Re: Strange behaviour of calendar

2023-05-10 Thread Gwen via TBBETA
Hello The,

On Tue, 9 May 2023, at 17:32:24 [GMT +0200] (which was 17:32 where I
live) Martin wrote:

> It seems to me that a calendar setup (I didn't do anything) tries to 
> connect Google - but in the new browser window there is an error about
> an authorising error.

Same for me, strangeness: Defailt browser is started with Google OAuth 
window and not internal CEF brwoser as in the past.

> Where can I stop this?

I hope this:
Account Property → Calendar → Set to "store calendar locally" 
Restart The Bat!

-- 
Regards
Gwen

Using The Bat! Version 10.3.3.11 (32-bit) on Windows 11 10.0 (Build 22621 )

pgpXLX2orSvkJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Strange behaviour of calendar

2023-05-09 Thread Martin
Hi TBBETA

It seems to me that a calendar setup (I didn't do anything) tries to 
connect Google - but in the new browser window there is an error about 
an authorising error.

Where can I stop this?

-- 
Best regards,
  Martin mailto:mar...@postzone.org

TheBat! 10.3.3.11 Pro (64bit, with OTFE) on Windows 10.0 19045 



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: RE to Re: 9.0.0.4 - very strange behaviour

2019-10-06 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Sunday, October 6, 2019, 15:56:08, Peter Hampf wrote:

> Just because it seems that nobody else has this strange problem, I
> have made a screenvideo just to show how it is here:

To me that looks like the Original Text pane - when I click Reply, the
pane also takes a moment before it appears, and the lack of bottom
notch on the scrollbar suggests that it's extended below the bottom
edge of the window (that this is possible is definitely a bug).

Does anything happen if you toggle the "Original text" option in the
View menu?

-- 
< Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< https://eternallybored.org/ >

Create the impression that you have already reached your level of incompetence.
   -- Peter's Rule for Creative Incompetence

TheBat! Version 9.0.0.4 (ALPHA) (64-bit), Windows 10.0.18362 



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: RE to Re: 9.0.0.4 - very strange behaviour

2019-10-06 Thread Peter Hampf
Just because it seems that nobody else has this strange problem, I
have made a screenvideo just to show how it is here:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jvWYCeLvGETy3PJS5GzwEOMUyFtNcJir/view?usp=sharing

-- 
Regards, Peter

  ... from his GMail account ...
  Usually using TB - latest version :-)


'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 9.0.0.4 - very strange behaviour

2019-10-05 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Saturday, October 5, 2019, 18:44:58, Peter Hampf wrote:

> As soon as I hit reply, it lasts a second and the *original text*
> appears in the text window - not the expected quoted text! After
> that I cannot type a single character in that window, only the
> header lines are accessible. So replying is impossible at all. The
> strange thing is that I cannot reply even after going back to
> 8.8.9.10, dated August 27th. My guess is that something happened to
> the configuration files after using v9-alpha that confuses TB completely ..

Check if the original message pane is stretched all the way to the
bottom (it may even extend below the bottom edge of the window - try
maximizing it if you can't see the draggable splitter). You can also
try to hide the original message pane through View → Original text.

-- 
< Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< https://eternallybored.org/ >

He that lives upon Hope dies farting.
   -- Franklin's Observation

TheBat! Version 9.0.0.4 (ALPHA) (64-bit), Windows 10.0.18362 



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Strange behaviour

2011-07-25 Thread Gunivortus Goos

 still have the annoying problem below.
 No one here how this can be stopped?

Obviously no solution for my TB-problem below.
sigh then I'll downgrade.

 TB is running in the background.
 TB called on the screen, I click on some folder to view recieved mail.
 TB pops up a small window, telling me,
 ... K bytes of storage space released
 Another folder, another popup appears, telling:
 Looks like no folder processing is nessesary.
 This happens almost every time I want to read recieved mail, no matter
 what folder.

 Hoever, I've set compressing folders on exit, but this happens while
 TB is running... there's no exit, TB runs all day until the computer is
 shut down in the evening.
 How can I deactivate this behaviour?
 It is really annoying.

-- 
Regards,
Gunivortus
Using The Bat Vs. 5.0.18.6 (BETA) under Windows 7 64 bit  POP3 only.



 Current beta is 5.0.18.12 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Strange behaviour

2011-07-20 Thread Gunivortus Goos
Hi,

still have the annoying problem below.
No one here how this can be stopped?

