Re: SMTP servers On-The-Go: how to share an SMTP server

2012-07-31 Thread MAU
Hello Luca,

 If you select use SMTP servers on-the-go, then configure, you get a
 shared checkbox, not working, for each server. Maybe in some next build...

You can't check or uncheck it directly with the mouse as one would 
expect, it does not work. But you can do it from context menu if you 
right click. However it doesn't seem to make any difference whether it 
is checked or not. 

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v5.1.6.7
My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com
My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com



Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: SMTP servers On-The-Go: how to share an SMTP server

2012-07-31 Thread Luca
Robin Anson:

 On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 at 21:08:24 +0200,Luca wrote:
   I'm trying to share an SMTP server between more than one account, but the
   shared flag is not active. 
  
  My TB! version has no shared flag in the account|transport settings, 
  active or otherwise. 
 
  If you select use SMTP servers on-the-go, then configure, you get a
  shared checkbox, not working, for each server. Maybe in some next build...
 
 Where is this option to be found?

Account/properties. 

-- 
Luca - e-mail: p.stevens at linuxfan.it



Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: SMTP servers On-The-Go: how to share an SMTP server

2012-07-31 Thread Robin Anson
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 at 17:51:28 +0200,Luca wrote:
   I'm trying to share an SMTP server between more than one account, but 
   the
   shared flag is not active. 
  
  My TB! version has no shared flag in the account|transport settings, 
  active or otherwise. 
 
  If you select use SMTP servers on-the-go, then configure, you get a
  shared checkbox, not working, for each server. Maybe in some next 
  build...
 
 Where is this option to be found?

 Account/properties. 

Hmm, you must be running v5.

If you share your version number in your question it helps people resolve your
problems. Since I'm running v4, I cannot help you

-- 
Robin

Using The Bat! v4.2.44.2
  Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1
  Popfile v1.1.1



Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: SMTP servers On-The-Go: how to share an SMTP server

2012-07-30 Thread Luca
MFPA:

 On Sunday 29 July 2012 at 9:04:53 AM, in
 mid:7br918hr1eegouge1a8hkpv4mbd7gha...@4ax.com, Luca wrote:
 
  I'm trying to share an SMTP server between more than one account, but the
  shared flag is not active. 
 
 My TB! version has no shared flag in the account|transport settings, 
 active or otherwise. 

If you select use SMTP servers on-the-go, then configure, you get a
shared checkbox, not working, for each server. Maybe in some next build...


-- 
Luca - e-mail: p.stevens at linuxfan.it



Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: SMTP servers On-The-Go: how to share an SMTP server

2012-07-30 Thread MFPA
Hi


On Monday 30 July 2012 at 8:08:24 PM, in
mid:homd18l2c3ghf44bkjo3arcekge4664...@4ax.com, Luca wrote:


 If you select use SMTP servers on-the-go, then
 configure, you get a shared checkbox,

That must have been introduced later than v4.0.38.

-- 
Best regards

MFPAmailto:expires2...@rocketmail.com

It is easy to propose impossible remedies.

Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600  



Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: SMTP servers On-The-Go: how to share an SMTP server

2012-07-30 Thread Robin Anson
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 at 21:08:24 +0200,Luca wrote:
  I'm trying to share an SMTP server between more than one account, but the
  shared flag is not active. 
 
 My TB! version has no shared flag in the account|transport settings, 
 active or otherwise. 

 If you select use SMTP servers on-the-go, then configure, you get a
 shared checkbox, not working, for each server. Maybe in some next build...

Where is this option to be found?

-- 
Robin

Using The Bat! v4.2.44.2
  Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1
  Popfile v1.1.1



Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: SMTP servers On-The-Go: how to share an SMTP server

2012-07-29 Thread MFPA
Hi


On Sunday 29 July 2012 at 9:04:53 AM, in
mid:7br918hr1eegouge1a8hkpv4mbd7gha...@4ax.com, Luca wrote:



 I'm trying to share an SMTP server between more than one account, but the
 shared flag is not active. 

My TB! version has no shared flag in the account|transport settings, 
active or otherwise. But the two choices that spring to mind are:-

1. Write the same settings in each account that you want to share 
   them.
   
2. Set the SMTP server in your TB! accounts to localhost and use a 
   local SMTP server program on your own computer to relay to whatever 
   SMTP servers you wish (or to send directly).



 Is there a way to make an SMTP server available to all
 accounts at once?

