[SLUG] Colo somewhere *other* then Sydney CBD/North Sydney.

2003-09-01 Thread Alan Lee
Hello Everyone.

Kinda OT, but I promise it will be running Linux :)

After today's power problems in Sydney, My company is looking at
implementing a backup system somewhere out of Sydney's CBD centers..

Anyone know of any companies which are reasonably priced with good
bandwidth - but not in Sydney CBD / North Sydney?  Paramatta would be good.

Thank you for your time!

Alan Lee

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


Re: [SLUG] Telstra ADSL - Quick Query

2001-11-25 Thread Alan Lee

When Telstra came and installed it for us, the box which had the network
card came with Turbo Linux hm?  They supplied equipemnt/software
which they dont support?  Sounds weird to me, is this legal?

Regards



- Original Message - 
From: "Kevin Waterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Steven Kerr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Telstra ADSL - Quick Query


| > The Telstra BigPondDirect - ADSL Linux Howto type document
| 
| This refers to an installation on RedHat 7.2 so ymmv.
| 
| When the Telstra "Technician" came to my door to install my Telstra ADSL
| I was
| curious why he had this massive hand book. Telstral _DO NOT_ support
| Linux, the
| reason for this is that the "Technicians" are incompetent. Had I not
| been on hand to
| install the NIC, this guy would still be here, it was pathetic. could
| not even add a windows
| driver for the NIC, I had to do it for him


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Telstra Outages

2001-07-01 Thread Alan Lee

Have you talked to connect.com.au?

My company, is getting a few ADSL links from then.  They offer unlimited
uploads at no charge, and very very good download rate (A few GB a month for
free, then a low 14cents a mb afterwards)

My contact there is Sunny, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (02 9409 2149).  He is
fast, almost always contactable, checks his 'work' emails before he goes to
bed, and actually knows what things like DDS and spoofin means!

Regards, Alan Lee

- Original Message -
From: "Gnuthad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Slug List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2001 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Telstra Outages


> On 1 Jul 01, at 13:27, Andrew Foster wrote:
>
> >
> > I was going to ask Pacific whether they provided a service like this, on
> > behalf of a client of ours, who was affected by the recent outage -
> > they're a bookshop with a cybercafe and so having no redundant
> > connection loses them customers.
> >
> > Do they allow www et cetera or is it email-only?
>
> I was hoping to be a Pacific Internet customer about 2 months ago however,
> problems with a major telco (no names) resulted in the service apparently
being
> connected (and documentation produced to prove thistwice) while my
phone
> line runs through a RIM exchange and is therefore incapable of having
ADSL,
> ever. My dealings with PI have been outstanding, they offer a great
service (on
> paper) and they would permit me to install any number of computers on the
ADSL
> link, run and number/type of servers I chose, as well as offerring me free
and
> unlimited uploads. This fact alone convinced me to choose them for their
> service. Now all I need is said telco to actually do what they've already
> documented and install the ADSL line.
>
> Gnuthad
>
> P.S. Anyone who is either a lawyer or knows a lawyer, could you contact me
> offlist regarding my problem?
>
>
> PGP Key Block available at:
> http://aussie.mine.nu/aussie/pgp_key.txt
>
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
>


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Hardley Normal

2001-06-17 Thread Alan Lee

I rather Linux any day other then Microsoft.

This is a very very general conclushion about this package.

How many other people at this company did you ask about the product?  Any
other stores?  There will be girls/guys working at Hardley Normal (heheh)
that will know something about Linux.  I like reading emails like this, but
you gota do wider research .. maybe we should all ask out local Hardley
Normal super stores about this product, and then we can REALLY turn around
and say what they are like!

Regards
- Original Message -
From: "Jon Biddell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 12:14 PM
Subject: [SLUG] Hardley Normal


> Just to give you an idea of how out of touch Harvey Norman is with the
> computer industry (which, to be honest, is not that surprising !!), they
are
> selling the "new" SuSE Linux professional at the "special" price of $199 -
> everywhere else it's about $120.
>
> They couldn't understand, when I questioned them, that no-one is buying it
> because of the price - they maintain that "once you use it, you'll see how
> good Windows is and change back".
>
> Another example of FUD in action...:)
>
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
>


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] ML 350's

2001-06-13 Thread Alan Lee

Got an interesting situation.

Going to have at least 4 of these beasts (even tho they are starting to
become outdated, and now they have a very very good price), maybe more..
depending on what we use in the core network.  Going to have all sit behind
a nice fast fibre connection :>

Givein me headaches, but hey.. it be fun!

Regards


- Original Message -
From: "Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alan Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 10:07 AM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] ML 350's


>
> At my old work, we had Redhat 6.2 running on such a beast fine.. Infact it
> all ran rather sweet.. we did have problems with something to do with NIC,
> but this was sorted with some patches.. But it was so long ago, I can't
> recall the exact problem. I do know we fixed it in the end.
>
> Have fun :P
>
> -Michael
>
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Alan Lee wrote:
>
> > Hi all.
> >
> > Anyone know if there are any issues with installing Linux (Slackware 7.0
or 7.1) onto Compaq ML350's (Dual 850's, 1gb ram etc)?
> >
> > Regards
> >
>
>


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



[SLUG] ML 350's

2001-06-13 Thread Alan Lee



Hi all.
 
Anyone know if there are any issues with installing 
Linux (Slackware 7.0 or 7.1) onto Compaq ML350's (Dual 850's, 1gb ram 
etc)?
 
Regards


Re: [SLUG] Re: ISP requests IP block back

2001-04-18 Thread Alan Lee


> > 
> > My advice is - Give them ALL the addresses back, choose a 
> > private address scheme and reassign all your machines.  Go 
> > through the pain.  Reconfigure your router/gateway/firewall/NAT and 
> > move on.  The advantage for all this once-off pain is that NO ONE  will
> > ever again dictate a change in IP addressing in your 
> > organisation.  You can allocate as many or as few addresses as 
> > you wish, making your scheme as complicated or as simple as 
> > you need and sub-addressing whatever you want for whichever 
> > branch offices that you have, etc.
> > 
> > Russell Ashdown
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
> 


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] ISP requests IP block back

2001-04-18 Thread Alan Lee

The address space is owned by one.net, but my company is listed in the aunic
database for that IP address range.

They are saying I have been 'allocated the incorrect IP range', even tho I
have had the address range over a year now.  This has only came to there
knolidge when I have requeseted a change for the reverse dns.  I also
requested a change about 8 months ago, they didn't pick up anything weird
then.  They are also saying the IP addresses have 'already been taken'.

Should I yell and scream, or just give em up?

btw, the block is 203.101.21.0/28 (203.101.21.95->110ish)



Regards


- Original Message -
From: "Dave Fitch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 8:19 PM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] ISP requests IP block back


> On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 06:58:06PM +1000, Rob B wrote:
> > A lot of ISP's will lease the IP space to you rather than selling it.
What
> > you can do is read your contract with the ISP and see if it mentions
> > allocations of IP space.  You can also check on the APNIC web site
> > (http://www.apnic.net) to see who really owns the IP space.
>
> as far as I'm aware no one actually owns IP addresses, even ISPs,
> you just get assigned them as you need them and give them back
> when no longer required anymore.  That's the theory anyway
> (AFAIK, YMMV and other assorted acronyms) so maybe your ISP
> has been asked to give those addresses back to the registry?
>
> Dave.
>
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
>


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



[SLUG] ISP requests IP block back

2001-04-18 Thread Alan Lee

Hey.

I have two IP address blocks, both are /28's situated in diffrent net
blocks.

My ISP has requested one of them back, I have had this address rang for over
a year now.  They say it was given to me by accident, and say its for use
with 'internal customers'.  Is this legal for them to do?  Ive talked to one
person, they say they can do this.  Has anyone had this problem before?


Regards, Alan Lee


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



[SLUG] Ghosting HDD's..

2001-03-24 Thread Alan Lee

Hello.

I am required to upgrade a clients HDD, under linux.  Currently, he has a
2gb HDD.. and its about full.. and he now has a 30gb HDD... whats the best
way to transfer the data from one drive to the other?  I saw a command,
about 6-8 weeks ago, in this list, but I lost a few hundred mails just the
other week.. dang microsoft!


Regards, Alan Lee


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Draft - Install Fest Announcement

2001-02-26 Thread Alan Lee


- Original Message -
From: "Dave Fitch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Draft - Install Fest Announcement


> On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 03:30:20PM +1100, Craige McWhirter wrote:
> > When:
> > 10:00am, Saturday, 10th of March, 2001.
>
> you should do up some posters advertising it for display at
> the slug stand at the PC show/Linux expo since it'll be the
> day after the show ends.
>
> > - Mirror machines - there's no 'net - *scary*.
>
> you mean no phone line available?
>
> Dave.
>
Noone has a cable/adsl connection and dosn't mind haveing a radio link from
there house to the Surf Life Saving Club?

:)

Regards, Alan Lee
Ecom Computers


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] deltree equivalent OK

2001-02-21 Thread Alan Lee

We are a shop front, and have technical guys.

We have had technical guys format systems, totaly kill customers hardware
etc.  They always seem to be part timers who do is..

