Re: CSRe: Cayenne / Aches pain
Ah! A true prince, eh? R On 10/10/2012 1:51 PM, Jane MacRoss wrote: one grain of pepper under hs mattress - he would KNOW
Re: CSRe: Cayenne / Aches pain
A king of princes! - Original Message - From: Rowena To: silver-list@eskimo.com Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 5:26 PM Subject: Re: CSRe: Cayenne / Aches pain Ah! A true prince, eh? R On 10/10/2012 1:51 PM, Jane MacRoss wrote: one grain of pepper under hs mattress - he would KNOW No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5320 - Release Date: 10/09/12
RE: Cayenne / Aches pain was // Re: CSProstatitis
Renee,You mentioned Peter Kulish has said that his enzyme product removes plaque from the arteries. Where did you purchasethese emzymes? I am very interested in them for my husband who has had two heart attacks. He is doing well nowand the part of his heart that died has regenerated but would love more information.Dianne From: gaiac...@gmail.com To: silver-list@eskimo.com Subject: RE: Cayenne / Aches pain was // Re: CSProstatitis Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 21:44:08 -0500 No, he never checked his blood sugar. The doctors were exasperated with him, and finally just said—take 2 shots a day of x amount of insulin. His doc didn’t like it but they knew dad would never check and it was the only way to ‘control’ the diabetes. And because he took shots Dad figured he could eat whatever he wanted. It was frustrating. He’d never had his sugar drop that low before and it was the first time he ever was out of it. then it happened 2 more times. The second time they took him to the ER but the third time they said—we can take him, but now you know what it is and you can give him such and such here at home and get him out of it. do you want us to take him? I said no, and brought him out of it myself. Mom got really sick and passed not too long after that, and by then Dad was blind so moved in with us and I got his diabetes under control. Started taking his blood tests because he couldn’t tell me no like he could Mom. J Yeah, Dad loved salt. And he had chronic constipation. But I’ve heard a lot of theories about why people get type 2. And it can always be cured with the correct food, so—food related. Oddly though, Peter Kulish has said that his enzyme product removes plaque from the arteries. To test this out he gave it to several doctors that he knows to test on their patients. Not only did it clear the arteries, the diabetics who were on the circulation enzymes became un-diabetic. They couldn’t figure out why as the enzymes didn’t have a thing to do with sugar or diabetes. Finally they theorized that the enzymes were not just cleaning the walls of the arteries but that they must have also been cleaning the CELL walls of plaque too, and that once the plaque was off the cell walls of the pancreas, it started working again normally and the symptoms of diabetes stopped! Very interesting, huh? Samala, Renee I have heard that diabetes (and appendicitis) are due to chronic constipation?
Re: Cayenne / Aches pain was // Re: CSProstatitis
Dianne - how did you get the heart to regenerate? Excellent! Jane these emzymes? I am very interested in them for my husband who has had two heart attacks. He is doing well now and the part of his heart that died has regenerated but would love more information.
Re: CSBeck blood purifier
The idea of reversing polarity during the manufacturing process is a very bad idea and obvious design flaw. Far better to select one electrode, and make a mark at the top with a pair of pliers, then simply connect it to positive one run , then negative the next, keeping note of dates you use the marked electrode with neg or pos current. The reason for this is that you will accrue a large amount of dark oxides which should not be disturbed during manufacturing. If they get into the sol (colloid) then the ions coming of the electrode will then stick to those chunks and your sol will bottom out much quicker, the particles also being less therapeutically beneficial as they will be getting so large to the point where they will just not be able to pass inside cell tissue and kill pathogens, also creating more possibility of argyria skin discolouration, though that can be lessened or even removed with selenium supplementation to chelate it from the skin I read. The regular changing of polarity will just push a load of muck into the distilled water and act as a magnet for the smaller groups of ions to stick to. With best wishes, Dave On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 1:32 AM, HARSHA GODAVARI h.godav...@shaw.ca wrote: I am considering using this to make colloidal silver. I like the idea of reversing polarity because it will slow down a build_up of CS near one electrode and both electrodes (hopefully) wear evenly. Also I have one of these around and it will save a bit for the time being :-) Are there any cons ( pros) to this notion. I would appreciate your thoughts on this. Thank you. regards hg
Re: CSBeck blood purifier
