Re: Image not printed

2017-09-10 Thread Ray_Net

WaltS48 wrote on 11-09-17 01:24:

On 9/10/17 3:52 AM, Ray_Net wrote:

WaltS48 wrote on 10-09-17 02:41:

On 9/9/17 12:53 PM, Ray_Net wrote:

Paul in Houston, TX wrote on 09-09-17 02:41:

Ed Mullen wrote:
On 9/8/2017 at 12:04 AM, Paul in Houston, TX created this epitome 
of digital genius:

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

Glen wrote:


David E. Ross wrote:

On 9/7/2017 1:25 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
On the printed page and on the print-preview screen the 
image is

not present... ...printing that page
 







Is this normal ?



By any chance, is it a background image?  If so:

1.  On the menu bar, go to [File > Page Setup].

2.  On the Format & Options tab of the Page Setup Window, 
make sure

the Print Background checkbox is checked.


I kept forgetting to look it up, as to the reason images were not
printing for me, and now it works again. Awesome! You saved me 
time.

Thank you! :)


Good for you, not for me. Changing the setting had no effect here.

There are lots of pages where SeaMonkey omits some of the 
content for

no reason I can
fathom. A good example is . Choose any
puzzle and try to print
it. You get the grid but no numbers -- totally useless.


SM 2.26.1:  I can print the sudoku ok but I cannot print the boxer
shorts pic from the
original url.  The pic actually comes from:
http://a248.e.akamai.net/f/248/9086/10h/origin-d4.scene7.com/is/image/Underarmour/V5ProdWithBadge?=on-model-mid|pdpZoomDesktop=0.50=jpg=85=sharp2=on,off=f0f0f0=0,0,1836,1950&$p_pos=450,380&$p_size=910,0=0,0,0,0&$p_src=is{Underarmour/V5-1277238-158_HTF} 




IE does not show any pics at all.


So the image is from a different site than the main site. Check 
Edit - Preferences -
Security - Images - and set the radio button for Load all images. 
See if that helps.


No change for me.  Already had it set to "all images". Toggled it 
and still the same.

Might help Ray though.


I had already (and I still use) "load all images" set.
I think that this option is to permit to see images in the Browser. 
The problem is that the image is visible on the screen of the 
Browser - so perfect ---> But the "print content" did not have the 
image. - so not perfect.

I just try to print with Internet Explorer ---> Same Problem !!!

Therefore my question is the same "Is this normal  ?"


For that site it probably is.

Did you notice the zoom feature when you move the mouse over an image?

Did you notice the images are links, not images coded in  tags 
in that web page?


Did you try opening the image link in a new tab and printing it?

I have no trouble opening an image link in a new tab and printing it.


Yes, me too, I noticed that also earlier ...but :
A page can be showed, but cannot be printed . this is strange ...



How do you print a link in a page? Not strange at all.



You rigth-click on the image then you use "Open link in New Window"
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image not printed

2017-09-10 Thread WaltS48

On 9/10/17 3:52 AM, Ray_Net wrote:

WaltS48 wrote on 10-09-17 02:41:

On 9/9/17 12:53 PM, Ray_Net wrote:

Paul in Houston, TX wrote on 09-09-17 02:41:

Ed Mullen wrote:
On 9/8/2017 at 12:04 AM, Paul in Houston, TX created this epitome 
of digital genius:

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

Glen wrote:


David E. Ross wrote:

On 9/7/2017 1:25 PM, Ray_Net wrote:

On the printed page and on the print-preview screen the image is
not present... ...printing that page
 







Is this normal ?



By any chance, is it a background image?  If so:

1.  On the menu bar, go to [File > Page Setup].

2.  On the Format & Options tab of the Page Setup Window, make 
sure

the Print Background checkbox is checked.


I kept forgetting to look it up, as to the reason images were not
printing for me, and now it works again. Awesome! You saved me 
time.

Thank you! :)


Good for you, not for me. Changing the setting had no effect here.

There are lots of pages where SeaMonkey omits some of the content 
for

no reason I can
fathom. A good example is . Choose any
puzzle and try to print
it. You get the grid but no numbers -- totally useless.


SM 2.26.1:  I can print the sudoku ok but I cannot print the boxer
shorts pic from the
original url.  The pic actually comes from:
http://a248.e.akamai.net/f/248/9086/10h/origin-d4.scene7.com/is/image/Underarmour/V5ProdWithBadge?=on-model-mid|pdpZoomDesktop=0.50=jpg=85=sharp2=on,off=f0f0f0=0,0,1836,1950&$p_pos=450,380&$p_size=910,0=0,0,0,0&$p_src=is{Underarmour/V5-1277238-158_HTF} 




IE does not show any pics at all.


So the image is from a different site than the main site. Check 
Edit - Preferences -
Security - Images - and set the radio button for Load all images. 
See if that helps.


No change for me.  Already had it set to "all images". Toggled it 
and still the same.

Might help Ray though.


I had already (and I still use) "load all images" set.
I think that this option is to permit to see images in the Browser. 
The problem is that the image is visible on the screen of the Browser 
- so perfect ---> But the "print content" did not have the image. - 
so not perfect.

I just try to print with Internet Explorer ---> Same Problem !!!

Therefore my question is the same "Is this normal  ?"


For that site it probably is.

Did you notice the zoom feature when you move the mouse over an image?

Did you notice the images are links, not images coded in  tags in 
that web page?


Did you try opening the image link in a new tab and printing it?

I have no trouble opening an image link in a new tab and printing it.


Yes, me too, I noticed that also earlier ...but :
A page can be showed, but cannot be printed . this is strange ...



How do you print a link in a page? Not strange at all.


--
Go Bucs, Pitt, Steelers!
Coexist 
National Popular Vote 
Ubuntu 16.04 LTS - Unity Desktop
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image not printed

2017-09-10 Thread Paul B. Gallagher

David E. Ross wrote:


I think I have seen pages that could not be printed because the
owner had them composed that way on purpose.  This limits the ability
of others to capture and modify the page.  When I have seen this,
disabling JavaScript AFTER the page is fully loaded defeats the
blocking of printing.


Surely that isn't the case with websudoku.com, which has a "print" 
button for that specific purpose.


--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image not printed

2017-09-10 Thread David E. Ross
On 9/10/2017 12:52 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
> WaltS48 wrote on 10-09-17 02:41:
>> On 9/9/17 12:53 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
>>> Paul in Houston, TX wrote on 09-09-17 02:41:
 Ed Mullen wrote:
> On 9/8/2017 at 12:04 AM, Paul in Houston, TX created this epitome 
> of digital genius:
>> Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
>>> Glen wrote:
>>>
 David E. Ross wrote:
> On 9/7/2017 1:25 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
>> On the printed page and on the print-preview screen the image is
>> not present... ...printing that page
>> 
>>  
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Is this normal ?
>>
>
> By any chance, is it a background image?  If so:
>
> 1.  On the menu bar, go to [File > Page Setup].
>
> 2.  On the Format & Options tab of the Page Setup Window, make 
> sure
> the Print Background checkbox is checked.
>
 I kept forgetting to look it up, as to the reason images were not
 printing for me, and now it works again. Awesome! You saved me 
 time.
 Thank you! :)
>>>
>>> Good for you, not for me. Changing the setting had no effect here.
>>>
>>> There are lots of pages where SeaMonkey omits some of the content 
>>> for
>>> no reason I can
>>> fathom. A good example is . Choose any
>>> puzzle and try to print
>>> it. You get the grid but no numbers -- totally useless.
>>
>> SM 2.26.1:  I can print the sudoku ok but I cannot print the boxer
>> shorts pic from the
>> original url.  The pic actually comes from:
>> http://a248.e.akamai.net/f/248/9086/10h/origin-d4.scene7.com/is/image/Underarmour/V5ProdWithBadge?=on-model-mid|pdpZoomDesktop=0.50=jpg=85=sharp2=on,off=f0f0f0=0,0,1836,1950&$p_pos=450,380&$p_size=910,0=0,0,0,0&$p_src=is{Underarmour/V5-1277238-158_HTF}
>>  
>>
>>
>>
>> IE does not show any pics at all.
>
> So the image is from a different site than the main site. Check 
> Edit - Preferences -
> Security - Images - and set the radio button for Load all images. 
> See if that helps.

 No change for me.  Already had it set to "all images". Toggled it 
 and still the same.
 Might help Ray though.

>>> I had already (and I still use) "load all images" set.
>>> I think that this option is to permit to see images in the Browser. 
>>> The problem is that the image is visible on the screen of the Browser 
>>> - so perfect ---> But the "print content" did not have the image. - 
>>> so not perfect.
>>> I just try to print with Internet Explorer ---> Same Problem !!!
>>>
>>> Therefore my question is the same "Is this normal  ?"
>>
>> For that site it probably is.
>>
>> Did you notice the zoom feature when you move the mouse over an image?
>>
>> Did you notice the images are links, not images coded in  tags in 
>> that web page?
>>
>> Did you try opening the image link in a new tab and printing it?
>>
>> I have no trouble opening an image link in a new tab and printing it.
>>
> Yes, me too, I noticed that also earlier ...but :
> A page can be showed, but cannot be printed . this is strange ...
> 

I think I have seen pages that could not be printed because the owner
had them composed that way on purpose.  This limits the ability of
others to capture and modify the page.  When I have seen this, disabling
JavaScript AFTER the page is fully loaded defeats the blocking of
printing.

-- 
David E. Ross


Yes, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and other
"founding fathers" owned slaves.  However, they created
a nation.  Robert E. Lee, Jefferson Davis, Thomas
"Stonewall" Jackson and other "heroes" of the
Confederacy tried to tear the nation apart.  Statues
and other monuments to those "heroes" of the
Confederacy actually celebrate traitors and treason.

See my .
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image not printed

2017-09-10 Thread Ray_Net

WaltS48 wrote on 10-09-17 02:41:

On 9/9/17 12:53 PM, Ray_Net wrote:

Paul in Houston, TX wrote on 09-09-17 02:41:

Ed Mullen wrote:
On 9/8/2017 at 12:04 AM, Paul in Houston, TX created this epitome 
of digital genius:

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

Glen wrote:


David E. Ross wrote:

On 9/7/2017 1:25 PM, Ray_Net wrote:

On the printed page and on the print-preview screen the image is
not present... ...printing that page
 







Is this normal ?



By any chance, is it a background image?  If so:

1.  On the menu bar, go to [File > Page Setup].

2.  On the Format & Options tab of the Page Setup Window, make 
sure

the Print Background checkbox is checked.


I kept forgetting to look it up, as to the reason images were not
printing for me, and now it works again. Awesome! You saved me 
time.

Thank you! :)


Good for you, not for me. Changing the setting had no effect here.

There are lots of pages where SeaMonkey omits some of the content 
for

no reason I can
fathom. A good example is . Choose any
puzzle and try to print
it. You get the grid but no numbers -- totally useless.


SM 2.26.1:  I can print the sudoku ok but I cannot print the boxer
shorts pic from the
original url.  The pic actually comes from:
http://a248.e.akamai.net/f/248/9086/10h/origin-d4.scene7.com/is/image/Underarmour/V5ProdWithBadge?=on-model-mid|pdpZoomDesktop=0.50=jpg=85=sharp2=on,off=f0f0f0=0,0,1836,1950&$p_pos=450,380&$p_size=910,0=0,0,0,0&$p_src=is{Underarmour/V5-1277238-158_HTF} 




IE does not show any pics at all.


So the image is from a different site than the main site. Check 
Edit - Preferences -
Security - Images - and set the radio button for Load all images. 
See if that helps.


No change for me.  Already had it set to "all images". Toggled it 
and still the same.

Might help Ray though.


I had already (and I still use) "load all images" set.
I think that this option is to permit to see images in the Browser. 
The problem is that the image is visible on the screen of the Browser 
- so perfect ---> But the "print content" did not have the image. - 
so not perfect.

I just try to print with Internet Explorer ---> Same Problem !!!

Therefore my question is the same "Is this normal  ?"


For that site it probably is.

Did you notice the zoom feature when you move the mouse over an image?

Did you notice the images are links, not images coded in  tags in 
that web page?


Did you try opening the image link in a new tab and printing it?

I have no trouble opening an image link in a new tab and printing it.


Yes, me too, I noticed that also earlier ...but :
A page can be showed, but cannot be printed . this is strange ...
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image not printed

2017-09-09 Thread WaltS48

On 9/9/17 12:53 PM, Ray_Net wrote:

Paul in Houston, TX wrote on 09-09-17 02:41:

Ed Mullen wrote:
On 9/8/2017 at 12:04 AM, Paul in Houston, TX created this epitome of 
digital genius:

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

Glen wrote:


David E. Ross wrote:

On 9/7/2017 1:25 PM, Ray_Net wrote:

On the printed page and on the print-preview screen the image is
not present... ...printing that page
 







Is this normal ?



By any chance, is it a background image?  If so:

1.  On the menu bar, go to [File > Page Setup].

2.  On the Format & Options tab of the Page Setup Window, make sure
the Print Background checkbox is checked.


I kept forgetting to look it up, as to the reason images were not
printing for me, and now it works again. Awesome! You saved me time.
Thank you! :)


Good for you, not for me. Changing the setting had no effect here.

There are lots of pages where SeaMonkey omits some of the content for
no reason I can
fathom. A good example is . Choose any
puzzle and try to print
it. You get the grid but no numbers -- totally useless.


SM 2.26.1:  I can print the sudoku ok but I cannot print the boxer
shorts pic from the
original url.  The pic actually comes from:
http://a248.e.akamai.net/f/248/9086/10h/origin-d4.scene7.com/is/image/Underarmour/V5ProdWithBadge?=on-model-mid|pdpZoomDesktop=0.50=jpg=85=sharp2=on,off=f0f0f0=0,0,1836,1950&$p_pos=450,380&$p_size=910,0=0,0,0,0&$p_src=is{Underarmour/V5-1277238-158_HTF} 




IE does not show any pics at all.


So the image is from a different site than the main site.  Check Edit 
- Preferences -
Security - Images - and set the radio button for Load all images. See 
if that helps.


No change for me.  Already had it set to "all images".  Toggled it and 
still the same.

Might help Ray though.


I had already (and I still use) "load all images" set.
I think that this option is to permit to see images in the Browser. The 
problem is that the image is visible on the screen of the Browser - so 
perfect ---> But the "print content" did not have the image. - so not 
perfect.

I just try to print with Internet Explorer ---> Same Problem !!!

Therefore my question is the same "Is this normal  ?"


For that site it probably is.

Did you notice the zoom feature when you move the mouse over an image?

Did you notice the images are links, not images coded in  tags in 
that web page?


Did you try opening the image link in a new tab and printing it?

I have no trouble opening an image link in a new tab and printing it.

--
Go Bucs, Pitt, Steelers!
Coexist 
National Popular Vote 
Ubuntu 16.04 LTS - Unity Desktop
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image not printed

2017-09-09 Thread Ray_Net

Paul in Houston, TX wrote on 09-09-17 02:41:

Ed Mullen wrote:
On 9/8/2017 at 12:04 AM, Paul in Houston, TX created this epitome of 
digital genius:

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

Glen wrote:


David E. Ross wrote:

On 9/7/2017 1:25 PM, Ray_Net wrote:

On the printed page and on the print-preview screen the image is
not present... ...printing that page
 







Is this normal ?



By any chance, is it a background image?  If so:

1.  On the menu bar, go to [File > Page Setup].

2.  On the Format & Options tab of the Page Setup Window, make sure
the Print Background checkbox is checked.


I kept forgetting to look it up, as to the reason images were not
printing for me, and now it works again. Awesome! You saved me time.
Thank you! :)


Good for you, not for me. Changing the setting had no effect here.

There are lots of pages where SeaMonkey omits some of the content for
no reason I can
fathom. A good example is . Choose any
puzzle and try to print
it. You get the grid but no numbers -- totally useless.


SM 2.26.1:  I can print the sudoku ok but I cannot print the boxer
shorts pic from the
original url.  The pic actually comes from:
http://a248.e.akamai.net/f/248/9086/10h/origin-d4.scene7.com/is/image/Underarmour/V5ProdWithBadge?=on-model-mid|pdpZoomDesktop=0.50=jpg=85=sharp2=on,off=f0f0f0=0,0,1836,1950&$p_pos=450,380&$p_size=910,0=0,0,0,0&$p_src=is{Underarmour/V5-1277238-158_HTF} 




IE does not show any pics at all.


So the image is from a different site than the main site.  Check Edit 
- Preferences -
Security - Images - and set the radio button for Load all images.  
See if that helps.


No change for me.  Already had it set to "all images".  Toggled it and 
still the same.

Might help Ray though.


I had already (and I still use) "load all images" set.
I think that this option is to permit to see images in the Browser. The 
problem is that the image is visible on the screen of the Browser - so 
perfect ---> But the "print content" did not have the image. - so not 
perfect.

I just try to print with Internet Explorer ---> Same Problem !!!

Therefore my question is the same "Is this normal  ?"
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image not printed

2017-09-08 Thread Paul in Houston, TX

Ed Mullen wrote:

On 9/8/2017 at 12:04 AM, Paul in Houston, TX created this epitome of digital 
genius:

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

Glen wrote:


David E. Ross wrote:

On 9/7/2017 1:25 PM, Ray_Net wrote:

On the printed page and on the print-preview screen the image is
not present... ...printing that page






Is this normal ?



