Re: export to outlook express
Hello chas, On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 18:22:48 +GMT (23-2-2002, 19:22 +0100GMT, where I live), you wrote: c> before i commit to staying with thebat I need to know how to export c> my messages , preferably in their folders , back to outlook express. c> ie dbx format . Exporting to OE can be done. Export your messages to msg-files (extension .msg) rename them *.eml, then drop those *.eml files in OE on a folder. -- Groetjes, Roelof -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: does anyone have the "secure bat"? and can you tell me something about it's features
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Stuart On 24 February 2002 at 22:13:00 -0500 (which was 03:13 where I live) Stuart Krivis wrote and made these points DE>>Depends wether you think that it is worth it? DE>>My office is my lap top. I don't want any one to get access to my mail. SK> There are a number of ways to encrypt filesystems or parts thereof SK> that offer more general utility. I question why you would spend the SK> money on something that only protects your e-mail. SK> Windows XP even offers an encrypted filesystem. An upgrade to XP isn't SK> something I would whole-heartedly endorse, but it makes more sense to SK> me than Secure Bat. SK> Am I the only one that is puzzled here? Yes there are other ways to encrypt stuff. PGPdisk comes to mind (Which I do use). As for using XP no chance. I need the functionally of a server, XP does not do that yet. Have a read of http://www.ritlabs.com/securebat/features.html this will explain it far better than I can. What I do like is that I can remove the ikey and everything is shut down. - -- Good Bye, ___ David | SecureBat! 1.54 B39/iKey1000 | E-mailaholics | _| Win 2K Server 5.0.2195 SP2 | International | | "Odo, cut to the chase." -- Sisko | ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32) Comment: GnuPG Signed, sealed, delivered. iD8DBQE8eIf/+Yrx5mUPRTQRAlCZAJ9uffkRn2BCvTTk2fNImEJfWkPI8gCdHgU9 8MNx/Zj6CeUV913mJXtXDfY= =sTsp -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: Insertion of extra spaces
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday, February 24, 2002 at 6:22 PM Jack wrote: JMI> Howdy. JMI> For some strange reason, The Bat! appears to like to insert extra JMI> spaces between words randomly after I go to the next line in the JMI> editor. Is there any way to correct this strange behavior? It's JMI> not critical, but I can see it becoming annoying soon. I don't JMI> know what causes it. The line appears fine while I'm typing, but JMI> as soon as I move down to the next line while typing, I notice JMI> the line I just finished typing now has extra spaces between some JMI> words that were not there while I was typing that line. Any help JMI> would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! Under Options/Editor Preferences/General uncheck the option "Justify on wrap". That should do the trick :-) Carren PGP public key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=PGP_Key_&Body=Please%20send%20key -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt (build 06) Comment: "As long as one keeps searching the answers come" iQA/AwUBPHfRxcqIEIT739NzEQLqAwCePmzMby/36BJlCgJq8ys27JM0tYwAoPw1 q+GDw2SbnFMQAYp6X+7DNHwt =r60g -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: Defragmentation of message bases - Maybe OT
Alastair, On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, at 15:12:16 [GMT +] (which was 8:42 PM where I live) you wrote: AS> This will grind away and come back to the DOS prompt sooner or later. AS> In my case it produces a considerable speed improvement, particularly AS> in backing up and compressing folders. In my case (I have not done a de-frag of the disk for over 2 months) and the de-frag using contig was over in a jiffy. And gave the following report "Summary: Number of files processed : 327 Number of files defragmented: 65 Average fragmentation before: 1.56575 frags/file Average fragmentation after : 1 frags/file" Can you throw light on the report on the level fragmentation the TB had ?? -- Warm regards, Raj mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Performance Appraisal Terms And Their Real Meanings Loyal - Can't get a job anywhere else Replied on Sunday, February 24, 2002 using TB Ver 1.54 Beta/39 on Windows 2000 -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: Filter question
Hello Raj On Sunday, February 24, 2002, at 06:34:27, Raj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote to Shahar about: Filter question S>> My need is to send a person a file just once even if he send me the S>> request message several times. > I too have a similar need and solved this as follows. > Filter 1 : Checks if the person who sends the message is in an AB group (say > Mail). If yes then it moves the message to Duplicate Folder. This filter has > continue processing in options checked. > Filter 2 : Adds the person id to the AB group - Mail and also sends out the mail > using the advanced options. Thank you very much for your help. I found a working solution, all in one filter and I tested it with about 200 messages from 10 different email addresses and it's smooth. I'll keep your mail for bad days when something will go wrong :-)) Thank you for writing. Shahar. -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Insertion of extra spaces