See 2. above. I do that for several accounts at home; I don't have a
need for a laptop, so do not use it on the go.



 Tnx.  (Sorry for my other message reposted... Gmane
 authorization problems.)  

Oops. I already commented on that...


-- 
Best regards

MFPAmailto:expires2...@rocketmail.com

An idealist is a person who helps other people to be prosperous

Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600  



Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: SMTP Servers

2004-06-27 Thread Johannes Posel
Dear John,

On 13:27 23.06.2004, you [John Phillips] wrote...

   I need to change smtp server all the time :(.

 No need with your own SMTP server.

Then he would need no change the smarthost configuration each time,
because neither his mail program nor any SMTP server running on his
computer is allowed to connect to a remote mailserver. His ISP is
blocking it, there's nothing that a program or even a remote server he
could authenticate against could do about it.

Cheers,
 Johannesmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: SMTP Servers

2004-06-23 Thread John Phillips

Hi Fredrik,
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, at 11:11:54 [GMT+0200] (which was 19:11:54 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:



JP Easy solution, get your own SMTP server which I fail to see how your isp can
JP stop you using.

 Actually, Telia (One of Swedens largest ISPs) blocks port 25 to stop
 spreading of viruses and SPAM :)

BigPond (commonly known in Australia as BigPong) also block Port 25; however
never had any problems with this using Mail Direct.

I believe they look up the address through some DNS Servers, or try to use
the MX records of the mail.

This mail is sent via Mail Direct, and it gets through!

-- 
John Phillips, Sydney, Australia

Using The Bat! v2.11.02 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 1 

There has been opposition to every innovation in the history of man, with the possible 
exception of the sword.



Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: SMTP Servers

2004-06-23 Thread John Phillips

Hi Fredrik,
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, at 12:53:48 [GMT+0200] (which was 20:53:48 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:



 Actually I have a Laptop that I take with me to home and work, then
   I need to change smtp server all the time :(.



No need with your own SMTP server.

-- 
John Phillips, Sydney, Australia

Using The Bat! v2.11.02 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 1 

*IT IS* documented, look under For Internal Use Only.



Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: SMTP Servers

2004-06-22 Thread Urban
Tuesday, June 22, 2004, Fredrik Bergström wrote:

 Actually, Telia (One of Swedens largest ISPs) blocks port 25

So connect through smtprelay.telia.com
It's all buried somewhere on their site. (They changed their DNS:es too,
so it might be worthwhile to take a look.)

-- 
Urban

My husband and I are either going to buy a dog or have a child. We can't
decide whether to ruin our carpets or ruin our lives. (Rita Rudner)


Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: SMTP Servers

2004-06-21 Thread John Phillips

Hi Fredrik,
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, at 16:28:21 [GMT+0200] (which was Tue, 0:28:21
Australian Eastern Time) you wrote:



 This is probably off topic and the moderators will kill me, but here
   we go :)

   Here in Sweden our ISPs are trying to stop SPAM and Viruses by not
   allowing connections to other SMTP servers than the one in the ISPs
   network. This means that on my notebook I need to use one SMTP
   server when I'm at home and one when I'm at work.



Easy solution, get your own SMTP server which I fail to see how your isp can
stop you using.

Google is your friend;  I use Mail Direct.   http://www.ocloudsoft.com/

-- 
John Phillips, Sydney, Australia

Using The Bat! v2.11.02 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 1 

Four snack groups: frozen, crunchies, cakes and sweets.



Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: SMTP Servers

2004-06-21 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Monday, June 21, 2004, John Phillips wrote...

 This is probably off topic and the moderators will kill me, but
 here we go :)

 Here in Sweden our ISPs are trying to stop SPAM and Viruses by not
 allowing connections to other SMTP servers than the one in the ISPs
 network. This means that on my notebook I need to use one SMTP
 server when I'm at home and one when I'm at work.

 Easy solution, get your own SMTP server which I fail to see how your
 isp can stop you using.

Quite easily... at the router level block port 25 connections to
anything but their SMTP servers. Running your own mail server then is
pointless. Also some ISPs don't allow you to run services, and doing
so introduces a breach of contract.

