RE: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

2005-05-18 Thread John
The real question is equality of launch height. If you went to a contest and
two of the 4 winches had 400 ft. more line you would not think it was fair.
I can hear the screaming now that with the longer line winches they get a
launch height advantage. On the other hand if you buy a moldy or Kevlar wrap
your spar and get a 400 ft. launch advantage it ok. I guess its just human
nature to think that way but it sure makes no sense.

John

-Original Message-
From: Steve Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 11:00 PM
To: Soaring@airage.com
Subject: Re: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks


Maybe we could just string our winches with CF Twine?  Or Kevlar reinforced
line...

Bring on bigger, stronger planes.

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with
MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL
are generally NOT in text format


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


Re: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

2005-05-18 Thread miamimike
John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

The real question is equality of launch height. If you went to a contest and
two of the 4 winches had 400 ft. more line you would not think it was fair.
I can hear the screaming now that with the longer line winches they get a
launch height advantage. On the other hand if you buy a moldy or Kevlar wrap
your spar and get a 400 ft. launch advantage it ok. I guess its just human
nature to think that way but it sure makes no sense.

You're right, but it seems to me that all of these types of contests are
designed to be as practical and fair as reasonably possible with the limited
technology that we have to work with. If there was a way to accurately
measure altitude and/or speed, or to drop all the gliders from a tall tower
at predetermined times, then the competition could be more fair, and more
interesting rules could be put into play. As it is, I tend to think of these
contests merely as fun get-togethers.

Mike
-- 
Winch Solenoid Safety Buzzer - http://www.vvsss.com/buzzer/
   _
  \__|__/
(O)


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


Re: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

2005-05-18 Thread ama3655

Sounds like the arguments have reached the natural conclusion that we must allhave our own standardized winches, and fly a slot time. In other words, F3j with F3b winches. For those who love the chase of ever more and better rules the F3x events are the place to be. 

For those who just want to fly and have some fun there is American style TD,warts and all. 

Pick yer poison.

happy trails - Rob Glover.


RE: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

2005-05-18 Thread John
P.S. The weak link can always go after the chute so you don't have to find
the chute on a break.


The real question is equality of launch height. If you went to a contest and
two of the 4 winches had 400 ft. more line you would not think it was fair.
I can hear the screaming now that with the longer line winches they get a
launch height advantage. On the other hand if you buy a moldy or Kevlar wrap
your spar and get a 400 ft. launch advantage it ok. I guess its just human
nature to think that way but it sure makes no sense.

John

-Original Message-
From: Steve Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 11:00 PM
To: Soaring@airage.com
Subject: Re: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks


Maybe we could just string our winches with CF Twine?  Or Kevlar reinforced
line...

Bring on bigger, stronger planes.

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with
MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL
are generally NOT in text format


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with
MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL
are generally NOT in text format


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


Re: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

2005-05-18 Thread Jeff Steifel
Let's discuss launch for a minute. I think TK hit on something that gets 
lost: technique.
Why do guys do pedal to the metal launches?
Is it to get more altitude?
More zoom?
Trash the brushes on the winches?

Tapping most of the way up will get you higher. Less line taken in.
Full pedal close to the apex and then into the zoom will accomplish the 
same zoom with reflex added to get the speed up.

So why do guys go at it full pedal full time? Could it be that they 
can't meter the power? Have a tough time tapping?
In a downwind launch it makes good sense to full pedal, but in an into 
the wind situation unless you are on mono you gain nothing.

Throwing the airplane on launch will do more to get the speed up than 
full pedal out of the hand.

Afraid of breaking line at the Nats and also I found that in some 
situations I had too much tension and popped off with in 50'.
I stopped the full tension and started going up with a moderate amount 
of tension and stopped popping off.
I tap and get the full length of line I can before going for the zoom. 
Then I push the winch.

I thought I was babying the winch, until I looked over and saw Joe Wurts 
doing the tap thing too.
If you've ever seen Joe launch F3B or J you know that Joe goes for 
maximum tension.
But I have only seen him launch on braided at the Nats and he taps... I 
don't know if this goes on at other west coast
contests, I suspect it does. Whats the point of reeling in alot of line?

Now it gets different with a retriever line attached. You must maintain 
a little more speed with the added drag
of another line. But still full pedal isn't necessary... just more 
frequent tapping.

Ok I am getting off my soapbox...
--
Jeff Steifel
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

2005-05-18 Thread John Erickson
Jeff,

With all the telemetry available now it would be an interesting study to see
what results in the highest launch.  In my opinion the most important
factors are the wind or thermal activity, the stretch of the line, and the
strength of the airframe.

The whole point about cambering the wing and getting lots of tension
initially is to get the most potential energy out of the line.  If it can't
all be created to kinetic energy at the zoom, then it is just a case of
burning out brushes on the winch.  I always shake my head when I see someone
really tension up, full pedal, then fly off at the wrong time without a
zoom, maybe just a flat trajectory going a little faster.

Dr. Drela did some launch sims comparing 6 volt and 12 volt winches.  The
most important factor was the speed at the top of the launch.  If you can do
it with tapping, great.  The sim indicated that full pedal was the best way.
There are a lot of other factors he put into the equation, such as line
elasticity, line diameter (resultant drag on the line), weight of the plane,
drum diameter, etc.

You can find the results here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Allegro-Lite/files/Winch_Launch/

I hear what everyone is saying about the lost art of winching a fragile
plane.  I have a Bird of Time that would most likely fold the wings under a
full pedal winch into a 10 mph headwind, yet it goes up fine without damage
if I tap carefully and don't zoom too hard.  The Icon, on the other hand,
can take just about any kind of abuse.  Because it is F3J related, the idea
is to get off the line quickly, hence lots of tension and smoked winches (I
know, I'm the club equipment manager).
  
JE
--
Erickson Architects
John R. Erickson, AIA


 From: Jeff Steifel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 08:54:42 -0400
 To: RCSE soaring@airage.com
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks
 
 Let's discuss launch for a minute. I think TK hit on something that gets
 lost: technique.
 Why do guys do pedal to the metal launches?
 Is it to get more altitude?
 More zoom?
 Trash the brushes on the winches?

