Re: How do you use SMARTBAT?

2003-10-23 Thread Vishal
Hi Darrin

Thursday, October 23, 2003, 12:41:45 AM, you wrote:

D Isnt this what a PIM is for?

Wouldn't be surprised if they headed that way..they've got a great address book,
email client, notepad and scheduler..what next? and they've certainly got the
smarts to produce a good PIM.

I wonder if this'll start a whole new slew of YES!s and NOOO!s :)

Cheers,

-- 
Vishal 



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: PGP Options

2003-10-23 Thread Richard Wakeford
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Thomas,
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 I have PGP 8.0.2 installed and, under Tools/Open PGP/Open PGP
 Preferences I have Mail set to automatically decrypt/verify when
 opening messages. It doesn't!

 Yes, because this functions isn't supported yet.

Ah, that's why they don't work then! ;-)

- --

Best regards,
Richard

| Using The Bat! 2.01.3  SpamPal
| Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 4
| and using the best browser: Opera7

PGP public key:
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCA93B5BE

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP SDK 3.0.2

iQA/AwUBP5d6QBqZtcDKk7W+EQL/HwCfZxb8RXadVITtTtRI1maGXfX3cf4An0bY
5l21b+BStw/lbGJxiBpUj1T+
=H6UT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: MyMacros 1.06

2003-10-23 Thread Andrew Perevodchik
Hello!

G All we need now is a combination of the %StrReplace and the %StrTr
G macro, because the %StrReplace only lets you replace one word. Or
G is there a way to place the result in a buffer and use it again in
G the %StrReplace macro?

Do you mean nested calls?
%StrReplace(%StrReplace('abc','a','X'),'c','Y')

If there are too many:
%_MyCoolText='abcdefg'%-
%_MyCoolText=%StrReplace(%_MyCoolText,'a','1')%-
%_MyCoolText=%StrReplace(%_MyCoolText,'b','2')%-
%_MyCoolText=%StrReplace(%_MyCoolText,'c','3')%-
%_MyCoolText=%StrReplace(%_MyCoolText,'d','4')%-
%_MyCoolText=%StrReplace(%_MyCoolText,'e','5')%-
%_MyCoolText=%StrReplace(%_MyCoolText,'f','6')%-
%_MyCoolText=%StrReplace(%_MyCoolText,'g','7')%-
%_MyCoolText

-- 
Andrew Perevodchik
Kiev, Ukraine

Using The Bat! v2.01 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: view images tabs are no longer there on the preview

2003-10-23 Thread MAU
Hello alists,

 Now, there are no tabs and the only way to see the pix is to
 double click on the attachment and bring up the external viewer.
 
 I'm very confused why this changed all of a sudden.

I'm sure you are aware that there are different type of pictures (*.jpg,
*.gif, *.png, etc.). Does this happen with all of them?

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v2.01.3
Winamp OFF:



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: How do you use SMARTBAT?

2003-10-23 Thread Allen
10/23/2003, 12:41 AM: Darrin said in How do you use SMARTBAT?

D Hi,  I  havent  really messed with this feature and was curious about
D how  others  are  using,  if  they  are  using  it. Seems like a nice
D feature, but in my opinion ritlabs should keep their concentration on
D other features of TB instead of something like this. Isnt this what a
D PIM is for?

I  find  it  handy  to  have  the  little notepad right there within the
program  for various annotations -- handier than swapping out to another
program.  I  also have it configured to send out some birthday greetings
automatically, just in case I forget -- but that's about it. I don't use
it too heavily.

I'd  be  bothered if TB became a fully-bl[own/oated] PIM like Outlook --
however,  I  donn't mind the presence of SmartBat. It's small enough and
discrete  enough  that  should a user not wish to use it, it won't be in
the way pestering them.

-- 
Peace, be well
J Allen R Day  http://protempore.org

The Bat! 2.01.3, BayesIt! 0.4gm | Windows XP Service Pack 1 build 2600

When your economy is kind of ooching along, it's important to let people
have more of their own money. -George W. Bush


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Error While Reading Message Base (v2.01.3)

2003-10-23 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Bob,

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 13:42:01 +1000GMT (23-10-03, 5:42 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:

BM Can you also clarify your advice regarding not storing mail in the
BM Inbox?  My batgroup account is set up only for messages from the group
BM - no other mail goes to it at all.

You shouldn't store mail (that you'd like to keep) in your inbox.
Since you don't do that, you're keeping the last 30 messages, that's
another matter.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Keyboard navigation scheduler

2003-10-23 Thread Allen
10/22/2003, 5:26 AM: Peter said in Keyboard navigation  scheduler


PFFor  example, in previous versions I had TB set up to move to
PFnext unread message when i hit ( ' )

Hmn,  you're  right . . . if you configure it to move to the next unread
on  pressing  (  ' ), nothing happens unless you are in the message list
pane.  However,  configured to use ctrl+alt+right as the shortcut key it
moves  on to the next unread message without regard to what pane you are
in.

PF Same  with navigating between the 3 panes. Before this could be done
PF with  TAB or SHIFT+TAB. Now, it does not always work. (Disclaimer: I
PF have just tried it in 2.01.3 and here it seems to work).

On  my 2.01.3 I have no trouble with this -- it navigates among panes as
expected.  One  thing to make note of is that if you are viewing an html
message  with  links, once you get to the message-view pane tabbing will
take you through the links before moving on to the folder pane.

PF I  would  like  to be able to set the scheduler to run backups. Am I
PF right when I say this cannot be done at the moment?

Quite  certain this is not possible, yet -- but, yes, it would be a nice
inclusion.

PF Also,  it  would  be  nice to be able to run backup minimised (while
PF working with TB). This isn't possible either, right?