Ive been in this company almost 2 years, and have never really had a need to
format a customers HDD, unless it was totaly wasted, and I had no choice!
And the customer knows what will happen etc.  I always do a backup anyways,
copy all the working files to another HDD and then format.  I will then put
the data back in a temp folder for the customer, So they can get back
pictrues, data etc that they require.  This seems to please most customers.

Regards, Alan Lee

- Original Message -
From: "Simon Bryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 9:40 AM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] deltree equivalent OK


> Thanks everyone got that! Now let me see,
> cd /
> rm -rf *
> find new job :-)
>
> Actually had a friend that on his first day in tech support, did do a
> deltree in the root directory of the bosses computer! Fortunately they did
> have data backups. I think he did it at about 2pm and went home about 3am
> and was back at work looking like nothing had happened at 8am the next
day.
> Since this was a fresh install of everything, the system actually ran
> better, no fragmented files etc. The boss, unaware of the process, thanked
> him for 'tuning up' his system.
>
> At 08:28 22/02/2001, you wrote:
> >Hi,
> >Is there an equivalent in Linux to the DOS deltree, that will remove
> >folders, files and .files without confirmation? Such a fun command on a
> >Windows system, generally goes like:
> >cd /
> >deltree *
> >Oh S***T!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Simon Bryan
> >
> >IT Manager
> >OLMC Parramatta
> >http://www.olmc.nsw.edu.au
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> >More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
>
>
>
> Simon Bryan
> 
> IT Manager
> OLMC Parramatta
> http://www.olmc.nsw.edu.au
> 
>
>
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
>


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] PPPd pain!

2001-02-20 Thread Alan Lee

The ISP is ozemail/uunet.

When connected, It dose a little banner, then says

Service?

Which then it requies "PPP" to be entered, before the "username" will come
up.

Ive been trying all sorts to get it going, editing the pppscripts, manually
editing other files and just about everythin else I could think of! I even
tryed to edit the wvdial source to type PPP when it say "service"!!

Has anyone got "knowen" working config files I can look over or something
for a perm. modem connection to ozemail?  If only this companys computers
didn't get taken :~(

Regards, Alan Lee



- Original Message -
From: "Steve Kowalik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alan Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "SLUG List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 10:51 PM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] PPPd pain!


> On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 07:39:25AM +1100, Alan Lee uttered:
> > Hey.. Been forever since ive had to setup PPPD.
> >
> MUAH, know the feeling.
>
> > Just a quick Q... The ISP my client is going to dialup into gives them a
choice ... "PPP for PPP, SLIP for SLIP etc"
> >
> > Soo... We need to send "ppp", then a username & password.
> >
> In your chatscript, you'll have:
> ogin: lalala
> assword: ladida
>
> Just add another expect/send pair before ogin, or sername, saying:
> PPP: ppp
>
> If you run chat with -v it will dump everything it recieves (and sends) to
/var/log/messages, so you can edit it accordingly.
>
> > Regards, Alan Lee
>
> --
> Steve
>   "I'm a sysadmin because I couldn't beat a blind monkey in a coding
contest."
> --Me
>
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
>


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



[SLUG] PPPd pain!

2001-02-19 Thread Alan Lee



Hey.. Been forever since ive had to setup 
PPPD.
 
Just a quick Q... The ISP my client is going to 
dialup into gives them a choice ... "PPP for PPP, SLIP for SLIP 
etc"
 
Soo... We need to send "ppp", then a username & 
password.
 
How can this be done... simple script or somethin 
will b perfect! 
 
Regards, Alan Lee


Re: [SLUG] Tekram SCSI Cards

2001-02-13 Thread Alan Lee


- Original Message -
From: "Heracles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Terry Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Alan Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 10:08 PM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Tekram SCSI Cards


> Terry Collins wrote:
>
> > Don't worry. It was a dig at our pro-markets mob that like businesses
> > with their here today and gone tomorrow business plans, so long as they
> > get a good price.
> >
> > I think you will find that it actually is legal to do business without
> > an ABN, but there are all sorts of disadvantages.
>
> I recently purchased a product(new) at the North Rocks Market and
> was given a receipt with ABN etc. The great majority of the people
> who sell new equipment at the markets, such as Westgate
> Technology,  are registered businesses. I have had dealings with
> several of them and have visited their shops. Some of the second
> hand dealers may be different.
>
> It is unfair to indulge in FUD.
>
> Stay well and happy
> Heracles
>
This is why I dont get involved with sales, I dont know how to do it! I
wouldn't know what was right or wrong.

Regards, Alan Lee
Ecom Computers


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Tekram SCSI Cards

2001-02-12 Thread Alan Lee


- Original Message -
From: "Terry Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Rennie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Tekram SCSI Cards


> Jason Rennie wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Somebody recommended the Tekram SCSI Cards to me for use with linux (for
a
> > scanner).
> >
> > Now i have a small problem. Apart from the computer markets, does
anybody
> > know where I can pick on up ?
>
> Yes, Me.
> >
> > Assuming the price is reasonable, I was hoping ot have the scanner
running
> > before the end of the weekend as it is needed.
>
> If you want to buy a new card from a legitimate Australian business,
> complete with invoice containing ABN (which is the only type good for
> getting your GST back and not having to pay it a second time), then fax
> me an order on letterhead.
>
> 1 Tekram DC315U @ $60 (includes GST). I have two in stock.
> 1 Courier Delvery  @$10
>
> If I call my courier today, then you should have it tommorrow.
>
I think its illigal to not provide a ABN etc isn't it?  If your in
retail/service etc and doing more then $10,000 a year in sales, you are
required to be registed and so forth?

Im not accountant or anything, just goin on what ive been told.

(And yes, we have ABN's and stuff too)


Regards, Alan Lee
Ecom Computers


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Tekram SCSI Cards

2001-02-12 Thread Alan Lee

We can supply tekram SCSI cards.

Im not sure on the priceing, since I only do the technical work.

If you find out what other people are selling em for.. we will match :)

Regards, Alan Lee
Ecom Computers
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Rennie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 9:23 AM
Subject: [SLUG] Tekram SCSI Cards


> Hi all,
>
> Somebody recommended the Tekram SCSI Cards to me for use with linux (for a
> scanner).
>
> Now i have a small problem. Apart from the computer markets, does anybody
> know where I can pick on up ?
>
> Assuming the price is reasonable, I was hoping ot have the scanner running
> before the end of the weekend as it is needed.
>
> I've looked about, but nobody sells the things.
>
> Jason
>
>
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
>


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] SCSI disk problems

2001-02-08 Thread Alan Lee

To get around this, you should be able to force the card to run at a lower
speed in the SCSI bios.

This will decress performance but should clean up the errors.

Regards, Alan Lee
Ecom Computers
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 1:38 PM
Subject: RE: [SLUG] SCSI disk problems


>
> I saw that Dazza mentioned this too - does this mean that something like
the
> filesystem size is not likely to be an issue?
>
> If LVD cables are orange and interwoven then I guess I've just got a
> standard one. My sysadmin may have just grabbed one that was lying around.
> I'll chase one up.
>
> Thanks
> Tony...
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Alan Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, 9 February 2001 13:26
> > To: Tony Young
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [SLUG] SCSI disk problems
> >
> >
> > LVD are usually orange interwoven cables, with a terminater
> > at the end.
> >
> > You can get cables without terminaters, but you will need
> > them.  The drive
> > may seem to work, but you will end up with problems from my
> > experence ( A
> > few hundred systems built/installed/configured, 3 this week alone!)
> >
> > Most controlers dont come with cables, unless its a retail
> > kit or a raid
> > controller.
> >
> > How much did the cable cost you?  The cable should have
> > costed $100au and
> > above for a LVD one.
> >
> > We have them, Im not too sure about the cost..
> >
> > Regards, Alan Lee
> > Ecom Computers
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards, Alan Lee
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "DaZZa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 12:45 PM
> > Subject: Re: [SLUG] SCSI disk problems
> >
> >
> > > On Fri, 9 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > > I've got a linux box - RedHat 6.1 base, 2.2.16 kernel
> > with nfsv3 patch
> > > > I'm using the aic7xxx SCSI driver for an Adaptec AIC-7892
> > Ultra 160/m
> > > > adapter.
> > > > I've got 1 20Gb SCSI drive (ID 0) Seagate ST318436LW
> > > > I've created one partition for the whole disk.
> > > >
> > > > I'm getting the following sorts of messages in my syslog:
> > > [...snipt...]
> > >
> > > > Unfortunately I don't know enough about SCSI drives to
> > know what's going
> > on
> > > > here.
> > > > Can anyone tell me what's causing these problems?
> > > > Is the drive dead?
> > > > Is there a bug in the driver?
> > > > Is it because I've created too big a file system?
> > >
> > > Get a batter quality SCSI cable. U160 drives need extremely
> > good quality
> > > cables to work properly. Chances are yours is a little
> > damaged, or not
> > > terminated properly, or even too long.
> > >
> > > Did you buy an LVD cable to go with it, or did you just use
> > any old thing?
> > >
> > > DaZZa
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> > > More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> > More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
> >
>


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] SCSI disk problems

2001-02-08 Thread Alan Lee

LVD are usually orange interwoven cables, with a terminater at the end.

You can get cables without terminaters, but you will need them.  The drive
may seem to work, but you will end up with problems from my experence ( A
few hundred systems built/installed/configured, 3 this week alone!)

