Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-21 Thread Carol Ann
By comparison of the cost of the two units-

The new Micro-Particle Colloidal Silver Generator is regularly priced at only 
$339.95, but if you act within the next 15 days you pay only $239.95 -- a 
whopping $100 savings! Or, purchase two of these amazing new units and get each 
one for only $219.95 per unit

You're kidding, right?

Faith Gagne jitte...@gis.net wrote: The SilverEdge does a great job as 
well.  No  one is agonizing.  Faith G.
  
  
- Original Message - 
   From:CarolAnn 
   To: silver-list@eskimo.com 
   Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 9:50PM
   Subject: Re: CSInfo about the bestgeneratrorfor collodial
   

For crying out loud. Go with Ode's - if you want a simplemachine that does 
the job. Stop agonizing. 

Faith Gagne jitte...@gis.net wrote:   Or check out this 
selection of  generators:  http://www.thesilveredge.com/gen.shtml
  
 Faith G.
  
  
-Original Message - 
   From:CarolAnn 
   To:silver-list@eskimo.com 
   Sent:Sunday, June 15, 2008 9:17 PM
   Subject:RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial
   

http://www.silverpuppy.com/

MaryEllen Murphy maryelle...@bellsouth.netwrote:What  
are some other generators that are Ionic silver

-Original  Message-
From: Clayton Family [mailto:clay...@skypoint.com]  
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 5:08 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject:  Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

I beg to  differ, at least in principle. An ion is smaller than a 
stable  
particle of any element. Don't confuse the poor girl. I respect  Frank 
Key's work, but this is getting to a nitpicking point that she  may be 
too sick to understand.

Ionically isolated silver is  going to be the most reasonable solution. 
I am not arguing with your  statement about the small size being more 
effective, but it is moot  to argue about nanometers when one is 
talking 
about ions. My  generator certainly produces ions, which are the 
smallest pieces of  silver that can exist.

kathryn

On Jun 15, 2008, at 4:31  PM, Jim Meissner yahoo wrote:

 Dear Mary  Ellen:

 Click on the link

  http://meissnerresearch.com/products/silver-generator

  No, not all generators are alike.
 There are no generators that  will produce a particle the size of an 
 atom.

  Frank Key, has developed a method that produces the smallest 
  particle
 possible and that is a group of atoms about .75  nanometers in size. 
 He has
 done some research that says  that the smaller particle means more 
 surface
 area and  best effects.

 Mesosilver page:  http://www.purestcolloids.com/mesosilver.htm

 Jim  Meissner www.MeissnerResearch.com

 -Original  Message-
 From: Mary Ellen Murphy  [mailto:maryelle...@bellsouth.net] 


--
The Silver List is  a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions  for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post,  address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic  messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and  Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer:  Mike Devour






Regards,Carol Ann ~ The only thing that is different is how you
think..
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/archivepix.html



Regards, Carol Ann ~ The onlything that is different is how youthink..
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/archivepix.html   



Regards, Carol Ann ~ The only thing that is different is how you think..
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/archivepix.html
   

Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-21 Thread Faith Gagne
If you have what you want you should be fine with it.  Faith G.


  - Original Message - 
  From: Carol Ann 
  To: silver-list@eskimo.com 
  Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 3:57 PM
  Subject: Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial


  By comparison of the cost of the two units-

  The new Micro-Particle Colloidal Silver Generator is regularly priced at only 
$339.95, but if you act within the next 15 days you pay only $239.95 -- a 
whopping $100 savings! Or, purchase two of these amazing new units and get each 
one for only $219.95 per unit

  You're kidding, right?

  Faith Gagne jitte...@gis.net wrote:
The SilverEdge does a great job as well.  No one is agonizing.  Faith G.


  - Original Message - 
  From: Carol Ann 
  To: silver-list@eskimo.com 
  Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 9:50 PM
  Subject: Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial


  For crying out loud. Go with Ode's - if you want a simple machine that 
does the job. Stop agonizing. 

  Faith Gagne jitte...@gis.net wrote: 
Or check out this selection of generators:  
http://www.thesilveredge.com/gen.shtml

Faith G.


  - Original Message - 
  From: Carol Ann 
  To: silver-list@eskimo.com 
  Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 9:17 PM
  Subject: RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial


  http://www.silverpuppy.com/

  Mary Ellen Murphy maryelle...@bellsouth.net wrote: 
What are some other generators that are Ionic silver

-Original Message-
From: Clayton Family [mailto:clay...@skypoint.com] 
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 5:08 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

I beg to differ, at least in principle. An ion is smaller than a 
stable 
particle of any element. Don't confuse the poor girl. I respect 
Frank 
Key's work, but this is getting to a nitpicking point that she may 
be 
too sick to understand.

Ionically isolated silver is going to be the most reasonable 
solution. 
I am not arguing with your statement about the small size being 
more 
effective, but it is moot to argue about nanometers when one is 
talking 
about ions. My generator certainly produces ions, which are the 
smallest pieces of silver that can exist.

kathryn

On Jun 15, 2008, at 4:31 PM, Jim Meissner yahoo wrote:

 Dear Mary Ellen:

 Click on the link

 http://meissnerresearch.com/products/silver-generator

 No, not all generators are alike.
 There are no generators that will produce a particle the size of 
an 
 atom.

 Frank Key, has developed a method that produces the smallest 
particle
 possible and that is a group of atoms about .75 nanometers in 
size. 
 He has
 done some research that says that the smaller particle means more 
 surface
 area and best effects.

 Mesosilver page: http://www.purestcolloids.com/mesosilver.htm

 Jim Meissner www.MeissnerResearch.com

 -Original Message-
 From: Mary Ellen Murphy [mailto:maryelle...@bellsouth.net] 


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal 
Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour 







  Regards, Carol Ann ~ The only thing that is different is how you 
think..
  http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/archivepix.html 



  Regards, Carol Ann ~ The only thing that is different is how you think..
  http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/archivepix.html 



  Regards, Carol Ann ~ The only thing that is different is how you think..
  http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/archivepix.html


Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-19 Thread Carol Ann
For crying out loud. Go with Ode's - if you want a simple machine that does the 
job. Stop agonizing. 

Faith Gagne jitte...@gis.net wrote:   Or check out this selection of 
generators:   http://www.thesilveredge.com/gen.shtml
  
 Faith G.
  
  
- Original Message - 
   From:CarolAnn 
   To: silver-list@eskimo.com 
   Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 9:17 PM
   Subject: RE: CSInfo about the bestgeneratrorfor collodial
   

http://www.silverpuppy.com/

MaryEllen Murphy maryelle...@bellsouth.netwrote:   What  are some 
other generators that are Ionic silver

-Original  Message-
From: Clayton Family [mailto:clay...@skypoint.com] 
Sent:  Sunday, June 15, 2008 5:08 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject:  Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

I beg to  differ, at least in principle. An ion is smaller than a stable 
particle  of any element. Don't confuse the poor girl. I respect Frank 
Key's work,  but this is getting to a nitpicking point that she may be 
too sick to  understand.

Ionically isolated silver is going to be the most  reasonable solution. 
I am not arguing with your statement about the  small size being more 
effective, but it is moot to argue about  nanometers when one is talking 
about ions. My generator certainly  produces ions, which are the 
smallest pieces of silver that can  exist.

kathryn

On Jun 15, 2008, at 4:31 PM, Jim Meissner yahoo  wrote:

 Dear Mary Ellen:

 Click on the  link

  http://meissnerresearch.com/products/silver-generator

 No,  not all generators are alike.
 There are no generators that will  produce a particle the size of an 
 atom.

 Frank Key,  has developed a method that produces the smallest particle
 possible  and that is a group of atoms about .75 nanometers in size. 
 He  has
 done some research that says that the smaller particle means  more 
 surface
 area and best effects.

  Mesosilver page:  http://www.purestcolloids.com/mesosilver.htm

 Jim Meissner  www.MeissnerResearch.com

 -Original Message-
  From: Mary Ellen Murphy [mailto:maryelle...@bellsouth.net]  


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing  Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at:  http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to:  silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to:  silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List  archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour  






Regards,Carol Ann ~ The only thing that is different is how youthink..
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/archivepix.html   



Regards, Carol Ann ~ The only thing that is different is how you think..
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/archivepix.html
   

Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-19 Thread Faith Gagne
The SilverEdge does a great job as well.  No one is agonizing.  Faith G.


  - Original Message - 
  From: Carol Ann 
  To: silver-list@eskimo.com 
  Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 9:50 PM
  Subject: Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial


  For crying out loud. Go with Ode's - if you want a simple machine that does 
the job. Stop agonizing. 

  Faith Gagne jitte...@gis.net wrote:
Or check out this selection of generators:  
http://www.thesilveredge.com/gen.shtml

Faith G.


  - Original Message - 
  From: Carol Ann 
  To: silver-list@eskimo.com 
  Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 9:17 PM
  Subject: RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial


  http://www.silverpuppy.com/

  Mary Ellen Murphy maryelle...@bellsouth.net wrote: 
What are some other generators that are Ionic silver

-Original Message-
From: Clayton Family [mailto:clay...@skypoint.com] 
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 5:08 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

I beg to differ, at least in principle. An ion is smaller than a stable 
particle of any element. Don't confuse the poor girl. I respect Frank 
Key's work, but this is getting to a nitpicking point that she may be 
too sick to understand.

Ionically isolated silver is going to be the most reasonable solution. 
I am not arguing with your statement about the small size being more 
effective, but it is moot to argue about nanometers when one is talking 
about ions. My generator certainly produces ions, which are the 
smallest pieces of silver that can exist.

kathryn

On Jun 15, 2008, at 4:31 PM, Jim Meissner yahoo wrote:

 Dear Mary Ellen:

 Click on the link

 http://meissnerresearch.com/products/silver-generator

 No, not all generators are alike.
 There are no generators that will produce a particle the size of an 
 atom.

 Frank Key, has developed a method that produces the smallest particle
 possible and that is a group of atoms about .75 nanometers in size. 
 He has
 done some research that says that the smaller particle means more 
 surface
 area and best effects.

 Mesosilver page: http://www.purestcolloids.com/mesosilver.htm

 Jim Meissner www.MeissnerResearch.com

 -Original Message-
 From: Mary Ellen Murphy [mailto:maryelle...@bellsouth.net] 


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour 







  Regards, Carol Ann ~ The only thing that is different is how you think..
  http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/archivepix.html 



  Regards, Carol Ann ~ The only thing that is different is how you think..
  http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/archivepix.html


Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-19 Thread Hanneke


LOL... I second that.
Hanneke
At 11:20 AM 20/06/2008, you wrote:
For crying out loud. Go with
Ode's - if you want a simple machine that does the job. Stop agonizing.

Faith Gagne jitte...@gis.net wrote:


Or check out this selection of
generators:

http://www.thesilveredge.com/gen.shtml



Faith G.






- Original Message - 

From: Carol Ann 

To:
silver-list@eskimo.com 

Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 9:17 PM

Subject: RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor
collodial

http://www.silverpuppy.com/


Mary Ellen Murphy

maryelle...@bellsouth.net wrote: 


What are some other generators that are Ionic silver

-Original Message-

From: Clayton Family
[
mailto:clay...@skypoint.com] 

Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 5:08 PM

To:
silver-list@eskimo.com

Subject: Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor
collodial

I beg to differ, at least in principle. An ion is smaller than a
stable 

particle of any element. Don't confuse the poor girl. I respect Frank


Key's work, but this is getting to a nitpicking point that she may be


too sick to understand.

Ionically isolated silver is going to be the most reasonable
solution. 

I am not arguing with your statement about the small size being more


effective, but it is moot to argue about nanometers when one is
talking 

about ions. My generator certainly produces ions, which are the 

smallest pieces of silver that can exist.

kathryn

On Jun 15, 2008, at 4:31 PM, Jim Meissner yahoo wrote:

 Dear Mary Ellen:



 Click on the link





http://meissnerresearch.com/products/silver-generator



 No, not all generators are alike.

 There are no generators that will produce a particle the size of
an 

 atom.



 Frank Key, has developed a method that produces the smallest
particle

 possible and that is a group of atoms about .75 nanometers in
size. 

 He has

 done some research that says that the smaller particle means
more 

 surface

 area and best effects.



 Mesosilver page:

http://www.purestcolloids.com/mesosilver.htm



 Jim Meissner

www.MeissnerResearch.com



 -Original Message-

 From: Mary Ellen Murphy
[
mailto:maryelle...@bellsouth.net] 


--

The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal
Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at:

http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to:
silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently
down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour 





Regards, Carol Ann ~ The only thing that is different is how you
think..



http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/archivepix.html 




Regards, Carol Ann ~ The only thing that is different is how you
think..

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/archivepix.html
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG. 
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.4.1/1510 - Release Date:
19/06/2008 3:21 PM



RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-18 Thread Ode Coyote
 after 1 day,
15uS after 2 days, 17uS, 18uS, 20us, and so on.  There seems to be a
limiting phenomenon where the ion content of the solution remains constant
while day by day the particle content increases slightly.  The size of the
particles is 2 to 3 nanometers.  It is interesting that the Hanna PWT
displays a 1 to 1 relationship with the PPM silver concentration.

