[talk-ph] One-way roads in Baguio this Holy Week
Hello mappers, Anybody would like to edit these temporary one way roads in Baguio for the Holy week this April 2 2015 until Sunday and edit it back after? I'm still on the road so I can't do it on my end. I'd be publishing a GPS navigation map come Wednesday for Holy week travelers so this must be already edited by March 31 so the changes will reflect on the April 1 release. A detailed explanation of the roads in Baguio is published here for reference http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/682162/baguio-sets-one-way-traffic-on-kennon-other-streets Thanks! GPS Map of the Philippines is published here. http://www.s1expeditions.com/p/openstreetmaps.html Ervin Malicdem for Schadow1 Expeditions a Filipino must not be a stranger to his own motherland. http://www.s1expeditions.com ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
[talk-ph] nice mapping key from bangladesh mappers
hotosm.github.io/tracing-guides/guide/ -- cheers, maning -- Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ -- ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [OSM-ja] MapillaryをOSMマッピングにオススメする１０の理由
ikiyaさん、こんにちは。コメントありがとうございます。
下記は同じマップを誰でも編集できるようにしてありますので
よろしければ右上の鉛筆マークをクリックして設定内容をご参照ください。
http://umap.fluv.io/ja/map/map_2554#17/36.56266/136.66250
各レイヤの設定の中に「サイト外のデータ」というところがあります。
そこでURL文字列内にAPIの内容を記述します。
例えばトイレレイヤには以下のように記述されています。
URL:
http://overpass-api.de/api/interpreter?data=[out:json][timeout:25];(node[amenity=toilets]({south},{west},{north},{east});way[amenity=toilets]({south},{west},{north},{east});relation[amenity=toilets]({south},{west},{north},{east}););
out body;;out skel qt;
フォーマット：OSM
表示開始するズームレベル：17
ダイナミック：チェックあり
ライセンス：ODbL
上記のように記述すると、マップを表示するタイミングで
OSMデータより任意のタグで該当データを抽出します。
（常に最新データを読み込んで表示します）
OSM以外で提供されているAPIもフォーマットが合っていれば
読み込めるはずです。試していませんが。
＜関連記事＞
http://www.mappa-mercia.org/2014/09/creating-an-always-up-to-date-map.html
＜注意事項＞
このAPIの文法はOverpass APIに似てはいますが微妙に変えているようですので
注意が必要です。
以前試したところでは、この動的読み込み機能はフランス版のサイト
(umap.openstreetmap.fr)では動作しませんでした。
2015/03/30 ikiya insidekiwi...@yahoo.co.jp:
ikiyaです。
Mapillaryのおススメまとめ、素晴らしい、いいですね。
さっそく説明するのに使わせていただきます。
一点だけ質問ですが、uMapとの連携についてですが、 ”写真URLをimageタグとしてOSMに登録し、uMapからOverpass
API経由で動的に読み込んだ例です。”
ここの「Overpass
API経由で動的に読み込んだ」を概略、教えていただけますでしょうか。
宜しくお願いします。
- Original Message -
From: Shu Higashi higa...@gmail.com
To: talk-ja talk-ja@openstreetmap.org
Date: 2015/3/29, Sun 23:05
Subject: [OSM-ja] MapillaryをOSMマッピングにオススメする１０の理由
東です。
あるプロジェクトでMapillaryを使おうとしていて
いろいろ試したり調べているうちに
Mapillaryの人に何か記事書いてと頼まれまていたのですが、
その後数ヶ月、、
ようやく時間ができたのでOSMの日記をはじめて使って
書いてみました。
Wikiページも一部訳しましたのでよろしければお試しください。
「MapillaryをOSMマッピングにオススメする１０の理由」
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/higa4/diary/34648
Mapillary
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Mapillary
___
Talk-ja mailing list
Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja
___
Talk-ja mailing list
Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Carte des données indoor : OpenLevelUp!
Merci de ta réactivité :) c'est un outil super :) Florian Le Lundi 30 mars 2015 0h36, PanierAvide panierav...@riseup.net a écrit : Bonjour à tous, Des nouvelles du développement d'OpenLevelUp, avec des changements significatifs depuis la dernière fois. Pour la version brève : une nouvelle interface plus moderne et légère, l'export (en bêta) vers une image d'un niveau, la possibilité de voir la liste des salles, et de nouvelles icônes (pour les chemins et polygones). Vous connaissez désormais l'adresse : http://github.pavie.info/openlevelup Pour la version plus détaillée des changements : * Refonte de l'interface utilisateur, un peu (beaucoup ?) inspirée du site openstreetmap.org * Export du niveau courant vers une image, au format SVG. Cette fonctionnalité est en bêta car sujette à des différences notables entre navigateurs, n'hésitez pas à faire des retours là-dessus. * Une liste des salles sur la zone est disponible, avec une barre de recherche. Le système fonctionne mais l'interface sera très probablement revue rapidement (manque d'ergonomie) * Les messages sont déplacés en bas à droite de la page * La fenêtre de chargement se ferme plus tard (au plus proche de l'affichage des données) * De nouvelles icônes pour : * Les escalators (en tant que verticalpassage) * Les portiques (barrier=turnstile) * Les chemins en général, en particulier ceux à sens unique * Les laboratoires (laboratory=physical, biology, biological, electronics, electronic) * Également pour le reste du style : * L'icône pour les cryptes est plus générale * Les murs en tant qu'objets individuels sont affichés en plus gras * L'icône des entrées de métro est plus discrète * Correction de bugs mineurs * La fenêtre de chargement ne se fermait pas lors du zoom sur une zone vide de données indoor * Les niveaux n'étaient pas triés pour les pop-ups, entraînant des erreurs sur la montée/descente depuis une pop-up Vos diverses remarques et impressions sont toujours la bienvenue ;) Cordialement, PanierAvide. ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [Talk-us] USA Rail: Calling all OSM railfans! (especially in California)
Keep me updated from Washington State. I work for a Railroad. Nathan P email: natf...@gmail.com On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote: stevea writes: I have run into devotees of old_railway_operator=* and respect the tag by leaving it be where I encounter it, though I don't go out of my way to add it unless I have absolute positive knowledge of it (rarely to never). Yeah, it's an NE2 thing which he added automatically by changing the name of abandoned railroads to old_railway_operator. He's technically correct because the branch of a railroad, the name it goes by, is often not the name of the company who operated it. The line that goes south of Lake Ontario in NY was called the Hojack, but was operated by New York Central. It would be nice if map renderers, when presented with an abandoned railroad that has no name, rather than follow the USGS practice of saying Abandoned Railroad Bed, would look for name= first, old_railway_operator= second, and only if those two are absent, rendered the railway as a dotted line labeled Abandoned Railroad Bed just like the USGS does. In California, rail is approximately early alpha. For the USA as a whole, I'd say rail is even before that, in an early development phase. New York rail is 99% done. I say 97% because I need to hit some railroad yards in Buffalo still. -- --my blog is athttp://blog.russnelson.com Crynwr supports open source software 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-600-8815 Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] USA Rail: Calling all OSM railfans! (especially in California)