Most controlers dont come with cables, unless its a retail kit or a raid
controller.

How much did the cable cost you?  The cable should have costed $100au and
above for a LVD one.

We have them, Im not too sure about the cost..

Regards, Alan Lee
Ecom Computers



Regards, Alan Lee
- Original Message -
From: "DaZZa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 12:45 PM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] SCSI disk problems


> On Fri, 9 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I've got a linux box - RedHat 6.1 base, 2.2.16 kernel with nfsv3 patch
> > I'm using the aic7xxx SCSI driver for an Adaptec AIC-7892 Ultra 160/m
> > adapter.
> > I've got 1 20Gb SCSI drive (ID 0) Seagate ST318436LW
> > I've created one partition for the whole disk.
> >
> > I'm getting the following sorts of messages in my syslog:
> [...snipt...]
>
> > Unfortunately I don't know enough about SCSI drives to know what's going
on
> > here.
> > Can anyone tell me what's causing these problems?
> > Is the drive dead?
> > Is there a bug in the driver?
> > Is it because I've created too big a file system?
>
> Get a batter quality SCSI cable. U160 drives need extremely good quality
> cables to work properly. Chances are yours is a little damaged, or not
> terminated properly, or even too long.
>
> Did you buy an LVD cable to go with it, or did you just use any old thing?
>
> DaZZa
>
>
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
>


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



[SLUG] byte to byte info about a connection.

2001-02-07 Thread Alan Lee



Hey all.
 
My company are going to upgrade all our net 
connections, to a DSL connections.  But, We would like to have byte-to-byte 
info about the connection.  IE, which internal host eats the most, 
etc.  Is this posiable.  I guess asking if its posiable.. cause 
im sure ive seen somethin about it :)
 
Regards, Alan Lee


Re: [SLUG] Re: Benchmarking Linux.

2001-02-02 Thread Alan Lee

FYI:

http://www2.ecomcomputers.com.au/tmp/computer1.jpg
http://www2.ecomcomputers.com.au/tmp/computer2.jpg

That is what the box looks like :)

Anyone want one? heh

Regards, Alan Lee


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Benchmarking Linux.

2001-02-01 Thread Alan Lee

Its a nice machine.  Its based on the Super Micro "MB-370DL3" motherboard.
1GB (4x 256ECC Reged) memory, a 30GB IDE 7200rpm IBM, and a 36GB Seagate
Cheeta, umm standard IDE cdrom :P~ heheh umm 4MB PCI video card etc

Very nice.. Very quick.. VRY fun! Im going to time it and see how fast
it can do a seti@home packet :) Maybe 50 odd over the weekend can be done?
We will see!

Regards, Alan Lee
Ecom Computers


- Original Message -
From: "Howard Lowndes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alan Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Benchmarking Linux.


> It looks like your weekend is planned then.
>
> --
> Howard.
> 
> LANNet Computing Associates <http://lannetlinux.com>
>    "...well, it worked before _you_ touched it!"
>
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Alan Lee wrote:
>
> > Anyone know a simple way to benchmark linux?
> >
> > I got a nice machien to play with ...
> >
> > Dual 1Ghz
> > 1024MB ram.
> > 160Scsi (36GB 10,000RPM Seagates's!)
> >
> > And a few other nice things :)
> >
> >
> > Regards, Alan Lee
> >
> >
> >
>
>


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



[SLUG] Benchmarking Linux.

2001-02-01 Thread Alan Lee

Anyone know a simple way to benchmark linux?

I got a nice machien to play with ...

Dual 1Ghz
1024MB ram.
160Scsi (36GB 10,000RPM Seagates's!)

And a few other nice things :)


Regards, Alan Lee


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Re: Telstra ADSL and recurrent recurrent lost connections.

2001-01-30 Thread Alan Lee

You know why it was out?  If you dont know why something like this is out, I
dont think you have any reason to scream and yell about it.  A few major
bits of their equipment was fried, in a storm in VICT.

(And no, I DONT WORK FOR TELSTRA!!!)

Regards, Alan Lee


- Original Message -
From: "Angus Lees" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "SLUG Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 11:24 PM
Subject: [SLUG] Re: Telstra ADSL and recurrent recurrent lost connections.


> \begin{Richard Piper}
> > > It's been hopeless for the last few days, up and down all the time,
terrible
> > > speed and latency.
> >
> > I would have to agree.
>
> i think its time we all had a chat with our friendly ombudsman..
>
>
> late last week adsl was down for at least 5 hours (from logs
> overnight, i think it was more like 17 hours!) which is pretty
> horrific service, considering what everyone is paying.
>
> --
>  - Gus
>
>
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
>



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] OT: MS hacked again

2001-01-21 Thread Alan Lee

server1:~$ whois microsoft.com
[whois.internic.net]

Whois Server Version 1.3

Domain names in the .com, .net, and .org domains can now be registered
with many different competing registrars. Go to http://www.internic.net
for detailed information.

MICROSOFT.COM.SHOULD.GIVE.UP.BECAUSE.LINUXISGOD.COM
MICROSOFT.COM.SE.FAIT.HAX0RIZER.PAR.TOUT.LE.ZOY.ORG
MICROSOFT.COM.OWNED.BY.MAT.HACKSWARE.COM
MICROSOFT.COM.N-AIME.BILL.QUE.QUAND.IL.N-EST.PAS.NU
MICROSOFT.COM.MUST.STOP.TAKEDRUGS.ORG
MICROSOFT.COM.IS.SOON.GOING.TO.THE.DEATHCORPORATION.COM
MICROSOFT.COM.IS.SECRETLY.RUN.BY.ILLUMINATI.TERRORISTS.NET
MICROSOFT.COM.IS.NOTHING.BUT.A.MONSTER.ORG
MICROSOFT.COM.IS.NO.MATCH.FOR.THE.UEBER-GEEKS.AT.JIMPHILLIPS.ORG
MICROSOFT.COM.IS.BORING.COMPARED.TO.TEENEXTREME.COM
MICROSOFT.COM.IS.AT.THE.MERCY.OF.DETRIMENT.ORG
MICROSOFT.COM.INSPIRES.COPYCAT.WANNABE.SUBVERSIVES.NET
MICROSOFT.COM.HAS.NO.LINUXCLUE.COM
MICROSOFT.COM.HACKED.BY.PSYKOJOKO.ON.A.ROOT-NETWORK.COM
MICROSOFT.COM.HACKED.BY.HACKSWARE.COM
MICROSOFT.COM.GUTS.NL
MICROSOFT.COM.FAIT.VRAIMENT.DES.LOGICIELS.A.TROIS.FRANCS.DOUZE.ORG
MICROSOFT.COM.ER.IKKE.NO.I.FORHOLD.TIL.LATHANS.NET
MICROSOFT.COM.AINT.WORTH.SHIT.KLUGE.ORG
MICROSOFT.COM

To single out one record, look it up with "xxx", where xxx is one of the
of the records displayed above. If the records are the same, look them up
with "=xxx" to receive a full display for each record.

>>> Last update of whois database: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 12:04:40 EST <<<

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .ORG, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

- Original Message -
From: "Damien Gardner Jnr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 12:44 PM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] OT: MS hacked again


> On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 12:34:05PM +1100, Rick Welykochy said:
> --> 
> --> try a whois microsoft
> --> 
>
> Looks normal to me...?   Remember that 'whois microsoft' will return a
list of all entries which match.. - domains, hosts, etc, so all the extra
entries you're seeing are hosts which people have registered...
>
> Wasn't this on slashdot about six months ago? :)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Damien Gardner Jnr   -  Dip.EE  StudIEAust
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]  -  http://www.rendrag.net/
> Ph: 0417 055 052 -  Fax: 02 6255 8663
> -- I'm trying to imagine you with a personality.
>
>
>
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
>



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] inetd.conf query

2001-01-21 Thread Alan Lee

Um

Do a "netstat -l -n" and see what ports are open. (Mainly high ports, ie,
16000)

If you see any weird ones, from an external machine, telnet to them and see
what happens.

I think your box may have been root'ed or something...


Regards, Alan Lee


- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Howard Lowndes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 8:41 PM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] inetd.conf query


> No...just new entries in my inetd.conf file that I didn't put there
>
>
>
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
>



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] FD Limit

2001-01-20 Thread Alan Lee

I got this sorted out,

Currently, the IRC server has 350 users on it, and doing well.  Before, was
struggleing to get 220(ircd uses about 20FD's)

Thanks all

Regards, Alan Lee
- Original Message -
From: "chesty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2001 10:09 PM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] FD Limit


> On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 07:24:16AM +, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> > Actually you can set it using ulimit with either 2.2 or 2.4.  Whether
the
> > application will cope with it is another question.
>
> You can do this, but fd_set will still be limited to 1024.
>
> --
> chesty
>
>
>
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
>



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



[SLUG] FD Limit

2001-01-19 Thread Alan Lee

Hey;

Incressing FD's on a linux box? Its running slackware, K 2.2.6

Its an IRC server, after about 24 hours been up, its now reached 230ish
users (all real users!!)

.. And now, the FD limit is in play.. How do we incress this?  New K?
diffrent OS?  This will only be a temp. soloution.

Regards, Alan



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



[SLUG] host:80<->internalip:80

2001-01-18 Thread Alan Lee

Hey all.