By any chance, is it a background image?  If so:

1.  On the menu bar, go to [File > Page Setup].

2.  On the Format & Options tab of the Page Setup Window, make sure
the Print Background checkbox is checked.


I kept forgetting to look it up, as to the reason images were not
printing for me, and now it works again. Awesome! You saved me time.
Thank you! :)


Good for you, not for me. Changing the setting had no effect here.

There are lots of pages where SeaMonkey omits some of the content for
no reason I can
fathom. A good example is . Choose any
puzzle and try to print
it. You get the grid but no numbers -- totally useless.


SM 2.26.1:  I can print the sudoku ok but I cannot print the boxer
shorts pic from the
original url.  The pic actually comes from:
http://a248.e.akamai.net/f/248/9086/10h/origin-d4.scene7.com/is/image/Underarmour/V5ProdWithBadge?=on-model-mid|pdpZoomDesktop=0.50=jpg=85=sharp2=on,off=f0f0f0=0,0,1836,1950&$p_pos=450,380&$p_size=910,0=0,0,0,0&$p_src=is{Underarmour/V5-1277238-158_HTF}


IE does not show any pics at all.


So the image is from a different site than the main site.  Check Edit - 
Preferences -
Security - Images - and set the radio button for Load all images.  See if that 
helps.


No change for me.  Already had it set to "all images".  Toggled it and still 
the same.
Might help Ray though.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image not printed

2017-09-08 Thread Ed Mullen
On 9/8/2017 at 12:04 AM, Paul in Houston, TX created this epitome of 
digital genius:

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

Glen wrote:


David E. Ross wrote:

On 9/7/2017 1:25 PM, Ray_Net wrote:

On the printed page and on the print-preview screen the image is
not present... ...printing that page





Is this normal ?



By any chance, is it a background image?  If so:

1.  On the menu bar, go to [File > Page Setup].

2.  On the Format & Options tab of the Page Setup Window, make sure
the Print Background checkbox is checked.


I kept forgetting to look it up, as to the reason images were not
printing for me, and now it works again. Awesome! You saved me time.
Thank you! :)


Good for you, not for me. Changing the setting had no effect here.

There are lots of pages where SeaMonkey omits some of the content for
no reason I can
fathom. A good example is . Choose any
puzzle and try to print
it. You get the grid but no numbers -- totally useless.


SM 2.26.1:  I can print the sudoku ok but I cannot print the boxer
shorts pic from the
original url.  The pic actually comes from:
http://a248.e.akamai.net/f/248/9086/10h/origin-d4.scene7.com/is/image/Underarmour/V5ProdWithBadge?=on-model-mid|pdpZoomDesktop=0.50=jpg=85=sharp2=on,off=f0f0f0=0,0,1836,1950&$p_pos=450,380&$p_size=910,0=0,0,0,0&$p_src=is{Underarmour/V5-1277238-158_HTF}

IE does not show any pics at all.


So the image is from a different site than the main site.  Check Edit - 
Preferences - Security - Images - and set the radio button for Load all 
images.  See if that helps.



--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net/
Suburbia: Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image not printed

2017-09-08 Thread Ray_Net

Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 08-09-17 06:10:

WaltS48 wrote:


On 9/7/17 9:23 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:


There are lots of pages where SeaMonkey omits some of the content
for no reason I can fathom. A good example is
. Choose any puzzle and try to print it.
You get the grid but no numbers -- totally useless.


Do you select Print from under the puzzle, or Print from the
SeaMonkey Menu bar?

I see the numbers in both print previews. Haven't tried to print it.


I don't see the numbers in either scenario.

It works for me, by the SM print-preview or going thru the "print" 
button on the page.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image not printed

2017-09-08 Thread Ray_Net

Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 08-09-17 03:23:

Glen wrote:


David E. Ross wrote:

On 9/7/2017 1:25 PM, Ray_Net wrote:

On the printed page and on the print-preview screen the image is
not present... ...printing that page
 




Is this normal ?



By any chance, is it a background image?  If so:

1.  On the menu bar, go to [File > Page Setup].

2.  On the Format & Options tab of the Page Setup Window, make sure
the Print Background checkbox is checked.


I kept forgetting to look it up, as to the reason images were not
printing for me, and now it works again. Awesome! You saved me time.
Thank you! :)


Good for you, not for me. Changing the setting had no effect here.

Same for me. This option did not cure the problem.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image not printed

2017-09-07 Thread Paul B. Gallagher

Paul in Houston, TX wrote:


Paul B. Gallagher wrote:


Good for you, not for me. Changing the setting had no effect here.

There are lots of pages where SeaMonkey omits some of the content
for no reason I can fathom. A good example is
. Choose any puzzle and try to print it.
You get the grid but no numbers -- totally useless.


SM 2.26.1:  I can print the sudoku ok but I cannot print the boxer
shorts pic from the original url.  The pic actually comes from:
http://a248.e.akamai.net/f/248/9086/10h/origin-d4.scene7.com/is/image/Underarmour/V5ProdWithBadge?=on-model-mid|pdpZoomDesktop=0.50=jpg=85=sharp2=on,off=f0f0f0=0,0,1836,1950&$p_pos=450,380&$p_size=910,0=0,0,0,0&$p_src=is{Underarmour/V5-1277238-158_HTF}

 IE does not show any pics at all.


OK, I can see the boxers at the page you link, and they also show up in 
the print preview, unlike the OP's page.


--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image not printed

2017-09-07 Thread Paul B. Gallagher

WaltS48 wrote:


On 9/7/17 9:23 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:


There are lots of pages where SeaMonkey omits some of the content
for no reason I can fathom. A good example is
. Choose any puzzle and try to print it.
You get the grid but no numbers -- totally useless.


Do you select Print from under the puzzle, or Print from the
SeaMonkey Menu bar?

I see the numbers in both print previews. Haven't tried to print it.


I don't see the numbers in either scenario.

--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image not printed

2017-09-07 Thread Paul in Houston, TX

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

Glen wrote:


David E. Ross wrote:

On 9/7/2017 1:25 PM, Ray_Net wrote:

On the printed page and on the print-preview screen the image is
not present... ...printing that page




Is this normal ?



By any chance, is it a background image?  If so:

1.  On the menu bar, go to [File > Page Setup].

2.  On the Format & Options tab of the Page Setup Window, make sure
the Print Background checkbox is checked.


I kept forgetting to look it up, as to the reason images were not
printing for me, and now it works again. Awesome! You saved me time.
Thank you! :)


Good for you, not for me. Changing the setting had no effect here.

There are lots of pages where SeaMonkey omits some of the content for no reason 
I can
fathom. A good example is . Choose any puzzle and try 
to print
it. You get the grid but no numbers -- totally useless.


SM 2.26.1:  I can print the sudoku ok but I cannot print the boxer shorts pic 
from the
original url.  The pic actually comes from:
http://a248.e.akamai.net/f/248/9086/10h/origin-d4.scene7.com/is/image/Underarmour/V5ProdWithBadge?=on-model-mid|pdpZoomDesktop=0.50=jpg=85=sharp2=on,off=f0f0f0=0,0,1836,1950&$p_pos=450,380&$p_size=910,0=0,0,0,0&$p_src=is{Underarmour/V5-1277238-158_HTF}
IE does not show any pics at all.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image not printed

2017-09-07 Thread WaltS48

On 9/7/17 9:23 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

Glen wrote:


David E. Ross wrote:

On 9/7/2017 1:25 PM, Ray_Net wrote:

On the printed page and on the print-preview screen the image is
not present... ...printing that page
 




Is this normal ?



By any chance, is it a background image?  If so:

1.  On the menu bar, go to [File > Page Setup].

2.  On the Format & Options tab of the Page Setup Window, make sure
the Print Background checkbox is checked.


I kept forgetting to look it up, as to the reason images were not
printing for me, and now it works again. Awesome! You saved me time.
Thank you! :)


Good for you, not for me. Changing the setting had no effect here.

There are lots of pages where SeaMonkey omits some of the content for no 
reason I can fathom. A good example is . 
Choose any puzzle and try to print it. You get the grid but no numbers 
-- totally useless.




Do you select Print from under the puzzle, or Print from the SeaMonkey 
Menu bar?


I see the numbers in both print previews. Haven't tried to print it.

--
Go Bucs!
Coexist 
National Popular Vote 
Ubuntu 16.04 LTS - Unity Desktop
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image not printed

2017-09-07 Thread Paul B. Gallagher

Glen wrote:


David E. Ross wrote:

On 9/7/2017 1:25 PM, Ray_Net wrote:

On the printed page and on the print-preview screen the image is
not present... ...printing that page



Is this normal ?



By any chance, is it a background image?  If so:

1.  On the menu bar, go to [File > Page Setup].

2.  On the Format & Options tab of the Page Setup Window, make sure
the Print Background checkbox is checked.


I kept forgetting to look it up, as to the reason images were not
printing for me, and now it works again. Awesome! You saved me time.
Thank you! :)


Good for you, not for me. Changing the setting had no effect here.

There are lots of pages where SeaMonkey omits some of the content for no 
reason I can fathom. A good example is . 
Choose any puzzle and try to print it. You get the grid but no numbers 
-- totally useless.


--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image not printed

2017-09-07 Thread Glen via support-seamonkey

David E. Ross wrote:

On 9/7/2017 1:25 PM, Ray_Net wrote:

On the printed page and on the print-preview screen the image is not
present...
...printing that page

Is this normal ?



By any chance, is it a background image?  If so:

1.  On the menu bar, go to [File > Page Setup].

2.  On the Format & Options tab of the Page Setup Window, make sure the
Print Background checkbox is checked.

I kept forgetting to look it up, as to the reason images were not 
printing for me, and now it works again. Awesome! You saved me time. 
Thank you! :)

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image not printed

2017-09-07 Thread David E. Ross
On 9/7/2017 1:25 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
> On the printed page and on the print-preview screen the image is not 
> present...
> ...printing that page
> 
> Is this normal ?
> 

By any chance, is it a background image?  If so:

1.  On the menu bar, go to [File > Page Setup].

2.  On the Format & Options tab of the Page Setup Window, make sure the
Print Background checkbox is checked.

-- 
David E. Ross


Yes, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and other
"founding fathers" owned slaves.  However, they created
a nation.  Robert E. Lee, Jefferson Davis, Thomas
"Stonewall" Jackson and other "heroes" of the
Confederacy tried to tear the nation apart.  Statues
and other monuments to those "heroes" of the
Confederacy actually celebrate traitors and treason.

See my .
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image not printed

2017-09-07 Thread TCW

On 9/7/2017 3:25 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
On the printed page and on the print-preview screen the image is not 
present...

...printing that page
 


Is this normal ?


Depends on the site, formatting of the code and how SM interprets it. 
Some print images, some not. I see no images on SM 2.48. FF 56.0b1 shows 
no images either. IE11, same thing.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image files in disk cache

2015-11-05 Thread David H. Durgee

Ray_Net wrote:

David H. Durgee wrote on 04/11/2015 21:06:

Ray_Net wrote:

David H. Durgee wrote on 04/11/2015 16:03:

Ray_Net wrote:

David H. Durgee wrote on 04/11/2015 00:55:

Ray_Net wrote:

David H. Durgee wrote on 03/11/2015 21:17:

Ray_Net wrote:

David H. Durgee wrote on 03/11/2015 17:14:

I seem to recall the ability in the past to access an image
file in
the disk cache from the media table in the page information,
but at
present I am unable to locate it.  I can of course select an
image
and
save it to a file elsewhere, but when I only need the file for
immediate use this requires me to take action to delete this file
when
I am done with it.

Am I missing a setting somewhere?  How can I access an image file
without needing to save it outside the cache for one-time-use
situations?

Dave

You may use http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/image_cache_viewer.html
and .

When selecting a cache item in the upper pane of
ImageCacheViewer, the
image is displayed in the lower pane, and you can copy the
image to
the
clipboard by pressing Ctrl+M.


then CTRL-V into IrfanView where you can do what you want with
this
image.


Hmm, that seems to provide a Windows solution. "Unfortunately,"
I am
a linux user and need a solution I can use here.

A bit of searching found me a perl tool, but unfortunately that
will
only work if the browser is closed as a key file is kept in memory
while the browser is operating.

Thanks for the pointer, perhaps someone else knows of a linux tool
and
I will keep looking myself.

Dave

Could this one help ?
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/cacheviewer/



It is unclear to me what additional features this add-on offers from
the description, and given it is a FireFox add-on it would need to be
converted to run with SeaMonkey.

Sometimes there is no need for a conversion.


Does anyone have it installed and can tell me if it is possible to
get
the actual full file name for a cached image file with it?

You tell me that i must install this extension on my SM to do your
test ?
What will you do with this file name:
~/.cache/mozilla/seamonkey/{SALT}.default/Cache/A/32/2D35Fd01 ?
The only way to catch it into an image-program is to see it per
exemple
inside https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/cacheviewer/
and do there a "COPY" then start your prefered image-program and do a
"PASTE".
Normally all image-programs are unable to open a file when this
filename
did not contains an "image-extension" like .jpg.



I was not telling you to do so.  I was simply asking if anyone who
already had it installed could tell me in advance if it had the
feature I needed.

Many programs, Gimp for example, don't mind working without an
extension and inspect the file content to see if they recognize it. So
while the extension makes it easier for users to determine what a file
is by inspection it is by no means a requirement.

Dave

Anyway when you are on a page, you can simply rigth-click on an image
and take the choice "Copy Image" ..then you "paste" it into your program
without the need of a filename.


I saw that choice, but when I attempted to do so with the program I
wanted to paste the image into what was pasted was the URI, not the
image itself.  I had assumed that this would be universal, but given
your suggestion I tried another program and found it pasted the image
as desired.

This suggests of course that the program needs to be fixed.  As this
was the sole reason for this thread, I will consider this topic closed.

Dave

Sometimes, I got also the URI instead of the image, so I modify my actions:
1. When you are on a page, you can simply rigth-click on an image
and take the choice "VIEW Image"
2. Then a new SM window opens with only that image in the center.
3. Then you can simply rigth-click on an image
and take the choice "COPY Image".
4. Paste into your program.


I tried this and unfortunately still get the URI pasted in the program I 
was attempting to use this with.  I get the image pasted in gimp, so it 
seems that the program is the problem.  I am in contact with the 
maintainer, so perhaps this can be fixed in a later release.


Thanks for your suggestions.

Dave
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image files in disk cache

2015-11-04 Thread Ray_Net

David H. Durgee wrote on 04/11/2015 21:06:

Ray_Net wrote:

David H. Durgee wrote on 04/11/2015 16:03:

Ray_Net wrote:

David H. Durgee wrote on 04/11/2015 00:55:

Ray_Net wrote:

David H. Durgee wrote on 03/11/2015 21:17:

Ray_Net wrote:

David H. Durgee wrote on 03/11/2015 17:14:
I seem to recall the ability in the past to access an image 
file in
the disk cache from the media table in the page information, 
but at
present I am unable to locate it.  I can of course select an 
image

and
save it to a file elsewhere, but when I only need the file for
immediate use this requires me to take action to delete this file
when
I am done with it.

Am I missing a setting somewhere?  How can I access an image file
without needing to save it outside the cache for one-time-use
situations?

Dave

You may use http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/image_cache_viewer.html
and .

When selecting a cache item in the upper pane of
ImageCacheViewer, the
image is displayed in the lower pane, and you can copy the 
image to

the
clipboard by pressing Ctrl+M.


then CTRL-V into IrfanView where you can do what you want with 
this

image.


Hmm, that seems to provide a Windows solution. "Unfortunately," 
I am

a linux user and need a solution I can use here.

A bit of searching found me a perl tool, but unfortunately that 
will

only work if the browser is closed as a key file is kept in memory
while the browser is operating.

Thanks for the pointer, perhaps someone else knows of a linux tool
and
I will keep looking myself.

Dave

Could this one help ?
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/cacheviewer/



It is unclear to me what additional features this add-on offers from
the description, and given it is a FireFox add-on it would need to be
converted to run with SeaMonkey.

Sometimes there is no need for a conversion.


Does anyone have it installed and can tell me if it is possible to 
get

the actual full file name for a cached image file with it?

You tell me that i must install this extension on my SM to do your
test ?
What will you do with this file name:
~/.cache/mozilla/seamonkey/{SALT}.default/Cache/A/32/2D35Fd01 ?
The only way to catch it into an image-program is to see it per 
exemple

inside https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/cacheviewer/
and do there a "COPY" then start your prefered image-program and do a
"PASTE".
Normally all image-programs are unable to open a file when this 
filename

did not contains an "image-extension" like .jpg.



I was not telling you to do so.  I was simply asking if anyone who
already had it installed could tell me in advance if it had the
feature I needed.

Many programs, Gimp for example, don't mind working without an
extension and inspect the file content to see if they recognize it. So
while the extension makes it easier for users to determine what a file
is by inspection it is by no means a requirement.

Dave

Anyway when you are on a page, you can simply rigth-click on an image
and take the choice "Copy Image" ..then you "paste" it into your program
without the need of a filename.


I saw that choice, but when I attempted to do so with the program I 
wanted to paste the image into what was pasted was the URI, not the 
image itself.  I had assumed that this would be universal, but given 
your suggestion I tried another program and found it pasted the image 
as desired.


This suggests of course that the program needs to be fixed.  As this 
was the sole reason for this thread, I will consider this topic closed.


