Videos to have the same 'value's, which however are distinct from each other among the values that a single Video possesses? GIYF: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5494660/how-to-validate-uniqueness-in-rails-3-model-if-i-want-to-check-if-there-is-a-2-f -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] distinctively difficult to do what I want
On 16 March 2012 16:59, Colin Law clan...@googlemail.com wrote: On 16 March 2012 15:41, bingo bob li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: I have a database with a lot of Name objects in it, some have the same given name - ok fairly normal. I simply wish to return all the Names with a unique given name. *important* I an array of objects returned not just the given names so I can access all the attributes of the name when they're returned, i.e. in my view I need the full object to get at the user and gender etc. But how will the code know which of the records with given == fred that you want? The other attributes may be different between the fred records. +1 You might be satisfied with .group_by(:given) on a collection of all the Name objects, which would give you a list of unique names, while still giving access to all the individual records. But this could be slow if you have a large collection. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] NoMethodError
On 9 March 2012 19:52, AndyLikesRuby usbd...@gmail.com wrote: I am getting this error message when I try to hit a certain URL: http://localhost:3000/captionfiles NoMethodError in CaptionfilesController#index undefined method `all' for Captionfile:Class app/controllers/captionfiles_controller.rb:5:in `index' @captionfiles = Captionfile.all class Captionfile ActiveRecord::Base There's nothing, at first glance, wrong with your code. So can you just confirm which version of Rails you have installed. Older (very old!) versions didn't have .all, you had to use .find(:all). But if that's your problem, you must be on Rails 1.x, and that won't be the last of your problems... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] [Rails Guides] Getting Started 7.4 - Array Output Problem
On 7 March 2012 12:04, NoobyOnRails satchillana...@web.de wrote: When I want to show the comment I get the following output under my comment: [#Comment id: 1, commenter: Tester, body: This is a test comment, post_id: 1, created_at: 2012-03-07 11:48:02, updated_at: 2012-03-07 11:48:02] You're possibly doing this: %= @my_object.comments.each do |comment| % # and then code to output the comment % end % rather than: % @my_object.comments.each do |comment| % # and then code to output the comment % end % The equals sign before the iterator will output to the browser the result of the iterator (which will be the collection that's iterated). You can see the Comment displayed has square brackets around it, which indicate it's a single element array - so probably a collection that's being rendered by mistake. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Include Advanced
On 8 March 2012 22:49, Rogelio A. RogeX li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: Hi, As I can do Include with parameters?? Example Modelo.find(:all,:include = [otroModelo(param,param)]) Modelo.find(:all,:include = :otro_modelo, :conditions = [otro_modelos.param1 = ? and otro_modelos.param2 = ?, param, param]) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] unable to interchange ruby versions using RVM
On 6 March 2012 12:31, honey ruby emailtohoneyr...@gmail.com wrote: hey guys i got the solutions Fancy sharing it for posterity so that anyone who gets the same error in future can search for it before posting? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.