[talk-ph] bulk import of wikipedia POIs to OSM

2009-05-06 Thread maning sambale
Over at the main OSM list, there is a discussion on importing POIs
from wikipedia articles:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2009-May/036582.html

The main discussion revolves around whether we should or shouldn't
import given that some of the POIs location (lon/lat) maybe derived
from Google Map.  I'm not really familiar with wikipedia's POI data
particularly for the Philippines.  Do we need to add them here?  Or
there will be major conflicts with existing POIs we have already
added.

Any ideas?

-- 
cheers,
maning
--
Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] bulk import of wikipedia POIs to OSM

2009-05-06 Thread Mike Collinson
I kinda sit on the fence on both the legal issues and the desirability of bulk 
importing specifically Philippines data.  For kicking off this discussion, I'd 
therefore suggest that we do not do a bulk import but that we do individually 
use the Wikipedia map location tool. I have found this very useful for broadly 
locating something I am looking for even when the exact location is not 
accurate (often).

If list members have not come across this, there are often lat/lon coords in 
the top right of a Wikipedia article.  Click on that and you are given a list 
of online maps, click on OpenStreetMap map and the on the usual OpenStreetMap 
Edit link.  I then use the landsat imagery to precisely locate the feature I am 
looking for and manually create a tag or way ... or adding more information to 
a tag that is already there.  I generally use it for getting names for rivers, 
mountains and towns.

Mike

At 09:08 AM 6/05/2009, maning sambale wrote:
Over at the main OSM list, there is a discussion on importing POIs
from wikipedia articles:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2009-May/036582.html

The main discussion revolves around whether we should or shouldn't
import given that some of the POIs location (lon/lat) maybe derived
from Google Map.  I'm not really familiar with wikipedia's POI data
particularly for the Philippines.  Do we need to add them here?  Or
there will be major conflicts with existing POIs we have already
added.

Any ideas?

-- 
cheers,
maning



___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] Is Makati road-complete?

2009-05-06 Thread Eugene Alvin Villar
Makati is close to complete and is extremely usable already. But I wouldn't
say it's 100% complete especially if we want to use it to find addresses.
For instance I recently tagged the street of northern Ecology Village as
missing and the residential streets in Magallanes very near the corner of
EDSA and NLEX are still missing (Yahoo!'s imagery is outdated).


On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:15 PM, maning sambale
emmanuel.samb...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Marloue Pidor mur...@mail2engineer.com
 wrote:
  I edited some roads in Guadalupe, named some streets. And there are lots
 of
  foot path in Brgy. Pitogo that is not in the map yet. I live in Pitogo
 when
  I'm in Manila and M. V. Laurilla St. leads to Samar St. I will be editing
  the area and I will be in Manila early next week. By the way, what is the
 From your report, it's obvious it's not yet road complete.

  criteria to consider an area/place to be road complete?
 When I say road complete, I define it as:
  Street names are labelled. This means that the map can be used to
 find an address.
 Roads for car traffic are present. One way streets and pedestrian
 streets are present. This means that the map can be used for car
 navigation
 Source: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:En:Map_status

 But we can define our own metric if the above definition is not sufficient.

  murlwe
 
  -Original Message-
 From: maning sambale [emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com]
 Sent: 5/6/2009 3:30:46 PM
 To: talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
 Subject: Re: [talk-ph] Is Makati road-complete?
 
 Follow-up to my inquiry here. Is Makati road-complete?
 
 In the main map: it has administrative boundaries up to
 barangay/village level; MRT stations; some building outlines;
 residential landuse areas; road restrictions; POIS; etc.
 
 Although there are few minor errors reported:
 
 http://openstreetbugs.appspot.com/?lon=121.02493475009584lat=14.556820060903302zoom=15
 
 I don't go to Makati very often, therefore, I cannot mark a stamp of
 approval. Any Makati resident who can attest to the completeness
 of OSm coverage of the City?
 
 
 On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:37 AM, maning sambale
 emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
  Of course not, everything changes. There will be new roads, old roads
  reclassified, Chairman BF changing u-turn slots and oneway streets.
 
  Of course, the question is what metrics should we use. We can roughly
  define complete as:
  Street names are labelled. Roads for car traffic are present. One way
  streets and pedestrian streets are present. This means that the map
  can be used for car navigation
  Source: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:En:Map_status
 
  On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Ed Garcia eppgar...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Hi Maning,
 
  Just curious ... when you declare an area as road-complete, would
 this
  mean it would be sealed of from additions/edits of ways?
 
 
  On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:24 AM, maning sambale
 emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
  I just had a look at Makati today:
 
 
 
 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=14.554lon=121.0276zoom=14layers=B000FTF
 
  I have to say the data is comprehensive, roads, POIs, landuse,
  administrative boundaries.
  However, I also saw a couple of unnamed roads:
 
 
 
 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=14.5543lon=121.0276zoom=14layers=000BFTF
 
  Once this, unnamed roads are updated, I think it's time to review the
  area and declare Makati as road-complete.
 
