[sage-devel] Re: Trophees Du Libre 2007 Wrap-Up
Thanks for the summary. I think that the native Windows port is very important, many scientists use windows, especially those not that much computer oriented. As to the Debian - I have a very strict opinion on this - I think if some program (project) cannot enter Debian unstable, for whatever reasons, something is wrong with that project. But SAGE will get there, eventually. :) The windows port is imho a priority. Ondrej --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: 2.8.14: coercion oddities on Solaris: MulMod bad args
Robert, look at the following from devel/sage/sage/rings/integer_mod.pxd: cdef extern from stdint.h: ctypedef int int_fast32_t ctypedef int int_fast64_t int_fast32_t INTEGER_MOD_INT32_LIMIT int_fast64_t INTEGER_MOD_INT64_LIMIT That certainly looks very, very wrong. I will change that to long long for Solaris 32 bit and see what breaks ;) Cheers, Michael --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] 2.8.15.alpha0 released
Ok, this release cycle hasn't been any fun so far. Tarball is at http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/sage-2.8.15.alpha0.tar [166 MB] There is quite some fallout, I am not sure if it due to mismerges or me missing some important patch. I might start over from scratch with another alpha0, but I would like to avoid that. You have been warned ;) Cheers, Michael alpha0: Merged: #645: Mike Hansen: multi-argument call for symbolic expressions #847: Mike Hansen: rewrite the symbolic calculus package to do evaluation/ simplification without recursion #1107: William Stein: add minkowski bound function for number fields [please verify that this went in correctly - I reverted to the 2.8.14 version after it miscompiled due to duplicate code sections] #: Mike Hansen: Symbolic equation expand left and right #1134: David Harvey: optimize creating elements of orders and number fields by coercing in lists [I left this ticket open fow now - see comment] #1141: Joel Mohler: improve Number Field elements arithmetic speed #1268: Carl Witty: new version of MPFI.spkg #1270: Carl Witty: implement complex intervals #1273: Carl Witty: implement complex root isolation #1275: Carl Witty: implementation of QQbar [I left this ticket open: merged qqbar-full.hg, waiting for comment on qqbar-sqrt-golden.patch submitted by Robert] #1295: Jason Grout: Added code to create the butterfly graph #1330: Michael Abshoff: Solaris: fix sympy doctest numerical noise #1331: Michael Abshoff: Solaris: fix complex_double doctest numerical noise #1335: Michael Abshoff: Linux PPC: lcalc doctest failure #1336: Michael Abshoff: Linux PPC: rings/polynomial/ polynomial_element.pyx doctest failure #1345: Mike Hansen: I is sometimes wrapped in SymbolicConstant, sometimes not According to the doctests the following tests failed: sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/plot/plot.py sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/functions/piecewise.py sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/arith.py But grepping for failures reveals that there were 13 doctest with failures! I have posted the log to http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/test-2.8.15.alpha0.log It is 14 megabytes in size! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: 2.8.14: coercion oddities on Solaris: MulMod bad args
On Dec 1, 2:17 pm, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de wrote: Robert, look at the following from devel/sage/sage/rings/integer_mod.pxd: cdef extern from stdint.h: ctypedef int int_fast32_t ctypedef int int_fast64_t As Carl Witty pointed out to me in IRC this means that cython should treat int_fast64_t like an int, so this isn't a typedef. int_fast32_t INTEGER_MOD_INT32_LIMIT int_fast64_t INTEGER_MOD_INT64_LIMIT That certainly looks very, very wrong. I will change that to long long for Solaris 32 bit and see what breaks ;) It didn't help, but Carl also found out that we defined int_fast64_t as a long in some stdint.h workaround. I did change that and am recompiling. The code was written by William, so I am going to blame him for it, even though I probably suggested it ;) Cheers, Michael Cheers, Michael --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: Bug Day 6 reminder