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


Re: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

2005-05-18 Thread Jeff Steifel
I think you didn't read what I said.
from the point the plane is flying until the apex it does you nothing to 
build up speed. If you keep the pedal to the metal you are just sucking 
in line.
Before you reach the apex you should start building speed.
As far as stretch in the line ... with braided there is hardly any 
stretch... it is there but not much. Mono on the other hand is a kick in 
the pants. ye haaa :-)
Cambering is a great thing (full trailing edge)... you get lift, but you 
don't need speed to convert it... But you must get the camber off to 
realize the speed.
As you are reaching the apex you should be getting speed up...

__I never said tap until the zoom__  if I wasn't clear here is my 
statement
Tapping most of the way up will get you higher. Less line taken in.
Full pedal close to the apex and then into the zoom will accomplish the 
same zoom with reflex added to get the speed up. 

When you get close to the apex you should then go full pedal (no camber) 
then reflex just b4 the zoom.I didn't say tap into the zoom.
If it is done correctly you are not stressing the line since you are now 
converting lift (camber slow tapping) into speed (no camber )... the 
lift generated at speed is substantial but if you are going for zoom you 
are probably( holding a slight amount of down (very very slight) or 
reflexing  ) to get the speed up because of the added lift (during 
speed) ...  NOW if it's mono you stretch the line before the zoom... 
but you can't do that with braided! so a more efficient launch gets the 
speed up.. If you keep the lift (camber, back stick, or neutral stick ) 
on and speed on you will break the line...If you are willing to trade 
speed for lift you will be safe and usually not break the line and have 
a great zoom.

For MONO go ahead and stretch. (yea baby)
John Erickson wrote:
Jeff,
With all the telemetry available now it would be an interesting study to see
what results in the highest launch.  In my opinion the most important
factors are the wind or thermal activity, the stretch of the line, and the
strength of the airframe.
The whole point about cambering the wing and getting lots of tension
initially is to get the most potential energy out of the line.  If it can't
all be created to kinetic energy at the zoom, then it is just a case of
burning out brushes on the winch.  I always shake my head when I see someone
really tension up, full pedal, then fly off at the wrong time without a
zoom, maybe just a flat trajectory going a little faster.
Dr. Drela did some launch sims comparing 6 volt and 12 volt winches.  The
most important factor was the speed at the top of the launch.  If you can do
it with tapping, great.  The sim indicated that full pedal was the best way.
There are a lot of other factors he put into the equation, such as line
elasticity, line diameter (resultant drag on the line), weight of the plane,
drum diameter, etc.
You can find the results here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Allegro-Lite/files/Winch_Launch/
I hear what everyone is saying about the lost art of winching a fragile
plane.  I have a Bird of Time that would most likely fold the wings under a
full pedal winch into a 10 mph headwind, yet it goes up fine without damage
if I tap carefully and don't zoom too hard.  The Icon, on the other hand,
can take just about any kind of abuse.  Because it is F3J related, the idea
is to get off the line quickly, hence lots of tension and smoked winches (I
know, I'm the club equipment manager).
 
JE
--
Erickson Architects
John R. Erickson, AIA

 

From: Jeff Steifel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 08:54:42 -0400
To: RCSE soaring@airage.com
Subject: Re: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks
Let's discuss launch for a minute. I think TK hit on something that gets
lost: technique.
Why do guys do pedal to the metal launches?
Is it to get more altitude?
More zoom?
Trash the brushes on the winches?
   



 

--
Jeff Steifel
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


FW: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

2005-05-18 Thread John Derstine

Well... you could...

Get rid of the winches and aerotow. Use an altimeter in the tow plane to
release all sailplanes at the same height. Over time, the result would
in fact be a complete redesign of TD ships to maximize actual flying and
thermalling characteristics (and landing) vs. launch optimized designs.

Or... retain winches, put altimeters and recording GPS units in all
planes, only start the day's task when a given altitude is attained
(either by descending or climbing as the case may dictate). Very easy
with today's technology. 
If a level playing field relative to launching is the goal, there are
ways to do it. Few will agree, as it probably takes thinking outside the
box, rocks the status quo, or represents too radical a change in mindset
to be generally accepted. 
JD
Just for yuks...

What you have now is a launch and land contest.

Endless Mountain Models
http://www.scalesoaring.com
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 7:36 AM
 To: soaring@airage.com
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks
 
 John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 The real question is equality of launch height. If you went to a
contest
 and
 two of the 4 winches had 400 ft. more line you would not think it was
 fair.
 I can hear the screaming now that with the longer line winches they
get a
 launch height advantage. On the other hand if you buy a moldy or
Kevlar
 wrap
 your spar and get a 400 ft. launch advantage it ok. I guess its just
 human
 nature to think that way but it sure makes no sense.
 
 You're right, but it seems to me that all of these types of contests
are
 designed to be as practical and fair as reasonably possible with the
 limited
 technology that we have to work with. If there was a way to accurately
 measure altitude and/or speed, or to drop all the gliders from a tall
 tower
 at predetermined times, then the competition could be more fair, and
more
 interesting rules could be put into play. As it is, I tend to think of
 these
 contests merely as fun get-togethers.
 


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


Re: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

2005-05-18 Thread Jeff Steifel
More
my launch looks like tension ... throw ... get plane flying .. tap tap 
tap... full pedal and camber out reflex... zoom until you can't get 
anymore height...

OTHERS:
fulll pedal... let the plane come out of the hand... full pedal... full 
pedal...
some of you reflex... some of you go to no camber.
zoom

it is the full pedal on the rise to the apex that does little.
That's all I am saying John... so when they hit the apex they still full 
pedal and many break the line there. Many break the line on the way 
up... the question is what did they get from it?



--
Jeff Steifel
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

2005-05-17 Thread Jeff Steifel
A weak link slows down the contest because it has to be replaced. If it 
is the last ring you must put a new one on. If it is between the line 
and chute you must get the chute. Limiting power doesn't slow the 
contest down.