I require a web server to be firewalled, as in, sitting behind a linux box
using port forwarding.

I recall playing around with it some time ago.. but i cant recall how!!

These are the IP's etc..

203.101.21.98:80 needs to be forward to 10.0.0.2:80, as well as ftp
(203.101.21.98:20/21->10.0.0.2:20/21)

Just a point in the right direction would help, as in, what web pages to
look at.  I dont really want someone to say"command 234.234.2 234.234 234"
whatever, tho, that would help:)

Regards, Alan Lee



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: Subba Rao, was Re: [SLUG] Large HD and VMWare's raw partitions

2001-01-15 Thread Alan Lee

Lets sign up for the same groups, and everyone here post a reply very
similar, which will kill his system!

:)

Regards, Alan Lee
(Im only on this list, and DHS.ORG (which is a general all around
hardware/software list))

PS, only jokein about killin his system! We only kill his wife instede?


- Original Message -
From: "Mike Holland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sydney Linux Users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 4:06 PM
Subject: Subba Rao, was Re: [SLUG] Large HD and VMWare's raw partitions


> There goes Subba again,
> posting the same question to SLUG, PLUG, Canberra, and who knows how many
> other lists. Do you just do this to Australia (he is in the US), or
> are you spamming lists all over the world?  Google shows you in Canada and
> UK _local_ groups.
>Even if its only the above three, this shows a total lack of respect
> for the time of those who try to help. How much effort is totally wasted,
> because someone on another list has already answered?
>
> --
> Mike Holland  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   --==--
> If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
>



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] When do you need more bandwidth

2000-12-28 Thread Alan Lee

Depeonds on alot of things, It could just be how the place has been setup.

In a case of users loging onto a domain controler, you might have a script
automaticly which will check the internet and download any updates to your
anti virus protection, if you have alot of people logging on at once, this
could cause a bottle neck in the interent, would be more wise to have the
clients update from a central point, ie, file server.

It could also be latency, you may find things run alot better with lower
latency.  IE, how long it takes for a user to click a link on the internet.
If alot of people are doing this at the same time, with a lower speed
connection, it can cripple it.

It could also be the equipment used with the connection, ie, a cheap router
could cause alot of bottle necks.  IE, a 20ms to prosess a tcpip request.

I guess more information is required, as in, what the connection is used for
(ie, ISP, local area network, wan, etc), What most people do (ie, download
20mb database files, p0rn etc)

Regards, Alan Lee
Ecom Computers


- Original Message -
From: "Howard Lowndes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mail List - Oz-ISP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Mail List - SLUG"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 5:58 PM
Subject: [SLUG] When do you need more bandwidth


> What triggers do folks use to decide that they need more bandwidth?  I'm
> thinking in terms of what %age saturation over a period would cause you to
> write out the order?
>
> --
> Howard.
> 
> LANNet Computing Associates <http://lannetlinux.com>
>"...well, it worked before _you_ touched it!"
>
>
>
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
>



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Email Server

2000-12-28 Thread Alan Lee

http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2000/06/msg00193.html

That is the problem I am getting;

As soon as qmailadmin is used, this file will be restored to what it used to
be, the unworking used to be that is.  I have tryed everything I can think
of, and there dosn't seem to be much information about this problem, or even
a real solution?

Regards, Alan Lee

- Original Message -
From: "Dave Kempe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alan Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Email Server


> On Fri, 29 Dec 2000 10:44, Alan Lee wrote:
> > Hey;
> >
> > Im looking for an email server, which is easy to install, easy to
config,
> > and keeps working.  Its required to be able to support multipical
domains,
> > and would be nice to have a web interface to it..
> >
> > .. What do other people use?
>
> What sort of web interface? to configure it or like a client MUA type
> interface?
> If you are looking for a configuration tool then webmin www.webmin.com
> configures sendmail and postfix.
> Postfix is my favorite btw for MTA stuff. However for MUA, things I
haven't
> found a really great web interface yet :/ I dunno if its meant to work
that
> way neway.
>
> Dave
>



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Email Server

2000-12-28 Thread Alan Lee

Qmail is what im using at the moment, I have 2 installs of it.  One is
working perfectly, but the other is haveing nothing but problems.

The machine which dosn't have any problems whatso ever, is sitting on 64k
ISDN, which we are going to terminate shortly in the new year.

I have another machine sitting on 10mbit+ of bandwidth, which im trying to
get qmail to work correctly.

Its kidna buggering me up.. heh

Regards, Alan Lee
- Original Message -
From: "Dean Hamstead" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alan Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Email Server


> sendmail is installed on most systems by default.
> It works, and its not too bad when all is said and done
>
> im a fan of qmail and exim.
>
> i think exim maybe a little easier to set up but possibly
> qmail has more available software.
>
> www.qmail.org
> www.exim.org
>
> smail is supposed to be good
>
> have a look on freshmeat.net, have a fiddle with them and
> see what works for you.
>
> Dean
>
> > Alan Lee wrote:
> >
> > Hey;
> >
> > Im looking for an email server, which is easy to install, easy to
> > config, and keeps working.  Its required to be able to support
> > multipical domains, and would be nice to have a web interface to it..
> >
> > .. What do other people use?
> >
> > Regards, Alan Lee
>
> --
> BONG: http://www.bong.com.au
> EMAIL...
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ICQ: 16867613
>



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



[SLUG] Email Server

2000-12-28 Thread Alan Lee



Hey;
 
Im looking for an email server, which is easy to 
install, easy to config, and keeps working.  Its required to be able to 
support multipical domains, and would be nice to have a web interface to 
it..
 
.. What do other people use?
 
Regards, Alan Lee


Re: [SLUG] Meeting

2000-12-28 Thread Alan Lee

Ha, If she did go, it would'nt be our first date.  Infact, I aint even
dateing her.

She's a younger girl, who would like to know more about computers.  Shes
already got a great interest in computers, but just dosn't know what area
she would like to get into.  So, it would be to show her, what linux would
be all about I guess.

Pitty shes out of the country at the moment tho.. :(

Anyways..

Regards, Alan Lee
- Original Message -
From: "Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alan Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Edward Murphy"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2000 8:00 AM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Meeting


> Not my idea on impressing someone on your first date...
>
> *shrugs*
>
> Just couldn't resist it.
>
> :)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Edward Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thursday, 28 December 2000 7:16
> Subject: Re: [SLUG] Meeting
>
>
> >.. I think I might go.
> >
> >Can I bring a girl? Or will she be swamped with men who sit behind
> computers
> >all day and dont see ladys? heh.. :)
> >
>
>



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Meeting

2000-12-28 Thread Alan Lee

.. I think I might go.

Can I bring a girl? Or will she be swamped with men who sit behind computers
all day and dont see ladys? heh.. :)

Regards, Alan Lee


- Original Message -
From: Edward Murphy
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2000 6:10 PM
Subject: [SLUG] Meeting


Is their a meeting tomorow

Sorry no info on the site :-)

Regards
Edward Murphy



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



[SLUG] Qmail Anyone?

2000-12-27 Thread Alan Lee



Hiya's..
 
Got a small problem with Qmail.
 
Keeps generating weird messages like;
 
Dec 28 11:28:51 shell qmail: 977956131.963350 
status: local 1/10 remote 0/20Dec 28 11:28:51 shell qmail: 977956131.993845 
delivery 91: deferral: 
/bin/sh:_/home/vpopmail/bin/alanlee:_Permission_denied/Dec 28 11:28:51 shell 
qmail: 977956131.994046 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20Dec 28 11:29:29 shell 
qmail: 977956169.992127 starting delivery 92: msg 2224458 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]Dec 
28 11:29:29 shell qmail: 977956169.992448 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20Dec 
28 11:29:30 shell qmail: 977956170.025380 delivery 92: deferral: 
/bin/sh:_/home/vpopmail/bin/alanlee:_Permission_denied/Dec 28 11:29:30 shell 
qmail: 977956170.025695 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
 
After close inspection, This file has been 
changed.
 
shell:/home/vpopmail/domains/bugpond.net# cat 
.qmail-default| /home/vpopmail/bin/alanlee
 
 
The file should have this;
 

| /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' 
bounce-no-mailbox
 
I can/have changed it back, but, any after any 
changes to qmail's domain info (ie, using qmailadmin web based thing) will reset 
it back to its former self, the "/home/vpopmail/bin/alanlee".  I am using 
the latest version fo qmail (1.03), and the qmailadmin tool is version 
0.26e.  I have another machine, using qmail, and its all working 
fine... But, I have to get this 2nd machine sorted out, since its got alot more 
bandwidth behind it.. 
 
Ive done searchs on the internet for information, 
but havn't been able to find anything about it.
 
The machine is running Slackware7.0.  I dont 
think any more information is required?
 
Regards, Alan Lee
 


Re: [SLUG] Re: ADSL not working - Authentication problem

2000-12-21 Thread Alan Lee


Same with alot of other help desk operators, such as Compaq, IBM etc.  The
first person you talk to on the phone, is normaly reading questions from
his/her screen.  Like, have you rebootd the computer?  Have you checked to
see if the phone line is working?  Is the screen turning on?  If they cant
solve your problem, they chuck you onto the guys getting payed more, and
that have a wider knolidge of computers (ex computer techies, c++ guru's).
You also have the problem, with the first level of help, they problaby have
never "used" the program/hardware you are trying to get help with.  Anyone
can read things from the screen, but actually providing knolidge based help
is something diffrent.