On Nov 30, 2007 3:23 AM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 30, 12:01 pm, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In light of this event, I created a .hg inspector plugin for trac. Excellent. http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/robertwb/trac-bundle/ I just tried installing this and it has absolutely no effect whatever, as far as I can tell. I was also very careful to follow the instructions and restart trac. By the way -- BUG Day 6 starts now! Now if we could also get smtp notification with trac working and CC to sage-trac per default :) I also configured this by adding this to my trac.ini, and it has no effect at all: [notification] always_notify_owner = false always_notify_reporter = false always_notify_updater = true mime_encoding = base64 smtp_always_bcc = smtp_always_cc = [EMAIL PROTECTED] smtp_default_domain = smtp_enabled = false smtp_from = [EMAIL PROTECTED] smtp_password = smtp_port = 25 smtp_replyto = [EMAIL PROTECTED] smtp_server = mail.math.washington.edu smtp_user = use_public_cc = false use_short_addr = false use_tls = false --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: 2.8.15.alpha0 released
mabshoff wrote: Ok, this release cycle hasn't been any fun so far. Tarball is at According to the doctests the following tests failed: sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/plot/plot.py sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/functions/piecewise.py sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/arith.py But grepping for failures reveals that there were 13 doctest with failures! Got the same test failures on Fedora 7/8, but also a lot of failures in testing const.tex Jaap --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: 2.8.15.alpha0 released
On Dec 1, 7:24 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: mabshoff wrote: Ok, this release cycle hasn't been any fun so far. Tarball is at According to the doctests the following tests failed: sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/plot/plot.py sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/functions/piecewise.py sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/arith.py But grepping for failures reveals that there were 13 doctest with failures! Hi Jaap, Got the same test failures on Fedora 7/8, but also a lot of failures in testing const.tex Mike Hansen fixed those - it was fallout from me not applying one patch of his and also some other side effects. Alpha1 is currently being prepared, you can join us in IRC to see what is going on. Jaap Thanks for testing, I guess you like to live on the bleeding edge. ;) Cheers, Michael --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] 2.8.15.alpha1 released
[So Jaap doesn't have to sit around idle we are doing another release :)] Alpha 1 is much better compared to alpha0, tarball is at http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/sage-2.8.15.alpha1.tar [166 MB] All doctests passed on sage.math - was is now building alpha1 on OSX 10.5, I will on OSX 10.4. alpha2 will be ATLAS on Linux per default assuming it all works smoothly. Cheers, Michael alpha1: Merged: #644: Mike Hansen: fix (sin + cos)(1) does not work #1148: David Harvey, Robert Bradshaw: valuation doesn't work for rational numbers #1214: Mike Hansen: error in polynomial ideal membership testing #1249: Robert Miller: fixes bug in graph plotting with partitions #1265: Paul Zimmermann: documentation typos #1279: Martin Abrecht: LLL on tall matrices immediately crashes sage #1280: Mike Hansen: make Permutation(range(10)).random() fast instead of dog slow. #1333: William Stein: fix a major inefficiency in floating point square root computation in Sage #1334: David Harvey: Constant polynomial can't be converted to rational #1341: Josh Kantor: add script so that which_fortran returns g95 or gfortran #1350: Mike Hansen: sage-2.8.15.alpha0 doctest error in plot.py #1352: Mike Hansen: doctest error in 2.8.15.alpha0 polynomial_element.pyx alpha0: Merged: #645: Mike Hansen: multi-argument call for symbolic expressions #847: Mike Hansen: rewrite the symbolic calculus package to do evaluation/ simplification without recursion #1107: William Stein: add minkowski bound function for number fields [please verify that this went in correctly - I reverted to the 2.8.14 version after it miscompiled due to duplicate code sections] #: Mike Hansen: Symbolic equation expand left and right #1134: David Harvey: optimize creating elements of orders and number fields by coercing in lists [I left this ticket open fow now - see comment] #1141: Joel Mohler: improve Number Field elements arithmetic speed #1268: Carl Witty: new version of MPFI.spkg #1270: Carl Witty: implement complex intervals #1273: Carl Witty: implement complex