Re: t-and-f: Re: where are all the world records?

2000-08-30 Thread Conway


On Tuesday, August 29, 2000 9:26 PM "Kurt Bray" said:
Subject: Re: t-and-f: Re: where are all the world records?


 The situations are not comparable.  Ben Johnson was found guilty of
 cheating, so he and his marks were disqualified.  The public certainly
 understands and accepts that and rightly forgets about Ben.  But is that
 what we are proposing to do?  To wipe out all the old records by declaring
 them tainted and the athletes cheaters?


Why not !! What is one of the biggest image problems of hte sport today for
Mr John Q Public ?? The idea that everyone in the sport is using drugs ..
And what do mostt of us in the know know about the sport and its records ??
That a large majority of them have been tainted by the use of drugs .. If we
just take what we know from recorded fact regarding the height of the
Eastern Bloc there go half the records in one fell swoop .. So why not tell
MR Public "Hey look" .. We know there's been a problem .. So we're
increasing our testing efforts and re-establishing the benchmark so as to be
fair to all !! For the next few years record breaking will be at an all time
high and hopefully so will the interest of Mr Public ...

   When was the last time you read that Uwe Hohn is stll the "real" WR
 holder in
   the javelin?


 Again, not a valid comparison because in this case they changed the
 implement.  The event was significantly changed such that the marks are
not
 directly comparable.  The equivalent change in the 100m would be to
lengthen
 it to 110m or shorten it to 90m and then start keeping new records.  In
that
 case people probably would forget about Maurice Greene after a while.  But
 as long as it stayed 100m, and Greene was not discredited in some way, a
new
 "world record" of say 9.89 would always cause many people to say: "Yeah,
but
 what about Mo?".

I don't think anyone in the general public has a clue about implement
changes .. Heck it takes quite a while for many in the sport to get a clue
.. Do you think many sprinters or distance runners can tell you about any
implement changes to field events ?? I'll give you another example ..
Decathlon and Heptathlon scoring tables .. When they have been changed (and
correspondingly the records) who knew or cared outside of the athletes and
coaches that were affected ?? And in the case of "yeah but what about MO",
in order to make that comparison one would have to know what the actual
records were prior to .. And John Q doesn't follow them that closely .. Mr
Public doesn't know (or care) what the actual marks are .. He just wants to
know for comparisons sake whether or not someone is close to or exceeding
them .. I think too often we transfer our need to know the minutiae of the
sport along to Mr Public who just wants to know if he is watching quality
competition .. And his only benchmark is records (since he isn't paying as
close attention as he would to say baseball or football) ..

Conway Hill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]








t-and-f: Field Event Distance Conversion

2000-08-30 Thread Shawn Sorenson

Everyone,

Call me crazy, but what the heck are people talking about with regard to an
adjusted algorithm to take measurement factors into account?

Every meet worldwide, with the exception of some non-championship,
relatively unimportant, and certainly not reported to this list meets I've
been to at the high school level, measures distances in metric units,
rounded to the nearest 0.01m.  These are the official distances, and that's
what matters for determining who wins, and for record purposes.  The only
motivation for expressing such a distance in feet and inches is to relate
the distances for those who don't have an intuitive feel for the metric,
unless some old records measured in feet and inches still stand (do they?).

If the official distance is in metric, then it's irrelevant what the
official distance would have been, had it been measured in the imperial
system.  To this end, any "algorithm" capable of converting metric to feet
and inches, and rounding to the nearest 1/4 inch, is entirely appropriate.
Whether or not it matches TFN's adjusted algorithm is irrelevant, because
the distance was measured in meters.

I have a very simple program on my calculator that does conversions for me
when I'm at a meet, and otherwise I use a windows program that I wrote,
available at:

http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/~riceroo/met-eng2.exe

I'd be happy to share either.

Shawn Sorenson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: t-and-f: Re: where are all the world records?

2000-08-30 Thread Runtenkm

What is one of the biggest image problems of hte sport today for

Mr John Q Public ?? The idea that everyone in the sport is using drugs ..

I'm not really sure that John Q Public cares all that much about drug use in sports. 
Seems to be a media focal point and gets this list riled up but the general public 
just wants to see the competition. 

Folks who are major football fans are well aware that the behemoths that form their 
favorite teams' Offensive and Defensive lines are using or have used some sort of 
pharmeceutical aid to get that way. They really don't care all that much if at all. I 
had a conversation over the weekend with a person who is a big Tennis fan. The subject 
of drugs in that sport came up and he acknowledged that some of the stars are probably 
 dirty. Didn't seem to bother him one bit. While speaking about the upcoming Olympics 
he did say that the coverage of them was going to suck because he would already know 
who the world's fastest human was and would not watch an event which he knew who the 
winner was. Not a good omen for the boys and girls at NBC.

Steve S. 



t-and-f: HARRISONS MAKING DOUBLE TROUBLE FOR OPPONENTS

2000-08-30 Thread Christopher Goss

HARRISONS MAKING DOUBLE TROUBLE FOR OPPONENTS

BRISBANE, Australia (AP) - They think, talk, act and run alike --
and they're making history together. They're the Harrison
brothers -- Alvin and Calvin -- the first twins to make a U.S.
Olympic track team.

"We've already made history by being the first twins on the team,
now we want to add to it," Alvin said.