AFAIK,  no,  it's  not possible -- but, do you mean mean have the Backup
happening in the background while still allowing you to work with TB? If
so,  that would be a very difficult thing as it's hard to back something
up while data is still being manipulated within it . . .


-- 
Peace, be well J Allen R Day http://protempore.org

The Bat! 2.01.3, BayesIt! 0.4gm | Windows XP Service Pack 1 build 2600

At 18 our convictions are hills from which we look; At 45 they are caves
in which we hide. -F. Scott Fitzgerald


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Account glyph change?

2003-10-23 Thread Allen
10/22/2003, 11:55 PM: Pixie said in Account glyph change?

P Do you know was that something that changed with 2.01 or new for .3?

I  can't remember /for certain/, but thinking back I'm pretty sure those
@'s happened in 2.01.3 . . . correct me if I'm wrong.

There  have  been  a  number  of  subtle and not so subtle (the splash!)
cosmetic fixes since 2.0 -- seems like one glyph or another changes with
each maintenance release. The find/replace in the compose message window
turned  orange  (which  I'm rather fond of, actually), the splash screen
changed, now the @'s . . .

Keeps us on our toes, or something like that.

-- 
Peace, be well J Allen R Day http://protempore.org

The Bat! 2.01.3, BayesIt! 0.4gm | Windows XP Service Pack 1 build 2600

Anger  as  soon  as  fed  is  dead-'Tis  starving  makes  it fat. -Emily
Dickinson


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Sudden change to base64 encoding

2003-10-23 Thread Gordon Woolf

A reply to one message is defaulting to base64 encoding, even if I
create a new message and just paste in a part of the text of the
original message and even if that text is saved via Notepad or
NoteTab.

It isn't happening with new messages, or with other replies to
messages that are in the same folder,

Any suggestions? Using 2.01.3

-- 
Gordon Woolf
The Worsley Press
Hastings, Victoria, Australia
www.worsleypress.com  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
New Book: Success in Store - How to Start or Buy a Retail Business,
Enjoy Running It and Make Money



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: PGP - Checking Signature

2003-10-23 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Michael,

@22-Oct-2003, 22:11 -0400 (23-Oct 03:11 UK time) Michael Rudnick
said to Marck:

MDP Use the Key Manager (from PGP 8) software's Upload key to
MDP key-server option.

 I have already done 'Server, Send to, ldap://keyserver.pgp.com'. I
 just did it again. The first time it said that I successfully
 updated it. When I did it again it said that it was already on the
 server. Is it possible that the key is not staying on the server
 or is there something else I'm not doing correctly.

It was a timing issue. The server I was polling for your key hadn't
had it sent to it *yet*. It is there now and that first message
checks out ... *but* the one I'm replying to now was victim of
PGP-wrap

gpg: Signature made 10/23/03 03:10:33 GMT Standard Time using DSA key ID 39C3DF85
gpg: BAD signature from Michael Rudnick [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You must set PGP wrapping off and set your TB wrap to around 70.
Currently your lines are too long to guarantee message integrity
(when passing through old SMTP servers that may wrap long lines
themselves).

-- 
Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
SB! v2.01.2 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1
'

pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP - Checking Signature

2003-10-23 Thread molescroft
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 21:19:34 -0400 GMT(23/10/2003, 2:19 AM +
GMT), Michael Rudnick wrote:

MR Having just registered The Bat! 2.0 I decided to jump in
MR to PGP as well. I downloaded and installed PGP 8.0 and
MR have set up a key.

MR I'd like to see if my key is working correctly. Can
MR someone verify the signature?

I haven't change to version 2 yet, but have tried PGP.
So can my signature be checked too, pretty please?

- -- 
Regards,
Eric  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]






Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000
5.0 Build 2195
Service Pack 4

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 8.0.2 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com

iQA/AwUBP5e1Aw59v1QjFNcNEQK27wCfQV0pdprQ1GQUk+D3uP8PZz1Lt50AoMI8
7KmPujlnqpXJ0ZCPRtITk8Ke
=wCUH
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: MyMacros 1.06

2003-10-23 Thread Gerard

ON Thursday, October 23, 2003, 9:22:17 AM, you wrote:
AP Hello!

AP Do you mean nested calls?
AP %StrReplace(%StrReplace('abc','a','X'),'c','Y')

AP If there are too many:
AP %_MyCoolText='abcdefg'%-
AP %_MyCoolText=%StrReplace(%_MyCoolText,'a','1')%-
AP %_MyCoolText=%StrReplace(%_MyCoolText,'b','2')%-
AP %_MyCoolText=%StrReplace(%_MyCoolText,'c','3')%-
AP %_MyCoolText=%StrReplace(%_MyCoolText,'d','4')%-
AP %_MyCoolText=%StrReplace(%_MyCoolText,'e','5')%-
AP %_MyCoolText=%StrReplace(%_MyCoolText,'f','6')%-
AP %_MyCoolText=%StrReplace(%_MyCoolText,'g','7')%-
AP %_MyCoolText


Andrew,

Brilliant!!

Now can we also make the case independent so I od not have to make
different search/replace strings for Gerard and gerard?

As a bonus I am learning how to write these pesky litle macro´s ;-)

-- 
Best regards,
 Gerard 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
One lesson you better learn if you want to be in politics is that you
never go out on a golf curse and beat the President. Lyndon B. Johnson

Using The Bat! v2.01.3 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: PGP - Checking Signature

2003-10-23 Thread Richard Wakeford
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Eric, On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 you wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 I haven't change to version 2 yet, but have tried PGP.
 So can my signature be checked too, pretty please?

Verified fine here. Where's your public key?