stevea writes: I have run into devotees of old_railway_operator=* and respect the tag by leaving it be where I encounter it, though I don't go out of my way to add it unless I have absolute positive knowledge of it (rarely to never). Yeah, it's an NE2 thing which he added automatically by changing the name of abandoned railroads to old_railway_operator. He's technically correct because the branch of a railroad, the name it goes by, is often not the name of the company who operated it. The line that goes south of Lake Ontario in NY was called the Hojack, but was operated by New York Central. It would be nice if map renderers, when presented with an abandoned railroad that has no name, rather than follow the USGS practice of saying Abandoned Railroad Bed, would look for name= first, old_railway_operator= second, and only if those two are absent, rendered the railway as a dotted line labeled Abandoned Railroad Bed just like the USGS does. In California, rail is approximately early alpha. For the USA as a whole, I'd say rail is even before that, in an early development phase. New York rail is 99% done. I say 97% because I need to hit some railroad yards in Buffalo still. -- --my blog is athttp://blog.russnelson.com Crynwr supports open source software 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-600-8815 Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Tesla Supercharger import
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 11:40 PM, Charles Samuels o...@charles.derkarl.org wrote: I am not subscribed to imports, please CC me directly. To engage in the process fully, you'll need to subscribe. I have not yet asked Tesla Motors for their permission, I have a hard time believing it'd be refused. Let us know when that process is complete. My software is capable of recurring up-to-datenings based on a new tag: tesla:ref Experience among the other up-to-datenings used with OSM is that a single conflation key is not enough. You'll need a proximity search as well: fortunately easy in your case as these stations almost by definition are not close to each other. You'll also want to read up on import procedure for OSM. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-GB] Fwd: OSM logo
Mike, maybe you are a very smart guy, but iMHO you do not understand how you should communicate with people in an open source and community project. All your aggressive and insulting mails are not appreciated by other people that are devoted to this project. In case you really want to change something you should really change the tones of your mails. Until then I list you as a troll. regards m On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 12:14 AM, Pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com wrote: OSM has problems with databases and data and now it seems OSM doesn't understand logos either. Here's one https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/osm-logo I've started - implementing some of my ideas but not all http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Logos#Logo_.27improvements.27. -- Mike. @millomweb https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction - For all your info on Millom and South Copeland via *the area's premier website - * *currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property pets* TCs https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[Talk-us] Tesla Supercharger import
I am not subscribed to imports, please CC me directly. I now have the software and the data to do a complete import of every global Tesla Supercharger station. My software is capable of recurring up-to-datenings based on a new tag: tesla:ref which is based on the name Tesla uses in their Javascript on this page: http://www.teslamotors.com/en_GB/findus . In the page source, search for nid and it's the big long JSON dump. I parse that and merge it with an OSM file I extract with Overpass Turbo. I have already taken the liberty of manually identifying the tesla:ref for nodes in North America and the UK. I have missed a few, though, such as Node 3225936795 because it doesn't have an operator tag which is how I've been searching for the nodes so far. Right now, if a tag doesn't match with what Tesla publishes on their web site, I overwrite OSM's. I have not yet asked Tesla Motors for their permission, I have a hard time believing it'd be refused. This is what the imported node looks like when there's nothing in OSM already: node version='1' id='-61' lat='36.254143' lon='-120.237920' tag k='amenity' v='charging_station' / tag k='operator' v='Tesla Motors Inc.' / tag k='capacity' v='6' / tag k='socket:tesla_supercharger' v='6' / tag k='name' v='Tesla Supercharger Harris Ranch' / tag k='addr:city' v='Coalinga' / tag k='tesla:ref' v='harrisranchsupercharger' / tag k='opening_hours' v='24/7' / /node This is what the imported node looks like when merged with a present node: node version='5' id='2327799782' lat='37.024450' lon='-121.565350' tag k='website' v='http://www.teslamotors.com/supercharger/Gilroy' / tag k='operator' v='Tesla Motors Inc.' / tag k='tesla:ref' v='gilroysupercharger' / tag k='opening_hours' v='24/7' / tag k='name' v='Tesla Supercharger Gilroy' / tag k='car' v='yes' / tag k='bicycle' v='no' / tag k='amenity' v='charging_station' / tag k='capacity' v='10' / tag k='addr:state' v='CA' / tag k='addr:postcode' v='95020' / tag k='addr:housenumber' v='681' / tag k='addr:city' v='Gilroy' / tag k='socket:tesla_supercharger' v='10' / tag k='addr:street' v='Leavesley Road' / tag k='access' v='customers' / /node I am not subscribed to imports, please CC me directly. Charles Santa Cruz County, CA, USA ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
[Talk-es] #243 de weeklyosm en castellano!
Hola El semanario #243 de weeklyosm, el sumario de todo lo que está ocurriendo en mundo OSM está en linea en español http:/www.weeklyosm.eu/?lang=es Disfrutadlo!___ Talk-es mailing list Talk-es@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es
Re: [OSM-talk] Query Overpass for multiple small areas
Yup, exactly, I was running many small queries in parallel. Aggregating them into one query resolved it. If the query bbox grows too big--right now looking at ~60% of the DRC, but will need to expand the query to run across all of the Congo Basin--then I'll divide into country-sized queries but be sure not to run them simultaneously. On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Roland Olbricht roland.olbri...@gmx.de wrote: Yeah, that all makes sense. I had spent a lot of time trying to limit the area I was searching against, and the result was a /429 Too Many Requests/ error. Thank you for the feedback. Just for clarification: You should get HTTP 429 only if you submit more than one request in parallel. This help other users to also get a chance that their queries are executed. If you get HTTP 429 in another case, please enforce that there is no runaway query by calling http://overpass-api.de/api/kill_my_queries This kills another query from your IP adress if any is running. Best regards, Roland ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-legal-talk] When does a produced work has to be share-alike?