Dave

Sometimes, I got also the URI instead of the image, so I modify my actions:
1. When you are on a page, you can simply rigth-click on an image
and take the choice "VIEW Image"
2. Then a new SM window opens with only that image in the center.
3. Then you can simply rigth-click on an image
and take the choice "COPY Image".
4. Paste into your program.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image files in disk cache

2015-11-04 Thread David H. Durgee

Ray_Net wrote:

David H. Durgee wrote on 04/11/2015 16:03:

Ray_Net wrote:

David H. Durgee wrote on 04/11/2015 00:55:

Ray_Net wrote:

David H. Durgee wrote on 03/11/2015 21:17:

Ray_Net wrote:

David H. Durgee wrote on 03/11/2015 17:14:

I seem to recall the ability in the past to access an image file in
the disk cache from the media table in the page information, but at
present I am unable to locate it.  I can of course select an image
and
save it to a file elsewhere, but when I only need the file for
immediate use this requires me to take action to delete this file
when
I am done with it.

Am I missing a setting somewhere?  How can I access an image file
without needing to save it outside the cache for one-time-use
situations?

Dave

You may use http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/image_cache_viewer.html
and .

When selecting a cache item in the upper pane of
ImageCacheViewer, the
image is displayed in the lower pane, and you can copy the image to
the
clipboard by pressing Ctrl+M.


then CTRL-V into IrfanView where you can do what you want with this
image.


Hmm, that seems to provide a Windows solution. "Unfortunately," I am
a linux user and need a solution I can use here.

A bit of searching found me a perl tool, but unfortunately that will
only work if the browser is closed as a key file is kept in memory
while the browser is operating.

Thanks for the pointer, perhaps someone else knows of a linux tool
and
I will keep looking myself.

Dave

Could this one help ?
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/cacheviewer/



It is unclear to me what additional features this add-on offers from
the description, and given it is a FireFox add-on it would need to be
converted to run with SeaMonkey.

Sometimes there is no need for a conversion.


Does anyone have it installed and can tell me if it is possible to get
the actual full file name for a cached image file with it?

You tell me that i must install this extension on my SM to do your
test ?
What will you do with this file name:
~/.cache/mozilla/seamonkey/{SALT}.default/Cache/A/32/2D35Fd01 ?
The only way to catch it into an image-program is to see it per exemple
inside https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/cacheviewer/
and do there a "COPY" then start your prefered image-program and do a
"PASTE".
Normally all image-programs are unable to open a file when this filename
did not contains an "image-extension" like .jpg.



I was not telling you to do so.  I was simply asking if anyone who
already had it installed could tell me in advance if it had the
feature I needed.

Many programs, Gimp for example, don't mind working without an
extension and inspect the file content to see if they recognize it. So
while the extension makes it easier for users to determine what a file
is by inspection it is by no means a requirement.

Dave

Anyway when you are on a page, you can simply rigth-click on an image
and take the choice "Copy Image" ..then you "paste" it into your program
without the need of a filename.


I saw that choice, but when I attempted to do so with the program I 
wanted to paste the image into what was pasted was the URI, not the 
image itself.  I had assumed that this would be universal, but given 
your suggestion I tried another program and found it pasted the image as 
desired.


This suggests of course that the program needs to be fixed.  As this was 
the sole reason for this thread, I will consider this topic closed.


Dave
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image files in disk cache

2015-11-04 Thread David H. Durgee

Ray_Net wrote:

David H. Durgee wrote on 04/11/2015 00:55:

Ray_Net wrote:

David H. Durgee wrote on 03/11/2015 21:17:

Ray_Net wrote:

David H. Durgee wrote on 03/11/2015 17:14:

I seem to recall the ability in the past to access an image file in
the disk cache from the media table in the page information, but at
present I am unable to locate it.  I can of course select an image
and
save it to a file elsewhere, but when I only need the file for
immediate use this requires me to take action to delete this file
when
I am done with it.

Am I missing a setting somewhere?  How can I access an image file
without needing to save it outside the cache for one-time-use
situations?

Dave

You may use http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/image_cache_viewer.html
and .

When selecting a cache item in the upper pane of ImageCacheViewer, the
image is displayed in the lower pane, and you can copy the image to
the
clipboard by pressing Ctrl+M.


then CTRL-V into IrfanView where you can do what you want with this
image.


Hmm, that seems to provide a Windows solution. "Unfortunately," I am
a linux user and need a solution I can use here.

A bit of searching found me a perl tool, but unfortunately that will
only work if the browser is closed as a key file is kept in memory
while the browser is operating.

Thanks for the pointer, perhaps someone else knows of a linux tool and
I will keep looking myself.

Dave

Could this one help ?
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/cacheviewer/



It is unclear to me what additional features this add-on offers from
the description, and given it is a FireFox add-on it would need to be
converted to run with SeaMonkey.

Sometimes there is no need for a conversion.


Does anyone have it installed and can tell me if it is possible to get
the actual full file name for a cached image file with it?

You tell me that i must install this extension on my SM to do your test ?
What will you do with this file name:
~/.cache/mozilla/seamonkey/{SALT}.default/Cache/A/32/2D35Fd01 ?
The only way to catch it into an image-program is to see it per exemple
inside https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/cacheviewer/
and do there a "COPY" then start your prefered image-program and do a
"PASTE".
Normally all image-programs are unable to open a file when this filename
did not contains an "image-extension" like .jpg.



I was not telling you to do so.  I was simply asking if anyone who 
already had it installed could tell me in advance if it had the feature 
I needed.


Many programs, Gimp for example, don't mind working without an extension 
and inspect the file content to see if they recognize it.  So while the 
extension makes it easier for users to determine what a file is by 
inspection it is by no means a requirement.


Dave
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image files in disk cache

2015-11-04 Thread David H. Durgee

Lee wrote:

On 11/3/15, David H. Durgee  wrote:

Richard Owlett wrote:

David H. Durgee wrote:

I seem to recall the ability in the past to access an image file
in the disk cache from the media table in the page information,


do you mean view / page info / media tab ?



Yes, that is exactly where I was referring to.  I seem to recall at one 
point there being a way to select a media file there and on a pop-up 
menu entry having access to the full file name in the cache.  It has 
been long enough ago that I forget the specifics.



but at present I am unable to locate it.  I can of course select
an image and save it to a file elsewhere, but when I only need
the file for immediate use this requires me to take action to
delete this file when I am done with it.

Am I missing a setting somewhere?  How can I access an image file
without needing to save it outside the cache for one-time-use
situations?

Dave


If I understand your question, Go->History .
I just tried it. Also found that using History's search box entering
"jpg" [without quotes] displayed only images in jpg format.



Nope, I am not after a link to the image file on the internet.  I am
after the actual location of the image file saved in the disk cache.

I am looking for an actual fully qualified file name that I can paste
into an "open file" type dialog to access the image file from the disk
cache.


I don't see anything that will give you the name of the file in cache,
but maybe browsing thru all the image files in cache would be close
enuf?  Something along the lines of

find $SEAMONKEYCACHEDIR -type f -exec file '{}' \; |\
   grep PNG | cut -d: -f1 |\
   awk '{ cmd="imageviewer " $0; print "" | cmd ; close(cmd)}'

where $SEAMONKEYCACHEDIR is the name of the SM top level cache
directory & "imageviewer" is the name of your image viewer program ?



Unfortunately there are thousands of images in the cache and and it 
would be simpler to "save as" the image and then use that than to take 
this approach.  I am hoping to save some steps, not add another one.


Dave
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image files in disk cache

2015-11-04 Thread Lee
On 11/3/15, David H. Durgee  wrote:
> Richard Owlett wrote:
>> David H. Durgee wrote:
>>> I seem to recall the ability in the past to access an image file
>>> in the disk cache from the media table in the page information,

do you mean view / page info / media tab ?

>>> but at present I am unable to locate it.  I can of course select
>>> an image and save it to a file elsewhere, but when I only need
>>> the file for immediate use this requires me to take action to
>>> delete this file when I am done with it.
>>>
>>> Am I missing a setting somewhere?  How can I access an image file
>>> without needing to save it outside the cache for one-time-use
>>> situations?
>>>
>>> Dave
>>
>> If I understand your question, Go->History .
>> I just tried it. Also found that using History's search box entering
>> "jpg" [without quotes] displayed only images in jpg format.
>>
>
> Nope, I am not after a link to the image file on the internet.  I am
> after the actual location of the image file saved in the disk cache.
>
> I am looking for an actual fully qualified file name that I can paste
> into an "open file" type dialog to access the image file from the disk
> cache.

I don't see anything that will give you the name of the file in cache,
but maybe browsing thru all the image files in cache would be close
enuf?  Something along the lines of

find $SEAMONKEYCACHEDIR -type f -exec file '{}' \; |\
  grep PNG | cut -d: -f1 |\
  awk '{ cmd="imageviewer " $0; print "" | cmd ; close(cmd)}'

where $SEAMONKEYCACHEDIR is the name of the SM top level cache
directory & "imageviewer" is the name of your image viewer program ?

Regards,
Lee
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image files in disk cache

2015-11-04 Thread Ray_Net

David H. Durgee wrote on 04/11/2015 16:03:

Ray_Net wrote:

David H. Durgee wrote on 04/11/2015 00:55:

Ray_Net wrote:

David H. Durgee wrote on 03/11/2015 21:17:

Ray_Net wrote:

David H. Durgee wrote on 03/11/2015 17:14:

I seem to recall the ability in the past to access an image file in
the disk cache from the media table in the page information, but at
present I am unable to locate it.  I can of course select an image
and
save it to a file elsewhere, but when I only need the file for
immediate use this requires me to take action to delete this file
when
I am done with it.

Am I missing a setting somewhere?  How can I access an image file
without needing to save it outside the cache for one-time-use
situations?

Dave

You may use http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/image_cache_viewer.html
and .

When selecting a cache item in the upper pane of 
ImageCacheViewer, the

image is displayed in the lower pane, and you can copy the image to
the
clipboard by pressing Ctrl+M.


then CTRL-V into IrfanView where you can do what you want with this
image.


Hmm, that seems to provide a Windows solution. "Unfortunately," I am
a linux user and need a solution I can use here.

A bit of searching found me a perl tool, but unfortunately that will
only work if the browser is closed as a key file is kept in memory
while the browser is operating.

Thanks for the pointer, perhaps someone else knows of a linux tool 
and

I will keep looking myself.

Dave

Could this one help ?
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/cacheviewer/



It is unclear to me what additional features this add-on offers from
the description, and given it is a FireFox add-on it would need to be
converted to run with SeaMonkey.

Sometimes there is no need for a conversion.


Does anyone have it installed and can tell me if it is possible to get
the actual full file name for a cached image file with it?
You tell me that i must install this extension on my SM to do your 
test ?

What will you do with this file name:
~/.cache/mozilla/seamonkey/{SALT}.default/Cache/A/32/2D35Fd01 ?
The only way to catch it into an image-program is to see it per exemple
inside https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/cacheviewer/
and do there a "COPY" then start your prefered image-program and do a
"PASTE".
Normally all image-programs are unable to open a file when this filename
did not contains an "image-extension" like .jpg.



I was not telling you to do so.  I was simply asking if anyone who 
already had it installed could tell me in advance if it had the 
feature I needed.


Many programs, Gimp for example, don't mind working without an 
extension and inspect the file content to see if they recognize it.  
So while the extension makes it easier for users to determine what a 
file is by inspection it is by no means a requirement.


Dave
Anyway when you are on a page, you can simply rigth-click on an image 
and take the choice "Copy Image" ..then you "paste" it into your program 
without the need of a filename.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image files in disk cache

2015-11-03 Thread David H. Durgee

Richard Owlett wrote:

David H. Durgee wrote:

I seem to recall the ability in the past to access an image file
in the disk cache from the media table in the page information,
but at present I am unable to locate it.  I can of course select
an image and save it to a file elsewhere, but when I only need
the file for immediate use this requires me to take action to
delete this file when I am done with it.

Am I missing a setting somewhere?  How can I access an image file
without needing to save it outside the cache for one-time-use
situations?

Dave


If I understand your question, Go->History .
I just tried it. Also found that using History's search box entering
"jpg" [without quotes] displayed only images in jpg format.



Nope, I am not after a link to the image file on the internet.  I am 
after the actual location of the image file saved in the disk cache.


I am looking for an actual fully qualified file name that I can paste 
into an "open file" type dialog to access the image file from the disk 
cache.


Dave

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image files in disk cache

2015-11-03 Thread A Williams

Richard Owlett wrote:

David H. Durgee wrote:

I seem to recall the ability in the past to access an image file
in the disk cache from the media table in the page information,
but at present I am unable to locate it.  I can of course select
an image and save it to a file elsewhere, but when I only need
the file for immediate use this requires me to take action to
delete this file when I am done with it.

Am I missing a setting somewhere?  How can I access an image file
without needing to save it outside the cache for one-time-use
situations?

Dave


If I understand your question, Go->History .
I just tried it. Also found that using History's search box entering
"jpg" [without quotes] displayed only images in jpg format.

HTH



does about:cache help you find what you want?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image files in disk cache

2015-11-03 Thread David H. Durgee

A Williams wrote:

Richard Owlett wrote:

David H. Durgee wrote:

I seem to recall the ability in the past to access an image file
in the disk cache from the media table in the page information,
but at present I am unable to locate it.  I can of course select
an image and save it to a file elsewhere, but when I only need
the file for immediate use this requires me to take action to
delete this file when I am done with it.

Am I missing a setting somewhere?  How can I access an image file
without needing to save it outside the cache for one-time-use
situations?

Dave


If I understand your question, Go->History .
I just tried it. Also found that using History's search box entering
"jpg" [without quotes] displayed only images in jpg format.

HTH



does about:cache help you find what you want?


Not that I see.  I see the image file in the cache, but I don't see the 
file name.  I only see the "key" which is what seems to copy/paste as 
well and is a URI.


Dave
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image files in disk cache

2015-11-03 Thread Ray_Net

David H. Durgee wrote on 03/11/2015 21:17:

Ray_Net wrote:

David H. Durgee wrote on 03/11/2015 17:14:

I seem to recall the ability in the past to access an image file in
the disk cache from the media table in the page information, but at
present I am unable to locate it.  I can of course select an image and
save it to a file elsewhere, but when I only need the file for
immediate use this requires me to take action to delete this file when
I am done with it.

Am I missing a setting somewhere?  How can I access an image file
without needing to save it outside the cache for one-time-use 
situations?


Dave

You may use http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/image_cache_viewer.html
and .

When selecting a cache item in the upper pane of ImageCacheViewer, the
image is displayed in the lower pane, and you can copy the image to the
clipboard by pressing Ctrl+M.


then CTRL-V into IrfanView where you can do what you want with this 
image.


Hmm, that seems to provide a Windows solution.  "Unfortunately," I am 
a linux user and need a solution I can use here.


A bit of searching found me a perl tool, but unfortunately that will 
only work if the browser is closed as a key file is kept in memory 
while the browser is operating.


Thanks for the pointer, perhaps someone else knows of a linux tool and 
I will keep looking myself.


Dave

Could this one help ?
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/cacheviewer/

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image files in disk cache

2015-11-03 Thread David H. Durgee

Ray_Net wrote:

David H. Durgee wrote on 03/11/2015 17:14:

I seem to recall the ability in the past to access an image file in
the disk cache from the media table in the page information, but at
present I am unable to locate it.  I can of course select an image and
save it to a file elsewhere, but when I only need the file for
immediate use this requires me to take action to delete this file when
I am done with it.

Am I missing a setting somewhere?  How can I access an image file
without needing to save it outside the cache for one-time-use situations?

Dave

You may use http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/image_cache_viewer.html
and .

When selecting a cache item in the upper pane of ImageCacheViewer, the
image is displayed in the lower pane, and you can copy the image to the
clipboard by pressing Ctrl+M.


then CTRL-V into IrfanView where you can do what you want with this image.


Hmm, that seems to provide a Windows solution.  "Unfortunately," I am a 
linux user and need a solution I can use here.


A bit of searching found me a perl tool, but unfortunately that will 
only work if the browser is closed as a key file is kept in memory while 
the browser is operating.


Thanks for the pointer, perhaps someone else knows of a linux tool and I 
will keep looking myself.


Dave
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image files in disk cache

2015-11-03 Thread Ray_Net

David H. Durgee wrote on 03/11/2015 17:14:
I seem to recall the ability in the past to access an image file in 
the disk cache from the media table in the page information, but at 
present I am unable to locate it.  I can of course select an image and 
save it to a file elsewhere, but when I only need the file for 
immediate use this requires me to take action to delete this file when 
I am done with it.


Am I missing a setting somewhere?  How can I access an image file 
without needing to save it outside the cache for one-time-use situations?


Dave

You may use http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/image_cache_viewer.html
and .

When selecting a cache item in the upper pane of ImageCacheViewer, the 
image is displayed in the lower pane, and you can copy the image to the 
clipboard by pressing Ctrl+M.



then CTRL-V into IrfanView where you can do what you want with this image.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image files in disk cache

2015-11-03 Thread David H. Durgee

Ray_Net wrote:

David H. Durgee wrote on 03/11/2015 21:17:

Ray_Net wrote:

David H. Durgee wrote on 03/11/2015 17:14:

I seem to recall the ability in the past to access an image file in
the disk cache from the media table in the page information, but at
present I am unable to locate it.  I can of course select an image and
save it to a file elsewhere, but when I only need the file for
immediate use this requires me to take action to delete this file when
I am done with it.

Am I missing a setting somewhere?  How can I access an image file
without needing to save it outside the cache for one-time-use
situations?

Dave

You may use http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/image_cache_viewer.html
and .