- - --

Best regards,
Richard

| Using The Bat! 2.01.3  SpamPal
| Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 4
| and using the best browser: Opera7

PGP public key:
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCA93B5BE

- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP SDK 3.0.2

iQA/AwUBP5e60BqZtcDKk7W+EQIP+ACg1fH9OO8Cnq63bZF+ezpOUA4l32YAoNbV
T4jSCM4XRiH+/FU5OcMJ/S5f
=71mC
- -END PGP SIGNATURE-

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP SDK 3.0.2

iQA/AwUBP5e60xqZtcDKk7W+EQIfDQCg0mej33HmvFGPE+zskxjkDg2uRAMAoIvF
AUpQElGpMabHasxL3f8aYGcI
=UT9+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: PGP - Checking Signature

2003-10-23 Thread Gerard

ON Thursday, October 23, 2003, 1:01:44 PM, you wrote:
m I haven't change to version 2 yet, but have tried PGP.
m So can my signature be checked too, pretty please?


Eric,

You key refers to a different email address then the one you are using
here.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

That would mean a fail :(

-- 
Best regards,
 Gerard 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
A golfer needs a wife, true. It is essential that he has a sympathetic
listener always handy, to whom he can relate the details of the day’s
play. But what sort of a life companion would a tennis player be? ==P.G
Wodehouse - UP FROM THE DEPTHS ==

Using The Bat! v2.01.3 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Strange attachments Fwd: [AGILE] Re: [AGILE] Agility Trial in England

2003-10-23 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Doug,

@23-Oct-2003, 06:17 Doug Weller said:

 I've looked at the original I sent and there are no attachments.
 Any ideas?  I don't think I've seen them on the list before
 either.

I don't understand the question. Sorry.

-- 
Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
SB! v2.01.2 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1
'

pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Account glyph change?

2003-10-23 Thread Vasiliy Efimenko
Hello Pixie,

On 22 October 2003, at 23:55:15 (GMT -0400) you wrote:

P Hmm.. Confusing as I didn't see anything in the change-log about
P this specifically.

I guess developers tried to make a surprise for our giggle.
But black '@' is associates for me like some mournful :(

P Do you know was that something that changed with 2.01 or new for .3?

Uuuh...  I already don't remember.

-- 
Best regards,
 Vasiliymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using:
 * The Bat! 2.01.3
 * Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 
 * PGP 8.0.2



pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: PGP - Checking Signature

2003-10-23 Thread molescroft
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 13:22:01 +0200 GMT(23/10/2003, 12:22 PM +
GMT), Gerard wrote:


G You key refers to a different email address then the one
G you are using here.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

G That would mean a fail :(

I thought I had added this addresses to the key too using
the 'add name' process, and updated it on the keyserver.

- -- 
Regards,
Eric  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]






Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000
5.0 Build 2195
Service Pack 4

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 8.0.2 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com

iQA/AwUBP5e/4A59v1QjFNcNEQIkqQCfYfatPIn7CDs24mCVzp3HBeXjgGwAoJ3O
g/kEqNWlvU7j5wACrHna5emT
=L9+r
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: PGP - Checking Signature

2003-10-23 Thread molescroft
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 12:26:10 +0100 GMT(23/10/2003, 12:26 PM +
GMT), Richard Wakeford wrote:


RW Hello Eric, On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 you wrote in
RW mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 I haven't change to version 2 yet, but have tried PGP. So
 can my signature be checked too, pretty please?

RW Verified fine here. Where's your public key?

Here?

- -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: PGP 8.0.2 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
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==
=GWth
- -END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-




- -- 
Regards,
Eric  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]






Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000
5.0 Build 2195
Service Pack 4

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 8.0.2 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com

iQA/AwUBP5fBMw59v1QjFNcNEQKFaACeNdo7BzYoTSt6eW0jmHxa+iiG9L4AnjxZ
wsReZ9qrUBU1pQrc6H0zRLLN
=lq7j
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Error While Reading Message Base (v2.01.3)

2003-10-23 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Bob,

@23-Oct-2003, 13:42 +1000 (04:42 UK time) Bob Morris said to Marck:

 I strongly recommend to *everyone* here not to use an account
 inbox as a mail store - get those messages into other folders
 now. Instate a filter set to keep the inbox empty.

 snipped

 Can you also clarify your advice regarding not storing mail in the
 Inbox?

... snip
 If I move the received mail into another folder as it is received
 and read won't this:

 (a) cause the Bat! to have problems with threading once again as
 newly received mail is in the Inbox and previous mail in the
 thread is stored elsewhere, and

No - if no messages are stored in the inbox and all messages are
moved to a TBUDL folder by a filter as they arrive then all
threading will remain intact and the inbox will remain empty.

 (b) the new folder will be subject to exactly the same pressures
 with exactly the same amount of mail passing through and stored in
 it - i.e. from Inbox - hold 31 days - Delete old mail and compress
 on each exit?

An inbox has different pressures than a mail storage folder. It is
used as a transit for any messages to that address. Albeit, the
entire account in this instance is dedicated to TBUDL, but the
principal remains that an Inbox does have different pressures from a
mail storage folder.

-- 
Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
SB! v2.01.2 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1
'

pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Strange attachments Fwd: [AGILE] Re: [AGILE] Agility Trial in England

2003-10-23 Thread Doug Weller
Quoting Marck D Pearlstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Hi Doug,
 
 @23-Oct-2003, 06:17 Doug Weller said:
 
  I've looked at the original I sent and there are no attachments.
  Any ideas?  I don't think I've seen them on the list before
  either.
 
 I don't understand the question. Sorry.
 
Did my email come through with 2 attachments? Probably I shouldn't have deleted 
it when I received it. :-)

If so, I don't understand where those two attachments came from.  They aren't in 
the email I sent, I have never seen them on email from that particular mailing 
list, so I'm at a loss.

Thanks.