New winches aren't necessary. Resistors could be made of all thread or 
anything But all would have to meet the resistance test.
Admittedly not all winches will be of the same power there either. 
Differences in drum diameter create different power bands. The smaller 
the drum the more power.

the larger drums create more speed but less power...
Single support vs dual supported drum, real balls vs oilite all add 
to the differences.
But assuming that power is restricted you level the playing field quite 
a bit. No one can draw the max power from the winch, and the brushes 
should last longer too by eliminating the higher current.

John wrote:
Jeff I agree that limited power winches would be a great thing, but it is
not practical for all club to get new winches. I don't understand why a week
link slows down a contest. In theory the weak link is the part that breaks
and almost all breaks will not be re-launched. When it is not the weak link
the only fair thing to do is re-launch because the line was damaged in the
first place and that is the cost of doing business.
John
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Steifel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 7:52 PM
To: John
Cc: RCSE
Subject: Re: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks
I don't think a weak link works. You want to keep things moving a link
only serves to slow things down.
I think the FAI solution works great.  Limit the power on the winches.
The resistored winches cut the power down and then everyone is nearly
identical in power.
Now does this solve line breaks... somewhat... it certainly cuts it down
a considerable amount if  you lower the power and level the playing
field. But breaks will still happen especially on windy days.
In the ESL we noticed that new spools from Memphis twine had bad spots
in it. After clearing the breaks, the lines rarely broke. We don't
respool between contests any more, only when the line gets ragged. This
is consistent with my experience with my own clubs and also retriever
lines too.
3 years ago at the nats I hit the pedal and broke the line. before I got
any tension. Fortunately I got another winch. But the no relaunch policy
doesn't allow for bad  retrieves, or a previous bad launch. What about
someone who launches before you and pulls the knot to exterme. or
stresses the ring. The no relaunch doesn't work. BUT neither does
letting the person relaunch with all the markers in the air.
Either let them launch again or relight the group. If you let them
relight it must be point the plane to the ground and land... no dilly
dallying anyone caught slowing up for a reading of air should
forfeit their flight.
John wrote:
 

Mark,
Why not use a weak link of 225lb at the tow hook with 280-300 line on the
winch? If the line breaks the weak link then they fly. You would need to be
able to check the line quickly. That said. I feel that you are doing a
   

great
 

job with the series and everyone knows the rules. Everyone launches under
the same rules. They can choose to stay home if they don't like the
   

contest.
 

You can't factor out all circumstances of launch problems. It is a roll of
the dice. You pays you money and you takes you chances.
John
-Original Message-
From: Marc Gellart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 6:04 PM
To: soaring@airage.com
Subject: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks
Jim, Paul, Jack,and Jim:
  Great comments and you all have pretty much sited all the pros and cons
about what we face at each and every contest.  From what i know every one
   

of
 

the contests we will be flying 280 or 290 line this year that is having MOM
formats, I know STL relined this weekend and all the winches that are
   

coming
 

are set up with the good stuff (actually one club event ona line I think
eliminates the splices and they are even better then).  Like all have said,
that eliminates nearly all the issues right there.
 But, still what do we do?  I have had folks saying to me that I should
mandate line strength and such, I have taken the attitude in the past that
the clubs run their show and OVSS just uses the scores generated.  I
   

realize
 

that my free market approach appaers a bit loose, but I still feel that
   

this
 

approach is best since as has been pointed out that conditions can vary as
well as equipment.  I urge clubs in the direction that I feel is what the
customer wants, i.e. MVSA going MOM format this year with the heavier line
than they have ever used before, there was trepidation, but they will make
folks happy with the choice.
  My answer to what I will do in STL since I am the CD there is to give
line breaks in the first round and to call down the entire flight group,
   

but
 

after that the show is on and no more chances

Re: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

2005-05-17 Thread Jo Grini
In Sweden (and lately also Norway) they have used low power winches for 
quite a while now. They use regular F3B winches with extra resistors to form 
a pull of 20kg (apx 700oz or 44lb) on the line. This makes starts a bit more 
even for F3B models compared to RES models. And there will be no linebreaks 
unless the wind is very strong or it is damaged. They also try to use apx 
same drum size on all winches. Best of it is that no matter what model you 
have one can step on the pedal all the way. You dont need to be careful with 
those beginner RES-planes...
Personally I feel that this is a good solution for most competitions. We 
have known for a long time now that resistors on F3B winches was a very good 
move to make. Although F3B winches are much more powerful than 20kg 
offcourse.
For F3B and F3J (yes we use winches in some F3J comp.) we still use normal 
F3B force offcourse.

Sadly I have never tried your US-style winches with braided line so cant 
comment on all issues. But will during Nats I guess ;-)
Airplane ticket to Nats is ordered...

Hilsen (Regards) Jojo
www.grini.no

-Original Message-
From: Jeff Steifel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 7:52 PM
To: John
Cc: RCSE
Subject: Re: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks
I don't think a weak link works. You want to keep things moving a link
only serves to slow things down.
I think the FAI solution works great.  Limit the power on the winches.
The resistored winches cut the power down and then everyone is nearly
identical in power.
Now does this solve line breaks... somewhat... it certainly cuts it down
a considerable amount if  you lower the power and level the playing
field. But breaks will still happen especially on windy days.
In the ESL we noticed that new spools from Memphis twine had bad spots
in it. After clearing the breaks, the lines rarely broke. We don't
respool between contests any more, only when the line gets ragged. This
is consistent with my experience with my own clubs and also retriever
lines too.
3 years ago at the nats I hit the pedal and broke the line. before I got
any tension. Fortunately I got another winch. But the no relaunch policy
doesn't allow for bad  retrieves, or a previous bad launch. What about
someone who launches before you and pulls the knot to exterme. or
stresses the ring. The no relaunch doesn't work. BUT neither does
letting the person relaunch with all the markers in the air.
Either let them launch again or relight the group. If you let them
relight it must be point the plane to the ground and land... no dilly
dallying anyone caught slowing up for a reading of air should
forfeit their flight.


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

2005-05-17 Thread Tom Kallevang
I've followed this thread with some interest ... as JB said, we've
discussed this topic trekking back and forth from many contests in the
van.