Reversing polarity of the electrodes while making CS is an effective and widely used method of decreasing buildup of silver and oxides of silver on the electrodes. I have made thousands of gallons of CS, and I reverse every minute, on a two minute cycle. Reversing eliminates the dark oxides because the electrode which forms the oxide is exposed to monoatomic hydrogen during the next half cycle, and the hydrogen immediately reacts with the oxide reducing the silver oxide to silver. Also any silver powder that accumulates on an electrode, either by reduction of silver oxide, or by deposition of silver from the solution, goes back out on the next half cycle as well. The result is electrodes which stay amazingly clean and never need to be cleaned. I can typically make several thousand gallons of CS on a set of electrodes and have never ever had to clean them. Also I have never witnessed any silver oxide coming loose due to polarity switching. If any were to come loose it would be from the stirring of the water, not a polarity switch. Marshall On 10/10/2012 6:31 PM, D B wrote: The idea of reversing polarity during the manufacturing process is a very bad idea and obvious design flaw. Far better to select one electrode, and make a mark at the top with a pair of pliers, then simply connect it to positive one run , then negative the next, keeping note of dates you use the marked electrode with neg or pos current. The reason for this is that you will accrue a large amount of dark oxides which should not be disturbed during manufacturing. If they get into the sol (colloid) then the ions coming of the electrode will then stick to those chunks and your sol will bottom out much quicker, the particles also being less therapeutically beneficial as they will be getting so large to the point where they will just not be able to pass inside cell tissue and kill pathogens, also creating more possibility of argyria skin discolouration, though that can be lessened or even removed with selenium supplementation to chelate it from the skin I read. The regular changing of polarity will just push a load of muck into the distilled water and act as a magnet for the smaller groups of ions to stick to. With best wishes, Dave On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 1:32 AM, HARSHA GODAVARI h.godav...@shaw.ca mailto:h.godav...@shaw.ca wrote: I am considering using this to make colloidal silver. I like the idea of reversing polarity because it will slow down a build_up of CS near one electrode and both electrodes (hopefully) wear evenly. Also I have one of these around and it will save a bit for the time being :-) Are there any cons ( pros) to this notion. I would appreciate your thoughts on this. Thank you. regards hg No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com http://www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1427 / Virus Database: 2441/5322 - Release Date: 10/10/12
Re: CSBeck blood purifier
... I second that, Marshall... hundreds of gallons of EIS using reverse polarity, producing nothing but a high quality product. ~Jason - Original Message - From: Marshall To: silver-list@eskimo.com Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 15:44 Subject: Re: CSBeck blood purifier Reversing polarity of the electrodes while making CS is an effective and widely used method of decreasing buildup of silver and oxides of silver on the electrodes. I have made thousands of gallons of CS, and I reverse every minute, on a two minute cycle. Reversing eliminates the dark oxides because the electrode which forms the oxide is exposed to monoatomic hydrogen during the next half cycle, and the hydrogen immediately reacts with the oxide reducing the silver oxide to silver. Also any silver powder that accumulates on an electrode, either by reduction of silver oxide, or by deposition of silver from the solution, goes back out on the next half cycle as well. The result is electrodes which stay amazingly clean and never need to be cleaned. I can typically make several thousand gallons of CS on a set of electrodes and have never ever had to clean them. Also I have never witnessed any silver oxide coming loose due to polarity switching. If any were to come loose it would be from the stirring of the water, not a polarity switch. Marshall On 10/10/2012 6:31 PM, D B wrote: The idea of reversing polarity during the manufacturing process is a very bad idea and obvious design flaw. Far better to select one electrode, and make a mark at the top with a pair of pliers, then simply connect it to positive one run , then negative the next, keeping note of dates you use the marked electrode with neg or pos current. The reason for this is that you will accrue a large amount of dark oxides which should not be disturbed during manufacturing. If they get into the sol (colloid) then the ions coming of the electrode will then stick to those chunks and your sol will bottom out much quicker, the particles also being less therapeutically beneficial as they will be getting so large to the point where they will just not be able to pass inside cell tissue and kill pathogens, also creating more possibility of argyria skin discolouration, though that can be lessened or even removed with selenium supplementation to chelate it from the skin I read. The regular changing of polarity will just push a load of muck into the distilled water and act as a magnet for the smaller groups of ions to stick to. With best wishes, Dave On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 1:32 AM, HARSHA GODAVARI h.godav...@shaw.ca wrote: I am considering using this to make colloidal silver. I like the idea of reversing polarity because it will slow down a build_up of CS near one electrode and both electrodes (hopefully) wear evenly. Also I have one of these around and it will save a bit for the time being :-) Are there any cons ( pros) to this notion. I would appreciate your thoughts on this. Thank you. regards hg No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1427 / Virus Database: 2441/5322 - Release Date: 10/10/12
Re: CSBeck blood purifier