Doug

-- 
Doug  Helen's Dogs: http://www.dougandhelen.com



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Error While Reading Message Base (v2.01.3)

2003-10-23 Thread Doug Weller
Quoting Roelof Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Hallo Bob,
 
 On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 13:42:01 +1000GMT (23-10-03, 5:42 +0200, where I
 live), you wrote:
 
 BM Can you also clarify your advice regarding not storing mail in the
 BM Inbox?  My batgroup account is set up only for messages from the group
 BM - no other mail goes to it at all.
 
 You shouldn't store mail (that you'd like to keep) in your inbox.
 Since you don't do that, you're keeping the last 30 messages, that's
 another matter.
 
What problems are caused by storing mail you'd like to keep in the Inbox?

I've got over 3000 emails there. A relatively small percentage of my total 
email, but more than 30!

Thanks.

Doug
-- 
Doug  Helen's Dogs: http://www.dougandhelen.com



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: PGP - Checking Signature

2003-10-23 Thread Gerard

ON Thursday, October 23, 2003, 1:48:04 PM, you wrote:

m I thought I had added this addresses to the key too using
m the 'add name' process, and updated it on the keyserver.


Hi molescroft,

I checked again and you did. Did I overlook it the first time or did you
just add it?

Problem is when I do Tools|message security|check signature it shows the
other email address.  It is only after importing your key, which I might
not want to do because I will end up with so many keys in a list like
this, that I see the other one.

-- 
Best regards,
 Gerard 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
At night, a golfer can program her mind with great expectations. But she
must throw them away when she steps onto the first tee.

Using The Bat! v2.01.3 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: PGP - Checking Signature

2003-10-23 Thread Vasiliy Efimenko
Hello Michael,

On 22 October 2003, at 21:19:34 (GMT -0400) you wrote:

MR I'd like to see if my key is working correctly. Can someone verify the signature?

I successfully donwload your public key from PGP server and verified you
signature fine. So, be happy :)

-- 
Best regards,
 Vasiliymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using:
 * The Bat! 2.01.3
 * Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 
 * PGP 8.0.2



pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: PGP - Checking Signature

2003-10-23 Thread Vasiliy Efimenko
Hello molescroft,

On 23 October 2003, at 12:01:44 (GMT +0100) you wrote:

m So can my signature be checked too, pretty please?

I  successfully  downloaded  key  and  verified your signature too. Your
public key are named on Eric J Thompson. Is it correct?

-- 
Best regards,
 Vasiliymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using:
 * The Bat! 2.01.3
 * Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 
 * PGP 8.0.2



pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Account inbox

2003-10-23 Thread Mogens Holst
 We are advised against using the Inbox as a storage folder and instead move the 
messages to other folders.  That brings up the following question: Is is OK to use 
subfolders to the inbox?   
--
  Mogens

  Using The Bat! Version 2.01.3
  under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1.



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: PGP - Checking Signature

2003-10-23 Thread molescroft

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 14:24:10 +0200 GMT(23/10/2003, 1:24 PM + GMT), Gerard wrote:

G I checked again and you did. Did I overlook it the first
G time or did you just add it?

I added it yesterday.

G Problem is when I do Tools|message security|check
G signature it shows the other email address.

A sequence that does nothing for me here :-(

G It is only after importing your key, which I might not
G want to do because I will end up with so many keys in a
G list like this, that I see the other one.

Thanks for the information.

-- 
Regards,
Eric  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]






Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000
5.0 Build 2195
Service Pack 4




Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Account glyph change?

2003-10-23 Thread Darrin
Hi,
On Thursday at 3:21 AM you wrote:
A 10/22/2003, 11:55 PM: Pixie said in Account glyph change?

P Do you know was that something that changed with 2.01 or new for .3?

A I  can't remember /for certain/, but thinking back I'm pretty sure those
A @'s happened in 2.01.3 . . . correct me if I'm wrong.

A There  have  been  a  number  of  subtle and not so subtle (the splash!)
A cosmetic fixes since 2.0 -- seems like one glyph or another changes with
A each maintenance release. The find/replace in the compose message window
A turned  orange  (which  I'm rather fond of, actually), the splash screen
A changed, now the @'s . . .

A Keeps us on our toes, or something like that.



Im glad the @'s are back. The few cosmetic changes are nice. I
disabled the high colour images before because I didnt like them.
Better now :)

-- 
Darrin




Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Account inbox

2003-10-23 Thread ETM
Hello Mogens

On Thursday, October 23, 2003, you wrote

MH Is is OK to use subfolders to the inbox?

I was until I read the admonishment not to use the inbox. So
I have moved those subfolders out as well.  Now I just have
to remember where I moved everything laughter.

Elaine

I envy people who drink. At least they have something to
blame everything on.   --Oscar Levant




Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Account inbox

2003-10-23 Thread Gerard

ON Thursday, October 23, 2003, 2:38:59 PM, you wrote:
MH  We are advised against using the Inbox as a storage folder and
MH instead move the messages to other folders.  That brings up the
MH following question: Is is OK to use subfolders to the inbox?   

Hi Mogens,

Their are a number of reasons for not using your inbox as a storage
area, but there is one very functional , typical TB! one. All your msg´s
first arrive in your inbox and are the filed according to filters you
setup.

As a result your inbox file will always be very fragmented and needs
purging and compressing often. As you can see from the above
description this is not a very safe place to keep msg´s you want to
preserve.

Since this is not the ase in any other (sub)folder the answer is yes,
you can use subfolders to the inbox.


Now for the nitty gritty, your cutmark doesn't work. t needs to be
dash-dash-space-return.

Or you could use the %CutHere macro from Andrew Perevodchik plugin.
http://en.barin.com.ua/soft/mymacros/

I think this is a macro that should be standard in TB! considering how
often it needs explaining here in the group.


-- 
Best regards,
 Gerard 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Universal Laws of Golf: Every par-three hole in the world has a secret
desire to humiliate golfers.