 TB is running in the background.
 TB called on the screen, I click on some folder to view recieved mail.
 TB pops up a small window, telling me,
 ... K bytes of storage space released
 Another folder, another popup appears, telling:
 Looks like no folder processing is nessesary.
 This happens almost every time I want to read recieved mail, no matter
 what folder.

 Hoever, I've set compressing folders on exit, but this happens while
 TB is running... there's no exit, TB runs all day until the computer is
 shut down in the evening.

 How can I deactivate this behaviour?
 It is really annoying.



 Current beta is 5.0.18.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Strange behaviour

2011-07-14 Thread Gunivortus Goos
Hi,

TB is running in the background.
TB called on the screen, I click on some folder to view recieved mail.
TB pops up a small window, telling me,
... K bytes of storage space released
Another folder, another popup appears, telling:
Looks like no folder processing is nessesary.
This happens almost every time I want to read recieved mail, no matter
what folder.

Hoever, I've set compressing folders on exit, but this happens while
TB is running... there's no exit, TB runs all day until the computer is
shut down in the evening.

How can I deactivate this behaviour?
It is really annoying.

-- 
Regards,
Gunivortus
Using The Bat Vs. 5.0.18.2 (BETA) under Windows 7 64 bit  POP3 only.



 Current beta is 5.0.18.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


strange behaviour with View-settings

2008-08-04 Thread Albrecht Backhaus
I marked the option RFC-822 headers in the View menu.

Wenn you click on various the messages in the list you get different 
results in the preview pane. Some mails show the headers others not. 
Mails written with TB e.g. don't show the headers although these option 
is selected.

I then open such a TB generated message. Right mousclick pops up the 
menu with the option RFC-822 headers already marked - but no headers 
are shown. Uncheck the option - no change - right mouseclick again and 
check the option brings up the header but the message completely 
dissapears ... (normaly when you select the header option the header 
line are shown first and the message is displayed below)

Regards, Albrecht



 Current beta is 4.0.26.5 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: strange behaviour with View-settings

2008-08-04 Thread Zygmunt Wereszczyński
Albrecht Backhaus wrote:
 I marked the option RFC-822 headers in the View menu.

 Wenn you click on various the messages in the list you get different
 results in the preview pane. Some mails show the headers others not.
 Mails written with TB e.g. don't show the headers although these option
 is selected.

How about the Headers tag in the message preview pane? Now this is the 
place for the header display.

--
Best regards,
Zygmunt Wereszczynski



 Current beta is 4.0.26.5 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: strange behaviour

2006-12-08 Thread Aurel Branzeanu
Dear Peter!

No, would you file one?

07.12.2006 10:24 you wrote:

PH Answering a 4 days old message (Sunday, December 3, 2006, 17:00)

PH Hello Aurel,

AB Could anyone confirm this?

PH Since there are no more than 2 responses, I doubt that this is a general
PH problem. Have you filed a bug report at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt ?



-- 
Sincerely yours,

Aurel Branzeanu,
Chief Manager
Riscom Computers
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: tvorogov
ICQ: 28282801
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fix: +373 22 88-8894
GSM: +373 7 940-7700
fax: +373 22 23-8899



 Current beta is 3.86.08 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Mod: Top posting (was: strange behaviour)

2006-12-08 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Aurel,

On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 20:18:06 +0200GMT (8-12-2006, 19:18 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:

AB No, would you file one?

AB 07.12.2006 10:24 you wrote:

PH Answering a 4 days old message (Sunday, December 3, 2006, 17:00)

moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Aurel.

  '

This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting.

Top posting, i.e., typing all your reply text at the top of your
message and following it with all quoted text below, is not
encouraged and we actually request that you not do so on this list
because

a) It makes it difficult to glean context from what you typed at the
   top of the message

and

b) It encourages excessive quoting.

We would much prefer if you quote just that much of the message to
which you're replying, so we know what it is you're referring to,
and then below the quotation, type your response. If you're
responding to more than one part of the original, then quote each
part separately and follow each part with your response.

Now, I know that you may not personally prefer this format and that
you may disagree with some of the reasoning here. We very much
respect this. However, this is the format that most of the active
members here prefer and all members are expected, and are being
asked to use the format that will make most of the active membership
here comfortable reading. You'll likely get a more responsive group
when you post using a style that is comfortable for them to read and
understand.

To find out why these MOD messages are posted to the list instead of
private mail, please read the welcome message you received when you
subscribed.