  Can somebody, have an objective look at Makati and evaluate? I
  suggest we follow this scheme:
  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:En:Map_status
 
  Then I propose we start voting whether we declare Makati as road
  complete
 
  --
  cheers,
  maning
  --
  Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden
  wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
  blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
  --
 
  ___
  talk-ph mailing list
  talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
  http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
 
 
 
  --
  website administrator:
  - www.waypoints.ph
  - reeflife.eppgarcia.com
 
  PADI Divemaster #491048
 
 
 
 
  --
  cheers,
  maning
  --
  Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden
  wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
  blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
  --
 
 
 
 
 --
 cheers,
 maning
 --
 Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden
 wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
 blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
 --
 
 ___
 talk-ph mailing list
 talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
 
 
  

[talk-ph] What level of POIs do we add? (was Click the City)

2009-05-06 Thread Eugene Alvin Villar
It's tempting to mark out in OSM all of the Jollibee, McDonald's, and
Starbucks branches in the Philippines but I'm wondering if this is wise. Do
we mark out every retail store, every bank branch, every Western
Union/FedEx/LBC outlet, and every company's office in OSM? My personal take
is that we don't need to.

One big problem is multi-storey malls like SM Megamall that have hundreds of
tenants. It'll be quite unwieldy to maintain and edit overlapping POIs in
such a small land area.

I feel that the level of detail we should attain is down to the building
level. If we know that there's a Jollibee in Megamall Building A, then it's
enough for us to map out where Building A is, but not where the Jollibee
there is exactly.

In the specific case of malls, exceptions will be added for anchor tenants,
like in SM Megamall: the SM Department Store, ACE Hardware, SM Supermarket,
SM Cinemas, the Megatrade Halls, etc. No need to mark out each and every
McDo, KFC, Jollibee, Bench, Penshoppe, Levi's, BPI, Chinabank, etc. in the
mall.

A comprehensive database of all retail addresses is better suited to
something like OpenYellowPages, not OpenStreetMap.

What do you guys think?


On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:31 AM, maning sambale
emmanuel.samb...@gmail.comwrote:

 What I mean is address information (we've discussed it already, and
 agreed it is important, unless I'm mistaken) not specific business
 establishment (although it is attached to the address).  We also have
 numerous POIs added already.

 On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Ahmed Farooq ah...@enthropia.com wrote:
  I don’t think adding business data to OSM is a good idea - that data
 changes far too often and is far more complex in upkeep.
 
  -A
 


-- 
http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] What level of POIs do we add? (was Click the City)

2009-05-06 Thread Eugene Alvin Villar
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:18 PM, maning sambale
emmanuel.samb...@gmail.comwrote:

 Just my take,
 1.  If it's on the ground it should be mapped.


This is a good guideline in general but of course a line has to be drawn
somewhere (pun not intended). I don't think drawing the individual stripes
of a pedestrian walkway is productive even if it *is* on the ground. A map
is supposed to be a representation--not a facsimile of the real world.
That's why we represent roads in OSM using center lines and not (at the
moment) as areas.


 2.  If somebody bothered to map fishball vendors in Luneta, nobody's
 stopping him.


Fishball vendors are probably not a good example for your point since they
are too ephemeral to be mapped. But anyway, OSM is a community project and
we work on consensus. While we do encourage people to map what they think
are important, I don't think we should just let people map things like
Location of Mark and Jenny's first kiss, right?

3 years ago (am I that old in OSM?), my only goal is to map major
 highways around the metro, now it's there.  But we want more.  We've
 mapped footways, cycleways, I even saw driveways somewhere.  If
 somebody sees the importance of a certain feature then by all means
 let them map it.

 If I can collect data for breeding sites of all the endangered bird
 species (and I think it is important) I will possibly map it here.

 I agree there should be some limits and priorities (at the moment) but
 I am hopeful we will get to a point where we will map individual
 houses with addresses


I disagree that the limits are there just for the moment. I think there
should be a limit imposed at all times (the limit can move over time, but
there is still a limit). For instance, Wikipedia has guidelines on what is
NOT acceptable (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:NOT) eventhough the presence
of those guidelines run counter to Wikipedia's lofty aim to be the sum of
all human knowledge.

I think individual features for detached residential houses are OK, but I
really don't think we need to place a point for every unit in high-rise
condominiums.


On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  It's tempting to mark out in OSM all of the Jollibee, McDonald's, and
  Starbucks branches in the Philippines but I'm wondering if this is wise.
 Do
  we mark out every retail store, every bank branch, every Western
  Union/FedEx/LBC outlet, and every company's office in OSM? My personal
 take
  is that we don't need to.
 
  One big problem is multi-storey malls like SM Megamall that have hundreds
 of
  tenants. It'll be quite unwieldy to maintain and edit overlapping POIs in
  such a small land area.
 
  I feel that the level of detail we should attain is down to the building
  level. If we know that there's a Jollibee in Megamall Building A, then
 it's
  enough for us to map out where Building A is, but not where the Jollibee
  there is exactly.
 
  In the specific case of malls, exceptions will be added for anchor
 tenants,
  like in SM Megamall: the SM Department Store, ACE Hardware, SM
 Supermarket,
  SM Cinemas, the Megatrade Halls, etc. No need to mark out each and every
  McDo, KFC, Jollibee, Bench, Penshoppe, Levi's, BPI, Chinabank, etc. in
 the
  mall.
 
  A comprehensive database of all retail addresses is better suited to
  something like OpenYellowPages, not OpenStreetMap.
 
  What do you guys think?
 
 
  On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:31 AM, maning sambale 
 emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
  What I mean is address information (we've discussed it already, and
  agreed it is important, unless I'm mistaken) not specific business
  establishment (although it is attached to the address).  We also have
  numerous POIs added already.
 
  On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Ahmed Farooq ah...@enthropia.com
 wrote:
   I don’t think adding business data to OSM is a good idea - that data
   changes far too often and is far more complex in upkeep.
  