root isolation #1275: Carl Witty: implementation of QQbar [I left this ticket open: merged qqbar-full.hg, waiting for comment on qqbar-sqrt-golden.patch submitted by Robert] #1295: Jason Grout: Added code to create the butterfly graph #1330: Michael Abshoff: Solaris: fix sympy doctest numerical noise #1331: Michael Abshoff: Solaris: fix complex_double doctest numerical noise #1335: Michael Abshoff: Linux PPC: lcalc doctest failure #1336: Michael Abshoff: Linux PPC: rings/polynomial/ polynomial_element.pyx doctest failure #1345: Mike Hansen: I is sometimes wrapped in SymbolicConstant, sometimes not --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: trac bundle inspection
On Dec 1, 2007, at 9:05 AM, William Stein wrote: On Nov 30, 2007 3:23 AM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 30, 12:01 pm, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In light of this event, I created a .hg inspector plugin for trac. Excellent. http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/robertwb/trac-bundle/ I just tried installing this and it has absolutely no effect whatever, as far as I can tell. I was also very careful to follow the instructions and restart trac. Here is a working demo http://sage.math.washington.edu:1/ sage_trac/ticket/1 served out of http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/ robertwb/trac-bundle/test/ (This is a huge bundle, but you can attach smaller ones too.) I think one might need to install ez_setup to handle the .egg files? You can get it from http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracPlugins By the way -- BUG Day 6 starts now! Now if we could also get smtp notification with trac working and CC to sage-trac per default :) I also configured this by adding this to my trac.ini, and it has no effect at all: [notification] always_notify_owner = false always_notify_reporter = false always_notify_updater = true mime_encoding = base64 smtp_always_bcc = smtp_always_cc = [EMAIL PROTECTED] smtp_default_domain = smtp_enabled = false smtp_from = [EMAIL PROTECTED] smtp_password = smtp_port = 25 smtp_replyto = [EMAIL PROTECTED] smtp_server = mail.math.washington.edu smtp_user = use_public_cc = false use_short_addr = false use_tls = false I tried to enable notification for the help trac and didn't have any success, so I think it's kind of fragile. Also, I think the smtp from needs to be a real address Connected to euler.math.washington.edu. Escape character is '^]'. 220 euler.math.washington.edu ESMTP Sendmail 8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11; Sat, 1 Dec 2007 11:07:09 -0800 MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 553 5.5.4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Real domain name required for sender address --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: 2.8.14: matrix power with mv polynomial ring entries over QQ trouble on Solaris - libSingular
On Nov 28, 10:54 pm, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de wrote: This is now #1325. Cheers, Michael One more data point: The coercion.pyx doctest fails with the exact same backtrace (modulo the top of the call chain) when doing: Trying: f.parent()###line 207:_sage_ f.parent() Expecting: Multivariate Polynomial Ring in t, x over Cyclotomic Field of order 13 and degree 12 ok Trying: ZZ['x','y'].gen(0) + ~Frac(QQ['y']).gen(0)###line 209:_sage_ ZZ['x','y'].0 + ~Frac(QQ['y']).0 Expecting: (x*y + 1)/y Unhandled SIGSEGV: A segmentation fault occured in SAGE. This probably occured because a *compiled* component of SAGE has a bug in it (typically accessing invalid memory) or is not properly wrapped with _sig_on, _sig_off. You might want to run SAGE under gdb with 'sage -gdb' to debug this. SAGE will now terminate (sorry). [3.8 s] exit code: 256 -- The following tests failed: sage -t -verbose devel/sage-main/sage/structure/coerce.pyx So from my perspective now robertbw and malb need to agree whose fault it is and send me a fix ;) This bug causes segfaults in nearly 100 doctests of the 105 still failing doctests on Solaris, so once this is fixed we will be in excellent shape for an actually working Solaris port. I am adding the same info to the ticket. Cheers, Michael --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: 2.8.15.alpha1 released
mabshoff wrote: [So Jaap doesn't have to sit around idle we are doing another release :)] Alpha 1 is much better compared to alpha0, tarball is at http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/sage-2.8.15.alpha1.tar [166 MB] -- All tests passed! Total time for all tests: 2288.6 seconds On Fedora 7/8 Jaap --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: 2.8.15.alpha1 released