Hi. ODbL don't want produced works to be share-alike, but wants the underlying database to be. So what's the deal when I'm strictly separating ODbL licensed data from data under another license? In Illustrator, I could load a SVG created by qGIS with OSM data. I could only *link* to this SVG only without embedding it. So it's in a complete seperate file / XML DB, which can't or doesn't have to be edited. Now I could add other layers with my own streets or even with data under a properity license. When storing the new file, the OSM-data doesn't get changed anymore. Sure, I have to release the SVG file or the workflow under share-alike, that's fine so far. But when I press export to PDF, will this be an intermidiate database, which also has to be share-alike? This simply wouldn't be possible pecause of the use of non-free data. In my eyes, the only solution could be to find a printers' shop, which directly printers from Illustrator to T-Shirts... But why does ODbL do this to users of the data? I think, ODbL harms the actual use of its data with other datasources. Nearly all commercial spatial data under a properity license allows you to mix the data when you give the right credits (f.e. rivers: (C) A. Corp, streets: (C) B. Corp). ODbL forces you to release your data mashed-up. That's way too strict and doesn't have to do anything with being open, but with being free. I hope, anyone is still active in this mailing-list... Best regards, Lars-Daniel ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Re: [Talk-us] Tesla Supercharger import
On Saturday, March 28, 2015 11:49:05 PM Bryce Nesbitt wrote: On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 11:40 PM, Charles Samuels o...@charles.derkarl.org wrote: I am not subscribed to imports, please CC me directly. To engage in the process fully, you'll need to subscribe. Ok, I will once I get Tesla's permission, and I'll try again there. I have not yet asked Tesla Motors for their permission, I have a hard time believing it'd be refused. Let us know when that process is complete. I'll ask them for their permission. My software is capable of recurring up-to-datenings based on a new tag: tesla:ref Experience among the other up-to-datenings used with OSM is that a single conflation key is not enough. You'll need a proximity search as well: fortunately easy in your case as these stations almost by definition are not close to each other. I just added this feature, which I should've thought of earlier because now I don't need to manually merge stations. You'll also want to read up on import procedure for OSM. Doing so now... Thanks, Charles ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-it] Numeri civici Ferrara
concordo pienamente con Andrea Musuruane è un db, è un import, va discusso sia qui che sulla lista import. Ciao, Martin ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Strada privata: dubbio su tagging
Am 29.03.2015 um 13:45 schrieb Federico Cortese cortese...@gmail.com: Condivido pienamente, infatti il punto è proprio il significato del cartello. forse vuol dire maxspeed=unlimited perché non ti trovi più nello spazio della strada pubblica ma su suolo privato (non so bene cosa dice la legge italiana, e quali sono le condizioni) ;-) ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
[OSM-ja] MapillaryをOSMマッピングにオススメする１０の理由
東です。 あるプロジェクトでMapillaryを使おうとしていて いろいろ試したり調べているうちに Mapillaryの人に何か記事書いてと頼まれまていたのですが、 その後数ヶ月、、 ようやく時間ができたのでOSMの日記をはじめて使って 書いてみました。 Wikiページも一部訳しましたのでよろしければお試しください。 「MapillaryをOSMマッピングにオススメする１０の理由」 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/higa4/diary/34648 Mapillary https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Mapillary ___ Talk-ja mailing list Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja
[OSM-talk-fr] FFRandonnée ? de quoi rire encore un moment (jaune ?)
Si Nicolas Moyroud a raison et que certains itinéraires sont entièrement réalisés par une entité différente de la FFR, il y aurait moyen de prouver que celle-ci usurpe la propriété intellectuelle de l'itinéraire (mais, celle pas des balises et de l'appellation). La mise à disposition du travail par le Département devrait alors être fait dans la cadre de la concurrence et non pas d'une mission arbitrairement donnée par l'Etat, car, le fait d'en tirer profit serait attaquable. Il y a là une piste à creuser : dans le cadre d'un wiki projet, il faudrait qu'OSM France recense les itinéraires litigieux en demandant à ses membres d'interroger leurs CG. (téléphoner aux techniciens, puis, écrire au prés.). Il faudrait, peut-être, arriver à dénoncer un détournement : acheter du temps de bénévole en octroyant arbitrairement des avantages commerciaux à un occupant du domaine public. A noter : la propriété intellectuelle n’est pas cessible : si un itinéraire a été créé par un organisme tiers, la FFR ne peut la revendiquer, même si une convention a été passée (association ou CG). Christian R. ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Talk-ie Digest, Vol 70, Issue 9
Hi Rachel, In josm, on the top menu, go to imagery menu and you want the 3906 layer. Its British War Office 3906 or something like that. Dave On 29 Mar 2015 13:12, Rachel Murphy rachel.harwood.mur...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone, A basic question but grateful for any assistance! I've followed the flow chart on the wiki, and identified the map I wanted to digitise in mapcraft, where the owner is haribo. The map is http://mapwarper.net/maps/1924 also IRL-GSGS-3906-17-17-NE-Cloghjordan.tif. When I follow the link in mapwarper I can see that the map has been cropped, georeferenced with 30 green and blue points and aligns to osm. The history shows it was last worked on in December 2014. My understanding is that because the work has been completed in mapwarper, I can go to josm and just start tracing townland boundaries if these haven't been done already. What I'm not sure about is how I add the map layer into josm and I couldn't find the instructions for this in the videos. I'm sure it's a simple step but would be grateful if someone could let me know how do it correctly or point me in the direction of the instructions. I have installed the townland boundary settings in josm already so should be good to go after that. Many thanks, Rachel On 28 March 2015 at 12:00, talk-ie-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote: Send Talk-ie mailing list submissions to talk-ie@openstreetmap.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to talk-ie-requ...@openstreetmap.org You can reach the person managing the list at talk-ie-ow...@openstreetmap.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of Talk-ie digest... Today's Topics: 1. Re: Irish boundaries map layer updates (Dave Foley) 2. Re: Irish boundaries map layer updates (Dave Corley) 3. Re: Irish boundaries map layer updates (Donal Diamond) 4. A couple of questions from a newbie (Rachel Murphy) 5. Re: A couple of questions from a newbie (moltonel 3x Combo) 6. Re: Irish boundaries map layer updates (Dave Corley) -- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 20:17:57 + From: Dave Foley daf...@outlook.ie To: Discussion of OpenStreetMap in Ireland talk-ie@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Irish boundaries map layer updates Message-ID: dub129-w565edc5839850850082d34ba...@phx.gbl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Great work Donal, that's really useful for checking mistakes with the boundaries. Dafo Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 22:53:43 + From: donal.diam...@gmail.com To: talk-ie@openstreetmap.org Subject: [OSM-talk-ie] Irish boundaries map layer updates The map layers showing Irish boundaries is now updated every 15 minutes. This includes county/barony/civil parish/ed and townlands. The map server starts updates at 05/20/35/50 minutes past the hour and should have all Irish edits up to 00/15/30/45 minutes past respectively. Updates should take about 2 minutes. I also updated the townland layer to show area in fractional acres from zoom 14 onwards. This may help you compare the acreage value shown on the GSGS3906 maps to help spot obvious errors. For example, I picked a spot at random below and you can see that there are a few areas that have the wrong acreage due to some townlands being missed: http://maps.openstreetmap.ie/oocmaps.html?zoom=15lat=53.71215lon=-6.91047layers=000B0TTFFF eg Barfordstown is reported as 482 acres as we actually included two townlands Barfordstown 283 acres and Boolies 198 acres. There's a similar issue with Calliaghstown nearby. When comparing fractional acres and ARP (acres,roods, perches) on the map, bear in mind that: 1 acre = 4 roods 1 rood = 40 perches You'll also notice a small difference in the acreage size reported by townlands.ie and the map layer. That is due to the map layer transforming to Irish Grid when calculating the area to get a slightly more accurate calculation. Townlands.ie has to do a lot more analysis so uses a different spatial reference system. Anyway hope it helps. D ___ Talk-ie mailing list Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie -- Message: 2 Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 20:21:24 + From: Dave Corley davecor...@gmail.com To: Discussion of Open Streetmap in Ireland talk-ie@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Irish boundaries map layer updates Message-ID: cahwd_aft5ycdj2tvv6tkpbmjzvkg3s_k-kqvgkq7tf647ha...@mail.gmail.com
