Version 4?

2007-05-21 Thread Graham Foster
I've had a long list of ignored suggestions. My primary beef is areound adress 
handling, particularly of address book groups and distributions lists. These 
woul dbe nice to have fixed / included
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3758
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=2995
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3643
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=718
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6362
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3004
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4328
-- 
Graham
(via gmane and the web)



 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Mod: HTML use (was: When to expect first betas of v4 ?)

2007-05-21 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Gleason,

On Sun, 20 May 2007 21:09:34 -0400GMT (21-5-2007, 3:09, where I live),
you wrote:

GP Gleason
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Gleason.

  '

Please do not send HTML messages to the list except for purposes of
testing. While the merits of HTML are debatable, and have been
discussed numerous times on the lists, the list rules prohibit HTML
e-mail. You can easily automate this by using %SetEditor=1 in your
list template.

To find out why these MOD messages are posted to the list instead of
private mail, please read the welcome message you received when you
subscribed.

Thank you.
/moderator

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

Moderators don't need a license. They just do it.


pgpyebxJlSBA2.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Deleted tab

2007-05-21 Thread Hendrik Oesterlin
Rick Grunwald wrote on 21/05/2007 at 03:47:22 +1100 
subject Deleted tab :

 Hello Thomas
 On Saturday, May 19, 2007 you wrote:

 If you create a wish-list item, I'll support it.

 I did create one and several people were interested in it.
 I just went into the bug tracker and it seems to be gone

It is not gone, not even deleted
http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6153

-- 
Sincerely 
Hendrik Oesterlin - email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TheBat! 3.99.6 and Regula Anti-Spam Plugin 2.2.6.0   on Windows 2000



___ 
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de



 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Deleted tab

2007-05-21 Thread Rick Grunwald
Hello Hendrik
On Monday, May 21, 2007 you wrote:

 I did create one and several people were interested in it.
 I just went into the bug tracker and it seems to be gone

 It is not gone, not even deleted
 http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6153

I could NOT find it yesterday for the life of me
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6153#bugnotes

Ok lets get out the pitch barrels, torches and pitchforks and march
on RItlabs - someone bring some rope just in case :D
-- 
Rick
The Bat Version 3.99.7






 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Wish: Adding contact's photo to MailTicker

2007-05-21 Thread vitalie vrabie
Marek Mikus wrote:
 anybody is interested in wish to display contact's photo to MailTicker? :-)

 https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6368
   
aha. sure. and the picture should be taken at the moment when the
message was sent (or queued for sending).


-- 
Signed,
  Vitalie.



 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Wish: Adding contact's photo to MailTicker

2007-05-21 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all,
Monday, May 21, 2007, vitalie vrabie wrote:

 Marek Mikus wrote:
 anybody is interested in wish to display contact's photo to MailTicker? :-)

 https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6368
   
 aha. sure. and the picture should be taken at the moment when the
 message was sent (or queued for sending).

You are using MailTicker for outgoing messages to create picture when
sending them? Or You did not understood this wish?

I am talking about images added to AddressBook or stored in IMAGES folder,
same image displayed in Message Header Pane.

-- 

Bye

Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz

Using the best The Bat! 3.99.7
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, NOD32 Antivirus plugin and AntispamSniper v 
2.0.1.2

Notebook Toshiba, Core2 Duo 1.83 GHz, 1 GB RAM


 




 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


RE: Wish: Adding contact's photo to MailTicker

2007-05-21 Thread Vilius Šumskas
 Marek Mikus wrote:
  anybody is interested in wish to display contact's photo to
 MailTicker? :-)
 
  https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6368
 
 aha. sure. and the picture should be taken at the moment when the
 message was sent (or queued for sending).

Sometimes I don't understand why everybody is trying to invent the wheel. The 
Bat! is email client and not instant messenger. If I wanted to use Mail Chat, 
Emoticons, Rogueicons, etc. I've just used Skype or Windows Messenger. I don't 
want to see Photo of the person who sent me mail. Usually the people I want to 
see I see in real life, and for those I don't - I don't. All I want is stable 
email (IMAP) client with some pieces of templates and good HTML support (Gecko, 
Trident or any other platform).