-- 
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Using The Bat! v2.12 Beta/1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1

A preposition is what you don't end a sentence with. Um.


pgpxedlOxVWsa.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: SMTP servers

2002-05-25 Thread Thomas F

Hello Reza,

On Fri, 24 May 2002 15:29:46 -0400 GMT (25/05/02, 02:29 +0700 GMT),
Reza Habib wrote:

RH Foxmail has a built in smtp server so it will relay your mail to the
RH host directly, bypassing the isp.  That would be a really cool feature
RH for TB to adopt.

You need to stay connected until the mail is actually delivered. Out
of the question for me on per-minute dial-up. Same holds true for an
SMTP server on my machine.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism.

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.60k
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM



Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: SMTP servers

2002-05-25 Thread Thomas F

Hello Keith,

On Fri, 24 May 2002 15:06:23 -0400 GMT (25/05/02, 02:06 +0700 GMT),
Keith Rodrigues wrote:

KR 2) Use a free email service that allows you to send from their
KR smtp server, with authentication. I use myrealbox
KR (www.myrealbox.com) for this. Set up an account with them, then
KR enter their smtp server in the Bat! settings, authenticate using
KR your username and password, and you can then send from all your
KR accounts using the same smtp server, regardless of which ISP you
KR happen to be connected to.

You said it. I used myrealbox this for three years when I lived in
Taiwan, and regardless which ISP I was connected to, it always
delivered all my mails from any account. :-)

No need to install an SMTP server on your computer. Leave the headache
of connecting to POP servers all over the world to the people with the
24/7 connection and the broad bandwidth. ;-)

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

Dinner Special -- Turkey $2.35; Chicken or Beef $2.25; Children $2.00.

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.60k
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM



Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: SMTP servers

2002-05-25 Thread Allie C Martin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Thomas F [TF] wrote:
...
TF You said it. I used myrealbox this for three years when I lived in
TF Taiwan, and regardless which ISP I was connected to, it always
TF delivered all my mails from any account. :-)

At what speed?

Slower than your ISP's SMTP server I'd bet.

TF No need to install an SMTP server on your computer. Leave the
TF headache of connecting to POP servers all over the world to the
TF people with the 24/7 connection and the broad bandwidth. ;-)

When I still had my dialup account, I used to use your method but it
was too slow. There was too much of a delay while the SMTP server was
being looked up and then accessed. Sometimes it was plain slow. I just
made MDaemon or Mercury depending on which one I was using, use my
ISP's SMTP server as a SmartHost.

- --
 -=Allie C Martin=-
List Moderator | TB! v1.60m | Windows XP Pro
PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iD8DBQE879CAV8nrYCsHF+IRAhhAAJ43Gk8ZbJlVNYPwyJ2l1CJ3Aovs+QCdEV1p
E/hB2r43oD3Q9EHJsZsb6Mc=
=VhTs
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: SMTP servers

2002-05-25 Thread Jonathan Angliss

Hi Thomas,
On Sat, 25 May 2002 13:36:06 +0700, you wrote:

 Hello Reza,
 
 On Fri, 24 May 2002 15:29:46 -0400 GMT (25/05/02, 02:29 +0700 GMT),
 Reza Habib wrote:
 
 RH Foxmail has a built in smtp server so it will relay your mail to the
 RH host directly, bypassing the isp.  That would be a really cool feature
 RH for TB to adopt.
 
 You need to stay connected until the mail is actually delivered. Out
 of the question for me on per-minute dial-up. Same holds true for an
 SMTP server on my machine.

So what is the difference between running an SMTP server on your host, and
connecting to that, verses connecting to your ISPs SMTP?  Both would take
roughly the same amount of time.  Unless you're running the SMTP locally, in
which case when you send mail, you can get it to queue the mail until you next
connect, and when it next connects, fires off the email to the relevant hosts.

-- 
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])


Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: SMTP servers

2002-05-25 Thread Thomas F

Hello Allie,

On Sat, 25 May 2002 12:54:14 -0500 GMT (26/05/02, 00:54 +0700 GMT),
Allie C Martin wrote:

ACM MDaemon here can be configured to use an SMTP host in the sense that
ACM it delivers mail to another SMTP server, usually your ISP SMTP server
ACM instead of doing a direct delivery.

OK then, why would I need MDaemon in the first place?

ACM Mercury will also do the same.
[...]

ACM Does that help you Thomas? :-)

Not really. As long as can use a ISP's SMTP server, I just throw my
mails their way and let them deal with it. :-)

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

12. Next Sunday a special collection will be taken to defray the cost
of the new carpet. All those wishing to do something on the new
carpet will come forward and do so.