They will get that opportunity at Sydney, hoping to run in the
1,600-meter relay final, win gold medals and break the world record.

Alvin is virtually assured a place on the relay team, after
finishing second to Michael Johnson in the 400 meters at the
Olympic trials in Sacramento, Calif., last month. Calvin was
fifth at the trials and he is contending with his brother, plus
Johnson, third-place finisher Antonio Pettigrew and fourth-place
finisher Jerome Young for a spot in the final.

Even if the brothers don't run in the final, they would still
earn gold medals if they run in preliminary rounds on the way to
a U.S. victory.

Alvin already has an Olympic gold. He ran the second leg on the
winning 1996 team that included Lamont Smith, Derek Mills and
Anthuan Maybank and was timed in 2 minutes, 55.99 seconds, the
fourth-fastest in history.

*** For the full Harrison brothers feature, see
http://www.infobeat.com/stories/cgi/story.cgi?id=2569303714-e46





Re: t-and-f: Re: where are all the world records?

2000-08-30 Thread GHTFNedit


In a message dated 8/30/00 8:05:46 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Why not?  Because if you declare all the records drug-tainted and invalid
you'll take down some major icons along with those evil commie cheaters -
that's why.  And some of those icons may hire lawyers to argue the point on
their behalf.  Sure we'd get rid of the East German marks that are
documented to be dirty, but we'd also get rid of records held by JJK,
Michael Johnson, El G, Geb, Jonathan Edwards, Bubka, and others.  Many of
these people are still competing and still testing negative.  

you mean like Ben Johnson for all those years pre-Seoul?  :-)

gh



Re: t-and-f: Ottey 10''99.

2000-08-30 Thread Conway



Looks like Ottey is bound and 
determined to run her way into the starting blocks for the Olympic 100 meters 
!

Conway Hill[EMAIL PROTECTED]



  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Michalis 
  Nikitaridis 
  To: Track  Field Mailing list ; 
  Athletics 
  Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 10:29 
  AM
  Subject: t-and-f: Ottey 10''99.
  
  Ottey won the 100 m. in Olympic Meeting of 
  Thessaloniki in 10''99., the best performance of the meeting so far.Samuel 
  Matete won the 400 m. hurdles with 49''03.beating Thomas, Thompson and 
  Davis.
  
  The meeting is in progress.
  
  Michalis Nikitaridis - Panayotis 
  Christopoulos
  http://www.athletix.gr


Re: t-and-f: Ottey 10''99.

2000-08-30 Thread GHTFNedit


In a message dated 8/30/00 11:04:02 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Looks like Ottey is bound and determined to run her way into the starting 
blocks for the Olympic 100 meters ! 

i want to know who it is they're planning on knocking off the team to put her 
on, and what the over/under is on how long it takes for the knockee to file 
suit.

gh



t-and-f: SURVIVOR--looks like we finish a day early!

2000-08-30 Thread GHTFNedit

since we had a tie, insead of just a single today, there will be a pair for 
day 7:
Meb  Lojo

And we were close to a 3-way tie. Escaping by the skin of his teeth yet again 
was a guy who has been no lower than No. 3 ever since day 3, but somehow 
manages to escape day after day. I'll ID him when (if?) he's finally gone.

gh



t-and-f: SURVIVOR--day 8

2000-08-30 Thread GHTFNedit

Dudes! you've got 24 hours (i.e., until noon PDT Thursday) to cut yet another 
Sacto champion from the dinner table.

If you didn't vote previously, doesn't mean you can't vote now. And no, you 
don't have to say the same thing two days in a row.

Here are the 9 remaining potential dinner guests to choose from:

Pascal Dobert
Adam Goucher
Allen Johnson
Angelo Taylor
Charles Austin
Adam Nelson
Adam Setliff
Lance Deal
Tom Pappas

gh

recap: day 1 eliminated Seaman  Mo, day 2 Greer   MJ, day 3 Gabe  Everett, 
day 4 Lister, day 5 Howard, day 6 Capel, day 7 Meb  Lojo



t-and-f: Drugs in Sport

2000-08-30 Thread Ken Parker

The comment " Sure we'd get rid of the East German marks that are documented
to be dirty" was made in today's list.

All GDR marks can be considered dirty. In 1977 I was in the GDR for 3 weeks
as part of the first group of Western coaches and sports officials allowed
into the country. They said to us point blank, when asked about how such a
small country could have won so many medals at Montreal, " It's not just the
steroids". They made absolutely no attempt to deny that they used drugs.
Their position was that steroids administered under medical supervision were
safe. It is likely true that many athletes did not even know that they were
on steroids.

Ken


Ken Parker
Runner's Web
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
http://www.runnersweb.com/running.html
 
 



Re: t-and-f: HOMEMADE METRIC PERVERSION CALCULATORS

2000-08-30 Thread Wayne T. Armbrust



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 The metric conversion of 0.3048 to feet is precise; it is not a rounded
 estimate.