-- 
  Best Regards,

  Vilius Šumskas
  LNK TV system administrator
  mob.: +370 614 75713
  http://www.lnk.lt




 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Wish: Adding contact's photo to MailTicker

2007-05-21 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all,
Monday, May 21, 2007, Vilius Šumskas wrote:

 Sometimes I don't understand why everybody is trying to invent the
 wheel. The Bat! is email client and not instant messenger. If I wanted to
 use Mail Chat, Emoticons, Rogueicons, etc. I've just used Skype or
 Windows Messenger. I don't want to see Photo of the person who sent me
 mail. Usually the people I want to see I see in real life, and for those
 I don't - I don't. All I want is stable email (IMAP) client with some
 pieces of templates and good HTML support (Gecko, Trident or any other
 platform).

OK, use Skype or Windows messenger, if You want, but I do not use them and
many people I know do not use them too.

AFAIK adding image to MailTicker must be simplier than implementing Gecko
and let me use Your comparison - The Bat! is email client and not web
browser.

-- 

Bye

Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz

Using the best The Bat! 3.99.7
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, NOD32 Antivirus plugin and AntispamSniper v 
2.0.1.2

Notebook Toshiba, Core2 Duo 1.83 GHz, 1 GB RAM


 




 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Wish: Adding contact's photo to MailTicker

2007-05-21 Thread vitalie vrabie
Marek Mikus wrote:
 I am talking about images added to AddressBook or stored in IMAGES folder,
 same image displayed in Message Header Pane.
   
oh, sure. and the message header pane should display fresh images too.

of course, falling back to what you said in case the contact didn't care
to have a webcam handy.


-- 
Signed,
  Vitalie.



 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Header pane drifting

2007-05-21 Thread Jernej Simončič
In very long threads, my header pane starts pretty uselessly drifting
to the left (Image1.png), instead of staying put (Image2.png). This is
fairly annoying, as the view doesn't change back when going to another
thread, making it impossible to see what you're actually looking at.

Also, is there a setting that would keep the columns fixed? I don't
want them to automatically adjust to the depth of the thread - I'd
much rather see that too deep nodes would start at the left side
again, with differently coloured treelines (eg. similarly to how
Dialog newsreader does it - Dialog.png)

-- 
 Jernej Simončič  http://deepthought.ena.si/ 

A successful symposium depends on the ratio of meeting to eating.
   -- Zusmann's Rule

[The Bat! v3.99.3 on Windows 2003 5.2.3790.Service Pack 2]
attachment: Image1.pngattachment: Image2.pngattachment: dialog.png
 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Wish: Adding contact's photo to MailTicker

2007-05-21 Thread Randy
--On Monday, May 21, 2007 4:55 AM, Marek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 AFAIK adding image to MailTicker must be simplier than implementing Gecko
 and let me use Your comparison - The Bat! is email client and not web
 browser.

This is not a reasonable argument.  The Bat! isn't a web browser but,
unfortunately, a lot of people like to treat the e-mail they send as
web pages which forces mail clients to implement, at the very least, a
rudimentary HTML display system (which The Bat! has).  This is far from
a full-fledged browser and thankfully so.

Now, having said that, I like eye candy and little pictures of
contacts (or even a customizable icon symbol to immediately show which
account an e-mail was sent to) is kind of neat.

But, let's let Ritlabs finish making IMAP stable.  I *still* have to
restart The Bat! several times a day because the IMAP queue gets
stuck.
--
 :R.




pgpZmcCQScHw5.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Voyager - a break through moment.

2007-05-21 Thread Nick Danger
The one major complaint I've had with using Voyager was that it took
around 15 minutes for it to clear itself from Window's processes after
shutting it down. If I shut it down and suddenly remembered something
I needed it for I had to go in and manually stop it before I could
restart Voyager.

Anyway... I found out the culprit, and it kills me that it was so easy
that I've struggled with it this long. The solution? I reformatted my
USB drive to NTFS. I'm guessing it came formatted as FAT as I never
bothered to reformat it upon buying it. Running it as NTFS, I can
close Voyager down and it closes and clears memory faster almost
instantaneously.

So if anyone else has had this problem of voyager.exe hanging around
in memory for far too long, check to see how your USB drive is
formatted - it may make a difference.

-- 
ò.ó Nick
 Danger

[MUA: TB! Voyager 3.99.4]
[OS: Windows XP 5 1]






 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Voyager - a break through moment.

2007-05-21 Thread Vili
 The one major complaint I've had with using Voyager was that it took
 around 15 minutes for it to clear itself from Window's processes after
 shutting it down. If I shut it down and suddenly remembered something
 I needed it for I had to go in and manually stop it before I could
 restart Voyager.
 Anyway... I found out the culprit, and it kills me that it was so easy
 that I've struggled with it this long. The solution? I reformatted my
 USB drive to NTFS. I'm guessing it came formatted as FAT as I never
 bothered to reformat it upon buying it. Running it as NTFS, I can
 close Voyager down and it closes and clears memory faster almost
 instantaneously.
 So if anyone else has had this problem of voyager.exe hanging around
 in memory for far too long, check to see how your USB drive is
 formatted - it may make a difference.