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.60k
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM



Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: SMTP servers

2002-05-25 Thread Thomas F

Hello Allie,

On Sat, 25 May 2002 12:57:19 -0500 GMT (26/05/02, 00:57 +0700 GMT),
Allie C Martin wrote:

TF You said it. I used myrealbox this for three years when I lived in
TF Taiwan, and regardless which ISP I was connected to, it always
TF delivered all my mails from any account. :-)

ACM At what speed?

Acceptable. With my different accounts, I use SMTP servers in Asia,
Europe, and USA. The SMTP server for this one account is in the States
(see headers).

ACM Slower than your ISP's SMTP server I'd bet.

My cable ISP in Taiwan was EThome.net.tw. In general, I was quite
happy with the cable speed (broadband). They do provide an SMTP
server, but after a short while, it was listed on ORBL, and some of my
message were returned by the receiving servers (including
ritlabs.com). I called EThome and they didn't even know what I was
talking about, which resulted in a very educational (for them) email
exhange. Finally the SMTP server address was changed, but for some
reason, I always got the error message could not connect to server.
My way out was myrealbox.com for my Hinet.net account at least:

My main account was on hinet.net. When you are connected via another
ISP, they will not allow you to use the their SMTP server. Sometimes I
had to dial in through them (EThome being a small company and Hinet
being the state-owned Big Guy), but this meant I kept switching.

On a side note, my mother is on AOL. They don't provide a standard
SMTP server. When I am in Germany and connected through my mother's
AOL account, I use the myrealbox.com SMTP server for my mail on other
ISPs.

TF No need to install an SMTP server on your computer.

ACM When I still had my dialup account, I used to use your method but it
ACM was too slow. There was too much of a delay while the SMTP server was
ACM being looked up and then accessed.

My experience differs. When I had an SMTP server installed on my
system, (using the cable modem and its flat rate) of course it tried
to connect the the recipients' servers individually. Those servers
where for some reason not always immediately accessible. Each time an
access attempt was unsuccessful, I got an error message. As annoying as
that was, it meant that I had to stay online until the message was
sent. Sorry, I'd rather decide myself when I go to bed. ;-)

With myrealbox, you just send the message out. Let them deal with any
connection problems. Easy as that. :-)

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

31. 'Stewardesses' is the longest English word that is typed with only
the left hand.

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.60k
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM



Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: SMTP servers

2002-05-25 Thread Syafril Hermansyah

On Sun, 26 May 2002 01:18:29 +0700 Thomas F [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 ACM MDaemon here can be configured to use an SMTP host in the sense
 ACM that it delivers mail to another SMTP server, usually your ISP
 ACM SMTP server instead of doing a direct delivery.
 
 OK then, why would I need MDaemon in the first place?

Depending on your need though :-)
These are some benefit for Dial Up users :

- While sending mail to more than one recipient : MDaemon only create
one session connection (single mail with multiple address).
- We can set auto compress if message larger than x KB (x =
configurable).
- First attempt delivery go directly to MX Recipient, if failed send to
relay host.
- Download mail from DomainPOP mailbox base on message size (smaller
first).
- Remote Configuration through mail command (change password, set/unset
auto forward etc).

-- 
syafril
=
Syafril Hermansyah[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: SMTP servers

2002-05-25 Thread Allie C Martin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Thomas F [TF] wrote:
...
ACM MDaemon here can be configured to use an SMTP host in the sense
ACM that it delivers mail to another SMTP server, usually your ISP
ACM SMTP server instead of doing a direct delivery.

TF OK then, why would I need MDaemon in the first place?

That's besides the point. You made the statement:

,-[ begin ]-
|
| You need to stay connected until the mail is actually delivered. Out
| of the question for me on per-minute dial-up. Same holds true for an
| SMTP server on my machine.|
|
'-[  end  ]-||

Using a local SMTP server doesn't necessarily mean you'll have to do a
direct delivery and have to wait while it does so.

This was the point I was making.

A local mail-server isn't necessarily a waste of money for those using
a dial-up connection. Not necessarily true at all. I've found that
MDaemon connects and negotiaties with POP and SMTP servers faster than
TB!. It actually has a great support for unattended dial-up. It could
actually be a cost saver ... but I'm not really writing this to make
you change how you do things. You're already happy with your method
that's quite OK. Only you would know what works best for you. However,
this may not be the case for others who could greatly benefit by using
their own local servers. It's not an overkill solution in many
instances where it's initially perceived as being so.