It is actually better than that, it is exact.  Now for something that may be
hard for you metrically challenged people to hear:  Sit down first.  The foot is
actually defined in terms of the meter.  1 foot equals 0.3048 meters by federal
law; this has been true for many years.  Sorry to have to be the one to tell
you.  :-)

--
Wayne T. Armbrust, Ph.D.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computomarx™
3604 Grant Ct.
Columbia MO 65203-5800 USA
(573) 445-6675 (voice  FAX)
http://www.Computomarx.com
"Know the difference between right and wrong...
Always give your best effort...
Treat others the way you'd like to be treated..."
- Coach Bill Sudeck





Re: t-and-f: ottey on the JAM team

2000-08-30 Thread GHTFNedit


In a message dated 8/30/00 11:52:11 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 
The word at the JAM trials was that Beveryly Macdonald was only going to run 
the 200m at the games, thus clearing a spot for Ottey. 

story on www.sportserver.com on 8/14 said, "McDonald also qualified at 200m 
and she dropped out of the 100m at last year's world championships when 
wuqlified for both due to schedulign conflicts. However, no such problem 
arises for Sydney, and her coach is adamant she will utilize both the spots 
she has earned."

???

gh



Re: t-and-f: HOMEMADE METRIC PERVERSION CALCULATORS

2000-08-30 Thread Wayne T. Armbrust



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Once again, folks, all of these calculators and things are completely
 worthless if you do not understand how to convert.  The Cray 1 will not give
 the right conversion without the right "fudge" added in!!  Rather than do all
 of this work, why not just get a Green Book.  We have already done the work!
 Scott Davis

Or you could just go "cold turkey," make no attempt to convert, and throw all of
those silly little books away.  :-)

--
Wayne T. Armbrust, Ph.D.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computomarx™
3604 Grant Ct.
Columbia MO 65203-5800 USA
(573) 445-6675 (voice  FAX)
http://www.Computomarx.com
"Know the difference between right and wrong...
Always give your best effort...
Treat others the way you'd like to be treated..."
- Coach Bill Sudeck





Re: t-and-f: HOMEMADE METRIC PERVERSION CALCULATORS

2000-08-30 Thread DSchles

I have been using the simplest of methodologies to convert precisely meters 
to feet and inches, with nothing more than a simple pocket calculator.  No 
spread sheet or computer program is necessary.

The metric conversion of 0.3048 to feet is precise; it is not a rounded 
estimate.  Enter meters in the calculator.  Divide by 0.3048.  This gives 
feet and tenths of a foot, which, of course, is a problem!  So, remembering 
how many feet you had, now subtract that number from the array, leaving just 
the decimal portion of feet.  Multiply by 12.  What you are now reading is 
inches and fractions of an inch, after the decimal point.

Now, how international rules round those fractions up or down is another 
matter!  You'll have to deal with that as best you can.

For example, my daughter's best high school triple jump was 12.77 meters.  
12.77/.3048 = 41.896325.  So, I know it's 41-something.  Subtract the 41, 
leaving the decimal.  Multiply 0.896325 by 12, giving 10.7559.  I make that 
10 3/4 inches.  So, the jump is 41-10.75.  I have done this procedure so many 
times that it takes me literally just a couple of seconds, from start to 
finish.

Don Schlesinger  



Re: t-and-f: Olympic Weather

2000-08-30 Thread GHTFNedit


In a message dated 8/30/00 2:25:58 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 With some of the recent performances we have seen coming out of some meets
such as in Gateshead the other day, what type of weather will be expected in
Sydney during the games ?? While there has been mention of the drought of
records so far this year, there will be no guarantee in Sydney if the
weather is not advantageous  

chances of records in Sydney are probably slim and none no matter how good 
the weather is (relatively speaking). It'll be too cold in the sprints (even 
80 is prob. too cold), the distances won't have the needed rabbits and nobody 
sets field-event records anymore. We'll just have to enjoy the competition 
for the best of reasons: for competition's sake alone. Oh darn.

gh



RE: t-and-f: Drugs in Sport

2000-08-30 Thread malmo

Sounds a lot like Eugene,OR during the same period, only the East Germans
were less sophisticated!

malmo

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Parker
 Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 12:33 PM
 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
 Subject: t-and-f: Drugs in Sport


 The comment " Sure we'd get rid of the East German marks that are
 documented
 to be dirty" was made in today's list.

 All GDR marks can be considered dirty. In 1977 I was in the GDR
 for 3 weeks
 as part of the first group of Western coaches and sports officials allowed
 into the country. They said to us point blank, when asked about how such a
 small country could have won so many medals at Montreal, " It's
 not just the
 steroids". They made absolutely no attempt to deny that they used drugs.
 Their position was that steroids administered under medical
 supervision were
 safe. It is likely true that many athletes did not even know that
 they were
 on steroids.

 Ken


 Ken Parker
 Runner's Web
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.runnersweb.com/running.html







Re: t-and-f: Re: where are all the world records?

2000-08-30 Thread R.T.

the public's tolerance for playing fast and footlo0se with the ability to set 
records is immense. Perhaps there's a reason we stay a fringe (and get ever 
fringier) sport.

You have to say it while holding your nose, so it comes out 'fridge', as in
where Joe Six-Pack heads whenever the 5K comes on the tube.

RT



t-and-f: Re: Rome on the Tim Seaman story

2000-08-30 Thread Michael J. Roth

All:

On Tim: Yes he gets "free" room  board, in the sense that he does not
have to work a "real job" to pay for it.  The majority of his expenses
are covered from the following sources: Mom  Dad, USATF, USATF-LI, NYAC
and various fundraising activities from the RW population which support
the entire RW team at ARCO.  For this he has 2-3 workouts a day and no
life to go with it.  The guy ate PBJ sandwiches for 2 years to get
where he is.