I think, it was not the FAT/NTFS change. It was the fact that when you
reformatted the drive, you inherently defragmented the drive.

-- 
Vili



 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Voyager - a break through moment.

2007-05-21 Thread Nick Danger
Reply to message sent 05/21/2007, @ 11:02:29 (10:02 AM Locally)
~~~
Hello Vili,

 I think, it was not the FAT/NTFS change. It was the fact that when
 you reformatted the drive, you inherently defragmented the drive.

Well, I was about to say I didn't think so as I had defragged the
drive before hoping that would help but it didn't. But before sending
off that post I figured I'd try some actual testing and reformatted
back to FAT to see what would happened. Fired up Voyager, and quit -
and sure enough it just sat there hanging around in memory until I
went in and killed it myself.

So I can confidently say that at least in my case the change to NTFS
solved the problem.

-- 
ò.ó Nick
 Danger

[MUA: TB! Voyager 3.99.4]
[OS: Windows XP 5 1]






 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Bat download message problems

2007-05-21 Thread Timothy Casten



After using the bat since its early beginnings I have had to begin 
the task of looking for alternate email client.

Two problems one just surfaced recently.
1.  Extremely large delay when sending emails, the bat connects to 
the email server and just sits there for approximately 30 seconds 
before starting to send the email.
2.  I leave the bat on all day, and retrieve new messages every 5 
minutes, After running the bat for an hour or so it locks up when 
downloading messages, it will just sit there with the last message 
being downloaded and will never finish, if i use the task manager to 
close it i get a invalid handle exception error from the bat.  No 
certain message causes this it just reappears at random.  I have gone 
back in Bat builds clear to last spring and it still happens, if I 
cant fix this I will be saying goodbye to the bat.

Any ideas?

--
Tim 




Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Voyager - a break through moment.

2007-05-21 Thread Vili
 I think, it was not the FAT/NTFS change. It was the fact that when
 you reformatted the drive, you inherently defragmented the drive.
 Well, I was about to say I didn't think so as I had defragged the
 drive before hoping that would help but it didn't. But before sending
 off that post I figured I'd try some actual testing and reformatted
 back to FAT to see what would happened. Fired up Voyager, and quit -
 and sure enough it just sat there hanging around in memory until I
 went in and killed it myself.
 So I can confidently say that at least in my case the change to NTFS
 solved the problem.

Ok. Then I must agree with you :)

-- 
Vili



 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Voyager - a break through moment.

2007-05-21 Thread vitalie vrabie
Vili wrote:
 I think, it was not the FAT/NTFS change. It was the fact that when you
 reformatted the drive, you inherently defragmented the drive.
   
obviously, you're too busy enjoying conventional hard drives in an usb
enclosure, so, at the moment, you simply can't figure out that not all
usb drives have any moving heads...


-- 
Signed,
  Vitalie.



 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Wish: Adding contact's photo to MailTicker

2007-05-21 Thread Cricket
On Mon, 21 May 2007 15:15:25 +0300
 vitalie vrabie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marek Mikus wrote:
 I am talking about images added to AddressBook or stored in IMAGES folder,
 same image displayed in Message Header Pane.
   
oh, sure. and the message header pane should display fresh images too.

of course, falling back to what you said in case the contact didn't care
to have a webcam handy.


There is a good idea imbedded in there ...
If cam is available and option is selected,  have a quick pic taken/attached
to email when you hit send.  Those 3 A.M.  emails are surely going to scare
someone. :-)

LCB
-- 
There are more airplanes on the bottom of the ocean than submarines in the
sky.


 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Voyager - a break through moment.

2007-05-21 Thread Doug Higby
Hello Nick,

Monday, May 21, 2007, 2:25:51 PM, you wrote:
 I reformatted my USB drive to NTFS. I'm guessing it came formatted
 as FAT as I never bothered to reformat it upon buying it. Running it
 as NTFS, I can close Voyager down and it closes and clears memory
 faster almost instantaneously.

How many Voyager lives did you use up in this test?  It seems that
every time I reformat my drive, I have to reactivate the key.  I think
I am down to one or two activations left, so I am not eager to procede
with the reformat to NTFS, even though I've been wanting to do this
for some time.


-- 
Best regards,
 Dougmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
TheBat! Voyager 3.99.4
on Windows XP



 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Voyager - a break through moment.

2007-05-21 Thread Nick Danger
Reply to message sent 05/21/2007, @ 16:27:20 (11:27 AM Locally)
~~~
Hello Doug,

 How many Voyager lives did you use up in this test?  It seems that
 every time I reformat my drive, I have to reactivate the key.  I
 think I am down to one or two activations left, so I am not eager to
 procede with the reformat to NTFS, even though I've been wanting to
 do this for some time.