Howdy. For some strange reason, The Bat! appears to like to insert extra spaces between words randomly after I go to the next line in the editor. Is there any way to correct this strange behavior? It's not critical, but I can see it becoming annoying soon. I don't know what causes it. The line appears fine while I'm typing, but as soon as I move down to the next line while typing, I notice the line I just finished typing now has extra spaces between some words that were not there while I was typing that line. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! -- Best regards, Jack mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: Filter question
Shahar, On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, at 20:02:20 [GMT +0200] (which was 11:32 PM where I live) you wrote: S> My need is to send a person a file just once even if he send me the S> request message several times. I too have a similar need and solved this as follows. Filter 1 : Checks if the person who sends the message is in an AB group (say Mail). If yes then it moves the message to Duplicate Folder. This filter has continue processing in options checked. Filter 2 : Adds the person id to the AB group - Mail and also sends out the mail using the advanced options. Needless to say Filter 1 is before Filter 2. This has been working very well for me. However in the beta I am having a peculiar problem. The filters before this filters some time does not work to complete satisfaction.. Before I post the problem I wanted to do some investigation. -- Warm regards, Raj mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] When everything's coming your way, you're in the wrong lane and going the wrong way. Replied on Sunday, February 24, 2002 using TB Ver 1.54 Beta/39 on Windows 2000 -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: Smart Bat!
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 09:03:12 +1100, John Phillips<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Hello fellow Bat! fans. > >I notice in latest betas there is a menu item Tools / Smart Bat! (F6 calls it >up). > >What is the purpose of this? It looks to me like a little memo/notepad or daily journal app. TheBat has always had some of the features of a PIM and this is just one more. :-) -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: does anyone have the "secure bat"? and can you tell me something about it's features
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 08:05:40 +, David Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > >Hi yahoo > >On 17 February 2002 at 14:58:02 -0600 (which was 20:58 where I live) yahoo 1 >wrote > >> I have seen the webpage for secure bat i was wondering if someone actually >> paid that huge amount for secure bat and was wondering if the money is >> actually worth it. > >Depends wether you think that it is worth it? > >My office is my lap top. I don't want any one to get access to my mail. There are a number of ways to encrypt filesystems or parts thereof that offer more general utility. I question why you would spend the money on something that only protects your e-mail. Windows XP even offers an encrypted filesystem. An upgrade to XP isn't something I would whole-heartedly endorse, but it makes more sense to me than Secure Bat. Am I the only one that is puzzled here? -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re[3]: Purchasing Norton Anti Virus 2001
Hello Dave, Saturday, February 23, 2002, 1:50:39 AM, you wrote: >>> I have found a few sites that let you download Demo versions, >>> but I dont think they can be activated by Symantec anymore. >>> Can someone be so nice as to point me to where they purchased >>> their copy?? DC> Ebay is pretty good for older stuff and I've bought some great DC> software bargains over the last few months. Make sure you buy DC> from people with good customer reviews. DC> BTW, unless I'm totally missing something, I don't have any DC> problems with 2002 and TB! But I use SystemWorks Pro and Norton DC> AV is just one element in that suite. DC> With best wishes, DC> Dave DC> -- DC> David Conroy MSW DC> Personal Life and Business Coaching World-wide DC> http://www.e-coaching-only.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] DC> Member International Coach Federation, ID 1006660. DC> PGP Key on request mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=send_pgp DC> Instant Messaging on request mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=send_im DC> Using The Bat! v1.54 Beta/42 DC> Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Thanks to everyone for all the responses. To Dave: The reason that I wanted 2001 rather than 2002, is what I read in these 2 posts: *Originally posted by Geoff Lane* Has NAV 2002 actually detected a virus in your email? If so, did it require you to intervene in some way? The problem is that NAV waits for your input, which stops the download from completing. Thus, the problem only manifests when NAV detects a virus. FWIW, I wanted to increase the number of NAV licenses on my network. This was to counter viruses that can propagate by attacking web servers. I assumed that NAV Corporate Edition or NAV 2002 would be appropriate and contacted Symantec (no mean feat) to ask their recommendation. Symantec told me that NAV Corporate Edition has no email scanning and NAV 2002 cannot be configured to work with either TB or my mail server (VPOP3) in the way that I wanted. They