Using The Bat! v2.01.3 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Dupes - From Somewhere

2003-10-23 Thread Steve Mulhall
Hi all,

It appears that since sometime this morning TB! has started retrieving
duplicate messages from my server (some from as far back as January).
There appears to be no discernable pattern to these duplicate messages
i.e. they can appear in any of my 9 accounts I have setup and TB! may
only retrieve 3 or 4 duplicates an hour from the server, some as far
back as January or some from a few day ago. I am almost certain that
this has nothing to do with our mail server, which is running locally
and I have checked and found no clue as to the reason for this. I have
made no configuration changes to TB! prior to this happening.

Firstly, has anyone any idea what might be happening here? Secondly,
does anyone have any ideas as to how I can create a filter that will
delete these duplicates automatically? I can see that you can set up a
filter to delete a message both from TB! and from the server but I
can't work out how to make TB! check for duplicate messages... now
having thought about this it may be either too difficult or not
possible as there will be discrepancies between the messages stored in
TB! and on the server i.e. many messages in TB! will be sorted into
separate folders. There will also be cases of messages retrieved from
the server that have consequently been deleted from TB! but not from
the server itself - Scarily awkward by the sounds of things.

Many thanks

Steve Mulhall
CMC Partnership (UK) Ltd
The Bat version 2.01.3
Windows 2000 SP3 Build 2195



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


FYI: IMAP and GMX

2003-10-23 Thread Markus Gloede
Hi,

for those fellow Bat users that have a Pro account with GMX I thought
I'd provide the following snippet of information.

I noticed that my IMAP to GMX connection frequently gets disconnected by
the server. I contacted GMX's support about this and received as an
answer that problems might occur when using The Bat for IMAP access. The
statement went on to say that GMX can offer no solution.

Great. I wish they had told me what exactly causes those problems.

I suggest that other The Bat GMX users with IMAP problems also contact
GMX and see if they get better answers. Make yourselves heard.

Regards,

Markus
-- 
Using The Bat! 2.01.3 under Windows NT 4.0 Build
1381 Service Pack 6



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: AntiVir Plugin ?

2003-10-23 Thread ken green
John Morse wrote:
   Actually, I quit using AVG PRO 7... I'm now using the most updated
   Antivirus software known to man  AntiVir http://www.free-av.com


Why did you switch to AntiVir?

If your reasons have nothing to do with The Bat, I'm still interested,
but reply to me directly or to TBOT.

Thanks.

-- 
 Ken Green
 Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: view images tabs are no longer there on the preview

2003-10-23 Thread alists
Hello MAU,

Thursday, October 23, 2003, 12:49:52 AM, you wrote:


M I'm sure you are aware that there are different type of pictures (*.jpg,
M *.gif, *.png, etc.). Does this happen with all of them?

All the pictures that used to show up with a little tab on the
bottom of the window (jpg and gif) are now requiring me to double
click on them... as there are no longer any tabs.

Thanks! :)

-- 

Best regards,
 alistsmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


PGP Tutorial (was Re:PGP - Checking Signature)

2003-10-23 Thread Michael Rudnick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Marck,

Thursday, October 23, 2003, 6:51:31 AM, you wrote:

MDP You must set PGP wrapping off and set your TB wrap to around 70.
MDP Currently your lines are too long to guarantee message integrity
MDP (when passing through old SMTP servers that may wrap long lines
MDP themselves).

OK. I turned off wrapping in PGP and checked TB, which was at 70.

Now, a question, since I'm new to PGP. Other than this forum, I don't
run across signed messages. I'd like to know how people are using PGP
to help them in their e-mail. Should I sign *all* my messages? Should
I urge all my associates to get onto PGP? How do I manage this
additional tool when most of my correspondents are using MS mailing
programs?

Thanks for your comments.

- --
Michael Rudnick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Using The Bat! 2.01.3 on Windows 4.0 (1381) Service Pack 5

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP SDK 3.0.2

iQA/AwUBP5fF8hIbxY05w9+FEQJfZACg4NvRBb0lEjYoXLzArGZ1LhT/LZQAnRfM
zqVzSwtAVzzlwxwv8OxqLL48
=kSdG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


PGP used all the time

2003-10-23 Thread Jurgen Haug
Hallo Fledermäuse,

I just realised that now all my mails are PGP signed, not only those to TBOT and TBUDL 
(as was my intention).

I have in the Account settings those two ticked:
Options/Message Editor Settings: 'Enable OpenPGP' and 'Sign when completed'

I thought that just means that I can use PGP if I feel like and that I have to add 
%SIGNCOMPLETE in the template. Now I have this strong feeling my idea was wrong O:-)
Am I right that I was wrong?
What do I have to do to use PGP only on certain email addresses? 
Do I have to generally switch it ON on the account, and then individually OFF for the 
no-no addresses? 

-- 
regards,
 Jurgen

The only thing, where men quarrel who has the smaller, is the mobile phone.

Using The Bat! v2.01.3 on WinXP.5.1.2600.SP1 

PGP key available on request: send mail with subject 'PGP key request'


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP Tutorial (was Re:PGP - Checking Signature)

2003-10-23 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Michael,

@23-Oct-2003, 08:14 -0400 (13:14 UK time) Michael Rudnick said to
Marck:

MDP You must set PGP wrapping off and set your TB wrap to around
MDP 70.

 OK. I turned off wrapping in PGP and checked TB, which was at 70.

Perfection.

gpg: Signature made 10/23/03 13:13:38 GMT Standard Time using DSA key ID 39C3DF85
gpg: Good signature from Michael Rudnick [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Now, a question, since I'm new to PGP. Other than this forum, I
 don't run across signed messages.

You'll find signed messages in PGP forums too ;-).