On Rome:  He is the biggest jackass in media today.  His entire career
has benn made on being a punk, and it is why he was banished from
mainstream ESPN coverage to the westcoast only (or mostly).  It was a
shame that footballer Jim Everett did not kick the living crap out of
this jerk when he had the chance, although the shots he got in on live
tv were a work of art.

MJR




t-and-f: wava tables

2000-08-30 Thread Michael Rohl

Netters

This comment by me is a blatant attempt to cause trouble and havoc 
on the list.  i do not  believe what i am going to say and ignore it for 
the stupidity it is.  however I know someone is already thinking it.
 You didn't ask, but Merlene's 10.99 at age 40 (into a slight wind) is worth 10.4 
as an open mark on the WAVA Age-Graded Tables. Another way to appreciate 
Ottey's performance: Consider the M40 results at the USATF Masters nationals in 
Eugene. She would have taken second!


First comment.  The  tables need to be reworked then.

Second comment That 10.49 is suspiciously close to another 
suspicious mark.  Take that where you like :)


Disclaimer this nonsense does not represent the true opinion of the 
writer as he has destroyed his brain cells in a 9000 foot hypoxic 
environment and has no opinions.
Good Training,
  Michael Rohl



Re: t-and-f: some results from sweden (Greer misses again)

2000-08-30 Thread R.T.

On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 12:35:15 +1000, you wrote:

 Växjö, Sweden 29 augusti 2000 
http://www.ifkvaxjo.g.se/FOLKSAM/index.htm  

M Spjut (Jav?)
 1  Breaux Greer  76  USA  7916 
 2  Daniel  Ragnvaldsson  76  IFK  Strömsund  7055 
 3  Mikael Snällfot  80  Nedre  Soppero IK  6944 


First nomination for name of the year (past years
have included names like Nathan Leeper).
I mean somebody who's a javelin thrower is usually
not cut out to be a sprinter, and with a name like
Snail Foot, well

P.S.- one of the online translators that I tried
says that Snällfot means "kind", so I suppose we
should be kind to the poor fellow...

RT



Re: t-and-f: FW: AA Information Release - Notification of Doping Case

2000-08-30 Thread R.T.

I don't understand why it takes more than 10 months to suspend
somebody who doesn't even choose to contest the finding or even
request a hearing.

RT


On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 13:47:39 +1100 (EST), you wrote:

Some stats lists from 1999 and 2000 - mine included - may need to be amended
following this news release about discus thrower Gerard Duffy.

Regards - Graham Thomas - http://homepages.go.com/~oztrack/

-Original Message-
From: Stephen Lock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 31 August 2000 1:54 PM
To: AA email list
Subject: AA Information Release - Notification of Doping Case

ATHLETICS AUSTRALIA
INFORMATION RELEASE
Thursday 31 August 2000

NOTIFICATION OF DOPING CASE

Athletics Australia advises that athlete Gerard Duffy, following an out of
competition test conducted by ASDA, has recorded a positive test for the
prohibited substance, testosterone.

Mr Duffy has advised Athletics Australia that he does not wish to contest
the finding and does not require a hearing.  In accordance with IAAF Rules
59(4) and 60(2)(a), he is therefore declared ineligible for the prescribed
period of two years from the date of the test, 8 October 1999.

He is also disqualified from the competitions in which he has competed since
that date - namely 16 October, 6 November, 4 December, 15 January and 1
February, which results will be amended accordingly.

END OF RELEASE

This information has been provided by:
Athletics Australia, Suite 22, Fawkner Towers, 431 St Kilda Road, Melbourne,
Victoria, 3004, Australia
Ph: 61 3 98203511
Fax: 61 3 9820 3544
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.athletics.org.au

To view past media releases visit
http://admin.listbox.com/ath_australia_release/current/index.html




Re: t-and-f: Re: where are all the world records?

2000-08-30 Thread William Bahnfleth

This hardly seems like the answer.  Too many non-whites in US football, 
basketball?  Tiger Woods effect on the popularity of golf, the Williams 
sisters on tennis?  If we think that's the solution, it really is evidence 
that we're out of the loop.

Spectators (as opposed to participants or former participants) like good 
competition and personalities who know how to play to the 
audience.  Neither is coming across very well in our mass media.  Making 
the sport and the athletes more telegenic seems more important to me and I 
don't believe race is the issue.

I don't see any sinister psychological undercurrents in that list of 
names.  Who else would you add in the UK of similar stature in recent times 
besides Christie (a clean incarnation??) and Edwards?

Bill Bahnfleth

At 11:19 AM 8/30/2000 -0700, A.J. Craddock wrote:
Well, you hit the nail right on the head.

What you are really saying, and it probably popped out subconsciously, is 
.. get more white guys winning races again, and the sport might regain 
its popularity.

A hideous statement, but one that I am sure is much discussed in the 
corridors of power in this demographics driven age.

And this is really the hidden issue affecting the sports' popularity that 
no-one wants to acknowledge in public.