I would be very interested to have you run some test on the generator to see
what you think.  If you would send me your address I will send you a
generator to play with.

Jim Meissner   www.MeissnerResearch.com

-Original Message-
From: Ode Coyote [mailto:odecoy...@alltel.net]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 10:24 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial





## but
they're not metallic particles until they .pick up an electron.
But free electrons don't exist in water.
It's possible that electrons can gather on the surface of glass, acting as
a capacitor, coming from electromagnetic radiation being converted into
electrons by the semi metallic and metallic components of the glass acting
like a [bad] solar cell...thus, you may see some silver plate out build up
on the glass as silver ions are being made metallic.
  A Harvard study pointed to the surface of glass as being a crystal
nucleation site where particles form and grow into clusters.

If you illuminate and magnify a CS making chamber and don't stir the water,
if there is enough [DC] current flowing, you'll see brownish gold particles
streaming off one electrode and white ones streaming off the other.
  The streams sink towards each other but vanish where they contact the
glass at the bottom.
  At that spot a silver mirror will form with a black oxide spot on one
side of it and a white hydroxide spot on the other.

  Why?  I dunno.  Maybe this, maybe that and maybe a combination of both
with other things thrown in...like..electrons on the glass surface?

If current is reduced, the golden stream doesn't form.
Why?
Most likely because almost all the oxides stay stuck to the electrode.

Every time I've seen that golden stream, I made golden CS.

Ode

EIS/CS forms silver ions in solution which are single atoms of silver...
but
they're not metallic particles until they happen to get together.  the
particulate portion of EIS/CS varies in particle size, some of them surely
being as small as is possible, but they tend to grow over time eventually
falling out.
so then we come back to which works, particles or ions? or which works
best?
again  again, ad nauseum.

  -Original Message-
  From: Jim Meissner yahoo [mailto:jpmeiss...@yahoo.com]
  Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 5:32 PM
  To: silver-list@eskimo.com
  Subject: RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial
 
 
  Dear Mary Ellen:
 
  Click on the link
 
  http://meissnerresearch.com/products/silver-generator
 
  No, not all generators are alike.
  There are no generators that will produce a particle the size of an
atom.
 
  Frank Key, has developed a method that produces the smallest particle
  possible and that is a group of atoms about .75 nanometers in
  size.  He has
  done some research that says that the smaller particle means more
surface
  area and best effects.
 
  Mesosilver page:  http://www.purestcolloids.com/mesosilver.htm
 
  Jim Meissner   www.MeissnerResearch.com
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Mary Ellen Murphy [mailto:maryelle...@bellsouth.net]
  Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 12:46 PM
  To: silver-list@eskimo.com
  Subject: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial
 
 
  Can some one please tell me which is the best generator to make
colloidal
  silver and does the particle size matter. I was told that it did not and
a
  lot of people do not know what I am talking about and saY that an
  atom is a
  as small as you can get and that's what they all do.
 
  Thanks
  Mary Ellen
 
 
 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Jim Meissner yahoo [mailto:jpmeiss...@yahoo.com]
  Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 10:50 AM
  To: Silver-List@Eskimo.Com
  Subject: FW: CSDesperately need help with Lyme
 
  Dear Mike:
 
  I have not been reading the CS group for quite a while, but Carol
  alerted me
  to the Lyme discussion going on.  A long story very short, Carol
  got bitten
  by a tick and proved to be a willing test subject to help me design a
new
  way of treating Lyme disease.  Take a look at the link
 
  http://meissnerresearch.com/products/dougplus .
 
  Carol is a great researcher and found that Lyme will mimic 200 other
  diseases.  We discovered that Carol has been suffering from Lyme
  for over 14
  years and was being treated for a variety of illnesses.  It took about 6
  months of daily treatments with the DougPlus for Carol to feel
  like she was
  90% recovered and possibly one year to be 100%.
 
  During that time she was consuming 32 ounces of colloidal silver every
day
  for 3 or 4 months.  She found that when she dropped back to a
  lower dosage,
  her

RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-18 Thread Dan Nave
You wrote:

If Faith's CS works for her purposes, what's the problem?

The original post said:

I'm sure it works fairly well, but not the best (sorry Wayne) generator
for the price.

So the original issue was value for the price paid.

The generator appears to be timed with an external timer, probably not
current regulated, and incorporates an air pump for stirring.  All of
which is fine, but pretty basic. Cost is $236.
 
Dan

 -Original Message-
 From: cking...@nycap.rr.com [mailto:cking...@nycap.rr.com] 
 Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 6:22 PM
 To: silver-list@eskimo.com
 Subject: Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial
 
 Faith is perfectly correct in her statement, even accordingly 
 to our sage, Brooks Bradly.
 
 All you NEED is CS strong enough to be effective, and you can 
 tell that by trial.
 Brooks has told us that 5 ppm is EFFECTIVE for most insults.
 
 You don't NEED to measure anything.
 You can SEE clear.
 We KNOW golden is OK.
 
 All the rest is just screwing around for the fun of it, or 
 verifying measurements for claims  so as to sell CS or CS makers.
 
 If Faith's CS works for her purposes, what's the problem?
 
   Chuck
 If words could speak, I wonder what they'd say 
 
 On 6/17/2008 5:24:49 PM, sol (sol...@sweetwaterhsa.com) wrote:
   You wrote:
  
  
   I don;t know how can you judge, never having used it yourself,
  
  
  Faith,
  Several people here have been doing CS for a very long time, many 
  years, some of them have replied to you already. They DO 
 know enough 
  to judge, because they know the mechanics and science behind making 
  colloidal silver. In fact, they know a lot of basic chemistry, 
  electromagnetics, electricity, and so on. So they are qualified to 
  critique this or any generator, knowing the manufacturer's claims.
  What ppm or uS is your finished CS? Have you used a water 
 test meter 
  to test it?  Since your unit uses a timer, it doesn't seem like it 
  could include any current controls. What voltage does it 
 operate at? I 
  find it curious you can make reliably clear CS, unless it 
 is low ppm.
  sol
 


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com



RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-18 Thread cking001
Even so, Dan,
Payback is still well under a year in doctor/medicine bills paid out
that the CS eliminates.
And she has an effective health immune system booster forever after
now.

Doesn't seem so awful a price at $236 now, does it?

People without technical skills always have to pay the plumber,
carpenter, etc.
But, they don't have to go without, or even search for the cheapest
handyman.

Chuck
I'm killing time, wasting space, and going through a phase 


On 6/18/2008 10:43:44 AM, Dan Nave (dan.n...@nilfisk-advance.com)
wrote:
 You wrote:
 
 If Faith's CS works for her purposes, what's the problem?
 
 The original post said:
 
 I'm sure it works fairly well, but not the best (sorry Wayne) generator
 for the price.
 
 So the original issue was value for the price paid.
 
 The generator appears to be timed with an external timer, probably not
 current regulated, and incorporates an air pump for stirring.  All of
 which is fine, but pretty basic. Cost is $236.
 
 Dan
 
  -Original Message
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.4.0/1507 - Release Date: 6/18/2008 7:09 
AM


RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-18 Thread Dan Nave


You pay for what you get, but you don't always get what you pay for...
-  Dan Nave 



 -Original Message-
 From: cking...@nycap.rr.com [mailto:cking...@nycap.rr.com] 
 Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 10:52 AM
 To: silver-list@eskimo.com
 Subject: RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial
 
 Even so, Dan,
 Payback is still well under a year in doctor/medicine bills 
 paid out that the CS eliminates.
 And she has an effective health immune system booster forever 
 after now.
 
 Doesn't seem so awful a price at $236 now, does it?
 
 People without technical skills always have to pay the 
 plumber, carpenter, etc.
 But, they don't have to go without, or even search for the 
 cheapest handyman.
 
   Chuck
 I'm killing time, wasting space, and going through a phase 
 
 
 On 6/18/2008 10:43:44 AM, Dan Nave (dan.n...@nilfisk-advance.com)
 wrote:
  You wrote:
  
  If Faith's CS works for her purposes, what's the problem?
  
  The original post said:
  
  I'm sure it works fairly well, but not the best (sorry Wayne) 
  generator for the price.
  
  So the original issue was value for the price paid.
  
  The generator appears to be timed with an external timer, 
 probably not 
  current regulated, and incorporates an air pump for 
 stirring.  All of 
  which is fine, but pretty basic. Cost is $236.
  
  Dan
  
   -Original Message
 


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com



RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-17 Thread Malcolm
Hi Mary Ellen, 
According to the blood test I don't have it, but I have a number of the
symptoms.  I live in tick country and have been nailed by them more
times than I could count - if I even wanted to.  I've had the rash
circle around the bite site too.  I doubt I'm cured, but it's pretty
much under control.  


I don't know anything about the salt and vitamin C protocol, but I am a
saltetarian - I like salt and use lots of it on my food; and I take
vitamin C as a matter of general good health - [at least when I remember
to] - a gram or two a day and maybe six grams a day if I'm feeling
yucky. I get the kid's stuff that tastes better, 500 mg tablets, two at
a time.  I try to be nice to, and care for, myself; - I really like me -
only me I've got, after all.

You do the same; take care of yourself.
Malcolm





 
On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 18:54 -0500, Mary Ellen Murphy wrote:
 Did you have Lyme.  Are you cured with just doing the colloidal silver.
 
 Has anyone on this site been cured.  How do you feel about the salt/vit C
 protocol
 
 Thanks for your info
 Mary Ellen
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Malcolm [mailto:s...@asis.com] 
 Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 5:33 PM
 To: silver-list@eskimo.com
 Subject: RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial
 
 Hi Mary Ellen, 
 I've been making my own colloidal silver with my own home-made generator
 for about ten years now; it's a current-controlled generator and has
 worked very well, producing high quality high strength CS.  I don't make
 generators for other people, mainly because it costs too much in time
 and money for me to do so; I leave it to others who wish to do it as a
 business.
 
 I've paid attention to what others have been doing who Are in that
 business.  I haven't gone about testing everyone else's, But I can tell
 you what I have noticed.  along with many other people's judgements, the
 Silver Puppy rates very high with me, and so does the SilverGen.
 
 http://silverpuppy.com
 
 http://www.silvergen.com/
   
 
 And PLEASE, take the advice of those who are urging you to check out the
 Lyme lists.  This is what is called an Emerging Disease so the people
 who've got it are on the leading edge of the research about it.
  
 http://www.lymediseaseassociation.org/
 
 http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/lymeinfo/
 
 There are lots of these.
 Take care of yourself, ok?
 
 
 
 On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 18:14 -0500, Mary Ellen Murphy wrote:
  What are some other generators that are Ionic silver
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Clayton Family [mailto:clay...@skypoint.com] 
  Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 5:08 PM
  To: silver-list@eskimo.com
  Subject: Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial
  
  I beg to differ, at least in principle. An ion is smaller than a stable 
  particle of any element.  Don't confuse the poor girl.  I respect Frank 
  Key's work, but this is getting to a nitpicking point that she may be 
  too sick to understand.
  
  Ionically isolated silver is going to be the most reasonable solution. 
  I am not arguing with your statement about the small size being more 
  effective, but it is moot to argue about nanometers when one is talking 
  about ions.  My generator certainly produces ions, which are the 
  smallest pieces of silver that can exist.
  
  kathryn
  
 
 
 
 --
 The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
 
 Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
 
 To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
 
 Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
 
 The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
 
 List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com

 
 


Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-17 Thread Ode Coyote
 1]  A timer cannot work to reproduce any consistency batch to 
batch.  Minor differences in water make major differences in time and no 
two jugs of water are the same.


 1.) The Brand New Micro-Particle Home Colloidal Silver Generator -- 
Over a year and a half in development, [back in 1970?]  this brand new 
model has been specifically designed to produce micro-particles of 
colloidal silver as small as http://www.thesilveredge.com/mp5.shtml.0008 
microns (i.e., eight ten-thousandths of a micron) in size - so small they 
are completely invisible to the naked eye and barely visible even when you 
shine a laser light through the solution. In fact, it takes a powerful 
electron microscope operating at 175,000x magnification to measure them! 


2] An electron microscope cannot measure the particle size of ANYTHING in a 
liquid and those particles BEING measured don't exist in the liquid to BE 
measured.
 What they've done is oxidize the ions into silver oxide by drying the 
sample so an electron microscope can be used, to make bigger particles so 
they can *say* they are smaller by using the wrong tool to measure 
something that doesn't exist in the water...at all.