The advent of affordable molded models has done more to cause line
problems than any other single facet of our chosen sport.  Today's
molded sailplanes are so strong that they can easily part 200# test
winch line, almost at will.  This is the primary reason we in the OVSS
and AMA/LSF Nats have moved to the 290# test lines we use today.  If
there are no burns, abrasions, crappy knots, etc. it's unlikely that
you will be able to break the line on purpose without damaging the
model.

With aircraft of this magnitude of strength, the need for developing
good winch technique has fallen by the wayside.  In my early days in
the sport, everyone flew open framework gasbags and a full pedal launch
on our SIX volt winches would result in a Monokoted bag full of sticks.
You learned to temper your foot or you learned to rebuild - fast!

Today's competition pilot doesn't need to develop any such technique,
he can simply hook up, step on the pedal and GO!  Poor winch technique
is easy to spot, the smoke coming from the winch armature and excessive
wing flex are sure indicators.  Moderating the amount of energy in the
line, motor and wings are all a part of launching technique that is all
too lacking among many competition pilots who have skipped the early
learning curves of winching built-up, more fragile models.

Examination of the line break often yields the answer to why the line
parted, the aforementioned abrasions, poor knots, frozen turnaround
pulleys ... equipment failures should result in a relight.  The pilot
that breaks the line as they push over into the zoom has no call for a
relight, he got 90+% of the way up.  The pilot who full pedal launches
through a thermal on tow shouldn't get a relight, either, unless the
equipment failed (and if he had proper technique, the line likely would
have stayed intact).

Weak links ... tried in F3B a decade or more ago, the weak link was
dropped quickly because the relative weakness of the link was actually
seen to be a safety hazard as most links failed just out of the
launcher's hand.  Yes, the (rather large) relative difference between
the line and the link had much to do with the problem, but what is the
right differential?  For a 100 RES or NOS vs a 3.9 meter Sharon?

Do we need devices on the winches to set torque or tension limits? 
Same issue as the weak link ... what's the right amount of torque and
is it the same for every model?

A seasoned pilot acting as the Launch Master can readily evaluate each
launch and come to a likely first approximation as to cause for line
failure on the spot ... subsequent investigation at the point of
failure serves to validate whether the call was correct or not.  I
would guess that the Launch Master is going to be right the majority of
the time.

Reserve one or two winches on the line for relights ... pilot calls the
break, Launch Master either denies the relight request and the pilot
continues the flight or confirms the relight and the pilot comes down
IMMEDIATELY for relaunch.  If the number of breaks exceeds the number
of backup winches, call the group down and start over.  I suggest if
that many lines break in the same round there are either equipment
issues or you're winching over desert scrub or through rose bushes.

Rather than look for a technological silver bullet, I propose that we,
as a part of bringing newer flyers into the competition circuit, teach
winch technique alongside air reading skills and spot landing practice.
 It will improve the quality of the pilots, it will improve equipment
life, and it will allow more flying, which is really the whole point,
isn't it?

IMHO,



Tom Kallevang
Wheeling, IL
LSF President  Webmaster
LSF #303 Level V #103
AMA L292
SOAR (Chicago)



Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour:
http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

2005-05-17 Thread John
I don't see it slowing down a contest Jeff. Maybe the first time someone
uses the system they may break the weak link but you have the whole round to
get the chute and fix the line.  If the week link is colored you can make
the call if you are watching the launch. After the first few times someone
has to fly out a broken week link you won't see and weak link line breaks.
All the breaks that will happen will be legitimate breaks and need to be
re-launched for fairness.

John

-Original Message-
From: Jeff Steifel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 9:49 AM
To: John
Cc: RCSE
Subject: Re: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

A weak link slows down the contest because it has to be replaced. If it
is the last ring you must put a new one on. If it is between the line
and chute you must get the chute. Limiting power doesn't slow the
contest down.

New winches aren't necessary. Resistors could be made of all thread or
anything But all would have to meet the resistance test.
Admittedly not all winches will be of the same power there either.
Differences in drum diameter create different power bands. The smaller
the drum the more power.

the larger drums create more speed but less power...
Single support vs dual supported drum, real balls vs oilite all add
to the differences.
But assuming that power is restricted you level the playing field quite
a bit. No one can draw the max power from the winch, and the brushes
should last longer too by eliminating the higher current.

John wrote:

Jeff I agree that limited power winches would be a great thing, but it is
not practical for all club to get new winches. I don't understand why a
week
link slows down a contest. In theory the weak link is the part that breaks
and almost all breaks will not be re-launched. When it is not the weak link
the only fair thing to do is re-launch because the line was damaged in the
first place and that is the cost of doing business.

John

-Original Message-
From: Jeff Steifel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 7:52 PM
To: John
Cc: RCSE
Subject: Re: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

I don't think a weak link works. You want to keep things moving a link
only serves to slow things down.

I think the FAI solution works great.  Limit the power on the winches.
The resistored winches cut the power down and then everyone is nearly
identical in power.
Now does this solve line breaks... somewhat... it certainly cuts it down
a considerable amount if  you lower the power and level the playing
field. But breaks will still happen especially on windy days.

In the ESL we noticed that new spools from Memphis twine had bad spots
in it. After clearing the breaks, the lines rarely broke. We don't
respool between contests any more, only when the line gets ragged. This
is consistent with my experience with my own clubs and also retriever
lines too.

3 years ago at the nats I hit the pedal and broke the line. before I got
any tension. Fortunately I got another winch. But the no relaunch policy
doesn't allow for bad  retrieves, or a previous bad launch. What about
someone who launches before you and pulls the knot to exterme. or
stresses the ring. The no relaunch doesn't work. BUT neither does
letting the person relaunch with all the markers in the air.
Either let them launch again or relight the group. If you let them
relight it must be point the plane to the ground and land... no dilly
dallying anyone caught slowing up for a reading of air should
forfeit their flight.


John wrote:



Mark,

Why not use a weak link of 225lb at the tow hook with 280-300 line on the
winch? If the line breaks the weak link then they fly. You would need to
be
able to check the line quickly. That said. I feel that you are doing a


great


job with the series and everyone knows the rules. Everyone launches under
the same rules. They can choose to stay home if they don't like the


contest.


You can't factor out all circumstances of launch problems. It is a roll of
the dice. You pays you money and you takes you chances.