On Dec 1, 2007, at 12:04 , mabshoff wrote: [So Jaap doesn't have to sit around idle we are doing another release :)] Alpha 1 is much better compared to alpha0, tarball is at http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/sage-2.8.15.alpha1.tar [166 MB] Built on Mac OS X, 10.4.11 (Dual Xeon, -j6) and 10.5.1 (Core Duo, - j2). Here are the tails of the logs (AKA the bottom line(s) :-}): 10.4.11: real62m19.149s user47m22.732s sys 24m38.714s All tests passed! Total time for all tests: 2338.2 seconds 10.5.1: real98m54.928s user75m40.591s sys 17m56.736s All tests passed! Total time for all tests: 2580.9 seconds BTW, the crash reporting in 10.5 seems improved, and I have a boat- load of mwrank crashes and one genus2reduction crash recorded. The test log seems blithely unconcerned. I assume it's expected, but I thought I'd mention it. Justin -- Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large Institute for the Absorption of Federal Funds Men are from Earth. Women are from Earth. Deal with it. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: 2.8.15.alpha1 released
On Dec 2, 12:52 am, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 1, 2007, at 12:04 , mabshoff wrote: [So Jaap doesn't have to sit around idle we are doing another release :)] Alpha 1 is much better compared to alpha0, tarball is at http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/sage-2.8.15.alpha1.tar [166 MB] Built on Mac OS X, 10.4.11 (Dual Xeon, -j6) and 10.5.1 (Core Duo, - j2). Here are the tails of the logs (AKA the bottom line(s) :-}): Thank you, grand old Unix wizard ;) 10.4.11: real62m19.149s user47m22.732s sys 24m38.714s All tests passed! Total time for all tests: 2338.2 seconds 10.5.1: real98m54.928s user75m40.591s sys 17m56.736s All tests passed! Total time for all tests: 2580.9 seconds BTW, the crash reporting in 10.5 seems improved, and I have a boat- load of mwrank crashes and one genus2reduction crash recorded. The test log seems blithely unconcerned. I assume it's expected, but I thought I'd mention it. I have made similar experiences, i.e. that doctest failures do not necessarily mean that the doctest is reported failing. Could you cut the relevant bits out of the logs and post them or if it is very long link it somewhere. Opening a ticket is also a good idea. Am I correct that this is a 10.5 problem only? Justin Cheers, Michael -- Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large Institute for the Absorption of Federal Funds Men are from Earth. Women are from Earth. Deal with it. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: 2.8.15.alpha1 released
On Dec 1, 2007, at 15:58 , mabshoff wrote: On Dec 2, 12:52 am, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 1, 2007, at 12:04 , mabshoff wrote: [snip] Built on Mac OS X, 10.4.11 (Dual Xeon, -j6) and 10.5.1 (Core Duo, - j2). Here are the tails of the logs (AKA the bottom line(s) :-}): Thank you, grand old Unix wizard ;) Whaddya mean 'old'? :-} BTW, the crash reporting in 10.5 seems improved, and I have a boat- load of mwrank crashes and one genus2reduction crash recorded. The test log seems blithely unconcerned. I assume it's expected, but I thought I'd mention it. I have made similar experiences, i.e. that doctest failures do not necessarily mean that the doctest is reported failing. Could you cut the relevant bits out of the logs and post them or if it is very long link it somewhere. Opening a ticket is also a good idea. Am I correct that this is a 10.5 problem only? Turns out there are no relevant bits. The logs (both 10.4 and 10.5) are clean. Could be the crashes are tests working correctly? I'll poke around to see if I can find anything remotely resembling light... Justin -- They said it couldn't be done, but sometimes, it doesn't work out that way. - Casey Stengel -- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: 2.8.15.alpha1 released