actually advised me to go to third party vendors and look for "old stock" NAV 2001, telling me that they couldn't even sell additional licenses for the software that I already have! *End Quote* *Originally posted by John Rainer* It is also important to know the differences between 2001 and 2002, as the email scanning mechanism is very different. There is no autodelete function for mail downloads in 2002 and both quarantine and repair on the mail scanner require user input, so any virus detection stops the mail download until this is done. After the 20th badtrans, this gets very tiresome. In 2001, infected mail attachments can be deleted by the mail scanner without interrupting the download at all, leaving the mail body intact and a virus information text file in place of the attachment. Symantec's advice on this change in 2002 is to turn the mail scanner off and rely on the resident scanner, as Geoff has indicated for 2001. This will have exactly the same problem (manual deleting of each infected attachment) unless you configure the resident scanner to autodelete which, unlike the mail scanner in 2002, can be done. This is, however, rather dangerous as it means that infections from other sources that affect system files could possibly lead to the deletion of system files before you have a chance to repair them, depending on what stage Norton picks the virus up. This is one reason why a separate mail scanner can be a good idea. Set the resident scanner to autoquarantine and it gets round this problem but still leaves quarantine filled up with infected files which have to be dealt with sometime. I had a lengthy correspondence with Symantec techies about the changes in 2002 and I got the distinct impression that they were not too keen on some of these themselves. It seems they were forced on them by their customer services people, who wanted a mail scanner that didn't require each account to be configured. They could only give them one at the expense of losing other functionality. I went back to 2001 - this works in XP, btw, if you run the symevent update file before rebooting after installation. *End quote* It seems that 2001 is better in the fact that it requires no user input, and will continue to download in the event that a virus is detected. Also I am interested in an auto delete function, which 2002 doesnt seem to have according to Mr. Rainer. I am of the beleif, that if there is *any* threat of a virus at all, I would much rather have it deleted before I ever get to see it. Does 2002 have the virtual pop server like 2001 does?? No one ever mentioned that in any of the posts. Please excuse my ignorance. Everyone seemed so happy with 2001, I figured that would be best. :) Thanks -- Best regards, Johnmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http
Re: OpenPGP key management
Hello Joseph N., On Saturday, February 23 2002 at 02:09 PM PDT, you wrote: > > Security wise, the emphasis at the moment in the > > development of TB lies in S/MIME. > Nick, do you know what assumptions are behind this choice? Assumptions? S/MIME appeals to a greater audience more so than PGP simply because of it's design, and the fact most popular/free Mail Clients support it. There is nothing to install other than a Certificate. RITLabs support S/MIME to be competitive. -- Nick Andriash Courtenay, B.C. Canada -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re[2]: OpenPGP key management
Nick Andriash wrote on Saturday, February 23, 2002: > Security wise, the emphasis at the moment in the > development of TB lies in S/MIME. Nick, do you know what assumptions are behind this choice? JN -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: OpenPGP key management
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 14:44:15 -0600GMT (which was 23.02.02, 21:44 +0100GMT where I live), Joseph N. wrote this about "OpenPGP key management": JN> Another contributor suggested that the reason is because GPG itself JN> has no front end code for TB to hook into. TB is not, apparently, JN> hooking into GPGshell. JN> What front end, if any, are you using? Hi Joseph, yes, I'm using a front end (GPGShell v.2.01 from http://www.jumaros.de/rsoft/index.html) and TB! seems to hook in there quite well... JN> Are you *sure* that the responses you're getting to the key manager JN> and preferences options are from GPG? They're probably from GPGShell. - -- Cheers Peter Winamp currently playing: - silence - ยด -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (MingW32) Comment: GnuPG signed for better authentication. :-) iD8DBQE8eAi/AzZSBuEHdM4RAl7xAJ9K4hB8NIr4xmR1B6u98UOiMGUv8gCePyDm xHF08yRLifs4XXwwTC4yheo= =PhXs -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: OpenPGP key management
Hello Joseph N., On Saturday, February 23 2002 at 12:44 PM PDT, you wrote: > Another contributor suggested that the reason is because GPG itself > has no front end code for TB to hook into. TB is not, apparently, > hooking into GPGshell. That is correct. Security wise, the emphasis at the moment in the development of TB lies in S/MIME. When that has finished, hopefully Max and Company will allocate some time to providing an updated PGP/GPG Plugin, but they should wait for another few months until GPG 1.0.7 is out, as that build contains a number of long awaited enhancements. -- Nick Andriash Courtenay, B.C. Canada -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Smart Bat!