John

-Original Message-
From: Marc Gellart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 6:04 PM
To: soaring@airage.com
Subject: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

Jim, Paul, Jack,and Jim:
   Great comments and you all have pretty much sited all the pros and cons
about what we face at each and every contest.  From what i know every one


of


the contests we will be flying 280 or 290 line this year that is having
MOM
formats, I know STL relined this weekend and all the winches that are


coming


are set up with the good stuff (actually one club event ona line I think
eliminates the splices and they are even better then).  Like all have
said,
that eliminates nearly all the issues right there.
  But, still what do we do?  I have had folks saying to me that I should
mandate line strength and such, I have taken the attitude in the past that
the clubs run their show and OVSS just uses the scores generated.  I

Re: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

2005-05-17 Thread mrmaserati
Tom's analysis is, as they might say in JOE (jolly olde England), SPOT ON.

And this excellent observation from non other than our current LSF President. 

Tom has the experience to define the FIX for this issue and has just done so.

I'll back his direction on this one.

Regards, Dave Corven.
  AMA 878
  LSF 254

 


 I've followed this thread with some interest ... as JB said, we've
 discussed this topic trekking back and forth from many contests in the
 van.
 
 The advent of affordable molded models has done more to cause line
 problems than any other single facet of our chosen sport.  Today's
 molded sailplanes are so strong that they can easily part 200# test
 winch line, almost at will.  This is the primary reason we in the OVSS
 and AMA/LSF Nats have moved to the 290# test lines we use today.  If
 there are no burns, abrasions, crappy knots, etc. it's unlikely that
 you will be able to break the line on purpose without damaging the
 model.
 
 With aircraft of this magnitude of strength, the need for developing
 good winch technique has fallen by the wayside.  In my early days in
 the sport, everyone flew open framework gasbags and a full pedal launch
 on our SIX volt winches would result in a Monokoted bag full of sticks.
 You learned to temper your foot or you learned to rebuild - fast!
 
 Today's competition pilot doesn't need to develop any such technique,
 he can simply hook up, step on the pedal and GO!  Poor winch technique
 is easy to spot, the smoke coming from the winch armature and excessive
 wing flex are sure indicators.  Moderating the amount of energy in the
 line, motor and wings are all a part of launching technique that is all
 too lacking among many competition pilots who have skipped the early
 learning curves of winching built-up, more fragile models.
 
 Examination of the line break often yields the answer to why the line
 parted, the aforementioned abrasions, poor knots, frozen turnaround
 pulleys ... equipment failures should result in a relight.  The pilot
 that breaks the line as they push over into the zoom has no call for a
 relight, he got 90+% of the way up.  The pilot who full pedal launches
 through a thermal on tow shouldn't get a relight, either, unless the
 equipment failed (and if he had proper technique, the line likely would
 have stayed intact).
 
 Weak links ... tried in F3B a decade or more ago, the weak link was
 dropped quickly because the relative weakness of the link was actually
 seen to be a safety hazard as most links failed just out of the
 launcher's hand.  Yes, the (rather large) relative difference between
 the line and the link had much to do with the problem, but what is the
 right differential?  For a 100 RES or NOS vs a 3.9 meter Sharon?
 
 Do we need devices on the winches to set torque or tension limits? 
 Same issue as the weak link ... what's the right amount of torque and
 is it the same for every model?
 
 A seasoned pilot acting as the Launch Master can readily evaluate each
 launch and come to a likely first approximation as to cause for line
 failure on the spot ... subsequent investigation at the point of
 failure serves to validate whether the call was correct or not.  I
 would guess that the Launch Master is going to be right the majority of
 the time.
 
 Reserve one or two winches on the line for relights ... pilot calls the
 break, Launch Master either denies the relight request and the pilot
 continues the flight or confirms the relight and the pilot comes down
 IMMEDIATELY for relaunch.  If the number of breaks exceeds the number
 of backup winches, call the group down and start over.  I suggest if
 that many lines break in the same round there are either equipment
 issues or you're winching over desert scrub or through rose bushes.
 
 Rather than look for a technological silver bullet, I propose that we,
 as a part of bringing newer flyers into the competition circuit, teach
 winch technique alongside air reading skills and spot landing practice.
  It will improve the quality of the pilots, it will improve equipment
 life, and it will allow more flying, which is really the whole point,
 isn't it?
 
 IMHO,
 
 
 
 Tom Kallevang
 Wheeling, IL
 LSF President  Webmaster
 LSF #303 Level V #103
 AMA L292
 SOAR (Chicago)
 
 
   
 Yahoo! Mail
 Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour:
 http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html
 
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
 unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that 
 subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME 
 turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are 
 generally NOT in text format
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from 

Re: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

2005-05-17 Thread JDIRRS
Can I get an AMEN Brother...Praise the lord and tap the pedal..
- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tom Kallevang [EMAIL PROTECTED]; soaring@airage.com
Cc: Marc Gellart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks


 Tom's analysis is, as they might say in JOE (jolly olde England), SPOT ON.

 And this excellent observation from non other than our current LSF
President.

 Tom has the experience to define the FIX for this issue and has just
done so.

 I'll back his direction on this one.

 Regards, Dave Corven.
   AMA 878
   LSF 254




  I've followed this thread with some interest ... as JB said, we've
  discussed this topic trekking back and forth from many contests in the
  van.
 
  The advent of affordable molded models has done more to cause line
  problems than any other single facet of our chosen sport.  Today's
  molded sailplanes are so strong that they can easily part 200# test
  winch line, almost at will.  This is the primary reason we in the OVSS
  and AMA/LSF Nats have moved to the 290# test lines we use today.  If
  there are no burns, abrasions, crappy knots, etc. it's unlikely that
  you will be able to break the line on purpose without damaging the
  model.
 
  With aircraft of this magnitude of strength, the need for developing
  good winch technique has fallen by the wayside.  In my early days in
  the sport, everyone flew open framework gasbags and a full pedal launch
  on our SIX volt winches would result in a Monokoted bag full of sticks.
  You learned to temper your foot or you learned to rebuild - fast!
 