- --
 -=Allie C Martin=-
List Moderator | TB! v1.60m | Windows XP Pro
PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iD8DBQE87/Q1V8nrYCsHF+IRAmIwAKDNwJNJaay071SMT8iVbl7BKtPzagCg4Kvf
q0n5S8incf8GkU7VlzD3jN0=
=CqmM
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: SMTP servers

2002-05-24 Thread Marek Mikus

On Fri, 24 May 2002, Ray Dawson wrote:

 I've got accounts with four different ISPs and send email with all four
 for different purposes.

 The problem is that when I connect to one ISP I can't get TB to send all
 email in the various Outboxes through the smtp server of the ISP I'm
 logged on to. If I click on 'Send All' TB tries to connect to the smtp
 servers of each ISP that I have outgoing email from - and some won't
 allow access if I'm not connected to them.

 How can I configure TB to 'Send all queued email in all Outboxes via the
 smtp of the ISP which we are connected to'?

it is not possible with TB, but You can try freeware utility Autoroute
SMTP from http://www.mailutilities.com/ars/

-- 

Marek Mikus
Czech Support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.ipex.cz



Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: SMTP servers

2002-05-24 Thread Syafril Hermansyah

On Fri, 24 May 2002 13:21:58 +0100 Ray Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The problem is that when I connect to one ISP I can't get TB to send   all email in 
the various Outboxes through the smtp server of the ISP   I'm  logged on to. If I 
click on 'Send All' TB tries to connect to the  smtp servers of each ISP that I have 
outgoing email from - and somewon't allow access if I'm not connected to them.
 
 How can I configure TB to 'Send all queued email in all Outboxes via   the smtp of 
the ISP which we are connected to'?

Unless you run your own SMTP Server, the best think I can think of is using WinGate 
SMTP Proxy. All of account set to send to Wingate's ip address, and in  Wingate's 
tcp/smtp mapping you may set each ISP SMTP map to their Dial Up Profile. 
I am not sure if Wingate lite (free version) can do this, but at least Standard 
Version have this capability.

-- 
syafril
---
Syafril Hermansyah [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: SMTP servers

2002-05-24 Thread Syafril Hermansyah

On Fri, 24 May 2002 20:22:39 +0700 Syafril Hermansyah
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
  The problem is that when I connect to one ISP I can't get TB to send
all email in the various Outboxes through the smtp server of the
ISP   I'm  logged on to. If I click on 'Send All' TB tries to
connect to the  smtp servers of each ISP that I have outgoing
email from - and somewon't allow access if I'm not connected
to them.

Oops.. my bad day, just change distro, recompile and forgot activate
Word Wrap, sorry folk.


-- 
syafril
---
Syafril Hermansyah [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: SMTP servers

2002-05-24 Thread Allie C Martin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Ray Dawson [RD] wrote:
...
RD The problem is that when I connect to one ISP I can't get TB to
RD send all email in the various Outboxes through the smtp server of
RD the ISP I'm logged on to. If I click on 'Send All' TB tries to
RD connect to the smtp servers of each ISP that I have outgoing email
RD from - and some won't allow access if I'm not connected to them.

RD How can I configure TB to 'Send all queued email in all Outboxes
RD via the smtp of the ISP which we are connected to'?

Your best bet would be to use your own SMTP server. There was one
mentioned in a thread earlier but it's shareware. It will save you a
lot of headache if you get one. You could go to download.com and see
if you can find a freeware solution that offers as little system
overhead as possible.

Freeware that immediately comes to mind is Mercury/32. It will solve
your SMTP headache and make interesting possibilities for you in terms
of it's POP server support.

- --
 -=Allie C Martin=-
List Moderator | TB! v1.60m | Windows XP Pro
PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iD8DBQE87lpcV8nrYCsHF+IRAs+wAJ9FWePW58oBYr8dY4yeoLd6fINHhgCg4XH6
j6FlNiStVMO5wfZyW/p888c=
=nJBp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: SMTP servers

2002-05-24 Thread Jonathan Angliss

On Friday, May 24, 2002, Ray Dawson wrote...

 This may be the one single thing that stops me using TB - which is a
 pity as I was really getting it working.

 How  on  earth  do other users manage with SMTP posting and multiple
 accounts?