On Dec 2, 2:11 am, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 1, 2007, at 15:58 , mabshoff wrote: On Dec 2, 12:52 am, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 1, 2007, at 12:04 , mabshoff wrote: [snip] Built on Mac OS X, 10.4.11 (Dual Xeon, -j6) and 10.5.1 (Core Duo, - j2). Here are the tails of the logs (AKA the bottom line(s) :-}): Thank you, grand old Unix wizard ;) Whaddya mean 'old'? :-} How about we settle on revered elder Unix Wizard - that is certainly true in relative terms ;) BTW, the crash reporting in 10.5 seems improved, and I have a boat- load of mwrank crashes and one genus2reduction crash recorded. The test log seems blithely unconcerned. I assume it's expected, but I thought I'd mention it. I have made similar experiences, i.e. that doctest failures do not necessarily mean that the doctest is reported failing. Could you cut the relevant bits out of the logs and post them or if it is very long link it somewhere. Opening a ticket is also a good idea. Am I correct that this is a 10.5 problem only? Turns out there are no relevant bits. The logs (both 10.4 and 10.5) are clean. Could be the crashes are tests working correctly? Nope. I just got the logs from William from a 10.5.1 box and those are clean. So maybe you get a rogue gmp or other library pulled in (again)? I'll poke around to see if I can find anything remotely resembling light... Alpha2 should happen fairly soon - I am waiting on some patch reviews, so there is your next chance to break stuff. Justin Cheers, Michael -- They said it couldn't be done, but sometimes, it doesn't work out that way. - Casey Stengel -- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: 2.8.15.alpha1 released
On Dec 1, 2007, at 17:16 , mabshoff wrote: On Dec 2, 2:11 am, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 1, 2007, at 15:58 , mabshoff wrote: On Dec 2, 12:52 am, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 1, 2007, at 12:04 , mabshoff wrote: [snip] Built on Mac OS X, 10.4.11 (Dual Xeon, -j6) and 10.5.1 (Core Duo, - j2). Here are the tails of the logs (AKA the bottom line(s) :-}): Thank you, grand old Unix wizard ;) Whaddya mean 'old'? :-} How about we settle on revered elder Unix Wizard - that is certainly true in relative terms ;) I can live with 'revered' :-} Turns out there are no relevant bits. The logs (both 10.4 and 10.5) are clean. Could be the crashes are tests working correctly? Nope. I just got the logs from William from a 10.5.1 box and those are clean. So maybe you get a rogue gmp or other library pulled in (again)? Just to be clear, my logs *are* clean. All tests claim to have passed, it's just that I see a bunch of crash reports that cropped up during the execution of make test. Does WAS see this? Also, on the 10.5 system, I only see /usr/local/libintl, as William reported. I'll poke around to see if I can find anything remotely resembling light... Alpha2 should happen fairly soon - I am waiting on some patch reviews, so there is your next chance to break stuff. Oh, goodie. Justin -- They said it couldn't be done, but sometimes, it doesn't work out that way. - Casey Stengel -- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: interactive widgets in the notebook
Jason wrote: Yeah! It works!! :) I've put a very alpha patch (against 2.8.13) up on trac #1322 that implements the following: I got it to work and I must admit its pretty cool! I'm going to have to think about the possibilities you have opened up with this approach. Ted --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] Re: 2.8.15.alpha1 released
On Dec 2, 2:30 am, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 1, 2007, at 17:16 , mabshoff wrote: On Dec 2, 2:11 am, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 1, 2007, at 15:58 , mabshoff wrote: On Dec 2, 12:52 am, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 1, 2007, at 12:04 , mabshoff wrote: [snip] Built on Mac OS X, 10.4.11 (Dual Xeon, -j6) and 10.5.1 (Core Duo, - j2). Here are the tails of the logs (AKA the bottom line(s) :-}): Thank you, grand old Unix wizard ;) Whaddya mean 'old'? :-} How about we settle on revered elder Unix Wizard - that is certainly true in relative terms ;) I can live with 'revered' :-} Turns out there are no relevant bits. The logs (both 10.4 and 10.5) are clean. Could be the crashes are tests working correctly? Nope. I just got the logs from William from a 10.5.1 box and those are clean. So maybe you get a rogue gmp or other library pulled in (again)? Just to be clear, my logs *are* clean. All tests claim to have passed, it's just that I see a bunch of crash reports that cropped up during the execution of make test. Does WAS see this? Nope, I watched the log, and then I rerun all mwrank test manually on the commad line again: Total time for all tests: 2.8 seconds bsd:sage-2.8.14-moved mabshoff$ ./sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/libs/ mwrank/all.py sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/libs/mwrank/all.py [1.4 s] -- All