Tony Craddock
___

At 05:29 PM 8/30/00 +0100, northam wrote:
   Why not !! What is one of the biggest image problems of hte sport today
 for
   Mr John Q Public ??
Why are those of us that love track and field so worried about Joe
Public? If the vast majority don't like our sport, so what?
I know it's nice that other people like something you like, but for Joe
Public to like track and field it seems the sport must be dumbed down.
New world records, different distances, no long distance races in
televised meets.
Perhaps if the sport was more popular it would get more TV coverage, but
IMHO that would mean more of those horrible profile spots, more people
spouting off without knowing what they are talking about.
If the sport becomes more popular let it be on its own terms. As long as
people want to run, throw and Jump - and even walk - there will always be
track and field. If the great unwashed don't like it, I don't care.
Sports popularity always goes in cycles. Even football (the proper kind)
suffered a few years ago in the Uk. Attendances were down and the sport
had a thuggish appeal. Now it's hugely popular and hugely fashionable. If
we get another Coe, Ovett and Cram along at the same time no doubt track
and field will become popular again.
Randall Northam



_

William P. Bahnfleth, Ph.D., P.E.
Associate Professor

Department of Architectural Engineering
The Pennsylvania State University
224 Engineering Unit A
University Park, PA 16802-1416 USA

voice: 814.863.2076 / fax: 814.863.4789
e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.engr.psu.edu/ae/faculty/bahnfleth.htm
_




RE: t-and-f: Talking tough

2000-08-30 Thread Andre Sammartino

Jai's a bit "out there" generally, and it is fair to say, he takes
liberties even with Australian-English...

Even as a native-speaker, i can only hazard a guess and suggest he means
they are babies... or that they tend to spill their beers (a much bigger
insult downunder)...

Look out for "Jumping Jai" at the Games (if the event/sport gets any
coverage up there).  He's a very extroverted character, tattoos aplenty,
long hair, smokes like a chimney. At the recent trials he opening with a
terrible 7.80m or so jump (25 and a half feet?) but jumped around as if
he'd broken the world record... asked why... he said he just wanted to wake
up the crowd...   


 In a message dated 8/29/00 17:43:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 writes:

  "They only jump big in America, and these guys, these three guys, are a
 bunch of dribblers, that's all I'm saying. 

 i give up, what's a dribbler? Malmo, where's that Excel Strine-to-English
 conversion chart? :-)

 gh

Reckon you know your stuff?
Come try our Olympics track and field tipping comp 
http://surf.to/bayside



Re: t-and-f: Re: where are all the world records?

2000-08-30 Thread Dan Kaplan

Can't say I agree.  How many white champions has the NBA had since Larry
Bird began his decline?  10+ years of popularity that kicks the butt of
anything TF dreams of.  The NFL became increasingly popular while
becoming increasingly black, and the same could possibly be said for
baseball, tennis, and golf of late.  Sure, white people want white
champions to root for, just as Americans want American champions to root
for, but it doesn't appear to play a big role in the popularity of the
different sports.

Dan

--- "A.J. Craddock" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Well, you hit the nail right on the head.
 
 What you are really saying, and it probably popped out subconsciously,
 is . get more white guys winning races again, and the sport might
 regain its popularity.
 
 A hideous statement, but one that I am sure is much discussed in the 
 corridors of power in this demographics driven age.
 
 And this is really the hidden issue affecting the sports' popularity
 that no-one wants to acknowledge in public.
 
 Tony Craddock


=
http://AbleDesign.com - AbleDesign, Web Design that Can!
http://Run-Down.com - 8,000 Running Links, Free Contests...

  @o   Dan Kaplan
 |\/ ^-  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_/ \ \/\   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (lifetime forwarding address)
   /   /   (503)370-9969 home, (503)945-6622 work

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/



Re: t-and-f: ottey on the JAM team

2000-08-30 Thread Wilmar K

Kebba Tolbert schreef:

 The word at the JAM trials was that Beveryly Macdonald was only going to run
 the 200m at the games, thus clearing a spot for Ottey.
 Kebba Tolbert ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Word in the international media after the trials was that MacDonald had
no
intention of giving up her spot in the 100 m? Given that, I was kind of
surprised everybody copied the message about Ottey running the 100 in
Sydney
without anybody explaining who would (been) withdrawn.
Wilmar Kortleever




Re: t-and-f: Brussels 10K

2000-08-30 Thread Wilmar K

[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:

 There has been some discussion as to whether Felix Limo, listed as finishing second 
in the Brussels 10K, had actually been lapped. Part of the reasoning, obviously, is 
that Felix apparently did not have the credentials to be running anywhere near the 
front of such a race. His previous PR's were 13:23.43 (’99) and 28:23.30 (’99).

 However, according to one astute observer, (namely my brother, agent of several 
athletes in the race), Limo was NOT lapped. This is what he wrote to me in response 
to my query:

 Dan-He was definitely not lapped.  He was following Kalya the whole way and then 
when Kalya started to slow down he kept up the same speed (closing the gap to 
Tergat).  If he would have waited and surprised Tergat later in the last 100m instead 
of passing him just after the lap he might have won.

 Dan Lilot
 Track  Field News

I can confirm most of this, although most of the people there were watching Tergat and 
his gap to no. 2. Ivuti. Limo indeed came out of the second group. I can tell you it 
took the organisers a very long time to produce the results of this event. And 
nowadays it is fun that you can see why that is: the press stand monitors kept
giving an incomplete result for the 10k (namely, the time of the winner Tergat), 
obviously while they were determining who was number two (read: whether Limo had 
indeed ran all the 25 laps).