Like the battery-operated unit it makes 16 ounces of pure high-quality 
colloidal silver per batch. It is calibrated to make 1 ppm colloidal silver 
per minute using the saline starter solution, or 10 ppm per hour without 
the saline starter solution. It is extremely simple to use - no special 
skills required 


 Very simple to use if you don't mind having no idea what's going on.
If you had any special skills, you *wouldn't* used it...or at least you'd 
know better than to follow those directions...very simple to mis-use and 
not know you did.
1 PPM per minute cannot be true if you don't know where you started...if 
anything even close to being predictable, it's one PPM per minute, *per 
minute*  until a current limit is reached...if ...it ever is reached or 
there is one built into it TO reachwith the very important first 
segment  starting point unknowable.
 Never never never use salt... but if you don't mind making light 
sensitive silver chloride, one single grain extra will throw all PPM 
predictions right out the window.


I believe that every case of blue-man attributed to home made colloidal 
silver was due to mis-using this type of generator and not knowing 
it...while following those directions, not knowing how faulty they can be.


  What a dinosaur.
I'll work, but not very well unless you know what you're doing and devise 
or buy instruments to monitor it.
If you do do that, you'll know exactly why it can't work as claimed because 
it won't work that way and the instruments will tell you so.


But then, you CAN work with it the way it DOES work...and that'll work OK.


 James Allison http://www.sunstoneherbals.com/ might still be selling 
something like it [with real instructions?] for $40-$50.

Humm, looks like he quit selling decently priced dinosaurs.
 Maybe too dangerous for common folk?
Still sells the instruments to herd them though.



Ode

At 07:45 AM 6/16/2008 -0400, you wrote:
Or check out this selection of 
generators: 
http://www.thesilveredge.com/gen.shtmlhttp://www.thesilveredge.com/gen.shtml


Faith G.


- Original Message -
From: mailto:saffiresk...@yahoo.comCarol Ann
To: mailto:silver-list@eskimo.comsilver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 9:17 PM
Subject: RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

http://www.silverpuppy.com/http://www.silverpuppy.com/

Mary Ellen Murphy 
mailto:maryelle...@bellsouth.netmaryelle...@bellsouth.net wrote:

What are some other generators that are Ionic silver

-Original Message-
From: Clayton Family [mailto:clay...@skypoint.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 5:08 PM
To: mailto:silver-list@eskimo.comsilver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

I beg to differ, at least in principle. An ion is smaller than a stable
particle of any element. Don't confuse the poor girl. I respect Frank
Key's work, but this is getting to a nitpicking point that she may be
too sick to understand.

Ionically isolated silver is going to be the most reasonable solution.
I am not arguing with your statement about the small size being more
effective, but it is moot to argue about nanometers when one is talking
about ions. My generator certainly produces ions, which are the
smallest pieces of silver that can exist.

kathryn

On Jun 15, 2008, at 4:31 PM, Jim Meissner yahoo wrote:

 Dear Mary Ellen:

 Click on the link

 http://meissnerresearch.com/products/silver-generator

 No, not all generators are alike.
 There are no generators that will produce a particle the size of an
 atom.

 Frank Key, has developed a method that produces the smallest particle
 possible and that is a group of atoms about .75 nanometers in size.
 He has
 done some research that says that the smaller particle means more
 surface
 area and best effects.

 Mesosilver

RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-17 Thread Ode Coyote







## but
they're not metallic particles until they .pick up an electron.
But free electrons don't exist in water.
It's possible that electrons can gather on the surface of glass, acting as 
a capacitor, coming from electromagnetic radiation being converted into 
electrons by the semi metallic and metallic components of the glass acting 
like a [bad] solar cell...thus, you may see some silver plate out build up 
on the glass as silver ions are being made metallic.
 A Harvard study pointed to the surface of glass as being a crystal 
nucleation site where particles form and grow into clusters.


If you illuminate and magnify a CS making chamber and don't stir the water, 
if there is enough [DC] current flowing, you'll see brownish gold particles 
streaming off one electrode and white ones streaming off the other.
 The streams sink towards each other but vanish where they contact the 
glass at the bottom.
 At that spot a silver mirror will form with a black oxide spot on one 
side of it and a white hydroxide spot on the other.


 Why?  I dunno.  Maybe this, maybe that and maybe a combination of both 
with other things thrown in...like..electrons on the glass surface?


If current is reduced, the golden stream doesn't form.
Why?
Most likely because almost all the oxides stay stuck to the electrode.

Every time I've seen that golden stream, I made golden CS.

Ode


EIS/CS forms silver ions in solution which are single atoms of silver... but
they're not metallic particles until they happen to get together.  the
particulate portion of EIS/CS varies in particle size, some of them surely
being as small as is possible, but they tend to grow over time eventually
falling out.
so then we come back to which works, particles or ions? or which works best?
again  again, ad nauseum.

 -Original Message-
 From: Jim Meissner yahoo [mailto:jpmeiss...@yahoo.com]
 Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 5:32 PM
 To: silver-list@eskimo.com
 Subject: RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial


 Dear Mary Ellen:

 Click on the link

 http://meissnerresearch.com/products/silver-generator

 No, not all generators are alike.
 There are no generators that will produce a particle the size of an atom.

 Frank Key, has developed a method that produces the smallest particle
 possible and that is a group of atoms about .75 nanometers in
 size.  He has
 done some research that says that the smaller particle means more surface
 area and best effects.

 Mesosilver page:  http://www.purestcolloids.com/mesosilver.htm

 Jim Meissner   www.MeissnerResearch.com

 -Original Message-
 From: Mary Ellen Murphy [mailto:maryelle...@bellsouth.net]
 Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 12:46 PM
 To: silver-list@eskimo.com
 Subject: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial


 Can some one please tell me which is the best generator to make colloidal
 silver and does the particle size matter. I was told that it did not and a
 lot of people do not know what I am talking about and saY that an
 atom is a
 as small as you can get and that's what they all do.

 Thanks
 Mary Ellen





 -Original Message-
 From: Jim Meissner yahoo [mailto:jpmeiss...@yahoo.com]
 Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 10:50 AM
 To: Silver-List@Eskimo.Com
 Subject: FW: CSDesperately need help with Lyme

 Dear Mike:

 I have not been reading the CS group for quite a while, but Carol
 alerted me
 to the Lyme discussion going on.  A long story very short, Carol
 got bitten
 by a tick and proved to be a willing test subject to help me design a new
 way of treating Lyme disease.  Take a look at the link

 http://meissnerresearch.com/products/dougplus .

 Carol is a great researcher and found that Lyme will mimic 200 other
 diseases.  We discovered that Carol has been suffering from Lyme
 for over 14
 years and was being treated for a variety of illnesses.  It took about 6
 months of daily treatments with the DougPlus for Carol to feel
 like she was
 90% recovered and possibly one year to be 100%.

 During that time she was consuming 32 ounces of colloidal silver every day
 for 3 or 4 months.  She found that when she dropped back to a
 lower dosage,
 her herx, fever and chills, would get worse.  Please note this high dosage
 should only be done with well made colloidal silver

 http://meissnerresearch.com/products/silver-generator

 containing only nano size particles.  My generator was tested by Frank Key
 who makes the smallest possible particles of 0.75 nanometer as found in
 MesoSilver.

 Anyway I would like to ask if it would be OK to post the DougPlus link on
 your CS group?

 Jim Meissner   www.MeissnerResearch.com

 -Original Message-
 From: Marshall Dudley [mailto:mdud...@king-cart.com]
 Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 10:09 AM
 To: silver-list@eskimo.com
 Subject: Re: CSDesperately need help with Lyme

 Mary Ellen Murphy wrote:
  What type of symtoms did you have.  I suffer with a lot of
 pain, fagigue,
  brain fog, back and neck problems, thyroid and addison's

Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-17 Thread Faith Gagne
Hi SamL.  I believe you are describing their small battery operated unit, a 
unit so simple that even a child could run it.  I don't know why they are 
showing a bag of salt with that generator when their video says to NEVER USE 
SALT.  

For more information on that you would have to call the company.

I selected and use the Micro Particle home colloidal Silver Generator.  It 
does not use salt.  I was actually unaware that any of their models use salt. 
.On the advice of friends  I quickly settled on the model I wanted and did not 
bother with the others.  My model is great.  It is easy to use, is completely 
automatic with easy to follow instructions, and shuts off in about 3 hours, 
giving perfect results every time.

Here's a video of it.   http://www.thesilveredge.com/vidclip.shtml

But if you don't like this one, find one you do like.  That is everyone's 
perogative.  MaryEllen asked about other generators and so I am showing the one 
I like best.  Best wishes.  Faith G.

 
  - Original Message - 
  From: Sam L. 
  To: silver-list@eskimo.com 
  Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 3:17 PM
  Subject: Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial


  Hi Faith.
  I wouldnt be recommending this CS generator. Heres a quote from there web 
page.

  ( Therefore, if you want a good high-quality concentration of 10 ppm, you 
just leave the generator running for about 10 minutes. If you want a stronger 
concentration of 20 ppm, you leave the generator running for about 20 minutes. 
You can even make highly concentrated batches of colloidal silver, in the 100 
to 500 ppm range, by letting the generator run longer. )

  Obviusly they are using salt water instead of distilled water and even show a 
bag of salt next to there generator.
  Just a word to the wise.

  Sam L.


  On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 5:45 AM, Faith Gagne jitte...@gis.net wrote:

Or check out this selection of generators:  
http://www.thesilveredge.com/gen.shtml

Faith G.


  - Original Message - 
  From: Carol Ann 
  To: silver-list@eskimo.com 
  Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 9:17 PM
  Subject: RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial


  http://www.silverpuppy.com/

  Mary Ellen Murphy maryelle...@bellsouth.net wrote: 
What are some other generators that are Ionic silver



RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-17 Thread Dan Nave
I'm sure it works fairly well, but not the best (sorry Wayne) generator
for the price.
 
Dan




From: Faith Gagne [mailto:jitte...@gis.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 9:33 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial


Hi SamL.  I believe you are describing their small battery
operated unit, a unit so simple that even a child could run it.  I don't
know why they are showing a bag of salt with that generator when their
video says to NEVER USE SALT.  
 
For more information on that you would have to call the company.
 
I selected and use the Micro Particle home colloidal Silver
Generator.  It does not use salt.  I was actually unaware that any of
their models use salt. .On the advice of friends  I quickly settled on
the model I wanted and did not bother with the others.  My model is
great.  It is easy to use, is completely automatic with easy to follow
instructions, and shuts off in about 3 hours, giving perfect results
every time.
 
Here's a video of it.
http://www.thesilveredge.com/vidclip.shtml
 
But if you don't like this one, find one you do like.  That is
everyone's perogative.  MaryEllen asked about other generators and so I
am showing the one I like best.  Best wishes.  Faith G.
 
 

- Original Message - 
From: Sam L. mailto:one...@gmail.com  
To: silver-list@eskimo.com 
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor
collodial

Hi Faith.
I wouldnt be recommending this CS generator. Heres a
quote from there web page.

( Therefore, if you want a good high-quality
concentration of 10 ppm, you just leave the generator running for about
10 minutes. If you want a stronger concentration of 20 ppm, you leave
the generator running for about 20 minutes. You can even make highly
concentrated batches of colloidal silver, in the 100 to 500 ppm range,
by letting the generator run longer. )

Obviusly they are using salt water instead of distilled
water and even show a bag of salt next to there generator.
Just a word to the wise.

Sam L.


On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 5:45 AM, Faith Gagne
jitte...@gis.net wrote:


Or check out this selection of generators:
http://www.thesilveredge.com/gen.shtml
 
Faith G.
 
 

- Original Message - 
From: Carol Ann
mailto:saffiresk...@yahoo.com  
To: silver-list@eskimo.com 
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 9:17 PM
Subject: RE: CSInfo about the best
generatrorfor collodial

http://www.silverpuppy.com/

Mary Ellen Murphy
maryelle...@bellsouth.net wrote: 

What are some other generators that are
Ionic silver





Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-17 Thread Faith Gagne
It works extremely well, not just 'fairly' well.  I don;t know how can you 
judge, never having used it yourself, but it doesn't matter to me.  I am 
satisfied with what I've got.Faith G.
  - Original Message - 
  From: Dan Nave 
  To: silver-list@eskimo.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 11:50 AM
  Subject: RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial


  I'm sure it works fairly well, but not the best (sorry Wayne) generator for 
the price.

  Dan




From: Faith Gagne [mailto:jitte...@gis.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 9:33 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial


Hi SamL.  I believe you are describing their small battery operated unit, a 
unit so simple that even a child could run it.  I don't know why they are 
showing a bag of salt with that generator when their video says to NEVER USE 
SALT.  

For more information on that you would have to call the company.

I selected and use the Micro Particle home colloidal Silver Generator.  
It does not use salt.  I was actually unaware that any of their models use 
salt. .On the advice of friends  I quickly settled on the model I wanted and 
did not bother with the others.  My model is great.  It is easy to use, is 
completely automatic with easy to follow instructions, and shuts off in about 3 
hours, giving perfect results every time.

Here's a video of it.   http://www.thesilveredge.com/vidclip.shtml

But if you don't like this one, find one you do like.  That is everyone's 
perogative.  MaryEllen asked about other generators and so I am showing the one 
I like best.  Best wishes.  Faith G.