   -A
  
 
  --
  http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com
 



 --
 cheers,
 maning
 --
 Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden
 wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
 blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
 --

 ___
 talk-ph mailing list
 talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph




-- 
http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] What level of POIs do we add? (was Click the City)

2009-05-06 Thread Eugene Alvin Villar
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Rally de Leon rall...@gmail.com wrote:

 If you have access to (data of) all locations of Jollibee, McDonalds,
 7-Eleven, Ministops, Mercury Drugs and all these big companies, by all means
 mark them. With the exceptions of those already inside big malls (which will
 just clutter the map); we only need the mall-building itself as a landmark
 (POI) together with position of entrance gates and parking lots.


Well, my idea is that if a McDo branch exists as a standalone building then
there's no problem drawing the building outline and adding name=McDonald's,
amenity=fastfood to it. But, as you've said, I don't think that means that
we should also place a point for the McDonald's inside Robinsons Galleria.

This implies that one *cannot* query the OSM database and get the coordinate
locations of *all* the McDonald's branches in Metro Manila (you'll only get
partial info). To get the full information, one should look elsewhere (e.g.,
go to www.mcdonaldsph.com, or look at ClicktheCity.com, or even start an
OpenYellowPages) then geocode the obtained addresses using street data from
OSM to get the actual coordinates. This actually helps create mashups
applications using OSM as a tool.


-- 
http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] POIs Part 2

2009-05-06 Thread Eugene Alvin Villar
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Ahmed Farooq ah...@enthropia.com wrote:

  I have to add – have you seen the Boracay map? While it looks fantastic
 that it is all mapped out, naming each resort/business there has lead to a
 map that looks absolutely bloated and is unreadable at times.

 For example
 http://www.openstreetmap.org.ph/map/c/11.960549689657205/121.925368309021/17/-
  “Mango Ray Shenna’s Resort” – are those two places? One? Which building is
 covered by their name? Multiple buildings or just one?

This is a rendering problem, not a problem of data collection. It's
theoretically possible to add more metadata to those resorts (like N-star
rating) so that a renderer can choose to, say, display only 4- and 5-star
resorts so as not to clutter a general-purpose map. This can be tied to zoom
levels so that at a low zoom level, only Boracay Regency, Discovery Shores,
Friday's, Shangri-La Boracay, etc. will be displayed or labeled. At higher
zoom levels, more detail and labels can then be displayed.

 A POI should be a notable location that a tourist may be interested in – a
 statue, a building, even a public transit location. But specific businesses
 (be it fast food joints or specific resorts) only create clutter and a mess
 – which will only get worse as businesses are created and others go out of
 business.

 Having too much data (especially as part of the primary data set) is
 contrary to the spirit of an open user-maintained map.

Well, I generally think that some types or classes of data are good
additions to the primary data set.

For instance, Asiatype publishes a paper map of the Makati CBD and Ortigas
business districts showing the locations of all the buildings. I don't think
having those buildings in OSM is too much data. Likewise, I think the
location of all resorts in Boracay is a class of data that would be a good
addition to OSM.

Detached (as in stand-alone) restaurants and other dining places are OK in
my opinion; they provide vital landmark info as Rally has said.

On the other hand, I oppose the systematic addition of *all* tenants inside
shopping malls. Some are OK (like the anchor tenants that I've mentioned in
a previous e-mail).


-- 
http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] POIs Part 2

2009-05-06 Thread Ahmed Farooq
Right - it isn't just about the rendering, but about the underlying data. A
POI should be considered a universal point of interest - ala a landmark of
building that would be included in a 'Guide to XXX City'. Loading up on all
the businesses is changing from being a map to a yellowpages - which is fine
if that is the idea of the project. Keeping this data upto date is far
harder than actual pathways - and once businesses are no longer operating,
the data will be bad - and that is a dangerous path to go down.

 

-A

 

 

From: Eugene Alvin Villar [mailto:sea...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 11:58 AM
To: Ahmed Farooq
Cc: maning sambale; OSM
Subject: Re: POIs Part 2

 

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Ahmed Farooq ah...@enthropia.com wrote:

I have to add - have you seen the Boracay map? While it looks fantastic that
it is all mapped out, naming each resort/business there has lead to a map
that looks absolutely bloated and is unreadable at times.

For example
http://www.openstreetmap.org.ph/map/c/11.960549689657205/121.925368309021/17
/ - Mango Ray Shenna's Resort - are those two places? One? Which building
is covered by their name? Multiple buildings or just one?

This is a rendering problem, not a problem of data collection. It's
theoretically possible to add more metadata to those resorts (like N-star
rating) so that a renderer can choose to, say, display only 4- and 5-star
resorts so as not to clutter a general-purpose map. This can be tied to zoom
levels so that at a low zoom level, only Boracay Regency, Discovery Shores,
Friday's, Shangri-La Boracay, etc. will be displayed or labeled. At higher
zoom levels, more detail and labels can then be displayed.

A POI should be a notable location that a tourist may be interested in - a
statue, a building, even a public transit location. But specific businesses
(be it fast food joints or specific resorts) only create clutter and a mess
- which will only get worse as businesses are created and others go out of
business.

Having too much data (especially as part of the primary data set) is
contrary to the spirit of an open user-maintained map.

Well, I generally think that some types or classes of data are good
additions to the primary data set.