Wilmar Kortleever
Race Results Weekly reporter





Re: t-and-f: High-Low

2000-08-30 Thread JimRTimes


In a message dated 8/29/00 6:47:31 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Does anyone know if we have any Olympic team members, from the 1500m up,
who used the "high-low" model for training

Wasn't Suzy F-H using the tent also?

Jim Gerweck
Running Times



t-and-f: Ottey 10.99 in Greece, Lamela Jayasinghe back

2000-08-30 Thread Andre Sammartino

IAAF Permit Meeting, 30 Aug 2000, Thessaloniki, Greece 

MEN 

100 m. 
10''29. Denis Mitchel (USA); 10''32 Donovan Bailey (CAN); 10''36. Coby
Miller (USA); 10''40. Davis Patros (FRA); 10''57. Aninos Markoulidis (CYP);
10''63. Roland Nemeth (HUN) 

200 m. 
20" 55. Cobby Miller (USA); 20" 72. Denis Mitchell (USA); 20" 96. Alexios
Alexopoulos (GRE); 21" 17. Anastassios Goussis (GRE); 21" 74.
Roshan Griffin (USA); 21" 83. Georgios Assariotakis (GRE). 
Race 2. 
20" 81. Ramas Urbas (POL); 20" 83. Anninos Markoulidis (CYP); 20" 88.
Patrick Van Balkom (NED) 

400 m. 
46" 08. Ibrahim Kwade (FRA); 46" 73. Georgios Economidis (GRE); 46" 74.
Stylianos Dimotsios (GRE) 

800 m. 
1' 44" 45. Ali Hecini (ALG) 

400 m. hurdles. 
49''03. Samuel Matete (ZAM); 49''35. Periklis Iakovakis (GRE) pb.; 49''94.
Eric Thomas (USA); 50''24. Kemel Thompson (JAM);
51''02. Calvin Davis (USA) 

3.000 m. steeple. 
8'37''48. Abrahan Cherono (KEN); 8'37"60. K. Kosgei (KEN); 8'39"07. L.Walle
(ETH) 

High Jump. 
2, 32 m. Mark Boswell CAN); 2, 30 m. Lambros Papakostas (GRE); 2, 23 m.
Kwaku Boateg; 2, 15 Constantinos Liapis; 2, 15 m.
Dimitrios Tomaras; 2, 15 m. Dimitrios Syrakos, DNM Antony Inteata (NGR) 

Long Jump. 
8, 22 m. Yago lamela (ESP); 8, 17 m. Yonus Mudrik (MAR); 8, 13 m. Carlos
Calado (POR); 8, 11 m. James Beckford (JAM); 8, 09 m.
Constantinos Koukodimos (GRE); 8, 00 m. Dimitrios Serelis (GRE); 7, 98 m.
Gregor Cancar; 7, 96 m. Stergios Noussios (GRE) pb. 

Hammer Throw  
80,21 m. Oli-Pekka Karjalainen (FIN); 79, 81 m. Alexandros Papadimitriou;
79, 12 m. Szymon Ziolkowski (POL), 78, 87 m.
Christos Polychroniou, 78, 06 m. Vladimir Maska (CZE); 77, 73 m. Heins Weis
(GER); 69, 33 m. Nikolaos Gentekos (GRE) 

Shot Put. 
19, 31 m. Vaios Tigas (GRE); 18, 38 m. Andreas Anastassopoulos (GRE); 18,
13 m. Christos Sarakoglou (GRE) 

WOMEN 

100 m. (-0.6 m/s) 
10''99. Marleen Ottey (JAM); 11"03. Sevatheda Fynes; 11" 21. Christy Gaines
. 11" 76. Panayota Koutrouli; 11" 76. Paraskevi
Patoulidou 

200 m. (-1 m/s). 
22"55. Susanthika Jayasinghe (SRI); 23" 19. Donne Fraser (GBR); 23" 21.
Ekaterini Koffa (GRE); 23" 73. Chryssoula Goudenoudi
(GRE) 

400 m. 
51" 53. Ebun Olabisi Afolabi (NGR); 51" 76. Monique Hennagan (USA); 52" 12.
Karen Shinkins (IRL) 

1.500 m. 
4' 11" 66. Olga Kuznetsova (RUS) 

400 m. hurdles 
54"52. Nesha Bidouane (MAR); 54"71. Sandra Cummings Glover (USA); 55¨68.
Urlike Urbansky (GER); 55''91. Heike Meissner
(GER); 56''76. Susan Smith (IRL); 57''38. Judit Szekeres (HUN) 

Pole Vault. 
4, 40 m. Nicole Humbert Rieger (GER); 4, 30 m. Mary Sauer (USA); 4, 20 m.
Monique De Wilt (NED); 4, 20 m. Pavla Hamackova
(CZE); 4, 10 m. Doris Auer (AUT); 4, 00 m. Thaleia Iakovidou; 4, 00 m.
Georgia Tsiliggiri 

Long Jump. 
6, 70 m. Niurka Montalvo (ESP); 6, 64 m. Niki Xanthou; 6, 60 m. Lisuta Cuza
(CUB); 6, 55 m. Valentina Gotovska (LAT) 

Triple Jump. 14, 79 m. 
Tereza Marinova (BUL), 14, 62 m. Anja Valant (SLO); 14, 22 m. Christina
Nikolau (ROM); 14, 05 m. Dimitra Markou (GRE)
pb.; 13, 82 m. Baya Rahouli (ALG); 12, 77 m. Chryssopigi Devetzi (GRE) 

Discus Throw. 
65,98 m. Natalya Sadova (RUS); 63, 66 m. Ekaterini Voggoli (GRE); 63, 64 m.
Nicoletta Grasu (ROM); Stella Tsikouna 63, 30 m. 