 I'd like to know how people are using PGP to help them in their
 e-mail.

An increasing number is all that can be said here. I have no
statistics for it.

 Should I sign *all* my messages?

I don't sign messages to close friends and family. I do sign all
other messages.

 Should I urge all my associates to get onto PGP?

Where possible, yes.

 How do I manage this additional tool when most of my
 correspondents are using MS mailing programs?

MS software is PGP and S/MIME aware. PGP comes with OE
compatibility.

-- 
Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v2.01.3 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1
'

pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[3]: view images tabs are no longer there on the preview

2003-10-23 Thread Vishal
Hi alists

Thursday, October 23, 2003, 11:12:45 AM, you wrote:

awc All the pictures that used to show up with a little tab on the
awc bottom of the window (jpg and gif) are now requiring me to double
awc click on them... as there are no longer any tabs.

It happened with me yesterday when someone sent me a jpeg. I first thought I had
the same problem as you, then I noticed that the file extension was '.jpe' not
'.jpeg' as it was supposed to be. It still had the jpeg icon though. Perhaps
something similar is happening to you?



Cheers,

-- 
Vishal 



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Error While Reading Message Base (v2.01.3)

2003-10-23 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Doug,

@23-Oct-2003, 13:27 Doug Weller said:

 What problems are caused by storing mail you'd like to keep in the
 Inbox?

The inbox is continually receiving messages. Some stay. Some are
filtered. Some are deleted. Some are purged. From day to day the
file used to hold those messages is being accessed and changed. To
keep valuable data in so heavily accessed a file is asking for
trouble.

An OS error can cause errors in frequently accessed files. Errors
like cross-linked sectors and corruption. I won't risk it myself.

-- 
Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v2.01.3 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1
'

pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP used all the time

2003-10-23 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Thursday, October 23, 2003, Jurgen Haug wrote...

 I just realised that now all my mails are PGP signed, not only those
 to TBOT and TBUDL (as was my intention).

 I have in the Account settings those two ticked: Options/Message
 Editor Settings: 'Enable OpenPGP' and 'Sign when completed'

This means that all emails are signing on completed.

 I thought that just means that I can use PGP if I feel like and
 that I have to add %SIGNCOMPLETE in the template. Now I have this
 strong feeling my idea was wrong O:-)
 Am I right that I was wrong?

You've nearly got it, uncheck that Sign when completed box in the
account settings, but leave the %SIGNCOMPLETE in the template for the
email addresses you want to have the mail signed in, and you should be
set.

-- 
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])

That which does not kill us strengthens us.


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

RE:PGP used all the time

2003-10-23 Thread Jurgen Haug
Hello Jonathan,

Thursday, October 23, 2003, 5:47:36 PM, you wrote:

 I thought that just means that I can use PGP if I feel like and
 that I have to add %SIGNCOMPLETE in the template. Now I have this
 strong feeling my idea was wrong O:-)
 Am I right that I was wrong?

 You've nearly got it, uncheck that Sign when completed box in the
 account settings, but leave the %SIGNCOMPLETE in the template for the
 email addresses you want to have the mail signed in, and you should be
 set.

a, merci bien!

I will try it immediately!

-- 
Regards,
 Jurgen

The only thing, where men quarrel who has the smaller, is the mobile phone.

Using The Bat! v2.01.3 
http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/index.html

PGP key available on request: send mail with subject 'PGP key request'


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP - Checking Signature

2003-10-23 Thread Vasiliy Efimenko
Hello All,

 Today  I  added  into my key my photo and uploaded this all on PGP keys
 server.  So,  I  would  to  ask  respected  audience  for  checking and
 verifying  of  my  public  key and to sign it (of course if that do not
 burden you). I'll be very happy to be trustworthy by you! :)

-- 
Best regards,
 Vasiliymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using:
 * The Bat! 2.01.3
 * Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 
 * PGP 8.0.2

Winamp playing now: Pink - Family Portrait -  - 2003


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: PGP - Checking Signature

2003-10-23 Thread Richard Wakeford
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Eric,

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 you wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RW Verified fine here. Where's your public key?

 Here?

Thank you :-)

- --

Best regards,
Richard

| Using The Bat! 2.01.3  SpamPal
| Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 4
| and using the best browser: Opera7

PGP public key:
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCA93B5BE

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP SDK 3.0.2

iQA/AwUBP5gAYhqZtcDKk7W+EQLpkgCgtKrx/lZdQMoNQcP7vTQ7O0urBCMAoNvM
uQzjLr6BuuZcUfa1jsGufULk
=v4dr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Threading

2003-10-23 Thread Peter Zhigulin
Good day, sirs

Is  there  any way to thread messages by two parameters by subject and then by
refences?

-- 
zpit

Using The Bat! 2.01.3
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: PGP Tutorial (was Re:PGP - Checking Signature)

2003-10-23 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Michael,

on Thu, 23 Oct 2003 08:14:26 -0400GMT (23.10.03, 14:14 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :

MR OK. I turned off wrapping in PGP and checked TB, which was at 70.

***[23.10.03 18:19:57] PGP Signature Status: good

MR Now, a question, since I'm new to PGP. Other than this forum, I don't
MR run across signed messages.

You might want to join the PGP-Basics mailing list:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] It is certainly a good forum to
discuss all the pros and cons of PGP in general and not related to a
particular mailer. :-)

-- 
Cheers
Peter

Black Holes were created when God divided by zero.

Winamp currently playing: Démis Roussos  Aphrodite's Child - Spring Summer Winter  
Fall


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Account inbox

2003-10-23 Thread Ravi/Shell-Shocked
MH Is is OK to use subfolders to the inbox?

Totally fine. Just so long as the messages.tbb file of the
inbox isn't very large.

TB treats subfolders of the inbox the same as any other
folder for this purpose.