For instance, Asiatype publishes a paper map of the Makati CBD and Ortigas
business districts showing the locations of all the buildings. I don't think
having those buildings in OSM is too much data. Likewise, I think the
location of all resorts in Boracay is a class of data that would be a good
addition to OSM.

Detached (as in stand-alone) restaurants and other dining places are OK in
my opinion; they provide vital landmark info as Rally has said.

On the other hand, I oppose the systematic addition of *all* tenants inside
shopping malls. Some are OK (like the anchor tenants that I've mentioned in
a previous e-mail).


-- 
http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] talk-ph Digest, Vol 10, Issue 8

2009-05-06 Thread noel mondragon
 think individual features for detached residential houses
 are OK, but I
 really don't think we need to place a point for every
 unit in high-rise
 condominiums.
 
 
 
 On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar
 sea...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  It's tempting to mark out in OSM all of the
 Jollibee, McDonald's, and
  Starbucks branches in the Philippines but I'm
 wondering if this is wise.
 Do
  we mark out every retail store, every bank branch,
 every Western
  Union/FedEx/LBC outlet, and every company's office
 in OSM? My personal
 take
  is that we don't need to.
 
  One big problem is multi-storey malls like SM Megamall
 that have hundreds
 of
  tenants. It'll be quite unwieldy to maintain and
 edit overlapping POIs in
  such a small land area.
 
  I feel that the level of detail we should attain is
 down to the building
  level. If we know that there's a Jollibee in
 Megamall Building A, then
 it's
  enough for us to map out where Building A is, but not
 where the Jollibee
  there is exactly.
 
  In the specific case of malls, exceptions will be
 added for anchor
 tenants,
  like in SM Megamall: the SM Department Store, ACE
 Hardware, SM
 Supermarket,
  SM Cinemas, the Megatrade Halls, etc. No need to mark
 out each and every
  McDo, KFC, Jollibee, Bench, Penshoppe, Levi's,
 BPI, Chinabank, etc. in the
  mall.
 
  A comprehensive database of all retail addresses is
 better suited to
  something like OpenYellowPages, not OpenStreetMap.
 
  What do you guys think?
 
 
  On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:31 AM, maning sambale
 emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
  What I mean is address information (we've
 discussed it already, and
  agreed it is important, unless I'm mistaken)
 not specific business
  establishment (although it is attached to the
 address).  We also have
  numerous POIs added already.
 
  On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Ahmed Farooq
 ah...@enthropia.com
 wrote:
   I don't think adding business data to OSM
 is a good idea - that data
   changes far too often and is far more complex
 in upkeep.
  
   -A
  
 
  --
  http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com
 
 
 
 
 
 --
 cheers,
 maning
 --
 Freedom is still the most radical idea of all
 -N.Branden
 wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
 blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
 --
 
 ___
 talk-ph mailing list
 talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com
 
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL:
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/attachments/20090506/b445d2d9/attachment-0001.htm
 
 
 --
 
 Message: 2
 Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 23:42:51 +0800
 From: Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: [talk-ph] What level of POIs do we add? (was
 Click the
   City)
 To: Rally de Leon rall...@gmail.com
 Cc: OSM talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
 Message-ID:
   a07a5a700905060842g4b8e4782q2a8287fc0ed29...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
 
 On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Rally de Leon
 rall...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  If you have access to (data of) all locations of
 Jollibee, McDonalds,
  7-Eleven, Ministops, Mercury Drugs and all these big
 companies, by all means
  mark them. With the exceptions of those already inside
 big malls (which will
  just clutter the map); we only need the mall-building
 itself as a landmark
  (POI) together with position of entrance gates and
 parking lots.
 
 
 Well, my idea is that if a McDo branch exists as a
 standalone building then
 there's no problem drawing the building outline and
 adding name=McDonald's,
 amenity=fastfood to it. But, as you've said, I
 don't think that means that
 we should also place a point for the McDonald's inside
 Robinsons Galleria.
 
 This implies that one *cannot* query the OSM database and
 get the coordinate
 locations of *all* the McDonald's branches in Metro
 Manila (you'll only get
 partial info). To get the full information, one should look
 elsewhere (e.g.,
 go to www.mcdonaldsph.com, or look at ClicktheCity.com, or
 even start an
 OpenYellowPages) then geocode the obtained addresses using
 street data from
 OSM to get the actual coordinates. This actually helps
 create mashups
 applications using OSM as a tool.
 
 
 -- 
 http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL:
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/attachments/20090506/1466730a/attachment-0001.htm
 
 
 --
 
 Message: 3
 Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 17:04:36 +0100
 From: Ronny Ager-Wick - Develo Ltd.
 r...@develo.ltd.uk
 Subject: Re: [talk-ph] What level of POIs do we add? (was
 Click the
   City)
 To: OSM talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
 Message-ID: 4a01b514.5020...@develo.ltd.uk
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset

Re: [talk-ph] talk-ph Digest, Vol 10, Issue 8

2009-05-06 Thread Marloue Pidor
Noel,

This is my opinion...