Thank you Marshall for clarifying the problem. When I used 3 (x9v) batteries to make my CS and was too lazy to stirr the solution I did get the black oxides. Two things happened, the batteries and my electrodes vanished some how ( I suspect some protector of the nation from 90 year old ladie's prosthetics and/or two pieces of silver wire :-) ) I have a Beck purifier thats not being used ( I have a vague notion that not using a useful item is a sin) I see no reason why it can't be used instead of my three, naked batteries. This Beck purifier also uses 3 x 9v batteries for its power source, only they are enclosed in a box . Nice to hear from you. regards hg - Original Message - From: Marshall mdud...@king-cart.com Date: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 5:46 pm Subject: Re: CSBeck blood purifier To: silver-list@eskimo.com Reversing polarity of the electrodes while making CS is an effective and widely used method of decreasing buildup of silver and oxides of silver on the electrodes. I have made thousands of gallons of CS, and I reverse every minute, on a two minute cycle. Reversing eliminates the dark oxides because the electrode which forms the oxide is exposed to monoatomic hydrogen during the next half cycle, and the hydrogen immediately reacts with the oxide reducing the silver oxide to silver. Also any silver powder that accumulates on an electrode, either by reduction of silver oxide, or by deposition of silver from the solution, goes back out on the next half cycle as well. The result is electrodes which stay amazingly clean and never need to be cleaned. I can typically make several thousand gallons of CS on a set of electrodes and have never ever had to clean them. Also I have never witnessed any silver oxide coming loose due to polarity switching. If any were to come loose it would be from the stirring of the water, not a polarity switch. Marshall On 10/10/2012 6:31 PM, D B wrote: The idea of reversing polarity during the manufacturing process is a very bad idea and obvious design flaw. Far better to select one electrode, and make a mark at the top with a pair of pliers, then simply connect it to positive one run , then negative the next, keeping note of dates you use the marked electrode with neg or pos current. The reason for this is that you will accrue a large amount of dark oxides which should not be disturbed during manufacturing. If they get into the sol (colloid) then the ions coming of the electrode will then stick to those chunks and your sol will bottom out much quicker, the particles also being less therapeutically beneficial as they will be getting so large to the point where they will just not be able to pass inside cell tissue and kill pathogens, also creating more possibility of argyria skin discolouration, though that can be lessened or even removed with selenium supplementation to chelate it from the skin I read. The regular changing of polarity will just push a load of muck into the distilled water and act as a magnet for the smaller groups of ions to stick to. With best wishes, Dave On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 1:32 AM, HARSHA GODAVARI h.godav...@shaw.ca mailto:h.godav...@shaw.ca wrote: I am considering using this to make colloidal silver. I like the idea of reversing polarity because it will slow down a build_up of CS near one electrode and both electrodes (hopefully) wear evenly. Also I have one of these around and it will save a bit for the time being :-) Are there any cons ( pros) to this notion. I would appreciate your thoughts on this. Thank you. regards hg No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com http://www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1427 / Virus Database: 2441/5322 - Release Date: 10/10/12
RE: CSBeck blood purifier
I also won't entertain the idea of auto polarity reversal for the same reason Dave stated, but then I'm not a commercial enterprise. If I was selling the stuff, then I would have to consider that option due to production volumes and time. Something must go somewhere off those electrodes and the only place that 'something' can go is back into the water, however, it won't be immediately observable due to that polarity reversal switching back and forth. If they are not removed and cleaned at regular timed intervals to minimise that 'something' being dispersed in the water, then whatever comes off those electrodes will remain circulating in the water and end up at the bottom of the storage vessel after gravity has done its thing. @ Marshall...Do you ever decant or filter...Yes/No? N. Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:44:16 -0400 From: mdud...@king-cart.com To: silver-list@eskimo.com Subject: Re: CSBeck blood purifier Reversing polarity of the electrodes while making CS is an effective and widely used method of decreasing buildup of silver and oxides of silver on the electrodes. I have made thousands of gallons of CS, and I reverse every minute, on a two minute cycle. Reversing eliminates the dark oxides because the electrode which forms the oxide is exposed to monoatomic hydrogen during the next half cycle, and the hydrogen immediately reacts with the oxide reducing the silver oxide to silver. Also any silver powder that accumulates on an electrode, either by reduction of silver oxide, or by deposition of silver from the solution, goes back out on the next half cycle as well. The result is electrodes which stay amazingly clean and never need to be cleaned. I can typically make several thousand gallons of CS on a set of electrodes and have never ever had to clean them. Also I have never witnessed any silver oxide coming loose due to polarity switching. If any were to come loose it would be from the stirring of the water, not a polarity switch. Marshall On 10/10/2012 6:31 PM, D B wrote: The idea of reversing polarity during the manufacturing process is a very bad idea and obvious design flaw. Far better to select one electrode, and make a mark at the top with a pair of pliers, then simply connect it to positive