Thank you.
/moderator

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

Damn it, Jim, I'm a doctor, not a conference moderator!


pgpOaYov4X82T.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 3.86.08 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

strange behaviour

2006-12-03 Thread Aurel Branzeanu
Dear !

Have noticed a strange behaviour - on starting The Bat 3.86.8 ALPHA I've heard 
an audio alert, looked into account log and seen this:

 03.12.2006, 17:45:31: FETCH - Initiating TLS handshake
 03.12.2006, 17:45:31: FETCH - TLS handshake complete
 03.12.2006, 17:45:31: FETCH - connected to POP3 server
!03.12.2006, 17:45:31: FETCH - Server reports TLS error: Decryption failed.
 03.12.2006, 17:45:31: FETCH - TLS connection completed successfully
!03.12.2006, 17:45:31: FETCH - Connection to host broken (last commands sent 
were: , USER thunder)

On the following attempts to connect to POP3 everything worked smooth - no more 
errors. Have quit The Bat, restarted it - again the first connection failed.

Could anyone confirm this?

-- 
Sincerely yours,

Aurel Branzeanu,
Chief Manager
Riscom Computers
http://www.riscom.com
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: tvorogov
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 28282801
fix: +373 22 88-8894
GSM: +373 7 940-7700
fax: +373 22 23-8899



 Current beta is 3.86.08 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: strange behaviour

2006-12-03 Thread Bob Riley
Hi All,

Sunday, December 3, 2006, 9:00:46 AM, Aurel wrote:

 Dear !

 Have noticed a strange behaviour - on starting The Bat 3.86.8 ALPHA
 I've heard an audio alert, looked into account log and seen this:

  03.12.2006, 17:45:31: FETCH - Initiating TLS handshake
  03.12.2006, 17:45:31: FETCH - TLS handshake complete
  03.12.2006, 17:45:31: FETCH - connected to POP3 server
 !03.12.2006, 17:45:31: FETCH - Server reports TLS error: Decryption failed.
  03.12.2006, 17:45:31: FETCH - TLS connection completed successfully
 !03.12.2006, 17:45:31: FETCH - Connection to host broken (last
 commands sent were: , USER thunder)

 On the following attempts to connect to POP3 everything worked
 smooth - no more errors. Have quit The Bat, restarted it - again the first 
 connection failed.

 Could anyone confirm this?

With my gmail account, I have had the first POP3 attempt fail with 3.86.08 also 
(every time I start up TB, I think).  Only the first attempt fails.

Bob Riley




-- 
Take Care,

 Bob   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
Using The Bat! v3.86.07 ALPHA (beta) on Windows XP 2600 Service Pack 2



 Current beta is 3.86.08 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Strange behaviour of the startup password edit box

2005-11-23 Thread Claude Renaud
Bonjour Claude,

Le mardi 22 novembre 2005 à 18:42:48, vous écriviez :

CR Hi,

CR   
CR   When we launch TBV we have to enter a password in the coresponding
CR field.
CR But there is a strange thing, although we see masked characters at the
CR screen *, my screen reader, when I reads the content of this area
CR tells me the true characters ...
CR So if someone was behind me and listened what I'm typing, he could guess
CR my password ..., lol !!!


If there are some Jaws users (or perhaps window eyes), could ou tell
me if you noticed this ?

-- 


Greetings,


Claude Renaud



The Bat! Voyager 3.63.3 (BETA) running on Windows XP 5.1  Build 2600
Service Pack 2




 Current beta is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re[2]: Strange behaviour of the startup password edit box

2005-11-23 Thread Vili
Hello Claude,

CR   When we launch TBV we have to enter a password in the coresponding
CR field.
CR But there is a strange thing, although we see masked characters at the
CR screen *, my screen reader, when I reads the content of this area
CR tells me the true characters ...
CR So if someone was behind me and listened what I'm typing, he could guess
CR my password ..., lol !!!
 If there are some Jaws users (or perhaps window eyes), could ou tell
 me if you noticed this ?

I will install JAWS 5.1 on my computer as we have problem with screen
readers, so I will check it. Please forward your original mail to my
[EMAIL PROTECTED] address (to remind me...)

-- 
Vili



 Current beta is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Strange behaviour of the startup password edit box

2005-11-22 Thread Claude Renaud
Hi,

  
  When we launch TBV we have to enter a password in the coresponding
field.
But there is a strange thing, although we see masked characters at the
screen *, my screen reader, when I reads the content of this area
tells me the true characters ...
So if someone was behind me and listened what I'm typing, he could guess
my password ..., lol !!!