I  run  several  mail servers, so I don't even use my ISPs mail server
for  sending. Plus I run my own server at home, with an SMTP server on
it,  so  if I ever have trouble with any of the work servers, I have a
fall back server.

 Surely  relying  on  third-party  applications  to  send mail is not
 normal?  I  can  be  connected to any one of four ISPs, but they all
 only allow mail to be sent if you are actually connected to them. As
 things  stand  with  TB, I have to connect to all four ISPs in turn,
 just to send email. Collection is fine from all four at once.

POP3  servers  tend  not to have restrictions set based on who you are
connected   to.   It's  normally  only  the  SMTP  server  with  those
restrictions  to stop UCE attempts, and is one of the quickest ways of
stopping a SMTP server from being an open relay.

 Why  does  TB  insist  on  only sending mail through the smtp of the
 account  it  was written from rather than the account it's connected
 to?

Because  I  doubt  they  have  coded TB! to recognize which ISP you're
connected  to. Otherwise it'd do what Outlook has a habbit of doing if
you  tick  the wrong box, and disconnect you from one ISP, and connect
you to another. Plus some SMTP servers have a setting that won't allow
relaying of another domain name that isn't theirs... for example, your
have  accounts  with  isp1.com  and isp2.com... You try sending a mail
from your [EMAIL PROTECTED] account via isp2.com mail server, and it might
reject  you  because  it's  not  a  valid  domain  to that mail server
(normally relaying denied type message).

-- 
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])




Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: SMTP servers

2002-05-24 Thread Tim Musson

Hey Allie,

My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.60m) 
to write the following on Friday, May 24, 2002 at 11:21:00 AM.

snip/
RD How can I configure TB to 'Send all queued email in all Outboxes
RD via the smtp of the ISP which we are connected to'?

ACM Your best bet would be to use your own SMTP server.
another snip/
ACM Freeware that immediately comes to mind is Mercury/32.
yet another snip/

I have also seen a ref to http://www.xrayapp.com on this list.  the
web site says it was written as a companion to TB!.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MUA = TB! v1.60k (www.RitLabs.com/The_Bat)
Windows 2000 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 2)
What's brown and sticky? A stick!



Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: SMTP servers

2002-05-24 Thread Miguel A. Urech

Hello Allie,

 Freeware that immediately comes to mind is Mercury/32. It will solve
 your SMTP headache and make interesting possibilities for you in terms
 of it's POP server support.

Mercury/32 is a great mail server, well supported and totally FREE. I
have used it for about one year now.

MailTraq is also a nice mail server. The FREE version is good for up to
4 accounts (I think) but it add a one line tag to sent mail.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.60c



Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: SMTP servers

2002-05-24 Thread Krister Ekstrom

Hi Dwight,
It so happened that On Fri, 24 May 2002, at 11:33:42 [GMT -0500] (which was 18:33 in my
corner of the world)  ,you typed:

 Why does TB insist on only sending mail through the smtp of the
 account it was written from rather than the account it's connected
 to?

DAC It doesn't. It sends it through the account where the message is in
DAC the outbox. If you want to send thru another account, create it in the
DAC other account, or drag the message to the outbox of the account to
DAC which you are connected.

Blasfemy mode on
It's a pity that TB doesn't do this. One of the few good things with
Becky! was that it had an option that said something like send all
outboxes mail through this account or something to that effect. This
meant that you could send all outgoing mail regardless of isp, (or so
i understand it) and it went out through the smtp server of the
account with which i currently worked.
blasfemy mode off
Maybe this would be a feature to consider?



-- 
/Krister mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This mail brought to you by The bat! V1.60m, on Windows 98 4 10 build 



Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: SMTP servers

2002-05-24 Thread Miguel A. Urech

Hello Krister,

 This meant that you could send all outgoing mail regardless of isp,
 (or so i understand it) and it went out through the smtp server of
 the account with which i currently worked.

If I understand correctly what you mean, that would not solve the
problem completely. Aside of the traditional you cannot send through
my SMTP server if you are not directly connected to me limitation,
there is an increasing number of ISP that are setting filters in
their servers, as I think someone has already mentioned. These filters
are such that either the From:, or To: or CC: addresses must include a
valid address (account) from the ISP's domain.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.60c



Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: SMTP servers

2002-05-24 Thread Mark Wieder

Ray-

You may have some more options here. I've set this up for a client in
the following manner:

Go to Account | Properties | Transport | Send Mail and click the
Authentication button. It's possible that Use POP before SMTP
authentication is all you need. This works for most of my situations.