When selecting a cache item in the upper pane of ImageCacheViewer, the
image is displayed in the lower pane, and you can copy the image to the
clipboard by pressing Ctrl+M.


then CTRL-V into IrfanView where you can do what you want with this
image.


Hmm, that seems to provide a Windows solution.  "Unfortunately," I am
a linux user and need a solution I can use here.

A bit of searching found me a perl tool, but unfortunately that will
only work if the browser is closed as a key file is kept in memory
while the browser is operating.

Thanks for the pointer, perhaps someone else knows of a linux tool and
I will keep looking myself.

Dave

Could this one help ?
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/cacheviewer/



It is unclear to me what additional features this add-on offers from the 
description, and given it is a FireFox add-on it would need to be 
converted to run with SeaMonkey.


Does anyone have it installed and can tell me if it is possible to get 
the actual full file name for a cached image file with it?


Dave
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image files in disk cache

2015-11-03 Thread David H. Durgee

mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:

David H. Durgee wrote:

A Williams wrote:

Richard Owlett wrote:

David H. Durgee wrote:

I seem to recall the ability in the past to access an image file
in the disk cache from the media table in the page information,
but at present I am unable to locate it.  I can of course select
an image and save it to a file elsewhere, but when I only need
the file for immediate use this requires me to take action to
delete this file when I am done with it.

Am I missing a setting somewhere?  How can I access an image file
without needing to save it outside the cache for one-time-use
situations?

Dave


If I understand your question, Go->History .
I just tried it. Also found that using History's search box entering
"jpg" [without quotes] displayed only images in jpg format.

HTH



does about:cache help you find what you want?


Not that I see.  I see the image file in the cache, but I don't see the
file name.  I only see the "key" which is what seems to copy/paste as
well and is a URI.

Dave


Edit > Preferences > Advanced > Cache > Cache Folder Location should
show where the cache is stored; it may be in a subdirectory named Cache
or cache2 depending on the version of SeaMonkey. I'm not sure that the
original files are cached on disk exactly as downloaded. Looking at a
few files under cache2, it looks like there's extra data appended to the
end of each. That probably makes the file invalid as (for example) a
JPEG file, so even if you could find the relevant file in the cache it
probably wouldn't open with other applications anyway.

Files may once have been stored in the cache exactly as downloaded, but
I'd guess the extra data allows some improvement in performance.



I am aware of where the cache is located, the problem is locating the 
particular file in the cache directory structure so that another program 
can use it via a "File Open" dialog.  Within the Cache directory there 
are 16 sub-directories, 0-F, each of which contains 256 sub-directories, 
00-FF, within each of which the cached files are stored.  The files are 
named with 5 hex digits and three additional characters with no extension.


Thus on my system a full file name for a cached file might be:

~/.cache/mozilla/seamonkey/{SALT}.default/Cache/A/32/2D35Fd01

I remember being able to get this data somewhere at one point, either 
from a pop-up menu on an image or from the data in the view>Page Info 
data somewhere.  Unfortunately either things have changed or my memory 
is faulty.


Dave

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image files in disk cache

2015-11-03 Thread mozilla-lists . mbourne

David H. Durgee wrote:

A Williams wrote:

Richard Owlett wrote:

David H. Durgee wrote:

I seem to recall the ability in the past to access an image file
in the disk cache from the media table in the page information,
but at present I am unable to locate it.  I can of course select
an image and save it to a file elsewhere, but when I only need
the file for immediate use this requires me to take action to
delete this file when I am done with it.

Am I missing a setting somewhere?  How can I access an image file
without needing to save it outside the cache for one-time-use
situations?

Dave


If I understand your question, Go->History .
I just tried it. Also found that using History's search box entering
"jpg" [without quotes] displayed only images in jpg format.

HTH



does about:cache help you find what you want?


Not that I see.  I see the image file in the cache, but I don't see the
file name.  I only see the "key" which is what seems to copy/paste as
well and is a URI.

Dave


Edit > Preferences > Advanced > Cache > Cache Folder Location should 
show where the cache is stored; it may be in a subdirectory named Cache 
or cache2 depending on the version of SeaMonkey. I'm not sure that the 
original files are cached on disk exactly as downloaded. Looking at a 
few files under cache2, it looks like there's extra data appended to the 
end of each. That probably makes the file invalid as (for example) a 
JPEG file, so even if you could find the relevant file in the cache it 
probably wouldn't open with other applications anyway.


Files may once have been stored in the cache exactly as downloaded, but 
I'd guess the extra data allows some improvement in performance.


Mark.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image files in disk cache

2015-11-03 Thread Ray_Net

David H. Durgee wrote on 04/11/2015 00:55:

Ray_Net wrote:

David H. Durgee wrote on 03/11/2015 21:17:

Ray_Net wrote:

David H. Durgee wrote on 03/11/2015 17:14:

I seem to recall the ability in the past to access an image file in
the disk cache from the media table in the page information, but at
present I am unable to locate it.  I can of course select an image 
and

save it to a file elsewhere, but when I only need the file for
immediate use this requires me to take action to delete this file 
when

I am done with it.

Am I missing a setting somewhere?  How can I access an image file
without needing to save it outside the cache for one-time-use
situations?

Dave

You may use http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/image_cache_viewer.html
and .

When selecting a cache item in the upper pane of ImageCacheViewer, the
image is displayed in the lower pane, and you can copy the image to 
the

clipboard by pressing Ctrl+M.


then CTRL-V into IrfanView where you can do what you want with this
image.


Hmm, that seems to provide a Windows solution. "Unfortunately," I am
a linux user and need a solution I can use here.

A bit of searching found me a perl tool, but unfortunately that will
only work if the browser is closed as a key file is kept in memory
while the browser is operating.

Thanks for the pointer, perhaps someone else knows of a linux tool and
I will keep looking myself.

Dave

Could this one help ?
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/cacheviewer/



It is unclear to me what additional features this add-on offers from 
the description, and given it is a FireFox add-on it would need to be 
converted to run with SeaMonkey.

Sometimes there is no need for a conversion.


Does anyone have it installed and can tell me if it is possible to get 
the actual full file name for a cached image file with it?

You tell me that i must install this extension on my SM to do your test ?
What will you do with this file name: 
~/.cache/mozilla/seamonkey/{SALT}.default/Cache/A/32/2D35Fd01 ?
The only way to catch it into an image-program is to see it per exemple 
inside https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/cacheviewer/
and do there a "COPY" then start your prefered image-program and do a 
"PASTE".
Normally all image-programs are unable to open a file when this filename 
did not contains an "image-extension" like .jpg.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image files in disk cache

2015-11-03 Thread Richard Owlett

David H. Durgee wrote:

I seem to recall the ability in the past to access an image file
in the disk cache from the media table in the page information,
but at present I am unable to locate it.  I can of course select
an image and save it to a file elsewhere, but when I only need
the file for immediate use this requires me to take action to
delete this file when I am done with it.

Am I missing a setting somewhere?  How can I access an image file
without needing to save it outside the cache for one-time-use
situations?

Dave


If I understand your question, Go->History .
I just tried it. Also found that using History's search box 
entering "jpg" [without quotes] displayed only images in jpg format.


HTH

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image sizing in Mail/News

2014-08-28 Thread Evan Davidson

Ed Mullen wrote:

Evan Davidson pounded out :

Ed Mullen wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher pounded out :

Trane Francks wrote:

On 8/26/14 10:47 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher pounded out :

BIll Spikowski wrote:

Ed Mullen wrote:

Someone mentioned in the Thunderbird group that TB fits large
images
to the viewport in an email like SeaMonkey's browser does. Doesn't
seem to work for emails in SM. I used about:config in both SM
and TB
to check for zoom and the settings are almost identical.  But no
image-fitting in SM mail.

Any thoughts?


Have you tried:
Edit | Preferences | Appearance | Content | resize large images to
fit
in the browser window


You can also click an oversize image once to fit it to the window,
just
as you can in the browser. You can set a global policy as BIll
suggests,
or just do it once in a while on the fly. Up to you.



1.  Yes, my prefs are set to resize in the browser pref
2.  No, it has no effect in mail/news

Have you tested it?  I have.  It has no effect in Mail/News.

That's why I asked the question in the first place.



It definitely works for me. I just tested with 2.26.1 with View |
Display Attachments Inline enabled. They resize to the view port by
default. If I click on the image, it is then displayed in original
size.

Works a charm here.


Does it also work for you when the image is part of an HTML message,
not
an attachment?



I tested again.  It works when the image is an attachment but not when
it is inline.  When inline I also do not get the zoom cursor.




I don't use Thunderbird and sometime in the past I started using Image
Zoom for Seamonkey mail -- maybe for the problem you're seeing. You can
check it out at:

http://imagezoom.yellowgorilla.net/

When I checked recently, Image Zoom did shrink a see-able image in the
mail view-space that exceeded the vertical window dimension. When it was
done, the image fit in both dimensions.



Well, before I check that out, the question seems to be inline vs.
attachment.  How's that work for you in SM?




As you already know, I was referring to inline.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image sizing in Mail/News

2014-08-27 Thread Ed Mullen

Ed Mullen pounded out :

Evan Davidson pounded out :

Ed Mullen wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher pounded out :

Trane Francks wrote:

On 8/26/14 10:47 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher pounded out :

BIll Spikowski wrote:

Ed Mullen wrote:

Someone mentioned in the Thunderbird group that TB fits large
images
to the viewport in an email like SeaMonkey's browser does. Doesn't
seem to work for emails in SM. I used about:config in both SM
and TB
to check for zoom and the settings are almost identical.  But no
image-fitting in SM mail.

Any thoughts?


Have you tried:
Edit | Preferences | Appearance | Content | resize large images to
fit
in the browser window


You can also click an oversize image once to fit it to the window,
just
as you can in the browser. You can set a global policy as BIll
suggests,
or just do it once in a while on the fly. Up to you.



1.  Yes, my prefs are set to resize in the browser pref
2.  No, it has no effect in mail/news

Have you tested it?  I have.  It has no effect in Mail/News.

That's why I asked the question in the first place.



It definitely works for me. I just tested with 2.26.1 with View |
Display Attachments Inline enabled. They resize to the view port by
default. If I click on the image, it is then displayed in original
size.

Works a charm here.


Does it also work for you when the image is part of an HTML message,
not
an attachment?



I tested again.  It works when the image is an attachment but not when
it is inline.  When inline I also do not get the zoom cursor.




I don't use Thunderbird and sometime in the past I started using Image
Zoom for Seamonkey mail -- maybe for the problem you're seeing. You can
check it out at:

http://imagezoom.yellowgorilla.net/

When I checked recently, Image Zoom did shrink a see-able image in the
mail view-space that exceeded the vertical window dimension. When it was
done, the image fit in both dimensions.



Well, before I check that out, the question seems to be inline vs.
attachment.  How's that work for you in SM?




Thanks, Evan!  Works great!


--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net/
How come abbreviated is such a long word?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image sizing in Mail/News

2014-08-26 Thread Paul B. Gallagher

Trane Francks wrote:

On 8/26/14 10:47 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher pounded out :

BIll Spikowski wrote:

Ed Mullen wrote:

Someone mentioned in the Thunderbird group that TB fits large images
to the viewport in an email like SeaMonkey's browser does. Doesn't
seem to work for emails in SM. I used about:config in both SM and TB
to check for zoom and the settings are almost identical.  But no
image-fitting in SM mail.

Any thoughts?


Have you tried:
Edit | Preferences | Appearance | Content | resize large images to fit
in the browser window


You can also click an oversize image once to fit it to the window, just
as you can in the browser. You can set a global policy as BIll suggests,
or just do it once in a while on the fly. Up to you.



1.  Yes, my prefs are set to resize in the browser pref
2.  No, it has no effect in mail/news

Have you tested it?  I have.  It has no effect in Mail/News.

That's why I asked the question in the first place.



It definitely works for me. I just tested with 2.26.1 with View |
Display Attachments Inline enabled. They resize to the view port by
default. If I click on the image, it is then displayed in original size.

Works a charm here.


Does it also work for you when the image is part of an HTML message, not 
an attachment?


--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image sizing in Mail/News

2014-08-26 Thread Ed Mullen

Paul B. Gallagher pounded out :

Trane Francks wrote:

On 8/26/14 10:47 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher pounded out :

BIll Spikowski wrote:

Ed Mullen wrote:

Someone mentioned in the Thunderbird group that TB fits large images
to the viewport in an email like SeaMonkey's browser does. Doesn't
seem to work for emails in SM. I used about:config in both SM and TB
to check for zoom and the settings are almost identical.  But no
image-fitting in SM mail.

Any thoughts?


Have you tried:
Edit | Preferences | Appearance | Content | resize large images to
fit
in the browser window


You can also click an oversize image once to fit it to the window, just
as you can in the browser. You can set a global policy as BIll
suggests,
or just do it once in a while on the fly. Up to you.



1.  Yes, my prefs are set to resize in the browser pref
2.  No, it has no effect in mail/news

Have you tested it?  I have.  It has no effect in Mail/News.

That's why I asked the question in the first place.



It definitely works for me. I just tested with 2.26.1 with View |
Display Attachments Inline enabled. They resize to the view port by
default. If I click on the image, it is then displayed in original size.

Works a charm here.


Does it also work for you when the image is part of an HTML message, not
an attachment?



I tested again.  It works when the image is an attachment but not when 
it is inline.  When inline I also do not get the zoom cursor.



--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net/
The online world today is a scary place so remember, practice safe hex.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image sizing in Mail/News

2014-08-26 Thread Evan Davidson

Ed Mullen wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher pounded out :

Trane Francks wrote:

On 8/26/14 10:47 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher pounded out :

BIll Spikowski wrote:

Ed Mullen wrote:

Someone mentioned in the Thunderbird group that TB fits large images
to the viewport in an email like SeaMonkey's browser does. Doesn't
seem to work for emails in SM. I used about:config in both SM and TB
to check for zoom and the settings are almost identical.  But no
image-fitting in SM mail.

Any thoughts?


Have you tried:
Edit | Preferences | Appearance | Content | resize large images to
fit
in the browser window


You can also click an oversize image once to fit it to the window,
just
as you can in the browser. You can set a global policy as BIll
suggests,
or just do it once in a while on the fly. Up to you.



1.  Yes, my prefs are set to resize in the browser pref
2.  No, it has no effect in mail/news

Have you tested it?  I have.  It has no effect in Mail/News.

That's why I asked the question in the first place.



It definitely works for me. I just tested with 2.26.1 with View |
Display Attachments Inline enabled. They resize to the view port by
default. If I click on the image, it is then displayed in original size.

Works a charm here.


Does it also work for you when the image is part of an HTML message, not
an attachment?



I tested again.  It works when the image is an attachment but not when
it is inline.  When inline I also do not get the zoom cursor.




I don't use Thunderbird and sometime in the past I started using Image 
Zoom for Seamonkey mail -- maybe for the problem you're seeing. You can 
check it out at:


http://imagezoom.yellowgorilla.net/

When I checked recently, Image Zoom did shrink a see-able image in the 
mail view-space that exceeded the vertical window dimension. When it was 
done, the image fit in both dimensions.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image sizing in Mail/News

2014-08-26 Thread Trane Francks

On 8/26/14 9:24 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

Trane Francks wrote:

On 8/26/14 10:47 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher pounded out :

BIll Spikowski wrote:

Ed Mullen wrote:

Someone mentioned in the Thunderbird group that TB fits large images
to the viewport in an email like SeaMonkey's browser does. Doesn't
seem to work for emails in SM. I used about:config in both SM and TB
to check for zoom and the settings are almost identical.  But no
image-fitting in SM mail.

Any thoughts?


Have you tried:
Edit | Preferences | Appearance | Content | resize large images to fit
in the browser window


You can also click an oversize image once to fit it to the window, just
as you can in the browser. You can set a global policy as BIll suggests,
or just do it once in a while on the fly. Up to you.



1.  Yes, my prefs are set to resize in the browser pref
2.  No, it has no effect in mail/news

Have you tested it?  I have.  It has no effect in Mail/News.

That's why I asked the question in the first place.



It definitely works for me. I just tested with 2.26.1 with View |
Display Attachments Inline enabled. They resize to the view port by
default. If I click on the image, it is then displayed in original size.

Works a charm here.


Does it also work for you when the image is part of an HTML message, not
an attachment?

This came as a surprise. I created an HTML mail with an image inserted 
and, despite mail.enable_automatic_image_resizing being set to True, the 
image was _not_ resized. From what I can recall in days past, this used 
to work fine. All my SeaMonkey image resizing preferences are set to 
True. It should work in all cases, but it obviously does not.


Good follow through there, Paul.

--
/
// Trane Francks   tr...@tranefrancks.com   Tokyo, Japan
// Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image sizing in Mail/News

2014-08-26 Thread Ed Mullen

Evan Davidson pounded out :

Ed Mullen wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher pounded out :

Trane Francks wrote:

On 8/26/14 10:47 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher pounded out :

BIll Spikowski wrote:

Ed Mullen wrote:

Someone mentioned in the Thunderbird group that TB fits large
images
to the viewport in an email like SeaMonkey's browser does. Doesn't
seem to work for emails in SM. I used about:config in both SM
and TB
to check for zoom and the settings are almost identical.  But no
image-fitting in SM mail.

Any thoughts?


Have you tried:
Edit | Preferences | Appearance | Content | resize large images to
fit
in the browser window


You can also click an oversize image once to fit it to the window,
just
as you can in the browser. You can set a global policy as BIll
suggests,
or just do it once in a while on the fly. Up to you.