Just one. As the drive ID includes format I needed a new one for the
NTFS format. Other than that I just change the volume ID number back
to what it was before reformatting. I use both a USB stick and USB
external drive but have them both ID'd the same so I can just update
whatever drive I want to use with my current Voyager installation and
run with it.

HTH

-- 
ò.ó Nick
 Danger

[MUA: TB! Voyager 3.99.4]
[OS: Windows XP 5 1]






 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Voyager - a break through moment.

2007-05-21 Thread Vili
 Vili wrote:
 I think, it was not the FAT/NTFS change. It was the fact that when you
 reformatted the drive, you inherently defragmented the drive.
 obviously, you're too busy enjoying conventional hard drives in an usb
 enclosure, so, at the moment, you simply can't figure out that not all
 usb drives have any moving heads...

Doug Higby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on May 11:

In  my  experience, every USB memory stick is different. The one I am
using  now reads and writes at 16MBits per second, and my previous one
was only 8. There is a free utility on the web to test your speed, but
it is on my office computer and I forget what it is called.

A  second  factor  that  really improved my speed was defragmenting my
Voyager  drive.  I  never  thought  to  do  this  and  **wow**  was it
fragmented!

Also readthis:
http://searchwincomputing.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid68_gci1220272,00.html

Vitalie:

-  if you are pissed off of me because I did not accept the invitation
to  your  professional  network, I am sorry, I just dont have the time
for  any  extra  online  activity  beside  the  4  kids, my job and my
business.

- if you just kick into anybody because of your ego.. well, that is
your problem. Try to accept the fact that you are not God.

-- 
Vili



 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Bat download message problems

2007-05-21 Thread Doug Higby
Hello Timothy,

Monday, May 21, 2007, 3:32:06 PM, you wrote:


 1.  Extremely large delay when sending emails, the bat connects to
 the email server and just sits there for approximately 30 seconds 
 before starting to send the email.

Your problems could be related to a poor DNS server.  If it is
standard pop3 and smtp, you could try using the tcpip address instead
of mail.domain.com, or you could set your computer to use the opendns
DNS servers (just Google OpenDNS).

If using wireless, it could be a problem with your wireless protocol,
where it fades in and out of connection.

Or, it could be your email host that is overworked and slow to
respond.

What is your server timeout set to in account properties under
Transport ?

 2.  I leave the bat on all day, and retrieve new messages every 5
 minutes, After running the bat for an hour or so it locks up when 
 downloading messages, it will just sit there with the last message 
 being downloaded and will never finish.

I've had this behaviour too with poor internet connections and a dozen
people trying to connect on a wireless connection.  If you tell us
that Outlook Express races through sending and receiving, then there
may be reason to suspect that The Bat! is at fault.

-- 
Best regards,
 Dougmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
TheBat! Voyager 3.99.4
on Windows XP



 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


OTF Encryption and defrag

2007-05-21 Thread Neal Laugman
Hi TBBETA,

After seeing Nick's thread on Voyager and reformatting USB sticks (I
always use NTFS on 'em) I realized I had forgotten to mention
something.

I have had mailbase corruption more than once when using OTF and
having Diskeeper running in the background. It took several times for
me to theorize what was happening, and I still do not have absolute
conclusive truth, but I believe Diskeeper running on automatic can
cause corruption on larger mailbases. I'm sure the same may hold true
for Voyager, too.

-- 
Regards, Neal
  Using TheBat! v3.99.6 on Windows XP Service Pack 2



 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Voyager - a break through moment.

2007-05-21 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Nick,

Monday, May 21, 2007, 4:25:51 PM, you wrote:

ND So if anyone else has had this problem of voyager.exe hanging around
ND in memory for far too long, check to see how your USB drive is
ND formatted - it may make a difference.

Are you talking about a USB HD or a USB memory stick?


-- 
Best Wishes,
Mark 
   
using 
The Bat! Version 3.99.6 
MyMacros 1.11a

zOmbie's Macros Version 0.7 
Windows 2000 Professional/5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 4 (0 days 12:43:16) on
Uno AMD Duron




 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Voyager - a break through moment.