Regards, Alan Lee
NRMA

> Just remember, the help-desk guys you talk to first are just phone
monkeys.
> They usually only know how to read the procedure documentation, and cater
> for user error - but have no ability to diagnose network problems.  Nor do
> they understand the intricasies of PPPoE encapsulation, firewalling or PPP
> authentication.  They just have their handbooks.
>
> --==--
>   Crossfire  | This email was brought to you
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED] | on 100% Recycled Electrons
> --==--




-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Wireless Lan Update - hardware

2000-12-15 Thread Alan Lee

One of our clients has a setup.

In the rocks area, the building is an old building (Brick walls etc)

They cant drill holes etc, So cable was out of the question.

So;

We sold em 12 wireless NIC's, and a wireless hub.

All went well

They have it spred over 2 floors, 4 machines downstairs and 6 upstairs.

Works pretty good, speeds are like um 800kb/s average on each floor, and
about 400kb/s going upstairs/dowstairs.

Sometimes the machines drop off, but they come back up pretty fast.

Pings are about 15ms to each machine, so its pretty nice overall.

I wouldn't put it in.. unless its required to do so... Since, machines
sometimes drop off and la la la

We used samgsung equipment. I dont know the prices. Sorry, I only put it
together..


Regards, Alan Lee
Ecom Computers
- Original Message -
From: "Terry Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alan Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Slug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2000 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Wireless Lan Update - hardware


> Alan Lee wrote:
> >
> > We have done a few wireless networks.. They overall tend to be simple,
just
> > like installing a Network card.  'Cept, no wires!
>
> Details please
>
> what brand?
> how much did they cost?
> distance, spread, situation?
>
> Just to give people an idea.
>
> The view is to give information to people looking at wireless LANs &
> WANs.
>
> --
>Terry Collins {:-)}}} Ph(02) 4627 2186 Fax(02) 4628 7861
>email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  www: http://www.woa.com.au
>WOA Computer Services 
>
>  "People without trees are like fish without clean water"
>



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Wireless Lan Update - hardware

2000-12-15 Thread Alan Lee

We have done a few wireless networks.. They overall tend to be simple, just
like installing a Network card.  'Cept, no wires!

Regards, Alan Lee
Ecom Computers Australia
- Original Message -
From: "Terry Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Slug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2000 8:43 AM
Subject: [SLUG] Wireless Lan Update - hardware


> TRhis was on CatGeek for those slowly acculmulating parts for their
> wireless Lan.
>
> >iBook users, take note:
> >
> >If a geek comes up to you and offers to buy "that lame Airport thing you
> >don't use", tell them to buy their own iBook.
> >
> >In recent articles in both the Wall Street Journal [1] and Salon
> >Magazine [2], the sudden explosion of wireless ethernet is discussed in
> >some detail. In several cities across the world, homebrew hackers are
> >putting together city-wide internet WANs based on the newly-approved
> >802.11b ethernet standard which operates in the 2.4 GHz range. What is
> >surprising is that a lot of this homebrew information is coming from
> >Australia [3].
> >
> >These budding airwave jockeys are, for the most part, Windows and linux
> >tinkerers, even though Apple's iBook was one of the first computers with
> >basic wireless ethernet as a standard feature. The Airport system Apple
> >use is essentially technology licenced from research giant Lucent, who
> >offer it to all comers as well as making their own range of
> >Intel-flavoured and stand-alone products.
> >
> >For city-wide WANs, however, more power is needed to cover the greater
> >ranges required, and can still cost US$800 or so per user. What used to
> >be a large part of the cost of setting up a wireless connection was a
> >once-rare item called an "antenna connector" - now all they have to do
> >is gut an Airport-ready iBook or desktop G4 unit.
> >
> >If someone offers to buy _your_ Mac's antenna connector, politely refuse
> >and say that if there's a wireless WAN going up in your area, you want
> >to be a part of it.
> >
> >
> >[1] http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2000/12/01/wireless_ethernet
> >/index.html (re-flow so it's one line)
> >[2] http://public.wsj.com/sn/y/SB975000515459708837.html
> >[3] http://www.air.net.au/
>
>
> --
>Terry Collins {:-)}}} Ph(02) 4627 2186 Fax(02) 4628 7861
>email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  www: http://www.woa.com.au
>WOA Computer Services 
>
>  "People without trees are like fish without clean water"
>
>
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
>



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



[SLUG] **URGENT** Require a 73GB Seagate (Yes, I know its OT.. but!!)

2000-12-05 Thread Alan Lee



Hey this is off topic..
 
.. but, i require a 73GB Seagate SCSI drive... like 
URGENT heh
 
If anyone knows a supplyer who HAS it in 
stock, and is GOING to sell, please let me know like in 10 sec 
time!
 
One of our bigest clients has a problem, ie, one of 
there drives have failed in there servers, and we need to get em a 
replacement.
 
If someone could email me, or ring me, my number is 
(02) 92990022 (Sydney), or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
If you help us out.. im sure we can you products at 
great prices? Deal? heh
 
Hope to get a reply...!


Re: [SLUG] How does Firewire stack up?

2000-12-02 Thread Alan Lee

I wouls rather use equipment that everyone has/can get in a flick of an
eye...

.. I work in a computer store, we deal alot with just about everything,
everythin from 2.1gb IDE's right upto 500gb raid 5 setups.  We have never
had a firewire hdd in stock.. yet.. nor has anyone wanted em.  Unless you
got the money to play around with, stick with somethin EVERYONE else has,
and will always seem to use.  We only got our first firewire card in stock
about 3 weeks ago.  Some guy wanted to hook his Digital Video camera upto
the computer, and his friend said to get a firewire card.  It worked well.

Regqards, Alan Lee


- Original Message -
From: "Crossfire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alan Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2000 7:34 PM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] How does Firewire stack up?


> - Original Message -
> From: Alan Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2000 6:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [SLUG] How does Firewire stack up?
>
>
> > When I think firewire, I think of fast USB
>
> You shouldn't.  Firewire is closer to SCSI than it is to USB.
>
> USB implements a distinct master/slave relationship between hosts, hubs
and
> devices.  Firewire is a true bus, like SCSI.
>
> > Also, think of it this way.  Firewire is new.  Scsi has been around for
> > sometime.  Scsi you know will work.   Firewire you have no idea :)
>
> When firewire does work [like on various Mac boxen under MacOS], it works
> well.  If only I could afford those toys...




-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] How does Firewire stack up?

2000-12-01 Thread Alan Lee

When I think firewire, I think of fast USB

Also, think of it this way.  Firewire is new.  Scsi has been around for
sometime.  Scsi you know will work.   Firewire you have no idea :)

Regards, Alan Lee
Ecom Computers Australia

- Original Message -
From: "Jason Rennie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2000 6:54 PM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] How does Firewire stack up?


> > Firewire compares quite favourable with SCSI devices in terms of price.
> > (Am I wrong on this?  Is there a reason for this?)  How well is it
> > supported by Debian / Linux?  How well does it perform, especially when
> > you start a bit of chaining?
>
> I know nothing about it, but there is support in the 2.4 kernels, at least
> to some extent.
>
> Jason
>
>
>
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
>



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



[SLUG] Wickard eth0 errors

2000-11-06 Thread Alan Lee



eth0: Oversized Ethernet frame spanned multiple 
buffers, entry 0x81d79 length 0 status 0600!eth0: Oversized Ethernet frame 
cfddd490 vs cfddd490.eth0: Something Wicked happened! 2008.eth0: 
Something Wicked happened! 2008.eth0: Something Wicked happened! 
2008.eth0: Something Wicked happened! 2008.eth0: Something Wicked 
happened! 2008.eth0: Something Wicked happened! 2008.eth0: Something 
Wicked happened! 2008.eth0: Something Wicked happened! 2008.eth0: 
Something Wicked happened! 2008.eth0: Something Wicked happened! 
2008.eth0: Something Wicked happened! 2008.eth0: Something Wicked 
happened! 2008.eth0: Oversized Ethernet frame spanned multiple buffers, 
entry 0x43a3ce length 0 status 0600!eth0: Oversized Ethernet frame cfddd4e0 
vs cfddd4e0.eth0: Oversized Ethernet frame spanned multiple buffers, entry 
0x46ef2a length 0 status 0600!eth0: Oversized Ethernet frame cfddd4a0 vs 
cfddd4a0.
 
 
 
Anyone knows what that means? :)
 
 


Re: [SLUG] [OT] ADSL

2000-11-06 Thread Alan Lee

Im getting the same kinda thing, I wonder what the speed would be like
between 2 ADSL users on the same ISP?

Regards, Alan Lee


- Original Message -
From: "John Ferlito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Slug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 10:58 AM
Subject: [SLUG] [OT] ADSL


> I know a couple of people here have got ADSL. Anyway I got my
> connection during the trial while everything was still based out of
> victoria. But I still seem to be coming out of victoria eg I get
> alocated an IP something like
> CPE-61-9-178-208.vic.bigpond.net.au
>
> Anyone who has gotten a connection more recently are you getting
> a nsw or vic address? Since telstras vic network leaves a lot to be
> desired.
>
> --
> John
>
> The difference between a good man and a bad one is the
> choice of cause - William James
>
>
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
>



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] PCMCIA network cards killing linux..