1.  Yes, my prefs are set to resize in the browser pref
2.  No, it has no effect in mail/news

Have you tested it?  I have.  It has no effect in Mail/News.

That's why I asked the question in the first place.



It definitely works for me. I just tested with 2.26.1 with View |
Display Attachments Inline enabled. They resize to the view port by
default. If I click on the image, it is then displayed in original
size.

Works a charm here.


Does it also work for you when the image is part of an HTML message, not
an attachment?



I tested again.  It works when the image is an attachment but not when
it is inline.  When inline I also do not get the zoom cursor.




I don't use Thunderbird and sometime in the past I started using Image
Zoom for Seamonkey mail -- maybe for the problem you're seeing. You can
check it out at:

http://imagezoom.yellowgorilla.net/

When I checked recently, Image Zoom did shrink a see-able image in the
mail view-space that exceeded the vertical window dimension. When it was
done, the image fit in both dimensions.



Well, before I check that out, the question seems to be inline vs. 
attachment.  How's that work for you in SM?



--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net/
Assphasia- a condition where your face looks so much like your butt your 
bowels don't know which way to move.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image sizing in Mail/News

2014-08-25 Thread BIll Spikowski

Ed Mullen wrote:

Someone mentioned in the Thunderbird group that TB fits large images to the viewport in 
an email like SeaMonkey's browser does. Doesn't seem to work for emails in SM. I used 
about:config in both SM and TB to check for zoom and the settings are almost 
identical.  But no image-fitting in SM mail.

Any thoughts?


Have you tried:
Edit | Preferences | Appearance | Content | resize large images to fit in the 
browser window

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image sizing in Mail/News

2014-08-25 Thread Philip Taylor



BIll Spikowski wrote:

Ed Mullen wrote:

Someone mentioned in the Thunderbird group that TB fits large images
to the viewport in an email like SeaMonkey's browser does. Doesn't
seem to work for emails in SM. I used about:config in both SM and TB
to check for zoom and the settings are almost identical.  But no
image-fitting in SM mail.

Any thoughts?


Have you tried:
Edit | Preferences | Appearance | Content | resize large images to fit
in the browser window


It might work (I haven't tried it) but why /should/ a preference that
refers explicitly to the browser window affect the appearance of
images appearing in the e-mail window ?

Philip Taylor
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image sizing in Mail/News

2014-08-25 Thread Paul B. Gallagher

BIll Spikowski wrote:

Ed Mullen wrote:

Someone mentioned in the Thunderbird group that TB fits large images
to the viewport in an email like SeaMonkey's browser does. Doesn't
seem to work for emails in SM. I used about:config in both SM and TB
to check for zoom and the settings are almost identical.  But no
image-fitting in SM mail.

Any thoughts?


Have you tried:
Edit | Preferences | Appearance | Content | resize large images to fit
in the browser window


You can also click an oversize image once to fit it to the window, just 
as you can in the browser. You can set a global policy as BIll suggests, 
or just do it once in a while on the fly. Up to you.


--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image sizing in Mail/News

2014-08-25 Thread Paul B. Gallagher

Philip Taylor wrote:


BIll Spikowski wrote:

Ed Mullen wrote:

Someone mentioned in the Thunderbird group that TB fits large images
to the viewport in an email like SeaMonkey's browser does. Doesn't
seem to work for emails in SM. I used about:config in both SM and TB
to check for zoom and the settings are almost identical.  But no
image-fitting in SM mail.

Any thoughts?


Have you tried:
Edit | Preferences | Appearance | Content | resize large images to fit
in the browser window


It might work (I haven't tried it) but why /should/ a preference that
refers explicitly to the browser window affect the appearance of
images appearing in the e-mail window ?


Because the browser engine is used to display HTML in the mail preview pane.

--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image sizing in Mail/News

2014-08-25 Thread Ed Mullen

Paul B. Gallagher pounded out :

BIll Spikowski wrote:

Ed Mullen wrote:

Someone mentioned in the Thunderbird group that TB fits large images
to the viewport in an email like SeaMonkey's browser does. Doesn't
seem to work for emails in SM. I used about:config in both SM and TB
to check for zoom and the settings are almost identical.  But no
image-fitting in SM mail.

Any thoughts?


Have you tried:
Edit | Preferences | Appearance | Content | resize large images to fit
in the browser window


You can also click an oversize image once to fit it to the window, just
as you can in the browser. You can set a global policy as BIll suggests,
or just do it once in a while on the fly. Up to you.



1.  Yes, my prefs are set to resize in the browser pref
2.  No, it has no effect in mail/news

Have you tested it?  I have.  It has no effect in Mail/News.

That's why I asked the question in the first place.


--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net/
Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in 
a garage makes you a car.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image sizing in Mail/News

2014-08-25 Thread Trane Francks

On 8/26/14 10:47 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher pounded out :

BIll Spikowski wrote:

Ed Mullen wrote:

Someone mentioned in the Thunderbird group that TB fits large images
to the viewport in an email like SeaMonkey's browser does. Doesn't
seem to work for emails in SM. I used about:config in both SM and TB
to check for zoom and the settings are almost identical.  But no
image-fitting in SM mail.

Any thoughts?


Have you tried:
Edit | Preferences | Appearance | Content | resize large images to fit
in the browser window


You can also click an oversize image once to fit it to the window, just
as you can in the browser. You can set a global policy as BIll suggests,
or just do it once in a while on the fly. Up to you.



1.  Yes, my prefs are set to resize in the browser pref
2.  No, it has no effect in mail/news

Have you tested it?  I have.  It has no effect in Mail/News.

That's why I asked the question in the first place.



Easy: View | Display Attachments Inline

--
/
// Trane Francks   tr...@tranefrancks.com   Tokyo, Japan
// Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image sizing in Mail/News

2014-08-25 Thread Ed Mullen

Trane Francks pounded out :

On 8/26/14 10:47 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher pounded out :

BIll Spikowski wrote:

Ed Mullen wrote:

Someone mentioned in the Thunderbird group that TB fits large images
to the viewport in an email like SeaMonkey's browser does. Doesn't
seem to work for emails in SM. I used about:config in both SM and TB
to check for zoom and the settings are almost identical.  But no
image-fitting in SM mail.

Any thoughts?


Have you tried:
Edit | Preferences | Appearance | Content | resize large images to fit
in the browser window


You can also click an oversize image once to fit it to the window, just
as you can in the browser. You can set a global policy as BIll suggests,
or just do it once in a while on the fly. Up to you.



1.  Yes, my prefs are set to resize in the browser pref
2.  No, it has no effect in mail/news

Have you tested it?  I have.  It has no effect in Mail/News.

That's why I asked the question in the first place.



Easy: View | Display Attachments Inline



I have that set.  That is not the question.  The question is:

Thunderbird resizes large images in emails to fit the viewport. 
SeaMonkey does not.  Why?  And is there some setting I can change in SM 
to make it work like TB?


I sent myself an email with a very large image:  3264x2448

The email view presented with both vertical and horizontal scroll bars. 
 Thunderbird simply resized the image to fit the viewport, no scroll 
bars needed, it simply resized the imaage to fit the viewport.


Does that clarify the difference adequately?



--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net/
Why do we drive on parkways and park on driveways?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image sizing in Mail/News

2014-08-25 Thread Trane Francks

On 8/26/14 11:16 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:

Trane Francks pounded out :

On 8/26/14 10:47 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher pounded out :

BIll Spikowski wrote:

Ed Mullen wrote:

Someone mentioned in the Thunderbird group that TB fits large images
to the viewport in an email like SeaMonkey's browser does. Doesn't
seem to work for emails in SM. I used about:config in both SM and TB
to check for zoom and the settings are almost identical.  But no
image-fitting in SM mail.

Any thoughts?


Have you tried:
Edit | Preferences | Appearance | Content | resize large images to fit
in the browser window


You can also click an oversize image once to fit it to the window, just
as you can in the browser. You can set a global policy as BIll suggests,
or just do it once in a while on the fly. Up to you.



1.  Yes, my prefs are set to resize in the browser pref
2.  No, it has no effect in mail/news

Have you tested it?  I have.  It has no effect in Mail/News.

That's why I asked the question in the first place.



Easy: View | Display Attachments Inline



I have that set.  That is not the question.  The question is:

Thunderbird resizes large images in emails to fit the viewport.
SeaMonkey does not.  Why?  And is there some setting I can change in SM
to make it work like TB?

I sent myself an email with a very large image:  3264x2448

The email view presented with both vertical and horizontal scroll bars.
   Thunderbird simply resized the image to fit the viewport, no scroll
bars needed, it simply resized the imaage to fit the viewport.

Does that clarify the difference adequately?



Nothing needed clarification. SeaMonkey fits images to the viewport on 
my installation and has for as long as I can remember. This is a classic 
case of WFM.


--
/
// Trane Francks   tr...@tranefrancks.com   Tokyo, Japan
// Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image sizing in Mail/News

2014-08-25 Thread Paul B. Gallagher

Ed Mullen wrote:


Paul B. Gallagher pounded out :


You can also click an oversize image once to fit it to the window, just
as you can in the browser. You can set a global policy as BIll suggests,
or just do it once in a while on the fly. Up to you.



1.  Yes, my prefs are set to resize in the browser pref
2.  No, it has no effect in mail/news

Have you tested it?  I have.  It has no effect in Mail/News.

That's why I asked the question in the first place.


Huh. Used to work. Sorry 'bout that.

--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image sizing in Mail/News

2014-08-25 Thread Trane Francks

On 8/26/14 11:46 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

Ed Mullen wrote:


Paul B. Gallagher pounded out :


You can also click an oversize image once to fit it to the window, just
as you can in the browser. You can set a global policy as BIll suggests,
or just do it once in a while on the fly. Up to you.



1.  Yes, my prefs are set to resize in the browser pref
2.  No, it has no effect in mail/news

Have you tested it?  I have.  It has no effect in Mail/News.

That's why I asked the question in the first place.


Huh. Used to work. Sorry 'bout that.

WFM with View | Display Attachments Inline enabled. I cannot remember a 
time when SeaMonkey did not do this.


--
/
// Trane Francks   tr...@tranefrancks.com   Tokyo, Japan
// Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image sizing in Mail/News

2014-08-25 Thread Trane Francks

On 8/26/14 10:47 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher pounded out :

BIll Spikowski wrote:

Ed Mullen wrote:

Someone mentioned in the Thunderbird group that TB fits large images
to the viewport in an email like SeaMonkey's browser does. Doesn't
seem to work for emails in SM. I used about:config in both SM and TB
to check for zoom and the settings are almost identical.  But no
image-fitting in SM mail.

Any thoughts?


Have you tried:
Edit | Preferences | Appearance | Content | resize large images to fit
in the browser window


You can also click an oversize image once to fit it to the window, just
as you can in the browser. You can set a global policy as BIll suggests,
or just do it once in a while on the fly. Up to you.



1.  Yes, my prefs are set to resize in the browser pref
2.  No, it has no effect in mail/news

Have you tested it?  I have.  It has no effect in Mail/News.

That's why I asked the question in the first place.


It definitely works for me. I just tested with 2.26.1 with View | 
Display Attachments Inline enabled. They resize to the view port by 
default. If I click on the image, it is then displayed in original size.


Works a charm here.

--
/
// Trane Francks   tr...@tranefrancks.com   Tokyo, Japan
// Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image display in flickr or facebook

2012-08-11 Thread sean . n . bean

sean nathan wrote:

image display has become so bad in Seamonkey that i rarely use SM as my
preferred browser anymore... one can't just browse the photos in flickr
w/o having to select all sizes before one can see any photo
... perversely in faceboo if one clicks on a photo to enlarge it and see
the commentary one only gets to see a black space

i've disabled all of my addons

now i'm a linux user... so now that adobe is no longer supporting linux
is this something i need to consider?

SRWare Iron displays everything w/no problem...

sean


noticed that there was a newer version of Seamonkey for 64 bit systems 
ready so i went ahead and updated it... Flickr  Facebook now work as 
they are expected to do...


sean
--
now to get tagzilla back



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image display in flickr or facebook

2012-08-10 Thread NoOp
On 08/09/2012 12:59 PM, sean nathan wrote:
 WLS wrote, On 08/09/2012 09:21 AM:
...
 Had no problem browsing the Explore section of Flickr.

 http://www.flickr.com/explore/
 
 
 ahhh but what happens when you try to view this page? for me the main 
 picture doesn't appear, nothing but whitespace, but i can see the 
 thumbnails to the right... but moving thru the stream only displays more 
 whitespace...
 
 
 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120717 Firefox/14.0.1
 SeaMonkey/2.11

And works just fine for me:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120715
Firefox/14.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.11

And clicking on the weather photo gets me here:
https://secure.flickr.com/photos/rareblues/6014658340/
and clicking othe photo again gets me here:
https://secure.flickr.com/photos/rareblues/6014658340/lightbox/
and clicking on View all sizes gets me here:
https://secure.flickr.com/photos/rareblues/6014658340/sizes/l/in/photostream/
all the sizes work.
...
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image display in flickr or facebook

2012-08-10 Thread NoOp
On 08/09/2012 03:52 PM, sean nathan wrote:
 Hartmut Figge wrote, On 08/09/2012 02:02 PM:
 sean nathan:
 WLS wrote, On 08/09/2012 09:21 AM:

 Had no problem browsing the Explore section of Flickr.

 That is true for me also.

 http://www.flickr.com/explore/

 ahhh but what happens when you try to view this page?

 I am getting this on 'Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0)
 Gecko/2012080900 SeaMonkey/2.14a1-h':

 http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/fl120809.jpg (300 KB)

 Hartmut

 
 i get the same thing when viewing the Explore page, but that page 
 displays differently than this page...
 
 the problem i'm having is on any of the members' public pages, for 
 instance on the following page:
 
 http://www.flickr.com/photos/casoulbyrd/4501943062/in/photosof-casoulbyrd/
 
 i see whitespace where a photo should be... but when i click the all 
 sizes a photo appears...
 
 sean

Again works just fine for me:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120715
Firefox/14.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.11

Clicking the photo give me:
https://secure.flickr.com/photos/casoulbyrd/4501943062/in/photosof-casoulbyrd/lightbox/
Clicking View all sizes gets me here:
https://secure.flickr.com/photos/casoulbyrd/4501943062/sizes/l/in/photosof-casoulbyrd/
All of the sizes work.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image display in flickr or facebook

2012-08-10 Thread Daniel

sean nathan wrote:

Philip TAYLOR wrote, On 08/09/2012 04:07 PM:



Hartmut Figge wrote:


I do not see 'all sizes' on that page. But i may be blind. ;)


More likely, not looking unde Actions.


thanks phillip, they've changed the drop down menus lately... actions
then all sizes...

but i shouldn't have to do that...

there's no photo showing where it should be...

http://www.flickr.com/photos/casoulbyrd/4501943062/in/photosof-casoulbyrd/

i just see the thumbnails to the right, scrolling thru them just give me
more blank white photospace... i just disabled the shockwave flash
plugins and clicked on the check to see if your plugins are up to date:



I see what looks like women in a frilly skirt with her legs reflected in 
a window with leaves on a pathway outside.



For your safety, Firefox has disabled your outdated version of Java.
Please upgrade to the latest version.


okay... have downloaded the/jre-7u5-linux-x64.tar.gz now... being a
relative linux n00b, where does one unpack the tar.gz to exactly?

sean



Sean, go back to where you downloaded the tar.gz file from and you 
should find a link to installation instructions.


--
Daniel
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image display in flickr or facebook

2012-08-09 Thread WLS

On 08/09/2012 11:57 AM, sean nathan wrote:

image display has become so bad in Seamonkey that i rarely use SM as my
preferred browser anymore... one can't just browse the photos in flickr
w/o having to select all sizes before one can see any photo
... perversely in faceboo if one clicks on a photo to enlarge it and see
the commentary one only gets to see a black space

i've disabled all of my addons

now i'm a linux user... so now that adobe is no longer supporting linux
is this something i need to consider?

SRWare Iron displays everything w/no problem...

sean



Had no problem browsing the Explore section of Flickr.

http://www.flickr.com/explore/

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120717 Firefox/14.0.1 
SeaMonkey/2.11


Don't go near Facebook, so I can't test it.

Adobe is continuing security updates for Linux for 5 years.

--
Fedora 17 | GNOME 3.4.2 | Thunderbird Earlybird
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image display in flickr or facebook

2012-08-09 Thread sean nathan

WLS wrote, On 08/09/2012 09:21 AM:

On 08/09/2012 11:57 AM, sean nathan wrote:

image display has become so bad in Seamonkey that i rarely use SM as my
preferred browser anymore... one can't just browse the photos in flickr
w/o having to select all sizes before one can see any photo
... perversely in faceboo if one clicks on a photo to enlarge it and see
the commentary one only gets to see a black space

i've disabled all of my addons

now i'm a linux user... so now that adobe is no longer supporting linux
is this something i need to consider?

SRWare Iron displays everything w/no problem...

sean



Had no problem browsing the Explore section of Flickr.

http://www.flickr.com/explore/

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120717 Firefox/14.0.1
SeaMonkey/2.11

Don't go near Facebook, so I can't test it.