André Sammartino
Reckon you know your stuff?
Come try our Olympics track and field tipping comp 
http://surf.to/bayside



t-and-f: Oops

2000-08-30 Thread Andre Sammartino

oops, should sayThessaloniki results from
http://www.eexi.gr/athletix/Salonika2000.html 


André Sammartino
Reckon you know your stuff?
Come try our Olympics track and field tipping comp 
http://surf.to/bayside



t-and-f: Sydney weather

2000-08-30 Thread Bruce Glikin

For all of you 'Celsius challenged' listers, here's a snapshot of the type
of 'Fahrenheit' weather to be expected in Sydney this September. My source
is Intellicast, a dot.com weather service. Take it for what it's worth.

September in Sydney:

Record low: 41 degrees

Normal low:  51 degrees

Normal high: 67 degrees

Record high: 92 degrees

Average monthly rainfall: 2.9"

Number of rainy day: 12

Since Jim Rome has no interest in the Olympics, those of you fortunate
enough to be attending the Sydney Games will not be sitting next to him.
Most certainly many of you will be canceling your tickets due to this tragic
circumstance. :-)

Bruce Glikin 

p.s. Malmo, are you available on a 'consulting/fee basis' for non-geek
types? Not only am I unable to convert metric, my blood pressure goes off
the charts when I open 'Excel' and stare blankly at those daunting spread
sheets. Those are spread sheets, aren't they?

  

 

 winmail.dat


RE: t-and-f: Olympic Weather

2000-08-30 Thread THOMAS,Graham

Try this link

http://www.olympic.bom.gov.au/olympic/

Olympic weather support - with years of historic trends for Sydney weather
in September.

First forecasts for the specific Olympic Park area will be available over
the weekend.

Here's the current forecast for Sydney:

SYDNEY OUTLOOK FOR THE NEXT FEW DAYS:
Friday   Fine. Increasing cloud. W/NW winds.
  City:Min: 11   Max: 21 
Saturday Early showers then fine. SW change. 
  City:Min: 10   Max: 20
Sunday   Fine, partly cloudy. SW winds. 
  City:Min: 10   Max: 19 

Sorry I did not convert celsius to farenheit.

Regards - GT - http://homepages.go.com/~oztrack/

-Original Message-
From: Conway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 31 August 2000 8:21
To: TFMail List
Subject: t-and-f: Olympic Weather

With some of the recent performances we have seen coming out of some meets
such as in Gateshead the other day, what type of weather will be expected in
Sydney during the games ?? While there has been mention of the drought of
records so far this year, there will be no guarantee in Sydney if the
weather is not advantageous .. So does anyone know what the weather is
expected to be ??

Conway Hill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]







RE: t-and-f: Olympic Weather

2000-08-30 Thread Steve Bennett

It is beautiful here in Sydney today and things could get even better.
However we could easily have a cold change and rain , wind etc even in
Summer. My guess is you will see the range of weather while the Olympics is
on. The most likely problem will be wind and this could spoil woorld records
on the track if it comes from the wrong direction.

Qualifying in sprints as a fastest loser will be very much a lottery.

regards
Steve Bennett
http://www.oztrack.com



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Conway
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 7:21 AM
To: TFMail List
Subject: t-and-f: Olympic Weather


With some of the recent performances we have seen coming out of some meets
such as in Gateshead the other day, what type of weather will be expected in
Sydney during the games ?? While there has been mention of the drought of
records so far this year, there will be no guarantee in Sydney if the
weather is not advantageous .. So does anyone know what the weather is
expected to be ??

Conway Hill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]









t-and-f: Gateshead 4x100

2000-08-30 Thread Peter Matthews
Title: Gateshead 4x100



Conway Hill asked:

A US team won the 4x1 at Gateshead in a nice 37.95 .. Does anyone know who
the personnel was on that team ??

Result was:
4x100:
1 USA (all HSI) (Drummond, Williams, C Johnson, Greene) 37.95
2 GBR (Chambers, Campbell, Devonish, Gardener) 38.35
3, GBR B 39.19
4, USA 2 (Saddler, Griffin, Miller, Dees) 39.60

Most impressive run by the HSI squad. This was early in the meeting (2.25 pm). It had rained hard an hour or two earlier - but no rain at this time. Later rained through much of the afternoon.
The individual 100m was last event at 5.10 pm.

This is my report which accompanies the detailed results in this week's 12-page issue of Athletics International (solid worldwide results to world top 200 standards).