  - Original Message - 
  From: Sam L. 
  To: silver-list@eskimo.com 
  Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 3:17 PM
  Subject: Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial


  Hi Faith.
  I wouldnt be recommending this CS generator. Heres a quote from there web 
page.

  ( Therefore, if you want a good high-quality concentration of 10 ppm, you 
just leave the generator running for about 10 minutes. If you want a stronger 
concentration of 20 ppm, you leave the generator running for about 20 minutes. 
You can even make highly concentrated batches of colloidal silver, in the 100 
to 500 ppm range, by letting the generator run longer. )

  Obviusly they are using salt water instead of distilled water and even 
show a bag of salt next to there generator.
  Just a word to the wise.

  Sam L.


  On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 5:45 AM, Faith Gagne jitte...@gis.net wrote:

Or check out this selection of generators:  
http://www.thesilveredge.com/gen.shtml

Faith G.


  - Original Message - 
  From: Carol Ann 
  To: silver-list@eskimo.com 
  Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 9:17 PM
  Subject: RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial


  http://www.silverpuppy.com/

  Mary Ellen Murphy maryelle...@bellsouth.net wrote: 
What are some other generators that are Ionic silver



RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-17 Thread Dan Nave
You wrote:
 
 
I don;t know how can you judge, never having used it yourself,
 
 
Because I know a thing or two, and I have a mind that actually thinks...
 
 
Dan




From: Faith Gagne [mailto:jitte...@gis.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 11:09 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial


It works extremely well, not just 'fairly' well.  I don;t know
how can you judge, never having used it yourself, but it doesn't matter
to me.  I am satisfied with what I've got.Faith G.

- Original Message - 
From: Dan Nave mailto:dan.n...@nilfisk-advance.com  
To: silver-list@eskimo.com 
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 11:50 AM
Subject: RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor
collodial

I'm sure it works fairly well, but not the best (sorry
Wayne) generator for the price.
 
Dan




From: Faith Gagne [mailto:jitte...@gis.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 9:33 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CSInfo about the best
generatrorfor collodial


Hi SamL.  I believe you are describing their
small battery operated unit, a unit so simple that even a child could
run it.  I don't know why they are showing a bag of salt with that
generator when their video says to NEVER USE SALT.  
 
For more information on that you would have to
call the company.
 
I selected and use the Micro Particle home
colloidal Silver Generator.  It does not use salt.  I was actually
unaware that any of their models use salt. .On the advice of friends  I
quickly settled on the model I wanted and did not bother with the
others.  My model is great.  It is easy to use, is completely automatic
with easy to follow instructions, and shuts off in about 3 hours, giving
perfect results every time.
 
Here's a video of it.
http://www.thesilveredge.com/vidclip.shtml
 
But if you don't like this one, find one you do
like.  That is everyone's perogative.  MaryEllen asked about other
generators and so I am showing the one I like best.  Best wishes.  Faith
G.
 
 

- Original Message - 
From: Sam L. mailto:one...@gmail.com  
To: silver-list@eskimo.com 
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: CSInfo about the best
generatrorfor collodial

Hi Faith.
I wouldnt be recommending this CS
generator. Heres a quote from there web page.

( Therefore, if you want a good
high-quality concentration of 10 ppm, you just leave the generator
running for about 10 minutes. If you want a stronger concentration of 20
ppm, you leave the generator running for about 20 minutes. You can even
make highly concentrated batches of colloidal silver, in the 100 to 500
ppm range, by letting the generator run longer. )

Obviusly they are using salt water
instead of distilled water and even show a bag of salt next to there
generator.
Just a word to the wise.

Sam L.


On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 5:45 AM, Faith
Gagne jitte...@gis.net wrote:


Or check out this selection of
generators:  http://www.thesilveredge.com/gen.shtml
 
Faith G.
 
 

- Original Message - 
From: Carol Ann
mailto:saffiresk...@yahoo.com  
To: silver-list@eskimo.com 
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 9:17 PM
Subject: RE: CSInfo about the best
generatrorfor collodial

http://www.silverpuppy.com/

Mary Ellen Murphy
maryelle...@bellsouth.net wrote: 

What are some other generators that are
Ionic silver





RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-17 Thread Jim Meissner yahoo
Dear Ode:

I have found what you say to be true.  

With my generator design, that is with the 3 volt, ultra low voltage and low
current, the positive electrode wire becomes slightly black.  One slight
disadvantage of using such low voltage is that poor quality distilled water
will turn the positive electrode very black and stop the process and the
generator will not make colloidal silver.  Probably the high voltage of
standard generators breaks down this layer.  On the other hand it might be a
good thing because why make colloidal silver with poor quality water.  The
other interesting thing that happens using low voltage and low current is
that the solution saturates with ions at 13.5 PPM and after that the excess
ions come out of the solution and become metallic silver crystals adhering
to the negative electrode.  I tell my customers that when they see some
silver fuzz one the negative electrode, they are done.  After a few days you
can see a beautiful upside down Christmas tree hanging from the negative
electrode.  The typical reading on the Hanna PWT will be 5uS after 1 day,
15uS after 2 days, 17uS, 18uS, 20us, and so on.  There seems to be a
limiting phenomenon where the ion content of the solution remains constant
while day by day the particle content increases slightly.  The size of the
particles is 2 to 3 nanometers.  It is interesting that the Hanna PWT
displays a 1 to 1 relationship with the PPM silver concentration.

I would be very interested to have you run some test on the generator to see
what you think.  If you would send me your address I will send you a
generator to play with.

Jim Meissner   www.MeissnerResearch.com
  
-Original Message-
From: Ode Coyote [mailto:odecoy...@alltel.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 10:24 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial





## but
they're not metallic particles until they .pick up an electron.
But free electrons don't exist in water.
It's possible that electrons can gather on the surface of glass, acting as 
a capacitor, coming from electromagnetic radiation being converted into 
electrons by the semi metallic and metallic components of the glass acting 
like a [bad] solar cell...thus, you may see some silver plate out build up 
on the glass as silver ions are being made metallic.
  A Harvard study pointed to the surface of glass as being a crystal 
nucleation site where particles form and grow into clusters.

If you illuminate and magnify a CS making chamber and don't stir the water, 
if there is enough [DC] current flowing, you'll see brownish gold particles 
streaming off one electrode and white ones streaming off the other.
  The streams sink towards each other but vanish where they contact the 
glass at the bottom.
  At that spot a silver mirror will form with a black oxide spot on one 
side of it and a white hydroxide spot on the other.

  Why?  I dunno.  Maybe this, maybe that and maybe a combination of both 
with other things thrown in...like..electrons on the glass surface?

If current is reduced, the golden stream doesn't form.
Why?
Most likely because almost all the oxides stay stuck to the electrode.

Every time I've seen that golden stream, I made golden CS.

Ode

EIS/CS forms silver ions in solution which are single atoms of silver...
but
they're not metallic particles until they happen to get together.  the
particulate portion of EIS/CS varies in particle size, some of them surely
being as small as is possible, but they tend to grow over time eventually
falling out.
so then we come back to which works, particles or ions? or which works
best?
again  again, ad nauseum.

  -Original Message-
  From: Jim Meissner yahoo [mailto:jpmeiss...@yahoo.com]
  Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 5:32 PM
  To: silver-list@eskimo.com
  Subject: RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial
 
 
  Dear Mary Ellen:
 
  Click on the link
 
  http://meissnerresearch.com/products/silver-generator
 
  No, not all generators are alike.
  There are no generators that will produce a particle the size of an
atom.
 
  Frank Key, has developed a method that produces the smallest particle
  possible and that is a group of atoms about .75 nanometers in
  size.  He has
  done some research that says that the smaller particle means more
surface
  area and best effects.
 
  Mesosilver page:  http://www.purestcolloids.com/mesosilver.htm
 
  Jim Meissner   www.MeissnerResearch.com
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Mary Ellen Murphy [mailto:maryelle...@bellsouth.net]
  Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 12:46 PM
  To: silver-list@eskimo.com
  Subject: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial
 
 
  Can some one please tell me which is the best generator to make
colloidal
  silver and does the particle size matter. I was told that it did not and
a
  lot of people do not know what I am talking about and saY that an
  atom is a
  as small as you can get and that's what they all do.
 
  Thanks
  Mary Ellen

Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-17 Thread sol



You wrote:
 
 
I don;t know how can you judge, never having used it yourself,
 


Faith,
  Several people here have been doing CS for a very long time, many 
years, some of them have replied to you already. They DO know enough to 
judge, because they know the mechanics and science behind making 
colloidal silver. In fact, they know a lot of basic chemistry, 
electromagnetics, electricity, and so on. So they are qualified to 
critique this or any generator, knowing the manufacturer's claims.
 What ppm or uS is your finished CS? Have you used a water test meter 
to test it?  Since your unit uses a timer, it doesn't seem like it could 
include any current controls. What voltage does it operate at? I find it 
curious you can make reliably clear CS, unless it is low ppm.

sol


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
  


Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-17 Thread cking001
Faith is perfectly correct in her statement, even accordingly to our
sage, Brooks Bradly.

All you NEED is CS strong enough to be effective, and you can tell
that by trial.
Brooks has told us that 5 ppm is EFFECTIVE for most insults.

You don't NEED to measure anything.
You can SEE clear.
We KNOW golden is OK.

All the rest is just screwing around for the fun of it, or verifying
measurements for claims  so as to sell CS or CS makers.

If Faith's CS works for her purposes, what's the problem?

Chuck
If words could speak, I wonder what they'd say 

On 6/17/2008 5:24:49 PM, sol (sol...@sweetwaterhsa.com) wrote:
  You wrote:
 
 
  I don;t know how can you judge, never having used it yourself,
 
 
 Faith,
 Several people here have been doing CS for a very long time, many
 years, some of them have replied to you already. They DO know enough to
 judge, because they know the mechanics and science behind making
 colloidal silver. In fact, they know a lot of basic chemistry,
 electromagnetics, electricity, and so on. So they are qualified to
 critique this or any generator, knowing the
 manufacturer's claims.
 What ppm or uS is your finished CS? Have you used a water test meter
 to test it?  Since your unit uses a timer, it doesn't
 seem like it could
 include any current controls. What voltage does it operate at? I find it
 curious you can make reliably clear CS, unless it is low ppm.
 sol
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.3.0/1505 - Release Date: 6/16/2008 7:20 
AM


RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-16 Thread Dee
It is the same principle as people using the word 'germs'.  To most folk who
aren't into A-level literacy, this cover anything i.e. Pathogens, bacteria,
viruses etc., I don't think it matters how literally correct we are,
(especially when one is upset and ill) as long as we understand what a
person means.  Dee 

---Original Message---
 
From: Jim Meissner yahoo
Date: 15/06/2008 23:34:58
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial
 
Dear Kathryn:
 
 but it is moot to argue about nanometers when one is talking
 about ions
 
Mary Ellen used the word atoms.
 
There are ions, atoms and particles and they are different things.  I do not
think it is nick picking when someone uses the wrong words.  An ion is an
incomplete atom and yes it will be smaller than an atom.  Most homemade
generators produce mostly ions.  

Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-16 Thread Faith Gagne
Or check out this selection of generators:  
http://www.thesilveredge.com/gen.shtml

Faith G.


  - Original Message - 
  From: Carol Ann 
  To: silver-list@eskimo.com 
  Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 9:17 PM
  Subject: RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial


  http://www.silverpuppy.com/

  Mary Ellen Murphy maryelle...@bellsouth.net wrote:
What are some other generators that are Ionic silver

-Original Message-
From: Clayton Family [mailto:clay...@skypoint.com] 
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 5:08 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

I beg to differ, at least in principle. An ion is smaller than a stable 
particle of any element. Don't confuse the poor girl. I respect Frank 
Key's work, but this is getting to a nitpicking point that she may be 
too sick to understand.

Ionically isolated silver is going to be the most reasonable solution. 
I am not arguing with your statement about the small size being more 
effective, but it is moot to argue about nanometers when one is talking 
about ions. My generator certainly produces ions, which are the 
smallest pieces of silver that can exist.

kathryn

On Jun 15, 2008, at 4:31 PM, Jim Meissner yahoo wrote:

 Dear Mary Ellen:

 Click on the link

 http://meissnerresearch.com/products/silver-generator

 No, not all generators are alike.
 There are no generators that will produce a particle the size of an 
 atom.

 Frank Key, has developed a method that produces the smallest particle
 possible and that is a group of atoms about .75 nanometers in size. 
 He has
 done some research that says that the smaller particle means more 
 surface
 area and best effects.

 Mesosilver page: http://www.purestcolloids.com/mesosilver.htm

 Jim Meissner www.MeissnerResearch.com

 -Original Message-
 From: Mary Ellen Murphy [mailto:maryelle...@bellsouth.net] 


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour 







  Regards, Carol Ann ~ The only thing that is different is how you think..
  http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/archivepix.html


RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-16 Thread Jim Meissner yahoo
Dear Bob:

Try the link now.

 so then we come back to which works, particles or ions? or which 
 works best? again  again, ad nauseum.