Adobe is continuing security updates for Linux for 5 years.



flickr's explore is set up differently than browsing someone's 
individually public accounts... but none of the menu links work for me 
at the moment...


hmmm...

sean





___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image display in flickr or facebook

2012-08-09 Thread sean nathan

WLS wrote, On 08/09/2012 09:21 AM:

On 08/09/2012 11:57 AM, sean nathan wrote:

image display has become so bad in Seamonkey that i rarely use SM as my
preferred browser anymore... one can't just browse the photos in flickr
w/o having to select all sizes before one can see any photo
... perversely in faceboo if one clicks on a photo to enlarge it and see
the commentary one only gets to see a black space

i've disabled all of my addons

now i'm a linux user... so now that adobe is no longer supporting linux
is this something i need to consider?

SRWare Iron displays everything w/no problem...

sean



Had no problem browsing the Explore section of Flickr.

http://www.flickr.com/explore/



ahhh but what happens when you try to view this page? for me the main 
picture doesn't appear, nothing but whitespace, but i can see the 
thumbnails to the right... but moving thru the stream only displays more 
whitespace...




Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120717 Firefox/14.0.1
SeaMonkey/2.11

Don't go near Facebook, so I can't test it.


no problem, hopefully someone else will chime in...



Adobe is continuing security updates for Linux for 5 years.


hm...








___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image display in flickr or facebook

2012-08-09 Thread Hartmut Figge
sean nathan:
WLS wrote, On 08/09/2012 09:21 AM:

 Had no problem browsing the Explore section of Flickr.

That is true for me also.

 http://www.flickr.com/explore/

ahhh but what happens when you try to view this page?

I am getting this on 'Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0)
Gecko/2012080900 SeaMonkey/2.14a1-h':

http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/fl120809.jpg (300 KB)

Hartmut
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image display in flickr or facebook

2012-08-09 Thread sean nathan

Hartmut Figge wrote, On 08/09/2012 02:02 PM:

sean nathan:

WLS wrote, On 08/09/2012 09:21 AM:



Had no problem browsing the Explore section of Flickr.


That is true for me also.


http://www.flickr.com/explore/


ahhh but what happens when you try to view this page?


I am getting this on 'Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0)
Gecko/2012080900 SeaMonkey/2.14a1-h':

http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/fl120809.jpg (300 KB)

Hartmut



i get the same thing when viewing the Explore page, but that page 
displays differently than this page...


the problem i'm having is on any of the members' public pages, for 
instance on the following page:


http://www.flickr.com/photos/casoulbyrd/4501943062/in/photosof-casoulbyrd/

i see whitespace where a photo should be... but when i click the all 
sizes a photo appears...


sean





___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image display in flickr or facebook

2012-08-09 Thread Hartmut Figge
sean nathan:

the problem i'm having is on any of the members' public pages, for 
instance on the following page:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/casoulbyrd/4501943062/in/photosof-casoulbyrd/

http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/fl120810.jpg (286 KB)

i see whitespace where a photo should be... but when i click the all 
sizes a photo appears...

I do not see 'all sizes' on that page. But i may be blind. ;)

Hartmut
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image display in flickr or facebook

2012-08-09 Thread Philip TAYLOR



Hartmut Figge wrote:


I do not see 'all sizes' on that page. But i may be blind. ;)


More likely, not looking unde Actions.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image display in flickr or facebook

2012-08-09 Thread sean nathan

Philip TAYLOR wrote, On 08/09/2012 04:07 PM:



Hartmut Figge wrote:


I do not see 'all sizes' on that page. But i may be blind. ;)


More likely, not looking unde Actions.


thanks phillip, they've changed the drop down menus lately... actions 
then all sizes...


but i shouldn't have to do that...

there's no photo showing where it should be...

http://www.flickr.com/photos/casoulbyrd/4501943062/in/photosof-casoulbyrd/

i just see the thumbnails to the right, scrolling thru them just give me 
more blank white photospace... i just disabled the shockwave flash 
plugins and clicked on the check to see if your plugins are up to date:



For your safety, Firefox has disabled your outdated version of Java. Please 
upgrade to the latest version.


okay... have downloaded the/jre-7u5-linux-x64.tar.gz now... being a 
relative linux n00b, where does one unpack the tar.gz to exactly?


sean




___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image display in flickr or facebook

2012-08-09 Thread WLS

On 08/09/2012 07:52 PM, sean nathan wrote:

Philip TAYLOR wrote, On 08/09/2012 04:07 PM:



Hartmut Figge wrote:


I do not see 'all sizes' on that page. But i may be blind. ;)


More likely, not looking unde Actions.


thanks phillip, they've changed the drop down menus lately... actions
then all sizes...

but i shouldn't have to do that...

there's no photo showing where it should be...

http://www.flickr.com/photos/casoulbyrd/4501943062/in/photosof-casoulbyrd/

i just see the thumbnails to the right, scrolling thru them just give me
more blank white photospace... i just disabled the shockwave flash
plugins and clicked on the check to see if your plugins are up to date:


For your safety, Firefox has disabled your outdated version of Java.
Please upgrade to the latest version.


okay... have downloaded the/jre-7u5-linux-x64.tar.gz now... being a
relative linux n00b, where does one unpack the tar.gz to exactly?

sean






Don't need Java for this. Do you have Load all images selected in your 
Privacy and Security  Images preferences?


--
WaltS
Fedora 17 (64-bit)
GNOME 3.4.2
Thunderbird Earlybird
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image display in SM 2.7 - Win 7

2012-02-10 Thread Ray_Net

JB wrote:
Message: 5 Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:43:00 -0500 From: Jim Taylor 
n...@likely.com To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org Subject: Re: 
Image display in SM 2.7 - Win 7 Message-ID: 
ulgdnd7kipsn9ansnz2dnuvz_vcdn...@mozilla.org Content-Type: 
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Jim Taylor wrote:



JB wrote:

Sorry, my apologies. A typical URL, is as follows:
http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-19222829.html
but it is also happening with all pages I'm looking at. If you see the
tack/info/task bar running across the picture, that then is what I'm
getting. Not just this picture but every one I view. This has only
started to occur since installing 2.7 a couple of days ago, prior to
that, I've been seeing the bar at the bottom of the picture for well
over a year now, so something very recent has caused this. Got any
ideas please? Regards - jb (dufus) Message: 3 Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012
17:02:35 +0100 From: Ray_Nettbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be  To:
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org  Subject: Re: Image display in SM
2.7 - Win 7 Message-ID:nbgdnzvbfomec67snz2dnuvz_qedn...@mozilla.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed JB wrote:


Hi, searching sites for property for sale, the images usually come up
with an info/navigation bar at the bottom of the picture. Suddenly,
with
newly installed 2.7, this bar now appears right across the picture,
almost central, which is a real handicap. Is there an option somewhere
which will enable this task bar to be moved down to the bottom of the
image?

Regards - dufus



May be if the webmaster create better pages ...
Thanks for not giving us the url


I can verify that I get the same thing on that page with SeaMonkey 2.7
and that IE displays it correctly. 64 Bit Windows 7 Home Premium -
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0)
Gecko/20120129 Firefox/10.0 SeaMonkey/2.7. But I can't help with why.
I haven't had any problems with the pages I go to and haven't seen
anything like that anywhere else except the link you posted. I ran
that page through validator.w3.org and it has 68 markup errors and 11
warnings and 204 CSS errors but I don't know if one of them is causing
the display problem or not. However, IE 9 does display it correctly.

Jim

The following line in the propertyDetails.css file is what is causing
the problem:

#controlpanel{background-color:#5d5d5d;left:0;bottom:7.5em;height:2.4em;opacity:.85;filter:alpha(opacity=85);color:#FFF;position:absolute;width:620px} 



The bottom:7.5em causes the control panel to be displayed 7.5em (font
heights) up from the bottom of the main image container.  If that is
changed to bottom:0 it displays at the bottom of the container where
you would expect it.  I don't know html or css so don't know if it is
coded wrong or is being rendered wrong, but to me it looks like it is
being rendered just as it is coded.  Perhaps somebody that knows html
and css will comment.

Jim


Thanks Jim, following your remarks, I now see it works correctly on 
Chrome too.


Does anyone know how a non-techie like me can fix this problem?

And, am I re-posting this correctly??

jb (dufus)


Why did you create a new post when you reply ? Your reply button is dead ?

 Does anyone know how a non-techie like me can fix this problem?
Did you create the css file for the page that exhibit the problem ?
If yes, you need to learn more.
If it's not you that construct the wrong css file, you cannot fix the 
problem.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image display in SM 2.7 - Win 7

2012-02-10 Thread NoOp
On 02/09/2012 01:32 PM, Jim Taylor wrote:
 JB wrote:
 Sorry, my apologies. A typical URL, is as follows:
 http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-19222829.html
 but it is also happening with all pages I'm looking at. If you see the
 tack/info/task bar running across the picture, that then is what I'm
 getting. Not just this picture but every one I view. This has only
...
 
 I can verify that I get the same thing on that page with SeaMonkey 2.7 
 and that IE displays it correctly. 64 Bit Windows 7 Home Premium - 
 Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0) 
 Gecko/20120129 Firefox/10.0 SeaMonkey/2.7. But I can't help with why. 
   I haven't had any problems with the pages I go to and haven't seen 
 anything like that anywhere else except the link you posted.  I ran 
 that page through validator.w3.org and it has 68 markup errors and 11 
 warnings and 204 CSS errors but I don't know if one of them is causing 
 the display problem or not.  However, IE 9 does display it correctly.
 
 Jim

Also occurs (bar is about 1/4 up from bottom of photo) on:
Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Presto/2.10.229 Version/11.61
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/10.0
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:13.0a1) Gecko/20120210 Firefox/13.0a1
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129
Firefox/10.0 SeaMonkey/2.7

Does not occur (bar is at bottom of the photo) with:
Evince Web Browser 2.30.2
Chromium 16.0.912.77 (Developer Build 118311 Linux) Ubuntu 10.10

Note to JB: you'll need to reply to this thread rather than starting a
new one again.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image display in SM 2.7 - Win 7

2012-02-09 Thread Ray_Net

JB wrote:


Hi, searching sites for property for sale, the images usually come up
with an info/navigation bar at the bottom of the picture.  Suddenly, with
newly installed 2.7, this bar now appears right across the picture,
almost central, which is a real handicap.  Is there an option somewhere
which will enable this task bar to be moved down to the bottom of the 
image?


Regards - dufus



May be if the webmaster create better pages ...
Thanks for not giving us the url :-)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image display in SM 2.7 - Win 7

2012-02-09 Thread Jim Taylor

JB wrote:

Sorry, my apologies. A typical URL, is as follows:
http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-19222829.html
but it is also happening with all pages I'm looking at. If you see the
tack/info/task bar running across the picture, that then is what I'm
getting. Not just this picture but every one I view. This has only
started to occur since installing 2.7 a couple of days ago, prior to
that, I've been seeing the bar at the bottom of the picture for well
over a year now, so something very recent has caused this. Got any
ideas please? Regards - jb (dufus) Message: 3 Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012
17:02:35 +0100 From: Ray_Net tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be To:
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org Subject: Re: Image display in SM
2.7 - Win 7 Message-ID: nbgdnzvbfomec67snz2dnuvz_qedn...@mozilla.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed JB wrote:


Hi, searching sites for property for sale, the images usually come up
with an info/navigation bar at the bottom of the picture. Suddenly,
with
newly installed 2.7, this bar now appears right across the picture,
almost central, which is a real handicap. Is there an option somewhere
which will enable this task bar to be moved down to the bottom of the
image?

Regards - dufus



May be if the webmaster create better pages ...
Thanks for not giving us the url



I can verify that I get the same thing on that page with SeaMonkey 2.7 
and that IE displays it correctly. 64 Bit Windows 7 Home Premium - 
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0) 
Gecko/20120129 Firefox/10.0 SeaMonkey/2.7. But I can't help with why. 
 I haven't had any problems with the pages I go to and haven't seen 
anything like that anywhere else except the link you posted.  I ran 
that page through validator.w3.org and it has 68 markup errors and 11 
warnings and 204 CSS errors but I don't know if one of them is causing 
the display problem or not.  However, IE 9 does display it correctly.


Jim
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image display in SM 2.7 - Win 7

2012-02-09 Thread MCBastos
Interviewed by CNN on 09/02/2012 17:20, JB told the world:
 Sorry, my apologies. A typical URL, is as follows: 
 http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-19222829.html 
 but it is also happening with all pages I'm looking at. If you 
 see the tack/info/task bar running across the picture, that then 
 is what I'm getting. Not just this picture but every one I view. 
 This has only started to occur since installing 2.7 a couple of 
 days ago, prior to that, I've been seeing the bar at the bottom 
 of the picture for well over a year now, so something very 
 recent has caused this. Got any ideas please? Regards - jb 


Hmmm, yes, this affects both SM 2.7 and Firefox 10. A quick check with
Javascript disabled verified that that bar (and the horizontal
scrolling with thumbnails) is done via Javascript.

So, it's a Javascript issue. What I'm not equipped to say, since I don't
know much Javascript, is if this is a bug on the site or a bug in the
latest version of Gecko's Javascript engine.

HOWEVER, the W3C Validator found 68 errors and 11 warnings on this page.
This does not inspire a lot of trust in the cleanness and conformance of
the author's code.
-- 
MCBastos

This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized
use will be prosecuted under the DMCA.

-=-=-
... Sent from my Rolodex.
* Added by TagZilla 0.7a1 running on Seamonkey 2.7 *
Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image display in SM 2.7 - Win 7

2012-02-09 Thread Jim Taylor

Jim Taylor wrote:

JB wrote:

Sorry, my apologies. A typical URL, is as follows:
http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-19222829.html
but it is also happening with all pages I'm looking at. If you see the
tack/info/task bar running across the picture, that then is what I'm
getting. Not just this picture but every one I view. This has only
started to occur since installing 2.7 a couple of days ago, prior to
that, I've been seeing the bar at the bottom of the picture for well
over a year now, so something very recent has caused this. Got any
ideas please? Regards - jb (dufus) Message: 3 Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012
17:02:35 +0100 From: Ray_Net tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be To:
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org Subject: Re: Image display in SM
2.7 - Win 7 Message-ID: nbgdnzvbfomec67snz2dnuvz_qedn...@mozilla.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed JB wrote:


Hi, searching sites for property for sale, the images usually come up
with an info/navigation bar at the bottom of the picture. Suddenly,
with
newly installed 2.7, this bar now appears right across the picture,
almost central, which is a real handicap. Is there an option somewhere
which will enable this task bar to be moved down to the bottom of the
image?

Regards - dufus



May be if the webmaster create better pages ...
Thanks for not giving us the url



I can verify that I get the same thing on that page with SeaMonkey 2.7
and that IE displays it correctly. 64 Bit Windows 7 Home Premium -
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0)
Gecko/20120129 Firefox/10.0 SeaMonkey/2.7. But I can't help with why.
I haven't had any problems with the pages I go to and haven't seen
anything like that anywhere else except the link you posted. I ran
that page through validator.w3.org and it has 68 markup errors and 11
warnings and 204 CSS errors but I don't know if one of them is causing
the display problem or not. However, IE 9 does display it correctly.

Jim


The following line in the propertyDetails.css file is what is causing 
the problem:


#controlpanel{background-color:#5d5d5d;left:0;bottom:7.5em;height:2.4em;opacity:.85;filter:alpha(opacity=85);color:#FFF;position:absolute;width:620px}

The bottom:7.5em causes the control panel to be displayed 7.5em (font 
heights) up from the bottom of the main image container.  If that is 
changed to bottom:0 it displays at the bottom of the container where 
you would expect it.  I don't know html or css so don't know if it is 
coded wrong or is being rendered wrong, but to me it looks like it is 
being rendered just as it is coded.  Perhaps somebody that knows html 
and css will comment.


Jim


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image display in SM 2.7 - Win 7

2012-02-09 Thread MCBastos
Interviewed by CNN on 09/02/2012 22:30, MCBastos told the world:

 So, it's a Javascript issue. What I'm not equipped to say, since I don't
 know much Javascript, is if this is a bug on the site or a bug in the
 latest version of Gecko's Javascript engine.

Wups! Jim Taylor tracked it to CSS. Apparently it's a CSS property that
only becomes relevant after Javascript is run... my mistake.

-- 
MCBastos

This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized
use will be prosecuted under the DMCA.

-=-=-
... Sent from my Deep Thought.
* Added by TagZilla 0.7a1 running on Seamonkey 2.7 *
Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image resizing

2012-01-05 Thread Reba27Atkins
freelance writer


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image resizing

2011-12-07 Thread NewmanBriana
freelance writer


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image

2011-04-10 Thread Walter

Ok, image post did not take. Ignore this


Walter wrote:


I have attempted to post an image on mozilla.test.

The image is on my screen as a gadget but I cannot determine where it
came from. It is not part of the gadgets that HP included with the
computer software. It displays when I boot but the busy icon is
displayed when I place the pointer on it. Has anybody seen such a thing
before and how do I get rid of it?

Thanks,
Walter


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image

2011-04-10 Thread David E. Ross
On 4/10/11 3:42 PM, Walter wrote:
 Ok, image post did not take. Ignore this
 
 
 Walter wrote:

 I have attempted to post an image on mozilla.test.

 The image is on my screen as a gadget but I cannot determine where it
 came from. It is not part of the gadgets that HP included with the
 computer software. It displays when I boot but the busy icon is
 displayed when I place the pointer on it. Has anybody seen such a thing
 before and how do I get rid of it?

 Thanks,
 Walter


The problem is that images are not allowed on these newsgroups except
possibly for mozilla.test.multimedia.