tests passed! Total time for all tests: 1.4 seconds bsd:sage-2.8.14-moved mabshoff$ ./sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/libs/ mwrank/interface.py sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/libs/mwrank/interface.py [3.1 s] -- All tests passed! Total time for all tests: 3.1 seconds bsd:sage-2.8.14-moved mabshoff$ ./sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/libs/ mwrank/mwrank.pyx sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/libs/mwrank/mwrank.pyx [2.8 s] -- All tests passed! Total time for all tests: 2.8 seconds bsd:sage-2.8.14-moved mabshoff$ ./sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/ interfaces/mwrank.py sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/mwrank.py [1.6 s] No crashes. So maybe wonky hardware/phase of the moon/the wrath of Steve on your end? Also, on the 10.5 system, I only see /usr/local/libintl, as William reported. ok. I'll poke around to see if I can find anything remotely resembling light... Alpha2 should happen fairly soon - I am waiting on some patch reviews, so there is your next chance to break stuff. Oh, goodie. Maybe another hour or two ;) Cheers, Michael Justin -- They said it couldn't be done, but sometimes, it doesn't work out that way. - Casey Stengel -- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sage-devel] hg_sage.push() and other minor changes.
Hi All, I noticed that the push() method was missing in sage-2.8.14, so here is a patch. I also added current_branch() and list_branches() for the convenience of those who may want to manage multiple branches simultaneously. I was also interested in being able to have a separate default outgoing repository for convenient backups, but there is an organizational issue here -- SAGE has hardcoded its default branch (on the server) as sage-main, so if one wanted to manage multiple branches from the same repository (as might happen if there were several branches being simultaneously pulled/pushed to on the same server) they will break the default scheme. So I forced the hardcoded default server to use only the main branch (and updated the hardcoded server to be sagemath.org instead of sage.math.washington.edu). For example, suppose one wants to have a server with two branches: sage-main and sage-other on the non-default server math.awesome.edu. Then the way things are coded now, both sage-main would update from sage-main, and sage-other would update from sage-other. If we were connecting to the default sagemath.org, then both branches would update from sage-main. (WARNING TO MAINTAINER: This means that if the default server is changed, one must also explicitly change the DEFAULT_SERVER variable in BRANCH_PATH/sage/misc/hg.py) Finally, I didn't really understand where the default_server was set, so I added support to set them from shell variables SAGE_INCOMING_SERVER and SAGE_OUTGOING_SERVER (with no trailing '/', in mercurial path format to the './devel' directory). However I was careful to preserve the default behavior when no settings are present. Any comments are appreciated! Thanks, -Jon =) P.S. I was a little unsure of where to add the appropriate documentation, so that would be a great comment! =) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- push_bundle__Dec_2_2007.hg Description: Binary data
[sage-devel] Re: hg_sage.push() and other minor changes.
Sorry, but there was a bug. Here's the updated bundle. Thanks, -Jon =) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- push_bundle__Dec_2_2007_ver2.hg Description: Binary data
[sage-devel] Re: interactive widgets in the notebook
Ted Kosan wrote: Jason wrote: Yeah! It works!! :) I've put a very alpha patch (against 2.8.13) up on trac #1322 that implements the following: I got it to work and I must admit its pretty cool! I'm going to have to think about the possibilities you have opened up with this approach. Well, it was a big hack and it's not very pretty the way things work, but the end result is sort of the idea of what I was going for. I've spent a lot more time thinking about this and I think it's going to be a hard thing to do nicely. William and others pointed out some of the difficulties (and impossibilities!) in at least the way I was wanting to approach things. I'm definitely going to have to think about things more too. At least now we have something of a starting point :). I think this is going to end up being a rather long-term project (at least to do nicely). -Jason --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