Maurice Greene will not be unduly bothered by his third place in the 100m, but Dwain Chambers was thrilled by his most impressive victory in this IAAF GP II meeting. Despite a headwind of 0.3 m/s and the usual cool, wet conditions in Britain¹s North-East he was off well, ahead of Greene at 40m and won clearly with a season¹s best of 10.11 as Bernard Williams also beat Greene. This race provided a splendid finale for the 8000 crowd who had braved the conditions ­ and who also enjoyed four other British victories ­ from Steve Backley in the javelin, Christian Malcolm, who equalled his season¹s best at 200m, Donna Fraser, benefitting from training with Cathy Freeman, at her ideal distance of 300m, and from Jonathan Edwards at triple jump.
Edwards had to take five jumps to ensure victory, but he did that emphatically with 17.48 after two long but narrow fouls earlier ­ he reckoned his fourth jump to have been about 17.70-17.80. He is concerned about an ankle injury, but still seems able to produce top-class performances; more worrying was the health of Sandra Glover, world leader at the women¹s 400m hurdles, who started with bandages on both legs, and who pulled out at the first hurdle. 
Maurice Greene had enjoyed his first race of the day, for he anchored a USA Select (all HSI members) team to the world¹s fastest 4x100m time of the year ­ 37.95 ­ and he captivated the crowd by encouraging the under-15 sprinters. André Bucher again beat Wilson Kipketer, but the latter is happy with his form, and both men were inside the stadium record. That was smashed in the men¹s 1500m and in the women¹s 3000m. Steve Cram¹s 3:35.2 from 1985 was left far behind by the brilliant Ali Saïdi-Sief; in only his second race of the year at his favourite distance the 22 year-old Algerian improved his pb to 3:30.82. Sonia O¹Sullivan kicked for home from 170m to pass Paula Radcliffe, who had led from 1300m, to win at 3000m in 8:33.00 and there were notable pbs from Libbie Hickman, who at the age of 35 improved her best from 8:43.32 to 8:35.02 and from Jo Pavey, who took 17 seconds off her best with 8:36.70 ­ hugely encouraging for a most talented athlete who had missed two years through injury prior to this summer.
Angelo Taylor ran the flat 400m for the first time for over two months and beat Mark Richardson and Cathy Freeman stepped down to run a season¹s best at 200m, coming from some 3m down after the bend to sweep past Inger Miller and Bev McDonald.

Peter Matthews,
Editor International Athletics Annual, Co-publisher Athletics International
10 Madgeways Close, Great Amwell, Ware, Herts SG12 9RU, England
Tel. 44 (0)1920 870434, Fax 44 (0)1920 877392






t-and-f: Brussels 10K

2000-08-30 Thread DLTFNedit

There has been some discussion as to whether Felix Limo, listed as finishing second in 
the Brussels 10K, had actually been lapped. Part of the reasoning, obviously, is that 
Felix apparently did not have the credentials to be running anywhere near the front of 
such a race. His previous PR's were 13:23.43 (’99) and 28:23.30 (’99).

However, according to one astute observer, (namely my brother, agent of several 
athletes in the race), Limo was NOT lapped. This is what he wrote to me in response to 
my query:

Dan-He was definitely not lapped.  He was following Kalya the whole way and
then when Kalya started to slow down he kept up the same speed (closing the
gap to Tergat).  If he would have waited and surprised Tergat later in the
last 100m instead of passing him just after the lap he might have won.

Dan Lilot
Track  Field News



t-and-f: Hickman's 3K

2000-08-30 Thread DLTFNedit

Don't forget that Hickman ran a 1:11:01 half-marathon to win Parkersburg just 9 days 
before her awesome run in Gateshead.
sideshow



Re: t-and-f: Re: where are all the world records?

2000-08-30 Thread northam

  Why not !! What is one of the biggest image problems of hte sport today
for
  Mr John Q Public ?? 
Why are those of us that love track and field so worried about Joe 
Public? If the vast majority don't like our sport, so what?
I know it's nice that other people like something you like, but for Joe 
Public to like track and field it seems the sport must be dumbed down. 
New world records, different distances, no long distance races in 
televised meets.
Perhaps if the sport was more popular it would get more TV coverage, but 
IMHO that would mean more of those horrible profile spots, more people 
spouting off without knowing what they are talking about.
If the sport becomes more popular let it be on its own terms. As long as 
people want to run, throw and Jump - and even walk - there will always be 
track and field. If the great unwashed don't like it, I don't care. 
Sports popularity always goes in cycles. Even football (the proper kind) 
suffered a few years ago in the Uk. Attendances were down and the sport 
had a thuggish appeal. Now it's hugely popular and hugely fashionable. If 
we get another Coe, Ovett and Cram along at the same time no doubt track 
and field will become popular again.
Randall Northam



Re: t-and-f: Conversion Lesson [was List Supervisor ...]

2000-08-30 Thread Ssd

With this method, just make sure you understand that you are getting only an 
approximation.  You are not truly doing the conversion correctly.  All such 
conversions require a "fudge" factor, which I have fully explained in the 
preface to the Green Book, Gold Book, Blue Book, etc.  You have to use this 
"fudge" factor, for lack of a better term to get the true conversion.  You 
have simplified the problem greatly.
Scott Davis



Re: t-and-f: Writers needed.

2000-08-30 Thread magpie

item on the upcoming c.u. xc meet and season:
http://thedailycamera.com/buffzone/sports/30cuxc.html



==
"In a big country, dreams stay with you, like a lover's voice, 'cross a mountainside . 
. . " - Big Country

_
i-run.com - your running log
A free online running log 



t-and-f: Olympic Weather

2000-08-30 Thread Conway

With some of the recent performances we have seen coming out of some meets
such as in Gateshead the other day, what type of weather will be expected in
Sydney during the games ?? While there has been mention of the drought of
records so far this year, there will be no guarantee in Sydney if the
weather is not advantageous .. So does anyone know what the weather is
expected to be ??

Conway Hill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]