one run , then negative the next, keeping note of dates you use the marked electrode with neg or pos current. The reason for this is that you will accrue a large amount of dark oxides which should not be disturbed during manufacturing. If they get into the sol (colloid) then the ions coming of the electrode will then stick to those chunks and your sol will bottom out much quicker, the particles also being less therapeutically beneficial as they will be getting so large to the point where they will just not be able to pass inside cell tissue and kill pathogens, also creating more possibility of argyria skin discolouration, though that can be lessened or even removed with selenium supplementation to chelate it from the skin I read. The regular changing of polarity will just push a load of muck into the distilled water and act as a magnet for the smaller groups of ions to stick to. With best wishes, Dave On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 1:32 AM, HARSHA GODAVARI h.godav...@shaw.ca wrote: I am considering using this to make colloidal silver. I like the idea of reversing polarity because it will slow down a build_up of CS near one electrode and both electrodes (hopefully) wear evenly. Also I have one of these around and it will save a bit for the time being :-) Are there any cons ( pros) to this notion. I would appreciate your thoughts on this. Thank you. regards hg No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1427 / Virus Database: 2441/5322 - Release Date: 10/10/12
Re: CSBeck blood purifier
I don't filter, but the system automatically decants since it pulls the water from the top. Marshall On 10/10/2012 11:31 PM, Neville Munn wrote: I also won't entertain the idea of auto polarity reversal for the same reason Dave stated, but then I'm not a commercial enterprise. If I was selling the stuff, then I would have to consider that option due to production volumes and time. Something must go somewhere off those electrodes and the only place that 'something' can go is back into the water, however, it won't be immediately observable due to that polarity reversal switching back and forth. If they are not removed and cleaned at regular timed intervals to minimise that 'something' being dispersed in the water, then whatever comes off those electrodes will remain circulating in the water and end up at the bottom of the storage vessel after gravity has done its thing. @ Marshall...Do you ever decant or filter...Yes/No? N. Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:44:16 -0400 From: mdud...@king-cart.com To: silver-list@eskimo.com Subject: Re: CSBeck blood purifier Reversing polarity of the electrodes while making CS is an effective and widely used method of decreasing buildup of silver and oxides of silver on the electrodes. I have made thousands of gallons of CS, and I reverse every minute, on a two minute cycle. Reversing eliminates the dark oxides because the electrode which forms the oxide is exposed to monoatomic hydrogen during the next half cycle, and the hydrogen immediately reacts with the oxide reducing the silver oxide to silver. Also any silver powder that accumulates on an electrode, either by reduction of silver oxide, or by deposition of silver from the solution, goes back out on the next half cycle as well. The result is electrodes which stay amazingly clean and never need to be cleaned. I can typically make several thousand gallons of CS on a set of electrodes and have never ever had to clean them. Also I have never witnessed any silver oxide coming loose due to polarity switching. If any were to come loose it would be from the stirring of the water, not a polarity switch. Marshall On 10/10/2012 6:31 PM, D B wrote: The idea of reversing polarity during the manufacturing process is a very bad idea and obvious design flaw. Far better to select one electrode, and make a mark at the top with a pair of pliers, then simply connect it to positive one run , then negative the next, keeping note of dates you use the marked electrode with neg or pos current. The reason for this is that you will accrue a large amount of dark oxides which should not be disturbed during manufacturing. If they get into the sol (colloid) then the ions coming of the electrode will then stick to those chunks and your sol will bottom out much quicker, the particles also being less therapeutically beneficial as they will be getting so large to the point where they will just not be able to pass inside cell tissue and kill pathogens, also creating more possibility of argyria skin discolouration, though that can be lessened or even removed with selenium supplementation to chelate it from the skin I read. The regular changing of polarity will just push a load of muck into the distilled water and act as a magnet for the smaller groups of ions to stick to. With best wishes, Dave On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 1:32 AM, HARSHA GODAVARI h.godav...@shaw.ca mailto:h.godav...@shaw.ca wrote: I am considering using this to make colloidal silver. I like the idea of reversing polarity because it will slow down a build_up of CS near one electrode and both electrodes (hopefully) wear evenly. Also I have one of these around and it will save a bit for the time being :-) Are there any cons ( pros) to this notion. I would appreciate your thoughts on this. Thank you. regards hg No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com http://www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1427 / Virus Database: 2441/5322 - Release Date: 10/10/12 No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com http://www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1427 / Virus Database: 2441/5322 - Release Date: 10/10/12