My generator makes mostly ions.  So you are not hearing any of those
arguments from me.  But if there are particles, I would like them to be as
small as possible for two reasons. One, smaller particles may be more
effective, and two, very large particles may get lodged in the capillaries.
So, if for the same price I can have small particles, then I would prefer
that.  The only reason all this came up was the statement that Carol was
taking 32 ounces of silver every day for months to help with her Lyme herx.
In those quantities it is very important to have smallest possible
particles. (In my opinion)

 but they tend to grow over time eventually
 falling out.

I have not found this to be true with the CS made with my generator.  I have
put my CS in direct sunlight in clear bottles for many days and had no
fallout.  This would be a no, no by those that recommend dark brown bottles.

Your statement does not follow the physics of a true colloidal suspension.
Again it depends on the particle size you start with. 

Jim Meissner   www.MeissnerResearch.com 
-Original Message-
From: bob Larson [mailto:bobl...@cablespeed.com] 
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 7:47 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

...at that page, the link to see a pic of the generator doesn't work.
i want to see inside the box of a 3vdc constant polarity machine to see
what's costing $200.


EIS/CS forms silver ions in solution which are single atoms of silver... but
they're not metallic particles until they happen to get together.  the
particulate portion of EIS/CS varies in particle size, some of them surely
being as small as is possible, but they tend to grow over time eventually
falling out.
so then we come back to which works, particles or ions? or which works best?
again  again, ad nauseum.

 -Original Message-
 From: Jim Meissner yahoo [mailto:jpmeiss...@yahoo.com]
 Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 5:32 PM
 To: silver-list@eskimo.com
 Subject: RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial


 Dear Mary Ellen:

 Click on the link

 http://meissnerresearch.com/products/silver-generator

 No, not all generators are alike.
 There are no generators that will produce a particle the size of an atom.

 Frank Key, has developed a method that produces the smallest particle
 possible and that is a group of atoms about .75 nanometers in
 size.  He has
 done some research that says that the smaller particle means more surface
 area and best effects.

 Mesosilver page:  http://www.purestcolloids.com/mesosilver.htm

 Jim Meissner   www.MeissnerResearch.com

 -Original Message-
 From: Mary Ellen Murphy [mailto:maryelle...@bellsouth.net]
 Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 12:46 PM
 To: silver-list@eskimo.com
 Subject: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial


 Can some one please tell me which is the best generator to make colloidal
 silver and does the particle size matter. I was told that it did not and a
 lot of people do not know what I am talking about and saY that an
 atom is a
 as small as you can get and that's what they all do.

 Thanks
 Mary Ellen





 -Original Message-
 From: Jim Meissner yahoo [mailto:jpmeiss...@yahoo.com]
 Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 10:50 AM
 To: Silver-List@Eskimo.Com
 Subject: FW: CSDesperately need help with Lyme

 Dear Mike:

 I have not been reading the CS group for quite a while, but Carol
 alerted me
 to the Lyme discussion going on.  A long story very short, Carol
 got bitten
 by a tick and proved to be a willing test subject to help me design a new
 way of treating Lyme disease.  Take a look at the link

 http://meissnerresearch.com/products/dougplus .

 Carol is a great researcher and found that Lyme will mimic 200 other
 diseases.  We discovered that Carol has been suffering from Lyme
 for over 14
 years and was being treated for a variety of illnesses.  It took about 6
 months of daily treatments with the DougPlus for Carol to feel
 like she was
 90% recovered and possibly one year to be 100%.

 During that time she was consuming 32 ounces of colloidal silver every day
 for 3 or 4 months.  She found that when she dropped back to a
 lower dosage,
 her herx, fever and chills, would get worse.  Please note this high dosage
 should only be done with well made colloidal silver

 http://meissnerresearch.com/products/silver-generator

 containing only nano size particles.  My generator was tested by Frank Key
 who makes the smallest possible particles of 0.75 nanometer as found in
 MesoSilver.

 Anyway I would like to ask if it would be OK to post the DougPlus link on
 your CS group?

 Jim Meissner   www.MeissnerResearch.com

 -Original Message-
 From: Marshall Dudley [mailto:mdud...@king-cart.com]
 Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 10:09 AM
 To: silver-list@eskimo.com
 Subject: Re: CSDesperately need

Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-16 Thread Teri Kavakos
Or check out www.silvergen.com We have bought several generators for 
ourselves and friends from Trem over they years.  I can't say enough about 
both the quality and customer service we have gotten.  We highly recommend 
his generators to everyone.


Teri  Gary Kavakos


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
  


Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-16 Thread Ode Coyote



  An ion is smaller than an atom.
..and that's what they all do.
 What happens after that, becomes somewhat of an issue as regards 
formation of Silver Hydroxide, Silver Oxide and metallic silver crystal 
structures and their variable ratios in the water.
But whatever, there will still be ions in there along with a variety of 
sized particles made of different combinations of silver, hydrogen and 
oxygen reacting with ions after they are made by the generator under 
various conditions of that generator popping out those ions at some rate in 
a water environment.


IE  different setups tweek for different things as dominant byproducts, but 
there is never only ONE thing of any one size in the water except the ions 
that are in there too, that only come in one size...smaller than an atom.


Ode



At 11:46 AM 6/15/2008 -0500, you wrote:


Can some one please tell me which is the best generator to make colloidal
silver and does the particle size matter. I was told that it did not and a
lot of people do not know what I am talking about and saY that an atom is a
as small as you can get and that's what they all do.

Thanks
Mary Ellen





-Original Message-
From: Jim Meissner yahoo [mailto:jpmeiss...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 10:50 AM
To: Silver-List@Eskimo.Com
Subject: FW: CSDesperately need help with Lyme

Dear Mike:

I have not been reading the CS group for quite a while, but Carol alerted me
to the Lyme discussion going on.  A long story very short, Carol got bitten
by a tick and proved to be a willing test subject to help me design a new
way of treating Lyme disease.  Take a look at the link

http://meissnerresearch.com/products/dougplus .

Carol is a great researcher and found that Lyme will mimic 200 other
diseases.  We discovered that Carol has been suffering from Lyme for over 14
years and was being treated for a variety of illnesses.  It took about 6
months of daily treatments with the DougPlus for Carol to feel like she was
90% recovered and possibly one year to be 100%.

During that time she was consuming 32 ounces of colloidal silver every day
for 3 or 4 months.  She found that when she dropped back to a lower dosage,
her herx, fever and chills, would get worse.  Please note this high dosage
should only be done with well made colloidal silver

http://meissnerresearch.com/products/silver-generator

containing only nano size particles.  My generator was tested by Frank Key
who makes the smallest possible particles of 0.75 nanometer as found in
MesoSilver.

Anyway I would like to ask if it would be OK to post the DougPlus link on
your CS group?

Jim Meissner   www.MeissnerResearch.com

-Original Message-
From: Marshall Dudley [mailto:mdud...@king-cart.com]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 10:09 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CSDesperately need help with Lyme

Mary Ellen Murphy wrote:
 What type of symtoms did you have.  I suffer with a lot of pain, fagigue,
 brain fog, back and neck problems, thyroid and addison's disease, sleep
 apnea, depression.  Gosh I could go on.  I want to get rid of this.  This
is
 a
  miserable existence.


All of the above except Addison's, plus a weird pulling sensation on the
top of my scalp, insomnia, yet falling asleep when I was trying to stay
awake, and later arthritis.

Marshall
 Mary Ellen

 -Original Message-
 From: Dave
  [mailto:ddar...@centurytel.net]
 Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 6:55 PM
 To:
  silver-list@eskimo.com
 Subject: Re: CSDesperately need help with Lyme

 Mary Ellen:
I had late Lyme for 42 years, a long time before they even
  named it.
 Besides the usual problems I got to the point where I couldn't even
  put
 a sentence together. Speaking to anyone became a major problem that
 still remains a problem though not so pronounced. Some call it brain fog.

Well to get to the help you need I will tell you how I got rid of it
 (the lyme).
 I wasn't into CS at that time so after hearing about it I bought
  two 16
 ounce bottles and a generator and started taking the small
  tablespoon
 full as was the wisdom at that time. After using up one of the bottles
 with no relief I thought it was all bull so I chugged the other bottle
 all
  at once.
 At that my generator arrived so I made a batch and started taking
  it at
 the rate of four ounces every twenty minutes. I figured if it
  killed me
 it was for the better. What happened was on the third day of this
 regimen I awoke in the middle of the night with a vigorous feeling of
 well
  being.

 The Lyme was gone but a long recovery was ahead as all the damage
  wasn't
 over.

 Incidently I had seen a doctor just before this and he took
  blood for
 testing at my insistance and it came back positive with two
  bands, after
 the CS I went back for another Lyme test and It came back
  negative.
 Dave




 Mary Ellen Murphy wrote:

 I am a new member.  I am

  trying to find out info about Lyme and how to use

 the silver, with

  diatamatious earth to get rid 

RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-16 Thread Dan Nave
Speaking frankly, I find it unethical to sell a battery/resistor/silver
wire/box for $200 when one could buy something like a SilverPuppy for
well under $200 which has auto shutoff, polarity switching, and thermal
or magnetic stirring. 

Dan



 -Original Message-
 From: Jim Meissner yahoo [mailto:jpmeiss...@yahoo.com] 
 Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 7:27 PM
 To: silver-list@eskimo.com
 Subject: RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial
 
 Dear Bob:
 
 Thank you, you are right, the link does not work.  I will 
 email my web guy.
 
 The generator consists of a battery box, two AA batteries, 
 one 4.7 K ohm resistor and two # 12 AWG .999 silver wires and 
 a Teflon sleeve.  It takes about an hour to make.  Total 
 manufacturing cost is less than $50.  For a while I was 
 selling plans for $10 for people to make their own.  No one 
 has bought the plans.  I have sold quite a few of generators.
 
 I have plans and instruction of how to make lots of things on 
 my EnergyPulser yahoo group but the interesting thing is that 
 only 1 out of 100 are actually able build something.
 
 Jim Meissner   www.MeissnerResearch.com 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: bob Larson [mailto:bobl...@cablespeed.com]
 Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 7:47 PM
 To: silver-list@eskimo.com
 Subject: RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial
 
 ...at that page, the link to see a pic of the generator doesn't work.
 i want to see inside the box of a 3vdc constant polarity 
 machine to see what's costing $200.
 
 
 EIS/CS forms silver ions in solution which are single atoms 
 of silver... but they're not metallic particles until they 
 happen to get together.  the particulate portion of EIS/CS 
 varies in particle size, some of them surely being as small 
 as is possible, but they tend to grow over time eventually 
 falling out.
 so then we come back to which works, particles or ions? or 
 which works best?
 again  again, ad nauseum.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Jim Meissner yahoo [mailto:jpmeiss...@yahoo.com]
  Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 5:32 PM
  To: silver-list@eskimo.com
  Subject: RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial
 
 
  Dear Mary Ellen:
 
  Click on the link
 
  http://meissnerresearch.com/products/silver-generator
 
  No, not all generators are alike.
  There are no generators that will produce a particle the 
 size of an atom.
 
  Frank Key, has developed a method that produces the 
 smallest particle 
  possible and that is a group of atoms about .75 nanometers 
 in size.  
  He has done some research that says that the smaller particle means 
  more surface area and best effects.
 
  Mesosilver page:  http://www.purestcolloids.com/mesosilver.htm
 
  Jim Meissner   www.MeissnerResearch.com
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Mary Ellen Murphy [mailto:maryelle...@bellsouth.net]
  Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 12:46 PM
  To: silver-list@eskimo.com
  Subject: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial
 
 
  Can some one please tell me which is the best generator to make 
  colloidal silver and does the particle size matter. I was 
 told that it 
  did not and a lot of people do not know what I am talking about and 
  saY that an atom is a as small as you can get and that's 
 what they all 
  do.
 
  Thanks
  Mary Ellen
 
 
 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Jim Meissner yahoo [mailto:jpmeiss...@yahoo.com]
  Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 10:50 AM
  To: Silver-List@Eskimo.Com
  Subject: FW: CSDesperately need help with Lyme
 
  Dear Mike:
 
  I have not been reading the CS group for quite a while, but Carol 
  alerted me to the Lyme discussion going on.  A long story 
 very short, 
  Carol got bitten by a tick and proved to be a willing test 
 subject to 
  help me design a new way of treating Lyme disease.  Take a 
 look at the 
  link
 
  http://meissnerresearch.com/products/dougplus .
 
  Carol is a great researcher and found that Lyme will mimic 
 200 other 
  diseases.  We discovered that Carol has been suffering from 
 Lyme for 
  over 14 years and was being treated for a variety of illnesses.  It 
  took about 6 months of daily treatments with the DougPlus 
 for Carol to 
  feel like she was 90% recovered and possibly one year to be 100%.
 
  During that time she was consuming 32 ounces of colloidal 
 silver every 
  day for 3 or 4 months.  She found that when she dropped back to a 
  lower dosage, her herx, fever and chills, would get worse.  Please 
  note this high dosage should only be done with well made colloidal 
  silver
 
  http://meissnerresearch.com/products/silver-generator
 
  containing only nano size particles.  My generator was 
 tested by Frank 
  Key who makes the smallest possible particles of 0.75 nanometer as 
  found in MesoSilver.
 