-- 

David E. Ross
http://www.rossde.com/

On occasion, I might filter and ignore all newsgroup messages
posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent
because of spam from that source.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image blocking in SM 2.0.10

2010-12-23 Thread HenriK

Heikki Jussila wrote:

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 21:36, HenriKbedp...@attglobal.net  wrote:

HenriK wrote:


For reasons that I can not sort out, images are being blocked in SM
2.0.10 used with my 933 mHz Dell 4100 using Windows XP-Home SP3 and
Avast! security software.

Specifically, the background maps when I go to Mapquest won't appear at
all and images on e-Bay often appear for a second or two and then
disappear. In both cases, SM is set to allow images from these two
sites. Text displays correctly. Turning off Avast! doesn't fix the
problem either.

Could this problem be caused by an SM Add-On or is it more likely to be
a preference setting that I don't know about?

Any help and/or suggestions will be gratefully received.


I have now disabled all SM add-ons, disabled the Microsoft firewall,
disabled the Avast! security software, enabled all images in the SM security
preferences window, enabled images for Mapquest and e-Bay specifically in
SM, and have SM installed in a sub-folder (directory) of my own creation.

Images still don't appear for these two URLs in the Windows XP-Home limited
log-on.  They do appear in the Windows XP-Home administrator log-on.

Anybody have any idea what could be going on?

Sorry for double posting, but I read this as an email list and somehow
the mailto was not set corretly.

The simple Windows thing. For some reason, the limited account used
blocks the images from that site (probably also from others too). Are
coming via a script java/js/vb/php etc. could be that the limited user
rights account does not have enough file rights (and even if you THINK
that you give them, Windows home thinks otherwise). I have found that
the only way to get limited accounts to work properly under WIN XP was
to use professional and its user management system so that when you
(as admin) give the proper policy rights they stick and they are also
followed.

This because you say that as admin all work. This means that it could
be that the images temp folder that SM uses does not have the proper
rights, check that, but if it is under admin user there is not very
much you can use, unless you upgrade your system to a professional
version with policy management system.

I know that this is not a very easy way, but when using the home
versions it probably is the only real solution.

Heikki Jussila

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey





I was about to accept Mr. Jussila's view that this image blocking 
situation is a problem endemic to XP-Home when it occurred to me that I 
had not checked to see if the same problem might exist with XP-Home and 
IE v.8.x.  Interestingly, with XP-Home and IE v.8.x, images do appear 
regardless of whether one is using the XP-Home administrator account or 
the limited account.


Accordingly, I now all but certain that image blocking I have been 
observing when logged in via the XP-Home limited account is a problem 
peculiar to SM v.2.x's interaction with the XP-Home limited account 
log-in.  Mr. Kaiser, how does one fix this problem?

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image problem--(Win 7- '64' )--seamonkey 2.0.11

2010-12-21 Thread Rufus

JB wrote:

Hi

I've been getting a viewing problem when trying to open some images on
eBay.

When I click, view supersized image, I get:-

***

XML Parsing Error: not well-formed
Location:
http://www.auctiva.com/hostedimages/showimage.aspx?gid=309213ppid=1122image=434127757images=434127673,434127697,434127716,434127734,434127757formats=0,0,0,0,0format=0

Line Number 41, Column 48: if (navigator.appName == 'Netscape' 
e.which == 3){
---^
***


This only happens with SeaMonkey, and doesn't happen with Internet
Explorer.

Do you know the cause of this please?



Bad browser sniffing by the website.

--
 - Rufus
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image problem--(Win 7- '64' )--seamonkey 2.0.11

2010-12-21 Thread David E. Ross
On 12/21/10 2:01 PM, Rufus wrote:
 JB wrote:
 Hi

 I've been getting a viewing problem when trying to open some images on
 eBay.

 When I click, view supersized image, I get:-

 ***

 XML Parsing Error: not well-formed
 Location:
 http://www.auctiva.com/hostedimages/showimage.aspx?gid=309213ppid=1122image=434127757images=434127673,434127697,434127716,434127734,434127757formats=0,0,0,0,0format=0

 Line Number 41, Column 48: if (navigator.appName == 'Netscape' 
 e.which == 3){
 ---^
 ***


 This only happens with SeaMonkey, and doesn't happen with Internet
 Explorer.

 Do you know the cause of this please?

 
 Bad browser sniffing by the website.
 

See my http://www.rossde.com/internet/sniffing.html.  It has some
suggestions for correcting sniffing problems.

-- 

David E. Ross
http://www.rossde.com/

On occasion, I might filter and ignore all newsgroup messages
posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent
because of spam from that source.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image blocking in SM 2.0.10

2010-12-20 Thread HenriK

HenriK wrote:

For reasons that I can not sort out, images are being blocked in SM
2.0.10 used with my 933 mHz Dell 4100 using Windows XP-Home SP3 and
Avast! security software.

Specifically, the background maps when I go to Mapquest won't appear at
all and images on e-Bay often appear for a second or two and then
disappear. In both cases, SM is set to allow images from these two
sites. Text displays correctly. Turning off Avast! doesn't fix the
problem either.

Could this problem be caused by an SM Add-On or is it more likely to be
a preference setting that I don't know about?

Any help and/or suggestions will be gratefully received.


I have now disabled all SM add-ons, disabled the Microsoft firewall, 
disabled the Avast! security software, enabled all images in the SM 
security preferences window, enabled images for Mapquest and e-Bay 
specifically in SM, and have SM installed in a sub-folder (directory) of 
my own creation.


Images still don't appear for these two URLs in the Windows XP-Home 
limited log-on.  They do appear in the Windows XP-Home administrator log-on.


Anybody have any idea what could be going on?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image blocking in SM 2.0.10

2010-12-20 Thread Heikki Jussila
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 21:36, HenriK bedp...@attglobal.net wrote:
 HenriK wrote:

 For reasons that I can not sort out, images are being blocked in SM
 2.0.10 used with my 933 mHz Dell 4100 using Windows XP-Home SP3 and
 Avast! security software.

 Specifically, the background maps when I go to Mapquest won't appear at
 all and images on e-Bay often appear for a second or two and then
 disappear. In both cases, SM is set to allow images from these two
 sites. Text displays correctly. Turning off Avast! doesn't fix the
 problem either.

 Could this problem be caused by an SM Add-On or is it more likely to be
 a preference setting that I don't know about?

 Any help and/or suggestions will be gratefully received.

 I have now disabled all SM add-ons, disabled the Microsoft firewall,
 disabled the Avast! security software, enabled all images in the SM security
 preferences window, enabled images for Mapquest and e-Bay specifically in
 SM, and have SM installed in a sub-folder (directory) of my own creation.

 Images still don't appear for these two URLs in the Windows XP-Home limited
 log-on.  They do appear in the Windows XP-Home administrator log-on.

 Anybody have any idea what could be going on?
Sorry for double posting, but I read this as an email list and somehow
the mailto was not set corretly.

The simple Windows thing. For some reason, the limited account used
blocks the images from that site (probably also from others too). Are
coming via a script java/js/vb/php etc. could be that the limited user
rights account does not have enough file rights (and even if you THINK
that you give them, Windows home thinks otherwise). I have found that
the only way to get limited accounts to work properly under WIN XP was
to use professional and its user management system so that when you
(as admin) give the proper policy rights they stick and they are also
followed.

This because you say that as admin all work. This means that it could
be that the images temp folder that SM uses does not have the proper
rights, check that, but if it is under admin user there is not very
much you can use, unless you upgrade your system to a professional
version with policy management system.

I know that this is not a very easy way, but when using the home
versions it probably is the only real solution.

Heikki Jussila
 ___
 support-seamonkey mailing list
 support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
 https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey




-- 
Heikki Jussila
freelance researcher and geographer
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image blocking in SM v.2.0.10 and SM v.2.0.11

2010-12-13 Thread hawker

I have had issues with User access on the program files directory.
User mode does not seem to give enough access to that directory.
Try installing Seamonkey into somewhere else and see what happens.
For one machine I had to make a directory C:\Programs\ rather than 
C:\Program Files\ and install most apps there in order to run as user mode.


Hawker

On 12/12/2010 12:58 PM, HenriK wrote:

HenriK wrote:

For reasons that I can not sort out, images are being blocked in SM
2.0.10 used with my 933 mHz Dell 4100 using Windows XP-Home SP3 and
Avast! security software.

Specifically, the background maps when I go to Mapquest won't appear at
all and images on e-Bay often appear for a second or two and then
disappear. In both cases, SM is set to allow images from these two
sites. Text displays correctly. Turning off Avast! doesn't fix the
problem either.

Could this problem be caused by an SM Add-On or is it more likely to be
a preference setting that I don't know about?

Any help and/or suggestions will be gratefully received.



Although I appreciate Mr. Ross' suggestion, I have now discovered that
the problem is more nuanced than I had suspected. First, image downloads
from all sites has been enabled and always has been.

If one is operating as a user with Windows XP administrative rights,
everything operates fine. If, however, you operate as a user with
Windows XP limited rights, as is generally recommended for day-to-day
use, the problem I originally described occurs. It does not matter
whether Avast! is enabled or disabled in either case. I also made
certain that image downloads were allowed from all sites in both modes
of operation. In addition, I upgraded to SM 2.0.11 and that also made no
difference in the problem.

Accordingly, it would appear to me that something really odd is going on
in the way SM v.2.x interacts with the different user modes (with admin
rights and without admin rights) of Windows XP-Home. It would be
appreciated if anyone with a really thorough knowledge of SM v.2.x can
explain what may be going on and/or can advise me how to solve the
problem I have described.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image blocking in SM v.2.0.10 and SM v.2.0.11

2010-12-13 Thread HenriK

Heikki Jussila wrote:

On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 18:58, HenriKbedp...@attglobal.net  wrote:


HenriK wrote:


For reasons that I can not sort out, images are being blocked in SM
2.0.10 used with my 933 mHz Dell 4100 using Windows XP-Home SP3 and
Avast! security software.

Specifically, the background maps when I go to Mapquest won't appear at
all and images on e-Bay often appear for a second or two and then
disappear. In both cases, SM is set to allow images from these two
sites. Text displays correctly. Turning off Avast! doesn't fix the
problem either.

Could this problem be caused by an SM Add-On or is it more likely to be
a preference setting that I don't know about?

Any help and/or suggestions will be gratefully received.




Although I appreciate Mr. Ross' suggestion, I have now discovered that the
problem is more nuanced than I had suspected.  First, image downloads from
all sites has been enabled and always has been.

If one is operating as a user with Windows XP administrative rights,
everything operates fine.  If, however, you operate as a user with Windows
XP limited rights, as is generally recommended for day-to-day use, the
problem I originally described occurs.  It does not matter whether Avast! is
enabled or disabled in either case.  I also made certain that image
downloads were allowed from all sites in both modes of operation.  In
addition, I upgraded to SM 2.0.11 and that also made no difference in the
problem.

 From the above, I make the wild guess that there is something at system

level that blocks images. When you have admin rights you (the program SM in
this case) has the right to download and show everything, but when you work
with limited user rights there might be problems, since SM might use a
directory that is at system level and at this point the system does not
allow images any more. I myself found that using Win XP as a restricted user
was almost impossible. Most programs (even those of MS) require that you
have admin rights or you need to define relatively high level rights to a
user in order to get things moving.

Check if the SM has write-read rights to the temp (cache) directory at user
level when looking at the sites (also javascript etc. as some images arrive
with AJAX and if at user level javascript or any other script is stopped
that could inhibit the images.

Accordingly, it would appear to me that something really odd is going on in

the way SM v.2.x interacts with the different user modes (with admin rights
and without admin rights) of Windows XP-Home.  It would be appreciated if
anyone with a really thorough knowledge of SM v.2.x can explain what may be
going on and/or can advise me how to solve the problem I have described.



I do not any more have WIN XP, but even on Windows Vista/Win 7 SM needs to
be installed as an admin and when used with limited account, windows stops
some operations (most notably updating to a new version), but also other
things. I have only used Firefox as limited user on WIN7, but found that
many things I could do as an admin on my Vista machine where not possibile,
however, the missing update was the most problematic, so to give also to the
Win7 notebook the possibility to update itself I changed the user as an
admin - the version is Home Premium.

I have the suspect that many Windows programs still need to be run as an
admin, althougth it is less safe and can create problems, but it seems that
it is the only simple way (especially with the home editions that do not
have group policy tools where you can set users rights properly, if you use
a professional/ulimate version then you can make user rights so that they
really do function, ie. like the old Win2K power user used to have).


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey



Thank you for your idea.  I share the view that Windows, XP and later, 
seems to have some problems with limited access users.  The problem is 
that my system used to show graphics properly with SM v.2.x.


This leaves me to believe that since the time when everything worked: 
1) a Windows XP update has caused the problem; 2) a SM v.2.x update has 
caused the problem; 3) a SM add-on has caused the problem; 4) an Avast! 
update has caused the problem; and/or I unwittingly changed an XP or SM 
security setting and caused the problem.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image blocking in SM v.2.0.10 and SM v.2.0.11

2010-12-13 Thread HenriK

Philip Chee wrote:

On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 12:58:32 -0500, HenriK wrote:


Although I appreciate Mr. Ross' suggestion, I have now discovered that
the problem is more nuanced than I had suspected.  First, image
downloads from all sites has been enabled and always has been.

If one is operating as a user with Windows XP administrative rights,
everything operates fine.  If, however, you operate as a user with
Windows XP limited rights, as is generally recommended for day-to-day
use, the problem I originally described occurs.  It does not matter
whether Avast! is enabled or disabled in either case.  I also made
certain that image downloads were allowed from all sites in both modes
of operation.  In addition, I upgraded to SM 2.0.11 and that also made
no difference in the problem.


This implies that you have some sort of system wide image blocker
possibly part of some firewall package. I do know that ZoneAlarm Pro has
certain privacy settings that can block images. And consumer firewall
packages have to be configured on a per user basis usually.

Phil

Thank you for your note.  As I have thought the matter through and since 
the graphics used to display properly under SM v.2.x and XM SP3-Home, I 
think the possibilities are: 1) a Windows XP update has caused the 
problem; 2) a SM v.2.x update has caused the problem; 3) a SM add-on has 
caused the problem; 4) along the lines you suggest, an Avast! update has 
caused the problem; and/or 5) I unwittingly changed an XP, SM, or Avast! 
security setting and caused the problem.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image blocking in SM v.2.0.10 and SM v.2.0.11

2010-12-13 Thread HenriK

hawker wrote:

I have had issues with User access on the program files directory.
User mode does not seem to give enough access to that directory.
Try installing Seamonkey into somewhere else and see what happens.
For one machine I had to make a directory C:\Programs\ rather than
C:\Program Files\ and install most apps there in order to run as user mode.

Hawker


Thank you for that interesting idea.  As it happens, I have SM v.2.x 
installed in my e:\ partition.  Moreover, everything used to work 
properly when installed on this PC.  Accordingly, I am now working 
through the following: 1) a Windows XP update has caused the problem; 2) 
a SM v.2.x update has caused the problem; 3) a SM add-on has caused the 
problem; 4) an Avast! update has caused the problem; and/or 5) I 
unwittingly changed an XP, SM, or Avast! security setting and caused the 
problem.


On 12/12/2010 12:58 PM, HenriK wrote:

HenriK wrote:

For reasons that I can not sort out, images are being blocked in SM
2.0.10 used with my 933 mHz Dell 4100 using Windows XP-Home SP3 and
Avast! security software.

Specifically, the background maps when I go to Mapquest won't appear at
all and images on e-Bay often appear for a second or two and then
disappear. In both cases, SM is set to allow images from these two
sites. Text displays correctly. Turning off Avast! doesn't fix the
problem either.

Could this problem be caused by an SM Add-On or is it more likely to be
a preference setting that I don't know about?

Any help and/or suggestions will be gratefully received.



Although I appreciate Mr. Ross' suggestion, I have now discovered that
the problem is more nuanced than I had suspected. First, image downloads
from all sites has been enabled and always has been.

If one is operating as a user with Windows XP administrative rights,
everything operates fine. If, however, you operate as a user with
Windows XP limited rights, as is generally recommended for day-to-day
use, the problem I originally described occurs. It does not matter
whether Avast! is enabled or disabled in either case. I also made
certain that image downloads were allowed from all sites in both modes
of operation. In addition, I upgraded to SM 2.0.11 and that also made no
difference in the problem.

Accordingly, it would appear to me that something really odd is going on
in the way SM v.2.x interacts with the different user modes (with admin
rights and without admin rights) of Windows XP-Home. It would be
appreciated if anyone with a really thorough knowledge of SM v.2.x can
explain what may be going on and/or can advise me how to solve the
problem I have described.




___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image blocking in SM v.2.0.10 and SM v.2.0.11

2010-12-12 Thread HenriK

HenriK wrote:

For reasons that I can not sort out, images are being blocked in SM
2.0.10 used with my 933 mHz Dell 4100 using Windows XP-Home SP3 and
Avast! security software.

Specifically, the background maps when I go to Mapquest won't appear at
all and images on e-Bay often appear for a second or two and then
disappear. In both cases, SM is set to allow images from these two
sites. Text displays correctly. Turning off Avast! doesn't fix the
problem either.

Could this problem be caused by an SM Add-On or is it more likely to be
a preference setting that I don't know about?

Any help and/or suggestions will be gratefully received.



Although I appreciate Mr. Ross' suggestion, I have now discovered that 
the problem is more nuanced than I had suspected.  First, image 
downloads from all sites has been enabled and always has been.