It is feasible but not practical, the names of the establishments will
be used as our points of interest (POI). My point is, those
establishments is on the ground and should be mapped and identified. OSM
will not become as you say it commercially-oriented instead, it will
be very useful to have those POIs intact. For example, if you are
looking for Mercury Drug because it is your preferred drugstore then if
the scenario is all the names of these drugstores were removed, you will
be guessing and hoping that the next drugstore is the one you preferred.
Its really hard to use the map that way. In my case I downloaded the OSM
tiles into my Palm (osm2palm) and I use it whenever I'm in Manila the
establishment's names were very useful for me to identify my location in
the map.


murlwe

-Original Message- 
From: noel mondragon [noel_pylo...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 5/7/2009 8:23:11 AM
To: talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-ph] talk-ph Digest, Vol 10, Issue 8

My suggestion is that we can POI like drugstores, fastfood but we will
not put
the name like McDonalds or Jollibee or Mercury Drugstore??or resort? Is
it that
feasible. It will make the OSM as commercially-oriented if we put
commercial
establishments with names

Comments? thanks.

-noel


--- On Wed, 5/6/09, talk-ph-requ...@openstreetmap.org
talk-ph-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:

 From: talk-ph-requ...@openstreetmap.org
talk-ph-requ...@openstreetmap.org
 Subject: talk-ph Digest, Vol 10, Issue 8
 To: talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
 Date: Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 8:55 AM
 Send talk-ph mailing list submissions to
 talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
 
 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body
 'help' to
 talk-ph-requ...@openstreetmap.org
 
 You can reach the person managing the list at
 talk-ph-ow...@openstreetmap.org
 
 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
 specific
 than Re: Contents of talk-ph digest...
 
 
 Today's Topics:
 
 1. POIs Part 2 (Ahmed Farooq)
 2. Re: What level of POIs do we add? (was Click the
 City)
 (Eugene Alvin Villar)
 3. Re: What level of POIs do we add? (was Click the
 City)
 (Ronny Ager-Wick - Develo Ltd.)
 
 

--
 
 Message: 1
 Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 11:40:05 -0400
 From: Ahmed Farooq ah...@enthropia.com
 Subject: [talk-ph] POIs Part 2
 To: 'Eugene Alvin Villar'
 sea...@gmail.com, 'maning
 sambale'
 emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com
 Cc: 'OSM' talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
 Message-ID: 01f601c9ce60$ee0643a0$ca12ca...@com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 
 Hi All,
 
 
 
 I have to add - have you seen the Boracay map? While it
 looks fantastic that
 it is all mapped out, naming each resort/business there has
 lead to a map
 that looks absolutely bloated and is unreadable at times.
 
 
 
 For example

http://www.openstreetmap.org.ph/map/c/11.960549689657205/121.92536830902
1/17
 / - Mango Ray Shenna's Resort - are those
 two places? One? Which building
 is covered by their name? Multiple buildings or just one?
 
 
 
 A POI should be a notable location that a tourist may be
 interested in - a
 statue, a building, even a public transit location. But
 specific businesses
 (be it fast food joints or specific resorts) only create
 clutter and a mess
 - which will only get worse as businesses are created and
 others go out of
 business.
 
 
 
 Having too much data (especially as part of the primary
 data set) is
 contrary to the spirit of an open user-maintained map.
 
 
 
 -A
 
 
 
 
 
 From: talk-ph-boun...@openstreetmap.org
 [mailto:talk-ph-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of
 Eugene Alvin Villar
 Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 11:28 AM
 To: maning sambale
 Cc: OSM
 Subject: Re: [talk-ph] What level of POIs do we add? (was
 Click the City)
 
 
 
 
 
 On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:18 PM, maning sambale
 emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 Just my take,
 1. If it's on the ground it should be mapped.
 
 
 This is a good guideline in general but of course a line
 has to be drawn
 somewhere (pun not intended). I don't think drawing the
 individual stripes
 of a pedestrian walkway is productive even if it *is* on
 the ground. A map
 is supposed to be a representation--not a facsimile of the
 real world.
 That's why we represent roads in OSM using center lines
 and not (at the
 moment) as areas.
 
 
 2. If somebody bothered to map fishball vendors in Luneta,
 nobody's
 stopping him.
 
 
 Fishball vendors are probably not a good example for your
 point since they
 are too ephemeral to be mapped. But anyway, OSM is a
 community project and
 we work on consensus. While we do encourage people to map
 what they think
 are important, I don't think we should just let people
 map things like
 Location of Mark and Jenny's first kiss,
 right?
 
 3 years ago (am I that old in OSM?), my only goal is to map
 major
 

Re: [talk-ph] What level of POIs do we add? (was Click the City)

2009-05-06 Thread Ed Garcia
Guys,

just merging the thoughts on qualifying POIs ...

how about, in addition to a POI having a street level entrance, we consider
if the POI has prominent building signage?  Some POIs may be inside a
building but have very visible signage outside or in front of the building
that serve as very good landmarks.

:) ed

On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Marloue Pidor mur...@mail2engineer.comwrote:

  In this case


 http://openstreetmap.org/?lat=7.078087lon=125.614181zoom=18layers=B000FTF

 Only KFC, Gerry's Grill and Pizza Hut have street level/accessible
 entrance. So if we agree on that rule of thumb to mapped only if they have
 a separate entrance. Should I remove Jollibee and McDonald's? Or retain the
 data as long as it is not cluttered?

 And in another case


 http://openstreetmap.org/?lat=7.062681lon=125.593989zoom=18layers=B000FTF

 All of these food chains do not have a street level entrance.


 murlwe

 -Original Message-
 From: Ronny Ager-Wick - Develo Ltd. [...@develo.ltd.uk]
 Sent: 5/7/2009 12:05:36 AM
 To: talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
 Subject: Re: [talk-ph] What level of POIs do we add? (was Click the City)
 
 Eugene, I think what you suggest sound sensible. Could we use this as a
 rule of
 thumb:
 If it has a door out to street level, then it can be mapped as a POI.
 This way, a shop or fast foot outlet in a mall can be mapped only if they
 have a
 separate entrance. All other shops are *inside* the mall. This way it's
 also
 consistent with for example a Jollibee that is located on the ground floor
 of an
 office building, as it will have its own entrance.
 Ronny.
 
 Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
 On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Rally de Leon rall...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 If you have access to (data of) all locations of Jollibee, McDonalds,
 7-Eleven,
 Ministops, Mercury Drugs and all these big companies, by all means mark
 them.
 With the exceptions of those already inside big malls (which will just
 clutter
 the map); we only need the mall-building itself as a landmark (POI)
 together
 with position of entrance gates and parking lots.
 
 
 Well, my idea is that if a McDo branch exists as a standalone building
 then
 there's no problem drawing the building outline and adding
 name=McDonald's,
 amenity=fastfood to it. But, as you've said, I don't think that means that
 we
 should also place a point for the McDonald's inside Robinsons Galleria.
 
 This implies that one *cannot* query the OSM database and get the
 coordinate
 locations of *all* the McDonald's branches in Metro Manila (you'll only
 get
 partial info). To get the full information, one should look elsewhere
 (e.g., go
 to www.mcdonaldsph.com, or look at ClicktheCity.com, or even start an
 OpenYellowPages) then geocode the obtained addresses using street data
 from OSM
 to get the actual coordinates. This actually helps create mashups
 applications
 using OSM as a tool.
 
 
 
 --
 http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com
 
 
 ___
 talk-ph mailing list
 talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
 

 ___
 Get the Free email that has everyone talking at http://www.mail2world.com
 Unlimited Email Storage – POP3 – Calendar – SMS – Translator – Much More!

 ___
 talk-ph mailing list
 talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph




-- 
website administrator:
- www.waypoints.ph
- reeflife.eppgarcia.com

PADI Divemaster #491048
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] What level of POIs do we add? (was Click the City)

2009-05-06 Thread Michael Cole
My 2 Centavos on Commercial Establishments,

It is nice to see them on the map but I find that the work to maintain these is 
going to get very difficult and a bulk load is just asking for problems.

Using the Wikipedia data before I found many were out of location or just plain 
wrong, Thus the work to fix is quite a lot and is discouraging at times.

If we just take Makati for an example the police station moved, I thought it 
had and checked the site. Now i live down the road from this and it was not 
updated.

I have tried to move it and checking now at least it is no longer out side the 
city hall which is shown but the police and the fire station have both 
disappeared from where they are 
meant to be..

Now moving down the road from Makati City hall we have McDo but Jollibee which 
is has more customers is not labeled, nor is the fast food shop across the 
street.

So do we want the head ache..

If you work for the establishment EG: McDo Philippines then go ahead and keep 
it up to date...

If you don't then don't add them... 

Places of Cultural Value all should be added first.. (and they don't move..)

Moving further out we have at Jupiter and Makati Ave a McDo listed but once 
again in the wrong place.

Now does it mean that since I live here close I have to double check every week 
the data?  What happens when I move again?

Do I only add the ones I like? And then add bias to the maps? Better to 
exclude..  What happens if I dont like and add it in the wrong place on purpose?

These are my 2 Centavo's


___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] What level of POIs do we add? (was Click the City)

2009-05-06 Thread maning sambale
Just a thought, imagine osm tokyo japan contemplating on this issue.
That would be one hell of a mapping problem. hehehe

But I digress, please move on ...

On 5/7/09, Marloue Pidor mur...@mail2engineer.com wrote:
 It seems to be a good idea but most of these food chains are located in
 front and in most cases on the ground floor/street level and most of
 them have a visible signage. Take for example Glorietta, most of the
 establishments have street level entrance

 Suggestion:
 maybe we can add these mall POIs in such a way that it is not confusing
 and overwhelming.

 When I say overwhelming, think of Mall of Asia if we add all
 establishments with street level entrance it would literally darken the
 perimeter of the building with all the POIs. Well this is just my
 thoughts and I could be wrong. :)


 murlwe

 -Original Message-
From: Ed Garcia [eppgar...@gmail.com]
Sent: 5/7/2009 10:21:44 AM
To: mur...@mail2engineer.com
Cc: r...@develo.ltd.uk;talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-ph] What level of POIs do we add? (was Click the
 City)

Guys,

just merging the thoughts on qualifying POIs ...

how about, in addition to a POI having a street level entrance, we
 consider if
the POI has prominent building signage? Some POIs may be inside a
 building but
have very visible signage outside or in front of the building that
 serve as very
good landmarks.

:) ed


On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Marloue Pidor
 mur...@mail2engineer.com wrote:

In this case

http://openstreetmap.org/?lat=7.078087lon=125.614181zoom=18layers=B0
 00FTF

Only KFC, Gerry's Grill and Pizza Hut have street level/accessible
 entrance. So
if we agree on that rule of thumb to mapped only if they have a
 separate
entrance. Should I remove Jollibee and McDonald's? Or retain the data
 as long as
it is not cluttered?