2000-11-05 Thread Alan Lee



Im not sure how to find the hardware 
address...
 
 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Brock Henry 
  To: Alan Lee 
  Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 1:23 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [SLUG] PCMCIA network cards 
  killing linux..
  Just a guess, but they don't have the same MAC Addresses do 
  they? Obviously they shouldn't have, but if they did it would probably do 
  that.Brock HenryAt 13:16 06/11/2000 +1100, you wrote:
  This is 
weird.. At my office, we have 2 
linux machines. When I plug a 
laptop into the network, one of the linux machines seems to drop off the 
network.  If I log into the machine, everything is correct, no settings 
have changed, no error's, nothing weird in the messages(s) files.  To 
fix it, I have to reboot the machine. This happens about 15 sec after I plug the laptop in.  dosn't 
matter what IP address the laptop has, dosn't matter what hub I plug the 
laptop into.   Ive even 
changed the network card! (same brand/model tho) Has anyone seen/heard such a 
    thing? Regards, Alan 
  Lee
  *Brock 
  Henry - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (H) - [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  (W)Adventure? Excitement? A Jedi craves not these 
  things.* 
  


Re: [SLUG] PCMCIA network cards killing linux..

2000-11-05 Thread Alan Lee

DHCP is there, thats assigning addresses of 10.0.0.10->254

The linux machine is sitting on 10.0.0.1

Even if I set the Laptop to 192.168.0.1, 21.21.21.21 etc, will hang the
networking on the linux box. If i unplug the laptop, the linux box dosn't
continue.


- Original Message -
From: "Howard Lowndes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alan Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Sydney Linux Users Group" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 4:11 PM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] PCMCIA network cards killing linux..


> Are you running a DHCP server and one of the machines is getting an IP
> from that with the other having a static, and identical, IP?
>
> --
> Howard.
> __
> LANNet Computing Associates <http://www.lannet.com.au>
>
> On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Alan Lee wrote:
>
> > This is weird..
> >
> > At my office, we have 2 linux machines.
> >
> > When I plug a laptop into the network, one of the linux machines seems
to drop off the network.  If I log into the machine, everything is correct,
no settings have changed, no error's, nothing weird in the messages(s)
files.  To fix it, I have to reboot the machine.
> >
> > This happens about 15 sec after I plug the laptop in.  dosn't matter
what IP address the laptop has, dosn't matter what hub I plug the laptop
into.
> >
> > Ive even changed the network card! (same brand/model tho)
> >
> > Has anyone seen/heard such a thing?
> >
> > Regards, Alan Lee
> >
>
>



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



[SLUG] PCMCIA network cards killing linux..

2000-11-05 Thread Alan Lee



This is weird..
 
At my office, we have 2 linux 
machines.
 
When I plug a laptop into the network, one of 
the linux machines seems to drop off the network.  If I log into the 
machine, everything is correct, no settings have changed, no error's, nothing 
weird in the messages(s) files.  To fix it, I have to reboot the 
machine.
 
This happens about 15 sec after I plug the laptop 
in.  dosn't matter what IP address the laptop has, dosn't matter what hub I 
plug the laptop into.  
 
Ive even changed the network card! (same 
brand/model tho)
 
Has anyone seen/heard such a thing?
 
Regards, Alan Lee


Re: [SLUG] Re: ADSL on Linux

2000-11-04 Thread Alan Lee

Im using rp-pppoe-2.3, with no problems what so ever.  After downloading it,
I had it working in less then 5 min. (Downloaded it via win2k, then ftp'ed
it accross)

All IP's in the machine at static, are you using the correct username? Are
you doing it like user@bigpond ?



- Original Message -
From: "Crossfire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2000 11:27 AM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Re: ADSL on Linux


> If you'll all wait until after the 13th, I'll have my ADSL connected and
> I'll work it all out [admitantly, under OpenBSD - but the principles are
the
> same]
>
> What I'm fairly certain of:
>
> * PPPoE frames over ethernet, not over IP, so having an IP address on the
> card itself is pointless, hence DHCP is not exactly needed.
> * DHCP allocating you 192.168.0.1 is just plain *wrong*.  That could have
> just been NT's fallback from no DHCP reply, otherwise Telstra are breaking
> the rules again.
>
> as for the disconnected by peer, its probably dued to failed
authentication.
>
> Read Angus' comment on the matter.
>
> If I find the time after I've installed mine, ja, I'll write up a HOWTO :)
>
> - Chris Collins.
> +--+
> | Crossfire  | This message was brought to you |
> | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | on 100% recycled electrons  |
> +--+
>
> - Original Message -
> From: George Vieira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 'Angus Lees' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2000 11:10 AM
> Subject: RE: [SLUG] Re: ADSL on Linux
>
>
> > Well funny enough, my NT box which Telstra couldn't get to work finally
> > works. DHCP was giving us grief and now it suddenly gets a 192.168.0.1
IP
> > (not my original IP either) and now authenticates fine and connects via
> > their software...
> >
> > So what do I put in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0? Should it
> be
> > static 192.168.0.1 or leave as DHCP which never works even with dhcpcd
or
> > even using ISC's dhclient...???
> >
> > I might try static IP and try other things out.
> >
> > NOTE: I do get error messages in the /var/log/messages that I was
> > disconnected by the PEER.. which I guess means that I do get through to
> the
> > server but disconnect for some reason..
> >
> > Anyhow... attack another day..
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Angus Lees [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2000 10:55 AM
> > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Subject: [SLUG] Re: ADSL on Linux
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 05, 2000 at 10:10:14AM +1100, George Vieira wrote:
> > > For Tel$stra you must set up your NIC for DHCP which then it gets an
IP
> > and
> > > then you run the Tel$stra profile program which enables your
connection
> (
> > > which i assume rp-PPoE does).
> >
> > err, no.
> >
> > ppp does all the authentication and IP negotiation. for adsl (at least
> > the pppoe flavour of it), dhcp is not used.
> >
> >
> > use CHAP, not PAP - despite the fact the telstra end agrees to
> > PAP. (its one of a list of bugs i've told several telstra people)
> >
> > and your password is all lower-case, despite what the install people
> > may have written down ;)
> >
> >
> > an "i survived telstra adsl" howto anyone?
> >
> > --
> >  - Gus
>
>
>
>
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
>



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Home network busted please help

2000-10-31 Thread Alan Lee

PPP may have stuffed your routeing tables, check the network settings and so
forth.

Use comands like ifconfig

- Original Message -
From: "Holroyd Engineering Services" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sydney Linux User Group" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 9:33 AM
Subject: [SLUG] Home network busted please help


> Not sure what happened, I installed an internal modem based on lucent
chip,
> following the linmodem howto. It works well. However following a reboot,
> whenever I tried to use it, it would freeze the PC. I back tracked and
> remove everything that I did but now ppp will dial, connect and negotiate,
> succeed but failed when it tries to start pppd
>
> To complicate matter worse now when I ping my win98 machine from linux
box,
> it doesnot show return packet info. when I stop ping using ctrl-c this is
> what it tells me
>
> ping stat 75 transmitted 1 packet received 98% packet loss round trip
> min/avg/max=1/1/1 ms
>
> any suggestion anyone?
>
>
>
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
>



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] mx-relay.bigpond.net.au unreachable

2000-10-31 Thread Alan Lee

I am using Telstra ADSL, and they have given me an email address or
something.  Never really used it, Im using another email address I host on a
machine in the city.

Regards, Alan Lee

- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 6:32 PM
Subject: [SLUG] mx-relay.bigpond.net.au unreachable


> Is it just me and the way I'm doing things or is anyone else having
> trouble sending from within bigpond cable to another address within
> bigpond of the form @bigpond.net.au
>
> If anyone wants to test it just pop me a small message to the gparnell
> address below. I'm not using their "mail-hub" server (in my case
> mail-hub.nsw.bigpond.net.au) as a smart host and it works just fine from
> outside bigpond. Oh, and you can't ping/traceroute to their servers
> either.
>
> Of course this may just be their way of forcing us to get a telstra.com
> account.
>
> --
> --
> Grant Parnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Ph: 02-9715-6171 Mob: 0408-686-201 Web: http://linuxfreak.com/~gripz
> Wk: 02-9712-1799 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://everythinglinux.com.au
> No Microsoft products were used in the production of this message.
>
>
>
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
>



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Adaptec 2100S

2000-10-25 Thread Alan Lee

Everything has the latest firmware, including the drives.

My supplyer has put it down to the extra bit of cable the removeable racks
give.. causeing the bus to die or something.

.. Dose this seam right? Wrong? Pulling my leg?