Re: [Talk-in] classification for rural roads
Just went through the IRC Roads and Bridges handbook [1] and updated some sections of the wiki regarding village roads: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_Roads_in_India#Major_Roads 1) Asphalted roads that are wide enough just for a single car/small truck. There are no shoulders to these kind of roads and the road boundaries are usually hard walls built around farm land. so if some other car comes in the opposite direction, you certainly have to go back 100-200meters to let it pass. highway=unclassified lanes=1 2) Asphalted roads that are wide enough for a car/small truck, but with shoulders. so it is possible to let the car in opposite side to pass by moving over to road shoulder. highway=unclassified lanes=1.5 3) Asphalted roads that are wide enough for 2 cars or a bus. typically connects 2 main villeges. highway=tertiary lanes=1.5 or 2 According to the IRC standards, it seems like most rural roads would be unclassified or tertiary, with singe lane (3-3.5m) or intermediate lane (3.5-5.5m) Residential roads and living streets should be used for roads serving purely local residential traffic and not for traffic between villages. [1] http://saiindia.gov.in/english/home/Public_Folder/Professional_Practices_Group/State_Local_Manual/PUDUCHERRY_MANUAL/Wad%20Manual/Roads%20%20Bridges.pdf -- Arun Ganesh (planemad) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Planemad http://j.mp/ArunGanesh ___ Talk-in mailing list Talk-in@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] When does a produced work has to be share-alike?
On 29/03/15 16:43, Lars-Daniel Weber wrote: Sure, I have to release the SVG file or the workflow under share-alike, that's fine so far. But when I press export to PDF, will this be an intermidiate database, which also has to be share-alike? This simply wouldn't be possible pecause of the use of non-free data. In my eyes, the only solution could be to find a printers' shop, which directly printers from Illustrator to T-Shirts... I'm not sure if a PDF counts as a database; probably only if accurate spatial data can be derived from it. But in any case, you only have to release a derivative database if it is published. If all you're doing with it is sending it to a printer, who is working for you, and who will not make the file available to anyone else, then that's not a publicly used database, so the share-alike requirement doesn't apply. Jonathan. -- Dr Jonathan Harley SpiffyMap Ltd j...@spiffymap.net 0845 3138457www.spiffymap.com The Venture Centre, Sir William Lyons Road, Coventry CV4 7EZ, UK ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Re: [Talk-it] Strada privata: dubbio su tagging
C'è confusione anche in Inghilterra access=private: non puoi entrare come persona, se non autorizzato del proprietario (ovviamente anche se utilizzi un veicolo) private road (cartello) non dice niente sul diritto di accesso, ma solo dice che la strada è proprietà privata. Lo so perché la mia casa in Inghilterra (England) si trova in una strada privata con accesso al pubblico. Qualcuno sa come è la situazione legale in Italia? Io avrei pensato che è simile. Se è cosi il cartello http://www.pixlemon.com/signs-cartelli-zeichen/files/cartelli/05402020/zoom.jpg dice che la proprieta della strada è privta (cosa che non ci interessa in OSM) e che è viatato l'ingresso di tutti veicoli, ma non di persone, cani, cavalli ecc. Il cartello http://www.ariete-group.com/public/images/15254.png invece dice che nessuno può entrare (access=no), ma il cartello stradale dice solo che si tratta di una strada a senso unico opposto, quindi il segnale stradale sul cartello è sbagliato. Volker 2015-03-29 15:32 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com: Am 29.03.2015 um 13:45 schrieb Federico Cortese cortese...@gmail.com: Condivido pienamente, infatti il punto è proprio il significato del cartello. forse vuol dire maxspeed=unlimited perché non ti trovi più nello spazio della strada pubblica ma su suolo privato (non so bene cosa dice la legge italiana, e quali sono le condizioni) ;-) ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-us] Tesla Supercharger import
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 11:40 PM, Charles Samuels o...@charles.derkarl.org wrote: I now have the software and the data to do a complete import of every global Tesla Supercharger station. node version='5' id='2327799782' lat='37.024450' lon='-121.565350' tag k='website' v='http://www.teslamotors.com/supercharger/Gilroy' / tag k='operator' v='Tesla Motors Inc.' / tag k='tesla:ref' v='gilroysupercharger' / tag k='opening_hours' v='24/7' / tag k='name' v='Tesla Supercharger Gilroy' / tag k='car' v='yes' / tag k='bicycle' v='no' / tag k='amenity' v='charging_station' / tag k='capacity' v='10' / tag k='addr:state' v='CA' / tag k='addr:postcode' v='95020' / tag k='addr:housenumber' v='681' / tag k='addr:city' v='Gilroy' / tag k='socket:tesla_supercharger' v='10' / tag k='addr:street' v='Leavesley Road' / tag k='access' v='customers' / /node I surveyed this node. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2776570644 I see nothing wrong with what you have done. You've built upon what another mapper had already added. I was so disappointed that another mapper beat me to the punch. ;-) Being the slacker that I am, I have pictures of the Buckeye AZ site to update the wili page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station. However, I have not added the pictures yet. The debate I've had with myself on mapping these nodes is one or many? Each Tesla charger takes up one parking space. Each charger has an individual reference node. Blink and SemaCharge also have a unique reference id per charger. In the case of Telsa, the address is actually on the actual 4x8 ish foot electrical walled off box. The node was already on the map and that you updated is near where the box is. In some respects all this does not matter, because a person driving a Tesla could find the location...well if it rendered. Perhaps the next step is to put in a bug report for the main OSM map. The challenge is to make a cute icon that would also take into other kinds of chargers in the rest of the world. I took notice of what Telsa is trying to accomplish. The electronic car is just a toy of the urban environment and is not practical as a regular vehicle until Tesla came along. Part of the charging station map almost looks like the history US route 66. It looks like you can almost make it across America now. http://www.teslamotors.com/findus#/bounds/35.5722872795,-107.2834384999,31.259882347870708,-117.8303134999?search=superchargername=usplace=buckeyesupercharger You still may want to bring along a Swiss Army knife set of adapters just to make sure that you don't get stranded. http://shop.teslamotors.com/collections/model-s-charging-adapters Regards, Greg ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [OSM-talk] Query Overpass for multiple small areas
Don't worry about the size of the query box. Focus instead on keeping the number of nodes and query time reasonable. Overpass is perfectly happy doing continent or world-wide queries: and it's usually quite fast. Note that the web client bogs down with more than a few hundred results, but if you load straight into JOSM or a script, you can get many more. Non-square bounding boxes seem to be slower than square ones. On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 7:45 AM, James Conkling james.lane.conkl...@gmail.com wrote: Yup, exactly, I was running many small queries in parallel. Aggregating them into one query resolved it. If the query bbox grows too big--right now looking at ~60% of the DRC, but will need to expand the query to run across all of the Congo Basin--then I'll divide into country-sized queries but be sure not to run them simultaneously. On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Roland Olbricht roland.olbri...@gmx.de wrote: Yeah, that all makes sense. I had spent a lot of time trying to limit the area I was searching against, and the result was a /429 Too Many Requests/ error. Thank you for the feedback. Just for clarification: You should get HTTP 429 only if you submit more than one request in parallel. This help other users to also get a chance that their queries are executed. If you get HTTP 429 in another case, please enforce that there is no runaway query by calling http://overpass-api.de/api/kill_my_queries This kills another query from your IP adress if any is running. Best regards, Roland ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] When does a produced work has to be share-alike?