If not, and if at least one of your ISP accounts *will* allow you to
access their SMTP server while you're logged on to someplace else, set
that server as your SMTP account. Then do as above and place a
checkmark in the Perform SMTP Authentication (RFC 2554) box. Select
Use specific settings and enter your login info for that server. Now
all your outgoing mail will be vectored through the ISP account that
allows roaming access.


-Mark
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Using The Bat! v1.60h on Windows 2000 5.0 Build
2195 Service Pack 2



Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: SMTP servers

2002-05-24 Thread Allie C Martin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Krister Ekstrom [KE] wrote:
...
KE Blasfemy mode on
KE It's a pity that TB doesn't do this. One of the few good things with
KE Becky! was that it had an option that said something like send all
KE outboxes mail through this account or something to that effect. This
KE meant that you could send all outgoing mail regardless of isp, (or so
KE i understand it) and it went out through the smtp server of the
KE account with which i currently worked.
KE blasfemy mode off

And you would have to change the setting each time you connect to a
different ISP. Not an elegant solution either.

KE Maybe this would be a feature to consider?

Perhaps. See if one of your SMTP servers allows relaying and if so,
configure all your accounts to use that server. If this isn't possible
then I do recommend your own SMTP server if one of your servers
doesn't allow relaying. This is heavy spam times and many ISP's are
securing their servers so they don't become black-listed as relaying
servers.

- --
 -=Allie C Martin=-
List Moderator | TB! v1.60m | Windows XP Pro
PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iD8DBQE87oNWV8nrYCsHF+IRArbXAJ91t9eGj3m3RnTuxelQMLea1FyXcACgnOZ7
hyL5Ynkra2Gk0/JNLttx2pE=
=zDoS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: SMTP servers

2002-05-24 Thread Keith Rodrigues

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


MW If not, and if at least one of your ISP accounts *will* allow you to
MW access their SMTP server while you're logged on to someplace else, set
MW that server as your SMTP account. Then do as above and place a
MW checkmark in the Perform SMTP Authentication (RFC 2554) box. Select
MW Use specific settings and enter your login info for that server. Now
MW all your outgoing mail will be vectored through the ISP account that
MW allows roaming access.


Having been through these problems myself I have two suggestions,
both of which work for me:

1) Use a local smtp server. I use Postcastserver
(www.postcastserver.com) which is freeware, takes about 2 mins to
install and set up and then works flawlessly.

2) Use a free email service that allows you to send from their
smtp server, with authentication. I use myrealbox
(www.myrealbox.com) for this. Set up an account with them, then
enter their smtp server in the Bat! settings, authenticate using
your username and password, and you can then send from all your
accounts using the same smtp server, regardless of which ISP you
happen to be connected to. The only limitation is they restrict
you to no more than 15 (I think) recipients per message, but this
is not a big deal for most users.



Best regards,
 Keithmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Friday, May 24, 2002, 2:58 PM (ET)
PGP Key at http://www.therods.net/keys/22CB617F.asc
...When everything is coming your way, you're in the wrong lane!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (MingW32)

iD8DBQE87o87OhcblCLLYX8RAsWaAKCbBG0rl4j0mJusDisKoQxaCQ0DTQCfX8BX
/SBmVLgVEGGZguC8wVtE/XM=
=SMpS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: SMTP servers

2002-05-24 Thread Reza Habib


KE It's a pity that TB doesn't do this. One of the few good things
KE with Becky! was that it had an option that said something like
KE send all outboxes mail through this account or something to that

Foxmail has a built in smtp server so it will relay your mail to the
host directly, bypassing the isp.  That would be a really cool feature
for TB to adopt.

Reza



*Using The Bat! v1.60k on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2*





Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: SMTP servers

2002-05-24 Thread Ray Dawson

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
   Allie C Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 RD How can I configure TB to 'Send all queued email in all Outboxes
 RD via the smtp of the ISP which we are connected to'?

 Your best bet would be to use your own SMTP server. There was one
 mentioned in a thread earlier but it's shareware. It will save you a
 lot of headache if you get one. You could go to download.com and see
 if you can find a freeware solution that offers as little system
 overhead as possible.

Thanks for all the responses. I'm downloading a couple of freeware smtp
servers and I'll see if they solve my problem. I really like TB and would
like to be able to use it.

Cheers,

Ray D



Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com