  Today's competition pilot doesn't need to develop any such technique,
  he can simply hook up, step on the pedal and GO!  Poor winch technique
  is easy to spot, the smoke coming from the winch armature and excessive
  wing flex are sure indicators.  Moderating the amount of energy in the
  line, motor and wings are all a part of launching technique that is all
  too lacking among many competition pilots who have skipped the early
  learning curves of winching built-up, more fragile models.
 
  Examination of the line break often yields the answer to why the line
  parted, the aforementioned abrasions, poor knots, frozen turnaround
  pulleys ... equipment failures should result in a relight.  The pilot
  that breaks the line as they push over into the zoom has no call for a
  relight, he got 90+% of the way up.  The pilot who full pedal launches
  through a thermal on tow shouldn't get a relight, either, unless the
  equipment failed (and if he had proper technique, the line likely would
  have stayed intact).
 
  Weak links ... tried in F3B a decade or more ago, the weak link was
  dropped quickly because the relative weakness of the link was actually
  seen to be a safety hazard as most links failed just out of the
  launcher's hand.  Yes, the (rather large) relative difference between
  the line and the link had much to do with the problem, but what is the
  right differential?  For a 100 RES or NOS vs a 3.9 meter Sharon?
 
  Do we need devices on the winches to set torque or tension limits?
  Same issue as the weak link ... what's the right amount of torque and
  is it the same for every model?
 
  A seasoned pilot acting as the Launch Master can readily evaluate each
  launch and come to a likely first approximation as to cause for line
  failure on the spot ... subsequent investigation at the point of
  failure serves to validate whether the call was correct or not.  I
  would guess that the Launch Master is going to be right the majority of
  the time.
 
  Reserve one or two winches on the line for relights ... pilot calls the
  break, Launch Master either denies the relight request and the pilot
  continues the flight or confirms the relight and the pilot comes down
  IMMEDIATELY for relaunch.  If the number of breaks exceeds the number
  of backup winches, call the group down and start over.  I suggest if
  that many lines break in the same round there are either equipment
  issues or you're winching over desert scrub or through rose bushes.
 
  Rather than look for a technological silver bullet, I propose that we,
  as a part of bringing newer flyers into the competition circuit, teach
  winch technique alongside air reading skills and spot landing practice.
   It will improve the quality of the pilots, it will improve equipment
  life, and it will allow more flying, which is really the whole point,
  isn't it?
 
  IMHO,
 
 
 
  Tom Kallevang
  Wheeling, IL
  LSF President  Webmaster
  LSF #303 Level V #103
  AMA L292
  SOAR (Chicago)
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Mail
  Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour:
  http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html
 
  RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe
and
  unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
  subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format

Re: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

2005-05-17 Thread James V. Bacus
So Paul, you started this thread...
You have seen some excellent responses, what do you think about this 
subject now?

Will you be at the first OVSS contest this weekend? (both days, it's in 
your backyard brother)

Will you be wearing your pink hat?  8-)
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

2005-05-17 Thread Steve Meyer
Hey Paul I have a wedding you can attend for me!  lol
At 08:12 PM 5/17/2005, James V. Bacus wrote:
So Paul, you started this thread...
You have seen some excellent responses, what do you think about this 
subject now?

Will you be at the first OVSS contest this weekend? (both days, it's in 
your backyard brother)

Will you be wearing your pink hat?  8-)
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


Re: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

2005-05-17 Thread Richard Hallett
Maybe we are getting to that point that we are going to have to define 
winch as was done in F3B. 

Other countries did not have the Ford starter so went with individual 
winches  rather than club winches but now we have a definition for that 
winch 23 milliohms of resistance between the starter and battery.

We are now pushing for an unbreakable line but now have models that can 
break most reasonable line.  I find it rather absurd though that now we 
are spending more energy lifting the line rather than the plane.

So why are clubs sticking with the Ford longshaft convenience?  I am 
surprised that some club has not come up with an alternative using 
diesel starting motors.  Or are we someway saying this is enough.

I doubt that we have the courage to drop back to the quarter power of 
the F3B winch.  It depends on all kinds of wrong things.  Own my own 
winch? you must be crazy? Walk to retrieve? I am too old.  Those are a 
few starters.

A conundrum?
Rick
Richard Hallett Pittsfield ME
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom's analysis is, as they might say in JOE (jolly olde England), SPOT ON.
And this excellent observation from non other than our current LSF President. 

Tom has the experience to define the FIX for this issue and has just done so.
I'll back his direction on this one.
Regards, Dave Corven.
 AMA 878
 LSF 254

 

I've followed this thread with some interest ... as JB said, we've
discussed this topic trekking back and forth from many contests in the
van.
The advent of affordable molded models has done more to cause line
problems than any other single facet of our chosen sport.  Today's
molded sailplanes are so strong that they can easily part 200# test
winch line, almost at will.  This is the primary reason we in the OVSS
and AMA/LSF Nats have moved to the 290# test lines we use today.  If
there are no burns, abrasions, crappy knots, etc. it's unlikely that
you will be able to break the line on purpose without damaging the
model.
With aircraft of this magnitude of strength, the need for developing
good winch technique has fallen by the wayside.  In my early days in
the sport, everyone flew open framework gasbags and a full pedal launch
on our SIX volt winches would result in a Monokoted bag full of sticks.
You learned to temper your foot or you learned to rebuild - fast!
Today's competition pilot doesn't need to develop any such technique,
he can simply hook up, step on the pedal and GO!  Poor winch technique
is easy to spot, the smoke coming from the winch armature and excessive
wing flex are sure indicators.  Moderating the amount of energy in the
line, motor and wings are all a part of launching technique that is all
too lacking among many competition pilots who have skipped the early
learning curves of winching built-up, more fragile models.
Examination of the line break often yields the answer to why the line
parted, the aforementioned abrasions, poor knots, frozen turnaround
pulleys ... equipment failures should result in a relight.  The pilot
that breaks the line as they push over into the zoom has no call for a
relight, he got 90+% of the way up.  The pilot who full pedal launches
through a thermal on tow shouldn't get a relight, either, unless the
equipment failed (and if he had proper technique, the line likely would
have stayed intact).
Weak links ... tried in F3B a decade or more ago, the weak link was
dropped quickly because the relative weakness of the link was actually
seen to be a safety hazard as most links failed just out of the
launcher's hand.  Yes, the (rather large) relative difference between
the line and the link had much to do with the problem, but what is the
right differential?  For a 100 RES or NOS vs a 3.9 meter Sharon?
Do we need devices on the winches to set torque or tension limits? 
Same issue as the weak link ... what's the right amount of torque and
is it the same for every model?

A seasoned pilot acting as the Launch Master can readily evaluate each
launch and come to a likely first approximation as to cause for line
failure on the spot ... subsequent investigation at the point of
failure serves to validate whether the call was correct or not.  I
would guess that the Launch Master is going to be right the majority of
the time.
Reserve one or two winches on the line for relights ... pilot calls the
break, Launch Master either denies the relight request and the pilot
continues the flight or confirms the relight and the pilot comes down
IMMEDIATELY for relaunch.  If the number of breaks exceeds the number
of backup winches, call the group down and start over.  I suggest if
that many lines break in the same round there are either equipment
issues or you're winching over desert scrub or through rose bushes.
Rather than look for a technological silver bullet, I propose that we,
as a part of bringing newer flyers into the competition circuit, teach
winch technique alongside air reading skills and spot landing practice.
It will improve the 

Re: Re: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

2005-05-17 Thread Marc Gellart
Actually Richard we do retrieve our lines by foot all the time, no retrievers 
in our contests in OVSS.  The reason that the ford motor is used is it is what 
has been used for years, maybe not the best idea, but available and fairly 
cheap.  The ownership issue is an individual choice, I have done this off and 
on since 1975 and have never owned one, and most guys I know either have a club 
winch they take care of or have a good hi-start.  

Marc





RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


Re: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

2005-05-17 Thread Steve Meyer
Maybe we could just string our winches with CF Twine?  Or Kevlar reinforced 
line...

Bring on bigger, stronger planes.
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

2005-05-16 Thread Marc Gellart
Jim, Paul, Jack,and Jim:
Great comments and you all have pretty much sited all the pros and cons 
about what we face at each and every contest.  From what i know every one of 
the contests we will be flying 280 or 290 line this year that is having MOM 
formats, I know STL relined this weekend and all the winches that are coming 
are set up with the good stuff (actually one club event ona line I think 
eliminates the splices and they are even better then).  Like all have said, 
that eliminates nearly all the issues right there.  
   But, still what do we do?  I have had folks saying to me that I should 
mandate line strength and such, I have taken the attitude in the past that the 
clubs run their show and OVSS just uses the scores generated.  I realize that 
my free market approach appaers a bit loose, but I still feel that this 
approach is best since as has been pointed out that conditions can vary as well 
as equipment.  I urge clubs in the direction that I feel is what the customer 
wants, i.e. MVSA going MOM format this year with the heavier line than they 
have ever used before, there was trepidation, but they will make folks happy 
with the choice.
My answer to what I will do in STL since I am the CD there is to give line 
breaks in the first round and to call down the entire flight group, but after 
that the show is on and no more chances are available.  That is my answer, and 
it can be used as a template, but each club is on their own with council from 
the wise among us.
   My 2 cents on the subject...

Marc
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

2005-05-16 Thread John
Mark,

Why not use a weak link of 225lb at the tow hook with 280-300 line on the
winch? If the line breaks the weak link then they fly. You would need to be
able to check the line quickly. That said. I feel that you are doing a great
job with the series and everyone knows the rules. Everyone launches under
the same rules. They can choose to stay home if they don't like the contest.
You can't factor out all circumstances of launch problems. It is a roll of
the dice. You pays you money and you takes you chances.

John

-Original Message-
From: Marc Gellart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 6:04 PM
To: soaring@airage.com
Subject: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

Jim, Paul, Jack,and Jim:
Great comments and you all have pretty much sited all the pros and cons
about what we face at each and every contest.  From what i know every one of
the contests we will be flying 280 or 290 line this year that is having MOM
formats, I know STL relined this weekend and all the winches that are coming
are set up with the good stuff (actually one club event ona line I think
eliminates the splices and they are even better then).  Like all have said,
that eliminates nearly all the issues right there.
   But, still what do we do?  I have had folks saying to me that I should
mandate line strength and such, I have taken the attitude in the past that
the clubs run their show and OVSS just uses the scores generated.  I realize
that my free market approach appaers a bit loose, but I still feel that this
approach is best since as has been pointed out that conditions can vary as
well as equipment.  I urge clubs in the direction that I feel is what the
customer wants, i.e. MVSA going MOM format this year with the heavier line
than they have ever used before, there was trepidation, but they will make
folks happy with the choice.
My answer to what I will do in STL since I am the CD there is to give
line breaks in the first round and to call down the entire flight group, but
after that the show is on and no more chances are available.  That is my
answer, and it can be used as a template, but each club is on their own with
council from the wise among us.
   My 2 cents on the subject...

Marc
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with
MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL
are generally NOT in text format


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


Re: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

2005-05-16 Thread Jeff Steifel
I don't think a weak link works. You want to keep things moving a link 
only serves to slow things down.

I think the FAI solution works great.  Limit the power on the winches. 
The resistored winches cut the power down and then everyone is nearly 
identical in power.
Now does this solve line breaks... somewhat... it certainly cuts it down 
a considerable amount if  you lower the power and level the playing 
field. But breaks will still happen especially on windy days.

In the ESL we noticed that new spools from Memphis twine had bad spots 
in it. After clearing the breaks, the lines rarely broke. We don't 
respool between contests any more, only when the line gets ragged. This 
is consistent with my experience with my own clubs and also retriever 
lines too.

3 years ago at the nats I hit the pedal and broke the line. before I got 
any tension. Fortunately I got another winch. But the no relaunch policy 
doesn't allow for bad  retrieves, or a previous bad launch. What about 
someone who launches before you and pulls the knot to exterme. or 
stresses the ring. The no relaunch doesn't work. BUT neither does  
letting the person relaunch with all the markers in the air.
Either let them launch again or relight the group. If you let them 
relight it must be point the plane to the ground and land... no dilly 
dallying anyone caught slowing up for a reading of air should 
forfeit their flight.

John wrote:
Mark,
Why not use a weak link of 225lb at the tow hook with 280-300 line on the
winch? If the line breaks the weak link then they fly. You would need to be
able to check the line quickly. That said. I feel that you are doing a great
job with the series and everyone knows the rules. Everyone launches under
the same rules. They can choose to stay home if they don't like the contest.
You can't factor out all circumstances of launch problems. It is a roll of
the dice. You pays you money and you takes you chances.
John
-Original Message-
From: Marc Gellart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 6:04 PM
To: soaring@airage.com
Subject: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks
Jim, Paul, Jack,and Jim:
   Great comments and you all have pretty much sited all the pros and cons
about what we face at each and every contest.  From what i know every one of
the contests we will be flying 280 or 290 line this year that is having MOM
formats, I know STL relined this weekend and all the winches that are coming
are set up with the good stuff (actually one club event ona line I think
eliminates the splices and they are even better then).  Like all have said,
that eliminates nearly all the issues right there.
  But, still what do we do?  I have had folks saying to me that I should
mandate line strength and such, I have taken the attitude in the past that
the clubs run their show and OVSS just uses the scores generated.  I realize
that my free market approach appaers a bit loose, but I still feel that this
approach is best since as has been pointed out that conditions can vary as
well as equipment.  I urge clubs in the direction that I feel is what the
customer wants, i.e. MVSA going MOM format this year with the heavier line
than they have ever used before, there was trepidation, but they will make
folks happy with the choice.
   My answer to what I will do in STL since I am the CD there is to give
line breaks in the first round and to call down the entire flight group, but
after that the show is on and no more chances are available.  That is my
answer, and it can be used as a template, but each club is on their own with
council from the wise among us.
  My 2 cents on the subject...
Marc
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with
MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL
are generally NOT in text format
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format

 

--
Jeff Steifel
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


RE: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

2005-05-16 Thread John
Jeff I agree that limited power winches would be a great thing, but it is
not practical for all club to get new winches. I don't understand why a week
link slows down a contest. In theory the weak link is the part that breaks
and almost all breaks will not be re-launched. When it is not the weak link
the only fair thing to do is re-launch because the line was damaged in the
first place and that is the cost of doing business.

John

-Original Message-
From: Jeff Steifel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 7:52 PM
To: John
Cc: RCSE
Subject: Re: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

I don't think a weak link works. You want to keep things moving a link
only serves to slow things down.

I think the FAI solution works great.  Limit the power on the winches.
The resistored winches cut the power down and then everyone is nearly
identical in power.
Now does this solve line breaks... somewhat... it certainly cuts it down
a considerable amount if  you lower the power and level the playing
field. But breaks will still happen especially on windy days.

In the ESL we noticed that new spools from Memphis twine had bad spots
in it. After clearing the breaks, the lines rarely broke. We don't
respool between contests any more, only when the line gets ragged. This
is consistent with my experience with my own clubs and also retriever
lines too.

3 years ago at the nats I hit the pedal and broke the line. before I got
any tension. Fortunately I got another winch. But the no relaunch policy
doesn't allow for bad  retrieves, or a previous bad launch. What about
someone who launches before you and pulls the knot to exterme. or
stresses the ring. The no relaunch doesn't work. BUT neither does
letting the person relaunch with all the markers in the air.
Either let them launch again or relight the group. If you let them
relight it must be point the plane to the ground and land... no dilly
dallying anyone caught slowing up for a reading of air should
forfeit their flight.


John wrote:

Mark,

Why not use a weak link of 225lb at the tow hook with 280-300 line on the
winch? If the line breaks the weak link then they fly. You would need to be
able to check the line quickly. That said. I feel that you are doing a
great
job with the series and everyone knows the rules. Everyone launches under
the same rules. They can choose to stay home if they don't like the
contest.
You can't factor out all circumstances of launch problems. It is a roll of
the dice. You pays you money and you takes you chances.

John

-Original Message-
From: Marc Gellart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 6:04 PM
To: soaring@airage.com
Subject: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

Jim, Paul, Jack,and Jim:
Great comments and you all have pretty much sited all the pros and cons
about what we face at each and every contest.  From what i know every one
of
the contests we will be flying 280 or 290 line this year that is having MOM
formats, I know STL relined this weekend and all the winches that are
coming
are set up with the good stuff (actually one club event ona line I think
eliminates the splices and they are even better then).  Like all have said,
that eliminates nearly all the issues right there.
   But, still what do we do?  I have had folks saying to me that I should
mandate line strength and such, I have taken the attitude in the past that
the clubs run their show and OVSS just uses the scores generated.  I
realize
that my free market approach appaers a bit loose, but I still feel that
this
approach is best since as has been pointed out that conditions can vary as
well as equipment.  I urge clubs in the direction that I feel is what the
customer wants, i.e. MVSA going MOM format this year with the heavier line
than they have ever used before, there was trepidation, but they will make
folks happy with the choice.
My answer to what I will do in STL since I am the CD there is to give
line breaks in the first round and to call down the entire flight group,
but
after that the show is on and no more chances are available.  That is my
answer, and it can be used as a template, but each club is on their own
with
council from the wise among us.
   My 2 cents on the subject...

Marc
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with
MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL
are generally NOT in text format


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with
MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL
are generally NOT in text format






--
Jeff Steifel

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL

RE: [RCSE] OVSS and Line Breaks

2005-05-16 Thread Jim Monaco
Jeff brings up a good point about the line from MNT.  Our experience is the
same.  Especially the last batch we got.  It was pieced together and some of
the line was terrible. The first contest we used it was awful, but after the
breaks from the reload were done, the line lasts great.  In the last 2
contests we had no line breaks.  Moral of the story - use the line at least
one contest prior to using it for a big event.
Jim

Jim Monaco

snip
In the ESL we noticed that new spools from Memphis twine had bad spots
in it. After clearing the breaks, the lines rarely broke. We don't
respool between contests any more, only when the line gets ragged. This
is consistent with my experience with my own clubs and also retriever
lines too.

snip


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format