-- 
Ravi (http://shell-shocked.org)

Running The Bat! 2.01.3 on Windows XP

MONEY TALKS ... but all mine ever says is GOODBYE!



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Threading

2003-10-23 Thread Ravi/Shell-Shocked

 Is there any way to thread messages by two parameters by
 subject and then by refences?

Not presently I believe - though it is an often requested
feature.

(Even better by references and then subject.)

-- 
Ravi (http://shell-shocked.org)

Running The Bat! 2.01.3 on Windows XP

If it wasnt for C, we would be using BASI, PASAL, LIPPER and
OBOL!



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: HELP - Text attachment unreadable...???!!!

2003-10-23 Thread Anne
On Wednesday, October 22, 2003, 6:27:42 PM, Daniel wrote in message:
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DR It is possible that the Apple Mailer doesn't support UUEncode.  MIME
DR seems to be quite common amongst e-mail clients.


Hi Daniel,

As I said I sent it again as MIME rather than UUEncode and it
still arrived scrambled. My correspondent sent me this reply
about it today - you'll see he has figured out what was
happening, but what I'd like to know is why? I certainly did not
compress the file - it left here as plain text and came back to
me as plain text when I mailed it to my other account, but this
is what he says:


The bad news is that when I looked at this second attached file, it was
all gibberish just like the first.

The good news is that I am a little bit of a techie myself.  Looking at 
the gibberish, it struck me odd that there were no blank spaces or 
repeated characters or any words standing out.  It did not look like a 
word processing file.  I began to wonder whether the file had been 
compressed.  So, I ran a little experiment.  I replaced the extension 
.txt with  .zip.  Then, I asked my computer to decompress the file. 
  Voila'!  It became a readable text file of the will of Elizabeth 
Docwra.

So, the file you sent was really a compressed file and should have had 
the extension  .zip instead of .txt at the end of the title.


Any thoughts as to why/where this may be happening? My
correspondent uses comcast.net as his ISP - could it be something
they are doing to the attachment - perhaps as an anti-virus
measure? I can't see it being my ISP (Freenetname) or the one I
mailed myself would have been treated the same way.

-- 
Cheers,
 Anne  

Flying high with The Bat! v2.00.6 on Windows 98 4.10 Build  

Visit The Bat! Users' Unofficial Help Forum http://the-bat-forums.donzeigler.com



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: PGP - Checking Signature

2003-10-23 Thread Gerard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


ON Thursday, October 23, 2003, 6:18:25 PM, you wrote:
VE Hello All,

VE  Today  I  added  into my key my photo and uploaded this all on PGP keys
VE  server.  So,  I  would  to  ask  respected  audience  for  checking and
VE  verifying  of  my  public  key and to sign it (of course if that do not
VE  burden you). I'll be very happy to be trustworthy by you! :)


Hi Vasiliy,

You will have to sign your emails for anyone to verify them.

- --
Best regards,
 Gerard


- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
It Is Time To Quit When... You have had three putts and your flight
mates tell you that you're still away.

Using The Bat! v2.01.3 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 (C) 1997-1999 Network Associates, Inc. and its 
affiliated companies.

iQA/AwUBP5gDNlfVOfprOY8ZEQLh/wCg63xr3Crl5QzppAyiPM9IyFAipQkAoOLy
H/opxb/58OctQNBUC3ZAz+UW
=kjGP
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: HELP - Text attachment unreadable...???!!!

2003-10-23 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Anne,

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 18:06:44 +0100 GMT (24/10/2003, 00:06 +0700 GMT),
Anne wrote:

 Any thoughts as to why/where this may be happening? My
 correspondent uses comcast.net as his ISP - could it be something
 they are doing to the attachment - perhaps as an anti-virus
 measure?

Just a guess - yes. I year or so ago, I sent my mother a message with
two attached pics to her AOL account. She received one zip-file as
attachment (but it carried the .zip extension). While she found out
how to use WinZip, she considered it incovenient to have to unzip
attachments and therefore asked me to send any messages with
attachments to her other account - which she can check with TB. So I
don't know whether this problem persists at AOL, but clearly ISPs have
funny ideas sometimes.

So the concerned recipient's ISP *could have* zipped the file but
fogotten to change the extension, weird as it sounds.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

Ladies, don't forget the rummage sale. It is a good chance to get rid
of those things not worth keeping around the house. Bring your
husbands.

Message reply created with The Bat! 2.01.3
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 128MB RAM




Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Alphabetical sorting of folders

2003-10-23 Thread Jim D
Myotis Mates,

  I was wondering if there is some hidden feature somwhere that will
  automatically sort folders alphabetically. This would be nice to do
  after adding a bunch of sub folders to make them easier to find.

  Just curious!  :)

-- 
Best regards,
 Jim D JD -at- CastleGK -dot- com
 [Using The Bat! 2.01.3 on Windows XP Service Pack 1 Build 2600]
---
My greatest fear in life is that no one will remember me after I'm
dead. --some dead guy
---



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: HELP - Text attachment unreadable...???!!!

2003-10-23 Thread Julian Beach (Lists)
On Thursday, October 23, 2003, 6:06:44 PM, Anne wrote:

 So, the file you sent was really a compressed file and should have had
 the extension  .zip instead of .txt at the end of the title.

 Any thoughts as to why/where this may be happening? My
 correspondent uses comcast.net as his ISP - could it be something
 they are doing to the attachment - perhaps as an anti-virus
 measure? I can't see it being my ISP (Freenetname) or the one I
 mailed myself would have been treated the same way.

As far as I remember, the Zip file format is a version of uuencoding, so a
zip utility should be able to decode a uuencoded file.  This suggests
that your message is changing to uuencoded format somewhere on its
journey from your outbox to his inbox.