-- 


Greetings,


Claude Renaud



The Bat! Voyager 3.63.2.0 BETA running on Windows XP 5.1  Build 2600
Service Pack 2




 Current beta is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


i have a new strange behaviour with IMAP

2004-10-30 Thread Jurgen Haug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hallo Fledermäuse!

I have this only since the .3 (but I haven't gotten any mails on that accound in the 
past 2 weeks!)

I got 4 messages in my inbox on my imap test account, and they where shown in the 
inbox list of messages, but when I clicked on one I did not get to see it in the 
preview pane, and they did not get sorted, too. That was not like that before.
Only after double-clicking on one of them, suddenly TB! sorted all four in their 
respective folders and then when moving to one of those folders and clicking on one of 
the new (unread) messages, I got to see it in the preview pane.

- --
regards,
:eu-flag3: :de-bw: :safaribears:

There are none so blind as those who will not see

Using The Bat! v3.0.2.4 Rush, Opera v7.54.3865 on WinXP Home v2600 SP2

* PGP key available on request: send mail with subject 'PGP key request'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFBgzCyoXyU9LPZSMERAq13AKC3geUFEJ4wEEl9eSLgk32FXVYUsACZAc5e
xp3rsvgE4b2kjpSViDUbIwU=
=XkB7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


strange behaviour when fetching mail after system restore from image (old registry)

2004-02-18 Thread dAniel hAhler
Hello bats,

I just went to a backup (image) of my system partition that was two
days old and recognized strange behaviour while fetching mail:

[02:22:48]  C: Connected to 127.0.0.1, port 110
[02:22:48]  S: +OK POP3 POPFile (v0.20.1) server ready
[02:22:48]  C: USER xxx
[02:22:49]  S: +OK May I have your password, please?
[02:22:49]  C: PASS xxx
[02:22:50]  S: +OK mailbox has 580 messages (2497411 octets)
[02:22:50]  C: STAT
[02:22:50]  S: +OK 580 2497411
[02:22:50]  C: LIST
[02:22:50]  S: +OK mailbox has 580 messages (2497411 octets)
[02:22:51]  S: 1 3486
[...]
[02:22:52]  S: 580 4645
[02:22:52]  S: .
[02:22:52]  C: UIDL
[02:23:52]  S: -ERR no response from mail server
[02:23:52]  C: TOP 1 1
[02:24:20]  S: !!! Socket error: #10054 (0x2746)
[...]
[02:24:21]  S: !!! Socket error: #10054 (0x2746)

The socket error appeared 585 times while there were only 580 mails.
After fetching nothing TB said 580 mails, 580 new.

The POPFile log does not say ANYTHING about this session..?!

What I also found confusing was that tb said Retrieiving (sic!) message
header #1 (1/580) for quite a while, though I did not invoke the
dispatcher and have no selective download filters.


-- 
shinE!
http://www.thequod.de ICQ#152282665
GnuPG/PGP key: http://thequod.de/danielhahler.asc

Using The Bat! v2.04.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
with POPFile 0.20.1 and avast Jan2004 (4.1.342)



 Current beta is 2.04.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


note: strange behaviour when fetching mail after system restore from image (old registry)

2004-02-18 Thread dAniel hAhler
Hello bats,

on Thu, 19. Feb 2004 at 02:36:14 +0100 I wrote:

d I just went to a backup (image) of my system partition that was two
d days old and recognized strange behaviour while fetching mail:

Of course, this is probably because of the last message marker
stored somewhere in the Registry, I assume - but as you can see this
is a bad idea..

this highwater marker should be stored with the accounts, I propose.
Because now, I'm downloading the whole bunch again.. this is bad, but
IMHO better not disturb that and Kill Dupes afterwards..


-- 
shinE!
http://www.thequod.de ICQ#152282665
GnuPG/PGP key: http://thequod.de/danielhahler.asc



 Current beta is 2.04.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Strange behaviour of maintenance feature

2004-02-15 Thread Allie Martin
Alexey N. Vinogradov, [ANV] wrote:

ANV Today I've run maintenance and checked all options (compress,
ANV find dupes, repair...) for all mailboxes and start the process...

ANV I found that when my IMAP account starts to be maintenanced,
ANV The Bat! became to dial up... As I understand - to make
ANV maintenance of remote IMAP folder... I think that such
ANV behaviour is not acceptable, and cancel the dialing...

Are you on a dialup connection. If so, then I'd expect that if you
wish to do some maintenance of IMAP folders then you'd need to be
connected in order to do so.