  Anyway I would like to ask if it would be OK to post the 
 DougPlus link 
  on your CS group?
 
  Jim Meissner   www.MeissnerResearch.com
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Marshall Dudley [mailto:mdud...@king

Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-16 Thread Sam L.
Hi Faith.
I wouldnt be recommending this CS generator. Heres a quote from there web
page.

( Therefore, if you want a good high-quality concentration of 10 ppm, you
just leave the generator running for about 10 minutes. If you want a
stronger concentration of 20 ppm, you leave the generator running for about
20 minutes. You can even make highly concentrated batches of colloidal
silver, in the 100 to 500 ppm range, by letting the generator run longer. )

Obviusly they are using salt water instead of distilled water and even show
a bag of salt next to there generator.
Just a word to the wise.

Sam L.

On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 5:45 AM, Faith Gagne jitte...@gis.net wrote:

  Or check out this selection of generators:
 http://www.thesilveredge.com/gen.shtml

 Faith G.



 - Original Message -
 *From:* Carol Ann saffiresk...@yahoo.com
 *To:* silver-list@eskimo.com
 *Sent:* Sunday, June 15, 2008 9:17 PM
 *Subject:* RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

 http://www.silverpuppy.com/

 *Mary Ellen Murphy maryelle...@bellsouth.net* wrote:

 What are some other generators that are Ionic silver

 -Original Message-
 From: Clayton Family [mailto:clay...@skypoint.com]
 Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 5:08 PM
 To: silver-list@eskimo.com
 Subject: Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

 I beg to differ, at least in principle. An ion is smaller than a stable
 particle of any element. Don't confuse the poor girl. I respect Frank
 Key's work, but this is getting to a nitpicking point that she may be
 too sick to understand.

 Ionically isolated silver is going to be the most reasonable solution.
 I am not arguing with your statement about the small size being more
 effective, but it is moot to argue about nanometers when one is talking
 about ions. My generator certainly produces ions, which are the
 smallest pieces of silver that can exist.

 kathryn

 On Jun 15, 2008, at 4:31 PM, Jim Meissner yahoo wrote:

  Dear Mary Ellen:
 
  Click on the link
 
  http://meissnerresearch.com/products/silver-generator
 
  No, not all generators are alike.
  There are no generators that will produce a particle the size of an
  atom.
 
  Frank Key, has developed a method that produces the smallest particle
  possible and that is a group of atoms about .75 nanometers in size.
  He has
  done some research that says that the smaller particle means more
  surface
  area and best effects.
 
  Mesosilver page: http://www.purestcolloids.com/mesosilver.htm
 
  Jim Meissner www.MeissnerResearch.com
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Mary Ellen Murphy [mailto:maryelle...@bellsouth.net]


 --
 The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

 Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

 To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

 Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

 The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

 List maintainer: Mike Devour






 Regards, Carol Ann ~ The only thing that is different is how you think..
 http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/archivepix.html




-- 
A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to
take
everything you have. Google Ron Paul


Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-16 Thread Arnold Beland
Apart from turning people blue, they also charge twice as much for 12 gauge 999 
as I do for 12 gauge .  Great salesmanship though.
Best Regards,
Arnold Beland
www.atlasnova.com
  - Original Message - 
  From: Sam L. 
  To: silver-list@eskimo.com 
  Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 12:17 PM
  Subject: Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial


  Hi Faith.
  I wouldnt be recommending this CS generator. Heres a quote from there web 
page.

  ( Therefore, if you want a good high-quality concentration of 10 ppm, you 
just leave the generator running for about 10 minutes. If you want a stronger 
concentration of 20 ppm, you leave the generator running for about 20 minutes. 
You can even make highly concentrated batches of colloidal silver, in the 100 
to 500 ppm range, by letting the generator run longer. )

  Obviusly they are using salt water instead of distilled water and even show a 
bag of salt next to there generator.
  Just a word to the wise.

  Sam L.


  On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 5:45 AM, Faith Gagne jitte...@gis.net wrote:

Or check out this selection of generators:  
http://www.thesilveredge.com/gen.shtml

Faith G.


  - Original Message - 
  From: Carol Ann 
  To: silver-list@eskimo.com 
  Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 9:17 PM
  Subject: RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial


  http://www.silverpuppy.com/

  Mary Ellen Murphy maryelle...@bellsouth.net wrote: 
What are some other generators that are Ionic silver

-Original Message-
From: Clayton Family [mailto:clay...@skypoint.com] 
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 5:08 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

I beg to differ, at least in principle. An ion is smaller than a stable 
particle of any element. Don't confuse the poor girl. I respect Frank 
Key's work, but this is getting to a nitpicking point that she may be 
too sick to understand.

Ionically isolated silver is going to be the most reasonable solution. 
I am not arguing with your statement about the small size being more 
effective, but it is moot to argue about nanometers when one is talking 
about ions. My generator certainly produces ions, which are the 
smallest pieces of silver that can exist.

kathryn

On Jun 15, 2008, at 4:31 PM, Jim Meissner yahoo wrote:

 Dear Mary Ellen:

 Click on the link

 http://meissnerresearch.com/products/silver-generator

 No, not all generators are alike.
 There are no generators that will produce a particle the size of an 
 atom.

 Frank Key, has developed a method that produces the smallest particle
 possible and that is a group of atoms about .75 nanometers in size. 
 He has
 done some research that says that the smaller particle means more 
 surface
 area and best effects.

 Mesosilver page: http://www.purestcolloids.com/mesosilver.htm

 Jim Meissner www.MeissnerResearch.com

 -Original Message-
 From: Mary Ellen Murphy [mailto:maryelle...@bellsouth.net] 


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour 







  Regards, Carol Ann ~ The only thing that is different is how you think..
  http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/archivepix.html 




  -- 
  A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take
  everything you have. Google Ron Paul 

RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-16 Thread Malcolm
Hi Mary Ellen, 
I've been making my own colloidal silver with my own home-made generator
for about ten years now; it's a current-controlled generator and has
worked very well, producing high quality high strength CS.  I don't make
generators for other people, mainly because it costs too much in time
and money for me to do so; I leave it to others who wish to do it as a
business.

I've paid attention to what others have been doing who Are in that
business.  I haven't gone about testing everyone else's, But I can tell
you what I have noticed.  along with many other people's judgements, the
Silver Puppy rates very high with me, and so does the SilverGen.

http://silverpuppy.com

http://www.silvergen.com/
  

And PLEASE, take the advice of those who are urging you to check out the
Lyme lists.  This is what is called an Emerging Disease so the people
who've got it are on the leading edge of the research about it.
 
http://www.lymediseaseassociation.org/

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/lymeinfo/

There are lots of these.
Take care of yourself, ok?



On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 18:14 -0500, Mary Ellen Murphy wrote:
 What are some other generators that are Ionic silver
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Clayton Family [mailto:clay...@skypoint.com] 
 Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 5:08 PM
 To: silver-list@eskimo.com
 Subject: Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial
 
 I beg to differ, at least in principle. An ion is smaller than a stable 
 particle of any element.  Don't confuse the poor girl.  I respect Frank 
 Key's work, but this is getting to a nitpicking point that she may be 
 too sick to understand.
 
 Ionically isolated silver is going to be the most reasonable solution. 
 I am not arguing with your statement about the small size being more 
 effective, but it is moot to argue about nanometers when one is talking 
 about ions.  My generator certainly produces ions, which are the 
 smallest pieces of silver that can exist.
 
 kathryn
 



--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
   


RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-16 Thread Mary Ellen Murphy
Did you have Lyme.  Are you cured with just doing the colloidal silver.

Has anyone on this site been cured.  How do you feel about the salt/vit C
protocol

Thanks for your info
Mary Ellen

-Original Message-
From: Malcolm [mailto:s...@asis.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 5:33 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

Hi Mary Ellen, 
I've been making my own colloidal silver with my own home-made generator
for about ten years now; it's a current-controlled generator and has
worked very well, producing high quality high strength CS.  I don't make
generators for other people, mainly because it costs too much in time
and money for me to do so; I leave it to others who wish to do it as a
business.

I've paid attention to what others have been doing who Are in that
business.  I haven't gone about testing everyone else's, But I can tell
you what I have noticed.  along with many other people's judgements, the
Silver Puppy rates very high with me, and so does the SilverGen.

http://silverpuppy.com

http://www.silvergen.com/
  

And PLEASE, take the advice of those who are urging you to check out the
Lyme lists.  This is what is called an Emerging Disease so the people
who've got it are on the leading edge of the research about it.
 
http://www.lymediseaseassociation.org/

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/lymeinfo/

There are lots of these.
Take care of yourself, ok?



On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 18:14 -0500, Mary Ellen Murphy wrote:
 What are some other generators that are Ionic silver
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Clayton Family [mailto:clay...@skypoint.com] 
 Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 5:08 PM
 To: silver-list@eskimo.com
 Subject: Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial
 
 I beg to differ, at least in principle. An ion is smaller than a stable 
 particle of any element.  Don't confuse the poor girl.  I respect Frank 
 Key's work, but this is getting to a nitpicking point that she may be 
 too sick to understand.
 
 Ionically isolated silver is going to be the most reasonable solution. 
 I am not arguing with your statement about the small size being more 
 effective, but it is moot to argue about nanometers when one is talking 
 about ions.  My generator certainly produces ions, which are the 
 smallest pieces of silver that can exist.
 
 kathryn
 



--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
   



Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-15 Thread Clayton Family
I am in the camp of Low Voltage Ionic silver myself. Yes, one atom is 
as small as one can get. I have a homemade set up using 9 volt 
batteries, wires, pure silver wires and a current limiter 
(potentiometer). It is low tech, but makes good silver.  If you want 
one that turns itself off, the silverpuppy is one that I have heard 
alot of good about, it is inexpensive, and a real workhorse.


www.silverpuppy.com

If you want to make one yourself, you might want to get a COM 100 meter 
to check the quality of your distilled water before you start.


kathryn

On Jun 15, 2008, at 11:46 AM, Mary Ellen Murphy wrote:



Can some one please tell me which is the best generator to make 
colloidal
silver and does the particle size matter. I was told that it did not 
and a
lot of people do not know what I am talking about and saY that an atom 
is a

as small as you can get and that's what they all do.

Thanks
Mary Ellen



--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
  


RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-15 Thread Mary Ellen Murphy
Is there anyone who lives in the Nashville, TN area.  Please let me know

-Original Message-
From: Clayton Family [mailto:clay...@skypoint.com] 
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 1:00 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

I am in the camp of Low Voltage Ionic silver myself. Yes, one atom is 
as small as one can get. I have a homemade set up using 9 volt 
batteries, wires, pure silver wires and a current limiter 
(potentiometer). It is low tech, but makes good silver.  If you want 
one that turns itself off, the silverpuppy is one that I have heard 
alot of good about, it is inexpensive, and a real workhorse.

www.silverpuppy.com

If you want to make one yourself, you might want to get a COM 100 meter 
to check the quality of your distilled water before you start.

kathryn

On Jun 15, 2008, at 11:46 AM, Mary Ellen Murphy wrote:


 Can some one please tell me which is the best generator to make 
 colloidal
 silver and does the particle size matter. I was told that it did not 
 and a
 lot of people do not know what I am talking about and saY that an atom 
 is a
 as small as you can get and that's what they all do.

 Thanks
 Mary Ellen


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
   


RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-15 Thread marmar845






Mary Ellen -- I'm about two hours west of there, in the Paducah KY area. ?? MA


-- Original message from "Mary Ellen Murphy" maryelle...@bellsouth.net: --  Is there anyone who lives in the Nashville, TN area. Please let me know   -Original Message-  From: Clayton Family [mailto:clay...@skypoint.com]  Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 1:00 PM  To: silver-list@eskimo.com  Subject: Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial   I am in the camp of Low Voltage Ionic silver myself. Yes, one atom is  as small as one can get. I have a homemade set up using 9 volt  batteries, wires, pure silver wires and a current limiter  (potentiometer). It is low tech, but makes good silver. If you want  one that turns itself off, the silverpuppy is one that I have heard  alot of good about, it is inexpensive, and a real workhorse.   www.silverpuppy.com   If you want to make one yourself, you might want to get a COM 100 meter  to check the quality of your distilled water before you start.   kathryn   On Jun 15, 2008, at 11:46 AM, Mary Ellen Murphy wrote:  Can some one please tell me which is the best generator to make   colloidal   silver and does the particle size matter. I was told that it did not   and a   lot of people do not know what I am talking about and saY that an atom   is a   as small as you can get and that's what they all do. Thanks   Mary Ellen--  The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.   Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org   To post, address your messag
e to: silver-list@eskimo.com   Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com   The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...   List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>  






RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-15 Thread Jim Meissner yahoo
Dear Mary Ellen:

Click on the link

http://meissnerresearch.com/products/silver-generator 

No, not all generators are alike. 
There are no generators that will produce a particle the size of an atom.