Regards, Alan Lee
Ecom Computers

- Original Message -
From: "Marty Richards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Alan Lee'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 7:25 AM
Subject: RE: [SLUG] Adaptec 2100S


> Hi Alan,
>
> I had a problem similar to this using Quantum drives and a DPT millenium
> controller.
>
> The key to it was in how the SCSI controller detected the drives - it was
> detecting the first as "drive" and the others as "disk".
>
> DPT kept saying Quantums were sick and that a flash upgrade was available
> for the disk controllers. Is there a flash upgade available for your
> drives? We never applied the quantum one.
>
> Our solution was in trying a 4th SCSI ribbon cable. Unbelievable. The
first
> 3, including the new one which came with the controller and two others I
> had lying around didn't work. 4th time lucky.
>
> Good luck!
>
> Cheers
> Marty
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Lee [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 10:52 PM
> To: SLUG
> Subject: Re: [SLUG] Adaptec 2100S
>
> The problem im getting is when using removeable racks, the 2nd drive will
> always fail no matter what we do.  If we use diffrent HDD racks, they will
> do the same.  Even if we swap the drives around, it will always be the 2nd
> drive.
>
> The RAID BIOS will report the drive has been failed.  It will build the
> array perfectly (even in nobuild mode), format ok, but as soon as any data
> after that point is put on it will fail.  Even under Dos, or Linux. Will
> just sit there and beep its head off...
>
> Regards, Alan Lee
> Ecom Computers Australia
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dean Hamstead" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "George Vieira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "'Alan Lee'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "SLUG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 4:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [SLUG] Adaptec 2100S
>
>
> > Having missed the first email of this thread, (so i dont
> > know whats going on) I have a working adaptec 2100s raid
> > (on a dual p3 800). Needless to say install was boot strapped
> > on but now the drivers are in place everything is fine.
> >
> > Anyway yeah, so i may be able to help.
> >
> > But as far as RAID setup went, the disks (ibm) went in the
> > rack, i grouped them in pairs, mirrored them, and they are
> > working perfectly...
> >
> > Dean
> >
> > George Vieira wrote:
> > >
> > > I guess that your running *nix? WHat OS and version are you running?
> > >
> > > I have seen problems with RH6.2 until you use the latest version ( i
> used
> > > bleeding edge )
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > George Vieira
> > > Network Administrator
> > > http://www.citadelcomputer.com.au
> > > PGP Fingerprint :   43DC 92AC 1A82 27B2 E97B  52F1 B60F 301A 38A9
> A10C
> > > PGP KeyID:  0x38A9A10C
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Alan Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 2:56 PM
> > > To: SLUG
> > > Subject: [SLUG] Adaptec 2100S
> > >
> > > Anyone played with the Adaptec 2100S SCSI RAID card before?  Anyone
got
> it
> > > working 100% correctly with hot swappable drives/racks?
> > >
> > > We are using RAID1 with 2 drives.
> > >
> > > We get the problem after we build the array within the RAID bios, and
> as
> > > soon as we try and do any data transfers/access it fails, claiming the
> 2nd
> > > drive has died.  We swap the drives over, and get excatly the same on
> the
> > > 2nd drive again.  We have used 2 diffrent brand drives, latest
firmware
> > > everything, diffrent motherboards, diffrent size hdd's and everything
> else
> > > we can think of.  We have used RH seires racks, Kingston ones and also
> > > another brand which is worth $1000AU+ per HDD rack.  All of them say
> they
> > > will work, but dont.  As soon as we take the drives out of the racks,
> it
> > > works fine.  Also it works on SCSI2, but this is "too slow" according
> to
> the
> > > customer.
> > >
> > > Any idea's?  Ive tryed every thing really, even M$!
> > 

Re: [SLUG] Adaptec 2100S

2000-10-25 Thread Alan Lee

If we use a AAA131 card, it works fine.  The other techie also tryed another
card, Another brand all together, it worked fine also (I cant recall the
brand behind it)

We have used these brands before.

Its got me buggered..

Regards, Alan Lee
Ecom Computers Australia
- Original Message -
From: "George Vieira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Alan Lee'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "SLUG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 8:15 AM
Subject: RE: [SLUG] Adaptec 2100S


> I suggest trying other Hot Swap caddies, sounds like something is dodgey.
>
> You've built many RAID systems before but what about these HDD caddies?
Ever
> used this brand before?
>
> Could it be that the 1 of the caddies has failed considering that the
> drives/raid/controller/pc are all OK and only fails with the Caddy...
>
> thanks,
> George Vieira
> Network Administrator
> http://www.citadelcomputer.com.au
> PGP Fingerprint : 43DC 92AC 1A82 27B2 E97B  52F1 B60F 301A 38A9 A10C
> PGP KeyID: 0x38A9A10C
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 11:50 PM
> Cc: SLUG
> Subject: Re: [SLUG] Adaptec 2100S
>
>
> Works fine without the racks, And I have built several dozen raid systems,
> and even more plain scsi systems and know its not a termination problem,
or
> cable problem.
>
> We are using Raid1 with 2 drives, I know another person using Raid 5 &
Raid0
> on the same card with alot more HDD's then me..
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Terry Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Alan Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "SLUG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 8:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [SLUG] Adaptec 2100S
>
>
> > Alan Lee wrote:
> > >
> > > The problem im getting is when using removeable racks, the 2nd drive
> will
> > > always fail no matter what we do.  If we use diffrent HDD racks, they
> will
> > > do the same.  Even if we swap the drives around, it will always be the
> 2nd
> > > drive.
> >
> > How many drives?
> > If two, then the last drive is not terminated.
> >
> > --
> >Terry Collins {:-)}}} Ph(02) 4627 2186 Fax(02) 4628 7861
> >email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  www: http://www.woa.com.au
> >or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >WOA Computer Services 
> >snail:  PO Box 1047, Campbelltown, NSW 2560.
> >
> >  "People without trees are like fish without clean water"
> >
>
>
>
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
>



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Adaptec 2100S

2000-10-25 Thread Alan Lee

Works fine without the racks, And I have built several dozen raid systems,
and even more plain scsi systems and know its not a termination problem, or
cable problem.

We are using Raid1 with 2 drives, I know another person using Raid 5 & Raid0
on the same card with alot more HDD's then me..


- Original Message -
From: "Terry Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alan Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "SLUG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 8:24 PM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Adaptec 2100S


> Alan Lee wrote:
> >
> > The problem im getting is when using removeable racks, the 2nd drive
will
> > always fail no matter what we do.  If we use diffrent HDD racks, they
will
> > do the same.  Even if we swap the drives around, it will always be the
2nd
> > drive.
>
> How many drives?
> If two, then the last drive is not terminated.
>
> --
>Terry Collins {:-)}}} Ph(02) 4627 2186 Fax(02) 4628 7861
>email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  www: http://www.woa.com.au
>or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>WOA Computer Services 
>snail:  PO Box 1047, Campbelltown, NSW 2560.
>
>  "People without trees are like fish without clean water"
>



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Adaptec 2100S

2000-10-25 Thread Alan Lee

The problem im getting is when using removeable racks, the 2nd drive will
always fail no matter what we do.  If we use diffrent HDD racks, they will
do the same.  Even if we swap the drives around, it will always be the 2nd
drive.

The RAID BIOS will report the drive has been failed.  It will build the
array perfectly (even in nobuild mode), format ok, but as soon as any data
after that point is put on it will fail.  Even under Dos, or Linux. Will
just sit there and beep its head off...

Regards, Alan Lee
Ecom Computers Australia


- Original Message -
From: "Dean Hamstead" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "George Vieira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "'Alan Lee'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "SLUG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 4:46 PM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Adaptec 2100S


> Having missed the first email of this thread, (so i dont
> know whats going on) I have a working adaptec 2100s raid
> (on a dual p3 800). Needless to say install was boot strapped
> on but now the drivers are in place everything is fine.
>
> Anyway yeah, so i may be able to help.
>
> But as far as RAID setup went, the disks (ibm) went in the
> rack, i grouped them in pairs, mirrored them, and they are
> working perfectly...
>
> Dean
>
> George Vieira wrote:
> >
> > I guess that your running *nix? WHat OS and version are you running?
> >
> > I have seen problems with RH6.2 until you use the latest version ( i
used
> > bleeding edge )
> >
> > thanks,
> > George Vieira
> > Network Administrator
> > http://www.citadelcomputer.com.au
> > PGP Fingerprint :   43DC 92AC 1A82 27B2 E97B  52F1 B60F 301A 38A9
A10C
> > PGP KeyID:  0x38A9A10C
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Alan Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 2:56 PM
> > To: SLUG
> > Subject: [SLUG] Adaptec 2100S
> >
> > Anyone played with the Adaptec 2100S SCSI RAID card before?  Anyone got
it
> > working 100% correctly with hot swappable drives/racks?
> >
> > We are using RAID1 with 2 drives.
> >
> > We get the problem after we build the array within the RAID bios, and as
> > soon as we try and do any data transfers/access it fails, claiming the
2nd
> > drive has died.  We swap the drives over, and get excatly the same on
the
> > 2nd drive again.  We have used 2 diffrent brand drives, latest firmware
> > everything, diffrent motherboards, diffrent size hdd's and everything
else
> > we can think of.  We have used RH seires racks, Kingston ones and also
> > another brand which is worth $1000AU+ per HDD rack.  All of them say
they
> > will work, but dont.  As soon as we take the drives out of the racks, it
> > works fine.  Also it works on SCSI2, but this is "too slow" according to
the
> > customer.
> >
> > Any idea's?  Ive tryed every thing really, even M$!
> >
> > I know of another company haveing excatly the same problem. But, using
RAID5
> > and RAID0 on the same card, with 6 drives in total
> >
> > Regards, Alan Lee
> > Ecom Computers Australia
> >
> > --
> > SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> > More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
> >
> > --
> > SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> > More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
>
> --
> BONG: http://www.bong.com.au
> EMAIL...
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ICQ: 16867613
>
>
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
>



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Adaptec 2100S

2000-10-24 Thread Alan Lee

Ive tryed calling em, they are no help.  Ive tryed Seagate and Quantium
also, still no help.  Even the creater of the racks and stuff'

Ive used a BX motherboard (Abit board), MSI Dual CPU board (VIA) as well as
a SuperMicro dual CPU board (Server works chipset)

The drive that fails is always the drive which isn't the first one. Dosnt
matter what place I put it on the cable, nor what ID i give it.  As long as
its the 2nd drive, it will complain about it.