-- 
 -= allie_M =- | List Moderator
   PGPKeys: http://key.ac-martin.com

Using TB! v2.04 RC/3 on WinXP Pro (SP1) 

pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 2.03 RC/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re[2]: Strange behaviour of maintenance feature

2004-02-15 Thread Alexey N. Vinogradov
Hello, Allie.

You wrote 15.02.2004 @ 19:37 

AM Are you on a dialup connection. If so, then I'd expect that if you
AM wish to do some maintenance of IMAP folders then you'd need to be
AM connected in order to do so.

Yes, I am on dialup. One is real IMAP box, another is the port from NNTP (using
plugin NNTP2IMAP). I expected that such remote maintenance would be specially
marked as namely remote, and I'd not expected that The Bat! will dial during the
operations that seems to be related to local folders (or local mirrors of
remote folders).

Do you know the exact list of maintenance features which require established
internet connections? I would to regard such dialing as bug (or inconvenience)
and I want to have a way to runaround it by avoiding some operations of
maintenance center.

-- 
Sincerely,
 Alexey.
Using TB 2.04 RC/3 on WinXP Pro SP1 (2600), spelling by ORFO2002 (CSAPI) 
..with Kaspersky Antivirus Plugin (ver 3.5 Gold)  antispam filter BayesIt! 0.4gm

   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 2.03 RC/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Strange behaviour of maintenance feature

2004-02-15 Thread Allie Martin
Alexey N. Vinogradov, [ANV] wrote:

ANV Yes, I am on dialup. One is real IMAP box, another is the port
ANV from NNTP (using plugin NNTP2IMAP).

I don't know anything about the NNTP port plugin so I can't make any
comments with regard to it and how folders that use it are managed by
TB!.

ANV I expected that such remote maintenance would be specially
ANV marked as namely remote,

IMAP, in and of itself, implies remote mail management.

All that TB! really keeps locally is a cache of all that you've
downloaded so far.

Operations such as duplicate removal, compression etc. is done on the
folder and not on a cache of it. As a result, such operations are done
on the servers messages and hence, you'll need an active Internet
connection. TB!'s bringing up the dialer is therefore not surprising
when you start a folder maintenance operation without an existing active
connection.

ANV and I'd not expected that The Bat! will dial during the
ANV operations that seems to be related to local folders (or local
ANV mirrors of remote folders).

Your IMAP folders shouldn't be considered local folders. They're
really local representations of folders on the server. You may choose
to cache what's on the server locally, but that's all you're really
doing.

ANV Do you know the exact list of maintenance features which require
ANV established internet connections?

If it's an IMAP folder, then all of them will. :)

-- 
 -= allie_M =- | List Moderator
   PGPKeys: http://key.ac-martin.com

Using TB! v2.04 RC/3 on WinXP Pro (SP1) 

pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 2.03 RC/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Strange behaviour of maintenance feature

2004-02-14 Thread Alexey N. Vinogradov
Hello, tbbeta.

Today I've run maintenance and checked all options (compress, find dupes,
repair...) for all mailboxes and start the process...

I found that when my IMAP account starts to be maintenanced, The Bat! became
to dial up... As I understand - to make maintenance of remote IMAP folder... I
think that such behaviour is not acceptable, and cancel the dialing...

As a result, maintenance hangs...

-- 
Sincerely,
 Alexey.
Using TB 2.03 Beta/59 on WinXP Pro SP1 (2600), spelling by ORFO2002 (CSAPI) 
..with Kaspersky Antivirus Plugin (ver 3.5 Gold)  antispam filter BayesIt! 0.4gm

  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current beta is 2.03 RC/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Strange behaviour with 8bit characters in subject

2003-09-16 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Tuesday, September 16, 2003, Michael Henke wrote...

 As I'm sensible now ;-) I've found another mail with this strange
 line break / blank in the subject line. And OE is not involved here
 ;-(:

It's perfectly legal in the RFCs, in fact, it's required if the header
line exceeds a certain length. This is called folding, and described
in the RFCs (see RFC 2822 [1] in section 3.2.3, and 2.2.3 for details
on its use).

  [1] http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.html

-- 
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Behind every good computer - is a jumble of wire.


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 2.00.06 | Using TBBETA information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Quote reply - strange behaviour

2003-06-10 Thread Jacek Wojaczynski
On Tuesday, June 10, 2003 Mark Partous wrote:

 BTW: did you see the message in which someone let us know you can now right
  click in the message text then selecting Reply to All quoting selected
  text?  Nice!