Hello fellow Bat! fans. I notice in latest betas there is a menu item Tools / Smart Bat! (F6 calls it up). What is the purpose of this? (Sorry, I am not on the beta list). -- Regards, John Phillips Sydney, Australia [EMAIL PROTECTED] HTML mail & spam not welcome. Bat! 1.54 Beta/42 Windows 98 4.10 Build ASony Vaio Notebook PCG-505TS Pentium 300 64meg ram -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: export to outlook express
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, February 23, 2002, at 10:22:48 AM PST, chas wrote: > ...back to outlook express. eek! I'm not sure if or how that can be done, but if it can be, I'm sure someone here will be able to help you. I just can't quite get my mind around the idea of actually *wanting* to move from The Bat! to OE. It's sort of like being in heavy seas in a lovely, well stocked, seaworthy yacht, and deciding to abandon it for a dinghy with lots of big holes, one oar (and the other one damaged), no water, no food - and not even any duct tape! It would take a special kind of masochist to make such a bold and reckless move. :-) Melissa - -- PGP public keys: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=PGP_Keys_8&Body=Please%20send%20keys -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQE8eAH1jVbXUvsE8ukRAik4AJ9RJcC1R1wMY/5cz6Qh+/iR1XXU4ACgjFHh pj4CyDI9vTM/J0RVONWS6nk= =ssQG -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re[2]: OpenPGP key management
1. I had to move the gpg.exe file into the main TB directory in order to have the OpenPGP option. I had a copy in c:\gnupg. Now, however, I've deleted it from the TB directory. It doesn't seem to matter at this point. 2. I've tried with the gpg.exe file there and not there; with gpgshell loaded and not loaded; i've quit and restarted TB each time. Nothing I do will cause the key manager or preferences menu choices to do anything at all if GPG is selected as my OpenPGP version. Another contributor suggested that the reason is because GPG itself has no front end code for TB to hook into. TB is not, apparently, hooking into GPGshell. What front end, if any, are you using? Are you *sure* that the responses you're getting to the key manager and preferences options are from GPG? JN Peter Meyns wrote on Saturday, February 23, 2002: > On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 08:43:15 -0600GMT (which was 21.02.02, 15:43 +0100GMT > where I live), Joseph N. wrote this about "OpenPGP key management": JN>> Under Tools/OpenPGP, there are menu options for key management and JN>> preferences. When I have PGP 6.x selected as my OpenPGP version, JN>> those menu choices work; the PGP key management module and the JN>> preferences dialogs open up. But when I have GnuPG selected as my JN>> OpenPGP version, those menu choices are ineffective; they're not JN>> grayed out, they just don't do anything. (Yes, the GnuPG executable JN>> is in the TB! directory.) Why? > Hi Joseph, > it works quite well here with GPG. My gpg.exe however is in C:\GnuPg\, > not in the TB! directory. > HTH -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: Problem with trash and read messages
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 01:45:48 -0500GMT (which was 23.02.02, 07:45 +0100GMT where I live), ETM wrote this about "Problem with trash and read messages": >> Thanks everyone, I'm glad to know that spammers are not >> getting any acknowledgement back from me. In OE they >> were getting my email address sent back and who knows >> what else! E> How did that happen in OE? I used it before going to a registered E> version of TB and no acknowledgements/receipts ever went out of OE. Hi Elaine, this may be true for your knowing/realizing it. But OE automatically connects to sites linked to an HTML mail. So, when your computer is calling their link they can tell that you opened the mail, hence your address is valid and worthwhile to receive more spam. The Bat! does not open any links to the internet as yet (I hope it will stay this way). So, with TB! you're safe in this respect. :) -- Cheers Peter Winamp currently playing: Brooks & Dunn - Nothin About You -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: OpenPGP key management