Hi, On 03/29/2015 05:43 PM, Lars-Daniel Weber wrote: In Illustrator, I could load a SVG created by qGIS with OSM data. I could only *link* to this SVG only without embedding it. So it's in a complete seperate file / XML DB, which can't or doesn't have to be edited. Now I could add other layers with my own streets or even with data under a properity license. When storing the new file, the OSM-data doesn't get changed anymore. Provided that you don't edit your other data set based on the OSM data you now see on the screen (uh, this road is now there twice, let me remove it... etc.) Sure, I have to release the SVG file or the workflow under share-alike, that's fine so far. But when I press export to PDF, will this be an intermidiate database, which also has to be share-alike? I don't have enough information to say whether the PDF will be a produced work or a database, but even if it were a database, it could be a collective database in which case share-alike would only apply to the ODbL part inside. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33 ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
[Talk-in] Roads classification
OSM in India helps in making an SDI at any level. Panchayat (village), Block (Mandal in A.P), Tehasil or District. Anything to be accepted by Society can go with the accepted way; for example Roads If you follow this from the beginning it can easily gain societal confidence, as the web display can also be in Indian languages. So crowd-sourcing may do well to follow Indian practices. Ex: A Village road can be Panchayath road.. and in turn Kucha road(fair weather road), Metal road etc. YES this requires knowledge of the area.. and this very list can help. Cheers Ravi Kumar ___ Talk-in mailing list Talk-in@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in
Re: [Talk-it] Numeri civici Ferrara
Ciao Fabrizio, la mail precedente è partita per sbaglio prima che potessi completarla. 2015-03-28 23:50 GMT+01:00 Fabrizio Tambussa ftambu...@gmail.com: Caro Andrea, ne abbiamo discusso stasera a cena con gente di almeno 5 regioni diverse, e questi sono alcuni punti emersi. 1) non e' un import perche' non parto da un database, ma da un elenco. Il db è semmai un'opera derivata dall'elenco dei civici. (Elenco - strutturazione - database ) Questo non l'ho capito. E' un database a tutti gli effetti esattamente come lo è l'elenco dei civici di Bologna o di Pavia o OSM. Inoltre, hanno tutti una licenza associata. 2) edito a piccoli pezzi controllati tipo via o quartiere. Non importo bulk, ma edito. Il fatto che non sia un import automatico (aka bulk) non significa che non stia facendo un import e/o non stia derivando dati da un'altra fonte. 3)Se fosse come dici tu, quasi la totalità degli oggetti mappati da satellite (il db delle immagini satellitari) sarebbero da cancellare perché opera derivata. 4 Infatti abbiamo apposite autorizzazioni a derivare i dati dalle immagini satellitari del PCN e di Bing: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Italy/PCN http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bing Non possiamo usare le immagini di Google, ecc perché non abbiamo le autorizzazioni a fare opere derivate. Detto questo, reputo che le discussione debba continuare sulla mailing list internazionale dedicata agli import e non qui. Per quanto riguarda Ferrara, io vorrei vedere la proposta che viene fatta dai mappers locali (Stefano e chi vorrà aiutarlo) e per questo la pagina di descrizione del wiki è fondamentale. Per me, si può anche fare l'import dei civici rilasciati dal comune così come sono se: a) non si importano i civici già presenti in OSM; b) c'è un piano (temporalmente limitato) per verificare il posizionamento degli altri. Ciao, Andrea ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Calvaire
Le 27 mars 2015 à 20:40, erwan salomon r...@gmx.fr a écrit : je viens d'envoyer un mail à l'association avec la carte d' http://overpass-turbo.eu que j'ai présenté précédemment (juste le fichier image en .png) en regardant le lien vers les calvaires du Finistère le site est différent et la carte passe par géobretagne (l'article du journal semble dire qu'il est lié à ce recensement également ?) : http://www.croix-finistere.com/ Pour leur montrer les possibilités d’OSM, overpass est peut-être un peu trop technique (geek ??) ;-) Voici un lien sur la carte des objets historiques pointant sur une croix avec un lien wikipedia et affichant la photo du monument : http://bit.ly/1BIezbT http://bit.ly/1BIezbT Un autre avec la seule croix ayant une photo : http://bit.ly/1DeChlW http://bit.ly/1DeChlW — Yves PS: les croix avec un lien wikipedia : 16 noeuds http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/8s8 http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/8s8 une photo : 1 noeud http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/8s9 http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/8s9 ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [OSM-talk-ie] A couple of questions from a newbie
On 27 March 2015 at 20:57, Rachel Murphy rachel.harwood.mur...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'd like to request map 20/15 NW, please (Tipperary). Sorry I cant upload any new sheets - mapwarper isn't allowing any more uploads :-( http://mapwarper.net/maps/new **DISK FULL, UPLOADS DISABLED***. Sorry, everyone has added 2TB of maps to the system over the years. Check back soon as a bigger server is sourced. Donal ___ Talk-ie mailing list Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
Re: [Talk-it] Numeri civici Ferrara