Frank Key, has developed a method that produces the smallest particle
possible and that is a group of atoms about .75 nanometers in size.  He has
done some research that says that the smaller particle means more surface
area and best effects.

Mesosilver page:  http://www.purestcolloids.com/mesosilver.htm 

Jim Meissner   www.MeissnerResearch.com 

-Original Message-
From: Mary Ellen Murphy [mailto:maryelle...@bellsouth.net] 
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 12:46 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial


Can some one please tell me which is the best generator to make colloidal
silver and does the particle size matter. I was told that it did not and a
lot of people do not know what I am talking about and saY that an atom is a
as small as you can get and that's what they all do.

Thanks
Mary Ellen 





-Original Message-
From: Jim Meissner yahoo [mailto:jpmeiss...@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 10:50 AM
To: Silver-List@Eskimo.Com
Subject: FW: CSDesperately need help with Lyme

Dear Mike:

I have not been reading the CS group for quite a while, but Carol alerted me
to the Lyme discussion going on.  A long story very short, Carol got bitten
by a tick and proved to be a willing test subject to help me design a new
way of treating Lyme disease.  Take a look at the link  

http://meissnerresearch.com/products/dougplus .

Carol is a great researcher and found that Lyme will mimic 200 other
diseases.  We discovered that Carol has been suffering from Lyme for over 14
years and was being treated for a variety of illnesses.  It took about 6
months of daily treatments with the DougPlus for Carol to feel like she was
90% recovered and possibly one year to be 100%.  

During that time she was consuming 32 ounces of colloidal silver every day
for 3 or 4 months.  She found that when she dropped back to a lower dosage,
her herx, fever and chills, would get worse.  Please note this high dosage
should only be done with well made colloidal silver 

http://meissnerresearch.com/products/silver-generator 

containing only nano size particles.  My generator was tested by Frank Key
who makes the smallest possible particles of 0.75 nanometer as found in
MesoSilver. 

Anyway I would like to ask if it would be OK to post the DougPlus link on
your CS group? 

Jim Meissner   www.MeissnerResearch.com  

-Original Message-
From: Marshall Dudley [mailto:mdud...@king-cart.com] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 10:09 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CSDesperately need help with Lyme

Mary Ellen Murphy wrote:
 What type of symtoms did you have.  I suffer with a lot of pain, fagigue,
 brain fog, back and neck problems, thyroid and addison's disease, sleep
 apnea, depression.  Gosh I could go on.  I want to get rid of this.  This
is
 a
  miserable existence.

   
All of the above except Addison's, plus a weird pulling sensation on the 
top of my scalp, insomnia, yet falling asleep when I was trying to stay 
awake, and later arthritis.

Marshall
 Mary Ellen

 -Original Message-
 From: Dave
  [mailto:ddar...@centurytel.net] 
 Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 6:55 PM
 To:
  silver-list@eskimo.com
 Subject: Re: CSDesperately need help with Lyme

 Mary Ellen:
I had late Lyme for 42 years, a long time before they even
  named it.
 Besides the usual problems I got to the point where I couldn't even
  put 
 a sentence together. Speaking to anyone became a major problem that 
 still remains a problem though not so pronounced. Some call it brain fog.

Well to get to the help you need I will tell you how I got rid of it 
 (the lyme).
 I wasn't into CS at that time so after hearing about it I bought
  two 16 
 ounce bottles and a generator and started taking the small
  tablespoon 
 full as was the wisdom at that time. After using up one of the bottles 
 with no relief I thought it was all bull so I chugged the other bottle 
 all
  at once.
 At that my generator arrived so I made a batch and started taking
  it at 
 the rate of four ounces every twenty minutes. I figured if it
  killed me
 it was for the better. What happened was on the third day of this 
 regimen I awoke in the middle of the night with a vigorous feeling of 
 well
  being.

 The Lyme was gone but a long recovery was ahead as all the damage
  wasn't 
 over.

 Incidently I had seen a doctor just before this and he took
  blood for 
 testing at my insistance and it came back positive with two
  bands, after 
 the CS I went back for another Lyme test and It came back
  negative.
 Dave




 Mary Ellen Murphy wrote:
   
 I am a new member.  I am
 
  trying to find out info about Lyme and how to use
   
 the silver, with
 
  diatamatious earth to get rid of Lyme
   
  

 I have also gotten info 

Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-15 Thread Clayton Family
I beg to differ, at least in principle. An ion is smaller than a stable 
particle of any element.  Don't confuse the poor girl.  I respect Frank 
Key's work, but this is getting to a nitpicking point that she may be 
too sick to understand.


Ionically isolated silver is going to be the most reasonable solution. 
I am not arguing with your statement about the small size being more 
effective, but it is moot to argue about nanometers when one is talking 
about ions.  My generator certainly produces ions, which are the 
smallest pieces of silver that can exist.


kathryn

On Jun 15, 2008, at 4:31 PM, Jim Meissner yahoo wrote:


Dear Mary Ellen:

Click on the link

http://meissnerresearch.com/products/silver-generator

No, not all generators are alike.
There are no generators that will produce a particle the size of an 
atom.


Frank Key, has developed a method that produces the smallest particle
possible and that is a group of atoms about .75 nanometers in size.  
He has
done some research that says that the smaller particle means more 
surface

area and best effects.

Mesosilver page:  http://www.purestcolloids.com/mesosilver.htm

Jim Meissner   www.MeissnerResearch.com

-Original Message-
From: Mary Ellen Murphy [mailto:maryelle...@bellsouth.net] 



--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
  


RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-15 Thread Jim Meissner yahoo
Dear Kathryn:

 but it is moot to argue about nanometers when one is talking 
 about ions

Mary Ellen used the word atoms.

There are ions, atoms and particles and they are different things.  I do not
think it is nick picking when someone uses the wrong words.  An ion is an
incomplete atom and yes it will be smaller than an atom.  Most homemade
generators produce mostly ions.  My version produces more than 90% ions.
Depending on the generator, voltage, current, salt, and many other variables
the particles produced could be very large.  When taking a teaspoon a day
that may not make any difference.  When taking 32 ounces a day as Carol did,
then in my opinion, it becomes very important.

Jim Meissner   www.MeissnerResearch.com 

-Original Message-
From: Clayton Family [mailto:clay...@skypoint.com] 
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 6:08 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

I beg to differ, at least in principle. An ion is smaller than a stable 
particle of any element.  Don't confuse the poor girl.  I respect Frank 
Key's work, but this is getting to a nitpicking point that she may be 
too sick to understand.

Ionically isolated silver is going to be the most reasonable solution. 
I am not arguing with your statement about the small size being more 
effective, but it is moot to argue about nanometers when one is talking 
about ions.  My generator certainly produces ions, which are the 
smallest pieces of silver that can exist.

kathryn

On Jun 15, 2008, at 4:31 PM, Jim Meissner yahoo wrote:

 Dear Mary Ellen:

 Click on the link

 http://meissnerresearch.com/products/silver-generator

 No, not all generators are alike.
 There are no generators that will produce a particle the size of an 
 atom.

 Frank Key, has developed a method that produces the smallest particle
 possible and that is a group of atoms about .75 nanometers in size.  
 He has
 done some research that says that the smaller particle means more 
 surface
 area and best effects.

 Mesosilver page:  http://www.purestcolloids.com/mesosilver.htm

 Jim Meissner   www.MeissnerResearch.com

 -Original Message-
 From: Mary Ellen Murphy [mailto:maryelle...@bellsouth.net] 


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
   


RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-15 Thread Mary Ellen Murphy
What are some other generators that are Ionic silver

-Original Message-
From: Clayton Family [mailto:clay...@skypoint.com] 
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 5:08 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

I beg to differ, at least in principle. An ion is smaller than a stable 
particle of any element.  Don't confuse the poor girl.  I respect Frank 
Key's work, but this is getting to a nitpicking point that she may be 
too sick to understand.

Ionically isolated silver is going to be the most reasonable solution. 
I am not arguing with your statement about the small size being more 
effective, but it is moot to argue about nanometers when one is talking 
about ions.  My generator certainly produces ions, which are the 
smallest pieces of silver that can exist.

kathryn

On Jun 15, 2008, at 4:31 PM, Jim Meissner yahoo wrote:

 Dear Mary Ellen:

 Click on the link

 http://meissnerresearch.com/products/silver-generator

 No, not all generators are alike.
 There are no generators that will produce a particle the size of an 
 atom.

 Frank Key, has developed a method that produces the smallest particle
 possible and that is a group of atoms about .75 nanometers in size.  
 He has
 done some research that says that the smaller particle means more 
 surface
 area and best effects.

 Mesosilver page:  http://www.purestcolloids.com/mesosilver.htm

 Jim Meissner   www.MeissnerResearch.com

 -Original Message-
 From: Mary Ellen Murphy [mailto:maryelle...@bellsouth.net] 


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
   



RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-15 Thread bob Larson
...at that page, the link to see a pic of the generator doesn't work.
i want to see inside the box of a 3vdc constant polarity machine to see
what's costing $200.


EIS/CS forms silver ions in solution which are single atoms of silver... but
they're not metallic particles until they happen to get together.  the
particulate portion of EIS/CS varies in particle size, some of them surely
being as small as is possible, but they tend to grow over time eventually
falling out.
so then we come back to which works, particles or ions? or which works best?
again  again, ad nauseum.

 -Original Message-
 From: Jim Meissner yahoo [mailto:jpmeiss...@yahoo.com]
 Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 5:32 PM
 To: silver-list@eskimo.com
 Subject: RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial


 Dear Mary Ellen:

 Click on the link

 http://meissnerresearch.com/products/silver-generator

 No, not all generators are alike.
 There are no generators that will produce a particle the size of an atom.

 Frank Key, has developed a method that produces the smallest particle
 possible and that is a group of atoms about .75 nanometers in
 size.  He has
 done some research that says that the smaller particle means more surface
 area and best effects.

 Mesosilver page:  http://www.purestcolloids.com/mesosilver.htm

 Jim Meissner   www.MeissnerResearch.com

 -Original Message-
 From: Mary Ellen Murphy [mailto:maryelle...@bellsouth.net]
 Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 12:46 PM
 To: silver-list@eskimo.com
 Subject: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial


 Can some one please tell me which is the best generator to make colloidal
 silver and does the particle size matter. I was told that it did not and a
 lot of people do not know what I am talking about and saY that an
 atom is a
 as small as you can get and that's what they all do.

 Thanks
 Mary Ellen





 -Original Message-
 From: Jim Meissner yahoo [mailto:jpmeiss...@yahoo.com]
 Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 10:50 AM
 To: Silver-List@Eskimo.Com
 Subject: FW: CSDesperately need help with Lyme

 Dear Mike:

 I have not been reading the CS group for quite a while, but Carol
 alerted me
 to the Lyme discussion going on.  A long story very short, Carol
 got bitten
 by a tick and proved to be a willing test subject to help me design a new
 way of treating Lyme disease.  Take a look at the link

 http://meissnerresearch.com/products/dougplus .

 Carol is a great researcher and found that Lyme will mimic 200 other
 diseases.  We discovered that Carol has been suffering from Lyme
 for over 14
 years and was being treated for a variety of illnesses.  It took about 6
 months of daily treatments with the DougPlus for Carol to feel
 like she was
 90% recovered and possibly one year to be 100%.

 During that time she was consuming 32 ounces of colloidal silver every day
 for 3 or 4 months.  She found that when she dropped back to a
 lower dosage,
 her herx, fever and chills, would get worse.  Please note this high dosage
 should only be done with well made colloidal silver

 http://meissnerresearch.com/products/silver-generator

 containing only nano size particles.  My generator was tested by Frank Key
 who makes the smallest possible particles of 0.75 nanometer as found in
 MesoSilver.

 Anyway I would like to ask if it would be OK to post the DougPlus link on
 your CS group?

 Jim Meissner   www.MeissnerResearch.com

 -Original Message-
 From: Marshall Dudley [mailto:mdud...@king-cart.com]
 Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 10:09 AM
 To: silver-list@eskimo.com
 Subject: Re: CSDesperately need help with Lyme

 Mary Ellen Murphy wrote:
  What type of symtoms did you have.  I suffer with a lot of
 pain, fagigue,
  brain fog, back and neck problems, thyroid and addison's disease, sleep
  apnea, depression.  Gosh I could go on.  I want to get rid of
 this.  This
 is
  a
   miserable existence.
 
 
 All of the above except Addison's, plus a weird pulling sensation on the
 top of my scalp, insomnia, yet falling asleep when I was trying to stay
 awake, and later arthritis.

 Marshall
  Mary Ellen
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Dave
   [mailto:ddar...@centurytel.net]
  Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 6:55 PM
  To:
   silver-list@eskimo.com
  Subject: Re: CSDesperately need help with Lyme
 
  Mary Ellen:
 I had late Lyme for 42 years, a long time before they even
   named it.
  Besides the usual problems I got to the point where I couldn't even
   put
  a sentence together. Speaking to anyone became a major problem that
  still remains a problem though not so pronounced. Some call it
 brain fog.
 