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 08:43:15 -0600GMT (which was 21.02.02, 15:43 +0100GMT where I live), Joseph N. wrote this about "OpenPGP key management": JN> Under Tools/OpenPGP, there are menu options for key management and JN> preferences. When I have PGP 6.x selected as my OpenPGP version, JN> those menu choices work; the PGP key management module and the JN> preferences dialogs open up. But when I have GnuPG selected as my JN> OpenPGP version, those menu choices are ineffective; they're not JN> grayed out, they just don't do anything. (Yes, the GnuPG executable JN> is in the TB! directory.) Why? Hi Joseph, it works quite well here with GPG. My gpg.exe however is in C:\GnuPg\, not in the TB! directory. HTH - -- Cheers Peter Winamp currently playing: Don Williams - Some Broken Hearts Never Mend -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (MingW32) Comment: GnuPG signed for better authentication. :-) iD8DBQE8d+y6AzZSBuEHdM4RAocBAKCKmgxrYksfzI2OmW6RcRbc6IG1YwCfRmYv sotaf2Fm036f4dDTmxWkzXg= =EAa6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
export to outlook express
Hi TBUDL, I am trialling thebat version 1.41 windows 98 second edition. before i commit to staying with thebat I need to know how to export my messages , preferably in their folders , back to outlook express. ie dbx format . Bye chas -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: Defragmentation of message bases
Hello Alastair, On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 at 15:12:16 [GMT +] (which was 16:12 where I live) you wrote: AS> I noted that the TB! message bases become _horrendously_ fragmented* AS> contig -s -q "C:\Program Files\The Bat!\MAIL\*.*" I do the same but through a batch file without the Quite argument to redirect the result in a log file I only defrag messages.* files and run the batch every day with mstask AS> In my case it produces a considerable speed improvement, particularly AS> in backing up and compressing folders. here too, a base like TBUDL can be fragmented in more than 50 parts in a single day (even in NTFS) ! -- Regards, Alain [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Bat! 1.54 Beta/42 Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Filter question
I have this situation: I set up a filter that adds a person to a group in an address book and send him a file. I did it in two rules one after the other. My need is to send a person a file just once even if he send me the request message several times. How do I do it ? I'll appreciate any help. Shahar. -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: Defragmentation of message bases
On 23 February 2002 at 15:38 Jason wrote: > Hello Alastair, > Saturday, February 23, 2002, 11:12:16 PM, you wrote: > AS> without having to defragment > AS> the entire hard disk (NT4, Win2K or WinXP only). > so, is there any similar solution for WinME?? Unfortunately not, because contig uses Windows system calls that aren't in 95, 98 or ME. (Unless someone, somewhere, has written a similar application for these flavours of Windows; unlikely and I can't find anything). Alastair PS I note that, on defragmenting, opening TB!, receiving _one_ email message, compressing, exiting TB! and defragmenting again, 5 out of 199 files in the MAIL directory and below are found to be fragmented on my (XP) system. That's a lot :( -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Filter problem wav solved
Sorry for the wasted bandwidth. Shahar. -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: Defragmentation of message bases
Hello Alastair, Saturday, February 23, 2002, 11:12:16 PM, you wrote: AS> without having to defragment AS> the entire hard disk (NT4, Win2K or WinXP only). so, is there any similar solution for WinME?? -- Best regards, Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Defragmentation of message bases
I noted that the TB! message bases become _horrendously_ fragmented* (hardly a surprise, as they're continuously written to) and have worked out a way of fixing this easily without having to defragment the entire hard disk (NT4, Win2K or WinXP only). The drill is: 1. Download contig.exe (which allows you to defragment single files) from http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/freeware/contig.shtml 2. Unpack it and, from a DOS prompt _with TB! closed_, type: contig -s -q "C:\Program Files\The Bat!\MAIL\*.*" This will grind away and come back to the DOS prompt sooner or later. In my case it produces a considerable speed improvement, particularly in backing up and compressing folders. Alastair * some files had over 400 fragments ... -- Alastair Scott (London, United Kingdom) Using Windows XP and The Bat! 1.54 Beta/42 -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: Backup
Jason, On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, at 21:17:53 [GMT +0800] (which was 6:47 PM where I live) you wrote: J> I would like to know is the "Backup" under the Tools menu J> include the backup of the filter setting?? Yes it includes. Ensure you select all the options... -- Warm regards, Raj mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Why isn't phonetic spelled the way it sounds? Replied on Saturday, February 23, 2002 using TB Ver 1.54 Beta/39 on Windows 2000 -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Backup
Hi, all I'm a novice user in TB I would like to know is the "Backup" under the Tools menu include the backup of the filter setting?? if it doesn't, then any other way out?? Best regards, --Jason-- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re[2]: Purchasing Norton Anti Virus 2001
>> I have found a few sites that let you download Demo versions, >> but I dont think they can be activated by Symantec anymore. >> Can someone be so nice as to point me to where they purchased >> their copy?? Ebay is pretty good for older stuff and I've bought some great software bargains over the last few months. Make sure you buy from people with good customer reviews. BTW, unless I'm totally missing something, I don't have any problems with 2002 and TB! But I use SystemWorks Pro and Norton AV is just one element in that suite. With best wishes, Dave -- David Conroy MSW Personal Life and Business Coaching World-wide http://www.e-coaching-only.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Member International Coach Federation, ID 1006660. PGP Key on request mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=send_pgp Instant Messaging on request mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=send_im Using The Bat! v1.54 Beta/42 Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re: Purchasing Norton Anti Virus 2001
Saturday, February 23, 2002, 6:26:20 AM, John Doe wrote: > I have found a few sites that let you download Demo versions, but I > dont think they can be activated by Symantec anymore. Can someone be > so nice as to point me to where they purchased their copy?? --- http://www.softwaresavings.co.uk/subcategory.cfm/SubCategoryID-13 It's a UK site that the Symantec UK customer service person (unofficially) advised me to visit. The link is to the page that advertises NAV 2001. Hopefully, they'll ship to your part of the World. HTH, -- Geoff Lane Cornwall, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Using The Bat! v1.53d on Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6 Daddy, what does "Formatting Drive C:" mean? -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Re[2]: Problem with trash and read messages
Hello Maurice, Saturday, February 23, 2002, 1:44:17 AM, you wrote: MS> On Friday, February 22, 2002, at 16:06:30 [GMT -0500] (which was 22:06 MS> where I live) Shoebuddy Jones wrote: SJ>> How do I prevent this? I've tried all sorts of SJ>> different settings but it's still marking them as read. MS> The only solution to this is probably to create a separate folder and MS> set your filter to dump the messages there. I use this method myself MS> by having a folder called 'SpamTrap', this way I can still see which MS> messages were sent to me and which are probably spam so I can still MS> retrieve the ones that were inadvertently put their by my overzealous MS> filter. I have done the same, my folder is called 'Possible spam'. In here goes any mail that isn't addressed to me directly. On this folder I've then put on a read filter that moves the message to 'Spam' once it is read and I move on to another message. (The filter kicks in if the sender has an '@' in the address). If it's not to be put in 'Spam' I can still drag and drop it to another folder before leaving the message. On 'Spam' there are age and number limits to do the tidying up. -- Best regards, Hans Henrik Using: The Bat! v. 1.53d Windows 95 Major version 4 Minor version 0 -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