Regards, Alan Lee
Ecom Computres Australia

- Original Message -
From: "George Vieira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Alan Lee'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Sydney Linux Users Group in Sydney (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 3:17 PM
Subject: RE: [SLUG] Adaptec 2100S


> Better call Adaptec and give them your TSID number for support. They can
> help you then.
>
> Swapping the 2 drives around, does it give the same drive error or it's
> always drive 1?
> Can you test this card and drives in another PC.. mainly different
> Motherboard..?
>
> thanks,
> George Vieira
> Network Administrator

> PGP Fingerprint : 43DC 92AC 1A82 27B2 E97B  52F1 B60F 301A 38A9 A10C
> PGP KeyID: 0x38A9A10C




-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Adaptec 2100S

2000-10-24 Thread Alan Lee

It is failing before the OS.  Here is an example.

Setup the RAID array

Boot to a M$ FDD

Setup FDISK

Reboot

Boot to a M$ FDD

Format C:

Copy a few files to C:

BEEP! 

Reboot, Enter the RAID BIOS.

"Drive ID1 FAILED!"

Regards, Alan Lee
Ecom Computers Australia


- Original Message - 
From: "George Vieira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Alan Lee'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "SLUG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 3:01 PM
Subject: RE: [SLUG] Adaptec 2100S


> I guess that your running *nix? WHat OS and version are you running?
> 
> I have seen problems with RH6.2 until you use the latest version ( i used
> bleeding edge )
> 
> thanks,
> George Vieira
> Network Administrator





-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



[SLUG] Adaptec 2100S

2000-10-24 Thread Alan Lee

Anyone played with the Adaptec 2100S SCSI RAID card before?  Anyone got it
working 100% correctly with hot swappable drives/racks?

We are using RAID1 with 2 drives.

We get the problem after we build the array within the RAID bios, and as
soon as we try and do any data transfers/access it fails, claiming the 2nd
drive has died.  We swap the drives over, and get excatly the same on the
2nd drive again.  We have used 2 diffrent brand drives, latest firmware
everything, diffrent motherboards, diffrent size hdd's and everything else
we can think of.  We have used RH seires racks, Kingston ones and also
another brand which is worth $1000AU+ per HDD rack.  All of them say they
will work, but dont.  As soon as we take the drives out of the racks, it
works fine.  Also it works on SCSI2, but this is "too slow" according to the
customer.

Any idea's?  Ive tryed every thing really, even M$!

I know of another company haveing excatly the same problem. But, using RAID5
and RAID0 on the same card, with 6 drives in total

Regards, Alan Lee
Ecom Computers Australia




-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



[SLUG] Samba file shareing

2000-10-11 Thread Alan Lee

.. Has anyone noticed how slow samba filesharing with MS clients can be?
Ive got like 3 installs, and all of em perform very badly...

Regards, Alan Lee



--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] DSL to DSL connections

2000-10-05 Thread Alan Lee

We want to get all of our stores hooked up together, so we can do major
filesharing (50mb documents) and also internet conectivity etc.

Seems ADSL isn't the go.. and HDSL is going to be too costly..

.. What other means are there of getting rather high speed connections
between offices(one of them been about 60km away) (but on average, 5km from
each other) without spending a few million bucks a month for connections,
and probably without going via a ISP, satalite?

Regards, Alan Lee
- Original Message -
From: "John Ferlito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alan Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Sydney Linux Users Group" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2000 10:49 AM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] DSL to DSL connections


> On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 11:28:35AM +1000, Alan Lee wrote:
> > Hey there;
> >
> > Is it posiable to have 2 offices hooked up via ADSL, and do VPN'ing and
things like that.. what kinda things are required to do it? Withing 2km?
etc?  Anyone know anything about this and how it can be done?
> >
> > Regards, Alan Lee
> >
>
> ADSL is just an internet connection ie it's no different to a modem. So
> both premises can connect to the ISP and VPN over the internet. You
> can't however connect one ADSL modem to another ADSL modem directly.
>
> What you want is HDSL which is basically to expensive modems ($1k-$3k)
> depending on the speed you want connected by 1-2 pairs of copper. ie
> copper directly between the two buildings no exchange equipment in the
> middle, a couple of crone blocks at the most. here is around a 3-6k
> limit here that includes the distance from building A to the exchange
> and thenh back to building B. You can achive speeds anywhere from
> 128kbits to 2Mbits depending on distance line quality and modem expense.
>
> The telstra product is PAPL, which they only gaurantee for voice. or
> CityDSL, you hae to be in the city and only wholesalers, ie ISP's can
> buy it so you nhaver to convince one to do it for you. The beauty of it
> is a PAPL connection only costs about $200/month so you can effectively
> get 2M of bandwidth between 2 locations for next to nothing.
>
> --
> John
>
>
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
>



--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



[SLUG] DSL to DSL connections

2000-10-05 Thread Alan Lee



Hey there;
 
Is it posiable to have 2 offices hooked up via 
ADSL, and do VPN'ing and things like that.. what kinda things are required to do 
it? Withing 2km? etc?  Anyone know anything about this and how it can be 
done?
 
Regards, Alan Lee
 


Re: [SLUG] help!

2000-09-28 Thread Alan Lee

... Ive gotten SAMBA to work with Win2k Pro.  Worked first time, and every
time since.  Ive had more problems with 98 clients tho!

Regards, Alan Lee
Ecom Computers Australia
irc.uplink.net.nz

- Original Message -
From: "Jill Rowling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Slug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 4:24 PM
Subject: RE: [SLUG] help!


> Yes I believe there are issues with Win2k and Samba.
> I don't have an answer for you but go look on the SAMBA FAQ site
> I think a patch has been released.
>
> - Jill.




--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



RE: [SLUG] Re: [Systalk]Telstra ADSL via Linux?

2000-09-28 Thread Alan Lee

Done it; works great.  Took me about 2 min in total to get it working on a
clean install of slackware 7.0.0.

Thanks;

Alan Lee
Ecom Computers Australia
irc.uplink.net.nz

-Original Message-
From: Jason Rennie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 28 September 2000 9:57 PM
To: John Ferlito
Cc: MarkW; Sydney Linux Users Group; Jason Rennie; Alan Lee; DHS Systalk
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Re: [Systalk]Telstra ADSL via Linux?


> > > Anyone know of software or something which will allow a Telstra ADSL
> > > connection to connect via a linux box?  Like hook it upto a linux box
> > > and have an IP_MASQ network behind it?

Assuming your not using debian.

Go to http://freshmeat.net/

then search for rp-pppoe

The either grab the rpm, if you have a rpm distro, or grab the osurce, and
follow the instructions.

IT is really easy to install.

It took me all of 20 minutes with this package.

Jason




--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Re: [Systalk]Telstra ADSL via Linux?

2000-09-27 Thread Alan Lee

Ive gotten this to work, and it works pretty well.  The overall performance
of ADSL in Sydnet isnt that good at the moment to be truefull.  Im paying
for 512kbits of bandwidth, and I get an average of 25kb/s downloads and a
max of about 55kb/s from the telstras FTP test site.  At the moment, all my
traffic is been routed via VIC.  The telstra guy said that will change in
the next few months, when they get the rest of these equipment up and
running fully.  The performance dies between MEL<->SYD.

Overall tho, I am happy with it.

Regards, Alan Lee
Ecom Computers Australia
irc.uplink.net.nz

- Original Message -
From: "John Ferlito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MarkW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Sydney Linux Users Group" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jason Rennie"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Alan Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "DHS
Systalk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Re: [Systalk]Telstra ADSL via Linux?


> You have to have an Alcatel Home or Pro modem ie one with ethernet
> not USB. Plug it into one ethernet port then all you need is pppoe and you
do MASQ as normal. On a debian box just
> apt-get install pppoe
> then edit /etc/ppp/chap-secrets and add in username and password
> edit /etc/ppp/peers/dsl-provider and change anything important in there.
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 04:30:11PM +1100, MarkW wrote:
> > On 27 Sep 2000, Alan Lee wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > > Anyone know of software or something which will allow a Telstra ADSL
> > > connection to connect via a linux box?  Like hook it upto a linux box
> > > and have an IP_MASQ network behind it?
> > >
> > > Regards, Alan Lee
> > > Ecom Computers Australia
> > > irc.uplink.net.nz
> >
> > I don't have an answer but a number of SLUG members have Telstra ADSL
> > and may be able to better advise you.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> >
> > --
> > SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> > More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
>
> --
> John
>



--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug