Re: Seamonkey 2.1 -- worst version ever
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 6/12/2011 8:46 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Mort wrote: I now have to click about 100 times to delete daily cookies, whereas with previous editions, I clicked only twice to do so. Why? In 2.0.14, I don't usually click at all -- whenever I close the app, it purges all cookies as instructed (I accept only session cookies). Doesn't v. 2.1 allow that? It does, Clear Private Data I presume Mort's issue is about looking at what he is specifically deleting first. Which in his case is going through the data manager, which is site specific. I understood that; I was just saying that I don't usually pick and choose which cookies to delete because I can't be bothered. In my value system, cookies are almost as bad as ads; if their hair was on fire, I wouldn't cross the street to pee on them. ;-) But on those rare occasions when I have several windows/tabs open at sites that require login/preference cookies etc. to work right, it's kind of a bother to restart SM (though that save-session feature is convenient), so I do go in and purge a bunch of the busybody cookies. Do I understand correctly that v. 2.1 won't let me select a bunch at once anymore? That would be disappointing... -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Bookmarks issues / question
David E. Ross wrote: On 6/12/11 9:27 PM, cmcadams wrote: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 19:46:39 -0500, /cmcadams/: * [P]roperties is gone from right-clicking links within Bookmark Manager. * [P]roperties and [M]ove both gone from right-clicking on search results within Bookmark Manager. The bookmark properties are directly visible and editable in the Bookmarks Manager window (whenever you select a bookmark). Not here they're not, unfortunately. XP SP3, I should have specified. It seems a bit weird there's no Move command available and moving is done just by mouse drags. I guess this is because of the newer Tags feature - one may assign one or more tags to the bookmarks which automatically materialize as folders. This way one doesn't need to create folders explicitly and move bookmarks into to organize, but just assign tags. That's going to be problematic where there are already a lot of bookmarks. There are no bookmark properties. In SeaMonkey 2.0.x, Properties was the combination of Name, Location, and Description (and possibly other attributes of a bookmark that I never used). I was of course referring to the things erroneously labeled bookmark properties. Besides Name, Location, and Tags, you can can view, set, or modify Keyword and Description of a bookmark. After selecting a bookmark, select the button to the left of More in the lower part of the right-hand pane of the Bookmarks Manager window. Excellent! I hadn't spotted that. Thank you very much. It would still be good to have a folder-referencing Move command in the right-click menu. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Bookmarks issues / question
cmcadams wrote: * [P]roperties is gone from right-clicking links within Bookmark Manager. As already said in this thread, the properties editing functionality have been integrated into the main screen (lower part, collapsed by default). * [P]roperties and [M]ove both gone from right-clicking on search results within Bookmark Manager. Move is still available from the Edit menu. Pre-2.1 SMs had a feature where you could specify a target folder for bookmarks when using the (Bookmarks - Bookmark this Page) pick list from SM's main screen. Now such bookmarks all seem to go to the end of Bookmarks Menu. Am I missing a setting, somewhere? Use File Bookmark (Ctrl+D) instead. HTH Jens -- Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/ SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker http://smtt.blogspot.com/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.1
On 6/12/2011 11:04 PM NoOp submitted the following: On 06/12/2011 07:00 PM, W3BNR wrote: On 6/12/2011 7:58 PM NoOp submitted the following: ... You can redownload the xpi here without ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/addons/67148/ An xpi is a zip archive, so you could unzip, modify the install.rdf, rezip and install that way if you wanted to. Or just try installing from the xpi when it fails it may expand into the proper folder then modify the install.rdf. Ah, yes - I didn't realize that a re-install, even though it failed, would leave the load intact. Downloaded the .xpi, went to the directory, changed the .rdf file and - viola - a restart of SM showed the add-on now works. (This with the Show IP add-on) Others will be tried tomorrow. Thanks. Welcome. The following add-on rdf files were modified per instructions and now work with SM 2.1 : * BetterPrivacy 1.51 (http://netticat.ath.cx/extensions.html) * DownloadHelper 4.8.6 (http://www.downloadhelper.net) * Image Zoom 0.4.6 (http://imagezoom.yellowgorilla.net/) * Password Exporter 1.2.1 (http://passwordexporter.fligtar.com) * PrefBar 5.1.1 (http://prefbar.mozdev.org/) * Quote Colors 0.3 (http://quotecolors.mozdev.org/) * ShowIP 1.0 (http://code.google.com/p/firefox-showip/) Thanks to all who offered the suggestion to modify the .rdf files. -- Ed http://mysite.verizon.net/vze1zhwu/ Powered by SeaMonkey: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/ A fool and his honey are soon parted. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Lightning 1.0b4pre for SeaMonkey 2.1
WLS ha scritto: Once more for those of you who may need to install the version of Lightning that works with SM 2.1. https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/nightly/latest-comm-miramar/ WLS You can find localized versions here: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/nightly/latest-comm-miramar-l10n/ -- Francesco ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Thank you, SM Developers
Stan schrieb: Thank you all once again for all your hard work. Thanks to you, the developers, people like me have been able to continue along the Netscape path and still be using this very logical way of doing things. Bravo! May i only say: me too thank You -- Liebe Grüße, Gerd Satelliten FAQ, PC-Tipps, Katzen, Mopped, Garten, Heimwerken: http://www.satgerd.de/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 2.1 -- worst version ever
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 19:48:27 -0400, /Mort/: I now have to click about 100 times to delete daily cookies, whereas with previous editions, I clicked only twice to do so. Why? I suggest you a much simpler setup for managing cookies. I allow all cookies, but I set to accept them for the current session only (being session cookies or not). I further white-list sites which cookies I wish persisted across sessions. This requires far less setup and clicking, and is generally done just once (for any new site determined important). On the previous SM versions, I click on cookie manager, and then with one click can delete all cookies. With the newest version, I must click onto each domain, then delete each individual cookie, = a hundred clicks vs. 2 clicks. I prefer to screen the cookies, as some are connected with on-line purchases. Thanks for all your replies. Mort ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.1
Ant schrieb: I am trying to avoid sync account and services. I don't like keep personal datas online. :/ Not even in a way that nobody else can read? Because that's what our Sync is, not even the server operators can read the data as they don't have the necessary keys, which always remain only on your side of the connection. Robert Kaiser -- Note that any statements of mine - no matter how passionate - are never meant to be offensive but very often as food for thought or possible arguments that we as a community should think about. And most of the time, I even appreciate irony and fun! :) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.1
Ant schrieb: I really don't want to use Sync. For what reason? Note that all data sent to a server by Sync is not readable by the server or its operators as it's encrypted on the client side and the private key is never sent to the server. Of course, as we are an open organization, you can set up your own server as well, of course, Mozilla even provides a version for you to install. Robert Kaiser -- Note that any statements of mine - no matter how passionate - are never meant to be offensive but very often as food for thought or possible arguments that we as a community should think about. And most of the time, I even appreciate irony and fun! :) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 2.1 -- worst version ever
Rufus schrieb: So far, SM 2.1 has generated the largest number of problems/user complaints I've ever read here regarding any version/release...and it's only been a week or so. Then you haven't been around much. I actually think the amount is pretty low compared to 2.0 ;-) Robert Kaiser -- Note that any statements of mine - no matter how passionate - are never meant to be offensive but very often as food for thought or possible arguments that we as a community should think about. And most of the time, I even appreciate irony and fun! :) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 2.1 -- worst version ever
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:34:39 -0400, Mort wrote: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 19:48:27 -0400, /Mort/: I now have to click about 100 times to delete daily cookies, whereas with previous editions, I clicked only twice to do so. Why? I suggest you a much simpler setup for managing cookies. I allow all cookies, but I set to accept them for the current session only (being session cookies or not). I further white-list sites which cookies I wish persisted across sessions. This requires far less setup and clicking, and is generally done just once (for any new site determined important). On the previous SM versions, I click on cookie manager, and then with one click can delete all cookies. With the newest version, I must click onto each domain, then delete each individual cookie, = a hundred clicks vs. 2 clicks. I prefer to screen the cookies, as some are connected with on-line purchases. Thanks for all your replies. Mort Workaround: Tools-Clear Private Data. Untick everything except Cookies. Press [Clear Private Data Now] Phil -- Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: font size in seamonkey2.1
David E. Ross wrote: On 6/12/11 2:17 PM, Ant wrote: On 6/12/2011 12:52 PM PT, David E. Ross typed: I wonder if No Squint 1.93.2.1 extension (http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmisc.html ) will still work in SM v2.1. I use it to set my font sizes for each web page/site. Go to about:config and search for browser.zoom.siteSpecific. The value true -- the default value -- should cause SeaMonkey 2.1 to remember how you zoomed a page. Unfortunately, it remembers zooming for the entire domain, which can be very annoying if you need different zooming for different pages in the same domain. Ah, so I can toss this extension out. I looked at its settings, and it only does global and site (domains?) only. The reason why I like this extension is because it can remember only changing font sizes and not everything else like images. I hope v2.1 does this. Does v2.1 have settings like a record list of each site settings for font sizes, how long to remember, etc.? FYI, Firefox's NoSquint version has more features as shown in https://urandom.ca/nosquint/ ... :/ I don't know about the details of this feature. I found it so annoying that I set browser.zoom.siteSpecific to false. Until I found out about that preference variable, I had even opened a bug report. The problem is that it is domain-specific, not URI-specific. I visit some Web sites regularly where the fonts on some pages are too small, on some pages too large, and on some pages just right. If I was browsing the site with several tabs, all the tabs for the site were affected when I zoomed one page. NoSquint is a Life Saver for me. My eyesight is not what use to be. and as I upgrade to new computers the Display detail its larger and the details get smaller and and smaller. the display size on my MacBook Pro is now 1920x1200 on 17 screen now if nNSquint could be set to enlarge text on email and newsgroup I'd be be thrilled. I know you can set fonts . Problem is It affect both the Mail news and web browser. so it you set large enough to see on Mail and news you screw up the display of Pages. here is a sample magnified somewhat: http://screencast.com/t/fNInHJRPSvhY -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.netmailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: font size in seamonkey2.1
On 6/13/2011 8:35 AM PT, PhillipJones typed: I wonder if No Squint 1.93.2.1 extension (http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmisc.html ) will still work in SM v2.1. I use it to set my font sizes for each web page/site. Go to about:config and search for browser.zoom.siteSpecific. The value true -- the default value -- should cause SeaMonkey 2.1 to remember how you zoomed a page. Unfortunately, it remembers zooming for the entire domain, which can be very annoying if you need different zooming for different pages in the same domain. Ah, so I can toss this extension out. I looked at its settings, and it only does global and site (domains?) only. The reason why I like this extension is because it can remember only changing font sizes and not everything else like images. I hope v2.1 does this. Does v2.1 have settings like a record list of each site settings for font sizes, how long to remember, etc.? FYI, Firefox's NoSquint version has more features as shown in https://urandom.ca/nosquint/ ... :/ I don't know about the details of this feature. I found it so annoying that I set browser.zoom.siteSpecific to false. Until I found out about that preference variable, I had even opened a bug report. The problem is that it is domain-specific, not URI-specific. I visit some Web sites regularly where the fonts on some pages are too small, on some pages too large, and on some pages just right. If I was browsing the site with several tabs, all the tabs for the site were affected when I zoomed one page. NoSquint is a Life Saver for me. My eyesight is not what use to be. and as I upgrade to new computers the Display detail its larger and the details get smaller and and smaller. the display size on my MacBook Pro is now 1920x1200 on 17 screen now if nNSquint could be set to enlarge text on email and newsgroup I'd be be thrilled. I know you can set fonts . Problem is It affect both the Mail news and web browser. so it you set large enough to see on Mail and news you screw up the display of Pages. here is a sample magnified somewhat: http://screencast.com/t/fNInHJRPSvhY Ditto. My old compound eyes aren't the same as they used to be too. :( Now, the question does it still work in v2.1. Official developer doesn't do SM2 port. :( -- Hey dad, look. I put honey on my back, and now the ants are carrying me home. --Chris from Family Guy /\___/\ Ant @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) / /\ /\ \Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net | |o o| | \ _ /If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link. ( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed. Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.1
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 22:10:22 -0700, David E. Ross wrote: On 6/12/11 2:19 PM, Jan-Galt wrote: If I already have something bookmarked, does 2.1 refuse to bookmark it again? I tried to bookmark http://denver.ebayclassifieds.com/ and it wouldn't add it to the bottom of the list like usual, so I searched and found it had already been done and was higher up in the list somewhere. Open the Bookmarks Manager. Navigate to where you want the second instance of a bookmark. This should be in the right-hand pane. Then drag from the address area (URI bar) or a tab and drop into the desired location, again in the right-hand pane. With duplicate bookmarks, you should assign a unique tag -- the same tag -- to both. Then, if you update one, the update will apply to both. If you then delete one, both might be deleted; but I'm not sure about this. A bookmark is only deleted if all duplicates are deleted. Just like hard-links in linux directories. Phil -- Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.1
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 16:35:12 -0400, PhillipJones wrote: MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 12/06/2011 12:14, W3BNR told the world: So I'll be waiting for the updates to: Download Helper Prefbar Quote Colors Show IP Mail User Agent I wouldn't hold my breath for Display Mail User-Agent, it seems to have been abandoned -- version 1.6.6 had problems in Seamonkey for months but wasn't fixed. But I managed to update the maxversion in 1.6.5. and it seem to work OK in SM 2.1. (Now that 2.1 is final, I might have a look at 1.6.6 again, since it seemed to work in Thunderbird...) Quote Colors is in a similar situation, but again, it seems to work with just a change in the maxversion. If Philip Chee is interested, I can mail him my hacked versions of those and a couple other extensions that seem to be working fine in SM 2.1 I'll vote for QuoteColors. Without QuoteColors I simply could not read emails and Newsgroups. Sure! Send them all to me. Thanks. Phil -- Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Bookmarks issues / question
cmcadams wrote: Pre-2.1 SMs had a feature where you could specify a target folder for bookmarks when using the (Bookmarks - Bookmark this Page) pick list from SM's main screen. Now such bookmarks all seem to go to the end of Bookmarks Menu. Am I missing a setting, somewhere? I miss this feature as well. Unsorted Bookmarks doesn't do it for me. -JW ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Bookmarks issues / question
J. Weaver Jr. wrote: cmcadams wrote: Pre-2.1 SMs had a feature where you could specify a target folder for bookmarks when using the (Bookmarks - Bookmark this Page) pick list from SM's main screen. Now such bookmarks all seem to go to the end of Bookmarks Menu. Am I missing a setting, somewhere? I miss this feature as well. Unsorted Bookmarks doesn't do it for me. -JW Followup: just did Bookmark This Page and the new bookmark was placed _after_ the last existing bookmark folder (but not in it) and _before_ Unsorted Bookmarks. Completely useless. -JW ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
SM 2.1: note for those using StrokeIt or other macro programs
...or any other application which depends on the window class: the window class of SM 2.1 is now MozillaWindowClass, which is different from previous versions (which were MozillaUIWindowClass). -JW ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
SM 2.1 Password Manager
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20110608 Firefox/4.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.1 Since upgrading from 2.1b2 I have been having odd issues with POP3 email stored passwords. On this system I've 4 POP3 accounts occasionally I get a password failed error on one or another of the accounts. Sometimes I can reproduce if I 'Get Msgs|Get All New Messages'. The odd part it that the correct password *is* there if I follow through on the password error dialog, when prompted for a new password, the password is filled in, but the check box for always remember/save (can't recall the exact wording just now) in unchecked. I do not enter any other password, just tick the remember/save box and click OK off it goes. It doesn't happen on any particular account. I seems entirely random. Anyone else notice simlar? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
stumbleupon addon won't load for 2.1
Trying to install stumbleupon addon and get message: Stumbleupon not compatible with SeaMonkey 2.1. Do I need to inform anyone about this? Stan ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: stumbleupon addon won't load for 2.1
Stan schrieb: Trying to install stumbleupon addon and get message: Stumbleupon not compatible with SeaMonkey 2.1. Do I need to inform anyone about this? You can ignore this mesage, StumpleUpon 3.91 works fine here with SeaMonkey 2.1! ;-) Stan Greets from Augsburg, Germany Mike -- *** TmoWizard *** ircs://irc.freenode.net:7070/tmowizard http://mikespeier.cwsurf.de/wordpress/ Little things i do directly, miracles take a somewhat longer and after midnight will be conjured! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Wrapping Text Pages
David E. Ross wrote: When I view ASCII text Web pages that have no explicit line breaks in the SeaMonkey browser, the pages are displayed without wrapping. Is there a way to get wrapping? Insert line feeds where you want them. An example is at http://rossde.com/test/Wrap_test.txt, which my service's Web server delivers as text/plain. Apparently, this is NOT a new problem. I see the same results with SM 2.0.14 and SM 2.1. ..and I see the same in all my browsers, not just SeaMonkey or Firefox. It isn't a problem; it's how plain text is displayed. http://tekrider.net/test/Wrap_test.txt -- -bts -Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 2.1 -- worst version ever
On 11-06-13 2:55 PM, Rufus wrote: Dunno...I was hesitant about 2.0 (in fact, I think I waited until 2.0.something, but I only recall two basic complaints - and most of it was over the Forms Manager. I feel like I'm reading more for 2.1, and of wider varieties...and workarounds that have users altering code? Whassupwiddat?.. Most times, it's better to have actual data. SM2.0 was released on Oct 27, 2009. Here's a link to the archive of this newsgroup from that time. http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.seamonkey/browse_frm/month/2009-10?start=750sa=N From there, you can go through all the posts made in the first few days and what the volume of traffic was, and compare it to 2.1. -- Chris Ilias http://ilias.ca Mailing list/Newsgroup moderator ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Wrapping Text Pages
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:04:09 -0700, /David E. Ross/: When I view ASCII text Web pages that have no explicit line breaks in the SeaMonkey browser, the pages are displayed without wrapping. Is there a way to get wrapping? An example is at http://rossde.com/test/Wrap_test.txt, which my service's Web server delivers as text/plain. Apparently, this is NOT a new problem. I see the same results with SM 2.0.14 and SM 2.1. I use (since SeaMonkey 1.*) the very handy Toggle Word Wrap extension: https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/toggle-word-wrap/ -- Stanimir ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: stumbleupon addon won't load for 2.1
TmoWizard wrote: Stan schrieb: Trying to install stumbleupon addon and get message: Stumbleupon not compatible with SeaMonkey 2.1. Do I need to inform anyone about this? You can ignore this mesage, StumpleUpon 3.91 works fine here with SeaMonkey 2.1! ;-) Stan Greets from Augsburg, Germany Mike I can't ignore the message because the SM Add-Ons Manager marked Stumble 3.91 as Disabled when I switched over to SM 2.1 yesterday. Stan ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: 2.1: Bookmarks Add-on Manager
Joe32065 wrote:
Joe32065 wrote:
Thanks, but your #BMB... lines didn't work. I found a similar note on
the Mozilla forums with a reply that does work:
#main-menubar [label=Subscribe to This Page],
#main-menubar [label=Personal Toolbar],
#main-menubar #bookmarksToolbarFolderMenu + menuseparator,
#main-menubar .feedsMenu + menuseparator {display: none !important;}
Could you give details please.
I seem to have 4 userchrome.css Windows 7 32 bit
C:\Users\Dad\AppData\Roaming\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles
C:\Users\Dad\Application Data\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles
C:\Documents and Settings\Dad\Application
Data\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles\
C:\Documents and Settings\Dad\AppData\Roaming\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles\
I edited all 4.
I believe that the two directories:
C:\Documents and Settings\Dad\Application Data\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles\
C:\Documents and Settings\Dad\AppData\Roaming\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles\
are related with Windows XP
The two others are for Windows 7
As per http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_SeaMonkey
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Wrapping Text Pages
On 6/13/11 12:28 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: David E. Ross wrote: When I view ASCII text Web pages that have no explicit line breaks in the SeaMonkey browser, the pages are displayed without wrapping. Is there a way to get wrapping? Insert line feeds where you want them. An example is at http://rossde.com/test/Wrap_test.txt, which my service's Web server delivers as text/plain. Apparently, this is NOT a new problem. I see the same results with SM 2.0.14 and SM 2.1. ..and I see the same in all my browsers, not just SeaMonkey or Firefox. It isn't a problem; it's how plain text is displayed. http://tekrider.net/test/Wrap_test.txt Inserting line feeds would work for my own pages. However, I contrived my example specifically for this question. I asked because I have encountered pages by others -- ASCII text, not HTML -- that do not wrap. I cannot insert line feeds without first downloading and editing someone else's work. I see that you did indeed download and edit my example. However, if I shrink my browser window to less than full screen, the problem reappears. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ On occasion, I might filter and ignore all newsgroup messages posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent because of spam from that source. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
SM 2.1 Disk Cache
Where can I find an explanation of the new layout for the cached files? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Wrapping Text Pages
On 6/13/11 1:13 PM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:04:09 -0700, /David E. Ross/: When I view ASCII text Web pages that have no explicit line breaks in the SeaMonkey browser, the pages are displayed without wrapping. Is there a way to get wrapping? An example is at http://rossde.com/test/Wrap_test.txt, which my service's Web server delivers as text/plain. Apparently, this is NOT a new problem. I see the same results with SM 2.0.14 and SM 2.1. I use (since SeaMonkey 1.*) the very handy Toggle Word Wrap extension: https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/toggle-word-wrap/ I tried Toggle Word Wrap. It is exactly what I need. Thanks. I also did some research in the HTML specifications at the W3C site, both HTML 4.01 and the current draft for HTML 5. Neither of them mention how a browser should handle plain ASCII text. Of course, both specifications are about HTML while a page of plain ASCII text is not HTML. The descriptions of the pre element in both specifications say nothing about wrapping; since the pre element is used when text is preformatted (e.g., with spaces, indentations, columns), wrapping is likely unwanted at least as a default. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ On occasion, I might filter and ignore all newsgroup messages posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent because of spam from that source. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.1
Interviewed by CNN on 13/06/2011 12:56, Philip Chee told the world: Sure! Send them all to me. Thanks. OK, the set of Display MUA + JSlib + QuoteColors + MailRedirect + PrefBar should be hitting your mailbox right now. -- MCBastos This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized use will be prosecuted under the DMCA. -=-=- ... Sent from my cyborg implant. *Added by TagZilla 0.066.2 running on Seamonkey 2.1 * Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 2.1 -- worst version ever
Chris Ilias wrote: On 11-06-13 2:55 PM, Rufus wrote: Dunno...I was hesitant about 2.0 (in fact, I think I waited until 2.0.something, but I only recall two basic complaints - and most of it was over the Forms Manager. I feel like I'm reading more for 2.1, and of wider varieties...and workarounds that have users altering code? Whassupwiddat?.. Most times, it's better to have actual data. SM2.0 was released on Oct 27, 2009. Here's a link to the archive of this newsgroup from that time. http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.seamonkey/browse_frm/month/2009-10?start=750sa=N From there, you can go through all the posts made in the first few days and what the volume of traffic was, and compare it to 2.1. Maybe it's because that archive starts with the Release Candidate (which I pretty much ignore - more so after my bad experience with a beta) but in terms of a final release this latest flurry still seems like it's trending to the more, if' it's not there already. And since I went and read the release notes and see that PPC support has been dropped...well...now I can't even test drive 2.1 on the machine I depend least upon. So I'll sit out for a bit. -- - Rufus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 2.1 -- worst version ever
PhillipJones wrote: NoOp wrote: On 06/12/2011 04:13 PM, PhillipJones wrote: ... NO for me. besides extensions If I switch I'll have to 2.1 I am going to have to keep a Notepad beside my computer just for usernames and passwords that won't save. I find that hard to believe. I suspect the problem may honestly be PEBCAK, or perhaps something to do with Mac users. 2.1 (all versions) have done just fine maintaining my uernames and passwords. Do you have a bug report link regarding your issue? Is not a Bug. It’s a change in policy. In SM1.x you were allowed to save user names and password and they would auto show or fill in even for Banks and Financial Institutions. In SM2.x the auto-show /filing parts was turned off. You could get around it by changing one word in Sm2.x SM2.1 is completely re written and this no longer can be bypassed. So although you can save passwords and User names if you don't remember how the User Name Then you out of luck. You would say wouldn't be dangerous. No-if you use a Master password, which you should if your dealing with banks and financial Institutions. But its get worse it even worse it hides all , even benign sites such as User Groups. I believe you can always look under TOOLPASSWORD MANAGERSTORED PASSWORDMANAGED PASSWORDS and look up all the information you are searching for. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.1 Disk Cache
Interviewed by CNN on 13/06/2011 20:45, Ed told the world: Where can I find an explanation of the new layout for the cached files? Better yet, is there any extension which can do for the new cache system what Cache Viewer did for the old one? -- MCBastos This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized use will be prosecuted under the DMCA. -=-=- ... Sent from my Illudium Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator. *Added by TagZilla 0.066.2 running on Seamonkey 2.1 * Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Wrapping Text Pages
Interviewed by CNN on 13/06/2011 16:28, Beauregard T. Shagnasty told the world: When I view ASCII text Web pages that have no explicit line breaks in the SeaMonkey browser, the pages are displayed without wrapping. Is there a way to get wrapping? ..and I see the same in all my browsers, not just SeaMonkey or Firefox. It isn't a problem; it's how plain text is displayed. Not quite true. SRWare Iron (and therefore, I assume, Google Chrome) does wrap the testcase text. But IE9 does not wrap. -- MCBastos This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized use will be prosecuted under the DMCA. -=-=- ... Sent from my Mont Blanc. *Added by TagZilla 0.066.2 running on Seamonkey 2.1 * Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Browser no longer supported
Robert Kaiser wrote: MCBastos schrieb: Interviewed by CNN on 29/05/2011 16:41, Robert Kaiser told the world: Paul B. Gallagher schrieb: For those few sites too stupid to sniff for Gecko, why not just lie to them and spoof FF? That's what 2.1 does. And it's not beta any more, it's RC, which means it's as good as release, with just minor adjustments to be made still. I sure hope that one of those adjustments is in the installer. Yes, the installer glitches are why it hasn't shipped as final yet. We fixed the default theme thing for the first build of RC2 but didn't even release that one as we found yet another problem with localizations and optional extensions that we need to do a second build for, and then RC2 should be there and hopefully will be converted to the actual final release a few days later. Robert Kaiser Robert, I think I hear you saying that when I get messages such as SM 2.1 not supported that this is a problem to be fixed in a nxt release of SM. So, I should just be patient. Is that correct? I currently have a problem with FxIF- View EDXIF data, Image Zoom, and StumbleUpon. Thanks Stan Stan ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.1
David E. Ross nobody@nowhere.invalid wrote : On 6/12/11 2:19 PM, Jan-Galt wrote: If I already have something bookmarked, does 2.1 refuse to bookmark it again? I tried to bookmark http://denver.ebayclassifieds.com/ and it wouldn't add it to the bottom of the list like usual, so I searched and found it had already been done and was higher up in the list somewhere. Open the Bookmarks Manager. Navigate to where you want the second instance of a bookmark. This should be in the right-hand pane. Then drag from the address area (URI bar) or a tab and drop into the desired location, again in the right-hand pane. With duplicate bookmarks, you should assign a unique tag -- the same tag -- to both. Then, if you update one, the update will apply to both. If you then delete one, both might be deleted; but I'm not sure about this. Didn't really want a duplicate, just didn't know I already had it. That green marker will be handy. Thanks! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Browser no longer supported
On 6/13/11 5:55 PM, Stan wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: MCBastos schrieb: Interviewed by CNN on 29/05/2011 16:41, Robert Kaiser told the world: Paul B. Gallagher schrieb: For those few sites too stupid to sniff for Gecko, why not just lie to them and spoof FF? That's what 2.1 does. And it's not beta any more, it's RC, which means it's as good as release, with just minor adjustments to be made still. I sure hope that one of those adjustments is in the installer. Yes, the installer glitches are why it hasn't shipped as final yet. We fixed the default theme thing for the first build of RC2 but didn't even release that one as we found yet another problem with localizations and optional extensions that we need to do a second build for, and then RC2 should be there and hopefully will be converted to the actual final release a few days later. Robert Kaiser Robert, I think I hear you saying that when I get messages such as SM 2.1 not supported that this is a problem to be fixed in a nxt release of SM. So, I should just be patient. Is that correct? I currently have a problem with FxIF- View EDXIF data, Image Zoom, and StumbleUpon. Thanks Stan Stan IF the problem is that the Web server is sniffing for Firefox instead of Gecko, SeaMonkey 2.1 solves the problem. It automatically presents a user agent (UA) string that contains Firefox. This feature can be turned off. On the menu bar, select [Edit Preferences Advanced HTTP Networking] and uncheck the checkbox for Advertise Firefox compatibility. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ On occasion, I might filter and ignore all newsgroup messages posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent because of spam from that source. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
SeaMonkey installation precedure
Suggestion for future major releases of SeaMonkey, such as the upgrade from 2.0.14 to 2.1. I tried this upgrade a few days ago but wound up reverting back to 2.0.14 (note that despite using system restore to do this, I still had to manually reestablish some of my original settings, such as theme and home page). The reason I went back to 2.0.14 was because there just weren't enough installed extensions yet that were upgradable to 2.1. While I don't know the technical problems involved, I think it would be a lot more user-friendly to search out the existing installation before a new version is installed and present to the user the same list of existing installed extensions that are currently incompatible, and also predetermine whether upgrades for them exist. This would be followed by a box to proceed or cancel. This would allow the user to make a decision to install or not install, rather than have to install and revert (or regret). ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Thinkpad Trackpoint Scrolling in 2.1
Hi, folks - Someone else on this list mentioned a problem with TrackPoint scrolling (2.1 Scrolling observation by Jamie Cruz). I can't reply to that message as I've just signed up for this list. But, I had the same problem and have found a workaround that works for my T500/Windows XP combination. The workaround is simply to set the driver to use 'smooth' (as opposed to 'standard') scrolling. The setting on Windows XP is in Control Panel Mouse UltraNav TrackPoint Settings Scrolling Settings Scrolling Type The scrolling is different (I'd call it 'mushier'), but at least it works. Regards, - Michael ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 2.1 -- worst version ever
MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 13/06/2011 01:10, PhillipJones told the world: MCBastos wrote: Funny, username and password saving is working perfectly for me on 2.1. Both with the old passwords saved before the upgrade, and with new passwords. Not for Banks and Financial Institutions. SM 2 would not allow that, unless certain code in SM2.x to allow its there was even instructions on what code to change to allow it. You can do that in SM2.1 because its not written with that type code. Well, I don't trust *any* software with my bank passwords anyway. Even on my password manager app (KeePass, if you are interested) I didn't enter the banking passwords -- what I put is a *hint* (a sort of puzzle) to help me remember the password, if I ever forget it. I don't bother memorizing most passwords (e-mail, websites and such) -- the unimportant ones I trust to Seamonkey, the middling-important ones I save in KeePass. But the ones I do make a point of committing to memory and not writing them down *anywhere* are: - Banking passwords; - The KeePass password (of course) - The PGP passphrases That's nice, congratulations! Out of curiosity, How old are you now? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Thinkpad Trackpoint Scrolling in 2.1
Michael Hannon wrote: Hi, folks - Someone else on this list mentioned a problem with TrackPoint scrolling (2.1 Scrolling observation by Jamie Cruz). I can't reply to that message as I've just signed up for this list. But, I had the same problem and have found a workaround that works for my T500/Windows XP combination. The workaround is simply to set the driver to use 'smooth' (as opposed to 'standard') scrolling. The setting on Windows XP is in Control Panel Mouse UltraNav TrackPoint Settings Scrolling Settings Scrolling Type The scrolling is different (I'd call it 'mushier'), but at least it works. Regards, - Michael Thanks, that did the trick! I don't know why it's so different; it worked just fine with every other app I have installed. -- Jaime A. Cruz President Nassau Wings Motorcycle Club http://www.nassauwings.org/ AMA District 34 http://www.AMADistrict34.com/ Pop's Run http://www.popsrun.org/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.1 Disk Cache
Interviewed by CNN on 13/06/2011 21:49, User told the world: MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 13/06/2011 20:45, Ed told the world: Where can I find an explanation of the new layout for the cached files? Better yet, is there any extension which can do for the new cache system what Cache Viewer did for the old one? about:cache I knew about that. It's not the same: the old extension allowed you to actually SEE the images cached. For that matter, I used to just check the cache for recent, large files in order to get copies of online movies which denied a save option. I tried this today... and I was surprised to see that the about:cache not only didn't list it (well, it happens...) but that it listed FAR TOO FEW recent files to account for my Web activity. OTOH, the cache (which I left at the new let Seamonkey manage the cache size setting to see how it goes) is far larger than the 50 Mb I used in 2.0.x. So I'm still trying to figure out how this new cache works. -- MCBastos This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized use will be prosecuted under the DMCA. -=-=- ... Sent from my mimeograph. *Added by TagZilla 0.066.2 running on Seamonkey 2.1 * Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey installation precedure