If one is operating as a user with Windows XP administrative rights, 
everything operates fine.  If, however, you operate as a user with 
Windows XP limited rights, as is generally recommended for day-to-day 
use, the problem I originally described occurs.  It does not matter 
whether Avast! is enabled or disabled in either case.  I also made 
certain that image downloads were allowed from all sites in both modes 
of operation.  In addition, I upgraded to SM 2.0.11 and that also made 
no difference in the problem.


Accordingly, it would appear to me that something really odd is going on 
in the way SM v.2.x interacts with the different user modes (with admin 
rights and without admin rights) of Windows XP-Home.  It would be 
appreciated if anyone with a really thorough knowledge of SM v.2.x can 
explain what may be going on and/or can advise me how to solve the 
problem I have described.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image blocking in SM v.2.0.10 and SM v.2.0.11

2010-12-12 Thread Heikki Jussila
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 18:58, HenriK bedp...@attglobal.net wrote:

 HenriK wrote:

 For reasons that I can not sort out, images are being blocked in SM
 2.0.10 used with my 933 mHz Dell 4100 using Windows XP-Home SP3 and
 Avast! security software.

 Specifically, the background maps when I go to Mapquest won't appear at
 all and images on e-Bay often appear for a second or two and then
 disappear. In both cases, SM is set to allow images from these two
 sites. Text displays correctly. Turning off Avast! doesn't fix the
 problem either.

 Could this problem be caused by an SM Add-On or is it more likely to be
 a preference setting that I don't know about?

 Any help and/or suggestions will be gratefully received.



 Although I appreciate Mr. Ross' suggestion, I have now discovered that the
 problem is more nuanced than I had suspected.  First, image downloads from
 all sites has been enabled and always has been.

 If one is operating as a user with Windows XP administrative rights,
 everything operates fine.  If, however, you operate as a user with Windows
 XP limited rights, as is generally recommended for day-to-day use, the
 problem I originally described occurs.  It does not matter whether Avast! is
 enabled or disabled in either case.  I also made certain that image
 downloads were allowed from all sites in both modes of operation.  In
 addition, I upgraded to SM 2.0.11 and that also made no difference in the
 problem.

 From the above, I make the wild guess that there is something at system
level that blocks images. When you have admin rights you (the program SM in
this case) has the right to download and show everything, but when you work
with limited user rights there might be problems, since SM might use a
directory that is at system level and at this point the system does not
allow images any more. I myself found that using Win XP as a restricted user
was almost impossible. Most programs (even those of MS) require that you
have admin rights or you need to define relatively high level rights to a
user in order to get things moving.

Check if the SM has write-read rights to the temp (cache) directory at user
level when looking at the sites (also javascript etc. as some images arrive
with AJAX and if at user level javascript or any other script is stopped
that could inhibit the images.

Accordingly, it would appear to me that something really odd is going on in
 the way SM v.2.x interacts with the different user modes (with admin rights
 and without admin rights) of Windows XP-Home.  It would be appreciated if
 anyone with a really thorough knowledge of SM v.2.x can explain what may be
 going on and/or can advise me how to solve the problem I have described.


I do not any more have WIN XP, but even on Windows Vista/Win 7 SM needs to
be installed as an admin and when used with limited account, windows stops
some operations (most notably updating to a new version), but also other
things. I have only used Firefox as limited user on WIN7, but found that
many things I could do as an admin on my Vista machine where not possibile,
however, the missing update was the most problematic, so to give also to the
Win7 notebook the possibility to update itself I changed the user as an
admin - the version is Home Premium.

I have the suspect that many Windows programs still need to be run as an
admin, althougth it is less safe and can create problems, but it seems that
it is the only simple way (especially with the home editions that do not
have group policy tools where you can set users rights properly, if you use
a professional/ulimate version then you can make user rights so that they
really do function, ie. like the old Win2K power user used to have).

 ___
 support-seamonkey mailing list
 support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
 https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


-- 
Heikki Jussila
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: image properties reset to default

2010-12-12 Thread David E. Ross
On 12/12/10 12:07 PM, beric wrote:
 After a recent upgrade to 2.0.11 on OSX 4.6.5, my user (wife :-) )
 discovered that image properties set in the composer are not
 retained.  For example, in the location tab, selecting Don't use
 alternate text is not retained; in the Dimensions tab, changes made
 in Custom Size are lost and reset to Actual Size.
 
 Is there some place to hardcode these changes?  Is it a bug?
 
 Thanks -

If your wife is composing Web pages, alternate text for an image is
required by the HTML specifications.

-- 

David E. Ross
http://www.rossde.com/

On occasion, I might filter and ignore all newsgroup messages
posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent
because of spam from that source.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image blocking in SM v.2.0.10 and SM v.2.0.11

2010-12-12 Thread Philip Chee
On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 12:58:32 -0500, HenriK wrote:

 Although I appreciate Mr. Ross' suggestion, I have now discovered that 
 the problem is more nuanced than I had suspected.  First, image 
 downloads from all sites has been enabled and always has been.
 
 If one is operating as a user with Windows XP administrative rights, 
 everything operates fine.  If, however, you operate as a user with 
 Windows XP limited rights, as is generally recommended for day-to-day 
 use, the problem I originally described occurs.  It does not matter 
 whether Avast! is enabled or disabled in either case.  I also made 
 certain that image downloads were allowed from all sites in both modes 
 of operation.  In addition, I upgraded to SM 2.0.11 and that also made 
 no difference in the problem.

This implies that you have some sort of system wide image blocker
possibly part of some firewall package. I do know that ZoneAlarm Pro has
certain privacy settings that can block images. And consumer firewall
packages have to be configured on a per user basis usually.

Phil

-- 
Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com
http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org
Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief,
oh Night, and so be good for us to pass.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image blocking in SM 2.0.10

2010-12-10 Thread David E. Ross
On 12/10/10 9:21 PM, HenriK wrote:
 For reasons that I can not sort out, images are being blocked in SM 
 2.0.10 used with my 933 mHz Dell 4100 using Windows XP-Home SP3 and 
 Avast! security software.
 
 Specifically, the background maps when I go to Mapquest won't appear at 
 all and images on e-Bay often appear for a second or two and then 
 disappear.  In both cases, SM is set to allow images from these two 
 sites.  Text displays correctly.  Turning off Avast! doesn't fix the 
 problem either.
 
 Could this problem be caused by an SM Add-On or is it more likely to be 
 a preference setting that I don't know about?
 
 Any help and/or suggestions will be gratefully received.

Mapquest requires you to set your preference to allow images from all
domains, not only from Mapquest.

-- 

David E. Ross
http://www.rossde.com/

On occasion, I might filter and ignore all newsgroup messages
posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent
because of spam from that source.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image pasted into a mail

2010-11-17 Thread Ray_Net

Evan Davidson wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:

Evan Davidson wrote:

Evan Davidson wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:



snip


I tried Snippy in Vista and it did not work. So XP may be the end of the
road for it. Vista and Windows 7 have their own screen capture snipping
tools ( http://graphicssoft.about.com/od/microsoft/ht/snippingtool.htm )
which work nicely. MWSnap 3 will work with all versions of Windows (
http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/products/?p=1318 ). All of the above
will automatically capture (copy) and paste JPEGs into TB and Seamonkey
mail without having to alter about:config .



Are you sure that the copy action will not insert a /png format into
SeaMonkey ? I have a doubt, because the default in SM is for
clipboard.paste_image_type integer value 1
Looking at
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Clipboard.paste_image_type
tells you: Prefer PNG over JPEG over GIF



The snap programs (Snipping Tool) and MWSnap3) pasted JPEGs into
Seamonkey Mail. I checked them with ImageZoom (
http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmisc.html#imagezoom )Properties and
they were JPEGs. I also also pasted them into Irfanview and they showed
up as JPEGs. My Clipboard.paste_image_type was set to the default (1).
As you know, with a setting of 1, if the generated image is a JPEG the
paste will be a JPEG in TB and Seamonkey Mail since a PNG is not
presented to the mail program.

 From http://kb.mozillazine.org/Clipboard.paste_image_type :

-
1

Prefer PNG over JPEG over GIF (this is the default):

1. If PNG is available, paste in PNG format;
2. if PNG is not available but JPEG, paste in JPEG;
3. if neither PNG nor JPEG are available, but GIF, paste in GIF.

Ok, but i prefer continuing to use the simple paint.exe to manipulate a 
PtrnScrn action. Modifying clipboard.paste_image_type with the value of 2
In that case, evenwhile PNG is presented - it is pasted as JPEG (i have 
verified with view-Message Source and better .. The recipient using 
(not using the latest version of Lotus Notes) Lotus Notes is now able to 
see my paste picture in their mail.

Prefer GIF over JPEG over PNG:

   1. If GIF is available, paste in GIF format;
   2. if GIF is not available but JPEG, paste in JPEG;
   3. if neither GIF nor JPEG are available, but PNG, paste in PNG.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image pasted into a mail

2010-11-12 Thread Ray_Net

Evan Davidson wrote:

Evan Davidson wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:

I have an image in the clipboard ...
and i wrote a mail with:
See my picture !!
(then here i do a paste from the clipboard)

The result is:
See my picture !!
*---*
| |
| here is the image |
| |
*---*


The result is ok for me, but my recipient having Lotus Notes as mail
received:
See my picture !!
*-*
| | - just an empty square
*-*

I have goggled and discovered that embedded .png file into an HTML
document cannot be rendered with Lotus Notes.


How can i create an embedded picture in a mail for my recipient who
is usinf Lotus Notes ?


See:
news://news.mozilla.org:119/_sydnuornmux7krrnz2dnuvz_osdn...@mozilla.org

It's a image clipboard program called Snippy. It says it only works on
Windows XP but if you read the Microsoft info, it should work on XP
through Windows 7. I have it working on Win 98SE with GDI+ installed.



I tried Snippy in Vista and it did not work. So XP may be the end of the
road for it. Vista and Windows 7 have their own screen capture snipping
tools ( http://graphicssoft.about.com/od/microsoft/ht/snippingtool.htm )
which work nicely. MWSnap 3 will work with all versions of Windows (
http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/products/?p=1318 ). All of the above
will automatically capture (copy) and paste JPEGs into TB and Seamonkey
mail without having to alter about:config .
Are you sure that the copy action will not insert a /png format into 
SeaMonkey ? I have a doubt, because the default in SM is for

clipboard.paste_image_type integer value 1
Looking at
 http://kb.mozillazine.org/Clipboard.paste_image_type
tells you: Prefer PNG over JPEG over GIF

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image pasted into a mail

2010-11-11 Thread Evan Davidson

Evan Davidson wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:

I have an image in the clipboard ...
 and i wrote a mail with:
See my picture !!
(then here i do a paste from the clipboard)

The result is:
See my picture !!
*---*
|   |
|   here is the image |
|   |
*---*


The result is ok for me, but my recipient having Lotus Notes as mail 
received:

See my picture !!
*-*
| |   - just an empty square
*-*

I have goggled and discovered that embedded .png file into an HTML 
document cannot be rendered with Lotus Notes.



How can i create an embedded picture in a mail for my recipient who is 
usinf Lotus Notes ?


See: 
news://news.mozilla.org:119/_sydnuornmux7krrnz2dnuvz_osdn...@mozilla.org


It's a image clipboard program called Snippy. It says it only works on 
Windows XP but if you read the Microsoft info, it should work on XP 
through Windows 7. I have it working on Win 98SE with GDI+ installed.




I tried Snippy in Vista and it did not work. So XP may be the end of the 
road for it. Vista and Windows 7 have their own screen capture snipping 
tools ( http://graphicssoft.about.com/od/microsoft/ht/snippingtool.htm ) 
which work nicely. MWSnap 3 will work with all versions of Windows ( 
http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/products/?p=1318 ). All of the above 
will automatically capture (copy) and paste JPEGs into TB and Seamonkey 
mail without having to alter about:config .

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


[SOLVED] Re: Image pasted into a mail

2010-11-10 Thread Ray_Net

Ray_Net wrote:

I have an image in the clipboard ...
and i wrote a mail with:
See my picture !!
(then here i do a paste from the clipboard)

The result is:
See my picture !!
*---*
| |
| here is the image |
| |
*---*


The result is ok for me, but my recipient having Lotus Notes as mail
received:
See my picture !!
*-*
| | - just an empty square
*-*

I have goggled and discovered that embedded .png file into an HTML
document cannot be rendered with Lotus Notes.


How can i create an embedded picture in a mail for my recipient who is
using Lotus Notes ?


Thanks for all who reacted on this post giving ideas, consels, etc ...
The following is to be done because Lotus Notes mail did not recognise a 
/png image before version 8.5.
With about:config change clipboard.paste_image_type integer value 2 
instead of 1
 - this action will permit for the image inclusion in the middle of a 
mail(inclusion by a paste ctrl-v action)

   to be a type /jpeg instead of the default /png.
All explanation can be found at:
 http://kb.mozillazine.org/Clipboard.paste_image_type

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image pasted into a mail

2010-11-08 Thread Evan Davidson

Ray_Net wrote:

I have an image in the clipboard ...
 and i wrote a mail with:
See my picture !!
(then here i do a paste from the clipboard)

The result is:
See my picture !!
*---*
|   |
|   here is the image |
|   |
*---*


The result is ok for me, but my recipient having Lotus Notes as mail 
received:

See my picture !!
*-*
| |   - just an empty square
*-*

I have goggled and discovered that embedded .png file into an HTML 
document cannot be rendered with Lotus Notes.



How can i create an embedded picture in a mail for my recipient who is 
usinf Lotus Notes ?


See: 
news://news.mozilla.org:119/_sydnuornmux7krrnz2dnuvz_osdn...@mozilla.org


It's a image clipboard program called Snippy. It says it only works on 
Windows XP but if you read the Microsoft info, it should work on XP 
through Windows 7. I have it working on Win 98SE with GDI+ installed.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image pasted into a mail

2010-11-07 Thread Tony Mechelynck

On 07/11/10 08:44, Ray_Net wrote:

David E. Ross wrote:

On 11/6/10 1:54 PM, Ray_Net wrote:

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:

Sat, 06 Nov 2010 22:37:04 +0100, /Ray_Net/:

Ed Mullen wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:


How can i change the format .png when doing paste into a mail ?


You can't. You have to convert the file first, then paste the new
file. If you need a converter program try:

http://irfanview.com/

It's free and very good.


This is *not* a file  it's just a copy/paste of an image, per
example, you press the PrintScrn button when what you want to
transfer is on screen.


You could probably first paste in IrfanView and then save in whatever
format you need. You could also paste in Paint and save in one of the
formats it supports.


I understand, but i did not want to put a file in attachement ... i
prefer just a copy/paste ... but as i have said soemwhere else:
I think that i have found the solurion ... i have to wait some days now,
because the recipient will be at work only at wednesday. I will tell you
the result.


The problem is that, no matter how you obtain the image, it traverses
the Internet as an attached file separate from the message. Only when
you compose the message and when the recipient's E-mail application
displays the message does the image file get combined with the message.
Thus, you need an image file when composing the message.


But 1. There is no file ...
2. When embedded in(per example, in the middle of the mail) the mail
there is no visible file attachement this is different when i click on
attach-browse-select a file; in this case the file is attached with the
mail(and not embedded in the mail text).
3. I know that the file or pseudo file is appended at the end of the
mail. Looking at the message source we see a multi-part message with the
message text/plain, the message text/html and the message image/png
... all those parts are composing the full message.


Well, in a plaintext mail there's no way you can have an image appear in 
the middle. You may see it at the end, just like you may see a text 
attachment at the end.


In an HTML email, you may see an image in the middle of the text if 
there is an img tag in your HTML source. The src= attribute in that 
tag may be a relative URL to an attachment, or the URL of a remote 
image. In the latter case the image is not sent with the email, but 
SeaMonkey will refuse to display it, unless *either* the mail is from 
someone already klnown in your address book, and with Allow remote 
content checked, *or* you click Display remote content after opening 
the mail. This click only applies for one email, but there is a link to 
create the address book entry if you want to always display remote 
content from this sender.


In every case, the MIME type of the image (as set in the attachment 
header fopr an image sent together with the mail, or as served by the 
remote server for a remote image) must agree with the actual format of 
the image. Renaming foobar.png to foobar without actually 
translating the image binary content is liable to get the sending mailer 
(for an attachment) or the remote HTTP server (for a remote image) 
mistake it for something other than image/png, with the result that the 
recipient's mailer probably won't be able to display it.



Best regards,
Tony.
--
The only way to get rid of a temptation is to yield to it.
-- Oscar Wilde
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Image pasted into a mail

2010-11-07 Thread Stanimir Stamenkov

Sun, 07 Nov 2010 08:44:55 +0100, /Ray_Net/:

David E. Ross wrote:

The problem is that, no matter how you obtain the image, it traverses 
the Internet as an attached file separate from the message.  Only when
you compose the message and when the recipient's E-mail application 
displays the message does the image file get combined with the 
message.  Thus, you need an image file when composing the message.


But 1. There is no file ...
2. When embedded in(per example, in the middle of the mail) the mail 
there is no visible file attachement this is different when i click 
on attach-browse-select a file; in this case the file is attached with 
the mail(and not embedded in the mail text).
3. I know that the file or pseudo file is appended at the end of the 
mail. Looking at the message source we see a multi-part message with 
the message text/plain, the message text/html and the message image/png

... all those parts are composing the full message.


So just try this and observe there's no difference:

1. While you're composing (in HTML I guess), select Insert - Image... 
and then Choose File... from the file system (rather than pasting an 
image from the clipboard);

2. Do you see any difference?

--
Stanimir
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


  1   2   >