Ciao Fabrizio, 2015-03-28 23:50 GMT+01:00 Fabrizio Tambussa ftambu...@gmail.com: Caro Andrea, ne abbiamo discusso stasera a cena con gente di almeno 5 regioni diverse, e questi sono alcuni punti emersi. 1) non e' un import perche' non parto da un database, ma da un elenco. Il db è semmai un'opera derivata dall'elenco dei civici. (Elenco - strutturazione - database ) 2) edito a piccoli pezzi controllati tipo via o quartiere. Non importo bulk, ma edito. 3)Se fosse come dici tu, quasi la totalità degli oggetti mappati da satellite (il db delle immagini satellitari) sarebbero da cancellare perché opera derivata. Infatti abbiamo apposite autorizzazioni a derivare i dati dalle immagini satellitari del PCN e di Bing: e non possiamo usare le immagini di Google, ecc perché non abbiamo le autorizzazioni. Ciao, Andrea ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Strada privata: dubbio su tagging
2015-03-28 23:14 GMT+01:00 Leonardo kinetocor...@gmail.com: Ciao, oggi ho raccolto un po di civici del mio paese con Vespucci e li sto inserendo in OSM, approfittandone anche per sistemare le strade. Mi sono imbattuto in parecchi cartelli con scritto Strada privata e mi stanno sorgendo alcuni dubbi a proposito del tagging. Ciao Leonardo, anche io uso spesso Vespucci per inserire vie e civici (tra l'altro mi pare su tuo consiglio) e devo dire che è molto comodo, anche se ora sto sperimentando riprese con action cam ed inserimento con JOSM a tavolino e forse è ancora più veloce. Stando alla wiki italiana (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:access) il tagging corretto è highway=residential + access=destination perchè access=private è solo se la strada corre DENTRO una proprietà privata mentre quelle che ho visto io sono strade residenziali che collegano alcune case in cui si può passare ma non parcheggiare per esempio (a meno di essere i residenti). Il ragionamento di tagging è corretto? Nella wiki italiana è stata aggiunta qualche spiegazione in più rispetto a quella inglese, perchè leggendo la wiki inglese la distinzione è semplicemente tra: - access=private, strada privata con divieto di accesso, dove possono entrare solo i proprietari o chi ha esplicito permesso dei proprietari. - access=destination, strada dove può entrare solo chi deve raggiungere la desitnazione (residenti e frontisti appunto, spesso si trovano cartelli con questa indicazione specifica). Dal cartello che hai riportato sembrerebbe più il primo caso, cioè accesso vietato a tutti, salvo esplicito permesso; da quel che spieghi però sembra che la funzione sia più quella di consetire l'accesso (al di là del parcheggio) a chi deve raggiungere le residenze, quindi potrebbe andar bene il tag da te impostato, anche se io, vedendo quel segnale, avrei qualche remora ad entrare senza aver ricevuto il permesso. Il cartello comunque è questo: http://www.ariete-group.com/public/images/15254.png Inoltre ne approfitto per chiedere se questo cartello (http://www.pixlemon.com/signs-cartelli-zeichen/files/cartelli/05402020/zoom.jpg) ha lo stesso valore del precedente. Secondo me hanno lo stesso identico significato. Grazie! Leonardo Ciao Federico ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Strada privata: dubbio su tagging
Am 28.03.2015 um 23:14 schrieb Leonardo kinetocor...@gmail.com: Mi sono imbattuto in parecchi cartelli con scritto Strada privata e mi stanno sorgendo alcuni dubbi a proposito del tagging. cosa significa il cartello? Che non puoi entrare a piedi o in bici? Che il proprietario è un privato? Che non puoi parcheggiare se non abiti lì? Che il proprietario rifiuta la responsabilità se cadi la dentro oppure fai un incidente di cui la causa potrebbe essere ricondotta ad un danno del manto stradale oppure neve non rimossa in inverno ecc? A noi ci interessa il significato del cartello, che può variare per la stessa dicitura... Ciao Martin ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Strada privata: dubbio su tagging
2015-03-29 12:42 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com: Am 28.03.2015 um 23:14 schrieb Leonardo kinetocor...@gmail.com: Mi sono imbattuto in parecchi cartelli con scritto Strada privata e mi stanno sorgendo alcuni dubbi a proposito del tagging. cosa significa il cartello? Che non puoi entrare a piedi o in bici? Che il proprietario è un privato? Che non puoi parcheggiare se non abiti lì? Che il proprietario rifiuta la responsabilità se cadi la dentro oppure fai un incidente di cui la causa potrebbe essere ricondotta ad un danno del manto stradale oppure neve non rimossa in inverno ecc? A noi ci interessa il significato del cartello, che può variare per la stessa dicitura... Condivido pienamente, infatti il punto è proprio il significato del cartello. Proprietà privata significa che la strada è privata, ma non dice quale sia la volontà del/dei proprietario/i. Divieto di accesso aggiunge l'informazione che non si può accedere, ma non fa capire se non si può accedere in nessun modo, oppure solo in macchina, ecc., e anche questo dipende dalla volontà del/dei proprietario/i. La wiki italiana esplicita giustamente che per una strada di proprietà privata non è automatico assegnare il tag access=private, che ha un significato molto restrittivo. Per questo mi pare che dalle tue indicazioni circa le possibilità di accesso, andrebbe bene l'access=destination, ma più che dal cartello dipende da quale sia la volontà precisa della proprietà. Ciao Federico Ciao Martin ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] come taggare una stazione di monitoraggio
Il 29 marzo 2015 22:03, Stefano saba...@gmail.com ha scritto: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmonitoring_station Grazie. Ho inserito una stazione idrometrica qui: http://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=45.364483%2C%2011.934497#map=17/45.36449/11.93450 mi controlli per cortesia se ho fatto giusto? Apparira' con un suo simbolo? Ciao. luca ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] come taggare una stazione di monitoraggio
Il 29 marzo 2015 22:36:22 CEST, luca menini menini.l...@gmail.com ha scritto: Il 29 marzo 2015 22:32, luca menini menini.l...@gmail.com ha scritto: mi controlli per cortesia se ho fatto giusto? E' questa: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3425385780 Ciao. luca ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it La esse di stazione va maiuscola. -- Simone Girardelli-- Inviato con K-9 Mail dal mio Samsung S5 ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] come taggare una stazione di monitoraggio
Il 29 marzo 2015 22:40, Simone liste.gira...@gmail.com ha scritto: La esse di stazione va maiuscola. Corretto, grazie. luca -- Passa al software libero! ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-us] Tesla Supercharger import
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Charles Samuels o...@charles.derkarl.org wrote: I'll ask them for their permission. While you ask them for permission, you might want to suggest that they switch to OSM instead of using google [1] maps. I think they use google maps in their navigation system but it wouldn't hurt to them thinking. [1] http://www.teslamotors.com/findus#/bounds/35.5722872795,-107.2834384999,31.259882347870708,-117.8303134999?search=superchargername=us -- @osm_seattle osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
[Talk-at] Fehlende Straßen als Shapefile: Jetzt auch für Kärnten
Liebe OSMer, ihr erinnert euch vielleicht daran dass ich vor einiger Zeit eine Seite online gestellt habe, wo die in OSM fehlenden steirischen Straßen als Shapefile täglich aktualisiert herunterladbar sind. Seit ein paar Tagen ist ein solches Shapefile jetzt auch für Kärnten verfügbar: http://osm-missing-streets.thomaskonrad.at/ http://osm-missing-streets.thomaskonrad.at/ (beide Shapefiles finden sich auf derselben Seite). Die Basisdaten stammen vom OGD-Portal des Landes Kärnten [1]. Danke nebulon42 für den Hinweis beim Wiener OSM-Stammtisch! Man muss dazusagen, dass hier nur die “höherrangigen Straßen” zur Verfügung stehen; das heißt, es handelt sich nicht um alle Straßen, die auch auf der Basemap [2] sichtbar sind. Dennoch beinhalten die Datensätze die Straßen teilweise bis zum Gemeindestraßenlevel. Bin wie immer dankbar für Feedback! Schöne Grüße Thomas PS: Der aktualisierte Quellcode der Seite und der dahinter stehenden Skripte findet sich wie gehabt auf der Github-Projektseite [3]. [1] http://data.ktn.gv.at/package/verkehrsnetz-kaernten/ http://data.ktn.gv.at/package/verkehrsnetz-kaernten/ [2] http://www.basemap.at/ http://www.basemap.at/ [3] https://github.com/thomaskonrad/osm-missing-streets-extractor https://github.com/thomaskonrad/osm-missing-streets-extractor On 31 Dec 2014, at 16:36, Thomas Konrad tkon...@gmx.net wrote: Liebe OSMer, das Land Steiermark hat ja sein Straßennetz in Form von Shapefiles [1] veröffentlicht. Der User Species hat außerdem ein Github-Projekt [2], wo die Daten aufbereitet und regelmäßig aktualisiert werden. Seit einigen Tagen läuft auf meinem Server ein Skript, das daraus täglich die noch fehlenden Straßenfragmente extrahiert und in ein Shapefile schreibt. Das Shapefile enthält außerdem schon OSM-kompatible name-Tags und korrekte Quellenangaben. Auf dieser Seite findet ihr das täglich aktualisierte Shapefile und ein Video mit einem Workflow-Vorschlag (kann noch dauern bis es verfügbar ist): - Shapefile und Infos: http://osm-styria-missing-streets.thomaskonrad.at/ http://osm-styria-missing-streets.thomaskonrad.at/ - Direktlink zum Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwcAFyOneHc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwcAFyOneHc Die Daten haben unterm Strich eine sehr hohe Qualität. Lasst uns diese Quelle nutzen, ich hoffe auf viele Unterstützer! :) Feedback ist jederzeit willkommen. Ich wünsche allen OSMern einen guten Rutsch ins neue Jahr und viel Spaß beim Umsetzen der OSM-Neujahrsvorsätze (Vorschlag siehe oben)! :) Thomas [1] http://data.steiermark.at/cms/beitrag/11822084/97108894/?AppInt_OGD_ID=53 http://data.steiermark.at/cms/beitrag/11822084/97108894/?AppInt_OGD_ID=53 [2] https://github.com/species/OGD-stmk-daten/tree/master/Stra%C3%9Fennetz https://github.com/species/OGD-stmk-daten/tree/master/Stra%C3%9Fennetz ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at
Re: [Talk-it] come taggare una stazione di monitoraggio
2015-03-29 22:32 GMT+02:00 luca menini menini.l...@gmail.com: Il 29 marzo 2015 22:03, Stefano saba...@gmail.com ha scritto: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmonitoring_station Grazie. Ho inserito una stazione idrometrica qui: http://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=45.364483%2C%2011.934497#map=17/45.36449/11.93450 mi controlli per cortesia se ho fatto giusto? Mi sembra giusto :-) http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3425385780 Apparira' con un suo simbolo? Purtoppo no... Idea che mi è venuta adesso: magari si potrebbe anche segnalare se i dati sono disponibili dove sono accessibili le letture? Ciao. luca ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] come taggare una stazione di monitoraggio
Il 29 marzo 2015 22:32, luca menini menini.l...@gmail.com ha scritto: mi controlli per cortesia se ho fatto giusto? E' questa: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3425385780 Ciao. luca ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] come taggare una stazione di monitoraggio
Il 29 marzo 2015 22:37, Stefano saba...@gmail.com ha scritto: Apparira' con un suo simbolo? Purtoppo no... Non ci si puo' fare niente? Idea che mi è venuta adesso: magari si potrebbe anche segnalare se i dati sono disponibili dove sono accessibili le letture? Si, ma come? Ciao. luca ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] come taggare una stazione di monitoraggio
Il giorno 29 marzo 2015 22:01, luca menini menini.l...@gmail.com ha scritto: Ciao a tutti, vorrei segnare alcune stazioni di monitoraggio del livello idrografico su OSM. Che tag posso usare? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmonitoring_station luca Ciao, Stefano -- Passa al software libero! ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
[Talk-it] come taggare una stazione di monitoraggio
Ciao a tutti, vorrei segnare alcune stazioni di monitoraggio del livello idrografico su OSM. Che tag posso usare? luca -- Passa al software libero! ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [OSM-talk] New features in iD - looking for feedback and beta testers..
On 2015-03-27 14:55, Dave F. wrote: Until there's a logical, common sense way to select, split, continue unstitch ways that meet at intersections, I'm sticking with P2. As a power user, I found these operations a lot less frustrating after discovering that selecting a way, holding down Shift, and selecting the intersecting node limits the split, disconnection, or extension to just that way. And why the delete key isn't utilized is beyond me. Leaving out basic functionality doesn't make iD easier to use. Press Ctrl+Del or Ctrl+Backspace to delete the selected feature. The modifier key was added [1] in response to complaints that iD was making it too easy to delete stuff. [2] FWIW, the wiki has a full list of shortcuts. [3] [1] https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/commit/b52eb9ce72653b538d025ca93f9264690d0bd398 [2] https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/1698 [3] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID/Shortcuts -- m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-it] Strada privata: dubbio su tagging
In Italia per queste strade private di solito si usa motor_vehicle=private On dom 29 mar 2015 15:32:40 CEST, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: Am 29.03.2015 um 13:45 schrieb Federico Cortese cortese...@gmail.com: Condivido pienamente, infatti il punto è proprio il significato del cartello. forse vuol dire maxspeed=unlimited perché non ti trovi più nello spazio della strada pubblica ma su suolo privato (non so bene cosa dice la legge italiana, e quali sono le condizioni) ;-) ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-br] Brasileiro no time da MapBox
Que bacana. Sucesso, tmpsantos! []s Arlindo On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Erick de Oliveira Leal erickdeoliveiral...@gmail.com wrote: Olha que legal pessoal https://www.mapbox.com/blog/thiago-joins/ ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
Re: [Talk-at] Fehlende Straßen als Shapefile: Jetzt auch für Kärnten
Vielen Dank für die Mühe! Ich habe schon ein paar kleine Lücken entdeckt, die eingetragen werden wollen. Sehr hilfreich! lg, nebulon42 Am Sonntag, den 29.03.2015, 21:26 +0200 schrieb Thomas Konrad: Liebe OSMer, ihr erinnert euch vielleicht daran dass ich vor einiger Zeit eine Seite online gestellt habe, wo die in OSM fehlenden steirischen Straßen als Shapefile täglich aktualisiert herunterladbar sind. Seit ein paar Tagen ist ein solches Shapefile jetzt auch für Kärnten verfügbar: http://osm-missing-streets.thomaskonrad.at/ (beide Shapefiles finden sich auf derselben Seite). Die Basisdaten stammen vom OGD-Portal des Landes Kärnten [1]. Danke nebulon42 für den Hinweis beim Wiener OSM-Stammtisch! Man muss dazusagen, dass hier nur die “höherrangigen Straßen” zur Verfügung stehen; das heißt, es handelt sich nicht um alle Straßen, die auch auf der Basemap [2] sichtbar sind. Dennoch beinhalten die Datensätze die Straßen teilweise bis zum Gemeindestraßenlevel. Bin wie immer dankbar für Feedback! Schöne Grüße Thomas PS: Der aktualisierte Quellcode der Seite und der dahinter stehenden Skripte findet sich wie gehabt auf der Github-Projektseite [3]. [1] http://data.ktn.gv.at/package/verkehrsnetz-kaernten/ [2] http://www.basemap.at/ [3] https://github.com/thomaskonrad/osm-missing-streets-extractor On 31 Dec 2014, at 16:36, Thomas Konrad tkon...@gmx.net wrote: Liebe OSMer, das Land Steiermark hat ja sein Straßennetz in Form von Shapefiles [1] veröffentlicht. Der User Species hat außerdem ein Github-Projekt [2], wo die Daten aufbereitet und regelmäßig aktualisiert werden. Seit einigen Tagen läuft auf meinem Server ein Skript, das daraus täglich die noch fehlenden Straßenfragmente extrahiert und in ein Shapefile schreibt. Das Shapefile enthält außerdem schon OSM-kompatible name-Tags und korrekte Quellenangaben. Auf dieser Seite findet ihr das täglich aktualisierte Shapefile und ein Video mit einem Workflow-Vorschlag (kann noch dauern bis es verfügbar ist): - Shapefile und Infos: http://osm-styria-missing-streets.thomaskonrad.at/ - Direktlink zum Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwcAFyOneHc Die Daten haben unterm Strich eine sehr hohe Qualität. Lasst uns diese Quelle nutzen, ich hoffe auf viele Unterstützer! :) Feedback ist jederzeit willkommen. Ich wünsche allen OSMern einen guten Rutsch ins neue Jahr und viel Spaß beim Umsetzen der OSM-Neujahrsvorsätze (Vorschlag siehe oben)! :) Thomas [1] http://data.steiermark.at/cms/beitrag/11822084/97108894/?AppInt_OGD_ID=53 [2] https://github.com/species/OGD-stmk-daten/tree/master/Stra%C3% 9Fennetz ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Carte des données indoor : OpenLevelUp!
Bonjour à tous, Des nouvelles du développement d'OpenLevelUp, avec des changements significatifs depuis la dernière fois. Pour la version brève : une nouvelle interface plus moderne et légère, l'export (en bêta) vers une image d'un niveau, la possibilité de voir la liste des salles, et de nouvelles icônes (pour les chemins et polygones). Vous connaissez désormais l'adresse : http://github.pavie.info/openlevelup Pour la version plus détaillée des changements : * Refonte de l'interface utilisateur, un peu (beaucoup ?) inspirée du site openstreetmap.org * Export du niveau courant vers une image, au format SVG. Cette fonctionnalité est en bêta car sujette à des différences notables entre navigateurs, n'hésitez pas à faire des retours là-dessus. * Une liste des salles sur la zone est disponible, avec une barre de recherche. Le système fonctionne mais l'interface sera très probablement revue rapidement (manque d'ergonomie) * Les messages sont déplacés en bas à droite de la page * La fenêtre de chargement se ferme plus tard (au plus proche de l'affichage des données) * De nouvelles icônes pour : * Les escalators (en tant que verticalpassage) * Les portiques (barrier=turnstile) * Les chemins en général, en particulier ceux à sens unique * Les laboratoires (laboratory=physical, biology, biological, electronics, electronic) * Également pour le reste du style : * L'icône pour les cryptes est plus générale * Les murs en tant qu'objets individuels sont affichés en plus gras * L'icône des entrées de métro est plus discrète * Correction de bugs mineurs * La fenêtre de chargement ne se fermait pas lors du zoom sur une zone vide de données indoor * Les niveaux n'étaient pas triés pour les pop-ups, entraînant des erreurs sur la montée/descente depuis une pop-up Vos diverses remarques et impressions sont toujours la bienvenue ;) Cordialement, PanierAvide. ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [Talk-us] Tesla Supercharger import
Hi Charles, tag k='capacity' v='6' / tag k='socket:tesla_supercharger' v='6' / tag k='name' v='Tesla Supercharger Harris Ranch' / tag k='addr:city' v='Coalinga' / tag k='tesla:ref' v='harrisranchsupercharger' / This telsa:ref tag seem weird, should probably be just ref, or ref:telsa if the value is a db key. However, given the stations have names + location, it is not needed to keep the data updated. Consider dropping it. You need to get permission. They might not want to encourage the data being duplicated in OSM. Please review the import policy, you need to setup an OSM wiki page documenting the import. Also, it would be a good idea to be on the import list. Thanks Jason ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