 Well to get to the help you need I will tell you how I got rid of it
  (the lyme).
  I wasn't into CS at that time so after hearing about it I bought
   two 16
  ounce bottles and a generator and started taking the small
   tablespoon
  full as was the wisdom at that time. After using up one of the bottles
  with no relief I thought it was all bull so I chugged the other

RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-15 Thread Jim Meissner yahoo
Dear Bob:

Thank you, you are right, the link does not work.  I will email my web guy.

The generator consists of a battery box, two AA batteries, one 4.7 K ohm
resistor and two # 12 AWG .999 silver wires and a Teflon sleeve.  It takes
about an hour to make.  Total manufacturing cost is less than $50.  For a
while I was selling plans for $10 for people to make their own.  No one has
bought the plans.  I have sold quite a few of generators.

I have plans and instruction of how to make lots of things on my
EnergyPulser yahoo group but the interesting thing is that only 1 out of 100
are actually able build something.

Jim Meissner   www.MeissnerResearch.com 

-Original Message-
From: bob Larson [mailto:bobl...@cablespeed.com] 
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 7:47 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

...at that page, the link to see a pic of the generator doesn't work.
i want to see inside the box of a 3vdc constant polarity machine to see
what's costing $200.


EIS/CS forms silver ions in solution which are single atoms of silver... but
they're not metallic particles until they happen to get together.  the
particulate portion of EIS/CS varies in particle size, some of them surely
being as small as is possible, but they tend to grow over time eventually
falling out.
so then we come back to which works, particles or ions? or which works best?
again  again, ad nauseum.

 -Original Message-
 From: Jim Meissner yahoo [mailto:jpmeiss...@yahoo.com]
 Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 5:32 PM
 To: silver-list@eskimo.com
 Subject: RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial


 Dear Mary Ellen:

 Click on the link

 http://meissnerresearch.com/products/silver-generator

 No, not all generators are alike.
 There are no generators that will produce a particle the size of an atom.

 Frank Key, has developed a method that produces the smallest particle
 possible and that is a group of atoms about .75 nanometers in
 size.  He has
 done some research that says that the smaller particle means more surface
 area and best effects.

 Mesosilver page:  http://www.purestcolloids.com/mesosilver.htm

 Jim Meissner   www.MeissnerResearch.com

 -Original Message-
 From: Mary Ellen Murphy [mailto:maryelle...@bellsouth.net]
 Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 12:46 PM
 To: silver-list@eskimo.com
 Subject: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial


 Can some one please tell me which is the best generator to make colloidal
 silver and does the particle size matter. I was told that it did not and a
 lot of people do not know what I am talking about and saY that an
 atom is a
 as small as you can get and that's what they all do.

 Thanks
 Mary Ellen





 -Original Message-
 From: Jim Meissner yahoo [mailto:jpmeiss...@yahoo.com]
 Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 10:50 AM
 To: Silver-List@Eskimo.Com
 Subject: FW: CSDesperately need help with Lyme

 Dear Mike:

 I have not been reading the CS group for quite a while, but Carol
 alerted me
 to the Lyme discussion going on.  A long story very short, Carol
 got bitten
 by a tick and proved to be a willing test subject to help me design a new
 way of treating Lyme disease.  Take a look at the link

 http://meissnerresearch.com/products/dougplus .

 Carol is a great researcher and found that Lyme will mimic 200 other
 diseases.  We discovered that Carol has been suffering from Lyme
 for over 14
 years and was being treated for a variety of illnesses.  It took about 6
 months of daily treatments with the DougPlus for Carol to feel
 like she was
 90% recovered and possibly one year to be 100%.

 During that time she was consuming 32 ounces of colloidal silver every day
 for 3 or 4 months.  She found that when she dropped back to a
 lower dosage,
 her herx, fever and chills, would get worse.  Please note this high dosage
 should only be done with well made colloidal silver

 http://meissnerresearch.com/products/silver-generator

 containing only nano size particles.  My generator was tested by Frank Key
 who makes the smallest possible particles of 0.75 nanometer as found in
 MesoSilver.

 Anyway I would like to ask if it would be OK to post the DougPlus link on
 your CS group?

 Jim Meissner   www.MeissnerResearch.com

 -Original Message-
 From: Marshall Dudley [mailto:mdud...@king-cart.com]
 Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 10:09 AM
 To: silver-list@eskimo.com
 Subject: Re: CSDesperately need help with Lyme

 Mary Ellen Murphy wrote:
  What type of symtoms did you have.  I suffer with a lot of
 pain, fagigue,
  brain fog, back and neck problems, thyroid and addison's disease, sleep
  apnea, depression.  Gosh I could go on.  I want to get rid of
 this.  This
 is
  a
   miserable existence.
 
 
 All of the above except Addison's, plus a weird pulling sensation on the
 top of my scalp, insomnia, yet falling asleep when I was trying to stay
 awake, and later arthritis.

 Marshall
  Mary Ellen
 
  -Original Message

Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-15 Thread Clayton Family


On Jun 15, 2008, at 5:34 PM, Jim Meissner yahoo wrote:


Dear Kathryn:


but it is moot to argue about nanometers when one is talking
about ions


Mary Ellen used the word atoms.

There are ions, atoms and particles and they are different things.  I 
do not
think it is nick picking when someone uses the wrong words.  An ion is 
an

incomplete atom and yes it will be smaller than an atom.  Most homemade
generators produce mostly ions.  My version produces more than 90% 
ions.
Depending on the generator, voltage, current, salt, and many other 
variables
the particles produced could be very large.  When taking a teaspoon 
a day
that may not make any difference.  When taking 32 ounces a day as 
Carol did,

then in my opinion, it becomes very important.



that may be. I have not taken that much in a day before.  I think my 
homemade brew also has a few oxides, and hydroxides in addition to the 
ions. When I make a good batch, it has very little tyndall, so mostly 
ions. Nearly all my batches are good ones, but once in a while 
something happens.  --kathryn




Jim Meissner   www.MeissnerResearch.com

-Original Message-
From: Clayton Family [mailto:clay...@skypoint.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 6:08 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

I beg to differ, at least in principle. An ion is smaller than a stable
particle of any element.  Don't confuse the poor girl.  I respect Frank
Key's work, but this is getting to a nitpicking point that she may be
too sick to understand.

Ionically isolated silver is going to be the most reasonable solution.
I am not arguing with your statement about the small size being more
effective, but it is moot to argue about nanometers when one is talking
about ions.  My generator certainly produces ions, which are the
smallest pieces of silver that can exist.

kathryn

On Jun 15, 2008, at 4:31 PM, Jim Meissner yahoo wrote:


Dear Mary Ellen:

Click on the link

http://meissnerresearch.com/products/silver-generator

No, not all generators are alike.
There are no generators that will produce a particle the size of an
atom.

Frank Key, has developed a method that produces the smallest particle
possible and that is a group of atoms about .75 nanometers in size.
He has
done some research that says that the smaller particle means more
surface
area and best effects.

Mesosilver page:  http://www.purestcolloids.com/mesosilver.htm

Jim Meissner   www.MeissnerResearch.com

-Original Message-
From: Mary Ellen Murphy [mailto:maryelle...@bellsouth.net]



--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com




RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-15 Thread Carol Ann
http://www.silverpuppy.com/

Mary Ellen Murphy maryelle...@bellsouth.net wrote: What are some other 
generators that are Ionic silver

-Original Message-
From: Clayton Family [mailto:clay...@skypoint.com] 
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 5:08 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

I beg to differ, at least in principle. An ion is smaller than a stable 
particle of any element.  Don't confuse the poor girl.  I respect Frank 
Key's work, but this is getting to a nitpicking point that she may be 
too sick to understand.

Ionically isolated silver is going to be the most reasonable solution. 
I am not arguing with your statement about the small size being more 
effective, but it is moot to argue about nanometers when one is talking 
about ions.  My generator certainly produces ions, which are the 
smallest pieces of silver that can exist.

kathryn

On Jun 15, 2008, at 4:31 PM, Jim Meissner yahoo wrote:

 Dear Mary Ellen:

 Click on the link

 http://meissnerresearch.com/products/silver-generator

 No, not all generators are alike.
 There are no generators that will produce a particle the size of an 
 atom.

 Frank Key, has developed a method that produces the smallest particle
 possible and that is a group of atoms about .75 nanometers in size.  
 He has
 done some research that says that the smaller particle means more 
 surface
 area and best effects.

 Mesosilver page:  http://www.purestcolloids.com/mesosilver.htm

 Jim Meissner   www.MeissnerResearch.com

 -Original Message-
 From: Mary Ellen Murphy [mailto:maryelle...@bellsouth.net] 


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour 
   





Regards, Carol Ann ~ The only thing that is different is how you think..
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/archivepix.html
   

Re: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

2008-06-15 Thread Arnold Beland
LOL   Wow, what a deal!!!  If anyone wants a ready made solution for under 
$200, why not get a generator from Ken at http://silverpuppy.com/.
It has some real guts and is sold by someone who has forgotten more about 
this stuff than must of us will ever know.
As long as we are into blatant self-promotion, free plans and theory for a 
constant polarity machine can be found at

http://www.atlasnova.com/CSMakingInfo.htm
and all the parts and equipment are available for $29.99.
http://www.atlasnova.com/ColloidalSilverStarterKit.htm
Best Regards,
Arnold Beland
www.atlasnova.com
- Original Message - 
From: Jim Meissner yahoo jpmeiss...@yahoo.com

To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 5:27 PM
Subject: RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial



Dear Bob:

Thank you, you are right, the link does not work.  I will email my web 
guy.


The generator consists of a battery box, two AA batteries, one 4.7 K ohm
resistor and two # 12 AWG .999 silver wires and a Teflon sleeve.  It takes
about an hour to make.  Total manufacturing cost is less than $50.  For a
while I was selling plans for $10 for people to make their own.  No one 
has

bought the plans.  I have sold quite a few of generators.

I have plans and instruction of how to make lots of things on my
EnergyPulser yahoo group but the interesting thing is that only 1 out of 
100

are actually able build something.

Jim Meissner   www.MeissnerResearch.com

-Original Message-
From: bob Larson [mailto:bobl...@cablespeed.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 7:47 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial

...at that page, the link to see a pic of the generator doesn't work.
i want to see inside the box of a 3vdc constant polarity machine to see
what's costing $200.


EIS/CS forms silver ions in solution which are single atoms of silver... 
but

they're not metallic particles until they happen to get together.  the
particulate portion of EIS/CS varies in particle size, some of them surely
being as small as is possible, but they tend to grow over time eventually
falling out.
so then we come back to which works, particles or ions? or which works 
best?

again  again, ad nauseum.


-Original Message-
From: Jim Meissner yahoo [mailto:jpmeiss...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 5:32 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial


Dear Mary Ellen:

Click on the link

http://meissnerresearch.com/products/silver-generator

No, not all generators are alike.
There are no generators that will produce a particle the size of an atom.

Frank Key, has developed a method that produces the smallest particle
possible and that is a group of atoms about .75 nanometers in
size.  He has
done some research that says that the smaller particle means more surface
area and best effects.

Mesosilver page:  http://www.purestcolloids.com/mesosilver.htm

Jim Meissner   www.MeissnerResearch.com

-Original Message-
From: Mary Ellen Murphy [mailto:maryelle...@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 12:46 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: CSInfo about the best generatrorfor collodial


Can some one please tell me which is the best generator to make colloidal
silver and does the particle size matter. I was told that it did not and 
a

lot of people do not know what I am talking about and saY that an
atom is a
as small as you can get and that's what they all do.

Thanks
Mary Ellen





-Original Message-
From: Jim Meissner yahoo [mailto:jpmeiss...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 10:50 AM
To: Silver-List@Eskimo.Com
Subject: FW: CSDesperately need help with Lyme

Dear Mike:

I have not been reading the CS group for quite a while, but Carol
alerted me
to the Lyme discussion going on.  A long story very short, Carol
got bitten
by a tick and proved to be a willing test subject to help me design a new
way of treating Lyme disease.  Take a look at the link

http://meissnerresearch.com/products/dougplus .

Carol is a great researcher and found that Lyme will mimic 200 other
diseases.  We discovered that Carol has been suffering from Lyme
for over 14
years and was being treated for a variety of illnesses.  It took about 6
months of daily treatments with the DougPlus for Carol to feel
like she was
90% recovered and possibly one year to be 100%.

During that time she was consuming 32 ounces of colloidal silver every 
day

for 3 or 4 months.  She found that when she dropped back to a
lower dosage,
her herx, fever and chills, would get worse.  Please note this high 
dosage

should only be done with well made colloidal silver

http://meissnerresearch.com/products/silver-generator

containing only nano size particles.  My generator was tested by Frank 
Key

who makes the smallest possible particles of 0.75 nanometer as found in
MesoSilver.

Anyway I would like to ask if it would be OK to post the DougPlus link on
your CS group?

Jim Meissner