It would be really nice if you could use it with keyboard...

regards,

-- 
kocurek

I am using The Bat! 1.63 Beta/10
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Dodatek Service Pack. 1



 Current beta is 1.63b10 | Using TBBETA information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Quote reply - strange behaviour

2003-06-09 Thread Frank Dzicher
Hello The Bat! - Betalist,

since Beta/8 I've noticed a strange behaviour on the quote reply feature. Until Beta/7 
I always marked the part of the message I want to quote and press F4 (see included 
screenshot msg_b4.png). Now, (Beta/8 and up), TB is inserting several quoting signs 
(, number depends on the length of the marked text) in the quoting (see screenshot 
msg_after.png)

Can anyone confirm this? Or is there a workaround for this?

-- 
cheers
Frank

[TheBat! (1.63 Beta/10)] [Windows 2000 5.0 (Build 2195) Service Pack 3]
[Hamster Version: 2.0.2.1] [powered by Intel [EMAIL PROTECTED] 512MB RAM]
attachment: Msg_b4.pngattachment: Msg_after.png
 Current beta is 1.63b9 | Using TBBETA information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: the bat! 1.62 strange behaviour

2003-02-26 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Thomas,

@26-Feb-2003, 08:08 +0700 (01:08 UK time) Thomas Fernandez [TF] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

 Don't worry about it. The list server is mangling S/MIME sigs right
 now. At least signed messages are getting through, even if the
 signature is no longer intact.

TF I see. That is indeed reason not to worry. ;-)

Testing server settings...

-- 
Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
'


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

 Current beta is 1.63b6 | Using TBBETA information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Strange behaviour of AV plugin.

2001-12-24 Thread Konstantin Volenbovsky

Hi, all!
1) When trying to open any HTML attachment the Tat says: Virus
detected in this file, antivirus reports:
2)For testing purposes I attached SirCam virus to the new message and
saved it in Outbox. Then Folders-Check for viruses. (select all) But
TB said 0 infected messages
TB says that plugin works OK.
The Bat beta 19 on Windows Me, AVP 3.5.133

--
Regards,
Kostya Volenbovsky   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
_
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Beta: 1.54 beta/15
Wish List  : http://wish.thebat.dutaint.com




Re: strange behaviour

2000-08-01 Thread Andreas Rumpenhorst

Ming-Li schrieb am 01.08.2000:
Hi Andreas,

 While getting mails TB doesn't delete them (normally it says
 "Getting message 1 of 134", "Deleting message 1 of 34"). It only
 says "Getting message x of x"

TB doesn't delete mail if you have the "leave mail on server" option
checked.

It does, because I delete my mails on the server otherwise their
getting too much.

 and stores them in the windows temp directory where they stay,
 i.e. TB doesn't import them and I can't read them.
I couldn't make TB to do this. I monitored my system temp folder
when TB is collecting mail and no temp file was created there. Do
you have filters?

Tons! ;-) 

 Is there a way to import the messages from Windows\Temp manually?
What's the names of the files created there? Could you read one with
a text editor? What's it like?

They are called bat42f4.tmp, bat42c2.tmp and so on. Most of them are
zero byte files and some of them store the contents of the mails
including the attachments (the whole base-64-encoding-crap).
There are 1500 files in the temp directory!

I really don't know what to do!!

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: strange behaviour

2000-08-01 Thread Curtis

On Tue, 1 Aug 2000 19:29:51 +0100, Andreas Rumpenhorst wrote:

TB doesn't delete mail if you have the "leave mail on server" option
checked.

AR It does, because I delete my mails on the server otherwise their
AR getting too much.

Well, Ming Li's statement, taken literally, isn't true because
there's another option to delete messages left on the server after a
predefined time which goes along with the option to leave messages on
the server. In the filters as well, there is a filter action option to
delete the message from the server. Presently I have TB! set to leave
messages on the server, to keep messages on the server after 1 day, and
most of my inbox filters have their filter actions set to delete
messages from the server. I then set TB! to not download messages
greater than 100kb in size. This is a great way of monitoring
attachments especially since I subscribe to Surginet where most of the
subscribers are OE and Outlook users who wantonly post in HTML and send
huge attachments. One individual actually sent a 3MB attachment once to
the list.

-- 
-=A.C. Martin=-[TB! v1.46 Beta/1 «» Win2k Pro SP1]
PGP Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendAlliePGPKey

"Health is the slowest rate at which one can die. " 

-- 
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, double-click HERE:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org