Julian

-- 
  Using The Bat! v2.01.3 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1




Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: PGP - Checking Signature

2003-10-23 Thread Gerard

ON Thursday, October 23, 2003, 6:18:25 PM, you wrote:

Hi Vasiliy,

Me mistake, everything checks out ok.
I even signed your key.

-- 
Best regards,
 Gerard 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
You make a lot of money in this game.  Just ask my ex-wives.  Both of
them are so rich that neither of their husbands' work.

Using The Bat! v2.01.3 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: How do you use SMARTBAT?

2003-10-23 Thread ken green
Allen wrote:
 It's small enough and discrete enough that should a user not wish to
 use it, it won't be in the way pestering them.


The golden rule to software usability, IMO

-- 
 Ken Green
 Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Alphabetical sorting of folders

2003-10-23 Thread Anne
On Thursday, October 23, 2003, 6:54:57 PM, Jim wrote in message:
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
JD   I was wondering if there is some hidden feature somwhere that will
JD   automatically sort folders alphabetically. This would be nice to do
JD   after adding a bunch of sub folders to make them easier to find.

JD   Just curious!  :)


Click on the Name bar at the top of the Account Tree pane - this
does exactly that :-)

-- 
Cheers,
 Anne  

Flying high with The Bat! v2.00.6 on Windows 98 4.10 Build  

Visit The Bat! Users' Unofficial Help Forum http://the-bat-forums.donzeigler.com



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: AntiVir Plugin ?

2003-10-23 Thread Edgar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Chris,

On Thursday, October 23, 2003, 12:35:17 AM, you wrote:

 Please stop quoting normal messages in a boxquote. Is confuses The
 Bat! (and every other e-mail client out there.)

What is it doing then? Can't see any thing wrong with the way TB
acts on it.

- --
Cheers,
 Edgar

Communicating with TB! v2.01.3, Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1

All our wanting comes from needs, thus we continiously suffer.
The intellect teaches free will, free from suffering. - Arthur
Schopenhauer

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i
Comment: For save mail ask for my public key

iQA/AwUBP5gPP3Yga0LgPr15EQJl6QCgtaJuWtpULQslpPFUgJ6hvIZ0sP8An0Pg
4e/YY+gspdBSc2w6c0nJWSw0
=I/6T
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Error While Reading Message Base (v2.01.3)

2003-10-23 Thread Doug Weller
Hi Marck,


Thursday, October 23, 2003, 4:39:53 PM, you wrote:

 The inbox is continually receiving messages. Some stay. Some are
 filtered. Some are deleted. Some are purged. From day to day the
 file used to hold those messages is being accessed and changed. To
 keep valuable data in so heavily accessed a file is asking for
 trouble.

 An OS error can cause errors in frequently accessed files. Errors
 like cross-linked sectors and corruption. I won't risk it myself.

Good points, I'll have to do something about it.

Doug

-- 
Doug Weller  Moderator, sci.archaeology.moderated
Submissions to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doug and Helen's Dogs: http://www.dougandhelen.com
Doug's Archaeology Site: http://www.ramtops.co.uk



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Undo or retrieving deletes

2003-10-23 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Tim,

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 13:45:45 +1000 GMT (23/10/2003, 10:45 +0700 GMT),
Tim wrote:

 Maybe I'm imagining things again (do I have to take the pills every
 day?).

No. The doctor said you should stop taking *those* pills. ;-)

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

When you come to a fork in the road, take it! (Yogi Berra)

Message reply created with The Bat! 2.01.3
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 128MB RAM




Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: HELP - Text attachment unreadable...???!!!

2003-10-23 Thread Anne
On Thursday, October 23, 2003, 6:45:15 PM, Thomas wrote in message:
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TF Just a guess - yes. I year or so ago, I sent my mother a message with
TF two attached pics to her AOL account. She received one zip-file as
TF attachment (but it carried the .zip extension). While she found out
TF how to use WinZip, she considered it incovenient to have to unzip
TF attachments and therefore asked me to send any messages with
TF attachments to her other account - which she can check with TB. So I
TF don't know whether this problem persists at AOL, but clearly ISPs have
TF funny ideas sometimes.

TF So the concerned recipient's ISP *could have* zipped the file but
TF fogotten to change the extension, weird as it sounds.


Hi Thomas,

Thanks for this - yes, I know that AOL do zip attachments if they
are over a certain size as this happens regularly with folks I
know on the genealogy lists. I've not come across it with other
ISP's though and never where the file extension isn't changed...
it's very odd.

-- 
Cheers,
 Anne  

Flying high with The Bat! v2.00.6 on Windows 98 4.10 Build  

Visit The Bat! Users' Unofficial Help Forum http://the-bat-forums.donzeigler.com



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re:PGP Tutorial (was Re:PGP - Checking Signature)

2003-10-23 Thread Michael Rudnick
Peter and others,

Thursday, October 23, 2003, 12:30:14 PM, you wrote:
PM Hi Michael,

PM on Thu, 23 Oct 2003 08:14:26 -0400GMT (23.10.03, 14:14 +0200GMT here),
PM you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :

PM You might want to join the PGP-Basics mailing list:
PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is certainly a good forum
PM to discuss all the pros and cons of PGP in general and not related
PM to a particular mailer. :-)

Thanks for the info. I'll check out the Yahoo group when I have the
time (about 3 years from now g).

--
Michael Rudnick 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Using The Bat! 2.01.3 on Windows 4.0 (1381) Service Pack 5




Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Invalid confirmation string

2003-10-23 Thread Danger
Hello TBUDL,

  Recently I was bounced form the list for having too many bounces.
  When I tried to 1) replay and 2) use the supplied link I was given
  the message that I had a Invalid confirmation string what's up with
  that?

-- 
Best regards,
 Danger  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html