And in another case

http://openstreetmap.org/?lat=7.062681lon=125.593989zoom=18layers=B0
 00FTF

All of these food chains do not have a street level entrance.


murlwe


-Original Message-
From: Ronny Ager-Wick - Develo Ltd. [...@develo.ltd.uk]
Sent: 5/7/2009 12:05:36 AM
To: talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-ph] What level of POIs do we add? (was Click the
 City)

Eugene, I think what you suggest sound sensible. Could we use this as
 a rule of
thumb:
If it has a door out to street level, then it can be mapped as a
 POI.
This way, a shop or fast foot outlet in a mall can be mapped only if
 they have a
separate entrance. All other shops are *inside* the mall. This way
 it's also
consistent with for example a Jollibee that is located on the ground
 floor of an
office building, as it will have its own entrance.
Ronny.

Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Rally de Leon rall...@gmail.com
 wrote:

If you have access to (data of) all locations of Jollibee, McDonalds,
 7-Eleven,
Ministops, Mercury Drugs and all these big companies, by all means
 mark them.
With the exceptions of those already inside big malls (which will just
 clutter
the map); we only need the mall-building itself as a landmark (POI)
 together
with position of entrance gates and parking lots.


Well, my idea is that if a McDo branch exists as a standalone building
 then
there's no problem drawing the building outline and adding
 name=McDonald's,
amenity=fastfood to it. But, as you've said, I don't think that means
 that we
should also place a point for the McDonald's inside Robinsons
 Galleria.

This implies that one *cannot* query the OSM database and get the
 coordinate
locations of *all* the McDonald's branches in Metro Manila (you'll
 only get
partial info). To get the full information, one should look elsewhere
 (e.g., go

to www.mcdonaldsph.com, or look at ClicktheCity.com, or even start an

OpenYellowPages) then geocode the obtained addresses using street data
 from OSM
to get the actual coordinates. This actually helps create mashups
 applications
using OSM as a tool.



--
http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com


___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

___
Get the Free email that has everyone talking at
 http://www.mail2world.com
Unlimited Email Storage - POP3 - Calendar - SMS - Translator - Much
 More!

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph





--
website administrator:
- www.waypoints.ph
- reeflife.eppgarcia.com

PADI Divemaster #491048


 span id=m2wTlpfont face=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif size=2
 style=font-size:13.5px___BRGet
 the Free email that has everyone talking at a
 href=http://www.mail2world.com target=newhttp://www.mail2world.com/abr
 font color=#99Unlimited Email Storage #150; POP3 #150; Calendar
 #150; SMS #150; Translator #150; Much More!/font/font/span


-- 
cheers,

[talk-ph] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Nominations for State of the Map Travel Scholarships

2009-05-06 Thread maning sambale
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mikel Maron mikel_ma...@yahoo.com
Date: Thu, May 7, 2009 at 1:25 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Nominations for State of the Map Travel Scholarships
To: t...@openstreetmap.org



The OpenStreetMap Foundation is excited to announce a program to cover
full travel and accomodations costs for 15 mappers to attend State of
the Map. We're seeking nominations from the community for potential
mappers.

Generally, we are seeking people from places where costs would
prohibit attendance, developing countries, and places that are
interesting geopolitically. The ideal candidates for funding are
from countries with a small OSM community, perhaps just a few mappers
in total. They have made a significant start at mapping their city,
either through Yahoo imagery or with their own GPS, and are directly
familiar with the process of OSM. They may have started communicating
among themselves, and made plans and scoped out the process for their
local district. But, the community is nowhere near critical mass, and
they need the inspiration and support to take OSM to the next level.

We need to act fast. State of the Map is just over two months away,
tickets and visas need to be arranged. In order to allow enough time
for all the arrangements, the nomination period will be short, one
week only, ending next Wednesday, May 13. From the nominations
received, we'll review the list and choose 15 mappers to approach with
the offer. Depending on their availability to attend, we'll work our
way through the list. We only recently secured funding for this
program, so the process has to be quick.

Please send your nominations to sotm.scholars...@gmail.com. For each
nomination, include the mappers name, OSM user name, email address,
location, and a paragraph or two on why they'd be great to have at
SOTM.

And also, please forward this message to other relevant local OSM lists.

As for regions, here are a few regions that seem to fit the bill, but
nominations are not limited to these places at all.

* Eastern Europe: the Caucasus, Russia, Bulgaria, Romania.
* Arab States: Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt. Egypt is particularly
interesting, as the ban on GPS units there was recently lifted.
* South Asia: India, Pakistan. While both countries have seen
significant activities, relative to size and population they are in
the very early stages.
* Southeast Asia: Phillipines, Vietnam, Thailand.
* South America: Colombia, Bolivia, Peru. Promising leads in
government for the release of data for use in OSM.
* East Africa: Kenya is a hotspot for mapping right now (Ushahidi,
AgCommons, MapMaker..)

Many thanks to the Open Society Institute for helping make this happen.

-Mikel

___
talk mailing list
t...@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk




-- 
cheers,
maning
--
Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] [OSM-talk] Nominations for State of the Map Travel Scholarships

2009-05-06 Thread maning sambale
We are mentioned here:
 * Southeast Asia: Phillipines, Vietnam, Thailand.
Anybody willing to represent OSM-PH?  I guess it's worth trying to
nominate one from the group.

On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 1:39 PM, maning sambale
emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
 -- Forwarded message --
 From: Mikel Maron mikel_ma...@yahoo.com
 Date: Thu, May 7, 2009 at 1:25 PM
 Subject: [OSM-talk] Nominations for State of the Map Travel Scholarships
 To: t...@openstreetmap.org



 The OpenStreetMap Foundation is excited to announce a program to cover
 full travel and accomodations costs for 15 mappers to attend State of
 the Map. We're seeking nominations from the community for potential
 mappers.