Interviewed by CNN on 13/06/2011 23:21, Roger Fink told the world: Suggestion for future major releases of SeaMonkey, such as the upgrade from 2.0.14 to 2.1. I tried this upgrade a few days ago but wound up reverting back to 2.0.14 (note that despite using system restore to do this, I still had to manually reestablish some of my original settings, such as theme and home page). The reason I went back to 2.0.14 was because there just weren't enough installed extensions yet that were upgradable to 2.1. While I don't know the technical problems involved, I think it would be a lot more user-friendly to search out the existing installation before a new version is installed and present to the user the same list of existing installed extensions that are currently incompatible, and also predetermine whether upgrades for them exist. This would be followed by a box to proceed or cancel. This would allow the user to make a decision to install or not install, rather than have to install and revert (or regret). Firefox 4 does have a feature like that. It should be possible to migrate the code, but I have no idea how much work it entails. -- MCBastos This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized use will be prosecuted under the DMCA. -=-=- ... Sent from my Garmin GPS. *Added by TagZilla 0.066.2 running on Seamonkey 2.1 * Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 2.1 -- worst version ever
Interviewed by CNN on 13/06/2011 23:31, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj told the world: I don't bother memorizing most passwords (e-mail, websites and such) -- the unimportant ones I trust to Seamonkey, the middling-important ones I save in KeePass. But the ones I do make a point of committing to memory and not writing them down *anywhere* are: - Banking passwords; - The KeePass password (of course) - The PGP passphrases That's nice, congratulations! Out of curiosity, How old are you now? I'm in my forties, why? -- MCBastos This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized use will be prosecuted under the DMCA. -=-=- ... Sent from my UNCLE communicator pen. *Added by TagZilla 0.066.2 running on Seamonkey 2.1 * Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: font size in seamonkey2.1 on eCS
On 2011/06/12 09:03 (GMT-0700) grainau composed: i am using two seamonkeys in two different partitions with the same ECS2.1. One for test purpose and the other for normal use. And one has a good readable font size for the user interface and the other not (is very small). What can I do to correct the font size for the other? Are they really the same, or is one using Panorama video and the other Snap? Look in CONFIG.SYS for *SDD* entries that don't match if using Snap on both. Do both in fact have identical font sets available? Do one or the other or both look like using a different font family from other apps? Which if either more closely matches UI fonts in other apps? Are both profiles identical? Created anew? Migrated from an earlier version? Do either or both profiles contain a chrome/userChrome.css file? Is reported DPI on http://fm.no-ip.com/Auth/dpi-screen-window.html the same for both, or one 96 and the other 120? -- The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive. Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
my sm
... is stuck in safe mode. any hlp??? -- Mr. Kevin W Mc Auley 1107 Middle Street So. Weymouth, MA 02190 781 335-8585 (fax, pls use email) beelzib...@comcast.net ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Wrapping Text Pages
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:24:07 -0700, David E. Ross wrote:
When I view ASCII text Web pages that have no explicit line breaks in
the SeaMonkey browser, the pages are displayed without wrapping. Is
there a way to get wrapping?
An example is at http://rossde.com/test/Wrap_test.txt, which my
service's Web server delivers as text/plain.
Apparently, this is NOT a new problem. I see the same results with SM
2.0.14 and SM 2.1.
A userContent.css style might be helpful e.g.
pre {
white-space: pre-wrap;
}
You might need !important
Phil
--
Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com
http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org
Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief,
oh Night, and so be good for us to pass.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: stumbleupon addon won't load for 2.1
Stan schrieb: I can't ignore the message because the SM Add-Ons Manager marked Stumble 3.91 as Disabled when I switched over to SM 2.1 yesterday. In about:config you must set /extensions.checkCompatibility/ from *true* to *false* and it works. Please install the Add-on /Add-on Compatibility Reporter/ from Mozilla https://addons.mozilla.org/de/seamonkey/addon/add-on-compatibility-reporter/?src=api and mark StumpleUppon as *Works properly*, it helps the Autors from Add-ons, Mozilla and at the End us Users from SeaMonkey or ather Gecko-Browsers! Stan Mike -- *** TmoWizard *** ircs://irc.freenode.net:7070/tmowizard http://mikespeier.cwsurf.de/wordpress/ Little things i do directly, miracles take a somewhat longer and after midnight will be conjured! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