2007-05-21 Thread Nick Danger
Reply to message sent 05/21/2007, @ 21:27:25 (2:27 PM Locally)
~~~
Hello Mark,

 Are you talking about a USB HD or a USB memory stick?

Memory stick, but it was purchasing a USB hard drive that brought the
problem to light. I formatted the hard drive to remove all the
preinstalled stuff I didn't want and then changed the volume ID. When
Voyager needed to be reactivated, that's what caused me to realize I
never formatted my USB stick and it was FAT. So to make it easy to
swap Voyager back and forth I formatted my stick to NTFS and BAM! I
noticed how quickly Voyager suddenly exited memory.

I didn't format the hard drive to FAT to see if that caused Voyager to
hang on it. Mainly because I already have a bunch of stuff on it and
don't feel like dealing with the hassle.

-- 
ò.ó Nick
 Danger

[MUA: TB! Voyager 3.99.4]
[OS: Windows XP 5 1]





 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Voyager activation problem

2007-05-21 Thread Vili
I  just  had  a  user  who experienced problems with the activation of
Voyager.  He did everything okay, but he still got the following error
message in Internet Explorer when he pressed the Fetch key button:

ERROR Text string is too long (should not exceed 250 characters)

I tried with his reg. key (put his USB stick's Volume ID in the link),
no problem at me.

As  we  finally  figured  out,  the  problem was that he used Internet
Explorer v7, I used IE6. IE7 replaces the final = (equation) character
in  the link that points to the secure Ritlabs site when you press the
Fetch key with %3D, the ascii code of the character =.

In my browser:
https://support.ritlabs.com/...TokenSernum=NTFS-KeyBlock=AW...Yy0=

in his IE7 browser:
https://support.ritlabs.com/...TokenSernum=NTFS-KeyBlock=AW...Yy0%3D

So, conclusion: IE6, Firefox can be used to get the Activation key,
IE7 does not... Maybe Ritlabs should change something how it handles
this queries on its server?

-- 
Vili



 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


RE: Voyager activation problem

2007-05-21 Thread Vilius Šumskas
 As  we  finally  figured  out,  the  problem was that he used Internet
 Explorer v7, I used IE6. IE7 replaces the final = (equation) character
 in  the link that points to the secure Ritlabs site when you press the
 Fetch key with %3D, the ascii code of the character =.

As it should. Character = cannot be used in data representation of the URL. 
It must be URL encoded (see 
http://www.blooberry.com/indexdot/html/topics/urlencoding.htm).
 
-- 
  Best Regards,

  Vilius Šumskas
  LNK TV system administrator
  mob.: +370 614 75713
  http://www.lnk.lt



 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Voyager - a break through moment.

2007-05-21 Thread vitalie vrabie
Vili wrote:
 A  second  factor  that  really improved my speed was defragmenting my
 Voyager  drive.  I  never  thought  to  do  this  and  **wow**  was it
 fragmented!
   
and? so what? was the drive formatted with NTFS or FAT? unlike FAT,
fragmented NTFS files do take extra structures to be read, thus slowing
the speed. not as much as with moving mechanical heads, but it might
somehow get noticeable. and NTFS fragmentation may take extra space too,
although it usually fits in the MFT.

 - if you just kick into anybody because of your ego.. well, that is
 your problem. Try to accept the fact that you are not God.
   
LOL. oh, my dear Oracle...


-- 
Signed,
  Vitalie.



 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Voyager activation problem

2007-05-21 Thread Vili
Hello Vilius,

 As  we  finally  figured  out,  the  problem was that he used Internet
 Explorer v7, I used IE6. IE7 replaces the final = (equation) character
 in  the link that points to the secure Ritlabs site when you press the
 Fetch key with %3D, the ascii code of the character =.
 As it should. Character = cannot be used in data representation
 of the URL. It must be URL encoded (see
 http://www.blooberry.com/indexdot/html/topics/urlencoding.htm).

I cant open that page, but I trust you. All I can say that IE6 did not
encode the =.

-- 
Vili
The Bat 3.99.6 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Szervizcsomag 2



 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Voyager - a break through moment.

2007-05-21 Thread vitalie vrabie
Vili wrote:
 -  if you are pissed off of me because I did not accept the invitation
 to  your  professional  network, I am sorry, I just dont have the time
 for  any  extra  online  activity  beside  the  4  kids, my job and my
 business.
   
waitaminute. you have 4 kids, and you dare calling *me* hyperactive?
what are you trying to insinuate???


-- 
Signed,
  Vitalie.



 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html