 Generally, we are seeking people from places where costs would
 prohibit attendance, developing countries, and places that are
 interesting geopolitically. The ideal candidates for funding are
 from countries with a small OSM community, perhaps just a few mappers
 in total. They have made a significant start at mapping their city,
 either through Yahoo imagery or with their own GPS, and are directly
 familiar with the process of OSM. They may have started communicating
 among themselves, and made plans and scoped out the process for their
 local district. But, the community is nowhere near critical mass, and
 they need the inspiration and support to take OSM to the next level.

 We need to act fast. State of the Map is just over two months away,
 tickets and visas need to be arranged. In order to allow enough time
 for all the arrangements, the nomination period will be short, one
 week only, ending next Wednesday, May 13. From the nominations
 received, we'll review the list and choose 15 mappers to approach with
 the offer. Depending on their availability to attend, we'll work our
 way through the list. We only recently secured funding for this
 program, so the process has to be quick.

 Please send your nominations to sotm.scholars...@gmail.com. For each
 nomination, include the mappers name, OSM user name, email address,
 location, and a paragraph or two on why they'd be great to have at
 SOTM.

 And also, please forward this message to other relevant local OSM lists.

 As for regions, here are a few regions that seem to fit the bill, but
 nominations are not limited to these places at all.

 * Eastern Europe: the Caucasus, Russia, Bulgaria, Romania.
 * Arab States: Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt. Egypt is particularly
 interesting, as the ban on GPS units there was recently lifted.
 * South Asia: India, Pakistan. While both countries have seen
 significant activities, relative to size and population they are in
 the very early stages.
 * Southeast Asia: Phillipines, Vietnam, Thailand.
 * South America: Colombia, Bolivia, Peru. Promising leads in
 government for the release of data for use in OSM.
 * East Africa: Kenya is a hotspot for mapping right now (Ushahidi,
 AgCommons, MapMaker..)

 Many thanks to the Open Society Institute for helping make this happen.

 -Mikel

 ___
 talk mailing list
 t...@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk




 --
 cheers,
 maning
 --
 Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden
 wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
 blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
 --




-- 
cheers,
maning
--
Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph


Re: [talk-ph] [OSM-talk] Nominations for State of the Map Travel Scholarships

2009-05-06 Thread Rally de Leon
i would like to nominate Maning Sambale to represent the OSM-PH. :-)

On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 1:47 PM, maning sambale
emmanuel.samb...@gmail.comwrote:

 We are mentioned here:
  * Southeast Asia: Phillipines, Vietnam, Thailand.
 Anybody willing to represent OSM-PH?  I guess it's worth trying to
 nominate one from the group.

 On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 1:39 PM, maning sambale
 emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
  -- Forwarded message --
  From: Mikel Maron mikel_ma...@yahoo.com
  Date: Thu, May 7, 2009 at 1:25 PM
  Subject: [OSM-talk] Nominations for State of the Map Travel Scholarships
  To: t...@openstreetmap.org
 
 
 
  The OpenStreetMap Foundation is excited to announce a program to cover
  full travel and accomodations costs for 15 mappers to attend State of
  the Map. We're seeking nominations from the community for potential
  mappers.
 
  Generally, we are seeking people from places where costs would
  prohibit attendance, developing countries, and places that are
  interesting geopolitically. The ideal candidates for funding are
  from countries with a small OSM community, perhaps just a few mappers
  in total. They have made a significant start at mapping their city,
  either through Yahoo imagery or with their own GPS, and are directly
  familiar with the process of OSM. They may have started communicating
  among themselves, and made plans and scoped out the process for their
  local district. But, the community is nowhere near critical mass, and
  they need the inspiration and support to take OSM to the next level.
 
  We need to act fast. State of the Map is just over two months away,
  tickets and visas need to be arranged. In order to allow enough time
  for all the arrangements, the nomination period will be short, one
  week only, ending next Wednesday, May 13. From the nominations
  received, we'll review the list and choose 15 mappers to approach with
  the offer. Depending on their availability to attend, we'll work our
  way through the list. We only recently secured funding for this
  program, so the process has to be quick.
 
  Please send your nominations to sotm.scholars...@gmail.com. For each
  nomination, include the mappers name, OSM user name, email address,
  location, and a paragraph or two on why they'd be great to have at
  SOTM.
 
  And also, please forward this message to other relevant local OSM lists.
 
  As for regions, here are a few regions that seem to fit the bill, but
  nominations are not limited to these places at all.
 
  * Eastern Europe: the Caucasus, Russia, Bulgaria, Romania.
  * Arab States: Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt. Egypt is particularly
  interesting, as the ban on GPS units there was recently lifted.
  * South Asia: India, Pakistan. While both countries have seen
  significant activities, relative to size and population they are in
  the very early stages.
  * Southeast Asia: Phillipines, Vietnam, Thailand.
  * South America: Colombia, Bolivia, Peru. Promising leads in
  government for the release of data for use in OSM.
  * East Africa: Kenya is a hotspot for mapping right now (Ushahidi,
  AgCommons, MapMaker..)
 
  Many thanks to the Open Society Institute for helping make this happen.
 
  -Mikel
 
  ___
  talk mailing list
  t...@openstreetmap.org
  http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
 
 
 
 
  --
  cheers,
  maning
  --
  Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden
  wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
  blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
  --
 



 --
 cheers,
 maning
 --
 Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden
 wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
 blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
 --

 ___
 talk-ph mailing list
 talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph